NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (the “Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and reflect all adjustments that are of a normal recurring nature which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for interim periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The Balance Sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and as updated in the Company’s March 31, 2009 Form 10-Q.
The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year since the consolidated earnings are subject to seasonal factors.
The Company has evaluated all subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued, August 7, 2009.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform previously reported data to the current presentation, specifically, prior year shares outstanding information as a result of the adoption of FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1 as of January 1, 2009, which requires retroactive application, see Note 4.
2. Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
The following tables set forth the components of pension and other post-retirement benefit costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Pension Benefits
Components of Net Periodic Cost (in thousands):
| | | Three Months | | | Six Months | |
| Period ended June 30 | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| Service Cost | | $ | 388 | | | $ | 324 | | | $ | 727 | | | $ | 630 | |
| Interest Cost | | | 507 | | | | 488 | | | | 1,012 | | | | 953 | |
| Expected Return on Plan Assets | | | (543 | ) | | | (532 | ) | | | (1,114 | ) | | | (1,060 | ) |
| Amortization of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transition Obligation | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
| Prior Service Cost | | | 17 | | | | 17 | | | | 34 | | | | 34 | |
| Net Loss | | | 104 | | | | 46 | | | | 199 | | | | 71 | |
| Net Periodic Benefit Cost | | $ | 473 | | | $ | 343 | | | $ | 859 | | | $ | 629 | |
The Company plans to make a contribution to the pension plan of $3.3 million for the 2008 plan year during the third quarter of 2009.
Other Post-Retirement Benefits
Components of Net Periodic Cost (in thousands):
| | | Three Months | | | Six Months | |
| Period ended June 30 | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| Service Cost | | $ | 113 | | | $ | 130 | | | $ | 236 | | | $ | 316 | |
| Interest Cost | | | 117 | | | | 138 | | | | 240 | | | | 329 | |
| Expected Return on Plan Assets | | | (68 | ) | | | (68 | ) | | | (136 | ) | | | (136 | ) |
| Other | | | 56 | | | | -- | | | | 112 | | | | -- | |
| Amortization of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transition Obligation | | | -- | | | | 30 | | | | -- | | | | 60 | |
| Prior Service Cost | | | (102 | ) | | | -- | | | | (203 | ) | | | -- | |
| Recognized Net Loss | | | 50 | | | | 11 | | | | 103 | | | | 101 | |
| Net Periodic Benefit Cost | | $ | 166 | | | $ | 241 | | | $ | 352 | | | $ | 670 | |
3. Earnings per Share
Earnings per weighted average common share are calculated by dividing net income applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the respective periods as detailed below (diluted shares include the effect of unexercised stock options):
| Three months ended June 30, | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Common Shares Outstanding End of Period: | | | 8,526,304 | | | | 8,430,354 | |
| Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (Days Outstanding Basis): | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | | 8,512,412 | | | | 8,415,527 | |
| Diluted | | | 8,512,669 | | | | 8,421,149 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Basic Earnings per Share | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.35 | |
| Dilutive Effect of Unexercised Stock Options | | | -- | | | | -- | |
| Diluted Earnings per Share | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.35 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Six Months ended June 30, | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (Days Outstanding Basis): | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | | 8,502,418 | | | | 8,405,097 | |
| Diluted | | | 8,502,946 | | | | 8,411,012 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Basic Earnings per Share | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 0.55 | |
| Dilutive Effect of Unexercised Stock Options | | | -- | | | | -- | |
| Diluted Earnings per Share | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 0.55 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total unrecognized compensation expense for all stock awards was approximately $1.2 million as of June 30, 2009 and will be recognized over the next four years.
4. New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement” (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 provides a single definition of fair value, a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007; as such we partially adopted SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, (FSP No. 157-2), which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. FSP No. 157-2 was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009. In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active”. In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transaction That Are Not Orderly”. The Company currently does not have any financial assets or liabilities that are valued in inactive or non-orderly markets, and as such are not currently impacted by the issuance of FSP 157-3 or FSP 157-4. The Company has adopted SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2008 and for non-financial assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2009. See Note 5 for additional disclosures regarding fair value.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (Revised 2007) “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141(R)), which establishes principles and requirements for how the acquiring company shall recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquired company and goodwill acquired in a business combination. This statement is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141(R) became effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (SFAS 160), which establishes and expands accounting and reporting standards for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as non-controlling interests, in a subsidiary and the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not have an impact on the Company.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities. Under SFAS 161, entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This statement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company does not currently hold any derivative financial instruments.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP 142-3 “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. The Company has adopted FSP 142-3 effective January 1, 2009 and will apply it prospectively to intangible assets acquired in the future. The Company does not anticipate this standard will have a material impact on its financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in preparation of financial statements presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). SFAS 162 directs the hierarchy to the entity, rather than the independent auditors, as the entity is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. SFAS 162 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after July 1, 2009. The Company will adopt this standard in the third quarter of 2009.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1 (EITF 03-6-1), “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities.” EITF 03-6-1 states that unvested awards of share-based payments with rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities for purposes of calculating earnings per share. As a result, these participating securities will be included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding as disclosed on the face of the income statement. EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior period earnings per share data presented in financial reports after the effective date shall be adjusted retrospectively to conform to the provisions of EITF 03-6-1. Early application is not permitted. The Company adopted EITF 03-6-1 in the first quarter of 2009 and it did not have a material impact on earnings per share, including the periods presented in the prior year.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” FSP 132(R)-1 is intended to improve disclosures about a company’s postretirement benefit plan assets by requiring more information about how investment allocation decisions are made, major categories of plan assets, fair value assumptions and concentrations of risk. The disclosures required by FSP 132(R)-1 will be included in the Company’s December 31, 2009 financial statements. This statement will not impact the consolidated financial results of operations, as the requirements are disclosure-only in nature.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” which requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim periods as well as in annual financial statements. The disclosures required by FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 are required for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. This FSP will not impact the consolidated financial results of operations, as the requirements are disclosure-only in nature.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 115-2 and 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”, which amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities and improves the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments for both debt and equity securities. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s operations, financial position or cash flows.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165 “Subsequent Events”. The purpose of SFAS 165 is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. SFAS 165 requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. SFAS 165 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted SFAS 165 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and the adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s operations, financial position or cash flows. See Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for the related disclosure.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 166 “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets – an amendment to SFAS 140”. The purpose of SFAS 166 is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. SFAS 166 becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 166 is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 167 “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (R)”. The purpose of SFAS 167 is to improve reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities. SFAS 167 becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS 167 will have on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 168 “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principals, a replacement of SFAS 162”. FSAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities and rules and interpretive releases of the SEC as authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification will supersede all the existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards upon its effective date and subsequently, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. SFAS 168 also replaces SFAS 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principals” given that once in effect, the Codification will carry the same level of authority. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after July 1, 2009. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS 168 will have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, cash flows or the consolidated financial statement footnote disclosures.
5. Fair Value Disclosures
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS 157 provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities and expands disclosure with respect to fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2 which allowed companies to elect a one year deferral of adoption of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a non-recurring basis. The Company adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008 and FSP 157-2 as of January 1, 2009.
SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the Company’s assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three broad levels, as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs developed using the Company’s estimates and assumptions, which reflect those that the Company believes market participants would use.
The following table summarizes our financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis within the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
| | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
| Investments | | $ | 942 | | | $ | -- | | | $ | -- | |
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each of the following financial instruments, which are not reported at market value on the financial statements.
Cash and cash equivalents – Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid instruments with original maturities at the time of purchase of three months or less. The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Long-Term Debt – The fair value of the Company's fixed rate long-term debt is based upon borrowing rates currently available to the Company. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the estimated fair value of the Company's long-term debt was $84,963,000 and $77,228,000, respectively, as compared to the carrying amounts of $92,094,000 and $92,227,000, respectively.
The fair values shown above have been reported to meet the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures About Fair Values of Financial Instruments" and do not purport to represent the amounts at which those obligations would be settled.
Interest Rate Swap – In 2004, Connecticut Water entered into a five-year interest rate swap associated with its $12.5 million 2004 series variable rate unsecured water facilities revenue refinancing bonds to manage the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in prevailing interest rates. The swap agreement qualifies for hedge treatment under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The fair value of the interest rate swap included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance sheet in “Other Current Liabilities” at December 31, 2008 was approximately $88,000. Changes in the fair value of this derivative instrument are recorded in “Other Comprehensive Income” in Common Stockholders’ Equity. The interest rate swap agreement expired on March 3, 2009.
6. Segment Reporting
The Company operates principally in three business segments: Water Activities, Real Estate Transactions, and Services and Rentals. Financial data for the segments is as follows (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 | |
| Segment | | Revenues | | | Pre-Tax Income | | | Income Tax Expense | | | Net Income | |
| Water Activities | | $ | 15,462 | | | $ | 2,907 | | | $ | 894 | | | $ | 2,013 | |
| Real Estate Transactions | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | |
| Service and Rentals | | | 1,226 | | | | 414 | | | | 161 | | | | 253 | |
| Total | | $ | 16,688 | | | $ | 3,321 | | | $ | 1,055 | | | $ | 2,266 | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | |
| Segment | | Revenues | | | Pre-Tax Income | | | Income Tax Expense | | | Net Income | |
| Water Activities | | $ | 16,259 | | | $ | 3,985 | | | $ | 1,238 | | | $ | 2,747 | |
| Real Estate Transactions | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | |
| Service and Rentals | | | 1,270 | | | | 339 | | | | 135 | | | | 204 | |
| Total | | $ | 17,529 | | | $ | 4,324 | | | $ | 1,373 | | | $ | 2,951 | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | |
| Segment | | Revenues | | | Pre-Tax Income | | | Income Tax Expense | | | Net Income | |
| Water Activities | | $ | 29,134 | | | $ | 3,858 | | | $ | 910 | | | $ | 2,948 | |
| Real Estate Transactions | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | |
| Service and Rentals | | | 2,303 | | | | 757 | | | | 295 | | | | 462 | |
| Total | | $ | 31,437 | | | $ | 4,615 | | | $ | 1,205 | | | $ | 3,410 | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | |
| Segment | | Revenues | | | Pre-Tax Income | | | Income Tax Expense | | | Net Income | |
| Water Activities | | $ | 30,074 | | | $ | 6,190 | | | $ | 1,928 | | | $ | 4,262 | |
| Real Estate Transactions | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | |
| Service and Rentals | | | 2,337 | | | | 646 | | | | 252 | | | | 394 | |
| Total | | $ | 32,411 | | | $ | 6,836 | | | $ | 2,180 | | | $ | 4,656 | |
The Revenues shown in Water Activities above consist of revenues from water customers of $15,147,000 and $16,020,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Additionally, there were revenues associated with utility plant leased to others of $315,000 and $239,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Revenues shown in Water Activities above consist of revenues from water customers of $28,528,000 and $29,589,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Additionally, there were revenues associated with utility plant leased to others of $606,000 and $485,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Assets by segment (in thousands):
| | | June 30, 2009 | | | December 31, 2008 | |
| Total Plant and Other Investments: | | | | | | |
| Water | | $ | 315,887 | | | $ | 304,591 | |
| Non-Water | | | 667 | | | | 676 | |
| | | | 316,554 | | | | 305,267 | |
| Other Assets: | | | | | | | | |
| Water | | | 64,283 | | | | 64,734 | |
| Non-Water | | | 1,951 | | | | 2,430 | |
| | | | 66,234 | | | | 67,164 | |
| Total Assets | | $ | 382,788 | | | $ | 372,431 | |
7. Income Taxes
From time to time, the Company was assessed interest and penalties by taxing authorities. In those cases, the charges would appear on the Other line item on the Income Statement. There were no such charges for the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Additionally, there were no accruals relating to interest or penalties as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The Company remains subject to examination by federal authorities for the 2005 through 2008 tax years and by state authorities for the tax years 2003 through 2008.
The Company’s estimated annual effective income tax rate for the first six months of 2009 and 2008, exclusive of discrete items, is 31.7% and 31.9%, respectively. In addition, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $264,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009 recorded for state tax credits earned in 2008. The resulting reported effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 26.1% and 31.9% respectively. The statutory income tax rates during the same periods were 39%. In determining its annual estimated effective tax rate for interim periods, the Company reflects its estimated permanent and flow-through tax differences for the taxable year. The primary flow-through difference causing the effective rate to be less than the statutory rate in 2009 is the planned pension contribution of $5.2 million for plan year 2009, which is in excess of the Company’s SFAS 87 expense.
8. Lines of Credit
On June 30, 2009, the Company let expire one line of credit totaling $6 million and entered into a new $15 million line of credit agreement, which increased the Company’s total lines of credit to $30 million among three banks. The next largest line of credit, representing $12 million of our total available line of credit, was renewed in the fourth quarter of 2007 and is due upon demand from the bank. The final line of credit, for $3 million, has a term of 12 months, expiring in October 2009. Interim Bank Loans Payable at June 30, 2009 was approximately $17.8 million and represents the outstanding aggregate balance on these lines of credit. Interest expense charged on interim bank loans will fluctuate based on market interest rates. After defining the Company’s expected 2009 capital expenditures, described below, the Company determined that additional access to short term capital arrangements may be needed. In November 2008, the Company was authorized by the Board of Directors to increase the available lines of credit to $40 million. The Company expects to finalize a further $10 million increase to its line of credit in the third quarter of 2009.
The Board of Directors has approved a $26.4 million construction budget for 2009, net of amounts to be financed by customer advances and contributions in aid of construction. The Company will use a combination of its internally generated funds, borrowing under its available lines of credit, and, depending on capital market conditions, a long term debt issuance. The Company anticipates utilization of approximately $20 million private activity bonds issued through the Connecticut Development Authority (CDA), for long term debt issuance in 2009 and beyond, as approved by the Board of Directors. In May 2009, the CDA authorized $20 million of volume capacity for the Company’s capital projects in 2009.
Regulatory Matters and Inflation
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, there were no material changes under this subheading to any items previously disclosed by the Company in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008.
In July 2006, the Company filed a rate application with the Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC) for Connecticut Water requesting an increase in rates of approximately $14.6 million, or 30%. On January 16, 2007, the DPUC issued its final decision and approved a Settlement Agreement, negotiated with the Office of Consumer Counsel and the DPUC’s Prosecutorial Staff; that allowed Connecticut Water an increase in revenues of approximately $10,940,000, or 22.3%. The Settlement Agreement allowed Connecticut Water to defer a portion of the approved rate increase, approximately $3.8 million through December 31, 2007 and $4.8 million through March 31, 2008. The Company recognized that increase through recording deferred revenues and a corresponding regulatory asset, as required by the decision. On January 31, 2008, the Company filed to reopen the case, a procedure required by the Settlement Agreement, to implement the second phase. In addition to the approval for the inclusion in current rates of the previously approved deferred revenues of $4.8 million, the filing includes requested recovery and a return on $15.5 million of additional capital investments made in 2007. On March 28, 2008, an 11.95% rate increase was approved. The approved rates became effective on April 1, 2008.
On July 23, 2008, the Company announced that it had reached a definitive agreement with Ellington Acres Company (Ellington Acres) to purchase all of Ellington Acres’ outstanding stock for approximately $1.5 million. Ellington Acres is a regulated water company serving approximately 750 customers in Ellington and Somers, Connecticut, situated between two systems in the Company’s Northern Region that the Company had planned to interconnect. The Company will be able to interconnect the two systems with Ellington Acres, saving the ratepayers of Connecticut Water and Ellington Acres significant capital expenditures. The DPUC approved the acquisition in December 2008 and the Company completed the transaction on January 16, 2009. The $1.5 million purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to amortizable intangible plant, on the Utility Plant line on the Balance Sheet, at June 30, 2009.
On October 10, 2008, the Company filed its Infrastructure Assessment Report (IAR) under the Water Infrastructure and Conservation Adjustment (WICA) Act which was passed into law in 2007. WICA allows the Company to add a surcharge to customers’ bills, subject to an expedited review and approval by the DPUC, to reflect the costs of replacement of certain types of aging utility plant. The purpose of the IAR is to clearly define the criteria for determining the priority of future replacement projects. The Company received approval of its IAR from the DPUC on March 26, 2009. The Company filed for a 1% surcharge under the WICA mechanism on April 24, 2009. On July 1, 2009, the Company was approved to add a 0.95% WICA surcharge on customers’ bills issued on and after July 2, 2009.
In 2008, the Company entered into negotiations with the Town of Windsor Locks, Connecticut and ultimately agreed to sell a conservation easement on a well field property no longer needed as a source of supply for $2.0 million. Windsor Locks was awarded a grant from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection to assist in purchasing the conservation easement in order to permanently protect the approximate 200-acre property from development and guarantee public access to the land for passive recreation. The Company filed an application with the DPUC and submitted the draft agreement and the form of Conservation Easement to the DPUC on April 3, 2009. DPUC approval is expected in the second half of 2009. The Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Company and the Town was executed on May 7, 2009. Subject to successful receipt of DPUC approval, and of final authorization for the Town to proceed with the transaction, the Company expects the transaction to be completed in 2009. If the transaction closes, the Company estimates that it will generate approximately $1 million in net income in the Real Estate segment. The Company currently has no other specific plans for land transactions in 2009 and beyond.
On April 30, 2009, the Company filed with the DPUC an agreement negotiated by and between the Company and the Office of Consumer Counsel, Connecticut’s consumer advocate, to accomplish three goals: First, a request to equalize depreciation rates across divisions, which would lower depreciation expense, resulting in a temporary 1.84% reduction of rates for all Connecticut Water customers, effective July 1 through December 31, 2009; Secondly, an increase in allowed Operation and Maintenance expense equal to the 1.84% of the Company’s previously allowed revenue requirements, effective January 1, 2010; Finally, an extension of the “stay out” period such that Connecticut Water will not file a new general rate adjustment seeking new rates to take effect any sooner than July 1, 2010. The net effect of these three items is a temporary rate reduction of 1.84%, offset by a reduction in Depreciation Expense, for the last six months of 2009, at which time the Company’s rates will revert to rates in effect during the first half of 2009, and a delay of at least six months in Connecticut Water’s next general rate filing. The DPUC approved the agreement on July 1, 2009 and the new rates took effect at that time.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company maintains its accounting records in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and as directed by the DPUC to which Connecticut Water, the Company’s regulated water utility subsidiary, is subject. Significant accounting policies employed by the Company, including the use of estimates, were presented in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Critical accounting policies are those that are the most important to the presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. The application of such accounting policies requires management’s most difficult, subjective, and complex judgments and involves uncertainties and assumptions. The Company’s most critical accounting policies pertain to public utility regulation related to Financial Accounting Standards No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulations” (SFAS 71), revenue recognition, and pension plan accounting. Each of these accounting policies and the application of critical accounting policies and estimates was discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. There were no significant changes in the application of critical accounting policies or estimates during the three months ending June 30, 2009. Please see Note 4 of the financial statements for newly adopted and recently announced accounting standards.
Management must use informed judgments and best estimates to properly apply these critical accounting policies. Because of the uncertainty in these estimates, actual results could differ from estimates used in applying the critical accounting policies. The Company is not aware of any reasonably likely events or circumstances which would result in different amounts being reported that would materially affect its financial condition or results of operations.
Outlook
The following modifies and updates the “Outlook” section of the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 13, 2009.
The Company’s earnings and profitability are primarily dependent upon the sale and distribution of water, the amount of which is dependent on seasonal weather fluctuations, particularly during the summer months when water demand will vary with rainfall and temperature levels. The Company’s earnings and profitability in future years will also depend upon a number of other factors, such as the ability to maintain our operating costs at or near historical levels, customer growth in the Company’s core regulated water utility business, additional growth in revenues attributable to non-water sales operations, and the timing and adequacy of rate relief when requested, from time to time, by our regulated water company. The Company experienced greater decline in residential customer usage in the second quarter of 2009 when compared to prior periods. The approximate 5.6% decline in year over year consumption was greater than the trend that the Company has noted over the past five years of approximately 2% per year. The Company will continue to monitor this usage trend.
Cool wet weather significantly impacted the sale of water in second quarter of 2009. Water production during the three months ended June 30, 2009 was approximately 7% less than the five-year average production for the same three month period.
The Company believes that these factors and those described in detail in Item 1A – Risk Factors and in “Commitments and Contingencies” in Item 7 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K may have significant impact, either alone or in the aggregate, on the Company’s earnings and profitability in fiscal years 2009 and beyond. Please also review carefully the risks and uncertainties described below under the heading “Forward-Looking Information.”
Based on the financial results through June and the continued wet and cool weather experienced in July the Company expects earnings results in 2009 to be similar to 2008, assuming a return to normal weather patterns during the remainder of the year, and the completion of the Windsor Locks land sale. During 2009 and subsequent years, the ability of the Company to maintain and increase its Net Income will principally depend upon the effect on the Company of the factors described above in this “Outlook” section, those factors described in the sections entitled Item 1A – Risk Factors, “Commitments and Contingencies” in Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and the risks and uncertainties described in the “Forward-Looking Information” section below.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company is not aware of demands, events, or uncertainties that will result in a decrease of liquidity or a material change in the mix or relative cost of its capital resources.
On June 30, 2009, the Company let expire one line of credit totaling $6 million and entered into a new $15 million line of credit agreement, which increased the Company’s total lines of credit to $30 million among three banks. The next largest line of credit, representing $12 million of our total available line of credit, was renewed in the fourth quarter of 2007 and is due upon demand from the bank. The final line of credit, for $3 million, has a term of 12 months, expiring in October 2009. Interim Bank Loans Payable at June 30, 2009 was approximately $17.8 million and represents the outstanding aggregate balance on these lines of credit. Interest expense charged on interim bank loans will fluctuate based on market interest rates. After defining the Company’s expected 2009 capital expenditures, described below, the Company determined that additional access to short term capital arrangements may be needed. In November 2008, the Company was authorized by the Board of Directors to increase the available lines of credit to $40 million. The Company expects to finalize a further $10 million increase to its line of credit in the third quarter of 2009.
The Board of Directors has approved a $26.4 million construction budget for 2009, net of amounts to be financed by customer advances and contributions in aid of construction. The Company will use a combination of its internally generated funds, borrowing under its available lines of credit, and, depending on capital market conditions, a long term debt issuance. The Company anticipates utilization of approximately $20 million private activity bonds issued through the Connecticut Development Authority (CDA), for long term debt issuance in 2009 and beyond, as approved by the Board of Directors. In May 2009, the CDA authorized $20 million of volume capacity for the Company’s capital projects in 2009.
Standard and Poor’s, on March 13, 2009, affirmed their 'A' corporate credit rating on the Company with a stable outlook. The affirmation of the corporate credit rating follows their annual review of the Company and incorporates their expectation of adequate and timely rate relief and maintenance of our current financial risk profile. The stable outlook reflects improving regulation and timely rate relief in Connecticut.
The Company offers a dividend reinvestment plan (DRIP) to all registered shareholders, whereby shareholders can opt to have dividends directly reinvested into additional shares of the Company. During the six months ended June, 30 2009 and 2008, shareholders reinvested $485,000 and $484,000 in additional shares, respectively, as part of the DRIP.
From 1999 through 2003, the Company issued stock options to certain employees of the Company. No stock options have been issued by the Company since 2003. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, no stock options were exercised. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, 6,059 stock options were exercised.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30
Net Income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased from that of the prior year by $685,000, which decreased earnings per basic and diluted average common share by $0.08, to $0.27.
This decrease in Net Income is broken down by business segment as follows:
| Business Segment | | June 30, 2009 | | June 30, 2008 | | Increase/(Decrease) |
| Water Activities | | $2,013,000 | | $2,747,000 | | $(734,000) |
| Real Estate Transactions | | -- | | -- | | -- |
| Services and Rentals | | 253,000 | | 204,000 | | 49,000 |
| Total | | $2,266,000 | | $2,951,000 | | $(685,000) |
The decrease in the Water Activity segment’s Net Income was primarily due to the net effects of variances listed below:
Revenue
Revenue from our water customers declined by $873,000 or 5.4% to $15,147,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 when compared to the same period in 2008. Reasons for this decline in revenue are detailed below:
| · | The water production for the second quarter declined approximately 6%. The majority of this decline was related to lower residential demand due to the extremely wet and cool second quarter of 2009. |
| · | During the second quarter of 2009, Windsor Locks, CT, part of our largest service area, experienced rain on 63 of 91 days, including 24 of 30 days in June. In the same period of 2008, there was rain on 53 days with 20 days in June. Total rainfall accumulation in the second quarter of 2009 was 13.2 inches, an increase of an inch from 2008. In addition to the rainfall, June 2009 was unusually cool; the average high temperature during the month was 75 degrees, compared to an average high of 81 degrees in 2008. Poor weather conditions primarily impact the outdoor water usage of residential customers. |
| · | Industrial revenues decreased by $205,000, or 37%, to $345,000 when compared to the second quarter of 2008, primarily due to the adverse economic conditions facing companies in the region. A portion of the decrease was due to industrial customers cutting back on shifts and other budget cuts. Additionally, another large industrial customer began using a process to recycle water used during their manufacturing processes, leading to a reduction in consumption. |
Operation and Maintenance Expense
Operation and Maintenance expense increased by $377,000 primarily due to the following components:
| Expense Components | | June 30, 2009 | | | June 30, 2008 | | | Increase/(Decrease) | |
| Employee benefit costs | | $ | 1,222,000 | | | $ | 1,043,000 | | | $ | 179,000 | |
| Outside services | | | 481,000 | | | | 327,000 | | | | 154,000 | |
| Water treatment (including chemical costs) | | | 533,000 | | | | 453,000 | | | | 80,000 | |
| Insurance | | | 296,000 | | | | 244,000 | | | | 52,000 | |
| Vehicles | | | 377,000 | | | | 338,000 | | | | 39,000 | |
| Customer | | | 279,000 | | | | 249,000 | | | | 30,000 | |
| Labor | | | 2,986,000 | | | | 3,058,000 | | | | (72,000 | ) |
| Utility costs | | | 797,000 | | | | 859,000 | | | | (62,000 | ) |
| Investor relations | | | 181,000 | | | | 205,000 | | | | (24,000 | ) |
| Other | | | 1,248,000 | | | | 1,247,000 | | | | 1,000 | |
| Total | | $ | 8,400,000 | | | $ | 8,023,000 | | | $ | 377,000 | |
| - | Employee benefit costs increased over 2008 levels, primarily due to an increase in costs associated with medical and pension expenses. Medical costs increased due to additional claims filed in the current year compared to 2008, offset partially by reduced medical administration costs. Pension costs increased primarily due to the impact of return on investments that were below actuarial assumptions in 2008. Outside services increased over prior years primarily due to increased legal costs associated with the Perry Street issued detailed in “Commitments and Contingencies”, consulting costs associated with the Company’s ERP and the increased use of temporary labor. Water treatment costs increased primarily due to an increase in the cost of key chemicals, despite a decrease in production when compared to the prior year. The increase in the costs of chemicals was partially offset by a reduction in the costs to operate our treatment facilities due to decreases in our testing costs. Insurance costs increased primarily due to increased premiums on the Company’s general liability insurance. Labor costs decreased in 2009 by approximately $72,000 due to a large number of ongoing capital projects, including the implementation of an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, resulting in less labor costs being charged to Operation and Maintenance expense. Utility costs have decreased over the prior year primarily due to a reduction in communication costs. Investor relation costs decreased due to a reduction in proxy mailing and notification related costs. |
| - | The Company saw a modest decrease in its Depreciation expense due to the negotiated reduction in depreciation rates that will result in a temporary reduction in rates for customers, despite an increase in the Company’s Utility Plant investment. |
| - | Income Tax expense associated with Water Activities decreased due to lower pre-tax income in 2009. |
Six Months Ended June 30
Net Income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased from that of the prior year by $1,246,000, which decreased earnings per basic and diluted average common share by $0.15, to $0.40.
This decrease in Net Income is broken down by business segment as follows:
| Business Segment | | June 30, 2009 | | | June 30, 2008 | | | Increase/(Decrease) | |
| Water Activities | | $ | 2,948,000 | | | $ | 4,262,000 | | | $ | (1,314,000 | ) |
| Real Estate Transactions | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | |
| Services and Rentals | | | 462,000 | | | | 394,000 | | | | 68,000 | |
| Total | | $ | 3,410,000 | | | $ | 4,656,000 | | | $ | (1,246,000 | ) |
The decrease in the Water Activity segment’s Net Income was primarily due to the net effects of variances listed below:
Revenue
Revenue from our water customers declined by $1,061,000 or 3.6% to $28,528,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 when compared to the same period in 2008. Reasons for this decline in revenue are detailed below:
| · | Residential water consumption for the first six months declined approximately 4%. The majority of this decline was related to lower residential demand due to the extremely wet and cool second quarter of 2009. |
| · | Industrial revenues decreased by $188,000, or 22%, to $687,000 when compared to the first half of 2008, primarily due to the economic condition facing companies in the region. A portion of the decrease is due to industrial customers cutting back on shifts and other budget cuts. Additionally, another large industrial customer began using a process to recycle water used during their manufacturing processes, leading to a reduction in consumption. |
| · | Partially offsetting the declining usage described above, was the implementation of the second phase of the Company’s 2006 rate increase that was effective April 1, 2008. As a result, the first quarter of 2009 included an increase of rates of approximately 4.5% that was not included in rates in the first quarter of 2008. |
The declining usage more than offset the incremental 4.5% increase in customer rates in the first half of 2009 and resulted in a $1,061,000 decline in revenues between years.
Operation and Maintenance Expense
Operation and Maintenance expense increased by $1,379,000 primarily due to the following components:
| Expense Components | | June 30, 2009 | | | June 30, 2008 | | | Increase/(Decrease) | |
| Outside services | | $ | 1,002,000 | | | $ | 652,000 | | | $ | 350,000 | |
| Water treatment (including chemical costs) | | | 1,067,000 | | | | 855,000 | | | | 212,000 | |
| Purchased water | | | 510,000 | | | | 303,000 | | | | 207,000 | |
| Labor | | | 5,996,000 | | | | 5,813,000 | | | | 183,000 | |
| Employee benefit costs | | | 2,504,000 | | | | 2,353,000 | | | | 151,000 | |
| Maintenance | | | 844,000 | | | | 747,000 | | | | 97,000 | |
| Vehicles | | | 722,000 | | | | 628,000 | | | | 94,000 | |
| Insurance | | | 562,000 | | | | 475,000 | | | | 87,000 | |
| Other | | | 3,393,000 | | | | 3,395,000 | | | | (2,000 | ) |
| Total | | $ | 16,600,000 | | | $ | 15,221,000 | | | $ | 1,379,000 | |
| - | Outside services increased over prior years primarily due to increased legal costs associated with the Perry Street issued detailed in “Commitments and Contingencies”, consulting costs associated with the Company’s ERP and the increased use of temporary labor. Water treatment costs increased primarily due to an increase in the cost of key chemicals, despite a decrease in production when compared to prior year. Purchased water expense increased primarily due to a negotiated reduction of bills related to 2007 consumption that the Company realized as a reduction of expense in the first quarter of 2008. During 2009, the Company was billed for water as it was purchased from neighboring utilities at the negotiated rates. Labor costs increased in 2009 due to an increase in employees, increased maintenance and repair work in both our Northeast and Southwest Regions, and regular wage increases effective as of April 1, 2009. Employee benefit costs increased primarily due to an increase in costs associated with medical and pension expenses, partially offset by a decrease in post-retirement medical costs. Medical costs increased due to additional claims filed in the current year compared to 2008. Pension costs increased primarily due to a lower return on investments within the pension plan. Maintenance expense increased over the prior year due to increased main break costs in our Northern and Mansfield divisions. |
| - | The Company saw a slight decrease in its Depreciation expense due to the negotiated reduction in depreciation rates that will result in a temporary reduction in rates for customers, despite an increase in the Company’s Utility Plant investment. |
| - | Income Tax expense associated with Water Activities decreased due to lower pre-tax income and a lower effective tax rate in 2009 associated with a combination of state tax credits and benefit plan contributions. |
Commitments and Contingencies
There were no material changes under this subheading to any of the other items previously disclosed by the Company in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008.
19 Perry Street Litigation – Connecticut Water’s Unionville division has for many years operated a well field located at 19 Perry Street, Farmington, Connecticut, pursuant to a 99-year lease entered into in 1975 with the property owner. This well field provides approximately half of the daily water supply requirements to the customers of the Unionville division. In 2004, the original property owner ceased business operations. The property is now owned by 19 Perry Street, LLC, which obtained the property through a foreclosure proceeding. In June 2007, the new owner commenced a lawsuit in Hartford Superior Court (Housing Section), asserting that Connecticut Water is in unlawful possession of the property under several theories, including that the lease is invalid and that Connecticut Water has failed to pay rent when due. A trial before a judge was held in November 2007, and a decision was issued on April 30, 2008. In its decision, the Court ruled that the lease is valid. However, in deciding the parties’ contentions regarding the proper form and amount of rental payments due, the Court ruled that Connecticut Water was in breach of its obligation to pay rent on the property and therefore entered an order of eviction.
On May 5, 2008, Connecticut Water filed a timely appeal of the decision in the Connecticut Appellate Court. The Connecticut Supreme Court has transferred the appeal to itself. This appeal stays the eviction order until the Connecticut Supreme Court rules on Connecticut Water’s claims that the trial court erred. At this time, the outcome of the appeal is uncertain. On August 5, 2008, Connecticut Water was served with a related lawsuit in which 19 Perry Street, LLC seeks the payment of back rent with respect to the property. As of February 23, 2009, the lawsuit for back rent has been stayed pending the resolution of the appeal related to the eviction case. The Company intends to maintain its use of the property to provide water to customers of its Unionville division while the appeal is pending. In addition, Connecticut Water will consider all other options with respect to its well field use of the property, including the outright purchase of the property or the exercise of Connecticut Water’s right to take the property by initiating eminent domain proceedings under applicable law.
Forward-Looking Information
This report, including management’s discussion and analysis, contains certain forward-looking statements regarding the Company’s results of operations and financial position. These forward looking statements are based on current information and expectations, and are subject to risks and uncertainties, which could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from expected results.
Regulated water companies, including Connecticut Water, are subject to various federal and state regulatory agencies concerning water quality and environmental standards. Generally, the water industry is materially dependent on the adequacy of approved rates to allow for a fair rate of return on the investment in utility plant. The ability to maintain our operating costs at the lowest possible level, while providing good quality water service, is beneficial to customers and stockholders. Profitability is also dependent on the timeliness of rate relief to be sought from, and granted by, the DPUC, when necessary, and numerous factors over which we have little or no control, such as the quantity of rainfall and temperature, customer demand and related conservation efforts, financing costs, energy rates, tax rates, and stock market trends which may affect the return earned on pension assets, compliance with environmental and water quality regulations, and the outcome of litigation matters, including the Unionville division well field dispute. From time to time, the Company may acquire other regulated and/or unregulated water companies. Profitability is often dependent on identification and consummation of business acquisitions and the profitable integration of these acquired businesses into the Company’s operations, including the January 2009 acquisition of Ellington Acres. The profitability of our other revenue sources is subject to the amount of land we have available for sale and/or donation, the demand for the land, the continuation of the current state tax benefits relating to the donation of land for open space purposes, regulatory approval of land dispositions (including the planned Windsor Locks land sale), the demand for telecommunications antenna site leases and the successful extensions and expansion of our service contract work. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Part I, Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
The primary market risk faced by the Company is interest rate risk. The Company had exposure to derivative financial instruments through an interest rate swap agreement. The Company has no other financial instruments with significant credit risk or off-balance sheet risks and is not subject, in any material respect, to any currency or other commodity risk.
The Company is subject to the risk of fluctuating interest rates in the normal course of business. The Company’s exposure to interest fluctuations is managed at the Company and subsidiary operations levels through the use of a combination of fixed rate long-term debt, variable long-term debt and short-term variable borrowings under financing arrangements entered into by the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company has $30.0 million of variable rate lines of credit with three banks, under which the interim bank loans payable at June 30, 2009 were approximately $17.8 million.
During March 2004, The Connecticut Water Company entered into a five-year interest rate swap transaction in connection with the refunding of its First Mortgage Bonds (Series V). The Swap expired in March 2009. The swap agreement provided for The Connecticut Water Company’s exchange of floating rate interest payment obligations for fixed rate interest payment obligations on a notional principal amount of $12.5 million. The purpose of the interest rate swap was to manage the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in prevailing interest rates. The Company does not enter into derivative financial contracts for trading or speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments. The Company is currently evaluating whether or not to enter into a new swap agreement to mitigate fluctuations in the interest rates.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $22.05 million of variable-rate debt outstanding. Holding other variables constant, including levels of indebtedness, a one-percentage point change in interest rates would impact pre-tax earnings by approximately $0.2 million, annually. The Company monitors its exposure to variable rate debt and will make future financing decisions as the need arises.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files and submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
We are involved in various legal proceedings from time to time. Although the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, there are no pending legal proceedings to which we or any of our subsidiaries are a party or to which any of our properties is the subject that presents a reasonable likelihood of a material adverse impact on the Company. Certain other legal proceedings that relate to specific segments of the Company’s business are discussed in Item 2, Part I, of this Form 10-Q under the heading “Commitments and Contingencies”.
Information regarding risk factors appeared in Item 1A of Part I of our Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. There have been no material changes to our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Part II, Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
No stock repurchases were made during the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
On May 13, 2009, at its annual meeting, the stockholders of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. elected the following directors to serve three-year terms expiring at the annual meeting to be held in 2012 by the following votes:
| | | For | | | Withheld | |
| Lisa J. Thibdaue | | | 20,123,549 | | | | 1,260,273 | |
| Carol P. Wallace | | | 20,776,370 | | | | 617,452 | |
| Donald B. Wilbur | | | 20,720,963 | | | | 662,859 | |
Directors whose term of office continues until the 2010 annual meeting are Heather Hunt, Arthur C. Reeds, and Eric W. Thornburg.
Directors whose term of office continues until the 2011 annual meeting are Mary Ann Hanley, Mark G. Kachur, and David A. Lentini.
The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 was ratified by the stockholders by the following vote:
| | | For | | | Withheld | | | Abstain | |
| PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP | | | 20,745,570 | | | | 428,973 | | | | 209,279 | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| | | |
| 3.1 | | Certificate of Incorporation of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. amended and restated as of April, 1998. (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K for the year ended 12/31/98). |
| | | |
| 3.2 | | By Laws, as amended, of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. as amended and restated as of August 12, 1999. (Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-K for the year ended 12/31/99). |
| | | |
| 3.3 | | Certification of Incorporation of The Connecticut Water Company effective April, 1998. (Exhibit 3.3 to Form 10-K for the year ended 12/31/98). |
| | | |
| 3.4 | | Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. dated August 6, 2001 (Exhibit 3.4 to Form 10-K for the year ended 12/31/01). |
| | | |
| 3.5 | | Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Connecticut Water Service, Inc. dated April 23, 2004. (Exhibit 3.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003). |
| | | |
| 10.1 | | Line of credit agreement dated June 29, 2009 between CoBank, ACB and Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed July 2, 2009). |
| | | |
| 10.2* | | Second Amendment to Reimbursement and Credit Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2007, between The Connecticut Water Company and Citizen’s Bank of Rhode Island 2004 A Series. |
| | | |
| 10.3* | | Second Amendment to Reimbursement and Credit Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2007, between The Connecticut Water Company and Citizen’s Bank of Rhode Island 2004 B Series. |
| | | |
| 10.4* | | Second Amendment to Reimbursement and Credit Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2007, between The Connecticut Water Company and Citizen’s Bank of Rhode Island 2004 Series Variable Rate, due 2029. |
| | | |
| 10.5* | | Third Amendment to Reimbursement and Credit Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2009, between The Connecticut Water Company and Citizen’s Bank of Rhode Island 2004 A Series. |
| | | |
| 10.6* | | Third Amendment to Reimbursement and Credit Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2009, between The Connecticut Water Company and Citizen’s Bank of Rhode Island 2004 B Series. |
| | | |
| 10.7* | | Third Amendment to Reimbursement and Credit Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2009, between The Connecticut Water Company and Citizen’s Bank of Rhode Island 2004 Series Variable Rate, due 2029. |
| | | |
| 31.1* | | Rule 13a-14 Certification of Eric W. Thornburg, Chief Executive Officer. |
| | | |
| 31.2* | | Rule 13a-14 Certification of David C. Benoit, Chief Financial Officer. |
| | | |
| 32* | | Certification of Eric W. Thornburg, Chief Executive Officer, and David C. Benoit, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | | |
| * filed herewith |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. (Registrant) |
| Date: August 7, 2009 | By: /s/ David C. Benoit David C. Benoit Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
| Date: August 7, 2009 | By: /s/ Nicholas A. Rinaldi Nicholas A. Rinaldi Controller |
