- MUX Dashboard
- Financials
- Filings
-
Holdings
- Transcripts
- ETFs
- Insider
- Institutional
- Shorts
-
CORRESP Filing
McEwen Mining (MUX) CORRESPCorrespondence with SEC
Filed: 6 Feb 17, 12:00am
February 6, 2017
Via EDGAR
Division of Corporation Finance
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington DC 20549
Attention: Craig Arakawa, Branch Chief, Office of Beverages, Apparel, and Mining
Re: | McEwen Mining Inc. |
| Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015 |
| Response Dated January 23, 2017 |
| File No. 001-33190 |
Dear Mr. Arakawa:
We refer to your correspondence dated January 31, 2017, addressed to Andrew Elinesky, Chief Financial Officer of McEwen Mining Inc. (“McEwen Mining”, the “Company” or “we”), relating to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “2015 Form 10-K”). This letter contains the responses to the comments contained in your January 31, 2017 letter.
The Company’s responses are as follows:
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2015
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures, page 61 through 66
Comment No. 1
We have reviewed your response and proposed disclosure to comment 1 noting you do not believe you have substituted an individually tailored accounting principle for the one in GAAP in your non-GAAP presentation of earnings from mining operations, total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs, all-in costs, and average realized prices. We note from your response and proposed disclosure that you are merely multiplying each individual line item on the financial statements of Minera Santa Cruz by your ownership percentage of 49%. Please note that under the equity method of accounting you own an interest in the investee as a whole and do not have a proportionate legal interest in each financial statement line item. Since you account for your interest in the Minera Santa Cruz mine using the equity method, inclusion of a proportionate economic ownership in the non-GAAP measures does not appear to be consistent with the guidance in Question 100.04 of the updated non-GAAP Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations issued on May 17, 2016. Please revise your non-GAAP disclosures accordingly.
Response:
Upon reviewing the staff’s recent comments in conjunction with our non-GAAP disclosure in the 2015 Form 10-K, and having further conversations with the staff, we identified certain modifications which we propose to incorporate prospectively, commencing with our 2016 Form 10-K. Specifically, we intend to cease consolidating the proportionate economic ownership of Minera Santa Cruz (“MSC”), in our non-GAAP measures and to separate the presentation of non-GAAP measures relating to our majority owned and controlled mine (El Gallo 1 Mine) from results of our minority owned mine (Sane José Mine, through our interest in MSC). In addition, our all-in sustaining costs will exclude the allocation of corporate general and administrative costs, and as such, we will revise our definition of the calculation of all-in sustaining costs to explain this removal to provide clarity in our report.
Consistent with our response dated January 23, we also propose to include additional disclosure in the narrative preceding the non-GAAP measures to alert the reader that we do not control the interest in, or operations of, MSC and the presentation of any assets, liabilities, revenues or expenses of MSC do not represent our legal claim to those items.
Please refer to the proposed prospective disclosure, using our 2015 Form 10-K non-GAAP performance measures for illustrative purposes, attached to this letter as follows:
· Appendix A: earnings from mining operations,
· Appendix B: total cash cost,
· Appendix C: all-in sustaining costs, and
· Appendix D: average realized prices.
Within each illustration, we excluded disclosure of consolidated results and consolidated totals.
Additionally, to avoid the appearance of providing individually tailored accounting principles as substitutions for GAAP measures, we will no longer provide the all-in costs metric as a whole because on a non-consolidated basis, the metric does not provide an appropriate comparison to our industry peer group.
In light of our consideration and the proposed revisions described herein, we also propose to eliminate the enhanced note disclosure, describing our equity investment in MSC, initially outlined in Appendix A of our January 23, 2017 response.
In speaking with the staff, we understand that it has allowed a transition period for implementing the changes to non-GAAP disclosure as a result of, among other items, the Compliance Disclosure Interpretations issued on May 17, 2016. We appreciate this opportunity and propose to take advantage of it. In this regard, we intend to present consolidated earnings from mine operations, total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs, all-in costs, and average realized prices in our 2016 earnings release and related disclosure (but not in the 2016 Form 10-K). Furthermore, we intend to provide our future guidance of non-GAAP measures in line with the proposed disclosure to our 10-K as discussed above.
With the forgoing undertaking and explanation, we believe that we have responded to all the comments in the staff’s letter. Should you have any additional questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at 647-258-0395.
Sincerely,
MCEWEN MINING INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Elinesky |
|
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
|
cc: | Robert McEwen, Chief Executive Officer — McEwen Mining Inc. |
| Carmen Diges, General Counsel — McEwen Mining Inc. |
| Richard W. Brissenden, Chair of the Audit Committee — McEwen Mining Inc. |
| Don Linsdell, Audit Partner — Ernst & Young LLP |
Appendix A
Proposed Presentation of Earning from Mining Operations
(Page 62 of the 2015 Form 10-K)
|
| Three months ended |
| Year ended |
| ||||||||
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| ||||
|
| (in thousands) |
| ||||||||||
El Gallo 1 Mine earnings from mining operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gold and silver sales |
| $ | 11,411 |
| $ | 13,683 |
| $ | 72,956 |
| $ | 45,303 |
|
Production costs applicable to sales |
| (5,695 | ) | (10,184 | ) | (34,607 | ) | (40,608 | ) | ||||
Depreciation of mining related assets |
| (102 | ) | (87 | ) | (333 | ) | (278 | ) | ||||
Gross profit |
| 5,614 |
| 3,412 |
| 38,016 |
| 4,417 |
| ||||
Add: Amortization related to fair value increments on historical acquisitions included in Production Costs Applicable to Sales |
| 322 |
| 322 |
| 1,288 |
| 1,288 |
| ||||
El Gallo 1 Mine earnings from mining operations |
| $ | 5,936 |
| 3,734 |
| 39,304 |
| 5,705 |
| |||
San José Mine earnings from mining operations (49% attributable basis) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net sales |
| $ | 22,045 |
| $ | 31,667 |
| $ | 91,187 |
| $ | 104,376 |
|
Production costs applicable to sales |
| (18,951 | ) | (27,270 | ) | (77,721 | ) | (84,904 | ) | ||||
San José Mine earnings from mining operations |
| $ | 3,094 |
| $ | 4,397 |
| $ | 13,466 |
| $ | 19,472 |
|
Appendix B
Proposed Reconciliation of Total Cash Costs to Production Costs
(Page 64 of the 2015 Form 10-K)
|
| Three months ended |
| Year ended |
| ||||||||
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| ||||
|
| (in thousands, except ounce and per ounce figures) |
| ||||||||||
El Gallo 1 Mine cash costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Production costs applicable to sales |
| $ | 5,695 |
| $ | 10,184 |
| $ | 34,607 |
| $ | 40,608 |
|
Depreciation |
| (322 | ) | (322 | ) | (1,288 | ) | (1,288 | ) | ||||
Less: Pre-stripping costs for future pit access |
| (698 | ) | (2,052 | ) | (6,408 | ) | (8,763 | ) | ||||
Mine general and administrative expenses |
| 195 |
| 296 |
| 805 |
| 1,174 |
| ||||
Property holding costs |
| — |
| — |
| 26 |
| 27 |
| ||||
Other non-cash adjustments |
| 220 |
| — |
| (135 | ) | (340 | ) | ||||
Total cash costs |
| $ | 5,090 |
| $ | 8,106 |
| $ | 27,607 |
| $ | 31,418 |
|
Gold equivalent ounces sold |
| 10,270 |
| 11,406 |
| 62,704 |
| 35,924 |
| ||||
El Gallo 1 Mine cash costs per gold equivalent ounces sold |
| $ | 496 |
| $ | 711 |
| $ | 440 |
| $ | 875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
San José Mine cash costs (49% attributable basis) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Production costs applicable to sales |
| 19,009 |
| 27,300 |
| 77,840 |
| 85,023 |
| ||||
Less: Operating site reclamation accretion and amortization |
| (378 | ) | (493 | ) | (1,213 | ) | (1,746 | ) | ||||
Depreciation |
| (6,369 | ) | (10,328 | ) | (22,275 | ) | (29,913 | ) | ||||
Mine general and administrative expenses |
| 920 |
| 948 |
| 3,454 |
| 3,927 |
| ||||
Refining, smelting, and transportation |
| 2,168 |
| 3,687 |
| 9,657 |
| 12,078 |
| ||||
Commercial discounts |
| 1,309 |
| 1,857 |
| 5,795 |
| 6,957 |
| ||||
Community costs related to current operations |
| 50 |
| (12 | ) | 211 |
| 224 |
| ||||
Total cash costs |
| $ | 16,709 |
| $ | 22,959 |
| $ | 73,469 |
| $ | 76,550 |
|
McEwen’s share of San José Mine gold equivalent ounces sold |
| 21,836 |
| 32,425 |
| 84,927 |
| 96,304 |
| ||||
San José Mine cash costs per gold equivalent ounces sold |
| $ | 765 |
| $ | 708 |
| $ | 865 |
| $ | 795 |
|
Appendix C
Proposed Reconciliation of All-In Sustaining Costs to Total Cash Costs
(Page 65 of the 2015 Form 10-K)
|
| Three months ended |
| Year ended |
| ||||||||
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| ||||
|
| (in thousands, except ounce and per ounce figures) |
| ||||||||||
El Gallo 1 Mine all-in sustaining costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total cash costs |
| $ | 5,090 |
| $ | 8,106 |
| $ | 27,607 |
| $ | 31,418 |
|
Operating site reclamation accretion and amortization |
| (20 | ) | 200 |
| 936 |
| 802 |
| ||||
Exploration and study costs |
| 344 |
| 260 |
| 1,488 |
| 1,592 |
| ||||
Mine construction and capital expenditures (sustaining) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 320 |
| ||||
Pre-stripping costs for future pit access |
| 698 |
| 2,052 |
| 6,408 |
| 8,763 |
| ||||
All-in sustaining costs |
| $ | 6,112 |
| $ | 10,618 |
| $ | 36,439 |
| $ | 42,895 |
|
Gold equivalent ounces sold |
| 10,270 |
| 11,406 |
| 62,704 |
| 35,924 |
| ||||
El Gallo 1 Mineall-in sustaining cost per gold equivalent ounces sold |
| $ | 595 |
| $ | 931 |
| $ | 581 |
| $ | 1,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
San José Mine all-in sustaining costs (49% attributable basis) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total cash costs |
| 16,709 |
| 22,959 |
| 73,469 |
| 76,550 |
| ||||
Operating site reclamation accretion and amortization |
| 378 |
| 493 |
| 1,213 |
| 1,746 |
| ||||
Exploration and study costs |
| 289 |
| 296 |
| 1,431 |
| 1,060 |
| ||||
Capitalised stripping & underground mine development |
| 2,915 |
| 5,540 |
| 13,378 |
| 15,161 |
| ||||
Capital expenditures (sustaining) |
| 885 |
| 3,918 |
| 4,899 |
| 10,041 |
| ||||
All-in sustaining costs |
| $ | 21,176 |
| $ | 33,206 |
| $ | 94,390 |
| $ | 104,558 |
|
McEwen’s share of San José Mine gold equivalent ounces sold |
| 21,836 |
| 32,425 |
| 84,927 |
| 96,304 |
| ||||
San José Mine all-in sustaining cost per gold equivalent ounces sold |
| $ | 970 |
| $ | 1,024 |
| $ | 1,111 |
| $ | 1,086 |
|
Appendix D
Proposed Reconciliation of Average Sales Price to Sales
(Page 66 of the 2015 Form 10-K)
|
| Three months ended |
| Year ended |
| ||||||||
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| ||||
|
| (in thousands, except ounce and per ounce figures) |
| ||||||||||
El Gallo 1 Mine average realized prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gold sales |
| $ | 11,347 |
| $ | 13,555 |
| $ | 72,377 |
| $ | 44,956 |
|
Silver sales |
| 64 |
| 129 |
| 579 |
| 347 |
| ||||
Gold and silver sales |
| $ | 11,411 |
| $ | 13,684 |
| $ | 72,956 |
| $ | 45,303 |
|
Gold ounces sold |
| 10,211 |
| 11,272 |
| 62,226 |
| 35,600 |
| ||||
Silver ounces sold |
| 4,416 |
| 8,000 |
| 35,862 |
| 19,417 |
| ||||
Gold equivalent ounces sold |
| 10,270 |
| 11,406 |
| 62,704 |
| 35,924 |
| ||||
Average realized price per gold ounce sold |
| $ | 1,111 |
| $ | 1,203 |
| $ | 1,163 |
| $ | 1,263 |
|
Average realized price per silver ounce sold |
| $ | 14.49 |
| $ | 16.08 |
| $ | 16.15 |
| $ | 17.89 |
|
Average realized price per gold equivalent ounce sold |
| $ | 1,111 |
| $ | 1,200 |
| $ | 1,163 |
| $ | 1,261 |
|
|
| Three months ended |
| Year ended |
| ||||||||
|
| December 31, |
| December 31, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| ||||
|
| (in thousands, except ounce and per ounce figures) |
| ||||||||||
San José Mine average realized prices (49% attributable basis) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gold sales |
| $ | 12,030 |
| $ | 17,207 |
| $ | 48,745 |
| $ | 55,268 |
|
Silver sales |
| 11,009 |
| 16,409 |
| 46,749 |
| 54,711 |
| ||||
Gold and silver sales |
| $ | 23,039 |
| $ | 33,616 |
| $ | 95,494 |
| $ | 109,979 |
|
Gold ounces sold |
| 11,353 |
| 14,764 |
| 43,508 |
| 44,725 |
| ||||
Silver ounces sold |
| 786,168 |
| 1,059,669 |
| 3,106,445 |
| 3,094,742 |
| ||||
Gold equivalent ounces sold |
| 21,836 |
| 32,425 |
| 84,927 |
| 96,304 |
| ||||
Average realized price per gold ounce sold |
| $ | 1,060 |
| $ | 1,165 |
| $ | 1,120 |
| $ | 1,236 |
|
Average realized price per silver ounce sold |
| $ | 14.00 |
| $ | 15.49 |
| $ | 15.05 |
| $ | 17.68 |
|
Average realized price per gold equivalent ounce sold |
| $ | 1,055 |
| $ | 1,037 |
| $ | 1,124 |
| $ | 1,142 |
|