Table of Contents
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 | ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| For the transition period from to |
Commission FileNumber 1-5341
ElkCorp
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 75-1217920 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
| 14911 Quorum Drive, Suite 600, Dallas, Texas | 75254-1491 (Zip Code) | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
(972) 851-0500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
| Common Stock Par Value $1 Per Share | New York Stock Exchange | |
| Rights to Purchase Series A Preferred Stock | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K. ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of common stock held by nonaffiliates as of December 31, 2005 (the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second quarter) was $666,747,931. This amount is based on the closing price of the Registrant’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2005.
As of the close of business on August 31, 2006, the Registrant had 20,497,189 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on October 31, 2006, are incorporated by reference into certain Items of Part III hereof. Except for those portions specifically incorporated herein by reference, such document shall not be deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of this report.
ElkCorp and Subsidiaries
Annual Report on Form 10-K
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | ||||||||
| 1 | ||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||
| 12 | ||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||
| 14 | ||||||||
| 15 | ||||||||
| 24 | ||||||||
| 24 | ||||||||
| 51 | ||||||||
| 51 | ||||||||
| 52 | ||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||
| 54 | ||||||||
| 58 | ||||||||
| Subsidiaries | ||||||||
| Consent of Grant Thornton LLP | ||||||||
| Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | ||||||||
| Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 | ||||||||
| Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 | ||||||||
| Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 | ||||||||
| Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 | ||||||||
Table of Contents
PART I
Forward-Looking Statements
In accordance with the safe harbor provisions of the securities law regarding forward looking statements, in addition to the historical information contained herein, this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements usually are accompanied by words such as “optimistic,” ”vision,” “outlook,” “believe,” “estimate,” “potential,” “forecast,” “goal,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “predict,” “position,” “could,” “should,” “may,” “likely,” or similar words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. These statements are based on judgments the company believes are reasonable; however, ElkCorp’s actual results could differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences are identified in Part 1. Item 1A. Risk Factors of this report, and include, but are not limited to, changes in demand, prices, raw material costs, transportation costs, changes in economic conditions of the various markets the company serves, failure to achieve expected efficiencies in new operations, changes in the amount and severity of inclement weather, acts of God, war or terrorism, as well as the other risks detailed herein. ElkCorp undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Item 1. Business
General
ElkCorp, which is referred to as “we,” “our,” “the registrant,” “the company” and “Elk” in this report, is a Delaware corporation originally incorporated in 1965, having its principal executive offices in Dallas, Texas. Shares of ElkCorp’s common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “ELK”.
We maintain an Internet website at http://www.elkcorp.com. In the Investor Relations section of the web site, we post the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All such filings on the Investor Relations web page, which also includes Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are available to be viewed on the web page free of charge. Additionally, our key committee charters, corporate governance guidelines and code of business conduct and ethics are available on our website and in print free of charge upon request. Information contained on the web site is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A copy of this Form 10-K is available without charge upon written request to Investor Relations, ElkCorp, 14911 Quorum Drive, Suite 600, Dallas, Texas 75254.
Vision
Our vision is to be the “Brand of Choice” to our customers for every aspect of our business. Our mission is to utilize our strengths in technology, manufacturing and marketing to produce innovative products that enhance profitability. Our primary strategy is to enter and maintain a leadership position in selected high growth, high margin markets where our technology brings true innovation to the building products industry. Key aspects of this strategy in the coming year include:
| - | Developing additional innovative roofing and composite products to serve our changing markets | |||
| - | Seeking innovative ways to make our roofing and composite products lighter and stronger | |||
| - | Diversifying and strengthening our asphalt supply chain to improve our options and competitiveness for this key raw material | |||
| - | Further identifying alternatives and new ideas to reduce freight costs | |||
| - | Commercializing and profitably growing in the fire barrier and flooring underlayment industries | |||
| - | Continuing to integrate RGM products into our national distribution channels | |||
| - | Pursuing add-on acquisitions and a new building product platform that will leverage the Elk brand and our investments in technology, distribution, marketing and manufacturing |
- 1 -
Table of Contents
Financial Information About Industry Segments
Financial information by industry segment is presented in Part II. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this report. Our primary focus centers on three building products platforms: Premium Roofing Products, Composite Building Products and Specialty Fabric Technologies. We maintain one additional segment, Surface Finishes, which includes hard chrome and other finishes designed to extend the life of steel machinery components operating in abrasive environments. This business does not fit into our focus on building products and is currently offered for sale. However, our current plan is for this business to remain as one of our business platforms if it is not sold.
In fiscal 2006, we changed our reporting for industry segments to better reflect our operating structure. External sales of coated and uncoated nonwoven fabrics were previously included in the Premium Roofing Products segment, but are now included in Specialty Fabric Technologies. In addition, fire barrier technologies are included in Specialty Fabric Technologies. In prior years, fire barrier technologies and the Surface Finishes segment were combined and shown as Other, Technologies.
Premium Roofing Products
Products and Warranties
The Premium Roofing Products platform is our largest segment, accounting for 90% of sales in fiscal 2006. The primary products manufactured at Elk’s roofing plants are premium architectural roofing shingles and certain accessory products. Our key products have either a wood-shake or slate-like look. Elk’s shingle product line includes: the Prestique® Gallery Collection®, Prestique Plus High Definition®, Prestique I High Definition, Prestique High Definition, Raised Profile®, Capstone®, Domain® Winslowâ, Domain Ashford®, Prestique Grandé® High Definition, Elk Cool Color Series shingles, and Prestique Xtra™. In addition to Elk’s traditional product line of architectural shingles, in recent years we have strengthened and expanded our brand by introducing a wider variety of products. The exposure of the Prestique Grande High Definition shingle is 40% larger than standard shingles, and installs 20% faster. It features an interply headlap technology that reduces the use of asphalt and granules, creating a more environmentally friendly product that is lighter in weight without sacrificing performance. The Elk Cool Color Series features “cool” asphalt shingles that slow heat build-up using highly reflective granules that reflect the sun’s rays and more effectively release absorbed heat. Prestique Xtra features an impact-resistant construction. The Domain line of super shingles are premium landscape shingles, which add a new visual dimension to roofing.
As a result of the acquisition of RGM in August 2005, we began offering Ridglass® high-profile hip and ridge shingles, a premium accessory product, to complement our existing Seal-A-Ridge® with Formula FLX®, Z® Ridge, Vented RidgeCrest hip and ridge products and HighPoint™ line of ridge vents. We offer other accessory products, including various starter-strip products sold as 9” Starter, 7.2” StartRite and 7.2” KwikStart™, TG-2™ SBS-modified underlayment, ShieldGard™ and HT ShieldGard self-adhering underlayments for low-slope roof systems and under tile and asphalt roofing, IceGard™ MS and IceGard PST all-climate membranes for superior protection against water penetration from wind-driven rain, RainCap™ SA Cap P and RoofGard™ SA Cap P-FR cap sheets, KwikWrap™, a weather resistant barrier, accessory paint for vent flashings and a built-in StainGuard® treatment.
The following table summarizes limited product warranty and limited wind warranty for the first five years for each product in our shingle line. Special high-wind application techniques are required for limited wind warranties of up to 90 miles per hour (mph) and higher.
| Product | Limited Warranty | Limited Wind Coverage | ||
| Domain Winslow | 50 years | 110 mph | ||
| Domain Cool Color Series | 50 years | 110 mph | ||
| Prestique Gallery Collection | 50 years | 110 mph | ||
| Prestique Plus High Definition | 50 years | 110 mph | ||
| Prestique Xtra | 40 years | 130 mph | ||
| Capstone | 40 years | 110 mph | ||
| Prestique Grandé High Definition | 40 years | 90 mph | ||
| Prestique I High Definition | 40 years | 90 mph | ||
| Prestique Cool Color Series | 40 years | 90 mph | ||
| Domain Ashford | 40 years | 80 mph | ||
| Prestique High Definition | 30 years | 80 mph | ||
| Raised Profile | 30 years | 70 mph |
- 2 -
Table of Contents
Sales and Marketing
Our customer base for roofing products includes approximately 180 wholesale distributors, many of which have multiple nationwide locations. Elk’s roofing products are distributed nationwide and in Canada and are sold by employee sales personnel primarily to these wholesale distributors, with delivery being made by rail, contract carrier, or by customer vehicles from our manufacturing plants or warehouses. Our warehouse locations and the master distribution center in Edgerton, Wisconsin provide us the capability to combine multiple products on the same trucks. On a short-term basis, demand for roofing products can be dictated by weather patterns. Even without unusual weather events, longer-term industry growth rates have been strong. Over the last five calendar years, the laminated asphalt shingle segment has grown at a compound annual growth rate of 12%. The laminated asphalt shingle market is expected to continue to grow 6% to 10% annually for the remainder of the decade. Approximately 80% of all asphalt shingles are used in reroofing and remodeling and about 20% are used in new construction. Approximately 70% of housing in the United States is over 20 years old, with the median age being approximately 32 years old. On average, steep-sloped roofs are replaced every 19 years. Approximately 89% of roof replacements are nondiscretionary and result from roof deterioration, age, leaks, or weather damage. Appearance upgrades account for the remaining 11% of roof replacements. Our ten largest customers account generally for 50% of consolidated sales. One customer, ABC Supply Co., Inc., the largest roofing wholesale distributor in the United States, accounted for 19% of consolidated sales in each of the past three fiscal years.
Elk’s sales personnel devote considerable time and effort to the education of roofing installation contractors regarding the superior appearance, quality and ease of application of Elk’s roofing products. Elk believes that our effort to develop brand loyalty among roofing installation contractors is a significant marketing strategy, since the product recommendations of roofing installation contractors often have a significant influence upon the roofing product brand selections of homeowners. Elk maintains a Peak PerformanceSM Contractor Program to reward top performing contractors for their brand loyalty and quality of service. Contractors in the Peak Performance program can also become shareholders of Elk.
Competition
Even though the premium shingle manufacturing business is highly competitive, we believe that Elk is one of the top five producers of premium architectural roofing shingles. Elk has been able to compete successfully with our competitors, some of which are larger in size and have greater financial resources. Elk’s target market for roofing shingle sales is the laminated segment which accounts for over 65% of all asphalt shingle sales. We believe we are the only major roofing manufacturer that focuses on this segment of the sloped roof market. Elk’s plants generally are among the most modern and efficient plants in the industry. We believe that many of our competitors have elective manufacturing capacity, allowing them to manufacture either commodity shingles or premium laminated shingles. Such elective capacity can affect the supply/demand balance in the premium roofing sector, which can influence the prices Elk charges its customers.
Manufacturing and Raw Materials
We manufacture premium architectural roofing shingles and accessory products at plants located in (1) Ennis, Texas, (2) Shafter, California, (3) Myerstown, Pennsylvania, and (4) from two adjacent manufacturing facilities in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. On August 25, 2005, we acquired RGM Products, Inc., a privately-held manufacturer of high-profile hip and ridge and other roofing related products based in Fresno, California. Our roofing plants ordinarily operate twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, year-round, except as required for planned maintenance.
The significant raw materials used in manufacturing shingle and accessory products are asphalt, ceramic coated granules, mineral filler and roofing mat. All of these materials are presently available from several sources and are in adequate supply. Temporary shortages or disruption in supply of raw materials do result from time to time for a variety of reasons. Asphalt costs, which are a significant cost component of our roofing products, can be materially affected by trends in crude oil prices and our cost of sales can vary substantially as a result of changes in the price and availability of asphalt. With the surge in the price of crude oil in the past two years, asphalt costs have reached record levels. We have historically been able to pass some of the higher raw material costs through to the customer, but there is no assurance of being able to do so in the future.
In addition to premium architectural shingles and accessory products, nonwoven fabrics are manufactured on two nonwoven mat lines that run in parallel at our Ennis, Texas facility. Elk’s nonwoven fabrics subsidiary is a leading
- 3 -
Table of Contents
manufacturer of nonwoven fiberglass shingle substrates and other products utilizing coated and uncoated nonwoven fabrics formed from fiberglass, polyester, cellulose and blended base fibers. Uncoated nonwoven fabrics form the core substrate of most residential asphalt shingles and commercial roofing membranes. During fiscal 2006, the majority of nonwoven fabrics produced by Elk were used in the manufacture of residential and commercial roofing and accessory products, with more than one-half of production consumed internally in the manufacture of Elk’s asphalt shingle and accessory roofing products. Nonwoven fabrics sold to outside customers are sold by sales personnel of Specialty Fabric Technologies. At the time of sale the products are transferred to Specialty Fabric Technologies and reported as sales for that business segment.
Our nonwoven fiberglass roofing mat facilities have the capacity to supply all of our internal fiberglass roofing mat needs. However, certain of our roofing plants may purchase nonwoven fiberglass roofing mat from other manufacturers, as such purchases may reduce freight costs to the manufacturing plants. The significant raw materials for the production of nonwoven fabrics are glass fibers and resins, all of which are available from several sources and are in adequate supply.
Composite Building Products
Products and Warranties
Composite Building Products is a relatively new business platform which accounted for 3% of sales in fiscal 2006. Our composite building products are designed for rapidly growing markets using advanced composite technology, including composite wood decking and railing. Composite wood products are sold under the CrossTimbers® name and marketed as an alternative to treated or untreated wood. Compared to wood, composite building products are designed to last longer with less maintenance, nor will they warp, crack, splinter or rot like wood. Unlike the products offered by many of our competitors, our CrossTimbers products contain no recycled polyethylene products, but consist of a combination of recycled wood and polypropylene, which we believe provides performance advantages including strength, longevity and dimensional stability, as compared to most other composite building products in the marketplace. Our current decking products are primarily voided deck board products with either a smooth or embossed wood grain finish. Our composite building products generally have limited product warranties for a twenty-year period.
We also manufacture composite railing products under the RailWays™ brand name. Our railing products are designed to complement our CrossTimbers decking products. Our RailWays product line includes the Traditional Series, available in white with a classic painted wood look, and the Old World Series, available in five colors and a decorative, wrought iron look. Both product series are available with a patent pending Uni-Ball™ connector that requires no drilling. Our railing products can be used not only with our products but with the decking products of our competitors. These complementary products allow us to provide our distributors a more diverse decking and railing product line that improves the speed of installation. In July 2006, we began shipping a new CrossTimbers Signature Series railing kit. This new product is designed to match our existing decking colors for a wide range of homes and architectural styles, is easy to install, and utilizes the superior Uni-Ball hardware and fasteners.
Sales and Marketing
Composite building products are sold by product dedicated sales personnel and by some of the same personnel that sell our premium roofing products, generally to many of the same wholesale distributors. Products are typically shipped by contract carrier to our customers from our manufacturing location or company warehouses.
Manufacturing and Raw Materials
Composite building products are manufactured in Lenexa, Kansas. The significant raw materials for this business are post-industrial recycled wood flour, polypropylene and additives for improved performance. All of these materials are currently available in adequate supply.
Competition
We believe that industry-wide sales of composite wood products currently account for approximately 22% of the estimated potential market for wood used in decking and railing applications and that composite products’ current compound annual growth rate is in excess of 15% per year. There are numerous competitors and we anticipate that the high growth potential of this emerging market may attract additional competitors. Current competitors include companies focusing on traditional wood products and companies offering wood alternative products. Some of these competitors are
- 4 -
Table of Contents
larger in size and have greater financial resources than we do. The current market is generally fragmented, although we believe one competitor may have more than a 30% market share for wood composites. We believe that our established building products distribution channels enhance our ability to compete successfully in this market.
Specialty Fabric Technologies
Products and Warranties
Specialty Fabric Technologies accounted for 6% of sales in fiscal 2006. Specialty Fabric Technologies was established as a marketing division and separate business segment to create brand awareness and promote increased sales of our nonwoven specialty fabrics products and VersaShield® fire barrier technology. Nonwoven fabrics are sold to other roofing manufacturers and to other high-growth markets, such as air filtration and carpet tile.
Included in the Specialty Fabric Technologies segment results are external sales of our nonwoven fabrics. Fabrics used internally by our roofing operation are not part of this business segment. Nonwoven fiberglass fabrics provide strength and fire-resistance. Coated nonwoven fabrics have been developed by Elk for use in various building product applications, including roofing underlayment, facer, filtration and carpet tiles. Many of Elk’s coated nonwoven products utilize our proprietary VersaShield fire barrier coatings.
Also included in the Specialty Fabric Technologies segment are fire barrier products, including fire retardant fabrics for mattresses, bed clothes and upholstered furniture. While these activities are outside our focus on building products platforms, we believe that potentially significant demand for products utilizing this technology could result from trends toward more stringent flammability safety laws and regulations for mattresses, upholstered furniture and possible additional products. This new business has produced a limited amount of commercial sales to date.
Sales and Marketing
Nonwoven fabrics produced for external sale are sold by product dedicated personnel for use in building and construction, filtration, floor coverings and other industries. Products are generally shipped by contract carriers to our customers’ locations.
Manufacturing and Raw Materials
As Specialty Fabric Technologies is a marketing division, the segment has no internal manufacturing operations. Our fire barrier products are accounted for through our Elk Technologies, Inc. subsidiary. The manufacture of fire barrier products, primarily specialty products sold to customers outside the roofing industry, was outsourced to independent companies in fiscal 2006.
Competition
For products sold by this marketing division, Elk successfully competes with other manufacturers of specialty fabrics, some of which are larger in size and have greater financial resources. Elk believes that the quality and properties of its specialty fabrics make it a desirable supplier of such products to other manufacturers. In fiscal 2006, a significant amount of external shipments of nonwoven fabrics were delivered to other manufacturers of asphalt shingles and commercial roofing membranes. Many of these customers purchased nonwoven fabrics from Elk in order to supplement their own internal nonwoven fabrics production capacity.
Surface Finishes
Surface Finishes represents the operations of Chromium Corporation (Chromium) and accounted for 1% of sales in fiscal 2006. Chromium does not fit into our focus on building products and has been positioned for sale. However, if it is not sold, it will continue as one of our business platforms. Chromium is a leader in plating proprietary finishes for use in remanufacturing large diesel engine cylinder liners, pistons and valves for the railroad and marine industries. Chromium also manufactures wear plate products utilizing its proprietary CRODON® hard chrome finish. These wear plate products are designed to extend the service life of steel machinery components operating in abrasive environments for a number of industries, including roofing manufacturing, mining and public utility industries.
We believe that Chromium is a leading remanufacturer of diesel engine cylinder liners and pistons for the railroad and marine transportation industries and is the primary supplier of hard chrome plated finishes for original equipment
- 5 -
Table of Contents
diesel engine cylinder liners to the major domestic locomotive manufacturers. We believe it has smaller competitors in the locomotive diesel engine cylinder liner market, but competes with larger, better capitalized manufacturers in certain markets. Chromium has achieved a leading position in remanufacturing markets through product performance, quality, service and price. In addition, technical innovations that enhance quality and performance are also increasing the value-added content per unit produced. The primary raw material used in this business is chromic acid, which is available in adequate supply.
Discontinued Operations
Cybershield, Inc., through subsidiaries (collectively Cybershield), was engaged in shielding plastic enclosures from electromagnetic and radio frequency interference. In fiscal 2005, we sold substantially all assets of Cybershield, excluding its Canton, Georgia facility, to the Cybershield management group. Later in fiscal 2005, we sold the Canton, Georgia facility and certain equipment to an unrelated party. The only remaining assets of the former Cybershield operation are immaterial amounts of equipment held for sale.
Ortloff Engineers, LTD (Ortloff) was engaged in licensing proprietary technologies and providing related engineering services to the natural gas processing industries, with particular emphasis on the natural gas liquids recovery, sulfur recovery and liquefied natural gas segments. In fiscal 2005 we concluded that it did not fit into our focus on building products platforms and it was sold to a financial buyer for cash. We do not participate in Ortloff’s management or ongoing operation in any manner, although we continue to have $4,400,000 in long-term license receivables, which the purchaser is collecting on our behalf for a service fee. In addition, we retained a portion of contingent license fees on certain projects that were in process at the date of sale. The maximum future benefit of contingent license fees is approximately $2,100,000, although there is no assurance that any of these contingent fees will ultimately be realized.
Transportation
Our products are shipped by rail, contract carrier, or by customer vehicles from our manufacturing plants or warehouses. Shipping costs are a significant component of cost of sales. Agreements with our contract carriers typically allow for surcharges as a result of increasing fuel prices. Further, carriers are subject to the rules issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation which govern truck drivers’ hours of service that have and will continue to impact our shipping costs. Historically, we have been able to pass along some of our higher transportation costs through to the customer, but there is no assurance of being able to do so in the future.
Backlog
Our backlog is generally not significant, nor is it material to any of our operations. At June 30, 2006, the backlog for our roofing shingles was less than one month of sales, which is typical except in times of extreme weather events when backlog generally increases due to very high demand for products in storm-damaged regions.
Patents
We own a number of patents and trade secrets covering certain products and processes. We believe that the rights under our patents are important to our operations, but we do not consider any individual patent or group of patents related to a specific product or process to be material to our total business.
Research and Development
Our research activities are primarily conducted at a technology center in Ennis, Texas. Our product development activities are conducted at the Ennis technology center and at each of our plant locations. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and included in cost of sales. Expenses for research activities at the Ennis technology center were $3,560,000, $3,348,000 and $2,300,000 in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Development costs at plant locations are not separately identified.
Extended Payment Terms
Our Premium Roofing Products and Composite Building Products businesses typically provide extended payment terms to certain customers for products shipped during the late winter and early spring months, with payment generally due during late spring or early summer. As of June 30, 2006, $4,130,000 in receivables relating to such shipments were outstanding. All such receivables are due in the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
- 6 -
Table of Contents
Seasonal Business
Except in years when unusual weather events disrupt normal cyclicality, our Premium Roofing Products and Composite Building Products businesses are seasonal to the extent that cold, wet or icy weather conditions during the late fall and winter months in some of our marketing areas typically limit the installation of residential building products. This seasonality causes sales to be generally slower during such periods. Damage to roofs from extreme weather such as severe wind, hurricanes and hail storms can result in higher demand for periods up to eighteen to twenty-four months depending upon the extent of roof damage. Working capital requirements generally fluctuate during the year because of seasonality and sales with extended payment terms. Typically, working capital requirements and borrowings are higher in the spring and summer months, and lower in the fall and winter months. Related liquidity and/or borrowings increase or decrease during the year as a result of working capital fluctuations.
Environmental Matters
ElkCorp and its subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local requirements regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes, and protection of the public health and the environment generally (collectively, Environmental Laws). Certain facilities of our subsidiaries ship waste products to various waste management facilities for treatment or disposal. Governmental authorities have the power to require compliance with these Environmental Laws, and violators may be subject to civil or criminal penalties, injunctions or both. Third parties may also have the right to sue for damages and/or to enforce compliance and to require remediation of contamination. If there are releases or if these facilities do not operate in accordance with Environmental Laws, or their owners or operators become financially unstable or insolvent, our subsidiaries are subject to potential liability.
We and our subsidiaries are also subject to Environmental Laws that impose liability for the costs of cleaning up contamination resulting from past spills, disposal, and other releases of hazardous substances. In particular, an entity may be subject to liability under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) and similar state laws that impose liability — without a showing of fault, negligence, or regulatory violations — for the generation, transportation or disposal of hazardous substances that have caused, or may cause, environmental contamination. In addition, an entity could be liable for cleanup of property it owns or operates even if it did not contribute to the contamination of such property. From time to time, we or our subsidiaries may incur such remediation and related costs at the company-owned plants and certain offsite locations maintained by other parties.
Chromium has engaged in limited remediation activities at the site of its former plating operation in Lufkin, Texas. Soil sampling results from a pre-closing environmental evaluation of the site indicated the necessity of localized cleanup. Chromium has entered the property into the Texas Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). Under this program, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) reviews the voluntary clean-up plan the applicant submits, and, when the work is complete, issues a certificate of completion, evidencing cleanup to levels protective of human health and the environment and releasing prospective purchasers and lenders from liability to the state. Properties entered into the VCP are protected from TCEQ enforcement actions.
In fiscal 2004, Chromium completed a supplemental groundwater and soil assessment at the Lufkin facility. The assessment further defined the horizontal and vertical extent of metals in soils, assessed the horizontal extent of metals in groundwater, and estimated the direction of groundwater movement. Chromium submitted its Affected Property Assessment Report (APAR) to the TCEQ. In June 2004, the TCEQ issued a letter accepting Chromium’s APAR in substantially all respects, indicating that no further assessment of the extent of contamination is necessary. In May 2005, Chromium proposed a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) to the TCEQ in which it proposed activities and engineering controls, including capping of affected soils and a pump-and-treat system for affected groundwater, to cleanup the site under the VCP to a site specific risk-based cleanup standard. The TCEQ approved the RAP, with some revisions, in October 2005. Chromium completed the soil capping portion of the RAP and submitted a Response Action Completion Report for the soil remediation to the TCEQ in August 2006 and is awaiting the agency’s approval.
Chromium applied to the City of Lufkin for a permit to discharge its post-treatment effluent from the groundwater pump-and-treat system into the City’s sewer system. The availability of this disposal method would decrease the on-going costs of treating the groundwater as proposed under the RAP. In June 2006 the City wrote Chromium a letter explaining that the City has applied to the TCEQ for a modification of its discharge permit which would allow the City to reallocate industrial waste loads. The City stated that if the TCEQ approves this permit modification it will be able to issue Chromium a discharge permit. The City believes that it will receive the desired permit modifications and, therefore, Chromium is optimistic that it will receive the desired discharge permit but can give no assurances that it will.
- 7 -
Table of Contents
In fiscal 2005, the company recorded an accrued liability of $700,000, which the company currently believes is adequate for costs relating to the matter. However, the cost of remediation could vary significantly depending on Chromium’s success in obtaining the requested City permit, and the success of the designed pump-and-treat system in attaining the groundwater response objective for Chromium established in the final RAP.
Our operations are subject to extensive Environmental Laws. Other than the possible costs associated with the previously described Chromium matter, we do not believe we will be required to expend amounts which will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity. We establish and maintain reserves for such known or probable remediation activities in accordance with SFAS No. 5 and AICPA Statement of Position 96-1. Such environmental laws are frequently changed and could result in significantly increased cost of compliance. We anticipate that our subsidiaries will incur costs to comply with Environmental Laws, including remediating any existing non-compliance with such laws and achieving compliance with anticipated future standards for air emissions and reduction of waste streams. Such subsidiaries expend funds to minimize the discharge of materials into the environment and to comply with governmental regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Further, certain of our manufacturing operations utilize hazardous materials in their production processes. As a result, we incur costs for recycling or disposal of such materials and may incur costs for remediation activities at our facilities and off-site from time to time.
Persons Employed
At June 30, 2006, we and our subsidiaries had 1,496 employees. Of this total, 1,100 were employed in the Premium Roofing Products segment, 108 were employed in the Composite Building Products segment, 4 were employed in the Specialty Fabric Technologies segment, 64 were employed in the Surface Finishes segment, and 220 (including most sales personnel) were employed by the corporate office. Included in these totals are 231 employees who are represented by labor unions. We believe that we have good relations with our employees and the labor unions.
Statement Regarding NYSE Mandated Disclosures
In November 2005, our Chief Executive Officer executed the annual Section 303A.12(a) CEO Certification required by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), certifying that he was not aware of any violation of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards by ElkCorp. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have executed the required Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Section 302 and 906 certifications on all fiscal 2006 Forms 10-Q, and the current certifications are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risks Factors
There are many factors that may affect our business and the results of our operations, many of which are beyond our control. Factors that might cause the actual results of our business and operations in future periods to differ materially from those currently expected or desired include, but are not limited to:
Changes in economic conditions and the actions of our competitors may adversely affect our results of operations.
Our businesses can be affected by the availability of customer and/or end-user financing, interest rates, insurance claims-paying practices, and general economic conditions. Although the large majority of our market is not in new construction and the current housing slowdown has not had a material effect on our business, a substantial and prolonged housing downturn could have significant direct and indirect impacts on our results. In addition, all of our businesses are in highly competitive industries. Actions of competitors, including changes in pricing, or slowing demand for asphalt roofing products due to general or industry economic conditions could result in decreased demand for our products, lower prices received or reduced utilization of plant facilities. Competitors have recently added capacity in key market areas and may continue to do so. Further, changes in building and insurance codes and other standards from time to time can cause changes in demand, challenges in meeting refined product specifications, or increases in costs that may not be passed through to customers.
- 8 -
Table of Contents
Higher raw material, energy and transportation costs may adversely affect our operating results.
Increased costs of raw materials can result in reduced margins, as can higher energy, trucking and rail costs. Further, our largest long-term contracts for asphalt and certain other raw materials expired at the end of calendar year 2005 and in early calendar year 2006. Negotiations of several new contracts are in process, but there is no assurance that new contracts will be agreed upon. As we initiate new multisourcing strategies, certain raw materials are currently being purchased on a purchase order basis. Either alternative (new contracts or purchases using purchase orders) may result in higher or lower raw material costs. Historically, we have been able to pass some of the higher raw material, energy and transportation costs through to the customer. Should we be unable to recover higher raw material, energy and/or transportation costs, including higher trucking costs resulting from fuel surcharges and regulatory changes in the trucking industry, through price increases of our products, operating results could be adversely affected and/or lower than projected.
Shortages or disruptions in the supply of raw materials or the availability of transportation may decrease the efficiency in our plants and negatively impact our operating results.
Shortages or temporary disruptions in the supply of raw materials or the availability of transportation do result from time to time from a variety of causes. Our manufacturing facilities are highly dependent on adequate supplies of raw materials to operate without unscheduled shutdowns, slowdowns or other production disruptions. Of particular importance is maintaining an adequate supply of asphalt at each of our roofing plants. In many cases oil, from which asphalt is derived, is produced in countries that are politically unstable. In addition, supplies of asphalt can be affected by refiners’ decisions to process alternative products from the residuals in the refining of crude oil. If we experience temporary shortages or disruptions in the supply of raw materials or the availability of transportation, our plants may not be able to operate as planned and operating results could be lower than projected.
Delays in achieving anticipated efficiencies at our new facilities could cause our operating results to be lower than projected.
We have been involved in a significant expansion plan over the past several years, including the construction of new facilities and the expansion of existing facilities. Progress in achieving anticipated operating efficiencies and financial results is difficult to predict for new and expanded plant facilities. If such progress is slower than anticipated, or if demand for products produced at new or expanded plants does not meet current expectations, operating results could be lower than projected.
Extreme weather conditions can delay or accelerate demand for our products and affect our results of operations.
Except in periods affected by extreme weather events, our sales can be seasonal, with operating results varying from quarter to quarter. With some exceptions, our sales and income have historically been higher in the first and fourth quarter than in the second and third quarters of a fiscal year. Extreme weather conditions, such as wet weather, hail, ice storms and hurricanes may sometimes delay or accelerate the demand for our products between periods and significantly affect our results of operations.
The utilization of hazardous materials causes us to incur costs for remediation and could materially affect our results of operations.
Certain facilities of our subsidiaries must utilize hazardous materials in their production process. As a result, we could incur costs for remediation activities at our facilities or off-site and other related exposures from time to time in excess of established reserves for such activities.
We are involved in ongoing litigation that may adversely affect our operating results.
We are involved in various legal proceedings and claims, including claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Our litigation and claims are subject to inherent and case-specific uncertainty. The outcome of such litigation and claims depends on numerous interrelated factors, many of which cannot be predicted.
Higher interest rates could substantially affect our borrowing costs.
We currently anticipate that most of our needs for capital in the near future will be met with current amounts of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, internally generated funds and borrowings under our available credit
- 9 -
Table of Contents
facility. However, should we make a material acquisition or engage in further significant facilities expansion activities, we may seek additional financing, including but not limited to increasing our revolving credit line or issuing additional senior debt. Significant increases in interest rates could substantially affect our borrowing costs or our cost of alternative sources of capital.
The failure to attract and retain skilled personnel could impede our operations.
We depend on certain key management and technical personnel to achieve our business strategies and productivity initiatives. The loss of one or more key employees could materially and adversely affect us. Our success also depends on our ability to attract and retain additional highly qualified technical, marketing and management personnel necessary for the maintenance and expansion of our activities. We face strong competition for such personnel. We might not be able to attract or retain such personnel.
The loss of one or more of our largest customers could adversely affect our business.
The majority of our sales relate to our building products platforms, and our primary customers are building products distributors. The ten largest customers account for approximately 50% of annual consolidated sales and one customer accounts for approximately 19% of consolidated sales. Our businesses each could suffer significant setbacks in revenues and operating income if we lost one or more of our largest customers, or if our customers’ plans and/or markets should change significantly.
Our manufacturing facilities are subject to numerous hazards and we are not fully insured against all of these hazards.
Although we insure ourselves against physical loss to our manufacturing facilities, including business interruption losses, natural or other disasters and accidents, including but not limited to fire, earthquake, damaging winds, floods, explosions and other casualties, operating results could be adversely affected if any of our manufacturing facilities became inoperable for an extended period of time due to these insured events or other non-insured events, including but not limited to acts of God, war or terrorism.
The failure to successfully commercialize our product developments could adversely affect our future operating results.
Each of our businesses is actively involved in the development of new products, processes and services which are expected to contribute to our ongoing long-term growth and earnings. Consumer products using VersaShield fire retardant coatings have produced a limited amount of commercial sales to date. VersaShield’s fire retardant coatings market potential may be dependent on the stringency of federal and state regulatory requirements, which are difficult to predict. Further, our composite building products operation is producing and selling a new generation of decking products. Our composite building products operation is also developing products for use in various industrial applications. Our premium roofing products and specialty fabric technologies businesses are actively involved in developing and marketing new shingle, accessory and nonwoven specialty fabric products. If our developmental activities are not successful, regulatory requirements for fire retardant products are less stringent than currently predicted, market demand, or acceptance is less than expected, we experience unanticipated product performance issues or delays in achieving target product specifications, or we cannot provide the requisite financial and other resources to successfully commercialize such developments, the growth of future sales and earnings may be adversely affected.
The failure to keep up with technological changes in our business may cause our products to become less desirable, resulting in an adverse effect on our business.
A key aspect of our business strategy is to seek innovative ways to make our roofing and composite products lighter and stronger. Additionally, we continually seek to improve the performance characteristics of our product offerings and our competitors seek to improve their products. Product improvements and measures to gain production efficiencies can reduce the overall cost of the product. If we fail to achieve our strategy of making products lighter and stronger, do not improve the performance characteristics of our products, or are unsuccessful at developing production improvement and efficiencies, but our competitors are successful in such endeavors, our products may become less desirable and our revenues could be negatively affected. Each of our businesses is subject to the risks of technological changes and competition that is based on technology improvement or labor savings. These factors could affect the demand for or the relative cost of our technology, products and services, or the method and profitability of distribution or delivery of such technology, products and services.
- 10 -
Table of Contents
Significant product performance issues and warranty claims could negatively affect our reputation, sales and operating results.
We develop and manufacture most of our products and expect to continue to do so, although we buy raw materials and some manufactured products from others. We have on occasion found manufacturing defects in our products. Some flaws or deficiencies have not been apparent until after the products were utilized by customers. If any flaws or deficiencies exist in our products and if such flaws or deficiencies are not discovered and corrected before they are utilized by the ultimate customers, claims could negatively affect our reputation, sales and operating results. Although we maintain reserves for warranty costs, in the event of a significant product performance issue, actual claims could materially exceed such reserves.
We may not be able to successfully integrate and operate businesses that we acquire.
From time to time, we may expand our business or product lines through strategic acquisitions. The success of these acquisitions will depend, in part, on our ability to integrate and operate the acquired businesses. If we are unable to successfully integrate acquisitions with our operations, we may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits of such transactions. In addition, acquisitions may cause us to issue additional securities that dilute the value of our existing equity securities or increase our debt. These actions could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
All manufacturing facilities, except for our composite building products facility in Lenexa, Kansas (which is leased), are owned by ElkCorp and its subsidiaries. We have an option to purchase the Lenexa, Kansas facility until August 2009. The only manufacturing facility subject to a significant encumbrance is the Fresno, California facility, acquired in connection with the purchase of RGM in August 2005. This property collateralizes the debt relating to that facility. Our corporate headquarters is located in leased offices at 14911 Quorum Drive, Suite 600, Dallas, Texas 75254.
Premium shingle products and accessories are manufactured at plants located in Ennis, Texas; Shafter, California; Myerstown, Pennsylvania; two adjacent plants in Tuscaloosa, Alabama; and in Fresno, California. Fiberglass roofing mat, nonwoven industrial, reinforcement and filtration products are manufactured on two parallel production lines located in Ennis, Texas. In June 2006, we acquired a facility in Waxahachie, Texas for future expansion of manufacturing activities and warehouse capacity relating to certain coated nonwoven fabrics. Initially this facility will be utilized as a warehouse facility. Manufacturing activities are currently expected to commence in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Composite building products are manufactured at a leased facility in Lenexa, Kansas. The Surface Finishes operating facility is located in Cleveland, Ohio. As of June 30, 2006, remote leased warehouse storage locations were maintained in (1) Denver, Colorado, (2) Plant City, Florida, (3) Greenville, South Carolina, (4) Tacoma, Washington, (5) Richmond, British Columbia, Canada and (6) a warehouse and master distribution center in Edgerton, Wisconsin. In addition, some of our roofing plants lease storage space near their operating locations.
Corporate headquarters and administrative offices for all operating segments are located in the same leased facility as our corporate offices in Dallas, Texas.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
There are various lawsuits and claims pending against ElkCorp and its subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, based in part on advice of counsel, none of these actions should have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended June 30, 2006.
- 11 -
Table of Contents
Item 4A. Executive Officers of the Registrant
Certain information concerning our executive officers is set forth below:
| Period | Age as of | |||||||||
| Served | August 1, | |||||||||
| Name | Title | As Officer | 2006 | |||||||
| Thomas D. Karol | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | 5 years | 48 | |||||||
| Richard A. Nowak | President and Chief Operating Officer | 5 years | 64 | |||||||
| David G. Sisler | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | 11 years | 48 | |||||||
| Matti Kiik | Senior Vice President, Research and Development | 5 years | 64 | |||||||
| Gregory J. Fisher | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller | 5 years | 55 | |||||||
| Curt A. Barker | Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing | 1 year | 49 | |||||||
| Leonard R. Harral | Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer | 12 years | 54 | |||||||
| Glenn A. Gies | Vice President, Information Technology | 6 months | 46 | |||||||
| Jan Jerger-Stevens | Vice President, Human Resources | 2 months | 43 | |||||||
All of the executive officers except Ms. Jerger-Stevens have been employed by ElkCorp or its subsidiaries in responsible management positions for more than the past five years. Mr. Barker and Mr. Gies were employed in responsible management positions at an ElkCorp subsidiary company for more than the past five years. Ms. Jerger-Stevens became Vice President, Human Resources of ElkCorp on April 17, 2006. For the past two years, Ms. Jerger-Stevens was employed by Jacuzzi Brands, Inc. as Director of Human Resources. Previously, she spent nearly fourteen years with Ingersoll-Rand Company, including most recently four years as Vice President, Human Resources for its Specialty Equipment Business.
Officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
- 12 -
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The principal market on which our common stock is traded is the New York Stock Exchange. There were 880 holders of record and approximately 5,900 beneficial owners of ElkCorp’s common stock on July 31, 2006.
The quarterly dividend declared per share and the high and low sale prices per share of our common stock for each quarter during fiscal year 2006 and fiscal year 2005 are set forth in the following table:
| Period | Dividend | High | Low | |||||||||
| Fiscal 2006 | ||||||||||||
| First Quarter | $ | .05 | $ | 37.32 | $ | 28.00 | ||||||
| Second Quarter | $ | .05 | $ | 36.28 | $ | 30.00 | ||||||
| Third Quarter | $ | .05 | $ | 36.98 | $ | 32.32 | ||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | .05 | $ | 34.71 | $ | 26.30 | ||||||
| Fiscal 2005 | ||||||||||||
| First Quarter | $ | .05 | $ | 28.22 | $ | 20.17 | ||||||
| Second Quarter | $ | .05 | $ | 35.00 | $ | 25.70 | ||||||
| Third Quarter | $ | .05 | $ | 41.30 | $ | 31.75 | ||||||
| Fourth Quarter | $ | .05 | $ | 39.00 | $ | 26.25 | ||||||
Subject to the limitations discussed below, we currently intend to continue to pay quarterly dividends for the foreseeable future. However, the final determination of the timing, amount and payment of dividends on our common stock is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our profitability, liquidity, financial condition and capital requirements.
Limitations affecting the future payment of dividends are imposed as a part of our revolving credit facility. Total cumulative dividends and stock repurchased since November 30, 2000 are subject to a formula limitation based on cumulative consolidated net income during the term of our $125,000,000 Revolving Credit Facility, which extends through November 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2006, such limitation was $87,100,000 and actual cumulative expenditures for these items were $31,200,000.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Quarter Ended June 30, 2006:
| Total Number of | Maximum Number (or | |||||||||||||||
| Total Number | Shares Purchased | Approximate Dollar Value) of | ||||||||||||||
| of Shares | Average | as Part of Publicly | Shares That May Yet be | |||||||||||||
| Purchased | Price Paid | Announced Plans | Purchased Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
| Period | (Notes 1 & 2) | per Share | or Programs | Programs (Note 3) | ||||||||||||
| April, 2006 | 1,684 | $ | 34.34 | — | $ | 6,600,000 | ||||||||||
| May, 2006 | 25,021 | $ | 32.64 | — | $ | 6,600,000 | ||||||||||
| June, 2006 | — | — | — | $ | 6,600,000 | |||||||||||
| Total | 26,705 | $ | 32.75 | — | ||||||||||||
- 13 -
Table of Contents
| (1) | Includes repurchase of 2,135 shares from officers and employees in connection with repurchased restricted shares for income tax withholding payments. | |
| (2) | As a result of participant diversification directives, the ElkCorp ESOP Trust accumulates a surplus of unallocated shares from time to time. In the quarter ended June 30, 2006, we purchased 24,570 shares from the ElkCorp ESOP Trust. The dollar value of this repurchase transaction is reflected in the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity but has no impact on previously announced repurchase programs outlined in (3). | |
| (3) | On August 28, 2000, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $10,000,000 of common stock. The authorizations did not specify an expiration date. Purchases may be increased, decreased or discontinued by the Board of Directors at any time without prior notice. The Board of Directors reevaluated their outstanding authorization in fiscal 2006 and concluded it is in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to leave the authorization in place. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
| ($ In thousands, except per share data) | Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
| Sales | $ | 929,792 | $ | 761,719 | $ | 566,041 | $ | 474,434 | $ | 468,502 | ||||||||||
| Income (Loss): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| From continuing operations | $ | 45,505 | $ | 42,696 | $ | 30,066 | $ | 21,206 | $ | 18,050 | ||||||||||
| From discontinued operations | (92 | ) | 4,171 | (9,560 | ) | 2,894 | (2,957 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 45,413 | $ | 46,867 | $ | 20,506 | $ | 24,100 | $ | 15,093 | ||||||||||
| Income (Loss) Per Share — Basic: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| From continuing operations | $ | 2.25 | $ | 2.16 | $ | 1.53 | $ | 1.09 | $ | .93 | ||||||||||
| From discontinued operations | (.01 | ) | .21 | (.48 | ) | .15 | (.15 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net Income Per Share — Basic | $ | 2.24 | $ | 2.37 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 1.24 | $ | .78 | ||||||||||
| Income (Loss) Per Share — Diluted: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| From continuing operations | $ | 2.21 | $ | 2.11 | $ | 1.51 | $ | 1.08 | $ | .92 | ||||||||||
| From discontinued operations | (.01 | ) | .20 | (.48 | ) | .15 | (.15 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net Income Per Share — Diluted | $ | 2.20 | $ | 2.31 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 1.23 | $ | .77 | ||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 681,860 | $ | 613,569 | $ | 480,708 | $ | 442,291 | $ | 381,428 | ||||||||||
| Long-Term Debt, including current maturities | $ | 200,777 | $ | 200,527 | $ | 156,858 | $ | 152,526 | $ | 119,718 | ||||||||||
| Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 322,426 | $ | 270,810 | $ | 215,042 | $ | 196,528 | $ | 176,092 | ||||||||||
| Cash Dividends Per Share | $ | .20 | $ | .20 | $ | .20 | $ | .20 | $ | .20 | ||||||||||
In fiscal 2005, we sold our Cybershield and Ortloff businesses. The Five-Year Summary of Selected Financial Data reflects these two businesses as discontinued operations.
- 14 -
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Executive Overview
ElkCorp, through its subsidiaries, is primarily a manufacturer of premium building products. We strive to be the brand of choice in each of our businesses. Our business strategy is focused on entering and maintaining a leadership position in selected high-growth, high-margin markets where our technology brings innovation to the building products industry. Premium architectural shingles and accessory products continued as our dominant business in fiscal 2006, accounting for 90% of sales. To further strengthen this business segment, on August 25, 2005, we acquired RGM Products, Inc., a privately-held manufacturer of high-profile hip and ridge and other roofing related products based in Fresno, California, initially for $24,285,000 in cash and the assumption of $10,764,000 of indebtedness. Subsequent to the acquisition date, we incurred an additional $1,940,000 of expenditures relating to, among other things, legal, audit and severance costs directly related to RGM. This acquisition enhances our current roofing accessories business and allows us to offer the broadest ridge product line in the industry.
We maintain three business segments whose primary focus is premium building products, and one non-core business which is currently offered for sale. Our key business segments are (1) Premium Roofing Products, which manufactures steep-slope and low-slope architectural shingles, plus related accessory and ventilation products, (2) Composite Building Products, a newer business that manufactures composite wood products for decking and railing, and (3) Specialty Fabric Technologies, a marketing operation developed to create brand awareness and increased sales of coated and uncoated nonwoven fabrics. Its product line includes coated and uncoated nonwoven fabrics used in asphalt shingles, underlayment, filtration and carpet tile products, together with fire barrier technologies designed for use in bedding, home furnishings and other consumer products. Although reported as separate operating segments, products from the Premium Roofing Products and Composite Building Products segments are manufactured for and marketed through some of the same wholesale distribution channels. The ultimate “customers” for both segments are professional installation contractors and homeowners. Many of our Specialty Fabric Technologies products are also sold to participants in the building products industry, including other manufacturers of shingle products. The non-core business, Surface Finishes, includes hard chrome and other finishes designed to extend the life of steel machinery components operating in abrasive environments. Corporate and Other represents corporate office expenses and other expense items not allocated to the operating segments. Prior to fiscal 2006, fire barrier technologies and the Surface Finishes segment were combined and shown as Other, Technologies. Prior to fiscal 2006, external sales of coated and uncoated nonwoven fabrics were included in the Premium Roofing Products segment.
Fiscal 2006 was another good year for ElkCorp as we achieved record levels for shipments of architectural shingles. Shingle and accessory product shipments increased approximately 6% compared to fiscal 2005 and average selling prices increased approximately 7%. However, our margins were pressured throughout fiscal 2006 by escalating transportation, energy and raw materials costs (especially asphalt costs) and changes in regional mix for product shipments. Gross margin, as a percent of sales, was negatively impacted by lower than expected shipments into Florida during the year. Demand in Florida was lower than anticipated, in part due to longer lead times for insurance settlements in certain regions of the state. Product expected to be sold into relatively higher margin markets in Florida was shipped instead to the Gulf Coast storm areas (which generally have lower margins) that were affected by Hurricanes Rita and Katrina, which occurred during the calendar 2005 hurricane season.
Our Composite Building Products business reduced its operating loss in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. Despite a larger than anticipated operating loss in the current year, due primarily to lower demand for our products than projected and higher fixed costs from facilities expansion, we believe in the potential of this business platform and are committed to its long-term success. We believe we have the products, organizational structure, financial capability and expertise, together with an excellent distribution channel that will allow us to prosper in this fast growth marketplace. Fiscal 2006 results also reflect significant improvement in sales and operating profit for the Specialty Fabric Technologies segment, attributable to increased volume and pricing in all product categories, and a shift in sales mix to higher margin products.
Performance Data
The following table and subsequent discussion set forth performance data from our continuing operations, expressed as a percentage of sales for the periods indicated. This data and the accompanying discussion and analysis
- 15 -
Table of Contents
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
| Sales | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
| Cost of sales | 81.7 | 80.6 | 80.1 | |||||||||
| Gross profit | 18.3 | 19.4 | 19.9 | |||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | 9.4 | 9.2 | 10.5 | |||||||||
| Operating income | 8.9 | 10.2 | 9.4 | |||||||||
| Interest expense, net and other | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.9 | |||||||||
| Income from continuing operations before income taxes | 7.6 | 8.9 | 8.5 | |||||||||
| Provision for income taxes | 2.7 | 3.3 | 3.2 | |||||||||
| Income from continuing operations | 4.9 | % | 5.6 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||||
Fiscal 2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Overall Performance
Sales from continuing operations of $929,792,000 during the year ended June 30, 2006 were 22.1 % higher than $761,719,000 in fiscal 2005. During the year ended June 30, 2006, operating income from continuing operations of $82,724,000 was 6.3% higher than the $77,848,000 last year. Sales of premium roofing shingles and accessory products increased substantially in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005, as a result of continuing strong demand, particularly in those regions of the United States affected by hurricane damage in fiscal 2005 and the early part of fiscal 2006. The percentage of cost of sales to sales increased to 81.7% in the year ended June 30, 2006 compared to 80.6% in fiscal 2005. Escalating raw material and transportation costs pressured margins all year in our roofing operations. Raw material and transportation costs are volatile and difficult to predict. As a result, there can be margin erosion from time-to-time when the impact of price increases lag rising costs. The roofing season is generally considered to be from March to mid-November of the calendar year. During the months of the roofing season that occurred in fiscal 2006 (generally the first and fourth quarters of our fiscal year), we were more successful in partially offsetting these higher costs than we were during the slower demand months of the fiscal year (generally the second and third quarters). Selling, general and administrative (S,G&A) costs of $87,817,000 in fiscal 2006 were 25.5% higher than $69,946,000 in fiscal 2005. As a percentage of net sales, S,G&A costs were 9.4% in fiscal 2006 compared to 9.2% in fiscal 2005. The addition of RGM, increased sales activity and higher stock-based compensation are the primary factors in the increased S,G&A costs. In fiscal 2006 we implemented the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment”, which increased stock-based compensation to $9,237,000 in fiscal 2006 from $2,544,000 in fiscal 2005.
Interest expense was $13,875,000 in fiscal 2006 compared to $10,571,000 in fiscal 2005 due primarily to increasing variable interest rates and no capitalized interest in fiscal 2006. For the year ended June 30, 2005, $754,000 of interest was capitalized related to the expansion of the Lenexa, Kansas facility and other significant capital projects. Increased interest rates on variable rate debt accounted for an approximate $1,650,000 year-to-year increase in total interest cost. Higher average borrowings on long-term debt accounted for the majority of the remaining increase in interest expense, as fiscal 2005 included only a partial year of interest for $50,000,000 of incremental senior unsecured notes, which closed in November 2004. The average interest rate paid on indebtedness (excluding amortization of loan costs and commitment fees) was 6.7% in fiscal 2006 compared to 5.8% in fiscal 2005, primarily as a result of higher variable interest rates.
Our effective tax rate for income from continuing operations was 35.8% during fiscal 2006 compared to 36.7% in fiscal 2005. Our current estimate of the effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 is approximately 36.5%. In fiscal 2006, we were able to benefit from the manufacturers’ deduction allowed by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. We also benefited in fiscal 2006 from reduced deferred state tax liabilities as a result of the State of Texas reforming its franchise tax laws in May 2006. The revision of Texas franchise tax laws resulted in a reduction in state deferred tax liability of approximately $1,500,000. In fiscal 2005 we benefited significantly from the utilization of state investment tax credits from expansion programs.
- 16 -
Table of Contents
In fiscal 2005 both Cybershield and Ortloff were sold. Cybershield’s and Ortloff’s results for each period presented are reported as discontinued operations. In fiscal 2006 we reported a pretax loss of $150,000 from finalizing certain obligations of these operations. In the year ended June 30, 2005, we reported pretax income from discontinued operations of $6,811,000. The fiscal 2005 results included a $6,484,000 pretax gain on the disposal of Ortloff.
Results of Business Segments
Sales in the Premium Roofing Products segment increased 20.6% to $836,208,000 in fiscal 2006 compared to $693,634,000 in fiscal 2005. Current year results include sales from RGM products subsequent to its acquisition. RGM sales accounted for more than a third of the increased year-to-year sales. In fiscal 2006, shingle and accessory product unit volume continued to be very strong, increasing 6% year-to-year, as demand remained strong in many regions of the United States, particularly those affected by hurricane activity in fiscal 2005 and the early part of fiscal 2006. Average shingle pricing increased approximately 7% in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 as a result of price increases implemented to offset rapidly escalating asphalt, energy and transportation costs.
Sales of Composite Building Products of $31,423,000 in fiscal 2006 were 61.8% higher compared to $19,425,000 in fiscal 2005. Pricing increased 14%, volume was 48% higher year-to-year, and the number of distributors continued to increase. We are committed to developing this business platform to take advantage of the opportunities created by increased awareness of the benefits of composite products compared to wood.
In fiscal 2006, Specialty Fabric Technologies sales increased 35.1% to $53,316,000 from $39,451,000 in fiscal 2005. External sales of applications for roofing mats and built-up roofing products in fiscal 2006 increased 35% from fiscal 2005. Sales of these applications accounted for nearly 75% of sales for the Specialty Fabric Technologies segment in both fiscal 2006 and 2005. In addition, this business segment achieved significant year-to-year increases in applications for non-roofing products, particularly for facer and carpet tile products. Sales of fire barrier products continue to increase but remain very small in relation to our consolidated sales total. Surface Finishes sales decreased 4% in fiscal 2006 to $8,845,000, compared to $9,209,000 in fiscal 2005.
Operating income for the Premium Roofing Products segment of $107,004,000 in fiscal 2006 increased 2.7% from $104,232,000 achieved in fiscal 2005. We were able to achieve higher shingle sales volume as a result of continuing strong demand, together with better efficiency as we continue to increase production at our newest roofing plant in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. This plant was placed in service at the beginning of fiscal 2005. Asphalt costs increased approximately 27% in the year ended June 30, 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. Transportation costs have also continued to increase and were approximately 16% higher in the current year than in the prior fiscal year. Our expectation is that asphalt and transportation costs will continue to rise in fiscal 2007. In an effort to offset higher costs, we implemented a 7% to 9% price increase in June 2006, with an additional 3% to 4% price increase in August 2006, and announced a $50 per truckload freight surcharge effective in August 2006. Our fiscal 2007 strategy includes finding ways to better utilize our raw materials and continuing to raise prices as needed to offset escalating costs, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in achieving these objectives. RGM, which was acquired August 25, 2005, added approximately $3,600,000 of operating profit in the period that it was included in our consolidated financial results. A silo failure in the granule storage system at our Myerstown, Pennsylvania facility encountered in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 did not significantly impact operating results in fiscal 2006. This plant operated at full capacity despite its damaged granule storage system. Initial repairs designed to correct the damaged areas at this roofing plant were completed in the first half of fiscal 2006. Various engineering refinements to eliminate machine productivity issues encountered in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 at the Tuscaloosa, Alabama roofing plant were completed early in fiscal 2006 and productivity improvements resumed during the remainder of fiscal 2006.
We incurred an operating loss of $7,816,000 for the Composite Building Products segment during fiscal 2006 compared to an $11,822,000 operating loss in fiscal 2005. Higher volume and pricing, together with cost improvement from the switch to more cost effective additives used in the manufacturing process were partially offset by increased costs from the ramp up of the new facility and additional sales personnel. We also made adjustments for returned material and non-decking inventories for this developing business in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The operating loss reported in fiscal 2006 included an approximate $4,100,000 charge attributable to costs associated with inventory for products that did not meet our formulations and customers specifications. These charges were taken primarily in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. This segment’s manufacturing facility is currently operating at approximately 30% of capacity. Other than the aforementioned inventory related charges, most of the fiscal 2006 operating loss was directly attributable to costs associated with the underutilization of manufacturing capacity, including higher depreciation from the facility being in service for all of fiscal 2006. Approximately $3,900,000 of the fiscal 2005 loss was also attributable to costs associated
- 17 -
Table of Contents
with inventory for products that did not meet our formulations and customer specifications. Additional fiscal 2005 losses of approximately $3,500,000 resulted from the expansion of operations at our new manufacturing facility in Lenexa, Kansas. We believe this business segment will continue to incur an operating loss in the first half of fiscal 2007, when buying for the calendar 2007 decking season begins in our third quarter of fiscal 2007.
The Specialty Fabric Technologies marketing segment reported a $6,320,000 operating profit in fiscal 2006 compared to a $2,083,000 operating profit in fiscal 2005. Higher sales volumes, improved pricing and changes in product mix due to increased demand for our new non-roofing products all contributed to improved profitability. Our focus in fiscal 2007 will continue to be to grow our higher margin applications and to continue to introduce new products to address the higher-margin markets. The operating profit from the sale of specialty fabrics sold to roofing manufacturers, air filtration, carpet tile and other high-growth markets was $7,371,000 in fiscal 2006, compared to $3,458,000 in fiscal 2005. However, the fire barrier business incurred an operating loss of $1,051,000 in fiscal 2006 compared to an operating loss of $1,375,000 in fiscal 2005, as this business is still being developed and has had limited sales to date.
The Surface Finishes segment had an operating profit of $1,033,000 in fiscal 2006 compared to a $144,000 operating profit in fiscal 2005. Fiscal 2005 results included a $700,000 charge for estimated environmental costs at its former Lufkin, Texas plating operation and a $210,000 provision for bad debt expenses.
Fiscal 2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Overall Performance
Sales from continuing operations of $761,719,000 during the year ended June 30, 2005 were 34.6 % higher than $566,041,000 in fiscal 2004. During the year ended June 30, 2005, operating income from continuing operations of $77,848,000 was 45.9% higher than the $53,346,000 in fiscal 2004. Sales of premium roofing shingles and accessory products increased substantially in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004, due to a significant increase in shingle unit volume, which was aided by shipments from the new Tuscaloosa production facility, overall improvements in production performance, and higher average selling prices. The percentage of cost of sales to sales increased to 80.6% in the year ended June 30, 2005 compared to 80.1% in fiscal 2004. A higher than expected loss at the Lenexa, Kansas composite building products operation was the primary factor in the overall lower gross margin during fiscal 2005. Selling, general and administrative (S,G&A) costs of $69,946,000 in fiscal 2005 were 17.6% higher than $59,482,000 in fiscal 2004 due primarily to increased selling expense and performance based compensation expense. However, due to substantially increased business activity and higher selling prices, S,G&A was only 9.2% of sales in fiscal 2005 compared to 10.5% in fiscal 2004.
Interest expense was $10,571,000 in fiscal 2005 compared to $5,444,000 in fiscal 2004 due primarily to higher debt levels, increasing interest rates and less capitalized interest. For the year ended June 30, 2005, $754,000 of interest was capitalized related to the expansion of the Lenexa, Kansas facility and other significant capital projects. In fiscal 2004, $3,079,000 of interest was capitalized, much of which related to construction of the new roofing plant in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Increased interest rates on variable rate debt accounted for an approximate $1,500,000 year-to-year increase in total interest cost. Average borrowings, net of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, were approximately $8,300,000 higher in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004. The average interest rate paid on indebtedness was 5.8% in fiscal 2005 compared to 5.0% in fiscal 2004 as a result of higher variable interest rates and an additional $50,000,000 in senior notes issued in November 2004 with a 6.28% fixed interest rate.
Our effective tax rate for income from continuing operations was 36.7% during fiscal 2005 compared to 37.4% in fiscal 2004. The lower fiscal 2005 rate was primarily attributable to lower state income taxes resulting from state investment tax credits from expansion programs.
In fiscal 2004, we made the decision to exit Cybershield’s business. In fiscal 2005 both Cybershield and Ortloff were sold. Both Cybershield’s and Ortloff’s results for each period presented are reported as discontinued operations. In the year ended June 30, 2005, we reported pretax income from discontinued operations of $6,811,000. In fiscal 2004, we reported a $14,615,000 pretax loss from discontinued operations. The fiscal 2005 results included a $6,484,000 pretax gain on the sale of Ortloff. Fiscal 2004 results included $12,346,000 of write-downs of Cybershield’s net assets to estimated market value.
- 18 -
Table of Contents
Results of Business Segments
Sales in the Premium Roofing Products segment increased 33.6% to $693,634,000 in fiscal 2005 compared to $519,284,000 in fiscal 2004. Compared to fiscal 2004, unit volume increased 24% in fiscal 2005. Shingle demand was extremely high for most of fiscal 2005 as a result of increased orders in most regions of the United States, led by the Southeast United States and other areas affected by four hurricanes in the summer and early fall of calendar 2004. We were able to benefit significantly from increased production capacity related to the new Tuscaloosa, Alabama roofing plant and productivity enhancements at all of our roofing facilities. Average shingle prices in fiscal 2005 increased 9% compared to fiscal 2004, primarily as a result of price increases that were consistent with industry trends.
Operating income for the Premium Roofing Products segment of $104,232,000 for the year ended June 30, 2005 increased 52.7% from $68,275,000 achieved in fiscal 2004. This significant improvement in operating income was primarily attributable to the aforementioned increases in unit volume and average selling prices. We were able to improve margins on premium asphalt shingle products as a result of higher average sales prices despite continuing increases in asphalt, energy, and transportation costs. Asphalt costs increased approximately 9% in the year ended June 30, 2005 from fiscal 2004. Transportation costs also continued to increase and were approximately 16% higher in fiscal 2005 than in fiscal 2004. The new Tuscaloosa, Alabama roofing plant reached its initial rated capacity in the quarter ended March 31, 2005. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the new Tuscaloosa facility experienced lower than expected volume due to unanticipated machine maintenance. The rate of progress in production slowed at this plant as these maintenance issues were addressed. Also in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we encountered a silo failure in the granule storage system at our Myerstown facility that reduced production to approximately 90% of capacity. The plant was able to return to 100% capacity while repairs were being made. Various engineering refinements designed to eliminate production bottlenecks at the Myerstown and Tuscaloosa plants were completed in fiscal 2006.
Sales of our Composite Building Products segment increased to $19,425,000 in fiscal 2005 compared to $8,524,000 in fiscal 2004, as we continued to develop this business platform by improving and increasing our product line. We incurred an $11,822,000 operating loss in our composite building products business in fiscal 2005 compared to a $2,262,000 operating loss for this business in fiscal 2004. Approximately $3,900,000 of the fiscal 2005 loss was attributable to costs associated with inventory for products that did not meet our formulations and customer specifications. Additional fiscal 2005 losses of approximately $3,500,000 resulted from the expansion of operations at our new manufacturing facility in Lenexa, Kansas. Other factors contributing to the higher than expected fiscal 2005 loss were longer than anticipated code approval in various areas of the country, a slower than expected ramp up of new production, higher than anticipated raw material costs, and slower than projected initiation of new products for non-decking markets. In fiscal 2005, our composite distribution base increased more than 50% to approximately 100 distributors in the United States and Canada.
In March 2005, the composite building products subsidiary completed the acquisition of Railwayz Inc. (Railwayz), a privately held composite railing company. Railwayz manufactures railing products that complement our CrossTimbers decking products and provides a more diverse decking and railing product line. The total purchase price was approximately $1,625,000, plus contingent future earn-out payments based on revenues for the first five years after acquisition with a maximum potential payment of $375,000.
In fiscal 2005, sales for the Specialty Fabric Technologies segment increased 32.0% to $39,451,000 compared to $29,894,000 in fiscal 2004, primarily as a result of increased sales of roofing mat, facer and filtration products. The operating profit relating to the sale of these and other fabrics was $3,458,000 in fiscal 2005, compared to $1,017,000 in fiscal 2004 primarily as a result of increased sales. However, our fire barrier subsidiary incurred an operating loss of $1,375,000 in the year ended June 30, 2005, compared to an operating loss of $698,000 in the same period in fiscal 2004. The fiscal 2005 operating loss included $582,000 in inventory write-downs.
The Surface Finishes segment reported sales of $9,209,000 in fiscal 2005 compared to $8,339,000 in fiscal 2004, a 10.4% increase, as a result of slightly higher demand for plating and finishing services in existing locomotive and marine markets. Surface Finishes had an operating profit of $144,000 in fiscal 2005, compared to a $598,000 operating profit in fiscal 2004. The fiscal 2005 amount included a $700,000 reserve for estimated environmental clean-up at its former plating operation located in Lufkin, Texas and a $210,000 provision for bad debt expenses.
- 19 -
Table of Contents
Financial Condition
Overview
Our liquidity needs generally arise principally from working capital requirements, capital expenditures, payment of dividends and interest payments. During fiscal 2006, we relied on internally generated funds and the sale or redemption of short-term investments to finance working capital requirements, the acquisition of RGM and other cash needs. We used $26,225,000 of available funds in connection with the acquisition of RGM and subsequent acquisition related costs. We did not borrow under the outstanding $125,000,000 revolving credit facility at any time in fiscal 2006. At June 30, 2006, we had $37,016,000 in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments available to fund growth opportunities, capital expenditures and other cash requirements. Our working capital requirements typically fluctuate significantly during the year because of seasonality in some market areas and our programs that offer extended payment terms to certain customers in the late winter and early spring months. Generally, working capital requirements are higher in the spring and summer months and lower in the fall and winter months.
Operating Activities
We generate cash flows from operating activities primarily from income from operations, after consideration of deferred taxes, stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization. Cash flows from operating activities also either increase or decrease by changes in working capital requirements. For the year ended June 30, 2006, we generated cash of $24,979,000 from operating activities, compared to $54,147,000 in fiscal 2005 and $50,648,000 in fiscal 2004.
After consideration of $5,708,000 of trade receivables acquired in the RGM acquisition in August 2005, trade receivables at June 30, 2006 were $26,487,000 higher than at June 30, 2005 due primarily to higher shipments of premium roofing products in the fourth quarter of the current fiscal year compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. In accordance with normal industry practices, extended payment terms are granted to certain customers for roofing and composite building products shipped during the late winter and early spring months, with payments generally due during the spring and early summer. At June 30, 2006, receivables from customer programs with extended due dates were $4,130,000 compared to $2,810,000 at June 30, 2005. Extended term receivables outstanding at June 30, 2006 are due in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. After considering $6,909,000 of inventories acquired in the RGM acquisition, inventories were $29,553,000 higher at June 30, 2006 than at June 30, 2005. The majority of the year-to-year difference is attributable to higher inventory levels at our Myerstown, Pennsylvania and Tuscaloosa, Alabama roofing plants. Inventory levels at the end of fiscal 2005 were unusually low as a result of storm-related demand in areas of the United States of America served by those plants. At June 30, 2006, current liabilities, after consideration of current liabilities assumed in the RGM acquisition, were $4,027,000 higher at June 30, 2006 compared to June 30, 2005. The current ratio was 3.2 to 1 at June 30, 2006 compared to 3.5 to 1 at June 30, 2005.
Investing Activities
Cash flows from investing activities primarily reflect our capital expenditure strategy, together with activity relating to short-term investments, and business acquisitions and disposals. Net cash used for investing activities was $22,169,000 in fiscal 2006 compared to $89,554,000 in fiscal 2005 and $63,368,000 in fiscal 2004. We sold or redeemed $36,200,000 of short-term investments (net of purchases) to fund our acquisition of RGM and to supplement cash flows from operating activities for working capital and other cash requirements in fiscal 2006. In late fiscal 2006, we acquired a facility in Waxahachie, Texas for approximately $9,000,000 for future expansion of manufacturing activities and warehouse capacity relating to certain coated nonwoven and fire barrier products. In fiscal 2007, we expect to spend an additional $3,300,000 in capital expenditures for equipment and improvements preparing this facility for use. We currently estimate all capital expenditures in fiscal 2007 will be in the range of $30,000,000 to $40,000,000.
Financing Activities
Cash flows from financing activities generally reflect changes in our borrowings, together with dividends paid on common stock, purchases of common stock and exercises of stock options. Net cash used for financing activities was $8,015,000 in fiscal 2006, compared to $44,395,000 and $7,937,000 of net cash provided in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively.
At June 30, 2006, liquidity consisted of $4,056,000 of cash and cash equivalents, $32,960,000 of short-term investments, and $121,148,000 of available borrowings (after deducting $3,852,000 of outstanding letters of credit) under the $125,000,000 committed line of credit facility which expires in November 2008. It is our current intention to begin
- 20 -
Table of Contents
negotiations with our bank group to renew and extend the line of credit facility in fiscal 2007. At June 30, 2006, the debt to capital ratio (after deducting cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $37,016,000 from $200,705,000 of long-term principal debt) was 33.7%.
Our Board of Directors has authorized our repurchase of common stock from time to time on the open market. As of June 30, 2006, we have repurchase authority of approximately $6,600,000 remaining, after repurchasing 113,690 shares for approximately $4,000,000 in fiscal 2006 under the Board’s repurchase authority.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our future payments relating to contractual obligations at June 30, 2006:
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than | After 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 1 year | 1 – 3 years | 4 – 5 years | years | ||||||||||||||||
| Contractual Obligations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term Debt | $ | 195,000 | $ | — | $ | 85,000 | $ | — | $ | 110,000 | ||||||||||
| Other Debt | 6,793 | 1,088 | 1,677 | 706 | 3,322 | |||||||||||||||
| Interest on Fixed Rate Debt | 38,125 | 7,557 | 14,921 | 6,675 | 8,972 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Leases | 41,740 | 5,702 | 9,474 | 8,998 | 17,566 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Contractual Obligations | $ | 281,658 | $ | 14,347 | $ | 111,072 | $ | 16,379 | $ | 139,860 | ||||||||||
At June 30, 2006, $87,134,000 of long-term debt was variable rate debt at a current average interest rate of 7.0%. Interest expense on variable rate debt is not included in the above table as it cannot be reasonably estimated.
Our only other significant lending commitment at June 30, 2006 is our $125,000,000 Revolving Credit Facility, the term of which extends through November 30, 2008. There was no outstanding balance on this Facility at June 30, 2006, although $3,852,000 of letters of credit are outstanding.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements or transactions with unconsolidated, limited purpose entities.
Environmental
Our operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental matters. Such environmental laws are frequently changed and could result in significantly increased cost of compliance. Certain of our manufacturing operations utilize hazardous materials in their production processes. As a result, we incur costs for remediation activities off-site and at our facilities from time to time. We establish and maintain reserves for such remediation activities, when appropriate. Current reserves established for known or probable remediation activities are not material to our financial position or results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions we believe are reasonable based on the information available. The accounting policies which we believe are the most critical to fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:
Collectibility of Accounts Receivable –
The majority of our sales are in the Premium Roofing Products and Composite Building Products segments and our primary customers in both segments are building products distributors. Due to consolidation in the industry, credit risk is concentrated. Ten customers account for approximately 50% of consolidated sales. The balance in the reserve for doubtful accounts is evaluated on an ongoing basis based on a combination of factors such as customers’ past payment history, length of time the receivables are past due, the status of customers’ financial condition and ongoing credit evaluations.
- 21 -
Table of Contents
Accruals for Loss Contingencies –
Contingencies, or uncertainties, by their nature, require management to exercise judgment both in assessing the likelihood that a liability has been incurred as well as in estimating the amount of loss. Accruals are established for loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Accrual balances are reviewed and adjusted periodically based on our judgment of changes in specific facts and circumstances for each loss accrual.
Key loss accruals for the company include:
| • | Product warranties – Product warranties are estimated and recorded based on various factors such as an examination of submitted claims for potential exposure, claims paid history, independent data as to average length of time between asphalt roofing replacements and other factors. | ||
| • | Litigation – Litigation reserves are determined on a case specific basis from evaluations by both management and outside counsel as to any probable exposure from litigation capable of reasonable estimation. | ||
| • | Environmental exposure – Environmental exposure, primarily related to Chromium, is evaluated by management and our environmental consultants when known or anticipated exposure is identified and quantifiable. | ||
| • | Self-insurance reserves – We are partially insured against losses for both casualty and medical claims. Reserves are calculated and maintained based on historical experience and specifically identified losses. |
Inventories –
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out method. We record adjustments to the value of inventories based on various factors. Adjustments may be made to inventory values based on the physical condition (e.g. age and quality) of the inventories. Inventories are adjusted to the lower of cost or market or written off if unsaleable. These adjustments are estimates and can vary from actual requirements if inventories deteriorate, become otherwise damaged or obsolete, or if competitive conditions differ from expectations.
Revenue Recognition –
We recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”. The majority of sales are for manufactured products, where revenue is recognized at the time products are shipped to customers. Such revenues are subject to returns, discounts, volume rebates and other incentives, which are estimated and recorded based on sales activity and historical trends. Differences in revenues could result if actual experience differs from the historical trends used in management’s estimates. Revenue recognition may be subject to judgment and interpretation that the specific requirements of SAB 104 have been met.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets –
Long-lived assets, primarily plant, property and equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of any such assets may not be recoverable. If the estimated sum of undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the assets being reviewed, we recognize an impairment loss, measured as the amount that the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the assets. The estimate of future cash flows is based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about expected future operating performance. Our estimates of undiscounted cash flows may differ from actual cash flow due to, among other things, changes in general economic conditions, industry conditions, customer requirements, technology or our business model.
Impairment of Goodwill and Certain Other Intangible Assets –
To determine if there has been any impairment of goodwill and certain other intangible assets, we evaluate the balance of such items annually or more frequently if impairment indicators exist. We base our determination of value using a discounted cash flow methodology that involves significant judgments based upon projections of future performance. There can be no assurances that these forecasts will be attained. Changes in strategy and/or market conditions may result in adjustments to recorded asset balances.
- 22 -
Table of Contents
Stock-Based Compensation –
Included in our stock-based compensation are stock options, performance stock awards and restricted stock. Compensation expense for these elements of stock-based compensation are determined based on fair value at the date of grant and our estimate of the number of shares that will ultimately be exercised or issued at the end of the performance period. The estimated compensation expense may be adjusted periodically based on our judgment of facts, circumstances and, for performance shares, forecasted financial performance. Actual performance may be substantially different than our estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In July 2006, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This interpretation requires that we recognize in our financial statements the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal year, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to retained earnings. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on our financial statements.
Market Risks
In addition to the risks inherent in our operations, we are exposed to financial, market, political and economic risks. The following discussion provides additional detail regarding our exposure to the risks of changing commodity prices and interest rates. We have no significant foreign exchange risk. Derivatives are held as part of a formally documented risk management program. Derivatives are held to mitigate uncertainty, volatility or to cover underlying exposures. No derivatives are held for trading purposes. We have entered into derivative transactions related to interest rate risk and our exposure to fluctuating prices of natural gas used in our manufacturing plants, as summarized in the following paragraphs.
We purchase natural gas for use in our manufacturing facilities. These purchases expose us to the risk of higher natural gas prices. To hedge this risk, we may enter into hedge transactions to fix the price on a portion of our projected natural gas usage. In March 2006, we entered into a hedge transaction to fix the price on approximately 25% of our projected natural gas usage through September 2006. The contract value of the hedge transaction was $1,278,000 and the fair value at June 30, 2006 was a liability of $100,000. It is anticipated that hedging strategies will likely be utilized in the future.
We use interest rate swaps to help maintain a reasonable balance between fixed and floating rate debt. We have entered into interest rate swaps to effectively convert the interest rate from fixed to floating on $85,000,000 of our outstanding debt at June 30, 2006. The fair value of these swaps was a liability of $1,016,000 at June 30, 2006. Based on outstanding debt at June 30, 2006, our annual interest costs would increase or decrease $850,000 for each theoretical 1% increase or decrease in the floating interest rate.
Credit Risk
We are subject to credit risks applicable to cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable and derivative instruments. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions or in short-term investments with high credit quality. Short-term investments are primarily in tax-exempt vehicles of high credit quality, including closed-end municipal bonds and variable rate demand notes issued by municipalities. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable primarily relate to the large building products distributors that are our primary customers. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition to determine the need for an allowance for doubtful accounts. We have not experienced significant credit losses for many years. Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited to those customers to whom we make significant sales. Our largest customer accounted for 19% of consolidated sales in each of the last three fiscal years. Derivative contracts are entered into with counterparties who are, in our opinion, creditworthy counterparties.
Inflation and Changing Prices
Our primary financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America based on historical dollars. Accordingly, the financial statements do not portray the effects of
- 23 -
Table of Contents
inflation. In recent years, inflation in our key markets has been moderate, and cost controls and improving productivity have generally minimized the impact of inflation.
The costs of manufacturing, transportation and key raw materials, including but not limited to ceramic coated granules, asphalt, glass fibers, resins, mineral filler, polypropylene, wood particles and various additives for improved performance, together with our ability to pass along higher costs are generally influenced by factors other than inflation. These factors include general economic and industry conditions, supply and demand, surpluses and shortages, and actions of key competitors.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Information relating to this item is discussed under the Market Risks caption of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
| Page | ||||
| Financial Statements: | ||||
| 25 | ||||
| 28 | ||||
| 29 | ||||
| 30 | ||||
| 31 | ||||
| 32 | ||||
| 36 | ||||
| Financial Statement Schedules: | ||||
| 48 | ||||
| 50 |
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, are not applicable, or the information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
- 24 -
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and
Shareholders of ElkCorp
Shareholders of ElkCorp
We have audited management’s assessment, included on page 51, that ElkCorp (a Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). ElkCorp’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of ElkCorp’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As described in Management’s Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting, management has excluded RGM Products, Inc. (“RGM”) from its assessment of internal controls over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006 because it was acquired by the Company in August 2005. We have also excluded RGM from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. RGM is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent 6.5% and 5.9%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended June 30, 2006.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that ElkCorp and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Frameworkissued by COSO. Also in our opinion, ElkCorp and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006, based on criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Frameworkissued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of ElkCorp and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for the years then ended, and our report dated September 6, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP |
Dallas, Texas
September 6, 2006
September 6, 2006
- 25 -
Table of Contents
'
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and
Shareholders of ElkCorp
Shareholders of ElkCorp
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ElkCorp (a Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Our audits also included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ElkCorp and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their consolidated operations and their consolidated cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of ElkCorp and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated September 6, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion on both management’s assessment of ElkCorp’s control over financial reporting and on the effectiveness of ElkCorp’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP | ||
| Grant Thornton LLP |
Dallas, Texas
September 6, 2006
September 6, 2006
- 26 -
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors,
ElkCorp
ElkCorp
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of ElkCorp and subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | ||
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
Dallas, Texas
August 30, 2004, except for changes in
presentation as noted in footnotes titled
“Discontinued Operations” and “Financial
Information By Company Segments,” as
to which the date is September 6, 2006
August 30, 2004, except for changes in
presentation as noted in footnotes titled
“Discontinued Operations” and “Financial
Information By Company Segments,” as
to which the date is September 6, 2006
- 27 -
Table of Contents
ELKCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| June 30, | ||||||||
| ($ In thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Current Assets | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,056 | $ | 9,261 | ||||
| Short-term investments | 32,960 | 69,160 | ||||||
| Trade receivables, less allowance of $639 and $695 | 181,123 | 148,928 | ||||||
| Inventories | 107,929 | 71,467 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other | 10,209 | 8,223 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 9,317 | 7,849 | ||||||
| Discontinued operations | 2,675 | 1,193 | ||||||
| Total current assets | 348,269 | 316,081 | ||||||
| Property, Plant and Equipment | ||||||||
| Land | 7,029 | 5,229 | ||||||
| Buildings and improvements | 127,161 | 117,778 | ||||||
| Machinery and equipment | 339,969 | 314,115 | ||||||
| Construction in progress | 14,149 | 3,867 | ||||||
| 488,308 | 440,989 | |||||||
| Less — Accumulated depreciation | (186,168 | ) | (156,901 | ) | ||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 302,140 | 284,088 | ||||||
| Discontinued Operations — noncurrent | 1,939 | 3,718 | ||||||
| Goodwill | 14,530 | 1,497 | ||||||
| Intangible Assets | 10,609 | 689 | ||||||
| Other Assets | 4,373 | 7,496 | ||||||
| $ | 681,860 | $ | 613,569 | |||||
| Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||
| Current Liabilities | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 71,585 | $ | 56,742 | ||||
| Accrued liabilities | 34,230 | 31,171 | ||||||
| Current maturities on long-term debt | 1,088 | 381 | ||||||
| Discontinued operations | 560 | 937 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | 107,463 | 89,231 | ||||||
| Long-Term Debt, net of current maturities | 199,689 | 200,146 | ||||||
| Deferred Income Taxes | 52,282 | 53,382 | ||||||
| Commitments and Contingencies | ||||||||
| Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||
| Common stock ($1 par, 20,503,855 and 20,297,905 shares issued) | 20,504 | 20,298 | ||||||
| Paid-in capital | 75,724 | 64,792 | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | (64 | ) | — | |||||
| Retained earnings | 227,713 | 186,388 | ||||||
| 323,877 | 271,478 | |||||||
| Less — Treasury stock (43,964 and 22,761 shares, at cost) | (1,451 | ) | (668 | ) | ||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 322,426 | 270,810 | ||||||
| $ | 681,860 | $ | 613,569 | |||||
The Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
- 28 -
Table of Contents
ELKCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| ($ In thousands, except per share data) | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
| Sales | $ | 929,792 | $ | 761,719 | $ | 566,041 | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 759,251 | 613,925 | 453,213 | |||||||||
| Gross profit | 170,541 | 147,794 | 112,828 | |||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | 87,817 | 69,946 | 59,482 | |||||||||
| Operating income from continuing operations | 82,724 | 77,848 | 53,346 | |||||||||
| Interest expense | (13,875 | ) | (10,571 | ) | (5,444 | ) | ||||||
| Interest income | 1,835 | 1,067 | 133 | |||||||||
| Other | 216 | (861 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Income from continuing operations before income taxes | 70,900 | 67,483 | 48,035 | |||||||||
| Provision for income taxes | 25,395 | 24,787 | 17,969 | |||||||||
| Income from continuing operations | 45,505 | 42,696 | 30,066 | |||||||||
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax provision (benefit) of ($58), $2,640, and ($5,055) | (92 | ) | 4,171 | (9,560 | ) | |||||||
| Net income | $ | 45,413 | $ | 46,867 | $ | 20,506 | ||||||
| Income (loss) per common share — basic | ||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations | $ | 2.25 | $ | 2.16 | $ | 1.53 | ||||||
| Discontinued operations | (.01 | ) | .21 | (.48 | ) | |||||||
| Net income per common share | $ | 2.24 | $ | 2.37 | $ | 1.05 | ||||||
| Income (loss) per common share — diluted | ||||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations | $ | 2.21 | $ | 2.11 | $ | 1.51 | ||||||
| Discontinued operations | (.01 | ) | .20 | (.48 | ) | |||||||
| Net income per common share | $ | 2.20 | $ | 2.31 | $ | 1.03 | ||||||
The Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
- 29 -
Table of Contents
ELKCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| ($ In thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities | ||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 45,413 | $ | 46,867 | $ | 20,506 | ||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 26,819 | 23,859 | 18,050 | |||||||||
| Gain on sale of discontinued assets | — | (6,484 | ) | — | ||||||||
| Impairment of discontinued assets | — | 651 | 12,346 | |||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | (2,740 | ) | 7,282 | 3,362 | ||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | 9,237 | 2,544 | 96 | |||||||||
| Excess tax benefits of stock option exercises | — | 1,662 | 275 | |||||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: | ||||||||||||
| Trade receivables | (26,487 | ) | (39,114 | ) | (2,564 | ) | ||||||
| Inventories | (29,553 | ) | (9,288 | ) | (8,608 | ) | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other | (1,657 | ) | 297 | (1,872 | ) | |||||||
| Accounts payable | 5,961 | 19,813 | 1,822 | |||||||||
| Accrued liabilities | (1,934 | ) | 6,879 | 7,536 | ||||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities of discontinued operations | (80 | ) | (821 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 24,979 | 54,147 | 50,648 | |||||||||
| Cash Flows From Investing Activities | ||||||||||||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment | (30,702 | ) | (38,251 | ) | (62,884 | ) | ||||||
| Purchases of short-term investments | (336,350 | ) | (217,880 | ) | — | |||||||
| Sales and redemptions of short-term investments | 372,550 | 148,720 | — | |||||||||
| Proceeds from sales of assets of discontinued operations | — | 17,643 | — | |||||||||
| Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (26,225 | ) | (471 | ) | — | |||||||
| Other, net | (1,442 | ) | 685 | (484 | ) | |||||||
| Net cash used for investing activities | (22,169 | ) | (89,554 | ) | (63,368 | ) | ||||||
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities | ||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of Senior Notes | — | 50,000 | — | |||||||||
| Borrowings (repayments) on Revolving Credit Facility, net | — | (10,300 | ) | 10,300 | ||||||||
| Payments on other borrowings | (5,045 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Dividends paid on common stock | (4,088 | ) | (4,019 | ) | (3,935 | ) | ||||||
| Exercises of stock options | 6,614 | 11,244 | 2,265 | |||||||||
| Purchases of common stock | (6,522 | ) | (2,530 | ) | (693 | ) | ||||||
| Excess tax benefits of stock option exercises | 1,026 | — | — | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities | (8,015 | ) | 44,395 | 7,937 | ||||||||
| Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (5,205 | ) | 8,988 | (4,783 | ) | |||||||
| Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year | 9,261 | 273 | 5,056 | |||||||||
| Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year | $ | 4,056 | $ | 9,261 | $ | 273 | ||||||
The Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
- 30 -
Table of Contents
ELKCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
($ In thousands, except per share data)
| Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive | Common | Paid-in | Retained | Treasury | Comprehensive | Shareholders’ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income | Stock | Capital | Earnings | Stock | Income | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2003 | $ | 19,988 | $ | 56,946 | $ | 126,969 | $ | (7,375 | ) | $ | — | $ | 196,528 | ||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 20,506 | — | — | 20,506 | — | — | 20,506 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative transactions, net of tax | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income | $ | 20,506 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercises of stock options | — | 77 | — | 2,188 | — | 2,265 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Excess tax benefit of stock option exercises | — | 275 | — | — | — | 275 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock grants | — | (170 | ) | — | 170 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock vesting | — | 96 | — | — | — | 96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of common stock from ESOP | — | — | — | (693 | ) | — | (693 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends, $.20 per share | — | — | (3,935 | ) | — | — | (3,935 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2004 | 19,988 | 57,224 | 143,540 | (5,710 | ) | — | 215,042 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 46,867 | — | — | 46,867 | — | — | 46,867 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative transactions, net of tax | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income | $ | 46,867 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercises of stock options | 310 | 5,790 | — | 5,144 | — | 11,244 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Excess tax benefit of stock option exercises | — | 1,662 | — | — | — | 1,662 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock grants | — | (2,428 | ) | — | 2,428 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock vesting | — | 1,214 | — | — | — | 1,214 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance stock amortization | — | 1,330 | — | — | — | 1,330 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of treasury stock | — | — | — | (2,530 | ) | — | (2,530 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends, $.20 per share | — | — | (4,019 | ) | — | — | (4,019 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2005 | 20,298 | 64,792 | 186,388 | (668 | ) | — | 270,810 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 45,413 | — | — | 45,413 | — | — | 45,413 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative transactions, net of tax | (64 | ) | — | — | — | — | (64 | ) | (64 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income | $ | 45,349 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercises of stock options | 206 | 1,179 | — | 5,229 | — | 6,614 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Excess tax benefit of stock option exercises | — | 1,026 | — | — | — | 1,026 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock option vesting | — | 4,563 | — | — | — | 4,563 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock grants | — | (510 | ) | — | 510 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock vesting | — | 1,767 | — | — | — | 1,767 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance stock amortization | — | 2,907 | — | — | — | 2,907 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of treasury stock | — | — | — | (6,522 | ) | — | (6,522 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends, $.20 per share | — | — | (4,088 | ) | — | — | (4,088 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2006 | $ | 20,504 | $ | 75,724 | $ | 227,713 | $ | (1,451 | ) | $ | (64 | ) | $ | 322,426 | |||||||||||||||
The Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
- 31 -
Table of Contents
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business
ElkCorp’s strategic focus is on its building products platforms. All significant building products companies, which comprise the three primary operating segments, operate as subsidiaries of Elk Premium Building Products, Inc. The Premium Roofing Products segment manufactures premium architectural roofing shingles and accessory products. The segment includes RGM Products, Inc. (RGM), which was acquired in August 2005, and manufactures high-profile hip and ridge and other roofing related products. The Composite Building Products segment manufactures composite wood decking and railing products. The Specialty Fabric Technologies segment is a marketing division established as a separate business platform primarily to create brand awareness and promote increased sales of Elk’s nonwoven specialty fabric products, which includes external sales of coated and uncoated nonwoven fabrics used in fire barrier technologies, various applications in asphalt shingles and in other industries. Fire barrier technologies feature fire retardant coatings designed for use in bedding, home furnishings, and other consumer products. The Surface Finishes segment includes hard chrome and other finishes designed to extend the life of steel machinery components operating in abrasive environments. Prior to fiscal 2006, fire barrier technologies and the Surface Finishes segment were combined and shown as Other, Technologies. Prior to fiscal 2006, external sales of coated and uncoated nonwoven fabrics were included in the Premium Roofing Products segment. Corporate and Other represents corporate office expenses and other expense items not allocated to the operating segments.
In fiscal 2004, the company made the decision to discontinue Cybershield, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Cybershield). Substantially all of Cybershield’s assets were sold in fiscal 2005. Also in fiscal 2005, the company sold Ortloff Engineers, LTD (Ortloff) to a financial buyer. Prior periods have been reclassified to present Cybershield and Ortloff as discontinued operations in all periods presented.
Principles of Consolidation / Use of Estimates
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and all subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany balances and transactions. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. They also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates upon subsequent resolution of the identified matters.
Certain prior year amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the fiscal 2006 presentation. The company has revised its fiscal 2005 and 2004 consolidated statements of cash flows to present the operating and investing portion of cash flows attributable to discontinued operations on a separately identifiable basis. The company had previously recorded these amounts on a combined basis. These reclassifications have no effect on net income or financial position as previously reported.
Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments
Cash equivalents represent money market funds subject to daily redemption. Short-term investments consist of Auction Rate Securities (ARS) and Variable Rate Demand Notes (VRDN). The company’s ARS and VRDN investments are tax-exempt instruments of high credit quality. The primary objectives of both types of investments are safety, preservation of invested funds and liquidity sufficient to meet cash flow requirements. Both ARS and VRDN securities have variable rates tied to short-term interest rates. Interest rates on ARS securities reset through a modified Dutch auction process at predetermined short-term intervals, either every 7, 28, or 35 days. Interest rates on VRDN securities reset weekly and can be tendered for sale upon notice (of generally no longer than seven days) to the remarketing agent in the secondary market to other investors. Although both ARS and VRDN securities are issued and rated as long-term securities, they are priced and traded as short-term instruments. The company classifies these short-term investments as available for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Instruments in Debt and Equity Securities.” The investments are carried at cost or par value which approximates the fair market value.
Accounts Payable
The company reflects disbursements as trade accounts payable until such time as payments are presented to the bank for payment. At June 30, 2006 and 2005, disbursements totaling approximately $36,000,000 and $23,000,000, respectively, had not been presented for payment to the bank.
- 32 -
Table of Contents
Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk
The Premium Roofing Products and Composite Building Products segments accounted for 93% of consolidated sales in fiscal 2006. The company’s primary customers are building products distributors. Due to consolidation in the industry, credit risk is concentrated. The ten largest customers account for approximately 50% of consolidated sales. One customer accounted for 19% of consolidated sales in each of the last three fiscal years. The company could suffer significant setbacks in revenues and operating income if it lost one or more of its largest customers, or if customers’ plans and/or markets should change significantly. The balance in the reserve for doubtful accounts is evaluated on an ongoing basis, based on a combination of factors such as customers’ past payment history, length of time the receivables are past due, the status of customers’ financial condition and ongoing credit evaluations.
Revenue Recognition
The majority of sales relate to manufactured products sold to building products distributors. Revenue is recognized at the time products are shipped to customers. All risks and rewards of ownership pass to the customer upon shipment. Sales volume rebates or contractual allowance payments are offered to customers based on their level of sales activity and regional, competitive market conditions. The effects of returns, discounts and other incentives are estimated and recorded at the time of shipment. Volume rebates and allowances are estimated and recorded as a reduction of sales.
Freight Costs
Freight costs are included in cost of goods sold.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (including materials, direct labor, and applicable overhead) or market, using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Adjustments may be made to inventory values based on the physical condition (e.g., age and quality) of the inventories. Inventories are adjusted to the lower of cost or market, or written off as applicable. The cost of raw materials inventories is reduced for volume rebates from suppliers as applicable volume thresholds are met. Inventories are comprised of:
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| June 30, | ||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
| Raw Materials | $ | 19,426 | $ | 15,380 | ||||
| Work-In-Process | 206 | 219 | ||||||
| Finished Goods | 88,297 | 55,868 | ||||||
| $ | 107,929 | $ | 71,467 | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are expensed when incurred. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the lease or the estimated useful life of the improvement, whichever is the shorter period. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of depreciable assets using the straight-line method. Useful lives for property and equipment are as follows:
| Buildings and improvements | 10–40 years | |||
| Machinery and equipment | 5–20 years | |||
| Computer equipment | 3–6 years | |||
| Office furniture and equipment | 5–12 years | |||
During fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, the company recorded to expense $25,948,000, $23,819,000, and $18,018,000, respectively, in depreciation expense.
The cost and accumulated depreciation for property, plant and equipment sold, retired, or otherwise disposed of are relieved from the accounts, and resulting gains or losses are reflected in income. Interest is capitalized in connection with the construction of major projects. The capitalized interest is recorded as part of the asset to which it relates and is
- 33 -
Table of Contents
amortized over the asset’s estimated useful life. In fiscal 2006, no interest was capitalized. In fiscal 2005 and 2004, $754,000 and $3,079,000 of interest cost was capitalized, respectively.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill has an indefinite useful life and is not amortized but is tested at least annually for impairment. The impairment review performed for fiscal 2006 indicated no impairment of goodwill. Intangible assets with identifiable useful lives are shown in the balance sheet net of accumulated amortization. These intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from five to fourteen years.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, advertising costs were $9,869,000, $7,733,000, and $8,894,000, respectively.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses include wages, employee benefits and material costs used in (1) the search, design and development of new products and processes, and (2) the improvement and enhancement of existing products. Research activities are primarily conducted at a technology center in Ennis, Texas. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and included in cost of sales. Expenses for research activities at the Ennis technology center were $3,560,000, $3,348,000 and $2,300,000 in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Development costs at plant locations are not separately identified.
Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. These evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by estimates of revenues, costs and expenses and other factors. If these assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are provided to reflect temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the company’s assets and liabilities using presently enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Supplemental Cash Flows
Supplemental cash flow amounts were as follows:
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
| Interest paid | $ | 13,811 | $ | 10,884 | $ | 8,250 | ||||||
| Income taxes paid | $ | 25,274 | $ | 16,204 | $ | 10,871 | ||||||
In conjunction with the acquisition of the stock of RGM in August 2005 and the assets of Railwayz, Inc., in March 2005, various subsidiaries of the company issued or assumed debt and other liabilities of $23,640,000 in fiscal 2006 and $1,154,000 in fiscal 2005.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Derivatives are held from time to time as part of a formally documented risk management program. No derivatives are held for trading purposes. The company measures hedge effectiveness by formally assessing, on a quarterly basis, the historical and probable future high correlation of changes in the fair value or expected future cash flows of the hedged item. The ineffective portions are recorded in other income or expense in the current period.
- 34 -
Table of Contents
The company purchases natural gas for use in its manufacturing facilities. These purchases expose the company to the risk of rising natural gas prices. To hedge this risk, the company may enter into hedge transactions to fix the price on a portion of its projected natural gas usage. In March 2006, the company entered into a hedge transaction to fix the price on approximately 25% of its projected natural gas usage through September 2006. The contract value of the hedge transaction was $1,278,000 and the fair value at June 30, 2006 was a liability of $100,000. It is anticipated that hedging strategies will likely be utilized in the future.
The Board of Directors and company management determined that prudent interest rate strategy is to maintain a reasonable balance between fixed rate debt and variable rate debt. In June 2002, the company entered into an interest rate swap to effectively convert the interest rate from fixed to floating on $60,000,000 of debt through June 2012. In July 2004, the company entered into an additional interest rate swap to effectively convert the interest rate from fixed to floating on $25,000,000 of debt through July 2007. For these fair value hedges, both the fair value of the derivative and the underlying hedged item are reported in the balance sheet. At June 30, 2006, the fair value of these swaps was a liability of $1,016,000. Changes in the fair value of the derivative and the underlying hedged item offset and are recorded each period in other income or expense, as applicable. However, since both interest rate swaps are 100% effective, as defined, there is no net effect on the company’s results of operations from marking the interest rate swaps to market.
The company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by counterparties on derivative instruments. Although nonperformance is possible, the company does not anticipate nonperformance on the interest rate swaps, as these contracts are, in management’s opinion, with creditworthy counterparties.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the company’s cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade receivables, accounts payable, long-term debt and derivative instruments approximate fair value.
Accruals for Loss Contingencies
Contingencies, or uncertainties, by their nature, require management to exercise judgment both in assessing the likelihood that a liability has been incurred as well as in estimating the amount of loss. Accruals are established for loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Accrual balances are reviewed and adjusted periodically based on management’s judgment of changes in specific facts and circumstances for each loss accrual. Key loss accruals for the company include product warranties, litigation, environmental exposures and self-insurance reserves.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
In fiscal 2006, the company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS 123(R)). SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments, including stock options, performance shares and restricted stock to be recognized in the income statement based on fair value. The Stock-Based Compensation footnote included in the notes to consolidated financial statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K presents detailed information regarding the impact and relevant disclosures as to the company’s adoption of SFAS 123(R).
- 35 -
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations were computed by dividing income from continuing operations by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Dilutive earnings per share include outstanding stock options and restricted shares. In accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations presented in the consolidated statements of operations were computed utilizing the same number of potential common shares used in computing the diluted per share amount for income from continuing operations, regardless of whether those amounts were anti-dilutive to their respective per share amounts. Performance share awards have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share, as the conditions necessary for their issuance have not been satisfied as of the end of the reporting period. The reconciliation of basic earnings per share from continuing operations to diluted earnings per share from continuing operations is shown in the following table:
| (In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
| Income from continuing operations | $ | 45,505 | $ | 42,696 | $ | 30,066 | ||||||
| Denominator for basic earnings per share-weighted average shares outstanding | 20,275 | 19,788 | 19,609 | |||||||||
| Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||
| Unvested restricted shares and outstanding stock options | 332 | 466 | 316 | |||||||||
| Denominator for diluted earnings per share-adjusted weighted average shares and assumed issuance of shares purchased under the stock option plans and vesting of restricted shares using the treasury stock method | 20,607 | 20,254 | 19,925 | |||||||||
| Basic earnings per share from continuing operations | $ | 2.25 | $ | 2.16 | $ | 1.53 | ||||||
| Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations | $ | 2.21 | $ | 2.11 | $ | 1.51 | ||||||
| Stock options excluded from computation of diluted earnings per share due to anti-dilutive effect | -0- | -0- | 730 | |||||||||
| Performance shares excluded from computation due to conditions for issuance having not been satisfied | 285 | 140 | — | |||||||||
Long-Term Debt
| Long-term debt is summarized as follows: | (In thousands) | |||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
| Senior Notes | $ | 195,000 | $ | 195,000 | ||||
| Revolving Credit Facility | — | — | ||||||
| Other debt | 6,793 | 1,064 | ||||||
| Fair value of interest rate swaps | (1,016 | ) | 4,463 | |||||
| 200,777 | 200,527 | |||||||
| Less: Current maturities | (1,088 | ) | (381 | ) | ||||
| $ | 199,689 | $ | 200,146 | |||||
The company has issued Senior Notes (Notes) summarized as follows (in thousands):
| Principal Amount | Maturity | Interest Rate | ||||||||
| $ | 25,000 | July 2007 | 4.69 | % | ||||||
| $ | 60,000 | June 2009 | 6.99 | % | ||||||
| $ | 60,000 | June 2012 | 7.49 | % | ||||||
| $ | 50,000 | November 2014 | 6.28 | % | ||||||
| $ | 195,000 | |||||||||
- 36 -
Table of Contents
In June 2002, the company entered into an interest rate swap to effectively convert the interest rate from fixed to floating on $60,000,000 of Notes through June 2012. For this fair value hedge, both the fair value of the derivative and the underlying hedged item are reported in the balance sheet. In July 2004, the company entered into a second interest rate swap to effectively convert the interest rate from fixed to floating on $25,000,000 of Notes through July 2007. Both interest rate swaps are fair value hedges. At June 30, 2006, the fair value of the derivatives was a liability of $1,016,000 and is recorded in accrued liabilities and as a decrease in the carrying value of long-term debt. Changes in the fair value of the derivative and the underlying hedged item offset and are recorded each period in other income or expense, as applicable.
At June 30, 2006, the company had $125,000,000 of primary credit available under a Revolving Credit Facility (Facility), including up to a maximum of $10,000,000 in letters of credit through November 30, 2008. At June 30, 2006, there were no borrowings outstanding on the Facility and $3,852,000 of letters of credit were outstanding.
Both the Notes and the Facility contain financial covenants which require that the company maintain a specified minimum consolidated net worth, and a maximum debt to capitalization ratio, based on defined terms. The Facility also contains a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and the Notes contain a minimum interest coverage ratio, also based on defined terms. Dividend payments and stock repurchases are also limited by the Facility to certain specified levels. At June 30, 2006, the company was in compliance with all financial covenants.
Other debt includes various mortgage debt and notes payable assumed in connection with acquisitions. The majority of these obligations, which included both fixed rate and variable rate instruments, are secured by liens on the assets acquired, and are due at various dates through June 2020.
Shareholders’ Equity
Authorized common stock, par value $1.00, is 100,000,000 shares, of which 20,503,855 and 20,297,905 shares were issued at June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board of Directors is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, without par value, in one or more series and to determine the rights, preferences, and restrictions applicable to each series. No preferred stock has been issued.
Shareholder Rights Plan
On May 26, 1998, the company’s Board of Directors adopted a new Shareholder Rights Plan which took effect when the existing rights plan expired on July 8, 1998. Under the new plan, rights were constructively distributed as a dividend at the rate of one right for each share of common stock of the company held by the shareholders of record as of the close of business on July 8, 1998. Until the occurrence of certain events, the rights are represented by and trade in tandem with common stock. Each right will separate and entitle shareholders to buy stock upon an occurrence of certain takeover or stock accumulation events. Should any person or group (Related Person), other than certain bona fide institutional investors to whom a 20% threshold applies, acquire beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the company’s common stock, all rights not held by the Related Person become rights to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of preferred stock for $110 or $110 of ElkCorp common stock at a 50% discount. If after such an event the company merges, consolidates or engages in a similar transaction in which it does not survive, each holder has a “flip over” right to buy discounted stock in the surviving entity.
Under certain circumstances, the rights are redeemable at a price of $0.01 per right. Further, upon defined stock accumulation events, the Board of Directors has the option to exchange one share of common stock per right. The rights will expire by their terms on July 8, 2008.
Product Warranties
The company provides its customers with limited warranties on certain products. Limited warranties generally range from 20 to 50 years. Warranty reserves are established based on known or probable claims, together with historical experience factors. During fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, the company recorded to expense $5,726,000, $5,664,000 and $3,313,000, respectively, in warranty claim settlements and reserves. The company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amount as necessary.
- 37 -
Table of Contents
Changes in the company’s warranty liability during fiscal 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 4,902 | $ | 3,103 | ||||
| Warranties of acquired business | 167 | — | ||||||
| Accrual for new warranties | 4,005 | 2,954 | ||||||
| Changes in estimates for pre-existing warranties | 1,721 | 2,710 | ||||||
| Warranty settlements during the year | (4,666 | ) | (3,865 | ) | ||||
| Balance at end of year | $ | 6,129 | $ | 4,902 | ||||
Stock-Based Compensation
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has established a current practice of awarding ElkCorp officers 75% of a long-term incentive compensation award in the form of performance shares (as described below) and 25% in the form of stock options. Long-term incentive awards, including stock option grants to officers, are granted and effective July 1 of each year and to directors on the date following the annual shareholder’s meeting. Other key employees receive their long-term incentive compensation in the form of awards of performance shares and stock loan grants. Stock-based compensation is granted to officers, directors and certain key employees in accordance with the provisions of the shareholder approved 2004 Amended and Restated ElkCorp Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (Equity Incentive Compensation Plan). This plan provides for grants of stock options, performance shares and restricted stock.
Stock Options –
The company’s Equity Incentive Compensation Plan provides for the granting of incentive and nonqualified stock options to directors, officers and key employees of the company for purchase of the company’s common stock. Stock options are generally granted for a ten-year term. Options granted to officers and key employees generally vest ratably over three-year or five-year periods, but vest earlier upon death, disability, retirement or a change in control of the company. Options granted to nonemployee directors fully vest at grant date. Awards granted prior to July 1, 2005 to employees who have reached retirement age are amortized over the applicable vesting period until such time that they announce their intention to retire. At that time, remaining unrecognized compensation is recorded as compensation expense during the remainder of their employment. Beginning in fiscal 2006, awards to employees who have reached retirement age are recorded as compensation expense when the awards are granted.
Prior to fiscal 2006, the company accounted for its stock options under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations. In fiscal 2006, the company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123(R) and selected the modified prospective method to initially report stock-based compensation amounts in the consolidated financial statements. The company is currently using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of all option grants. For options the following weighted-average assumptions were used:
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
| Dividend yield: | 0.85% | 0.90% | 1.00% | |||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate: | 4.15% | 4.60% | 3.70% | |||||||||
| Expected market price volatility: | .390 | .352 | .435 | |||||||||
| Expected life of options: | 8.0 years | 8.2 years | 9.0 years | |||||||||
| Fair value of grants: | $ | 13.37 | $ | 10.63 | $ | 11.40 | ||||||
For the year ended June 30, 2006, the company recorded $4,563,000 of stock-based compensation expense related to stock option grants. This amount is recorded in selling, general and administrative expense. The company issues treasury shares, if available, to satisfy stock option exercises. If treasury shares are unavailable, new shares are issued. At June 30, 2006, there is $1,645,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options remaining to be recognized through fiscal 2008.
- 38 -
Table of Contents
Information relating to options is as follows:
| Weighted | |||||||||||||||||
| Number | Exercise Price | Average Exercise | |||||||||||||||
| of Shares | Range per Share | Price per Share | |||||||||||||||
| Outstanding at June 30, 2003 | 1,999,011 | $ | 7.56 | — | $ | 34.25 | $ | 21.51 | |||||||||
| Granted | 391,385 | $ | 22.61 | — | $ | 25.60 | $ | 22.78 | |||||||||
| Cancelled | (24,596 | ) | $ | 10.72 | — | $ | 28.04 | $ | 24.75 | ||||||||
| Exercised | (218,988 | ) | $ | 8.33 | — | $ | 28.04 | $ | 15.20 | ||||||||
| Outstanding at June 30, 2004 | 2,146,812 | $ | 7.56 | — | $ | 34.25 | $ | 22.35 | |||||||||
| Granted | 81,023 | $ | 23.21 | — | $ | 27.72 | $ | 24.03 | |||||||||
| Cancelled | (49,285 | ) | $ | 13.33 | — | $ | 34.25 | $ | 26.12 | ||||||||
| Exercised | (499,521 | ) | $ | 8.33 | — | $ | 28.04 | $ | 21.87 | ||||||||
| Outstanding at June 30, 2005 | 1,679,029 | $ | 7.56 | — | $ | 28.04 | $ | 22.47 | |||||||||
| Granted | 93,250 | $ | 28.39 | — | $ | 31.83 | $ | 28.93 | |||||||||
| Cancelled | (10,095 | ) | $ | 20.07 | — | $ | 27.93 | $ | 24.00 | ||||||||
| Exercised | (338,826 | ) | $ | 7.56 | — | $ | 28.04 | $ | 20.33 | ||||||||
| Outstanding at June 30, 2006 | 1,423,358 | $ | 7.56 | — | $ | 31.83 | $ | 23.41 | |||||||||
The following table summarizes information about options outstanding at June 30, 2006:
| Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted-Average | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||
| Range of Exercise | Number | Remaining | Exercise | Number | Average | |||||||||||||||
| Prices | Outstanding | Contractual Life | Price | Exercisable | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
| $ 7.56 - $19.99 | 291,860 | 3.69 yrs. | $ | 17.85 | 291,860 | $ | 17.85 | |||||||||||||
| $20.00 - $24.99 | 598,206 | 6.42 yrs. | $ | 21.99 | 309,003 | $ | 21.67 | |||||||||||||
| $25.00 - $31.83 | 533,292 | 5.89 yrs. | $ | 28.05 | 338,198 | $ | 28.01 | |||||||||||||
At June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, options for 939,061, 1,016,425, and 1,176,124 shares were exercisable, respectively. A total of 359,053, 641,369, and 1,060,098 shares were reserved for future grants of stock options, performance stock and restricted stock at June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Performance Stock Awards –
In December 2004 and July 2005, the company entered into Performance Stock Award agreements (PSA Agreements) granting performance stock awards (PSAs) to certain of the company’s officers and other key employees under the Equity Incentive Compensation Plan. The PSAs consist of a contingent right to receive whole shares of the company’s common stock if the company meets specified performance criteria over a three-year performance period. The performance criteria for 70% of the total PSA is based on the company’s return on equity (ROE) measured against all New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listed companies, and 30% of the total PSA is based on the company’s total shareholder return (TSR), or stock appreciation plus dividends, measured against all NYSE listed companies.
The company currently estimates that the probable number of shares to be issued at the end of the three-year performance period ending June 30, 2007, will be 157,152 shares. The maximum potential number of shares that can be issued for this performance period is 205,305 shares. For the three-year performance period ending June 30, 2008, the company estimates that the probable number of shares to be issued will be 128,266 shares. The maximum potential number of shares that can be issued for this second performance period is 183,255 shares. Prior to July 1, 2005, the initial award was accounted for using variable accounting as prescribed by APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations, and the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. Under APB 25, performance shares were accounted for by charging a ratable portion of compensation expense during each accounting period based on the probable number of shares to be issued times the price of ElkCorp common stock at the end of each period. Beginning July 1, 2005, all performance shares are accounted for at fair value in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). During the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, $2,907,000 and $1,330,000, respectively, was charged to compensation expense for performance shares, based on the
- 39 -
Table of Contents
probable number of shares. At June 30, 2006, there is $3,154,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance stock awards remaining to be recognized through fiscal 2008. Compensation expense attributable to performance stock awards is classified as selling, general and administrative expense.
Restricted Stock –
The Equity Incentive Compensation Plan also provides for grants of restricted stock to directors and employees of the company. Grantees generally have all rights of a shareholder except that unvested shares are held in escrow and subject to forfeiture. Restricted shares either vest 33 1/3% per year over a three-year restriction period or 20% per year over a five-year restriction period, but vest earlier upon death, disability, retirement or a change in control of the company. In the year ended June 30, 2006, 36,495 restricted shares were granted at market prices ranging from $30.18 to $35.55 per share. The value of restricted stock is amortized over the applicable restriction period. Restricted stock issued to directors vest in full three years after grant date. In the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, compensation expense of $1,767,000 and $1,214,000, respectively, was recognized relating to restricted stock awards. At June 30, 2006, there is $2,349,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock remaining to be recognized through fiscal 2011. Compensation expense attributable to restricted shares is classified as selling, general and administrative expense.
Stock/Loan Plan –
Under the company’s Stock/Loan Plan, certain employees are granted loans based on a percentage of their salaries, the performance of their operating units, and also as long-term incentive compensation awards, for the purpose of purchasing the company’s common stock. Under the Stock/Loan Plan, a ratable portion of the loans, which are unsecured, and any accrued interest are forgiven and recognized as compensation expense over five years of continuing service with the company. If employment is terminated for any reason except death, disability or retirement, the balance of the loan becomes due and payable. Loans outstanding at June 30, 2006 and 2005 totaling $4,302,000 and $2,963,000, respectively, are included in other assets. In compliance with certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, no loans have been granted to executive officers of ElkCorp since the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Prior Year Pro Forma Disclosure –
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
| Net income, as reported | $ | 46,867 | $ | 20,506 | ||||
| Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income under APB No. 25, net of related tax effects | 865 | — | ||||||
| Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of related tax effects | (3,571 | ) | (2,519 | ) | ||||
| Pro forma earnings | $ | 44,161 | $ | 17,987 | ||||
| Earnings per common share: | ||||||||
| Basic – as reported | $ | 2.37 | $ | 1.05 | ||||
| Basic – pro forma | $ | 2.23 | $ | .92 | ||||
| Diluted – as reported | $ | 2.31 | $ | 1.03 | ||||
| Diluted – pro forma | $ | 2.18 | $ | .90 | ||||
- 40 -
Table of Contents
Effect of Adoption of SFAS 123(R) –
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the financial results of ElkCorp were lower than the results would have been under the previous accounting method for stock-based compensation by the following amounts.
| (in thousands) | ||||
| Year Ended | ||||
| June 30, 2006 | ||||
| Income from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 5,063 | ||
| Income from continuing operations and net income | $ | 3,250 | ||
| Basic and diluted earnings per share | $ | .16 | ||
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) all tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options were reflected as operating cash flows in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS 123(R) requires that cash flows from the exercise of stock-based compensation resulting from tax benefits in excess of recognized compensation cost (excess tax benefits) be classified as financing cash flows. In fiscal 2006, $1,026,000 of such excess tax benefits was classified as financing cash flows. In fiscal 2005 and 2004, excess tax benefits of $1,662,000 and $275,000 were recorded, respectively, as operating cash flows, as was prescribed prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R).
Employee Benefit Plans
The company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) became effective January 1, 1981. Under the plan, the company may contribute a percentage of each participant’s annual compensation into a trust, either as treasury stock contributions or cash, which is then used to purchase ElkCorp common stock. Employees vest 20% after one year of employment and 20% per year thereafter, with the stock distributed to a participant at retirement, death, disability, or as authorized by the Plan Administrative Committee. Effective January 1, 1990, the company established an Employee Savings Plan under Internal Revenue Code section 401(k). Under the 401(k) Plan, the company may contribute a percentage of each participant’s annual compensation into the 401(k) Plan to be invested among various defined alternatives at the participants’ direction. Investment alternatives under the 401(k) Plan do not include ElkCorp common stock. Vesting of company contributions is in accordance with the same schedule as that of the ESOP. All full-time employees, except those covered by plans established through collective bargaining, are eligible for participation in the above plans after meeting minimum service requirements.
Since 1998, the Board of Directors annually has authorized total contributions of 5.0%, including forfeitures, of each participant’s annual compensation, as defined, split equally between the ESOP and 401(k) Plans. In addition, the company contributes an additional $.50 for every $1.00 of employee contributions into the 401(k) Plan limited to a maximum matching company contribution of 2% of an employee’s compensation. Total contributions charged to expense for these plans were $4,814,000, $3,985,000, and $3,633,000, in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Commitments and Contingencies
The company and its subsidiaries lease certain office space, facilities, and equipment under operating leases, expiring on various dates through 2019. Total rental expense was $6,745,000 in 2006, $5,081,000 in 2005 and $3,993,000 in 2004. At June 30, 2006, future minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases, payable over the remaining lives of the leases, are:
| (In thousands) | ||||
| Minimum Rental | ||||
| Fiscal Year | Commitments | |||
| 2007 | $ | 5,702 | ||
| 2008 | 5,080 | |||
| 2009 | 4,394 | |||
| 2010 | 4,506 | |||
| 2011 | 4,492 | |||
| Thereafter | 17,566 | |||
| Total | $ | 41,740 | ||
The company has no significant commitments for purchase orders or construction contracts at June 30, 2006.
- 41 -
Table of Contents
In connection with an acquisition in October 2002, a contingent future earn-out arrangement was agreed upon based on the profitability above certain thresholds of Elk Composite Building Products, Inc. The acquisition provides that for five years, the contingent earn-out amount is unlimited in amount and is calculated using a defined formula. The company is currently unable to estimate an amount for maximum potential payment in the first five years. If in the first five years, the total contingent earn-out payments are less than $12,725,000, the acquisition agreement provides that the obligation continues indefinitely based on the defined formula, limited however, so that total contingent payments cannot exceed this amount. If in the first five years the total earn-out payments exceed $12,725,000 the payment obligation would terminate under the agreement at the end of such five year period and no further payments are due. As of June 30, 2006, no earn-out payments have been earned or paid. There is no minimum future earn-out payment requirement. Further, the company’s earn-out agreement is the subject of a dispute and current legal proceedings brought against a principal of the company acquired and former officer of Elk Composite Building Products, Inc.
Chromium has engaged in limited remediation activities at the site of its former plating operation in Lufkin, Texas. Soil sampling results from a pre-closing environmental evaluation of the site indicated the necessity of localized cleanup. Chromium has entered the property into the Texas Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). Under this program, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) reviews the voluntary clean up plan the applicant submits, and, when the work is complete, issues a certificate of completion, evidencing clean-up to levels protective of human health and the environment and releasing prospective purchasers and lenders from liability to the state. Properties entered into the VCP are protected from TCEQ enforcement actions.
In fiscal 2004, Chromium completed a supplemental groundwater and soil assessment at the Lufkin facility. The assessment further defined the horizontal and vertical extent of metals in soils, assessed the horizontal extent of metals in groundwater, and estimated the direction of groundwater movement. Chromium submitted its Affected Property Assessment Report (APAR) to the TCEQ. In June 2004, the TCEQ issued a letter accepting Chromium’s APAR in substantially all respects, indicating that no further assessment of the extent of contamination is necessary. In May 2005, Chromium proposed a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) to the TCEQ in which it proposed activities and engineering controls, including capping of affected soils and a pump-and-treat system for affected groundwater, to cleanup the site under the VCP to a site specific risk-based cleanup standard. The TCEQ approved the RAP, with some revisions, in October 2005. Chromium completed the soil capping portion of the RAP and submitted a Response Action Completion Report for the soil remediation to the TCEQ in August 2006 and is awaiting the agency’s approval.
Chromium applied to the City of Lufkin for a permit to discharge its post-treatment effluent from the groundwater pump-and-treat system into the City’s sewer system. The availability of this disposal method would decrease the on-going costs of treating the groundwater as proposed under the RAP. In June 2006 the City wrote Chromium a letter explaining that the City has applied to the TCEQ for a modification of its discharge permit which would allow the City to reallocate industrial waste loads. The City stated that if the TCEQ approves this permit modification it will be able to issue Chromium a discharge permit. The City believes that it will receive the desired permit modifications and, therefore, Chromium is optimistic that it will receive the desired discharge permit but can give no assurances that it will.
In fiscal 2005, the company recorded an accrued liability of $700,000, which the company currently believes is adequate for costs relating to the matter. However, the cost of remediation could vary significantly depending on Chromium’s success in obtaining the requested City permit, and the success of the designed pump-and-treat system in attaining the groundwater response objective for Chromium established in the final RAP.
The company’s operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental matters. Other than the possible costs associated with the previously described Chromium matter, the company does not believe it will be required to expend amounts which will have a material adverse effect on the company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations by reason of environmental laws and regulations. Such laws and regulations are frequently changed and could result in significantly increased cost of compliance. Further, certain of the company’s manufacturing operations utilize hazardous materials in their production processes. As a result, the company incurs costs for recycling or disposal of such materials and may incur costs for remediation activities at its facilities and off-site from time to time. The company establishes and maintains reserves for such known or probable remediation activities in accordance with SFAS No. 5 “Accounting for Contingencies” and AICPA Statement of Position 96-1.
The company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other legal proceedings and claims, including claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on advice from legal counsel, management believes such litigation and claims will be resolved without material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
- 42 -
Table of Contents
Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| June 30, | ||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
| Product warranty reserves | $ | 6,129 | $ | 4,902 | ||||
| Self-insurance reserves | 1,599 | 1,221 | ||||||
| Compensation and employee benefits | 12,432 | 14,488 | ||||||
| All other | 14,070 | 10,560 | ||||||
| $ | 34,230 | $ | 31,171 | |||||
Acquisitions
In March 2005, a subsidiary of the company purchased the principal assets of Railwayz, Inc. (Railwayz), a privately-held composite railing company whose products are complementary to the company’s composite decking products. The total purchase price was approximately $1,625,000, plus contingent future earn-out payments based on revenues for the first five years after acquisition with a maximum potential payment of $375,000. There is no minimum future earn-out payment requirement. Existing cash resources of $471,000 and a three-year non-interest bearing note were used to finance the acquisition. The purchase price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired. The operating results attributable to the acquired assets have been included in the company’s consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition. Sales of Railwayz products in its most recent fiscal year prior to acquisition were not significant in amount.
On August 25, 2005, Elk Premium Building Products, Inc., acquired the outstanding shares of RGM Products, Inc. (RGM), a privately-held manufacturer of high-profile hip and ridge and other roofing related products, together with certain other assets related to RGM’s business. The acquisition enhances ElkCorp’s current roofing accessory business and allows the company to offer the broadest ridge product line in its industry. The purchase price of the acquisition was $24,285,000, together with the assumption of certain related indebtedness and costs of acquisition. Subsequent to the acquisition date, the company incurred an additional $1,940,000 of expenditures relating to, among other things, legal, audit and severance costs. The purchase price was allocated to $26,286,000 of net tangible assets, $10,700,000 of identifiable intangible assets and $12,879,000 of goodwill, taking into account indebtedness and current liabilities assumed. The results of RGM’s operations are included in the results of operations prospectively from the date of acquisition. Pro forma financial information has not been presented, as the effects were not material to ElkCorp’s historical financial statements.
Discontinued Operations
In fiscal 2004 the decision was made to discontinue Cybershield and to sell its operations or its assets. In fiscal 2005, the company sold substantially all assets of Cybershield, excluding the Canton, Georgia facility, to the Cybershield management group for $1,293,000 in cash. The sale price approximated the carrying value of assets, net of assumed liabilities, at the date of sale. Also in fiscal 2005, the Canton land, building and certain equipment were sold for $2,750,000. The sales price approximated the carrying value of the assets sold.
In fiscal 2005, management and the Board of Directors concluded that Ortloff did not fit into the company’s focus on building products platforms, and Ortloff was sold to a financial buyer for approximately $13,600,000. The company retained $4,400,000 in license receivables and a portion of contingent license fees that could result in an additional $2,100,000 in future years. There is no assurance that any of the contingent license fees will be realized. ElkCorp does not participate in Ortloff’s management in any capacity. The purchaser is collecting the retained license receivables on ElkCorp’s behalf for a service fee on all collected funds. The book value of receivables relating to Ortloff have been reduced to reflect the service fee to be paid and have been discounted to fair value at June 30, 2006. The effect of all financial matters relating to the disposal of Ortloff was a pretax gain of $6,484,000.
- 43 -
Table of Contents
Summary operating results of discontinued operations are as follows:
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
| Sales | $ | — | $ | 5,386 | $ | 15,101 | ||||||
| Cost of sales | — | 1,039 | 11,173 | |||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative | 150 | 3,369 | 6,197 | |||||||||
| Write-down of assets | — | 651 | 12,346 | |||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | (150 | ) | 327 | (14,615 | ) | |||||||
| Gain on disposal | — | 6,484 | — | |||||||||
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations | (150 | ) | 6,811 | (14,615 | ) | |||||||
| Income tax provision (benefit) | (58 | ) | 2,640 | (5,055 | ) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | (92 | ) | $ | 4,171 | $ | (9,560 | ) | ||||
Included in the above amounts are write-downs of Cybershield’s net assets to estimated market value. In fiscal 2005, a $651,000 write-down was recorded on the Canton, Georgia facility. In fiscal 2004, the pretax write-down of assets of Cybershield’s Lufkin facility totaled $10,496,000. A write-down of Cybershield’s Canton, Georgia assets of $1,850,000 was also recorded in fiscal 2004.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is shown in the following table:
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | |||||||
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | 1,497 | $ | — | ||||
| Goodwill acquired | 13,033 | 1,497 | ||||||
| Balance at end of year | $ | 14,530 | $ | 1,497 | ||||
As of June 30, 2006, goodwill of $12,879,000 is attributable to the Premium Roofing Products segment and $1,651,000 is attributable to the Composite Building Products segment. At June 30, 2005, all goodwill was attributable to the Composite Building Products segment.
Intangible assets as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| Intangible Assets, Cost | Accumulated Amortization | Net Book Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Patents | $ | 6,215 | $ | 724 | $ | 395 | $ | 35 | $ | 5,820 | $ | 689 | ||||||||||||
| Customer relationships | 3,700 | — | 308 | — | 3,392 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Trademarks | 600 | — | 36 | — | 564 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Noncompete agreement | 1,000 | — | 167 | — | 833 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 11,515 | $ | 724 | $ | 906 | $ | 35 | $ | 10,609 | $ | 689 | |||||||||||||
Weighed average useful lives are as follows:
Patents – 14 years
Customer relationships – 10 years
Trademarks – 14 years
Noncompete agreement – 5 years
Patents – 14 years
Customer relationships – 10 years
Trademarks – 14 years
Noncompete agreement – 5 years
In fiscal years 2007 to 2010, amortization of intangible assets recorded as of June 30, 2006 will be $1,037,000 per year. In fiscal 2011, amortization will be $870,000
.
.
- 44 -
Table of Contents
Financial Information By Company Segments
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
Sales | ||||||||||||
| Premium Roofing Products | $ | 836,208 | $ | 693,634 | $ | 519,284 | ||||||
| Composite Building Products | 31,423 | 19,425 | 8,524 | |||||||||
| Specialty Fabric Technologies | 53,316 | 39,451 | 29,894 | |||||||||
| Surface Finishes | 8,845 | 9,209 | 8,339 | |||||||||
| $ | 929,792 | $ | 761,719 | $ | 566,041 | |||||||
Income from Continuing Operations | ||||||||||||
| Premium Roofing Products | $ | 107,004 | $ | 104,232 | $ | 68,275 | ||||||
| Composite Building Products | (7,816 | ) | (11,822 | ) | (2,262 | ) | ||||||
| Specialty Fabric Technologies | 6,320 | 2,083 | 319 | |||||||||
| Surface Finishes | 1,033 | 144 | 598 | |||||||||
| Corporate | (23,817 | ) | (16,789 | ) | (13,584 | ) | ||||||
| 82,724 | 77,848 | 53,346 | ||||||||||
| Interest expense, net and other | (11,824 | ) | (10,365 | ) | (5,311 | ) | ||||||
| Income from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 70,900 | $ | 67,483 | $ | 48,035 | ||||||
Identifiable Assets | ||||||||||||
| Premium Roofing Products | $ | 540,780 | $ | 434,008 | $ | 401,618 | ||||||
| Composite Building Products | 55,765 | 51,988 | 23,183 | |||||||||
| Specialty Fabric Technologies | 8,239 | 7,829 | 4,666 | |||||||||
| Surface Finishes | 6,571 | 7,021 | 6,796 | |||||||||
| Corporate | 65,891 | 107,812 | 27,506 | |||||||||
| Discontinued Operations | 4,614 | 4,911 | 16,939 | |||||||||
| $ | 681,860 | $ | 613,569 | $ | 480,708 | |||||||
Depreciation and Amortization | ||||||||||||
| Premium Roofing Products | $ | 21,342 | $ | 18,511 | $ | 14,216 | ||||||
| Composite Building Products | 2,948 | 1,055 | 419 | |||||||||
| Specialty Fabric Technologies | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Surface Finishes | 571 | 689 | 682 | |||||||||
| Corporate | 1,958 | 3,604 | 2,733 | |||||||||
| $ | 26,819 | $ | 23,859 | $ | 18,050 | |||||||
Capital Expenditures | ||||||||||||
| Premium Roofing Products | $ | 24,198 | $ | 11,753 | $ | 52,043 | ||||||
| Composite Building Products | 4,448 | 24,482 | 3,836 | |||||||||
| Specialty Fabric Technologies | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Surface Finishes | 268 | 272 | 260 | |||||||||
| Corporate | 1,788 | 1,744 | 6,745 | |||||||||
| $ | 30,702 | $ | 38,251 | $ | 62,884 | |||||||
- 45 -
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
The company’s effective tax rate was 35.8% in fiscal 2006, 36.7% in 2005 and 37.4% in 2004. The difference between the federal statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate is reconciled as follows:
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
| Federal statutory tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
| Change in tax rate resulting from: | ||||||||||||
| State income taxes, net of federal benefit | 1.9 | % | 1.7 | % | 2.1 | % | ||||||
| Other, including manufacturers’ deduction in fiscal 2006 | (1.1 | )% | — | .3 | % | |||||||
| 35.8 | % | 36.7 | % | 37.4 | % | |||||||
Components of the income tax provisions consist of the following:
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
| Federal: | ||||||||||||
| Current | $ | 26,171 | $ | 17,787 | $ | 5,558 | ||||||
| Deferred | (2,140 | ) | 5,812 | 11,340 | ||||||||
| State: | ||||||||||||
| Current | 1,964 | 632 | 300 | |||||||||
| Deferred | (600 | ) | 556 | 771 | ||||||||
| $ | 25,395 | $ | 24,787 | $ | 17,969 | |||||||
The significant components of the company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are summarized below:
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||||||
| Accrued liabilities, difference in expense recognition | $ | 4,014 | $ | 3,759 | $ | 2,967 | ||||||
| Receivables, bad debt reserve | 189 | 243 | 314 | |||||||||
| Inventories, difference in capitalization | 1,867 | 2,009 | 2,318 | |||||||||
| Nonqualified deferred compensation plan | 1,085 | 806 | 679 | |||||||||
| Asset impairment | 47 | 123 | 4,030 | |||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | 3,126 | 897 | 46 | |||||||||
| Other | — | 12 | 42 | |||||||||
| 10,328 | 7,849 | 10,396 | ||||||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||||||
| Fixed assets, primarily depreciation method differences and deferred testing costs | (51,999 | ) | (52,119 | ) | (45,611 | ) | ||||||
| Deferred license fees | (1,294 | ) | (1,263 | ) | (3,037 | ) | ||||||
| (53,293 | ) | (53,382 | ) | (48,648 | ) | |||||||
| Net deferred tax liability | $ | (42,965 | ) | $ | (45,533 | ) | $ | (38,252 | ) | |||
The company has state net operating losses (NOL) at certain of its subsidiary companies. In some instances there is no assurance that the benefits of these NOL’s will be realized. Valuation reserves, which are immaterial in amount, are recorded for the state deferred tax assets pertaining to those subsidiaries.
- 46 -
Table of Contents
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In July 2006, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This interpretation requires that a company recognize in its financial statements the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for ElkCorp as of the beginning of the 2008 fiscal year, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to retained earnings. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on its financial statements.
Quarterly Summary of Operations
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)
| First Quarter | Second Quarter | Third Quarter | Fourth Quarter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sales | $ | 215,857 | $ | 163,012 | $ | 228,949 | $ | 194,099 | $ | 243,194 | $ | 201,871 | $ | 241,792 | $ | 202,737 | ||||||||||||||||
| Gross Profit | 39,728 | 29,590 | 42,137 | 41,202 | 42,277 | 43,932 | 46,399 | 33,070 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income (Loss) from: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Continuing Operations | 10,527 | 7,660 | 11,081 | 14,198 | 10,146 | 14,123 | 13,751 | (1) | 6,715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Discontinued Operations | — | (851 | ) | (66 | ) | 128 | — | 1,174 | (26 | ) | 3,720 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Income | $ | 10,527 | $ | 6,809 | $ | 11,015 | $ | 14,326 | $ | 10,146 | $ | 15,297 | $ | 13,725 | ( 1) | $ | 10,435 | |||||||||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) Per Share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Continuing Operations – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | .52 | $ | .39 | $ | .54 | $ | .72 | $ | .50 | $ | .71 | $ | .67 | (1) | $ | .34 | |||||||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | .51 | $ | .38 | $ | .54 | $ | .70 | $ | .49 | $ | .69 | $ | .67 | (1) | $ | .33 | |||||||||||||||
| Discontinued Operations – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | — | $ | (.04 | ) | — | $ | .01 | — | $ | .06 | — | $ | .18 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted | — | $ | (.04 | ) | — | $ | .01 | — | $ | .06 | — | $ | .18 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net Income– | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | .52 | $ | .35 | $ | .54 | $ | .73 | $ | .50 | $ | .77 | $ | .67 | $ | .52 | ||||||||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | .51 | $ | .34 | $ | .54 | $ | .71 | $ | .49 | $ | .75 | $ | .67 | $ | .51 | ||||||||||||||||
Note:
| (1) | Recognition of stock-based compensation of retirement age eligible employees reduced income from continuing operations and net income by $645, or $.03 per basic and diluted net income per share. |
- 47 -
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
Board of Directors and
Shareholders of ElkCorp
Shareholders of ElkCorp
We have audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) the consolidated financial statements of ElkCorp and subsidiaries referred to in our report dated September 6, 2006, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The Schedule II – Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Grant Thornton LLP
Grant Thornton LLP
Dallas, Texas
September 6, 2006
September 6, 2006
- 48 -
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
To the Board of Directors
of ElkCorp:
of ElkCorp:
Our audit of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated August 30, 2004, except for changes in presentation as noted in footnotes titled “Discontinued Operations” and “Financial Information by Company Segments,” as to which the date is September 6, 2006, appearing in the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K of ElkCorp also included an audit of the financial statement schedule for the year ended June 30, 2004, listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Dallas, Texas
August 30, 2004
August 30, 2004
- 49 -
Table of Contents
ELKCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II – CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006, 2005, AND 2004
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Column A | Column B | Column C | Column D | Column E | ||||||||||||||||
| Additions | Deductions | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at Beginning of | Charged to Costs and | For Purposes For Which | Balance at | |||||||||||||||||
| Description | Period | Expenses | Other | Reserves Were Created | End of Period | |||||||||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 695 | $ | 81 | $ | 100 | $ | (237 | ) | $ | 639 | |||||||||
| Allowance for inventory obsolescence | $ | 262 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (147 | ) | $ | 115 | |||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 605 | $ | 358 | $ | — | $ | (268 | ) | $ | 695 | |||||||||
| Allowance for inventory obsolescence | $ | 262 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 262 | ||||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 935 | $ | 83 | $ | (175 | ) | $ | (238 | ) | $ | 605 | ||||||||
| Allowance for inventory obsolescence | $ | 262 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 262 | ||||||||||
- 50 -
Table of Contents
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
On September 13, 2004, we dismissed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. On the same date, Grant Thornton LLP was engaged to succeed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as reported on our current Report on Form 8-K, which was filed on September 17, 2004.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We completed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. A system of internal control may become inadequate over time because of changes in conditions, or deterioration in the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective, can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of June 30, 2006, our internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles based on such criteria.
On August 25, 2005, we acquired RGM Products, Inc. (RGM), a privately held company. As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, management excluded RGM from management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006 and for the year then ended. This business constituted approximately 5.9% of consolidated sales and 6.5% of consolidated total assets as of June 30, 2006. RGM will be included in management’s assessment of the internal control over financial reporting for ElkCorp and our consolidated subsidiaries as of June 30, 2007.
Grant Thornton LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, audited management’s assessment and independently assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and has issued an attestation report concurring with management’s assessment. Their report is included under “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
- 51 -
Table of Contents
Limitations on Effectiveness of Internal Controls
The effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of our systems, the possibility of human error, and the risk of fraud. Moreover, projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes and conditions and the risk that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate over time. Because of these limitations, there can be no assurance that any system of disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud or in making all material information known in a timely manner to the appropriate levels of management.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
- 52 -
Table of Contents
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information concerning our Directors required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the caption “Election of Directors” of our Proxy Statement (Proxy Statement) for the October 31, 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information concerning our Audit Committee and determination by the Board of Directors that at least one member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the caption “Audit Committee Report” of the Proxy Statement. Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of the Proxy Statement. Information concerning Executive Officers of ElkCorp is contained in Part 1 of this report in Item 4A, under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”
Code of Conduct and Ethics in Financial Reporting -
Since May 1979, we have maintained General Policy D-2, a code of conduct requiring employees to comply with laws, conduct themselves ethically and avoid improper conflicts of interest. Annually, we require our employees to report to our internal auditor on their compliance with the code of conduct. The current version of the code of conduct, which has been approved by our Board of Directors and Audit Committee, is published on our website atwww.elkcorp.com.
To supplement the code of conduct that binds each of our employees, we also have obtained a formal written commitment from each ElkCorp financial officer and our Chief Executive Officer to abide by a code of ethics setting forth standards of ethical conduct for the preparation and review of our financial statements and reports. This code is published on our website atwww.elkcorp.com, and has received the review and approval of our Board of Directors and Audit Committee.
We also have retained an independent third party to maintain a toll-free confidential “hotline” for employees to report any accounting or auditing concerns they may have. Any such concerns are reported by the third-party agency directly to the ElkCorp General Counsel, without identifying the reporting employee and without screening any accounting or auditing concerns. In turn, the General Counsel is required to report any such concerns directly to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
We intend to disclose future amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of our codes of conduct and ethics on our website atwww.elkcorp.com within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the captions “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation of Directors,” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” of the Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the caption “ElkCorp Stock Ownership” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” of the Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material under the captions “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Change-in-Control (Severance) Agreements” and “Stock/Loan Balances” of the Proxy Statement.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fee Information” of the Proxy Statement.
- 53 -
Table of Contents
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
| (a) | 1. | Financial Statements | |
| The following financial statements of the company are set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: |
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2006 and 2005
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2006 and 2005
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
| 2. | Financial Statement Schedules | ||
| Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms Schedule II — Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts | |||
| All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, are not applicable, or the information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto. | |||
| 3. | Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements | ||
| The following is a list of all executive compensation plans and arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit to this report: |
| 1. | Amended and Restated Elcor Corporation Employee Stock/Loan Plan filed as Exhibit 10.2 hereto and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 1-5341). | ||
| 2. | 2004 ElkCorp Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Compensation Plan filed as Exhibit 10.4 hereto and incorporated by reference to Exhibit B in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated September 17, 2004 (File 1-5341). | ||
| 3. | Deferred Compensation Plan filed as Exhibit 10.3 hereto and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 1-5341). | ||
| 4. | Form of Executive Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 1-5341). |
- 54 -
Table of Contents
4. Exhibits
| Number | Description of Exhibit | |
| **3.1 | The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the company, filed as Exhibit 3.1 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1994 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **3.2 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation dated December 2, 1998, filed as Exhibit 3.11 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1999 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **3.3 | Bylaws of the company, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.2 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.1 | Form of Rights Agreement dated as of July 7, 1998, between the company and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., as Rights Agent, which includes as Exhibits A and B thereto the Forms of Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Participating Preferred Stock, Rights Certificate, filed as Exhibit 4.1 in the company’s current Report on Form 8-K dated May 26, 1998 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.2 | Credit Agreement dated as of November 30, 2000 among the company, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Bank One, Texas, N.A., as Documentation Agent, First Union National Bank, as Syndication Agent, The Other Lenders Party Hereto, and Banc of America Securities LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Book Manager, filed as Exhibit 4.12 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.3 | First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 31, 2001 among the company, Bank One, N.A., as Documentation Agent, First Union National Bank, as Syndication Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.13 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.4 | Note Purchase Agreement dated as of June 1, 2002 for the sale of $120,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of Senior Notes, filed as Exhibit 4.14 in the company’s current Report on Form 8-K dated June 10, 2002 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.5 | Note Purchase Agreement dated as of March 1, 2003 for the sale of $25,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of Senior Notes, filed as Exhibit 4.15 in the company’s current Report on Form 8-K dated March 18, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.6 | Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of June 5, 2002 among the company, Bank One, N.A., as Documentation Agent, First Union National Bank, as Syndication Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.16 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.7 | Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of February 20, 2003 among the company, Bank One, N.A., as Documentation Agent, Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.17 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). |
- 55 -
Table of Contents
| Number | Description of Exhibit | |
| **4.8 | Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 7, 2003 among the company, Bank One, N.A., as Documentation Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.18 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.9 | Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of December 5, 2003 among the company, Bank One, N.A. as Documentation Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.19 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.10 | Note Purchase Agreement dated as of June 15, 2004 for the sale of $50,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of Senior Notes, filed as Exhibit 4.19 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.11 | Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of May 27, 2005 among the company, Bank One, N.A. as Documentation Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.11 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.12 | Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 12, 2005 among the company, Bank One, N.A. as Documentation Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.11 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **10.1 | Form of Executive Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **10.2 | Amended and Restated Elcor Corporation Employee Stock/Loan Plan filed as Exhibit 10.2 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **10.3 | Deferred Compensation Plan filed as Exhibit 10.4 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **10.4 | 2004 Amended and Restated ElkCorp Equity Incentive Compensation Plan filed as Exhibit B in the company’s Proxy Statement dated September 17, 2004 (File 1-5341). | |
| **10.5 | Form of Performance Stock Award Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 in the company’s current Report in Form 8-K dated December 10, 2004 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| ** 16 | PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Letter to the Commission dated September 17, 2004, filed as Exhibit 16.1 in the company’s current Report on Form 8-K dated September 13, 2004 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| * 21 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant. | |
| * 23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Grant Thornton LLP). | |
| * 23.2 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP). |
- 56 -
Table of Contents
| Number | Description of Exhibit | |
| * 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| * 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| * 32.1 | Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| * 32.2 | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| * | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a part of the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. | |
| ** | Incorporated by reference. |
- 57 -
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| ElkCorp | ||||
| Date September 6, 2006 | By /s/ Gregory J. Fisher | |||
| Gregory J. Fisher | ||||
| Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller | ||||
| By /s/ Leonard R. Harral | ||||
| Leonard R. Harral | ||||
| Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer | ||||
- 58 -
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below in multiple counterparts by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
| /s/ Thomas D. Karol | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | September 6, 2006 | ||
| /s/ Richard A. Nowak | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director | September 6, 2006 | ||
| /s/ Gregory J. Fisher | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller (Principal Financial Officer) | September 6, 2006 | ||
| /s/ Leonard R. Harral | Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer) | September 6, 2006 | ||
| /s/ James E. Hall | Director | September 6, 2006 | ||
| /s/ Dale V. Kesler | Director | September 6, 2006 | ||
| /s/ Shauna R. King | Director | September 6, 2006 | ||
| /s/ Michael L. McMahan | Director | September 6, 2006 | ||
| /s/ Steven J. Demetriou | Director | September 6, 2006 |
- 59 -
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
| **3.1 | The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the company, filed as Exhibit 3.1 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1994 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **3.2 | Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation dated December 2, 1998 filed as Exhibit 3.11 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1999 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **3.3 | Bylaws of the company, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.2 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.1 | Form of Rights Agreement dated as of July 7, 1998, between the company and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., as Rights Agent, which includes as Exhibits A and B thereto the Forms of Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Participating Preferred Stock, Rights Certificate, filed as Exhibit 4.1 in the company’s current Report on Form 8-K dated May 26, 1998 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4. 2 | Credit Agreement dated as of November 30, 2000 among the company, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Bank One, Texas, N.A., as Documentation Agent, First Union National Bank, as Syndication Agent, The Other Lenders Party Hereto, and Banc of America Securities LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Book Manager, filed as Exhibit 4.12 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.3 | First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 31, 2001 among the company, Bank One, N.A., as Documentation Agent, First Union National Bank, as Syndication Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.13 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.4 | Note Purchase Agreement dated as of June 1, 2002 for the sale of $120,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of Senior Notes, filed as Exhibit 4.14 in the company’s current Report on Form 8-K dated June 10, 2002 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.5 | Note Purchase Agreement dated as of March 1, 2003 for the sale of $25,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of Senior Notes, filed as Exhibit 4.15 in the company’s current Report on Form 8-K dated March 18, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.6 | Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of June 5, 2002 among the company, Bank One, N.A., as Documentation Agent, First Union National Bank, as Syndication Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.16 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.7 | Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of February 20, 2003 among the company, Bank One, N.A., as Documentation Agent, Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.17 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). |
Table of Contents
| **4.8 | Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 7, 2003 among the company, Bank One, N.A., as Documentation Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.18 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.9 | Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of December 5, 2003 among the company, Bank One, N.A. as Documentation Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.19 in the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.10 | Note Purchase Agreement dated as of June 15, 2004 for the sale of $50,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of Senior Notes, filed as Exhibit 4.19 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.11 | Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of May 27, 2005 among the company, Bank One, N.A. as Documentation Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.11 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **4.12 | Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 12, 2005 among the company, Bank One, N.A. as Documentation Agent, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, filed as Exhibit 4.11 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **10.1 | Form of Executive Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **10.2 | Amended and Restated Elcor Corporation Employee Stock/Loan Plan filed as Exhibit 10.2 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **10.3 | Deferred Compensation Plan filed as Exhibit 10.4 in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| **10.4 | 2004 Amended and Restated ElkCorp Equity Incentive Compensation Plan filed as Exhibit B in the company’s Proxy Statement dated September 17, 2004 (File 1-5341). | |
| **10.5 | Form of Performance Stock Award Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 in the company’s current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2004 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| ** 16 | PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Letter to the Commission dated September 17, 2004, filed as Exhibit 16.1 in the company’s current Report on Form 8-K dated September 13, 2004 (File No. 1-5341). | |
| * 21 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant. | |
| * 23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Grant Thornton LLP). | |
| * 23.2 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP). |
Table of Contents
| * 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| * 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| * 32.1 | Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| * 32.2 | Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| * | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a part of the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. | |
| ** | Incorporated by reference. |