| Actual
| | |
| Core Bond
| Global Bond
| ML Total Return Bond
| Mercury Total Return Bond
| Corporate Fund
| Pro Forma Combined
|
Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from shareholder’s investment)(a): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) imposed on purchases (as a percentage of offering price) | 4.00% | (c) | 4.00% | (c) | 4.25% | (c) | 4.25% | (c) | None | | 4.00% | (c) |
Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load) (as a percentage of original purchase price or redemption proceeds, whichever is lower) | None | (d) | None | (d) | None | (d) | None | (d) | None | | None | (d) |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) imposed on Dividend Reinvestments | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Redemption Fee | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Exchange Fee | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that are deducted from Fund assets)(e): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management Fee | 0.37% | (f) | 0.60% | | 0.30% | (g) | 0.30% | (g) | 0.50% | | 0.37% | (f) |
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees(h) | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Other Expenses (including administration and transfer agency fees)(i) | 0.22% | | 0.79% | | 0.87% | | 0.90% | | 0.58% | | 0.22% | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | 0.59%
| | 1.39%
| | 1.17%
| (k) | 1.20%
| (k) | 1.08%
| | 0.59%
| |
</R> | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Actual
| | |
| Core Bond(b)
| Global Bond(b)
| ML Total Return Bond(b)
| Mercury Total Return Bond(b)
| Pro Forma Combined(b)
|
Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from shareholder’s investment)(a): | | | | | | | | | | |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) imposed on purchases (as a percentage of offering price) | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load) (as a percentage of original purchase price or redemption proceeds, whichever is lower)(j) | 4.00% | (c) | 4.00% | (c) | 4.00% | (c) | 4.00% | (c) | 4.00% | (c) |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) imposed on Dividend Reinvestments | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Redemption Fee | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Exchange Fee | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that are deducted from Fund assets)(e): | | | | | | | | | | |
Management Fee | 0.37% | (f) | 0.60% | | 0.30% | (g) | 0.30% | (g) | 0.37% | (f) |
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees(h) | 0.75% | | 0.75% | | 1.00% | | 1.00% | | 0.75% | |
Other Expenses (including administration and transfer agency fees)(i) | 0.24% | | 0.79% | | 0.87% | | 0.90% | | 0.24% | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | 1.36% | | 2.14% | | 2.17% | (k) | 2.20% | (k) | 1.36% | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Actual
| | |
| Core Bond
| Global Bond
| ML Total Return Bond
| Mercury Total Return Bond
| Pro Forma Combined
|
Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from shareholder’s investment)(a): | | | | | | | | | | |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) imposed on purchases (as a percentage of offering price) | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load) (as a percentage of original purchase price or redemption proceeds, whichever is lower) | 1.00% | (c) | 1.00% | (c) | 1.00% | (c) | 1.00% | (c) | 1.00% | (c) |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) imposed on Dividend Reinvestments | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Redemption Fee | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Exchange Fee | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that are deducted from Fund assets)(e): | | | | | | | | | | |
Management Fee | 0.37% | (f) | 0.60% | | 0.30% | (g) | 0.30% | (g) | 0.37% | (f) |
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees(h) | 0.80% | | 0.80% | | 1.00% | | 1.00% | | 0.80% | |
Other Expenses (including administration and transfer agency fees)(i) | 0.25% | | 0.79% | | 0.87% | | 0.90% | | 0.25% | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | 1.42% | | 2.19% | | 2.17% | (k) | 2.20% | (k) | 1.42% | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
</R> | | | | | | | | | | |
| Actual
| | |
| Core Bond
| Global Bond
| ML Total Return Bond
| Mercury Total Return Bond
| Pro Forma Combined
|
Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from shareholder’s investment)(a): | | | | | | | | | | |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) imposed on purchases (as a percentage of offering price) | 4.00% | (c) | 4.00% | (c) | 4.25% | (c) | 4.25% | (c) | 4.00% | (c) |
Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load) (as a percentage of original purchase price or redemption proceeds, whichever is lower) | None | (d) | None | (d) | None | (d) | None | (d) | None | (d) |
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) imposed on Dividend Reinvestments | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Redemption Fee | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Exchange Fee | None | | None | | None | | None | | None | |
Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that are deducted from Fund assets)(e): | | | | | | | | | | |
Management Fee | 0.37% | (f) | 0.60% | | 0.30% | (g) | 0.30% | (g) | 0.37% | (f) |
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees(h) | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | | 0.25% | |
Other Expenses (including administration and transfer agency fees)(i) | 0.22% | | 0.79% | | 0.87% | | 0.90% | | 0.22% | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | 0.84%
| | 1.64%
| | 1.42%
| (k) | 1.45%
| (k) | 0.84%
| |
</R> | | | | | | | | | | |
Mercury Total Return Bond | <R>Mercury Total Return Bond is a series of Mercury Trust which was organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on August 22, 1984. Mercury Total Return Bond commenced operations on December 6, 1994 and converted to its current master/feeder structure on October 6, 2000 as one of eight series of Mercury Trust and as a feeder fund of FAM Trust. |
| |
ML Total Return Bond | ML Total Return Bond is a series of MLIM Fund which was organized under the laws of the State of Maryland on July 6, 2000. ML Total Return Bond commenced operations on October 6, 2000 as one of two series of MLIM Fund and as a feeder fund of FAM Trust.</R> |
| |
Global Bond | Global Bond was organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 28, 1986. Global Bond commenced operations on October 3, 1988. |
| |
Corporate Fund | Corporate Fund was organized under the laws of the State of Maryland on June 9, 1976. Corporate Fund commenced operations on June 9, 1976. |
| | | Core Bond*
| | Mercury Total Return Bond
| | ML Total Return Bond
| | Global Bond
| | Corporate Fund
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Address of Funds | | The address of each Fund is 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Type of Fund | | Diversified | | Diversified | | Diversified | | Non-diversified | | Diversified |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Assets as of September 30, 2002 | | $1,530,356,684 | | $127,147,785 | | $42,857,573 | | $56,262,571 | | $55,842,103 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment Objective | | High level of current income and secondarily capital growth | | Maximize long-term total return | | Maximize long-term total return | | High total investment return | | High level of current income |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal Investment Policies | | Invests primarily in fixed-income securities, as well as in U.S. and foreign equity | | Invests primarily in fixed-income securities, as well as in U.S. and foreign equity | | Invests primarily in fixed-income securities, as well as in U.S. and foreign equity | | Invests primarily in fixed-income securities, as well as in U.S. and foreign equity | | Invests primarily in fixed-income securities, as well as in U.S. and foreign equity |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equities | | May invest up to 10% of total assets | | May invest up to 20% of total assets | | May invest up to 20% of total assets | | May invest up to 20% of total assets | | May invest up to 20% of total assets |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed-Income Securities | | Will ordinarily invest at least 90% of net assets | | Will ordinarily invest at least 80% of net assets | | Will ordinarily invest at least 80% of net assets | | Will ordinarily invest at least 80% of net assets | | Will ordinarily invest at least 80% of net assets |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Maturity /Duration | | None specified | | 2-8 years | | 2-8 years | | No more that 10 years | | 2 years or more |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign Securities | | Limited to investing up to 25% of total assets in foreign securities | | Limited to investing up to 25% of total assets in foreign securities | | Limited to investing up to 25% of total assets in foreign securities | | May invest without limitation in foreign securities | | Limited to investing up to 25% of total assets in foreign securities |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Junk Bonds | | May invest up to 10% in junk bonds | | May invest up to 15% in junk bonds | | May invest up to 15% in junk bonds | | May not invest in junk bonds | | May not invest in junk bonds |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment Adviser/ Admin- istrator | | FAM | | FAM/ Mercury Advisors | | FAM | | MLIM | | FAM |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investment Sub-Adviser | | MLAM U.K. | | N/A | | N/A | | MLAM U.K. | | MLAM U.K. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Portfolio Manager | | James Pagano and Patrick Maldari | | James Pagano and Patrick Maldari | | James Pagano and Patrick Maldari | | Gareth Fielding | | Robert Peterson and Melinda Raso |
</R> | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prior to June 30, 2002, with respect to ML Total Return Bond and Mercury Total Return Bond, FAM had contractually waived the payment of investment advisory/administration fees in order to cap the expenses of these Funds. This contractual waiver is no longer in effect, although FAM currently intends to continue to waive voluntarily the payment of investment advisory/administration fees until the consummation of the Target Fund Acquisitions involving these two Funds. |
| | |
| | <R> Core Bond’s investment advisory agreement with FAM provides that as compensation for FAM’s services to Core Bond, FAM receives at the end of each month a fee at an annual rate ranging between 0.50% and 0.35% of the aggregate average daily net assets of the three portfolios of Bond Fund (in addition to Core Bond, Bond Fund offers shares of High Income Portfolio and Intermediate Term Portfolio). The advisory fee rate is calculated based on the aggregate average daily net assets at specified breakpoint levels. See “Comparison of the Funds—Management and Advisory Relationships.” |
| | |
| | As of September 30, 2002, the aggregate net assets of the three portfolios of Bond Fund were approximately $3.7 billion. As of that date, the aggregate net assets of Core Bond were approximately $1.5 billion and the advisory fee rate payable by Core Bond was approximately 0.37%. |
| | |
| | Assuming all four Target Fund Acquisitions had taken place on September 30, 2002, the Combined Fund would have paid, on a pro forma basis, a monthly advisory fee at the annual rate of 0.37% of the average daily net assets of the Combined Fund. See “Summary—Fee Tables” and “Comparison of the Funds—Management and Advisory Relationships.” </R> |
| | |
| | 12b-1 Fees. Under separate class-specific plans adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, Global Bond, ML Total Return Bond and Core Bond pay fees in connection with account maintenance for each of Class B, Class C and Class D shares and in connection with distribution for each of Class B and Class C shares (“12b-1 fees”). Mercury Total Return Bond pays fees in connection with account maintenance for each of Class A, Class B and Class C shares and in connection with distribution for each of Class B and Class C shares. Corporate Fund does not pay 12b-1 fees. Set forth below is a comparison of the 12b-1 fees for Global Bond, Mercury Total Return Bond, ML Total Return Bond and Core Bond: |
| | Capital Stock. Core Bond, ML Total Return Bond and Global Bond each offers four classes of shares under the Merrill Lynch Select PricingSM System. Shares of Core Bond acquired by Target Fund shareholders in a Target Fund Acquisition will be subject to the same CDSC schedule as shares of that Target Fund held prior to such Target Fund Acquisition. |
| | |
| | <R>The Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D shares issued by Core Bond are similar to the Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D shares issued by Global Bond with the exception that they represent ownership interests in a different investment portfolio. |
| | |
| | The Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D shares issued by Core Bond are similar to the Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D shares issued by ML Total Return Bond with the exception that (i) they represent ownership interests in a different investment portfolio, (ii) the maximum sales charge (load) imposed on purchases of Class A and Class D shares of ML Total Return Bond is 0.25% higher than the maximum sales charge (load) imposed on purchases of Class A and Class D shares of Core Bond, and (iii) the Rule 12b-1 distribution fees applicable to Class B and Class C shares of ML Total Return Bond are 0.25% and 0.20%, respectively, higher than these fees for Core Bond.</R> |
| | |
| | Mercury Total Return Bond offers four different classes of shares. The Class I, Class B, Class C and Class A shares issued by Mercury Total Return Bond are similar to the Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D shares issued by Core Bond with the exception that (i) they represent ownership interests in a different investment portfolio, (ii) the maximum sales charge (load) imposed on purchases of Class I and Class A shares of Mercury Total Return Bond is 0.25% higher than the maximum sales charge (load) imposed on purchases of Class A and Class D shares of Core Bond, and (iii) the Rule 12b-1 distribution fees applicable to Class B and Class C shares of Mercury Total Return Bond are 0.25% and 0.20%, respectively, higher than these fees for Core Bond. |
| | |
| | Corporate Fund offers one class of shares. Shareholders of Corporate Fund will receive Class A shares of Core Bond in their Target Fund Acquisition. See “Comparison of the Funds—Capital Stock,” “—Redemption of Shares” and “—Additional Information—Shareholder Services.” |
| | |
| | Overall Annual Expense Ratio. The tables below show (a) the annualized total operating expense ratio for each class of shares for each Target Fund and Core Bond for the twelve month period ended September 30, 2002, and (b) the estimated pro forma annualized total operating expense ratio for each class of</R> |
| | date of a Target Fund Acquisition will be tacked onto the holding period of the shares of Core Bond that are distributed in such Target Fund Acquisition. See “Comparison of the Funds—Redemption of Shares.” |
| | |
| | Dividends. The policies of each Target Fund with respect to dividends and distributions are identical to those of Core Bond. See “Comparison of the Funds—Dividends.” |
| | |
| | Net Asset Value. The Target Funds and Core Bond each determines the net asset value of each class of its shares once daily Monday through Friday as of the close of business on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) on each day the NYSE is open for trading based on prices at the time of closing. The NYSE generally closes at 4:00 p.m., Eastern time. Each Fund computes net asset value per share in the same manner. See “Comparison of the Funds—Additional Information—Net Asset Value.” |
| | |
| | Voting Rights. The corresponding voting rights of the shareholders of the Target Funds and the shareholders of Core Bond are substantially similar. See “Comparison of the Funds—Additional Information—Capital Stock.” |
| | |
| | <R>Other Significant Considerations. Shareholder services available to shareholders of each Target Fund, such as the providing of annual and semi-annual reports, are substantially the same as those available to the shareholders of Core Bond. See “Comparison of the Funds—Additional Information—Shareholder Services.” An automatic dividend reinvestment plan is available to shareholders of each Fund. Such plans are identical. See “Comparison of the Funds—Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan” and “—Additional Information—Shareholder Services.” An automatic investment plan and a systematic withdrawal plan are available to shareholders of each Fund except Corporate Fund. Such plans are identical. See “Comparison of the Funds—Automatic Investment Plan,” “—Systematic Withdrawal Plan” and “—Additional Information—Shareholder Services.”</R> |
| | |
Tax Considerations | | Each Target Fund and Core Bond will receive an opinion of counsel with respect to each Target Fund Acquisition to the effect that, among other things, neither Core Bond nor any Target Fund will recognize any gain or loss on the transaction, and no Target Fund shareholder will recognize any gain or loss upon receipt of shares of Core Bond in a Target Fund Acquisition. Consummation of the Reorganization is subject to the receipt of such opinion of counsel. See “The Reorganization—Tax Consequences of each Target Fund Acquisition.” |
| | Effect of the Reorganization on Shareholders of:
|
Core Bond Risk
| | Mercury Total Return Bond
| ML Total Return Bond
| Global Bond
| Corporate Fund
|
|
Bond Market and Selection Risk — Bond market risk is the risk that the bond market will go down in value, including the possibility that the market will go down sharply and unpredictably. Selection risk is the risk that the securities that the Investment Adviser selects will underperform the market, the relevant indices or other funds with similar investment objectives and investment strategies. | | O | O | O | O |
| | | | | |
Call and Redemption Risk — A bond’s issuer may call a bond for redemption before it matures. If this happens to a bond a Core Bond holds, Core Bond may lose income and may have to invest the proceeds in bonds with lower yields. | | O | O | O | O |
| | | | | |
Credit Risk — Credit risk is the risk that the issuer will be unable to pay the interest or principal when due. The degree of credit risk depends on both the financial condition of the issuer and the terms of the obligation. Issuers of high-yield bonds generally are more subject to credit risk than issuers of investment grade securities. | | O | O | O | O |
| | | | | |
Interest Rate Risk — Interest rate risk is the risk that prices of fixed-income securities generally increase when interest rates decline and decrease when interest rates increase. Prices of longer term securities generally change more in response to interest rate changes than prices of shorter term securities. | | O | O | O | O |
| | | | | |
Borrowing and Leverage Risk — Core Bond may borrow for temporary emergency purposes including to meet redemptions. Borrowing may exaggerate changes in the net asset value of Core Bond’s shares and in the yield on Core Bond’s portfolio. Borrowing will cost Core Bond interest expense and other fees. The costs of borrowing may reduce Core Bond’s return. Certain securities that Core Bond buys may create leverage including, for example, inverse floating rate securities, when issued securities, forward commitments and options. | | O | O | O | O |
| | | | | |
Foreign Market Risk — Since Core Bond may invest up to 25% of its total assets in foreign securities, it offers the potential for more diversification than an investment only in the United States. This is because securities traded on foreign markets have often (though not always) performed differently than securities in the United States. However, such foreign investments involve special risks not present in U.S. investments that can increase the chances that Core Bond will lose money. In particular, investment in foreign securities involves the following risks, which are generally greater for investments in emerging markets. | | O | O | O | O |
</R> | | | | | |
| | Effect of the Reorganization on Shareholders of:
|
Core Bond Risk
| | Mercury Total Return Bond
| ML Total Return Bond
| Global Bond
| Corporate Fund
|
<R>Foreign Market Risk (continued)</R> | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
• | The economies of certain foreign markets often do not compare favorably with the economy of the United States with respect to such issues as growth of gross national product, reinvestment of capital, resources and balance of payments position. Certain such economies may rely heavily on particular industries or foreign capital and are more vulnerable to diplomatic developments, the imposition of economic sanctions against a particular country or countries, changes in international trading patterns, trade barriers and other protectionist or retaliatory measures. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
• | Investments in foreign markets may also be adversely affected by governmental actions such as the imposition of capital controls, nationalization of companies or industries, expropriation of assets or the imposition of punitive taxes. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
• | The governments of certain countries may prohibit or impose substantial restrictions on foreign investing in their capital markets or in certain industries. Any of these actions could severely affect security prices, impair Core Bond’s ability to purchase or sell foreign securities or transfer its assets or income back into the United States, or otherwise adversely affect Core Bond’s operations. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
• | Other foreign market risks include foreign exchange controls, difficulties in pricing securities, defaults on foreign government securities, difficulties in enforcing favorable legal judgments in foreign courts and political and social instability. Legal remedies available to investors in certain foreign countries may be less extensive than those available to investors in the United States or other foreign countries. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
• | Because there are fewer investors in foreign markets and a smaller number of securities traded each day, it may be difficult for Core Bond to buy and sell securities on those exchanges. In addition, prices of foreign securities may go up and down more than prices of securities traded in the United States. | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
• | Non-U.S. markets have different clearance and settlement procedures and in certain markets, settlements may be unable to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions which may cause delays. This means that Core Bond’s assets may be uninvested and not earning returns. Core Bond may miss investment opportunities or be unable to dispose of a security because of these delays. | | | | | |
| | Effect of the Reorganization on Shareholders of:
|
Core Bond Risk
| | Mercury Total Return Bond
| ML Total Return Bond
| Global Bond
| Corporate Fund
|
Junk Bonds — Core Bond may invest in junk bonds. Although junk bonds generally pay higher rates of interest than investment grade bonds, there is a greater risk of loss of income or principal. Junk bonds are high-risk investments that may cause losses in Core Bond. The major risks in junk bond investments include: | | O | O | • | • |
| | | | | |
• Junk bonds may be issued by less creditworthy companies. Issuers of junk bonds may have a larger amount of outstanding debt relative to their assets than issuers of investment grade bonds. In the event of an issuer’s bankruptcy, claims of other creditors may have priority over the claims of junk bond holders, leaving few or no assets available to repay junk bond holders. Prices of junk bonds are subject to extreme price fluctuations. Adverse changes to the issuer’s industry and general economic conditions may have a greater impact on the prices of junk bonds than on other higher rated fixed income securities. Issuers of junk bonds may be unable to meet their interest or principal payment obligations because of an economic downturn, specific issuer developments, or the unavailability of additional financing. | | | | | |
| | | | | |
• Junk bonds frequently have redemption features that permit an issuer to repurchase the security from Core Bond before it matures. If the issuer redeems junk bonds, Core Bond may have to invest the proceeds in bonds with lower yields and may lose income. | | | | | |
| | | | | |
• Junk bonds may be less liquid than higher rated fixed income securities, even under normal economic conditions. | | | | | |
| | | | | |
• There are fewer dealers in the junk bond market, and there may be significant differences in the prices quoted for junk bonds by the dealers. Because they are less liquid, judgment may play a greater role in valuing certain of Core Bond’s securities than is the case with securities trading in a more liquid market. | | | | | |
| | | | | |
• Core Bond may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting issuer. | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities — Core Bond may invest in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities represent the right to receive a portion of principal and/or interest payments made on a pool of residential or commercial mortgage loans. When interest rates fall, borrowers may refinance or otherwise repay principal on their loans earlier than scheduled. When this happens, certain types of mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities will be paid off more quickly than originally anticipated and Core Bond will have to invest the proceeds in | | O | O | • | O |
| | Effect of the Reorganization on Shareholders of:
|
Core Bond Risk
| | Mercury Total Return Bond
| ML Total Return Bond
| Global Bond
| Corporate Fund
|
securities with lower yields. This risk is known as “prepayment risk.” When interest rates rise, certain types of mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities will be paid off more slowly than originally anticipated and the value of these securities will fall. This risk is known as “extension risk.” Because of prepayment risk and extension risk, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities react differently to changes in interest rates than other fixed-income securities. Small movements in interest rates (both increases and decreases) may quickly and significantly reduce the value of certain mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Sovereign Debt — Core Bond may invest in sovereign debt securities. These securities are issued or guaranteed by foreign government entities. Investments in sovereign debt subject Core Bond to the risk that a government entity may delay or refuse to pay interest or repay principal on its sovereign debt. Some of these reasons may include: cash flow problems, insufficient foreign currency reserves, political considerations, the relative size of its debt position to its economy or its failure to put in place economic reforms required by the International Monetary Fund or other multilateral agencies. If a government entity defaults, it may ask for more time in which to pay, or for further loans. There is no legal process for collecting sovereign debts that a government does not pay. | | • | • | O | • |
| | | | | |
Securities Lending — Core Bond may lend securities to financial institutions that provide cash or securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government as collateral. Securities lending involves the risk that the borrower may fail to return the securities in a timely manner or at all. As a result, Core Bond may lose money and there may be a delay in recovering the loaned securities. Core Bond could also lose money if it does not recover the loaned securities and/or the value of the collateral falls, including the value of investments made with cash collateral. These events could trigger adverse tax consequences to Core Bond. | | O | O | O | O |
| | | | | |
Hedging — Core Bond may use derivatives for hedging purposes including anticipatory hedges. Hedging is a strategy in which Core Bond uses a derivative to offset the risks associated with other Core Bond holdings. While hedging can reduce losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains if the market moves in a different manner than anticipated by Core Bond or if the cost of the derivative outweighs the benefit of the hedge. Hedging also involves the risk that changes in the value of the derivative will not match those of the holdings being hedged as expected by Core Bond, in which case any losses on the holdings being hedged may not be reduced. There can be no assurance that Core Bond’s hedging strategy will reduce risk or that hedging transactions will be either available or cost effective. Core Bond is not required to use hedging and may choose not to do so. | | • | • | • | • |
| | Effect of the Reorganization on Shareholders of:
|
Core Bond Risk
| | Mercury Total Return Bond
| ML Total Return Bond
| Global Bond
| Corporate Fund
|
Swap Agreements — Core Bond may engage in swap agreements. Swap agreements are over-the-counter contracts in which one party agrees to make periodic payments based on the change in market value of a specified bond, basket of bonds, or index in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate or the change in market value of a different bond, basket of bonds, or index. Swap agreements may be used to obtain exposure to a bond or market without owning or taking physical custody of securities. | | O | O | O | • |
| | | | | |
Derivatives — Core Bond may use derivative instruments, including indexed and inverse securities, options on portfolio positions, options on securities or other financial indices, financial futures and options on such futures and swap agreements. Derivatives allow Core Bond to increase or decrease its risk exposure more quickly and efficiently than other types of instruments. Derivatives are volatile and involve significant risks, including: | | O | O | O | • |
| | | | | |
| Credit Risk — the risk that the counterparty (the party on the other side of the transaction) on a derivative transaction will be unable to honor its financial obligation to Core Bond. | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Leverage Risk — the risk associated with certain types of investments or trading strategies that relatively small market movements may result in large changes in the value of an investment. Certain investments or trading strategies that involve leverage can result in losses that greatly exceed the amount originally invested. | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Liquidity Risk — the risk that certain securities may be difficult or impossible to sell at the time that the seller would like or at the price that the seller believes the security is currently worth. | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Indexed and Inverse Floating Rate Securities — Core Bond may invest in securities whose potential returns are directly related to changes in an underlying index or interest rate, known as indexed securities. The return on indexed securities will rise when the underlying index or interest rate rises and fall when the index or interest rate falls. Core Bond may also invest in securities whose return is inversely related to changes in an interest rate (inverse floaters). In general, income on inverse floaters will decrease when short-term interest rates increase and increase when short-term interest rates decrease. Investments in inverse floaters may subject Core Bond to the risks of reduced or eliminated interest payments and losses of principal. In addition, certain indexed securities and inverse floaters may increase or decrease in value at a greater rate than the underlying interest rate, which effectively leverages Core Bond’s investment. As a result, the market value of such securities will generally be more volatile than that of fixed rate, tax-exempt securities. Indexed securities and inverse floaters are derivative securities and can be considered speculative. | | O | O | • | • |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Repurchase Agreements — Core Bond may invest in obligations which are subject to repurchase agreements with any member bank of the Federal Reserve System or primary dealer in U.S. Treasury securities. The bank or dealer agrees to repurchase the security from Core Bond at a set time and price, which sets the yield. If the bank or dealer defaults, Core Bond may suffer time delays and incur costs and possible losses. | | O | O | O | O |
| | | | | |
Illiquid Securities — Core Bond may invest up to 15% of its assets in illiquid securities that it cannot easily sell within seven days at current value or that have contractual or legal restrictions on resale. If Core Bond buys illiquid securities it may be unable to quickly sell them or may be able to sell them only at a price below current value. | | O | O | O | O |
| | | | | |
Restricted Securities — Core Bond may invest up to 10% of its total assets in restricted securities. Restricted securities have contractual or legal restrictions on their resale and may include “private placement” securities that Core Bond buys directly from the issuer. Private placement and other restricted securities may not be listed on an exchange and may have no active trading market. | | O | O | O | O |
| | | | | |
Restricted securities may be illiquid. Core Bond may be unable to sell them on short notice or may be able to sell them only at a price below current value. Core Bond may get only limited information about the issuer, so it may be less able to predict a loss. In addition, if Core Bond management receives material adverse nonpublic information about the issuer, then Core Bond will not be able to sell the securities. | | | | | |
<R> | Class A
|
| For the Year Ended September 30,
|
| 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net asset value, beginning of year | $11.21 | | $10.68 | | $10.88 | | $11.78 | | $11.40 | |
|
Investment income—net | .53 | | .66 | | .72 | | .70 | | .73 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments—net | .31 | | .53 | | (.20 | ) | (.90 | ) | .38 | |
|
Total from investment operations | .84 | | 1.19 | | .52 | | (.20 | ) | 1.11 | |
|
Less dividends from investment income—net | (.53 | ) | (.66 | ) | (.72 | ) | (.70 | ) | (.73 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of year | $11.52 | | $11.21 | | $10.68 | | $10.88 | | $11.78 | |
|
Total Investment Return:* | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | 7.71 | % | 11.44 | % | 5.09 | % | (1.70 | %) | 10.05 | % |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses | .59 | % | .61 | % | .57 | % | .57 | % | .58 | % |
|
Investment income—net | 4.68 | % | 6.03 | % | 6.79 | % | 6.22 | % | 6.32 | % |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of year (in thousands) | $645,820 | | $519,815 | | $489,778 | | $535,188 | | $600,655 | |
|
Portfolio turnover | 281.67 | % | 262.47 | % | 94.67 | % | 79.06 | % | 149.41 | % |
|
| Class B
|
| For the Year Ended September 30,
|
| 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 | | 1998 | |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net asset value, beginning of year | $11.21 | | $10.68 | | $10.88 | | $11.78 | | $11.40 | |
|
Investment income—net | .44 | | .57 | | .64 | | .61 | | .64 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments—net | .31 | | .53 | | (.20 | ) | (.90 | ) | .38 | |
|
Total from investment operations | .75 | | 1.10 | | .44 | | (.29 | ) | 1.02 | |
|
Less dividends from investment income—net | (.44 | ) | (.57 | ) | (.64 | ) | (.61 | ) | (.64 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of year | $11.52 | | $11.21 | | $10.68 | | $10.88 | | $11.78 | |
|
Total Investment Return:* | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | 6.89 | % | 10.59 | % | 4.29 | % | (2.45 | %) | 9.21 | % |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses | 1.36 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.34 | % |
|
Investment income—net | 3.93 | % | 5.25 | % | 6.02 | % | 5.46 | % | 5.56 | % |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of year (in thousands) | $487,746 | | $511,166 | | $455,162 | | $636,115 | | $685,345 | |
|
Portfolio turnover | 281.67 | % | 262.47 | % | 94.67 | % | 79.06 | % | 149.41 | % |
|
</R> |
<R> | | Class C
|
| | For the Year Ended September 30,
|
| | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: |
|
Net asset value, beginning of year | | $11.21 | | $10.68 | | $10.88 | | $11.79 | | $11.40 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .43 | | .57 | | .64 | | .61 | | .63 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments—net | | .31 | | .53 | | (.20 | ) | (.91 | ) | .39 | |
|
Total from investment operations | | .74 | | 1.10 | | .44 | | (.30 | ) | 1.02 | |
|
Less dividends from investment income—net | | (.43 | ) | (.57 | ) | (.64 | ) | (.61 | ) | (.63 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of year | | $11.52 | | $11.21 | | $10.68 | | $10.88 | | $11.79 | |
|
Total Investment Return:* | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 6.83 | % | 10.53 | % | 4.23 | % | (2.58 | %) | 9.25 | % |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses | | 1.42 | % | 1.44 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.40 | % |
|
Investment income—net | | 3.85 | % | 5.16 | % | 5.96 | % | 5.41 | % | 5.50 | % |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of year (in thousands) | | $110,065 | | $76,963 | | $55,889 | | $79,581 | | $77,464 | |
|
Portfolio turnover | | 281.67 | % | 262.47 | % | 94.67 | % | 79.06 | % | 149.41 | % |
|
| | Class D |
| |
|
| | For the Year Ended September 30, |
| |
|
| | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of year | | $11.21 | | $10.68 | | $10.88 | | $11.79 | | $11.41 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .50 | | .63 | | .70 | | .67 | | .70 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments—net | | .31 | | .53 | | (.20 | ) | (.91 | ) | .38 | |
|
Total from investment operations | | .81 | | 1.16 | | .50 | | (.24 | ) | 1.08 | |
|
Less dividends from investment income—net | | (.50 | ) | (.63 | ) | (.70 | ) | (.67 | ) | (.70 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of year | | $11.52 | | $11.21 | | $10.68 | | $10.88 | | $11.79 | |
|
Total Investment Return:* | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 7.44 | % | 11.16 | % | 4.83 | % | (2.03 | %) | 9.77 | % |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses | | .84 | % | .86 | % | .82 | % | .82 | % | .82 | % |
|
Investment income—net | | 4.43 | % | 5.75 | % | 6.55 | % | 5.98 | % | 6.07 | % |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of year (in thousands) | | $286,726 | | $201,269 | | $148,890 | | $135,401 | | $123,202 | |
|
Portfolio turnover | | 281.67 | % | 262.47 | % | 94.67 | % | 79.06 | % | 149.41 | % |
|
</R> |
| | Class I(1) |
| |
|
| | For the Year Ended June 30, |
| |
|
| | 2002 | 2001(3) | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $12.48 | | $12.33 | | $12.85 | | $13.46 | | $13.04 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .68 | *** | .83 | | .86 | | .81 | | .89 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments from the Portfolio—net | | .40 | | .15 | | (.54 | ) | (.49 | ) | .50 | |
|
|
Total from investment operations | | 1.08 | | .98 | | .32 | | .32 | | 1.39 | |
|
Less dividends and distributions: Investment income—net | | (.70 | ) | (.83 | ) | (.84 | ) | (.83 | ) | (.97 | ) |
|
Realized gain on investments—net | | — | | — | | — | | (.10 | ) | — | |
|
Total dividends and distributions | | (.70 | ) | (.83 | ) | (.84 | ) | (.93 | ) | (.97 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $12.86 | | $12.48 | | $12.33 | | $12.85 | | $13.46 | |
|
Total Investment Return:** | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 8.78 | % | 8.18 | % | 2.59 | % | 2.30 | % | 11.04 | % |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses, net of reimbursement(4) | | .65 | % | .65 | % | .65 | % | .65 | % | .65 | % |
|
Expenses(4) | | 1.08 | % | .93 | % | .92 | % | .79 | % | 1.02 | % |
|
Investment income—net | | 5.28 | % | 6.60 | % | 6.80 | % | 5.78 | % | 6.65 | % |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | $63,268 | | $86,849 | | $100,372 | | $124,320 | | $45,250 | |
|
Portfolio turnover | | 208.91 | %††† | 276.08 | %†† | 247.00 | % | 233.00 | % | 195.00 | % |
|
| | Class A(1) |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | For the Period June 2, 1999(2) to June 30, |
|
| | For the Year Ended June 30,
|
| | 2002 | 2001(3) | 2000 | 1999 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $12.46 | | $12.33 | | $12.85 | | $12.88 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .68 | *** | .78 | | .80 | | .06 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments from the Portfolio—net | | .38 | | .15 | | (.51 | ) | (.03 | ) |
|
|
Total from investment operations | | 1.06 | | .93 | | .29 | | .03 | |
|
Less dividends and distributions: Investment income—net | | (.67 | ) | (.80 | ) | (.81 | ) | (.06) | |
|
Realized gain on investments—net | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
|
Total dividends and distributions | | (.67 | ) | (.80 | ) | (.81 | ) | (.06 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $12.85 | | $12.46 | | $12.33 | | $12.85 | |
|
Total Investment Return:** | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 8.60 | % | 7.76 | % | 2.37 | % | .23 | %† |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses, net of reimbursement(4) | | .90 | % | .90 | % | .90 | % | .90 | %* |
|
Expenses(4) | | 1.32 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.18 | %* |
|
Investment income—net | | 5.32 | % | 6.31 | % | 6.55 | % | 6.26 | %* |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | $58,547 | | $66,908 | | $43,940 | | $350 | |
|
Portfolio turnover | | 208.91 | %††† | 276.08 | %†† | 247.00 | % | 233.00 | % |
|
<R> | | Class B
| Class C
|
| | For the Year Ended June 30, 2002 | For the Period October 6, 2000 (1) to June 30, 2001 | For the Year Ended June 30, 2002 | For the Period October 6, 2000 (1) to June 30, 2001 |
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $12.42 | | $12.38 | | $12.26 | | $12.38 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .61 | *** | .55 | | .62 | *** | .41 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain on investments and from Portfolio—net | | .42 | | .07 | | .38 | | .09 | |
|
|
Total from investment operations | | 1.03 | | .62 | | 1.00 | | .50 | |
|
Less dividends from investment income—net | | (.64 | ) | (.58 | ) | (.64 | ) | (.62 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $12.81 | | $12.42 | | $12.62 | | $12.26 | |
|
Total Investment Return:** | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 8.31 | % | 5.08 | %† | 8.29 | % | 4.10 | %† |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses, net of reimbursement (2) | | 1.16 | % | 1.40 | %* | .89 | % | .43 | %* |
|
Expenses (2) | | 1.57 | % | 1.65 | %* | 1.30 | % | .43 | %* |
|
Investment income—net | | 4.91 | % | 5.63 | %* | 4.93 | % | 3.97 | %* |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | $388 | | $146 | | $6 | | — | |
|
Portfolio turnover from the Portfolio | | 208.91 | % | 276.08 | % | 208.91 | % | 276.08 | % |
|
</R> |
| | For the Year Ended June 30, 2002
|
| | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class D |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $10.20 | | $10.18 | | $10.18 | | $10.19 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .51 | *** | .44 | *** | .40 | *** | .51 | *** |
|
Realized and unrealized gain on investments from the Portfolio—net | | .42 | | .39 | | .47 | | .41 | |
|
|
Total from investment operations | | .93 | | .83 | | .87 | | .92 | |
|
Less dividends and distributions: Investment income—net | | (.57 | ) | (.47 | ) | (.51 | ) | (.56 | ) |
|
Realized gain on investments—net | | (.01 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.01 | ) |
|
Total dividends and distributions | | (.58 | ) | (.48 | ) | (.52 | ) | (.57 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $10.55 | | $10.53 | | $10.53 | | $10.54 | |
|
Total Investment Return:** | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 9.30 | % | 8.21 | % | 8.22 | % | 9.03 | % |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses, net of reimbursement †† | | .65 | % | 1.65 | % | 1.64 | % | .90 | % |
|
Expenses†† | | 1.54 | % | 2.58 | % | 2.51 | % | 1.80 | % |
|
Investment income—net | | 5.07 | % | 4.22 | % | 4.07 | % | 4.85 | % |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | $875 | | $10,113 | | $10,339 | | $10,107 | |
|
Portfolio turnover from the Portfolio | | 208.91 | % | 208.91 | % | 208.91 | % | 208.91 | % |
|
| | For the Period October 6, 2000† to June 30, 2001
|
| | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class D |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $10.00 | | $10.00 | | $10.00 | | $10.00 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .45 | | .35 | | .36 | | .42 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain on investments from the Portfolio—net | | .17 | | .18 | | .17 | | .17 | |
|
|
Total from investment operations | | .62 | | .53 | | .53 | | .59 | |
|
Less dividends and distributions: Investment income—net | | (.42 | ) | (.35 | ) | (.35 | ) | (.40 | ) |
|
Realized gain on investments—net | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
|
Total dividends and distributions | | (.42 | ) | (.35 | ) | (.35 | ) | (.40 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $10.20 | | $10.18 | | $10.18 | | $10.19 | |
|
Total Investment Return:** | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 6.23 | %††† | 5.39 | %††† | 5.39 | %††† | 5.97 | %††† |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses, net of reimbursement†† | | .65 | %* | 1.65 | %* | 1.65 | %* | .90 | %* |
|
Expenses†† | | 19.00 | %* | 20.00 | %* | 20.00 | %* | 19.25 | %* |
|
Investment income—net | | 6.56 | %* | 5.32 | %* | 5.44 | %* | 6.19 | %* |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | $64 | | $2,077 | | $259 | | $805 | |
|
Portfolio turnover from the Portfolio | | 276.08 | % | 276.08 | % | 276.08 | % | 276.08 | % |
|
| | Class A
|
| | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 | For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
| | (unaudited) | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $7.61 | | $8.13 | | $8.46 | | $9.66 | | $9.12 | | $9.56 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .08 | † | .22 | | .36 | | .45 | | .52 | | .54 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions—net | | .53 | | (.52 | ) | (.33 | ) | (1.20 | ) | .54 | | (.44 | ) |
|
|
Total from investment operations | | .61 | | (.30 | ) | .03 | | (.75 | ) | 1.06 | | .10 | |
|
Less dividends: Investment income—net | | (.08 | ) | — | | — | | (.34 | ) | (.52 | ) | (.14 | ) |
|
Return of capital—net | | — | | (.22 | ) | (.36 | ) | (.11 | ) | — | | (.40 | ) |
|
Total dividends | | (.08 | ) | (.22 | ) | (.36 | ) | (.45 | ) | (.52 | ) | (.54 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $8.14 | | $7.61 | | $8.13 | | $8.46 | | $9.66 | | $9.12 | |
|
Total Investment Return:** | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 8.03 | %†† | (3.78 | %) | .52 | % | (7.92 | %) | 11.99 | % | 1.19 | % |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses | | 1.47 | %* | 1.40 | % | 1.07 | % | 1.06 | % | .92 | % | .96 | % |
|
Investment income—net | | 2.03 | %* | 2.79 | % | 4.50 | % | 5.02 | % | 5.57 | % | 5.83 | % |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | $9,080 | | $8,815 | | $11,517 | | $16,776 | | $26,289 | | $27,522 | |
|
Portfolio turnover | | 113.08 | % | 124.66 | % | 221.49 | % | 138.81 | % | 129.20 | % | 699.63 | % |
|
| | Class B
|
| | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 | | For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
| | (unaudited) | | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $7.61 | | $8.13 | | $8.47 | | $9.66 | | $9.12 | | $9.56 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .05 | † | .15 | | .29 | | .38 | | .45 | | .47 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions—net | | .54 | | (.52 | ) | (.34 | ) | (1.19 | ) | .54 | | (.44 | ) |
|
|
Total from investment operations | | .59 | | (.37 | ) | (.05 | ) | (.81 | ) | .99 | | .03 | |
|
Less dividends: Investment income—net | | (.05 | ) | — | | — | | (.28 | ) | (.45 | ) | (.13 | ) |
|
Return of capital—net | | — | | (.15 | ) | (.29 | ) | (.10 | ) | — | | (.34 | ) |
|
Total dividends | | (.05 | ) | (.15 | ) | (.29 | ) | (.38 | ) | (.45 | ) | (.47 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $8.15 | | $7.61 | | $8.13 | | $8.47 | | $9.66 | | $9.12 | |
|
Total Investment Return:** | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 7.75 | %†† | (4.53 | %) | (.38 | %) | (8.53 | %) | 11.13 | % | .41 | % |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses | | 2.27 | %* | 2.18 | % | 1.86 | % | 1.84 | % | 1.71 | % | 1.73 | % |
|
Investment income—net | | 1.27 | %* | 2.02 | % | 3.71 | % | 4.24 | % | 4.80 | % | 5.07 | % |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | $19,877 | | $24,148 | | $38,426 | | $62,822 | | $110,620 | | $160,571 | |
|
Portfolio turnover | | 113.08 | % | 124.66 | % | 221.49 | % | 138.81 | % | 129.20 | % | 699.63 | % |
|
| | Class C
|
| | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 | For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
| | (unaudited) | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $7.16 | | $8.13 | | $8.46 | | $9.66 | | $9.12 | | $9.56 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .05 | † | .15 | | .29 | | .37 | | .45 | | .46 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions—net | | .52 | | (.52 | ) | (.33 | ) | (1.20 | ) | .54 | | (.44 | ) |
|
|
Total from investment operations | | .57 | | (.37 | ) | (.04 | ) | (.83 | ) | .99 | | .02 | |
|
Less dividends: Investment income—net | | (.04 | ) | — | | — | | (.28 | ) | (.45 | ) | (.12 | ) |
|
Return of capital—net | | — | | (.15 | ) | (.29 | ) | (.09 | ) | — | | (.34 | ) |
|
Total dividends | | (.04 | ) | (.15 | ) | (.29 | ) | (.37 | ) | (.45 | ) | (.46 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $8.14 | | $7.61 | | $8.13 | | $8.46 | | $9.66 | | $9.12 | |
|
Total Investment Return:** | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 7.59 | %†† | (4.59 | %) | (.32 | % | (8.69 | %) | 11.07 | % | .33 | % |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses | | 2.29 | %* | 2.26 | % | 1.91 | % | 1.89 | % | 1.75 | % | 1.82 | % |
|
Investment income—net | | 1.20 | %* | 1.89 | % | 3.65 | % | 4.19 | % | 4.74 | % | 4.94 | % |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | $1,218 | | $565 | | $407 | | $785 | | $1,848 | | $2,284 | |
|
Portfolio turnover | | 113.08 | % | 124.66 | % | 221.49 | % | 138.81 | % | 129.20 | % | 699.63 | % |
|
| | Class D
|
| | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 | | For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
| | (unaudited) | | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $7.61 | | $8.13 | | $8.46 | | $9.66 | | $9.11 | | $9.55 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .07 | † | .20 | | .32 | | .43 | | .50 | | .51 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions—net | | .53 | | (.52 | ) | (.33 | ) | (1.20 | ) | .55 | | (.44 | ) |
|
|
Total from investment operations | | .60 | | (.32 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.77 | ) | 1.05 | | .07 | |
|
Less dividends: Investment income—net | | (.07 | ) | — | | — | | (.32 | ) | (.50 | ) | (.13 | ) |
|
Return of capital—net | | — | | (.20 | ) | (.32 | ) | (.11 | ) | — | | (.38 | ) |
|
Total dividends | | (.07 | ) | (.20 | ) | (.32 | ) | (.43 | ) | (.50 | ) | (.51 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $8.14 | | $7.61 | | $8.13 | | $8.46 | | $9.66 | | $9.11 | |
|
Total Investment Return:** | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 7.90 | %†† | (4.02 | %) | .27 | % | (8.15 | %) | 11.84 | % | .94 | % |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses | | 1.72 | %* | 1.65 | % | 1.32 | % | 1.31 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.19 | % |
|
Investment income—net | | 1.80 | %* | 2.52 | % | 4.25 | % | 4.77 | % | 5.32 | % | 5.66 | % |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | $27,852 | | $25,504 | | $28,181 | | $34,894 | | $48,724 | | $49,813 | |
|
Portfolio turnover | | 113.08 | % | 124.66 | % | 221.49 | % | 138.81 | % | 129.20 | % | 699.63 | % |
|
| | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 | For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
| | (unaudited) | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset Value: Per Share Operating Performance: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | | $20.91 | | $20.34 | | $19.77 | | $21.62 | | $21.13 | | $20.69 | |
|
Investment income—net | | .50 | † | 1.08 | † | 1.21 | † | 1.17 | † | 1.19 | † | 1.22 | |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments—net | | (.03 | ) | .57 | | .58 | | (1.84 | ) | .50 | | .44 | |
|
|
Total from investment operations | | .47 | | 1.65 | | 1.79 | | (.67 | ) | 1.69 | | 1.66 | |
|
Less dividends: Investment income—net | | (.48 | ) | (1.08 | ) | (1.22 | ) | (1.18 | ) | (1.20 | ) | (1.22 | ) |
|
In excess of investment income—net | | — | | — | | — | | — | †† | — | | — | |
|
Total dividends | | (.48 | ) | (1.08 | ) | (1.22 | ) | (1.18 | ) | (1.20 | ) | (1.22 | ) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | $20.90 | | $20.91 | | $20.34 | | $19.77 | | $21.62 | | $21.13 | |
|
Total Investment Return: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Based on net asset value per share | | 2.28 | %* | 8.32 | % | 9.21 | % | (3.14 | %) | 8.24 | % | 8.30 | % |
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses | | 1.11 | %** | 1.22 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.11 | % | 1.00 | % | .99 | % |
|
Investment income—net | | 4.94 | %** | 5.17 | % | 6.16 | % | 5.69 | % | 5.60 | % | 5.84 | % |
|
Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | $54,690 | | $59,179 | | $58,967 | | $63,150 | | $71,131 | | $72,381 | |
|
Portfolio turnover | | 49 | % | 227 | % | 127 | % | 61 | % | 66 | % | 90 | % |
|
A Fund will receive a premium from writing a put or call option, which increases the Fund’s return on the underlying security in the event the option expires unexercised or is closed out at a profit. In the former instance, the Fund increases its return by retaining the premium without being required to purchase or sell the underlying security. In the latter case, the Fund increases its return by liquidating the option position at a profit. The amount of the premium will reflect, among other factors, the current market price of the underlying security, the relationship of the exercise price to the market price, the time period until the expiration of the option and interest rates. By writing a call, the Fund limits its opportunity to profit from an increase in the market value of the underlying security above the exercise price of the option for so long as the Fund’s obligation as a writer continues. By writing a put, the Fund will be obligated to purchase the underlying security at a price that may be higher than the market value of that security at the time of exercise for as long as the option is outstanding. In addition, in closing out an option position, the Fund may incur a loss. Thus, in some periods the Fund will receive less total return and in other periods greater total return from its option positions than it otherwise would have received from the underlying securities. To the extent that such transactions are engaged in for hedging purposes, any gain (or loss) thereon may offset, in whole or in part, gains (or losses) on securities held in a Fund or increases in the value of securities the Fund intends to acquire. The Fund will attempt to achieve, through the receipt of premiums on covered options, a more consistent average total return than it would otherwise realize from holding the underlying securities alone. To facilitate closing transactions, as described below, the Fund will ordinarily only write options for which a liquid secondary market appears to exist. |
In general, mortgage-backed securities are “pass-through” securities, meaning that principal and interest payments made by the borrower on the underlying mortgages are passed through to the Fund. The value of mortgage-backed securities, like that of traditional fixed-income securities, typically increases when interest rates fall and decreases when interest rates rise. However, mortgage-backed securities differ from traditional fixed-income securities because of their potential for prepayment without penalty. The price paid by the Fund for its mortgage-backed securities, the yield the Fund expects to receive from such securities and the average life of the securities are based on a number of factors, including the anticipated rate of prepayment of the underlying mortgages. In a period of declining interest rates, borrowers may prepay the underlying mortgages more quickly than anticipated, thereby reducing the yield to maturity and the average life of the mortgage-backed securities. Moreover, when the Fund reinvests the proceeds of a prepayment in these circumstances, it will likely receive a rate of interest that is lower than the rate on the security that was prepaid. To the extent that the Fund purchases mortgage-backed securities at a premium, mortgage foreclosures and principal prepayments may result in a loss to the extent of the premium paid. If the Fund buys such securities at a discount, both scheduled payments of principal and unscheduled prepayments will increase current and total returns and will accelerate the recognition of income which, when distributed to shareholders, will be taxable as ordinary income. In a period of rising interest rates, prepayments of the underlying mortgages may occur at a slower than expected rate, creating maturity extension risk. This particular risk may effectively change a security that was considered short or intermediate-term at the time of purchase into a long-term security. Since long-term securities generally fluctuate more widely in response to changes in interest rates than shorter-term securities, maturity extension risk could increase the inherent volatility of the Fund. |
Other than as noted below, Core Bond and each Target Fund have substantially similar investment restrictions. As an additional fundamental restriction, each of Core Bond, Mercury Total Return Bond, ML Total Return Bond and Corporate Fund (the “Diversified Funds”), will not make any investment inconsistent with its classification as a diversified fund under the Investment Company Act. A fund that elects to be classified as a “diversified” fund under the Investment Company Act, such as the Diversified Funds, must satisfy the requirements that (i) with respect to 75% of its total assets, not more than 5% of the market value of its total assets will be invested in the securities of a single issuer, and (ii) with respect to 75% of its total assets, it will not own more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of a single issuer. For purposes of this restriction, each of the Diversified Funds will regard each state and each political subdivision, agency or instrumentality of such state and each multi-state agency of which such state is a member and each public authority that issues securities on behalf of a private entity as a separate issuer. If the security is backed only by the assets and revenues of a non-governmental entity, then the entity with the ultimate responsibility for payment of interest and principal may be regarded as the sole issuer. See “Investment Restrictions” in the Bond Fund Statement. Global Bond is classified as a “non-diversified” fund within the meaning of the Investment Company Act, which means that Global Bond is not limited by the Investment Company Act in the proportion of its assets that it may invest in securities of a single issuer. To the extent that Global Bond assumes a large position in securities of a small number of issuers, its respective net asset value may fluctuate to a greater extent than that of a diversified fund as a result of changes in the financial condition or in the market’s assessment of the issuers, and Global Bond may be more susceptible to any single, economic, political or regulatory occurrence than the Diversified Funds. |
Period
| | Class I Shares
| Class B Shares
| Class C Shares
| Class A Shares
|
|
|
| | Average Annual Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 3.29 | % | 3.36 | % | 6.57 | % | 2.96 | % |
Inception** to September 30, 2002 | | 7.90 | % | 7.10 | % | 8.46 | % | 5.56 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | Average Annual Total Return After Taxes on Dividends (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 1.32 | % | 1.48 | % | 4.62 | % | 1.09 | % |
Inception** to September 30, 2002 | | 3.25 | % | 4.81 | % | 6.11 | % | 3.15 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | Average Annual Total Return After Taxes on Dividends and Redemptions (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 1.95 | % | 2.00 | % | 3.97 | % | 1.75 | % |
Inception** to September 30, 2002 | | 3.35 | % | 4.52 | % | 5.59 | % | 3.21 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Yield*** |
30 Days Ended September 30, 2002 | | 3.87 | % | 5.27 | % | 3.85 | % | 3.64 | % |
Period
| | Class A Shares
| Class B Shares
| Class C Shares
| Class D Shares
|
|
|
| | Average Annual Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 4.02 | % | 3.27 | % | 6.17 | % | 3.38 | % |
Inception (October 6, 2000) to September 30, 2002 | | 7.90 | % | 7.56 | % | 8.96 | % | 7.40 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | Average Annual Total Return After Taxes on Dividends (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 1.98 | % | 1.57 | % | 4.47 | % | 1.45 | % |
Inception (October 6, 2000) to September 30, 2002 | | 5.65 | % | 5.65 | % | 7.08 | % | 5.26 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | Average Annual Total Return After Taxes on Dividends and Redemptions (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 2.39 | % | 1.95 | % | 3.73 | % | 2.01 | % |
Inception (October 6, 2000) to September 30, 2002 | | 5.19 | % | 5.09 | % | 6.24 | % | 4.84 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Yield** |
30 Days Ended September 30, 2002 | | 3.85 | % | 3.05 | % | 3.05 | % | 3.63 | % |
Period
| | Class A Shares
| Class B Shares
| Class C Shares
| Class D Shares
|
| | Average Annual Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 2.75 | % | 2.18 | % | 5.14 | % | 2.49 | % |
Five Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 1.52 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.51 | % | 1.27 | % |
Ten Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 3.55 | % | 3.17 | % | — | | — | |
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2002 | | — | | — | | 2.86 | % | 2.94 | % |
| | Average Annual Total Return After Taxes on Dividends (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 1.95 | % | 1.67 | % | 4.65 | % | 1.79 | % |
Five Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 0.42 | % | 0.67 | % | 0.63 | % | 0.24 | % |
Ten Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 1.77 | % | 1.62 | % | — | | — | |
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2002 | | — | | — | | 1.79 | % | 1.70 | % |
| | Average Annual Total Return After Taxes on Dividends and Redemptions (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 1.65 | % | 1.31 | % | 3.13 | % | 1.50 | % |
Five Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 0.66 | % | 0.81 | % | 0.77 | % | 0.50 | % |
Ten Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 1.95 | % | 1.78 | % | — | | — | |
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2002 | | — | | — | | 1.76 | % | 1.73 | % |
| | Yield** |
30 Days Ended September 30, 2002 | | 1.56 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.80 | % | 1.32 | % |
Period
| |
| Average Annual Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charge) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | 8.45% |
Five Years Ended September 30, 2002 | 6.53% |
Ten Years Ended September 30, 2002 | 6.40% |
| |
| Average Annual Total Return After Taxes on Dividends (including maximum applicable sales charge) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | 6.44% |
Five Years Ended September 30, 2002 | 4.23% |
Ten Years Ended September 30, 2002 | 3.82% |
| |
| Average Annual Total Return After Taxes on Dividends and Redemptions (including maximum applicable sales charge) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | 5.11% |
Five Years Ended September 30, 2002 | 4.05% |
Ten Years Ended to September 30, 2002 | 3.81% |
| Yield* |
30 Days Ended September 30, 2002 | 3.98% |
Period
| | Class A Shares
| Class B Shares
| Class C Shares
| Class D Shares
|
|
|
|
| | Average Annual Total Return (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 3.40 | % | 2.89 | % | 5.83 | % | 3.14 | % |
Five Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 5.55 | % | 5.60 | % | 5.55 | % | 5.27 | % |
Ten Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 6.08 | % | 5.71 | % | — | | — | |
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2002 | | — | | — | | 6.68 | % | 6.74 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | Average Annual Total Return After Taxes on Dividends (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 1.54 | % | 1.28 | % | 4.24 | % | 1.38 | % |
Five Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 3.08 | % | 3.45 | % | 3.41 | % | 2.91 | % |
Ten Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 3.26 | % | 3.21 | % | — | | — | |
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2002 | | — | | — | | 4.39 | % | 4.21 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | Average Annual Total Return After Taxes on Dividends and Redemptions (including maximum applicable sales charge*) |
One Year Ended September 30, 2002 | | 2.02 | % | 1.72 | % | 3.53 | % | 1.87 | % |
Five Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 3.16 | % | 3.38 | % | 3.35 | % | 3.00 | % |
Ten Years Ended September 30, 2002 | | 3.40 | % | 3.29 | % | — | | — | |
Inception (October 21, 1994) to | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2002 | | — | | — | | 4.22 | % | 4.12 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Yield** |
30 Days Ended September 30, 2002 | | 1.56 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.80 | % | 1.32 | % |
Voting rights for Board Members are not cumulative. Shares of Core Bond to be issued to a Target Fund in a Target Fund Acquisition and thereafter distributed to the shareholders of such Target Fund will be fully paid and non-assessable, will have no preemptive rights and will have the conversion rights described in this Prospectus and Proxy Statement and in the Bond Fund Prospectus. Each share of Core Bond is entitled to participate equally in dividends declared with respect to Core Bond and in the net assets of Core Bond on liquidation or dissolution after satisfaction of outstanding liabilities, except that Class B, Class C and Class D shares bear certain additional expenses. The Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D shares issued by Core Bond are similar to the Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D shares issued by ML Total Return Bond and Global Bond with the exception that (i) they represent ownership interests in a different investment portfolio, (ii) the maximum sales charge (load) imposed on purchases of Class A and Class D shares of ML Total Return Bond are 0.25% higher than the maximum sales charge (load) imposed on purchases of Class A and Class D shares of Core Bond, and (iii) the Rule 12b-1 distribution fees applicable to Class B and Class C shares of ML Total Return Bond are 0.25% and 0.20%, respectively, higher than these fees for Core Bond. Mercury Total Return Bond offers four different classes of shares. The Class I, Class B, Class C and Class A shares issued by Mercury Total Return Bond are similar to the Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D shares issued by Core Bond with the exception that (i) they represent ownership interests in a different investment portfolio, (ii) the maximum sales charge (load) imposed on purchases |
Shares of Beneficial Interest/Capital Stock. Core Bond is authorized to issue 700,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.10 per share, divided into four classes, designated Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D. Class A and Class B each consist of 250,000,000 shares and Class C and Class D each consist of 100,000,000 shares. Global Bond is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest, par value $.10 per share, divided into four classes, designated Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D. ML Total Return Bond is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, divided into four classes, designated Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D. Class A consists of 100,000,000 shares, Class B consists of 200,000,000 shares, |
<R>Under Section 381(a) of the Code, Core Bond will succeed to and take into account certain tax attributes of each Target Fund including, but not limited to, earnings and profits, any net operating loss carryovers, any capital loss carryovers and method of accounting. The Code, however, contains special limitations with regard to the use of net operating losses, capital losses, and other similar items in the context of certain reorganizations, including a tax-free reorganization pursuant to Section 368(a)(1)(C) of the Code, which could reduce the benefit of these attributes to Core Bond. As of September 30, 2002, each Target Fund other than ML Total Return Bond, had net realized capital losses. As of that date, each Fund also had net unrealized capital gains. As a result of a Target Fund Acquisition, shareholders of the Target Fund may benefit from the ability of the Combined Fund to use the net realized capital losses of the Target Fund to offset future net realized capital gains, if any, of the Combined Fund. However, the benefit of offsetting these capital losses would be diluted for the shareholders of Global Bond because Global Bond had significant net realized capital losses.</R> |
Each Target Fund and Bond Fund, on behalf of Core Bond, file reports and other information with the Commission. Reports, proxy statements, registration statements and other information filed by each Fund, can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities of the Commission at Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such materials can be obtained from the public reference section of the Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. The Commission maintains a Web site at http://www.sec.gov containing reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants, including each Fund, that file electronically with the Commission. |
Certain legal matters in connection with each Target Fund Acquisition will be passed upon for Bond Fund, Mercury Total Return Bond, ML Total Return Bond and Corporate Fund by Clifford Chance US LLP (“Clifford Chance”), 200 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10166 and for Global Bond by Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP (“Sidley Austin”), 787 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10019. Clifford Chance will rely as to matters of Maryland law on the opinion of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, 1501 K Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005. Sidley Austin and Clifford Chance will rely as to matters of Massachusetts law on the opinion of Bingham McCutchen LLP, 150 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1726. Certain tax matters in connection with each Target Fund Acquisition will be passed upon by Sidley Austin, counsel to Global Bond and special tax counsel to Bond Fund, Mercury Total Return Bond, ML Total Return Bond and Corporate Fund. |
Shareholders of the Target Funds are entitled to one vote for each share held and fractional votes for fractional shares held and will vote on any matter submitted to a shareholder vote. MLIM Fund and Corporate Fund, as Maryland corporations, and Mercury Trust and Global Bond, as Massachusetts business trusts, do not intend to hold annual meetings of shareholders under most circumstances. TheCharters and by-laws of MLIM Fund and Mercury Trust do not generally require MLIM Fund or Mercury Trust, respectively, to hold an annual meeting of shareholders of ML Total Return Bond and Mercury Total Return Bond, respectively. The Charters and by-laws of Corporate Fund and Global Bond do not generally require Corporate Fund or Global Bond, respectively, to hold an annual meeting of shareholders. The Target Funds will be required, however, to call special meetings in accordance with the requirements of the Investment Company Act to seek approval of new management and advisory arrangements or of a change in the fundamental policies, objectives or restrictions of any Target Fund. The Target Funds also will be required to hold a shareholders’meeting to elect new Board Members at such time as less than a majority of the Board Members holding office have been elected by shareholders. In addition, each Target Fund may hold shareholder meetings for approval of certain other matters as required by the Charter of each Target Fund. The by-laws of MLIM Fund provide that a shareholders’meeting may be called with respect to ML Total Return Bond at any time by a majority of the Board, the President, or on the written request of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of ML Total Return Bond entitled to vote at such meeting. The by-laws of Mercury Trust provide that a shareholders’meeting may be called with respect to Mercury Total Return Bond at any time by the Chairman of the Board, the President or the Board, and shall be called by the Secretary of Mercury Trust upon written request of shareholders of Mercury Total Return Bond holding in the aggregate not less than one-third of the outstanding shares of Mercury Total Return Bond having voting rights. The Charter of Mercury Trust provides that the Board of Mercury Trust must call a meeting to remove a Board Member if 10% of the outstanding shares request it. The by-laws of Corporate Fund provide that a shareholders’meeting may be called with respect to Corporate Fund at any time by a majority of the Board, the President, or on the written request of the holders of at least 10% of the outstanding shares of ML Total Return Bond entitled to vote at such meeting. The Charter of Global Bond provides that a shareholders’meeting may be called with respect to Global Bond at any time by a majority of the Board and shall be called by any Board Member upon the written request of the holders of at least 10% of the outstanding shares of Global Bond entitled to vote at such meeting. |
<R>THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION (this “Agreement”) is made as of the 4th day of December, 2002, by and among Merrill Lynch Global Bond Fund for Investment and Retirement, a Massachusetts business trust (“Global Bond”), Mercury Funds II, a Massachusetts business trust (“Mercury Trust”), on behalf of Mercury Total Return Bond Fund, a series of Mercury Trust (“Mercury Total Return Bond”), Merrill Lynch Investment Managers Funds, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“MLIM Fund”), on behalf of Merrill Lynch Total Return Bond Fund, a series of MLIM Fund (“ML Total Return Bond”), Fund Asset Management Master Trust, a Delaware statutory trust (“FAM Trust”), on behalf of Total Return Bond Master Portfolio, a series of FAM Trust (“Total Return Master”), The Corporate Fund Accumulation Program, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Corporate Fund”), and Merrill Lynch Bond Fund, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Bond Fund”), on behalf of Core Bond Portfolio, a series of Bond Fund (“Core Bond,” and together with Global Bond, Mercury Trust, Mercury Total Return Bond, MLIM Fund, ML Total Return Bond, FAM Trust and Corporate Fund, the “Funds”).</R> |
(f) Bond Fund, Mercury Trust, on behalf of Mercury Total Return Bond, MLIM Fund, on behalf of ML Total Return Bond, FAM Trust, on behalf of Total Return Master, Global Bond and Corporate Fund each agrees that by the Closing Date all Federal and other tax returns and reports required to be filed by each such Fund on or before such date shall have been filed and all taxes shown as due on each Fund’s returns either have been paid or adequate liability reserves have been provided for the payment of such taxes. In connection with this covenant, the Funds agree to cooperate with each other in filing any tax return, amended return or claim for refund, determining a liability for taxes or a right to a refund of taxes or participating in or conducting any audit or other proceeding in respect of taxes. Bond Fund agrees to retain for a period of ten (10) years following the Closing Date all returns, schedules and work papers and all material records or other documents relating to tax matters of each Target Fund for its taxable period first ending after the Closing Date and for all prior taxable periods. Any information obtained under this subsection shall be kept confidential except as otherwise may be necessary in connection with the filing of returns or claims for refund or in conducting an audit or other proceeding. After the Closing Date, each Target Fund shall prepare, or cause its agents to prepare, any Federal, state or local tax returns, including any Forms 1099, required to be filed by such Target Fund with respect to its final taxable year ending with its complete liquidation and for any prior periods or taxable years and further shall cause such tax returns and Forms 1099 to be duly filed with the appropriate taxing authorities. Notwithstanding the aforementioned provisions of this subsection, any expenses incurred by each Target Fund in connection with the preparation and filing of said tax returns and Forms 1099 after the Closing Date shall be borne by such Target Fund, to the extent such expenses have been accrued by such Target Fund in the ordinary course without regard to the Reorganization; any excess expenses (other than for payment of taxes) shall be borne by Bond Fund at the time such tax returns and Forms 1099 are prepared. |
<R>(a) Delivery of the assets of each Target Fund to be transferred, together with any other Investments, and the shares of Core Bond Common Stock to be issued, shall be made at the offices of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, 787 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10019, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time on the next full business day following the Valuation Time, or at such other place, time and date agreed to in writing by an officer of Bond Fund, and by an officer of Mercury Trust, MLIM Fund, FAM Trust, Global Bond and Corporate Fund, as applicable, the date and time upon which such delivery is to take place being referred to herein as the “Closing Date.” To the extent that any Investments, for any reason, are not transferable to Core Bond on the Closing Date, each Target Fund shall cause such Investments to be transferred to Bond Fund’s account with State Street Bank and Trust Company, on behalf of Core Bond, at the earliest practicable date thereafter. |
<R>(e) That Global Bond shall have received an opinion of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, special Maryland counsel to Bond Fund, in form satisfactory to Global Bond and dated as of the Closing Date, to the effect that (i) Bond Fund is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing, and in good standing in conformity with the laws of the State of Maryland; (ii) the Corresponding Shares of Core Bond to be delivered to the shareholders of Global Bond as provided for by this Agreement are duly authorized and, when issued and delivered pursuant to this Agreement against payment of the consideration set forth herein, will be validly issued and outstanding and fully paid and nonassessable by Bond Fund, and no shareholder of Core Bond has any preemptive right to subscription or purchase in respect thereof (pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation of Bond Fund, as amended and supplemented, or the by-laws of Bond Fund, as amended, or, to the best of such counsel’s knowledge, otherwise); (iii) this Agreement has been duly authorized, executed, and delivered by Bond Fund; (iv) the execution and delivery of this Agreement do not, and the consummation of the Reorganization will not, violate the Articles of Incorporation of Bond Fund, as amended and supplemented, the by-laws of Bond Fund, as amended, or, to the best of such counsel’s knowledge, Maryland law; (v) to the best of such counsel’s knowledge, no consent, approval, authorization or order of any Maryland state court or governmental authority is required for the consummation by Bond Fund of the Reorganization, except such as have been obtained under Maryland law; and (vi) such opinion is solely for the benefit of Global Bond and its trustees and officers. In giving the opinion set forth above, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP may state that it is relying on certain certificates of officers of FAM, Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, L.P. (“MLIM”), Financial Data Services, Inc. (“FDS”), and Bond Fund with regard to matters of fact and certain certificates and written statements of government officials with respect to the organization, existence, and good standing of Bond Fund.</R> |
(f) That Global Bond shall have received an opinion of Clifford Chance US LLP, as counsel to Bond Fund, in form satisfactory to Global Bond and dated the Closing Date, to the effect that (i) this Agreement represents a valid and binding contract of Bond Fund, enforceable against Bond Fund in accordance with its terms, except as enforceability thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws pertaining to the enforcement of creditors’rights generally and court decisions with respect thereto; provided, such counsel shall express no opinion with respect to the application of equitable principles in any proceeding, whether at law or in equity; (ii) no consent, approval, authorization or order of any United States Federal court or governmental authority is required for the consummation by Bond Fund of the Reorganization, except such as have been obtained under the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act, and the 1940 Act and the published rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder, and under applicable state securities laws, if any; (iii) to such counsel’s knowledge, the N-14 Registration Statement has become effective under the 1933 Act, no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the N-14 Registration Statement has been issued and no proceedings for that purpose have been instituted or are pending or contemplated under the 1933 Act, and the N-14 Registration Statement, as of its effective date, |
insofar as it relates to Bond Fund, appears on its face to be appropriately responsive in all material respects to the requirements of the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act, and the 1940 Act and the published rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder; (iv) the descriptions in the N-14 Registration Statement of statutes, legal and governmental proceedings and contracts and other documents, insofar as it relates to Bond Fund, are accurate and fairly present the information required to be shown; (v) such counsel does not know of any statutes, legal or governmental proceedings or contracts or other documents related to the Reorganization, insofar as it relates to Bond Fund, of a character required to be described in the N-14 Registration Statement which are not described therein or, if required to be filed, filed as required; (vi) the execution and delivery of this Agreement does not, and the consummation of the Reorganization will not, violate any material provision of any agreement (known to such counsel) to which Bond Fund is a party or by which Bond Fund is bound; (vii) Bond Fund, to the knowledge of such counsel, is not required to qualify to do business as a foreign corporation in any jurisdiction, except as may be required by state securities laws, and except where it has so qualified or the failure so to qualify would not have a material adverse effect on Core Bond, or its shareholders; (viii) such counsel does not have knowledge of any material suit, action or legal or administrative proceeding pending or threatened against Bond Fund, the unfavorable outcome of which would materially and adversely affect Bond Fund; (ix) all corporate actions required to be taken by Bond Fund to authorize this Agreement and to effect the Reorganization have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate actions on the part of Bond Fund; and (x) such opinion is solely for the benefit of Global Bond and its trustees and officers. |
(g) That Global Bond shall have received a letter from Clifford Chance US LLP, as counsel to Bond Fund, in form and in substance satisfactory to Global Bond and dated the Closing Date, to the effect that, (i) while such counsel cannot make any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of statements of fact in the N-14 Registration Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto, nothing has come to their attention that caused them to believe that, on the effective date of the N-14 Registration Statement, (1) the N-14 Registration Statement, insofar as it relates to Bond Fund, contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading; and (2) the Proxy Statement and Prospectus included in the N-14 Registration Statement, insofar as it relates to Bond Fund, contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; (ii) such counsel does not express any opinion or belief as to the financial statements or other financial or statistical data contained or incorporated by reference in the N-14 Registration Statement; and (iii) such letter is solely for the benefit of Global Bond and its trustees and officers. In giving the letter set forth above, Clifford Chance US LLP may state that it is relying on certain certificates of officers of FAM, MLIM, FDS, and Bond Fund with regard to matters of fact and the opinion of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP as to matters of Maryland law. |
<R>(d) That Global Bond and Corporate Fund, as applicable, shall have delivered to Bond Fund a letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP, dated the Closing Date, stating that such firm has performed a limited review of the Federal, state and local income tax returns of Global Bond and Corporate Fund, as applicable, for the period ended December 31, 2001 (which returns originally were prepared and filed by the applicable Fund), and that based on such limited review, nothing came to their attention which caused them to believe that such returns did not properly reflect, in all material respects, the Federal, state and local income taxes of the applicable Fund for the period covered thereby; and that for the period from January 1, 2002, to and including the Closing Date and for any taxable year of the applicable Fund ending upon such Fund’s liquidation, such firm has performed a limited review to ascertain the amount of applicable Federal, state and local taxes, and has determined that either such amount has been paid or reserves have been established for payment of such taxes, this review to be based on unaudited financial data; and that based on such limited review, nothing has come to their attention which caused them to believe that the taxes paid or reserves set aside for payment of such taxes were not adequate in all material respects for the satisfaction of Federal, state and local taxes for the period from January 1, 2002, to and including the Closing Date and for any taxable year of such Funds ending upon such Fund’s liquidation or that either Fund would not continue to qualify as a RIC for Federal income tax purposes for the tax years in question. |
(j) That, if applicable, Bond Fund shall have received an opinion of Bingham McCutchen LLP, as special Massachusetts counsel to Global Bond and Mercury Trust, in form satisfactory to Bond Fund and dated the Closing Date, to the effect that (i) each of Global Bond and Mercury Trust is a trust with transferable shares of beneficial interest, validly existing in conformity with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and duly authorized to transact business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; (ii) this Agreement, to the extent Massachusetts law applies, has been duly authorized and executed by each of Global Bond and Mercury Trust; (iii) to the extent that Massachusetts law applies, the execution of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by each of Global Bond and Mercury Trust; (iv) the execution and delivery of this Agreement by each of Global Bond and Mercury Trust and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby in accordance with the terms of this Agreement do not violate the applicable Declaration of Trust, as amended, or by-laws of Global Bond and Mercury Trust, as amended, or, to the best of such counsel’s knowledge, Massachusetts law; (v) to the best of such counsel’s knowledge, no consent, approval, authorization or order of any Massachusetts state court or governmental authority is required under Massachusetts law for the consummation by each of Global Bond and Mercury Trust of the Reorganization in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, except (a) a filing with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to terminate Mercury Total Return Bond as a series of Mercury Trust, (b) a filing with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to terminate Global Bond as a Massachusetts business trust, and (c) such as may be required under Massachusetts state securities laws about which such counsel need not express an opinion. Such opinion is solely for the benefit of Bond Fund and its Directors and officers. In giving the opinion set forth above, Bingham McCutchen LLP may state that it is relying on certificates of officers of FAM, MLIM, FDS and of Global Bond and Mercury Trust with regard to matters of fact and certain certificates and written statements of government officials with respect to the good standing of each of Global Bond and Mercury Trust. |
(k) That, if applicable, Bond Fund shall have received an opinion of Richards, Layton &Finger, P.A., as special Delaware counsel to FAM Trust, in form and substance satisfactory to Bond Fund and dated the Closing Date, to the effect that (i) FAM Trust is a statutory trust duly formed, validly existing and in good standing in conformity with the laws of the State of Delaware; (ii) this Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by FAM Trust; (iii) the execution and delivery of this Agreement does not, and the consummation of the Reorganization will not, violate any material provisions of Delaware law or the Declaration of Trust, as amended and restated, or the by-laws, as amended; (iv) FAM Trust has the power to sell, assign, transfer and |
</R>(m) That Bond Fund, as applicable, shall have received from Deloitte & Touche LLP a letter dated within three days prior to the effective date of the N-14 Registration Statement and a similar letter dated within five days prior to the Closing Date, in form and substance satisfactory to Bond Fund, to the effect that (i) they are independent public accountants with respect to each of Global Bond and Corporate Fund within the meaning of the 1933 Act and the applicable published rules and regulations thereunder; (ii) in their opinion, the financial statements and supplementary information of Global Bond and Corporate Fund, as applicable, included or incorporated by reference in the N-14 Registration Statement and reported on by them comply as to form in all material respects with the applicable accounting requirements of the 1933 Act and the published rules and regulations thereunder; (iii) on the basis of limited procedures agreed upon by Global Bond and Corporate Fund, as applicable, and Bond Fund and described in such letter (but not an examination in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards) consisting of a reading of any unaudited interim financial statements and unaudited supplementary information of the applicable Fund included in the N-14 Registration Statement, and inquiries of certain officials of the applicable Fund responsible for financial and accounting matters, nothing came to their attention that caused them to believe that (a) such unaudited financial statements and related unaudited supplementary information do not comply as to form in all material respects with the applicable accounting requirements of the 1933 Act and the published rules and regulations thereunder, (b) such unaudited financial statements are not fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, applied on a basis substantially consistent with that of the audited financial statements, or (c) such unaudited supplementary information is not fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the unaudited financial statements taken as a whole; and (iv) on the basis of limited procedures agreed upon by Bond Fund and the applicable Fund and described in such letter (but not an examination in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards), the information relating to the applicable Fund appearing in the N-14 Registration Statement, which information is expressed in dollars (or percentages derived from such dollars) (with the exception of performance comparisons, if any), if any, has been obtained from the accounting records of the applicable Fund or from schedules prepared by officials of the applicable Fund having responsibility for financial and reporting matters and such information is in agreement with such records, schedules or computations made therefrom. |
(e) The respective representations and warranties contained in Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of this Agreement shall expire with, and be terminated by, the consummation of the Reorganization, and neither Bond Fund, Global Bond, Mercury Trust, MLIM Fund, FAM Trust and Corporate Fund nor any of their officers, directors or trustees, agents or shareholders shall have any liability with respect to such representations or warranties after the Closing Date. This provision shall not protect any officer, director, agent or shareholder of Bond Fund, Global Bond, Mercury Trust, MLIM Fund, FAM Trust and Corporate Fund against any liability to the entity for which that officer, director or trustee, agent or stockholder so acts or to its shareholders, to which that officer, director or trustee, agent or stockholder otherwise would be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the duties in the conduct of such office. |
<R> | | | | |
| | | MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT MANAGERS FUNDS, INC. on behalf of MERRILL LYNCH TOTAL RETURN BOND FUND |
| | | | |
| | | By: | /s/ DONALD C. BURKE |
| | | |
|
| | | | (Donald C. Burke, Vice President and Treasurer) |
| | | | |
ATTEST: | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
By: | /s/ PHILLIP S. GILLESPIE | | | |
|
| | | |
| (Phillip S. Gillespie, Secretary) | | | |
| | | | |
| | | MERCURY FUNDS II on behalf of MERCURY TOTAL RETURN BOND FUND |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | By: | /s/ DONALD C. BURKE |
| | | |
|
| | | | (Donald C. Burke, Vice President and Treasurer) |
| | | | |
ATTEST: | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
By: | /s/ PHILLIP S. GILLESPIE | | | |
|
| | | |
| (Phillip S. Gillespie, Secretary) | | | |
| | | | |
| | | FUND ASSET MANAGEMENT MASTER TRUST on behalf of TOTAL RETURN BOND MASTER PORTFOLIO |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | By: | /s/ DONALD C. BURKE |
| | | |
|
| | | | (Donald C. Burke, Vice President and Treasurer) |
| | | | |
ATTEST: | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
By: | /s/ PHILLIP S. GILLESPIE | | | |
|
| | | |
| (Phillip S. Gillespie, Secretary) | | | |
| | | | |
| | | MERRILL LYNCH GLOBAL BOND FUND FOR INVESTMENT AND RETIREMENT |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | By: | /s/ DONALD C. BURKE |
| | | |
|
| | | | (Donald C. Burke, Vice President and Treasurer) |
| | | | |
ATTEST: | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
By: | /s/ DAVID CLAYTON | | | |
|
| | | |
| (David Clayton, Secretary)</R> | | | |
Aaa | | Bonds which are rated Aaa are judged to be of the best quality. They carry the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as “gilt-edge.” Interest payments are protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable margin and principal is secure. While the various protective elements are likely to change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such issues. |
| | |
Aa | | Bonds which are rated Aa are judged to be of high quality by all standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are generally known as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins of protection may not be as large as in Aaa securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which make the long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa securities. |
| | |
A | | Bonds which are rated A possess many favorable investment attributes and are to be considered as upper medium-grade obligations. Factors giving security to principal and interest are considered adequate but elements may be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the future. |
| | |
Baa | | Bonds which are rated Baa are considered medium-grade obligations, i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured. Interest payments and principal security appear adequate for the present but certain protective elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and in fact have speculative characteristics as well. |
| | |
Ba | | Bonds which are rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements; their future cannot be considered as well assured. Often the protection of interest and principal payments may be very moderate and thereby not well safeguarded during both good and bad times over the future. Uncertainty of position characterizes bonds in this class. |
| | |
B | | Bonds which are rated B generally lack characteristics of a desirable investment. Assurance of interest and principal payments or of maintenance of other terms of the contract over any long period of time may be small. |
| | |
Caa | | Bonds which are rated Caa are of poor standing. Such issues may be in default or there may be present elements of danger with respect to principal or interest. |
| | |
Ca | | Bonds which are rated Ca represent obligations that are speculative in a high degree. Such issues are often in default or have other marked shortcomings. |
| | |
C | | Bonds which are rated C are the lowest rated class of bonds and issues so rated can be regarded as having extremely poor prospects of ever attaining any real investment standing. |
BBB | | Bonds rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Whereas they normally exhibit adequate protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay principal for bonds in this category than in higher rated categories. |
| | |
BB B CCC CC | | Bonds rated BB, B, CCC and CC are regarded, on balance, as predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation. BB indicates the lowest degree of speculation and CC the highest degree of speculation. While such bonds will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these are outweighed by large uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse conditions. |
| | |
C | | The C rating is reserved for income bonds on which no interest is being paid. |
| | |
D | | Bonds rated D are in default, and payment of interest and/or repayment of principal is in arrears. |
| | |
NR | | Indicates that no rating has been requested, that there is insufficient information on which to base a rating, or that S&P does not rate a particular type of bond as a matter of policy. |
AAA | | Bonds rated AAA are considered to be investment grade and of the highest credit quality. The obligor has an exceptionally strong ability to pay interest and repay principal, which is unlikely to be affected by reasonably foreseeable events. |
| | |
AA | | Bonds rated AA are considered to be investment grade and of very high credit quality. The obligor’s ability to pay interest and repay principal is very strong, although not quite as strong as bonds rated AAA. Because bonds rated in the AAA and AA categories are not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable future developments, short-term debt of these issuers is generally rated F1+. |
| | |
A | | Bonds rated A are considered to be investment grade and of high credit quality. The obligor’s ability to pay interest and repay principal is considered to be strong, but may be more vulnerable to adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances than bonds with higher ratings. |
| | |
BBB | | Bonds rated BBB are considered to be investment grade and of satisfactory credit quality. The obligor’s ability to pay interest and repay principal is considered to be adequate. Adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances, however, are more likely to have an adverse impact on these bonds and, therefore, impair timely payment. The likelihood that the ratings of these bonds will fall below investment grade is higher than for bonds with higher ratings. |
| | |
BB | | Bonds rated BB are considered speculative. The obligor’s ability to pay interest and repay principal may be affected over time by adverse economic changes. However, business and financial alternatives can be identified which could assist the obligor in satisfying its debt service requirements. |
| | |
B | | Bonds rated B are considered highly speculative. While bonds in this class are currently meeting debt service requirements, the probability of continued timely payment of principal and interest reflects the obligor’s limited margin of safety and the need for reasonable business and economic activity throughout the life of the issue. |
| | |
CCC | | Bonds rated CCC have certain identifiable characteristics, which, if not remedied, may lead to default. The ability to meet obligations requires an advantageous business and economic environment. |
| | |
CC | | Bonds rated CC are minimally protected. Default in payment of interest and/or principal seems probable over time. |
| | |
C | | Bonds rated C are in imminent default in payment of interest or principal. |
| | |
DDD DD D | | Bonds rated DDD, DD and D are in actual default of interest and/or principal payments. Such bonds are extremely speculative and should be valued on the basis of their ultimate recovery value in liquidation or reorganization of the obligor. DDD represents the highest potential for recovery on these bonds and D represents the lowest potential for recovery. |
| Percentage of Class Owned
| | Owned
|
Shareholder Name and Address*
| Class I
| Class B
| Class C
| Class A
| Percentage of Fund Owned
| Beneficially
| Of Record
|
Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. Reinvest Account | 26.86% | — | — | — | 14.20% | | X |
| | | | | | | |
National Financial Services Corp FBO The Exclusive Benefit of Our Customers | 11.20% | — | — | — | 5.92% | | X |
| | | | | | | |
Merrill Lynch Trust Co., FSB (2) Trustee FBO Smart & Final 401(k) Savings Plan | 10.30% | — | — | — | 5.45% | | X |
| | | | | | | |
Merrill Lynch Trust Co., FSB (2) Trustee FBO Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 401(k) Svgs. | 6.77% | — | — | — | 3.58% | | X |
| | | | | | | |
Merrill Lynch Trust Co., FSB (1) TTEE FBO Merrill Lynch | 5.15% | — | — | — | 2.72% | | X |
| | | | | | | |
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. CUST For Vicki Perkins | �� | 15.78% | — | — | .05% | | X |
| | | | | | | |
Marie E. Gibree IRRA FBO Marie E. Gibree | — | 13.16% | — | — | .04% | X | X |
| | | | | | | |
George L. Hamoy IRA FBO George L. Hamoy | — | 12.12% | — | — | .04% | X | X |
| | | | | | | |
Alice G. Hamoy IRA FBO Alice G. Hamoy | — | 10.90% | — | — | .04% | X | X |
| | | | | | | |
William B. Allin IRRA FBO William B. Allin | — | 8.93% | — | — | .03% | X | X |
| | | | | | | |
Mrs. Hazel P. Thomas | — | 5.42% | — | — | .02% | X | X |
| | | | | | | |
Mr. Jesse Stanfield IRRA FBO Mr. Jesse Stanfield | — | — | 98.32% | — | .01% | X | X |
| | | | | | | |
Merrill Lynch Trust Co., FSB (2) Trustee FBO Geneva Steel Union Blended Fund — Unitized | — | — | — | 32.65% | 15.28% | | X |
| | | | | | | |
Merrill Lynch Trust Co., FSB (2) Trustee FBO Women’s Health Partnership, P.C. 401(k) PSP | — | — | — | 6.55% | 3.07% | | X |
| | | | | | | |
Merrill Lynch Trust Co., FSB (2) TTEE FBO DVCC, Inc. Employees | — | — | — | 5.23% | 2.45% | | X |
<R> | Percentage of Class Owned
| | Owned
|
Shareholder Name and Address*
| Class A
| Class B
| Class C
| Class D
| Percentage of Fund Owned
| Beneficially
| Of Record
|
Merrill Lynch Trust Co., FSB (1) TTEE FBO Merrill Lynch | 25.29% | — | — | — | 3.88% | | X |
| | | | | | | |
The Marty and Dorothy Silverman Foundation | 7.87% | — | — | — | 1.21% | X | X |
| | | | | | | |
Merrill Lynch Trust Co., FSB (1) TTEE FBO Merrill Lynch | 7.29% | — | — | — | 1.12% | | X |
| | | | | | | |
ML Deferred Compensation 2002 700843 TTEE FBO Merrill Lynch | 6.14% | — | — | — | .94% | | X |
| | | | | | | |
Helen Hermsen and Jean A. Dassenko JTWROS | — | — | 15.73% | — | .24% | X | X |
| | | | | | | |
Ruth Anne Garrison TTEE U/A/ DTD 01/07/1998 By Garrison Survivor’s Trust | — | — | 7.21% | — | .11% | X | X |
| | | | | | | |
Fred D. Guth TTEE U/A/ DTD 12/16/1996 By Martha G. Guth Trust | — | — | 6.11% | — | .09% | X | X |
<R>This Statement of Additional Information is not a prospectus and should be read in conjunction with the Joint Proxy Statement and Prospectus of Merrill Lynch Global Bond Fund for Investment and Retirement (“Global Bond”), Mercury Total Return Bond Fund (“Mercury Total Return Bond”), a series of Mercury Funds II (“Mercury Trust”), Merrill Lynch Total Return Bond Fund (“ML Total Return Bond”), a series of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers Funds, Inc. (“MLIM Fund”), The Corporate Fund Accumulation Program, Inc. (“Corporate Fund”) and Core Bond Portfolio (“Core Bond”), a series of Merrill Lynch Bond Fund, Inc. (“Bond Fund”), dated December 5, 2002 (the “Proxy Statement and Prospectus”), which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) and can be obtained, without charge, by calling Bond Fund at 1-800-637-3863, or by writing to Bond Fund at the above address. This Statement of Additional Information has been incorporated by reference into the Proxy Statement and Prospectus. Global Bond, Mercury Total Return Bond, ML Total Return Bond and Corporate Fund are each referred to herein as a “Target Fund” and collectively as the “Target Funds,” as the context requires.</R> |
<R>The shareholders of each Target Fund are being asked to approve an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization whereby Total Return Bond Master Portfolio (“Total Return Master”), a series of Fund Asset Management Master Trust (“FAM Trust”), will transfer all of its assets and liabilities on a pro rata basis to Mercury Total Return Bond and ML Total Return Bond in return for all of their beneficial interests in Total Return Master. Next, Global Bond, Mercury Total Return Bond, ML Total Return Bond and Corporate Fund will transfer all of their assets and all of their liabilities to Core Bond in return solely for an equal aggregate value of newly issued shares of Core Bond to be distributed to the shareholders of Global Bond, Mercury Total Return Bond, ML Total Return Bond and Corporate Fund. Global Bond and Corporate Fund will thereafter dissolve as a matter of state law and deregister as investment companies and Mercury Total Return Bond, ML Total Return Bond and Total Return Master will thereafter be terminated as series of Mercury Trust, MLIM Fund and FAM Trust, respectively. Each acquisition of assets and assumption of liabilities of a Target Fund by Core Bond is individually referred to herein as a “Target Fund Acquisition,” and the Target Fund Acquisitions are collectively referred to herein as the “Reorganization.” Bond Fund is an open-end fund that is organized as a Maryland corporation. A Special Meeting of the Shareholders of each Target Fund will be held at the offices of Fund Asset Management, L.P. (“FAM”) and Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, L.P. (“MLIM”), 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, New Jersey, on January 17, 2003, at the following times: |
1 | (a) | | — | | Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File No. 2-62329)) (“Registration Statement”). |
| (b) | | — | | Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1(b) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
| (c) | | — | | Articles Supplementary reclassifying shares of Intermediate Term Portfolio Series Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1(c) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
| (d) | | — | | Articles of Amendment changing name to Merrill Lynch Bond Fund, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1(d) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
| (e) | | — | | Articles of Amendment to Articles Supplementary renaming Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock, Class C Common Stock and Class D Common Stock of the High Quality Portfolio to Core Bond Portfolio. |
2 | | | — | | By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
<R> | |
3 | (a) | | — | | Specimen certificates for Class A shares of High Quality Portfolio Series and High Income Portfolio Series Common Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) filed with Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
| (b) | | — | | Specimen certificates for Class B shares of High Quality Portfolio Series and High Income Portfolio Series Common Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) filed with Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
4 | (a) | | — | | Form of Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Fund Asset Management, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 filed with Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
| (b) | | — | | Form of Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fund Asset Management, L.P. and Merrill Lynch Asset Management U.K. Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5(b) filed with Post- Effective Amendment No. 23 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
5 | | | — | | Form of Unified Distribution Agreement between Registrant and FAM Distributors, Inc. (the “Distributor”) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
6 | | | — | | None. |
7 | | | — | | Form of Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A.8 filed with Amendment No. 2 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-5) (“Post-Effective Amendment No. 2”). |
8 | (a) | | — | | Form of Transfer Agency, Dividend Disbursing Agency and Shareholder Servicing Agency Agreement between Registrant and Financial Data Services, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 9(a) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
| (b) | | — | | Form of Agreement relating to the use of the “Merrill Lynch” name (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A.9(c) filed with Amendment No. 2). |
| (c) | | — | | Credit Agreement between the Registrant and a syndicate of banks (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 8(b) to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A of Master Premium Growth Trust (File No. 811-09733), filed on December 21, 1999). |
| (d) | | — | | Form of Administrative Services Agreement between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 8(d) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A of Merrill Lynch Focus Twenty Fund, Inc. (File No. 333-89775) filed on March 20, 2001 |
9 | | | — | | Opinion of Rogers & Wells (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
10 | | | — | | Investment Letter—High Income Portfolio—Class C and Class D shares (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 13(a) filed with Post-Effective Amendment No. 20 to Registrant’s Registration Statement). |
11 | | | — | | Opinion of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP.** |
12 | | | — | | Tax Opinion of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP.* |
13 | | | — | | Not applicable. |
14 | (a) | | — | | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors for the Registrant.** |
| (b) | | — | | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors for Merrill Lynch Global Bond Fund for Investment and Retirement.** |
| (c) | | — | | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors for The Corporate Fund Accumulation Program, Inc.** |
| (d) | | — | | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors for Mercury Total Return Bond Fund of Mercury Funds II.** |
| (e) | | — | | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors for Merrill Lynch Total Return Bond Fund of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers Funds, Inc.** |
17 | (a) | | — | | Prospectus, dated January 24, 2002, of the Registrant (previously filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 333-100666) on October 22, 2002). |
| (b) | | — | | Statement of Additional Information, dated January 24, 2002, of the Registrant (previously filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 333-100666) on October 22, 2002). |
</R> | |
<R> | |
17 | (c) | | — | | Prospectus, dated April 19, 2002, of Merrill Lynch Global Bond Fund for Investment and Retirement (previously filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 333-100666) on October 22, 2002). |
| (d) | | — | | Prospectus, dated April 29, 2002, of The Corporate Fund Accumulation Program, Inc. (previously filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 333-100666) on October 22, 2002). |
| (e) | | — | | Prospectus, dated October 25, 2002, of Mercury Total Return Bond Fund of Mercury Funds II.** |
| (f) | | — | | Prospectus, dated October 25, 2002, of Merrill Lynch Total Return Bond Fund of Merrill Lynch Investment Mangers Funds, Inc.** |
| (g) | | — | | Annual Report to Shareholders of the Registrant, as of September 30, 2002.** |
| (h) | | — | | Annual Report to Shareholders of Merrill Lynch Global Bond Fund for Investment and Retirement, as of December 31, 2001 (previously filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 333-100666) on October 22, 2002). |
| (i) | | — | | Semi-Annual Report to Shareholders of Merrill Lynch Global Bond Fund for Investment and Retirement, as of June 30, 2002 (previously filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 333-100666) on October 22, 2002). |
| (j) | | — | | Annual Report to Shareholders of The Corporate Fund Accumulation Program, Inc., as of December 31, 2001 (previously filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 333-100666) on October 22, 2002). |
| (k) | | — | | Semi-Annual Report to Shareholders of The Corporate Fund Accumulation Program, Inc., as of June 30, 2002 (previously filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 333-100666) on October 22, 2002). |
| (l) | | — | | Annual Report to Shareholders of Mercury Total Return Bond Fund of Mercury Funds II, as of June 30, 2002 (previously filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 333-100666) on October 22, 2002). |
| (m) | | — | | Annual Report to Shareholders of Merrill Lynch Total Return Bond Fund of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers Funds, Inc., as of June 30, 2002 (previously filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 333-100666) on October 22, 2002). |
| (n) | | — | | Forms of Proxy (previously filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-14 (File No. 333-100666) on October 22, 2002). |
Exhibit Number
| | | | Description
|
|
| | | | | |
11 | | | — | | Opinion of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP. <R> |
14 | (a) | | — | | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors for the Registrant. |
| (b) | | — | | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors for Merrill Lynch Global Bond Fund for Investment and Retirement.</R> |
| (c) | | — | | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors for The Corporate Fund Accumulation Program, Inc. |
| (d) | | — | | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors for Mercury Total Return Bond Fund of Mercury Funds II. |
| (e) | | — | | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors for Merrill Lynch Total Return Bond Fund of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers Funds, Inc. |
17 | (e) | | — | | Prospectus, dated October 25, 2002, of Mercury Total Return Bond Fund of Mercury Funds II. |
| (f) | | — | | Prospectus, dated October 25, 2002, of Merrill Lynch Total Return Bond Fund of Merrill Lynch Investment Mangers Funds, Inc. |
| (g) | | — | | Annual Report to Shareholders of the Registrant, as of September 30, 2002. |