Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 |
Or |
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to . |
Commission file number: 002-25577
DIODES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 95-2039518 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification Number) | |
4949 Hedgcoxe Road, Suite 200 | ||
Plano, Texas | 75024 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
(972) 987-3900
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filerþ | Accelerated filero | Non-accelerated filero(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting companyo |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of November 3, 2011 was 45,619,364.
Table of Contents
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
EX-10.1 | ||||||||
EX-10.2 | ||||||||
EX-10.3 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 — Financial Statements
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
ASSETS
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 124,897 | $ | 270,901 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net | 139,391 | 129,207 | ||||||
Inventories | 139,074 | 120,689 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, current | 8,488 | 8,276 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other | 17,450 | 11,679 | ||||||
Total current assets | 429,300 | 540,752 | ||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net | 231,863 | 200,745 | ||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES, non-current | 1,812 | 1,574 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS | ||||||||
Goodwill | 67,770 | 68,949 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 25,317 | 28,770 | ||||||
Other | 17,667 | 5,760 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 773,729 | $ | 846,550 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
- 3 -
Table of Contents
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS(cont’)
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS(cont’)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
(In thousands, except share data)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES | ||||||||
Lines of credit | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
Accounts payable | 82,554 | 70,057 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities | 34,694 | 36,937 | ||||||
Income tax payable | — | 15,412 | ||||||
Convertible senior notes | 236 | 128,261 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 694 | 698 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 118,178 | 251,365 | ||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion | 2,941 | 3,393 | ||||||
CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS, net of current portion | 1,152 | 1,380 | ||||||
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | 34,159 | 37,520 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 156,430 | 293,658 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | ||||||||
EQUITY | ||||||||
Diodes Incorporated stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock — par value $1.00 per share; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common stock — par value $0.66 2/3 per share; 70,000,000 shares authorized; 45,606,464 and 44,662,796 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively | 30,406 | 29,775 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 244,677 | 231,842 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 372,529 | 324,907 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (44,333 | ) | (45,080 | ) | ||||
Total Diodes Incorporated stockholders’ equity | 603,279 | 541,444 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest | 14,020 | 11,448 | ||||||
Total equity | 617,299 | 552,892 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 773,729 | $ | 846,550 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
- 4 -
Table of Contents
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
NET SALES | $ | 160,577 | $ | 163,120 | $ | 491,938 | $ | 449,120 | ||||||||
COST OF GOODS SOLD | 115,383 | 102,143 | 333,736 | 286,893 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 45,194 | 60,977 | 158,202 | 162,227 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 23,404 | 22,837 | 67,389 | 65,678 | ||||||||||||
Research and development | 7,304 | 7,212 | 20,355 | 20,403 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 1,120 | 1,098 | 3,408 | 3,448 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 31,828 | 31,147 | 91,152 | 89,529 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations | 13,366 | 29,830 | 67,050 | 72,698 | ||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES) | (2,300 | ) | (2,415 | ) | (7,444 | ) | (5,694 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest | 11,066 | 27,415 | 59,606 | 67,004 | ||||||||||||
INCOME TAX PROVISION | 359 | 5,346 | 9,912 | 11,705 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME | 10,707 | 22,069 | 49,694 | 55,299 | ||||||||||||
Less: NET INCOME attributable to noncontrolling interest | (750 | ) | (907 | ) | (2,072 | ) | (2,532 | ) | ||||||||
NET INCOME attributable to common stockholders | $ | 9,957 | $ | 21,162 | $ | 47,622 | $ | 52,767 | ||||||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE attributable to common stockholders | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 1.20 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 1.16 | ||||||||
Number of shares used in computation | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 45,603 | 44,346 | 45,252 | 44,031 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 47,093 | 45,673 | 46,875 | 45,418 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
- 5 -
Table of Contents
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | $ | 65,053 | $ | 90,046 | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Purchases of investments | (13,482 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments | — | 296,600 | ||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | (69,802 | ) | (66,342 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 19 | 2,141 | ||||||
Other | 64 | (384 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (83,201 | ) | 232,015 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Advances on line of credit | 10,000 | 3,762 | ||||||
Repayments on lines of credit | (10,000 | ) | (303,192 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock | 3,352 | 2,763 | ||||||
Repayments of long-term debt | (134,369 | ) | (1,062 | ) | ||||
Other | 282 | (902 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (130,735 | ) | (298,631 | ) | ||||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 2,879 | (1,576 | ) | |||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (146,004 | ) | 21,854 | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period | 270,901 | 241,953 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period | $ | 124,897 | $ | 263,807 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||
Non-cash financing activities: | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment purchased on accounts payable | $ | (4,075 | ) | $ | (5,828 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
- 6 -
Table of Contents
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE A — Nature of Operations, Basis of Presentation and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Nature of Operations
Diodes Incorporated and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) is a leading global manufacturer and supplier of high-quality, application specific standard products within the broad discrete, logic and analog semiconductor markets, serving the consumer electronics, computing, communications, industrial and automotive markets throughout Asia, North America and Europe.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.”) (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. They do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. These consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the period presented have been included in the interim period. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for other interim periods or the year ending December 31, 2011. The consolidated condensed financial data at December 31, 2010 is derived from audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. As permitted under U.S. GAAP, interim accounting for certain expenses, including income taxes, are based on full year forecasts. Such amounts are expensed in full in the year incurred. For interim financial reporting purposes, income taxes are recorded based upon estimated annual effective income tax rates.
Certain prior year’s balances have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-08,Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU No. 2011-08 is intended to simplify goodwill impairment testing by adding a qualitative review step to assess whether the required quantitative impairment analysis that exists today is necessary. Under the amended rule, a company will not be required to calculate the fair value of a business that contains recorded goodwill unless it concludes, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of that business is less than its book value (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent). If such a decline in fair value is deemed more likely than not to have occurred, then the quantitative goodwill impairment test that exists under current GAAP must be completed; otherwise, goodwill is deemed to be not impaired and no further testing is required until the next annual test date (or sooner if conditions or events before that date raise concerns of potential impairment in the business). The amended goodwill impairment guidance does not affect the manner in which a company estimates fair value. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-08 are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this amendment will have on its consolidated financial statements and is considering early adoption.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU No. 2011-05,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income.ASU No. 2011-05 provides two options for presenting other comprehensive income (OCI), which previously has typically been placed near the statement of equity. The amendments require an OCI statement to be included with the income statement, which together will make a statement of total comprehensive income or separate from the income statement, but the two statements will have to appear consecutively within a financial report. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-05 are effective for fiscal quarters and years beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company will select one of the two presentation options in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012.
- 7 -
Table of Contents
NOTE B — Functional Currencies, Foreign Currency Translation and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Functional Currencies and Foreign Currency Translation— The functional currency for the Company’s China subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar, while other subsidiaries, including subsidiaries in Taiwan and the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), use their local currency as their functional currency. Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are recorded as other income (expense) in the consolidated condensed statements of operations. The Company had foreign exchange transaction gain of approximately $1 million and loss of approximately $0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and gain of approximately $2 million and loss of approximately $1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)— U.S. GAAP generally requires that recognized revenues, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities are reported as separate components of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income or loss.
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows(in thousands):
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 10,707 | $ | 22,069 | $ | 49,694 | $ | 55,299 | ||||||||
Translation adjustment | (6,852 | ) | 7,361 | (621 | ) | (3,552 | ) | |||||||||
Unrealized gain/(loss) on defined benefit plan, net of tax | (3,783 | ) | 1,802 | 1,347 | (4,068 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 72 | 31,232 | 50,420 | 47,679 | ||||||||||||
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest | (750 | ) | (907 | ) | (2,072 | ) | (2,532 | ) | ||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders | $ | (678 | ) | $ | 30,325 | $ | 48,348 | $ | 45,147 | |||||||
- 8 -
Table of Contents
NOTE C — Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated similarly but includes potential dilution from the exercise of stock options and stock awards, except when the effect would be anti-dilutive.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is as follows(in thousands, except per share data):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
BASIC | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings per share | 45,603 | 44,346 | 45,252 | 44,031 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 9,957 | $ | 21,162 | $ | 47,622 | $ | 52,767 | ||||||||
Earnings per share attributable to common stockholders | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 1.20 | ||||||||
DILUTED | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings per share | 45,603 | 44,346 | 45,252 | 44,031 | ||||||||||||
Add: Assumed exercise of stock options and stock awards | 1,490 | 1,327 | 1,623 | 1,387 | ||||||||||||
47,093 | 45,673 | 46,875 | 45,418 | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 9,957 | $ | 21,162 | $ | 47,622 | $ | 52,767 | ||||||||
Earnings per share attributable to common stockholders | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 1.16 | ||||||||
There are no shares included in the earnings per share calculation related to the Company’s 2.25% convertible senior notes (“Notes”) outstanding as our average stock price did not exceed the conversion price and, therefore, there is no conversion spread.
NOTE D — Inventories
Inventories stated at the lower of cost or market value are as follows(in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Raw materials | $ | 67,920 | $ | 60,402 | ||||
Work-in-progress | 21,666 | 22,288 | ||||||
Finished goods | 49,488 | 37,999 | ||||||
Total | $ | 139,074 | $ | 120,689 | ||||
- 9 -
Table of Contents
NOTE E — Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Changes in goodwill are as follows(in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2010 | $ | 68,949 | ||
Currency exchange and other | (1,179 | ) | ||
Balance at September 30, 2011 | $ | 67,770 | ||
Changes in intangible assets are as follows(in thousands):
Balance at September 30, 2011: | ||||
Intangible assets subject to amortization: | ||||
Gross carrying amount | $ | 48,664 | ||
Accumulated amortization | (18,093 | ) | ||
Currency exchange and other | (7,747 | ) | ||
Net value | 22,824 | |||
Intangible assets with indefinite lives: | ||||
Gross carrying amount | 3,162 | |||
Currency exchange and other | (669 | ) | ||
Total | 2,493 | |||
Total intangible assets, net | $ | 25,317 | ||
Amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization was approximately $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and approximately $3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
NOTE F — Fair Value Measurements
On September 7, 2011, the Company purchased 10 million shares of the common stock of Eris Technology Corporation (“Eris”), a publicly traded company listed as an Emerging Stock on the Taiwan OTC Exchange (TWO) that provides design, manufacturing and after-market services for diode products. The Company paid NT$39 per share or NT$390 million (approximately US$14 million), which represents an approximately 30 percent ownership in Eris after the transaction. As of September 30, 2011, the Company holds 10,045,000 shares of Eris.
The accounting rules permit a company to choose, at specified election dates, to measure at fair value certain eligible financial assets and liabilities that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The specified election dates include, but are not limited to, the date when an entity first recognizes the item, when an entity enters into a firm commitment or when changes in the financial instrument causes it to no longer qualify for fair value accounting under a different accounting standard. The fair value option may be elected for each entire financial instrument, but need not be applied to all similar instruments. Once the fair value option has been elected, it is irrevocable. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will be reported in other income (expense).
The Company has elected the fair value option for the shares of Eris common stock. Fair value is the price that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The shares of Eris common stock will be valued under the fair value hierarchy as a Level 1 Input, which is the quoted price (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
- 10 -
Table of Contents
Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of September 30, 2011 are classified in the following table(in thousands):
Changes in Fair Values for Items | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Measured at Fair Value Pursuant to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements | Election of the Fair Value Option | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Prices in | Changes in | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Active | Significant | Fair Values | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Markets for | Other | Significant | Included in | |||||||||||||||||||||
Identical | Observable | Unobservable | Current- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Other Gains | Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Description | Estimate | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | and (Losses) | Earnings | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities carried at fair value * | $ | 12,148 | $ | 12,148 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (1,334 | ) | $ | (1,334 | ) |
(*) | Represents investments that would otherwise be accounted for under the equity method of accounting. |
NOTE G — Income Tax Provision
Income tax expense of approximately $0 million and $10 million was recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. This resulted in an effective tax rate of 17% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to 18% in the same period of last year and compared to 18% for the full year of 2010. Our effective tax rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%, principally from the impact of higher income in lower-taxed jurisdictions. In addition, our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was impacted by provision-to-return adjustments and the utilization of foreign tax credits. Lastly, our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was also impacted by the noncash income tax benefit of reversing valuation allowances on deferred tax assets from U.K. loss carryforwards.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company reported domestic and foreign pre-tax income (loss) of approximately $(20) million and $80 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company reported domestic and foreign pre-tax income (loss) of approximately $(15) million and $82 million, respectively. Funds repatriated from foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. may be subject to federal and state income taxes. The Company intends to permanently reinvest overseas all of its earnings from its foreign subsidiaries; accordingly, U.S. taxes are not being recorded on undistributed foreign earnings.
The impact of tax holidays decreased the Company’s tax expense by approximately $6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011. The benefit of the tax holidays on both basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was approximately $0.13. The benefit of the tax holidays on both basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $0.13 and $0.12, respectively.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years before 2008. With respect to state and local jurisdictions and countries outside of the U.S., with limited exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax audits for years before 2006. Although the outcome of tax audits is always uncertain, the Company believes that adequate amounts of tax, interest and penalties, if any, have been provided for in the Company’s reserve for any adjustments that may result from future tax audits. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of September 30, 2011, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $10 million.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized benefit with respect to certain of the Company’s unrecognized tax positions will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months. These changes may be the result of settlements of ongoing audits or competent authority proceedings. At this time, an estimate of the range of the reasonably possible outcomes cannot be made.
- 11 -
Table of Contents
NOTE H — Share-Based Compensation
The following table shows the total compensation expensed for share-based compensation plans, including stock options and share grants, recognized in the statements of operations(in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Cost of sales | $ | 112 | $ | 87 | $ | 287 | $ | 262 | ||||||||
Selling and administrative expense | 3,259 | 2,824 | 9,088 | 8,510 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expense | 272 | 355 | 735 | 1,008 | ||||||||||||
Total share-based compensation expense | $ | 3,643 | $ | 3,266 | $ | 10,110 | $ | 9,780 | ||||||||
Stock Options.Stock options generally vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period and expire ten years after the grant date, and expense was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The total net cash proceeds received from stock option exercises during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was approximately $3 million. Stock option expense for both the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $1 million. Stock option expense for both the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $3 million.
A summary of the stock option plans is as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Stock Options | Shares (000) | Price | Term (yrs) | Value ($000) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 | 3,707 | $ | 14.14 | 5 | $ | 47,891 | ||||||||||
Granted | 385 | 29.07 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised | (482 | ) | 7.04 | 11,007 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited or expired | (6 | ) | 21.69 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2011 | 3,604 | $ | 16.67 | 5 | $ | 14,475 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2011 | 2,633 | $ | 14.50 | 4 | $ | 13,789 | ||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is before applicable income taxes and represents the amount option holders would have received if all options had been exercised on the last business day of the period indicated, based on the Company’s closing stock price.
As of September 30, 2011, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested stock options, net of forfeitures, was approximately $11 million, before income taxes, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3 years.
Share Grants.Restricted stock awards and restricted stock units generally vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period.
The total fair value of restricted stock awards vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $7 million. Share grant expense for both the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $2 million. Share grant expense for both the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $7 million
- 12 -
Table of Contents
A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested share grants is as follows:
Weighted- | ||||||||||||
Average | Aggregate | |||||||||||
Grant-Date | Intrinsic | |||||||||||
Share Grants | Shares (000) | Fair Value | Value ($000) | |||||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2011 | 774 | $ | 16.16 | $ | 12,479 | |||||||
Granted | 367 | 27.55 | ||||||||||
Vested | (362 | ) | 20.1 | 7,267 | ||||||||
Forfeited | (35 | ) | 19.74 | |||||||||
Nonvested at September 30, 2011 | 744 | $ | 19.83 | $ | 14,742 | |||||||
As of September 30, 2011, total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock awards, net of forfeitures, was approximately $25 million, before income taxes, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3 years.
NOTE I—Segment Information and Enterprise-Wide Disclosure
For financial reporting purposes, the Company operates in a single segment, standard semiconductor products, through the Company’s various manufacturing and distribution facilities. The Company aggregates its products because the products are similar and have similar economic characteristics, and the products are similar in production process and share the same customer type.
The Company’s primary operations include the domestic operations in Asia, North America and Europe.
Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of subsidiaries producing the revenues(in thousands):
Three Months Ended | North | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2011 | Asia | America | Europe | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Total sales | $ | 145,562 | $ | 34,559 | $ | 47,155 | $ | 227,276 | ||||||||
Inter-company sales | (25,674 | ) | (15,111 | ) | (25,914 | ) | (66,699 | ) | ||||||||
Net sales | $ | 119,888 | $ | 19,448 | $ | 21,241 | $ | 160,577 | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | Asia | North America | Europe | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Total sales | $ | 133,116 | $ | 42,769 | $ | 45,129 | $ | 221,014 | ||||||||
Inter-company sales | (15,961 | ) | (14,898 | ) | (27,035 | ) | (57,894 | ) | ||||||||
Net sales | $ | 117,155 | $ | 27,871 | $ | 18,094 | $ | 163,120 | ||||||||
As Of And For The Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2011 | Asia | North America | Europe | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Total sales | $ | 427,132 | $ | 107,156 | $ | 157,628 | $ | 691,916 | ||||||||
Inter-company sales | (64,251 | ) | (46,321 | ) | (89,406 | ) | (199,978 | ) | ||||||||
Net sales | $ | 362,881 | $ | 60,835 | $ | 68,222 | $ | 491,938 | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment | $ | 167,413 | $ | 33,562 | $ | 30,888 | $ | 231,863 | ||||||||
Total assets | $ | 485,448 | $ | 96,995 | $ | 191,286 | $ | 773,729 | ||||||||
- 13 -
Table of Contents
As Of And For The Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | Asia | North America | Europe | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Total sales | $ | 364,347 | $ | 112,380 | $ | 127,772 | $ | 604,499 | ||||||||
Inter-company sales | (38,054 | ) | (40,094 | ) | (77,231 | ) | (155,379 | ) | ||||||||
Net sales | $ | 326,293 | $ | 72,286 | $ | 50,541 | $ | 449,120 | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment | $ | 137,604 | $ | 30,116 | $ | 31,378 | $ | 199,098 | ||||||||
Total assets | $ | 439,303 | $ | 169,801 | $ | 213,280 | $ | 822,384 | ||||||||
Geographic Information
Revenues were derived from (billed to) customers located in the following countries (in thousands):
Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
for the Three Months | Percentage of | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Net Sales | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
China | $ | 57,804 | $ | 49,944 | 36 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||
Taiwan | 32,171 | 36,035 | 20 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||||
United States | 22,733 | 41,641 | 14 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||||
Korea | 9,200 | 9,681 | 6 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||||
England | 7,906 | 6,757 | 5 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||
Germany | 7,555 | 7,260 | 5 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||
Singapore | 6,744 | 7,079 | 4 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||
All Others (1) | 16,464 | 4,723 | 10 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 160,577 | $ | 163,120 | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
for the Nine Months | Percentage of | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Net Sales | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
China | $ | 158,370 | $ | 138,901 | 32 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||
Taiwan | 106,432 | 103,841 | 22 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||
United States | 79,190 | 103,430 | 16 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||
Korea | 29,389 | 26,569 | 6 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||||
England | 25,134 | 13,432 | 5 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||
Germany | 25,011 | 24,412 | 5 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||
Singapore | 18,333 | 18,448 | 4 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||
All Others (1) | 50,079 | 20,087 | 10 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 491,938 | $ | 449,120 | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Represents countries with less than 3% of the total revenues each. |
- 14 -
Table of Contents
NOTE J — Convertible Senior Notes
In October 2006, the Company issued and sold Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $230 million due 2026, which pay 2.25% interest per annum on the principal amount of the Notes, payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year.
On September 30, 2011, in accordance with the Indenture, dated as of October 12, 2006, between the Company, as issuer, and Union Bank, N.A. (formerly, Union Bank of California, N.A.), as trustee and paying agent (the “Paying Agent”), substantially all of the note holders surrendered their Notes for purchase (the “Put Option”). The Company was advised by the Paying Agent that Notes in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $134 million were validly surrendered. The Company has accepted for purchase all of these Notes for a purchase price of $1,000 in cash per $1,000 principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, October 1, 2011, the purchase date for the Put Option. The Company has delivered the aggregate purchase price of approximately $136 million for the accepted Notes, which includes accrued and unpaid interest, to the Paying Agent for distribution to the note holders. Following the Company’s purchase of the Notes pursuant to the Put Option, approximately $0.2 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes remains outstanding. The Company has the option to call the remaining Notes, which it intends to do during the fourth quarter of 2011.
In determining the original liability and equity components, the Company determined the expected life of the Notes to be five years as that was the earliest date in which the Notes could be put back to the Company at par value. As of September 30, 2011, the discount of the liability was fully amortized. As of September 30, 2011, the liability and equity components are as follows(in thousands):
Liability | Liability | Liability | Equity | ||||||||||
Component | Component | Component | Component | ||||||||||
Principal | Net Carrying | Unamortized | Carrying | ||||||||||
Amount | Amount | Discount | Amount | ||||||||||
$ | 236 | $ | 236 | $ | — | $ | 35,515 |
The effective interest rate of the liability component was 8.5%, which was a comparable yield for nonconvertible notes with terms and conditions otherwise comparable to the Company’s Notes as of the date of issuance. The amount of interest expense, including amortization of debt discount for the liability component and debt issuance costs is as follows(in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Notes contractual interest expense | $ | 755 | $ | 769 | $ | 2,266 | $ | 2,321 | ||||||||
Amortization of debt discount | 2,021 | 2,006 | 6,032 | 5,713 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs | 137 | 138 | 412 | 412 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,913 | $ | 2,913 | $ | 8,710 | $ | 8,446 | ||||||||
NOTE K — Commitments
Purchase commitments —As of September 30, 2011, the Company had approximately $31 million in non-cancelable purchase contracts related to capital expenditures, primarily for manufacturing equipment in China.
Other commitments— During 2010, the Company entered into an investment agreement with the Management Committee of the Chengdu Hi-Tech Industrial Development Zone (the “CDHT”). Under this agreement, the Company agreed to form a joint venture with a Chinese partner, Chengdu Ya Guang Electronic Company Limited, to establish a semiconductor manufacturing facility for the purpose of providing surface mounted component production, assembly and testing, and integrated circuit assembly and testing in Chengdu, People’s Republic of China. This is a long-term, multi-year project that will provide additional capacity for the Company as needed. The Company is expected to invest approximately $48 million in installments during the first three years. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has invested approximately $15 million.
- 15 -
Table of Contents
NOTE L — Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Plan
The Company has a contributory defined benefit plan that covers certain employees in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and Germany. The net pension and supplemental retirement benefit obligations and the related periodic costs are based on, among other things, assumptions regarding the discount rate, estimated return on plan assets and mortality rates. These obligations and related periodic costs are measured using actuarial techniques and assumptions. The projected unit credit method is the actuarial cost method used to compute the pension liabilities and related expenses.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net period benefit costs associated with the defined benefit plan were approximately $0 million.
The following tables set forth the benefit obligation, the fair value of plan assets, and the funded status of the Company’s plan (in thousands):
Defined Benefit Plan | ||||
Change in benefit obligation: | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 | $ | 118,505 | ||
Service cost | 242 | |||
Interest cost | 4,613 | |||
Actuarial gain | (7,696 | ) | ||
Benefits paid | (2,943 | ) | ||
Currency changes | (388 | ) | ||
Benefit obligation at September 30, 2011 | $ | 112,333 | ||
Change in plan assets: | ||||
Fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2010 | $ | 93,642 | ||
Actual return on plan assets | (2,136 | ) | ||
Employer contribution | 1,534 | |||
Benefits paid | (2,943 | ) | ||
Currency changes | (343 | ) | ||
Fair value of plan assets at September 30, 2011 | $ | 89,754 | ||
Underfunded status at September 30, 2011 | $ | (22,579 | ) | |
Based on an actuarial study performed as of September 30, 2011, the plan is underfunded and a liability is reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a long-term liability. The weighted-average discount rate assumption used to determine benefit obligations as of September 30, 2011 was 5.1%.
The following are weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2011:
Discount rate | 5.4 | % | ||
Expected long-term return on plan assets | 6.6 | % |
The Company previously adopted a payment plan with the trustees of the defined benefit plan, in which the Company will pay approximately £1.0 million GBP (approximately $1.6 million based on a USD:GBP exchange rate of 1.6:1) every year from 2009 through 2012. Contribution amounts, if any, for 2013 and thereafter have not yet been determined, but discussions are ongoing with the trustees of the defined benefit plan as to the required payments going forward.
The Company also has pension plans in Asia for which the benefit obligation, fair value of the plan assets and the funded status amounts are deemed immaterial and therefore, are not included in the figures or assumptions above.
- 16 -
Table of Contents
Deferred Compensation
The Company maintains a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) for executive officers, key employees and members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Deferred Compensation Plan allows eligible participants to defer the receipt of eligible compensation, including equity awards, until designated future dates. The Company offsets its obligations under the Deferred Compensation Plan by investing in the actual underlying investments. These investments are classified as trading securities and are carried at fair value. At September 30, 2011, these investments totaled approximately $4 million. All gains and losses in these investments are materially offset by corresponding gains and losses in the Deferred Compensation Plan liabilities.
NOTE M—Related Parties
The Company conducts business with a related party company, Lite-On Semiconductor Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, “LSC”), that owned approximately 18.4% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock as of September 30, 2011. The Company also conducts business with one significant company, Keylink International (B.V.I.) Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, “Keylink”). Keylink is the Company’s 5% joint venture partner in the Company’s Shanghai manufacturing facilities. In addition, the Company conducts business with a related party company, Eris. The Company owned approximately 30% of Eris’s outstanding Common Stock as of September 30, 2011.
The Audit Committee of the Company’s Board reviews all related party arrangements for potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis, in accordance with such procedures as the Audit Committee may adopt from time to time.
Lite-On Semiconductor Corporation —During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company sold products to LSC totaling approximately 0% and 1% of its net sales, respectively. Net sales decreased in 2011 compared to 2010 due to fewer wafers being sold to LSC and more wafers being used for internal consumption. Also, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, approximately 5% and 7%, respectively, of the Company’s net sales were from semiconductor products purchased from LSC for subsequent sale, making LSC the Company’s largest supplier.
Net sales to, and purchases from, LSC are as follows(in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 894 | $ | 1,457 | $ | 1,846 | $ | 5,983 | ||||||||
Purchases | $ | 11,730 | $ | 11,073 | $ | 30,224 | $ | 31,961 |
Keylink International (B.V.I.) Inc.— During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company sold products to subsidiaries and affiliates of Keylink totaling approximately 1% and 3% of its net sales, respectively. Net sales decreased in 2011 compared to 2010 due to a contract expiring, which is currently being renegotiated. Also, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, approximately 1% and 2%, respectively, of the Company’s net sales were from semiconductor products purchased from Keylink for subsequent sale. In addition, the Company’s subsidiaries in China lease their manufacturing facilities from, and subcontract a portion of their manufacturing process (including, but not limited to, metal plating and environmental services) to Keylink. The Company also pays a consulting fee to Keylink. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company paid Keylink an aggregate of approximately $13 million and $11 million, respectively, with respect to these items.
Net sales to, and purchases from, Keylink are as follows(in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 5,898 | $ | 4,235 | $ | 7,102 | $ | 11,977 | ||||||||
Purchases | $ | 3,222 | $ | 3,059 | $ | 9,102 | $ | 8,232 |
- 17 -
Table of Contents
Eris Technology Corporation— The Company subcontracts to Eris some of its wafers for assembly and test capacities and also purchases finished goods not sourced from the Company’s wafers. With respect to these assembly and test fees and additional finished goods purchases, the Company paid Eris approximately $5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and approximately $12 million and $14 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Accounts receivable from, and accounts payable to, LSC, Eris and Keylink are as follows(in thousands):
September 30, | ||||
2011 | ||||
Accounts receivable | ||||
LSC | $ | 706 | ||
Keylink | 6,320 | |||
$ | 7,026 | |||
Accounts payable | ||||
LSC | $ | 7,843 | ||
Eris | 6,408 | |||
Keylink | 7,412 | |||
$ | 21,663 | |||
- 18 -
Table of Contents
Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters addressed in this Item 2 constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the Company’s management. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”) provides certain “safe harbor” provisions for forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made pursuant to the Act. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to its forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unexpected events. Unless the context otherwise requires, the words “Diodes,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Diodes Incorporated and its subsidiaries.
This management’s discussion should be read in conjunction with the management’s discussion included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, previously filed with Securities and Exchange Commission.
Highlights
• | Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $161 million, a decrease of $3 million, or 2%, over the same period last year, and a sequential decrease of 5% compared to the $170 million in the second quarter of 2011; |
• | Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $492 million, an increase of $43 million, or 10%, over the same period last year; |
• | Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $45 million, a decrease of $16 million, or 26%, over the same period last year, and a sequential decrease of 20% compared to the $56 million in the second quarter of 2011; |
• | Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $158 million, a decrease of $4 million, or 2%, over the same period last year; |
• | Gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was 28%, a decrease of 9% over the same period last year, and a sequential decrease of 5% compared to the second quarter of 2011; |
• | Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was 32%, a decrease of 4% over the same period last year; |
• | Net income attributable to common stockholders for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $10 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, compared to the same period last year, which was $21 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, and second quarter of 2011 net income of $18 million, or $0.38 per diluted share; and |
• | Net income attributable to common stockholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $48 million, or $1.02 per diluted share, compared to the same period last year, which was $53 million, or $1.16 per diluted share. |
Business Outlook
The broad weakness across global markets that began in May 2011 is extending into the fourth quarter and continues to impact demand in the consumer and computing markets. Looking beyond the current market environment, we increased our investment in R&D to further advance our new product initiatives, maintain design win momentum and position ourselves for additional market share gains in future quarters. Furthermore, we have additional capacity available, which prepares us for upside potential and a return to our historical growth levels as the market improves. We remain committed to our business model and believe these actions will produce long-term returns for our shareholders. For the fourth quarter of 2011, we expect revenue to range between $140 million and $150 million, or down 7% to 13% sequentially. We expect gross margin to be 25%, plus or minus 1.5%. Operating expenses are expected to remain approximately flat with third quarter on a dollar basis. We expect our income tax rate to range between 17% and 23%, and shares used to calculate GAAP EPS for the fourth quarter are anticipated to be approximately 47 million.”
Overview
We are a leading global manufacturer and supplier of high-quality, application specific standard products within the broad discrete, logic and analog semiconductor markets, serving the consumer electronics, computing, communications, industrial and automotive markets. The products are sold primarily throughout Asia, North America and Europe.
We design, manufacture and market these semiconductors for diverse end-use applications. Semiconductors, which provide electronic signal amplification and switching functions, are basic building-block electronic components that are incorporated into almost every electronic device. We believe that our focus on standard semiconductor products provides us with a meaningful competitive advantage relative to other semiconductor companies.
- 19 -
Table of Contents
During the first quarter of 2011, net sales were stronger than typical first quarter seasonal patterns, assisted by increased demand in tablets, notebooks, smartphones and LED TV’s. We saw strong demand in Europe and Asia, while North America revenue declined sequentially from fourth quarter of 2010. In addition, the first quarter of 2011 was impacted by reduced unit output from our packaging facilities due to lower equipment utilization as a result of China labor shortages, and gross margin reflected reduced fixed cost coverage caused by the lower unit output. Although we experienced lower unit output during the first quarter, we were able to ship from finished goods inventory and reduced our contract assembly commitments, which allowed us to achieve sequential revenue growth in our core business.
During the second quarter of 2011, we continued to focus on design wins, new products and customer expansion. During May, we started to see a slowdown in the global markets, in particular the consumer and computing space. This weakness accelerated in the last several weeks of the second quarter, affecting several of our customers that build product for the U.S. and European markets. Gross margin in the second quarter was also impacted by the softening demand, which caused us to change our mix to lower margin commodity products to support revenue. In addition, there was a slower than expected ramp in productivity due to the training requirements for replacing operators as a result of the China labor shortages, which was completed in the third quarter.
During the third quarter of 2011, we continued to see broad weakness across global markets that began in May and accelerated throughout the third quarter. Despite this softness, we were able to execute our strategy of gaining market share by shifting our product mix to lower margin products to best utilize our installed capacity, and we grew our nine month revenue 10% over the prior year period. We continued to drive manufacturing productivity improvements at our China packaging facilities to maximize the utilization of our operators and equipment. We used excess capacity to build finished goods inventory in preparation for a three day shut-down for the China National Holiday, which occurred during the first week in October. In response to these market conditions, we have implemented cost reduction actions that include the delay of capital investments, hiring freezes, a reduction in factory overtime, as well as temporary reductions on travel.
The following has affected, and, we believe, will continue to affect, our results of operations:
• | Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $492 million compared to $449 million in the same period last year. This increase in net sales mainly reflects the increase in demand for our products in most geographic regions during the first six months of 2011, partially offset by the decrease in sales during the third quarter of 2011 compared to third quarter of 2011. |
• | Our gross profit margin was 32% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 36% in the same period last year. Our gross margin percentage decreased over the same period last year due to a shift in product mix to lower margin products and lower equipment utilization due to training replacement operators as a result of the previously disclosed China labor shortages. In addition, during the third quarter of 2011 gross profit margin was also impacted by reduction in subcontractor activity and increase in gold prices. Future gross profit margins will depend primarily on market prices, our product mix, manufacturing cost savings, and the demand for our products. |
• | For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our capital expenditures, excluding capital expenditures related to our investment agreement with the Management Committee of the Chengdu Hi-Tech Industrial Development Zone (the “CDHT”), were approximately 12% of our net sales, which is at the high end of our historical 10% to 12% of net sales model. For 2011, we expect capital expenditures, excluding capital expenditures related to our investment agreement, to be at the low end of our historical model. |
• | For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the percentage of our net sales derived from our Asian subsidiaries was 74%. In the near future, we expect our percentage of net sales to the Asian market to remain approximately the same. In addition, Europe accounted for approximately 14% of our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 11% in the same period last year. |
• | As of September 30, 2011, we had invested approximately $342 million in our Asian manufacturing facilities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we invested approximately $61 million in these manufacturing facilities, and we expect to continue to invest in our manufacturing facilities, although the amount to be invested will depend on product demand and new product developments. |
• | For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”) and electronic manufacturing services (“EMS”) customers together accounted for approximately 46% of our net sales, while our global network of distributors accounted for approximately 54% of our net sales. |
- 20 -
Table of Contents
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
The following table sets forth, the percentage that certain items in the statements of operations bear to net sales and the percentage dollar increase (decrease) of such items from period to period.
Percent of Net Sales | Percentage Dollar | |||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase | |||||||||||
September 30, | (Decrease) | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | ‘10 to ‘11 | ||||||||||
Net sales | 100 | % | 100 | % | (2 | ) | ||||||
Cost of goods sold | (72 | ) | (63 | ) | 13 | |||||||
Gross profit | 28 | 37 | (26 | ) | ||||||||
Operating expenses | (20 | ) | (19 | ) | 2 | |||||||
Income from operations | 8 | 18 | (55 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest | 7 | 17 | (60 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax provision | — | 3 | (93 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | 7 | 14 | (51 | ) | ||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | 6 | 13 | (53 | ) | ||||||||
The following discussion explains in greater detail our consolidated operating results and financial condition for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report(in thousands).
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net Sales | $ | 160,577 | $ | 163,120 |
Net sales decreased approximately $2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period last year. The 2% decrease in net sales represented an approximately 7% decrease in ASP and a 6% increase in units sold. The revenue decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was attributable to general market slowdown on a global basis, specifically in the consumer and computing markets, causing larger than normal pricing decline, coupled with a reduction in assembly test contractor activity.
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cost of goods sold | $ | 115,383 | $ | 102,143 | ||||
Gross profit | $ | 45,194 | $ | 60,977 | ||||
Gross profit margin | 28.1 | % | 37.4 | % |
Cost of goods sold increased approximately $13 million, or 13%, for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period last year. As a percent of sales, cost of goods sold increased to 72% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 63% in the same period last year, and our average unit cost (“AUP”) increased 6% due to direct manufacturing costs.
- 21 -
Table of Contents
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, gross profit decreased by approximately $16 million, or 26%, compared to the same period last year. Gross margin decreased to 28% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 37% for the same period last year. Gross margin as been decreasing over the past quarters with gross margin being 38% in the fourth quarter of 2010, 36% in the first quarter of 2011 and 33% in the second quarter of 2011. This decrease is mainly due to the shift in product mix to lower margin products on effort to maintain full capacity utilization.
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Operating expenses | $ | 31,828 | $ | 31,147 |
Operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased approximately $1 million compared to the same period last year. In addition, of the components within operating expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased approximately $1 million, while research and development expenses (“R&D”) remained relatively flat. SG&A, as a percentage of sales, increased to 15% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 14% in the same period last year, and R&D, as a percentage of sales, increased to 5% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 4% in the same period last year, due to the decrease in net sales.
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Other expenses | $ | 2,300 | $ | 2,415 |
Other expenses remained relatively flat for the three months ended September 30, 2011 at approximately $2 million, compared to approximately $2 million in the same period last year. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, other expense consisted of net interest expense of approximately $3 million, which included approximately $2 million for the amortization of debt discount related to our 2.25% convertible senior notes (“Notes”) and an approximately $1 million loss on securities carried at fair value, partially offset by an approximately $1 million foreign currency gain. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, other expense consisted of net interest expense of approximately $3 million, which included approximately $2 million for the amortization of debt discount related to our Notes, partially offset by other miscellaneous income.
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Income tax provision | $ | 359 | $ | 5,346 |
We recognized income tax expense of approximately $0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to approximately $5 million income tax expense in the same period last year. The estimated effective tax rate is 3% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 20% in the same period last year. Our effective tax rates for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%, principally from the impact of higher income in lower-taxed jurisdictions. In addition, our effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was impacted by provision-to-return adjustments and the utilization of foreign tax credits. Lastly, the Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was also impacted by the noncash income tax benefit of reversing valuation allowances on deferred tax assets from U.K. loss carryforwards.
- 22 -
Table of Contents
Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
The following table sets forth, the percentage that certain items in the statements of operations bear to net sales and the percentage dollar increase (decrease) of such items from period to period.
Percent of Net Sales | Percentage Dollar | |||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September | ||||||||||||
30, | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | ‘10 to ‘11 | ||||||||||
Net sales | 100 | % | 100 | % | 10 | |||||||
Cost of goods sold | (68 | ) | (64 | ) | 16 | |||||||
Gross profit | 32 | 36 | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Operating expenses | (19 | ) | (20 | ) | 2 | |||||||
Income from operations | 13 | 16 | (8 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest | 12 | 15 | (11 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax provision | 2 | 2 | (15 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | 10 | 13 | (10 | ) | ||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | — | (1 | ) | (18 | ) | |||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | 10 | 12 | (10 | ) | ||||||||
The following discussion explains in greater detail our consolidated operating results and financial condition for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report(in thousands).
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net Sales | $ | 491,938 | $ | 449,120 |
Net sales increased approximately $43 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period last year. The 10% increase in net sales represented an approximately 1% decrease in ASP and an 11% increase in units sold. The revenue increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was attributable to the increase in demand for our products in most geographic regions during the first six months of 2010, partially offset by the decrease in sales during the third quarter of 2011 compared to third quarter of 2011.
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cost of goods sold | $ | 333,736 | $ | 286,893 | ||||
Gross profit | $ | 158,202 | $ | 162,227 | ||||
Gross profit margin | 32.2 | % | 36.1 | % |
Cost of goods sold increased approximately $47 million, or 16%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period last year. As a percent of sales, cost of goods sold increased to 68% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 64% in the same period last year, and AUP increased 5% due to product mix and direct manufacturing costs.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, gross profit decreased by approximately $4 million, or 2%, compared to the same period last year. Gross margin decreased to 32% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 36% for the same period last year. This decrease is mainly due to the shift in product mix to lower margin products on effort to maintain full capacity utilization.
- 23 -
Table of Contents
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Operating expenses | $ | 91,152 | $ | 89,529 |
Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased approximately $1 million compared to the same period last year. In addition, of the components within operating expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”), increased approximately $2 million, while research and development expenses (“R&D”) remained relatively flat. SG&A, as a percentage of sales, decreased to 14% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 15% in the same period last year, and R&D, as a percentage of sales, decreased to 4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 5% in the same period last year, due to higher net sales.
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Other expenses | $ | 7,444 | $ | 5,694 |
Other expenses increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to approximately $7 million, compared to approximately $6 million in the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, other expense consisted of net interest expense of approximately $8 million, which included approximately $6 million for the amortization of debt discount related to our Notes and an approximately $1 million loss on securities carried at fair value, partially offset by an approximately $2 million foreign currency gain. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, other expense consisted of net interest expense of approximately $7 million, which included approximately $6 million for the amortization of debt discount related to our Notes, partially offset by an approximately $2 million gain on sale of non-core intellectual property for which no intangible assets were ever recorded.
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Income tax provision | $ | 9,912 | $ | 11,705 |
We recognized income tax expense of approximately $10 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to approximately $12 million income tax expense in the same period last year. The estimated effective tax rate is 17% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 18% in the same period last year. Our effective tax rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%, principally from the impact of higher income in lower-taxed jurisdictions. In addition, our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was impacted by provision-to-return adjustments and the utilization of foreign tax credits. Lastly, our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was also impacted by the noncash income tax benefit of reversing valuation allowances on deferred tax assets from U.K. loss carryforwards.
- 24 -
Table of Contents
Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, funds from operations and, if necessary, borrowings under our credit facilities. We currently have a U.S. credit agreement for a $10 million revolving credit facility and a $10 million uncommitted facility with no outstanding borrowings. Our U.S. credit agreement’s maturity date is during November 2011 and we are currently in negations with our lender to renew this credit agreement. In addition, we have foreign credit facilities with borrowing capacities of approximately $45 million with no outstanding borrowings and $14 million used for import and export guarantees. Our primary liquidity requirements have been to meet our inventory and capital expenditure needs and to fund on-going operations. At December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, our working capital was $289 million and $311 million, respectively. Our working capital increased in the first nine months of 2011 primarily due to the increase in accounts receivables and inventories as the decrease in cash and Notes partially offset each other. We expect cash generated by our operations, together with existing cash, cash equivalents and available credit facilities, to be sufficient to cover cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. Cash and cash equivalents, the conversion of other working-capital items and borrowings are expected to be sufficient to fund on-going operations.
On September 30, 2011, in accordance with the Indenture, dated as of October 12, 2006, between us, as issuer, and Union Bank, N.A. (formerly, Union Bank of California, N.A.), as trustee and paying agent (the “Paying Agent”), substantially all of the note holders surrendered their Notes for purchase (the “Put Option”). We were advised by the Paying Agent that Notes in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $134 million were validly surrendered. We have accepted for purchase all of these Notes for a purchase price of $1,000 in cash per $1,000 principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, October 1, 2011, the purchase date for the Put Option. We have delivered the aggregate purchase price of approximately $136 million for the accepted Notes, which includes accrued and unpaid interest, to the Paying Agent for distribution to the note holders. Following the purchase of the Notes pursuant to the Put Option, approximately $0.2 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes remains outstanding.
On October 12, 2011, we delivered to the Paying Agent, a notice (the “Notice to Trustee of Optional Redemption”) of our intention to redeem on December 1, 2011 (the “Redemption Date”) all of our outstanding Notes pursuant to Section 3.01 of the Indenture. Following the redemption of the approximately remaining $0.2 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes, no Notes will be outstanding.
Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $74 million and $72 million, respectively, which include $15 million of capital expenditures related to the investment agreement with the Management Committee of the CDHT for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Capital expenditures, excluding capital expenditures related to the investment agreement, in the first nine months of 2011 were approximately 12% of our net sales and were primarily related to manufacturing expansion in our facilities in China.
On September 7, 2011, we purchased 10 million shares of the common stock of Eris Technology Corporation (“Eris”), a publicly traded company listed as an Emerging Stock on the Taiwan OTC Exchange (TWO) that provides design, manufacturing and after-market services for diode products. We paid NT$39 per share or NT$390 million (approximately US$14 million). As of September 30, 2011, we hold 10,045,000 shares of Eris, which represents an approximately 30 percent ownership in Eris and we intend to purchase additional shares over the next year. See Note F of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for additional information.
- 25 -
Table of Contents
Discussion of Cash Flow
Cash and cash equivalents decreased from $271 million at December 31, 2010, to $125 million at September 30, 2011 primarily from cash used in investing and financing activities, offset by cash provided by operating activities.
A summary of the consolidated condensed statements of cash flows is as follows(in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 65,053 | $ | 90,046 | $ | (24,993 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used by) investing activities | (83,201 | ) | 232,015 | (315,216 | ) | |||||||
Net cash (used by) financing activities | (130,735 | ) | (298,631 | ) | 167,896 | |||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | 2,879 | (1,576 | ) | 4,455 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (146,004 | ) | $ | 21,854 | $ | (167,858 | ) | ||||
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $65 million, resulting primarily from $50 million of net income and $45 million in depreciation and amortization, offset partially by a $27 million increase in operating assets. Net cash provided by operating activities was $90 million for the same period last year, resulting primarily from $55 million of net income and $44 million in depreciation and amortization, offset partially by a greater increase in operating assets than operating liabilities.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $83 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to net cash provided by of $232 million for the same period last year. This decrease in net cash provided by investing activities was due primarily to $297 million in proceeds from the sale of short-term investments in 2010.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $131 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to net cash used in of $299 million in the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, $134 million was used for retirement of Notes. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, $303 million was used for the repayment of lines of credit with the proceeds from the sale of short-term investments in 2010.
Debt Instruments
There have been no material changes to our debt instruments as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, filed on February 28, 2011, except for the retirement of approximately $134 million of our Convertible Senior Notes.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any transactions, arrangements and other relationships with unconsolidated entities that will affect our liquidity or capital resources. We have no special purpose entities that provide off-balance sheet financing, liquidity or market or credit risk support, nor do we engage in leasing, swap agreements, or outsourcing of research and development services, that could expose us to liability that is not reflected on the face of our financial statements.
- 26 -
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes in any of our contractual obligations as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, filed on February 28, 2011.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies, as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, relate to revenue recognition, inventories, accounting for income taxes, goodwill and long-lived assets, share-based compensation, fair value measurements, defined benefit plan, contingencies and convertible senior notes. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies since December 31, 2010, except for the accounting of our Notes, which will no longer apply once the remaining Notes are retired during the fourth quarter of 2011, and the purchase of Eris common stock which is being valued as a Level 1 Input under the fair value option.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note A of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for detailed information regarding the status of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Available Information
Our Internet address ishttp://www.diodes.com. We make available, free of charge through our Internet website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our website also provides access to investor financial information, including SEC filings and press releases, as well as stock quotes and information on corporate governance compliance.
Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters addressed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We generally identify forward-looking statements by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “potential,” “continue,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” or similar phrases or the negatives of such terms. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under “Risks Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by our management. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”) provides certain “safe harbor” provisions for forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made on this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made pursuant to the Act.
All forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are subject to, in addition to the other matters described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, a variety of significant risks and uncertainties. The following discussion highlights some of these risks and uncertainties. Further, from time to time, information provided by us or statements made by our employees may contain forward-looking information. There can be no assurance that actual results or business conditions will not differ materially from those set forth or suggested in such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below.
For more detailed discussion of these factors, see the “Risk Factors” discussion in Item 1A of the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC and in Part II, Item 1A of this report. The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made only as of the date of this report, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
- 27 -
Table of Contents
Risk Factors
Risks Related To Our Business
Ø | The success of our business depends on the strength of the global economy and the stability of the financial markets, and any weaknesses in these areas may have a material adverse effect on our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | During times of difficult market conditions, our fixed costs combined with lower revenues may have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | Downturns in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry or changes in end-market demand could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | The semiconductor business is highly competitive, and increased competition may harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | A related party is our largest external supplier and the loss of this supplier could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | Delays in initiation of production at facilities, implementing new production techniques or resolving problems associated with technical equipment malfunctions could adversely affect our manufacturing efficiencies, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | We are and will continue to be under continuous pressure from our customers and competitors to reduce the price of our products, which could adversely affect our growth and profit margins. | ||
Ø | Our customers require our products to undergo a lengthy and expensive qualification process without any assurance of product sales, which could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | Our customer orders are subject to cancellation or modification usually with no penalty. High volumes of order cancellation or reductions in quantities ordered could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | Production at our manufacturing facilities could be disrupted for a variety of reasons, which could prevent us from producing enough of our products to maintain our sales and satisfy our customers’ demands and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | New technologies could result in the development of new products by our competitors and a decrease in demand for our products, and we may not be able to develop new products to satisfy changes in demand, which would adversely affect our net sales, market share, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | We may be adversely affected by any disruption in our information technology systems, which could adversely affect our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | We may be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights or demands that we license third-party technology, which could result in significant expense and reduction in our intellectual property rights. | ||
Ø | We depend on third-party suppliers for timely deliveries of raw materials, parts and equipment, as well as finished products from other manufacturers, and our reputation with customers, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain adequate supplies in a timely manner. | ||
Ø | If we do not succeed in continuing to vertically integrate our business, we will not realize the cost and other efficiencies we anticipate, which could adversely affect our ability to compete, profit margins, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | Part of our growth strategy involves identifying and acquiring companies with complementary product lines or customers. We may be unable to identify suitable acquisition candidates or consummate desired acquisitions and, if we do make any acquisitions, we may be unable to successfully integrate any acquired companies with our operations, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | We are subject to many environmental laws and regulations that could result in significant expenses and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
- 28 -
Table of Contents
Ø | Our products may be found to be defective and, as a result, product liability claims may be asserted against us, which may harm our business, reputation with our customers, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | We may fail to attract or retain the qualified technical, sales, marketing and management personnel required to operate our business successfully, which could adversely affect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | We may not be able to maintain our growth or achieve future growth and such growth may place a strain on our management and on our systems and resources, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | Obsolete inventories as a result of changes in demand for our products and change in life cycles of our products could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | If OEMs do not design our products into their applications, a portion of our net sales may be adversely affected. | ||
Ø | We are subject to interest rate risk that could have an adverse effect on our cost of working capital and interest expenses. | ||
Ø | Restrictions in our credit facilities may limit our business and financial activities, including our ability to obtain additional capital in the future. | ||
Ø | The value of our defined benefit plan assets and liabilities is based on estimates and assumptions, which may prove inaccurate and the actual amount of expenses recorded in the consolidated financial statements could differ materially from the assumptions used. | ||
Ø | Due to fluctuations in the U.K.’s equity markets and bond markets, changes in actuarial assumptions for our defined benefit plan could increase the volatility of the plan’s asset value, require us to increase cash contributions to the plan and have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | In 2010, we established a joint venture to build a semiconductor facility in Chengdu, People’s Republic of China. We are required to contribute at least $47.5 million to the joint venture during the first three years with additional contributions thereafter, as well as a substantial amount of time and resources to establish and operate the joint venture. Any failure to meet any such requirements, delays or unforeseen circumstances may cause us to incur penalties or require us to contribute additional expenses or resources and, as a result, could have an adverse effect on our operating efficiencies, results of operations and financial conditions. | ||
Ø | Certain of our customers and suppliers require us to comply with their codes of conducts, which may include certain restrictions that may substantially increase the cost of our business as well as have an adverse effect on our operating efficiencies, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | There are risks associated with previous and future acquisitions. We may ultimately not be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with acquisitions. | ||
Ø | If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls or discover material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately or detect fraud, which could harm our business and the trading price of our Common Stock. | ||
Ø | Terrorist attacks, or threats or occurrences of other terrorist activities, whether in the United States or internationally, may affect the markets in which our Common Stock trades, the markets in which we operate, and our results of operations and financial condition. |
Risks Related To Our International Operations
Ø | Our international operations subject us to risks that could adversely affect our operations. | ||
Ø | We have significant operations and assets in China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and U.K. and, as a result, will be subject to risks inherent in doing business in those jurisdictions, which may adversely affect our financial performance. | ||
Ø | A slowdown in the Chinese economy could limit the growth in demand for electronic devices containing our products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and prospects. | ||
Ø | Economic regulation in China could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and prospects. |
- 29 -
Table of Contents
Ø | We could be adversely affected by violations of the United States’ Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws. | ||
Ø | We are subject to foreign currency risk as a result of our international operations. | ||
Ø | The People’s Republic of China is experiencing rapid social, political and economic change, which has increased labor costs and other related costs that could make doing business in China less advantageous than in prior years. Increased labor costs in China could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. | ||
Ø | We may not continue to receive preferential tax treatment in Asia, thereby increasing our income tax expense and reducing our net income. | ||
Ø | The distribution of any earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to the United States may be subject to U.S. income taxes, thus reducing our net income. |
Risks Related To Our Common Stock
Ø | Variations in our quarterly operating results may cause our stock price to be volatile. | ||
Ø | We may enter into future acquisitions and take certain actions in connection with such acquisitions that could adversely affect the price of our Common Stock. | ||
Ø | Our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders hold a substantial portion of our Common Stock, which may lead to conflicts with other stockholders over corporate transactions and other corporate matters. | ||
Ø | We were formed in 1959, and our early corporate records are incomplete. As a result, we may have difficulty in assessing and defending against claims relating to rights to our Common Stock purporting to arise during periods for which our records are incomplete. | ||
Ø | Non-cash tender offers, debt equity swaps or equity exchanges to consummate our business activities are likely to have the effect of diluting the ownership interest of existing stockholders, including qualified stockholders who receive shares of our Common Stock in such business activities. | ||
Ø | The repurchase rights and the increased conversion rate triggered by a make-whole fundamental change could discourage a potential acquirer. | ||
Ø | Anti-takeover effects of certain provisions of Delaware law and our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, may hinder a take-over attempt. | ||
Ø | Section 203 of Delaware General Corporation Law may deter a take-over attempt. | ||
Ø | Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaw Provisions may deter a take-over attempt. |
- 30 -
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As a multinational corporation, we are subject to certain market risks including foreign currency, interest rate, political, inflation and credit. We consider a variety of practices to manage these market risks. There have been no material changes to our market risks as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed on February 28, 2011.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer, Keh-Shew Lu, and Chief Financial Officer, Richard D. White, with the participation of the Company’s management, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer believe that, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be included in this report is:
• | recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms; and | ||
• | accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions required disclosure. |
Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entity’s disclosure objectives. The likelihood of achieving such objectives is affected by limitations inherent in disclosure controls and procedures. These include the fact that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors, mistakes or intentional circumvention of the established processes.
Changes in Controls over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting, known to our Chief Executive Officer or our Chief Financial Officer, that occurred during the last fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
- 31 -
Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company is involved in various routine legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business. The Company is not currently a party to any material litigation.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, filed on February 28, 2011.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
We may from time to time seek to repurchase our outstanding Notes or Common Stock in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
There have been no repurchases of our Notes or Common Stock during the third quarter of 2011.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
There are no matters to be reported under this heading.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
There are no matters to be reported under this heading.
- 32 -
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit | Filed | |||||||||||
Number | Description | Form | Date of First Filing | Number | Herewith | |||||||
3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation, as amended | S-3 | September 8, 2005 | 3.1 | ||||||||
3.2 | Amended By-laws of the Company dated July 19, 2007 | 8-K | July 23, 2007 | 3.1 | ||||||||
4.1 | Form of Certificate for Common Stock, par value $0.66 2/3 per share | S-3 | August 25, 2005 | 4.1 | ||||||||
4.2 | Form of 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 | S-3 | October 4, 2006 | 4.1 | ||||||||
4.3 | Form of Indenture for the 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 | S-3 | October 4, 2006 | 4.3 | ||||||||
10.1 | First Floor of the Accommodation Building Agreement, dated June 1, 2011, between Shanghai Kai Hong Technology Company Limited and Shanghai Ding Hong Electronic Company Limited. | 10-Q | 10.1 | X | ||||||||
10.2 | Third Floor of the Dormitory Building Lease Agreement, dated July 1, 2011, between Shanghai Kai Hong Technology Company Limited and Shanghai Ding Hong Electronic Company Limited. | 10-Q | 10.2 | X | ||||||||
10.3 | Third Supplemental Agreement to the Factory Building Lease Agreement, dated May 16, 2011, between Shanghai Kai Hong Technology Company Limited and Shanghai Yuan Hao Electronic Company Limited. | 10-Q | 10.3 | X | ||||||||
31.1 | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | ||||||||||
31.2 | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | ||||||||||
32.1* | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | ||||||||||
32.2* | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | ||||||||||
101.INS** | XBRL Instance Document | |||||||||||
101.SCH** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | |||||||||||
101.CAL** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |||||||||||
101.LAB** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase | |||||||||||
101.PRE** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase | |||||||||||
101.DEF** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
- 33 -
Table of Contents
* | A certification furnished pursuant to Item 601 of the Regulation S-K will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. | |
** | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability. |
PLEASE NOTE: It is inappropriate for investors to assume the accuracy of any covenants, representations or warranties that may be contained in agreements or other documents filed as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In certain instances the disclosure schedules to such agreements or documents contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations, warranties and covenants. Moreover, some of the representations and warranties may not be complete or accurate as of a particular date because they are subject to a contractual standard of materiality that is different from those generally applicable to stockholders and/or were used for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties rather than establishing certain matters as facts. Accordingly, you should not rely on the representations and warranties as characterizations of the actual state of facts at the time they were made or otherwise.
- 34 -
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DIODES INCORPORATED (Registrant)
By: | /s/ Richard D. White | November 9, 2011 | ||
RICHARD D. WHITE | ||||
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Chief Accounting Officer) |
- 35 -