UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[x] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 30, 2005
OR
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from __________ to __________.
Commission file number 1-6140
DILLARD’S, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 71-0388071
(State or other jurisdiction (IRS Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
1600 CANTRELL ROAD, LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201
(Address of principal executive office)
(Zip Code)
(501) 376-5200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter time that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No_ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12-b-2). Yes x No _ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12-b-2). Yes No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
CLASS A COMMON STOCK as of July 30, 2005 78,519,377
CLASS B COMMON STOCK as of July 30, 2005 4,010,929
1
Index
DILLARD’S, INC.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | Page Number |
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited): | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 30, 2005, January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004. | 3 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Retained Earnings for the Three, Six and Twelve Month Periods Ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004. | 4 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004. | 5 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | 6 |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. | 12 |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk. | 23 |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures. | 23 |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings. | 24 |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. | 24 |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. | 25 |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. | 25 |
Item 5. Other Information. | 26 |
Item 6. Exhibits. | 26 |
SIGNATURES | 26 |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |||||||||
Item 1. Financial Statements | |||||||||
DILLARD'S, INC. | |||||||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |||||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||
(In Thousands) | |||||||||
July 30, | January 29, | July 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Assets | |||||||||
Current Assets: | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 177,393 | $ 498,248 | $ 82,787 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 8,933 | 9,651 | 1,036,566 | ||||||
Merchandise inventories | 1,926,431 | 1,733,033 | 1,723,319 | ||||||
Other current assets | 43,638 | 52,559 | 32,334 | ||||||
Total current assets | 2,156,395 | 2,293,491 | 2,875,006 | ||||||
Property and Equipment, net | 3,214,524 | 3,180,756 | 3,146,779 | ||||||
Goodwill | 35,495 | 35,495 | 36,731 | ||||||
Other Assets | 172,368 | 181,839 | 171,485 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ 5,578,782 | $ 5,691,581 | $ 6,230,001 | ||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | |||||||||
Current Liabilities: | |||||||||
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ 894,834 | $ 820,242 | $ 731,389 | ||||||
Current portion of capital lease obligations | 5,109 | 4,926 | 2,214 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 148,982 | 91,629 | 254,970 | ||||||
Federal and state income taxes | 91,768 | 128,436 | 113,566 | ||||||
Other short-term borrowings | - | - | 122,000 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 1,140,693 | 1,045,233 | 1,224,139 | ||||||
Long-term Debt | 1,159,242 | 1,322,824 | 1,755,685 | ||||||
Capital Lease Obligations | 17,880 | 20,182 | 16,538 | ||||||
Other Liabilities | 252,771 | 269,056 | 150,407 | ||||||
Deferred Income Taxes | 482,869 | 509,589 | 616,328 | ||||||
Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in the | |||||||||
Company's Subordinated Debentures | 200,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | ||||||
Stockholders' Equity: | |||||||||
Common stock | 1,188 | 1,186 | 1,174 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 743,635 | 739,620 | 722,740 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (13,333) | (13,333) | (11,281) | ||||||
Retained earnings | 2,325,061 | 2,305,993 | 2,222,659 | ||||||
Less treasury stock, at cost | (731,224) | (708,769) | (668,388) | ||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 2,325,327 | 2,324,697 | 2,266,904 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | $ 5,578,782 | $ 5,691,581 | $ 6,230,001 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
DILLARD’S, INC. | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND RETAINED EARNINGS | |||||||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||||
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) | |||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Twelve Months Ended | |||||||||
July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | ||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Net Sales | $1,691,878 | $1,671,380 | $3,494,877 | $3,525,775 | $7,497,674 | $7,589,313 | |||||
Service Charges, Interest and Other Income | 36,596 | 58,675 | 72,330 | 116,159 | 243,870 | 244,636 | |||||
1,728,474 | 1,730,055 | 3,567,207 | 3,641,934 | 7,741,544 | 7,833,949 | ||||||
Costs and Expenses: | |||||||||||
Cost of sales | 1,144,025 | 1,145,846 | 2,314,297 | 2,333,346 | 4,998,716 | 5,105,129 | |||||
Advertising, selling, administrative | |||||||||||
and general expenses | 484,727 | 500,124 | 982,026 | 1,009,908 | 2,070,909 | 2,090,369 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 75,853 | 74,248 | 150,420 | 148,486 | 303,851 | 290,559 | |||||
Rentals | 10,069 | 12,940 | 20,605 | 26,658 | 48,721 | 62,800 | |||||
Interest and debt expense | 27,242 | 37,566 | 53,442 | 75,518 | 116,980 | 153,794 | |||||
Asset impairment and store closing charges | 5,962 | - | 6,381 | 4,680 | 21,118 | 31,344 | |||||
Total Costs and Expenses | 1,747,878 | 1,770,724 | 3,527,171 | 3,598,596 | 7,560,295 | 7,733,995 | |||||
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes | (19,404) | (40,669) | 40,036 | 43,338 | 181,249 | 99,954 | |||||
Income Taxes (Benefit) | (7,065) | (14,640) | 14,335 | 15,605 | 65,615 | 36,880 | |||||
Net Income (Loss) | (12,339) | (26,029) | 25,701 | 27,733 | 115,634 | 63,074 | |||||
Retained Earnings at Beginning | |||||||||||
of Period | 2,340,704 | 2,252,045 | 2,305,993 | 2,201,623 | 2,222,659 | 2,172,897 | |||||
Cash Dividends Declared | (3,304) | (3,357) | (6,633) | (6,697) | (13,232) | (13,312) | |||||
Retained Earnings at End of Period | $2,325,061 | $2,222,659 | $2,325,061 | $2,222,659 | $2,325,061 | $2,222,659 | |||||
Earnings (Loss) Per Share: | |||||||||||
Basic | $ (0.15) | $ (0.31) | $ 0.31 | $ 0.33 | $ 1.40 | $ 0.76 | |||||
Diluted | $ (0.15) | $ (0.31) | $ 0.31 | $ 0.33 | $ 1.39 | $ 0.75 | |||||
Cash Dividends Declared Per Common Share | $0.04 | $0.04 | $0.08 | $0.08 | $0.16 | $0.16 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
DILLARD’S, INC. | |||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |||
(Unaudited) | |||
(In Thousands) | |||
Six Months Ended | |||
July 30, | July 31, | ||
2005 | 2004 | ||
Operating Activities: | |||
Net income | $ 25,701 | $ 27,733 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to | |||
net cash provided by operating activities: | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 151,780 | 150,769 | |
Asset impairment and store closing charges | 6,381 | 4,680 | |
Gain on sale of property and equipment | (3,354) | - | |
Provision for loan losses | - | 12,848 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||
Decrease in accounts receivable | 718 | 142,075 | |
Increase in merchandise inventories and other current assets | (184,477) | (84,324) | |
Decrease (increase) in other assets | 8,111 | (20,562) | |
(Decrease) increase in trade accounts payable and accrued expenses, | |||
other liabilities and income taxes | (4,211) | 60,841 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 649 | 294,060 | |
Investing Activities: | |||
Purchases of property and equipment | (197,817) | (101,966) | |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | 11,098 | - | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (186,719) | (101,966) | |
Financing Activities: | |||
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations | (108,348) | (11,536) | |
Net proceeds from short-term borrowings | - | 72,000 | |
Retirement of Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in the Company’s Subordinated Debentures | - | (331,579) | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 2,652 | 7,632 | |
Cash dividends paid | (6,633) | (6,697) | |
Purchase of treasury stock | (22,456) | - | |
Net cash used in financing activities | (134,785) | (270,180) | |
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (320,855) | (78,086) | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period | 498,248 | 160,873 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period | $ 177,393 | $ 82,787 | |
Non-cash transactions: | |||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options | $ 1,366 | $ 1,139 | |
Capital lease transactions | 229 | - | |
Accrued capital expenditures | 77 | - |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
DILLARD’S, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. | Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Dillard's, Inc. (the "Company") have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, each as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three, six and twelve months ended July 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending January 28, 2006 due to the seasonal nature of the business. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2005.
Note 2. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company periodically grants stock options to employees. Pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” the Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements using the intrinsic value method. No compensation expense has been recorded in the consolidated financial statements with respect to option grants. The Company has adopted only the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123”. If compensation cost for the Company’s stock option plans had been determined in accordance with the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income (loss) would have been (in thousands, except per share data):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Twelve Months Ended | ||||||||
July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | |||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Net Income (Loss): | ||||||||||
As reported | $(12,339) | $(26,029) | $25,701 | $27,733 | $115,634 | $63,074 | ||||
Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of taxes | (361) | (438) | (756) | (922) | (1,437) | (1,939) | ||||
Pro forma | $(12,700) | $(26,467) | $(24,945) | $(26,811) | $114,197 | $61,135 | ||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share: | ||||||||||
As reported | $(0.15) | $(0.31) | $0.31 | $0.33 | $1.40 | $0.76 | ||||
Pro forma | (0.15) | (0.32) | 0.30 | 0.32 | 1.38 | 0.73 | ||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share: | ||||||||||
As reported | $(0.15) | $(0.31) | $0.31 | $0.33 | $1.39 | $0.75 | ||||
Pro forma | (0.15) | (0.32) | 0.30 | 0.32 | 1.37 | 0.73 |
The Company did not grant any options during the three, six and twelve months ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004. See Note 11 for a discussion regarding recently issued accounting standards.
6
Note 3. Disposition of Credit Card Receivables
On November 1, 2004, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of its private label credit card business to GE Consumer Finance (“GE”). The purchase price of approximately $1.1 billion included the assumption of $400 million of securitization liabilities and the purchase of owned accounts receivable and other assets. Net cash proceeds received by the Company were $688 million. The Company recorded a pretax gain of $83.9 million as a result of the sale. The gain is recorded in Service Charges, Interest and Other Income on the Consolidated Statement of Income and Retained Earnings.
As part of the transaction, the Company and GE have entered into a long-term marketing and servicing alliance with an initial term of 10 years, with an option to renew. GE will own the accounts and balances generated during the term of the alliance and will provide all key customer service functions supported by ongoing credit marketing efforts.
Note 4. Accounts Receivable Securitization
Prior to November 1, 2004, the Company transferred credit card receivable balances to Dillards Credit Card Master Trust (“Trust”) in exchange for certificates representing undivided interests in such receivables. The Trust securitized balances by issuing certificates representing undivided interests in the Trust’s receivables to outside investors. In each securitization, the Company retained certain subordinated interests that served as a credit enhancement to outside investors and exposed the Trust assets to possible credit losses on receivables sold to outside investors. The investors and the Trust had no recourse against the Company beyond Trust assets. In order to maintain the committed level of securitized assets, the Trust reinvested cash collections on securitized accounts in additional balances. The Company also received annual servicing fees as compensation for servicing the outstanding balances.
All borrowings under the Company’s receivable financings were recorded on the balance sheet. The Company had $400 million of long-term debt outstanding under this agreement on the consolidated balance sheet as of July 31, 2004.
The Company’s short-term receivable financing conduits were terminated and amounts outstanding were repaid concurrent with the sale of the Company’s private label credit card business to GE on November 1, 2004.
At July 31, 2004, the Company had $122 million outstanding short-term borrowings under its accounts receivable conduit facilities related to seasonal financing needs.
Note 5. Asset Impairment and Store Closing Charges
During the three months ended July 30, 2005, the Company recorded pretax expense of $6.0 million for asset impairment. This charge relates to the write-down to fair value for two stores that are scheduled to close during the third quarter of 2005. The Company does not expect to incur significant exit costs during fiscal 2005 related to these stores.
During the six months ended July 30, 2005, the Company recorded pre-tax expense of $6.4 million for asset impairment and store closing costs. The expense includes a $6.0 million write-down to fair value for the stores noted above and a $0.4 million future lease obligation on a store closed during the first quarter of 2005.
7
During the six months ended July 31, 2004, the Company recorded pre-tax expense of $4.7 million for asset impairment and store closing costs. The expense includes a $4.2 million write-down to fair value for two previously closed stores and a $0.5 million future lease obligation on a store closed during the first quarter of 2004. The write-down to fair value was deemed necessary due to the deterioration in these stores’ market values in the first quarter of 2004.
The Company has established a reserve for store closing charges. Following is a summary of the activity in the reserve established for store closing charges (in thousands):
Balance, January 29, 2005 | Charges | Cash Payments | Balance July 30, 2005 | |
Rent, property taxes and utilities | $2,905 | $419 | $1,532 | $1,792 |
The store closing reserves are included in trade accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities.
Note 6. Note Repurchase and Retirement of Preferred Securities
During the six months ended July 30, 2005, the Company repurchased $15.4 million of its outstanding unsecured notes prior to their maturity dates. Interest rates on the repurchased securities ranged from 7.8% to 7.9% while the maturity dates ranged from 2023 to 2027. A pre-tax loss of $0.5 million recorded within interest expense resulted from the repurchase of the unsecured notes during the six months ended July 30, 2005. No debt was repurchased during the quarter ended July 30, 2005.
During the quarter ended July 31, 2004, the Company repurchased $6.0 million of its 8.2% notes due in 2022. During the six months ended July 31, 2004, the Company repurchased $8.6 million of its outstanding unsecured notes prior to their related maturity dates. Interest rates on the repurchased securities ranged from 6.3% to 8.2% for the six months ended July 31, 2004. Maturity dates ranged from 2008 to 2022 for the six months ended July 31, 2004. A gain of $60,000 was recorded from the unsecured notes during the six months ended July 31, 2004.
The Company redeemed the $331.6 million liquidation amount of Preferred Securities of Horatio Finance V.O.F., a consolidated entity of the Company, effective February 2, 2004. No gain or loss was incurred related to the redemption.
Note 7. Earnings Per Share Data
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share data).
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Twelve Months Ended | |||||||
July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | ||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||
Basic: | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | $(12,339) | $(26,029) | $25,701 | $27,733 | $115,634 | $63,074 | |||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding | 82,688 | 83,738 | 82,956 | 83,620 | 82,873 | 83,477 | |||
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ (0.15) | $ (0.31) | $ 0.31 | $ 0.33 | $ 1.40 | $ 0.76 |
8
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Twelve Months Ended | ||||||
July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | |||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||
Diluted: | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $(12,339) | $(26,029) | $25,701 | $27,733 | $115,634 | $63,074 | ||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding | 82,688 | 83,738 | 82,956 | 83,620 | 82,873 | 83,477 | ||
Stock options | - | - | 237 | 474 | 416 | 387 | ||
Total weighted average equivalent shares | 82,688 | 83,738 | 83,193 | 84,094 | 83,289 | 83,864 | ||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ (0.15) | $ (0.31) | $ 0.31 | $ 0.33 | �� | $ 1.39 | $ 0.75 |
Total stock options outstanding were 2,862,784 and 6,158,764 at July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively. Of these, options to purchase 2,524,007 and 4,402,049 shares of Class A common stock at prices ranging from $25.13 to $40.22 and $24.01 to $40.22 per share at July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the six and twelve month periods because they would be antidilutive. No stock options were included for the three months ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004 computation of diluted earnings per share because they would be antidilutive due to the net loss.
Note 8. Comprehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists only of the minimum pension liability, which is calculated annually in the fourth quarter. The following table shows the computation of comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Twelve Months Ended | ||||
July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | |
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |
Net Income (Loss) | $(12,339) | $(26,029) | $25,701 | $27,733 | $115,634 | $63,074 |
Other Comprehensive Loss: | ||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes | - | - | - | - | (2,052) | (6,785) |
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) | $(12,339) | $(26,029) | $25,701 | $27,733 | $113,582 | $56,289 |
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
On July 29, 2002, a Class Action Complaint (followed on December 13, 2004 by a Second Amended Class Action Complaint) was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio against the Company, the Mercantile Stores Pension Plan (the “Plan”) and the Mercantile Stores Pension Committee (the “Committee”) on behalf of a putative class of former Plan participants. The complaint alleges that certain actions by the Plan and the Committee violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), as a result of amendments made to the Plan that allegedly were either improper and/or ineffective and as a result of certain payments made to certain beneficiaries of the Plan that allegedly were improperly calculated and/or discriminatory on account of age. The Second Amended Complaint does not specify any liquidated amount of damages sought and seeks recalculation of certain benefits paid to putative class members. No trial date has been set.
The Company is defending the litigation vigorously and has named the Plan’s actuarial firm as a cross defendant. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of the pending litigation, management believes after consultation with counsel, that its outcome, after consideration of
9
the provisions recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, would not have a material adverse effect upon its consolidated cash flow or financial position. However, it is possible that an adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated net income in a particular quarterly or annual period.
Various legal proceedings in the form of lawsuits and claims, which occur in the normal course of business, are pending against the Company and its subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, disposition of these matters is not expected to materially affect the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
The Company is a 50% guarantor on a $54.3 million loan commitment for a joint venture as of July 30, 2005. At July 30, 2005, the joint venture had $42.3 million outstanding on the loan. The loan is collateralized by a mall in Yuma, Arizona with a book value of $53.3 million at July 30, 2005.
The Company is a guarantor on a $185 million loan commitment with another joint venture as of July 30, 2005. The Company is a guarantor on up to 50% of the loan balance with the joint venture partner guaranteeing the remaining 50% of the loan balance. The loan had an outstanding balance of $37.2 million as of July 30, 2005.
At July 30, 2005, letters of credit totaling $67.3 million were issued under the Company’s $1.2 billion line of credit facility.
Note 10. Benefit Plans
The Company has a nonqualified defined benefit plan for certain officers. The plan is noncontributory and provides benefits based on years of service and compensation during employment. Pension expense is determined using various actuarial cost methods to estimate the total benefits ultimately payable to officers and allocates this cost to service periods. The pension plan is unfunded. The actuarial assumptions used to calculate pension costs are reviewed annually. The Company made contributions of $0.9 million and $1.7 million during the three and six months ended July 30, 2005, respectively. The Company expects to make a contribution to the pension plan of approximately $1.9 million for the remainder of fiscal 2005.
The components of net periodic benefit costs are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Twelve Months Ended | ||||
July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | |
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |
Components of net periodic benefit costs: | ||||||
Service cost | $ 498 | $ 442 | $ 997 | $ 885 | $1,882 | $1,382 |
Interest cost | 1,189 | 1,145 | 2,378 | 2,289 | 4,667 | 4,407 |
Net actuarial gain | 393 | 286 | 785 | 573 | 1,358 | 638 |
Amortization of prior service cost | 157 | 157 | 313 | 313 | 626 | 626 |
Net periodic benefit costs | $2,237 | $2,030 | $4,473 | $4,060 | $8,533 | $7,053 |
Note 11. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (“SFAS No. 151”). SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred
10
during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets - An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” (“SFAS No. 153”). SFAS No. 153 eliminates from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 21 (b) of APB Opinion No. 29, and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123-R”). SFAS No. 123-R requires all forms of share-based payment to employees, including employee stock options, be treated as compensation and recognized in the income statement based on their estimated fair values. This statement will be effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
The Company currently accounts for stock options under APB No. 25 using the intrinsic value method in accounting for its employee stock options. No stock-based compensation costs were reflected in net income (loss), as no options under those plans had an exercise price less than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
Under the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the Company will be required to expense stock options over the vesting period in its statement of operations. In addition, the Company will need to recognize expense over the remaining vesting period associated with unvested options outstanding as of January 28, 2006. The Company has not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123-R, and it has not determined whether the adoption will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47 (“FIN 47”), “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143.” FIN 47 clarifies the scope and timing of liability recognition for conditional asset retirement obligations under SFAS No. 143 and is effective no later than the end of our 2005 fiscal year. The Company does not expect FIN 47 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Correction, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3” (“SFAS No. 154”). SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This statement requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principles, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 154 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 12. Revolving Credit Agreement
During the three months ended July 30, 2005, the Company amended and extended its revolving credit agreement (“credit agreement”) with JPMorgan to increase the amount available under this facility from $1 billion to $1.2 billion. Borrowings under the credit agreement accrue interest at either JPMorgan's Base Rate or LIBOR plus 1.25% (currently 4.77%) subject to certain availability thresholds as defined in the credit agreement. Availability for borrowings and letter of credit obligations under the credit agreement is limited to 85% of the inventory of certain Company subsidiaries (approximately $1.08
11
billion at July 30, 2005). There are no financial covenant requirements under the credit agreement provided availability exceeds $100 million. The credit agreement expires on December 12, 2010. The Company pays an annual commitment fee to the banks of 0.25% of the committed amount less outstanding borrowings and letters of credit.
Note 13. Share Repurchase Program
During the three months ended July 30, 2005, the Company completed the remaining authorized repurchase of Class A Common Stock under its $200 million program, which was approved by the board of directors in May of 2000 and announced the authorization of a new $200 million share repurchase program. Repurchases totaling 932,000 shares during the three and six months ended July 30, 2005 under both plans totaled $22.5 million. Approximately $193.6 million in share repurchase authorization remained under this open-ended plan at July 30, 2005. No shares were repurchased during the six months ended July 31, 2004.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Dillard’s, Inc. ( the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) operates 329 retail department stores in 29 states. Our stores are located in suburban shopping malls and offer a broad selection of fashion apparel and home furnishings. We offer an appealing and attractive assortment of merchandise to our customers at a fair price. We seek to enhance our income by maximizing the sale of this merchandise to our customers. We do this by promoting and advertising our merchandise and by making our stores an attractive and convenient place for our customers to shop.
Fundamentally, the Company’s business model is to offer the customer a compelling price/value relationship through the combination of high quality products and services at a competitive price. The Company seeks to deliver a high level of profitability and cash flow. Noteworthy items for the three months ended July 30, 2005 include the following:
· | A comparable store sales increase of 1%. |
· | Gross profit improvement of 100 basis points of sales compared to the three months ended July 31, 2004. |
· | A reduction of advertising, selling, administrative and general expenses of $15.4 million compared to the three months ended July 31, 2004. |
· | Decrease in interest expense of $10.3 million compared to the three months ended July 31, 2004. |
· | Decreased net loss of $12.3 million compared to $26.0 million for the three months ended July 31, 2004. |
12
2005 Guidance
A summary of guidance on key financial measures for 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), is shown below. See “forward-looking information” below.
(In millions of dollars) | 2005 | 2004 |
Estimated | Actual | |
Depreciation and amortization | $310 | $302 |
Rental expense | 48 | 55 |
Interest and debt expense | 105 | 139 |
Capital expenditures | 335 | 285 |
General
Net Sales. Net Sales include sales of comparable stores, non-comparable stores and lease income on leased departments. Comparable store sales include sales for those stores which were in operation for a full period in both the current month and the corresponding month for the prior year. Non-comparable store sales include sales in the current fiscal year from stores opened during the previous fiscal year before they are considered comparable stores, sales from new stores opened in the current fiscal year and sales in the previous fiscal year for stores that were closed in the current fiscal year.
Service Charges, Interest and Other Income. Service Charges, Interest and Other Income includes income generated through the long-term marketing and servicing alliance between the Company and GE for the three months and six months ended July 30, 2005 and the resulting gain on the sale of its credit card business to GE for the twelve months ended July 30, 2005. Service Charges, Interest and Other Income also includes interest and service charges, net of service charge write-offs, related to the Company’s proprietary credit card sales for the three months and six months ended July 31, 2004 and the twelve months ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004. Other income relates to joint ventures accounted for by the equity method, rental income, shipping and handling fees and gains (losses) on the sale of property and equipment and joint ventures.
Cost of sales. Cost of sales includes the cost of merchandise sold, bank card fees, freight to the distribution centers, employee and promotional discounts, non-specific vendor allowances and direct payroll for salon personnel.
Advertising, selling, administrative and general expenses. Advertising, selling, administrative and general expenses include buying, occupancy, selling, distribution, warehousing, store and corporate expenses (including payroll and employee benefits), insurance, employment taxes, advertising, management information systems, legal, bad debt costs and other corporate level expenses. Buying expenses consist of payroll, employee benefits and travel for design, buying and merchandising personnel.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses include depreciation and amortization on property and equipment.
Rentals. Rentals include expenses for store leases and data processing equipment rentals.
Interest and debt expense. Interest and debt expense includes interest relating to the Company’s unsecured notes, mortgage notes, credit card receivables financing, the Guaranteed Beneficial Interests in the Company’s Subordinated Debentures, gains and losses on note repurchases, amortization of financing costs, call premiums and interest on capital lease obligations.
13
Asset impairment and store closing charges. Asset impairment and store closing charges consist of write downs to fair value of under-performing properties and exit costs associated with the closure of certain stores. Exit costs include future rent, taxes and common area maintenance expenses from the time the stores are closed.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company’s accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005. As disclosed in this note, the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Since future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty, actual results will differ from those estimates. The Company evaluates its estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and predicates those estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Management of the Company believes the following critical accounting policies significantly affect its judgments and estimates used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Merchandise inventory. Approximately 98% of the inventories are valued at lower of cost or market using the retail last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) inventory method. Under the retail inventory method (“RIM”), the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a calculated cost to retail ratio to the retail value of inventories. RIM is an averaging method that has been widely used in the retail industry due to its practicality. Additionally, it is recognized that the use of RIM will result in valuing inventories at the lower of cost or market if markdowns are currently taken as a reduction of the retail value of inventories. Inherent in the RIM calculation are certain significant management judgments and estimates including, among others, merchandise markon, markups, and markdowns, which significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost as well as the resulting gross margins. Management believes that the Company’s RIM provides an inventory valuation which results in a carrying value at the lower of cost or market. The remaining 2% of the inventories are valued by the specific identified cost method.
Allowance for doubtful accounts. In November 2004, the Company sold substantially all of its accounts receivable to GE and no longer maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts.
Prior to the sale, the accounts receivable from the Company’s private label credit card sales were subject to credit losses. The Company maintained allowances for uncollectible accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The adequacy of the allowance was based on historical experience with similar customers including write-off trends, current aging information and year-end balances. Bankruptcies and recoveries used in the allowance calculation were projected based on qualitative factors such as current and expected consumer and economic trends.
Merchandise vendor allowances. The Company receives concessions from its merchandise vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements, including co-operative advertising, payroll reimbursements and markdown reimbursement programs. Co-operative advertising allowances are reported as a reduction of advertising expense in the period in which the advertising occurred. Payroll reimbursements are reported as a reduction of payroll expense in the period in which the reimbursement occurred. All other merchandise vendor allowances are recognized as a reduction of cost purchases when received. Accordingly, a reduction or increase in vendor concessions has an inverse impact on cost of sales and/or selling and administrative expenses. The amounts recognized as a reduction in cost of sales have not varied significantly over the past three fiscal years.
14
Insurance accruals. The Company’s consolidated balance sheets include liabilities with respect to self-insured workers’ compensation and general liability claims. The Company estimates the required liability of such claims, utilizing an actuarial method, based upon various assumptions, which include, but are not limited to, our historical loss experience, projected loss development factors, actual payroll and other data. The required liability is also subject to adjustment in the future based upon the changes in claims experience, including changes in the number of incidents (frequency) and changes in the ultimate cost per incident (severity). Adjustments to earnings resulting from changes in historical loss trends have been insignificant for the quarter and six months ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004. Further, we do not anticipate any significant change in loss trends, settlements or other costs that would cause a significant change in our earnings.
Finite-lived assets. The Company’s judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on market and operational performance. We assess the impairment of long-lived assets, primarily fixed assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:
· | Significant changes in the manner of our use of assets or the strategy for our overall business; |
· | Significant negative industry or economic trends; or |
· | Store closings |
The Company performs an analysis of the anticipated undiscounted future net cash flows of the related finite-lived assets. If the carrying value of the related asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value is reduced to its fair value. Various factors including future sales growth and profit margins are included in this analysis. To the extent these future projections or the Company’s strategies change, the conclusion regarding impairment may differ from the current estimates.
Goodwill. The Company evaluates goodwill annually or whenever events and changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable from its estimated future cash flows. To the extent these future projections or our strategies change, the conclusion regarding impairment may differ from the current estimates.
Estimates of fair value are primarily determined using projected discounted cash flows and are based on our best estimate of future revenue and operating costs and general market conditions. These estimates are subject to review and approval by senior management. This approach uses significant assumptions, including projected future cash flows, the discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows, and a terminal growth rate.
Income taxes. Temporary differences arising from differing treatment of income and expense items for tax and financial reporting purposes result in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are recorded on the balance sheet. These balances, as well as income tax expense, are determined through management’s estimations, interpretation of tax law for multiple jurisdictions and tax planning. If the Company’s actual results differ from estimated results due to changes in tax laws, new store locations or tax planning, the Company’s effective tax rate and tax balances could be affected. As such these estimates may require adjustment in the future as additional facts become known or as circumstances change.
The Company’s income tax returns are periodically audited by various state and local jurisdictions. Additionally, the Internal Revenue Service audits the Company’s federal income tax return annually. The Company reserves for tax contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the contingent amount is reasonably estimable. These reserves are based upon the Company's best estimation of the potential exposures associated with the timing and amount of deductions as well as various tax filing positions. Due to the complexity of these examination issues, for which reserves have been recorded, it may be several years before the final resolution is achieved.
15
Discount rate. The discount rate that the Company utilizes for determining future pension obligations is based on the Moody's AA corporate bond index. The indices selected reflect the weighted average remaining period of benefit payments. The discount rate had decreased to 5.5% as of January 29, 2005 from 6.0% as of January 31, 2004. The actuarial assumptions used to calculate pension costs are reviewed annually.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the results of operations, expressed as a percentage of net sales, for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Twelve Months Ended | ||||||||||
July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | July 30, | July 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Net sales | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
Cost of sales | 67.6 | 68.6 | 66.2 | 66.2 | 66.7 | 67.3 | ||||||
Gross profit | 32.4 | 31.4 | 33.8 | 33.8 | 33.3 | 32.7 | ||||||
Advertising, selling, administrative | ||||||||||||
and general expenses | 28.6 | 29.9 | 28.1 | 28.6 | 27.6 | 27.6 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 3.8 | ||||||
Rentals | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | ||||||
Interest and debt expense | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 2.0 | ||||||
Asset impairment and store closing charges | 0.4 | - | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 35.7 | 37.3 | 34.7 | 35.9 | 34.2 | 34.6 | ||||||
Service charges, interest and other income | 2.2 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 | ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | (1.1) | (2.4) | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 1.3 | ||||||
Income taxes (benefit) | (0.4) | (0.8) | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.5 | ||||||
Net income (loss) | (0.7) | % | (1.6) | % | 0.7 | % | 0.8 | % | 1.5 | % | 0.8 | % |
Net Sales
The percent change by category in the Company’s total sales for the three and six months ended July 30, 2005 compared to the three and six months ended July 31, 2004 is as follows:
% Change | ||
Three Months | Six Months | |
Cosmetics | 3.3% | 2.2% |
Women’s and Juniors’ Clothing | -2.4% | -4.9% |
Children’s Clothing | -4.5% | -4.6% |
Men’s Clothing and Accessories | 2.6% | -0.8% |
Shoes, Accessories and Lingerie | 9.4% | 6.8% |
Home | -3.2% | -3.7% |
The percent change by region in the Company’s total sales for the three and six months ended July 30, 2005 compared to the three and six months ended July 31, 2004 is as follows:
% Change | ||
Three Months | Six Months | |
Eastern | 2.4% | 0.7% |
Central | -0.2% | -2.3% |
Western | 5.1% | 2.0% |
16
Net sales increased 1% on a total and a comparable store basis for the three month period ended July 30, 2005 compared to the three month period ended July 31, 2004. Sales were strongest in cosmetics, men’s clothing and shoes, accessories and lingerie during the second quarter of 2005, with those areas performing above the Company average trend of a 1% increase for the period. Sales were weakest in the home, women’s and children’s areas, with sales in these areas trending below the average Company performance for the period.
During the three month period ended July 30, 2005, net sales were strongest in the Western region, exceeding the Company’s average sales performance for the period. Net sales were slightly above trend in the Eastern region and slightly below trend in the Central region.
The Company continues to execute key merchandise initiatives as it works to maintain relationships with existing loyal customers while attracting new customers with expanded offerings in upscale and contemporary fashions. These expanded selections include the Company’s improved lines of exclusive brand merchandise.
Storewide sales penetration of exclusive brand merchandise for the six month period ended July 30, 2005 was 22.8% compared to 22.1% during the six month period ended July 31, 2004.
Net sales decreased 1% for the six month period ended July 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Sales in comparable stores declined 1% for the six month period ended July 30, 2005.
Net sales declined 1% for the twelve month period ended July 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 as a result of comparable store sales declines.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 67.6% for the three months ended July 30, 2005, from 68.6% for the three months ended July 31, 2004. The increase in cost of sales was primarily due to specific factors inherent in the integration of the Acquired Stores into the Company’s merchandising operations. This decrease of 100 basis points in cost of sales for the three months ended July 30, 2005, is attributable to a shift in the Company’s product mix toward higher margin merchandise and a decrease in markdown activity for the three months ended July 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The lower level of markdown activity decreased cost of sales by 0.90% of sales while increased markup percentage was responsible for a decrease in cost of sales of 0.10% of sales. Improved gross margins were noted in children’s, cosmetics, women’s and juniors and men’s clothing. Decreased gross margins were noted in shoes, accessories and lingerie and home.
Total inventory increased primarily due to an increase relating to inventory in transit. Inventory in comparable stores at July 30, 2005 increased 3% compared to inventory at July 31, 2004.
Cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, was 66.2% for the six months ended July 30, 2005, unchanged from the six months ended July 31, 2004. Markdown activity decreased cost of sales by 0.49% of sales while the increased markup percentage offset this decrease in cost of sales by 0.45% of sales. Improved gross margins were noted in children’s, women’s and juniors and men’s clothing. Decreased gross margins were noted in shoes, accessories and lingerie, cosmetics and home.
Advertising, Selling, Administrative and General Expenses
Advertising, Selling, Administrative and General (“SG&A”) expenses declined $15.4 million for the three months ended July 30, 2005 compared with the three months ended July 31, 2004. The decrease in SG&A expenses were driven by decreases in bad debt expense ($4.2 million), payroll ($4.8 million) and communication and advertising costs ($4.3 million) resulting primarily from the Company’s sale of its credit card business in November of 2004. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 28.6% for the three months ended July 30, 2005 from 29.9% for the three months ended July 31, 2004.
17
The comparable relationship between SG&A expenses and net sales for the six months ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively, was 28.1% and 28.6%. SG&A expenses declined $27.9 million for the six months ended July 30, 2005 compared with the comparable period in 2004. The improvement in SG&A expenses was driven by savings in bad debt expense ($15.4 million), payroll ($7.7 million) and communication and advertising ($8.3 million). These were partially offset by increases in utilities, travel, pension, pre-opening and other SG&A expenses. The reduction in bad debt expense, payroll and communications and advertising was primarily due to the sale of the Company’s credit card business in November 2004.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of net sales was 4.5% for the three month period ended July 30, 2005 compared to 4.4% for the similar period in 2004. Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of net sales was 4.3% for the six months ended July 30, 2005 compared to 4.2% for the similar period in 2004. Depreciation expenses increased $1.6 million and $1.9 million for the three and six months ended July 30, 2005 compared to the similar periods in 2004. These increases were due to higher property and equipment additions in the current periods.
Rentals
Rental, as a percentage of net sales was 0.6% for the three months and six months ended July 30, 2005, respectively, compared to 0.8% for the same three and six months in 2004. Rentals declined $2.9 million and $6.1 million for the three and six month periods ended July 30, 2005 compared to July 31, 2004, respectively. The decrease in rentals is due to a reduction in store rent expense relating to a decline in the number of leased stores and to a reduction in leased data processing equipment.
Interest and Debt Expense
Interest and debt expense was $27.2 million for the three month period ended July 30, 2005 compared with $37.6 million for the similar period in 2004. Interest and debt expense declined $10.4 million during the three month period ended July 30, 2005 compared to the three month period ended July 31, 2004 as a result of lower debt levels. Average debt outstanding declined approximately $722 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to 2004. The debt reduction was due primarily to the assumption by GE of $400 million in accounts receivable securitization debt, the payoff of short term receivable financing conduits in conjunction with the sale of the Company’s private label credit card business to GE and maturities and repurchases of various outstanding notes.
Interest and debt expense was $53.4 million for the six month period ended July 30, 2005 compared with $75.5 million for the similar period in 2004. The decline in interest and debt expense in 2005 was due to the reduction in average outstanding debt in 2005 compared to 2004.
Asset Impairment and Store Closing Charges
During the three months ended July 30, 2005, the Company recorded pretax expense of $6.0 million for asset impairment and store closing charges. This charge relates to the write-down to fair value for two stores that are scheduled to close during the third quarter of 2005. The Company does not expect to incur significant additional exit costs during fiscal 2005 related to these stores.
During the six months ended July 30, 2005, the Company recorded pre-tax expense of $6.4 million for asset impairment and store closing costs. The expense includes a $6.0 million write-down to fair value for the stores noted above and a $0.4 million future lease obligation on a store closed during the first quarter of 2005.
During the six months ended July 31, 2004, the Company recorded pre-tax expense of $4.7 million for asset impairment and store closing costs. The expense includes a $4.2 million write-down to fair value for
18
two previously closed stores and a $500,000 future lease obligation on a store closed during the first quarter of 2004. The write-down to fair value was deemed necessary due to the first quarter of 2004 deterioration in these stores’ market values.
Service Charges, Interest and Other Income
Service charges, interest and other income for the three months ended July 30, 2005 decreased to $36.6 million or 2.2% of net sales compared to $58.7 million or 3.5% of net sales for the three months ended July 31, 2004. The Company completed its sale of its credit card business during the fourth quarter of 2004 to GE and entered into a ten year marketing and servicing alliance. Included in service charges, interest and other income for the three months ended July 30, 2005 is the income from the marketing and servicing alliance of $24.9 million. Service charge income was $46.5 million for the three months ended July 31, 2004. Included in other income were gains on the sale of property and equipment of $3.1 million for the three months ended July 30, 2005.
Service charges, interest and other income for the six months ended July 30, 2005 decreased to $72.3 million or 2.1% of net sales compared to $116.2 million or 3.3% of net sales for the six months ended July 31, 2004. Income from the marketing and servicing alliance was $49.4 million for the six months ended July 30, 2005. Service charge income was $95.9 million for the six months ended July 31, 2004. Included in other income were gains on the sale of property and equipment of $3.4 million for the six months ended July 30, 2005.
Income Taxes
The federal and state income tax rates for the three month period ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004 were 36.4% and 36%, respectively. The federal and state income tax rates for the six month period ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004 were 35.8% and 36%, respectively. During the quarter ended July 30, 2005, income taxes include a $2.5 million reduction of reserves for tax contingencies and deferred tax liabilities as well as a $2.4 million increase of reserves for tax contingencies. These changes result from resolution of various federal and state income tax issues and the impact of tax law changes in the State of Ohio, which became effective on June 30, 2005. Excluding these changes, the estimated effective rate for the three month period ended July 30, 2005 is 36%.
Financial Condition
Financial Position Summary
(in thousands of dollars) | July 30, 2005 | January 29, 2005 | $ Change | % Change |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 177,393 | $498,248 | (320,855) | -64.4 |
Short-term debt | - | - | - | - |
Current portion of long-term debt | 148,982 | 91,629 | 57,353 | 62.6 |
Long-term debt | 1,159,242 | 1,322,824 | (163,582) | -12.4 |
Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests | 200,000 | 200,000 | - | - |
Stockholders’ equity | 2,325,327 | 2,324,697 | 630 | - |
Current ratio | 1.89 | 2.19 | ||
Debt to capitalization | 39.3% | 41.0% |
19
(in thousands of dollars) | July 30, 2005 | July 31, 2004 | $ Change | % Change |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 177,393 | $ 82,787 | 94,606 | 114.3 |
Short-term debt | - | 122,000 | (122,000) | - |
Current portion of long-term debt | 148,982 | 254,970 | (105,988) | -41.6 |
Long-term debt | 1,159,242 | 1,755,685 | (596,443) | -34.0 |
Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests | 200,000 | 200,000 | - | - |
Stockholders’ equity | 2,325,327 | 2,266,904 | 58,423 | 2.6 |
Current ratio | 1.89 | 2.35 | ||
Debt to capitalization | 39.3% | 50.7% |
Net cash flows from operations for the six months ended July 30, 2005 plus the beginning cash on hand were adequate to fund the Company’s operations for the period. Cash flows from operations decreased from 2004 levels due primarily to a $100.2 million decrease related to changes in inventory in the current year compared with the prior year, a $65.1 million decrease related to changes in accounts payable in the current year compared with the prior year and a $141.4 million decline related to changes in trade accounts receivables in the current year compared to the prior year. The accounts receivables related to the credit card business were sold to GE on November 1, 2004.
Capital expenditures were $197.8 million for the six months ended July 30, 2005. These expenditures consist primarily of the construction of new stores, remodeling of existing stores and investments in technology. During the six months ended July 30, 2005, the Company opened three new stores, Imperial Valley in El Centro, California; St. Johns Towne Center in Jacksonville, Florida; and Perimeter Mall in Atlanta, Georgia; and one replacement store, Crestview Hills in Crestview Hills, Kentucky. These four stores totaled approximately 585,000 square feet, net of replaced square footage. Capital expenditures for 2005 are expected to be approximately $335 million. The Company plans to open five additional new stores in fiscal 2005 totaling 962,000 square feet, net of replaced square footage. Historically, the Company has financed such capital expenditures with cash flow from operations. The Company believes that it will continue to finance capital expenditures in this manner during fiscal 2005.
For the six months ended July 30, 2005, the Company recorded a gain on the sale of property and equipment of $3.4 million and received proceeds of $11.1 million.
Cash used in financing activities for the six months ended July 30, 2005 totaled $134.8 million compared to cash used of $270.2 million for the six months ended July 31, 2004. During the six months ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, the Company repurchased $15.4 million and $8.6 million, respectively, of its outstanding unsecured notes prior to their related maturity dates. During the six months ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, the Company reduced its total level of outstanding debt and capital lease obligations, including debt repurchases of $15.4 million and $8.6 million, by $108.3 million and $11.5 million, respectively. During the six months ended July 31, 2004, the Company redeemed its $331.6 million Preferred Securities. The Company increased its short-term borrowings through its available receivable financing facilities by $72.0 million during the six months ended July 31, 2004.
During the three months ended July 30, 2005, the Company completed the repurchase authorization of its Class A Common Stock under its existing share repurchase plan authorized by the board of directors in May of 2000. In addition, the board of directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $200 million of its Class A Common Stock.
During the six months ended July 30, 2005, the Company repurchased approximately 932,000 shares of Class A common stock for $22.5 million under its existing share repurchase authorizations. Approximately $193.6 million in share repurchase authorization remained under the open-ended plan at July 30, 2005.
The sale of the Company’s credit card business significantly strengthened its liquidity and financial position. The Company had cash on hand of $177 million as of July 30, 2005 and no outstanding short term borrowings. During fiscal 2005, the Company expects to finance its capital expenditures and its working capital requirements including required debt repayments and stock repurchases, if any, from cash on hand and cash flows generated from operations. As part of its overall liquidity management strategy and for peak working capital requirements, the Company has a $1.2 billion credit facility. At July 30, 2005, letters of credit totaling $67.3 million were issued under the $1.2 billion revolving credit agreement.
20
Availability for borrowings and letter of credit obligations under the credit agreement is limited to 85% of the inventory of certain Company subsidiaries (approximately $1.08 billion at July 30, 2005) leaving unutilized availability under the facility of $1.01 billion. Depending on conditions in the capital markets and other factors, the Company will from time to time consider possible capital market transactions, the proceeds of which could be used to refinance current indebtedness or other corporate purposes.
At July 30, 2005, the Company had $1.5 billion total debt outstanding (including Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in the Company’s Subordinated Debentures) compared with $2.4 billion at July 31, 2004.
Subsequent to July 30, 2005, the Company paid off $50.0 million in mortgage notes due August 2011. These notes bear interest at 7.25% and were collateralized by certain corporate buildings, land and land improvements. These notes were included in the current portion of long-term debt on the balance sheet as of July 30, 2005.
Subsequent to July 30, 2005, Hurricane Katrina forced the closure of a number of stores in Louisiana and Mississippi. Seven stores located in New Orleans and Southern Mississippi are expected to remain closed for the foreseeable future.
Except as noted above, there have been no material changes in the information set forth under caption “Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments” in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
The Company has not created, and is not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance-sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating the Company’s business. The Company is a guarantor on a $54.3 million loan commitment for a joint venture as of July 30, 2005. At July 30, 2005, the joint venture had $42.3 million outstanding on the loan. The loan is collateralized by a mall in Yuma, Arizona with a book value of $53.3 million at July 30, 2005.
The Company is a guarantor on a $185 million loan commitment with another joint venture as of July 30, 2005. The Company is a guarantor on up to 50% of the loan balance with the joint venture partner guaranteeing the remaining 50% of the loan balance. The loan had an outstanding balance of $37.2 million as of July 30, 2005.
The Company does not have any additional arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated into the financial statements that are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s liquidity or the availability of capital resources.
New Accounting Standards
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” (“SFAS No. 151”). SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets - An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” (“SFAS No. 153”). SFAS No. 153 eliminates from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive
21
assets in paragraph 21 (b) of APB Opinion No. 29, and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123-R”). SFAS No. 123-R requires all forms of share-based payment to employees, including employee stock options, be treated as compensation and recognized in the income statement based on their estimated fair values. This statement will be effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.
The Company currently accounts for stock options under APB No. 25 using the intrinsic value method in accounting for its employee stock options. No stock-based compensation costs were reflected in net income, as no options under those plans had an exercise price less than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
Under the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the Company will be required to expense stock options over the vesting period in its statement of operations. In addition, the Company will need to recognize expense over the remaining vesting period associated with unvested options outstanding as of January 28, 2006. The Company has not yet determined the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123-R, and it has not determined whether the adoption will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47 (“FIN 47”), “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143.” FIN 47 clarifies the scope and timing of liability recognition for conditional asset retirement obligations under SFAS No. 143 and is effective no later than the end of our 2005 fiscal year. The Company does not expect FIN 47 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Correction, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3”(“SFAS No. 154”). SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This statement requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principles, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 154 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Forward-Looking Information
Statements in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this document include certain “forward-looking statements,” including (without limitation) statements with respect to anticipated future operating and financial performance (including the 2005 guidance regarding the Company’s estimated depreciation and amortization expense, rental expense, interest and debt expense and capital expenditures), growth and acquisition opportunities, financing requirements and other similar forecasts and statements of expectation. Words such as “expects,”“estimates”, “anticipates,”“plans” and “believes,” and variations of these words and similar expressions, are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. The Company cautions that forward-looking statements, as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, contained in this report, or made by management are based on estimates, projections, beliefs and assumptions of management at the time of such statements and are not guarantees of future performance. The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new information, or otherwise. Forward-looking statements of the Company involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various important factors. Actual future performance, outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking
22
statements made by the Company and its management as a result of a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Representative examples of those factors (without limitation) include general retail industry conditions and macro-economic conditions; economic and weather conditions for regions in which the Company’s stores are located and the effect of these factors on the buying patterns of the Company’s customers; the impact of competitive pressures in the department store industry and other retail channels including specialty, off-price, discount, internet, and mail-order retailers; changes in consumer spending patterns and debt levels; adequate and stable availability of materials and production facilities from which the Company sources its merchandise; changes in operating expenses, including employee wages, commission structures and related benefits; possible future acquisitions of store properties from other department store operators and the continued availability of financing in amounts and at the terms necessary to support the Company’s future business; potential disruption from terrorist activity and the effect on ongoing consumer confidence; potential disruption of international trade and supply chain efficiencies; events causing disruption or delays in the store construction schedule, world conflict and the possible impact on consumer spending patterns and other economic and demographic changes of similar or dissimilar nature.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
During the six months ended July 30, 2005, the Company repurchased $15.4 million of its outstanding unsecured notes prior to their maturity dates. Interest rates on the repurchased securities ranged from 7.8% to 7.9% while the maturity dates ranged from 2023 to 2027.
Except as disclosed above, there have been no material changes in the information set forth under caption “Item 7A-Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains “disclosure controls and procedures”, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports, pursuant to the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurances of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As of July 30, 2005, the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of Company’s management, including William Dillard, II, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer), and James I. Freeman, Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended July 30, 2005 to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
23
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On July 29, 2002, a Class Action Complaint (followed on December 13, 2004 by a Second Amended Class Action Complaint) was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio against the Company, the Mercantile Stores Pension Plan (the “Plan”) and the Mercantile Stores Pension Committee (the “Committee”) on behalf of a putative class of former Plan participants. The complaint alleges that certain actions by the Plan and the Committee violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), as a result of amendments made to the Plan that allegedly were either improper and/or ineffective and as a result of certain payments made to certain beneficiaries of the Plan that allegedly were improperly calculated and/or discriminatory on account of age. The Second Amended Complaint does not specify any liquidated amount of damages sought and seeks recalculation of certain benefits paid to putative class members. No trial date has been set.
The Company is defending the litigation vigorously and has named the Plan’s actuarial firm as a cross defendant. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of the pending litigation, management believes after consultation with counsel, that its outcome, after consideration of the provisions recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, would not have a material adverse effect upon its consolidated cash flow or financial position. However, it is possible that an adverse outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated net income in a particular quarterly or annual period.
From time to time, we are involved in other litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. Such issues may relate to litigation with customers, employment related lawsuits, class action lawsuits, purported class action lawsuits and actions brought by governmental authorities. As of September 8, 2005, we are not a party to any legal proceedings that, individually or in the aggregate, are reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period | (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | (b) Average Price Paid per Share | (c)Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | (d) Approximate Dollar Value that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
May 1, 2005 through May 28, 2005 | 619,900 | $24.22 | 619,900 | $201,090,138 |
May 29, 2005 through July 2, 2005 | 261,600 | 23.81 | 261,600 | 194,850,871 |
July 3, 2005 through July 30, 2005 | 50,900 | 23.81 | 50,900 | 193,649,473 |
Total | 932,400 | $24.08 | 932,400 | $193,649,473 |
24
In May 2005, the Company completed the repurchase authorization of its Class A Common Stock under its existing share repurchase plan authorized by the board of directors in May of 2000. In addition, the Company announced that the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of its Class A Common Stock. The plan has no expiration date.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company was held on May 21, 2005. The matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders were as follows:
Votes | ||||||
Votes For | Votes Against | Abstained | ||||
Election of Directors Class A Nominees | ||||||
Robert C. Connor | 59,809,131 | 10,287,553 | 0 | |||
Will D. Davis | 59,770,185 | 10,326,499 | 0 | |||
John Paul Hammerschmidt | 59,724,548 | 10,372,136 | 0 | |||
Peter Johnson | 60,592,238 | 9,504,446 | 0 | |||
Class B Nominees | ||||||
Drue Corbusier | 4,005,260 | 0 | 0 | |||
Alex Dillard | 4,005,260 | 0 | 0 | |||
William Dillard, II | 4,005,260 | 0 | 0 | |||
Mike Dillard | 4,005,260 | 0 | 0 | |||
James I. Freeman | 4,005,260 | 0 | 0 | |||
Warren A. Stephens | 4,005,260 | 0 | 0 | |||
William H. Sutton | 4,005,260 | 0 | 0 | |||
J. C. Watts | 4,005,260 | 0 | 0 | |||
Other Proposals | ||||||
Stock Bonus Plan | 39,175,322 | 21,948,416 | 5,278,769 | |||
Stock Purchase Plan | 59,864,358 | 5,903,105 | 635,044 | |||
Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan | 38,488,268 | 27,157,520 | 793,430 | |||
Global Human Rights Standards | 4,553,818 | 56,512,415 | 5,326,274 | |||
Ratification of Auditors | 72,250,145 | 1,266,751 | 585,048 |
25
Item 5. Other Information
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:
The Company has calculated the ratio of earnings to fixed charges pursuant to Item 503 of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Act as follows:
Six Months Ended | Fiscal Years Ended | |||||||||||
July 30, | July 31, | January 29, | January 31, | February 3, | February 2, | February 3, | ||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001* | ||||||
1.58 | 1.48 | 2.11 | 1.07 | 1.94 | 1.52 | 1.79 |
* 53 week year.
Item 6. Exhibits
Number | Description |
3(b)* | By-Laws as currently in effect (Exhibit 3(b) to Form 8-K dated May 25, 2005 in 1-6140). |
10* | Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among Dillard’s, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank (Exhibit 10 to Form 8-K dated June 3, 2005 in 1-6140). |
12 | Statement re: Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
* Incorporated by reference as indicated.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DILLARD’S, INC.
(Registrant)
DATE: September 8, 2005 /s/James I. Freeman
James I. Freeman
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)