without the other party’s consent. Diamondback and Energen also agreed to use their respective reasonable best efforts to cause the Merger to be consummated and to obtain expiration or termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act, subject to certain exceptions, including that Diamondback is not required to take any action that would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or operations of the combined company from and after the closing.
The Merger Agreement provides that, during the period from the date of the Merger Agreement until the Effective Time, each of Diamondback and Energen will be subject to certain restrictions on its ability to solicit alternative acquisition proposals from third parties, to provide non-public information to third parties and to engage in discussions with third parties regarding alternative acquisition proposals, subject to customary exceptions. Diamondback is required to call a meeting of its stockholders to approve the issuance of Diamondback common stock in connection with the merger (the “Diamondback Stock Issuance”) and, subject to certain exceptions, to recommend that its stockholders approve the Diamondback Stock Issuance. Energen is required to call a meeting of its shareholders to approve the Merger Agreement and, subject to certain exceptions, to recommend that its shareholders approve the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement contains termination rights for each of Diamondback and Energen, including, among others, (1) if the consummation of the Merger does not occur on or before March 31, 2019, subject to extension to June 30, 2019 for the sole purpose of obtaining regulatory clearances and (2) subject to certain conditions, if such party wishes to terminate the Merger Agreement to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a Parent Superior Proposal or a Company Superior Proposal (in each case, as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement), as applicable. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including the termination by Energen in the event of a change of recommendation by Diamondback board of directors or by Diamondback to enter into an agreement providing for a Parent Superior Proposal (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement), Diamondback would be required to pay Energen a termination fee of $400 million. In addition, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including the termination by Diamondback in the event of a change of recommendation by the Energen board of directors or by Energen to enter into an agreement providing for a Company Superior Proposal (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement), Energen would be required to pay Diamondback a termination fee of $250 million. In addition, if the Merger Agreement is terminated because of a failure of Energen’s shareholders or Diamondback’s stockholders to approve the proposals required to complete the Merger, Energen and Diamondback, as applicable, may be required to reimburse the other party for its actual transaction expenses in an amount not to exceed $40 million, in the case of Energen’s expenses, and $25 million, in the case of Diamondback’s expenses. In no event will either party be entitled to receive more than one termination fee, net of any expense reimbursement.
The foregoing description of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby in this Current Report on Form 8-K is only a summary and does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 2.1 hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
The Merger Agreement has been included to provide investors with information regarding its terms. It is not intended to provide any other factual information about Energen. The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the Merger Agreement were made only for purposes of the Merger Agreement as of the specific dates therein, were solely for the benefit of the parties to the Merger Agreement, may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties, including being qualified by confidential disclosures made for the purposes of allocating contractual risk between the parties to the Merger Agreement instead of establishing these matters as facts, and may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to the contracting parties that differ from those applicable to investors. Investors are not third-party beneficiaries under the Merger Agreement and should not rely on the representations, warranties