MARKET RISK
The Company has net assets and liabilities denominated in numerous foreign currencies and uses various methods to manage its exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. The Company predominantly structures its drilling rig contracts in U.S. dollars, which significantly reduces the portion of the Company's cash flows and assets denominated in foreign currencies. The Company also employs various strategies, including the use of derivative instruments, to match foreign currency denominated assets with equal or near equal amounts of foreign currency denominated liabilities, thereby minimizing exposure to earnings fluctuations caused by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company occasionally utilizes derivative instruments to hedge forecasted foreign currency denominated transactions. At June 30, 2004, the Company had foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding to exchange $18.9 million U.S. dollars for Australian dollars, Great Britain pounds and Euros, all of which mature during the third and fourth quarters of 2004. Based on a hypothetical 10% adverse change in foreign currency exchange rates, the net unrealized loss associated with the Company's foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities and related foreign currency exchange contracts as of June 30, 2004 would approximate $400,000. The Company uses various derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate risk. The Company occasionally uses interest rate swap agreements to effectively convert the variable interest rate on debt to a fixed rate or the fixed rate on debt to a variable rate, and interest rate lock agreements to hedge against increases in interest rates on pending financing. At June 30, 2004, the Company had no outstanding interest rate swap agreements or interest rate lock agreements. The Company utilizes derivative instruments and undertakes hedging activities in accordance with its established policies for the management of market risk. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. Management believes that the Company's use of derivative instruments and related hedging activities do not expose the Company to any material interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk, credit risk or any other market rate or price risk. OUTLOOK Changes in industry conditions and the corresponding impact on the Company's operations cannot be accurately predicted because of the short-term nature of many of the Company's contracts and the volatility of oil and natural gas prices, which impact expenditures for oil and gas drilling, rig utilization and day rates. Whether recent levels of regional and worldwide expenditures for oil and gas drilling will increase, decrease or remain unchanged, is not determinable at this time. Management's current plans and expectations relative to its major areas of operations and near-term industry conditions are detailed below. Rig Construction On May 21, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with KFELS for the construction of a new high performance premium jackup rig to be named ENSCO 107. Upon execution of the agreement, the Company sold and transferred three rigs (ENSCO 23, ENSCO 24 and ENSCO 55) to KFELS and will pay an additional $55.0 million prior to delivery of the rig, which is expected in late 2005. The ENSCO 107 will be an enhanced KFELS MOD V (B) design modified to ENSCO specifications and a sister rig to the ENSCO 106, which is currently under construction in Singapore. The ENSCO 106, which is being constructed under a joint venture with KFELS, is expected to be delivered by year-end 2004. Rig Enhancements and Relocations The ENSCO 68 is currently in a shipyard undergoing major enhancements and is projected to return to service in the Gulf of Mexico during October 2004. The ENSCO 67 is currently en route to Singapore where it will enter a shipyard for major enhancements and is projected to return to service in the Asia Pacific region during the second quarter of 2005. The ENSCO 95 is scheduled to mobilize from the Gulf of Mexico by the end of July 2004 to a shipyard in the Middle East where it will undergo enhancements and is projected to return to service in late November or early December 2004. The ENSCO 88, currently in a Gulf of Mexico shipyard undergoing enhancements that are projected to be completed in August 2004, is scheduled to mobilize to a Middle East shipyard for installation of additional quarters and be available for work in October 2004. The Company plans to commence enhancement procedures on three additional Gulf of Mexico jackup rigs during 2004, including two projects with projected shipyard durations of four months each commencing in September 2004 and December 2004 and one project with projected shipyard duration of nine months commencing in October 2004. North America As of July 26, 2004, all 17 of the Company's jackup rigs in the North America region not undergoing enhancement procedures or preparing for international mobilization are working. The ENSCO 7500, the Company's deep water semisubmersible rig, completed minor improvements, regulatory inspection and maintenance procedures during the second quarter and is currently idle. However, the Company has received a letter of intent for an approximate 100-day contract scheduled to commence in August 2004 at an approximate day rate of $85,000. As of July 26, 2004, one of the Company's three platform rigs is operating under a contract scheduled for completion in August 2004. The Company has executed a long-term contract for a second platform rig with a commencement date scheduled in September 2004. The Company's platform rigs have experienced utilization in the 40% to 60% range during the previous five years, primarily as a result of reduced opportunities for deep-well drilling contracts. The Company's platform rigs, which are all capable of completing 25,000 to 30,000 feet wells, are best suited for long-term, deep well drilling applications where the platform rig components will stay in place for a substantial period of time. The Company's platform rigs currently compete against smaller, easier to mobilize and assemble, self-erecting platform rigs for shallow well drilling. The Company is not able to predict when there will be a recovery of drilling activity that will require a sustained use of the class of platform rigs owned and operated by the Company. The Company evaluated the carrying values of its platform rigs in December 2003 and determined such carrying values were not impaired. The Company will continue to perform such evaluations as circumstances dictate. Europe/Africa As of July 26, 2004, two of the Company's eight jackup rigs in the Europe/Africa region are idle and management currently anticipates additional idle time for these rigs in the third quarter of 2004. Asia Pacific As of July 26, 2004, all of the Company's 13 rigs currently located in the Asia Pacific region are operating with commitments into the fourth quarter of 2004 or later. As noted above, the Company is increasing the size of its Asia Pacific fleet during 2004 through the relocation of three jackup rigs from the Gulf of Mexico, one of which is currently en route and the other two scheduled for mobilization in the near future. Allowing for mobilization and shipyard procedures upon arrival, management expects two of the rigs relocated from the Gulf of Mexico to be available for service in the fourth quarter of 2004 and the third in the second quarter of 2005. South America/Caribbean The Company's jackup rig working offshore Trinidad and Tobago, the ENSCO 76, continues operations under a contract scheduled for completion in September 2004. As of July 26, 2004, the Company's six barge rigs located in Venezuela are idle, with two of the barge rigs currently in drydock undergoing regulatory procedures after completing contracts in July 2004. Due to the deterioration in the political and economic environment in Venezuela, the Company believes the timing of a recovery of drilling activity in Venezuela is uncertain and unlikely in the near term. The Company evaluated the carrying values of its barge rigs in December 2003 and determined such carrying values were not impaired. The Company will continue to perform such evaluations and monitor the situation in Venezuela, as circumstances dictate. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires the Company's management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company's significant accounting policies are included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 included in the Company's Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K. These policies, along with the underlying assumptions and judgments made by the Company's management in their application, have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company identifies its most critical accounting policies as those that are the most pervasive and important to the portrayal of the Company's financial position and results of operations, and that require the most difficult, subjective and/or complex judgments by management regarding estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company's most critical accounting policies are those related to property and equipment, impairment of long-lived assets and income taxes. Property and Equipment At June 30, 2004, the carrying value of the Company's property and equipment totaled $2,375.0 million, which represents 74% of total assets. This carrying value reflects the application of the Company's property and equipment accounting policies, which incorporate estimates, assumptions and judgments by management relative to the capitalized costs, useful lives and salvage values of the Company's rigs. The Company develops and applies property and equipment accounting policies that are designed to appropriately and consistently capitalize those costs incurred to enhance, improve and extend the useful lives of its assets and expense those costs incurred to repair or maintain the existing condition or useful lives of its assets. The development and application of such policies requires judgment and assumptions by management relative to the nature of, and benefits from, expenditures on Company assets. The Company establishes property and equipment accounting policies that are designed to depreciate or amortize its assets over their estimated useful lives. The assumptions and judgments used by management in determining the estimated useful lives of its property and equipment reflect both historical experience and expectations regarding future operations, utilization and performance of its assets. The use of different estimates, assumptions and judgments in the establishment of property and equipment accounting policies, especially those involving the useful lives of the Company's rigs, would likely result in materially different carrying values of assets and results of operations. Impairment of Assets The Company evaluates the carrying value of its property and equipment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Generally, extended periods of idle time and/or inability to contract assets at economical rates are an indication that an asset may be impaired. However, the offshore drilling industry is highly cyclical and it is not unusual for assets to be unutilized or underutilized for significant periods of time and subsequently resume full or near full utilization when business cycles change. Likewise, during periods of supply and demand imbalance, assets are frequently contracted at or near cash break-even rates for extended periods of time until demand comes back into balance with supply. Impairment situations may arise with respect to specific individual assets, groups of assets, such as a type of drilling rig, or assets in a certain geographic location. The Company's assets are mobile and may be moved from markets with excess supply, if economically feasible. The Company's jackup rigs and semisubmersible rig are suited for, and accessible to, broad and numerous markets throughout the world. However, there are fewer economically feasible markets available to the Company's barge rigs and platform rigs. The Company tests its goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists. Under a goodwill impairment test, the Company determines its reporting units and estimates their fair values as of the testing date. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, its goodwill is considered not impaired. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the Company estimates the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to such excess. Based on the goodwill test performed as of December 31, 2003, there was no impairment of the Company's goodwill. Asset impairment evaluations are, by nature, highly subjective. They involve expectations of future cash flows to be generated by the Company's drilling rigs, and are based on management's assumptions and judgments regarding future industry conditions and operations, as well as management's estimates of future expected utilization, contract rates, expense levels and capital requirements of the Company's drilling rigs. The estimates, assumptions and judgments used by management in the application of the Company's asset impairment policies reflect both historical experience and an assessment of current operational, industry, economic and political environments. The use of different estimates, assumptions, judgments and expectations regarding future industry conditions and operations, would likely result in materially different carrying values of assets and results of operations. Income Taxes The Company conducts operations and earns income in numerous foreign countries and is subject to the laws of taxing jurisdictions within those countries, as well as U.S. federal and state tax laws. At June 30, 2004, the Company has a $343.5 million net deferred income tax liability and $51.7 million of accrued liabilities for income taxes currently payable. The carrying values of deferred income tax assets and liabilities reflect the application of the Company's income tax accounting policies in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS 109"), and are based on management's assumptions and estimates regarding future operating results and levels of taxable income, as well as management's judgments regarding the interpretation of the provisions of SFAS 109. The carrying values of liabilities for income taxes currently payable are based on management's interpretation of applicable tax laws, and incorporate management's assumptions and judgments regarding the use of tax planning strategies in various taxing jurisdictions. The use of different estimates, assumptions and judgments in connection with accounting for income taxes, especially those involving the deployment of tax planning strategies, may result in materially different carrying values of income tax assets and liabilities and results of operations. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51" ("FIN 46R"). FIN 46R requires a company to consolidate a variable interest entity, as defined, when the company will absorb a majority of the variable interest entity's expected losses, receive a majority of the variable interest entity's expected residual returns, or both. FIN 46R also requires certain disclosures relating to consolidated variable interest entities and unconsolidated variable interest entities in which a company has a significant variable interest. The provisions of FIN 46R are required for companies that have interests in variable interest entities or potential variable interest entities commonly referred to as special-purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. The provisions of FIN 46R are required to be applied for periods ending after March 15, 2004 for all other types of entities. The Company's equity interest in, and related charter arrangement associated with, ENSCO Enterprises Limited II ("EEL II") constitute a variable interest in a variable interest entity under FIN 46R. However, the Company will not absorb a majority of the expected losses or receive a majority of the expected residual returns, as defined by FIN 46R, of EEL II, and accordingly the Company is not required to consolidate EEL II. (See "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements" and Note 5 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.) Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Information required under Item 3. has been incorporated into Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Market Risk. Item 4. Controls and Procedures Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, no change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. |