Exhibit 99.1
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
Board of Directors and Stockholders
CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
Opinion
We have audited the accompanying Historical Summary of Revenues and Direct Costs of Revenues of The Collection at Forsyth (the “Property”) for the year ended December 31, 2021 and the related notes (the “Historical Summary”).
In our opinion, the accompanying Historical Summary presents fairly, in all material respects, the revenues and direct costs of revenues of the Property for the year ended December 31, 2021, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit of the Historical Summary in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAS). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of CTO Realty Growth, Inc. and the Property and to meet our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audits. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Emphasis of matter
We draw attention to Note 2 to the Historical Summary, which describes that the accompanying Historical Summary was prepared for the purposes of complying with certain rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (for inclusion in the Current Report on Form 8-K of CTO Realty Growth, Inc.) and is not intended to be a complete presentation of the Property’s revenues and direct expenses. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
Responsibilities of management for the financial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the Historical Summary in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the Historical Summary that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the Historical Summary, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Property’s ability to continue as a going concern for the time period set by the applicable financial reporting framework; for US GAAP: one year after the date the financial statements are issued.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Historical Summary as a whole is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with US GAAS will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the Historical Summary.
In performing an audit in accordance with US GAAS, we:
● | Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. |
● | Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the Historical Summary, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the Historical Summary. |
● | Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Property’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. |
● | Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the Historical Summary. |