Recently Issued Accounting Standards | Recently Issued Accounting Standards Revenue from Contracts with Customers In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) , which stipulates that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. This update was amended by ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date , which deferred the effective date for the Company from the first quarter of fiscal 2017 to the first quarter of fiscal 2018 with early adoption permitted. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). This ASU clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations, as it assists in the determination of whether the entity controls the good or service before it is transferred to the customer. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. This ASU clarifies two aspects of Topic 606, including identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the principles for those areas. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients . This ASU clarifies three aspects of Topic 606, including the objective of the collectibility criterion, the measurement date for noncash consideration and the requirements for a completed contract. The ASU also includes a practical expedient for contract modifications. Additionally, the amendments allow an entity to exclude amounts collected from customers for all sales taxes from the transaction price. The Company is currently assessing the impact of these updates on its consolidated financial statements. Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) , which requires management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued and provide related disclosures. This ASU is effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, and we plan to adopt this ASU for the annual period ending on January 28, 2017. We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, to simplify the presentation of deferred taxes in the balance sheet. Under this amendment, entities will no longer be required to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in the balance sheet. Rather, the amendment requires deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in the balance sheet. The amendments in this update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company elected to adopt the accounting standard in the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. The prior period in our consolidated financial statements were retrospectively adjusted. Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs , to amend ASC Topic 835. The amendment adds the requirement for an entity to present debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset and to report amortization of the debt issuance costs as interest expense. ASU No. 2015-03 requires retrospective application and represents a change in accounting principle. The Company adopted ASU No. 2015-03 during the first quarter of fiscal 2016, using retrospective application as permitted. Prior period amounts in our condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with current presentation. As a result, the Company reclassified $1.7 million and $1.9 million of debt issuance costs from other assets to reduce long-term debt on our condensed consolidated balance sheets at January 30, 2016 and May 2, 2015, respectively. Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements, to provide authoritative guidance related to line-of-credit arrangements, which were not addressed in ASU No. 2015-03. An entity may defer and present debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements as an asset. Subsequently, the debt issuance costs may be amortized as interest expense ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The Company adopted ASU No. 2015-15 at the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2016. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory , to simplify the measurement of inventory using the first-in, first out (FIFO) or average cost methods. Under this amendment, inventory under the FIFO or average cost methods should be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This update will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Approximately 96% of the Company's merchandise inventories are valued using the retail inventory method, which is outside the scope of ASU No. 2015-11. The remaining 4% of the Company's merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market using the average cost or specific identified cost methods, and the Company is evaluating the effect of this update on these inventory values. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Leases: Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842): Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Under these amendments, lessees are required to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for leases classified as operating leases under ASC 840. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements. |