FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The Company determined the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in FASB guidance referenced in the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The Company has adopted the provisions from the FASB guidance that is referenced in the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic for non-financial assets and liabilities (such as property and equipment, goodwill, and other intangible assets) that are required to be measured at fair value on a periodic basis. The effect on the Company’s periodic fair value measurements for non-financial assets and liabilities was not material. The Company has categorized its financial instruments, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three level hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the category level is based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are categorized as follows: ● Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market. ● Level 2 : Quoted prices in markets that are not active or significant inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include the following: a) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; b) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets; c) Inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable; and d) Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data through correlation or other means. ● Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. They reflect management’s own estimates about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – (Continued) The following table presents the Company’s hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2021: Measurement Category Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total (Dollars In Millions) Assets: Fixed maturity securities — AFS Residential mortgage-backed securities 4 $ — $ 6,765 $ 40 $ 6,805 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 4 — 2,127 180 2,307 Other asset-backed securities 4 — 905 515 1,420 U.S. government-related securities 4 411 397 — 808 State, municipalities, and political subdivisions 4 — 4,156 — 4,156 Other government-related securities 4 — 753 — 753 Corporate securities 4 — 52,117 1,582 53,699 Redeemable preferred stocks 4 307 — — 307 Total fixed maturity securities — AFS 718 67,220 2,317 70,255 Fixed maturity securities — trading Residential mortgage-backed securities 3 — 133 — 133 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 3 — 209 — 209 Other asset-backed securities 3 — 92 93 185 U.S. government-related securities 3 27 6 — 33 State, municipalities, and political subdivisions 3 — 286 — 286 Other government-related securities 3 — 48 16 64 Corporate securities 3 — 1,867 8 1,875 Redeemable preferred stocks 3 8 — — 8 Total fixed maturity securities — trading 35 2,641 117 2,793 Total fixed maturity securities $ 753 $ 69,861 $ 2,434 $ 73,048 Equity securities 3 633 40 155 828 Other long-term investments(1) 3&4 59 1,093 295 1,447 Short-term investments 3 683 179 — 862 Total investments 2,128 71,173 2,884 76,185 Cash 3 390 — — 390 Assets related to separate accounts Variable annuity 3 13,648 — — 13,648 Variable universal life 3 1,982 — — 1,982 Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis $ 18,148 $ 71,173 $ 2,884 $ 92,205 Liabilities: Annuity account balances(2) 3 $ — $ — $ 63 $ 63 Other liabilities(1) 3&4 20 820 1,939 2,779 Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis $ 20 $ 820 $ 2,002 $ 2,842 Measurement category 3 represents fair value through net income and 4 represents fair value through other comprehensive income (loss). (1) Includes certain freestanding and embedded derivatives. (2) Represents liabilities related to fixed indexed annuities. 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – (Continued) The following table presents the Company’s hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020: Measurement Category Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total (Recast) (Dollars In Millions) Assets: Fixed maturity securities — AFS Residential mortgage-backed securities 4 $ — $ 6,668 $ — $ 6,668 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 4 — 2,502 32 2,534 Other asset-backed securities 4 — 1,143 435 1,578 U.S. government-related securities 4 1,014 501 — 1,515 State, municipalities, and political subdivisions 4 — 4,420 — 4,420 Other government-related securities 4 — 717 — 717 Corporate securities 4 — 50,675 1,432 52,107 Redeemable preferred stocks 4 125 69 — 194 Total fixed maturity securities — AFS 1,139 66,695 1,899 69,733 Fixed maturity securities — trading Residential mortgage-backed securities 3 — 209 — 209 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 3 — 214 — 214 Other asset-backed securities 3 — 92 71 163 U.S. government-related securities 3 79 12 — 91 State, municipalities, and political subdivisions 3 — 282 — 282 Other government-related securities 3 — 30 — 30 Corporate securities 3 — 1,842 18 1,860 Redeemable preferred stocks 3 13 — — 13 Total fixed maturity securities — trading 92 2,681 89 2,862 Total fixed maturity securities 1,231 69,376 1,988 72,595 Equity securities 3 566 — 101 667 Other long-term investments(1) 3&4 52 1,285 298 1,635 Short-term investments 3 403 59 — 462 Total investments 2,252 70,720 2,387 75,359 Cash 3 656 — — 656 Assets related to separate accounts Variable annuity 3 12,378 — — 12,378 Variable universal life 3 1,287 — — 1,287 Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis $ 16,573 $ 70,720 $ 2,387 $ 89,680 Liabilities: Annuity account balances(2) 3 $ — $ — $ 67 $ 67 Other liabilities(1) 3&4 14 867 2,239 3,120 Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis $ 14 $ 867 $ 2,306 $ 3,187 Measurement category 3 represents fair value through net income and 4 represents fair value through other comprehensive income (loss). (1) Includes certain freestanding and embedded derivatives. (2) Represents liabilities related to fixed indexed annuities. 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – (Continued) Determination of Fair Values The valuation methodologies used to determine the fair values of assets and liabilities reflect market participant assumptions and are based on the application of the fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable market inputs over unobservable inputs. The Company determines the fair values of certain financial assets and financial liabilities based on quoted market prices, where available. The Company also determines certain fair values based on future cash flows discounted at the appropriate current market rate. Fair values reflect adjustments for counterparty credit quality, the Company’s credit standing, liquidity, and where appropriate, risk margins on unobservable parameters. The following is a discussion of the methodologies used to determine fair values for the financial instruments as listed in the above table. The fair value of fixed maturity, short-term, and equity securities is determined by management after considering one of three primary sources of information: third party pricing services, non-binding independent broker quotations, or pricing matrices. Security pricing is applied using a "waterfall" approach whereby publicly available prices are first sought from third party pricing services, the remaining unpriced securities are submitted to independent brokers for non-binding prices, or lastly, securities are priced using a pricing matrix. Typical inputs used by these three pricing methods include, but are not limited to: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data including market research publications. Third party pricing services price 91.87% of the Company’s available-for-sale and trading fixed maturity securities. Based on the typical trading volumes and the lack of quoted market prices for available-for-sale and trading fixed maturities, third party pricing services derive the majority of security prices from observable market inputs such as recent reported trades for identical or similar securities making adjustments through the reporting date based upon available market observable information outlined above. If there are no recent reported trades, the third party pricing services and brokers may use matrix or model processes to develop a security price where future cash flow expectations are developed based upon collateral performance and discounted at an estimated market rate. Certain securities are priced via independent non-binding broker quotations. When using non-binding independent broker quotations, when available the Company obtains two quotes per security. Where multiple broker quotes are obtained, the Company reviews the quotes and selects the quote that provides the best estimate of the price a market participant would pay for these specific assets in an arm’s length transaction. A pricing matrix is used to price securities for which the Company is unable to obtain or effectively rely on either a price from a third party pricing service or an independent broker quotation. The pricing matrix used by the Company begins with current spread levels to determine the market price for the security. The credit spreads, assigned by brokers, incorporate the issuer’s credit rating, liquidity discounts, weighted- average of contracted cash flows, risk premium, if warranted, due to the issuer’s industry, and the security’s time to maturity. The Company uses credit ratings provided by nationally recognized rating agencies. For securities that are priced via non-binding independent broker quotations, the Company assesses whether prices received from independent brokers represent a reasonable estimate of fair value. The Company’s assessment incorporates various metrics (yield curves, credit spreads, prepayment rates, etc.) along with other information available to the Company from both internal and external sources to determine the valuation of such holdings. As a result of this analysis, if the Company determines there is a more appropriate fair value based upon the analytics, the price received from the independent broker is adjusted accordingly. The Company did not adjust any quotes or prices received from brokers during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – (Continued) The Company has analyzed the third party pricing services’ valuation methodologies and related inputs and has also evaluated the various types of securities in its investment portfolio to determine an appropriate fair value hierarchy level based upon trading activity and the observability of market inputs that is in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC. Based on this evaluation and investment class analysis, each price was classified into Level 1, 2, or 3. Most prices provided by third party pricing services are classified into Level 2 because the significant inputs used in pricing the securities are market observable and the observable inputs are corroborated by the Company. Since the matrix pricing of certain debt securities includes significant non-observable inputs, they are classified as Level 3. Asset-Backed Securities This category mainly consists of RMBS, CMBS, and other asset-backed securities (collectively referred to as asset-backed securities or "ABS"). As of December 31, 2021, the Company held $10.2 billion of ABS classified as Level 2. These securities are priced from information provided by a third party pricing service and independent broker quotes. The third party pricing services and brokers mainly value securities using both a market and income approach to valuation. As part of this valuation process they consider the following characteristics of the item being measured to be relevant inputs: 1) weighted-average coupon rate, 2) weighted-average years to maturity, 3) types of underlying assets, 4) weighted-average coupon rate of the underlying assets, 5) weighted-average years to maturity of the underlying assets, 6) seniority level of the tranches owned, and 7) credit ratings of the securities. After reviewing these characteristics of the ABS, the third party pricing service and brokers use certain inputs to determine the value of the security. For ABS classified as Level 2, the valuation would consist of predominantly market observable inputs such as, but not limited to: 1) monthly principal and interest payments on the underlying assets, 2) average life of the security, 3) prepayment speeds, 4) credit spreads, 5) treasury and swap yield curves, and 6) discount margin. The Company reviews the methodologies and valuation techniques (including the ability to observe inputs) in assessing the information received from external pricing services and in consideration of the fair value presentation. As of December 31, 2021, the Company held $828 million of Level 3 ABS, which included $735 million of other asset-backed securities classified as available-for-sale and $93 million of other asset-backed securities classified as trading. These securities are predominantly ARS whose underlying collateral is at least 97% guaranteed by the FFELP. As a result of the ARS market collapse during 2008, the Company prices its ARS using an income approach valuation model. As part of the valuation process the Company reviews the following characteristics of the ARS in determining the relevant inputs: 1) weighted-average coupon rate, 2) weighted-average years to maturity, 3) types of underlying assets, 4) weighted-average coupon rate of the underlying assets, 5) weighted-average years to maturity of the underlying assets, 6) seniority level of the tranches owned, 7) credit ratings of the securities, 8) liquidity premium, and 9) paydown rate. In periods where market activity increases and there are transactions at a price that is not the result of a distressed or forced sale we consider those prices as part of our valuation. If the market activity during a period is solely the result of the issuer redeeming positions we consider those transactions in our valuation, but still consider them to be level three measurements due to the nature of the transaction. 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – (Continued) Corporate Securities, Redeemable Preferred Stocks, U.S. Government-Related Securities, States, Municipals, and Political Subdivisions, and Other Government Related Securities As of December 31, 2021, the Company classified $59.6 billion of corporate securities, redeemable preferred stocks, U.S. government-related securities, states, municipals, and political subdivisions, and other government-related securities as Level 2. The fair value of the Level 2 securities is predominantly priced by broker quotes and a third party pricing service. The Company has reviewed the valuation techniques of the brokers and third party pricing service and has determined that such techniques used Level 2 market observable inputs. The following characteristics of the securities are considered to be the primary relevant inputs to the valuation: 1) weighted-average coupon rate, 2) weighted-average years to maturity, 3) seniority, and 4) credit ratings. The Company reviews the methodologies and valuation techniques (including the ability to observe inputs) in assessing the information received from external pricing services and in consideration of the fair value presentation. The brokers and third party pricing service utilize valuation models that consist of a hybrid methodology that utilizes a cash flow analysis and market approach to valuation. The pricing models utilize the following inputs: 1) principal and interest payments, 2) treasury yield curve, 3) credit spreads from new issue and secondary trading markets, 4) dealer quotes with adjustments for issues with early redemption features, 5) liquidity premiums present on private placements, and 6) discount margins from dealers in the new issue market. As of December 31, 2021, the Company classified $1.6 billion of securities as Level 3 valuations. Level 3 securities primarily represent investments in illiquid bonds for which no price is readily available. To determine a price, the Company uses a discounted cash flow model with both observable and unobservable inputs. These inputs are entered into an industry standard pricing model to determine the final price of the security. These inputs include: 1) principal and interest payments, 2) coupon rate, 3) sector and issuer level spread over treasury, 4) underlying collateral, 5) credit ratings, 6) maturity, 7) embedded options, 8) recent new issuance, 9) comparative bond analysis, and 10) an illiquidity premium. Equities As of December 31, 2021, the Company held $155 million of equity securities classified as Level 3. Of this total, $148 million represents FHLB stock. The Company believes that the cost of the FHLB stock approximates fair value. Other Long-Term Investments and Other Liabilities Derivative Financial Instruments Other long-term investments and other liabilities include free-standing and embedded derivative financial instruments. Refer to Note 6, Derivative Financial Instruments Derivative instruments classified as Level 1 generally include futures and options, which are traded on active exchange markets. 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – (Continued) Derivative instruments classified as Level 2 primarily include swaps, options, and swaptions, which are traded over-the-counter. Level 2 also includes certain centrally cleared derivatives. These derivative valuations are determined using independent broker quotations, which are corroborated with observable market inputs. Derivative instruments classified as Level 3 were embedded derivatives and include at least one significant non-observable input. A derivative instrument containing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs will be classified as a Level 3 financial instrument in its entirety if it has at least one significant Level 3 input. The Company utilizes derivative instruments to manage the risk associated with certain assets and liabilities. However, the derivative instruments may not be classified within the same fair value hierarchy level as the associated assets and liabilities. Therefore, the changes in fair value on derivatives reported in Level 3 may not reflect the offsetting impact of the changes in fair value of the associated assets and liabilities. Embedded derivatives are carried at fair value in other long-term investments other liabilities net gains (losses) — investments and derivatives Derivative Financial Instruments The fair value of the GLWB embedded derivative is derived through the income method of valuation using a valuation model that projects future cash flows using multiple risk neutral stochastic equity scenarios and policyholder behavior assumptions. The risk neutral scenarios are generated using the current swap curve and projected equity volatilities and correlations. The projected equity volatilities are based on a blend of historical volatility and near- term equity market implied volatilities. The equity correlations are based on historical price observations. For policyholder behavior assumptions, expected lapse and utilization assumptions are used and updated for actual experience, as necessary. The Company assumes age-based mortality from the Ruark 2015 ALB table with attained age factors varying from 88% — 100% based on company experience. The present value of the cash flows is determined using the discount rate curve, which is based upon LIBOR plus a credit spread (to represent the Company’s non-performance risk). For expected lapse and utilization, assumptions are used and updated for actual experience, as necessary, using an internal predictive model developed by the Company. As a result of using significant unobservable inputs, the GLWB embedded derivative is categorized as Level 3. Policyholder assumptions are reviewed on an annual basis. The balance of the FIA embedded derivative is impacted by policyholder cash flows associated with the FIA product that are allocated to the embedded derivative in addition to changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative during the reporting period. The fair value of the FIA embedded derivative is derived through the income method of valuation using a valuation model that projects future cash flows using current index values and volatility, the hedge budget used to price the product, and policyholder assumptions (both elective and non-elective). For policyholder behavior assumptions are used and updated for actual experience, as necessary. The Company assumes age-based mortality from the 2015 Ruark ALB mortality table, with attained age factors varying from 88% — 100% based on company experience. The present value of the cash flows is determined using the discount rate curve, which is based upon LIBOR up to one year and constant maturity treasury rates plus a credit spread (to represent the Company’s non-performance risk) thereafter. Policyholder assumptions are reviewed on an annual basis. As a result of using significant unobservable inputs, the FIA embedded derivative is categorized as Level 3. 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – (Continued) The balance of the indexed universal life ("IUL") embedded derivative is impacted by policyholder cash flows associated with the IUL product that are allocated to the embedded derivative in addition to changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative during the reporting period. The fair value of the IUL embedded derivative is derived through the income method of valuation using a valuation model that projects future cash flows using current index values and volatility, the hedge budget used to price the product, and policyholder assumptions (both elective and non-elective). For policyholder behavior assumptions, expected lapse and withdrawal assumptions are used and updated for actual experience, as necessary. The Company assumes age-based mortality factors varying from 43% — 110% that are applied to the base table, which is defined as 90% of 2015 VBT Primary Tables adjusted for 5.5 years of 2020 SOA HMI. The present value of the cash flows is determined using the discount rate curve, which is based upon LIBOR up to one year and constant maturity treasury rates plus a credit spread (to represent the Company’s non-performance risk) thereafter. Policyholder assumptions are reviewed on an annual basis. As a result of using significant unobservable inputs, the IUL embedded derivative is categorized as Level 3. The Company has assumed and ceded certain blocks of policies under modified coinsurance agreements in which the investment results of the underlying portfolios inure directly to the reinsurers. Funds withheld arrangements related to such agreements contain embedded derivatives that are reported at fair value. Changes in their fair value are reported in net gains (losses) — investments and derivatives net gains (losses) — investments and derivatives In conjunction with the Captive Merger, PLC terminated its interest support, yearly renewable term ("YRT") premium support, and portfolio maintenance agreements with Golden Gate, Golden Gate II, Golden Gate V, and WCL. The interest support agreement provided that PLC would make payments to Golden Gate II if actual investment income on certain of Golden Gate II’s asset portfolios fell below a calculated investment income amount as defined in the interest support agreement, the YRT premium support agreements provided that PLC would make payments to Golden Gate and Golden Gate II in the event that YRT premium rates increased, and the portfolio maintenance agreements provided that PLC would make payments to Golden Gate, Golden Gate V, and WCL in the event of other-than-temporary impairments on investments that exceeded defined thresholds. As part of the Captive Merger, PLC entered into a new portfolio maintenance agreement with Golden Gate. This agreement meets the definition of a derivative and is accounted for at fair value and is considered Level 3 valuation. The fair value of this derivative is included in Other long-term investments. For information regarding gains on these derivatives please refer to Note 6, Derivative Financial Instruments The portfolio maintenance agreement provides that PLC will make payments to Golden Gate in the event of credit losses on investments that exceed defined thresholds. The derivative is valued using an internal discounted cash flow model. The significant unobservable inputs are the projected probability and severity of credit losses used to project future cash flows on the investment portfolios. 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – (Continued) The Funds Withheld derivative results from reinsurance agreements with Protective Life Reinsurance Bermuda LTD, a wholly owned subsidiary of PLC ("PL Re") where the economic performance of certain hedging instruments held by the Company are ceded to PL Re. The value of the Funds Withheld derivative is directly tied to the value of the hedging instruments held in the funds withheld accounts. The hedging instruments consist of derivative instruments, the fair values of which are classified as a Level 2 measurement; as such, the fair value of the Funds Withheld derivative has been classified as a Level 2 measurement. The fair value of the Funds Withheld derivative as of December 31, 2021, was a liability of $10 million. Annuity Account Balances The Company records a certain legacy block of FIA reserves at fair value. Based on the characteristics of these reserves, the Company believes that the fund value approximates fair value. The fair value measurement of these reserves is considered a Level 3 valuation due to the unobservable nature of the fund values. Separate Accounts Separate account variable annuity and variable life assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers which are invested in open-ended mutual funds and are included in Level 1. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – (Continued) Valuation of Level 3 Financial Instruments The following table presents the valuation method for material financial instruments included in Level 3 as of December 31, 2021, as well as the unobservable inputs used in the valuation of those financial instruments: Fair Value As of December 31, Valuation Unobservable Range 2021 Technique Input (Weighted Average) (Dollars In Millions) Assets: Residential mortgage-backed securities $ 40 Trade Price Spread 1.03% - 1.10% (1.07%) Commercial mortgage-backed securities 180 Discounted cash flow Spread over treasury 1.04% - 2.47% (1.30%) Other asset-backed securities 436 Liquidation Liquidation value $98.63 - $99.75 ($99.07) Discounted cash flow Liquidity premium 0.11% - 2.14% (1.54%) Paydown Rate 11.20% - 13.41% (12.30%) Liquidation value $60.00 - 113.88% (112.92%) Corporate securities 1,588 Discounted cash flow Spread over treasury 0.00% - 4.00% (1.50%) Liabilities:(1)(2) Embedded derivatives — GLWB $ 475 Actuarial cash flow model Mortality 88% to 100% of Ruark 2015 ALB Table Lapse PL-RBA Predictive Model Utilization PL-RBA Predictive Model Nonperformance risk 0.19% - 0.82% Embedded derivative — FIA 595 Actuarial cash flow model Expenses $214 per policy Withdrawal rate 0.4% - 2.4% prior to age 70 RMD for ages 70+ or WB withdrawal rate Assume underutilized RMD for nonWB policies ages 72 - 88 Mortality 88% to 100% of Ruark 2015 ALB table Lapse 0.2% - 50.0%, depending on duration/surrender charge period. Dynamically adjusted for WB moneyness and projected market rates vs credited rates. Nonperformance risk 0.19% - 0.82% Embedded derivative — IUL $ 269 Actuarial cash flow model Mortality 43% - 110% of base table (90% of 2015 VBT Primary Tables adjusted for 5.5 years of 2020 SOA HMI) 94% - 248% of duration 8 point in scale 2015 VBT Primary Tables, depending on type of business Lapse 0.375% - 7.5%, depending on duration/distribution channel and smoking class Nonperformance risk 0.19% - 0.82% (1) Excludes modified coinsurance arrangements. (2) Fair value is presented as a net liability. The chart above excludes Level 3 financial instruments that are valued using broker quotes and those for which book value approximates fair value. Unobservable inputs were weighted by the relative fair value of instruments, except for other asset-backed securities which were weighted by the relative par amounts. 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS – (Continued) The Company has considered all reasonably available quantitative inputs as of December 31, 2021, but the valuation techniques and inputs used by some brokers in pricing certain financial instruments are not shared with the Company. This resulted in $197 million of financial instruments being classified as Level 3 as of December 31, 2021. Of the $197 million, $172 million are other asset-backed securities, $3 million are corporate securities, $16 million are other government securities, and $6 million are equity securities. In certain cases the Company has determined that book value materially approximates fair value. As of December 31, 2021, the Company held $148 million of financial instruments where book value approximates fair value which are predominantly FHLB stock. The following table presents the valuation method for material financial instruments included in Level 3, as of December 31, 2020, as well as the unobservable inputs used in the valuation of those financial instruments: Fair Value As of December 31, Valuation Unobservable Range 2020 Technique Input (Weighted Average) (Recast) (Dollars In Millions) Assets: Commercial mortgage-backed securities $ 32 Discounted cash flow Spread over treasury 2.78% - 2.92% ( Other asset-backed securities 435 Liquidation Liquidation value $95.00 - $97.00 ($96.19) Discounted cash flow Liquidity premium 0.54% - 2.30% (1.63%) Paydown Rate 8.79% - 12.49% (11.39%) Corporate securities 1,432 Discounted cash flow Spread over treasury 0.00% - 4.75% (1.89%) Liabilities:(1)(2) Embedded derivatives — GLWB $ 822 Actuarial cash flow model Mortality 88% to 100% of Ruark 2015 ALB Table |