EXHIBIT 99.1
TRI-VALLEY CORPORATION
RESERVE ESTIMATION AND
ECONOMIC EVALUATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
OXNARD, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Effective Date: January 1, 2011
February 16, 2011
Tri-Valley Corporation
Suite 600, 4550 California Avenue
Bakersfield, California
93309
Attention: Mr. Jim Kromer
RE: Tri-Valley Corporation
Reserve Estimation and Economic Evaluation
Oxnard, Ventura County, California
At your request and authorization, AJM Petroleum Consultants (“AJM”) has prepared an independent evaluation of certain oil and gas assets of Tri-Valley Corporation (“Tri-Valley”) in the Oxnard area of California, effective January 1, 2011.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Tri-Valley Corporation and no part thereof shall be reproduced, distributed or made available to any other person, company, regulatory body or organization without the complete content of the report and the knowledge and consent of AJM.
The evaluation includes an estimate of proved developed producing, total proved and proved plus probable reserves with an associated forecast of the pre-tax present value of future production income from the property using SEC January 1, 2010 to December 1, 2010 Pricing. This report documents the results of the evaluation with the following tables summarizing the total corporate reserves and value:
• Table 1 – summary of total corporate reserves and value using constant prices and costs; and
• Table 2 – reserves reconciliation.
The oil and gas reserves calculations and income projections, upon which this report is based, were estimated in accordance with the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (COGEH). The Evaluation Procedure section included in this report details the reserves definitions, price and market demand forecasts and general procedure used by AJM in its determination of this evaluation. The extent and character of ownership and all factual data supplied by Tri-Valley Corporation were accepted as presented (see Representation Letter attached within).
East Tower, Fifth Avenue Place 6th Floor, 425 – 1st Street S.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3L8
phone 403.648.3200 fax 403.265.0862 web www.ajmpetroleumconsultants.com
- 2 -
Tri-Valley Corporation
Reserve Estimation and Economic Evaluation
Oxnard, Ventura County, California
This report contains forward looking statements including expectations of future production and capital expenditures. Information concerning reserves may also be deemed to be forward looking as estimates imply that the reserves described can be profitably produced in the future. These statements are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, which could cause the actual results to differ from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: the underlying risks of the oil and gas industry (i.e. operational risks in development, exploration and production; potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of reserves estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to p roduction, costs and expenses, political and environmental factors), and commodity price and exchange rate fluctuation. Present values for various discount rates documented in this report may not necessarily represent fair market value of the reserves.
A Boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 barrel has been used within this report. This conversion ratio is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
No value has been assigned in this evaluation for non-reserve lands.
It has been a pleasure to perform this evaluation for you, and we trust it is sufficient to meet your current requirements. Should you have any questions, please contact our office.
Yours truly,
AJM Petroleum Consultants
Original signed by: “R. G. Bertram”
Robin G. Bertram, P. Eng.
Executive Vice President
/jp
TRI-VALLEY CORPORATION |
Economic Reserves at January 1, 2011 All Reserve Categories Table 1 |
| Remaining Before Tax Reserves Cash Flow (Mbb) NPV (4)(5) |
| WI | RI | Net (1) | 0.0% | 5.0% | 8.0% | 10.0% | 15.0% | 20.0% |
Proved Developed Producing |
Heavy Oil | 228.7 | 47.3 | 218.8 | 12,596.2 | 10,618.5 | 9.669.3 | 9,114.7 | 7,948.3 | 7.026.9 |
Total | | | | 12,596.2 | 10,618.5 | 9.668.3 | 9114.7 | 7,984.3 | 7,026.9 |
Proved Developed Non-Producing |
Total | | | | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Proved Undeveloped |
Heavy Oil | 769.3 | 156.7 | 733.6 | 33,043.2 | 25,261.5 | 21,645.7 | 19,577.3 | 15,356.5 | 12,175.4 |
Total | | | | 33,043.2 | 25,261.5 | 21,645.7 | 19,577.3 | 15,356.5 | 12,175.4 |
Total Proved |
Heavy Oil | 997.9 | 203.9 | 952.4 | 45,639.5 | 35,880.0 | 31,315.0 | 26,692.1 | 23,304.8 | 12,202.3 |
Total | | | | 45,639.5 | 35,880.0 | 31,315.0 | 26,692.1 | 23,304.8 | 12,202.3 |
Total Proved + Provable |
Heavy Oil | 805.8 | 155.3 | 759.7 | 37,820.7 | 29,358.4 | 25,392.6 | 23,112.1 | 18,425.3 | 14,856.4 |
Total | | | | 37,820.7 | 29,358.4 | 25,392.6 | 23,112.1 | 18,425.3 | 14,856.4 |
Total Proved + Provable |
Heavy Oil | 1,803.7 | 359.2 | 1,712.0 | 83,460.1 | 65,238.4 | 56,707.6 | 51,804.2 | 41,730.1 | 34,058.7 |
Total | | | | 83,460.1 | 65,238.4 | 56,707.6 | 51,804.2 | 41,730.1 | 34,058.7 |
BOE Reserves & NPV/BOE (2)(3) |
Proved Developed Producing | 228.7 | 47.3 | 218.8 | 45.65 | 38.48 | 35.04 | 33.03 | 28.80 | 25.46 |
Proved Developed Non-Producing | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Proved Undeveloped | 769.3 | 156.7 | 733.6 | 35.69 | 27.28 | 23.38 | 21.14 | 16.59 | 13.15 |
Total Proved | 997.9 | 203.9 | 952.4 | 37.97 | 29.85 | 26.06 | 23.87 | 19.39 | 15.98 |
Total Probable Additional | 805.8 | 155.3 | 759.7 | 39.35 | 30.55 | 26.42 | 24.05 | 19.17 | 15.46 |
Total Proved + Probable | 1803.7 | 359.2 | 1,712.0 | 38.59 | 30.16 | 26.22 | 23.95 | 19.29 | 15.75 |
(1) After royalty deductions (2) Oil Equivalent based on 6:1 Mcf/bbl Gas 1:1 bbl/bbl Liquids. (3) Based on Co. Share (4) No allowances was made for the degree of risk associated with any of the reserve categories (5) Costs associated with extraction of natural gas products have in most cases been deducted from the natural gas revenues. |
TRI-VALLEY CORPORATION |
Table 2 Co. Share Changes since January 1, 2010 |
| PDP | PNP | PUD | TP | P+PDP | P+PNP | P+PUD | TPP |
Light Oil (Mbbl) | | | | | | | | |
Opening Balance on Jan. 1, 2010 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Changes | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Balance After Changes | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Amount from Jan. 1, 2010 to Jan. 1, 2011 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Remaining Amount as of Jan. 1, 2011 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Amount | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Outstanding Balance (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Heavy Oil (MBBl) | | | | | | | | |
Opening Balance on Jan. 1, 2010 | 302.0 | - | 925.9 | 1,227.9 | 302.0 | - | 1,887.0 | 2,189.1 |
Total Changes | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Balance After Changes | 302.0 | - | 925.9 | 1,227.9 | 302.0 | - | 1,887.0 | 2,189.1 |
Amount from Jan. 1, 2010 to Jan. 1, 2011 | 26.1 | - | - | 26.1 | 26.1 | - | - | 26.1 |
Remaining Amount as of Jan. 1, 2011 | 275.9 | - | 925.9 | 1,201.9 | 275.9 | - | 1,887.0 | 2,163.0 |
Total Amount | 302.0 | - | 925.9 | 1,227.9 | 302.0 | - | 1,887.0 | 2,189.1 |
Outstanding Balance (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Sales Gas (MMcf) | | | | | | | | |
Opening Balance on Jan. 1, 2010 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Changes | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Balance After Changes | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Amount from Jan. 1, 2010 to Jan. 1, 2011 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Remaining Amount as of Jan. 1, 2011 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Amount | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Outstanding Balance (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Liquids (Mbbl) | | | | | | | | |
Opening Balance on Jan. 1, 2010 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Changes | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Balance After Changes | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Amount from Jan. 1, 2010 to Jan. 1, 2011 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Remaining Amount as of Jan. 1, 2011 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Amount | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Outstanding Balance (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Sulphur (MLT) | | | | | | | | |
Opening Balance on Jan. 1, 2010 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Changes | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Balance After Changes | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Amount from Jan. 1, 2010 to Jan. 1, 2011 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Remaining Amount as of Jan. 1, 2011 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total Amount | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Outstanding Balance (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
BOE (Mbbl) | | | | | | | | |
Opening Balance on Jan. 1, 2010 | 302.0 | - | 925.9 | 1,227.9 | 302.0 | - | 1,887.0 | 2,189.1 |
Total Changes | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Balance After Changes | 302.0 | - | 925.9 | 1,227.9 | 302.0 | - | 1,887.0 | 2,188.1 |
Amount from Jan. 1, 2010 to Jan. 1, 2011 | 26.1 | - | - | 26.1 | 26.1 | - | - | 26.1 |
Remaining Amount as of Jan. 1, 2011 | 275.9 | - | 925.9 | 1,201.9 | 275.9 | - | 1,887.0 | 2,163.0 |
Total Amount | 302.0 | - | 925.9 | 1,227.9 | 302.0 | - | 1,887.0 | 2,189.1 |
Outstanding Balance (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
(1) Outstanding Balance = Total Amount + Balance After Changes |