The tax recovery in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 is a result of the tax losses at Dextran Products during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. The Canadian operations continue to have significant research and development tax pools to offset current taxes payable. Chemdex had increased taxable income during the second quarter of fiscal year 2006, as compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, resulting in an increased tax provision.
As of July 31, 2005, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $1,889,643, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $2,401,051 at January 31, 2005. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 the Company generated cash of $76,058 in its operating activities, compared to $144,514 for the second quarter of fiscal year 2005. The decrease of cash generated from operations during the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 is primarily due to the loss incurred during the quarter. Significant cash was utilized for investing activities related to new equipment and the acquisition of additional investments available for sale. Although there was a large increase in net income in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, the increase resulted from the sale of the Vet Labs assets and its interest in the Joint Venture, which was an investing activity. Depreciation and amortization continues to be a large non-cash expense of the Company.
The Company had $2,823,349 of working capital and a current ratio of 3.2 to 1 as of July 31, 2005 compared to $3,691,418 and 3.8 to 1 as of January 31, 2005.
In July 2005, the Company committed to the purchase of a pharmaceutical stainless steel spray dryer in the amount of approximately $132,000 with full payment expected to be made during the third quarter of fiscal 2006. The Company at present does not have any other material commitments for capital expenditures, although management intends to continue the plant refurbishment process at Dextran Products in Toronto.
Management expects the primary source of its future capital needs to be a combination of company earnings, existing cash reserves and borrowings. The Company believes that, based upon the current levels of revenues and spending, its existing working capital resources will be sufficient to support continuing operations for the foreseeable future.
At July 31, 2005, the Company had accounts receivable of $726,361 and inventory of $1,360,019, compared to $922,267 and $1,516,893 at January 31, 2005 and $698,866 and $1,351,927 at July 31, 2004. The decrease in accounts receivable during the second quarter
ended July 31, 2005 is due to decreased sales during the quarter. Accounts receivable and inventory levels at July 31, 2005 are consistent with the levels at July 31, 2004.
At July 31, 2005, the Company had accounts payable of $511,421 compared to $463,579 at January 31, 2005 and $368,554 at July 31, 2004. The increase in accounts payable was due to timing of supplier payments, including the acquisition of new equipment.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2006, capital expenditures totaled $72,610, as compared to $15,536 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005. The majority of capital expenditures were for production equipment at the Dextran Products plant in Toronto during both of these periods. Management intends to continue its plant refurbishment and expansion plan during the remainder of fiscal year 2006, and expects capital expenditures to increase during this period.
The change in accumulated other comprehensive income of the Company is primarily attributable to the currency translation adjustment of Dextran Products. Dextran Products’ functional currency is the Canadian dollar. This currency translation adjustment arises from the translation of Dextran Products’ financial statements to U.S. dollars.
Dextran Products has a Cdn. $1,250,000 (U.S. $1,021,000) line of credit, of which Cdn. $30,000 (U.S. $24,500) was utilized at July 31, 2005. At January 31, 2005, Cdn. $30,000 (U.S. $24,000) of this line of credit was utilized. This line of credit bears interest at the Canadian banks’ prime lending rate plus 0.75% (July 31, 2005 — 5%; January 31, 2005 — 5%). This indebtedness is collateralized by a general security agreement over the Company’s assets and a collateral mortgage of Cdn. $500,000 on the Dextran Products building in Toronto. This line of credit is used periodically by the Company to cover temporary short-term Canadian dollar cash needs. For these short-term cash needs, the interest expense on the credit line is typically less than the transaction costs incurred in selling short-term investments.
Chemdex entered into a long-term debt obligation relating to the redemption of the 10% minority interest in Chemdex in fiscal year 2004. The redemption amount was $146,500, which is to be paid in 25 equal monthly installments of $5,860. The Company has made 23 payments through July 31, 2005. Since this installment contract is non-interest bearing, it has been discounted using a discount rate of 9%. The present value of this installment contract is $11,631, which has been recorded as a current liability.
The decrease in long-term debt and capital lease obligations from January 31, 2005 is due to continuing payments by the Company. The majority of the long-term debt and capital lease obligations are due in the next two years.
Changes in the relative values of the Canadian dollar and the United States dollar occur from time to time and may, in certain instances, materially affect the Company’s results of operations.
The Company does not believe that the impact of inflation and changing prices has had a material effect on its operations or financial results at any time in the last three years.
21
Related Party Transactions
In August 1997, the Company loaned the late Thomas C. Usher, its former Vice-Chairman, Director of Research and Development, a member of its Board of Directors and the beneficial owner of greater than 5% of the outstanding common shares of the Company, $691,500 at an interest rate equal to the prime rate of Toronto Dominion Bank plus 1.50% (the “Loan”). The Loan was used to partially fund a $1,000,000 payment to the State of Florida in order to allow Thomas C. Usher to regain possession of 430,000 Common Shares of the Company then held by the State as collateral security relating to the liquidation of insurance companies formerly owned by Thomas C. Usher. Repayment of the Loan is accomplished by monthly payments and through offsets by the Company against royalty payments due Thomas C. Usher pursuant to intellectual property license agreements and bonus payments, if any, granted Thomas C. Usher as an employee of the Company. The amount outstanding under the Loan as of July 31, 2005 was $349,057, as compared to $373,373 at January 31, 2005, including accrued interest. The Company has taken a cumulative provision of $278,232 against accrued interest on this loan at July 31, 2005, compared to a cumulative provision of $264,543 at January 31, 2005.
In August 1999, Thomas C. Usher personally assumed all of the assets and liabilities of Novadex Corp., including the balance of receivables (the “Receivables”) due to the Company from Novadex Corp. The Receivables have no specific repayment terms. The total outstanding amount of the Receivables as of July 31, 2005 and January 31, 2005 was $285,037. Thomas C. Usher also owes $250,000 to a subsidiary of the Company, Novadex International Limited, as of July 31, 2005, pursuant to a non-interest bearing loan with no specific repayment terms. The outstanding amount of this loan has not changed from January 31, 2005.
Thomas C. Usher had pledged 315,450 common shares of the Company as security for these amounts owing to the Company. These common shares have a market value of $1,577,250 at July 31, 2005, based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the Nasdaq SmallCap market on July 29, 2005, the last trading day prior to July 31, 2005.
During February 2005, Thomas C. Usher passed away. All assets and liabilities of Thomas C. Usher transferred to his estate. The Company will continue to hold the pledged assets as collateral until the loan is repaid. The Company has a commitment to pay an amount of $110,000 to Thomas C. Usher’s estate within one year of his death. At July 31, 2005, $22,200 of this benefit has been paid to the estate.
The Company also has an outstanding loan payable to Ruth Usher, a member of the Board of Directors until her retirement on October 31, 2003, the beneficial owner of greater than 5% of the outstanding common shares of the Company, and the widow of Thomas C. Usher. The amount due from the Company pursuant to this loan decreased to $677,470 at July 31, 2005 from $681,304 at January 31, 2005 due to monthly payments by the Company less interest charges.
22
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
As of July 31 2005, future minimum cash payments due under contractual obligations, including, among others, the Dextran Products line of credit, the loan payable to Ruth Usher, the long-term debt obligation in connection with the Chemdex redemption, research and development agreements and capital lease agreements, are as follows:
Payment due by period
| |
---|
Contractual Obligations
| | | | Total
| | Less than 1 year
| | 1-3 years
| | 3-5 years
| | More than 5 years
|
---|
Long-term debt obligations (1) | | | | $ | 711,909 | | | $ | 90,670 | | | $ | 122,741 | | | $ | 121,028 | | | $ | 377,470 | |
Capital lease obligations (2) | | | | | 257,985 | | | | 232,208 | | | | 22,832 | | | | 2,945 | | | | — | |
Operating Lease obligations (3) | | | | | 528 | | | | 528 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Purchase obligations (4) | | | | | 196,668 | | | | 196,668 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Revolving loans (5) | | | | | 24,508 | | | | 24,508 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Total | | | | $ | 1,191,598 | | | $ | 544,582 | | | $ | 145,573 | | | $ | 123,973 | | | $ | 377,470 | |
| (a) | | Note payable in monthly payments of $5,860 maturing September 19, 2005; |
| (b) | | Note payable in quarterly payments of Cdn. $419 (US $342), bearing interest at 10.43% and maturing December 2009; and |
| (c) | | Amounts due to shareholder which bear interest at the U.S. bank prime lending rate plus 1.5%, with required minimum monthly payments, including interest, of $5,000. |
2. | | Consists of capital lease obligations for: |
| (a) | | Production equipment of Cdn. $236,455 (US $193,166) repayable in monthly installments, bearing interest at 9% and maturing November 2006; |
| (b) | | Production equipment of Cdn. $54,107 (US $44,201) repayable in monthly installments, bearing interest at 7.59% and maturing November 2006; and |
23
| (c) | | Office equipment of Cdn. $25,237 (US $20,617) repayable in quarterly installments, bearing interest at 10.43% and maturing December 2009. |
3. | | Consists of operating lease obligations for office equipment requiring quarterly payments of Cdn. $161 (US $132) terminating June 2006. |
| (a) | | Purchase obligations of $64,668 for research and development services payable as specified milestones are achieved. |
| (b) | | Purchase obligation of GBP 75,000 (US $132,000) for production equipment, half payable in September 2005, and the remainder upon shipment. |
5. | | Consists of Canadian operating line of credit bearing interest at the Canadian banks’ prime lending rate plus 0.75%, repayable upon demand. |
Risk Factors
The risks, uncertainties and other factors described below could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.
The Company’s product development efforts may be reduced or discontinued due to difficulties or delays in clinical trials.
To achieve sustained profitability, the Company must, alone or with corporate partners and collaborators, successfully research, develop and commercialize identified technologies or product candidates. Current developmental product candidates are in various stages of clinical and pre-clinical development and will require significant further funding, research, development, preclinical and/or clinical testing, regulatory approval and commercialization testing, and are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of products based on innovative or novel technologies. These products are also rigorously regulated by the U.S. federal government, particularly the FDA, and by comparable agencies in state and local jurisdictions and in foreign countries. Specifically, each of the following results is possible with respect to any one of the Company’s developmental product candidates:
• | | that the Company will not be able to maintain its current research and development schedules; |
• | | that the Company will not be able to enter into human clinical trials because of scientific, governmental or financial reasons, or that it will encounter problems in clinical trials that will cause a delay or suspension of the development of the product candidate; |
• | | that the developmental product will be found to be ineffective or unsafe; |
• | | that government regulations will delay or prevent the product’s marketing for a considerable period of time and impose costly procedures upon the Company’s activities; |
24
• | | that the FDA or other regulatory agencies will not approve the product or the process by which the product is manufactured, or will not do so on a timely basis; and/or |
• | | that the FDA’s policies may change and additional government regulations and policies may be instituted, which could prevent or delay regulatory approval of the product. |
If any of the risks set forth above occurs, the Company may not be able to successfully develop its identified developmental product candidates.
The Company’s developmental product commercialization efforts may not be successful.
It is possible that, for reasons including, but not limited to those set forth below, the Company may be unable to commercialize or receive royalties from the sale of any given developmental product, even if it is shown to be effective, if:
• | | the product is uneconomical or if the market for the product does not develop or diminishes; |
• | | the Company is not able to enter into arrangements or collaborations to commercialize and/or market the product; |
• | | the product is not eligible for third-party reimbursement from government or private insurers; |
• | | others hold proprietary rights that preclude the Company from commercializing the product; |
• | | others have brought to market similar or superior products; |
• | | others have superior resources to market similar products or technologies; |
• | | government regulation imposes limitations on the indicated uses of the product, or later discovery of previously unknown problems with the product results in added restrictions on the product or results in the product being withdrawn from the market; and/or |
• | | the product has undesirable or unintended side effects that prevent or limit its commercial use. |
The Company depends on partnerships with third parties for the development and commercialization of its products.
The Company’s strategy for development and commercialization of its products is to rely on licensing agreements with third party partners. As a result, the ability of the Company to commercialize future products is dependent upon the success of third parties in performing
25
clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals, manufacturing and successfully marketing its products. There can be no assurance that such third party collaborations will be successful. Should any of the Company’s current research and development partnerships be discontinued, it may not be able to find others to develop and commercialize its current product candidates.
The Company does not currently have agreements with third parties to market its developmental products.
The commercialization of any of the Company’s developmental products that receive FDA approval will depend upon the Company’s ability to enter into agreements with companies that have sales and marketing capabilities. The Company currently intends to sell its products in the United States and internationally in collaboration with one or more marketing partners. The Company may not be able to enter into any such collaboration to market its developmental products in a timely manner or on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.
The Company may be unable to commercialize its products if it is unable to protect its proprietary rights, and may be liable for significant costs and damages if it faces a claim of intellectual property infringement by a third party.
The Company’s success depends in part on its ability to obtain and maintain patents, protect trade secrets and operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. In the absence of patent and trade secret protection, competitors may adversely affect the Company’s business by independently developing and marketing substantially equivalent or superior products, possibly at lower prices. The Company could also incur substantial costs in litigation and suffer diversion of attention of technical and management personnel if it is required to defend intellectual property infringement suits brought by third parties, with or without merit, or if required to initiate litigation against others to protect or assert intellectual property rights. Moreover, any such litigation may not be resolved in favor of the Company.
The Company has received various patents covering the uses of its developmental products. However, the patent position of companies in the pharmaceutical industry generally involves complex legal and factual questions, and recently has been the subject of much litigation. Any patents the Company has obtained, or may obtain in the future, may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. To date, no consistent policy has been developed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents.
In addition, because patent applications in the United States are maintained in secrecy until patents issue, and because publication of discoveries in scientific or patent literature often lags behind actual discoveries, the Company cannot be certain that it and its licensors are the first creators of inventions covered by any licensed patent applications or patents or that the Company or such licensors are the first to file. The United States Patent and Trademark Office may commence interference proceedings involving patents or patent applications, in which the question of first inventorship is contested. Accordingly, the patents owned by or licensed to the Company may not be valid or may not afford the Company protection against competitors with similar intellectual property.
26
It is also possible that the Company’s patents may infringe on patents or other rights owned by others, licenses to which may not be available to the Company. The Company may have to alter its products or processes, pay licensing fees or cease certain activities altogether because of patent rights of third parties.
In addition to the products for which the Company has patents or have filed patent applications, the Company relies upon unpatented proprietary technology and may not be able to meaningfully protect its rights with regard to that unpatented proprietary technology.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, applied on a consistent basis. The critical accounting policies include the use of estimates of allowance for doubtful accounts, the useful lives of assets and the realizability of deferred tax assets. The Company’s accounting policies with respect to the Joint Venture and its disposition are also discussed below.
Management is required to make estimates and assumptions, in preparing the consolidated financial statements, that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods. The actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant estimates made by management include the calculation of reserves for uncollectible accounts, inventory allowances, useful lives of long-lived assets and the realizability of deferred tax assets.
Revenue Recognition
Since March 4, 2004, all revenue is from sales of bulk manufactured products and is recognized when title and risk of ownership of products pass to the customer. Title and risk of ownership pass to the customer pursuant to the applicable sales contract, either upon shipment of product or upon receipt by the customer. Since returns are rare and generally not accepted, management has not made provision for returns. In addition, product sold in bulk quantities is tested, prior to release for shipment, to ensure that it meets customer specifications, and in many cases, customers receive samples for their own testing. Approval is obtained from the customer prior to shipping.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable is stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts. Allowances for doubtful accounts are determined by each reporting unit on a specific item basis. Management reviews the credit worthiness of individual customers and past payment history to determine the allowance for doubtful accounts. Since the majority of sales at Dextran Products are export, Dextran Products maintains credit insurance through a crown corporation for the majority of its customers receivables. There has been no allowance for doubtful accounts during the past two fiscal years.
27
Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation or amortization computed using the straight-line method based on their estimated useful lives ranging from three to fifteen years. Useful life is the period over which the asset is expected to contribute to the Company’s future cash flows. A significant change in estimated useful lives could have a material impact on the results of operations. The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets, including buildings, equipment and other intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from the expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. The measurement of impairment requires management to make estimates of these cash flows related to long-lived assets as well as other fair value determinations.
Deferred Tax Assets
The Company has recorded a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets where there is uncertainty as to the ultimate realization of the future tax deduction. Dextran Products has incurred capital losses, which are only deductible against capital gains. It is not certain that Dextran Products will realize capital gains in the future to use these Canadian capital loss deductions.
The Joint Venture
In 1992, Vet Labs and Sparhawk entered into the Joint Venture for the manufacture and sale of veterinary pharmaceutical products. Vet Labs and Sparhawk each owned 50% of the Joint Venture during its operation. The Joint Venture was governed by the Agreement for the Operation of Veterinary Laboratories, Inc.’s Lenexa Facility and Sparhawk Lab of KC as a Joint Venture, dated December 1, 1992, by and among Sparhawk, Chemdex and Vet Labs (the “Joint Venture Agreement”).
Pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement, the Joint Venture Policy Committee was responsible for the overall management of the Joint Venture, including the direction and control of the persons designated with the daily management responsibilities of the Joint Venture, and the general supervision of the management and conduct of the affairs of the Joint Venture. The Policy Committee consisted of five members, three of which were selected by Vet Labs and two of which were selected by Sparhawk. Decisions of the Policy Committee required a simple majority vote.
Because the Company controlled the operating, financing and investing decisions of the Joint Venture through Vet Labs’ control of the Policy Committee, it consolidated the Joint
28
Venture’s assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses in the Company’s financial statements. The Company has funded the Joint Venture’s cumulative losses since 1992 and, accordingly, has recorded 100% of these losses in the consolidated financial statements.
On January 13, 2004, the Company, Chemdex and Vet Labs entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Sparhawk. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to sell substantially all of the assets of Vet Labs, including its interest in the Joint Venture, to Sparhawk for $5,500,000 in cash. Effective March 4, 2004, this sale was completed and a gain of $1,859,471 was recognized. Simultaneously with the closing, Chemdex advanced $350,000 to Sparhawk in exchange for an unsecured subordinated promissory note bearing interest at 13% per annum and a warrant to purchase 4% of the equity of Sparhawk. The promissory note is payable in full on March 4, 2009. Interest is payable annually, but can be deferred and added to the principal balance of the promissory note each year at Sparhawk’s discretion. The warrant expires at the earlier of payment in full of the promissory note or 10 years from date of issue. The warrant becomes exercisable the day after the fifth anniversary from the date of issue. Chemdex also entered into a supply agreement with Sparhawk to supply ferric hydroxide and hydrogenated dextran solution to Sparhawk on an exclusive basis in the United States for 10 years.
Since Sparhawk is thinly capitalized and highly leveraged, the Company has deferred $350,000 of the gain relating to the promissory note receivable from Sparhawk. The Company will monitor the financial position of Sparhawk and will recognize this deferred gain at such time as Sparhawk’s cash flows from operations are sufficient to fund debt service on a full accrual basis.
Changes in Accounting Policies
No changes in accounting principles or their application have been implemented in the reporting period that would have a material effect on reported income.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board [the “FASB”] issued FASB Statement No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” [“Statement 123(R)”], which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” [“Statement 123”]. Statement 123(R) supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and amends FASB Statement No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”. Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123. However, Statement 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. Effective February 1, 2003, the Company has adopted the fair value accounting method provided for under Statement 123 to apply recognition provisions to its employee stock options granted, modified or settled after February 1, 2003. Statement 123(R) will have no impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
29
In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement 151, “Inventory Costs”, which clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials should be recognized as current-period charges and requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. This guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not anticipate that this guidance will impact the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets”, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions”. Statement 153 is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Statement 153 eliminates the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Statement 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The provisions of Statement 153 should be applied prospectively. The Company does not anticipate that the application of Statement 153 will have an impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections — a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3”, which applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle. This Statement requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not anticipate that this guidance will impact the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Exchange Rate Sensitivity
The Company’s operations consist of manufacturing activities in the United States and Canada. The Company’s products are sold in North America, Europe and the Pacific Rim.
While the majority of the sales of Dextran Products, the Company’s Canadian operation, are denominated in United States dollars, the majority of its expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars. The majority of the assets and liabilities of Dextran Products are denominated in Canadian dollars prior to the currency translation adjustment necessary for preparation of the consolidated financial statements of the Company contained in this report. When the Canadian dollar rises in value relative to the United States dollar, the carrying value of the assets and liabilities of Dextran Products as stated in United States dollars increases. A rise in the Canadian dollar relative to the United States dollar also results in a decrease in gross margins and net income of Dextran Products. Dextran Products also experiences a foreign exchange gain when the Canadian dollar rises in relation to the United States dollar because it has a net liability exposure to the United States dollar resulting from a United States dollar denominated intercompany loan. Similarly, a decline in the Canadian dollar relative to the United States dollar results in a foreign exchange loss and increased gross margins and net income at Dextran Products.
Management monitors currency fluctuations to ensure that an acceptable margin level at Dextran Products is maintained. Management has the ability, to some extent, to adjust sales prices to maintain an acceptable margin level.
The following table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments other than accounts receivable that are sensitive to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. All financial instruments are held for other than trading purposes. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates.
31
| | | | Expected Maturity Date
| | | | | |
---|
| | | | 1/31/06
| | 1/31/07
| | 1/31/08
| | 1/31/09
| | 1/31/10
| | Thereafter
| | Total
| | Fair Value
|
---|
| | | | (US$ Equivalent) | |
---|
Assets:
|
Short-term investments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed rate ($Cdn) | | | | | 1,680,226 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,680,226 | | | | 1,681,895 | |
Average interest rate | | | | | 2.40 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.40 | % | | | | |
Marketable securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed rate ($Cdn) | | | | | 604,518 | | | | 599,751 | | | | 661,256 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,865,525 | | | | 1,764,657 | |
Average interest rate | | | | | 2.66 | % | | | 2.85 | % | | | 2.86 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.79 | % | | | | |
Liabilities:
|
Long-term debt:
|
Fixed rate ($Cdn) | | | | | 160,580 | | | | 157,661 | | | | 5,531 | | | | 6,137 | | | | 6,807 | | | | — | | | | 336,716 | | | | 327,513 | |
Average interest rate | | | | | 8.78 | % | | | 8.81 | % | | | 10.43 | % | | | 10.43 | % | | | 10.43 | % | | | — | | | | 8.88 | % | | | | |
| | | 32
Interest Rate Sensitivity
The Company has interest earning assets consisting of investment grade short-term commercial paper and medium-term fixed income instruments. A significant portion of the Company’s debt is at fixed rates. The variable rate debt represents the shareholder loan payable, which is partially offset by the shareholder loan receivable. Both of these financial instruments carry the same interest rate. As such, the Company has no significant risk exposure to changes in interest rates.
The following table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. All financial instruments are held for other than trading purposes. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates.
| | | | Expected Maturity Date
| | | | | |
---|
| | | | 1/31/06
| | 1/31/07
| | 1/31/08
| | 1/31/09
| | 1/31/10
| | Thereafter
| | Total
| | Fair Value
|
---|
| | | | (US$ Equivalent) | |
---|
Assets:
|
Short-term investments:
|
Fixed rate ($Cdn) | | | | | 1,680,226 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,680,226 | | | | 1,681,895 | |
Average interest rate | | | | | 2.40 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.40 | % | | | | |
Marketable securities:
|
Fixed rate ($Cdn) | | | | | 604,518 | | | | 599,751 | | | | 661,256 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,865,525 | | | | 1,764,657 | |
Average interest rate | | | | | 2.66 | % | | | 2.85 | % | | | 2.86 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.79 | % | | | | |
Notes receivable: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Variable rate ($US) | | | | | 84,737 | | | | 60,045 | | | | 64,548 | | | | 69,389 | | | | 74,594 | | | | 20,060 | | | | 373,373 | | | | 373,373 | |
Average interest rate | | | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | | |
Liabilities:
|
Long-term debt:
|
Fixed rate ($Cdn) | | | | | 160,580 | | | | 157,661 | | | | 5,531 | | | | 6,137 | | | | 6,807 | | | | — | | | | 336,716 | | | | 321,329 | |
Average interest rate | | | | | 8.78 | % | | | 8.81 | % | | | 10.43 | % | | | 10.43 | % | | | 10.43 | % | | | — | | | | 8.88 | % | | | | |
Variable rate ($US) | | | | | 7,404 | | | | 9,459 | | | | 10,169 | | | | 10,931 | | | | 11,751 | | | | 631,568 | | | | 681,283 | | | | 681,283 | |
Average interest rate | | | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | 7.50 | % | | | | |
33
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
The Company completed an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them on a timely basis of material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in its periodic Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation discussed above that occurred in the Company’s last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
34
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
(a) | | The 2005 Annual General Meeting of the Members was held on July 8, 2005. |
(c) | | No matters were voted upon at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Members other than (i) the election of Mr. Derek John Michael Lederer as a director of the Company to hold office for a three-year term expiring at the Annual General Meeting of the Members held in 2008 or until successors are duly elected and qualified, and (ii) the ratification of the appointment of Sloan Partners LLP as the independent registered accounting firm of the Company. The tabulation of votes in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting with respect to such matters are as follows: |
Proposal 1 — Election of Derek John Michael Lederer:
Class
| | | | Votes For
| | Votes Against
| | Abstentions and Non-Votes
|
---|
Common Shares | | | | | 2,329,521 | | | | 5,845 | | | | — | |
Class B Preferred Shares | | | | | 1,798,800 | (1) | | | — | | | | — | |
(1) | | Class B Preferred Shares are entitled to two (2) votes per share. |
Proposal 2 — Ratification of Independent Registered Accounting Firm:
Class
| | | | Votes For
| | Votes Against
| | Abstentions and Non-Votes
|
---|
Common Shares | | | | | 2,331,121 | | | | 3,415 | | | | 830 | |
Class B Preferred Shares | | | | | 1,798,800 | (1) | | | — | | | | — | |
(1) | | Class B Preferred Shares are entitled to two (2) votes per share. |
35
Item 6. Exhibits.
3.1 | | Memorandum of Association of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited, as amended to date (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed April 30, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference) |
3.2 | | Articles of Association of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited, as amended to date (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed September 13, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference) |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: September 14, 2005
POLYDEX PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED
(Registrant)
By | | /s/ George G. Usher George G. Usher, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
By | | /s/ Sharon L. Wardlaw Sharon L. Wardlaw, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
37
Exhibit Index
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
38