National Property Investors Iii 10QSB 2007 Q2 Quarterly report (small business)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)

[X]

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from _________to _________

Commission file number 0-9567

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS III

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

California

13-2974428

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

Identification No.)

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

(864) 239-1000

(Issuer's telephone number)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes __ No X_

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS III

BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except unit data)

June 30, 2007


Assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$ 4,225
Receivables and deposits		271
Other assets		750
Investment property:
Land	$ 2,093
Buildings and related personal property	28,340
	30,433
Less accumulated depreciation	(21,269)	9,164
		$ 14,410
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
Accounts payable		$ 631
Tenant security deposit liabilities		106
Accrued property taxes		788
Other liabilities		341
Mortgage note payable		29,928

Partners' Deficit
General partner	$ (172)
Limited partners (48,049 units
issued and outstanding)	(17,212)	(17,384)
		$ 14,410

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS III

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per unit data)


	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2007	2006	2007	2006
Revenues:
Rental income	$ 1,207	$ 1,299	$ 2,473	$ 2,560
Other income	269	209	462	421
Total revenues	1,476	1,508	2,935	2,981

Expenses:
Operating	506	643	1,297	1,350
General and administrative	51	40	98	89
Depreciation	193	141	333	279
Interest	464	430	867	863
Property taxes	167	142	362	383
Total expenses	1,381	1,396	2,957	2,964

Casualty gains (Note E)	15	--	15	--
Net income (loss)	$ 110	$ 112	$ (7)	$ 17

Net income allocated
to general partner (1%)	$ 1	$ 1	$ --	$ --
Net income (loss) allocated
to limited partners (99%)	109	111	(7)	17

	$ 110	$ 112	$ (7)	$ 17
Net income (loss) per limited
partnership unit	$ 2.27	$ 2.31	$ (.14)	$ .35

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS III

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except unit data)


	Limited
	Partnership	General	Limited
	Units	Partner	Partners	Total

Original capital contributions	48,049	$ 1	$ 24,024	$ 24,025

Partners' deficit at
December 31, 2006	48,049	$ (172)	$(17,205)	$(17,377)

Net loss for the six months
ended June 30, 2007	--	--	(7)	(7)

Partners' deficit at
June 30, 2007	48,049	$ (172)	$(17,212)	$(17,384)

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS III

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2007	2006
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$ (7)	$ 17
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	333	279
Amortization of loan costs	19	16
Casualty gain	(15)	--
Change in accounts:
Receivables and deposits	22	(45)
Other assets	(105)	(45)
Accounts payable	(17)	29
Tenant security deposit liabilities	(1)	2
Accrued property taxes	22	40
Other liabilities	78	35
Due to affiliates	(245)	76
Net cash provided by operating activities	84	404

Cash flows from investing activities:
Property improvements and replacements	(2,954)	(397)
Insurance proceeds received	15	--
Net cash used in investing activities	(2,939)	(397)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Advances from affiliate	545	49
Repayment on advances from affiliate	(2,266)	--
Payments on mortgage notes payable	(299)	(373)
Loan proceeds received	9,000	--
Loan costs paid	(104)	--
Net cash used in financing activities	6,876	(324)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	4,021	(317)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	204	482
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 4,225	$ 165

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest	$ 1,050	$ 770

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
Property improvements and replacements included in accounts
payable	$ 531	$ 9

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, approximately $83,000 and $131,000, respectively, of property improvements and replacements were included in accounts payable which are included in property improvements and replacements at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS III

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note A – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of National Property Investors III (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of NPI Equity Investments, Inc. ("NPI Equity" or the "Managing General Partner") all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. For further information, refer to the financial st atements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The Managing General Partner is an affiliate of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2006 balances to conform to the 2007 presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used in developing fair value estimates. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entity’s own data. SFAS No. 157 requires fair value measurements to be disclosed by level within the fair va lue hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership has not yet determined whether it will elect the fair value option for any of its financ ial instruments.

In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“the AICPA”) issued Statement of Position No. 07-1, “Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies” ("SOP 07-1"). SOP 07-1 provides guidance for determining whether the accounting principles of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide “Investment Companies” are required to be applied to an entity by clarifying the definition of an investment company and, whether investment company accounting should be retained by a parent company upon consolidation of an investment company subsidiary, or by an investor in the application of the equity method of accounting to an investment company investee. SOP 07-1 applies to reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2007, but earlier adoption is encou raged. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that adoption of SOP 07-1 may have on its financial statements in the period of adoption.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for payments to affiliates for services and as reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership's property as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $144,000 and $147,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $121,000 and $58,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment property. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are fees related to development services and construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of approximately $56,000 and $5,000, respectively.

For services relating to the administration of the Partnership and operation of the Partnership's property, the Managing General Partner is entitled to receive payment for non-accountable expenses up to a maximum of $100,000 per year based upon the number of Partnership units sold, subject to certain limitations. There were no such fees for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, as no operating distributions were made.

Upon the sale of the Partnership’s property, NPI Equity will be entitled to an Incentive Compensation Fee equal to a declining percentage of the difference between the total amount distributed to limited partners and the appraised value of their investment at February 1, 1992. The percentage amount to be realized by NPI Equity, if any, will be dependent upon the year in which the property is sold. Payment of the Incentive Compensation Fee is subordinated to the receipt by the limited partners, of: (a) distributions from capital transaction proceeds of an amount equal to their appraised investment in the Partnership at February 1, 1992, and (b) distributions from all sources (capital transactions as well as cash flow) of an amount equal to six percent (6%) per annum cumulative, non-compounded, on their appraised investment in the Partnership at February 1, 1992.

The maximum draw available to the Partnership under the Partnership Revolver is $300,000. Loans under the Partnership Revolver will have a term of 365 days, be unsecured and accrue interest at the prime rate plus 2% per annum (10.25% at June 30, 2007). The maturity date of any such borrowing accelerates in the event of: (i) the removal of NPI Equity as the managing general partner (whether or not for cause); (ii) the sale or refinancing of a property by the Partnership (whether or not a borrowing under the Partnership Revolver was made with respect to such property); or (iii) the liquidation of the Partnership. During the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership received advances of approximately $545,000 and $49,000, respectively, to fund capital improvements and operations at Lakeside Apartments. Interest expense during each of the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, amounted to approximately $54,000 and $79,000, respec tively. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Partnership repaid in full the advances and accrued interest of approximately $2,565,000 with proceeds from the second mortgage financing (see Note C).

The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its property above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $147,000 for hazard insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration. Additional charges will be incurred by the Partnership during 2007 as other insurance policies renew later in the year. The Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $106,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration during the year ended December 31, 2006.

Note C – Mortgage Financing

On March 30, 2007, the Partnership obtained a second mortgage loan in the principal amount of $9,000,000 on its sole investment property Lakeside Apartments. The second mortgage bears interest at 5.90% per annum and requires monthly payments of interest only of $44,250 beginning May 1, 2007, through May 1, 2010. Beginning on June 1, 2010, monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $53,400 are due and payable through the January 1, 2022 maturity date. The second mortgage has a balloon payment of approximately $7,185,000 due at maturity. The Partnership may prepay the second mortgage loan subject to a prepayment penalty. As a condition of the loan, the lender required AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Partnership, to guarantee the obligations and liabilities of the Partnership with respect to the new mortgage financing. In connection with the financing, the lender and the Partnership also entered int o an agreement regarding various rehabilitation and renovation work to be completed at the Partnership’s property at an approximate cost of $22,500,000 (see Note D). In connection with obtaining the second mortgage, the Partnership incurred loan costs of approximately $104,000 which were capitalized and are included in other assets on the accompanying balance sheet.

In connection with the second mortgage loan, the Partnership also agreed to certain modifications on the existing mortgage loan encumbering Lakeside Apartments. The modification includes an interest rate of 7.14% per annum, monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $141,000, commencing May 1, 2007, through the maturity of January 1, 2022, at which time a balloon payment of approximately $15,791,000 is due. The previous terms were an interest rate of 7.09% per annum through the maturity date of January 1, 2022 and monthly payments of approximately $191,000 through the maturity date, at which time the loan was scheduled to be fully amortized. The Partnership may prepay the first mortgage loan subject to a prepayment penalty. As a condition of the loan, the lender required AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Partnership, to guarantee the obligations and liabilities of the Partnership with respect to the modi fied loan.

In accordance with the terms of both loan agreements, payment of the loans may be accelerated at the option of the respective lender if an event of default, as defined in the applicable loan agreements, occurs. Events of default include, but are not limited to: nonpayment of monthly principal and interest by the due date; nonpayment of the matured balance of the loan on the maturity date; and the occurrence of any breach or default in the performance of any of the covenants or agreements made by the Partnership.

Note D – Redevelopment

During 2005 the Partnership commenced with a $1,500,000 redevelopment project at Lakeside Apartments. Approximately $832,000 was completed at December 31, 2005 and during the year ended December 31, 2006 an additional $377,000 was incurred. During the six months ended June 30, 2007 approximately $3,045,000 was incurred. In August 2006, the scope of the redevelopment project was significantly expanded and was planned to be approximately $16,300,000 with the majority of the work started in October 2006 and to be completed by November 2008. During the second quarter of 2007 the anticipated cost of the project was increased by approximately $6,200,000 to a total project cost of approximately $22,500,000. The redevelopment is expected to consist of site, building exterior, common area and unit interior improvements. The planned site improvements consist of landscape enhancements and replacements, repair of retaining w alls and correction of erosion problems, lighting upgrades and the addition of patio privacy fences. The planned building exterior improvements consist of rear entrance door replacements, gutter improvements, foundation work and exterior painting. The planned common area improvements consist of upgrading the leasing center, replacing current clubhouse with a business center and conference room, fitness center with locker rooms, and addition of a boathouse for lake recreation activities. In addition the west clubhouse will be upgraded and include a social/game room, locker rooms and new decking. The planned unit interior improvements consist of kitchen and bath upgrades, replacement of original fireplaces and other interior renovations. The Partnership expects to fund the redevelopment from operations, advances from an affiliate of the Managing General Partner and proceeds from the second mortgage financing. During the construction period, certain expenses will be capitaliz ed and depreciated over the remaining life of the property. For the six months ended June 30, 2007 these amounts included approximately $33,000 of construction period taxes, $89,000 of construction period interest and $9,000 of construction period operating costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, these amounts included approximately $4,000 of construction period interest.

Note E – Casualty Gains

During August 2006, the Partnership incurred fire damage to one of the apartment units at Lakeside Apartments. The Partnership received approximately $6,000 of insurance proceeds and recognized a gain of approximately $6,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as the damaged assets were fully depreciated.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 the Partnership received additional insurance proceeds of approximately $9,000 related to damage incurred to one of the buildings at Lakeside Apartments during 2006. The Partnership recognized a gain of approximately $9,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as the damaged assets were fully depreciated. The Partnership had previously received $13,000 for this casualty during 2006.

During February 2007, the Partnership incurred fire damage to one of the apartment units at Lakeside Apartments. Subsequent to June 30, 2007 the Partnership received approximately $8,000 of insurance proceeds related to this casualty and anticipates recognizing a gain of approximately $8,000 during the third quarter of 2007 as the damaged assets were fully depreciated.

Note F – Contingencies

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the Partnership commenced an action entitledRosalie Nuanes, et al. v. Insignia Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others, the Partnership, its Managing General Partner and several of their affiliated partnerships and corporate entities. The action purported to assert claims on behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) that are named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of interests in certain Managing General Partner entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia; past tender offers by the Insignia affiliates to acquire lim ited partnership units; management of the partnerships by the Insignia affiliates; and the series of transactions which closed on October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby Insignia and Insignia Properties Trust, respectively, were merged into AIMCO. The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint captionedHeller v. Insignia Financial Group (the "Heller action") was filed against the same defendants that are named in the Nuanes action. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. The Heller action was brought as a purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution. On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted defendants motion to strike the complaint. Plaintiffs took an appeal from this order.

On January 8, 2003, the parties filed a Stipulation of Settlement in proposed settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action. On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions. On August 12, 2003, an objector ("Objector") filed an appeal (the “Appeal”) seeking to vacate and/or reverse the order approving the settlement and entering judgment thereto. On May 4, 2004, the Objector filed a second appeal challenging the court’s use of a referee and its order requiring Objector to pay those fees.

On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals. With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals vacated the trial court’s order and remanded to the trial court for further findings on the basis that the “state of the record is insufficient to permit meaningful appellate review”. The matter was transferred back to the trial court on June 21, 2005. With regard to the second appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. With respect to the related Heller appeal, on July 28, 2005, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s order striking the first amended complaint.

On August 18, 2005, Objector and his counsel filed a motion to disqualify the trial court based on a peremptory challenge and filed a motion to disqualify for cause on October 17, 2005, both of which were ultimately denied and/or struck by the trial court. On or about October 13, 2005 Objector filed a motion to intervene and on or about October 19, 2005 filed both a motion to take discovery relating to the adequacy of plaintiffs as derivative representatives and a motion to dissolve the anti-suit injunction in connection with settlement. On November 14, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a Motion For Further Findings pursuant to the remand ordered by the Court of Appeals. Defendants joined in that motion. On February 3, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the various matters pending before it and ordered additional briefing from the parties and Objector. On June 30, 2006, the trial court entered an order confirming its approval of the class act ion settlement and entering judgment thereto after the Court of Appeals had remanded the matter for further findings. The substantive terms of the settlement agreement remain unchanged. The trial courtalso entered supplemental orders on July 1, 2006, denying Objector’s Motion to File a Complaint in Intervention, Objector’s Motion for Leave of Discovery and Objector’s Motion to Dissolve the Anti-Suit Injunction. Notice of Entry of Judgment was served on July 10, 2006. On August 31, 2006, the Objector filed a Notice of Appeal to the Court’s June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006 orders. On December 14, 2006, Objector filed his Appellant’s Brief. The Partnership and its affiliates, as well as counsel for the Settlement Class, both filed Respondents’ Briefs on May 17, 2007. Objector filed his response on August 3, 2007. No hearing date has yet been scheduled.

The Managing General Partner does not anticipate that any costs to the Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will be material to the Partnership’s overall operations.

The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment property that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Environmental

Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its property, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its property.

Mold

The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure. Affiliates of the Managing General Partner have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training and the Managing General Partner believes that these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure and will minimize the effects that mold may have on residents. To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions. Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the Managing General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors including, without limitation: national and local economic conditions; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Registrant operates; financing risks, including the risk that cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting and defending cla ims and any adverse outcomes, and possible environmental liabilities. Readers should carefully review the Registrant's financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the documents the Registrant files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Partnership’s investment property consists of one apartment complex, Lakeside Apartments, located in Lisle, Illinois. The average occupancy of the property for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was 87% and 98%, respectively. The Managing General Partner attributes the decrease in occupancy at Lakeside Apartments to the redevelopment of the property (see below for detail on the redevelopment project).

The Partnership’s financial results depend upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment property, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment property, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner monitors the rental market environment of its investment property to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the Managing General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership, such as the local economic climate and weather, can adversely or positively affect the Partnership’s financial results.

Results of Operations

The Partnership's net income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $110,000 and $112,000 respectively. The Partnership’s net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was approximately $7,000 compared to net income of approximately $17,000 for the corresponding period in 2006. The decrease in net income for the six months ended 2007 is due to a decrease in total revenues partially offset by the recognition of casualty gains and a slight decrease in total expenses. The decrease in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 is attributable to a decrease in total revenues partially offset by a decrease in total expenses and the recognition of casualty gains.

Total revenues decreased for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 due to a decrease in rental income partially offset by an increase in other income. The decrease in rental income is attributable to a decrease in occupancy as a result of the redevelopment project at the property partially offset by an increase in the average rental rate. The increase in other income is predominately due to an increase in interest income as a result of cash received from the second mortgage financing at the end of the first quarter which is being reserved to fund the redevelopment project.

Total expenses decreased slightly for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as a decrease in operating expenses was offset by increases in depreciation, interest and general and administrative expenses. In addition, property tax expense increased for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Operating expense decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due to decreases in maintenance and property expense. Property expense decreased due to decreases in utility costs at the property. Maintenance expense decreased due to decreases in contract painting, water extraction, snow removal and exterior building improvement costs. Operating expense decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due to decreases in maintenance and property expense. Maintenance expense decreased due to decreases in contract painting, repairs payroll capitalized, and a decrease in supplies and parts purchased. Property expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in utility and payroll costs. Depreciation expense increased for both periods due to property improvements and replacements being placed into service during the second quarter of 2007. Interest expense increased for both periods due to the addition of new debt encumbering Lakeside Apartments partially offset by a decrease in interest on advances from an affiliate as a result of the advances being repaid during April 2007 and interest capitalized in connection with the redevelopment of the property. Property tax expense increased for the three months ended June 30, 2007 due to an increase in the assessed value of the property which more than offset the amount of property taxes capitalized in connection with the redevelopment of the property. For the six months ended June 30, 2007 the amount of capitalized property taxes exceeded the increase in the taxes as a result of the increase in assessed value. Property taxes also increased for both periods due to the receipt of a tax refund during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

General and administrative expenses increased for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 due to an increase in the cost of services included in the management reimbursements paid to the Managing General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement. Also included in general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 are costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2007, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $4,225,000 as compared to approximately $165,000 at June 30, 2006. Cash and cash equivalents increased approximately $4,021,000 from December 31, 2006 due to approximately $6,876,000 and $84,000 of cash provided by financing and operating activities, respectively, partially offset by approximately $2,939,000 of cash used in investing activities. Cash provided by financing activities consisted of proceeds from the second mortgage encumbering the Partnership’s property and advances received from an affiliate of the Managing General Partner partially offset by principal payments made on the mortgage encumbering the Partnership's property, repayment of the advances received and the payment of loan costs. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements partially offset by the receipt of insurance proceeds. The Partnership invests i ts working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

NPI Equity on behalf of the Partnership and certain affiliated partnerships, has established a revolving credit facility (the "Partnership Revolver") to be used to fund deferred maintenance and working capital needs of the Partnership and certain other affiliated partnerships in the National Property Investors Partnership Series. The maximum draw available to the Partnership under the Partnership Revolver is $300,000. Loans under the Partnership Revolver will have a term of 365 days, be unsecured and accrue interest at the prime rate plus 2% per annum (10.25% at June 30, 2007). The maturity date of any such borrowing accelerates in the event of: (i) the removal of NPI Equity as the managing general partner (whether or not for cause); (ii) the sale or refinancing of a property by the Partnership (whether or not a borrowing under the Partnership Revolver was made with respect to such property); or (iii) the liquidation of the Partnership. D uring the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership received advances of approximately $545,000 and $49,000, respectively, to fund capital improvements and operations at Lakeside Apartments. Interest expense during each of the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, amounted to approximately $54,000 and $79,000, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Partnership repaid in full the advances and accrued interest of approximately $2,565,000 with proceeds from the second mortgage financing (see Note C).

The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. The Managing General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests additional compliance measures with regard to governance, disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these changes, the Partnership expects that it will incur higher expenses related to compliance. Capital improvements planned for the Partnership's property are detailed below.

Lakeside Apartments

During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $3,402,000 in capital expenditures at Lakeside Apartments consisting primarily of redevelopment costs, other building improvements, and floor covering replacements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow, advances from the Managing General Partner and proceeds from the second mortgage financing. During 2005 the Partnership commenced with a $1,500,000 redevelopment project at Lakeside Apartments. Approximately $832,000 was completed at December 31, 2005 and during the year ended December 31, 2006 an additional $377,000 was incurred. During the six months ended June 30, 2007 approximately $3,045,000 was incurred. In August 2006, the scope of the redevelopment project was significantly expanded and was planned to be approximately $16,300,000 with the majority of the work started in October 2006 and to be completed by November 200 8. During the second quarter of 2007 the anticipated cost of the project was increased by approximately $6,200,000 to a total project cost of approximately $22,500,000. The redevelopment is expected to consist of site, building exterior, common area and unit interior improvements. The planned site improvements consist of landscape enhancements and replacements, repair of retaining walls and correction of erosion problems, lighting upgrades and the addition of patio privacy fences. The planned building exterior improvements consist of rear entrance door replacements, gutter improvements, foundation work and exterior painting. The planned common area improvements consist of upgrading the leasing center, replacing current clubhouse with a business center and conference room, fitness center with locker rooms, and addition of a boathouse for lake recreation activities. In addition the west clubhouse will be upgraded and include a social/game room, locker rooms and new decking. The planned unit interior improvements consist of kitchen and bath upgrades, replacement of original fireplaces and other interior renovations. The Partnership expects to fund the redevelopment from operations, advances from an affiliate of the Managing General Partner and proceeds from the second mortgage financing. During the construction period, certain expenses will be capitalized and depreciated over the remaining life of the property. For the six months ended June 30, 2007 these amounts included approximately $33,000 of construction period taxes, $89,000 of construction period interest and $9,000 of construction period operating costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 these amounts included approximately $4,000 of construction period interest. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. In addition to the expenditures indicated above related to the redevelopment of the property, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated dur ing 2007.

Additional capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations or from Partnership reserves. To the extent that such capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The Partnership's assets are thought to be generally sufficient for any near-term needs (exclusive of capital improvements and redevelopment costs referred to above) of the Partnership. On March 30, 2007, the Partnership obtained a second mortgage loan in the principal amount of $9,000,000 on its sole investment property Lakeside Apartments. The second mortgage bears interest at 5.90% per annum and requires monthly payments of interest only of $44,250 beginning May 1, 2007, through May 1, 2010. Beginning on June 1, 2010, monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $53,400 are due and payable through the January 1, 2022 maturity date. The second mortgage has a balloon payment of approximately $7,185,000 due at maturity. The Partnership may prepay the second mortgage loan subject to a prepayment penalty. As a condition of the loan, the lender required AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Partnership, to guarantee the obligations and liabilities of the Partnership with respect to the new mortgage financing. In connection with the financing, the lender and the Partnership also entered into an agreement regarding various rehabilitation and renovation work to be completed at the Partnership’s property at an approximate cost of $22,500,000 (see Note D). In connection with obtaining the second mortgage the Partnership incurred loan costs of approximately $104,000 which were capitalized and are included in other assets on the accompanying balance sheet.

There were no distributions during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated from operations, the timing of debt maturity, property sale and/or refinancing. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the planned property redevelopment, it is unlikely that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations after capital expenditures to permit any distributions to its partners in 2007 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 37,410 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 77.86% of the outstanding Units at June 30, 2007. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 77.86% of the outstan ding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to influence all voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. However, with respect to the 21,380 Units acquired on January 19, 1996, AIMCO IPLP, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner and of AIMCO, agreed to vote such Units: (i) against any increase in compensation payable to the Managing General Partner or to its affiliates; and (ii) on all other matters submitted by it or its affiliates, in proportion to the vote cast by third party unitholders. Except for the foregoing, no other limitations are imposed on AIMCO IPLP, L.P.'s, AIMCO's or any other affiliates' right to vote each Unit held. Although the Managing General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with t he duties of the Managing General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Investment property is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnership’s estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.

Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk. Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnership’s investment property. These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; and changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing. Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership’s asset.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less. The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area. Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

Capitalized Costs Related to Redevelopment and Construction Projects

The Partnership capitalizes costs incurred in connection with capital expenditure activities, including redevelopment and construction projects. Costs including interest, property taxes and operating costs associated with redevelopment and construction projects are capitalized during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 34 “Capitalization of Interest Costs” and SFAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and the Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Properties.” Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital expenditure activities at the property level.

ITEM 3.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership’s disclosure contr ols and procedures are effective.

(b)

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On August 18, 2005, Objector and his counsel filed a motion to disqualify the trial court based on a peremptory challenge and filed a motion to disqualify for cause on October 17, 2005, both of which were ultimately denied and/or struck by the trial court. On or about October 13, 2005 Objector filed a motion to intervene and on or about October 19, 2005 filed both a motion to take discovery relating to the adequacy of plaintiffs as derivative representatives and a motion to dissolve the anti-suit injunction in connection with settlement. On November 14, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a Motion For Further Findings pursuant to the remand ordered bythe Court of Appeals. Defendants joined in that motion. On February 3, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the various matters pending before it and ordered additional briefing from the parties and Objector. On June 30, 2006, the trial court entered an order confirming its approval of the class action settlement and entering judgment thereto after the Court of Appeals had remanded the matter for further findings. The substantive terms of the settlement agreement remain unchanged. The trial court also entered supplemental orders on July 1, 2006, denying Objector’s Motion to File a Complaint in Intervention, Objector’s Motion for Leave of Discovery and Objector’s Motion to Dissolve the Anti-Suit Injunction. Notice of Entry of Judgment was served on July 10, 2006. On August 31, 2006, the Objector filed a Notice of Appeal to the Court’s June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006 orders. On December 14, 2006, Objector filed his Appellant’s Brief.The Partnership and its affiliates, as well as counsel for the Settlement Class, both filed Respondents’ Briefs on May 17, 2007. Objector filed his response on August 3, 2007. No hearing date has yet been scheduled.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

See Exhibit Index.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS III

	By: NPI EQUITY INVESTMENTS, INC.
	Managing General Partner

Date: August 13, 2007	By: /s/Martha L. Long
	Martha L. Long
	Senior Vice President

Date: August 13, 2007	By: /s/Stephen B. Waters
	Stephen B. Waters
	Vice President

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS III

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit

2.1

NPI, Inc. Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 17, 1995, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 17, 1995.

3.4 (a)

Agreement of Limited Partnership incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Prospectus of the Partnership dated October 24, 1979 contained in the Partnership's Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Reg. No. 2-63733).

3.4 (b)

Amendments to Agreement of Limited Partnership dated as of November 25, 1980 incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3 and 4 to the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1981.

3.4 (c)

Amendments to the Agreement of Limited Partnership incorporated by reference to the Definitive Proxy Statement of the Partnership dated April 3, 1981.

3.4 (d)

Amendments to the Agreement of Limited Partnership incorporated by reference to the Statement Furnished in Connection With The Solicitation of Consents of the Partnership dated August 28, 1992.

3.4 (e)

Amendment to the Limited Partnership Agreement dated December 22, 2005 filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-KSB dated December 31, 2005.

10.8

Multifamily Note dated December 14, 2001, by and between National Property Investors III, L.P., a California limited partnership, and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, a California corporation filed with the Registrant's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001.

10.11

Form Of Amended and Restated Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement between Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and National Property Investors III, a California limited partnership, dated March 30, 2007. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2007.

10.12

Form of Amended and Restated Multifamily Note (Recast Transaction) between Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and National Property Investors III, a California limited partnership, dated March 30, 2007. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2007.

10.13

Form of Amended and Restated Guaranty (Recast Transaction) between AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, dated March 30, 2007. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2007.

10.14

Form of Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement between Capmark Bank and National Property Investors III, a California limited partnership, dated March 30, 2007. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2007.

10.15

Form of Multifamily Note between Capmark Bank and National Property Investors III, a California limited partnership, dated March 30, 2007. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2007.

10.16

Form of Guaranty between AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and Capmark Bank, dated March 30, 2007. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2007.

10.17

Form of Rehabilitation Agreement between National Property Investors III, a California limited partnership and Capmark Bank, dated March 30, 2007. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 30, 2007.

31.1

Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National Property Investors III;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2007

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long

Senior Vice President of NPI Equity Investments, Inc., equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National Property Investors III;

(a)

(b)

(c)

(a)

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of NPI Equity Investments, Inc., equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of National Property Investors III (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


	/s/Martha L. Long
	Name: Martha L. Long
	Date: August 13, 2007

	/s/Stephen B. Waters
	Name: Stephen B. Waters
	Date: August 13, 2007

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

National Property Investors Iii Inactive 10QSB2007 Q2 Quarterly report (small business)