Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) 10-Q 2006 Q3 Quarterly report

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to                    

Commission file number1-4879

Diebold, Incorporated

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio	34-0183970
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)
5995 Mayfair Road, PO Box 3077, North Canton, Ohio	44720-8077
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (330) 490-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filerþ      Accelerated Filero      Non-Accelerated Filero

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

     Common Stock, $1.25 Par Value – 65,487,198 shares as of November 2, 2006

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

	Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - September 30, 2006 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2005		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) - Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005		5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		6
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		18
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		27
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures		27
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings		28
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		29
ITEM 6. Exhibits		30
SIGNATURES		34
EXHIBIT INDEX		35
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

2

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	(Unaudited)			December 31,
	September 30, 2006			2005
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	210,160		$	207,900
Short-term investments		71,395			52,885
Trade receivables, less allowances of $30,699 and $27,216, respectively		589,403			676,361
Inventories		427,204			341,614
Prepaid expenses		27,235			20,816
Other current assets		132,360			128,304
Total current assets		1,457,757			1,427,880
Securities and other investments		69,293			54,154
Property, plant and equipment, at cost		630,778			606,085
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		353,370			329,119
		277,408			276,966
Goodwill		448,578			389,134
Other assets		212,905			205,059
	$	2,465,941		$	2,353,193
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Notes payable	$	48,462		$	34,472
Accounts payable		151,448			180,725
Deferred income		158,143			136,135
Other current liabilities		239,540			228,699
Total current liabilities		597,593			580,031
Notes payable – long-term		622,507			454,722
Other long-term liabilities		167,626			165,591
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred shares, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares,
none issued		—			—
Common shares, par value $1.25, authorized 125,000,000 shares; issued 74,989,562 and 74,726,031 shares, respectively outstanding 65,510,198 and 68,721,847 shares, respectively		93,737			93,408
Additional capital		224,540			199,033
Retained earnings		1,156,611			1,140,468
Treasury shares, at cost (9,479,364 and 6,004,184 shares, respectively)		(399,923	)		(256,336	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		3,250			(23,437	)
Other		—			(287	)
Total shareholders’ equity		1,078,215			1,152,849
	$	2,465,941		$	2,353,193

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Net sales
Products	$	364,335		$	301,346		$	1,031,323		$	835,319
Services		366,404			320,987			1,049,503			941,114
		730,739			622,333			2,080,826			1,776,433
Cost of sales
Products		257,525			226,412			735,297			610,070
Services		291,122			252,254			844,138			726,488
		548,647			478,666			1,579,435			1,336,558
Gross profit		182,092			143,667			501,391			439,875
Selling, general and administrative expense		116,403			101,762			338,135			273,706
Research, development and engineering expense		17,299			15,132			53,873			43,451
		133,702			116,894			392,008			317,157
Operating profit		48,390			26,773			109,383			122,718
Other income (expense)
Investment income		4,026			2,872			12,913			8,199
Interest expense		(9,643	)		(4,559	)		(25,598	)		(11,093	)
Miscellaneous, net		502			(1,484	)		(3,985	)		(6,637	)
Minority interest		(1,564	)		(1,363	)		(4,393	)		(3,826	)
Income from continuing operations before taxes		41,711			22,239			88,320			109,361
Taxes on income		(12,169	)		(8,740	)		(28,855	)		(36,860	)
Income from continuing operations		29,542			13,499			59,465			72,501
Discontinued operations
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			—			—			909
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			12,933			—			12,933
Income from discontinued operations		—			12,933			—			13,842
Net income	$	29,542		$	26,432		$	59,465		$	86,343
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding		65,627			70,447			67,055			71,042
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding		66,020			70,812			67,242			71,517
Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.45		$	0.19		$	0.89		$	1.02
Income from discontinued operations		—			0.18			—			0.20
Net income	$	0.45		$	0.37		$	0.89		$	1.22
Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.45		$	0.19		$	0.88		$	1.02
Income from discontinued operations		—			0.18			—			0.19
Net income	$	0.45		$	0.37		$	0.88		$	1.21
Cash dividends paid per common share	$	0.215		$	0.205		$	0.645		$	0.615

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2006			2005
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income	$	59,465		$	86,343
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Income from discontinued operations		—			(909	)
Minority share of income		4,393			3,826
Depreciation and amortization		69,485			56,164
Share-based compensation		11,258			(1,127	)
Deferred income taxes		(951	)		3,072
Gain on sale of discontinued operations		—			(20,290	)
(Gain) loss on sale of assets, net		(890	)		561
Cash provided (used) by changes in certain assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables		101,338			2,926
Inventories		(74,738	)		(62,928	)
Prepaid expenses		(5,789	)		(7,002	)
Other current assets		1,402			(38,789	)
Accounts payable		(34,971	)		7,456
Certain other assets and liabilities		24,701			14,201
Net cash provided by operating activities		154,703			43,504
Cash flow from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations		—			29,350
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(53,389	)		(27,701	)
Proceeds from maturities of investments		46,504			36,778
Payments for purchases of investments		(63,599	)		(30,762	)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets		6,442			—
Capital expenditures		(32,209	)		(39,967	)
Rotable spares expenditures		(12,351	)		(12,622	)
Increase in certain other assets		(30,564	)		(25,409	)
Net cash used by investing activities		(139,166	)		(70,333	)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Dividends paid		(43,322	)		(43,578	)
Notes payable borrowings		1,179,680			863,514
Notes payable repayments		(1,009,322	)		(729,231	)
Distribution of affiliates’ earnings to minority interest holder		(718	)		(793	)
Issuance of common shares		7,020			5,524
Repurchase of common shares		(143,744	)		(82,344	)
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(10,406	)		13,092
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(2,871	)		1,334
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		2,260			(12,403	)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		207,900			184,045
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	210,160		$	171,642

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contained in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

In addition, some of the company’s statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may be considered forward-looking and involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected results. The results of operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.

The company has reclassified the presentation of the cash flow statement for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to conform to the current year presentation.

2. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), restricted shares and performance shares have been issued to officers and other management employees under the company’s 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (1991 Plan). The stock options generally vest over a four- or five-year period and have a maturity of ten years from the issuance date. Option exercise prices equal the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. RSUs provide for the issuance of a share of the company’s common stock at no cost to the holder and generally vest after three to seven years with no partial vesting. During the vesting period, employees are paid the cash equivalent of dividends on RSUs. Unvested RSUs are forfeited upon termination unless the Board of Directors determines otherwise. Restricted share grants are subject to forfeiture under certain conditions and have a three-year vesting period. Performance shares are granted based on certain management objectives, as determined by the Board of Directors each year. Each performance share earned entitles the holder to the then current value of one common share. The performance share objectives are generally calculated over a three-year period and no shares are granted unless certain threshold management objectives are met. To cover the exercise and/or vesting of its share-based payments, the company generally issues new shares from its authorized, unissued share pool. The number of common shares that may be issued pursuant to the 1991 Plan was 5,474 of which 1,208 shares were available for issuance at September 30, 2006.

Effective January 1, 2006, the company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004),Share-Based Payment(SFAS No. 123R), which requires the company to recognize costs resulting from all share-based payment transactions in the financial statements, including stock options, RSUs, restricted shares and performance shares, based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant date. SFAS No. 123R supersedes SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation(SFAS No. 123), and APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees(APB No. 25). The company has adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective application method of adoption, which requires the company to record compensation cost related to unvested stock awards as of December 31, 2005 by recognizing the unamortized grant date fair value of these awards over the remaining requisite periods of those awards with no change in historical reported earnings. Awards granted after December 31, 2005 are valued at fair value in accordance with provisions of SFAS No. 123R and recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite periods of each award. The company estimated forfeiture rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 based on its historical experience.

As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123R, the company’s net income was lower for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 by $795 and $4,872 (net of $327 and $2,367 tax benefit), respectively, than if the company had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB No. 25. The impact on both basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $0.01 and $0.07, respectively, per share. The impact on cash flow from financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was not material.

6

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

2. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)

Prior to 2006, the company accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with APB No. 25 using the intrinsic value method, which did not require that compensation cost be recognized for the company’s stock options provided the option exercise price was not below the common stock fair market value on the date of grant. Under APB No. 25, the company was required to record expense over the vesting period for the value of RSUs, restricted shares and performance shares granted. Prior to 2006, the company provided pro forma disclosure amounts in accordance with SFAS No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, as if the fair value method defined by SFAS No. 123 was applied to its share-based compensation.

The estimated fair value of the options granted during 2006 and prior years was calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following summarizes the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model for the nine months ended September 30:

	2006			2005
Expected life (in years)		3-6			4-6
Weighted average volatility		33	%		30	%
Risk-free interest rate		4.55 – 5.11	%		3.54 – 3.76	%
Expected dividend yield		1.58 – 1.63	%		1.41 – 1.52	%

The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value share-based awards. The risk-free rate of interest for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on a zero-coupon U.S. government instrument over the contractual term of the equity instrument. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the price of the company’s common stock. The company generally uses the midpoint of the life of the grant to estimate option exercise timing within the valuation model. This methodology is not materially different from the company’s historical data on exercise timing. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior with regard to option exercise timing and forfeiture rates are considered separately for valuation and attribution purposes.

Pro forma net income as if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards is as follows:

	Three Months			Nine Months
	Ended			Ended
	September 30,			September 30,
	2005			2005
Net income as reported	$	26,432		$	86,343
Add: Share-based compensation programs recorded as expense, net of tax		979			(747	)
Deduct: Total share-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax		(1,920	)		(3,006	)
Pro forma net income	$	25,491		$	82,590
Earnings per share:
Basic – as reported	$	0.37		$	1.22
Basic – pro forma	$	0.36		$	1.16
Diluted – as reported	$	0.37		$	1.21
Diluted – pro forma	$	0.36		$	1.15

7

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

2. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)

As of September 30, 2006, unrecognized compensation cost of $8,798 for stock options, $5,683 for RSUs, $123 for restricted shares and $6,136 for performance shares, is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.1, 3.2, 1.3 and 1.3 years, respectively.

Share-based compensation was recognized as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. Performance share compensation recognized in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 was offset by reductions in the performance share accrual because the company did not meet certain performance objectives. The following table summarizes the components of the company’s share-based compensation programs recorded as expense:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Stock Options:
Pre-tax compensation expense	$	1,466		$	—		$	5,346		$	—
Tax benefit		(357	)		—			(1,746	)		—
Stock option expense, net of tax	$	1,109		$	—		$	3,600		$	—
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs):
Pre-tax compensation expense	$	813		$	739		$	3,274		$	1,861
Tax benefit		(189	)		(265	)		(1,070	)		(627	)
Restricted stock unit expense, net of tax	$	624		$	474		$	2,204		$	1,234
Restricted Shares:
Pre-tax compensation expense	$	23		$	45		$	165		$	154
Tax benefit		(3	)		(17	)		(54	)		(52	)
Restricted share expense, net of tax	$	20		$	28		$	111		$	102
Performance Shares:
Pre-tax compensation expense	$	1,206		$	639		$	2,473		$	(3,142	)
Tax (benefit) expense		(354	)		(162	)		(808	)		1,059
Performance share expense, net of tax	$	852		$	477		$	1,665		$	(2,083	)
Total Share-Based Compensation:
Pre-tax compensation expense	$	3,508		$	1,423		$	11,258		$	(1,127	)
Tax (benefit) expense		(903	)		(444	)		(3,678	)		380
Total share-based compensation, net of tax	$	2,605		$	979		$	7,580		$	(747	)

8

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

2. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)

Options outstanding and exercisable under the 1991 Plan as of September 30, 2006 and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were as follows:

				Weighted-
				Average		Weighted Average		Aggregate
				Exercise		Remaining Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		Term (in years)		Value (1)
Outstanding at January 1, 2006		3,112		$	40.20
Granted		285			40.13
Exercised		(252	)		33.20
Expired or forfeited		(119	)		47.99
Outstanding at September 30, 2006		3,026		$	40.47		6	$	17,343
Exercisable at September 30, 2006		2,057		$	39.15		5	$	14,016

(1) The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the third quarter of 2006 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2006. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the company’s common stock.

The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $2,306 and $4,270, respectively. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $13.12 and $14.25, respectively. Total fair value of stock options vested for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $25,040 and $24,448, respectively. Exercise of options during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 resulted in cash receipts of $7,859 and $5,586, respectively. The tax benefit during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 related to the exercise of employee stock options was not material.

The following tables summarize information on unvested restricted stock units and performance shares outstanding:

	Number of			Weighted-Average
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs):	Shares			Grant-Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 2006		130		$	53.94
Exercised		(5	)		52.84
Forfeited		(11	)		52.62
Vested		—			—
Granted		190			39.43
Unvested at September 30, 2006		304		$	44.82

	Number of			Weighted-Average
Performance Shares:	Shares			Grant-Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 2006		363		$	53.33
Exercised		(6	)		36.55
Forfeited		—			—
Vested		—			—
Granted		199			39.46
Unvested at September 30, 2006		556		$	48.55

Unvested performance shares are based on a maximum potential payout. Actual shares granted at the end of the performance period may be less than the maximum potential payout level depending on achievement of performance share objectives. The company had 5 unvested restricted shares as of September 30, 2006 with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $55.20, and 10 unvested restricted shares as of December 31, 2005 with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $54.10.

9

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

3. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The basic and diluted earnings per share computations in the condensed consolidated statements of income are based on the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during each period reported. The following data show the amounts used in computing earnings per share and the effect on the weighted-average number of shares of potentially dilutive common stock.

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Numerator:
Income used in basic and diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	29,542	$	13,499	$	59,465	$	72,501
Income from discontinued operations		—		12,933		—		13,842
Net income		29,542		26,432		59,465		86,343
Denominator:
Basic weighted-average shares		65,627		70,447		67,055		71,042
Effect of dilutive share-based compensation		393		365		187		475
Diluted weighted-average shares		66,020		70,812		67,242		71,517
Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.45	$	0.19	$	0.89	$	1.02
Income from discontinued operations		—		0.18		—		0.20
Net income	$	0.45	$	0.37	$	0.89	$	1.22
Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.45	$	0.19	$	0.88	$	1.02
Income from discontinued operations		—		0.18		—		0.19
Net income	$	0.45	$	0.37	$	0.88	$	1.21
Anti-dilutive shares not used in calculating diluted weighted-average shares		992		1,044		981		727

4. INVENTORIES

Domestic inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market applied on a first-in, first out (FIFO) basis, and international inventories are valued using the average cost method, which approximates FIFO. At each reporting period, the company identifies and writes down its excess or obsolete inventory to its net realizable value based on forecasted usage, orders and inventory aging. With the development of new products, the company also rationalizes its product offerings and will write down discontinued product to the lower of cost or net realizable value.

Major classes of inventories are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
Finished goods	$	135,399	$	90,484
Service parts		101,988		84,264
Work in process		142,758		126,247
Raw materials		47,059		40,619
Total inventory	$	427,204	$	341,614

10

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

5. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is reported separately from retained earnings and additional capital in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Items considered to be other comprehensive income (loss) include adjustments made for foreign currency translation (under SFAS No. 52) and pensions (under SFAS No. 87). Components of other accumulated comprehensive income (loss) consist of the following:

	September 30,			December 31,
	2006			2005
Translation adjustment	$	7,852		$	(18,835	)
Pensions, less accumulated taxes of $(1,572) for 2006 and 2005		(4,602	)		(4,602	)
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	3,250		$	(23,437	)

Components of comprehensive income consist of the following for the nine months ended September 30:

	2006		2005
Net income	$	59,465	$	86,343
Other comprehensive income:
Translation adjustment		26,687		(163	)
Comprehensive income	$	86,152	$	86,180

6. INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was 29.2 percent versus 39.3 percent in the same period in 2005. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was 32.7 percent versus 33.7 percent in the same period in 2005. The decrease in effective tax rate was the result of a $1.6 million tax refund, discrete to the third quarter of 2006, and a lower projected annual tax rate. The lower projected annual tax rate is attributable to income mix, which favors lower tax jurisdictions.

7. BENEFIT PLANS

The company has several pension plans covering substantially all United States employees. Plans covering salaried employees provide pension benefits that are based on the employee’s compensation during the 10 years before retirement. The company’s funding policy for salaried plans is to contribute annually, if required, at an actuarially determined rate. Plans covering hourly employees and union members generally provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service. The company’s funding policy for hourly plans is to make at least the minimum annual contributions required by applicable regulations. Employees of the company’s operations in countries outside of the United States participate to varying degrees in local pension plans, which in the aggregate are not significant.

In addition to providing pension benefits, the company provides healthcare benefits (referred to as Other Benefits) for certain retired employees. Eligible employees may be entitled to these benefits based upon years of service with the company, age at retirement and collective bargaining agreements. Currently, the company has made no commitments to increase these benefits for existing retirees or for employees who may become eligible for these benefits in the future. Currently, there are no plan assets and the company funds the benefits as the claims are paid.

11

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

7. BENEFIT PLANS (continued)

	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Three months ended September 30
Service cost	$	2,794		$	3,093		$	2		$	1
Interest cost		5,761			5,566			327			314
Expected return on plan assets		(7,749	)		(7,239	)		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		191			280			(126	)		(153	)
Amortization of initial transition asset		—			(164	)		—			—
Recognized net actuarial loss		1,138			583			198			132
Special termination benefits		—			—			—			—
Curtailment gain		—			(41	)		—			—
Net periodic pension benefit cost	$	2,135		$	2,078		$	401		$	294

	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Nine months ended September 30
Service cost	$	8,381		$	9,280		$	6		$	2
Interest cost		17,282			16,700			967			941
Expected return on plan assets		(23,246	)		(21,717	)		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		573			839			(406	)		(459	)
Amortization of initial transition asset		—			(493	)		—			—
Recognized net actuarial loss		3,414			1,748			594			396
Special termination benefits		—			—			74			—
Curtailment gain		—			(124	)		—			—
Net periodic pension benefit cost	$	6,404		$	6,233		$	1,235		$	880

Cash Flows

Previously, the company disclosed expected payments related to the 2006 plan year of $14,089 to its qualified and non-qualified pension plans and $2,921 to its other postretirement benefit plan. In the third quarter of 2006, the company changed its expectation for the total contributions to the qualified and non-qualified pension plans to $14,850. The company’s expectation for contributions to its other postretirement benefit plans has not changed. As of September 30, 2006 and 2005, voluntary contributions of $11,838 and $14,843 have been made to the pension plans, respectively.

8. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The company’s segments are comprised of its three main sales channels: Diebold North America (DNA), Diebold International (DI) and Election Systems (ES) & Other. These sales channels are evaluated based on revenue from customers and operating profit contribution to the total corporation. The reconciliation between segment information and the condensed consolidated financial statements is disclosed. Revenue summaries by geographic segment and product and service solutions are also disclosed. All income and expense items below operating profit are not allocated to the segments and are not disclosed.

12

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

8. SEGMENT INFORMATION (continued)

The DNA segment sells and services financial and retail systems in the United States and Canada. The DI segment sells and services financial and retail systems over the remainder of the globe. The ES & Other segment includes the operating results of Diebold Election Systems, Inc. and the voting and lottery related business in Brazil. Each of the sales channels buys the goods it sells from the company’s manufacturing plants through intercompany sales that are eliminated in consolidation, and intersegment revenue is not significant. Each year, intercompany pricing is agreed upon which drives sales channel operating profit contribution. As permitted under SFAS No. 131,Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, certain information not routinely used in the management of these segments, information not allocated back to the segments or information that is impractical to report is not shown. Items not allocated are as follows: interest income, interest expense, equity in the net income of investees accounted for by the equity method, income tax expense or benefit, and other non-current assets.

	DNA		DI		ES & Other			Total
Segment Information by Channel for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
Revenue from continuing operations	$	392,826	$	274,474	$	63,439		$	730,739
Operating profit		31,568		5,244		11,578			48,390
Capital and rotable expenditures		8,007		6,280		349			14,636
Depreciation		7,339		8,457		137			15,933
Segment Information by Channel for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
Revenue from continuing operations	$	338,608	$	240,649	$	43,076		$	622,333
Operating profit		21,042		3,489		2,242			26,773
Capital and rotable expenditures		12,014		3,264		105			15,383
Depreciation		8,165		2,601		460			11,226
Segment Information by Channel for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
Revenue from continuing operations	$	1,096,095	$	807,786	$	176,945		$	2,080,826
Operating profit		71,050		9,664		28,669			109,383
Capital and rotable expenditures		24,074		18,359		2,127			44,560
Depreciation		23,151		22,699		1,137			46,987
Property, plant and equipment, at cost		395,579		229,387		5,812			630,778
Segment Information by Channel for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
Revenue from continuing operations	$	1,021,294	$	683,797	$	71,342		$	1,776,433
Operating profit		111,582		11,337		(201	)		122,718
Capital and rotable expenditures		36,248		15,793		548			52,589
Depreciation		28,136		11,282		987			40,405
Property, plant and equipment, at cost		423,037		201,117		4,208			628,362

          Revenue Summary by Geographic Segment

	For the quarter ended				For the nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
The Americas:
Financial self-service solutions	$	309,257	$	277,556	$	883,636	$	852,478
Security solutions		178,488		152,064		505,334		436,875
Election systems		61,413		39,697		141,791		67,963
Lottery systems		2,026		3,379		35,154		3,379
Total Americas		551,184		472,696		1,565,915		1,360,695
Asia-Pacific:
Financial self-service solutions		60,508		51,584		164,031		150,501
Security solutions		11,571		10,783		32,340		25,492
Total Asia Pacific		72,079		62,367		196,371		175,993

13

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

8. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

EMEA:
Financial self-service solutions		101,197		82,379		301,359		230,733
Security solutions		6,279		4,891		17,181		9,012
Total EMEA		107,476		87,270		318,540		239,745
Total Revenue from Continuing Operations	$	730,739	$	622,333	$	2,080,826	$	1,776,433

Revenue Summary by Product and Service Solutions

	For the quarter ended September 30,				For the nine months ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Financial self-service:
Products	$	229,855	$	194,248	$	655,353	$	580,285
Services		241,107		217,271		693,673		653,427
Total financial self-service		470,962		411,519		1,349,026		1,233,712
Security:
Products		81,180		67,870		225,301		194,728
Services		115,158		99,868		329,554		276,651
Total security		196,338		167,738		554,855		471,379
Total financial self-service & security		667,300		579,257		1,903,881		1,705,091
Election systems:
Products		52,295		35,849		116,736		56,927
Services		9,118		3,848		25,055		11,036
Total election systems		61,413		39,697		141,791		67,963
Lottery systems		2,026		3,379		35,154		3,379
Total revenue from continuing operations	$	730,739	$	622,333	$	2,080,826	$	1,776,433

9. GUARANTEES AND PRODUCT WARRANTIES

The company has applied the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 45,Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, to its agreements that contain guarantees or indemnification clauses. These disclosure requirements expand those required by SFAS No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies, by requiring a guarantor to disclose certain types of guarantees, even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor’s performance is remote. The following is a description of arrangements in effect as of September 30, 2006 in which the company is the guarantor.

In connection with the construction of certain manufacturing facilities, the company guaranteed repayment of principal and interest on variable rate industrial development revenue bonds by obtaining letters of credit. The bonds were issued with a 20-year original term and are scheduled to mature in 2017. Any default, as defined in the agreements, would obligate the company for the full amount of the outstanding bonds through maturity. At September 30, 2006, the carrying value of the liability was $11,900. The company provides its global operations guarantees and standby letters of credit through various financial institutions to suppliers, regulatory agencies and insurance providers. If the company is not able to make payment, the suppliers, regulatory agencies and insurance providers may draw on the pertinent bank. At September 30, 2006, the maximum future payment obligations relative to these various guarantees totaled $41,470 of which $21,163 represented standby letters of credit to insurance providers for which no associated liability was recorded.

The company provides its customers a standard manufacturer’s warranty and records, at the time of the sale, a corresponding estimated liability for potential warranty costs. Estimated future obligations due to warranty claims are

14

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

9. GUARANTEES AND PRODUCT WARRANTIES (Continued)

based upon historical factors such as labor rates, average repair time, travel time, number of service calls per machine and cost of replacement parts. Changes in the company’s warranty liability balance are illustrated in the following table:

	2006			2005
Balance at January 1	$	21,399		$	14,410
Current period accruals		15,983			13,525
Accrual adjustments to reflect actual experience		(750	)		—
Current period settlements		(17,163	)		(9,583	)
Balance at September 30	$	19,469		$	18,352

10. ACQUISITIONS

The following mergers and acquisitions were accounted for as purchase business combinations and, accordingly, the purchase price has been or will be allocated to identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based upon their respective fair values, with the excess allocated to goodwill. Results of operations from the date of acquisition of these companies are included in the condensed consolidated statements of income of the company.

In August 2006, the company acquired Bitelco Telecommunications, Ltd. and Bitelco Services, Ltd. (Bitelco) based in Santiago, Chile for approximately $8,400. Bitelco is a leading security company specializing in product integration, installation, project management and service. Bitelco provides electronic security, fire detection and suppression, and telecommunications security solutions for the financial, commercial, government and retail markets. Preliminary estimate of goodwill and other intangibles net of amortization amounted to approximately $4,735 at September 30, 2006. Bitelco is included as part of the company’s DI segment.

In July 2006, the company acquired 100% of the capital stock of Firstline, Inc. (Firstline) for $12,500. Firstline, located in Gold River, California, is a first and second line ATM maintenance service provider operating throughout the west coast of the U.S. and also provides limited cash handling services. Preliminary estimate of goodwill and other intangibles net of amortization amounted to approximately $12,476 at September 30, 2006. Firstline is included as part of the company’s DNA segment.

In June 2006, the company acquired Actcom, Incorporated (Actcom), a privately held company based in Virginia Beach, Virginia for approximately $11,300. Actcom is a leader in identification and enterprise security. Actcom’s primary customers include U.S. federal government agencies, such as the Department of Defense, as well as state and municipal government agencies. Preliminary estimate of goodwill and other intangibles net of amortization amounted to approximately $8,700 at September 30, 2006. Actcom is included as part of the company’s DNA segment.

In May 2006, the company acquired ERAS Joint Venture, LLP (ERAS) for $14,000. ERAS is a processing and imaging provider of outsourced serviced and installed systems based in Miami, Florida. Preliminary estimate of goodwill and other intangibles net of amortization amounted to approximately $12,426 at September 30, 2006. ERAS is included as part of the company’s DNA segment.

In February 2006, the company purchased the membership interests of Genpass Service Solutions, LLC (GSS) for approximately $10,600. GSS is an independent, third-party ATM maintenance and service provider for approximately 6,000 ATMs in 34 states within the U.S. and has been integrated within the company’s DNA service organization. Preliminary estimate of goodwill and other intangibles net of amortization amounted to approximately $5,970 and $213, respectively, at September 30, 2006.

The company is party to a joint venture partnership with Shanghai Xinsheng Aviation Industry Investment Co., LTD. In September 2005, an additional 7% of ownership was purchased for approximately $9,500. With this purchase, the company increased its ownership interest from 78 percent to 85 percent in the joint venture.

15

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

10. ACQUISITIONS (Continued)

In May 2005, the company announced the acquisition of TASC Security (Holdings) Limited (TASC Security). TASC Security is a global leader in electronic security solutions headquartered in London, England with subsidiaries in Amsterdam, Netherlands; Tokyo, Japan; San Francisco, California; Dublin, Ireland; Leeds, England; and Melbourne and Sydney, Australia; with a network of offices in Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific. TASC Security was purchased for approximately $26,300, including the payoff of certain debt, and has been integrated within the company’s Electronic Security and Currency Systems Group. Goodwill and other intangibles net of amortization amounted to $8,855 and $8,118, respectively, at September 30, 2006.

11. PRIVATE PLACEMENT DEBT FINANCING

In March 2006, the company issued senior notes in an aggregate principal amount of $300,000 with a fixed interest rate of 5.50 percent. The maturity dates of the senior notes are staggered, with $75,000, $175,000 and $50,000 becoming due in 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively. There are various covenants governing the senior notes, less restrictive than those that govern the company’s existing revolving credit facility. Additionally, the company entered into a derivative transaction to hedge interest rate risk on $200,000 of the senior notes, which was treated as a cash flow hedge. This reduced the effective interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50 to 5.36 percent.

The company used $270,000 of the net proceeds from the senior notes to reduce the outstanding balance under its revolving credit facility, which has a variable interest rate. The remaining $30,000 was used to fund normal operations. Refer to management’s discussion and analysis related to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further information related to the company’s financing as of September 30, 2006.

12. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

During the first quarter of 2005, the company initiated a restructuring plan for its manufacturing and service operations, primarily in Western Europe, to remove its excess capacity. In the second quarter of 2005, the company initiated a separate restructuring plan for the announced closing of its Danville, Virginia manufacturing operations. Total pre-tax costs to be incurred in the plans were anticipated to be approximately $30,000, of which $7,655 and $18,408 were expensed for the third quarter of 2005 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively ($4,647 and $11,901 after tax), resulting in an accrual of approximately $1,682 as of September 30, 2005. The restructuring charges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 were incurred as follows: $2,168 and $11,128, respectively, against product cost of sales; $2,052 and $3,069, respectively, against service cost of sales and $3,435 and $4,384, respectively, against operating expenses. The restructuring charges for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 were $2,296 related to DNA and $5,359 related to DI while for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the charges were $5,594 in DNA and $12,814 in DI.

During the first quarter of 2006, the company initiated an additional restructuring plan related to realignment of its global research and development efforts. Total pre-tax costs to be incurred related to research and development realignment were anticipated to be approximately $12,400. In addition to this plan, during the second quarter of 2006, the company incurred restructuring charges related to the termination of an information technology (IT) outsourcing agreement and product development rationalization.

For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, total restructuring charges were approximately $2,442, primarily from costs associated with the realignment of the European service and research and development operations, as well as realignment of the company’s global manufacturing operations. The accrual balance as of September 30, 2006 was immaterial. Restructuring expenses were incurred as follows: $263 related to product cost of sales, $779 related to service cost of sales, $966 related to selling and administrative expense, $434 related to research and development. These restructuring charges were incurred in the following segments: $2,424 related to DI and the remaining to DNA.

16

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

12. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES (Continued)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, total restructuring charges were $17,363, primarily related to the termination of the company’s IT outsourcing agreement, realignment of global service and research and development efforts, realignment of global manufacturing, and product development rationalization of $7,000, $6,819, $2,082, and $1,000, respectively. Restructuring expenses were incurred as follows: $2,086 related to product cost of sales, $9,780 related to selling and administrative, $4,185 related to research and development, and the remaining primarily related to service cost of sales. These restructuring charges were incurred in the following segments: $6,782 related to DNA, $9,920 related to DI and $661 related to ES & Other.

13. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In July 2005, the company announced the sale of its campus card systems business for approximately $38,000, and as such, the company has disclosed these operations as discontinued in the condensed consolidated statements of income for all periods presented herein in accordance with SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Separate disclosure of the specific assets held-for-sale, both current and non-current, is not presented as the amounts are not material to the consolidated balance sheets. The following summarizes discontinued operations reclassified from continuing operations in the condensed consolidated statements of income:

	Nine Months ended September 30
	2006		2005
Net sales	$	—	$	11,633
Cost of sales		—		7,365
Gross profit		—		4,268
Operating expenses		—		2,898
Operating profit		—		1,370
Income before taxes		—		1,370
Taxes		—		461
Net income	$	—	$	909
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	—	$	0.01
Diluted	$	—	$	0.01

17

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As of September 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

OVERVIEW

Over 145 years ago, the company entered into the business of making strong, reliable safes. Diebold, Incorporated has a long tradition of safeguarding assets and protecting investments. Today, the company is a global leader in providing integrated self-service delivery systems, security and services to customers within the financial, government and retail sectors. In 2003, the company introduced Opteva, a new ATM line within the financial self-service market that provides a higher level of security, convenience and reliability. Opteva is powered by Agilis, which is a software platform for financial self-service equipment developed by the company. The combination of Opteva and Agilis provides the ability for financial institutions to customize solutions to meet their consumers’ demands and positively affect equipment performance, while providing a safer ATM. The Agilis software platform gives customers the ability to run the same software across their entire network, which helps contain costs and improve financial self-service equipment availability. Security features were engineered into the design, including consumer awareness mirrors to discourage shoulder surfing and provide consumers with increased security during ATM transactions. Opteva also includes PIN-pad positioning that helps maintain consumer security, a recessed fascia design, card reader technology with a jitter mechanism, an optional ink-dye system and an envelope depository that is designed to resist trapping. The company’s software includes the industry’s most advanced ATM protection against viruses, worms and other cyber security threats. Diebold is at the forefront in protecting ATMs from threats even before patches are developed and made available. The company established its own Global Security Task Force to collect, analyze, clarify and disseminate news and information about ATM fraud and security. The group includes associates from various departments around the world. These associates work to reduce fraud and to improve security for the industry. In addition to these advances in the company’s product line, the company has also continued to make strategic acquisitions, which have increased its presence in the security market, and in 2005, the company was awarded a sales contract to produce lottery machines in Brazil.

The election systems business continues to be a challenge for the company. A number of individuals and groups have raised concerns about the reliability and security of the company’s election systems products and services. The individuals and groups making these challenges oppose the use of technology in the electoral process generally and, specifically, have filed lawsuits and taken other actions to publicize what they view as flaws in the company’s election management software and firmware. These efforts have adversely affected some of the company’s customer relations with its election systems customers. Despite all of these challenges, the company continues to participate in new jurisdiction decisions to purchase voting equipment. Election systems revenues in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 continued to increase over the comparable periods in 2005, representing a combination of the recapture of delayed sales from 2004, a U.S. presidential election year and growth from new sales due to demand generated by the Help America Vote Act (HAVA).

The markets the company serves are dynamic and continue to grow. Financial institutions continue to place increasing strategic importance on their retail networks. Demand is increasing for integrated security solutions. The company’s brand is trusted by its customers. The company has a growing global footprint with a broad customer base. Besides world-class products and services that offer a competitive advantage, one of the key features of the company is the commitment, energy and knowledge of its employees. As the company focuses on the future, its long-term strategic plan includes focusing on the customer to increase loyalty, improve product and service quality, strengthen the supply chain, enhance communications through teamwork and rebuild profitability. The company announced restructuring activities in 2005 and 2006 that are in line with the long-term strategic plan including European and U.S. manufacturing capacity optimization, realignment of global research and development efforts, and reorganization of its global information technology operation and rationalization of product development.

Also, the company has initiated its multi-year profit improvement plan that targets a $100,000 reduction in the company’s cost structure by 2008. These improvements are focused on a number of key areas including forecasting, order management, product staging, improved accounts receivable collections and other elements of supply chain management. The company anticipates achieving $35,000 of these savings in 2007 with the remaining $65,000 expected to be realized in 2008, as management works towards its three-year corporate operating margin target of 11 to 12 percent.

18

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
As of September 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

OVERVIEW (continued)

Since assuming implementation and support responsibilities for the global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system and other IT-related functions on June 1, 2006, the company has made some progress addressing stabilization of the ERP system. While the company remains committed to the new ERP platform, it has begun a thorough evaluation of its implementation plan, with the assistance of a third-party provider, including organization, processes, and software and hardware architecture. A substantial portion of this evaluation is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter.

The company plans to continue to optimize its manufacturing capacity, including a restructuring of its production operations, in 2006. A major component of this initiative is to establish a new manufacturing operation for financial self-service terminals and related components in the Eastern European region. The company identified Budapest, Hungary, as the location for this production facility and in the third quarter, the company completed a successful pilot production program. The company expects to produce more than 1,000 Opteva^® automated teller machines from this facility in the fourth quarter of 2006. Additionally, as a result of this planned restructuring, the company has engaged in the consultation process required in order to close its existing production facility located in Cassis, France. The company incurred third quarter restructuring charges of $.02 per share. The majority of these charges were associated with the realignment of the European service and research and development operations. Full-year restructuring charges are anticipated to be in the range of $.62 to $.64 per share. This includes charges of $.12 per share primarily associated with the consolidation of global R&D facilities and other service consolidations, $.07 per share from the termination of the IT outsourcing agreement, $.02 of other restructuring charges related to the company’s relocation of its European headquarters and anticipated restructuring charges of $.41 to $.43 per share as a result of the planned closure of the Cassis production facility. While management is fully engaged in completing this restructuring in 2006, the possibility remains that it may not be completed until 2007.

The company intends the discussion of its financial condition and results of operations that follows to provide information that will assist in understanding the financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements from year to year and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles, policies and estimates affect the financial statements.

The business drivers of the company’s future performance include several factors that include, but are not limited to:

• timing of a self-service upgrade and/or replacement cycle in mature markets such as the United States;

• high levels of deployment growth for new self-service products in emerging markets such as Asia-Pacific;

• demand for new service offerings, including outsourcing or operating a network of ATMs;

• demand beyond expectations for security products and services for the financial, retail and government sectors;

• implementation and timeline for new election systems in the United States;

• the company’s strong financial position; and

• the company’s ability to successfully integrate acquisitions.

In addition to the business drivers above, the company, as a global operation, is exposed to risks described under the caption entitled “Forward-Looking Statement Disclosure.”

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management’s discussion and analysis of the company’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon the company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The company bases these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making

19

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
As of September 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (Continued)

judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Management believes there have been no significant changes during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 to the items that the company disclosed as its critical accounting policies and estimates in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 158 (SFAS No. 158),Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88 ,106 and 132(R). SFAS No. 158 requires an entity to recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan in its statement of financial position measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation. For a pension plan, the benefit obligation would be the projected benefit obligation; for any other postretirement benefit plan, the benefit obligation would be the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. The pronouncement also requires entities to recognize the actuarial gains and losses and the prior service costs and credits that arise during the period, but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost as a component of other comprehensive income, and measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employer's statement of financial position for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The pronouncement also requires disclosure of additional information in the notes to financial statements about certain effects of net periodic benefit cost in the subsequent fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the actuarial gains and losses and the prior service costs and credits. Under SFAS No. 158, the Company will be required to recognize the funded status of its defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures commencing as of December 31, 2006. The company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 158 on its financial position and related disclosures.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(SFAS No. 157), which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. This statement defines fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy, and requires separate disclosure of fair value measurements by level within the hierarchy. The company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48),Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the recognition threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, however requires disclosure as of December 31, 2006. The company is currently evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108). SAB 108 provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a potential current year misstatement. SAB 108 requires companies to quantify errors using both a balance sheet and an income statement approach. Prior to SAB 108, companies could use either the balance sheet approach or the income statement approach, which could result in misstatements that would be material under one approach and immaterial under the other. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The company is currently evaluating the impact of SAB 108 on its financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140.SFAS No. 155 amends SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. SFAS No. 155 resolves issues addressed in SFAS No. 133, Implementation Issue No. D1,Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. The company believes that the adoption of this standard will have no material impact on its financial statements.

20

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
	RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
	As of September 30, 2006
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued)

Effective January 1, 2006, the company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which requires the company to recognize costs resulting from all share-based payment transactions in the financial statements. See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Capital resources are obtained from income retained in the business, senior notes, committed and uncommitted credit facilities, long-term industrial revenue bonds, and operating and capital leasing arrangements. Management expects that cash provided from operations, available credit, long-term debt and the use of operating leases will be sufficient to finance planned working capital needs, investments in facilities or equipment, and the purchase of company common stock. Part of the company’s growth strategy is to pursue strategic acquisitions. The company has made acquisitions in the past and intends to make acquisitions in the future. The company intends to finance any future acquisitions with either cash provided from operations, borrowings under available credit facilities, proceeds from debt or equity offerings and/or the issuance of common shares.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the company generated $154,703 in cash from operating activities, an increase of $111,199 from the same period in 2005. Cash flows from operating activities are generated primarily from net income and controlling the components of working capital. Cash flows from operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were negatively affected by the $26,878 decrease in net income and a $42,427 decrease in accounts payable, offset by a $98,412 decrease in accounts receivable and a $40,191 decrease in other current assets. The large decrease in accounts receivable was $101,338, which was $98,412 greater than the decrease of $2,926 in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. This cash improvement from accounts receivable, which included approximately $11,000 of past due election receivables from counties in California, was the result of days sales outstanding decreasing to 67 days at September 30, 2006 compared to 78 days at September 30, 2005. The improvement in days sales outstanding was primarily a result of increased collections in all geographies except for Brazil. The change in other current assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period of 2005 positively affected cash flows from operations by $40,191. The change was primarily the result of the decrease in net value added tax receivable balances.

The company used $139,166 for investing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $68,833 from the same period in 2005. The increase in the first nine months of 2006 over the comparable period in 2005 was the result of the $53,389 used for 2006 acquisitions, primarily Actcom, Incorporated, ERAS Joint Venture, LLP, Genpass Service Solutions, LLC, Bitelco Telecommunications, Ltd., and Firstline, Inc. compared to $27,701 for the comparable period in 2005; increases in payments for purchases of investments over the prior year period of $32,837 and the non-reoccurrence of proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations of $29,350 which occurred during 2005. These increases were partially offset by proceeds from maturities of investments of $9,726 and a decrease in capital and rotable expenditures of $8,029.

Net cash used by financing activities was $10,406 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006; an increase of $23,498 over cash provided by financing activities of $13,092 in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase in cash used by financing activities in 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 was largely attributable to the increase of $61,400 in stock repurchases period over period, partially offset by increased net note payable borrowings of $36,075.

In March 2006, the company secured fixed-rate long-term financing of $300,000 in senior notes in order to take advantage of attractive long-term interest rates. The maturity dates of the senior notes are staggered, with $75,000, $175,000 and $50,000 becoming due in 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively. The company used $270,000 of the net proceeds from the offering to

21

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
	RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
	As of September 30, 2006
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (Continued)

reduce the outstanding balance under its revolving credit facility. All other contractual cash obligations with initial and remaining terms in excess of one year and contingent liabilities remained generally unchanged at September 30, 2006 compared to December 31, 2005.

At September 30, 2006, the company had U.S. dollar denominated private placement debt outstanding of $300,000, U.S. dollar denominated outstanding bank credit lines approximating $201,909, euro denominated outstanding bank credit lines approximating 128,216 (translated at $162,507) and Indian rupee denominated outstanding bank credit lines approximating 300,000 (translated at $6,553). An additional $167,610 was available under committed credit line agreements, and $45,063 was available under uncommitted lines of credit.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Third Quarter 2006 Comparisons with Third Quarter 2005

Net Sales

Net sales for the third quarter of 2006 totaled $730,739 and were $108,406 or 17.4 percent higher than net sales for the third quarter of 2005. Security product and services revenue increased by $28,600 or 17.1 percent over third quarter 2005 due to increases in the financial segment, which has benefited from new branch construction and modernization, as well as continued growth in the retail, government and commercial markets augmented by strategic acquisitions. Financial self-service product and services revenue increased by $59,443 or 14.4 percent over the comparable period in 2005 with revenue from Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) increasing by 22.8 percent, revenue from the Americas increasing by 11.4 percent, and revenue from Asia Pacific increasing by 17.3 percent. Election systems product and services revenue of $61,413 increased by $21,716, or 54.7 percent, over the third quarter of 2005, which was largely due to increased election systems product and services within Brazil. Revenue for the third quarter of 2006 was positively impacted by approximately $9,934 or 1.6 percent related to the quarter-over-quarter strengthening of the Brazilian real and euro.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the third quarter of 2006 totaled $182,092 and was $38,425 or 26.7 percent higher than gross profit in the third of quarter 2005.

Product gross margin was 29.3 percent compared to 24.9 percent in the comparable period of 2005. Restructuring charges of approximately $200 were included in product costs of sales for the third quarter of 2006 while restructuring charges of approximately $2,200 were recorded in the third quarter of 2005. Restructuring charges in the third quarter of 2006 related primarily to the process of realigning the company’s global manufacturing operations and adversely affected product gross margin by 0.1 percentage point. Restructuring charges in the third quarter of 2005 related primarily to realignment actions taken in Western Europe and adversely affected product gross margin by 0.7 percentage points. Improved pricing discipline resulting in further price stabilization in North America, a more favorable geographic mix within the Americas contributed to the improvement in product gross margin in the third quarter 2006.

Service gross margin was 20.5 percent compared to 21.4 percent in the third quarter of 2005. Restructuring charges of approximately $800 were included in service costs of sales for the third quarter of 2006, while restructuring charges of approximately $2,100 were recorded in the third quarter of 2005. The quarter-over-quarter decline in service gross

22

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
	RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
	As of September 30, 2006
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

margin was primarily a result of lower profitability in DNA, service acquisitions that currently operate below expected gross margin levels and increased investments in customer service engineers and associated resources to continue improving performance in targeted areas.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses were 18.3 percent of net sales, down from 18.8 percent in the third quarter of 2005. Restructuring charges of approximately $1,400, or 0.2 percent of net sales, were included in operating expenses for the third quarter of 2006 and were primarily related to the realignment of European service and research and development operations. Restructuring charges included in operating expenses for the third quarter of 2005 of approximately $3,400 or 0.6 percent of sales.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income and expense for the third quarter of 2006 totaled $6,679 of net expense and was $2,145 higher than the third quarter of 2005. This expense increase was due primarily to higher interest expense of $5,084 as a result of increases in both borrowing levels and interest rates during the third quarter of 2006 compared with third quarter of 2005. The adverse impact of increased interest expense was partially offset by an increase in investment income of $1,154 and a decrease in miscellaneous net expense of $1,986 in the third quarter of 2006 compared with the third quarter of 2005.

Income from Continuing Operations and Net Income

Income from continuing operations for the third quarter of 2006 was $29,542 and increased $16,043 or 118.8 percent compared with the third quarter of 2005. Gain on sale of discontinued operations, which was related to the campus card systems business in the third quarter of 2005, was $12,933. Income from continuing operations was 4.0 percent of revenue compared to 2.2 percent in the third quarter of 2005. The increase in net income was due primarily to higher gross profit and lower operating expenses as a percentage of revenue. Also contributing to the improvement in income from continuing operations was a lower third quarter effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2006 was 29.2 percent versus 39.3 percent in the third quarter of 2005. The third quarter 2006 tax rate benefited from a net $1,600 tax refund, discrete to the third quarter, and a lower projected annual tax rate. The lower annual tax rate is attributable to a change of income mix, which favors lower tax jurisdictions.

Segment Analysis

DNA third quarter 2006 net sales of $392,826 increased $54,218 or 16.0 percent over third quarter 2005 net sales of $338,608. The increase in DNA net sales was primarily due to increased financial self-service product revenue related to incremental sales in Canada. DI third quarter 2006 net sales of $274,474 increased by $33,825 or 14.1 percent compared with net sales in the comparable period in 2005 of $240,649. The increase in DI net sales was attributable to strong EMEA revenue growth of $20,206 as well as growth in Asia-Pacific and Latin America. ES & Other third quarter 2006 net sales of $63,439 increased by $20,363 or 47.3 percent compared to third quarter 2005 net sales of $43,076. This increase was due primarily to increased net sales of electronic voting product and services in Brazil.

DNA third quarter 2006 operating profit of $31,568 increased $10,526 compared with third quarter 2005 operating profit of $21,042. This increase was due primarily to a higher mix of revenue from increased financial self service product revenue. DI operating profit for the third quarter of 2006 was $5,244, an increase of $1,755 or 50.3 percent compared with the third quarter of 2005. The favorable movement in DI operating profit was due primarily to improved performance in EMEA and Latin America.

23

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
	RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
	As of September 30, 2006
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

ES & Other third quarter of 2006 operating profit was $11,578 and improved by $9,336 compared to an operating profit of $2,242 in the third quarter of 2005. This improvement was a result of increased margin and sales volume in election systems as well as profits from the addition of lottery systems sales.

Refer to Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for details of segment revenue and operating profit.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 Comparisons with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005

Net Sales

Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 totaled $2,080,826 and were $304,393 or 17.1 percent higher than net sales for the comparable period in 2005. Financial self-service product revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased by $75,068 or 12.9 percent over the comparable period in 2005, due primarily to gains in market share and market growth in EMEA and Latin America as well as the benefits from the positive foreign currency effects. Security product revenue increased by $30,573 or 15.7 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, due primarily to increases in the retail, government and financial security markets as a result of growth in the market, complemented by growth resulting from strategic acquisitions and increased market share. Total service revenue for financial self-service and security solutions increased $93,149 or 10.0 percent over the comparable period in 2005, as the company continued to expand its service customer base.

Election systems net sales of $141,791 increased by $73,828 or 108.6 percent compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. 2006 results were helped by voting revenues from Brazil which did not occur in 2005. Further, in 2005, voting purchases were delayed by county and state governments within the United States as a result of ongoing political debates over electronic voting.

Revenue from lottery systems, which was a new market for the company during the third quarter of 2005, was $35,154 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $31,775 over the comparable period in 2005.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 totaled $501,391 and was $61,516 or 14.0 percent higher than gross profit in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Product gross margin was 28.7 percent in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to 27.0 percent in the comparable period in 2005. The increase in product gross margin percentages was attributable to improved pricing discipline resulting in further price stabilization in North America, and a more favorable geographic mix within the Americas, which helped to augment the lower than expected production volume in Europe resulting in higher supply chain costs. In addition, improved profitability on higher revenue in the election system business also contributed to the gross margin performance.

Service gross margin in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 decreased to 19.6 percent as a percentage of sales compared with 22.8 percent in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Service gross margins were adversely affected by restructuring charges of approximately $1,400 and $3,100 for the nine month ended 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decline in service gross margin percentages was a result of margin declines in EMEA, service acquisitions that currently operate below expected gross margin levels and increased service costs associated with investments in customer service engineers and associated resources to continue improving performance in targeted areas.

24

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
	RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
	As of September 30, 2006
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were 18.8 percent of net sales, up from 17.9 percent of net sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase in operating expenses as a percent of net sales was due to increased product development activities, increased IT costs, increased intangible amortization expense related to acquisitions, the impact of expensing stock options and higher legal expenses.

Other Income (Expense)

Investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $12,913 and increased $4,714 or 57.5 percent over investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The increase was due to a larger investment portfolio in 2006. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $25,598 and increased $14,505 or 130.8 percent compared to same period in 2005. The increase was primarily due to higher borrowing levels year-over-year.

Income from Continuing Operations and Net Income

Income from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $59,465 and decreased $13,036 or 18.0 percent compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Income from discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, which was related to the campus card systems business, was $13,842. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $59,465 and decreased $26,878 or 31.1 percent over net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was 32.7 percent versus 33.7 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The decrease in effective tax rate was the result of a $1.6 million tax refund, discrete to the third quarter of 2006, and a lower projected annual tax rate. The lower projected annual tax rate is attributable to a change of income mix, which favors lower tax jurisdictions.

Segment Analysis

DNA net sales of $1,096,095 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased $74,801 or 7.3 percent over the comparable period 2005 net sales of $1,021,294. The increase in DNA net sales was due to increased product and service revenue from growth in both financial self service and security offerings. DI net sales of $807,786 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased by $123,989 or 18.1 percent over the comparable period of 2005 net sales of $683,797. The increase in DI net sales was attributed to strong revenue growth of $78,795 in EMEA and higher revenue from Latin America and Asia Pacific of $31,596 and $20,378, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, revenue was positively impacted by the year-over-year strengthening of the Brazilian real, euro and certain other currencies. The positive currency impact in the first nine months of 2006 was approximately $31,116. ES and Other net sales of $176,945 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased $105,603 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Purchasing delays by county and state governments within the United States as a result of ongoing political debates over electronic voting adversely affected the overall election systems business in 2005. Further, 2006 contained revenues associated with sales of Brazilian voting terminals.

DNA operating profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 decreased by $40,532 or 36.3 percent versus the comparable period in 2005. The decrease was primarily due to product mix and increased service costs. DI operating profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 decreased by $1,673 or 14.8 percent versus the comparable period in 2005. The decrease was due primarily to service pricing pressures in EMEA. The operating profit in ES and Other increased by $28,870, moving from an operating loss of $201 in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to an operating profit of $28,669 in the first nine months of 2006. This increase in ES & Other operating profit was a result of higher revenue associated with the sales of election systems products and services.

Refer to Note 8 in the condensed consolidated financial statements for further details of segment revenue and operating profit.

25

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
	RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
	As of September 30, 2006
	(Unaudited)
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT DISCLOSURE

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, statements that are not reported, financial results or other historical information are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements give current expectations or forecasts of future events and are not guarantees of future performance. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the company’s future operating performance, the company’s share of new and existing markets, the company’s short- and long-term revenue and earnings growth rates, and the company’s implementation of cost-reduction initiatives and measures to improve pricing, including the optimization of the company’s manufacturing capacity. The use of the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends” and similar expressions is intended to identify forward-looking statements that have been made and may in the future be made by or on behalf of the company. Although the company believes that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions regarding, among other things, the economy, its knowledge of its business, and on key performance indicators which impact the company, these forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. The company is not obligated to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Some of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

• competitive pressures, including pricing pressures and technological developments;

• changes in the company’s relationships with customers, suppliers, distributors and/or partners in its business ventures;

• changes in political, economic or other factors such as currency exchange rates, inflation rates, recessionary or expansive trends, taxes and regulations and laws affecting the worldwide business in each of the company’s operations, including Brazil, where a significant portion of the company’s revenue is derived;

• acceptance of the company’s product and technology introductions in the marketplace;

• unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments;

• the timely completion of the company’s new manufacturing operation for financial self-service terminals and related components in the Eastern European region;

• costs associated with the planned closure of the company’s Cassis production facility, including the timing of related restructuring charges;

• the completion of the company’s implementation of its ERP system and other IT-related functions;

• the company’s ability to reduce costs and expenses and improve internal operating efficiencies, including the optimization of the company’s manufacturing capacity;

• the company’s ability to successfully implement measures to improve pricing;

• variations in consumer demand for self-service technologies, products and services;

• challenges raised about the reliability and security of the company’s election systems products, including the risk that such products will not be certified for use or will be decertified;

• changes in laws regarding the company’s election systems products and services;

• potential security violations to the company’s information technology systems; and

• the company’s ability to achieve benefits from its cost-reduction initiatives and other strategic changes.

26

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
(Dollars in thousands)

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in its international operations denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. A hypothetical 10 percent unfavorable movement in the applicable foreign exchange rates would have resulted in a decrease in 2006 year-to-date operating profit of approximately $6,197. The sensitivity model assumes an instantaneous, parallel shift in the foreign currency exchange rates. Exchange rates rarely move in the same direction. The assumption that exchange rates change in an instantaneous or parallel fashion may overstate the impact of changing exchange rates on amounts denominated in a foreign currency.

The company’s risk-management strategy uses derivative financial instruments such as forwards to hedge certain foreign currency exposures. The intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposures, with gains and losses on the derivative contracts hedging these exposures. The company does not enter into derivatives for trading purposes. The company’s primary exposures to foreign exchange risk are movements in the dollar/euro and dollar/Brazilian real rates. There were no significant changes in the company’s foreign exchange risks compared with the prior period.

The company manages interest rate risk with the use of variable rate borrowings under its committed and uncommitted credit facilities, fixed rate borrowings under its private placement agreement and interest rate swaps. Variable rate borrowings totaled $365,229 at September 30, 2006, of which $50,000 was effectively converted to fixed rate using interest rate swaps. A one percentage point increase or decrease in interest rates would have resulted in an increase or decrease in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 of approximately $788 and $2,125, respectively, on the variable debt including the impact of the swap agreement. The company’s primary exposure to interest rate risk is movement in the three-month LIBOR rate. As discussed in Note 11, the company hedged $200,000 of the fixed rate borrowings under its private placement agreement, which was treated as a cash flow hedge. This reduced the effective interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50 to 5.36 percent.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Management, under the supervision and with the participation of the company’s chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, has evaluated the company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of September 30, 2006.

As reported in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, it was determined that, as of December 31, 2005, the following material weakness existed:

The company did not have personnel with sufficient technical knowledge to analyze complex revenue contracts to ensure that such transactions were accounted for in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles at its voting subsidiary, Diebold Election Systems, Inc. (DESI). Specifically, the review of these contracts did not provide for effective identification of, and consideration of, terms of certain arrangements within the contracts that impact the accounting required for the related revenue for such arrangements. This material weakness resulted in a material overstatement of revenue and a material understatement of deferred revenue balances in the company’s preliminary interim and annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005. The revenue and deferred revenue balances were corrected by management prior to the issuance of the company’s consolidated financial statements.

The company had previously disclosed in its prior SEC filings on-going remediation efforts related to DESI, which included the following:

• realignment of the finance organization; which includes formal review procedures of new contracts as well as current financial statements;

• standardization of revenue recognition policies; and

• training and implementation of revenue recognition policies and literature.

In addition to the above remediation efforts, the company had invested in additional accounting management at DESI during the first quarter of 2006. During the second quarter of 2006, the company was able to fully implement the above remediation efforts including testing of the additional internal controls related to analyzing and reviewing complex revenue contracts. During the third quarter of 2006, the company continued the above remediation efforts including testing of the additional internal controls by the company’s internal audit department.

27

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (Continued)

Under the direction of the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, the company has evaluated its disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2006, including the remedial actions discussed above, and has concluded that, as of September 30, 2006, the company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Unrelated to the issues noted above, the company implemented the global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system in several significant subsidiaries in Europe as well as in Mexico and Australia during 2005. Although the company is experiencing certain implementation challenges related to these subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, management is confident that there are sufficient compensating controls in place to mitigate the increase in risk caused by the implementations. On June 1, 2006, the company reorganized its global IT operation and assumed implementation and support responsibilities for its global ERP system and other IT-related functions, which were previously outsourced. The company has made some progress in stabilizing the ERP system to date. While the company remains committed to the new ERP Platform, it has begun a thorough evaluation of its implementation plan, with the assistance of a third-party provider, including organization, processes, and software and hardware architecture. A substantial portion of this evaluation is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter.

Other than the remedial actions taken with respect to the material weakness described above and the information technology reorganization, management has not identified any change in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the third quarter of 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

At September 30, 2006, the company was a party to several lawsuits that were incurred in the normal course of business, none of which individually or in the aggregate is considered material by management in relation to the company’s financial position or results of operations. In management’s opinion, the condensed consolidated financial statements would not be materially affected by the outcome of any present legal proceedings, commitments, or asserted claims.

In addition to the routine legal proceedings noted above, the company has been served with various lawsuits, filed against it and certain current and former officers and directors, by shareholders and participants in the company’s 401(k) savings plan, alleging violations of the federal securities laws and breaches of fiduciary duties with respect to the 401(k) plan. These complaints seek compensatory damages in an unspecific amount, fees and expenses related to such lawsuit and the granting of extraordinary equitable and/or injunctive relief. For each of these lawsuits, the date each complaint was filed, the name of the plaintiff and the federal court in which such lawsuit is pending are as follows:

• Konkol v. Diebold Inc., et al., No. 5:05CV2873 (N.D. Ohio, filed December 13, 2005).

• Ziolkowski v. Diebold Inc., et al., No. 5:05CV2912 (N.D. Ohio, filed December 16, 2005).

• New Jersey Carpenter’s Pension Fund v. Diebold, Inc., No. 5:06CV40 (N.D. Ohio, filed January 6, 2006).

• Rein v. Diebold, Inc., et al.,No. 5:06CV296 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 9, 2006).

• Graham v. Diebold, Inc., et al.,No.5:05CV2997 (N.D. Ohio, filed December 30, 2005).

• McDermott v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV170 (N.D. Ohio, filed January 24, 2006).

• Barnett v. Diebold, Inc., et al.,No. 5:06CV361 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 15, 2006).

• Farrell v. Diebold, Inc., et al.,No. 5:06CV307 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 8, 2006).

• Forbes v. Diebold, Inc., et al.,No. 5:06CV324 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 10, 2006).

• Gromek v. Diebold, Inc., et al.,No. 5:06CV579 (N.D. Ohio, filed March 14, 2006).

The plaintiffs in theKonkol,Ziolkowski,New Jersey Carpenter’s Pension Fund,ReinandGraham cases, which allege violations of the federal securities laws, have filed motions to consolidate these actions into a single proceeding and for the court to name a lead plaintiff and lead plaintiffs’ counsel. Various plaintiffs in theMcDermott,Barnett,Farrell,ForbesandGromek cases, which allege breaches of fiduciary duties with respect to the 401(k) plan, have moved to consolidate these actions into a single proceeding. The company and the individual defendants deny the allegations made against them, regard them as without merit, and intend to defend themselves vigorously.

28

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Continued)

Additionally, certain current and former officers and directors have been named as defendants in two shareholder derivative actions filed in federal court, purportedly on behalf of the company (Recht v. O’Dell et al., No. 5:06CV233 (N.D. Ohio, filed January 31, 2006) andWietschner v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV418 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 23, 2006)). The complaints assert claims of breach of fiduciary duties against the defendants on behalf of the company in connection with alleged violations of the federal securities laws. The defendants have moved to consolidate the derivative cases into a single proceeding.

Management is unable to determine the financial statement impact, if any, of the federal securities actions, the 401(k) actions and the derivative actions as of September 30, 2006.

The company was informed during the first quarter of 2006 that the staff of the SEC had begun an informal inquiry relating to the company’s revenue recognition policy. The SEC indicated in its letter to the company that the inquiry should not be construed as an indication by the SEC that there has been any violation of the federal securities laws. In the second quarter of 2006, the company was informed that the SEC’s inquiry had been converted to a formal, non-public investigation. The company is continuing to cooperate with the SEC in connection with the investigation. The company cannot predict the length, scope or results of the investigation, or the impact, if any, on its results of operations.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Information concerning the company’s stock repurchases made during the third quarter of 2006:

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

					(c)		(d)
					Total Number of		Maximum Number of
	(a)		(b)		Shares Purchased as		Shares that May Yet
	Total Number of		Average Price Paid		Part of Publicly		Be Purchased Under
	Shares Purchased		Per Share		Announced Plans(2)		the Plans(1)
July		—	$	—		—		1,300,000
August		3,500		39.98		3,500		1,296,500
September		274,300		42.07		274,300		1,022,200
Total		277,800		42.05		277,800		1,022,200

(1) The company repurchased 277,800 common shares in the third quarter of 2006 pursuant to the company stock repurchase plan (the Plan). The total number of shares repurchased as part of the publicly announced Plan was 8,977,800 as of September 30, 2006. The Plan was approved by the Board of Directors in April 1997 and authorized the repurchase of up to two million shares. The Plan was amended in June 2004 to authorize the repurchase of an additional two million shares, and was further amended in August and December 2005 to authorize the repurchase of an additional six million shares. The Plan has no expiration date.

29

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

3.1	(i)	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(i) of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
3.1	(ii)	Code of Regulations — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-32960.
3.2		Certificate of Amendment by Shareholders to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1996. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
3.3		Certificate of Amendment to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
4.1		Rights Agreement dated as of February 11, 1999 between Diebold, Incorporated and The Bank of New York — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated February 11, 1999. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.1		Form of Employment Agreement as amended and restated as of September 13, 1990 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.2		Schedule of Certain Officers who are Parties to Employment Agreements – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.5	(i)	Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan I as amended and restated July 1, 2002 – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 (i) of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.5	(ii)	Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan II as amended and restated July 1, 2002 – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 (ii) of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.7	(i)	1985 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.7	(ii)	Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 1985 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 (ii) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.7	(iii)	Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated 1985 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 (ii) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.7	(iv)	2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Diebold, Incorporated, effective as of January 1, 2005 – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7(iv) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.8		Diebold, Incorporated 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated as of February 15, 2006) – incorporated by reference to Appendix A of Registrant’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 17, 2006. (Commission File No. 1-4879).

30

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS (Continued)

*10.9		Long-Term Executive Incentive Plan – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.10	(i)	1992 Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan (as amended and restated) – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 (i) of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.10	(ii)	2005 Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005 – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 (ii) of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.11		Annual Incentive Plan — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.13	(i)	Forms of Deferred Compensation Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to Deferred Compensation Agreement — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.13	(ii)	Section 162(m) Deferred Compensation Agreement (as amended and restated January 29, 1998) — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 (ii) to Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.14		Deferral of Stock Option Gains Plan — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.15		Employment Agreement with Walden W. O’Dell – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.17	(i)	Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of April 30, 2003 among Diebold, Incorporated, the Subsidiary Borrowers, the Lenders and Bank One, N.A. — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.17	(ii)	First amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of April 28, 2004 among Diebold, Incorporated, the Subsidiary Borrowers, the Lenders and Bank One, N.A. — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17(ii) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.17	(iii)	Second amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of April 27, 2005 among Diebold, Incorporated, the Subsidiary Borrowers, the Lenders and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, N.A.) — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.17	(iv)	Third amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of November 16, 2005 among Diebold, Incorporated, the Subsidiary Borrowers, the Lenders and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, N.A.) — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.18	(i)	Retirement and Consulting Agreement with Robert W. Mahoney – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.18	(ii)	Extension of Retirement and Consulting Agreement with Robert W. Mahoney – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 (ii) of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.18	(iii)	Extension of Retirement and Consulting Agreement with Robert W. Mahoney — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 (iii) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. (Commission File No. 1-4879).

31

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS (Continued)

*10.18	(iv)	Extension of Retirement and Consulting Agreement with Robert W. Mahoney — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 (iv) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.18	(vi)	Extension of Retirement and Consulting Agreement with Robert W. Mahoney dated March 7, 2006 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 (vi) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
10.20	(i)	Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2001 by and among DCC Funding LLC, Diebold Global Finance Corporation (formerly Diebold Credit Corporation), Diebold, Incorporated, Receivables Capital Corporation and Bank of America, N. A. — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 (i) on Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
10.20	(ii)	Amendment No. 1 to the Transfer and Administration Agreement by and among DCC Funding LLC, Diebold Credit Corporation, Diebold, Incorporated, Receivables Capital Corporation and Bank of America, National Association – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 (ii) on Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.21	(i)	Employment Agreement with Eric C. Evans — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 on Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.21	(ii)	Separation Agreement with Eric C. Evans — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.22		Form of Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 16, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.23		Form of Restricted Share Agreement – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 16, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.24		Form of RSU Agreement – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 on Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.25		Form of Performance Share Agreement – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 on Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.26		Diebold, Incorporated Annual Cash Bonus Plan – incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of Registrant’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 16, 2005. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.27		Form of Note Purchase Agreement – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2006. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.28		Employment Agreement between Diebold, Incorporated and Thomas W. Swidarski – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2006. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.29		Employment [Change in Control] Agreement between Diebold, Incorporated and Thomas W. Swidarski – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2006. (Commission File No. 1-4879)
*10.30		Compromise Agreement between Diebold International Limited, Diebold, Incorporated and Daniel J. O’Brien – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 1, 2006. (Commission File No. 1-4879).
*10.31		Separation Agreement between Diebold, Incorporated and Michael J. Hillock, effective June 12, 2006 – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2006. (Commission File No. 1-4879).

32

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (Continued)

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

* Reflects management contract or other compensatory arrangement.

33

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED
		(Registrant)
Date : November 6, 2006	By:	/s/ Thomas W. Swidarski
		Thomas W. Swidarski
		President and Chief
		Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
Date : November 6, 2006	By:	/s/ Kevin J. Krakora
		Kevin J. Krakora
		Executive Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

34

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q

EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NO.	DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

35