Document and Entity Information
Document and Entity Information - shares | 9 Months Ended | |
Sep. 30, 2015 | Nov. 09, 2015 | |
Entity Information [Line Items] | ||
Entity Registrant Name | TELOS CORP | |
Entity Central Index Key | 320,121 | |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | |
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer | No | |
Entity Voluntary Filers | No | |
Entity Current Reporting Status | Yes | |
Entity Filer Category | Non-accelerated Filer | |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2,015 | |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q3 | |
Document Type | 10-Q | |
Amendment Flag | false | |
Document Period End Date | Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Class A Common Stock [Member] | ||
Entity Information [Line Items] | ||
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 40,238,461 | |
Class B Common Stock [Member] | ||
Entity Information [Line Items] | ||
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 4,037,628 |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMEN
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | |
Revenue | ||||
Services | $ 23,868 | $ 29,228 | $ 74,183 | $ 81,055 |
Products | 9,794 | 9,279 | 19,525 | 16,605 |
Total Revenue | 33,662 | 38,507 | 93,708 | 97,660 |
Costs and expenses | ||||
Cost of sales - Services | 17,769 | 24,067 | 56,787 | 64,928 |
Cost of sales - Products | 7,219 | 6,936 | 14,299 | 13,389 |
Total costs and expenses | 24,988 | 31,003 | 71,086 | 78,317 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 8,189 | 9,743 | 24,978 | 29,416 |
Operating income (loss) | 485 | (2,239) | (2,356) | (10,073) |
Other income (expense) | ||||
Other income | 0 | 1 | 18 | 258 |
Interest expense | (1,444) | (1,373) | (4,215) | (3,965) |
Loss before income taxes | (959) | (3,611) | (6,553) | (13,780) |
Benefit for income taxes (Note 7) | 618 | 3,337 | 1,805 | 4,202 |
Net loss | (341) | (274) | (4,748) | (9,578) |
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest (Note 2) | (1,065) | (500) | (1,812) | (1,101) |
Net loss attributable to Telos Corporation | $ (1,406) | $ (774) | $ (6,560) | $ (10,679) |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEME3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited) [Abstract] | ||||
Net loss | $ (341) | $ (274) | $ (4,748) | $ (9,578) |
Other comprehensive loss: | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (9) | (4) | (12) | (6) |
Total other comprehensive loss | (9) | (4) | (12) | (6) |
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest | (1,065) | (500) | (1,812) | (1,101) |
Comprehensive loss attributable to Telos Corporation | $ (1,415) | $ (778) | $ (6,572) | $ (10,685) |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Sep. 30, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2014 |
Current assets (Note 5) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 34 | $ 32 |
Accounts receivable, net of reserve of $483 and $372, respectively | 23,499 | 22,522 |
Inventories, net of obsolescence reserve of $1,363 and $1,366, respectively | 3,922 | 3,345 |
Deferred income taxes (Note 7) | 715 | 1,004 |
Deferred program expenses | 110 | 1,391 |
Other current assets | 4,724 | 6,144 |
Total current assets | 33,004 | 34,438 |
Deferred income taxes, long-term (Note 7) | 2,189 | 910 |
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $27,400 and $25,990, respectively | 17,712 | 18,913 |
Goodwill (Note 3) | 14,916 | 14,916 |
Other intangible assets (Note 3) | 1,693 | 3,386 |
Other assets | 1,087 | 1,257 |
Total assets | 70,601 | 73,820 |
Current liabilities | ||
Senior credit facility - short-term (Note 5) | 1,400 | 2,300 |
Accounts payable and other accrued payables (Note 5) | 16,302 | 17,816 |
Accrued compensation and benefits | 5,060 | 4,203 |
Deferred revenue | 4,091 | 3,344 |
Capital lease obligations - short-term (Note 8) | 811 | 772 |
Other current liabilities | 1,993 | 1,774 |
Total current liabilities | 29,657 | 30,209 |
Senior revolving credit facility (Note 5) | 7,080 | 8,590 |
Subordinated debt (Note 5) | 2,500 | 0 |
Capital lease obligations (Note 8) | 20,123 | 20,735 |
Senior redeemable preferred stock (Note 6) | 2,008 | 1,958 |
Public preferred stock (Note 6) | 122,964 | 120,097 |
Other liabilities | 837 | 717 |
Total liabilities | $ 185,169 | $ 182,306 |
Commitments, contingencies and subsequent events (Note 8) | ||
Telos stockholders' deficit | ||
Common stock | $ 78 | $ 78 |
Additional paid-in capital | 3,229 | 3,229 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 33 | 45 |
Accumulated deficit | (118,982) | (112,422) |
Total Telos stockholders' deficit | (115,642) | (109,070) |
Non-controlling interest in subsidiary (Note 2) | 1,074 | 584 |
Total stockholders' deficit | (114,568) | (108,486) |
Total liabilities, redeemable preferred stock, and stockholders' deficit | $ 70,601 | $ 73,820 |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Sep. 30, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2014 |
Current assets (Note 5) | ||
Accounts receivable, reserve | $ 483 | $ 372 |
Inventories, obsolescence reserve | 1,363 | 1,366 |
Property and equipment, accumulated depreciation | $ 27,400 | $ 25,990 |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEME6
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 9 Months Ended | |
Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | |
Operating activities: | ||
Net income | $ (4,748) | $ (9,578) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities: | ||
Dividends of preferred stock as interest expense | 2,917 | 2,917 |
Depreciation and amortization | 3,218 | 3,169 |
Amortization of debt issuance costs | 100 | 32 |
Deferred income tax benefit | (990) | (3,957) |
Other noncash items | 110 | (25) |
Loss on disposal of fixed assets | 10 | |
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities | 3,378 | 15,774 |
Cash provided by operating activities | 3,995 | 8,332 |
Investing activities: | ||
Purchases of property and equipment | (334) | (517) |
Cash used in investing activities | (334) | (517) |
Financing activities: | ||
Proceeds from senior credit facility | 101,306 | 125,935 |
Repayments of senior credit facility | (101,766) | (132,341) |
Decrease in book overdrafts | (1,854) | (1,044) |
Repayments of term loan | (1,950) | (438) |
Proceeds from subordinated debt | 2,500 | 0 |
Proceeds from assignment of purchase option under lease | 0 | 1,669 |
Payments under capital lease obligations | (573) | (597) |
Distributions to Telos ID Class B member - non-controlling interest | (1,322) | (1,048) |
Cash used in financing activities | (3,659) | (7,864) |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 2 | (49) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 32 | 94 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | 34 | 45 |
Cash paid during the period for: | ||
Interest | 1,161 | 1,070 |
Income taxes | 65 | 869 |
Noncash: | ||
Dividends of preferred stock as interest expense | 2,917 | 2,917 |
Financing of capital leases | $ 0 | $ 5,680 |
General and Basis of Presentati
General and Basis of Presentation | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
General and Basis of Presentation [Abstract] | |
General and Basis of Presentation | Note 1 . General and Basis of Presentation Telos Corporation, together with its subsidiaries (the "Company" or "Telos" or "We"), is an information technology solutions and services company addressing the needs of U.S. Government and commercial customers worldwide. Our principal offices are located at 19886 Ashburn Road, Ashburn, Virginia 20147. The Company was incorporated as a Maryland corporation in October 1971. Our web site is www.telos.com . The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Telos and its subsidiaries, including Ubiquity.com, Inc., Xacta Corporation, and Teloworks, Inc., all of whose issued and outstanding share capital is owned by the Company. We have also consolidated the results of operations of Telos Identity Management Solutions, LLC ("Telos ID") (see Note 2 – Non-controlling Interests). All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In our opinion, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) and reclassifications necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The presented interim results are not necessarily indicative of fiscal year performance for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, the impact of seasonal and short-term variations. We have continued to follow the accounting policies (including the critical accounting policies) set forth in the consolidated financial statements included in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. In preparing these condensed consolidated financial statements, we have evaluated subsequent events through the date that these condensed consolidated financial statements were issued. Segment Reporting Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker ("CODM"), or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. We currently operate in one operating and reportable business segment for financial reporting purposes. We currently have the following three business lines: Cyber Operations and Defense, Secure Communications, and Telos ID. Our Chief Executive Officer is the CODM. Our CODM manages our business primarily by function and reviews financial information on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information by line of business as well as certain operational data, for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. The CODM only evaluates profitability based on consolidated results. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers," which requires an entity to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. In July 2015, the FASB finalized the delay of the effective date by one year, making the new standard effective for interim periods and annual period beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard can be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of the change recognized at the date of the initial application. We are currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern." The new standard addresses management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Management's evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued. The new standard will be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this update will not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs." The new standard requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, instead of as an asset. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, "Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements – Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting," which clarified that this guidance is not required to be applied to line-of-credit arrangements. The new standard will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this update will not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory," which requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The provisions of the ASU are effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently assessing the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Revenue Recognition Revenues are recognized in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 605-10-S99. We consider amounts earned upon evidence that an arrangement has been obtained, services are delivered, fees are fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Additionally, revenues on arrangements requiring the delivery of more than one product or service are recognized in accordance with ASC 605-25, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables," which addresses and requires the separation and allocation at the inception of the arrangement of all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. This determination is made first by employing vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE"), to the extent it exists, then third-party evidence ("TPE") of selling price, to the extent that it exists. Given the nature of the deliverables contained in our multi-element arrangements, which often involve the design and/or delivery of complex or technical solutions to the government, we have not obtained TPE of selling prices on multi-element arrangements due to the significant differentiation which makes obtaining comparable pricing of products with similar functionality impractical. Therefore we do not utilize TPE. If VSOE is not determinable, we use our best estimate of selling price ("ESP") as defined in ASC 605-25, which represents our best estimate of the prices under the terms and conditions of a particular order for the various elements if they were sold on a stand-alone basis. We recognize revenues for software arrangements upon persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery of the software, and determination that collection of a fixed or determinable license fee is probable. Revenues for software licenses sold on a subscription basis are recognized ratably over the related license period. For arrangements where the sale of software licenses are bundled with other products, including software products, upgrades and enhancements, post-contract customer support ("PCS"), and installation, the relative fair value of each element is determined based on VSOE. VSOE is defined by ASC 985-605, "Software Revenue Recognition," and is limited to the price charged when the element is sold separately or, if the element is not yet sold separately, the price set by management having the relevant authority. When VSOE exists for undelivered elements, the remaining consideration is allocated to delivered elements using the residual method. If VSOE does not exist for the allocation of revenue to the various elements of the arrangement, all revenue from the arrangement is deferred until the earlier of the point at which (1) such VSOE does exist or (2) all elements of the arrangement are delivered. PCS revenues, upon being unbundled from a software license fee, are recognized ratably over the PCS period. Software arrangements requiring significant production, modification, or customization of the software are accounted for in accordance with ASC 605-35 "Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts." We may use subcontractors and suppliers in the course of performing contracts and under certain contracts where we provide supplier procurement services and materials for our customers. Some of these arrangements may fall within the scope of ASC 605-45, "Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent." We presume that revenues on our contracts are recognized on a gross basis, as we generally provide significant value-added services, assume credit risk, and reserve the right to select subcontractors and suppliers, but we evaluate the various criteria specified in the guidance in making the determination of whether revenue should be recognized on a gross or net basis. A description of the business lines, the typical deliverables, and the revenue recognition criteria in general for such deliverables follows: Cyber Operations and Defense – Regarding our deliverables of secure network solutions, we provide wireless and wired networking solutions consisting of hardware and services to our customers. Also, within our Cyber Operations and Defense solutions area is our Emerging Technologies group creating innovative, custom-tailored solutions for government and commercial enterprises. The solutions within the Cyber Operations and Defense and Emerging Technologies groups are generally sold as firm-fixed price ("FFP") bundled solutions. Certain of these networking solutions involve contracts to design, develop, or modify complex electronic equipment configurations to a buyer's specification or to provide network engineering services, and as such fall within the scope of ASC 605-35. Revenue is earned upon percentage of completion based upon proportional performance, such performance generally being defined by performance milestones. Certain other solutions fall within the scope of ASC 605-10-S99, such as resold information technology products, like laptops, printers, networking equipment and peripherals, and ASC 605-25, such as delivery orders for multiple solutions deliverables. For product sales, revenue is recognized upon proof of acceptance by the customer, otherwise it is deferred until such time as the proof of acceptance is obtained. For example, in delivery orders for Department of Defense customers, which comprise the majority of the Company's customers, such acceptance is achieved with a signed Department of Defense Form DD-250 or electronic invoicing system equivalent. Services provided under these contracts are generally provided on a FFP basis, and as such fall within the scope of ASC 605-10-S99. Revenue for services is recognized based on proportional performance, as the work progresses. FFP services may be billed to the customer on a percentage-of-completion basis or based upon milestones, which may approximate the proportional performance of the services under the agreements, as specified in such agreements. To the extent that customer billings exceed the performance of the specified services, the revenue would be deferred. Revenue is recognized under time-and-materials ("T&M") services contracts based upon specified billing rates and other direct costs as incurred. Regarding our information assurance deliverables, we provide Xacta IA Manager software and cybersecurity services to our customers. The software and accompanying services fall within the scope of ASC 985-605, "Software Revenue Recognition," as discussed above. We provide consulting services to our customers under either a FFP or T&M basis. Such contracts fall under the scope of ASC 605-10-S99. Revenue for FFP services is recognized on a proportional performance basis. FFP services may be billed to the customer on a percentage-of-completion basis or based upon milestones as appropriate under a particular contract, which may approximate the proportional performance of the services under the agreements, as specified in such agreements. To the extent that customer billings exceed the performance of the specified services, the revenue would be deferred. Revenue is recognized under T&M contracts based upon specified billing rates and other direct costs as incurred. For cost plus fixed fee ("CPFF") contracts, revenue is recognized in proportion to the allowable costs incurred unless indicated otherwise in the terms of the contract. Secure Communications – We provide Secure Information eXchange (T-6) suite of products which include the flagship product the Automated Message Handling System ("AMHS"), Secure Collaboration, Secure Discovery, Secure Directory and Cross Domain Communication, as well as related services to our customers. The system and accompanying services fall within the scope of ASC 985-605, as fully discussed above. Other services fall within the scope of ASC 605-10-S99 for arrangements that include only T&M contracts and ASC 605-25 for contracts with multiple deliverables such as T&M elements and FFP services. Under such arrangements, the T&M elements are established by direct costs. Revenue is recognized on T&M contracts according to specified rates as direct labor and other direct costs are incurred. For CPFF contracts, revenue is recognized in proportion to the allowable costs incurred unless indicated otherwise in the terms of the contract. Revenue for FFP services is recognized on a proportional performance basis. FFP services may be billed to the customer on a percentage-of-completion basis or based upon milestones, which may approximate the proportional performance of the services under the agreements, as specified in such agreements. To the extent that customer billings exceed the performance of the specified services, the revenue would be deferred. Telos ID – We provide our identity assurance and access management solutions and services and sell information technology products, such as computer laptops and specialized printers, and consumables, such as identity cards, to our customers. The solutions are generally sold as FFP bundled solutions, which would typically fall within the scope of ASC 605-25 and ASC 605-10-S99. Revenue for services is recognized based on proportional performance, as the work progresses. FFP services may be billed to the customer on a percentage-of-completion basis or based upon milestones, which may approximate the proportional performance of the services under the agreements, as specified in such agreements. To the extent that customer billings exceed the performance of the specified services, the revenue would be deferred. Revenue is recognized under T&M contracts based upon specified billing rates and other direct costs as incurred. Estimating future costs and, therefore, revenues and profits, is a process requiring a high degree of management judgment. In the event of a change in total estimated contract cost or profit, the cumulative effect of a change is recorded in the period the change in estimate occurs. To the extent contracts are incomplete at the end of an accounting period, revenue is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, on a proportional performance basis, using costs incurred in relation to total estimated costs, or costs are deferred as appropriate under the terms of a particular contract. In the event cost estimates indicate a loss on a contract, the total amount of such loss, excluding overhead and general and administrative expense, is recorded in the period in which the loss is first estimated. Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable are stated at the invoiced amount, less allowances for doubtful accounts. Collectability of accounts receivable is regularly reviewed based upon management's knowledge of the specific circumstances related to overdue balances. The allowance for doubtful accounts is adjusted based on such evaluation. Accounts receivable balances are written off against the allowance when management deems the balances uncollectible. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, where cost is determined on the weighted average method. Substantially all inventories consist of purchased commercial off-the-shelf hardware and software, and component computer parts used in connection with system integration services that we perform. An allowance for obsolete, slow-moving or nonsalable inventory is provided for all other inventory. This allowance is based on our overall obsolescence experience and our assessment of future inventory requirements. This charge is taken primarily due to the age of the specific inventory and the significant additional costs that would be necessary to upgrade to current standards as well as the lack of forecasted sales for such inventory in the near future. Gross inventory is $5.3 million $4.7 million , respectively. As of September 30, 2015, it is management's judgment that we have fully provided for any potential inventory obsolescence, Income Taxes We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10, "Income Taxes." Under ASC 740-10, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences of temporary differences and income tax credits. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured by applying enacted statutory tax rates that are applicable to the future years in which deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be settled or realized for differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Any change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in net income in the period in which the tax rate change is enacted. We record a valuation allowance that reduces deferred tax assets when it is "more likely than not" that deferred tax assets will not be realized. We follow the provisions of ASC 740-10 related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The accounting estimates related to liabilities for uncertain tax positions require us to make judgments regarding the sustainability of each uncertain tax position based on its technical merits. If we determine it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained based on its technical merits, we record the impact of the position in our consolidated financial statements at the largest amount that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. These estimates are updated at each reporting date based on the facts, circumstances and information available. We are also required to assess at each reporting date whether it is reasonably possible that any significant increases or decreases to our unrecognized tax benefits will occur during the next 12 months. The provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed by applying the estimated annual effective tax rate against earnings before income tax expense for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items are recorded during the period in which they occur. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets We evaluate the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with ASC 350, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other," which requires goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets to be assessed on at least an annual basis for impairment using a fair value basis. Between annual evaluations, if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount, then impairment must be evaluated. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climate, or (2) a loss of key contracts or customers. As the result of an acquisition, we record any excess purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired as goodwill. An allocation of the purchase price to tangible and intangible net assets acquired is based upon our valuation of the acquired assets. Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to annual impairment tests. We complete our goodwill impairment tests as of December 31st each year. Additionally, we make evaluations between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The evaluation is based on the estimation of the fair values of our three reporting units, Cyber Operations and Defense, Secure Communications, and Telos ID, in comparison to the reporting unit's net asset carrying values. Our discounted cash flows analysis required management judgment with respect to forecasted revenue streams and operating margins, capital expenditures and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate. We utilized the weighted average cost of capital as derived by certain assumptions specific to our facts and circumstances as the discount rate. The net assets attributable to the reporting units are determined based upon the estimated assets and liabilities attributable to the reporting units in deriving its free cash flows. In addition, the estimate of the total fair value of our reporting units is compared to the market capitalization of the Company. The Company's assessment resulted in a fair value that was greater than the Company's carrying value, therefore the second step of the impairment test, as prescribed by the authoritative literature, was not required to be performed and no impairment of goodwill was recorded as of December 31, 2014. . Other intangible assets consist primarily of customer relationship enhancements. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 5 years. The amortization is based on a forecast of approximately equal annual customer orders over the 5-year period. Intangible assets are subject to impairment review if there are events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the carrying amount is not recoverable. As of September 30, 2015, no impairment charges were taken. Restricted Stock Grants Since June 2008, we have issued restricted stock (Class A common) to our executive officers, directors and employees. To date, there have been no grants in 2015. As of September 30, 2015, there were 19,047,259 shares of restricted stock outstanding. Such stock is subject to a vesting schedule as follows: 25% of the restricted stock vests immediately on the date of grant, thereafter, an additional 25% will vest annually on the anniversary of the date of grant subject to continued employment or services. In the event of death of the employee or a change in control, as defined by the Telos Corporation 2008 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan or the 2013 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, all unvested shares shall automatically vest in full. Other Comprehensive Income Our functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. For one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, the functional currency is the local currency. For this subsidiary, the translation of its foreign currency into U.S. Dollars is performed for assets and liabilities using current foreign currency exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using average foreign currency exchange rates during the period. Translation gains and losses are included in stockholders' deficit as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Accumulated other comprehensive income included within stockholders' deficit consists of the following (in thousands): September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Cumulative foreign currency translation loss $ (76 ) $ (64 ) Cumulative actuarial gain on pension liability adjustment 109 109 Accumulated other comprehensive income $ 33 $ 45 |
Non-controlling Interests
Non-controlling Interests | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Non-controlling Interests [Abstract] | |
Non-controlling Interests | Note 2. Non-controlling Interests On April 11, 2007, Telos ID was formed as a limited liability company under the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act. We contributed substantially all of the assets of our Identity Management business line and assigned our rights to perform under our U.S. Government contract with the Defense Manpower Data Center ("DMDC") to Telos ID at their stated book values. The net book value of assets we contributed totaled $17,000. Until April 19, 2007, we owned 99.999% of the membership interests of Telos ID and an entity conrolled by certain private equity investors (the "Investor") owned 0.001% of the membership interests of Telos ID. On April 20, 2007, we sold an additional 39.999% of the membership interests to the Investor in exchange for $6 million in cash consideration. In accordance with ASC 505-10, "Equity-Overall," we recognized a gain of $5.8 million. On December 24, 2014 (the "Closing Date"), we entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"), between the Company and the Investor, pursuant to which the Investor acquired from the Company an additional ten percent (10%) membership interest in Telos ID in exchange for $5 million (the "Transaction"). In connection with the Transaction, the Company and the Investor entered into the Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement (the "Operating Agreement") governing the business, allocation of profits and losses and management of Telos ID. Under the Operating Agreement, Telos ID is managed by a board of directors comprised of five (5) members (the "Telos ID Board"). The Operating Agreement provides for two classes of membership units, Class A membership units held by the Company and Class B membership units held by the Investor. The Company, as the "Class A member," owns 50% of Telos ID, is entitled to receive 50% of the profits of Telos ID, and may appoint three (3) members of the Telos ID Board. The Investor, as the "Class B member," owns 50% of Telos ID, is entitled to receive 50% of the profits of Telos ID, and may appoint two (2) members of the Telos ID Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the allocations of profits and losses and distributions (including any distributions that relate to the year ending December 31, 2014, that are paid in a subsequent year) from the Closing Date through and including December 31, 2014, continued to be governed by the operating agreement of Telos ID in effect prior to the Closing Date and allocated based on the percentages of ownership prior to the Closing Date. In connection with the Transaction, the Company and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC ("Agent"), as agent for certain lenders (the "Lenders") and as a Lender under the Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement ("Loan Agreement"), entered into the Consent and Ninth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the "Consent") on the Closing Date. Under the Consent, the Agent and the Lenders consented to the consummation of the Transaction and the release of the lien in favor of the Agent on the transferred membership interest; provided that $1 million of the proceeds of the Transaction be applied to the term loan under the Loan Agreement. The parties further agreed to certain amendments to the Loan Agreement. As of December 31, 2014, we had received $3 million of the $5 million of consideration for the sale. The remaining $2 million was recorded as a receivable and received in January 2015. Despite the post-Transaction ownership of Telos ID being evenly split at 50% by each member, Telos maintains control of the subsidiary through its holding of three of the five Telos ID board of director seats and therefore accounts for the investment in Telos ID using the consolidation method. Under the Operating Agreement, the Class A and Class B members each have certain options with regard to the ownership interests held by the other party including the following: ● Upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Class A member (as defined in the Operating Agreement, a "Change in Control"), the Class A member has the option to purchase the entire membership interest of the Class B member. ● Upon the occurrence of the following events: (i) the involuntary termination of John B. Wood as CEO and chairman of the Class A member; (ii) the bankruptcy of the Class A member; or (iii) unless the Class A member exercises its option to acquire the entire membership interest of the Class B member upon a Change in Control of the Class A member, the transfer or issuance of more than fifty-one percent (51%) of the outstanding voting securities of the Class A member to a third party, the Class B member has the option to purchase the membership interest of the Class A member; provided, however, that in the event that the Class B member exercises the foregoing option, the Class A Member may then choose to purchase the entire interest of the Class B member. ● In the event that more than fifty percent (50%) of the ownership interests in the Class B member are transferred to persons or individuals (other than members of the immediate family of the initial owners of the Class B member) without the consent of Telos ID, the Class A member has the option to purchase the entire membership interest of the Class B member. ● The Class B member has the option to sell its interest to the Class A member at any time if there is not a letter of intent to sell Telos ID, a binding contract to sell all of the assets or membership interests in Telos ID, or a standstill for due diligence with respect to a sale of Telos ID. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Class A member will not be obligated to purchase the interest of the Class B member if that purchase would constitute a violation of the Loan Agreement or if a Default or Event of Default (as each is defined in the Loan Agreement) would occur immediately after giving effect to that purchase and the Agent refuses to consent to that purchase or to waive such violation, Default, or Event of Default. If either the Class A member or the Class B member elects to sells its interest or buy the other member's interest upon the occurrence of any of the foregoing events, the purchase price for the interest will be based on an appraisal of Telos ID prepared by a nationally recognized investment banker. If the Class A member fails to satisfy its obligation, subject to the restrictions in the Purchase Agreement, to purchase the interest of the Class B member under the Operating Agreement, the Class B member may require Telos ID to initiate a sales process for the purpose of seeking an offer from a third party to purchase Telos ID that maximizes the value of Telos ID. The Telos ID Board must accept any offer from a bona fide third party to purchase Telos ID if that offer is approved by the Class B member, unless the purchase of Telos ID would violate the terms of the Loan Agreement or result in the occurrence of a Default or Event of Default and the Agent does not consent to that purchase or waive the violation, Default, or Event of Default. The sale process is the sole remedy available to the Class B member if the Class A member does not purchase its membership interest. Under such a forced sale scenario, a sales process would result in both members receiving their proportionate membership interest shares of the sales proceeds and both members would always be entitled to receive the same form of consideration. Pursuant to the Transaction, the Class A and Class B members each owns 50% of Telos ID, as mentioned above, and as such was allocated 50% of the profits, which was $1.1 million and $1.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Prior to the Transaction, the Class A member owns 60% of Telos ID, as mentioned above, and as such is allocated 60% of the profits, which was . The Class B member owns 40% of Telos ID prior to the Transaction, and as such is allocated 40% of the profits, which was . The Class B member is the non-controlling interest. Distributions are made to the members only when and to the extent determined by the Telos ID's Board of Directors, in accordance with the Operating Agreement. The Class B member received a total of $0.4 million and $1.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, and $0.3 million and $1.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, of such distributions. The following table details the changes in non-controlling interest for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands): Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 2014 2015 2014 Non-controlling interest, beginning of period $ 370 $ 350 $ 584 $ 454 Net income 1,065 500 1,812 1,101 Distributions (361 ) (343 ) (1,322 ) (1,048 ) Non-controlling interest, end of period $ 1,074 $ 507 $ 1,074 $ 507 |
Goodwill and Intangible Asset
Goodwill and Intangible Asset | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets [Abstract] | |
Goodwill and Intangible Asset | Note 3 . Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets The goodwill balance was $14.9 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Other intangible assets consist primarily of customer relationship enhancements. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 5 years. The amortization is based on a forecast of approximately equal annual customer orders over the 5-year period. Amortization expense was $0.6 million and $1.7 million for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. The remaining balance of $1.7 million will be fully amortized as of June 30, 2016. Other intangible assets are subject to impairment review if there are events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the carrying amount is not recoverable. As of September 30, 2015, no impairment charges were taken. Other intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands): September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Cost Accumulated Amortization Cost Accumulated Amortization Other intangible assets $ 11,286 $ 9,593 $ 11,286 $ 7,900 $ 11,286 $ 9,593 $ 11,286 $ 7,900 |
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract] | |
Fair Value Measurements | Note 4 . Fair Value Measurements The accounting standard for fair value measurements provides a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The framework requires the valuation of financial instruments using a three-tiered approach. The statement requires fair value measurement to be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories: Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets and liabilities; Level 2: Quoted prices in the markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; or Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no market activity). As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we did not have any financial instruments with significant Level 3 inputs and we did not have any financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the carrying value of the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock was $2.0 million. Since there have been no material modifications to the financial instruments, the estimated fair value of the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock remains consistent with amounts recorded as of December 31, 2014. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the carrying value of the Company's 12% Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Public Preferred Stock") was $123.0 million and $120.1 million, respectively, and the estimated fair market value was $35.0 million and $43.0 million, respectively, based on quoted market prices. For certain of our non-derivative financial instruments, including receivables, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The estimated fair value of the Facility and long-term debt is based primarily on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for similar debt issues. The fair value approximates the carrying value of long-term debt. |
Current Liabilities and Debt Ob
Current Liabilities and Debt Obligations | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Current Liabilities and Debt Obligations [Abstract] | |
Current Liabilities and Debt Obligations | Note 5 . Current Liabilities and Debt Obligations Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Payables As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the accounts payable and other accrued payables consisted of $14.1 million and $13.6 million, respectively, in trade account payables and $2.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively, in accrued payables. Senior Revolving Credit Facility On March 27, 2014, we amended our $30 million revolving credit facility (the "Facility") with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC ("Wells Fargo") to extend the maturity date to November 13, 2015 from November 13, 2014. In addition, Wells Fargo issued a waiver of certain existing defaults under the Facility including failure to maintain required EBITDA (as defined in the Facility) covenants. The March 2014 amendment also amends the terms of the Facility with respect to repayment on the term loan component. Prior to the March 2014 amendment, the principal of the term loan component had been repaid in quarterly installments of $93,750. The March 2014 amendment required quarterly installment payments of $250,000 beginning July 1, 2014, with a final installment of the unpaid principal amount payable on November 13, 2015, the maturity date of the amended Facility. In consideration for the closing of this amendment, we paid Wells Fargo a fee of $75,000, plus expenses related to the closing. On December 24, 2014, the Facility was amended to provide for Wells Fargo's consent to the sale of 10% of our membership interests in Telos ID to the Class B member of Telos ID and to specify the amount of the transaction proceeds that were to be applied to the term loan component of the Facility. The amendment specifies that $1 million of the proceeds from the sale of the membership interests would be applied to the term loan component of the Facility, with the remaining balance of the proceeds being applied to the revolving component of the Facility. As of December 31, 2014, the $1 million application to the term loan had not occurred and accordingly this amount is classified as a current liability, which, when added to the regular quarterly amortization of the term loan, resulted in a total short term liability of $2.3 million related to the Facility as of December 31, 2014. Additional information regarding the sale transaction is disclosed in Note 2 – Non-controlling Interests. On February 27, 2015, the Facility was amended to change the February 28, 2015 dates specified in the November 2014 amendment to March 23, 2015. On March 19, 2015, the Facility was amended to change the March 23, 2015 dates specified in the February 2015 amendment to March 31, 2015. On March 31, 2015, the Facility was amended ("the Twelfth Amendment") to extend the maturity date to April 1, 2016. The Twelfth Amendment also amends the terms of the Facility, reducing the total credit available from $30 million to $20 million, and reducing the letter of credit sub-line limit from $5 million to $1 million. The reduced limits under the Facility more appropriately reflect the Company's current and near-term projected utilization of the Facility. The Twelfth Amendment requires quarterly installment payments of $350,000 beginning April 1, 2015, and extend the maturity date to April 1, 2016. The Twelfth Amendment establishes EBITDA and recurring revenue covenants, amending and restating in the entirety previously established financial covenants. The Twelfth Amendment authorizes the issuance of $5 million in subordinated notes to affiliated entities of John R.C. Porter ("Porter Notes"), a holder of Telos Class A Common Stock and Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock. The Twelfth Amendment also establishes a minimum excess availability requirement under the revolving component of $1.25 million and allows for the payment of interest under the Porter Notes, subject to separate subordination agreements. In consideration for the closing of the Twelfth Amendment, we paid Wells Fargo a fee of $150,000, plus expenses related to the closing. On August 12, 2015, the Facility was amended to extend the maturity date to July 1, 2016. On November 17, 2015, the Facility was amended ("the Fifteenth Amendment") to extend the maturity date to October 1, 2016, and the EBITDA covenant for the period ending September 30, 2015 was reset to more accurately reflect the Company's revised estimates of operating results. Prior to the Twelfth Amendment, the interest rate on the term loan component was the same as that on the revolving credit component of the Facility, which was the higher of the Wells Fargo Bank "prime rate" plus 1%, the Federal Funds rate plus 1.5%, or the 3-month LIBOR rate plus 2%. In lieu of having interest charged at the foregoing rates, the Company could have elected to have the interest on all or a portion of the advances on the revolving credit component be a rate based on the LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Facility) plus 3.75%. The Twelfth Amendment also amended the interest rate on the components of the Facility. The Twelfth Amendment established two tiers of interest rate pricing based upon the Company's performance compared to projections provided to Wells Fargo for 2015. The first tier interest rate pricing was effective as of the date of the amendment and is the higher of the Wells Fargo Bank "prime rate" plus 2.25%, the Federal Funds rate plus 2.75%, or the 3-month LIBOR rate plus 3.25%. In lieu of having interest charged at the foregoing rates, the Company may elect to have the interest on all or a portion of the advances on the revolving credit component be a rate based on the LIBOR Rate plus 5%. Upon receipt by Wells Fargo of our quarterly financial statements, starting with the June 2015 financials, pricing will be redetermined based on the Company's performance compared to plan. Failure to meet or exceed plan EBITDA for each quarter (as defined by the Facility) would result in the first tier rates remaining in effect until the quarter-end reflecting plan achievement. Assuming plan achievement, which was the case for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, the second tier interest rate pricing becomes effective, which is the higher of the Wells Fargo Bank "prime rate" plus 1%, the Federal Funds rate plus 1.5%, or the 3-month LIBOR rate plus 2%. In lieu of having interest charged at the foregoing rates, the Company may elect to have the interest on all or a portion of the advances on the revolving credit component be a rate based on the LIBOR Rate plus 3.75%. As of September 30, 2015, we had not elected the LIBOR Rate option. Borrowings under the Facility are collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets including inventory, equipment, and accounts receivable. The Facility has various covenants that may, among other things, affect our ability to merge with another entity, sell or transfer certain assets, pay dividends and make other distributions beyond certain limitations. The financial covenants also include minimum EBITDA, minimum recurring revenue and a limit on capital expenditures. In conjunction with the March 2014 amendment, Wells Fargo issued a waiver of certain existing defaults under the Facility including failure to maintain required EBITDA covenants. In conjunction with the Twelfth Amendment, Wells Fargo issued a waiver of certain existing defaults under the Facility. The Twelfth Amendment establishes EBITDA and recurring revenue covenants, amending and restating in the entirety previously established financial covenants. The Fifteenth Amendment resets EBITDA covenants to more accurately reflect current results. At September 30, 2015, we had outstanding borrowings of $8.5 million on the Facility, which included a $3.6 million balance of the term loan, of which $1.4 million was short-term. At December 31, 2014, we had outstanding borrowings of $10.9 million on the Facility, which included the $5.5 million term loan, of which $2.3 million was short-term. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had unused borrowing availability on the Facility of $6.2 million and $4.9 million, respectively. The effective weighted average interest rates on the outstanding borrowings under the Facility were 6.7% and 5.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The following are maturities of the Facility presented by year (in thousands): 2015 2016 Total Short-term: Term loan $ 1,400 $ -- $ 1,400 1 Long-term: Term loan $ -- $ 2,150 $ 2,150 1 Revolving credit -- 4,930 4,930 2 Subtotal $ -- $ 7,080 $ 7,080 Total $ 1,400 $ 7,080 $ 8,480 1 The principal will be repaid in quarterly installments of $350,000 with a final installment of the unpaid principal amount payable on October 1, 2016. 2 Balance due represents balance as of September 30, 2015, with fluctuating balances based on working capital requirements of the Company. Subordinated Notes On March 31, 2015, the Company entered into Subordinated Loan Agreements and Subordinated Promissory Notes ("Porter Notes") with affiliated entities of Mr. John R. C. Porter (together referenced as "Porter"). Mr. Porter and Toxford Corporation, of which Mr. Porter is the sole shareholder, own 39.3% of our Class A Common Stock. Under the terms of the Porter Notes, Porter lent the Company $2.5 million on or about March 31, 2015. Telos also entered into Subordination and Intercreditor Agreements (the "Subordination Agreements") with Porter and Wells Fargo, in which the Porter Notes are fully subordinated to the Facility and payments under the Porter Notes are permitted only if certain conditions specified by Wells Fargo are met. According to the terms of the Porter Notes, the outstanding principal sum bears interest at the fixed rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum which would be payable in arrears in cash on the 20th day of each May, August, November and February, with the first interest payment date due on August 20, 2015. The Porter Notes do not call for amortization payments and are unsecured. The unpaid principal, together with interest, is due and payable in full on July 1, 2017. The Porter Notes, in whole or in part, may be repaid at any time without premium or penalty. We incurred interest expense in the amount of $76,000 and $153,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, on the Porter Notes. |
Redeemable Preferred Stock
Redeemable Preferred Stock | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Redeemable Preferred Stock [Abstract] | |
Redeemable Preferred Stock | Note 6 . Redeemable Preferred Stock Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock The Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock is senior to all other outstanding equity of the Company, including the Public Preferred Stock. The Series A-1 ranks on a parity with the Series A-2. The components of the authorized Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock are 1,250 shares of Series A-1 and 1,750 shares of Series A-2 Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock, each with $.01 par value. The Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock carries a cumulative per annum dividend rate of 14.125% of its liquidation value of $1,000 per share. The dividends are payable semiannually on June 30 and December 31 of each year. We have not declared dividends on our Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock since its issuance. The liquidation preference of the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock is the face amount of the Series A-1 and A-2 ($1,000 per share), plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. Due to the terms of the Facility and of the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock, we have been and continue to be precluded from paying any accrued and unpaid dividends on the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock, other than described below. Certain holders of the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock have entered into standby agreements whereby, among other things, those holders will not demand any payments in respect of dividends or redemptions of their instruments and the maturity dates of the instruments have been extended. As a result of such standby agreements, as of September 30, 2015, instruments held by Toxford Corporation ("Toxford"), the holder of 76.4% of the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock, will mature on February 28, 2017. As of September 30, 2015, Mr. John Porter held 6.3% of the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock. In the aggregate, as of September 30, 2015, Mr. Porter and Toxford held a total of 163 shares and 228 shares of Series A-1 and Series A-2 Redeemable Preferred Stock, respectively, or 82.7% of the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock. Mr. Porter is the sole stockholder of Toxford. Mr. Porter and Toxford own 39.3% of our Class A Common Stock. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the total number of shares of Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock issued and outstanding was 197 shares and 276 shares for Series A-1 and Series A-2, respectively. Due to the limitations, contractual restrictions, and agreements described above, the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock is classified as noncurrent as of September 30, 2015. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, cumulative undeclared, unpaid dividends relating to Senior Redeemable Preferred stock totaled $1.5 million. We accrued dividends on the Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock of $17,000 and $50,000 for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, which were reported as interest expense. Prior to the effective date of ASC 480-10, "Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity," on July 1, 2003, such dividends were charged to stockholders' deficit. Public Preferred Stock A maximum of 6,000,000 shares of the Public Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, has been authorized for issuance. We initially issued 2,858,723 shares of the Public Preferred Stock pursuant to the acquisition of the Company during fiscal year 1990. The Public Preferred Stock was recorded at fair value on the date of original issue, November 21, 1989, and we made periodic accretions under the interest method of the excess of the redemption value over the recorded value. We adjusted our estimate of accrued accretion in the amount of $1.5 million in the second quarter of 2006. The Public Preferred Stock was fully accreted as of December 2008. We declared stock dividends totaling 736,863 shares in 1990 and 1991. Since 1991, no other dividends, in stock or cash, have been declared. In November 1998, we retired 410,000 shares of the Public Preferred Stock. The total number of shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was 3,185,586. The Public Preferred Stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and the OTC Pink marketplace. Since 1991, no dividends were declared or paid on our Public Preferred Stock, based upon our interpretation of restrictions in our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, limitations in the terms of the Public Preferred Stock instrument, specific dividend payment restrictions in the Facility entered into with Wells Fargo to which the Public Preferred Stock is subject, other senior obligations, and Maryland law limitations in existence prior to October 1, 2009. Pursuant to the terms , we were scheduled, but not required, to redeem the Public Preferred Stock in five annual tranches during the period 2005 through 2009. However, due to our substantial senior obligations, limitations set forth in the covenants in the Facility, foreseeable capital and operational requirements, and restrictions and prohibitions of our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, we were unable to meet the redemption schedule set forth in the terms of the Public Preferred Stock. Moreover, the Public Preferred Stock is not payable on demand, nor callable, for failure to redeem the Public Preferred Stock in accordance with the redemption schedule set forth in the instrument. Therefore, we classify these securities as noncurrent liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. We are parties with certain of our subsidiaries to the Facility agreement with Wells Fargo, whose term expires on October 1, 2016. Under the Facility, we agreed that, so long as any credit under the Facility is available and until full and final payment of the obligations under the Facility, we would not make any distribution or declare or pay any dividends (other than common stock) on our stock, or purchase, acquire, or redeem any stock, or exchange any stock for indebtedness, or retire any stock. Accordingly, as stated above, we will continue to classify the entirety of our obligation to redeem the Public Preferred Stock as a long-term obligation. The Facility prohibit, among other things, the redemption of any stock, common or preferred, other than as described above. The Public Preferred Stock by its terms cannot be redeemed if doing so would violate the terms of an agreement regarding the borrowing of funds or the extension of credit which is binding upon us or any of our subsidiaries, and it does not include any other provisions that would otherwise require any acceleration of the redemption of or amortization payments with respect to the Public Preferred Stock. Thus, the Public Preferred Stock is not and will not be due on demand, nor callable, within 12 months from September 30, 2015. This classification is consistent with ASC 210-10, "Balance Sheet" and 470-10, "Debt" and the FASB ASC Master Glossary definition of "Current Liabilities." ASC 210-10 and the FASB ASC Master Glossary define current liabilities as follows: The term current liabilities is used principally to designate obligations whose liquidation is reasonably expected to require the use of existing resources properly classifiable as current assets, or the creation of other current liabilities. As a balance sheet category, the classification is intended to include obligations for items which have entered into the operating cycle, such as payables incurred in the acquisition of materials and supplies to be used in the production of goods or in providing services to be offered for sale; collections received in advance of the delivery of goods or performance of services; and debts that arise from operations directly related to the operating cycle, such as accruals for wages, salaries, commissions, rentals, royalties, and income and other taxes. Other liabilities whose regular and ordinary liquidation is expected to occur within a relatively short period of time, usually twelve months, are also intended for inclusion, such as short-term debts arising from the acquisition of capital assets, serial maturities of long-term obligations, amounts required to be expended within one year under sinking fund provisions, and agency obligations arising from the collection or acceptance of cash or other assets for the account of third persons. ASC 470-10 provides the following: The current liability classification is also intended to include obligations that, by their terms, are due on demand or will be due on demand within one year (or operating cycle, if longer) from the balance sheet date, even though liquidation may not be expected within that period. It is also intended to include long-term obligations that are or will be callable by the creditor either because the debtor's violation of a provision of the debt agreement at the balance sheet date makes the obligation callable or because the violation, if not cured within a specified grace period, will make the obligation callable. If, pursuant to the terms of the Public Preferred Stock, we do not redeem the Public Preferred Stock in accordance with the scheduled redemptions described above, the terms of the Public Preferred Stock require us to discharge our obligation to redeem the Public Preferred Stock as soon as we are financially capable and legally permitted to do so. Therefore, by its very terms, the Public Preferred Stock is not due on demand or callable for failure to make a scheduled payment pursuant to its redemption provisions and is properly classified as a noncurrent liability. We pay dividends on the Public Preferred Stock when and if declared by the Board of Directors. The Public Preferred Stock accrues a semi-annual dividend at the annual rate of 12% ($1.20) per share, based on the liquidation preference of $10 per share and is fully cumulative. Dividends in additional shares of the Public Preferred Stock for 1990 and 1991 were paid at the rate of 6% of a share for each $.60 of such dividends not paid in cash. For the cash dividends payable since December 1, 1995, we have accrued $91.1 million and $88.2 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. We accrued dividends on the Public Preferred Stock of $1.0 million and $2.9 million for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, which was recorded as interest expense. Prior to the effective date of ASC 480-10 on July 1, 2003, such dividends were charged to stockholders' accumulated deficit. The carrying value of the accrued Paid-in-Kind ("PIK") dividends on the Public Preferred Stock for the period 1992 through June 1995 was $4.0 million. Had we accrued such dividends on a cash basis for this time period, the total amount accrued would have been $15.1 million. However, as a result of the redemption of the 410,000 shares of the Public Preferred Stock in November 1998, such amounts were reduced and adjusted to $3.5 million and $13.4 million, respectively. Our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, Section 2(a) states, "Any dividends payable with respect to the Exchangeable Preferred Stock ("Public Preferred Stock") during the first six years after the Effective Date (November 20, 1989) may be paid (subject to restrictions under applicable state law), in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors, in cash or by issuing additional fully paid and nonassessable shares of Exchangeable Preferred Stock …". Accordingly, the Board had the discretion to pay the dividends for the referenced period in cash or by the issuance of additional shares of Public Preferred Stock. During the period in which we stated our intent to pay PIK dividends, we stated our intention to amend our Charter to permit such payment by the issuance of additional shares of Public Preferred Stock. In consequence, as required by applicable accounting requirements, the accrual for these dividends was recorded at the estimated fair value (as the average of the ask and bid prices) on the dividend date of the shares of Public Preferred Stock that would have been (but were not) issued. This accrual was $9.9 million lower than the accrual would be if the intent was only to pay the dividend in cash, at that date or any later date. In May 2006, the Board concluded that the accrual of PIK dividends for the period 1992 through June 1995 was no longer appropriate. Since 1995, we have disclosed in the footnotes to our audited financial statements the carrying value of the accrued PIK dividends on the Public Preferred Stock for the period 1992 through June 1995 as $4.0 million, and that had we accrued cash dividends during this time period, the total amount accrued would have been $15.1 million. As stated above, such amounts were reduced and adjusted to $3.5 million and $13.4 million, respectively, due to the redemption of 410,000 shares of the Public Preferred Stock in November 1998. On May 12, 2006, the Board voted to confirm that our intent with respect to the payment of dividends on the Public Preferred Stock for this period changed from its previously stated intent to pay PIK dividends to that of an intent to pay cash dividends. We therefore changed the accrual from $3.5 million to $13.4 million, the result of which was to increase our negative shareholder equity by the $9.9 million difference between those two amounts, by recording an additional $9.9 million charge to interest expense for the second quarter of 2006, resulting in a balance of $123.0 million and $120.1 million for the principal amount and all accrued dividends on the Public Preferred Stock as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. This action is considered a change in assumption that results in a change in accounting estimate as defined in ASC 250-10, which sets forth guidance concerning accounting changes and error corrections. |
Income Taxes
Income Taxes | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Income Taxes [Abstract] | |
Income Taxes | Note 7 . Income Taxes The income tax provision for interim periods is determined using an estimated annual effective tax rate adjusted for discrete items, if any, which are taken into account in the quarterly period in which they occur. We review and update our estimated annual effective tax rate each quarter. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, o Under the provisions of ASC 740-10, we determined that there were approximately $766,000 and $708,000 of unrecognized tax benefits required to be recorded as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. |
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and Contingencies | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract] | |
Commitments and Contingencies | Note 8 . Commitments, Contingencies and Subsequent Events Financial Condition and Liquidity As described in Note 5 – Current Liabilities and Debt Obligations, we maintain a revolving Facility with Wells Fargo. Borrowings under the Facility are collateralized by substantially all of our assets including inventory, equipment, and accounts receivable. The amount of available borrowings fluctuates based on the underlying asset-borrowing base, in general 85% of our trade accounts receivable, as adjusted by certain reserves (as further defined in the Facility agreement). The Facility provides us with virtually all of the liquidity we require to meet our operating, investing and financing needs. Therefore, maintaining sufficient availability on the Facility is the most critical factor in our liquidity. While a variety of factors related to sources and uses of cash, such as timeliness of accounts receivable collections, vendor credit terms, or significant collateral requirements, ultimately impact our liquidity, such factors may or may not have a direct impact on our liquidity, based on how the transactions associated with such circumstances impact our availability under the Facility. For example, a contractual requirement to post collateral for a duration of several months, depending on the materiality of the amount, could have an immediate negative effect on our liquidity, as such a circumstance would utilize availability on the Facility without a near-term cash inflow back to us. Likewise, the release of such collateral could have a corresponding positive effect on our liquidity, as it would represent an addition to our availability without any corresponding near-term cash outflow. Similarly, a slow-down of payments from a customer, group of customers or government payment office would not have an immediate and direct effect on our availability on the Facility unless the slowdown was material in amount and over an extended period of time. Any of these examples would have an impact on the Facility, and therefore our liquidity. Additionally, management evaluated the results of operations for 2014 and the continued impact of contract delays as well as other government budgetary funding issues, and determined the need to raise additional working capital. Accordingly, in December 2014, we sold 10% of the membership interests in Telos ID to the Telos ID Class B member for $5 million, and, in March 2015, we issued subordinated notes in the amount of $2.5 million to affiliated entities of John R.C. Porter ("Porter Notes"), a holder of Telos Class A Common Stock and Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock. Should management determine that additional capital is required, management would likely look to these sources of funding first to meet any requirements, although no assurances can be given that these investors would be able to invest or that the Company and the investors would agree upon terms for such investments. With the additional proceeds of the December 2014 Telos ID sale and the Porter Notes, management believes that the Company's existing borrowing capacity is sufficient to fund our capital and liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. We anticipate the continued need for a credit facility upon terms and conditions substantially similar to the Facility in order to meet our long term needs for operating expenses, debt service requirements, and projected capital expenditures. Our working capital was $3.3 million and $4.2 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Although no assurances can be given, we expect that we will be in compliance throughout the term of the Facility with respect to the financial and other covenants. Leases Effective November 1, 2013, we entered into a 13-year lease ("the 2013 lease") that would have expired on October 31, 2026 for the building in Ashburn, Virginia that serves as our corporate headquarters. The 2013 lease was treated as a modification of the prior lease on the property in accordance with ASC 840, "Leases". The 2013 lease included an option to purchase, assign to, or designate a purchaser on June 1, 2014, which required notice of intent to exercise the option by not later than March 31, 2014. On March 28, 2014, we entered into a definitive agreement with an unrelated third party to assign the purchase option to that third party in return for cash consideration of $1.7 million, payable upon the closing of the purchase transaction, and certain obligations under the agreement, including entering in to a new 15-year lease with the third party upon the third party's exercise of the purchase option and purchase of the building from the prior landlord. On March 28, 2014, we provided the prior landlord notice of our assignment and exercise of the purchase option. On May 28, 2014 the third party completed the purchase transaction and the 2013 lease was terminated, with no ongoing obligations, by mutual agreement between us and the prior landlord. On the same day we entered into a new lease ("the 2014 lease") with the third party that expires on May 31, 2029. The 2014 lease was treated as a modification of the prior lease on the property in accordance with ASC 840, "Leases", and determined to be a capital lease. As a result of the new lease, the corresponding capital asset increased by $5.7 million, resulting in a net book value of the capital asset of $18.3 million and the liability increased by $6.7 million, resulting in a capital obligation of $22.0 million. As part of this treatment, the net cash consideration received in connection with the definitive agreement was treated as a lease incentive that will be amortized over the life of the lease. Legal Proceedings Costa Brava Partnership III, L.P., et al. v. Telos Corporation, et al. As previously disclosed in Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014, on October 17, 2005, Costa Brava Partnership III, L.P. ("Costa Brava"), a holder of our Public Preferred Stock, filed a lawsuit against the Company and certain past and present directors and officers ("Telos Defendants") in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland (the "Circuit Court"). A second holder of the Company's Public Preferred Stock, Wynnefield Small Cap Value, L.P. ("Wynnefield"), subsequently intervened as a co-Plaintiff (Costa Brava and Wynnefield are hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiffs"). On February 27, 2007, Plaintiffs added, as an additional defendant, Mr. John R.C. Porter, a holder of the Company's common stock. As of September 30, 2015, Costa Brava and Wynnefield own 12.7% and 15.5%, resepectively, of the outstanding Public Preferred Stock. No material developments occurred in this litigation during the three months ended September 30, 2015. At this state of the litigation, it is impossible to reasonably determine the degree of probability related to Plaintiffs' success in relation to any of their assertions in the litigation. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of the case, the Company and its present and former officers and directors strenuously deny Plaintiffs' allegations and continue to vigorously defend the matter, and oppose all relief sought by Plaintiffs. Hamot et al. v. Telos Corporation As previously disclosed in Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014, Messrs. Seth W. Hamot and Andrew R. Siegel, principals of Costa Brava and Class D Directors of Telos filed a lawsuit against the Company on August 2, 2007, and have been engaged in litigation against the Company since that date. Other Litigation In addition, the Company is a party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, while the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with any reasonable degree of certainty, the final outcome of such known matters will not, based upon all available information, have a material adverse effect on the Company's condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Subsequent Events On November 17, 2015, the Facility was amended ("the Fifteenth Amendment") to extend the maturity date to October 1, 2016, and the EBITDA covenant for the period ending September 30, 2015 was reset to more accurately reflect the Company's revised estimates of operating results. Note 9 . Related Party Transactions |
Related Party Transactions
Related Party Transactions | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Related Party Transactions [Abstract] | |
Related Party Transactions | Emmett J. Wood, the brother of our Chairman and CEO, has been an employee of the Company since 1996. The amounts paid to this individual as compensation were $76,000 and $227,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and $70,000 and $323,000 for three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Additionally, Mr. Wood owned 650,000 shares and 50,000 shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, respectively, as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. On March 31, 2015, the Company entered into Subordinated Loan Agreements and Subordinated Promissory Notes ("Porter Notes") with affiliated entities of Mr. John R. C. Porter (together referenced as "Porter"). Mr. Porter and Toxford Corporation, of which Mr. Porter is the sole shareholder, own 39.3% of our Class A Common Stock. Under the terms of the Porter Notes, Porter lent the Company $2.5 million on or about March 31, 2015. Telos also entered into Subordination and Intercreditor Agreements (the "Subordination Agreements") with Porter and Wells Fargo, in which the Porter Notes are fully subordinated to the Facility and payments under the Porter Notes are permitted only if certain conditions specified by Wells Fargo are met. According to the terms of the Porter Notes, the outstanding principal sum bears interest at the fixed rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum which would be payable in arrears in cash on the 20th day of each May, August, November and February, with the first interest payment date due on August 20, 2015. The Porter Notes do not call for amortization payments and are unsecured. The unpaid principal, together with interest, is due and payable in full on July 1, 2017. The Porter Notes, in whole or in part, may be repaid at any time without premium or penalty. We incurred interest expense in the amount of $76,000 and $153,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, on the Porter Notes. |
General and Basis of Presenta16
General and Basis of Presentation (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
General and Basis of Presentation [Abstract] | |
Segment Reporting | Segment Reporting Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker ("CODM"), or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. We currently operate in one operating and reportable business segment for financial reporting purposes. We currently have the following three business lines: Cyber Operations and Defense, Secure Communications, and Telos ID. Our Chief Executive Officer is the CODM. Our CODM manages our business primarily by function and reviews financial information on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information by line of business as well as certain operational data, for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. The CODM only evaluates profitability based on consolidated results. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers," which requires an entity to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. In July 2015, the FASB finalized the delay of the effective date by one year, making the new standard effective for interim periods and annual period beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard can be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of the change recognized at the date of the initial application. We are currently assessing the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern." The new standard addresses management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Management's evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued. The new standard will be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this update will not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs." The new standard requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, instead of as an asset. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, "Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements – Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting," which clarified that this guidance is not required to be applied to line-of-credit arrangements. The new standard will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this update will not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory," which requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The provisions of the ASU are effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently assessing the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on our condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition Revenues are recognized in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 605-10-S99. We consider amounts earned upon evidence that an arrangement has been obtained, services are delivered, fees are fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Additionally, revenues on arrangements requiring the delivery of more than one product or service are recognized in accordance with ASC 605-25, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables," which addresses and requires the separation and allocation at the inception of the arrangement of all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. This determination is made first by employing vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE"), to the extent it exists, then third-party evidence ("TPE") of selling price, to the extent that it exists. Given the nature of the deliverables contained in our multi-element arrangements, which often involve the design and/or delivery of complex or technical solutions to the government, we have not obtained TPE of selling prices on multi-element arrangements due to the significant differentiation which makes obtaining comparable pricing of products with similar functionality impractical. Therefore we do not utilize TPE. If VSOE is not determinable, we use our best estimate of selling price ("ESP") as defined in ASC 605-25, which represents our best estimate of the prices under the terms and conditions of a particular order for the various elements if they were sold on a stand-alone basis. We recognize revenues for software arrangements upon persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery of the software, and determination that collection of a fixed or determinable license fee is probable. Revenues for software licenses sold on a subscription basis are recognized ratably over the related license period. For arrangements where the sale of software licenses are bundled with other products, including software products, upgrades and enhancements, post-contract customer support ("PCS"), and installation, the relative fair value of each element is determined based on VSOE. VSOE is defined by ASC 985-605, "Software Revenue Recognition," and is limited to the price charged when the element is sold separately or, if the element is not yet sold separately, the price set by management having the relevant authority. When VSOE exists for undelivered elements, the remaining consideration is allocated to delivered elements using the residual method. If VSOE does not exist for the allocation of revenue to the various elements of the arrangement, all revenue from the arrangement is deferred until the earlier of the point at which (1) such VSOE does exist or (2) all elements of the arrangement are delivered. PCS revenues, upon being unbundled from a software license fee, are recognized ratably over the PCS period. Software arrangements requiring significant production, modification, or customization of the software are accounted for in accordance with ASC 605-35 "Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts." We may use subcontractors and suppliers in the course of performing contracts and under certain contracts where we provide supplier procurement services and materials for our customers. Some of these arrangements may fall within the scope of ASC 605-45, "Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent." We presume that revenues on our contracts are recognized on a gross basis, as we generally provide significant value-added services, assume credit risk, and reserve the right to select subcontractors and suppliers, but we evaluate the various criteria specified in the guidance in making the determination of whether revenue should be recognized on a gross or net basis. A description of the business lines, the typical deliverables, and the revenue recognition criteria in general for such deliverables follows: Cyber Operations and Defense – Regarding our deliverables of secure network solutions, we provide wireless and wired networking solutions consisting of hardware and services to our customers. Also, within our Cyber Operations and Defense solutions area is our Emerging Technologies group creating innovative, custom-tailored solutions for government and commercial enterprises. The solutions within the Cyber Operations and Defense and Emerging Technologies groups are generally sold as firm-fixed price ("FFP") bundled solutions. Certain of these networking solutions involve contracts to design, develop, or modify complex electronic equipment configurations to a buyer's specification or to provide network engineering services, and as such fall within the scope of ASC 605-35. Revenue is earned upon percentage of completion based upon proportional performance, such performance generally being defined by performance milestones. Certain other solutions fall within the scope of ASC 605-10-S99, such as resold information technology products, like laptops, printers, networking equipment and peripherals, and ASC 605-25, such as delivery orders for multiple solutions deliverables. For product sales, revenue is recognized upon proof of acceptance by the customer, otherwise it is deferred until such time as the proof of acceptance is obtained. For example, in delivery orders for Department of Defense customers, which comprise the majority of the Company's customers, such acceptance is achieved with a signed Department of Defense Form DD-250 or electronic invoicing system equivalent. Services provided under these contracts are generally provided on a FFP basis, and as such fall within the scope of ASC 605-10-S99. Revenue for services is recognized based on proportional performance, as the work progresses. FFP services may be billed to the customer on a percentage-of-completion basis or based upon milestones, which may approximate the proportional performance of the services under the agreements, as specified in such agreements. To the extent that customer billings exceed the performance of the specified services, the revenue would be deferred. Revenue is recognized under time-and-materials ("T&M") services contracts based upon specified billing rates and other direct costs as incurred. Regarding our information assurance deliverables, we provide Xacta IA Manager software and cybersecurity services to our customers. The software and accompanying services fall within the scope of ASC 985-605, "Software Revenue Recognition," as discussed above. We provide consulting services to our customers under either a FFP or T&M basis. Such contracts fall under the scope of ASC 605-10-S99. Revenue for FFP services is recognized on a proportional performance basis. FFP services may be billed to the customer on a percentage-of-completion basis or based upon milestones as appropriate under a particular contract, which may approximate the proportional performance of the services under the agreements, as specified in such agreements. To the extent that customer billings exceed the performance of the specified services, the revenue would be deferred. Revenue is recognized under T&M contracts based upon specified billing rates and other direct costs as incurred. For cost plus fixed fee ("CPFF") contracts, revenue is recognized in proportion to the allowable costs incurred unless indicated otherwise in the terms of the contract. Secure Communications – We provide Secure Information eXchange (T-6) suite of products which include the flagship product the Automated Message Handling System ("AMHS"), Secure Collaboration, Secure Discovery, Secure Directory and Cross Domain Communication, as well as related services to our customers. The system and accompanying services fall within the scope of ASC 985-605, as fully discussed above. Other services fall within the scope of ASC 605-10-S99 for arrangements that include only T&M contracts and ASC 605-25 for contracts with multiple deliverables such as T&M elements and FFP services. Under such arrangements, the T&M elements are established by direct costs. Revenue is recognized on T&M contracts according to specified rates as direct labor and other direct costs are incurred. For CPFF contracts, revenue is recognized in proportion to the allowable costs incurred unless indicated otherwise in the terms of the contract. Revenue for FFP services is recognized on a proportional performance basis. FFP services may be billed to the customer on a percentage-of-completion basis or based upon milestones, which may approximate the proportional performance of the services under the agreements, as specified in such agreements. To the extent that customer billings exceed the performance of the specified services, the revenue would be deferred. Telos ID – We provide our identity assurance and access management solutions and services and sell information technology products, such as computer laptops and specialized printers, and consumables, such as identity cards, to our customers. The solutions are generally sold as FFP bundled solutions, which would typically fall within the scope of ASC 605-25 and ASC 605-10-S99. Revenue for services is recognized based on proportional performance, as the work progresses. FFP services may be billed to the customer on a percentage-of-completion basis or based upon milestones, which may approximate the proportional performance of the services under the agreements, as specified in such agreements. To the extent that customer billings exceed the performance of the specified services, the revenue would be deferred. Revenue is recognized under T&M contracts based upon specified billing rates and other direct costs as incurred. Estimating future costs and, therefore, revenues and profits, is a process requiring a high degree of management judgment. In the event of a change in total estimated contract cost or profit, the cumulative effect of a change is recorded in the period the change in estimate occurs. To the extent contracts are incomplete at the end of an accounting period, revenue is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, on a proportional performance basis, using costs incurred in relation to total estimated costs, or costs are deferred as appropriate under the terms of a particular contract. In the event cost estimates indicate a loss on a contract, the total amount of such loss, excluding overhead and general and administrative expense, is recorded in the period in which the loss is first estimated. |
Accounts Receivable | Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable are stated at the invoiced amount, less allowances for doubtful accounts. Collectability of accounts receivable is regularly reviewed based upon management's knowledge of the specific circumstances related to overdue balances. The allowance for doubtful accounts is adjusted based on such evaluation. Accounts receivable balances are written off against the allowance when management deems the balances uncollectible. |
Inventories | Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, where cost is determined on the weighted average method. Substantially all inventories consist of purchased commercial off-the-shelf hardware and software, and component computer parts used in connection with system integration services that we perform. An allowance for obsolete, slow-moving or nonsalable inventory is provided for all other inventory. This allowance is based on our overall obsolescence experience and our assessment of future inventory requirements. This charge is taken primarily due to the age of the specific inventory and the significant additional costs that would be necessary to upgrade to current standards as well as the lack of forecasted sales for such inventory in the near future. Gross inventory is $5.3 million $4.7 million , respectively. As of September 30, 2015, it is management's judgment that we have fully provided for any potential inventory obsolescence, |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-10, "Income Taxes." Under ASC 740-10, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences of temporary differences and income tax credits. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured by applying enacted statutory tax rates that are applicable to the future years in which deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be settled or realized for differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Any change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in net income in the period in which the tax rate change is enacted. We record a valuation allowance that reduces deferred tax assets when it is "more likely than not" that deferred tax assets will not be realized. We follow the provisions of ASC 740-10 related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The accounting estimates related to liabilities for uncertain tax positions require us to make judgments regarding the sustainability of each uncertain tax position based on its technical merits. If we determine it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained based on its technical merits, we record the impact of the position in our consolidated financial statements at the largest amount that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. These estimates are updated at each reporting date based on the facts, circumstances and information available. We are also required to assess at each reporting date whether it is reasonably possible that any significant increases or decreases to our unrecognized tax benefits will occur during the next 12 months. The provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed by applying the estimated annual effective tax rate against earnings before income tax expense for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items are recorded during the period in which they occur. |
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets We evaluate the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with ASC 350, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other," which requires goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets to be assessed on at least an annual basis for impairment using a fair value basis. Between annual evaluations, if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount, then impairment must be evaluated. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climate, or (2) a loss of key contracts or customers. As the result of an acquisition, we record any excess purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired as goodwill. An allocation of the purchase price to tangible and intangible net assets acquired is based upon our valuation of the acquired assets. Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to annual impairment tests. We complete our goodwill impairment tests as of December 31st each year. Additionally, we make evaluations between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The evaluation is based on the estimation of the fair values of our three reporting units, Cyber Operations and Defense, Secure Communications, and Telos ID, in comparison to the reporting unit's net asset carrying values. Our discounted cash flows analysis required management judgment with respect to forecasted revenue streams and operating margins, capital expenditures and the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate. We utilized the weighted average cost of capital as derived by certain assumptions specific to our facts and circumstances as the discount rate. The net assets attributable to the reporting units are determined based upon the estimated assets and liabilities attributable to the reporting units in deriving its free cash flows. In addition, the estimate of the total fair value of our reporting units is compared to the market capitalization of the Company. The Company's assessment resulted in a fair value that was greater than the Company's carrying value, therefore the second step of the impairment test, as prescribed by the authoritative literature, was not required to be performed and no impairment of goodwill was recorded as of December 31, 2014. . Other intangible assets consist primarily of customer relationship enhancements. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 5 years. The amortization is based on a forecast of approximately equal annual customer orders over the 5-year period. Intangible assets are subject to impairment review if there are events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the carrying amount is not recoverable. As of September 30, 2015, no impairment charges were taken. |
Restricted Stock Grants | Restricted Stock Grants Since June 2008, we have issued restricted stock (Class A common) to our executive officers, directors and employees. To date, there have been no grants in 2015. As of September 30, 2015, there were 19,047,259 shares of restricted stock outstanding. Such stock is subject to a vesting schedule as follows: 25% of the restricted stock vests immediately on the date of grant, thereafter, an additional 25% will vest annually on the anniversary of the date of grant subject to continued employment or services. In the event of death of the employee or a change in control, as defined by the Telos Corporation 2008 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan or the 2013 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, all unvested shares shall automatically vest in full. |
Other Comprehensive Income | Other Comprehensive Income Our functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. For one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, the functional currency is the local currency. For this subsidiary, the translation of its foreign currency into U.S. Dollars is performed for assets and liabilities using current foreign currency exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using average foreign currency exchange rates during the period. Translation gains and losses are included in stockholders' deficit as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. |
General and Basis of Presenta17
General and Basis of Presentation (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
General and Basis of Presentation [Abstract] | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | Accumulated other comprehensive income included within stockholders' deficit consists of the following (in thousands): September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Cumulative foreign currency translation loss $ (76 ) $ (64 ) Cumulative actuarial gain on pension liability adjustment 109 109 Accumulated other comprehensive income $ 33 $ 45 |
Non-controlling Interests (Tabl
Non-controlling Interests (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Non-controlling Interests [Abstract] | |
Changes in Non-controlling Interest | The following table details the changes in non-controlling interest for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands): Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 2014 2015 2014 Non-controlling interest, beginning of period $ 370 $ 350 $ 584 $ 454 Net income 1,065 500 1,812 1,101 Distributions (361 ) (343 ) (1,322 ) (1,048 ) Non-controlling interest, end of period $ 1,074 $ 507 $ 1,074 $ 507 |
Goodwill and Intangible Asset (
Goodwill and Intangible Asset (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets [Abstract] | |
Other Intangible Asset | Other intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands): September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Cost Accumulated Amortization Cost Accumulated Amortization Other intangible assets $ 11,286 $ 9,593 $ 11,286 $ 7,900 $ 11,286 $ 9,593 $ 11,286 $ 7,900 |
Current Liabilities and Debt 20
Current Liabilities and Debt Obligations (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2015 | |
Current Liabilities and Debt Obligations [Abstract] | |
Maturities of the Facility | The following are maturities of the Facility presented by year (in thousands): 2015 2016 Total Short-term: Term loan $ 1,400 $ -- $ 1,400 1 Long-term: Term loan $ -- $ 2,150 $ 2,150 1 Revolving credit -- 4,930 4,930 2 Subtotal $ -- $ 7,080 $ 7,080 Total $ 1,400 $ 7,080 $ 8,480 1 The principal will be repaid in quarterly installments of $350,000 with a final installment of the unpaid principal amount payable on October 1, 2016. 2 Balance due represents balance as of September 30, 2015, with fluctuating balances based on working capital requirements of the Company. |
General and Basis of Presenta21
General and Basis of Presentation (Details) $ in Thousands | 9 Months Ended | |
Sep. 30, 2015USD ($)SegmentBusinessshares | Dec. 31, 2014USD ($)shares | |
Segment Reporting [Abstract] | ||
Number of reportable segments | Segment | 1 | |
Number of business lines | Business | 3 | |
Inventories [Abstract] | ||
Gross inventory | $ 5,300 | $ 4,700 |
Inventory Valuation Reserves | $ 1,363 | 1,366 |
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets [Abstract] | ||
Estimated useful life of intangible asset | 5 years | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Abstract] | ||
Cumulative foreign currency translation loss | $ (76) | (64) |
Cumulative actuarial gain on pension liability adjustment | 109 | 109 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | $ 33 | $ 45 |
Restricted Stock Grants [Member] | ||
Restricted Stock Grants [Abstract] | ||
Restricted stock outstanding | shares | 19,047,259 | 19,047,259 |
Restricted stock vested on date of grant (in hundredths) | 25.00% | |
Restricted stock vest on anniversary of the date of grant (in hundredths) | 25.00% |
Non-controlling Interests (Deta
Non-controlling Interests (Details) | Dec. 24, 2014USD ($)DirectorSubclasses | Apr. 30, 2007DirectorSubclasses | Apr. 19, 2007USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2015USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2014USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2015USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2014USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2014USD ($) | Apr. 20, 2007USD ($) | Apr. 11, 2007USD ($) |
Noncontrolling Interest [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Net book value of assets contributed | $ 17,000 | |||||||||
Cash consideration received on sale of membership interest | $ 5,000,000 | $ 3,000,000 | $ 6,000,000 | |||||||
Recognized gain on sale of membership interests to the Investors | $ 5,800,000 | |||||||||
Percentage of membership interest sold to investor (in hundredths) | 10.00% | 39.999% | ||||||||
Receivable from sale of membership interest | $ 2,000,000 | |||||||||
Portion of the proceeds attributable to the term loan under loan agreement | $ 1,000,000 | |||||||||
Percentage of ownership interest owned after transaction (in hundredths) | 60.00% | |||||||||
Number of members in board of director | Director | 5 | 5 | ||||||||
Number of subclasses of membership units | Subclasses | 2 | 2 | ||||||||
Net income | $ (341,000) | $ (274,000) | $ (4,748,000) | $ (9,578,000) | ||||||
Changes in non-controlling interest [Abstract] | ||||||||||
Non-controlling interest, beginning of period | 370,000 | 350,000 | 584,000 | 454,000 | ||||||
Percentage of membership interest sold to investor (in hundredths) | 10.00% | 39.999% | ||||||||
Net income | 1,065,000 | 500,000 | 1,812,000 | 1,101,000 | ||||||
Distributions | (361,000) | (343,000) | (1,322,000) | (1,048,000) | ||||||
Non-controlling interest, end of period | $ 1,074,000 | 507,000 | $ 1,074,000 | 507,000 | ||||||
Class A Membership Unit [Member] | ||||||||||
Noncontrolling Interest [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Percentage of ownership interest owned after transaction (in hundredths) | 50.00% | 60.00% | ||||||||
Number of members in board of director | Director | 3 | |||||||||
Percentage of profit and loss allocated (in hundredths) | 50.00% | 50.00% | 60.00% | |||||||
Net income | $ 1,100,000 | 700,000 | $ 1,800,000 | 1,600,000 | ||||||
Number of directors entitled to appoint | Director | 3 | |||||||||
Class B Membership Unit [Member] | ||||||||||
Noncontrolling Interest [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Percentage of ownership interest owned after transaction (in hundredths) | 50.00% | 40.00% | ||||||||
Number of members in board of director | Director | 2 | |||||||||
Percentage of profit and loss allocated (in hundredths) | 50.00% | 50.00% | 40.00% | |||||||
Net income | $ 1,100,000 | 0.5 | $ 1,800,000 | 1.1 | ||||||
Number of directors entitled to appoint | Director | 2 | |||||||||
Changes in non-controlling interest [Abstract] | ||||||||||
Distributions | $ 0.4 | $ 0.3 | $ 1.3 | $ 1 | ||||||
Telos ID [Member] | ||||||||||
Noncontrolling Interest [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Percentage of membership interest owned before (in hundredths) | 99.999% | |||||||||
Owned membership interest from private equity investors (in hundredths) | 0.001% | |||||||||
Percentage of membership interest sold to investor (in hundredths) | 10.00% | |||||||||
Portion of the proceeds attributable to the term loan under loan agreement | $ 1,000,000 | |||||||||
Changes in non-controlling interest [Abstract] | ||||||||||
Percentage of membership interest sold to investor (in hundredths) | 10.00% |
Goodwill and Intangible Asset23
Goodwill and Intangible Asset (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||
Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets [Abstract] | |||||
Goodwill | $ 14,916 | $ 14,916 | $ 14,916 | ||
Estimated useful lives customer relationship | 5 years | ||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 600 | $ 600 | $ 1,700 | $ 1,700 | |
Annual amortization expense | 1,700 | ||||
Asset impairment charges | 0 | ||||
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items] | |||||
Cost | 11,286 | 11,286 | 11,286 | ||
Accumulated Amortization | 9,593 | 9,593 | 7,900 | ||
Other Intangible Assets [Member] | |||||
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items] | |||||
Cost | 11,286 | 11,286 | 11,286 | ||
Accumulated Amortization | $ 9,593 | $ 9,593 | $ 7,900 |
Fair Value Measurements (Detail
Fair Value Measurements (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions | 9 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | ||
Sep. 30, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 1991 | Dec. 31, 1990 | |
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Member] | ||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||
Carrying amount of senior redeemable preferred stock | $ 2 | $ 2 | ||
Preferred stock dividend rate per annum (in hundredths) | 14.125% | |||
Public Preferred Stock [Member] | ||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||
Preferred stock dividend rate per annum (in hundredths) | 12.00% | 12.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% |
Public preferred stock par value (in dollar per share) | $ 0.01 | |||
Carrying (Reported) Amount, Fair Value Disclosure [Member] | Public Preferred Stock [Member] | ||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||
Public preferred stock | $ 123 | $ 120.1 | ||
Estimate of Fair Value, Fair Value Disclosure [Member] | Public Preferred Stock [Member] | ||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||
Public preferred stock | $ 35 | $ 43 |
Current Liabilities and Debt 25
Current Liabilities and Debt Obligations (Details) - USD ($) | Mar. 19, 2015 | Feb. 27, 2015 | Dec. 24, 2014 | Sep. 30, 2015 | Mar. 31, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2010 | Mar. 31, 2014 | Apr. 20, 2007 | |
Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Payables [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Trade account payables | $ 14,100,000 | $ 14,100,000 | $ 13,600,000 | |||||||||||
Accrued trade payables | 2,200,000 | 2,200,000 | 4,200,000 | |||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Term loan component of Facility | 3,600,000 | $ 3,600,000 | ||||||||||||
Amended expiration date of revolving credit facility | Mar. 31, 2015 | Mar. 23, 2015 | Oct. 1, 2016 | Nov. 13, 2015 | ||||||||||
Principal amount of term loan repaid in quarterly installments | $ 250,000 | |||||||||||||
Fees paid in connection with amendment | $ 75,000 | |||||||||||||
Percentage of membership interest sold to investor (in hundredths) | 10.00% | 39.999% | ||||||||||||
Portion of the proceeds attributable to the term loan under loan agreement | $ 1,000,000 | |||||||||||||
Interest rate on credit facility (in hundredths) | 4.25% | 4.25% | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | $ 1,444,000 | $ 1,373,000 | $ 4,215,000 | $ 3,965,000 | ||||||||||
Outstanding borrowing of credit facility | 8,500,000 | 8,500,000 | 10,900,000 | |||||||||||
Remaining borrowing capacity | $ 6,200,000 | $ 6,200,000 | 4,900,000 | |||||||||||
Weighted average interest rates on outstanding borrowings (in hundredths) | 6.70% | 5.70% | 6.70% | 5.70% | ||||||||||
Proceeds from related party, debt | $ 2,500,000 | $ 0 | ||||||||||||
Interest Expense, Related Party | $ 76,000 | $ 153,000 | ||||||||||||
Debt instrument, fixed interest rate (in hundredths) | 12.00% | 12.00% | ||||||||||||
Debt instrument, first interest payment due date | Aug. 20, 2015 | |||||||||||||
Debt instrument, last principal and interest payment date | Jul. 1, 2017 | |||||||||||||
Maturities of facility presented by year [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
2,015 | $ 1,400,000 | $ 1,400,000 | ||||||||||||
2,016 | 7,080,000 | 7,080,000 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ 8,480,000 | $ 8,480,000 | ||||||||||||
Telos ID [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of membership interest sold to investor (in hundredths) | 10.00% | |||||||||||||
Portion of the proceeds attributable to the term loan under loan agreement | $ 1,000,000 | |||||||||||||
Porter [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Related party ownership percentage (in hundredths) | 39.30% | 39.30% | ||||||||||||
Term Loan [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Principal amount of term loan repaid in quarterly installments | $ 250,000 | $ 93,750 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of term loan amortized per year (in hundredths) | 5.00% | 5.00% | ||||||||||||
Outstanding borrowing of credit facility | $ 3,600,000 | $ 3,600,000 | 5,500,000 | |||||||||||
Term Loan [Member] | The "Twelfth Amendment" [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Principal amount of term loan repaid in quarterly installments | 350,000 | |||||||||||||
Fees paid in connection with amendment | $ 150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||||||||
Term Loan [Member] | Telos ID [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Amount of term loan classified as current liabilty | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||||
Short-term debt | 2,300,000 | |||||||||||||
Term Loan [Member] | Prime Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 1.00% | |||||||||||||
Term Loan [Member] | Federal Funds Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 1.50% | |||||||||||||
Term Loan [Member] | LIBOR Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 2.00% | |||||||||||||
Revolving Credit [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Maximum revolving credit facility | $ 30,000,000 | |||||||||||||
Line of credit sub-line limit | $ 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | 200,000 | $ 200,000 | 400,000 | $ 500,000 | ||||||||||
Revolving Credit [Member] | The "Twelfth Amendment" [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Maximum revolving credit facility | 20,000,000 | 20,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Line of credit sub-line limit | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Debt issuance, subordinate notes | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Current line of credit borrowing capacity | $ 1,250,000 | $ 1,250,000 | ||||||||||||
Revolving Credit [Member] | Prime Rate [Member] | First Tier Interest Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 2.25% | |||||||||||||
Revolving Credit [Member] | Prime Rate [Member] | Second Tier Interest Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 1.00% | |||||||||||||
Interest rate on credit facility (in hundredths) | 4.25% | 4.25% | ||||||||||||
Revolving Credit [Member] | Federal Funds Rate [Member] | First Tier Interest Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 2.75% | |||||||||||||
Revolving Credit [Member] | Federal Funds Rate [Member] | Second Tier Interest Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 1.50% | |||||||||||||
Revolving Credit [Member] | LIBOR Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 3.75% | |||||||||||||
Revolving Credit [Member] | LIBOR Rate [Member] | First Tier Interest Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 3.25% | |||||||||||||
Revolving Credit [Member] | LIBOR Rate [Member] | Second Tier Interest Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 2.00% | |||||||||||||
First Tranche [Member] | Porter [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from related party, debt | 2,500,000 | |||||||||||||
Subordinated Promissory Note [Member] | Porter [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from related party, debt | $ 5,000,000 | |||||||||||||
Advances on Revolving Credit [Member] | LIBOR Rate [Member] | First Tier Interest Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 5.00% | |||||||||||||
Advances on Revolving Credit [Member] | LIBOR Rate [Member] | Second Tier Interest Rate [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Percentage added to reference rate to compute the variable rate (in hundredths) | 3.75% | |||||||||||||
Short-term [Member] | Term Loan [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Senior Revolving Credit Facility [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding borrowing of credit facility | $ 1,400,000 | $ 1,400,000 | $ 2,300,000 | |||||||||||
Maturities of facility presented by year [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
2,015 | 1,400,000 | 1,400,000 | ||||||||||||
2,016 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Total | [1] | 1,400,000 | 1,400,000 | |||||||||||
Long-term [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Maturities of facility presented by year [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
2,015 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
2,016 | 7,080,000 | 7,080,000 | ||||||||||||
Total | 7,080,000 | 7,080,000 | ||||||||||||
Long-term [Member] | Term Loan [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Maturities of facility presented by year [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
2,015 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
2,016 | 2,150,000 | 2,150,000 | ||||||||||||
Total | [1] | 2,150,000 | 2,150,000 | |||||||||||
Long-term [Member] | Revolving Credit [Member] | ||||||||||||||
Maturities of facility presented by year [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
2,015 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
2,016 | 4,930,000 | 4,930,000 | ||||||||||||
Total | [2] | $ 4,930,000 | $ 4,930,000 | |||||||||||
[1] | The principal will be repaid in quarterly installments of $350,000, with a final installment of the unpaid principal amount payable on April 1, 2016. | |||||||||||||
[2] | Balance due represents balance as of June 30, 2015, with fluctuating balances based on working capital requirements of the Company. |
Redeemable Preferred Stock (Det
Redeemable Preferred Stock (Details) | 1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 30 Months Ended | ||||||
Dec. 31, 2009Tranche | Sep. 30, 2015USD ($)$ / sharesshares | Sep. 30, 2014USD ($) | Jun. 30, 2006USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2015USD ($)$ / sharesshares | Sep. 30, 2014USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2014USD ($)shares | Dec. 31, 1998shares | Dec. 31, 1991$ / sharesshares | Dec. 31, 1990$ / sharesshares | Jun. 30, 1995USD ($) | |
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Abstract] | |||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stock liquidation value (in dollar per share) | $ / shares | $ 1,000 | $ 1,000 | |||||||||
Percentage of redeemable preferred stock held by related party after redemption (in hundredths) | 39.30% | 39.30% | |||||||||
12% Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock [Abstract] | |||||||||||
Number of annual tranches during the period | Tranche | 5 | ||||||||||
Accrued paid-in kind dividends | $ | $ 4,000,000 | ||||||||||
Accrued paid-in cash dividends | $ | 15,100,000 | ||||||||||
Redemption of public preferred stock (in shares) | 410,000 | ||||||||||
Reduced amount of Paid in kind dividends due to redemption of public preferred stock | $ | 3,500,000 | ||||||||||
Adjusted amount of accrued cash dividends due to redemption of public preferred stock | $ | 9,900,000 | ||||||||||
Revised accrued dividends to reflect change from Pik dividends to cash dividends | $ | $ 13,400,000 | ||||||||||
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Member] | |||||||||||
Class of Stock [Line Items] | |||||||||||
Preferred stock dividend rate per annum (in hundredths) | 14.125% | ||||||||||
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Abstract] | |||||||||||
Undeclared unpaid dividends | $ | $ 1,500,000 | $ 1,500,000 | $ 1,500,000 | ||||||||
Accrued dividends reported as interest expenses | $ | $ 17,000 | $ 17,000 | $ 50,000 | $ 50,000 | |||||||
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Member] | Toxford [Member] | |||||||||||
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Abstract] | |||||||||||
Senior redeemable preferred stock maturity date | Feb. 28, 2017 | ||||||||||
Percentage of redeemable preferred stock held by related party after redemption (in hundredths) | 76.40% | 76.40% | |||||||||
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Member] | Porter [Member] | |||||||||||
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Abstract] | |||||||||||
Percentage of redeemable preferred stock held by related party after redemption (in hundredths) | 6.30% | 6.30% | |||||||||
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Member] | Porter And Toxford [Member] | |||||||||||
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Abstract] | |||||||||||
Percentage of redeemable preferred stock held by related party after redemption (in hundredths) | 82.70% | 82.70% | |||||||||
Public Preferred Stock [Member] | |||||||||||
Class of Stock [Line Items] | |||||||||||
Preferred stock authorized (in shares) | 6,000,000 | 6,000,000 | |||||||||
Preferred stock par value (in dollar per share) | $ / shares | $ 0.01 | $ 0.01 | |||||||||
Preferred stock dividend rate per annum (in hundredths) | 12.00% | 12.00% | 6.00% | 6.00% | |||||||
Dividends Payable | $ | $ 91,100,000 | $ 91,100,000 | $ 88,200,000 | ||||||||
Carrying value of redeemable preferred stock | $ | $ 123,000,000 | $ 123,000,000 | $ 120,100,000 | ||||||||
Preferred stock issued and outstanding (in shares) | 3,185,586 | 3,185,586 | 2,858,723 | ||||||||
12% Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock [Abstract] | |||||||||||
Adjusted accrued accretion of public preferred stock | $ | $ 1,500,000 | ||||||||||
Number of shares declared as dividend (in shares) | 736,863 | 736,863 | |||||||||
Period during which redeemable preferred stock not callable | 12 months | ||||||||||
Preferred stock dividend rate per annum (in dollars per share) | $ / shares | $ 1.20 | $ 0.60 | $ 0.60 | ||||||||
Preferred stock, liquidation preference (in dollars per share) | $ / shares | $ 10 | $ 10 | |||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock | $ | $ 1,000,000 | $ 1,000,000 | $ 2,900,000 | $ 2,900,000 | |||||||
Series A-1 Preferred Stock [Member] | |||||||||||
Class of Stock [Line Items] | |||||||||||
Preferred stock authorized (in shares) | 1,250 | 1,250 | |||||||||
Preferred stock par value (in dollar per share) | $ / shares | $ 0.01 | $ 0.01 | |||||||||
Preferred stock issued and outstanding (in shares) | 197 | ||||||||||
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Abstract] | |||||||||||
Related party preferred stock held after redemption (in shares) | 163 | 163 | |||||||||
Series A-1 Preferred Stock [Member] | Public Preferred Stock [Member] | |||||||||||
Class of Stock [Line Items] | |||||||||||
Preferred stock issued and outstanding (in shares) | 3,185,586 | ||||||||||
Series A-2 Preferred Stock [Member] | |||||||||||
Class of Stock [Line Items] | |||||||||||
Preferred stock authorized (in shares) | 1,750 | 1,750 | |||||||||
Preferred stock par value (in dollar per share) | $ / shares | $ 0.01 | $ 0.01 | |||||||||
Preferred stock issued and outstanding (in shares) | 276 | 276 | 276 | ||||||||
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Abstract] | |||||||||||
Related party preferred stock held after redemption (in shares) | 228 | 228 | |||||||||
Series A-2 Preferred Stock [Member] | Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Member] | |||||||||||
Class of Stock [Line Items] | |||||||||||
Preferred stock issued and outstanding (in shares) | 197 | 197 | |||||||||
Class A Common Stock [Member] | Porter And Toxford [Member] | |||||||||||
Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Abstract] | |||||||||||
Common stock held by related parties (in hundredths) | 39.30% | 39.30% |
Income Taxes (Details)
Income Taxes (Details) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||
Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Income Taxes [Abstract] | |||||
Income tax benefit (expense) | $ 618,000 | $ 3,337,000 | $ 1,805,000 | $ 4,202,000 | |
Unrecognized tax benefits | $ 766,000 | $ 766,000 | $ 708,000 |
Commitments and Contingencies (
Commitments and Contingencies (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands | Aug. 12, 2015 | Mar. 19, 2015 | Feb. 27, 2015 | Nov. 01, 2013 | Mar. 31, 2015 | Mar. 31, 2014 | Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 24, 2014 | Apr. 20, 2007 |
Financial Condition and Liquidity [Abstract] | ||||||||||||
Percentage of trade account receivable collateralized under the facility (in hundredths) | 85.00% | |||||||||||
Percentage of membership interest sold to investor (in hundredths) | 10.00% | 39.999% | ||||||||||
Cash consideration received on sale of membership interest | $ 3,000 | $ 5,000 | $ 6,000 | |||||||||
Proceeds from related party, debt | $ 2,500 | |||||||||||
Working capital | $ 3,300 | $ 4,200 | ||||||||||
Leases [Abstract] | ||||||||||||
Term of lease | 13 years | |||||||||||
Renewal term of lease | 15 years | |||||||||||
Proceeds from assignment of purchase option under lease | $ 1,700 | $ 0 | $ 1,669 | |||||||||
Increase in capital assets | 5,700 | |||||||||||
Net book value of capital assets | 18,300 | |||||||||||
Increase in capital assets liability | 6,700 | |||||||||||
Capital assets obligation | $ 22,000 | |||||||||||
Subsequent Events [Abstract] | ||||||||||||
Amended expiration date of revolving credit facility | Mar. 31, 2015 | Mar. 23, 2015 | Oct. 1, 2016 | Nov. 13, 2015 | ||||||||
Subsequent Event [Member] | ||||||||||||
Subsequent Events [Abstract] | ||||||||||||
Amended expiration date of revolving credit facility | Oct. 1, 2016 | |||||||||||
Costa Brava [Member] | ||||||||||||
Legal Proceedings [Line Items] | ||||||||||||
Percentage of public preferred stock owned (in hundredths) | 12.70% | |||||||||||
Wynnefield [Member] | ||||||||||||
Legal Proceedings [Line Items] | ||||||||||||
Percentage of public preferred stock owned (in hundredths) | 15.50% |
Related Party Transactions (Det
Related Party Transactions (Details) - USD ($) | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||
Sep. 30, 2015 | Mar. 31, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | Sep. 30, 2015 | Sep. 30, 2014 | |
Related Party Transaction [Line Items] | |||||
Percentage of of shares owned (in hundredths) | 39.30% | 39.30% | |||
Proceeds from related party, debt | $ 2,500,000 | ||||
Interest Expense, Related Party | $ 76,000 | $ 153,000 | |||
Debt instrument, fixed interest rate | 12.00% | 12.00% | |||
Debt instrument, first interest payment date | Aug. 20, 2015 | ||||
Debt instrument, last principal and interest payment date | Jul. 1, 2017 | ||||
Emmett Wood [Member] | |||||
Related Party Transaction [Line Items] | |||||
Compensation to related parties | $ 76,000 | $ 70,000 | $ 227,000 | $ 323,000 | |
Emmett Wood [Member] | Class A Common Stock [Member] | |||||
Related Party Transaction [Line Items] | |||||
Number of shares held by related party (in shares) | 650,000 | 650,000 | |||
Emmett Wood [Member] | Class B Common Stock [Member] | |||||
Related Party Transaction [Line Items] | |||||
Number of shares held by related party (in shares) | 50,000 | 50,000 | |||
Porter And Toxford [Member] | Senior Redeemable Preferred Stock [Member] | |||||
Related Party Transaction [Line Items] | |||||
Percentage of of shares owned (in hundredths) | 82.70% | 82.70% |
Uncategorized Items - tlsrp-201
Label | Element | Value |
Gain (Loss) on Disposition of Assets | us-gaap_GainLossOnDispositionOfAssets1 | $ 0 |