![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/8-K/0001564590-22-008845/g192566dsp252.jpg)
The Charles Schwab Corporation
March 3, 2022
Page 3
Delaware Constitution, and reported judicial decisions interpreting these laws) and those laws, statutes, rules and regulations of the State of California (exclusive of municipal and other local laws) presently in effect that, in our experience, are normally applicable to transactions of the type contemplated by the documents referred to above, and we express no opinion with respect to choice of law or conflicts of law. We express no opinion whatsoever as to the compliance or noncompliance by any person with antifraud or information delivery provisions of state or federal laws, rules and regulations, and no inference regarding such compliance or noncompliance may be drawn from any opinion in this letter.
Based upon the foregoing, and subject to the qualifications, limitations and exceptions set forth herein, and assuming, without expressing any opinion with respect thereto, that the Notes have been duly authenticated and delivered in accordance with the Indenture, and have been issued, sold and delivered against payment of the purchase price therefor in accordance with the Underwriting Agreement and the Indenture, we are of the opinion that the Notes constitute binding obligations of the Company, except as the binding nature of the same may be limited by one or more of the Stated Exceptions (as defined below).
Our opinion in the preceding paragraph is subject to and limited by the effects of each of the following (collectively, the “Stated Exceptions”): (i) applicable federal or state bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, arrangement, moratorium, fraudulent transfer or conveyance, and other laws or court decisions relating to or affecting the rights of creditors; (ii) equitable principles of general applicability (including, without limitation, concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing, equitable subordination, and the possible unavailability of specific performance or injunctive relief), regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law or whether codified by statute; (iii) California judicial decisions which have held that certain provisions, including without limitation those providing for the acceleration of indebtedness upon the occurrence of specified events, are unenforceable under circumstances where it cannot be demonstrated that the enforcement of such provisions (A) is reasonably necessary for the protection of the party seeking enforcement, (B) has been undertaken in good faith under the circumstances then existing, and (C) is commercially reasonable; (iv) limitations on the enforceability of indemnification, release, contribution, exculpatory or nonliability provisions under federal or state securities laws, under Sections 1542, 1543 and 2772-78 of the California Civil Code, and under any other applicable statute or court decisions, including, without limitation, the effect of California statutes and cases applying such statutes which have denied enforcement of indemnification agreements against the indemnitee’s negligence, wrongdoing or violation of law; (v) the potential to vary the provisions of an unambiguous agreement on the basis of parol evidence; (vi) the unenforceability, under certain circumstances, of provisions which provide for penalties, liquidated damages, acceleration of future amounts due (other than principal) without appropriate discount to present value, prepayment charges, late charges, additional interest in the event of a default or fees or costs related to such charges; (vii) the unenforceability, under certain