In November, 1993, the Board of Directors adopted a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) to provide a supplemental retirement benefit to key management or highly compensated employees of the Company who may be designated from time to time by the Compensation Committee.
The purpose of the SERP is to assure that each participant receives an annual retirement benefit starting at age 65, based on years of service, of up to 50% of the average of his or her highest consecutive five years’ annual compensation (which relates to the salary and bonus columns of the Summary Compensation Table on page 7) during the ten years preceding the participant’s retirement, disability, termination of employment or removal from the SERP. When a participant retires, or if a participant’s employment is terminated within 24 months of a change in control, the SERP benefit is calculated, and then funds from the following sources are deducted to determine the payment due from the Company under the SERP; (i) one half of the participant’s monthly social security insurance benefit and (ii) the participant’s accrued benefits attributable to employer contributions to the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan, 401 (k) Plan, Excess Benefit Plan, Deferred Compensation Plan and any other qualified or non-qualified pension or deferred compensation plans maintained by the Company. If the sum of these payments exceeds the participant’s benefit computed under the SERP, then no payment will be due from the Company under the SERP.
The table above shows the assumed actuarial value of the retirement plan benefits plus the SERP payment which, when taken together, will result in a total retirement payment based on average compensation and years of service. Assuming retirement at age 65, or termination of employment within 24 months of a change in control, the number of years of service for the four individuals named in the summary compensation table would be: Christopher J. Carey, 20 years; Robert L. Hoverson, 24 years; Mark E. Magee, 28 years; and Philip R. Myers, 42 years.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCEThe graph below summarizes the cumulative return experienced by Provident’s shareholders over the years 1995 through 2000, compared to the NASDAQ Index and the Keefe, Bruyette & Woods 50 Bank Index which is a market-capitalization weighted bank stock index that includes all money-center banks and most major regional bank holding companies, and is a widely available index. The number of companies comprising the KBW 50 Index allows ready comparisons of Provident’s stock with an industry standard. Provident is not included in the KBW 50 Index.
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONSProvident and its subsidiaries, in their normal course of business have had and, to the extent permitted by applicable regulations and other regulatory restrictions expect to continue to have, transactions with Provident’s directors, officers, principal shareholders and affiliates of such persons including American Financial Group, Inc. (“AFG”) and its subsidiaries. All such transactions are and will be on terms no less favorable to Provident than those which could be obtained with non-affiliated parties.
Provident received $246,000 in 2000 from AFG in connection with an expense sharing arrangement for a cafeteria operated by Provident for the employees of both companies. A subsidiary of AFG provides security guard and surveillance services at Provident’s main office for which Provident was charged $100,000 in 2000. Provident leases its main banking and corporate offices from a trust for the benefit of a subsidiary of AFG. Provident was charged rent under the leases of $2,951,000 in 2000.
Certain of the principal shareholders, directors and executive officers of Provident maintain investments in Provident commercial paper and repurchase agreements. The average month-end commercial paper balances for such persons (including commercial paper held by corporations they control, members of their immediate families and trusts for their benefit) for 2000 were as follows: Carl H. Lindner, $7,898,000; Keith E. Lindner, $5,074,000; siblings of Carl H. Lindner, $1,662,000; and Philip R. Myers, $84,000. The average month-end repurchase agreement balances for such persons for 2000 were as follows: AFG, $4,983,000; Carl H. Lindner, $297,000; and S. Craig Lindner $1,635,000.
Loans and lines of credit were extended by Provident Bank in 2000 to certain of Provident’s executive officers, directors, principal shareholders, affiliates of such persons and to members of their families. Management believes that such loans and lines of credit were made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. During 2000, the highest month-end outstanding balances of loans to principal shareholders of Provident and their related interests were as follows: AFG, $13,666,000; Carl H. Lindner, $4,085,000; siblings of Carl H. Lindner, $20,702,000; and S. Craig Lindner, $2,554,000. In addition, subsidiaries of Provident Bank have entered into various automobile and equipment leases with AFG from time to time on market terms and conditions. During 2000, the aggregate payments on these leases were $710,000 by AFG.
PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTEIn addition to voting for directors, the following two proposals will be presented by Provident and voted on at the Meeting. A majority of the votes cast is required to approve each proposal. The votes will be computed for each proposal as described on page 1.
PROPOSAL TO INCREASE NUMBER OF SHARES UNDER 1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN
(Item 2 on the proxy form)On May 15, 1997, the shareholders of Provident adopted the 1997 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) for the purpose on enabling Provident to retain and attract employees of outstanding ability and to encourage ownership of Provident Common Stock by those persons. All of Provident’s approximately 3,200 employees are eligible to receive options. Provident’s non-employee directors are not eligible to receive options. The proposed amendment, if adopted, will increase the number of shares subject to the Plan by 3,000,000 shares, bringing the total to 7,000,000 shares subject to the Plan.
There are presently options outstanding for the purchase of 3,802,000 shares under this Plan, and 87,000 shares are available for the grant of additional options. Under these circumstances, the Board of Directors believes it advisable for the Plan to be increased so as to make additional options available for grants in furtherance of the purposes of the Plan.
The Plan provides for the granting of options that are incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue Code and for those that are non-qualified stock options. The major differences between these types of options relate to federal income tax consequences upon exercise or sale. Employees who receive options incur no federal income tax liability at the time of grant and Provident has no tax deduction. Optionees exercising non-qualified options recognize taxable income at the time of exercise to the extent of the difference between market price at the time and exercise price and Provident has a tax deduction to the same extent. Optionees exercising incentive stock options do not recognize taxable income until they sell the stock. If the stock is sold or disposed of more than two years after the date of grant and one year after the date of exercise, any gains realized will be treated as capital gains for federal income tax purposes and Provident will receive no tax deduction. Sales within those periods of time generate ordinary income to the optionee and a tax deduction to Provident, to the extent of the difference between the option exercise price and the market value of the stock on the date of exercise. The same amount for an incentive stock option constitutes a tax adjustment item for purposes of the alternative minimum tax.
The exercise price per share may not be less than 100% of the market value on the date of grant for incentive stock options and not less than 95% of the market value in the case of non-qualified options. The exercise price of incentive options for persons beneficially owning 10% or more of Provident’s outstanding Common Stock must be at least 110% of the market value at the time of grant. On March 13, 2001, the closing sale price for Provident’s Common Stock was $29.31 per share.
The vesting schedule and expiration dates for all options are determined at the time of each particular stock option grant. Options generally do not become exercisable until one year from the date of grant. Thereafter, the options generally provide for vesting on a schedule of 20% per year, although options may be granted with different vesting schedules. The right to exercise options is cumulative to the extent not utilized in prior periods. The length of each option may vary from one to ten years. Optionees who own beneficially 10% or more of Provident’s outstanding Common Stock may only be granted incentive options for terms of five years or less. Options may be exercised for cash or for Provident Common Stock at its fair market value on date of exercise. Provident does not receive any consideration from employees upon the grant of options.
The Compensation Committee, consisting of Messrs. Peerless, Grote and Pedoto was directed by the Board of Directors to administer the Plan. The Committee grants options, determines vesting and otherwise administers the Plan.
The Board of Directors recommends that Section 4.1 of the Plan be amended to increase the number of shares subject to option by 3,000,000 shares and, as so amended, the said Article will read in its entirety as follows:
SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN
4.1 The Shares that may be made subject to Options granted under the Plan shall not exceed 7,000,000 Shares in the aggregate. Except as provided in Section 4.2, upon lapse or termination of any Option for any reason without being completely exercised, the shares which were subject to such Option may again be subject to other Options. All other terms and conditions of the Plan will remain unchanged.
Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that your vote FOR the increase in shares authorized under Provident’s 1997 Stock Option Plan.
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS (Item 3 on the proxy form)The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has recommended the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, as independent public accountants to audit Provident’s books, records and accounts for 2001, subject to your approval. Ernst & Young served as Provident’s independent auditors for 2000. Provident paid fees to Ernst & Young during 2000 as follows:
Audit Fees Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees All Other Fees (including Audit Related Fees of $551,000) | $ 300,000 $ 0 $1,512,000 |
The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the foregoing non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young.
One or more representatives of the firm will attend the Annual Meeting and will be given the opportunity to comment, if they so desire, and to respond to appropriate questions.
Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the approval of Ernst & Young LLP as Provident’s independent public accounts for 2001.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR NEXT YEARThe deadline for shareholder proposals to be included in the Proxy Statement for next year’s meeting is November 23, 2001.
The form of Proxy for this meeting grants authority to the designated proxies to vote in their discretion on any matters that come before the meeting except those set forth in the Company’s Proxy Statement and except for matters as to which adequate notice is received. In order for a notice to be deemed adequate for the 2002 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, it must be received prior to February 6, 2002. If there is a change in the anticipated date of next year’s annual meeting or these deadlines by more than 30 days, we will notify you of this change through our Form 10-Q filings.
QUESTIONS?Provident will send upon written request, without charge, a copy of Provident’s current annual report on Form 10-K to any Provident shareholder who writes to Investor Relations at the address shown below. If you have questions or need more information about the annual meeting, write to:
Patricia A. Forsythe
Assistant Vice President, Investor Relations
Provident Financial Group, Inc.
MS 843A
One East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
E-mail:
InvestorRelations@provident-financial.com
or call us at (513) 345-7102 or (800) 851-9521.
For more information about Provident, visit our website at www.provident-financial.com. For information about your record holdings call The Provident Bank Shareholder Services at (888) 863-5893.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Mark E. Magee
SecretaryAPPENDIX I
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
OrganizationThis charter governs the operations of the Audit Committee. The Committee shall review and reassess the charter at least annually and obtain the approval of the Board of Directors. The Committee shall be appointed by the Board of Directors and shall be comprised of at least three directors, each of whom is independent of management and the company. Members of the Committee shall be considered independent if they have no relationship that may interfere with the exercise of their independence from management and the company. All Committee members shall be financially literate, (or shall become financially literate within a reasonable period of time after appointment to the Committee) and at least one member shall have accounting or related financial management expertise.
Statement of PolicyThe Audit Committee shall provide assistance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling their oversight responsibility to the shareholders, potential shareholders, the investment community, and others relating to the company’s financial statements and the financial reporting process, the systems of internal accounting and financial controls, the internal audit function, the annual independent audit of the company’s financial statements, and the legal compliance and ethics programs as established by management and the Board. In so doing, it is the responsibility of the Committee to maintain free and open communication between the Committee, independent auditors, the internal auditors and management of the company. In discharging its oversight role, the Committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention, with full access to all books, records, facilities, and personnel of the company and the power to retain outside counsel, or other experts for this purpose.
Responsibilities and ProcessesThe primary responsibility of the Audit Committee is to oversee the company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board and report the results of their activities to the Board. Management is responsible for preparing the company’s financial statements, and the independent auditors are responsible for auditing those financial statements. The Committee in carrying out its responsibilities believes its policies and procedures should remain flexible, in order to best react to changing conditions and circumstances. The Committee should take the appropriate actions to set the overall corporate “tone” for quality financial reporting, sound business risk practices, and ethical behavior.
The following shall be the principal recurring processes of the Audit Committee in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. The processes are set forth as a guide, with the understanding that the Committee may supplement them as appropriate.
- The Committee shall have a clear understanding with management and the independent auditors that the independent auditors are ultimately accountable to the Board and the Audit Committee, as representatives of the company’s shareholders. The Committee shall have the ultimate authority and responsibility to evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the independent auditors. The Committee shall discuss with the auditors their independence from management and the company and the matters included in the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board. Annually, the Committee shall review and recommend to the Board the selection of the company’s independent auditors, subject to shareholders’ approval.
- The Committee shall discuss with the internal auditors and the independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits including the adequacy of staffing and compensation. Also, the Committee shall discuss with management, the internal auditors, and the independent auditors the adequacy and effectiveness of the accounting and financial controls, including the company’s system to monitor and manage business risk, and legal and ethical compliance programs. Further, the Committee shall meet separately with the internal auditors and the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations.
- The Committee shall require the independent auditor’s review of the company’s quarterly financial statements prior to the filing of the 10-Q. The Committee will review items brought forward by the independent auditor.
- The Committee shall review with management and the independent auditors the financial statements to be included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (or the annual report to shareholders if distributed prior to the filing of Form 10-K), including their judgement about the quality, not just acceptability, of accounting principles. Also, the Committee shall discuss the results of the annual audit and any other matters required to be communicated to the Committee by the independent auditors under generally accepted auditing standards.