Checkpoint Systems (CKP) 10-Q 2005 Q1 Quarterly report

FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

For the quarterly period ended March 27, 2005

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from             to          

Commission File No. 1-11257

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Articles of Incorporation)

Pennsylvania	22-1895850
(State of Incorporation)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

101 Wolf Drive, PO Box 188, Thorofare, New Jersey	08086
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

856-848-1800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes No 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer, (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes No 

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

As of May 2, 2005, there were 37,838,520 shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding.

1

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
FORM 10-Q

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION			Page
	Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
		Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
		Consolidated Statements of Operations	4
		Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity	5
		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income	6
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	7
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8–16
	Item 2.	Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17­–24
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk	25
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	25
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	25–26
	Item 6.	Exhibits	27
	SIGNATURES		28
	INDEX TO EXHIBITS		29

2

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 

(Unaudited)

(amounts in thousands)

	March 27, 2005			December 26, 2004*
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	76,253		$	102,694
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of
$12,007 and $12,647		155,084			157,337
Inventories		96,758			92,844
Other current assets		30,178			29,991
Deferred income taxes		17,194			17,716
Total Current Assets		375,467			400,582
REVENUE EQUIPMENT ON OPERATING LEASE, net		4,640			4,507
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, net		88,541			91,442
GOODWILL		184,221			191,305
OTHER INTANGIBLES, net		37,681			39,975
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		19,160			20,064
OTHER ASSETS		18,516			19,073
TOTAL ASSETS	$	728,226		$	766,948
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long term debt	$	5,108		$	24,940
Accounts payable		46,554			65,436
Accrued compensation and related taxes		35,029			39,789
Other accrued expenses		26,143			28,850
Income taxes		17,650			21,645
Unearned revenues		29,007			27,640
Restructuring reserve		3,539			4,643
Other current liabilities		18,600			20,727
Total Current Liabilities		181,630			233,670
LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT MATURITIES		71,134			47,827
ACCRUED PENSIONS		74,749			77,666
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES		6,168			6,240
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		20,427			21,657
MINORITY INTEREST		1,134			1,125
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value, 500,000 shares authorized, none issued
Common stock, par value $.10 per share,
100,000,000 shares authorized, issued 39,875,379 and 39,841,134		3,987			3,984
Additional capital		310,061			309,503
Retained earnings		77,061			73,230
Common stock in treasury, at cost, 2,041,519 shares		(20,678	)		(20,678	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		2,553			12,724
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		372,984			378,763
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	728,226		$	766,948

*  Taken from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements at December 26, 2004

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

3

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Quarter ended	March 27, 2005		March 28, 2004
Net revenues	$	182,167	$	180,646
Cost of revenues		107,021		104,969
Gross profit		75,146		75,677
Selling, general, and administrative expenses		64,991		60,653
Research and development		4,868		5,694
Litigation settlement income		350		—
Operating income		5,637		9,330
Interest income		586		453
Interest expense		973		2,180
Other gain, net		178		56
Earnings before income taxes and minority interest		5,428		7,659
Income taxes		1,574		2,221
Minority interest		23		9
Net Earnings	$	3,831	$	5,429
Basic Earnings Per Share	$	.10	$	.16
Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	.10	$	.15

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

4

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)

(amounts in thousands)

				Additional Capital		Retained Earnings							Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Common Stock							Treasury Stock
Quarter ended	Shares	Amount						Shares		Amount
Balance, December 26, 2004	39,841	$	3,984	$	309,503	$	73,230		2,042	$	(20,678	)	$	12,724		$	378,763
Net income							3,831										3,831
Proceeds from the exercise
of stock options	34		3		361												364
Tax benefit related to stock
option					87												87
Non-employee stock
compensation expense					110												110
Foreign currency translation
adjustment														(10,171	)		(10,171	)
Balance, March 27, 2005	39,875	$	3,987	$	310,061	$	77,061		2,042	$	(20,678	)	$	2,553		$	372,984

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

5

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(Unaudited)

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Quarter ended	March 27, 2005			March 28, 2004
Net earnings	$	3,831		$	5,429
Net gain on interest rate swap, net of tax		—			4
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(10,171	)		(3,475	)
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(6,340	)	$	1,958

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

6

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Quarter ended	March 27, 2005			March 28, 2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	3,831		$	5,429
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization		6,322			6,395
Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets		42			(112	)
Stock-based compensation		110			—
(Increased) decrease in current assets, net of the effects of acquired companies:
Accounts receivable		(2,008	)		1,069
Inventories		(6,533	)		(6,624	)
Other current assets		(1,503	)		(399	)
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities, net of the effects of acquired
companies:
Accounts payable		(17,520	)		(17,353	)
Income taxes		(2,709	)		(120	)
Unearned revenues		2,091			792
Restructuring reserve		(951	)		(696	)
Other current and accrued liabilities		(6,891	)		(7,686	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(25,719	)		(19,305	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property, plant, and equipment		(3,458	)		(2,987	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		—			(155	)
Other investing activities		235			270
Net cash used in investing activities		(3,223	)		(2,872	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from stock issuances		364			1,331
Net change in short-term debt		3,102			2,077
Proceeds of long-term debt		35,000			—
Payment of long-term debt		(32,804	)		(1,930	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		5,662			1,478
Effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents		(3,161	)		(1,507	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(26,441	)		(22,206	)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of period		102,694			110,376
End of period	$	76,253		$	88,170

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

7

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 1.  BASIS OF ACCOUNTING

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries (Company). All inter-company transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements and related notes are unaudited and do not contain all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in annual financial statements. Refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2004 for the most recent disclosure of the Company’s accounting policies.

The consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly our financial position at March 27, 2005 and December 26, 2004 and its results of operations and changes in cash flows for the thirteen-week periods ended March 27, 2005 and March 28, 2004.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2004 financial statements and related footnotes to conform to the 2005 presentation. The reclassifications made to the results of operations consist of research and development and product royalty expenses. We have reclassified research and development expenses from cost of revenues to operating expenses for the prior year. Product royalties’ expense was reclassified from selling, general and administrative expenses to cost of revenues for the prior year.

Stock Options

At March 27, 2005, we have two stock-based employee compensation plans. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. We continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of our common stock at the date of grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Since all options were granted at market value, there is no compensation cost to be recognized.

Had compensation cost for our stock option plans been determined based upon the fair value at the grant date using the Black Scholes option pricing model, our net earnings and net earnings per share would approximate the pro-forma amounts as follows:

(dollar amounts in thousands)
Quarter ended	March 27, 2005			March 28, 2004
Net earnings, as reported	$	3,831		$	5,429
Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method, net of tax		(705	)		(541	)
Pro forma net earnings	$	3,126		$	4,888
Net earnings per share:
Basic:
As reported	$	.10		$	.16
Pro forma	$	.08		$	.14
Diluted:
As reported	$	.10		$	.15
Pro forma	$	.08		$	.14

8

The following assumptions were used in the estimation of the fair value on the stock options:

Quarter ended	March 27, 2005			March 28, 2004
Dividend yield		None			None
Expected volatility		.3209			.3048
Risk-free interest rates		2.82% - 4.29	%		2.79	%
Expected life (in years)		3.42			3.22

Warranty Reserves

We provide product warranties for our various products. These warranties vary in length depending on product and geographical region. We establish our warranty reserves based on historical data of warranty transactions.

The following table sets forth the movement in the warranty reserve:

(dollar amounts in thousands)
Quarter ended	March 27, 2005			March 28, 2004
Balance at beginning of year	$	5,171		$	4,591
Accruals for warranties issued		233			306
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties, including changes
in estimate		—			—
Total accruals		233			306
Settlement made		(149	)		(204	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(78	)		(57	)
Balance at end of year	$	5,177		$	4,636

New Accounting Pronouncements and Other Standards

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs”, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. This pronouncement will be effective for our first quarter 2006. We are in the process of evaluating the effects of this pronouncement on our consolidated financial statements.

On December 21, 2004, the FASB issued “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004”, a FASB Staff Position (FSP) that provides guidance on the application of SFAS No. 109 to the tax deduction on qualified production activities provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. FSP FAS 109-1 states that the qualified production activities deduction should be accounted for as a special deduction in accordance with SFAS No. 109, whereby the deduction is contingent upon the performance of specific activities, including wage levels. The FASB also concluded that the special deductions should be considered when measuring deferred taxes and assessing a valuation allowance. We are currently in the process of evaluating our ability to claim this deduction and the impact, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.

On December 21, 2004, the FASB issued “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004”, a FSP that provides accounting and disclosure guidance for the foreign earnings repatriation provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The Act provides special, one-time dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer. FSP FAS 109-2 states that a company is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings, as it applies to the application of SFAS No. 109. The decision process to build the plan may occur in stages, as an enterprise may separately evaluate the provisions of the Act. We are in the process of

9

evaluating the effects of the repatriation provision to determine whether we will repatriate foreign earnings and the impact, if any, this pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements. In addition, the U.S. Treasury Department is expected to provide additional clarifying guidance on key elements of the repatriation provision. Until such clarification is received, we will continue our plan and intention to indefinitely reinvest accumulated earnings of our foreign subsidiaries.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” This statement is a revision to SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” This statement establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, primarily focusing on the accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. Entities will be required to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service, the requisite service period (usually the vesting period), in exchange for the award. On April 14, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced a deferral of the effective date of FAS 123R for calendar year companies until the beginning of 2006. In accordance with the SEC announcement, we will adopt SFAS No. 123R effective for our first quarter 2006 beginning December 26, 2005. Upon adoption, we have two application methods to choose from: the modified-prospective transition approach or the modified-retrospective transition approach. Under the modified-prospective transition method, we would be required to recognize compensation cost for share-based awards to employees based on their grant-date fair value from the beginning of the fiscal period in which the recognition provisions are first applied as well as compensation cost for awards that were granted prior to, but not vested as of the date of adoption. Prior periods remain unchanged and pro forma disclosures previously required by SFAS No. 123 continue to be required. Under the modified-retrospective transition method, we would restate prior periods by recognizing compensation cost in the amounts previously reported in the pro forma footnote disclosure under SFAS No. 123. We would follow the same guidelines as in the modified-prospective transition method for awards granted subsequent to adoption and those that were granted and not yet vested. We have not yet determined which methodology we will adopt but believe that the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will have on our financial position or results of operations will approximate the magnitude of the stock-based employee compensation cost disclosed in Note 1 pursuant to the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148.

Note 2.  INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following:

(dollar amounts in thousands)
	March 27, 2005		December 26, 2004
Raw materials	$	13,163	$	12,689
Work-in-process		5,159		4,025
Finished goods		78,436		76,130
Total	$	96,758	$	92,844

10

Note 3.  GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

We had intangible assets with a net book value of $37.7 million and $40.0 million as of March 27, 2005 and December 26, 2004, respectively.

The following table reflects the components of intangible assets as of March 27, 2005 and December 26, 2004:

(dollar amounts in thousands)
			March 27, 2005				December 26, 2004
	Amortizable Life (years)		Carrying Amount		Gross Accumulated Amortization		Carrying Amount		Gross Accumulated Amortization
Customer lists		20	$	32,216	$	20,269	$	33,555	$	20,955
Trade name		30		29,254		12,818		30,350		13,127
Patents, license agreements		5 to 14		38,736		30,074		40,140		30,644
Other		3 to 6		1,090		454		1,096		440
Total			$	101,296	$	63,615	$	105,141	$	65,166

Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years is anticipated to be:

(dollar amounts in thousands)
2005	$	3,315
2006	$	3,077
2007	$	3,015
2008	$	2,966
2009	$	2,601

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the quarter ended March 27, 2005, are as follows:

(dollar amounts in thousands)
	Security			Labeling Services			Retail Merchandising			Total
Balance as of December 26, 2004	$	114,237		$	3,944		$	73,124		$	191,305
Translation adjustment		(4,350	)		(1	)		(2,733	)		(7,084	)
Balance as of March 27, 2005	$	109,887			3,943			70,391			184,221

Pursuant to SFAS 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, we will perform our annual assessment of goodwill by comparing each individual reporting unit’s carrying amount of net assets, including goodwill, to their fair value during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. Future annual assessments could result in impairment charges, which would be accounted for as an operating expense.

11

Note 4.  LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt at March 27, 2005 and December 26, 2004 consisted of the following: 

(dollar amounts in thousands)
	March 27, 2005		December 26, 2004
Senior secured credit facility:
€244 million variable interest rate term loan maturing in 2006	$	—	$	30,625
$100 million multi-currency variable interest rate revolving credit       facility maturing in 2006		—		27,893
Senior unsecured credit facility:
$150 million variable interest rate revolving credit facility maturing in 2010		59,715		—
€9.5 million capital lease maturing in 2021		10,756		11,330
€2.7 million capital lease maturing in 2007		1,234		1,404
Other capital leases with maturities through 2010		495		550
Total		72,200		71,802
Less current portion		1,066		23,975
Total long-term portion	$	71,134	$	47,827

On March 4, 2005, we entered into a new $150.0 million five-year senior unsecured multi-currency revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of lenders. The Credit Agreement replaces the $425.0 million senior collateralized multi-currency credit facility arranged in December 1999. In connection with the refinancing, we borrowed $60.0 million to repay the outstanding principal, interest and fees and expenses associated with the extinguishment of the previous credit facility. In the first quarter of 2005, we recorded a $1.1 million charge for the unamortized fees from the extinguished credit facility.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest rates of LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.75% to 1.75% and/or prime plus 0.00% to 0.50%. The interest rate matrix is based on our leverage ratio of funded debt to EBITDA, as defined by the Credit Agreement. Under the Credit Agreement, we pay an unused line fee ranging from 0.18% to 0.30% per annum on the unused portion of the commitment. In connection with the refinancing, our aggregate fees and expenses are anticipated to approximate $0.7 million, which are being amortized over the term of the Credit Agreement.

The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants, as defined in the Credit Agreement, that include requirements for a maximum ratio of debt to EBITDA, a maximum ratio of interest to EBITDA, and a maximum threshold for capital expenditures.

Note 5.  INCOME TAXES

Income taxes are provided on an interim basis at an estimated effective annual tax rate. Our earnings generated by the operations of its Puerto Rico subsidiary are partially exempt from Federal income taxes under Section 936 of the Internal Revenue Code (as amended under the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996) and substantially exempt from Puerto Rico income taxes. Under current law, this exemption from Federal income tax is subject to certain limits during the years 2002 through 2005 and will be eliminated thereafter. Under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted statutory tax rates in effect at the balance sheet date.

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law on October 22, 2004. We are currently studying the impact of the law, particularly with respect to the U.S. tax treatment of domestic manufacturing activities, repatriation of foreign earnings and foreign tax credit carryforwards.

12

Note 6.  PER SHARE DATA

The following data shows the amounts used in computing earnings per share and the effect on income and the weighted average number of shares of dilutive potential common stock:

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Quarter ended	March 27, 2005		March 28, 2004
Basic earnings available to common stockholders:
Earnings available to common stockholders	$	3,831	$	5,429
Interest on convertible subordinated debentures, net of tax		—		664
Diluted earnings available to common stockholders	$	3,831	$	6,093
Shares:
Basic weighted average number of common shares    outstanding		37,806		34,967
Common shares assumed upon exercise of stock    options		623		1,064
Common shares assumed upon conversion of subordinates    debentures		—		4,538
Weighted average common stock and dilutive stock    outstanding		38,429		40,569
Basic earnings per share	$	.10	$	.16
Diluted earnings per share	$	.10	$	.15

Options to purchase 1.4 million and 0.4 million shares of common stock were outstanding at March 27, 2005 and March 28, 2004, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares on such dates.

Note 7.  SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Cash payments for interest and income taxes for the thirteen-week periods ended March 27, 2005 and March 28, 2004 were as follows:

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Quarter ended	March 27, 2005		March 28, 2004
Interest	$	1,124	$	1,070
Income tax payments	$	4,499	$	250

13

Note 8.  PROVISION FOR RESTRUCTURING

In the fourth quarter of 2003, we established a shared services initiative in Europe and a manufacturing cost reduction program. The manufacturing cost reduction program included 373 planned employee terminations and was completed as of the end of the third quarter 2004. The shared services initiative in Europe included 139 planned employee terminations. We expect the 31 remaining planned terminations and other actions to be completed by the end of 2005.

Termination benefits are being paid out over a period of 1 to 24 months after termination. The total cost of the 2003 restructuring is anticipated to be approximately $4.8 million.

Restructuring accrual activity was as follows:

(dollar amounts are in thousands)

	Accrual at Beginning of Year (1)		Charged to Earnings		Charge Reversed to Earnings		Cash Payments			Exchange Rate Changes			Accrual at 3/27/05 (2)
2005
Severance and other    employee-related    charges	$	3,737	$	—	$	—	$	(877	)	$	(141	)	$	2,719
Lease termination costs		906		—		—		(74	)		(12	)		820
	$	4,643	$	—	$	—	$	(951	)	$	(153	)	$	3,539

(1) Includes restructuring costs prior to 2003 of $1,708, of which $906 relates to lease termination costs.
(2) Includes restructuring costs prior to 2003 of $1,082 which $820 relates to lease termination costs.

Note 9.  PENSION BENEFITS

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the thirteen-week periods ended March 27, 2005 and March 28, 2004 were as follows:

(dollar amounts in thousands)
Quarter ended	March 27, 2005			March 28, 2004
Service cost	$	364		$	352
Interest cost		1,012			933
Expected return on plan assets		(1	)		1
Amortization of actuarial gain		19			29
Amortization of transition obligation		31			—
Amortization of prior service costs		1			1
Net periodic pension cost	$	1,426		$	1,314

We expect the cash requirements for funding the pension benefits to be approximately $3.9 million during fiscal 2005, including $0.9 million which was funded during the quarter ended March 27, 2005.

14

Note 10.  CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND SETTLEMENTS

We are involved in certain legal and regulatory actions, all of which have arisen in the ordinary course of business, except for the matters described in the following paragraphs. Management believes it is remotely possible that the ultimate resolution of such matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and/or financial condition, except as described below.

ID Security Systems Canada Inc. versus Checkpoint Systems, Inc.

On August 1, 2004, the Company and ID Security Systems Canada Inc. entered into a settlement agreement effective July 30, 2004, pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay $19.95 million, in full and final settlement of the claims covered by the litigation. This settlement was accrued in the second quarter of 2004. Payment in full was made on August 5, 2004. The settlement did not cause the Company to be in default on any its debt covenants. The Company does not admit or acknowledge any wrongdoing or liability regarding the litigation. In connection with the settlement, the parties have mutually released each other from all other claims, except for any claims relating to existing contracts between the parties. A release in favor of the Company was also provided by various affiliates and associates of ID Security Systems Canada Inc. Management believes that the settlement was in the best interest of the Company to avoid the risks, burden, and expenses of continued litigation.

Matters related to ID Security Systems Canada Inc. versus Checkpoint Systems, Inc.

A certain number of follow-on purported class action suits have arisen in connection with the ID Security Systems Canada Inc. litigation. The purported class action complaints generally allege a claim of monopolization and are substantially based upon the same allegations as contained in the ID Security Systems Canada Inc. case (Civil Action No. 99-CV-577) as discussed below.

On August 1, 2002, a civil action was filed in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, designated as Civil Action No. 02-6379(ER) by plaintiff Diane Furs, Inc. t/a Diane Furs against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on August 21, 2002. On August 21, 2002, a Notice of Substitution of Plaintiff and Filing of Amended Complaint was filed by the plaintiff, and the named plaintiff was changed to Medi-Care Pharmacy, Inc.

On August 2, 2002, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Camden) designated as Docket No. 02-CV-3730(JEI) by plaintiff Club Sports International, Inc., d/b/a Soccer CSI against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on August 26, 2002.

On October 2, 2002, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Camden) designated as Docket No. 02-CV-4777(JBS) by plaintiff Baby Mika, Inc. against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on October 7, 2002.

On October 23, 2002, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Camden) designated as Docket No. 02-CV-5001(JEI) by plaintiff Washington Square Pharmacy, Inc. against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on November 1, 2002.

On October 18, 2002, The United States District, District of New Jersey (Camden) entered an Order staying the proceedings in the Club Sports International, Inc. and Baby Mika, Inc. cases referred to above. In accordance with the Order, the Stay will also apply to the Washington Square Pharmacy, Inc. case referred to above. In addition, the Medi-Care Pharmacy, Inc. case, referred to above, will be voluntarily dismissed, and it has been re-filed in New Jersey and is included in the Stay Order. As a result of the settlement of the litigation with ID Security Systems Canada Inc. described above, an application can be made to the Court to dissolve the Stay Order at this time.

On November 13, 2002, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Camden) designated as Docket No. 02-CV-5319(JEI) by plaintiff 1700 Pharmacy, Inc. against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on November 15, 2002.

On December 30, 2002, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Camden) designated as Docket No. 02-CV-6131(JEI) by plaintiff Medi-Care Pharmacy, Inc. against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on January 3, 2003.

15

Both the 1700 Pharmacy, Inc. case and the Medi-Care Pharmacy, Inc. case were consolidated with the previously mentioned cases and are included in the October 18, 2002 Stay Order referred to above.

No liability has been recorded for any of the purported class action suits. Management is of the opinion that, based upon the advice of outside legal counsel, it is not probable that the purported class action suits will be successful. Management believes that the lower end of the reasonably possible range of the contingent liability is zero at this time. The high end of the range cannot be estimated at this time.

All-Tag Security S.A., et al

On April 22, 2004, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued an opinion granting All-Tag Security S.A. and All-Tag Security Americas, Inc.’s (jointly “All-Tag”) and Sensormatic Electronics Corporation’s motion for summary judgment, which was filed on February 15, 2002, and ordered the case closed. The Company originally filed suit on May 1, 2001, alleging that the disposable, deactivatable radio frequency security tag manufactured by All-Tag S.A. and sold by Sensormatic infringed on a patent owned by the Company. The Court determined that the US patent is invalid because the original application failed to identify a co-inventor. The original US application was filed in March 1988 and was scheduled to expire on March 15, 2008. The Company acquired the patent in 1995 when it acquired Actron AG. On May 24, 2004, the Company filed a Notice of Appeal to the District Court’s decision. Our appeal is currently pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Note 11. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

(dollar amounts in thousands)
Quarter ended	March 27, 2005		March 28, 2004
Business segment net revenue:
Security	$	117,434	$	112,529
Labeling Services		39,020		41,040
Retail Merchandising		25,713		27,077
Total	$	182,167	$	180,646
Business segment gross profit:
Security	$	50,651	$	50,528
Labeling Services		11,976		11,893
Retail Merchandising		12,519		13,256
Total gross profit		75,146		75,677
Operating expenses (1)		69,509		66,347
Interest expense, net		387		1,727
Other gain, net		178		56
Earnings before income taxes and minority interest	$	5,428	$	7,659

(1) Includes $350 of legal settlement income.

16

Item 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Information relating to Forward-Looking Statements

This report includes forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Except for historical matters, the matters discussed are forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Information about potential factors that could affect our business and financial results is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 26, 2004, and our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There has been no change to our critical accounting policies and estimates, contained in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 26, 2004.

Overview

Checkpoint Systems, Inc. is a multinational manufacturer and marketer of integrated system solutions for retail security, labeling, and merchandising. We provide technology-driven integrated supply chain solutions to brand, track, and secure goods for retailers and consumer product manufacturers worldwide. We are a leading provider and earn revenues primarily from the sale of electronic article surveillance (EAS), closed-circuit television (CCTV), radio frequency identification (RFID) systems, barcode labeling systems (BCS), hand-held labeling systems (HLS) and retail merchandising systems. Applications include automatic identification, retail security, and pricing and promotional labels. Operating directly in 31 countries, we have a global network of subsidiaries and distributors, and provide customer service and technical support around the world.

Our results are heavily dependent upon sales to the retail market. Our customers are dependent upon retail sales which are susceptible to economic cycles and seasonal fluctuations. Furthermore, as approximately two-thirds of our revenues and operations are located outside the USA, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have a significant impact on reported results.

Our business plan is to generate sustained revenue growth through increased investments in product development and marketing. We intend to offset these investments through product cost and operating expense reductions.

During the first quarter 2005, we continued to evaluate our business lines and operations globally in order to develop a plan to dramatically improve operating margins, shareholder value and customer focus. As previously announced, we have decided to focus on our core businesses and exit underperforming businesses. Due to the success and strong profitability in our EAS and CCTV businesses, management has made the decision to focus on these businesses for investment and growth and has decided to exit our barcode systems businesses included in our labeling reporting segment. In 2004, the barcode systems businesses generated annual revenues of $100.6 million with approximately a 27% gross profit.

Currently, we are in the process of evaluating and finalizing a plan for our divesture of the bar code businesses. We are carefully working to separate these businesses and determine a method of disposal in the 24 countries serviced by these businesses. We believe a plan for disposal of the businesses will be finalized in the second half of 2005. Upon finalization, we will begin to actively market the portions of the business selected to be disposed by sale. Management expects that these actions will result in the eventual reporting of the bar code business as a discontinued operation.

In an effort to improve profitability, we are in the process of finalizing plans designed to improve our sales productivity and overhead structure in Europe. As a result, we will likely record a restructuring charge of between approximately $10 million to $15 million in the second quarter 2005.

17

On March 4, 2005, we entered into a new $150.0 million five-year senior unsecured multi-currency revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of lenders. This agreement will allow us the flexibility for the execution of future business plans.

Revenue for the first quarter of 2005 was $182.2 million, a 0.8% increase over the comparable periods in 2004. Foreign currency translation had a positive impact on revenue of approximately 3.0%, for the quarter ended March 27, 2005. The net decrease in sales for the first quarter ended 2005 was primarily due to the declines in European sales and our bar code labeling businesses partially offset by continued growth in the our US EAS business. The decrease in Europe was due primarily to the continued difficult market conditions in this region. The bar code businesses continued to decline as we transition these businesses for divesture. The increase in our US EAS business was due to new large chain-wide roll-outs.

The net income for the first quarter of 2005 was $3.8 million compared to $5.4 million in 2004. Our results reflect higher than normal operating expenses and large customer installation activity. We expect the margins to improve as we progress through 2005.

Future financial results will be dependent upon our ability to expand the functionality of our existing product lines, develop or acquire new products for sale through our global distribution channels, and reduce the cost of our products and infrastructure to respond to competitive pricing pressures.

Our strong base of recurring revenue (revenues from the sale of consumables into the installed base of security systems, and hand-held labeling tools), repeat customer business, and our borrowing capacity should provide us with adequate cash flow and liquidity to execute our business plan.

Results of Operations

(All comparisons are with the prior year period, unless otherwise stated.)

Net Revenues

Our unit volume is driven by product offerings, number of direct sales personnel, recurring sales and, to some extent, pricing. Our base of installed systems and printers provides a source of recurring revenues from the sale of disposable tags and service revenues.

Our customers are substantially dependent on retail sales, which are seasonal, subject to significant fluctuations, and difficult to predict. Such seasonality and fluctuations impact our sales. Historically, we have experienced lower sales in the first half of each year.

18

Analysis of Statement of Operations

The following table presents for the periods indicated certain items in the consolidated statement of operations as a percentage of total revenues and the percentage change in dollar amounts of such items compared to the indicated prior period:

	Percentage of Total Revenues					Percentage Change In Dollar Amount
Quarter ended		March 27, 2005 (Fiscal 2005)		March 28, 2004 (Fiscal 2004)			Fiscal 2005 vs. Fiscal 2004
Net Revenues
Security		64.5	%	62.3	%		4.4	%
Labeling services		21.4		22.7			(4.9	)
Retail merchandising		14.1		15.0			(5.0	)
Net revenues		100.0		100.0			0.8
Cost of revenues		58.7		58.1			2.0
Total gross profit		41.3		41.9			(0.7	)
Selling, general, and administrative     expenses		35.7		33.6			7.2
Research and development		2.7		3.2			(14.5	)
Legal settlement income		0.2		—			—
Operating income		3.1		5.2			(39.6	)
Interest income		0.3		0.3			29.4
Interest expense		0.6		1.1			(55.4	)
Other gain, net		0.1		0.0			217.9
Earnings before income taxes and     minority interest		2.9		4.3			(29.1	)
Income taxes		0.9		1.2			(29.1	)
Minority interest		0.0		0.0			187.5
Net earnings		2.1	%	3.1	%		(29.4	)%

19

First Quarter 2005 Compared to First Quarter 2004

Net Revenues

Revenues for the first quarter 2005 compared to the first quarter 2004 increased by $1.6 million or 0.8% from $180.6 million to $182.2 million. Foreign currency translation had a positive impact on revenues of approximately $5.4 million or 3.0% in the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the first quarter of 2004.

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Quarter ended	March 27, 2005 (Fiscal 2005)		March 28, 2004 (Fiscal 2004)		Dollar Amount Change Fiscal 2005 vs. Fiscal 2004			Percentage Change Fiscal 2005 Vs. Fiscal 2004
Net Revenues:
Security	$	117.5	$	112.5	$	5.0			4.4	%
Labeling Services		39.0		41.0		(2.0	)		(4.9	)
Retail Merchandising		25.7		27.1		(1.4	)		(5.2	)
Net revenues	$	182.2	$	180.6	$	1.6			0.8	%

Security revenues increased by $5.0 million or 4.4% in the first quarter 2005 as compared to the first quarter 2004. Foreign currency translation had a positive impact of approximately $3.0 million. The remaining increase was primarily due to growth in EAS revenues in the US ($6.6 million), partially offset by a decline in European and Asia Pacific EAS sales of $2.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The growth in the US EAS revenues can be primarily attributed to large account chain-wide installations. The decrease in Europe is due primarily to poor economic conditions in that region. In Asia Pacific, the decrease was primarily the result of large account chain-wide installations in the prior year, which did not occur in the first quarter of 2005.

Labeling services revenues decreased by $2.0 million or 4.9%. The positive impact of foreign currency translation was approximately $1.1 million. The remaining decrease was primarily due to lower BCS revenues of $5.9 million offset, in part, by an increase in Check-Net and intelligent library system revenues of $1.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

Retail merchandising revenues decreased by $1.4 million or 5.2%. The positive impact of foreign currency translation was approximately $1.3 million. The remaining decrease was primarily due to continued decreases in HLS revenues. The continuing transition from hand-held price labeling to automated bar-coding and scanning by retailers caused the decline in HLS revenues.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the first quarter 2005 was $75.1 million, or 41.3% of revenues, compared to $75.7 million, or 41.9% of revenues, for the first quarter 2004. The benefit of foreign currency translation on gross profit was approximately $2.4 million in the first quarter of 2005.

Security gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, decreased to 43.1% in the first quarter 2005 from 44.9% in the first quarter 2004. Security gross profit was negatively impacted by large account chain-wide installations of our EAS products.

Gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, for labeling services increased to 30.7% in the first quarter 2005 from 29.0% in the first quarter 2004. The increase in labeling gross profit, as a percentage of labeling revenues, was primarily due to supply chain and manufacturing efficiencies.

The retail merchandising gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, decreased to 48.7% in the first quarter 2005 from 49.0% in the first quarter of 2004. This decrease, as a percentage of retail merchandise revenues, was mainly due to a shift in sales mix coupled with competitive price pressures in the industry.

Field service and installation costs for the first quarter 2005 and 2004 were 11.0% and 9.6% of net revenues, respectively. The increase was due primarily to the large account chain-wide installations of our EAS products.

20

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses

SG&A expenses increased, as a percentage of revenues, from 33.6% in 2004 to 35.7% in 2005. This was an increase of $4.4 million, or 7.2% over the first quarter 2004. Foreign currency translation increased SG&A expenses by approximately $2.0 million. The remaining increase was primarily due to consulting costs associated with the evaluation of our business and the write-off of unamortized bank fees associated with the term loan and secured revolving credit facility resulting from the refinancing.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development (R&D) costs were $4.9 million, or 2.7% of revenues in the first quarter 2005 and $5.7 million, or 3.2% in the first quarter 2004. We continue to reinvest in the Company through technology and process improvement.

Litigation Settlement Income

Litigation settlement income of $0.4 million for the first quarter of 2005 consisted of an amount received in accordance with a settlement agreement related to litigation resulting from the acquisition of AW printing in 2001.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the first quarter 2005 decreased $1.2 million from the comparable quarter in 2004 due primarily to lower overall debt levels.

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for both the first quarter 2005 and the first quarter 2004 was 29.0%.

Net Earnings

Net earnings were $3.8 million, or $.10 per diluted share, in the first quarter 2005 compared to $5.4 million, or $.15 per diluted share, in the first quarter 2004. The weighted average number of shares used in the diluted earnings per share computation were 38.4 million and 40.6 million for the first quarters of 2005 and 2004, respectively.

21

Financial Condition

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our liquidity needs have related to, and are expected to continue to relate to, capital investments, product development costs, future restructurings related to the rationalization of the business, acquisitions, and working capital requirements. We believe that cash provided from operating activities and funding available under our current credit agreement should be adequate for the foreseeable future to service debt and meet our anticipated cash requirements.

As of March 27, 2005, our cash and cash equivalents were $76.3 million compared to $102.7 million as of December 26, 2004. Our operating activities during the first quarter of 2005 used approximately $25.7 million compared to a use of $19.3 million during the first quarter of 2004. In 2005, our cash from operating activities was impacted negatively by a decrease in accounts payable and other current and accrued liabilities coupled with an increase in inventory. The decrease in accounts payable and the increase in inventory are primarily seasonal changes in our business. The decrease in other current and accrued liabilities is primarily attributed to the payment of annual bonuses.

We continue to reinvest in the Company through our investment in technology and process improvement. In the first quarter of 2005, our investment in research and development amounted to $4.9 million. We estimate the investment in research and development during the remainder of 2005 will be approximately $18 million.

Our capital expenditures during the first quarter of 2005 totaled $3.5 million, compared to $3.0 million during the first quarter of 2004. We anticipate our capital expenditures, used primarily to upgrade technology and improve our production capabilities, to approximate $14 million for the remainder 2005.

On March 4, 2005, we entered into a new $150.0 million five-year senior unsecured multi-currency revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of lenders. The Credit Agreement replaces the $425.0 million senior collateralized multi-currency credit facility arranged in December 1999. In connection with the new credit facility, we borrowed $60.0 million to repay the outstanding principal, interest and fees and expenses associated with the previous credit facility. In the first quarter of 2005, we recorded a $1.1 million charge for the unamortized fees from the extinguished credit facility.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest rates of LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.75% to 1.75% and/or prime plus 0.00% to 0.50%. The interest rate matrix is based on our leverage ratio of funded debt to EBITDA, as defined by the Credit Agreement. Under the Credit Agreement, we pay an unused line fee ranging from 0.18% to 0.30% per annum on the unused portion of the commitment. In connection with the refinancing, our aggregate fees and expenses are anticipated to approximate $0.7 million, which are being amortized over the term of the Credit Agreement.

The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants, as defined in the Credit Agreement, that include requirements for a maximum ratio of debt to EBITDA, a maximum ratio of interest to EBITDA, and a maximum threshold for capital expenditures. At March 27, 2005, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.

As of March 27, 2005, our working capital was $193.8 million compared to $166.9 million as of December 26, 2004. At the end of the first quarter 2005, our percentage of total debt to total stockholders’ equity increased to 20.4% from 16.1% as of December 26, 2004. As of March 27, 2005, we had available line of credit totaling approximately $88.7 million.

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividend on our common stock in the near future.

Provisions for Restructuring

In the fourth quarter of 2003, we established a shared services initiative in Europe and a manufacturing cost reduction program. The manufacturing cost reduction program included 373 planned employee terminations and was completed as of the end of the third quarter 2004. The shared services initiative in Europe included 139 planned employee terminations and we expect the 31 remaining planned terminations and other actions under this initiative to be completed by the end of 2005.

22

Termination benefits are being paid out over a period of 1 to 24 months after termination. The total cost of the 2003 restructuring is anticipated to be approximately $4.8 million. Upon completion, the annual savings are expected to be approximately $7.8 million.

Restructuring accrual activity was as follows:

(dollar amounts are in thousands)

	Accrual at Beginning of Year (1)		Charged to Earnings		Charge Reversed to Earnings		Cash Payments			Exchange Rate Changes			Accrual at 3/27/05 (2)
2005
Severance and other    employee-related    charges	$	3,737	$	—	$	—	$	(877	)	$	(141	)	$	2,719
Lease termination costs		906		—		—		(74	)		(12	)		820
	$	4,643	$	—	$	—	$	(951	)	$	(153	)	$	3,539

(1) Includes restructuring costs prior to 2003 of $1,708, of which $906 relates to lease termination costs.
(2) Includes restructuring costs prior to 2003 of $1,082, of which $820 relates to lease termination costs.

Exposure to Foreign Currency

We manufacture products in the USA, the Caribbean, Europe, and the Asia Pacific region for both the local marketplace, as well as for export to our foreign subsidiaries. The subsidiaries, in turn, sell these products to customers in their respective geographic areas of operation, generally in local currencies. This method of sale and resale gives rise to the risk of gains or losses as a result of currency exchange rate fluctuations on the inter-company receivables and payables. Additionally, the sourcing of product in one currency and the sales of product in a different currency can cause gross margin fluctuations due to changes in currency exchange rates.

We selectively purchase currency forward exchange contracts to reduce the risks of currency fluctuations on short-term inter-company receivables and payables. These contracts guarantee a predetermined exchange rate at the time the contract is purchased. This allows us to shift the effect of positive or negative currency fluctuations to a third party.

As of March 27, 2005, we had currency forward exchange contracts totaling approximately $18.7 million. The contracts are in the various local currencies covering primarily our Western European, Canadian, and Australian operations. Historically, we have not purchased currency forward exchange contracts where it is not economically efficient, specifically for our operations in South America and Asia.

We have historically not used financial instruments to minimize our exposure to currency fluctuations on our net investments in and cash flows derived from our foreign subsidiaries. We have used third party borrowings in foreign currencies to hedge a portion of our net investments in and cash flows derived from our foreign subsidiaries. As we reduce our third party foreign currency borrowings, the effect of foreign currency fluctuations on our net investments in and cash flows derived from our foreign subsidiaries increases.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Our significant contractual obligations and off-balance sheet arrangements have not changed materially from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

23

New Accounting Pronouncements and Other Standards

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 151, “Inventory Costs”, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. This pronouncement will be effective for our first quarter 2006. We are in the process of evaluating the effects of this pronouncement on our consolidated financial statements.

On December 21, 2004, the FASB issued “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004”, a FASB Staff Position (FSP) that provides guidance on the application of SFAS No. 109 to the tax deduction on qualified production activities provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. FSP FAS 109-1 states that the qualified production activities deduction should be accounted for as a special deduction in accordance with SFAS No. 109, whereby the deduction is contingent upon the performance of specific activities, including wage levels. The FASB also concluded that the special deductions should be considered when measuring deferred taxes and assessing a valuation allowance. We are currently in the process of evaluating our ability to claim this deduction and the impact, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.

On December 21, 2004, the FASB issued “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004”, a FSP that provides accounting and disclosure guidance for the foreign earnings repatriation provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The Act provides special, one-time dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer. FSP FAS 109-2 states that a company is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings, as it applies to the application of SFAS No. 109. The decision process to build the plan may occur in stages, as an enterprise may separately evaluate the provisions of the Act. We are in the process of evaluating the effects of the repatriation provision to determine whether we will repatriate foreign earnings and the impact, if any, this pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements. In addition, the U.S. Treasury Department is expected to provide additional clarifying guidance on key elements of the repatriation provision. Until such clarification is received, we will continue our plan and intention to indefinitely reinvest accumulated earnings of our foreign subsidiaries.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” This statement is a revision to SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” This statement establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, primarily focusing on the accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. Entities will be required to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service, the requisite service period (usually the vesting period), in exchange for the award. On April 14, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) announced a deferral of the effective date of FAS 123R for calendar year companies until the beginning of 2006. In accordance with the SEC announcement, we will adopt SFAS No. 123R effective for our first quarter 2006 beginning December 26, 2005. Upon adoption, we have two application methods to choose from: the modified-prospective transition approach or the modified-retrospective transition approach. Under the modified-prospective transition method, we would be required to recognize compensation cost for share-based awards to employees based on their grant-date fair value from the beginning of the fiscal period in which the recognition provisions are first applied as well as compensation cost for awards that were granted prior to, but not vested as of the date of adoption. Prior periods remain unchanged and pro forma disclosures previously required by SFAS No. 123 continue to be required. Under the modified-retrospective transition method, we would restate prior periods by recognizing compensation cost in the amounts previously reported in the pro forma footnote disclosure under SFAS No. 123. We would follow the same guidelines as in the modified-prospective transition method for awards granted subsequent to adoption and those that were granted and not yet vested. We have not yet determined which methodology we will adopt but believe that the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will have on our financial position or results of operations will approximate the magnitude of the stock-based employee compensation cost disclosed in Note 1 pursuant to the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148.

24

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no significant changes to the market risks as disclosed in Item 7a. “Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 26, 2004.

Item 4. DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

During the quarter ended March 27, 2005, as part of our plan to convert all our subsidiaries in Europe to SAP, we implemented SAP software in our UK subsidiary. This constitutes a material change in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15f and 15d-15f under the Exchange Act).

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in certain legal and regulatory actions, all of which have arisen in the ordinary course of business, except for the matters described in the following paragraphs. Management believes it is remotely possible that the ultimate resolution of such matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and/or financial condition, except as described below.

ID Security Systems Canada Inc. versus Checkpoint Systems, Inc.

On August 1, 2004, the Company and ID Security Systems Canada Inc. entered into a settlement agreement effective July 30, 2004, pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay $19.95 million, in full and final settlement of the claims covered by the litigation. This settlement was accrued in the second quarter of 2004. Payment in full was made on August 5, 2004. The settlement did not cause the Company to be in default on any its debt covenants. The Company does not admit or acknowledge any wrongdoing or liability regarding the litigation. In connection with the settlement, the parties have mutually released each other from all other claims, except for any claims relating to existing contracts between the parties. A release in favor of the Company was also provided by various affiliates and associates of ID Security Systems Canada Inc. Management believes that the settlement was in the best interest of the Company to avoid the risks, burden, and expenses of continued litigation.

Matters related to ID Security Systems Canada Inc. versus Checkpoint Systems, Inc.

A certain number of follow-on purported class action suits have arisen in connection with the ID Security Systems Canada Inc. litigation. The purported class action complaints generally allege a claim of monopolization and are substantially based upon the same allegations as contained in the ID Security Systems Canada Inc. case (Civil Action No. 99-CV-577) as discussed below.

On August 1, 2002, a civil action was filed in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, designated as Civil Action No. 02-6379(ER) by plaintiff Diane Furs, Inc. t/a Diane Furs against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on August 21, 2002. On August 21, 2002, a Notice of Substitution of Plaintiff and Filing of Amended Complaint was filed by the plaintiff, and the named plaintiff was changed to Medi-Care Pharmacy, Inc.

On August 2, 2002, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Camden) designated as Docket No. 02-CV-3730(JEI) by plaintiff Club Sports International, Inc., d/b/a Soccer CSI against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on August 26, 2002.

On October 2, 2002, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Camden) designated as Docket No. 02-CV-4777(JBS) by plaintiff Baby Mika, Inc. against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on October 7, 2002.

On October 23, 2002, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Camden) designated as Docket No. 02-CV-5001(JEI) by plaintiff Washington Square Pharmacy, Inc. against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on November 1, 2002.

25

On October 18, 2002, The United States District, District of New Jersey (Camden) entered an Order staying the proceedings in the Club Sports International, Inc. and Baby Mika, Inc. cases referred to above. In accordance with the Order, the Stay will also apply to the Washington Square Pharmacy, Inc. case referred to above. In addition, the Medi-Care Pharmacy, Inc. case, referred to above, will be voluntarily dismissed, and it has been re-filed in New Jersey and is included in the Stay Order. As a result of the settlement of the litigation with ID Security Systems Canada Inc. described above, an application can be made to the Court to dissolve the Stay Order at this time.

On November 13, 2002, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Camden) designated as Docket No. 02-CV-5319(JEI) by plaintiff 1700 Pharmacy, Inc. against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on November 15, 2002.

On December 30, 2002, a civil action was filed in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Camden) designated as Docket No. 02-CV-6131(JEI) by plaintiff Medi-Care Pharmacy, Inc. against Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and served on January 3, 2003.

Both the 1700 Pharmacy, Inc. case and the Medi-Care Pharmacy, Inc. case were consolidated with the previously mentioned cases and are included in the October 18, 2002 Stay Order referred to above.

No liability has been recorded for any of the purported class action suits. Management is of the opinion that, based upon the advice of outside legal counsel, it is not probable that the purported class action suits will be successful. Management believes that the lower end of the reasonably possible range of the contingent liability is zero at this time. The high end of the range cannot be estimated at this time.

All-Tag Security S.A., et al

On April 22, 2004, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued an opinion granting All-Tag Security S.A. and All-Tag Security Americas, Inc.’s (jointly “All-Tag”) and Sensormatic Electronics Corporation’s motion for summary judgment, which was filed on February 15, 2002, and ordered the case closed. The Company originally filed suit on May 1, 2001, alleging that the disposable, deactivatable radio frequency security tag manufactured by All-Tag S.A. and sold by Sensormatic infringed on a patent owned by the Company. The Court determined that the US patent is invalid because the original application failed to identify a co-inventor. The original US application was filed in March 1988 and was scheduled to expire on March 15, 2008. The Company acquired the patent in 1995 when it acquired Actron AG. On May 24, 2004, the Company filed a Notice of Appeal to the District Court’s decision. Our appeal is currently pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

26

Item 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit 3.1	Articles of Incorporation, as amended, are hereby incorporated by reference to Item 14(a), Exhibit 3(i) of the Registrant’s 1990 Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 14, 1991.
Exhibit 3.2	By-Laws, as Amended and Restated, are hereby incorporated by reference to Item 15(c), Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrant’s 2004 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2005.
Exhibit 10.1	Credit Agreement dated March 4, 2005, by and among Registrant and the parties named therein, is here by incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated March 4, 2005 and filed with the SEC on March 9, 2005.
Exhibit 31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of George W. Off, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 31.2	Rule 13a-a4(a) Certification of W. Craig Burns, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
Exhibit 32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

27

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

/s/W. Craig Burns	May 5, 2005
W. Craig Burns Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
/s/Arthur W. Todd	May 5, 2005
Arthur W. Todd Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

28

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT	DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT 31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of George W. Off, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2	Rule 13a-4(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of W. Craig Burns, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 936 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

29