that of its benchmark and Morningstar peer group. The Directors noted that the only performance information available was for the1-year period ended December 31, 2018, and that the BlackRock Fund had underperformed its bench mark and peer group. They noted, however, that the BlackRock Fund performance was in the 54th percentile of its peer group. Based on this performance, the Directors concluded that BlackRock has the ability to manage the Portfolio effectively going forward.
Fees and Expenses, Profitability, & Economies of Scale
The Board reviewed charts showing how the Portfolio’s proposed advisory andsub-advisory fees compared to the advisory andsub-advisory fees of the funds in its peer group. The charts showed the number of funds in the peer group within each defined range of advisory fees orsub-advisory fees, and the range that included the Portfolio. The Directors also noted that the Adviser, and not the Portfolio, is responsible for payingsub-advisory fees to theSub-Adviser. The Board also considered the reasonableness of the proposedsub-advisory fees to be paid by the Adviser to theSub-Adviser for the Portfolio. The Directors relied on the ability of the Adviser to negotiate the terms of theSub-Advisory Agreement, including thesub-advisory fee, atarm’s-length, noting that the Adviser is not affiliated with theSub-Adviser. With respect to the Portfolio, the Directors noted that the proposed advisory andsub-advisory fees were lower than the current fees. They also noted that the advisory fees payable by the Portfolio were well within the range of fees payable by the Portfolio’s peer group. The Directors remarked that, because thesub-advisory fees were paid by the Adviser and not by the Portfolio, the Adviser was incentivized to negotiate a favorable fee. Accordingly, the cost of services provided by theSub-Adviser and the profitability of theSub-Adviser in connection with its relationship with the Portfolio were not material factors in the Board’s deliberations. For similar reasons, the Board concluded that the potential realization of economies of scale by the Portfolio from thesub-advisory arrangement with theSub-Adviser should not be a material factor in its deliberations.
After consideration of the foregoing, the Board reached the following conclusions regarding the proposedSub-Advisory Agreement, in addition to the conclusions set forth above: (a) theSub-Adviser possesses the capability and resources to perform the duties required of it under theSub-Advisory Agreement; (b) the investment philosophy, strategies and techniques of the Adviser are appropriate for pursuing the Portfolio’s investment objective; (c) theSub-Adviser is likely to execute its investment philosophy, strategies and techniques consistently over time; and (d) theSub-Adviser maintains appropriate compliance programs. Based on all of the above-mentioned factors and their related conclusions, with no single factor or conclusion being determinative and with each Director not necessarily attributing the same weight to each factor, the Directors unanimously approved theSub-Advisory Agreement.
The Adviser and Administrator. The Adviser serves as investment adviser for the Fund and all of its portfolios. The Adviser is wholly-owned by The Ohio National Life Insurance Company (“ONLIC”), which serves as the principal administrator for the Fund. The Adviser and ONLIC are located at One Financial Way, Montgomery, Ohio 45242.
Annual and Semi-Annual Reports. The Fund has previously sent its most recent Annual Report and Semi-Annual Report to its shareholders. Copies of them are available, without charge, by writing to the Fund at One Financial Way, Montgomery, Ohio 45242 or by calling 877.665.6642.
5