Allowance for Probable Loan Losses | (4) Allowance for Probable Loan Losses The allowance for probable loan losses primarily consists of the aggregate loan loss allowances of the Subsidiary Banks. The allowances are established through charges to operations in the form of provisions for probable loan losses. Loan losses or recoveries are charged or credited directly to the allowances. The allowance for probable loan losses of each Subsidiary Bank is maintained at a level considered appropriate by management, based on estimated probable losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance for probable loan losses is derived from the following elements: (i) allowances established on specific impaired loans, which are based on a review of the individual characteristics of each loan, including the customer’s ability to repay the loan, the underlying collateral values, and the industry in which the customer operates, (ii) allowances based on actual historical loss experience for similar types of loans in our loan portfolio, and (iii) allowances based on general economic conditions, changes in the mix of loans, company resources, border risk and credit quality indicators, among other things. Our management continually reviews the allowance for loan losses of the Subsidiary Banks using the amounts determined from the allowances established on specific impaired loans, the allowance established on quantitative historical loss percentages, and the allowance based on qualitative data to establish an appropriate amount to maintain in our allowance for probable loan losses. Should any of the factors considered by management in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for probable loan losses change, our estimate of probable loan losses could also change, which could affect the level of future provisions for probable loan losses. While the calculation of the allowance for probable loan losses utilizes management’s best judgment and all information available, the adequacy of the allowance is dependent on a variety of factors beyond our control, including, among other things, the performance of the entire loan portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates and the view of regulatory authorities towards loan classifications. The loan loss provision is determined using the following methods. On a weekly basis, loan past due reports are reviewed by the credit quality committee to determine if a loan has any potential problems and if a loan should be placed on our internal classified report. Additionally, our credit department reviews the majority of our loans for proper internal classification purposes regardless of whether they are past due and segregates any loans with potential problems for further review. The credit department will discuss the potential problem loans with the servicing loan officers to determine any relevant issues that were not discovered in the evaluation. Also, an analysis of loans that is provided through examinations by regulatory authorities is considered in the review process. After the above analysis is completed, we will determine if a loan should be placed on an internal classified report because of issues related to the analysis of the credit, credit documents, collateral and/or payment history. World and U.S. economic conditions have continued to improve; however, there remains some uncertainty created by continued issues with negative demographic trends, weak labor participation rates, enormous government debt, excessive regulations, and unfunded entitlement programs that could create a financial crisis. The impact to the world and U.S. economy from these issues is being magnified by a lack of appropriate government action to find solutions to the problems. Economic risk factors are minimized by the underwriting standards of the Subsidiary Banks. The general underwriting standards encompass the following principles: (i) the financial strength of the borrower including strong earnings, a high net worth, significant liquidity and an acceptable debt to worth ratio, (ii) managerial and business competence, (iii) the ability to repay, (iv) for a new business, projected cash flows, (v) loan to value, (vi) in the case of a secondary guarantor, a guarantor financial statement, and (vii) financial and/or other character references. Although the underwriting standards reduce the risk of loss, unique risk factors exist in each type of loan in which the Subsidiary Banks invest. Commercial and industrial loans are mostly secured by the collateral pledged by the borrower that is directly related to the business activities of the company such as accounts receivable and inventory. The ability of the borrower to collect accounts receivable, and to turn inventory into sales are risk factors in the repayment of the loan. Construction and land development loans can carry risk of repayment when projects incur cost overruns, have an increase in the price of building materials, encounter zoning and environmental issues, or encounter other factors that may affect the completion of a project on time and on budget. Additionally, repayment risk may be negatively impacted when the market experiences a deterioration in the value of real estate. Risks specifically related to 1‑4 family development loans also include the practice by the mortgage industry of more restrictive underwriting standards, which inhibits the buyer from obtaining long term financing and excessive housing and lot inventory in the market. Commercial real estate loans demonstrate a risk of repayment when market values deteriorate, the business experiences turnover in key management, the business has an inability to attract or keep occupancy levels stable, or when the market experiences an exit of a specific business industry that is significant to the local economy, such as a manufacturing plant. First and second lien residential 1-4 family mortgage and consumer loan repayments may be affected by unemployment or underemployment and deteriorating market values of real estate. A summary of the changes in the allowance for probable loan losses by loan class is as follows: December 31, 2018 Domestic Foreign Commercial real estate: other Commercial construction & real estate: Commercial land farmland & real estate: Residential: Residential: Commercial development commercial multifamily first lien junior lien Consumer Foreign Total (Dollars in Thousands) Balance at December 31, $ 27,905 $ 11,675 $ 16,663 $ 1,109 $ 2,950 $ 6,103 $ 440 $ 842 $ 67,687 Losses charge to allowance (14,220) (1) (70) — (122) (347) (362) (3) (15,125) Recoveries credited to allowance 1,981 25 246 — 36 369 43 10 2,710 Net losses charged to allowance (12,239) 24 176 — (86) 22 (319) 7 (12,415) Provision (credit) charged to operations (3,070) 3,424 2,514 699 603 1,594 326 22 6,112 Balance at December 31, $ 12,596 $ 15,123 $ 19,353 $ 1,808 $ 3,467 $ 7,719 $ 447 $ 871 $ 61,384 December 31, 2017 Domestic Foreign Commercial real estate: other Commercial construction & real estate: Commercial land farmland & real estate: Residential: Residential: Commercial development commercial multifamily first lien junior lien Consumer Foreign Total (Dollars in Thousands) Balance at December 31, $ 25,649 $ 13,889 $ 16,731 $ 806 $ 2,455 $ 3,716 $ 531 $ 884 $ 64,661 Losses charge to allowance (12,094) (213) (40) — (101) (340) (309) (1) (13,098) Recoveries credited to allowance 4,020 21 527 — 11 258 45 21 4,903 Net losses charged to allowance (8,074) (192) 487 — (90) (82) (264) 20 (8,195) Provision (credit) charged to operations 10,330 (2,022) (555) 303 585 2,469 173 (62) 11,221 Balance at December 31, $ 27,905 $ 11,675 $ 16,663 $ 1,109 $ 2,950 $ 6,103 $ 440 $ 842 $ 67,687 December 31, 2016 Domestic Foreign Commercial real estate: other Commercial construction & real estate: Commercial land farmland & real estate: Residential: Residential: Commercial development commercial multifamily first lien junior lien Consumer Foreign Total (Dollars in Thousands) Balance at December 31, $ 21,431 $ 13,920 $ 19,769 $ 1,248 $ 3,509 $ 5,321 $ 638 $ 1,152 $ 66,988 Losses charge to allowance (32,959) (16) (1,890) (180) (70) (331) (414) (41) (35,901) Recoveries credited to allowance 7,110 6,099 119 — 21 278 69 19 13,715 Net losses charged to allowance (25,849) 6,083 (1,771) (180) (49) (53) (345) (22) (22,186) Provision (credit) charged to operations 30,067 (6,114) (1,267) (262) (1,005) (1,552) 238 (246) 19,859 Balance at December 31, $ 25,649 $ 13,889 $ 16,731 $ 806 $ 2,455 $ 3,716 $ 531 $ 884 $ 64,661 The allowance for probable loan losses is a reserve established through a provision for probable loan losses charged to expense, which represents management’s best estimate of probable loan losses when evaluating loans (i) individually or (ii) collectively. The decrease in the provision for probable loan losses charged to expense for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 can be attributed to a decrease in the historical loss experience in the commercial category of the calculation. As discussed in prior periods, charge-offs increased from historical levels due to the deterioration of one relationship that was secured by multiple pieces of transportation equipment beginning in the fourth quarter of 2014. We use a three-year historical charge-off experience in the calculation, therefore, as those charge-offs are eliminated from the calculation, the allowance for probable loan losses is impacted. As fluctuations occur in historical loss factors, management evaluates the need to adjust the qualitative factors used in the calculation to properly reflect probable loan losses. The increase in losses charged to the allowance for probable loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2016 can be attributed to further deterioration in the previously identified and charged down relationship primarily secured by multiple pieces of transportation equipment. In March 2016, litigation against the management of the borrower was filed in the State of Nevada, resulting in a going concern issue with the borrower’s operations and the future use of the transportation equipment pledged as collateral on the relationship. As a result, management, in accordance with its credit review procedures, re-evaluated the collateral values on the equipment in light of the new circumstances and reduced the collateral values accordingly, resulting in a further charge-down of the relationship of approximately $19.4 million, which is included in the losses charged to the allowance in the commercial category in the table detailing the year ended December 31, 2016 activity. The table below provides additional information on the balance of loans individually or collectively evaluated for impairment and their related allowance, by loan class: December 31, 2018 Loans Individually Loans Collectively Evaluated For Evaluated For Impairment Impairment Recorded Recorded Investment Allowance Investment Allowance (Dollars in Thousands) Domestic Commercial $ 9,179 $ 656 $ 1,119,790 $ 11,940 Commercial real estate: other construction & land development 2,092 116 1,884,139 15,007 Commercial real estate: farmland & commercial 3,509 — 1,946,389 19,353 Commercial real estate: multifamily 507 — 225,750 1,808 Residential: first lien 6,244 — 439,556 3,467 Residential: junior lien 901 — 726,400 7,719 Consumer 1,175 — 45,141 447 Foreign 293 — 150,224 871 Total $ 23,900 $ 772 $ 6,537,389 $ 60,612 December 31, 2017 Loans Individually Loans Collectively Evaluated For Evaluated For Impairment Impairment Recorded Recorded Investment Allowance Investment Allowance (Dollars in Thousands) Domestic Commercial $ 17,947 $ 300 $ 1,068,520 $ 27,605 Commercial real estate: other construction & land development 2,455 116 1,681,095 11,559 Commercial real estate: farmland & commercial 33,123 18 2,010,162 16,645 Commercial real estate: multifamily 476 — 192,440 1,109 Residential: first lien 6,852 — 425,925 2,950 Residential: junior lien 723 — 700,025 6,103 Consumer 1,281 — 48,262 440 Foreign 347 — 158,539 842 Total $ 63,204 $ 434 $ 6,284,968 $ 67,253 The decrease in loans individually evaluated for impairment at December 31, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017, can be attributed to the foreclosure on a relationship primarily secured by a water park and the foreclosure of the collateral on a relationship secured by multiple pieces of transportation equipment. The foreclosure of the collateral securing the two relationships is also impacting the balances reported as impaired loans in the following tables. Loans accounted for on a non‑accrual basis at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 amounted to $15,791,000, $54,730,000 and $37,245,000, respectively. The effect of such non‑accrual loans reduced interest income by approximately $1,119,000, $977,000 and $2,461,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amounts received on non‑accruals are applied, for financial accounting purposes, first to principal and then to interest after all principal has been collected. Accruing loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest payments at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 amounted to approximately $40,674,000, $7,257,000 and $5,226,000, respectively and can be attributed to a relationship that is secured by multiple pieces of real property on which car dealerships are operated. The table below provides additional information on loans accounted for on a non‑accrual basis by loan class: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 (Dollars in Thousands) Domestic Commercial $ 9,143 $ 17,909 Commercial real estate: other construction & land development 2,092 2,455 Commercial real estate: farmland & commercial 3,509 33,123 Commercial real estate: multifamily 507 476 Residential: first lien 347 712 Residential: junior lien 171 11 Consumer 22 44 Total non-accrual loans $ 15,791 $ 54,730 Impaired loans are those loans where it is probable that all amounts due according to contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. We have identified these loans through our normal loan review procedures. Impaired loans are measured based on (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; (ii) the loan’s observable market price; or (iii) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Substantially all of our impaired loans are measured at the fair value of the collateral. In limited cases, we may use other methods to determine the level of impairment of a loan if such loan is not collateral dependent. The following tables detail key information regarding our impaired loans by loan class for the year ended December 31, 2018: December 31, 2018 Unpaid Average Recorded Principal Related Recorded Interest Investment Balance Allowance Investment Recognized (Dollars in Thousands) Loans with Related Allowance Domestic Commercial $ 1,563 $ 2,161 $ 656 $ 1,741 $ — Commercial real estate: other construction & land development 135 169 116 141 — Total impaired loans with related allowance $ 1,698 $ 2,330 $ 772 $ 1,882 $ — December 31, 2018 Unpaid Average Recorded Principal Recorded Interest Investment Balance Investment Recognized (Dollars in Thousands) Loans with No Related Allowance Domestic Commercial $ 7,616 $ 7,730 $ 16,194 $ 3 Commercial real estate: other construction & land development 1,957 2,205 2,151 — Commercial real estate: farmland & commercial 3,509 4,031 36,632 — Commercial real estate: multifamily 507 538 565 — Residential: first lien 6,244 6,386 7,136 305 Residential: junior lien 901 911 976 44 Consumer 1,175 1,190 1,211 2 Foreign 293 293 327 14 Total impaired loans with no related allowance $ 22,202 $ 23,284 $ 65,192 $ 368 The following tables detail key information regarding our impaired loans by loan class for the year ended December 31, 2017: December 31, 2017 Unpaid Average Recorded Principal Related Recorded Interest Investment Balance Allowance Investment Recognized (Dollars in Thousands) Loans with Related Allowance Domestic Commercial real estate: other construction & land development $ 1,300 $ 1,577 $ 300 1,346 — Commercial real estate: farmland & commercial 145 169 116 150 — Commercial real estate: multifamily 449 590 18 489 — Total impaired loans with related allowance $ 1,894 $ 2,336 $ 434 $ 1,985 $ — December 31, 2017 Unpaid Average Recorded Principal Recorded Interest Investment Balance Investment Recognized (Dollars in Thousands) Loans with No Related Allowance Domestic Commercial $ 16,646 $ 44,095 $ 19,615 $ 3 Commercial real estate: other construction & land development 2,310 2,455 3,493 — Commercial real estate: farmland & commercial 32,675 33,275 38,536 — Commercial real estate: multifamily 476 505 511 — Residential: first lien 6,852 6,968 7,249 324 Residential: junior lien 723 736 970 45 Consumer 1,281 1,283 1,293 3 Foreign 347 347 750 16 Total impaired loans with no related allowance $ 61,310 $ 89,664 $ 72,417 $ 391 A portion of the impaired loans have adequate collateral and credit enhancements not requiring a related allowance for loan loss. Management is confident our loss exposure regarding these credits will be significantly reduced due to our long‑standing practices that emphasize secured lending with strong collateral positions and guarantor support. Management is likewise confident the reserve for probable loan losses is adequate. Management recognizes the risks associated with these impaired loans. However, management's decision to place loans in this category does not necessarily mean that losses will occur. In the current environment, troubled loan management can be protracted because of the legal and process problems that delay the collection of an otherwise collectible loan. Additionally, management believes that the collateral related to these impaired loans and/or the secondary support from guarantors mitigates the potential for losses from impaired loans. The following table details loans accounted for as “troubled debt restructuring,” segregated by loan class. Loans accounted for as troubled debt restructuring are included in impaired loans. December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 (Dollars in Thousands) Domestic Commercial $ 35 $ 6,910 Commercial real estate: farmland & commercial — — Residential: first lien 5,947 6,140 Residential: junior lien 730 712 Consumer 1,153 1,237 Foreign 293 347 Total troubled debt restructuring $ 8,158 $ 15,346 The Subsidiary Banks charge-off that portion of any loan which management considers to represent a loss, as well as that portion of any other loan which is classified as a “loss” by bank examiners. Commercial and industrial or real estate loans are generally considered by management to represent a loss, in whole or part, when an exposure beyond any collateral coverage is apparent and when no further collection of the loss portion is anticipated based on the borrower’s financial condition and general economic conditions in the borrower’s industry. Generally, unsecured consumer loans are charged‑off when 90 days past due. While management considers that it is generally able to identify borrowers with financial problems reasonably early and to monitor credit extended to such borrowers carefully, there is no precise method of predicting loan losses. The determination that a loan is likely to be uncollectible and that it should be wholly or partially charged‑off as a loss is an exercise of judgment. Similarly, the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for probable loan losses can be made only on a subjective basis. It is the judgment of our management that the allowance for probable loan losses at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, was adequate to absorb probable losses from loans in the portfolio at that date. The following table presents information regarding the aging of past due loans by loan class: December 31, 2018 90 Days or Total 30 - 59 60 - 89 90 Days or greater & Past Total Days Days Greater still accruing Due Current Portfolio (Dollars in Thousands) Domestic Commercial $ 4,651 $ 1,089 $ 19,851 $ 10,890 $ 25,591 $ 1,103,378 $ 1,128,969 Commercial real estate: other construction & land development 727 1,707 922 16 3,356 1,882,875 1,886,231 Commercial real estate: farmland & commercial 2,928 784 27,239 24,910 30,951 1,918,947 1,949,898 Commercial real estate: multifamily 927 — 578 71 1,505 224,752 226,257 Residential: first lien 3,998 1,677 3,362 3,079 9,037 436,763 445,800 Residential: junior lien 1,155 618 1,108 937 2,881 724,420 727,301 Consumer 486 19 45 32 550 45,766 46,316 Foreign 1,106 117 739 739 1,962 148,555 150,517 Total past due loans $ 15,978 $ 6,011 $ 53,844 $ 40,674 $ 75,833 $ 6,485,456 $ 6,561,289 December 31, 2017 90 Days or Total 30 - 59 60 - 89 90 Days or greater & Past Total Days Days Greater still accruing Due Current Portfolio (Dollars in Thousands) Domestic Commercial $ 3,790 $ 398 $ 18,308 $ 537 $ 22,496 $ 1,063,971 $ 1,086,467 Commercial real estate: other construction & land development 354 308 820 6 1,482 1,682,068 1,683,550 Commercial real estate: farmland & commercial 3,925 518 31,133 954 35,576 2,007,709 2,043,285 Commercial real estate: multifamily 84 — 476 — 560 192,356 192,916 Residential: first lien 4,295 2,458 4,095 3,861 10,848 421,929 432,777 Residential: junior lien 1,310 580 1,110 1,099 3,000 697,748 700,748 Consumer 868 98 160 133 1,126 48,417 49,543 Foreign 1,229 69 667 667 1,965 156,921 158,886 Total past due loans $ 15,855 $ 4,429 $ 56,769 $ 7,257 $ 77,053 $ 6,271,119 $ 6,348,172 The increase in the commercial real estate: farmland and commercial in the 90 days and greater category at December 31, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017 can be attributed to a relationship that is secured by multiple pieces of real property on which car dealerships are operated. The allowance based on historical loss experience on our remaining loan portfolio, which includes the “Special Review Credits,” “Watch List—Pass Credits,” and “Watch List—Substandard Credits” is determined by segregating the remaining loan portfolio into certain categories such as commercial loans, installment loans, international loans, loan concentrations and overdrafts. Installment loans are then further segregated by number of days past due. A historical loss percentage, adjusted for (i) management’s evaluation of changes in lending policies and procedures, (ii) current economic conditions in the market area served, (iii) other risk factors, (iv) the effectiveness of the internal loan review function, (v) changes in loan portfolios, and (vi) the composition and concentration of credit volume is applied to each category. Each category is then added together to determine the allowance allocated under ASC 450‑20. A summary of the loan portfolio by credit quality indicator by loan class is as follows: December 31, 2018 Special Watch Watch List— Watch List— Pass Review List—Pass Substandard Impaired (Dollars in Thousands) Domestic Commercial $ 998,625 $ 441 $ 44,544 $ 76,180 $ 9,179 Commercial real estate: other construction & land development 1,817,098 1,648 9,055 56,338 2,092 Commercial real estate: farmland & commercial 1,726,711 62,046 38,373 119,259 3,509 Commercial real estate: multifamily 224,823 — — 927 507 Residential: first lien 438,773 — 142 641 6,244 Residential: junior lien 725,538 — 862 — 901 Consumer 45,141 — — — 1,175 Foreign 150,224 — — — 293 Total $ 6,126,933 $ 64,135 $ 92,976 $ 253,345 $ 23,900 December 31, 2017 Special Watch Watch List— Watch List— Pass Review List—Pass Substandard Impaired (Dollars in Thousands) Domestic Commercial $ 905,707 $ — $ 3,170 $ 159,643 $ 17,947 Commercial real estate: other construction & land development 1,616,604 1,288 672 62,531 2,455 Commercial real estate: farmland & commercial 1,863,763 5,134 41,820 99,445 33,123 Commercial real estate: multifamily 192,440 — — — 476 Residential: first lien 425,811 40 — 74 6,852 Residential: junior lien 699,875 150 — — 723 Consumer 48,262 — — — 1,281 Foreign 158,539 — — — 347 Total $ 5,911,001 $ 6,612 $ 45,662 $ 321,693 $ 63,204 The increase in special review credits in the commercial real estate: farmland and commercial for December 31, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017 can be attributed to a relationship secured by children’s learning centers reclassified from the Pass category. The increase in Watch-List Pass commercial credits can be attributed to the reclassification of a relationship in the oil and gas production business from Watch-List Substandard. The decrease in Watch-List Substandard for December 31, 2018 can be attributed to the payoff of a relationship secured by barges used in the transportation of petroleum products, the reclassification of a relationship secured by accounts receivable to Pass and the previously mentioned reclassification of the relationship in the oil and gas production business to Watch-List Pass. The increase in Watch-List Substandard commercial credits for December 31, 2018 can be attributed to a relationship secured by real property on which car dealerships are operated from the Pass category. The decrease in Watch-List Impaired credits in the commercial real estate: farmland and commercial at December 31, 2018 can be attributed to the foreclosure of a loan relationship primarily secured by a water park. |