Mineral reserves are estimated at Babicanora (Main, Norte, Sur, Vista, El Muerto, and Granaditas), and Las Chispas (Las Chispas, Giovani, Giovani Mini, Luigi, Luigi FW and William Tell) mines (Figure 12-1 to Figure 12-6). All estimates envisage underground mining methods. Mineral reserves were converted from measured and indicated mineral resources. Inferred mineral resources were set to waste. The mine plans assume underground mining using longhole open stoping, cut and fill stoping and resue stoping, using trackless equipment, and a combination of cemented rock fill (CRF) and unconsolidated rockfill (URF) for backfill (URF). Target mining rates are 1,250 t/d initially, increasing to 1,500 t/d at its peak for the LOM.
12.2 | Development of Mining Cases |
The Mineral Reserve Estimate is based on the following inputs and considerations:
• | Mineral resource block model, with estimated tonnage, gold, and silver grades; |
• | Cut-off grade calculations; |
• | Stope and development designs; |
• | Geotechnical and hydrogeological information; |
• | Estimates for mining recovery and dilution; |
• | Depletion from previous mining; |
• | Consideration of other modifying factors. |
Deswik mine planning software was used for the mine design, 3D modeling, and interrogation of the 3D mining model against the block model.
The surveyed “as-built” mining excavations were depleted from the designed solids and the resource block model.
Mining, geotechnical, and hydrological factors were considered in the estimation of the mineral reserves, including the application of dilution and ore recovery factors.
Mining excavations (stopes and ore development) were designed to include mineralized material above the cut-off grade. These excavations were then assessed for economic viability. In addition to the mining cut-off grade, an incremental cut-off grade (excluding the mining cost) was calculated to classify mineralized material mined as a result of essential development to access higher grade mining areas. Mineralized material above this cut-off grade will add value, and is therefore, included as process plant feed. Waste and mineralized material below the incremental cut-off will be disposed of on surface in waste rock storage facilities (WRSFs) or will be used underground as backfill.
Figure12‑1: | Deposit Layout Plan |
Source: Coeur, 2025
Figure 12‑2:
| Babicanora Complex Plan View |
Source: Coeur, 2025
Figure 12‑3: | Babicanora Vein Overview Plan View |
Source: Coeur, 2025
Figure 12‑4:
| Babicanora Looking Northeast |
Source: Coeur, 2025
Figure 12‑5:
| Las Chispas Complex Plan View |
Source: Coeur, 2025
Figure 12‑6:
| Las Chispas Looking Northeast |
Source: Coeur, 2025
All designed excavations in the Mineral Reserve have been tested for a positive economic return. However, other costs not included in the economic review will be incurred, such as costs related to underground infrastructure installations, capital equipment purchases, and sustaining capital. In addition to these costs, there are taxes and royalties that are payable based on net income.
The resulting mine plan was analyzed in a financial model and is economically viable.
Stope designs were generated for the planned mining methods using the cut-off grade to target material for inclusion. Stope designs were completed using the Deswik Mineable Shape Optimizer software. Centerlines representing ore development drives were digitized to represent ore development and were used to create a 3D solid model in Deswik Spatial. The stope solids were cut using the ore development solids, using Boolean routines in the planning software. The resulting 3D model formed the basis of the Mineral Reserve Estimate.
Silver equivalent (AgEq) cut-off grades were calculated for the deposits, with mineral reserves estimated and reported above this cut-off. The AgEq cut-off was calculated as follows:
where mining, processing and G&A are costs expressed as US$ per tonne, and silver price and refining costs are expressed as US$ per troy ounce. The payability refers to the percentage of metal payable after refining.
A silver:gold value ratio was used to convert gold grades to silver equivalent grades and is calculated using the following formula:
Silver equivalent grades were calculated using the following formula:
Where, AgEq, Ag and Au are the silver equivalent grade, silver grade, and gold grade, respectively, in g / t.
The input parameters to the cut-off grades and the resulting grade cut-off for Mineral Reserves reporting are provided in Table 12-1.
12.5 | Ore Loss and Dilution |
The following sources of dilution were identified:
• | Overbreak into the hanging wall or footwall rocks following drilling and blasting operations; |
• | Rock failures (slough) from rock walls adjacent to the stope boundaries as a result of weak rock mass characteristics; and, |
• | Backfill dilution from over mucking into the stope floor. |
Ore dilution factors to account for overbreak and wall slough (waste rock dilution) from the hanging wall and footwall surfaces were estimated based on the consideration of geotechnical information and stope reconciliations and were applied to stope shapes in the stope optimization software.
Unplanned dilution was added during the MSO stage and then optimized for grade. Equivalent Linear Overbreak Slough (ELOS) for longhole varies based on geotechnical conditions in each of the stoping areas, with overall ELOS varying from 1.0 m to 1.5 m, including of 0.5 – 1.0 m hangingwall and 0.25 m – 0.5 m footwall dilution . ELOS for resue considers 0.2 m hangingwall and 0.2 m footwall dilution. Cut and fill mining was assumed as breasting in all cases, using the ore sill drive width of 3.5 m as a minimum mining width inclusive of dilution. The resulting stope shapes were reviewed for practicality of mining, with impractical mining shapes removed or adjusted. Cemented Rock Fill (CRF) and Unconsolidated Rock Fill (URF) are used to backfill mined-out stopes in order to enhance ore recovery, provide mine stability, and eliminate the need for permanent ore pillars to be left.
Ore losses can occur during mining as a result of:
• | Stope under-break and unrecoverable bridging; |
• | Unrecovered ore stocks due to flat dipping footwalls and stope draw point geometry; |
• | Misclassification of material resulting in ore hauled inadvertently to waste dumps; and, |
• | Abandoned ore stocks due to excessive dilution from stope wall failures. |
A development design was produced to align with the resulting stope shapes that tied into the existing underground as-builts. The development design follows current site design criteria and geotechnical recommendations. A development dilution factor of 5% and recovery factor of 98% was applied.
Stope shapes were depleted with development drives. Estimated maximum mining recoveries for stoping was 95%, with lower recoveries assumed for specific locations due to ground conditions, quality of existing backfill above and pillar requirements.
Table 12-2 summarizes the dilution factors for the various mining methods used at Las Chispas.
Table 12‑1: | Input Parameters to Cut-off Grade Determination, Mineral Reserves |
Parameter | Units | Value/Value Range (from/to) |
Silver price | $ / oz | 23.50 |
Gold price | $ / oz | 1,800.00 |
Silver recovery | % | 97.50 |
Gold recovery | % | 98.00 |
Silver payable | % | 99.90 |
Gold payable | % | 99.85 |
Ag:Au value ratio | Ag:Au | 76.95 |
Production Mining cost | $ / t | 58.06–239.511 |
Development Mining cost | $ / t | 27.40 |
Processing | $ / t | 45.72 |
Underground G&A | $ / t | 12.81 |
Site G&A | $ / t | 20.70 |
Sustaining Capital | $x / t | 7.64 |
AgEq cut-off grade | g / t | 235 – 4832 |
Marginal development AgEq cut-off grade | g / t | 62.00 |
Note 1: Average Production Mining Cost = 68.72 $USD / t
Note 2: Average AgEq cut-off grade = 250 g / t
Table 12‑2: | Dilution Factors |
| Mining Method | Unplanned Dilution |
| Development (Rock) | 5% |
| Longhole Stoping (Rock) | 1.0 m – 1.5 m ELOS1 (0.5 – 1.0 m HW, 0.25 m - 0.5 m FW) |
| Cut and Fill Stoping (Rock) | 0.2 m ELOS (0.1 m HW, 0.1 m FW) |
| Resue Stoping (Rock) | 0.4 m ELOS (0.2 m HW, 0.2 m FW) |
| All (Backfill) | 3% |
Note 1: Varies based on geotechnical conditions in each area
The silver price assumed for the Mineral Reserve estimate is US $23.50/oz and the gold price assumed is US$1,800/oz and details of this are outlined in Section 16. The QP reviewed the metal prices used in the calculation of the Mineral Reserve estimate and believes that they are reasonable to use over the 7-year mine life given the consideration of long-term consensus pricing by analysts (5-year forecast), 3-year historical averages and industry peer comparisons.
12.7 | Mineral Reserve Statement |
Mineral reserves are reported using the mineral reserve definitions set out in S-K 1300. The reference point for the Mineral Reserve Estimate is the point of delivery to the process plant. Mineral reserves are reported in Table 12‑1. Mineral reserves are current at December 31, 2024. Estimates are reported on a 100% basis.
The Qualified Person for the estimate is Mr. Joseph Wallick, P.Eng.
Table 12‑3: | Mineral Reserve Estimate |
Zone/Deposit | Mineral Reserve Classification | Tonnes (kt) | Grade | Contained Ounces | Silver Equivalent Average Cut-off Grade (g/t AgEq) | Metallurgical Recovery |
Ag (g/t) | Au (g/t) | Ag (koz) | Au (koz) | Ag (%) | Au (%) |
Babicanora | Proven | 606 | 537.9 | 5.04 | 10,482 | 98 | 250 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Probable | 2,164 | 264.8 | 3.16 | 18,426 | 220 | 250 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Subtotal proven and probable | 2,770 | 324.6 | 3.57 | 28,908 | 318 | 250 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Las Chispas | Proven | - | - | - | - | - | 250 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Probable | 285 | 273.2 | 2.10 | 2,505 | 19 | 250 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Subtotal proven and probable | 285 | 273.2 | 2.10 | 2,505 | 19 | 250 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Stockpiles | Proven | 107 | 609.1 | 5.67 | 2,104 | 20 | 250 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Probable | - | - | - | - | - | - | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Subtotal proven and probable | 107 | 609.1 | 5.67 | 2,104 | 20 | - | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Total Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves | Total proven | 714 | 548.6 | 5.13 | 12,586 | 118 | 250 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Total probable | 2,449 | 265.8 | 3.03 | 20,931 | 239 | 250 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Total proven and probable | 3,163 | 329.6 | 3.51 | 33,516 | 357 | 250 | 97.5 | 98.0 |
Notes to Accompany Mineral Reserves Table:
1 The Mineral Reserve estimates are current as of December 31, 2024 and are reported using the definitions in Item 1300 of Regulation S–K (17 CFR Part 229) (S-K 1300). 2 The reference point for the Mineral Reserve Estimate is the point of delivery to the process plant. The estimate is current as at December 31, 2024. The Qualified Person for the estimate is Mr. Joseph Wallick, an employee of Coeur Mining. 3 The estimate uses the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional underground mining; silver price of US$23.50 / oz and gold price of US$1,800 / oz; reported above an average silver equivalent cut-off grade of 250 g / t silver equivalent and an incremental development cut-off grade of 62 g / t AgEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 97.5% for silver and 98.0% for gold; mining dilution assumes 5% for development, 1 meter to 1.5 meters of ELOS (0.5 m – 1.0 m of hangingwall and 0.25 m – 0.5 m of footwall dilution) depending on geotechnical conditions in each longhole stoping location, 0.2 meter ELOS (0.1 m of hangingwall and 0.1 m of footwall dilution) for cut and fill, 0.4 meter ELOS (0.2 m of hangingwall and 0.2 m of footwall dilution), and 3% waste dilution for backfill; mining loss of 2% for development and 5% for stoping was applied, additional losses have been included to account for the required pillars in uphole stopes that cannot be filled; variable production mining costs that range from US$58.06–US$239.51/t, development mining costs of US$27.40/t, process costs of US$45.72/t, site general and administrative costs of US$20.70/t, underground general and administrative costs of US$12.81/t, and sustaining capital costs of US$7.64/t. 4 Rounding of tonnes, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tonnes, grades, and contained metal contents.
12.8 | Uncertainties (Factors) That May Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate |
Factors that may affect the Mineral Reserve estimates include:
• | Commodity prices: the mineral reserve estimates are sensitive to metal prices. Coeur’s current strategy is to sell most of the metal production at spot prices, exposing the company to both positive and negative changes in the market, both of which are outside of the company’s control; |
• | Metallurgical recovery: long term changes in metallurgical recovery could also have an impact on the mineral reserve estimates. For example, a 10% change in metallurgical recovery has the same impact as a 10% change in metal prices. However, the metallurgy is well understood, and as a result, the mineral reserve estimates are considered to be less sensitive to long-term factors affecting metallurgical recovery, compared to the sensitivity to metal prices, which tend to have greater variances; |
• | Mining method will change from cut and fill and resue to longitudinal longhole stoping based on actual vein widths mined which could result in higher dilution quantities, lower costs and higher productivity which can impact grade. All of these factors could impact cut-off grades, reserve estimates and economics; |
• | Operating costs: higher or lower operating costs than those assumed could also affect the mineral reserve estimates. While the trend over the last few years showed operating cost reductions at the Las Chispas Operations, this trend could reverse and costs could increase over the life of the Project, due to factors outside of the company’s control. However, of the factors discussed in this section, the QP considers the mineral reserve sensitivity to changes in operating costs to be low; |
• | Dilution: additional dilution has the effect of increasing the overall volume of material mined, hauled and processed. This results in an increase in operating costs and could result in mineral reserve losses if broken stopes are diluted to the point where it is uneconomic to muck, haul, and process the material and the broken stocks are abandoned. The operations have developed a number of methods to control dilution, including the installation of stope support, a flexible mine plan with the ability to limit stope wall spans, and good development practices that avoid undercutting the stope hanging wall. To assist in these efforts, site geotechnical reviews are regularly completed by external consultants, and a geotechnical engineer is employed by the mine. In the opinion of the QP, sufficient controls are in place at the Las Chispas Operations to manage dilution, and the risk of material changes to the mineral reserve from dilution above the amounts used in the Mineral Reserve Estimate is low; |
• | Geotechnical: geotechnical issues could lead to additional dilution, difficulty accessing portions of the ore body, or sterilization of broken or in situ ore. In addition to the controls discussed in the dilution section there are significant management controls in place to effectively mitigate geotechnical risks. Designed openings are evaluated for stability using the Modified Stability Graph method. There is regular underground geotechnical mapping, and comprehensive geotechnical reviews are held on a weekly basis. The QP considers that sufficient controls are in place at the Las Chispas Operations to effectively manage geotechnical risk, and the risk of significant impact on the Mineral Reserve Estimate is low; |
• | Hydrogeological: unexpected hydrogeological conditions could cause issues with access and extraction of areas of the Mineral Reserve due to higher than anticipated rates of water ingress. The QP considers the risk of encountering hydrogeological conditions that would significantly affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate is low; |
• | Geological and structural interpretations: changes in the underlying geology model including changes in local interpretations of mineralization geometry and continuity of mineralized zones, changes to geological and mineralization shape and geological and grade continuity assumptions, and density and domain assignments could result in changes to the geology model upon which Mineral Reserve Estimate is based; |
• | Permitting and social license: inability to maintain, renew, or obtain environmental and other regulatory permits, to retain mineral and surface right titles, to maintain site access, and to maintain social license to operate could result in the inability to extract some or all of the mineral reserves. |
The Babicanora, Las Chispas mines use conventional underground mining and conventional equipment. The overall production rate is 1,250 t/d initially and peaks at 1,500 t/d for the LOM. Figure 13‑1 show the final mine design by vein and mining method.
Figure 13‑1:
| Las Chispas Final Mine Design Plan View by Vein |
Source: Coeur, 2025
13.2 | Geotechnical Considerations |
The Las Chispas Operations Technical Services Department maintains a Ground Control Management Plan that is updated annually and serves to provide mine personnel with operating, monitoring, and quality control/assurance guidance. The Ground Control Management Plan specifies ground support standards and identifies where they are applicable in the mines.
Knight Piésold (KP) performed a geotechnical assessment of the mine area, with site visits being conducted in 2022 and 2023, and provided guidance on developing RMR logging procedures and calculated rock mass rating (RMR76). Due to the varying nature of the multiple veins, the RMR76 values also vary significantly across the deposit, with some areas having values in the range of 20–35, or a “Poor” rock quality, up to a RMR76 rating of “Good” or 70. The areas where ground conditions were demonstrated as “Poor” have been considered for cut and fill mining and resue mining.
Initial stope dimensions were developed using the Modified Stability Graph method, which predicts equivalent linear overbreak slough values (Pakalnis, 2016). Modifications based on variability and updated geotechnical models were made as the mine developed. Updated designs are modelled using two and three-dimensional numerical simulation software to provide final design for each access and stope.
Based on the calculated modified stability number (N’) values, the planned stope surfaces at Babicanora are estimated to have equivalent linear overbreak slough values of 1.0 m – 1.5 m, accounting for 0.5 m – 1.0 m of hangingwall overbreak and 0.25 – 0.5 m of footwall overbreak, depending on vein dimensions, structural interpretation, and rock quality locally. Stope spans range from 10 – 25 m along strike, depending on vein dimensions, structural interpretation, and rock quality locally.
The Las Chispas Operation maintains current ground support standards based on the ground conditions encountered, typically containing resin rebar in the backs and shoulders, along with welded wire mesh. In some poorer ground conditions, in-cycle shotcrete with a thickness of 5 cm is added, and intersections require either Swellex or cable bolts, depending on the span. In addition to this, cable bolts are typically installed in the hangingwall of the sill drives of stopes.
The most recent geotechnical review was conducted in 2023 to review updated support methods, maximum allowable stable stope spans, mining sequence, and overall mine stability.
The geotechnical conditions at Las Chispas are classified with rock qualities ranging from 60 to 65, which falls in the “Good” category. Ground support schemes and stope parameters are similar to those at Babicanora, however there is no planned cut and fill or resue mining considered for Las Chispas due to the better overall ground conditions.
Based on the calculated modified stability number (N’) values, the majority of the planned stope surfaces at Babicnaora are estimated to have equivalent linear overbreak slough values of 1.0 m, accounting for 0.5 m of hangingwall overbreak and 0.5 m of footwall overbreak. Stope spans range from 10– 25 m along strike, depending on vein dimensions, structural interpretation, and rock quality locally.
The most recent geotechnical review was conducted in 2023 to review updated support methods, maximum allowable stable stope spans, mining sequence, and overall mine stability.
13.3 | Hydrogeological Considerations |
Permeability of the volcanic rock units in all mines is low to very low. Persistent inflows generally occur within larger fault structures. Flows increase and decrease seasonally if the structure is connected to the surface. Access ramps encountered significant water inflows from these structural features during early development; however, over time, inflows into the mine have diminished as local storage is removed. Increases in flow currently are directly related to opening new developments laterally or ramping downward to lower levels. A series of 10 to 30 kW pumps, in a series of dirty water sumps, main collection sumps and solid separation sumps will dewater Babicanora.
Hydro-Resources Inc (HRI) completed a review of the hydrogeological and structural models for the operation. Expected mine inflows are in the range of 20 L / s at Babicanora, plus any additional water used in the mining process.
Las Chispas will be dewatered similarly to Babicanora, with a series of 10 to 30 kW pumps, in a series of dirty water sumps, main collection sumps and solid separation sumps.
Based on the pump test results completed by HRI, in Las Chispas the maximum inflow is expected to be 9.4 L / s, and this is what LOM dewatering designs for Las Chispas have been based on.
Primary access and egress to the Babicanora mine is from surface via two ramps. The Santa Rosa and Babicanora Central portals can handle the proposed trucking fleet and will also be used as intake flows for the primary ventilation circuit.
Babicanora contains mineralized zones along a strike length of 2,600 m and a depth of 450 m. The mineralized zones are varying in dip and thickness both along strike and at depth. The Babicanora mine includes the following veins of mineralization, the Babicanora Norte (BAN) extends furthest to the north and the El Muerto (EM) vein extends the deepest, with the Granaditas (GRA) vein extending furthest south. Additional veins include Babicanora Vista (BAV), Babicanora Main (BAM), Babicanora Sur (BAS) and Babicanora Central (BAC). While all geometries are suitably extracted using the longitudinal longhole stoping method, particular areas in the EM vein have been selected for cut and fill mining due to geotechnical considerations. Additionally, resue mining sees limited use in the BAC and BAM veins, to minimize dilution in high-grade narrow veins.
Ramp access is driven at 15% grades, mine access drifts and other capital development is primarily developed at 4.5 m wide by 4.5 m high, and ore drives are developed at 3.3 m wide by 4.0 m high.
Key input parameters to the mine design include mechanized diesel and electric drill, load, and haulage systems. Production rates for Babicanora are 400 thousand tonnes per year (kt/a) for ore and 300 kt/a for waste over the LOM. The material handling system uses a load-haul-dump (LHD) and truck transport system of ore loading and hauling to an interim surface stockpile. Ore is separated at surface into stockpiles to support blending prior to transport to the plant run-of-mine (ROM) stockpile. Waste from development is either directly transported from development to backfilling pockets in active stopes, mixed with cement for cemented rockfill to be utilized in the backfilling of stopes, or stockpiled underground for later use as backfill.
Mining methods used at Babicanora include longitudinal sublevel stoping, cut and fill, and resuing. Longitudinal sublevel stoping is the primary mining method, and in areas where there is either poorer ground conditions, or veins are very narrow, either cut and fill or resuing is used.
Access to longitudinal stoping areas is via level accesses perpendicular to the vein strike, from a ramp that is developed primarily in the footwall of the vein to be mined. Stope development is completed along strike of the vein, and the longitudinal stoping is completed by retreating from the extents of the vein back to the central access. The stopes (10-25 m of strike) are excavated and backfilled with either cemented rockfill or unconsolidated rockfill, depending on the area. The open stope is backfilled, and the extraction continues in sequence. Level or stope heights in Babicanora are generally 18 m, with the exception of BAS, which has a general stope height of 15 m.
Cut and fill is utilized in the BAC vein of Babicanora. Cut and fill breasting will be applied in this area, and the mining will initially be accessed by developing a pivot drive. From the pivot drive, an ore sill will be developed to the economic extents of the orebody. Once the sill is complete, rockfill will be placed to create a new working floor for the next cut to be mined in an overhand fashion. A new access to the next lift will be taken, through slashing of the pivot drive back.
Four areas of Babicanora will utilize the resuing mining method: BAC, BAN, BAV and EM. These selected high grade areas have a minimum width of 0.9m inclusive of ELOS. A sill drive is developed, similar to longitudinal stoping or cut and fill, and then the narrow ore vein is mined with up-hole drilling. After the ore is mined, the waste is then mined and utilized as the floor of the next lift, with either excess waste removed, or additional waste added to obtain a new working floor.
Lateral development is completed using conventional mechanized drilling and blasting methods. Drift rounds are drilled using twin boom, electric/hydraulic drill jumbos. Ground support is installed using mechanical/electrical bolting machines and (when required) shotcrete is applied with a shotcrete machine. Mine services (air, water, compressed air, electrical and communication cables) are extended to the working areas.
Longhole production drilling of stopes is completed using electric/hydraulic vertical hammer drill rigs. Production drilling is mainly done in pattern format in a down dip configuration, with the holes drilled parallel to the dip of the orebody.
Primary access to the Las Chispas mine is from surface via the Las Chispas portal, it can handle the proposed trucking fleet as well as being utilized for intake flows for the primary ventilation circuit.
Las Chispas contains mineralized zones along a strike length of 900 m and a depth of 300 m. The mineralized zones vary in dip and thickness both along strike and at depth. The Las Chispas mine includes the following veins of mineralization, the William Tell (WT) vein extends furthest to the north, with the Las Chispas (LC) vein extending furthest south and the deepest. Additional veins include Giovanni (GIO), Gio Mini (GIOM), Luigi (LUI), and Luigi Footwall (LFW). Mining methods and development sizes are similar to Babicanora, with the longhole stoping and resue methods being utilized in Las Chispas for production.
Ramp access is driven at 15% grades, mine access drifts and other capital development is primarily developed at 4.5 m wide by 4.5 m high, and ore drives are developed at 3.3 m wide by 4.0 m high.
Key input parameters to the mine design include mechanized diesel and electric drill, load, and haulage systems. Production rates for Las Chispas are 60 thousand tonnes per year (kt/a) for ore and 60 kt/a for waste over the LOM. The material handling system uses a load-haul-dump (LHD) and truck transport system of ore loading and hauling to an interim surface stockpile. Ore is separated at surface into stockpiles to support blending prior to transport to the plant run-of-mine (ROM) stockpile. Waste from development is either directly transported from development to backfilling pockets in active stopes, mixed with cement for cemented rockfill to be utilized in the backfilling of stopes, or stockpiled underground for later use as backfill.
The primary mining method used at Las Chispas is longitudinal sublevel stoping, and resue mining is used minimally in the Las Chispas vein. Access to longitudinal stoping areas is via level accesses perpendicular to the vein strike, from a ramp that is developed primarily in the footwall of the vein to be mined. Stope development is completed along strike of the vein, and the longitudinal stoping is completed by retreating from the extents of the vein back to the central access. The stopes (10-25 m of strike) are excavated and backfilled with either cemented rockfill providing or unconsolidated rockfill, depending on the area. The open stope is backfilled, and the extraction continues in sequence. Level or stope heights in Las Chispas are generally 18 m.
Lateral development is completed using conventional mechanized drilling and blasting methods. Drift rounds are drilled using twin boom, electric/hydraulic drill jumbos. Ground support is installed using mechanical/electrical bolting machines and (when required) shotcrete is applied with a shotcrete machine. Mine services (air, water, compressed air, electrical and communication cables) are extended to the working areas.
Longhole production drilling of stopes is completed using electric/hydraulic vertical hammer drill rigs. Production drilling is mainly done in pattern format in a down dip configuration, with the holes drilled parallel to the dip of the orebody.
The underground mining methods currently in use include longitudinal longhole stoping, cut-and-fill stoping and resue stoping, with cemented or uncemented rockfill as backfill. Uncemented Rockfill (URF) will be used in most cases. The longhole stopes will be backfilled with a combination of Cemented Rockfill (CRF) and URF to avoid the use of rib pillars. CRF will also be used in all of the mining methods for sill mats above temporary sill pillars.
The primary ventilation system is powered by 15 fans of various sizes, with a combined power of 1,560 kW, installed in various intake exhaust raises. The mine air is distributed using five ventilation zones. The northern zone is ventilated with fresh air raise in BAC is shared with BAM and BAV zones and some of the air entering the BAC portal is directed into BAN SE. The eastern zone is ventilated from the outside to the center, supplied with fresh air from the BAC fresh air raise and Santa Rosa portals and exhausted primarily through an existing raise to surface positioned near the Santa Rosa portal. The main zone is ventilated with fresh air primarily from BAC to the north and from the Santa Rosa portal. It exhausts from an existing raise on the south side. Partially used air is routed to BVS in the south and is nearly the sole source of air for that zone. There is an imbalance in the ventilation of BAS to the west, which is intended solely to draw sufficient air flow from BAM to ventilate the haulage ramps connecting the two zones. The southern zone is ventilated with air from BAM and through a fresh air raise in GRA. BVS has no independent supply of fresh air. Both zones have independent exhaust raises. The western zone is ventilated from north to south, with 20% of the fresh air requirement coming from the Santa Rosa portal via BAM into the southern half of the zone. Secondary ventilation is directed through booster fans installed on levels and directed through sublevel raises vertically and laterally along horizontal drives to the work areas. Vertical raises are installed level to level using a raise bore.
The ventilation circuit is currently operating at a 250m³/sec and has the capacity to be increased to 705 m3/sec as the ventilation requirements increase with further mining.
The primary ventilation system is powered by two fans of different sizes, with a combined power of 122kW, installed in the various exhaust raises. The mine air is distributed using two ventilation zones. The northern zone is ventilated utilizing a fresh air raise located near the northern ramp system. The southern zone is ventilated with fresh air drawn in from the Las Chispas portal, the air flows north along the access and down the ramp exiting the mine through the exhaust raise system located near the southern ramp. Secondary ventilation is directed through booster fans installed on levels and directed through sublevel raises vertically and laterally along horizontal drives to the work areas. Vertical raises are installed level to level using a raise bore.
The ventilation circuit is currently operating at 60m³/sec and is increasing along mine development and production to a capacity of 125m³/sec.
13.7 | Blasting and Explosives |
Longhole drilling of stope production holes are completed using electric/hydraulic downhole hammer drills. Drill and blast design is customized to match individual conditions found in each stope and development headings. Blasting is conducted using controlled spacing and timing method via a central electronic timing and detonation system.
13.8 | Underground Sampling and Production Monitoring |
Preliminary in situ channel sampling is conducted across the vein intercepts by the geologists to support preliminary ore control. Follow-up samples are taken during and post extraction from individual stope stockpiles on surface to support blending and reconciliation with the plant on a continuous basis as part of day-to-day operations.
13.9 | Infrastructure Facilities |
Infrastructure for the operation is discussed in Chapter 15. All underground operations share the same surface infrastructure excluding stockpiles and compressed air and ventilation systems.
Underground maintenance facilities in Babicanora and Las Chispas support field and preventative maintenance activities. Primary maintenance is conducted in joint facilities located on surface and a large main facility located at the Las Chispas office and plant site.
Surface magazines support Babicanora and Las Chispas.
The Las Chispas Operation has a seven-year mine life.
A production schedule is provided in Table 13‑1.
Table 13‑1:
| Production Schedule |
| | Units | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 | LOM |
| Underground Babicanora |
| Ore mined | kt | 421 | 374 | 404 | 416 | 530 | 526 | 99 | 2,770 |
| Silver grade mined | g/t | 407.4 | 420.3 | 356.3 | 351.8 | 304.5 | 193.6 | 169.8 | 324.6 |
| Gold grade mined | g/t | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 3.6 |
| Silver contained metal | koz | 5,516 | 5,053 | 4,633 | 4,705 | 5,186 | 3,275 | 540 | 28,908 |
| Gold contained metal | koz | 52 | 47 | 48 | 53 | 63 | 45 | 9 | 318 |
| Vertical Capital Development | m | 189 | 596 | 1,221 | 669 | 292 | 395 | — | 3,362 |
| Lateral Capital Development | m | 6,277 | 6,131 | 6,484 | 4,714 | 3,755 | 2,927 | — | 30,290 |
| Operating Waste Development | m | 2,907 | 1,970 | 1,045 | 880 | 978 | 816 | — | 8,596 |
| Operating Ore Development | m | 3,897 | 2,036 | 3,123 | 2,109 | 2,953 | 1,136 | — | 15,255 |
| Waste mined | kt | 437 | 431 | 394 | 307 | 253 | 188 | — | 2,010 |
| Underground Las Chispas |
| Ore mined | kt | 28 | 62 | 96 | 78 | 21 | — | — | 285 |
| Silver grade mined | g/t | 214.2 | 333.8 | 304.2 | 218.3 | 235.7 | — | — | 148.7 |
| Gold grade mined | g/t | 1.6 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 2.2 | — | — | 2.0 |
| Silver contained metal | koz | 194 | 665 | 941 | 547 | 157 | — | — | 2,505 |
| Gold contained metal | koz | 1 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 1 | — | — | 19 |
| Vertical Capital Development | m | 55 | 299 | 112 | — | — | — | — | 466 |
| Lateral Capital Development | m | 2,081 | 1,797 | 540 | 389 | 190 | — | — | 4,996 |
| Operating Waste Development | m | 145 | 535 | 100 | 127 | 20 | — | — | 928 |
| Operating Ore Development | m | 471 | 973 | 540 | 40 | 101 | — | — | 2,125 |
| Waste mined | kt | 107 | 118 | 31 | 25 | 12 | — | — | 294 |
The equipment listed in Table 13‑2 is shared between the two underground mines. The Max Required Unit is the quantity of equipment required to meet the production schedule. Currently, there are two mining contractors at the operation: Cominvi and Dumas. This leads to a current equipment fleet count that is higher than the Max Required Units.
The equipment on site is sufficient to meet LOM plan requirements.
Table 13‑2: | Underground Equipment |
| Mining Equipment | Make and Model | 2024 | LOM |
Current Fleet | Max Required Units |
| Production/Development Equipment |
| Jumbo Drill (Single Boom) | Sandvik DD311 | 4 | 6 |
Epiroc S1D | 3 |
| Jumbo Drill (Double Boom) | Epiroc B282 | 2 |
| Bolter | Sandvik DS311 | 3 | 8 |
Epiroc Boltec S | 3 |
Epiroc Boltec 235 | 3 |
Resemin Muki | 1 |
| Explosives Truck | Maclean AC2 | 2 | 3 |
Maclean MEM-933 | 1 |
| Stope Loader - 2.5yd3 | Epiroc ST2G | 1 | 2 |
| Stope Loader - 4.0yd3 | Sandvik LH307 | 1 | 3 |
Epiroc ST7 | 3 |
| Truck Loader - 6.0yd3 | Sandvik LH410 | 6 | 3 |
Epiroc ST1030 | 3 |
| Haul Truck | Sandvik TH430 | 5 | 11 |
Sandvik TH315 | 1 |
Epiroc MT2200 | 4 |
Epiroc MT436B | 1 |
| Production Drill (Longhole) | Resemin Jumbo Raptor | 1 | 5 |
Resemin Jumbo Muki LHBP-2R | 2 |
Epiroc Boomer S1D | 1 |
Epiroc Simba S7D | 2 |
Boart Stopemate-HX | 1 |
Sandvik DL331 | 1 |
| Total Prod/Dev Units | 55 | 41 |
Mining Equipment | Make and Model | 2024 | LOM |
Current Fleet | Max Required Units |
Service *LOM Max will be 2025 max, due to two contractor fleets onsite. | Equipment
|
Scissor Lift | Mixed (Walden, Normet, Maclean) | 5 | 2 |
Dump Truck | Kenworth T800 | 3 | 3 |
Bulldozer | Caterpillar D4 | 2 | 1 |
Backhoe | Mixed (CAT, John Deere) | 6 | 4 |
Boom Truck | Mixed Fleet | 2 | 2 |
Telehandler | Mixed Fleet | 3 | 3 |
Lube Truck | Mixed Fleet | 2 | 2 |
Shotcrete Sprayer | Normet Alpha 20 | 3 | 1 |
Concrete Mixer (1m3 and 4m3) | Mixed Fleet | 4 | 2 |
Light Vehicle | Mixed Fleet | 34 | 15 |
Personnel Carrier | Pasajeros International | 5 | 3 |
Total Service Units | 69 | 38 |
Total Units | 124 | 74 |
Mining operations are forecast to employ 400 persons over the LOM.
The Las Chispas Operation is designed to process 1,250 t/d to produce Ag-Au doré via cyanide leaching and Merrill-Crowe recovery.
• | Major equipment is achieving a nominal throughput of 1,250 t/d, with the ability to accommodate increased throughput up to 1,750 t/d via an expansion to the comminution circuit, if desired. |
• | Crushing circuit availability of 70% or higher is being achieved, supported by using a surge bin, a dedicated feeder and an emergency stockpile to provide continuous feed to the balance of the Process Plant. |
• | The Process Plant facility, including semi-autogenous grinding (SAG), cyanide leaching circuit, Merrill Crowe circuit, and tailings handling facilities, is achieving an overall availability of 91.3% or greater. |
The total power consumption for the Process Plant has averaged 55.2 kWh/t in 2024.
The Process Plant is located at the mine site and receives blended feed material from numerous mineralized veins. Due to anticipated grade and clay content variability within the deposit, operational periods exist where blending of mineralized materials from selected mining areas is employed to mitigate potentially adverse effects on Process Plant operability or process recoveries.
Figure 14‑1 presents the daily dry tonnes processed since January 1, 2024.
Figure 14‑1:
| Daily Tonnes Processed since January 1, 2024 |
Source: Ausenco, 2024.
14.2 | Selected Process Flowsheet |
The Operation includes:
• | Single stage SAG mill circuit closed with cyclones for classification, |
• | Flotation concentrate cyanide leaching, |
• | Flotation concentrate post-leach thickening, |
• | Flotation tails pre-leach thickening, |
• | Countercurrent decantation (CCD) washing and pre-clarification of pregnant solution, |
• | Clarification, de-aeration and zinc precipitation of Au and Ag (Merrill-Crowe), |
• | Mercury removal using a retort, |
• | Smelting to produce doré, |
• | Cyanide Detoxification by SO2/air, |
• | Tailings thickening and filtration, and |
• | Transferring filtered tails to the FTSF. |
The Operation is currently bypassing the flotation and concentrate leaching circuits, with all leaching occurring in the bulk leaching circuit with free cyanide concentrations maintained above 2,000 mg/L. This configuration provides greater economics than the base case flowsheet. The current strategy allows the Operation to maintain high metal recoveries while separating the grinding water loop from the leaching and metal recovery solution loop.
Separating the two solution loops allows the Operation to:
• | bypass the detox circuit thereby saving on reagents costs and increasing cyanide recycle to leaching circuit while maintaining low cyanide concentrations in the filtered tailings seepage ponds. |
• | reduce metal loss in filtered tailing solution by eliminating the use of grinding water in the CCD that has higher Au and Ag concentrations than the Merril-Crowe Barren solution. |
Figure 14‑2 presents an overall process flow diagram of the facility. The sections with grey shade are not currently operating except the Detox tanks that are operating intermittently on either solution or slurry depending on North Pond seepage solution volume and CN concentration.
Figure 14‑2:
| Overall Process Flow Diagram |
Source: Ausenco, 2023.
The Process Plant uses a conventional comminution circuit, including a primary jaw crusher and a SAG mill, to reduce the feed material to the target particle size distribution for processing. The SAG mill operates in closed-circuit with a cyclone cluster with the cyclone underflow returned to the SAG mill and cyclone overflow forwarded to a trash screen. Cyclone overflow is thickened in a pre-leach thickener prior to transferring to the bulk leach circuit. In the bulk leach circuit, gold and silver are recovered by conventional cyanide leaching in stirred tanks.
The Process Plant has the option to direct the cyclone overflow to a bulk flotation circuit if the economics are more favorable than the current strategy. Concentrate would be leached in a separate, higher intensity leach circuit equipped with a concentrate post-leach thickener. The overflow of this thickener would be forwarded to the Merrill Crowe process with solids returned to the first bulk leach tank. Flotation tails would be thickened in the pre-leach thickener prior to entering the first bulk leach tank.
Discharge solids from the bulk leach are washed in a five-stage CCD circuit and the CCD No. 1 overflow is clarified to remove fine solids. The resulting clarified solution is deaerated and treated in a Merrill-Crowe process, which employs addition of zinc powder to precipitate gold and silver. The precious metals precipitate is filtered and treated in a retort furnace for mercury removal and then smelted on site to produce gold–silver doré bars. The captured mercury is collected and disposed of safely off-site.
Underflow slurry from the fifth CCD thickener is filtered and the filter cakes are transferred to the FTSF for impoundment.
Recent modifications to the Process Plant allow FTSF seepage water to be sent to the detox circuit for treatment if desired.
The Process Plant has the option to treat underflow from the fifth CCD thickener with sulphur dioxide and oxygen to destroy residual cyanide. The detoxed slurry would be thickened prior to filtration and transferred to the FTSF.
14.3 | Key Process Design Criteria |
The key process design criteria listed in Table 14‑1 form the basis of the process flowsheet design and installed mechanical equipment.
Table 14‑1: | Process Design Criteria |
| Parameter | Unit | Value |
| Plant Throughput | t/d | 1,250 |
| Head Grade–nominal | g/t Au | 8 |
g/t Ag | 800 |
| Head Grade–design | g/t Au | 11 |
g/t Ag | 1,100 |
| Head Grade- peak | g/t Au | 13 |
g/t Ag | 1,300 |
| Overall Recovery (From mineralized material to doré)–Au | % | 98.0 |
| Overall Recovery (From mineralized material to doré)–Ag | % | 97.5 |
| Parameter | Unit | Value |
| Plant Availability | % | 91.3 |
| SMC- Axb-design (75th percentile) | kWh/t | 41 |
| Bond Ball Mill Work Index–design (75th percentile) | kWh/t | 19.4 |
| Flotation Concentrate Mass Pull | % | 2 |
| Flotation Concentrate Leach Residence Time | h | 96 |
| Concentrate Leach Slurry Density | % solids (w/w) | 15 |
| Concentrate Thickener Solid Loading | t/m2.h | 0.1 |
| Pre-Leach Thickener Solid Loading | t/m2.h | 0.6 |
| Bulk Leach Residence Time | h | 96 |
| Bulk Leach Slurry Density | % solids (w/w) | 48 |
| Total Sodium Cyanide Consumption Rate (design) | kg/t | 3.5 |
| Total Quick lime Consumption Rate (design) | kg/t | 1.76 |
| Number of CCD Wash Stages | - | 5 |
| CCD Wash Efficiency | % | 99.7 |
| Metal Recovery Method | - | Merrill Crowe |
| Cyanide Detoxification Method | - | SO2/Air |
| Tailings Thickener Solid Loading | t/m2.h | 0.6 |
| Tails Filter Cake Moisture | % | 18 |
| Tailings Management | - | Dry stacking |
Source: Ausenco, 2023.
Comminution
Operations to date have been aligned with the design, verifying the robustness of the circuit design. Material wear rates in practice have been lower than estimated during the 2021 FS Report. This may be a result of higher clay content than samples used during the lab tests.
Flotation Circuit
The flotation circuit was installed to generate a high-grade concentrate, which would be leached under aggressive conditions. The circuit is being bypassed for improved economics associated.
The flotation circuit consists of four TankCells with internal launders, the first TankCell cell is used as the conditioning tank for the nominal throughput at 57 t/h.
Cyanide Leach and Pregnant Leach Solution Recovery
Concentrate leach circuit consists of 3 leach tanks with 96-h residence time and the bulk leach circuit consists of 6 tanks with a 96-h residence time.
Solids are washed in a 5 stage CCD consisting of five 14 m thickeners.
Thickening and Filtration
Pre-leach thickener, CCD thickeners, tails thickener and filtration are operating as designed.
Merrill Crowe Circuit
The Merrill Crowe circuit is designed for a pregnant solution feed rate up to 366 m3/h and peak head grades of 1,300 g/t Ag and 13 g/t Au.
Cyanide Detox
The Cyanide detoxification circuit can operate on either slurry (as initially designed) or on solution from the North Pond. Typically, this circuit is by-passed and operates on as needed basis to maintain the North Pond with a low volume and CN concentration below the ICMC levels.
14.4 | Unit Process Description |
A conventional jaw crusher reduces the feed material particle size to P80 of 63 mm, suitable for feeding a single stage SAG mill. The nominal feed throughput of the crushing circuit is 74 t/h, at 70% availability.
The crushing circuit major equipment includes:
• | Static grizzly and hopper, |
• | Belt feeder to reclaim crushed material to feed the SAG mill, |
• | Emergency stockpile and reclaim, and |
• | Associated material handling systems (conveyors, weightometers and tramp magnet). |
Run-of-mine (ROM) mineralized material is trucked from the underground mine either to the ROM pad stockpile or directly onto the static grizzly hopper. ROM mineralized material from the stockpile is reclaimed using front-end loaders and dumped into the static grizzly hopper. The jaw crusher is a Metso C80 with a closed side setting (CSS) of 80 mm and crushes the ROM mineralized material from F80 of 159 mm to P80 of 63 mm. The crushed mineralized material is conveyed to the surge bin via the primary crusher product conveyor. A tramp metal magnet is installed at the head end of this conveyor to remove tramp. The tramp metal can be manually removed as needed.
The surge bin has a live capacity of 10 minutes for 9.5 t of storage.
Surge bin overflow is transferred to an emergency stockpile via the emergency stockpile conveyor and reclaimed from the stockpile using a front-end loader when required. The emergency stockpile provides 16 hr of storage given a plant feed rate of 57 t/h.
Crushed mineralized material is reclaimed via a belt feeder beneath the surge bin and conveyed to the SAG mill feed chute by the SAG mill feed conveyor.
A freshwater line is available for dust suppression in the crushing area if required.
A conventional SAG mill, arranged in closed circuit with a cyclone cluster, reduces the mineralized material from a F80 of 63 mm to P80 of 100 µm. The nominal feed throughput of the grinding circuit is 57 t/h, based on 91.3% availability.
The grinding circuit includes:
• | One SAG mill, 6.1 m (20 ft) in diameter by 3.66 m (12 ft) in length, powered by a 2,000 kW variable speed drive motor |
• | Two 55 kW slurry pumps to pump SAG mill discharge to cyclones, with one pump in operation and one in standby |
• | One cyclone cluster with ten 250 mm cyclones, six to eight in operation and two to four in standby |
• | Associated material handling and storage systems (sump pumps, pump boxes, bins). |
Crushed mineralized material is reclaimed from the surge bin onto the SAG mill feed conveyor and discharged into the feed chute of the SAG mill. The SAG mill is a grate discharge type mill. The grate aperture is 15 mm and has no pebble ports, so there is no recycle of pebbles.
Provisions were made in the plant layout to allow the installation of a ball-mill, the retrofit of conveyors and a pebble crusher in a potential expansion case.
The SAG mill product is discharged onto a trommel screen. Trommel screen undersize reports to a cyclone feed pump box and the oversize to a scats bunker. Process water is added to the SAG mill feed chute and cyclone feed pump box to maintain a target mill discharge slurry solids density of 70%. The cyclone cluster is fed at a nominal rate of 228 t/h to separate the coarse and fine particles in the SAG mill trommel screen undersize. The cyclone underflow returns to the SAG mill feed. The nominal circulating load is 400%. The cyclone overflow with a particle size of P80 of 100
µm reports to the bulk leaching circuit after flowing through a trash screen to remove foreign material. Trash reports to the trash bunker which is periodically removed for emptying.
A vertical cantilevered centrifugal sump pump services the area. Grinding media for the SAG mill is introduced by use of a dedicated kibble and a grinding building jib crane.
14.4.3 | Bulk Rougher Flotation |
The bulk flotation circuit is not currently being operated. The following description outlines how the equipment was originally designed to be operated.
The bulk rougher flotation circuit is installed to generate a small amount of concentrate, 2% mass pull, that would contain a significant portion of the gold and silver from the ore. The high-grade flotation concentrate would be leached in a concentrate leach circuit with high-intensity cyanide conditions to dissolve the gold and silver from the flotation concentrate into a small stream of high-grade pregnant solution. The produced pregnant solution would be further processed in the Merrill Crowe circuit in conjunction with the pregnant solution recovered from the flotation tailings (bulk) leach circuit.
The flotation circuit as built includes:
• | One trash screen, currently in use to clean the grinding cyclone overflow |
• | Four 5 m3 forced-air tank cells, arranged in series. |
Cyclone overflow would gravitate over the vibrating trash screen, to remove foreign material prior to flotation. Screen undersize would gravitate to the first flotation cell which is used as conditioning tank at current throughput (57 t/h).
PAX and Aeroflot 208 would be added as preferred collectors, respectively in the first and third flotation cells using dedicated pumps. Frother would also be dosed into the first and third flotation cells using dedicated pumps.
Fine gold and silver associated with sulphides would be floated in the bulk rougher circuit and flow by gravity to the concentrate leach feed pump box via overflow launder. The 2019 testwork showed that the flotation concentrate would have particle size of 30 µm and no regrinding step would be required prior to concentrate leaching.
The flotation tailings would flow by gravity to the flotation tails pump box and would be thickened in a pre-leach thickener prior to leaching in the bulk leach circuit.
On average recovery of 62% and 64% of gold and silver respectively was estimated to the flotation concentrate.
Leaching of separate flotation products is not currently in use at the Operation. The following description outlines how the equipment was originally designed to be operated.
The concentrate leaching circuit would leach precious metal values from the flotation concentrate in a series of stirred tanks and the corresponding leach residue would be thickened in a concentrate thickener. Thickener overflow, a pregnant solution containing high concentrations of dissolved precious metals, would be pumped to a pre-clarifier for removal of fine suspended solids before being introduced to the Merrill Crowe circuit. Thickener underflow pumps would transfer the concentrate leach residue to bulk leach circuit for further extraction of the gold and silver, and for recovery of the unconsumed cyanide.
Gold and silver contained in the flotation tailings or whole ore is extracted in the bulk leaching circuit. Residue from the bulk circuit flows to the CCD thickeners for washing.
Flotation Concentrate Cyanide Leaching
This circuit is not currently operating. The flotation concentrate would be leached in three mechanically-agitated leach tanks operating in series.
The nominal feed rate of flotation concentrate to the corresponding cyanide leaching circuit was designed to be
1.2 t/h.
The flotation concentrate leaching circuit as built includes:
• | Three 6.8 m diameter x 6.8 m high leach tanks, |
• | One 5 m diameter high-rate concentrate thickener, and |
• | Associated material handling and storage systems (agitators, pumps, sump pumps, pump boxes). |
The concentrate leaching circuit would operate continuously; leaching reagents, including sodium cyanide and lead nitrate would be added to facilitate gold and silver extractions. The operating pH of the leach circuit would be maintained between 10.5 and 11.0 with additions of milk of lime to drive leach kinetics, to limit corrosion and to prevent the loss of cyanide to gaseous hydrogen cyanide. Milk of lime is actively produced in a lime slaking plant located on site for use in the bulk leaching circuit.
Gold and silver leaching would occur in a series of three tanks, providing over 96 hours of total residence time. Each leach tank is designed to have a live volume of 229 m³, providing 32 hours retention. The target solids concentration for the leach circuit would be 15% w/w; barren solution would be added to the concentrate leach feed pump box to achieve the desired leach density.
Leach discharge slurry would gravitate to a thickener where it would be mixed with diluted flocculant to increase particle settling rate. The concentrate leach thickener is a 5 m diameter high-rate thickener, which would increase the solids density to a target of 30% w/w. Thickener underflow slurry would be pumped to the feed box ahead of the bulk leach circuit using a concentrate leach thickener underflow pump. Thickener overflow, containing the bulk of the precious metal values, would be pumped to a pre-clarifier.
Oxygen is produced at site using vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) technology, with a supply of liquid oxygen available as a backup when necessary. Oxygen would be supplied from the oxygen plant, as required, and delivered to the concentrate leaching circuit via the tank agitator shafts. The dissolved oxygen would be maintained at the range of 20–30 mg/L in the circuit.
To allow for maintenance of individual concentrate leach tanks, the circuit is configured with a provision which allows for slurry to bypass any single leach tank and report directly to the subsequent leach tank, allowing one tank to be removed for service without requiring the entire circuit to be stopped.
Bulk Cyanide Leaching
Whole ore feed (or bulk flotation tailings when the flotation circuit is in use) is thickened and subsequently leached in the bulk leaching circuit, which consists of six, mechanically-agitated leach tanks operating in series. The nominal feed rate to the bulk cyanide leaching circuit is 57 t/h.
The bulk cyanide leaching circuit includes:
• | One 14 m diameter high-rate thickener, |
• | Six 12 m diameter x 12.7 m high leaching tanks, and |
• | Associated material handling and storage systems (agitators, pumps, sump pumps, pump boxes). |
The whole ore or flotation tails at 30% w/w solids density are fed to the pre-leach thickener to increase the solids density to 46% w/w target density prior to feed to the bulk leach circuit.
Sodium cyanide, for gold and silver dissolution, is added to the leach circuit via cyanide ring main and dosing valves and maintained ~2,000mg/L. The primary cyanide dosing point is the leach feed distribution box, with a further addition point located in each leach tank. Lead nitrate is added to the leach circuit to reduce the detrimental effect of metallic sulphides and decrease cyanide consumption.
Milk of lime is used to maintain the operating pH of the leach circuit between 10.5 and 11.0.
Oxygen is introduced into the circuit via the leach tank agitator shafts, to maintain the desired oxygen level at 20 mg/L in the circuit. The bulk leach circuit has a 96 hr retention time, equally distributed across the six tanks. Slurry exiting the leach circuit flows by gravity to the CCD circuit to recover pregnant solution from leached slurry.
The leach circuit is serviced by a vertical cantilevered centrifugal sump pump, which will return spillage to a nearby leach tank.
14.4.5 | CCD Circuit and Pre-Clarifier |
A five-stage CCD washing circuit and a pre-clarifier is used to recover pregnant solution from the cyanide leached slurry. The nominal throughput of the circuit is 57 t/h.
The washing circuit includes:
• | Five 14 m diameter high-rate thickeners, |
• | One 23 m diameter pre-clarifier, |
• | One pregnant solution storage tank, with a live volume of 460 m3, and |
• | Associated material handling and storage systems (feed boxes, pumps, sump pumps, pump boxes). |
The leached slurry gravitates to the first CCD thickener and underflow from the first thickener is fed to the subsequent CCD thickener. The process repeats until the solids flow reports to the last CCD thickener (CCD No. 5). The underflow of CCD No. 5 is pumped to the tailings stock tank prior to filtration or to the cyanide detoxification circuit if the process flowsheet in operation requires it. The barren solution from the Merrill Crowe circuit is added to CCD No. 5 as wash solution. Overflow solution from the final CCD thickener flows in a counter current mode to the preceding thickener. The overflow from the first CCD thickener flows to a pre-clarifier feed box. The recovered pregnant solution from the concentrate leach circuit would combine with the pregnant solution recovered from CCD circuit. Pregnant solution is clarified in the pre-clarifier prior to storage in the pregnant solution tank which feeds the Merrill Crowe circuit. The pre-clarifier underflow is pumped to bulk cyanide leach feed box.
The washing ratio, washing solution volume to feed solution volume, is designed at 3.5:1 to achieve an overall CCD washing performance efficiency of higher than 99%.
Settling of solids is aided by the addition of diluted flocculant at each stage of CCD and diluted coagulant to the pre-clarifier.
Antiscalant is added to the pregnant solution tank as required to inhibit scale formation in the Merrill Crowe circuit.
One vertical cantilevered centrifugal sump pump is provided in the CCD area to return spillage to the circuit.
14.4.6 | Merrill Crowe Circuit |
Pregnant liquor from the pre-clarifier is stored in the pregnant solution tank. Clarified pregnant solution is treated by the Merrill Crowe process which employs zinc-dust cementation to recover the contained precious metals. The barren solution is recycled to the CCD wash circuit as wash solution. The nominal solution feed rate to the Merrill Crowe precipitation circuit is 300 m3/h, although the circuit was designed to treat up to 366 m3/h of pregnant liquor.
The Merrill Crowe circuit was provided as a vendor package, and includes:
• | Two rotating disk filters as clarifier filters, each having a 139 m2 filtration area, |
• | One air/water separator, |
• | One de-aeration tower vacuum pump, |
• | One zinc mixing cone, including a hopper and a feeder, |
• | Two precipitation filter press units, each having a 185 m2 filtration area, |
• | One pre-coat preparation tank, |
• | One body feed preparation tank, and |
• | Associated material handling and storage systems (pumps, sump pumps, pump boxes, feed conveyors). |
Pregnant solution from the pre-clarifier is discharged to the pregnant solution tank which provides 1.5 hr of surge capacity to cater to the semi-continuous nature of the clarification and precipitation stages in the Merrill Crowe circuit.
A further stage of clarification is required to reduce the suspended solids content to <5 mg/L for efficient zinc precipitation. The clarifying filter feed pumps forward the pregnant solution from the pregnant solution tank to clarifying disk filters to remove any residual solids. Two filters are provided in a duty/standby arrangement. Pre-coat is required to enhance capture of the fine solids at the start of each cycle. At the end of the filtration cycle, the clarifying filter sludge is pumped back to the CCD circuit via the clarifying filter sump pump, to minimize any losses of precious metals in the entrained solution.
Filtrate from the clarifying filters feeds the de-aeration tower. Dissolved oxygen is removed under vacuum by splashing the pregnant solution over tower packings to increase the exposed surface area. De-aeration of the solution prevents excessive zinc consumption by minimizing side reactions that oxidize zinc.
De-aerated pregnant solution is contacted with the zinc dust slurry and pumped to the precipitate filters using precipitate filter feed pumps. Zinc dust is slurried with barren solution in a zinc mixing cone. Cyanide is added to the process as required, to maintain adequate free cyanide for the precipitation reaction. A small flow of lead nitrate solution is also injected to the pregnant solution pipe prior being contacted with zinc dust to improve the precipitation efficiency. The precipitate filter feed pumps are horizontal centrifugal pumps with mechanical seals such that air cannot enter the system.
The precipitate filters are recessed plate filter presses furnished with filter cloths. Pre-coat is used at the beginning of the filter cycle to prevent cloth blinding and body feed is required to provide acceptable filtration rates. The filters will typically be operated in a duty/standby configuration and operated until the pressure reaches a predetermined value. Filtrate reports to the barren solution tank to be reused mainly as CCD wash solution. The original flowsheet allowed any excess barren solution to report to the cyanide detoxification circuit to be recycled to Process Plant as process water or could be bled from the plant as required, which is not currently necessary. The facility to recycle barren solution to the pre-clarifier feed box was included in the design in case high-grade barren solution occurs.
At the end of the precipitation filtration cycle, feed pumps are shut down, filters drained, and compressed air may be used to further dewater the cake. The filter cake, containing 50% w/w precious metals, is dropped onto precipitate carts for transfer to the doré room for smelting. The precipitate filters are located in a secured, closed room within the doré room building.
Zinc precipitate from the Merrill Crowe circuit is loaded into a mercury retort for removal of mercury and further treated by smelting into gold–silver doré. The smelting process is performed in batch mode. The circuit is in a secure enclosed area with closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras and restricted access. The doré room was designed to be able to manage the volume of doré to be produced at design grades for gold and silver.
The smelting circuit was provided as a vendor package, and the main equipment includes:
• | One 54 kW, (40 ft3) electric retort and adsorption skid, |
• | One 400 kW, (10 ft3) induction furnace, |
• | Flux dosing and flux mixer system, |
• | One gold–silver doré safe, |
• | Mechanized slag handling, and |
• | Associated material handling and other systems (molds, dryers, dust collection system). |
There is a provision in doré room layout to install a second mercury retort if the plant receives high mercury material and the inclusion is justified.
The wet precipitate filter cakes from the Merrill Crowe circuit are loaded into the mercury retort for removal of mercury. The mercury retort, as part of the vendor package, includes the retort oven, condenser, mercury trap, sulphur-impregnated carbon adsorber, and a vacuum pump with seal water separator. If present, mercury is collected in a mercury trap and decanted into a mercury flask.
Once the mercury free material has cooled following the retort process, it is mixed with fluxes and loaded into the electric furnace for smelting. The fluxes react with base metal oxides to form a slag, whilst the gold and silver remains as molten metal. The molten metal is poured into 55kg moulds, to form doré ingots at nominal composition of 0.5-1.5% Au and 85-95% Ag, and other impurities including copper and zinc. The doré bars are cleaned, assayed, stamped, and if needed, stored in a secure vault ready for periodic transfer to market.
Once solidified, slag is tipped from the slag pot onto spikes and broken slag is collected in a bin underneath and stored.
Sufficient ventilation and off-gas handling is provided in the doré room for a healthy work environment. Fume and dust exposure for the melting furnace and material handling is controlled through a ventilation system installed in the doré room, including hoods, enclosures, and fans to follow local regulations/guidelines.
A sump pump, complete with precious metals trap, is installed in the doré room to remove mercury retort condenser return water, scrubber liquid and any hose-down or spillage, and return it to pre-clarifier feed box.
14.4.8 | Cyanide Detoxification |
The cyanide detoxification circuit is operated on an as-needed basis. It is used as required on slurry (leach residue) or on solution depending on the volume contained in the North Pond and the residual CN level of the seepage solution.
The following description outlines how the circuit operates when desired.
The washed leach residue slurry from the CCD circuit is treated using a sulphur dioxide (SO2)/air process to reduce the CNWAD cyanide concentration.
The cyanide detoxification circuit includes:
• | Two cyanide detoxification reaction tanks of 4.7 m in diameter x 7 m high, operating in parallel, and |
• | Associated material handling systems (pumps, pump boxes, sump pumps). |
Thickened, washed tailings slurry from the final CCD thickener, with solids concentration of 50%, is pumped to the cyanide detoxification tanks. Barren solution is used for slurry density control. In the SO2/air process, sodium metabisulphite, oxygen, copper sulphate (catalyst) and milk of lime is added to oxidize residual free and CNWAD to cyanate, thereby reducing the CNWAD concentration to the target level prior to filtration and long-term storage of the tailings solids. The cyanide detoxification circuit as built consists of two mechanically agitated tanks, each providing a residence time of 1 hr.
Oxygen is provided from the oxygen plant as required and would be added to the tanks via agitator shafts. CNWAD levels of the cyanide detoxification discharge are being measured by analysis of regularly collected samples.
The detoxified tailings are pumped to a thickener to thicken the slurry prior to filtration and dry stacking of the final solids.
The cyanide detoxification circuit is serviced by a dedicated sump pump.
14.4.9 | Final Tailings Dewatering and Disposal |
Underflow from CCD No.5 is filtered, and the filtered solids are impounded in an on-site storage facility. A tailings thickener is provided for dewatering of the detoxified tailings and is bypassed with the cyanide detoxification circuit (on slurry). The nominal throughput of the final tailings circuit is 57 t/h.
The tailings circuit includes:
• | One 14.0 m diameter high-rate thickener, |
• | One 8.6 m diameter x 8.6 m high agitated tails filter feed tank, |
• | Two 2.1 m x 2.1 m, 120 chamber plate and frame pressure filters, |
• | One 3.5 m diameter x 3.5 m high tails filter filtrate tank, |
• | One 3.5 m diameter x 3.5 m high cloth wash water tank, and |
• | Associated material handling systems (pumps, pump boxes, sump pumps). |
Thickener underflow slurry, at 50% solids w/w, is pumped to an agitated filter feed tank, prior to being pumped to a filtration circuit for further dewatering. This tank provides 6 hr of surge capacity between the thickener and filter. Two vertical plate pressure filters were selected for this purpose to increase the solid density of the tailings from 50% w/w to 82% w/w, after which the tailings are hauled to the FSTF.
Filtered solids are impounded at the designated FTSF, located northeast of the Process Plant. Filtrate can be recycled back to the tailings thickener, where it would be combined with tailings thickener overflow solution and ultimately report to the process water tank for distribution throughout the process facilities or in current operations, filtrate is recycled back to the CCD thickeners to be used as wash solution.
Any spillage within this area is returned to the sump pump in the cyanide detoxification area, and in turn is pumped to the tailings stock tank.
14.4.10 | Reagent Handling and Storage |
The mixing and storage area for each reagent is located proximate to various addition points throughout the plant. Some reagents are delivered in 25 kg bags and manually handled from a pallet to the bag breaker for mixing and further storage. Reagents delivered in bulk bags are moved from storage to the mixing area by forklift. Electric hoists servicing in the reagent area lift the reagents to the respective reagent bag breaker that is located above the reagent mixing area.
The reagent handling system includes unloading and storage facilities, mixing tanks, stock tanks, transfer pumps, and feeding equipment.
Hydrated lime is delivered to the Process Plant in regular 20 t bulk shipments and received in a 30 t storage silo, which, at design operating rates, provides for 13 days of storage. Lime is subsequently slurried in a package slaking circuit, sized for 183 kg/hr. The resulting milk of lime slurry, at 20% CaO solids %w/v, is stored in an agitated tank and distributed to the various addition points by way of a ring-main. At the design production rate, the process facility consumes 800 t of lime annually.
Sodium cyanide, supplied in solid (briquette) form, is received in regular bulk shipments from regional suppliers in 1 t bulk bags. Sodium cyanide stock solution of 20 vol% (200 g/L NaCN) is generated on site using a solid to liquid system (SLS) to minimize potential releases and employee exposure. The stock solution storage tank provides for 12 hrs of cyanide supply at the nominal production rates. From the stock solution storage tank, sodium cyanide solution is provided to the leaching circuits and Merrill Crowe circuit as required via a ring-main. The SLS storage and make up, as well as the cyanide solution storage tank are fully contained in a bunded area and separated from the plant site. The solid sodium cyanide is stored in a fenced and locked area before being used to prepare stock solution. At the design production rate, the process facility consumes 1,600 t of sodium cyanide annually.
Table 14‑2 shows the reagents for the process.
Table 14‑2: | Summary of Reagent Used in the Process Plant |
Reagent | Preparation Method | Use | Design Consumption (t/a) | 2024 Consumptions (t/a) |
Lime | Received as hydrated lime from a 20 t pneumatic tanker truck and transferred to a silo; mixed to 20% strength; pumped to a storage tank. Dosed to concentrate leaching, bulk leaching and cyanide detoxification circuits as required | pH control added as required | 1,750 | 584.9 |
Sodium Cyanide | Received in 1 t bulk bags; mixed to 20% strength; transferred to a storage tank. Dosed using the cyanide circulation pump and a ringmain system to the concentrate and bulk cyanide leaching circuits, as well as Merrill Crowe circuit if required | Leaching agent | 1,300 | 846.4 |
Flocculant | Received as powder in 25 kg bags; mixed to 0.25% storing strength; transferred to a storage tank. Dosed directly to concentrate thickener, pre-leach thickener and CCD washing thickeners with dilution as required | Flocculation of thickener feed solids | 40 | 29.8 |
Coagulant | Received as powder in 25 kg bags; mixed to 0.25% storing strength; transferred to a storage tank, and dosed directly to pre-clarifier | Clarification of the pregnant solution | 36 | 0 |
Oxygen | Produced by oxygen plant, gasified, and sent to the concentrate and bulk cyanide leaching circuits and cyanide detoxification circuit | Cyanidation reagent, Cyanide detoxification reagent | 1,400 | 0 |
Diatomaceous Earth | Received as powder in 25 kg bags; mixed to 5% solution strength. Dosed to the clarifier and precipitate filters in Merrill-Crowe circuit | Precoat and body feed in Merrill-Crowe circuit | 410 | 213.5 |
Zinc Powder | Received as powder in 20 kg drums. Dosed to Zn mixing cone through a feeder at specific rate in Merrill-Crowe circuit | Precipitation reagent | 200 | 190.5 |
Lead Nitrate | Received as powder in 1 t bulk bags, mixed to 10% strength; transferred to a storage tank. Dosed directly to the concentrate and bulk cyanide leaching circuits, as well as Merrill-Crowe circuit | Leaching aid in cyanidation and a co-precipitation regent in Merrill-Crowe | 20 | 193.0 |
Copper Sulphate | Received as powder in 25 kg bags; mixed to 10% strength; transferred to a storage tank. Dosed to the cyanide detoxification circuit | Catalyst in the cyanide detoxification process | 500 | 0 |
Sodium Metabisulfite | Received as powder in 1 t bulk bags; mixed to 20% strength; transferred to a storage tank. Dosed to the cyanide detoxification circuit. | Reactant in the cyanide detoxification process | 500 | 8.0 |
Antiscalant | Delivered in liquid form in IBC totes. Dosed neat without dilution to pregnant solution tank and process water tank | To minimize scale build-up | 25 | 42.6 |
Flux | Received as powder in bulk; mixed with calcined charges for smelting | Fusion agent | 200 | 187.0 |
14.5.1 | Fresh Water, Raw Water, Fire Water and Potable Water |
Provisions are made for the raw water to be supplied from the underground mine, the fresh water (storm) pond, the Sonora Valley, or any combination thereof pending availability and requirement. Raw water is supplied to settling tanks for bulk removal of solids. The sediment-free water is transferred from the raw water tanks to a fresh/fire water storage tank.
Fresh water is used for the following duties:
• | Reagent mixing and preparation, |
• | General process uses in crushing area and emergency stockpile, and |
Wherever possible in the Process Plant, process water or barren solution is used to minimize freshwater consumption. The total freshwater requirement for the Process Plant is 3.6 L/s.
Potable water is also sourced from the sediment-free water in the raw water tanks. The raw water is treated in a water treatment plant prior to transferring to the potable water tank for distribution where needed.
14.5.2 | Process Water and Barren Solution |
Process water consists of reclaimed water from the pre-leach thickener overflow and tailings thickener overflow. Barren solution is used as make-up for the process water supply as required. Process water is stored in a process water tank and pumped to the grinding circuit, lime preparation, and cloth wash water for tailings filters. Any excess process water is transferred to the collection pond. If impurities build-up in the Process Plant, a flow of process water to a collection pond allows for the required bleeding from the system. No water is expected to be discharged to the environment.
Barren solution from the Merrill Crowe circuit is stored in a barren solution tank, recycled to the CCD washing circuit as wash water and used for flocculant dilution. The residual barren solution is used wherever possible, to minimize the freshwater consumption. Barren solution is used for concentrate leach feed and cyanide detoxification feed dilution to achieve target density, and in stock cyanide solution preparation. The barren solution within the Merrill Crowe circuit is used for pre-clarifier coagulant dilution, sluicing water for clarifier filters, pre-coat and body feed preparation, zinc dust slurry preparation, and vacuum pump gland seal water to minimize the freshwater usage. Any solution will report to a collection pond.
The oxygen plant generates oxygen using vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) technology. The oxygen plant consists of five units each with oxygen production capacity of 954 kg/day with 38 kW installed power requirement for each unit. Oxygen is produced at 93% purity at 100 psig (6.8 barg).
Oxygen is used in the bulk leaching circuit. Oxygen is also available for use in the concentrate leach circuit and the cyanide detoxification circuit. The total oxygen required for the plant is 3.8 t/d. A 60 Mt liquid oxygen tank is available as a back-up oxygen supply.
The total power line capacity for the Operation is 7.6 MW with a normal operating load of 5.1 MW. The plant currently operates at approximate draw of 3.0 MW.
Power is supplied to site from the regional grid, as described in Section 15.
14.5.5 | High Pressure and Low Pressure Air |
High-Pressure Air for Tailings Area
High-pressure air at 1,000 kPa(g) is provided by two high-pressure air compressors, operating in a lead-lag configuration for tailings filters. The portion that is required for instrument air at 700 kPa(g) for this area is dried and filtered and distributed via the tailing area instrument air receiver.
Plant and Instrument Air for the Balance of the Process Plant
Plant and instrument air for the balance of the Process Plant at 700 kPa(g) is provided by two Process Plant air compressors, operating in a lead-lag configuration. The entire high-pressure air produced is dried and filtered and is used to satisfy both plant and instrument air demand. Dried air is distributed via the Process Plant air receiver, with additional receivers for precipitate filter in Merrill Crowe circuit and dust collector in the refinery area.
Low-Pressure Air for Flotation Circuit
Low-pressure air to flotation cells is supplied by one dedicated blower.
14.5.6 | Instrumentation and Process Control |
A distributed control system (DCS) is installed in the Process Plant. The process control system consists of individual, locally mounted, control panels located near the equipment and a PC-based operator interface station (OIS) located in a centralized control room. The local control panels act as a local point for monitoring and control of the nearby equipment and instrumentation. They also act as the distribution point of power for instrumentation. Major process performances, including process rates, mill power draw, and motor variable speeds, are displayed in the centralized control room. DCS and OIS perform process control and data management through equipment and processing interlocking, control, alarming, trending, event logging, and report generation. In this manner, the Process Plant is monitored and operated automatically from operator workstations in conjunction with control systems.
14.5.7 | Sampling and Quality Control |
A metallurgical and assay laboratory is provided to conduct daily assays for quality control and optimize process performance. The assay laboratory is equipped with the necessary analytical instruments to provide all the routine assays for mine samples, geological samples, Process Plant samples, and samples taken for environmental monitoring. The metallurgical laboratory undertakes all basic test work to monitor metallurgical performance and to improve the process flowsheet and efficiencies.
14.6 | QP Comments on Recovery Methods |
The operating data demonstrates that the Process Plant is operating well and targeting ~1,250 t/d and achieving expected Au and Ag recoveries.
Infrastructure existing for the mining and processing operations include:
• | Underground mine, including portals, ramps, and vents; |
• | Roads: main access road, site access road, bridge crossing, borrow pit haul road, filtered tailings storage facility (FTSF) haul road, waster rock storage facility (WRSF) haul road, and explosives access road; |
• | Diversion and collection channels, culverts, and containment structures; |
• | Site main gate and guard house (2); |
• | Power and water distribution; |
• | Warehouse and truck shop, offices, medical clinic, and nursery; |
• | Assay laboratory (off-site facility); |
• | Reagent storage facilities; |
• | Mineralized stockpiles and waste rock storage facilities (WRSFs); |
• | Filtered Tailings Storage Facility (FTSF); |
• | Nuclear devices storage facility; |
• | Hazardous waste interim storage facility; and |
• | Exploration core shacks. |
Figure 15‑1 shows the site layout.
Figure 15‑1: Current Site Layout
Source: SilverCrest, 2023.
The Las Chispas Operation can be accessed from Highway 89 via an existing
10 km access road
Access to the site is controlled by two security gates on the access road. The first security gate is on the gravel road
100 meters from Highway 89 and the second just before the accommodation camp. The second security gate is the main control point to the Las Chispas Operation.
A single lane bridge ‑located
250 meters east of Highway 89, was built over the Rio Sonora with a length of
171m and a capacity of 72.5 t, sufficient to support the operation.
Additions and upgrades to existing access roads around the Las Chispas Operation site were completed to access mine infrastructure including mine portals, Process Plant, explosive magazines, potable water well, FTSF, WRSF, seepage ponds, and all other ancillary infrastructures.
The Las Chispas Operation is equipped with an accommodation camp with a capacity of 500 beds. The camp is connected to the national electricity grid and is also equipped with an emergency genset capable of handling the entire camp's electrical load. The camp is serviced by a potable water treatment plant and sewage treatment plant. Garbage is collected on site and disposed of at the Arizpe municipality waste disposal facility.
While the camp is available for all staff, the company approach has been to allow staff to choose between on-site accommodation or living in the surrounding communities. To date 20% of all employees and contractors have elected to live in the surrounding communities.
The camp is equipped with kitchen and dining facilities to support the 24-hour operation, laundry, and maintenance camp shop. The camp also includes a gym, a multifunctional sports field, a recreation facility, barbecue area and a chapel.
Fuel and gasoline requirements are temporarily being distributed by Energex. This service provider has authorized permits for distribution.
Diesel fuel requirements for the mining equipment, process and ancillary facilities are supplied from two modular above-ground diesel fuel storage tanks located near the Process Plant. The fuel storage tanks have a capacity of 50,000 L of diesel and 20,000 L of gasoline, sufficient for nine days of operation. The above-ground tanks include containment, and dispensing equipment conforming to all applicable regulations.
Electrical power is provided to site via a 33 kV connected to the national grid, by way of
81 km of overhead power line, divided into two sections.
The first section, from Nacozari de Garcia Substation to Los Hoyos is
26 km long and owned by Comisión Federal de Electricidad (Federal Electricity Commission – CFE). This section was an older overhead power line, which was upgraded by CFE (conductor size and poles) to support the additional power required at the Las Chispas Operation.
The second section of the power line is new and has a length of
55 km. This section goes from Los Hoyos to Las Chispas Operation, and it is owned by LLA. Right-of-way agreements are in place.
Power factor correction equipment has been installed on both the 33 kV line and at the 4.16kV distribution bus of the Process Plant to ensure a lagging load power factor of 0.99. The 2,000 kW SAG mill motor is the largest motor on the mine controlled by a Variable Speed Drive.
The actual total normal operating load for the entire operation has been averaging between 4.1 and 4.5 MW (normalized at 100% load factor) including the Process Plant, ancillary facilities, camps, and mine portals, however as the underground mine continue to ramp-up and expand, this operating load is expected to increase slightly over the next few years. The contracted power demand with CFE is 7.65 MW, which is expected to be sufficient for the LOM.
15.6 | Power Distribution and Emergency Power |
Power is distributed internally through the mine site at 33 kV. At the Process Plant a 10 MVA transformer stepdown the voltage to 4.16 kV to serve the grinding and CCD areas of the Process Plant. Backup power is provided by a 1.25 MW generator to CCD’s equipment like agitators in case of utility failure. An Automatic transfer switch is installed in the CCD electrical room to automatically switch between grid and generator power in the event of utility power failure.
For the Babicanora area, a 3.5 MVA stepdown transformer to 4.16 kV installed at the Santa Rosa portal provides power to the underground mine distribution system. A 1 MW standby generator is also installed at the portal and provides power to essential loads, in the event of utility failure.
Three more small generators of varied sizes also provide backup power to the camp, offices, maintenance shop and the water potable treatment plant.
On-site communication systems include a voice over internet protocol (VoIP) telephone system, a local area network (LAN) with wired and wireless access points, hand-held
very high frequency (VHF) radios, and a leaky feeder network for the underground mine. Internet service is provided through a series of communication towers from Hermosillo to the Las Chispas Operation. A point-to-point link from the general offices in Hermosillo to the operation, exploration and administration offices, is operational via towers. The system is providing redundant communication equipment with two services in Hermosillo: a 200 Mbps fiber dedicated internet and a 200 Mbps symmetric fiber internet, and three other satellite internet services in: administration office, exploration office and construction offices.
A redundant communication system has been installed via a separate set of towers to reduce the exposure of the current system to weather elements. It uses the fiber optic lines on the 33 kV Power Line. Additionally, satellite communication by StarLink has been added for emergency situations.
Communication at site is being handled by 7 km surface fiber optic ring network which connects every operational site including the UG mine.
A complete fire protection system is operational at site. It includes a detection and alarm system, a fire water supply and distribution system, a water-based fire protection system, and special hazard fire protection system (as per applicable regulations). Fire detectors, alarms, extinguishers, and towers have been installed where required. The firewater distribution network is maintained under constant pressure with a jockey pump and has been sectionalized to minimize loss of fire protection.
Yard hydrants are limited to the fuel storage tank area. Wall hydrants are used in lieu of yard hydrants, and these are located on the outside walls of the buildings.
Fire protection within buildings includes sprinkler systems and portable fire extinguishers.
Sewage collected from the camp and ancillary buildings is pumped to the two rotating-biological-contactor type sewage treatment modules for treatment. Treated effluent is accumulated in tanks before being recycled on site roads as dust suppressant.
15.10 | Hazardous Waste Interim Storage Facility |
A storage facility for hazardous waste has been built at site to allow for temporary storage of ancillary wastes, such as used oils and greases, before they are transported off-site for disposal by a third-party.
A nursery has been built to conserve the flora rescued from the areas where infrastructure, Process Plant, roads, bridges, and power lines have been built. The nursery is also used to grow additional flora as per the requirements of the permits.
15.12 | Nuclear Devices Storage Facility |
The Las Chispas Operation has a radioactive source storage facility authorized by the Comisión Nacional de Seguridad Nuclear. The use of this storage facility is exclusively for safeguarding radioactive sources that are not in use to ensure the safety of personnel and avoid unnecessary exposure. This facility's construction was done in compliance with the radiological and physical safety requirements. Access to the warehouse is limited to persons authorized by the Commission to attend to emergencies. This warehouse is currently empty because the six radioactive sources are in operation.
15.13 | Mine Related Infrastructure |
15.13.1 | Waste Rock Storage Facilities |
Waste Rock Storage Facility (WRSF) 1 is between Santa Rosa Portal and Babi Central Portals. The maximum capacity of WRSF 1 has been estimated at 899,500 t. This stockpile is being used to temporarily store the development waste before returning it to rockfill the mined-out stope. WRSF 2 is east of the accommodation camp. WRSF 2 is located where the expansion of the FTSF is expected to be located. It is expected that WRSF 2 will be reclaimed ahead of WRSF 1.
Ore stockpiles are located near the crusher. The stockpiles are segregated into several different piles typically by grade: marginal grade, low grade, medium grade, and high grade. At times, a stockpile of higher level of clays has also been used.
Blend fingers (BF) is the term being used to describe the temporary stockpiles built to control the grade to the Process Plant. They contain between 2,000 and 3,000 Tonnes on the crusher pad. They are built in 3 to 5 layers of ore and dozed between each layer. Once completed, the BF is reclaimed by a 5 yards loader and fed into the crusher.
The site roads provide access to the on-site facilities. All roads have been designed for a speed of
30 km/hr and a slope limit of 12%. Most site roads have two lanes.
All new facilities and surrounding areas have been graded to ensure stormwater drains away from the facilities during rainfall. Drainage ditches are 0.6 m bottom channels with a minimum longitudinal grade of 0.5%. At the intersection of drainage paths and access roads, water is conveyed across the road via culvert crossings. Culverts have been installed with rip-rap erosion protection at inlets and outlets and require regular maintenance to keep them sediment free and free-flowing during rainfall events.
The warehouse facility consists of a pre-engineered steel structure with a roof and low walls and limited interior support steel structures. The building is supported on concrete spread footings and concrete grade walls along its perimeters. Sumps and trenches were constructed to collect wastewater in the maintenance bays.
The warehouse area also includes several other buildings and containers. It also uses a large outside area that is surrounded by a fence to prevent undesired access.
The
main office is west of the Process Plant and just below the water tanks. The main offices house the mining team (operations, geology, and engineering) as well as some G & A departments such as environment, management, finances, procurement, and human resources.
15.15.2 | Process Plant Offices |
The Process Plant office is within the fenced area of the plant and houses the process operations management team and some metallurgical staff. ‑
The Process Plant maintenance team is in the main maintenance shop.
The metallurgical lab consists of several trailers connected. It houses the metallurgical team and the metallurgical testing facilities.
Other offices are located in different parts of the Las Chispas Operation, which are used by safety, site services, warehouse, contractors, and IT personnel.
The medical facilities are located east of the Process Plant, made up of two medical offices and a module for the immediate attention of workers, as well as a rescue unit to carry out transfers in cases requiring hospital attention.
The primary crushing area features a concrete foundation, steel structures for supporting process equipment, platforms, and walkways.
The Process Plant area; which includes comminution, flotation, residue handling and gold/ silver recovery; is not fully roofed and principal construction is on concrete foundations, with steel structures for supporting process equipment, platforms, and walkways. Where required, some areas of the Process Plant have been roofed.
Process Plant cranage is provided by a mobile crane for most areas. Exception to this is the filter area, where a gantry type crane is available for operation and maintenance.
The Process Plant is equipped with elevated steel platforms in the grinding area and over the leach tanks and other large tanks for maintenance access.
The Process Plant foundation consists of concrete spread footings and containment bunds forming the secondary containment area, along the building perimeters and a slab-on-grade floor. The floor surfaces have localized areas that are sloped toward sumps for clean-up operations.
The Process Plant is also surrounded by a tertiary containment area built on compacted soil and connected via concrete drainage point to the Emergency Pond.
The Merrill Crowe facility is housed outside and within
close proximity to the Doré Room.
The doré room has been constructed to restrict access. The facility is monitored 24 hours/d by security personnel. Access to the doré room is restricted to authorized personnel only.
The gold and silver recovery and smelting areas have been provided with sufficient ventilation to mitigate the potential impact of off gas produced from the melting furnace and dust generated from flux mixing.
Gold–silver doré products are not being stored at site. Doré product transportation is undertaken on a frequent basis by contractors using armored trucks.
15.15.4 | Reagent Storage Facilities |
Reagent storage facilities are available in various locations around the Process Plant. This approach limits travelling distance with chemicals, reduces potential for spill, reduces the risk of incompatible reagents, and provides overall productivity.
• | The key facilities for water management include: |
• | Underground mine dewatering, predominantly from backfilling operations, |
• | Process Plant (including fresh and process water tanks), |
• | Filtered tailings storage facility (FTSF), |
• | Surface water diversion and water management structures, |
• | Fresh water supply system, including pumps and piping; and, |
• | Sediment and erosion control measures for the facilities. |
The water management strategy uses water within the Operations area to the maximum practical extent. This involves collecting and managing site runoff from disturbed areas and maximizing the recycling of process water. The water supply sources are as follows:
• | Precipitation runoff from the mine site facilities, |
• | Water recycled from the tailings dewatering system, |
• | Groundwater from the underground mine dewatering system for fresh water supply and potable water, |
• | Treated black and grey water, in small quantities, from the buildings, and |
• | If needed, water can be drawn from the Sonora Valley for fresh water supply and potable water. |
A deterministic annual water balance model was developed for the site using the site data, which included the characterization of climate, hydrometric, hydrogeologic and surface water conditions in the mine development area.
For developing the water balance, the following components were considered:
• | Water entering the operations area from precipitation and surface or groundwater sources, |
• | Water exiting the operations area through evaporation or infiltration, and |
• | Water entrained in the filtered tailings and exiting the system. |
System Inflows
The main water sources identified for the Las Chispas Operation consist of 1) groundwater from the underground pumping system; 2) fresh water from the Sonora Valley; and 3) surface water resulting from precipitation in contact areas and retained in contact water ponds. Based on a hydrogeological characterization of the site as well as recent pumping tests conducted in the Las Chispas underground mining area (Hydro-Ressources, 2020), the groundwater source located in the historic Las Chispas workings can consistently supplement
9.6 m
3/h. Future studies will focus on fault areas within Las Chispas mine area that could produce up to 22 m
3/h of groundwater, potentially becoming the main source of fresh water for the Las Chispas Operation.
Water rights have been negotiated with the local national regulators to use up to
34.2 m
3/h of water from the Sonora Valley. The mine groundwater and the Sonora Valley sources provide
43.8 m
3/h, which is more than the required 29 to
36 m
3/h of fresh water for the LOM.
Additional sources of water include an existing historic water reservoir on site, which has an effective capacity of 42,000 m
3, that can function as an emergency supply of water for up to two months (at a total mine demand of
29 m
3/h) depending on the season.
Occasional inflows to the system will come from the FTSF contact water pond during the rainy season, which can supplement inflows from the valley and underground dewatering system to satisfy water demands.
System Outflows
Water demands include: the Process Plant, the underground mine, water entrained in the tailings and going to the FTSF, water for construction and dust suppression, and evaporative losses (Wood, 2021).
Based on the Process Plant water balance (with occasional bleed scenario) the water demand for the Process Plant is 11.9 m3/h (Ausenco, 2023).
The current estimates of water loss as pore water in the filtered tailings is
10 m
3/h. This amount exceeds optimum water for tailings compaction but evaporation loss (which exceeds average precipitation all year round) allows for tailings placement and compaction on most days. On days when there is more precipitation and the tailings exceed the optimum moisture content, tailings that have not been graded and compacted are dumped in designated areas until the climatic conditions allow again for moisture loss due to evaporation. Alternatively, although thus far it has not been necessary, tailings can be covered with plastic sheeting (or raincoats) until the rain subsides and tailings placement and compaction are resumed.
The demand from the underground mine is 12.5 m3/h. However, most of this water is reused, therefore a 4.7 m3/h constant demand has been estimated in balance calculations.
Water will also be required for dust suppression in the FTSF, roads and miscellaneous structures. A, 2.2 m3/h demand has been estimated based on current consumption and similar projects in semi-desert regions of Mexico.
Reclaim Water System
Reclaim water for use in the mill processes is pumped from the tailings filtrate water tank to the process water storage tank. The six process water storage tanks store a 24-hour supply of mill process water, which is gravity fed to the Process Plant site. Additional process water is obtained from other sources described in Section 15.18.10.
Additional Water Management Facilities
Additional facilities include contact water ponds for each FTSF, a contact water pond in the Process Plant area, settling and monitoring ponds for the temporary waste dump and mineralized material stockpile and a mine water reclaim pond in the proximity of the main portal.
15.18 | Filtered Tailings Storage Facility |
A FTSF design was developed based on the mine plan, the limited available construction materials, and to avoid risks associated with storage of conventional slurried tailings behind a dam. The tailings being stored on surface are thickened, filtered, and delivered by trucks to the FTSF. Two facilities have been designed to store up to 4.5 Mt.
Due to their unsaturated condition and
predominantly dilatant geotechnical behavior, filter-pressed dry-stacked or filtered tailings, do not need large retention structures (dams) and allow for the mitigation of physical stability risks. Additionally, once placed and compacted, filtered tailings tend to be
very low permeability materials, which in combination with adequate surface water management systems results in a structure that significantly reduces the quantity of water that can migrate into the natural environment. Another advantage of filtered tailings is that water recovered in the filtration step can be recycled into the metallurgical process. Moreover, in comparison with conventional slurry tailings facilities, filtered tailings stacks
generally require a smaller footprint for tailings storage, are easier to progressively reclaim, and can have lower long-term (closure) liability in terms of potential environmental impacts.
The FTSFs locations were selected according to the criteria established by the Mexican authorities through the NOM-141-SEMARNAT-2003 standard, with a focus on the integrity and stability of the FTSFs. Accordingly, hydraulic aspects related to the catchment area and large return-period precipitation events as well as geotechnical aspects related to location and properties of the soil and rock material underlying the Las Chispas Operation area were considered.
In addition, the selected FTSF sites have the following advantages:
• | Proximity to the Process Plant and mine portal, |
• | Closest population center (Sinoquipe) located 20 km downstream of the proposed FTSF structures, |
• | Areas with minor human activity both in the catchment basin as well as downstream of both proposed FTSFs structures, |
• | The selected FTSF sites are not within the footprint of what would be considered federal surface water bodies according to the Comisión Nacional del Agua (CONAGUA), |
• | Absence of aquifer and groundwater production wells in the FTSF areas, and |
• | Underlying bedrock with low permeability at shallow depths (5 m or less) that limits the vertical infiltration of water. |
The FTSFs have a projected maximum elevation of 1,219 masl in the East FTSF and 1,187 masl in the NW FTSF. The East FTSF is in the eastern vicinity of the Process Plant and when completed will cover an area of
102,000 m
2. The NW FTSF, when constructed, will be
300 m northwest of the Process Plant, and cover an area of
48,000 m
2. At this time, it is anticipated that the East FTSF will store up to 3.1 Mt of the tailings production, while the remainder (150-200 kt) of the filtered tailings production will be stored at the NW FTSF.
15.18.2 | Geotechnical Characterization of Tailings |
Filtered tailings have been stacked in the Phase 1 FTSF area since the middle of 2022. Based on the Unified Soil Classification System (SUCS), the tailings classify
predominantly as Sandy SILT (ML) with a smaller portion of tailings classifying as low plasticity Silty CLAY (CL).
The tailings placed in the FTSF range from 70% to 85% by weight of its particles passing the No. 200 mesh (0.075 mm) and a Specific Gravity of 2.69. Based on the standard Proctor compaction test, these tailings have a maximum dry density ranging from 17.7 to 19.6 kN/m3 and an optimum geotechnical moisture content (weight of water over the weight of solids) of 13.0 to 16.5%.
Direct shear tests and triaxial tests from representative samples of placed tailings have returned internal effective friction angles φ´ of 32 to 35 degrees and cohesion “c” values of zero to 80 KPa. The average saturated hydraulic conductivity in reconstituted samples as measured in a flexible wall permeameter in the laboratory ranged from 2.3E-05 to 4.3E-
06 cm/s.
Swell/collapse tests on tailings samples at the proposed compaction conditions of 95% maximum dry density and minus 2.0% of optimum moisture content have resulted in collapse of 0.5%, which translates into a low collapse potential.
Also, unsaturated soil mechanics capillary humidity retention tests have been conducted under similar remolded conditions to define infiltration from precipitation and runoff in the filtered tailings once placed and compacted. These tests covered ranges of zero suction (saturation) up to a 0.6% humidity that reached a maximum suction of 1,550 bar (15,810 m of water column).
15.18.3 | Geotechnical Analyses |
Geotechnical characterization of the filtered tailings that are being placed in the Phase 1 FTSF is conducted on a regular basis to monitor changes in the gradation, plasticity, and strength properties to reflect these potential changes in the current and projected stability of the
tailings facility. Thus far, the friction angles have had a narrow range of values between 32 and 35 degrees, and a cohesion range between zero and 80 kPa. Therefore, for geotechnical evaluation purposes, an angle of internal friction φ = 33 degrees and cohesion C=0 have been used for limit equilibrium stability analyses.
15.18.4 | Infiltration Analyses |
A series of infiltration modelling analyses have been updated to estimate the infiltration during construction and through the lifetime of the FTSF (WSP, 2023). These analyses have been performed using the commercially available finite element 2D software SEEP/W, which can perform steady-state and transient flow analyses in porous media. Infiltration modelling indicated that under the anticipated filtered tailings placement and compaction conditions, and the site-specific climatological conditions, little to no infiltration from the filtered TSF into the native ground would be expected. Despite the infiltration modelling results, the FTSF was designed and constructed with a 2 mm HDPE liner as well as a subsurface water collection system (subdrain) to capture potential infiltration during the early construction stages.
15.18.5 | Geotechnical Stability Analyses |
Geotechnical stability analyses have been conducted for the design and are updated on a yearly basis using the commercially available computer program Slide v.8 (Rocscience, 2019), which enables the user to perform limit equilibrium slope stability calculations using a variety of methods and failure surface search routines. This software allows analysis of either individual slip surfaces or application of search algorithms to calculate the critical failure surface (i.e., lowest deterministic factor of safety) for a given set of soil shear strength properties, geometry, pore-water pressure, and loading conditions.
The stability of the FTSF is regularly evaluated, at least annually or as appropriate based on performance or construction conditions, for two loading conditions:
2. | Seismic loading conditions using pseudo-static analyses. |
The existing configuration of the East FTSF meets the design criteria for stability under static and seismic loading based on the site conditions and the characterization of the materials that currently compose the
tailings structure. Additionally, the projected geometry of subsequent filtered tailings stacking would meet the specified factors of safety for stability, provided the placement specifications for compacted tailings density and moisture continue to be implemented.
15.18.6 | Key FTSF Design Elements |
The FTSF structures were designed to store together an approximate capacity of up to 4.5 Mt of tailings (current Mineral Reserve is 3.3 Mt) with an overall slope of 2.8:1 (H:V), slope between benches of 2.2:1 (H:V), and maximum approximate heights of 50–56 m (measured from the lowest portion of the starting buttress to the maximum elevation of the dry stacks).
15.18.7 | Non-Contact Surface Water Diversion Systems |
Non-contact surface water diversion structures consist of ditches that divert the surface water uphill from the footprint of the FTSF and prevent it from encountering the tailings placed downstream. These diversion channels were excavated before construction of the FTSF to minimize contact water generation and reduce the required size of the contact water ponds.
A competent foundation is fundamental for the stability and adequate performance of the FTSF. Most of the existing East FTSF foundation material consisted of the shallow underlying rock. In those areas where the foundation soil did not have to be removed, the foundation soil was scarified, moistened, and compacted prior to geomembrane installation or placement of any structural element.
15.18.9 | Contact Water Subdrain System Installation |
This system was designed to capture water from
possible infiltrations into the FTSF structure. Numerical modelling to simulate the natural processes of precipitation, infiltration, and evaporation on the surface of the compacted filtered tailings indicated that infiltration into the filtered tailings would be negligible. However, as an additional environmental and geotechnical risk mitigation measure and to drain potential infiltrations in the FTSF, the installation of a subdrain system at the bottom of the facility was constructed that could direct contact water to the pond downstream for storage, monitoring, and reuse in the Process Plant. This subdrain system consists of 12” and 18” perforated HDPE pipe and a gravel drain cover. Subdrain details and drawings are provided in the Detailed Design Drawings and As-Built Report (WSP, 2022).
15.18.10 | Contact Water Collection Ponds |
Based on information from environmental testing on representative samples, the filtered tailings show little potential for acid generation or metal leaching. However, the metallurgical process will use cyanide leaching. Therefore, contact water resulting from the filtered tailings runoff will need to be collected and stored in this pond for its subsequent reuse in the Process Plant.
The contact water ponds have been proposed downstream of each of the FTSF starting buttresses to capture surface contact water runoff from active tailings placement areas, where there will be solids removal in a sedimentation pond prior to storage, monitoring, potential treatment or pumping back of this water to the Process Plant.
The existing contact water pond for the currently operating Eastern FTSF has a capacity of 16,800 m
3. This pond capacity will be expanded in 2024 to a storage capacity of 37,000 m
3, which will be able to handle a precipitation event with a return period of up to 1,000 years and its resulting contact water runoff from the active
tailings placement areas of the FTSF.
The starter buttress was built at the toe of the East FTSF to provide stability and erosion protection. This buttress was designed and constructed with 3H:1V and 2H:1V for downstream and upstream slopes, respectively. The structure has a 6 m wide crest, and a maximum height of 6 m. The starter buttress was constructed with native material excavated from the FTSF foundation and approved borrow soils.
15.18.12 | Filtered Tailings |
The tailings are dewatered in the filter plant to a gravimetric moisture content (ww/ws) of
18–20%. The optimum moisture contents for the filtered tailings, based on standard proctor compaction tests, range from 13–16.5% and the tailings can reach 95% compaction of the standard Proctor test with
±3% of the optimum moisture content. Given the semi-arid conditions of the site, evaporation typically takes place between loading, transport by trucks from the filter plant to the FTSF and placement in the FTSF. Therefore, the tailings are placed and compacted with the moisture they have directly when coming from the filter plant even on light rainy days. On days when there is more precipitation and the tailings exceed the optimum humidity, tailings are dumped in designated areas until the weather again allows for moisture loss due to evaporation and the tailings finally are extended and compacted. The geotechnical design calls for the filtered tailings to be compacted at 95% of the maximum Proctor density value ±3% of the optimum moisture content, and in lifts no greater than 0.3 m.
15.18.13 | Coarse Graded Filtered Tailings Cover |
After placing and compacting the filtered tailings and having built at least one bench, the surface slopes and those areas that have reached the proposed final grading will be covered with a coarse graded cover of 0.5 m in thickness. The objective of this cover is to protect against erosion, mitigate tailings dust resuspension by wind action or the suspension of solids by surface water runoff and allow for revegetation of the surface as part of reclamation and progressive closure of those areas of the FTSF that have reached its target storage capacity.
15.18.14 | FTSF Construction |
• | Some of the key elements of the FTSF can be constructed in parallel or the order changes slightly but, in general, the construction sequence of key elements of the FTSF design is as follows: |
• | Clearing grubbing and grading of the area that the FTSF will occupy, |
• | Foundation preparation of the FTSF area, subdrain system and structural elements such as starter buttress and contact water pond embankments, |
• | Construction of the water diversion systems to manage non-contact surface water upstream of the tailings dry stack, |
• | Installation of a subdrain system to funnel the surface contact water of the FTSF footprint and to collect contact water resulting from infiltration into the FTSF, |
• | Construction of the contact water ponds for sedimentation, temporary storage, and monitoring of contact water prior to reuse in the Process Plant, |
• | Construction of the starter buttress at the toe of the FTSF, |
• | Filtered tailings placement, grading and compaction, and |
• | Progressive placement of a coarse material cover on the filtered tailings as it reaches its proposed final grade at each bench to prevent water erosion and dust resuspension and implement its progressive closure. |
15.18.15 | Contact Water Collector Channels and Collection/Storage Ponds |
Each FTSF will have a contact water collection system, consisting of collecting channels that will direct contact water into collection ponds. This contact water management system will be maintained in the first year of closure, with the intention of continuing to capture water runoff from still to be reclaimed areas of FTSFs. The contact water runoff may contain suspended solids and associated metals and residual cyanide. Therefore, the collection system must be maintained if there are exposed tailings areas that can generate contact water or seeps of contact water coming off the subdrain system. However, at the end of the first year if there is no runoff or seepage, the ponds could be removed, and the area regraded and rehabilitated.
15.18.16 | Surface Water Monitoring |
Surface water monitoring was conducted by Las Chispas Operations Environmental Personnel to establish an environmental baseline of the site conditions prior to Las Chispas Operation development. During operations as well as closure and post-closure Las Chispas Operations must continue to collect water samples upstream and downstream of the mine site. The purpose of this sampling and testing will be to show that water quality is comparable outside and inside the Las Chispas Operation area and that the Las Chispas Operation is not negatively impacting water quality in the Las Chispas, Babicanora and La Culebra streams. Should the impacts on water quality be noticeable (above the baseline water quality) or significant (above the permissible maximum limits), mitigative measures through engineering controls or treatment should be implemented to comply with local regulatory guidelines and operation objectives.
15.18.17 | Groundwater Monitoring |
A number of groundwater monitoring wells have been installed to monitor baseline groundwater conditions both inside and outside the Las Chispas Operation area.
The assay laboratory is located in the town of Arizpe. The decision to locate the laboratory in Arizpe was based on several factors, including supporting the Company’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) efforts by establishing a business in Arizpe that could potentially outlive the Las Chispas Operation and even grow with the addition of other clients. The assay laboratory is an independent and accredited laboratory that is being operated by SGS de Mexico S.A de C.V.
16 | MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS |
Gold and silver doré can be readily sold on many markets throughout the world and the market price is ascertained on demand, eliminating the need for market studies. The doré bars produced at the Las Chispas Operation have variable gold and silver contents and a variable gold to silver ratio. Gold and silver are freely traded at prices that are widely known, and the prospects for the sale of any production are well understood. Together with public documents and analysis forecasts, these data support that there is a reasonable basis to
assume that for the LOM Plan, the key products will be saleable at the assumed commodity pricing.
There are no agency relationships relevant to the marketing strategies used.
Coeur sells its payable silver and gold production on behalf of its subsidiaries on a spot- or forward basis, primarily to multinational banks and bullion trading houses. Markets for both silver and gold bullion are highly liquid, and the loss of a single trading counterparty would not impact Coeur’s ability to sell its bullion.
Coeur uses a combination of historical and current contract pricing, contract negotiations, knowledge of its key markets from a long operations production record, short-term versus long-term price forecasts prepared by the company’s internal finance group, public documents, and analyst forecasts when considering long-term commodity price forecasts
Figure 16‑1:
| Gold and Silver Price Assumptions for Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources |
| | Mineral Reserve Prices | Mineral Resource Prices |
| Silver ($/oz) | 23.50 | 27.00 |
| Gold ($/oz) | 1,800 | 2,100 |
Metal pricing for financial analysis was agreed upon based on consideration of various metal price sources. This included review of consensus price forecasts from banks and financial institutions, historic averages of spot prices, and current spot prices. The metal pricing for the base case economic model was:
The metal price forecasts used in the economic and cash flow analysis for gold varies from US$2,400 to US$2,700 per troy ounce payable and for silver varies from US$28.00 to US$30.00 per troy ounce payable.
At the Report Effective Date, necessary contracts and agreements necessary for operating Las Chispas have been entered int, including but are not limited to, contracts for drilling, underground mining, explosives, power, supply of consumables, catering and camp management, security, personnel transportation, and refining. These contracts are reviewed and negotiated periodically to ensure they remain competitive and aligned within industry norms for projects in similar settings in Mexico.
16.2 | Refining Terms and Conditions |
Gold and silver doré produced at the Las Chispas Operation is refined by a third party before being provided to the market.
The refining terms used as the basis of the economic analysis in Section 19 are based on the average historic payment terms and refining costs provided by Coeur Mining, which are in the industry.
Gold and silver doré can be readily sold on many markets throughout the world and the market price ascertained on demand. The Company sells at prices based on current spot prices when the metal is available or on forward prices with certain pre-approved financial institutions. Title of the metal is transferred to the customer upon receipt of payment.
Metal pricing used for the economic analysis in Section 19 was agreed upon based on considering various metal price sources. These sources included review of consensus price forecasts from banks and financial institutions, historic trailing average of spot prices, and current spot prices.
Metal pricing for financial analysis was agreed upon based on consideration of various metal price sources. This included review of consensus price forecasts from banks and financial institutions, historic averages of spot prices, and current spot prices. The metal pricing for the base case economic model was:
The metal price forecasts used in the cashflow analysis in the base case economic model for gold varies from US$2,400 to US$2,700 per troy ounce payable and for silver varies from US$28.00 to US$30.00 per troy ounce payable.
At the Report Effective Date, the Company
has entered into contracts necessary for the Las Chispas Operation. These contracts and agreements include, but are not limited to, contracts for drilling, underground mining, explosives, power, supply of consumables, catering and camp management, security, personnel transportation, and refining. These contracts are reviewed and negotiated periodically to ensure they remain competitive and aligned within industry norms for projects in similar settings in Mexico.
Based on operational performance to date and estimated projections, the metal content is expected to be 99.5%-98.5% gold and 85%-95% silver. There are no known concerns with the predicted deportment of impurity or deleterious elements, which would adversely affect the refining terms and costs.
16.6 | Comments on Market Studies and Contracts |
Doré produced from the Las Chispas Operation is readily marketable, and there are no known concerns with the predicted deportment of impurity or deleterious elements, which would adversely affect the refining terms and costs. Terms, rates and charges for contracts in place are within industry norms.
The QP is also of the opinion that the doré marketing and commodity price information is suitable to be used in the economic analysis in Section 19.
17 | ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT |
17.1.1 | Baseline and Supporting Studies |
Environmental studies related to permit applications to describe the physical and biological environments such as climate, flora, fauna, air quality, noise, and surface and groundwater quality surrounding the study area for Las Chispas Operation have been completed and continue to be updated by Compañía Llamarada (LLA). This information has previously been submitted to the Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT) and continues to be updated and reported to the environmental authorities on an annual basis. This information was also included in the environmental baseline study submitted by LLA to SEMARNAT in 2020. Details of the studies are summarized in the 2021 FS Report and the general descriptions are presented in Table 17‑1.
Table 17‑1:
| Baseline and Supporting Studies |
Study Type | | Comments |
Climate | | Three types of climates typically occur around the study area of the Las Chispas Operation, described as dry semi-warm, semi temperate and semi-dry warm. The mean annual temperature is 21.1°C. The warmest months occur in the period from June to September (>25°C); the mean maximum temperature is recorded in June with 42.8°C, while the minimum is recorded in January, with -3.6°C. |
Flora | | LLA has identified the predominant vegetation as subtropical scrubland type (MST) according to data from sampling and floristic studies that were conducted in the Las Chispas Operation area (2017, 2019 and 2020), which are characterized by the presence of shrubs or low trees.
There were 53 vascular plant species identified (six trees, 29 shrubs, seven cacti, 11 herbaceous); none of them are listed in any special protection category according to NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2001. |
Fauna | | LLA conducted field and bibliographic studies to document the presence of fauna at the site, of which 39 species have been identified (21 birds, 11 mammals, five reptiles and two amphibians).
Based on the definitions of NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2001, none of the fauna species identified in the Las Chispas Operation area are listed in any special protection category that requires specific protection actions. |
Air quality | | Biannual ambient air quality sampling is conducted for total suspended particulate matter (TSP) and particulate matter <10 µm (PM10) to determine baseline compliance with NOM-035-SEMARNAT-1993. The results of these studies are submitted to SEMARNAT on an annual basis in LLA's environmental permit compliance reports.
The most recent results show that the emission values of both were found to be below the maximum permissible limits (TSP = 21 µg/m3; PM10 = 11 µg/m3).
LLA proposed to the environmental authority that from 2023 onwards this particulate monitoring would be conducted on a quarterly basis throughout each year. |
Noise | | LLA conducts annual perimeter noise emission measurements to determine baseline compliance with NOM-091-SEMARNAT-1994.
The most recent results show noise levels are within the maximum permissible limit established by the Mexican standard (51.2 dB daytime and 48.33 dB nighttime).
The results of these measurements are reported to SEMARNAT in the annual environmental compliance reports. |
Surface water | | Since 2019, LLA has consistently conducted surface water quality monitoring within the study area of the Las Chispas Operation. This work is performed to assess the physicochemical characteristics of the water as referenced in the NOM-127-SSA1-SEMARNAT-2021 standard. Initially, sampling was performed every six months and as of 2023, this work is being performed on a quarterly basis. |
Study Type | | Comments |
| | Surface water quality regularly meets applicable guidelines, with occasional exceedances of fecal coliform and total suspended solids, which appear to be related to grazing and livestock activities upstream and downstream of the Las Chispas Operation. High background Fe and Mn were detected during the baseline studies. These waters typically display an average pH of around 7.5. |
| | Groundwater is being sampled quarterly from eight (8) wells located on the property. The most recent results reviewed are from Q1-2023. The pH of groundwater averages 6.9. Of the 29 parameters analyzed, the total coliforms was the only category to exceed the maximum allowable limits, which may be associated with other activities upstream of the Las Chispas Operation area, such as grazing and cattle ranching. Fluorides are also present, but this element occurs as a natural condition in the baseline study. Results are reported to SEMARNAT in the annual environmental permit compliance reports submitted by LLA. |
| | The National Catalog of Historic Monuments, architectural or with cultural value by the National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH) contains no records for the Las Chispas Operation property in the municipality of Arizpe, Sonora. |
The Company also completed a Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) assessment aligned with physical climate risk assessment in 2021. The assessment aimed to identify and quantify the impact on the Las Chispas Operation from climate risks over multiple different climate scenarios and time horizons. Of the climate hazards assessed, it was determined that extreme heat, flooding, and drought would have the most significant impact on the Las Chispas Operation.
LLA is currently developing a geochemical characterization study based on drill core samples from the area of the Las Chispas Operation. The objective of this study is to generate information that will allow the company to understand and determine the potential for acid rock drainage (ARD) and metal leaching (ML) in the surface waste rock and tailings. The results of this on-going study are expected to inform the potential requirement for further controls as necessary. The spectrum of samples being analyzed were selected considering the lithological characteristics of the deposit and the relative quantity of each rock type. The samples are being processed by an independent laboratory (SGS Lakefield Canada) and the analysis of the results is being performed by a consultant specialized in the field.
This exercise will complement and update the geochemical information previously collected by LLA in compliance with NOM-157-SEMARNAT-2009. This study consisted of waste rock samples taken from exploration drill holes and from the footprint area of the deposit. This material was analyzed by ALS in Monterrey, NL, Mexico. Results indicated the following:
• | Exploration drill core: Potentially leachable metals included barium and lead, but in concentrations that were well below the maximum allowable limits of 100 and 5 mg/L, respectively. Neutralization potential measured in CaCO3 kg/t of waste was >20. The acid generation potential was therefore considered very low. All pH measurements were greater than nine. |
• | Test pits: Barium was the only potentially leachable metal, but in concentrations well below the maximum allowable limits. All pH determinations were >8. Neutralization potential measured in CaCO3 kg/t of waste ranged from 0.51-1.51. One sample yielded a neutralization potential/acid potential ratio of 0.025; however, this value is below the minimum ratio of that established in NOM-157-SEMARNAT-2009. Therefore, those samples were considered to be potentially acid generating. |
Metallurgical tests were performed by SGS Lakefield Canada and ALS in Monterrey Mexico on tailings samples that underwent acid base accounting (ABA) and net acid generation (NAG) tests based on NOM-141-SEMARNAT-2003. The results showed low risk of acid formation or leachable metals of interest, and the results showed a high neutralization potential
17.1.3 | Environmental Liabilities |
There are no known environmental liabilities at the Las Chispas Operation study arising from historic mining and processing operations. Since 2019, LLA has been conducting environmental characterization studies on soil and water, first in the baseline study reported to SEMARNAT and subsequently periodically as part of the monitoring program implemented at the Las Chispas Operation. No environmental liabilities have been identified.
SEMARNAT requires that a series of studies be completed to support the granting of environmental permits to explore or construct and operate a mine. To comply with the above, LLA has obtained from the different levels of government each of these key environmental impact permits for its exploration, construction and operation stages, including for water use, change of land use, waste generation, emissions and finally for the operation of the Process Plant through the operating license of the Las Chispas Operation.
17.2.2 | Permits to Support Construction and Operations |
At its Las Chispas Operation, LLA operates under environmental permits granted by regulatory authorities at different levels of government for the development of its mining operations in exploration, operation, and mineral processing activities.
A summary of the key permits issued that are currently in effect is shown in Table 17‑2.
Table 17‑2:
| Key Permit List |
| Permit | Current Status | Agency |
| Mining Exploration Permit in 5th exploration stage | Completed | SEMARNAT |
| Manifestación de impacto ambiental (MIA) titled, “Mina Las Chispas” or “Las Chispas Mine” | Completed | SEMARNAT |
| MIA titled, “Ampliación de camino de acceso a Las Chispas” or “Access Road Expansion to Las Chispas” | Completed | SEMARNAT |
| MIA titled, “Ampliación de Mina Las Chispas” or “Las Chispas Mine Expansion” | Completed | SEMARNAT |
| Change of land use document titled, “Ampliación de Mina Las Chispas” or “Las Chispas Mine Expansion” | Completed | SEMARNAT |
| MIA titled, “Ampliación 2 Las Chispas” or “Las Chispas Expansion 2” | Completed | SEMARNAT |
| MIA titled, “Acceso a mina Las Chispas Project” or “Access to the Las Chispas Mine Project” | Completed | SEMARNAT |
| Change of land use document titled, “Ampliación 2 Las Chispas” or “Las Chispas Expansion 2” | Completed | SEMARNAT |
| MIA and land use change document titled, “LT Los Hoyos – Mina las Chispas” | Completed | SEMARNAT |
| Permit to allow bridge construction | Completed | CONAGUA |
| Title on water rights grant (300,000 m3) | Completed | CONAGUA |
| Federal registration as a hazardous waste generator | Completed | SEMARNAT |
| State registration as a No-hazardous waste generator (special handling waste) | Completed | CEDES |
| Municipal permit for garbage disposal | Completed | Local Municipality |
| Hazardous waste management plan | Completed | SEMARNAT |
| Special handling waste management plan | Completed | CEDES |
| General permit for the purchase, storage and use of explosives (and modifications) | Completed | SEDENA |
| Environmental operating License (LAU) | Completed | SEMARNAT |
Table 17‑3 summarizes the duration and purposes of the granted permits.
Table 17‑3:
| Current Permits and Validity |
Permit Name | Permit No. | Issuing Authority | Issue Date | Validity | Comment |
MIA for the Las Chispas Operation | DS-SG-UGA-IA-0669-16 | SEMARNAT | September 2016 | 10 years (Expandable for a similar period at least once) | Mineral exploration and extraction activities associated with underground mining. Originally allowed for usage of 3.1 ha for stockpiles and waste rock storage. Subject to four modifications approved by SEMARNAT. Disturbed area allowance expanded to 22.95 ha, to allow for portal and decline expansion, laydown area and explosives magazine. |
MIA for access road and bridge | DS-SG-UGA-IA-0268-19 | SEMARNAT | June 2019 | 14 years (Expandable for a similar period at least once) | Construction of a road from km 86 of the Mazocahui–Cananea highway to the mine site. Approval also covers any required turn-out and rest areas. Allowed disturbance area of 14.3 ha. Agreements reached with six surface rights owners impacted by the easement. |
Updated MIA for planned expansion of area that will
be affected by development of Las Chispas Operation | DS-SG-UGA-IA-0341-19 | SEMARNAT | July 2019 | 14 years (Expandable for a similar period at least once) | Covers the area required for Process Plant, FTSF, support and administrative facilities, internal roads, environmental monitoring equipment, and fencing/berms. Allowed disturbance area of 96.7 ha. |
Updated MIA for planned expansion of area that will be affected by development of Las Chispas Operation | DS-SG-UGA-IA- 0204/20 | SEMARNAT | August 2020 | 14 years (Expandable for a similar period at least once) | Covers additional area required for internal roads, water pipelines, ventilation raises and fans, laydown areas, WRSF areas, and topsoil storage. Allowed disturbance area of 1,414.7 ha. |
Permit Name | Permit No. | Issuing Authority | Issue Date | Validity | Comment |
Updated MIA for access road and bridge | DS.SG-UGA-IA-0244/20 | SEMARNAT | August 2020 | 14 years (Expandable for a similar period at least once) | Covers final road design, and vehicular and pedestrian bridge to be constructed over the Sonora River. Allowed disturbance area of 26.9 ha. |
Water usage permit | No. 826243 | CONAGUA | October 2020 | 10 years (Expandable for a similar period at least once) | Allows for use of water, at the rate of 300,000 m3/year. |
Disposal of hazardous waste | No. MLA2600600003 | SEMARNAT | May 2019 | Unlimited | Regulates the generation, handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. |
Disposal of waste requiring special handling | No. CEDES-RGRME-19-121 (2020) | CEDES | October 2020 | Annual renewal | Renewed every year. It covers recyclable waste. |
General permit for the purchase, storage, and use of explosive materials for 2020 | No. 5131-SON | SEDENA | January 2020 | This permit is renewed every year. It is currently valid until December 31, 2025. | The permit covers the use of explosives in 24 mining concessions. |
Single Environmental License (LAU) | LAU-26/118/2022 | SEMARNAT | September 2022 | Unlimited | This license allows the operation of the process plant. It covers the finished products (Dore) and production capacity installed in the processing plan and for all equipment, including crushing, flotation, leaching, Merrill-Crowe, refinery, and tailings disposal. It also covers all ancillary and maintenance services and infrastructure. Please refer to section 17.2.7. |
Permit Name | Permit No. | Issuing Authority | Issue Date | Validity | Comment |
Allow Construction of Power Line | DS-SG-UGA-0066/03/2021 | SEMARNAT | April 2021 | 50 years | Design, construction, and commissioning of a 33 KV overhead medium voltage power transmission line connected to the federal line operated by the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE). This power line went into operation in April 2022. The project consisted of the construction of 83 km of line that crosses 13 properties through rights of way. |
Water Rights Transfers | 826243 | CONAGUA | October 2020 | 10 years | LLA has a concession title to use national groundwater up to an authorized volume of 300,000 m3 /year for industrial mining use. The extraction well is located adjacent to the Sonora River and the water is channeled through a pipeline 9 km long to a system of storage tanks of up to 1,400 m3 that distribute the water to the various operations such as mining, the Process Plant, drilling, camp, and other services. The authorization is registered in the Public Registry of Water Rights. |
Permit Name | Permit No. | Issuing Authority | Issue Date | Validity | Comment |
Hazardous and Mining Waste Management Plan | 26-PMG-I-4572-2022 | SEMARNAT | November 2022 | Unlimited | LLA applies a hazardous waste management plan that considers all classifications of hazardous waste generated by the operation of the Process Plant and maintenance services for machinery and equipment, including contractors, providing certainty as to the destination assigned to each waste. In November 2022, LLA obtained the registration of the hazardous waste management plan from SEMARNAT under number 26-PMG-I-4572-2022. |
17.3 | Mining Waste and Water Management |
17.3.1 | Waste Rock and Tailings Management |
Waste rock and filtered tailings are stored in designated facilities that have been designed to store the anticipated waste tonnage to be produced during the LOM. These facilities include contact and non-contact water management structures, where the non-contact water is temporarily stored and used in the Process Plant. More information regarding the design basis, engineering analyses and key design elements of these mine waste management facilities is referred to in Section 15.
The key facilities for water management include:
• | Underground mine dewatering, predominantly from backfilling operations |
• | Mill (including fresh and process water tanks) |
• | Filtered tailings storage facility (FTSF) |
• | Surface water diversion and water management structures |
• | Fresh water supply system, including pumps and piping |
• | Sediment and erosion control measures for the facilities. |
The water management strategy uses and recycles water within the operational footprint to the maximum practical extent. This involves collecting and managing site runoff from disturbed areas (contact water) and maximizing the recycling of process water. The wastewater generated at Las Chispas operation from services at the camp and office facilities is directed to a wastewater treatment plant system to improve its quality. In the first quarter of 2023,
9,500 m3 of wastewater was treated; In one year, this represents 12.5% of the total amount of water authorized by CONAGUA. This water is being recycled to irrigate roads, to suppress dust, and is also being used to irrigate areas where reforestation has been carried out.
A more detailed account of the site water management, including the site-wide water balance, is provided in Section 15.
17.4 | Social and Community Requirements |
17.4.1 | Population and Demographics |
Refer to Figure 3-2 for regional location map showing nearby communities in relation to of the Las Chispas Property. Arizpe, located 12km to the northeast, has a population of 3,037, of which 1,571 are male and 1,466 are female. According to the 2020 INEGI Census, this represents 0.1% of the population of the state of Sonora. The average household size in the municipality is 3.3 members, while in the state the average size is 3.7. The population of Arizpe is divided into 971 minors and 1,988 adults, of which 523 are over 60 years old.
The Sonora Valley includes several isolated municipalities set in a region of rugged topography. The areas planned for mining activity are not visible from the local communities or from adjacent roads.
17.4.2 | Local Hiring, Procurement and Sponsorship |
As of March 2023, the Las Chispas Operation personnel consisted of 908 personnel (327 employees of Llamarada and 581 contractors), of which 139 people were from the Sonora Valley, 450 were from the rest of Sonora and 317 were from other states in Mexico. Table 17‑4 below summarizes the source of employment for the Las Chispas Operation.
Table 17‑4:
| Source of Employment |
Las Chispas Personnel, including Llamarada and Contractors | Number of Persons | Percentage (%) |
Men | 801 | 88 |
Women | 107 | 12 |
Total | 908 | 100 |
Employees from the Sonora River valley area (Bacoachi, Arizpe, Banamichi, Huepac, Aconchi, Baviacora y Ures; this is considered locals) | 139 | 15 |
Employees from the rest of the Sonora state | 450 | 50 |
Other Mexican states | 317 | 34 |
Internationals | 2 | 1 |
Total | 908 | 100 |
LLA has two main contractors at the Las Chispas Operation: one main contractor responsible for the Mine development and operation and one contractor responsible for the non-production drilling requirements. Together, these two contractors have more than 125 employees from the local area. They also do business with more than 70 local vendors. In 2022, the economic impact of these two contractors has been estimated to be more than $4 M.
The Company is one of the major sponsors of a non-profit organization (Impulso Koria A.C.) located in Arizpe. Impulso Koria’s objectives include supporting local infrastructure, education and health care needs. The Company communicates with Impulso Koria representatives on a regular basis as part of local community and social responsibility (CSR) efforts.
17.4.3 | Community Engagement and Relationship Management |
There are four main ejido groups, three of which are being impacted by mining operations (Ejido Bamori, Ejido Arizpe, and Ejido Sinoquipe) and the fourth (Ejido Los Hoyos) by the powerline:
• | Ejido Bamori - 84 members as of April 2023. LLA maintains constant and direct dialogue with the Ejido members. LLA attends the monthly Board of Directors meetings, the annual general meeting (AGM) and, as required, may attend periodic meetings. LLA has a 20-year lease agreement with Ejido Bamori that applies to 400 ha of land within the Las Chispas operation area. The Ejido Bamori controls 9,184 ha. |
• | Ejido Arizpe - 348 members (as of March 2023) and Ejido Sinoquipe - 116 members (as of March 2023) – There are currently no agreements in place with either group given the Las Chispas Operation does not impact their land; however, LLA maintains constant and direct dialogue with both groups of Ejido members. LLA attends the monthly Board of Directors meetings, the AGMs, and, as required, may attend periodic meetings. |
• | Ejido Los Hoyos has 156 members. In 2020, LLA contractually agreed upon a right of way relationship with the Ejido to have land access to build the Las Chispas Operation power line. |
• | Resulting from LLA findings in its Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures work, it has been estimated that 74% of the local communities work in agriculture. In 2022, LLA initiated a five-year water stewardship program to increase the availability of water to the community by fixing the water intake valves and the aqueducts allowing water to efficiently reach those that need it. This program also includes the repair and replacement of the sewage system in Arizpe. |
Cattle ranching is a significant part of the economy in Sonora state and in the Sonora Valley. The Company established a ranching business, Babicanora Agrícola del Noroeste S.A de C.V (BAN). BAN formally got accepted as a member of the Arizpe ranching association in March 2022. Active participation in this organization is an important community communication channel.
Consultation and Engagement Observation
LLA started community consultation and engagement activities in March 2019, and the report was finalized in January 2020. The main findings were as follows:
• | The community lacked details and knowledge of the Las Chispas operation. |
• | The community had concerns relating to a 2014 environmental incident in Cananea (some 100 km north of Las Chispas), and outside the control of Las Chispas Project. |
• | The community wished to see improvement to their local infrastructure. |
• | The communities requested that adequate environmental safety and appropriate mine closure protocols were in place in order to protect the region at the end of the mine life. |
• | The communities desired more jobs with a focus on providing women with opportunities., |
• | The communities mentioned water safety and scarcity as regional concerns. |
Summary Findings from Additional Studies and Reports
A board-led Safety Environmental and Social Sustainability (SESS) Committee was established in May 2019 to oversee corporate ESG.
In early 2020, a materiality assessment led by an independent consultant to determine they key material risks and opportunities to the Company as well as the communities in which it operates.
A Task Force for Climate Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) study was completed Q3 2021, and which included the following key findings:
• | Drought, flooding and severe heat are key risks |
• | Las Chispas water consumption was 12 L/s, while the community uses 2100 L/s |
• | Agriculture makes up over 74% of the livelihoods in the area |
• | Arizpe does not have water concessions which makes them unable to access government funding for water-related infrastructure |
• | The sewage systems and water delivery systems serving the farmers is severely inefficient and the floods have damaged current infrastructure. |
In early 2022, a 5-year Water Stewardship Plan was created which includes:
• | Fixing over 20 km of aqueducts, fixing the water intake valve allowing for delivery of water from the river to the aqueducts and fixing the local sewage system |
• | Attempting to obtain water permits for Arizpe |
• | Partnering with local ejidos and ranchers to prioritize key areas of concern |
Other recent highlights include:
• | New jobs created for the assay lab built in Arizpe (completed in Q2 2022) |
• | Partnerships with over 70 local businesses in the community |
• | Strong local employment (over 90% from Sonora and over 98% in Mexico) |
An inaugural ESG report was released by SilverCrest in 2023, highlighting steps taken to establish and integrate systems to minimize the environmental footprint, and engage and support local communities. Coeur is committed to updating the ESG report in due course.
17.4.4 | Stakeholder Identification and Materiality Analysis |
In early 2020, two third-party ESG consultants were engaged to complete a Materiality Assessment designed to identify the key risks facing the Las Chispas Property including potential risks relating to the Company’s relationship with and impact on local communities. A detailed stakeholder analysis was completed that included interviews with the mayor of Arizpe, the owner of a key contracting partner and a workshop with members from the local community. Key findings predominantly echoed those found within the community consultation and engagement activities and were centered around climate and water risks, community health issues (mining, food, water), environmental safety of the local river and agriculture, employment opportunities, a desire for improved infrastructure (sports, recreation, health) and a concern regarding a potential influx of people from outside the community taxing local infrastructure.
As part of the ESG framework, and in response to the issues raised within the community consultation and engagement activities and the Materiality Assessment, a community communication strategy was formalized that includes direct outreach, use of social media, presentation of company-generated videos, flyers, posters, and workshops. A whistleblower policy and a grievance mechanism was also established and reported to be in use.
17.4.5 | Disclosure of Socioeconomic Risk |
As part of internal research, stakeholder engagement and a completed TCFD and Water Stewardship Report, it was clear that access to water is a major risk. To gain an understanding of the full extent of water risk in the region, a third-party consultant was brought in to conduct a climate-risk assessment of its site and for the surrounding community. The TCFD study confirmed that drought and flooding is the predominant climate risk for the region, and its severity and frequency are expected to worsen over the coming decade.
In addition, a report by the Bank of Nova Scotia on ‘Water Scarcity Across Mining Operations in the Americas’ conducted a thorough review and analysis of water risk in mining. The report highlights a severe water scarcity issue in Mexico and finds that silver is the most water stress exposed metal, reaffirming concerns around water scarcity in Las Chispas Operation and the wider surrounding area. Federal annual spending on the order of $2.5 B each year is recommended over a 20-year period to guarantee access to water. The Las Chispas Operation site is expected to have a low water usage footprint, and operational disruptions related to water shortage are not expected if managed correctly. However, water scarcity and droughts may have a significant impact on the surrounding communities that depend on water for their livelihoods and well-being.
The Company has committed to investing $1.5M over five years (2022 - 2026) to improve local water infrastructure, which is expected to address the issue of water scarcity being identified as a major risk in the Las Chispas Operation site and the surrounding region. This investment will go towards the revitalization of river water intake valves, fixing sewage systems in Arizpe and repairing or replacing aqueducts delivering water from the Sonora River to local farmers and ranchers.
An International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) aligned water stewardship report has been produced to communicate these planned water initiatives and track progress in building water resilience into the company's operations and surrounding communities.
17.4.6 | Indigenous Communities |
The potential for impacts to Indigenous populations were considered; however, there were no Indigenous populations identified within 10 km of the Las Chispas Operation.
17.5 | Closure Considerations |
17.5.1 | Conceptual Closure Plan |
A Conceptual Closure Plan was prepared in general accordance with applicable Mexican standards. Under Mexican law, mining may be initiated under a Conceptual Closure Plan with a Detailed Closure Plan being developed later in the project life.
The Conceptual Closure Plan incorporates information from the Detailed Engineering Phase 1 Filtered Tailings Storage Facility (FTSF) Design (WSP, 2022a), information gathered for a recent Asset Retirement Obligation update (WSP, 2022b), as well as environmental information provided by Las Chispas Operations, which includes on-going environmental baseline studies, MIAs, environmental laboratory testing results and data that supplements the granted environmental permits.
The Conceptual Closure Plan focuses on ensuring the post-mining landscape is safe and physically, geochemically, and ecologically stable. The plan ensures that the quality of water resources (possible effluents) in the area is protected, and that the restitution plan is welcomed by communities and regulators. The optimum performance of reclamation activities heavily depends on stakeholder participation and adequate monitoring of the reclaimed site conditions.
The objectives of the Closure Plan include minimizing long-term environmental liabilities, complying with current legislation, and observing international standards and best practices for long-term environmental protection. The reclamation process should lead to a stable terrain configuration that can be used for other purposes, such as conservation, recreation, or other services.
The main objectives of the Conceptual Closure Plan are:
• | Cessation of activities that cause disturbances or impacts (noise, lights, dust, vehicle traffic, etc.) |
• | Physical, chemical, and biological stabilization of impacted land |
• | Ensuring appropriate environmental compliance |
• | Minimizing risks to safety and public health |
• | Reclamation of the mine site to similar site conditions that were present prior to mining. |
17.5.2 | Closure and Reclamation Areas |
The total anticipated disturbed area from the Las Chispas operation is expected to be 95 ha, including:
• | Filtered Tailings Storage Facility (FTSF), associated water management structures (ponds, channels, etc.): 17 ha |
• | Temporary waste rock storage facility (WRSF) and stockpile: 9 ha |
• | Buildings, yards, Process Plant, and miscellaneous infrastructure: 45 ha. |
• | Other ancillary disturbance: 7 ha. |
The FTSFs represent the biggest surface-impacted areas to be reclaimed and the most challenging in terms of ensuring the long-term physical and chemical stability of the waste to remain on site in the post-closure stage. The greatest closure efforts, starting with progressive reclamation, should be focused on these facilities.
Closure will include:
• | FTSFs: Scarifying and grading of temporary access roads, benches and slopes; use of an inert cover material; covering the facility with a layer of topsoil to promote vegetative growth; closure of water management infrastructure; and revegetation; |
• | Facilities: Buildings will be dismantled, donated, retired, and/or kept; |
• | Portal, shafts and adits: Will be sealed to prevent access from surface; |
• | WRSF and stockpile: Planned to be depleted prior to cessation of mining. Disturbed footprint areas will be graded and reclaimed; |
• | Waste and water storage ponds: Will be demolished, and/or filled, graded and reclaimed; |
• | Water and miscellaneous tanks: May be donated, sold, dismantled or demolished; |
• | Water reservoir: Will be left in place to supply local pasture or farming water needs; |
• | Pipelines: Will be dismantled and recycled; and, |
• | Access roads: The main access roads will be maintained during the monitoring phase. Secondary roads that are no longer needed will be regraded, closed, and revegetated. |
17.5.3 | Conceptual FTSF Closure |
The proposed FTSFs will be located close to the Babicanora stream, and therefore, water management will be a prime consideration during the closure and post-closure periods. The potential impact of any FTSF contact water runoff on existing surface water streams will need to be properly mitigated.
A progressive reclamation approach is adopted where, as each slope or bench of the FTSF is completed, it is immediately covered with a coarse protective layer to minimize surface erosion. This process, when combined with revegetation, will result in progressive reclamation of a great portion of the FTSFs areas prior to closure. Therefore, most of the costs for the cover materials for the FTSFs will be incurred during operations rather than closure. The final operational bench of each FTSF will require, at the time of closure, grading of the disposed tailings to provide positive drainage towards the slopes and perimeter channels of the facilities. The cover layer will be composed of inert, non-acid-generating material with a minimum thickness of 0.5 m. A layer of organic soil that promotes the growth of native vegetation will be placed on top of each FTSF. The organic soil layer is proposed to have a uniform thickness of 0.2 m to facilitate root and vegetation development.
The FTSF design includes contact water collection structures during operation, to keep contact water from impacting the native ground, surface, and subsurface water in the Las Chispas Operation. These structures will need to be well maintained and remain operational during the lifetime of the FTSFs. The contact water ponds, and channel systems will remain active for at least one year after operations cease in case there is a need to capture contact water that could drain from the FTSFs. However, based on infiltration tests and numerical modelling, and assuming proper construction and operation of the facility, infiltration into the tailings is expected to be negligible. Once the contact areas are reclaimed and if the monitoring results indicate that water is of acceptable quality for discharge, the ponds will be filled, the surface will be graded and rehabilitated. Water runoff will be directed to the natural downstream creek bed, and finally the closed and revegetated FTSF would integrate into the surrounding environment.
The qualified person has reviewed the plans and programs related to the adequacy of environmental management and monitoring plans to address issues related to environmental compliance, permitting, and local individual or groups and has found them to be adequate.
18 | CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS |
18.1 | Sustaining Capital Costs |
Capital cost estimates are at a minimum at pre-feasibility level of confidence, having an accuracy level of ±25% and a contingency range not exceeding 15%.
LOM sustaining capital costs total $163.1M from January 1, 2025, which can be broken as per Table 18‑1 below.
Table 18‑1:
| Sustaining Capital Costs for the LOM ($M) |
| Calendar Year | LOM | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 |
| Production Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| U/G Mine Development | 139.3 | 30.6 | 31.4 | 29.8 | 20.6 | 15.1 | 11.8 | - |
| U/G Mine Infrastructure | 14.9 | 3.8 | 6.1 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.2 | - | - |
| Process Plant | 4.0 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - |
| Other Sust. & Dev. | 0.6 | - | - | - | 0.3 | - | 0.3 | - |
| G&A (including mobile) | 4.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | - | - |
| Total | 163.1 | 37.5 | 38.8 | 32.8 | 24.3 | 17.6 | 12.1 | - |
18.1.1 | Underground Mine Development |
In determining development costs, both lateral and vertical development unit costs were estimated as part of the 2025 Las Chispas Budget and were based on first principles actual costs, and existing contracts from the Las Chispas Operation. These costs include contractor costs, supplies, consumables, and an allocation for rehabilitation, Mine G&A, power, fuel, and fixed equipment maintenance.
The total development costs were based on application of the unit rates to the total development meters generated from the LOM Mineral Reserve design and schedule. Total mine development has been estimated at 69.1 km including 65.2 km of lateral and 3.8 km of vertical development. This includes 39.1 km of capital development and 29.9 m of operating development. Capital development costs were estimated with a calculated unit rate of 3,561$/m for a total LOM cost of $139.3M.
Expensed development costs were determined as a $/ore tonne to be included in mining unit rates broken down in section 18.3.
Table 18‑2:
| Underground Capital Development Schedule – Lateral and Vertical |
Year | LOM | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 |
Capital Lateral Development (m) | 35,286 | 8,358 | 7,929 | 7,024 | 5,103 | 3,945 | 2,927 | 0 |
Capital Vertical Development (m) | 3,828 | 244 | 894 | 1,333 | 669 | 292 | 395 | 0 |
Total Cost ($M) | 139.3 | 30.6 | 31.4 | 29.8 | 20.6 | 15.1 | 11.8 | - |
18.1.2 | Underground Mine Infrastructure |
The underground infrastructure demands were estimated for the operation, extending existing infrastructure to support the existing mine plan for the Babicanora and Las Chispas Areas. Costs were derived from actual labor, equipment, material and supply costs incurred by Las Chispas Operation and then included in the first principles estimates. The total costs were escalated to Q4, 2024 dollars. The underground infrastructures have been scheduled according to the mine development plan. The total capital estimated for U/G infrastructure is $14.9M over the LOM and includes general infrastructure, dewatering, utilities, ventilation, communications, emergency preparedness.
18.1.3 | Process Plant, G&A, and Other Sustaining Capital |
The total sustaining capital not related to the underground mine has been estimated at $8.9M and includes process plant, FTSF, surface mobile equipment, light vehicles, G&A, and other site wide capital improvements.
18.2 | Reclamation and Closure Cost Estimate |
An allowance of $11.9M was made for closure and reclamation, based on an estimate developed and carried by the Company. The spending is scheduled to occur across ten years with a bulk of the spend occurring during the three years following the cessation of production. No provision or accrual for closure was made (cash or otherwise) for the purposes of the economic evaluation. Any change in project scope or in regulations would require the Company to update the total and the timing of these expenditures.
No salvage value was assumed for the Process Plant and surface infrastructure. It has also been assumed that CFE would accept ownership of the power line which is common in Mexico.
18.3 | Operating Cost Estimate |
Operating cost estimates are at a minimum at pre-feasibility level of confidence, having an accuracy level of ±25% and a contingency range not exceeding 15%.
The average LOM operating cost is estimated at 176.95 $/t processed. The operating cost is defined as the total direct operating costs including mining, processing, and G&A costs. Mining costs are estimated to be 110.29 $/t processed (114.17 $/t mined). Tonnes of material to be processed includes mined ore that is already in stockpiles. Table 18‑3 shows a summary breakdown of the operating costs.
Table 18‑3:
| Operating Cost Summary |
| Area | LOM Average Operating Cost |
| Mining* ($/t processed) | 110.29 |
| Process ($/t processed) | 42.05 |
| G&A ($/t processed) | 24.61 |
| Total LOM Operating Cost ($/t processed) | 176.95 |
Notes: *Includes stope development but excludes capitalized underground development. Total may not add due to rounding.
The operating costs exclude doré shipping and refining charges. Costs associated with doré transport and refining are included in the financial analysis along with the applicable payable rates for gold and silver.
18.3.1 | Basis of Operating Cost Estimate |
Estimate Base Date and Validity Period
Overall, the operating costs were estimated from a combination of actual operating costs during the period of January 2023 to December 2024 and budgeted costs developed from first principles build-up of mining, processing, and G&A.
Infrastructure and other distributable costs such as power, light vehicles, maintenance, fuel, travel, and camp are distributed through the mining, processing, and G&A costs as applicable.
All the costs provided in the operating cost estimate were in US dollars, unless otherwise specified, and where required were converted to US dollars from Mexican Pesos using the exchange rate of 20:1.
18.3.2 | Mining Operating Cost Estimate |
Yearly average mining costs were determined by applying unit rates of different mining methods and activities calibrated to site historical actuals. All components were treated as variable unit rates as fixed costs are minimal due to contract mining and mining rates are consistent through the LOM.
Table 18‑4:
| Mining Costs by Activity |
Activity | Unit | LOM Total | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 |
Opex Development | Ore Tonnes | 622,904 | 156,292 | 112,123 | 131,583 | 74,314 | 108,603 | 39,989 | -- |
($173.5/t) | $M | 108.1 | 27.1 | 19.5 | 22.8 | 12.9 | 18.8 | 6.9 | -- |
Longhole | Ore Tonnes | 2,279,305 | 266,449 | 288,137 | 342,542 | 394,334 | 418,559 | 470,299 | 98,984 |
($65.5/t) | $M | 149.2 | 17.4 | 18.9 | 22.4 | 25.8 | 27.4 | 30.8 | 6.5 |
Cut & Fill | Ore Tonnes | 18,327 | -- | 6,750 | 1,255 | -- | 1,752 | 8,570 | -- |
($147.5/t) | $M | 2.7 | -- | 1.0 | 0.2 | -- | 0.3 | 1.3 | -- |
Resue | Ore Tonnes | 134,783 | 26,545 | 28,935 | 25,232 | 25,292 | 21,511 | 7,267 | -- |
($206.3/t) | $M | 27.8 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 4.4 | 1.5 | -- |
Mining G&A | Ore Tonnes | 3,055,319 | 449,286 | 435,946 | 500,612 | 493,940 | 550,426 | 526,125 | 98,984 |
($15.5/t) | $M | 47.4 | 7.0 | 6.8 | 7.8 | 7.7 | 8.5 | 8.2 | 1.5 |
CRF | m3 | 544,457 | 67,501 | 79,093 | 80,948 | 88,983 | 91,757 | 113,336 | 22,840 |
($12.3/m3) | $M | 6.7 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.3 |
URF | m3 | 473,240 | 55,228 | 67,684 | 68,086 | 80,742 | 80,957 | 101,855 | 18,687 |
($14.5/m3) | $M | 6.9 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.3 |
Mine OPEX | $M | 348.8 | 58.6 | 54.0 | 60.4 | 53.9 | 61.8 | 51.5 | 8.6 |
Total Ore Tonnes | Tonnes | 3,055,319 | 449,286 | 435,946 | 500,612 | 493,940 | 550,426 | 526,125 | 98,984 |
Average Mining Rate | $/tonne | 114.2 | 130.5 | 123.9 | 120.7 | 109.1 | 112.3 | 98.0 | 86.6 |
Total operating costs are consistent over the LOM with early years heavier on development and later years increasing ore and backfill rates. Operating development costs peak in 2025 and decrease over the LOM as the requirement diminishes. Ore production rates and total mining costs peak in 2029.
18.3.3 | Process Operating Cost Estimate |
The process operating cost estimates are made on a unit rate basis comprising of crushing, grinding, whole ore cyanide leaching, countercurrent decantation washing, Merrill-Crowe precious metals recovery, and smelting unit operations to produce gold–silver doré bars. Tailings filter operation, FTSF operation and FTSF seepage treatment costs were also included. Processing costs were forecast based on recent actual site costs.
Costs related to the doré shipping and refining were included in the financial analysis in Section 19.
Processing Operating Cost Summary
The unit process operating cost for the LOM was estimated at 42.05 $/t processed, based on a milling rate of 1,250 t/d. Unit rates were used for all components of the processing cost because of the consistent processing schedule in the LOM. Table 18‑5 summarizes processing operating costs.
Table 18‑5:
| LOM Process Operating Cost Breakdown |
| Process OPEX Unit Rates | LOM Unit Rate ($/tonne) |
| Crushing & Milling | 7.98 |
| Leaching & Bulk Leach Tank | 8.26 |
| Counter Current Decantation (CCD) | 0.62 |
| Merril-Crowe & Refining | 7.10 |
| Detox & Tailing Filters | 3.50 |
| FTSF | 2.13 |
| Services | 1.02 |
| Management & Met Lab | 4.49 |
| Labor | 6.94 |
| Total $/tonne Processed | 42.05 |
| Total LOM Tonnes Processed (kt) | 3,163 |
| Total Operating Costs ($M) | 133.0 |
18.3.4 | General and Administrative Operating Cost Estimate |
G&A costs are used to cover the expenses of service departments. Operating departments (mine, geology, mine engineering, plant operation/maintenance) are included in mining and processing operating costs.
The total annual G&A cost was estimated at $11.0M/a for a total of $77.8M during the seven years of production, which equated to an average LOM G&A cost of $24.61/t processed. G&A costs are summarized in Table 18‑6.
Table 18‑6:
| General and Administrative (G&A) Costs for the LOM |
| G&A Expense | Average Year ($M) | LOM Total Cost ($M) | LOM Avg $/tonne Processed |
| Management | 2.5 | 17.6 | 5.20 |
| IT | 0.7 | 4.8 | 1.42 |
| Human Resources | 0.9 | 6.4 | 1.91 |
| HSSE | 0.9 | 6.2 | 1.83 |
| Security | 1.0 | 7.3 | 2.17 |
| Environmental & Permitting | 0.6 | 3.9 | 1.15 |
| Site Services | 1.2 | 8.3 | 2.47 |
| Warehouse | 0.6 | 4.3 | 1.28 |
| CSR | 0.9 | 6.1 | 1.81 |
| 2025 Corporate Costs | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 |
| Hermosillo Office & Ranch | 1.7 | 11.9 | 5.37 |
| Total LOM G&A Cost ($M) | 11.0 | 77.8 | 24.61 |
Capital and operating cost estimates are at a minimum at a pre-feasibility level of confidence, having an accuracy level of ±25% and a contingency range not exceeding 15%. The estimate accuracies and ranges comply with the stated accuracy and contingency ranges required to meet a pre-feasibility level of study under S-K 1300. The QPs considered the risks associated with the engineering estimation methods used when stating the accuracy and contingency ranges and preparing the cost estimate forecasts.
The capital and operating cost estimates are presented for an operating mine, with more than three years of production and development history. Analogues to prior similar environments are not relevant to the Las Chispas Operation given the production history and that the mine was in production as at year-end December 31, 2024.
19.1 | Forward-Looking Information Cautionary Statements |
The results of the economic analysis discussed in this Section represent forward-looking information that is subject to several known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those presented herein. Information that is forward-looking includes the following:
• | Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves that have been modified from Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate; |
• | Assumed commodity prices and exchange rates; |
• | Proposed mine and process production plan; |
• | Projected mining and process recovery rates; |
• | Ability to have doré refined on favorable terms; |
• | Proposed capital and operating costs; |
• | Assumptions as to closure costs and closure requirements; and |
• | Assumptions as to environmental, permitting, and social risks. |
Additional risks to the forward-looking information include:
• | Changes to costs of production from what is assumed; |
• | Unrecognized environmental risks; |
• | Unanticipated reclamation expenses; |
• | Unexpected variations in quantity of mineralization, grade or recovery rates; |
• | Geotechnical or hydrogeological considerations during operations being different from what was assumed; |
• | Failure of mining methods to operate as anticipated; |
• | Failure of Process Plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; |
• | Changes to assumptions as to the availability and or generation of electrical power, and the power rates used in the operating cost estimates and financial analysis; |
• | Ability to maintain the social license to operate; |
• | Accidents, labor disputes and other risks of the mining industry; |
• | Changes to interest rates, tax rates or applicable laws, and |
• | Receipt of any required permits, beyond those already held by the Company. |
A pre- and post-tax economic analysis was completed on the basis of a discounted cash flow model featuring a 5% discount rate. The analysis used constant (real) Q4 2024 US$ and the Las Chispas Operation cash flows were modelled in annual periods.
All the costs provided in the operating cost estimate were in US dollars, unless otherwise specified, and where required were converted to US dollars from Mexican Pesos using the exchange rate of 20:1.
The model assumed a production period of seven years, including 2025-2031.
19.3 | Financial Model Parameters and Assumptions |
19.3.1 | Mineral Resources, Mineral Reserves and Production Schedule |
The mine plan is based on the estimated Mineral Reserves for the Las Chispas Operation. No Inferred Mineral Resources were included in the material scheduled for processing.
Figure 19‑1 provides the LOM production forecast. Figure 19‑2 summarizes the mining schedule.
Figure 19‑1:
| LOM Production Forecast (Moz) |
Source: Coeur, 2024.
Notes: The AgEq is based on Ag:Au ratio of 86.38:1, calculated using metal prices of $2,493 /oz Au and $28.86/oz Ag. All numbers are rounded.
Figure 19‑2:
| Ore Mining Schedule |
Source: Coeur, 2024.
19.3.2 | Metallurgical Recoveries |
Metallurgical recoveries were applied to the economic model in accordance with the metallurgical test work and the actual metal recoveries described in Section 10. The overall achieved LOM recoveries are shown in Table 19‑1.
Table | 19‑1: LOM Processing Recoveries |
Metal | Unit | Recovery |
Gold | % | 98.0 |
Silver | % | 97.5 |
19.3.3 | Freight, Smelting and Refining |
Assumed terms for smelting and refining of the gold and silver product are discussed in Section 16. Rates are based on the average historic payment terms and refining costs provided by the Company, which are to charges in the industry.
The economic model is based on the following metal price assumptions:
Table 19‑2:
| Metal Price Assumptions |
Metal | Unit | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029-LOM |
Gold Price | $/oz | 2,700 | 2,550 | 2,500 | 2,450 | 2,400 |
Silver Price | $/oz | 30.00 | 29.50 | 29.00 | 28.50 | 28.00 |
Base case metal prices selected for this report were based on a review of consensus price forecasts from banks and financial institutions, a three-year historic trailing average of spot prices, and current spot prices.
The operating costs are detailed in Section 18. The projected total operating costs are estimated to average $176.95/t processed. Mining costs are estimated to be $110.29/t processed ($114.17/t mined).
Table 19‑3:
| LOM Operating Costs |
| | LOM Average Operating Cost |
| Mining* ($/t processed) | 110.29 |
| Process ($/t processed) | 42.05 |
| G&A ($/t processed) | 24.61 |
| Total LOM operating cost ($/t processed) | 176.95 |
Note: Includes stope development but excludes capitalized underground development.
All initial construction capital costs have been incurred at Las Chispas Operation. Future capital costs are limited to sustaining capital costs, predominantly related to underground mine development and infrastructure, closure costs, management fees, and exploration planned for 2025. All mining related sustaining capital costs were estimated by the Company and scheduled to match the expected spend profile developed as part of the mining cost estimation process and based on the production and waste movement profile. Sustaining capital costs for the process plant, tailings facility and other surface infrastructure were scheduled based on projected capital expenditures.
An allowance of $11.9 M was made for closure and reclamation, based on an estimate developed and carried by the Company. The spending is scheduled to occur across ten years with a bulk of the spend occurring during the three years following the cessation of production (estimated to be 2032-2034). No provision or accrual for closure was made (cash or otherwise) for the purposes of the economic evaluation.
Table 19‑4:
| Sustaining Capital Cost |
| Area | Units | Sustaining Capital |
| Mine & Underground Infrastructure | $M | 154.2 |
| Process Plant | $M | 4.0 |
| G&A and Other | $M | 4.9 |
| Total | $M | 163.1 |
| Closure | $M | 11.9 |
There is a 2% royalty on the Nuevo Lupena and Panuco II concessions.
The royalty is subject to material that exceeds specified grade thresholds on these concessions. None of the estimated Mineral Reserves are within these concessions; therefore, this royalty is not applicable and was excluded from the economic analysis.
Working capital adjustments in the model include:
• | Value added taxes (VAT): The model assumes that value added taxes will be collectible in an estimate of 120 days from the date the related costs are incurred. |
• | Accounts Payable: The model assumes operating costs will be paid in an estimate of 55 days from the date the costs are incurred. |
• | Special Mining Duty: The model assumes that payments will be collected in the year after the costs are incurred. |
• | Income Tax: The model assumes that payments are made monthly 30 days after the cost is incurred. |
Current VAT and accounts payable balances have been updated to YE2024.
19.3.9 | Taxes and Government Royalties |
The corporate taxes and government royalties applied to this Report cash flow include the following:
• | Corporate income tax of 30% |
• | Special mining duty of 8.5% of EBITDA, applicable to mining companies |
• | Extraordinary mining royalty of 1.0% of net revenue (NSR), applicable to gold and silver operations. |
These taxes were built into the financial model used for this evaluation and included in sensitivity analysis.
19.3.10 | Closure Costs and Salvage Values |
An allowance of $11.9M was made for closure, an estimate developed by the Company in 2024 based on area of disturbance and mine life relative to other Mexican operations. The spending is scheduled to occur across ten years with the bulk of the spending occurring during the three years following the cessation of production (estimated to be 2032-2034). No provision or accrual for closure was made (cash or otherwise) for the purposes of the economic evaluation. Any change in regulations that would require the Las Chispas Operations to undertake progressive closure, or to post a cash bond, would affect the timing of these cash flows.
No salvage value was assumed for any items.
19.3.11 | Financing and Inflation |
No consideration of financing was made. The model considers the cash flow only at an asset level and assumes 100% equity ownership.
The modelling was undertaken in real Q4 2024 US$ with no inflation applied to either commodity prices or costs (unless otherwise stated). An assumption of US$ accounting was made.
The economic analysis demonstrates that the mine plan has positive economics under the assumptions used. The Las Chispas Operation post-tax (NPV) at a 5% discount rate is estimated to be $538.6M. A financial summary is shown in Table 19‑5.
Table 19‑5:
| Economic Analysis Summary |
| Description | Unit | LOM Total/Avg. |
| Average Mill Throughput | t/d | 1,250 |
| Mine Life years | years | 7 |
| Average Gold Mill Head Grade | g/t Au | 3.51 |
| Average Silver Mill Head Grade | g/t Ag | 329.6 |
| Average Silver Equivalent Mill Head Grade | g/t AgEq | 632.5 |
| Contained Gold in Mine Plan | koz Au | 356.6 |
| Contained Silver in Mine Plan | koz Ag | 33,516.4 |
| Contained Silver Equivalent in Mine Plan | (koz AgEq) | 64,319.4 |
| Average Gold Metallurgical Recovery | % Au | 98.0% |
| Average Silver Metallurgical Recovery | % Ag | 97.5% |
| Payable Gold | koz Au | 349.0 |
| Payable Silver | koz Ag | 32,645.9 |
| Payable Silver Equivalent | koz AgEq | 62,787.5 |
| Average Full Year Annual Production (Years 1-5) |
| Description | Unit | LOM Total/Avg. |
| Gold | Au koz/yr | 53.1 |
| Silver | Ag koz/yr | 5,259.1 |
| Silver Equivalent | AgEq koz/yr | 9,843.7 |
| Mining Cost | $/t mined | 114.17 |
| Mining Cost | $/t processed | 110.29 |
| Process Cost | $/t processed | 42.05 |
| G&A Cost | $/t processed | 24.61 |
| Total Operating Cost | $/t processed | 176.95 |
| LOM Sustaining Capital Cost | $M | 163.1 |
| Closure Costs | $M | 11.9 |
| Cash Costs LOM – Mine Level | $/oz AgEq | 9.42 |
| Au Price (LOM Average) | $/oz | 2,493 |
| Ag Price (LOM Average) | $/oz | 28.86 |
| Undiscounted LOM net free cash flow | $M | 626.4 |
| Pre-Tax NPV 5%, $M | 5%, $M | 853.0 |
| Post-Tax NPV (5%, $M) | 5%, $M | 538.6 |
The production schedule was incorporated into a financial model to develop the annual recovered metal production. The annual at-mine revenue contribution of each metal was determined by deducting the applicable treatment, refining, and transportation charges (from mine site to market) from gross revenue.
The cash flow is based on payable ounces of 349.0 koz gold and 32,645.9 koz silver.
Sustaining capital costs were incorporated on a year-by-year basis over the LOM, and operating costs were deducted from gross revenue to estimate annual mine operating earnings.
The financial model includes a mine closure and reclamation cost forecast of $11.9M. The spending is scheduled to occur across ten years with a bulk of the spend occurring during the three years following the cessation of production (estimated to be 2032-2034).
The operating costs are expected to average $176.95 per tonne milled over the LOM. Additional 2025 expensed exploration costs are included in the NPV calculation but are not required for current Mineral Reserves.
Table 19‑6 is an overall cost summary for the Las Chispas Operation.
| Item | LOM $M | Per AgEq Oz |
| Mining | 348.8 | 5.56 |
| Processing + TCRC | 151.8 | 2.42 |
| G&A | 77.8 | 1.24 |
| Cash Costs | 578.5 | 9.21 |
| Sustaining Capital | 163.1 | 2.60 |
| Closure | 11.9 | 0.19 |
Note: Inventory adjustments include costs applied to previously unsold ounces from inventory. Operating costs differ from cash costs.
Tax analysis was included in the financial model and in sensitivity analysis (refer to Section 19.3.9).
Figure 19‑3 shows the annual after-tax net cash flows (NCFs) and cumulative after-tax net cash flows.
The project is a mature producing and cash flowing asset and has already paid back it’s initial capital investment.
Figure 19‑3: After-Tax Cash Flow
Source: Coeur, 2024.
A sensitivity analysis was completed to evaluate the response of the NPV to changes in assumptions on key inputs of metals prices, sustaining capital costs and operating costs. The after-tax results across a range of ±20% from the base case assumption value are shown in Figure 19‑4. The Las Chispas Operation maintains a positive NPV across the range tested and is most sensitive to metal prices, with a smaller impact due to changes in operating and sustaining capital costs. Grade or recovery sensitivities match metal price sensitivity.
Figure 19‑4:
| Post-Tax NPV Sensitivities |
Source: Coeur, 2024.
Table 19‑7:
| Post-Tax NPV($M) Sensitivities (base-case is bolded) |
| Parameter | -20% | -15% | -10% | -5% | Base | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% |
| Metal Price/Grade | 340 | 390 | 439 | 489 | 539 | 588 | 638 | 688 | 737 |
| Operating Cost | 600 | 585 | 570 | 554 | 539 | 523 | 508 | 492 | 477 |
| Capital Cost | 562 | 556 | 550 | 544 | 539 | 533 | 527 | 521 | 516 |
19.6 | Gold and Silver Price Scenarios |
A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of changing gold and silver prices on the Las Chispas Operation, as outlined in Table 19‑8. The base case is bolded in the table.
Table 19‑8:
| Economic Results for Different Metal Price Scenarios |
| Price Case | Gold Price ($/oz) | Silver Price ($/oz) | Post-Tax NPV 5% ($M) |
| Base Case (LOM average) | 2,493 | 28.86 | 538.6 |
| Downside Case (Reserve Cutoff) | 1,800 | 23.50 | 308.9 |
| Spot Case | 2,814 | 31.83 | 649.7 |
| Upside Case | 3,000 | 35.00 | 742.0 |
Note: Spot Prices are based on data as of February 2nd, 2025. The Downside case is based on prices used to determine the mineral reserves cutoff.
Advanced exploration or operating properties are not known to exist immediately adjacent, or contiguous to, the Las Chispas Property that have relevance to the Report.
20.1 | Nearby Properties and Operating Mines |
Many operating mines exist along the Rio Sonora valley in proximity to the Las Chispas Property. These include the nearby Santa Elena Mine, operated by First Majestic Silver Corp., and the Mercedes Mine, operated by Bear Creek Mining Corp. The Santa Elena Mine is a gold-silver underground mine, processing 2,500 t/d and is located 22 km south–southwest of Las Chispas (First Majestic, 2025). The Mercedes Mine is also a gold–silver underground mine, processing 2,000 t/d and is located 33 km to the northwest of Las Chispas (Bear Creek, 2025).
The mineral deposits being exploited at these mines are low to intermediate sulphidation epithermal veins with associated breccia and stockwork over varying thicknesses of <1 m to >10 m. The deposits occur in volcanic host rocks with similar age of precious metal emplacement (late Cretaceous to Paleogene Neogene) to Las Chispas. The gold–silver mineralization found on these properties is similar to Las Chispas in lithology, structural controls, alteration, and geochemistry with some variations. Current mining operations may differ from the Las Chispas Operation.
20.2 | Comment on Adjacent Properties |
The Qualified Person has been unable to verify the information above. The information is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on the Las Chispas Property that is the subject of this Report.
21 | OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION |
There is no additional relevant data or information that should be included in this Technical Report Summary.
22 | INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS |
The QPs note the following interpretations and conclusions in their respective areas of expertise, based on the review of data available for this Report.
22.2 | Mineral Tenure, Surface Rights, Water Rights, Royalties and Agreements |
Information from legal and Coeur experts support that the tenure held is valid and sufficient to support a declaration of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.
The Las Chispas Operation consists of 27 mineral concessions, totalling 1,414 ha. Concessions have expiry dates from 2039 to 2073. LLA, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Coeur, has acquired 100% title to 25 of the mining concessions and is in control of the other two mining concessions. The mineral concessions that host the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves are in good standing. At the Effective Date of the Report, all required mining duties were paid.
There are three option agreements. Option 1 is for the La Fortuna mining concession applications No. 082/39410 and 082/38731, which cover the Panuco II and Carmen Dos Fracción II mineral lots; title transfer to LLA of the new concession are pending until the applications are issued as mining concessions. Under Option 2, LLA has a 67% ownership interest in the Lopez concession. Option 3 provides LLA with 100% rights to Panuco II, pending title for ownership. All three options are not material to the Report.
The surface rights overlying the Las Chispas mineral concessions and road access from local highway are either owned by LLA or held by LLA under negotiated lease agreements and sufficient to support plant operations.
A 2% royalty is payable to the Gutierrez-Pérez-Ramirez optionees, on the Nuevo Lupena and Panuco II concessions (when granted) for material that has processed grades of ≥0.5 oz/tonne gold and ≥ 40 oz/tonne silver, combined. No Mineral Reserves exist on these concessions.
To the extent known to the QP, there are no other significant factors and risks that may affect access, title, or the right or ability to perform work on the Las Chispas Operation that are not discussed in the Report.
22.3 | Geology and Mineralization |
Mineral deposits in the Las Chispas District are classified as low to intermediate sulfidation gold and silver epithermal systems.
The understanding of the vein settings, lithologies, mineralization, and the geological, structural, and alteration controls on mineralization is sufficient to support estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves.
There is remaining exploration potential in the Las Chispas Operation area. A number of the known veins remain open along strike (e.g., Las Chispas Main) and at depth (e.g., Amethyst, Babi Main Babicanora Norte Veins). Surface geological mapping has identified several mineralized structures to the north of the Las Chispas Area that require further drill testing (e.g., Los Chiltepins, El Cumaro and Ranch Veins).
22.4 | Exploration, Drilling and Analytical Data Collection in Support of Mineral Resource Estimation |
The exploration programs completed to date are appropriate for epithermal-style gold and silver mineralization.
Sampling methods are acceptable to support Mineral Resource estimation.
Sample preparation, analysis and security were generally performed in accordance with exploration best practices and industry standards at the time the information was collected.
The quantity and quality of the logged geological data, collar, and downhole survey data collected in the exploration and infill drill programs are sufficient to support Mineral Resource estimation.
No material factors were identified with the data collection from the drill programs that could significantly affect Mineral Resource estimation.
Sample preparation and analyses were performed by independent accredited laboratories. The sample preparation, analysis, and security practices and are acceptable, meet industry-standard practices at the time they were undertaken, and are sufficient to support Mineral Resource estimation.
QA/QC submission rates met industry best practices at the time of each of the drill campaigns. The QA/QC programs did not detect any material sample biases in the data reviewed that supports Mineral Resource estimation.
The data verification programs concluded that the data collected from the Las Chispas Operation adequately support the geological interpretations and constitute a database of sufficient quality to support the use of the data in Mineral Resource estimation.
22.5 | Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing |
Based on the assumptions and parameters presented in the Report, the Las Chispas Operation should continue to provide positive economics.
22.6 | Mineral Reserve Estimate |
Mineral Reserve estimation uses industry-accepted practices, and the estimate is reported using Subpart 229.1300 – Disclosure by Registrants Engaged in Mining Operations.
Mineral Reserves were converted from Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources and do not include any Inferred Mineral Resources. Inferred Mineral Resources contained within the Mineral Resource block models were treated as waste at zero grade.
Factors that may affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate include geological complexity, geological interpretation, and Mineral Resource block modelling; COG estimations; commodity prices, market conditions and foreign exchange rate assumptions; operating cost and productivity assumptions; sustaining capital costs to maintain production; rock quality and geotechnical constraints, dilution and mining recovery factors; hydrogeological assumptions; and metallurgical process recoveries. There are no other environmental, legal, title, taxation, socioeconomic, marketing, political or other relevant factors known to the QP that would materially affect the estimation of Mineral Reserves that are not discussed in the Report.
22.7.1 | Geotechnical Considerations |
Extensive geomechanical core logging and underground mapping has been completed by Las Chispas Operations at the Babicanora and Las Chispas Complexes using the RMR76 and Q’ rock mass classification systems. Rock mass structure data has been collected through mapping in the sill drives at the BAN, BAV, and BAM veins. The rock mass quality and structural data were reviewed by KP through site visits, core photos, and complementary underground mapping.
The available data have been used to define rock mass quality domains based on spatial variability, proximity to the mineralized zone, and lithology. The rock mass quality in the waste development and in the mineralized areas is typically GOOD (i.e., RMR76 values between 60 and 70). At the BAM and BAS veins, the rock mass quality in proximity to the mineralization is variable and can be of reduced quality (i.e., POOR to FAIR with RMR76 values between 20 and 60). The mineralization is hosted in a fault zone at the BAC vein, and the rock mass quality is typically POOR (i.e., RMR76 values between 20 and 35).
The available discontinuity orientation data have been used to define the structural domains that reflect differences between the veins as well as several key lithologies. The defined joint sets are parallel to sub-parallel to the mineralization, cross-cut the mineralization, and are sub-horizontal.
The following geotechnical design input was provided to the mine plan was based on the rock mass quality and structural domains, empirical stability analyses, 2D numerical modelling, existing experience at the mine, and experience from other similar projects and mines:
• | Stope dimensions and overbreak |
• | Dimensions for crown, sill, rib and inter-lode pillars |
• | Offsets and strategies for mining around voids and historic workings |
• | Offsets between stopes and development |
• | Strategies for temporary sill pillar recovery under sill mats |
22.7.2 | Hydrological Considerations |
The new mine plan at the Las Chispas Operation implies some of the workings to be eventually submerged below the water table; dewatering will therefore be required. Even if hydrogeological studies completed so far indicate there is no major concerns related to groundwater additional information will be required to define the exact inflow to support the dewatering strategy. When mine development gets closer to the water table, further analysis will be completed to refine the assumptions used in this Report. Those will include drilling from underground in various areas and testing open boreholes from underground.
The mine design was based on a targeted production rate of 1,250 t/d. The proposed underground mining approach will use variations of longhole stoping and cut and fill mining methods via several access drifts and ramps. These methods are appropriate to the sub-vertical vein geometry, where the veins have thicknesses ranging from 0.1–10 m.
Mining operations will extract from the principal veins divided into six mining areas, which will be accessed via three portals. Each mining area will be serviced by supporting infrastructure including power distribution, compressed air distribution, water supply, ventilation, dewatering and communications.
The equipment fleet is conventional for underground mining operations.
All mining activities are being completed by a contractor. Geological, grade control and planning services are being provided by Las Chispas Operations. The contractor will supply adequate underground mining equipment for the different mining activities.
The Process Plant originally designed for 1,250 t/d with an estimate rate of milling of 57 t/h (tonne per operating hour) and a 91.3% availability.
The plant has been operating without the flotation circuit. The cyanide detox system has been retrofitted to operate on pond seepage solution as well as leach slurry and has been proven effective.
Overall, the Process Plant has operated according to the design criteria and met or exceeded throughput and availability targets. For the LOM, it is reasonable to expect that the Process Plant will be able to process the expected mine production to mill of 1,250 t/d at a metallurgical recovery of 98.0% for gold and 97.5% for silver.
22.9 | Project Infrastructure |
The Operation includes the following infrastructure: underground mine, including portals and ramps; various roads such as the main access road to site, borrow pit haul road, FTSF haul road, WRSF haul road, and explosives access road; diversion and collection channels, culverts, and containment structures; site main gates and guard houses; accommodation camp; warehouse and truck shops, offices, medical clinic, and nursery; explosives magazines, exploration core shack; Process Plant; control room; doré room; assay laboratory (off-site facility); reagent storage facilities; water treatment plant; stockpiles and WRSFs; FTSF; hazardous waste containment facility; and Nuclear Devices warehouse.
Electrical power is supplied to site from the national grid, by way of a 33 KV overhead power line. Emergency power is also available throughout the property.
Water is being sourced from the Underground and from the Sonora valley.
22.10 | Markets and Contracts |
Gold and silver doré can be readily sold on many markets throughout the world and the market price ascertained on demand. Las Chispas Operation doré is delivered to the refinery, where it is refined under a fixed-term contract. After refining, gold and silver are sold on the spot market to arm’s length international metal brokers and institutional banks. The existing contract for refining and with metal brokers and banks is considered within industry standards. The commercial terms are reviewed at the renewal period and the company does not expect any difficulties with renewing the existing contract or securing new contracts for the sale of the doré.
At the Report Effective Date, the Company has entered into all contracts necessary for operating Las Chispas. These contracts and agreements include, but are not limited to, contracts for drilling, underground mining, explosives, power, supply of consumables, catering and camp management, security, personnel transportation and refining (as per above). These contracts are reviewed and negotiated periodically to ensure they remain competitive and aligned within industry norms for projects in similar settings in Mexico.
Metal pricing used in the economic analysis is based on consideration of various metal price sources. This included review of consensus price forecasts from banks and financial institutions, three-year trailing average of spot prices, and current spot prices.
22.11 | Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social Considerations |
22.11.1 | Environmental Considerations |
Environmental surveys and studies for the Las Chispas Operation were completed in support of permit applications. Completed studies include climate, flora, fauna, air quality, noise, surface and groundwater quality.
Based on the 2023 ESG report (Silvercrest 2023 ESG Report, 2024), ML testing showed that potentially leachable metals included barium and lead, but in concentrations that were below the maximum allowable limits. ARD testing indicated that the majority of the rocks showed low ARD potential. The majority of tailings samples showed non-acid forming (NAF) characteristics in NAG testing.
No known environmental liabilities exist in the Las Chispas Operation are from historic mining and processing operations. Soil and tailings testing were conducted as part of the overall sampling that has been ongoing at site. To date, there are no known contaminants measured in the soils. Water quality testing is currently ongoing through ongoing environmental studies.
22.11.2 | Permitting Considerations |
LLA has a permitting team in Mexico located at the Las Chispas Operation. The permitting team is in charge of monitoring all LLA obligation pertaining to its existing permits, including the data acquisition and reporting obligations. The permitting Team is also monitoring potential regulatory changes in Mexico and mandated to respond to such potential changes to permits if and when required. The Permitting Team is supported with Mexican Legal Counsel.
LLA now operates under the umbrella of a LAU (Licencia Ambiental Unica) which is an integrated permit for all of its operation as related to atmospheric conditions at the Las Chispas Operation. Permits will be renewed as required.
22.11.3 | Closure and Reclamation |
A Conceptual Closure Plan was prepared in general accordance with applicable Mexican standards. Under Mexican law, mining may be initiated under a Conceptual Closure Plan with a Detailed Closure Plan being developed later in the project life.
The closure cost forecast is $11.9M. Closure costs were assumed to be disbursed over a period of approximately three years, following cessation of production.
22.11.4 | Social Considerations |
A social baseline study, completed in 2019–2020, found key areas of community concern were: water usage, and water safety; a lack of information on the Las Chispas Operation; concerns around an environmental incident in 2014 that was caused by a different mining company (100 km from the Las Chispas Operation); a desire to see improvements in the local infrastructure; that environmental safety and appropriate mine closure protocols should be in place to protect the region at the end of the LOM; and job creation with a focus on opportunities being made available for women.
A 2019–2020 materiality assessment as well as a climate risk assessment in 2021 formed the basis of a company-wide Environmental and Social Management System. Key findings from the materiality and climate risk assessments were centered around climate (drought, extreme heat, flooding) and water risks (economic reliance on access to water), community health issues (poor sewage), environmental safety of the local river and agriculture, employment opportunities, a desire for improved infrastructure (aqueducts, sports, recreation, health) and a concern regarding a potential influx of people from outside the community taxing local infrastructure.
A Five-year Water Stewardship Plan has been formalized, aiming at improving the local infrastructure which will provide improved economic resilience for the large percentage of the community that relies on farming and ranching. In conjunction with the local infrastructure projects, A communication strategy has been implemented that employs direct outreach, social media, company-generated videos, flyers, posters and workshops. There is also a whistle blower policy and hotline and a grievance mechanism process.
22.12 | Capital and Operating Costs |
22.12.1 | Sustaining Capital Cost Estimates |
Capital cost estimates are at a minimum at pre-feasibility level of confidence, having an accuracy level of ±25% and a contingency range not exceeding 15%.
LOM sustaining capital costs a total of $163.1M, which can be broken down as per Table 22‑1.
Table 22‑1:
| LOM Sustaining Capital Cost Estimates ($M) |
| Calendar Year | LOM | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 |
| Production Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| U/G Mine Development ($M) | 139.3 | 30.6 | 31.4 | 29.8 | 20.6 | 15.1 | 11.8 | - |
| U/G Mine Infrastructure ($M) | 14.9 | 3.8 | 6.1 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.2 | - | - |
| Process Plant ($M) | 4.0 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - |
| Other Sust. & Dev. ($M) | 0.6 | - | - | - | 0.3 | - | 0.3 | - |
| G&A (including mobile) ($M) | 4.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | - | - |
| Total | 163.1 | 37.5 | 38.8 | 32.8 | 24.3 | 17.6 | 12.1 | - |
22.12.2 | Reclamation and Closure Cost Estimates |
An allowance of $11.9M was made for closure costs with spending scheduled to occur across ten years with the bulk of the spend occurring during the first three years following the cessation of production. Any change in in project scope or regulations would require the company to update the total cost and timing of these expenditures.
No salvage value was assumed for the plant and surface infrastructure. It has also been assumed that CFE would accept ownership of the power line which is common in Mexico.
22.12.3 | Operating Cost Estimate |
Operating cost estimates are at a minimum at pre-feasibility level of confidence, having an accuracy level of ±25% and a contingency range not exceeding 15%.
The average LOM operating cost is estimated at $176.95/t processed. The operating cost is defined as the total direct operating costs including mining, processing, and G&A costs. Mining costs are estimated to be $110.29/t processed ($114.17/t mined). Tonnes of material to be processed includes mined ore that is already in stockpiles. Table 25-2 shows a summary breakdown of the operating costs for the entire LOM.
Table 22‑2:
| Operating Cost Summary |
Area | LOM Average Operating Cost ($/t processed) |
Mining | 110.29 |
Process | 42.05 |
G&A | 24.61 |
Total LOM Operating Cost ($/t processed) | 176.95 |
A pre- and post-tax economic analysis was completed on the basis of a discounted cash flow model featuring a 5% discount rate. The analysis used constant (real) Q4 2024 US$ and the Las Chispas Operation cash flows were modelled in annual periods.
The model assumed a production period of seven years, including 2025-2031.
The economic model was based on an average gold price of $2,493/oz and a silver price of $28.86/oz. The refining terms used as the basis of the economic analysis are based on actual average cost paid by the Company with its third-party refiner. The freight terms are also based on actual rates.
Taxes were built into the financial model and include a 30% corporate income tax, a mining tax of 8.5% of EBITDA, and a precious metals mining tax on 1% NSR.
The economic analysis demonstrates that the mine plan has positive economics under the assumptions used. The Las Chispas Operation post-tax (NPV) at a 5% discount rate is estimated to be $538.6M. A summary of the economic analysis of the Las Chispas Operation is shown in Table 19‑5.
The Las Chispas Operation is most sensitive to metal pricing and recovery/grade. Grade sensitivity mirrors the sensitivity to metal prices.
22.14 | Risks and Opportunities |
22.14.1.1 | Exploration, Drilling and Analytical Data Collection in Support of Mineral Resource Estimation |
A structured risk management process was established to promote early identification of risks, determine the likelihood and consequence of risk actualization, and propose risk mitigation plans to reduce the likelihood and (or) impacts. The same process was used to identify and promote opportunities.
22.14.1.2 | Metallurgical Testwork and Recovery Plan |
There is a minor risk that Au and Ag recoveries while processing future ore do not meet current estimated recoveries. However, the flexibility of the Process Plant design will provide opportunities to mitigate losses in recovery.
22.14.1.3 | Mineral Resource Estimate |
The drill sample spacing varies by vein and the classification of Mineral Resource Estimate was assigned based on the level of confidence based on drill core sample spacing and grade variability. Risk is associated with all classifications of Mineral Resource Estimate, most particularly with the Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate.
There is a risk that the Mineral Resource Estimate wireframes (>150 g/t AgEq) may be moderately high biased with respect to the representative volume, and subsequent estimated tonnage and metal content. This potential bias could be where the wireframes extend somewhat too far into lower-grade (<150 g/t AgEq) assay areas of influence. A follow-up rolling reconciliation is recommended to allow for any mine call factor adjustments to be made in these lower-grade areas.
Localized high-grade samples were encountered in drill core sampling as part of the mineralization system. Locally, this represents a risk in the accuracy of grade estimation for Mineral Resource and subsequent Mineral Reserve estimation, and to operational grade control.
Where only widely spaced sampling is available, the spatial extent of the high-grade mineralization may be uncertain. This risk can be reduced through future close-range sampling to delineate high-grade shoots within the vein systems, thereby allowing the highest-grade material to be sub-domain to constrain spatial influence of these samples within delineated shoots. Closely spaced pre-production definition drilling in combination with duplicate sampling protocols for high-grade samples should be implemented to mitigate excessive extrapolation of high-grade values and to inform the local, short-range, grade variability.
22.14.1.4 | Mineral Reserve Estimate and Mine Plan |
General factors that may affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate include adjustments to gold price and exchange rate assumptions; changes in operating and capital cost estimates; dilution adjustments; changes to geotechnical assumptions, changes to hydrogeological and underground dewatering assumptions; and changes to modifying factor assumptions, including mining recovery and dilution. Additionally, adjustments to reserve estimates may be required if reserve to plant production reconciliation trend in a consistently bias manner (currently F3 is 0.95) over successive reserve estimations.
There is a known open stope area in the Babicanora Central zone. This area could cause recovery problems because although the general area is known, the exact size and geometry of the open stope is not appropriately defined. To mitigate the possible impact of this risk, all mining within 10 m of the known void have been removed from the plan, and test hole drilling cost estimates were included in the costing of this area.
Las Chispas Operations has established access to the historic workings at the historic Las Chispas Area and has created a 3D model of the extensive workings, through the use of digitized historic long sections. However, there remains considerable uncertainty in the position of some of the voids. It is recommended that surveys be completed to confirm the void position and geometry prior to further mining. Probe drilling will also be required on advance during development near potential voids.
22.14.6.5 | Project Infrastructure |
22.14.6.5.1 | Filtered Tailings System Facility (FTSF) |
Based on tailings filtering assays (Outotec, 2020) a portion of the tailings could show high clay/mica content, which could only be dewatered in the filter plant to a 22% gravimetric moisture content, which is above the range of optimum compaction contents determined from geotechnical laboratory testing. This could translate into greater moisture than the target at the filter plant, and longer times and greater effort to process and compact the filtered tailings at the FTSF.
This risk has not materialized to date. However, this potential risk can be further mitigated by providing sufficient area for the FTSF, where tailings that do not meet the design specifications or higher clay content tailings can be temporarily placed in the interior portion of the FTSF. Filtered tailings can then be extended and compacted when conditions allow, without the need to stop tailings disposal.
Additional tailings storage (Phase 2) capacity was constructed in 2024 to address the scenario of higher clay content tailings being produced staring.
The following sub-sections summarize opportunities that could potentially improve on the economics of this Report. Alone or combined, these opportunities could change the approach to development, timelines, capital requirements and operating costs described within this Report with potential to change production, scale, economics and (or) the Las Chispas Operation value.
22.14.2.1 | Exploration and Mineral Resources |
Several potential opportunities have been identified for expansion and increasing confidence of existing Mineral Resources, in addition to brownfields exploration to test defined targets along vein strike and to depth.
The most significant upside is the potential for:
• | Conversion of Inferred Mineral Resources to Indicated Resources through infill drilling; and |
• | Discovery of additional mineralization through exploration and exploration drilling that may support Mineral Resource estimation. |
The 2025 drill program should also focus on identifying additional Inferred Mineral Resources and to improve confidence of existing Inferred to the level of Indicated Mineral Resources. Work will consist of infill and Inferred drilling and brownfields exploration drilling to test mapped targets along vein strike and to depth.
22.14.2.2 | Mineral Resource Estimate |
Several potential opportunities have been identified for expansion and increasing confidence of existing Mineral Resources, in addition to brownfields exploration to test mapped targets along vein strike and to depth.
The most significant upside is the potential for conversion of existing Inferred Mineral Resources to Indicated Mineral Resources with additional drilling, and the exploration potential to identify and support new Inferred Mineral Resources.
Inferred Mineral Resources are estimated at 1.2 Mt grading 3.81 g/t Au, and 268 g/t Ag, or 571 g/t AgEq, for 21.5 Moz AgEq. The majority of the AgEq oz are of sufficient mining width, close to surface, and in proximity to current or planned underground workings, and should be targeted immediately for drilling to assess conversion into Indicated Resources. The majority of these Mineral Resources are located in the El Muerto Splay, Babicanora Norte, Babi Sur and Sorpresa Zone.
The Las Chispas Operation has significant brownfields exploration potential. There are over 23 km in strike of underexplored veins and structures throughout the property that have been identified on surface through mapping and sampling programs. These areas include the Chiltepin Area, La Martina, Las Chispas Southeast, Ranch Vein, and La Victoria Vein. There are also several blind veins and structures that have been tagged through various drill programs including potential vein expansion to depth along several of the currently known zones. Future drilling should focus on step-out drilling within the known mineralization zones and testing deeper host lithologies, parallel veins and newly identified areas that had limited historical workings.
22.14.2.3 | Conversion of Inferred Mineral Resources |
Inferred Mineral Resources are estimated at 24.1 Moz AgEq (refer to Table 14-17). There are 15 Moz over 500 g/t AgEq with sufficient mining width, close to surface, and in proximity to current or planned underground workings, of which 10 Moz AgEq will be targeted immediately for drilling to assess conversion into Indicated Resources. A majority of these resources are located as follows.
BAS Area (BAS Main, BAS HW, BAS FW) has an estimated 7.31 Moz AgEq with a grade of 566 g/t AgEq (4.55 g/t Au and 204 g/t Ag) in Inferred Mineral Resources. Included in this amount is 4.86 Moz AqEq with a grade of 1,050 g/t AgEq (8.46 g/t Au and 378 g/t Ag) using a cut-off of 500 g/t AgEq. This mineralization is located proximal of the current ongoing underground development and proposed mine design for the BAS Main Vein. Encouraging high grade mineralization has been intercepted both at depth and towards surface in the main mineralized structures indicating a potential for expansion of mineralization.
El Muerto Area (El Muerto, El Muerto Splay, Los Parientes) has an estimated 3.42 Moz AgEq with a grade of 711 g/t AgEq (4.38 g/t Au and 362 g/t Ag) in Inferred Resources. This includes El Muerto Splay which contains 2.15 Moz AgEq with a grade of 1,148 g/t AgEq (6.62 g/t Au and 622 g/t Ag) using a cut-off of 500 g/t AgEq. Drilling of the El Muerto Zone at depth below the Babicanora Central Zone has potential to intercept additional high-grade mineralization below the limit of the current Mineral Resource Estimate.
BAN Area (BAN Main, BAN NW Ext., BAN HW, BAN Splay 1-4) has an estimated Inferred Mineral Resource of 3.44 Moz AgEq with a grade of 785 g/t AgEq (3.54 g/t Au and 503 g/t Ag). Included in this is BAN NW Extension with 1.55 Moz AgEq with a grade of 2,294 g/t AgEq (11.08 g/t Au and 1,413 g/t Ag) using a cut-off of 500 g/t AgEq. Expansion drilling along the projected NW strike of BAN Main has suggested the mineralized trend continues along strike and to surface in the area.
BAV Area (BAV Main, BAV FW, BAV Splay 1-3, BAV Andesite) has an estimated Inferred Resource of 2.43 Moz AgEq with a grade of 1,337 g/t AgEq (10.72 g/t Au and 484 g/t Ag). This includes BAV FW with 1.08 Moz AgEq with a grade of 2,327 g/t AgEq (14.00 g/t Au and 1,214 g/t Ag) using a cut-off of 500 g/t AgEq. Underground development in the BAV Main area has intercepted the BAV FW. Drilling underground with short, targeted holes may support potential for conversion of Inferred Mineral Resources to Indicated Mineral Resources.
Encinitas has an estimated Inferred Mineral Resource of 1.25 Moz AgEq with a grade of 567 g/t AgEq (6.51 g/t Au and 49 g/t Ag). Included in this amount is 898 Koz AgEq with a grade of 902 g/t AgEq (10.45 g/t Au and 72 g/t Ag) using a cut-off of 500 g/t AgEq. Located in the BAS Area, Encinitas has potential for mineralization along strike and to depth. Further step-out drilling along trend has potential for additional Inferred Mineral Resources.
Las Chispas Area (Las Chispas Main, Gio Mini, Luigi, Luigi FW, and excluding William Tell) has an estimated Inferred Resource of 2.25 Moz AgEq with a grade of 529 g/t AgEq. This includes Las Chispas Main Vein which contains 1.24 Moz AgEq with a grade of 1,783 g/t AgEq (8.66 g/t Au and 1,095 g/t Ag) using a cut-off of 500 g/t AgEq. This mineralization is along trend of current proposed mine design for the Las Chispas Main Vein and is open along strike and to depth which makes it a target for potential Mineral Resource expansion.
22.14.2.4 | Mine Design and Schedule Optimization |
The design of the LOM was completed at a level of detail sufficient for inclusion in this Report. The LOM plan will be used to form the basis of future detailed design and schedule. As with any LOM, there exists an opportunity to further improve the mine design and schedule in terms of detailed design, especially with due regard to integration of services, layout of development, design of stopes and geomechanics. The benefit from this additional work is estimated to be in the order of 5M AgEq ounces.
Geomechanical assumptions and assessments present opportunities to reclaim AgEq ounces in the following areas:
• | The collection of additional data to reassess crown pillars, potentially reducing their size. |
• | Longhole stopes under sill pillars are currently planned to be left empty with the use of rib and/or sill pillars. The addition of top sills in these stopes could result in an increase in recovery of these pillar at the cost of more development. |
• | Detailed design and sequencing of interlode pillars could add a few stopes where vein splays, the FW vein or HW vein are in close proximity to each other and the main veins. |
• | Evaluate longhole stoping in areas of BAS at reduced sill heights improving cost and productivity. |
Additional opportunities to reclaim AgEq ounces through detailed design and site testing exist in the following areas:
• | There is opportunity to review Measured and Indicated Resource which did not make the cut-off grade of after the first pass incremental MSO stope run. Some of this resource exists on the fringes of Mineral Reserve shapes and some exists as isolated material. More detailed design, such as varying stope widths, heights and strike lengths, could increase the mined grade of some of the fringe resource. In some cases, the isolated material could be bolstered with additional material converted during the exploration program. Site continues to work on improving blast design and wall control, which could allow for reductions in minimum mining widths and unplanned dilution. |
• | Cut and fill and resue mine areas have the potential for conversion to longhole stoping where ground conditions are suitable. Converting these stopes to longhole provide a more robust and efficient mine plan with a reduced cost per tonne with an acceptable impact to dilution. |
• | The Las Chispas Operation is currently trialing the Avoca variant of longhole open stoping. If trials are positive, Avoca could provide a cheaper and more productive method to apply in specific areas over the LOM. |
• | Opportunity exists with development and infrastructure optimization of the ventilation network through detailed design, calibrating the LOM plan to the short-term site plan, optimizing the placement of fresh and return air raises to limit development and improve the overall circuit. |
Although the Process Plant has been built at a capacity of 1,250 t/d, it is designed to accommodate a future expansion of up to 1,750 t/d. Additional studies and engineering would be required to execute a future plant expansion, including a review of the crushing, grinding, flotation, leaching and dewatering circuits as well as power supply facilities.
22.14.6.6 | Project Infrastructure |
The project is engaged with outside consultants to examine the possibility of using renewable energy to meet operational needs. The broader geographic region is well suited for solar power and the company is actively pursuing a power purchase agreement from a solar supplier.
A sequential phase approach is presented for recommended future work. The following Table presents the budget for the recommended exploration and development activities to be completed in 2025.
Table 23‑1: | Summary of Budget for Recommended Exploration and Development Activities |
| Exploration and Development Activity | Cost Estimate ($M) 2025 |
| Exploration and Mineral Resource Conversion Drilling (74,800 m) | 14.50 |
| QA/QC | 0.10 |
| Bulk Density Investigation | 0.03 |
| Resource Estimation | 0.10 |
| Mine Design | 0.10 |
| Sub-Total | 14.80 |
| Contingency (10%) | 1.50 |
| Total | 16.30 |
Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding.
23.2 | Exploration at Las Chispas |
Approximately 74,800 m of drilling is recommended, of which 18,800 m would be allocated to infill drilling, 30,400 m to Inferred Mineral Resources drilling and 25,600 m to exploration (discovery) drilling. Specific collar locations have yet to be determined. Successive drill collar locations will be dependent on the results of each drilled hole. The program budget assumes 60,000 to 90,000 samples will be taken and submitted for assay.
The infill and Inferred drilling should immediately target the higher-grade, close to current and future underground workings Inferred Mineral Resource. Areas where Indicated Mineral Resources did not make it into the updated Mineral Reserve are also considered in this phase. Other areas for future consideration should be included in future drilling phases. Exploration drilling should be planned for the Los Chiltepins veins, Las Chispas Northwest, Babicanora Norte SE, Los Sheiks, and Las Chispas Extension (eg. GAP zone) Babicanora Sur Deep, and follow-up on high-grade blind vein intercepts.
Surface exploration surveys should include additional geological and structural mapping and mineralogical and alteration studies, along with interpretation of intrusion age dating to refine the overall geological model and to aid identification of prospective deep targets.
The budget for the recommended Las Chispas Operations geology and exploration program is $16.3M (Table 23‑1). This budget is subject to modification, if warranted by the results of previous drilling programs. The recommended program should be completed in 2025.
The sample preparation, analysis, and security procedures implemented at Las Chispas are consistent with standard industry practices. Since further drilling at the Las Chispas Operation is being undertaken to further define, increase confidence and expand on the current resources, the following is recommended:
• | Continue insertion of all QC sample types (CRMs, blanks and duplicates) at the current rate of insertion for all sample types being collected; |
• | Ensure that custom CRMs are suitably prepared, round-robin tested and span appropriate grade ranges; |
• | Progressively phase out externally sourced CRMs when transitioning to custom CRMs, to enable the lab(s) time to adjust to new CRMs; |
• | Continue real-time review and assessment of QC samples as results are received and follow-up on any issues immediately; |
• | Continue re-analyzing 10 samples below and 10 above CRM failures in zones of significant mineralization, recording follow-up actions taken; and |
• | Routinely umpire assay at least 5% of samples assayed at primary lab. |
The costs of this work program are estimated to be $100,000.
23.4 | Mineral Resource Estimation |
Prior to the next Mineral Resource update, the following work is recommended to be completed:
• | Create a density model (instead of a uniform density of 2.55) with the existing density measurements (~45,000). Note that many of the bulk density measurements are not in the vein/alteration zone(s) and that the presence of cavities should also be considered if this work were to proceed. |
• | Continue to use results of reconciliation, geometallurgical study, and underground development to optimize the geological model and grade estimation procedure. |
• | Review the results of the Mine Reserve reconciliation process to identify opportunities to improve long range modelling and estimation methods, particularly to refine interpretation of ultra-high-grade ore shoots and to refine the geometry of mineral boundaries along strike, and |
• | Consider the use of a minimum wireframe constraining width. |
Through calibration of the long-term mining plan to the short-term site plan, several opportunities exist for optimizing ramp placement, raise locations, and other infrastructure. This has the potential to reduce capital development and power requirements for fixed equipment.
It is recommended that alternative dewatering pumps be studied to reduce or eliminate the need for settling sumps. Helical rotor style pumps that are designed to pump clean and dirty (up to 5% solids) water are a low maintenance alternative to submersible pumps. Additionally, with the removal of settling sumps, there is no need to utilize LHDs to clean the sump, allowing the equipment and personnel to focus on mining activities.
Due to the predominantly very narrow width of ore veins, the Mineral Reserve contains a total dilution of 166%, where 57% is unplanned dilution (or ELOS) and the remainder is internal dilution. Continuation of the ongoing work to improve drill and blast practices, ensuring timely extraction of blasted material, and prompt backfilling can all assist in reducing unplanned dilution. For the reduction of planned dilution, testing narrower minimum mining widths is recommended.
Sublevel spacing of 18 m for longhole open stoping could be increased with the introduction of more sophisticated drilling rigs. Hole deviation can be controlled with a more rigid drill, minimizing the impact of increased hole lengths.
Survey of the Las Chispas historic workings and stopes should be completed before production operations begin in this area.
23.6 | Metallurgy and Process Recovery |
The Las Chispas Operations are preforming at or above design values. It is recommended that the Operation continue to apply best practice actions to reduce the soluble metal losses and costs. Other than ongoing operational application of these practices, there is no cost to this work program.
Aguirre-Díaz, G., and McDowell, F., (1991). The volcanic section at Nazas, Durango, Mexico, and the possibility of widespread Eocene volcanism within the Sierra Madre Occidental: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 96, p. 13,373–13,388.
Aguirre-Díaz, G., and McDowell, F., (1991). The volcanic section at Nazas, Durango, Mexico, and the possibility of widespread Eocene volcanism within the Sierra Madre Occidental: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 96, p. 13,373–13,388.
Aguirre-Díaz, G., and McDowell, F., (1993). Nature and timing of faulting and synextensional magmatism in the southern Basin and Range, central-eastern Durango, Mexico: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 105, p. 1435–1444.
Alaniz-Alvarez and Nieto-Samaniego, A.F., (2007). the Taxco-San Miguel de Allende fault system and the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt: Two tectonic boundaries in central Mexico active during the Cenozoic, in Alaniz-Alvarez, S.A and Nieto-Samaniego, A.F., ed., Geology of Mexico: Celebrating the Centenary of the Geological Society of Mexico: Geological society of America special Paper 422, p. 301-316.
An Introduction to Cut-Off Grade Estimation, Second Edition. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc.; January 2014, 159p.
Barr, James and Huang, Jianhui (John), (2019). Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Las Chispas Property, Sonora, Mexico. Completed for SilverCrest Metals Inc. Effective date February 8, 2019.
Barr, James, (2018), Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Las Chispas Property Sonora, Mexico. Completed for SilverCrest Metals Inc. Effective date February 12, 2018. Amended date May 9, 2018.
Bear Creek Mining Corporation. (2024). www.bearcreekmining.com/projects/mercedes. January 24, 2025
Buchanan, L.J., (1981). Precious metal deposits associated with volcanic environments in the southwest: in Relations of Tectonics to Ore Deposits in the Southern Cordillera: Arizona Geological Society Digest, v. 14, p. 237-262.
Carlos M. González-León, Luigi Solari, Jesús Solé, Mihai N. Ducea, Timothy F. Lawton, Juan Pablo Bernal, Elizard González Becuar, Floyd Gray, Margarita López Martínez, and Rufi no Lozano., (2011). Stratigraphy, geochronology, and geochemistry of the Laramide magmatic arc in north-central Sonora, Mexico. Geosphere; December 2011; v. 7; no. 6; p. 1392–1418.
Carlos M. González-León., Víctor A. Valencia., Margarita López-Martínez., Hervey Bellon., Martín Valencia-Moreno., and Thierry Calmus, (2010). Arizpe sub-basin: A sedimentary and volcanic record of Basin and Range extension in north-central Sonora, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, v. 27, núm. 2, 2010, p. 292-312.
Caterpillar (2018). Caterpillar Performance Handbook. Peoria, Illinois, USA. 48th Edition.
Colombo, F., (2017a). Petrographic Report on 24 Rock Samples from Las Chispas district, Sonora, Mexico for SilverCrest Metals Inc. Internal report for SilverCrest Metals Inc., December 1, 2017, p. 1-71.
Colombo, F., (2017b). Petrographic Report on Eight Rock Samples from Las Chispas district, Sonora, Mexico for SilverCrest Metals Inc. Internal report, Oct 31, 2017, pp 1-17.
Dahlgren, C.B., (1883). Historic Mines of Mexico: a Review of the Mines of that Republic for the past Three Centuries, p 81-82.
Delgado-Granados, H., Aguirre-Diaz, G.J., Stock, J.M., (2000). Cenozoic Tectonics and Volcanism of Mexico, Geological Society of America Special Paper 336, 278 pages.
Dufourcq, E.L., (1910). Minas Pedrazzini Operations near Arizpe Sonora, Engineering and Mining Journal, vol 90, p 1,105, December 3, 1910.
Dufourcq, E.L., (1912). Chispas Cyanide Plant, Arizpe, Sonora, Columbia University, The School of Mines Quarterly, vol 33, p 18, 1912.
Ferrari, L. Valencia-Moreo, M., Bryan, S., (2007). Magmatism and tectonics of the Sierra Madre Occidental and its relation with the evolution of the western margin of north America, p. 1-29; in Geology of Mexico: Celebrating the Centenary of the Geological Society of Mexico, The Geological Society of America, Special Paper 422, 2007, edited by Susana A. Alaniz-Alvarez and Angel F. Nieto-Samaniego; 465pp.
Fier, N. Eric, (2018). Technical Report and Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Las Chispas Property Sonora, Mexico. Effective date September 13, 2018.
First Majestic Silver Corp. (2024). www.firstmajestic.com/projects/overview/producing-mines/santa-elena. January 24, 2025.
First Majestic Silver, (2018). Annual Information Form (AIF) for the Year Ended December 31, 2017, report dated March 29, 2019.
Gonzalez-Becuar Elizard., Efren Perez-Segura., Ricardo Vega-Granillo., Luigi Solari., Carlos M. Gonzalez-Leon, Jesus Sole., and Margarita Lopez Martinez., (2017). Laramide to Miocene synextensional plutonism in the Puerta del Sol area, central Sonora, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, vol. 34, number. 1, March, 2017, pp. 45-61.
Hard Rock Miner’s Handbook, Edition 5, Stantec Consulting Ltd. January 2014, 314p
Hartman, Howard L. (1992). SME Mining Engineering Handbook. 2nd ed. Littleton, Colorado: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, 1992. Print
Hydro-Ressources Inc, (2020). Las Chispas Mine – Hydrogeological Feasibility Analysis. 12p.
Hydro-Ressources, (2020). Las Chispas Mine Hydrogeological Feasibility Analysis, Technical Report – File P19-120, Hydro -Ressources Inc., November 2020.
Johnson, C. M., (1991). Large-scale crust formation and lithosphere modification beneath middle to late Cenozoic calderas and volcanic fields, Western North America: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 96, p. 13485–13507.
Kalanchey, R, Weston, S., Stone, W., Puritch, E., Burga, D., Barry, J., Wu, Y., Turner, A.J., Michaud, C., Verreault, M., Aref, K., and Preciado, H., (2021). NI 43-101 Technical Report & Feasibility Study on the Las Chispas Project, Sonora, Mexico, for SilverCrest Metals Inc., Effective date: January 4, 2021.
Montijo, F., (1920). The Las Chispas Mine, in Sonora Mexico, Mining and Scientific Press, vol 121, p 58, July-December. 1920. (reference to Montijo Jr., 1920 in Section 6 should be revised to Montijo, 1920)
Mulchay, R., (1941). Victoria – Chispas district, File Collection Dr6: historical sample analysis records from the La Victoria workings, internal SilverCrest Metals Inc. document.
Mulchay, R.B., (1935). Summary of Reconnaissance Examinations and General Information Arizpe district, Sonora, West Coast Syndicate.
Murray, K., Weston, S., Marthinus Marx, W., Langlais, P., Verreault, M., Peacock, B., Barry, J., Burga, D., Puritch, E., Stone, W., Wu, Y., Lee, C. and Preciado, H.F., (2023), Las Chispas Operation Technical Report, for SilverCrest Metals Inc., Effective date: July 19, 2023, Report Date: September 5, 2023.
Parker, H. M., (2012). Reconciliation principles for the mining industry, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Mining Technology, volume 121, number 3, pp 160-176.
Pérez Segura E., (2017). Estudio microtermométrico (inclusiones fluidas) del yacimiento Las Chispas, Sonora México, Internal report for SilverCrest Metals Inc., May 2017.
Potvin, Y. (1988). Empirical open stope design in Canada. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. Mining and Mineral Processing, University of British Columbia.
Premier Gold Mines Limited, (2018). Annual Information Form (AIF) for the Year Ended December 31, 2017, report dated March 29, 2018.
Ralf, C., (2017) Epithermal Gold and Silver Deposits: ICMJ’s Prospecting and Mining Journal, on-line https://www.icmj.com/magazine/print-article/epithermal-gold-and-silver-deposits-3618/
Rockland Ltd. (2020a). Geomechanical feasibility of the underground design for the Las Chispas Project – SilverCrest Metal Inc. Report prepared for SilverCrest Metal Inc. February.
Rockland Ltd. (2020b). Design of crown pillars for Babicanora Central Vein – SilverCrest Metal Inc. Report prepared for SilverCrest Metal Inc. May.
Rogers, J.W et.al., (2004). Continents and Supercontinents. Section 6. p85.
RS2, (2019). 2D Finite element program, Version 9. Rocscience, Inc.
Russell, B.E., (1908). Las Chispas Mines, Sonora, Mexico, The Engineering and Mining Journal, vol 86, p 1,006, November 21, 1908.
Schlische W. R., (1995). Geometry and Origin of Fault-Related Folds in Extensional Settings. AAPG Bulletin, V. 79, No. 11, November 1995, p. 1661-1678.
Sillitoe, R.H., (1991). Gold rich porphyry systems in the Maricunga Belt, northern Chile: Economic Geology, v. 86, p. 1238-1260.
Sillitoe, R.H., (1994). Erosion and collapse of volcanoes: Causes of telescoping in intrusion-centered ore deposits. Geology, v. 22, number 10, p. 945-967.
Sillitoe, R.H., (2010). Porphyry copper systems. Economic Geology, v. 105, p. 3-41.
SilverCrest Metals: 2024. (2024). Silvercrestmetals.com. https://www.silvercrestmetals.com/news/2024/index.php?content_id=544
SilverCrest, (2015). Babicanora Project, Arizpe, Sonora, Mexico, internal SilverCrest Metals Inc. report.
SilverCrest, (2022), Task Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. https://silvercrestmetals.com/_resources/reports/SilverCrest-Metals-TCFD-report-Final.pdf?v=0.655.
SilverCrest, 2022, Water Stewardship. https://silvercrestmetals.com/_resources/reports/SilverCrest-Metals-Water-Stewardship-Report-2022-Final.pdf?v=0.655.
Turner, M., (2011). Babicanora Project, Sonora, Mexico, Nuevo Babicanora Lote, Drilling Summary, internal Minefinders report.
Unwedge V4. (2019). Stability analysis program for underground excavations in rock containing intersecting structural discontinuities. Rocscience, Toronto, Canada
Wallace, T.C., (2008). Famous Mineral Localities: The Las Chispas Mine, Arizpe, Sonora, The Mineralogical Record, vol 39, November-December 2008.
Wark, D. A., Kempter, K. A., and McDowell, F. W., (1990). Evolution of waning subduction-related magmatism, northern Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 102, p. 1555–1564.
White, N.C. and Hedenquist, J.W., (1995). Epithermal gold deposits: styles, characteristics and exploration: SEG Newsletter, no. 23, p. 1, 9-13.
Wood, (2020). Feasibility Design Report: Las Chispas Filtered Tailings Storage Facility, Sonora, Mexico, prepared for SilverCrest Metals Inc., December 2020.
25 | RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE REGISTRANT |
The QPs have relied on information provided by Coeur (the Registrant) including expert reports, in preparing its findings and conclusions regarding the following modifying factors: macroeconomic information, marketing information, legal matters, environmental matters, accommodations the registrant commits or plans to provide to local individuals or groups in connection with its mine plans, and governmental factors.
The QPs consider it reasonable to rely on Coeur for this information since they have obtained opinion from appropriate experts.
The QPs have not independently reviewed ownership of the Las Chispas Operation and any underlying mineral tenure, and surface rights. The QPs have fully relied upon information derived from the company and legal experts retained by Coeur for this information through the following document:
• | EC RUBIO, 2025: Due Diligence on SilverCrest Metal’s Properties: December 31, 2024 |
This information is used in the summary in Section 1, and in Section 3, Property Description and Location, of the Report. It is also used to support the Mineral Resource Estimate in Section 11, the Mineral Reserve Estimate in Section 12, and the economic analysis in Section 19.
25.3 | Environmental Matters and Community Accommodations |
The QPs have not independently reviewed environmental baseline, permitting, and social information for the Las Chispas Operation. The QPs have fully relied upon information derived from the company and experts retained by the company for this information through the following documents:
• | ALS, 2019; Waste Rock Samples Analytical Reports, prepared for Altadore Energía, S.A. de C.V., November 2019, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico. |
• | ALS, 2020; Tailings Samples Analytical Reports, prepared for Tinto Roca Exploración S.A. de C.V, March 2020, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico. |
• | Ontiveros A, 2019; Various Reports on Surface Water Quality Results from Sampling Points Located Upstream and Downstream from the Mine Project, prepared for Compañía Minera la Llamarada S.A. de C.V and Altadore Energía, S.A. de C.V., Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico. |
• | SGS, 2020a; Modified Acid Base Accounting & Net Acid Generation Testing Results on Various Rock Core Samples from the Babicanora Central, Babicanora Norte, Babicanora Sur, Babi Vista, William Tell, and Las Chispas Mining Areas, Report prepared by SGS Minerals Services for SilverCrest Metals Inc., Project 17337-1, January 2020, Lakefield, Ontario, Canada. |
This information is used in Section 17 of the Report. It is also used to support the Mineral Resource Estimate in Section 11, the Mineral Reserve Estimate in Section 12, and the economic analysis in Section 19.
The QPs have fully relied upon information supplied by Coeur Mining for information related to market assumptions as applied to the financial model. This information is used in support of the marketing assumptions presented in Section 16 and the financial analysis discussed in Section 19. To some extent, this information was also included in the estimation of the Mineral Reserve Estimate, detailed in Section 12.
The QPs consider it reasonable to rely upon the information provided by Coeur Mining for gold and silver doré marketing and marketing assumptions, especially given the ongoing Las Chispas Operations and existing contracts and agreements in place.
The QPs have fully relied upon information supplied by Coeur Mining’s corporate tax department, for information related to taxation assumptions used in support of the economic analysis discussed in Section 19. The QPs consider it reasonable to rely upon information provided by Coeur Mining.