Globe Life (GL) 10-Q 2013 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Quarter Ended September 30, 2013

Commission File Number 1-8052

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	63-0780404
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3700 South Stonebridge Drive, McKinney, Texas	75070
Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (972) 569-4000

NONE

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x            No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes  x            No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  ¨            No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding for each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date.

CLASS	OUTSTANDING AT October 25, 2013
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value	90,419,611

Index of Exhibits (Page 59).

Total number of pages included are 60.

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

INDEX

			Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Condensed Financial Statements
		Consolidated Balance Sheets		1
		Consolidated Statements of Operations		2
		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income		3
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		4
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		5
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		22
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		55
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		56
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		56
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors		59
	Item 2.	Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		59
	Item 6.	Exhibits		59

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012*
Assets	(Unaudited)
Investments:
Fixed maturities, available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2013 – $12,267,490 ; 2012 – $11,963,406)	$	12,756,917		$	13,541,193
Equity securities, at fair value (cost: 2013 – $875 ; 2012 – $14,875)		1,654			15,567
Policy loans		441,867			424,050
Other long-term investments		14,539			18,539
Short-term investments		135,988			94,860
Total investments		13,350,965			14,094,209
Cash		38,792			61,710
Accrued investment income		203,473			195,497
Other receivables		412,972			383,709
Deferred acquisition costs		3,306,417			3,198,431
Goodwill		441,591			441,591
Other assets		383,504			401,763
Total assets	$	18,137,714		$	18,776,910
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Future policy benefits	$	11,118,833		$	10,706,219
Unearned and advance premiums		78,098			76,088
Policy claims and other benefits payable		248,821			228,470
Other policyholders’ funds		94,348			93,288
Total policy liabilities		11,540,100			11,104,065
Current and deferred income taxes payable		1,272,175			1,609,828
Other liabilities		330,070			392,502
Short-term debt		227,927			319,043
Long-term debt (fair value: 2013 – $1,145,499 ; 2012 – $1,191,320)		990,566			989,686
Total liabilities		14,360,838			14,415,124
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $1 per share – Authorized 5,000,000 shares; outstanding: -0- in 2013 and in 2012		0			0
Common stock, par value $1 per share – Authorized 320,000,000 shares; outstanding: (2013 – 105,812,123 issued, less 15,058,017 held in treasury and 2012 – 105,812,123 issued, less 11,576,487 held in treasury)		105,812			105,812
Additional paid-in capital		471,566			439,782
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		237,143			925,275
Retained earnings		3,724,146			3,403,338
Treasury stock, at cost		(761,791	)		(512,421	)
Total shareholders’ equity		3,776,876			4,361,786
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	18,137,714		$	18,776,910

* Derived from audited financial statements

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited and in thousands except per share data)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenue:
Life premium	$	470,936		$	453,699		$	1,416,859		$	1,356,527
Health premium		279,948			246,000			884,403			766,950
Other premium		114			161			401			440
Total premium		750,998			699,860			2,301,663			2,123,917
Net investment income		176,656			169,400			531,459			518,697
Realized investment gains (losses)		4,459			7,283			9,143			16,950
Other-than-temporary impairments		0			0			(2,678	)		0
Other income		676			557			1,757			1,254
Total revenue		932,789			877,100			2,841,344			2,660,818
Benefits and expenses:
Life policyholder benefits		305,931			295,845			921,921			879,317
Health policyholder benefits		199,983			172,130			638,971			564,259
Other policyholder benefits		10,869			11,144			32,393			32,997
Total policyholder benefits		516,783			479,119			1,593,285			1,476,573
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs		98,444			94,016			302,646			287,115
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition costs		53,791			46,898			166,490			148,254
Other operating expense		53,245			48,433			160,845			144,307
Interest expense		19,676			19,843			61,381			59,163
Total benefits and expenses		741,939			688,309			2,284,647			2,115,412
Income before income taxes		190,850			188,791			556,697			545,406
Income taxes		(58,728	)		(58,119	)		(171,042	)		(167,069	)
Net income	$	132,122		$	130,672		$	385,655		$	378,337
Basic net income per share	$	1.45		$	1.37		$	4.18		$	3.89
Diluted net income per share	$	1.43		$	1.36		$	4.12		$	3.84
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.17		$	0.15		$	0.51		$	0.45

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited and in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net income	$	132,122		$	130,672		$	385,655		$	378,337
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period		(152,039	)		352,906			(1,077,967	)		631,743
Less: reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses on securities included in net income		(4,520	)		(6,900	)		(7,871	)		(16,609	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for amortization of (discount) and premium		(1,478	)		1,348			(4,939	)		1,224
Less: foreign exchange adjustment on securities marked to market		(4,097	)		(6,966	)		6,036			(6,569	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities		(162,134	)		340,388			(1,084,741	)		609,789
Unrealized gains (losses) on other assets		1,754			1,814			(1,115	)		2,828
Total unrealized gains (losses)		(160,380	)		342,202			(1,085,856	)		612,617
Less applicable taxes		56,150			(119,771	)		381,262			(214,417	)
Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax		(104,230	)		222,431			(704,594	)		398,200
Unrealized gains (losses) attributable to deferred acquisition costs		2,565			(1,219	)		13,128			5,352
Less applicable taxes		(898	)		427			(4,595	)		(1,873	)
Unrealized gains (losses) attributable to deferred acquisition costs, net of tax		1,667			(792	)		8,533			3,479
Foreign exchange translation adjustments		4,138			3,707			(1,698	)		3,619
Less applicable taxes		(1,324	)		(1,154	)		686			(1,265	)
Foreign exchange translation adjustments, net of tax		2,814			2,553			(1,012	)		2,354
Amortization of pension costs		4,605			3,569			13,756			10,678
Less applicable taxes		(1,613	)		(1,250	)		(4,815	)		(3,737	)
Amortization of pension costs, net of tax		2,992			2,319			8,941			6,941
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(96,757	)		226,511			(688,132	)		410,974
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	35,365		$	357,183		$	(302,477	)	$	789,311

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited and in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Cash provided from operations	$	771,003		$	697,668
Cash provided from (used for) investment activities:
Long-term investments sold or matured:
Fixed maturities available for sale—sold		78,751			148,597
Fixed maturities available for sale—matured, called, and repaid		453,216			624,815
Equities and other long-term investments		14,067			1,525
Total long-term investments sold or matured		546,034			774,937
Long -term investments acquired:
Fixed maturities		(792,562	)		(747,008	)
Other long-term investments		(571	)		(1,750	)
Total long-term investments acquired		(793,133	)		(748,758	)
Net increase in policy loans		(17,817	)		(16,297	)
Net (increase) decrease in short-term investments		(41,128	)		(364,781	)
Net change in payable or receivable for securities		(43,989	)		12,496
Disposition of properties		557			56
Additions to properties		(4,364	)		(3,856	)
Investment in low-income housing interests		(34,463	)		(62,453	)
Cash used for investment activities		(388,303	)		(408,656	)
Cash provided from (used for) financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		73,122			138,308
Repayment of 7.375% Notes		(94,050	)		0
Proceeds from issuance of 3.8% Senior Notes		0			150,000
Proceeds from issuance of 5 7/8% Junior Notes		0			125,000
Issue expenses of debt offerings		0			(7,101	)
Net borrowings (repayments) of commercial paper		2,840			946
Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises		14,669			14,651
Acquisition of treasury stock		(342,680	)		(466,099	)
Cash dividends paid to shareholders		(45,487	)		(41,293	)
Net receipts (withdrawals) from deposit product operations		(16,734	)		11,141
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities		(408,320	)		(74,447	)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash		2,702			153
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(22,918	)		214,718
Cash at beginning of year		61,710			84,113
Cash at end of period	$	38,792		$	298,831

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note A—Accounting Policies

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Therefore, they do not include all of the annual disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). However, in the opinion of management, these statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position at September 30, 2013, and the consolidated results of operations, comprehensive income, and cash flows for the periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The interim period condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with theConsolidated Financial Statements that are included in the Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2013.

Note B—Earnings Per Share

A reconciliation of basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding is as follows.

	For the three months ended September 30,				For the nine months ended September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		91,269,169		95,125,843		92,339,971		97,355,334
Weighted average dilutive options outstanding		1,404,205		1,216,279		1,318,386		1,282,764
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		92,673,374		96,342,122		93,658,357		98,638,098
Antidilutive shares		0		0		35,000		0

5

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note C—Postretirement Benefit Plans

The following tables present a summary of post-retirement benefit costs by component.

Components of Post-Retirement Benefit Costs

	Three Months ended September 30,
	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	2013			2012			2013		2012
Service cost	$	3,746		$	2,928		$	69	$	81
Interest cost		4,260			4,100			258		254
Expected return on assets		(4,357	)		(4,242	)		0		0
Prior service cost		569			516			0		0
Net actuarial (gain)/loss		4,060			3,434			74		0
Net periodic benefit cost	$	8,278		$	6,736		$	401	$	335

	Nine Months ended September 30,
	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	2013			2012			2013		2012
Service cost	$	11,238		$	8,309		$	271	$	325
Interest cost		12,783			12,397			775		767
Expected return on assets		(13,072	)		(12,479	)		0		0
Prior service cost		1,707			1,547			0		0
Net actuarial (gain)/loss		12,184			9,392			149		0
Net periodic benefit cost	$	24,840		$	19,166		$	1,195	$	1,092

6

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note C—Postretirement Benefit Plans (continued)

The following chart presents assets at fair value for the defined-benefit pension plans at September 30, 2013 and the prior-year end.

Pension Assets by Component

		September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
		Amount	%		Amount	%
Corporate debt	$	159,000	55.9	$	169,817	61.2
Other fixed maturities		275	0.1		327	0.1
Equity securities		104,076	36.6		89,833	32.4
Short-term investments		5,448	1.9		2,218	0.8
Guaranteed annuity contract		13,169	4.6		13,277	4.8
Other		2,567	0.9		2,169	0.7
Total	$	284,535	100.0	$	277,641	100.0

The liability for the funded defined-benefit pension plans was $359 million at September 30, 2013 and $353 million at December 31, 2012. Cash contributions in the amount of $9 million were made to the qualified pension plans during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Torchmark does not expect to make any additional cash contributions during the remainder of 2013. With respect to the Company’s non-qualified supplemental retirement plan, life insurance policies on the lives of plan participants have been established with an unaffiliated carrier to fund a portion of the Company’s obligations under the plan. These policies, as well as investments deposited with an unaffiliated trustee, were previously placed in a Rabbi Trust to provide for payment of the plan obligations. At September 30, 2013, the combined value of the insurance policies and investments in the Rabbi Trust to support plan liabilities were $63 million, compared with $54 million at year end 2012. This plan is unqualified. Therefore, the value of the insurance policies and investments are recorded as other assets in theConsolidated Balance Sheets and are not included in the chart of plan assets above. The liability for the unqualified pension plan was $61 million at September 30, 2013 and $59 million at December 31, 2012.

7

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note D—Investments

Portfolio Composition:

A summary of fixed maturities and equity securities available for sale by cost or amortized cost and estimated fair value at September 30, 2013 is as follows.

Portfolio Composition as of September 30, 2013

	Cost or Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		% of Total Fixed Maturities*
Fixed maturities available for sale:
Bonds:
U.S. Government direct, guaranteed, and government-sponsored enterprises	$	449,177	$	414	$	(55,301	)	$	394,290		3	%
States, municipalities, and political subdivisions		1,277,916		84,528		(10,428	)		1,352,016		11
Foreign governments		31,161		521		(46	)		31,636		0
Corporates		9,882,319		748,720		(278,103	)		10,352,936		81
Collateralized debt obligations		67,950		0		(14,877	)		53,073		1
Other asset-backed securities		36,113		2,592		(277	)		38,428		0
Redeemable preferred stocks		522,854		28,423		(16,739	)		534,538		4
Total fixed maturities		12,267,490		865,198		(375,771	)		12,756,917		100	%
Equity securities		875		779		0			1,654
Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	12,268,365	$	865,977	$	(375,771	)	$	12,758,571

* At fair value

8

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note D—Investments (continued)

A schedule of fixed maturities by contractual maturity date at September 30, 2013 is shown below on an amortized cost basis and on a fair value basis. Actual maturity dates could differ from contractual maturities due to call or prepayment provisions.

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Fixed maturities available for sale:
Due in one year or less	$	106,594	$	108,669
Due from one to five years		500,210		547,597
Due from five to ten years		908,195		983,269
Due from ten to twenty years		2,923,264		3,166,802
Due after twenty years		7,721,773		7,855,364
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities		107,454		95,216
	$	12,267,490	$	12,756,917

Selected information about sales of fixed maturities is as follows.

For the nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Proceeds from sales	$	78,751		$	148,597
Gross realized gains		4,310			12,606
Gross realized losses		(788	)		(240	)

9

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note D—Investments (continued)

Fair Value Measurements:

The following table represents assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2013 Using:

Description	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Total Fair Value
Fixed maturities available for sale:
Bonds:
U.S. Government direct, guaranteed, and government-sponsored enterprises	$	0		$	394,290		$	0		$	394,290
States, municipalities, and political subdivisions		0			1,352,016			0			1,352,016
Foreign governments		0			31,636			0			31,636
Corporates		53,532			10,059,649			239,755			10,352,936
Collateralized debt obligations		0			0			53,073			53,073
Other asset-backed securities		0			38,428			0			38,428
Redeemable preferred stocks		22,320			512,218			0			534,538
Total fixed maturities		75,852			12,388,237			292,828			12,756,917
Equity securities		878			0			776			1,654
Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	76,730		$	12,388,237		$	293,604		$	12,758,571
Percent of total		0.6	%		97.1	%		2.3	%		100.0	%

As of September 30, 2013, fair value measurements classified as Level 3 represented 2.3% of total fixed maturities and equity securities, compared with 2.1% at December 31, 2012.

10

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note D—Investments (continued)

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments:

During the early part of 2013, Torchmark wrote down investment real estate in the amount of $2.7 million pretax ($1.7 million after tax) because of other-than-temporary impairment. In the third quarter of 2013, this real estate was sold for an additional pretax loss of $245 thousand ($159 thousand after tax). There were no additional other-than-temporary impairments during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013 or 2012.

Unrealized Loss Analysis:

The following table discloses unrealized investment losses by class of investment at September 30, 2013. Torchmark considers these investments not to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

Analysis of Gross Unrealized Investment Losses

At September 30, 2013

	Less than Twelve Months					Twelve Months or Longer					Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Fixed maturities available for sale:
Bonds:
U.S. Government direct, guaranteed, and government-sponsored enterprises	$	371,080	$	(55,299	)	$	127	$	(2	)	$	371,207	$	(55,301	)
States, municipalities and political subdivisions		145,656		(10,428	)		0		0			145,656		(10,428	)
Foreign governments		10,612		(46	)		0		0			10,612		(46	)
Corporates		2,746,725		(234,356	)		280,220		(43,747	)		3,026,945		(278,103	)
Collateralized debt obligations		125		0			52,948		(14,877	)		53,073		(14,877	)
Other asset-backed securities		6,790		(210	)		3,961		(67	)		10,751		(277	)
Redeemable preferred stocks		110,365		(4,284	)		71,948		(12,455	)		182,313		(16,739	)
Total fixed maturities		3,391,353		(304,623	)		409,204		(71,148	)		3,800,557		(375,771	)
Equity securities		0		0			0		0			0		0
Total fixed maturities and equity securities	$	3,391,353	$	(304,623	)	$	409,204	$	(71,148	)	$	3,800,557	$	(375,771	)

11

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note D—Investments (continued)

Additional information about investments in an unrealized loss position is as follows.

	Less than Twelve Months		Twelve Months or Longer		Total
Number of issues (Cusip numbers) held:
As of September 30, 2013		466		73		539
As of December 31, 2012		195		95		290

Torchmark’s entire fixed-maturity and equity portfolio consisted of 1,615 issues at September 30, 2013 and 1,630 issues at December 31, 2012. The weighted average quality rating of all unrealized loss positions as of September 30, 2013 was BBB+. Even though Torchmark’s fixed-maturity investments are available for sale, Torchmark’s management generally does not intend to sell and does not believe it will be required to sell any securities which are temporarily impaired before they recover due to the strong and stable cash flows generated by its insurance products.

Torchmark’s balances related to bifurcated credit loss positions included in accumulated other comprehensive income were $22 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, with no change to this balance during the period.

12

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note E—Supplemental Information about Changes to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

An analysis in the change in balance by component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income is as follows for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

	For the three months ended September 30, 2013
	Available for Sale Assets			Deferred Acquisition Costs			Foreign Exchange			Pension Adjustments			Total
Balance at July 1, 2013	$	424,003		$	(9,551	)	$	22,782		$	(103,334	)	$	333,900
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		(100,348	)		1,667			2,814			0			(95,867	)
Reclassifications		(3,882	)		0			0			2,992			(890	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(104,230	)		1,667			2,814			2,992			(96,757	)
Balance at September 30, 2013	$	319,773		$	(7,884	)	$	25,596		$	(100,342	)	$	237,143
	For the nine months ended September 30, 2013
	Available for Sale Assets			Deferred Acquisition Costs			Foreign Exchange			Pension Adjustments			Total
Balance at January 1, 2013	$	1,024,367		$	(16,417	)	$	26,608		$	(109,283	)	$	925,275
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		(697,480	)		8,533			(1,012	)		0			(689,959	)
Reclassifications		(7,114	)		0			0			8,941			1,827
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(704,594	)		8,533			(1,012	)		8,941			(688,132	)
Balance at September 30, 2013	$	319,773		$	(7,884	)	$	25,596		$	(100,342	)	$	237,143

13

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note E—Supplemental Information about Changes to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (continued)

Reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income are presented below for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Reclassification Adjustments

Component Line Item	Three months ended September 30, 2013			Nine months ended September 30,  2013			Affected line items in the Statement of Operations
Unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale assets:
Realized (gains) losses	$	(4,520	)	$	(7,871	)	Realized investment gains (losses)
Amortization of (discount) premium		(1,478	)		(4,939	)	Net investment income
Total before tax		(5,998	)		(12,810	)
Tax		2,116			5,696		Income Taxes
Total after tax		(3,882	)		(7,114	)
Pension adjustments:
Amortization of prior service cost		569			1,707		Other operating expenses
Amortization of actuarial gain (loss)		4,036			12,049		Other operating expenses
Total before tax		4,605			13,756
Tax		(1,613	)		(4,815	)	Income Taxes
Total after tax		2,992			8,941
Total reclassifications (after tax)	$	(890	)	$	1,827

14

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

NOTE F—Business Segments

Torchmark is comprised of life insurance companies which primarily market individual life and supplemental health insurance products through niche distribution systems to middle income Americans. To a limited extent, the Company also markets fixed annuities. Torchmark’s core operations are insurance marketing and underwriting, and management of its investments. Insurance marketing and underwriting is segmented by the types of insurance products offered: life, health, and annuity. Management’s measure of profitability for each insurance segment is insurance underwriting margin, which is underwriting income before other income and insurance administrative expenses. It represents the profit margin on insurance products before administrative expenses, and is calculated by deducting net policy obligations (claims incurred and change in reserves), commissions and other acquisition expenses from premium revenue. Torchmark further views the profitability of each insurance product segment by the marketing groups that distribute the products of that segment: direct response, independent, or captive agencies.

The investment segment includes the management of the investment portfolio, debt, and cash flow. Management’s measure of profitability for this segment is excess investment income, which is the income earned on the investment portfolio less the required interest on net policy liabilities and financing costs. Financing costs include the interest on Torchmark’s debt. Other income and insurance administrative expense are classified in a separate “Other” segment.

The majority of the Company’s required interest on net policy liabilities (benefit reserves less the deferred acquisition cost asset) is not credited to policyholder accounts. Instead, it is an actuarial assumption for discounting cash flows in the computation of benefit reserves and the amortization of the deferred acquisition cost asset. Required interest related to the net policy liabilities is not included in the various insurance underwriting segments but is shown in the investment segment as a reduction to net investment income. We believe this presentation facilitates a more meaningful analysis of the Company’s underwriting and investment performance as the underwriting results are based on premiums, claims, and expenses and are not affected by unanticipated fluctuations in investment yields.

As noted, Torchmark’s “core operations” are insurance and investment management. The insurance segments issue policies for which premiums are collected for the eventual payment of policy benefits. In addition to policy benefits, operating expenses are incurred including acquisition costs, administrative expenses, and taxes. Because life and health contracts can be long term, premium receipts in excess of

15

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

NOTE F—Business Segments (continued)

current expenses are invested. Investment activities, conducted by the investment segment, focus on seeking quality investments with a yield and term appropriate to support the insurance product obligations. These investments generally consist of fixed maturities, and, over the long term, the expected yields are taken into account when setting insurance premium rates and product profitability expectations. As a result, fixed maturities are generally held for long periods to support the liabilities, and Torchmark generally expects to hold investments until maturity. Dispositions of investments occur from time to time, generally as a result of credit concerns, calls by issuers, or other factors usually beyond the control of management.

Dispositions are sometimes required in order to maintain the Company’s investment policies and objectives. Investments are also occasionally written down as a result of other-than-temporary impairment. Torchmark does not actively trade investments. As a result, realized gains and losses from the disposition and write down of investments are generally incidental to operations and are not considered a material factor in insurance pricing or product profitability. While from time to time these realized gains and losses could be significant to net income in the period in which they occur, they generally have a limited effect on the yield of the total investment portfolio. Further, because the proceeds of the disposals are reinvested in the portfolio, the disposals have little effect on the size of the portfolio and the income from the reinvestments is included in net investment income. Therefore, management removes realized investment gains and losses from results of core operations when evaluating the performance of the Company. For this reason, these gains and losses are excluded from Torchmark’s operating segments.

Torchmark accounts for its stock options and restricted stock under current accounting guidance requiring stock options and stock grants to be expensed based on fair value at the time of grant. Management considers stock compensation expense to be an expense of the Parent Company. Therefore, stock compensation expense is treated as a corporate expense in Torchmark’s segment analysis.

Torchmark provides coverage under the Medicare Part D prescription drug plan for Medicare beneficiaries. In accordance with GAAP, Part D premiums are recognized evenly throughout the year when they become due but benefit costs are recognized when the costs are incurred. Due to the design of the Part D product, premiums are evenly distributed throughout the year, but benefit costs are higher earlier in the year. As a result, under GAAP, benefit costs can exceed premiums in the first part of the year,

16

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

NOTE F—Business Segments (continued)

but be less than premiums during the remainder of the year. In order to more closely match the benefit cost with the associated revenue for interim periods, Torchmark defers these excess benefits for segment reporting purposes. In addition, GAAP recognizes in each quarter a government risk-sharing premium adjustment consistent with the contract as if the quarter represented an entire contract period. These quarterly risk-sharing adjustments are removed in the segment analysis because the actual contract payments are based upon the experience of the full contract year, not the experience of interim periods. For the entire year, Torchmark expects its benefit ratio to be in line with pricing and does not expect to receive any government risk-sharing premium. For the full year of 2012, the total premiums and benefits were the same under this alternative method as they were under GAAP and are expected to be essentially the same in 2013. The Company’s presentation results in the underwriting margin percentage of each interim period reflecting the expected margin percentage for the full year.

An analysis of the adjustments for the difference in the interim results as presented for segment purposes and GAAP for Medicare Part D is as follows.

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Benefit costs deferred	$	21,279		$	25,047
Government risk-sharing premium adjustment		(8,706	)		(6,125	)
Pre-tax addition to segment interim period income	$	12,573		$	18,922
After tax amount	$	8,172		$	12,299

Torchmark has invested in various limited partnerships that provide investment returns through the provision of low-income housing tax credits and other related Federal income tax benefits to the Company. The investment returns from a portion of the interests are guaranteed by unrelated third-parties. Under GAAP, expenses associated with the amortization of the guaranteed interests are required to be reflected in income tax expense. In contrast, GAAP requires the expenses associated with the amortization of non-guaranteed interests to be reflected as a component of “Net investment income.” All of the investment returns from investing in these guaranteed and non-guaranteed limited partnerships interests are in the form of income tax benefits reflected in income tax expense. Management believes including the amortization

17

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

NOTE F—Business Segments (continued)

expense associated with the non-guaranteed as well as the guaranteed interests in income tax expense provides a more appropriate matching of the expense with the related income. For this reason, amortization expense of the non-guaranteed interests is included in “Income taxes” and not “Net investment income” for segment reporting purposes.

During 2013, Torchmark incurred four non-operating charges: (1) a state guaranty fund assessment in the amount of $1.2 million ($751 thousand after tax), resulting from events in years prior to 2012, (2) a legal settlement related to a non-insurance matter in the amount of $500 thousand ($325 thousand after tax), (3) the settlement of a litigation matter related to prior years in the amount of $8.6 million ($5.6 million after tax), and (4) a one-time adjustment related to the finalization of accounting for the insurance assets and liabilities of the Family Heritage Life Insurance Company of America (Family Heritage) acquisition which closed on November 1, 2012. This adjustment increased after-tax earnings in the amount of $522 thousand. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2012, Torchmark incurred $615 thousand of expenses ($400 thousand after tax) in connection with the Family Heritage acquisition.

The 2013 Family Heritage adjustment was included in its pretax amount of $1.5 million under the caption “Amortization of deferred acquisition costs” in theConsolidated Statements of Operations. The $8.6 million litigation matter in 2013 was recorded as an increase in “Health policyholder benefits” expense. The remaining items above are included in “Other operating expense” in those statements. The Company removes items related to prior years and non-operating items such as all of the above items when analyzing its segment profitability, because management does not view such items as part of its core insurance operating results.

The following tables total the components of Torchmark’s operating segments and reconcile these operating results to its pretax income and each significant line item in its Consolidated Statements of Operations.

18

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

NOTE F—Business Segments (continued)

Reconciliation of Segment Operating Information to the Consolidated Statement of Operations

	For the nine months ended September 30, 2013
	Life			Health			Annuity			Investment			Other & Corporate			Adjustments			Consolidated
Revenue:
Premium	$	1,416,859		$	875,697		$	401								$	8,706	(1)	$	2,301,663
Net investment income										$	550,015						(18,556	)(4)		531,459
Other income													$	1,970			(213	)(3)		1,757
Total revenue		1,416,859			875,697			401			550,015			1,970			(10,063	)		2,834,879
Expenses:
Policy benefits		921,921			609,067			32,393									29,904	(1,6)		1,593,285
Required interest on:
Policy reserves		(379,163	)		(44,602	)		(43,298	)		467,063									0
Deferred acquisition costs		123,599			17,503			1,399			(142,501	)								0
Amortization of acquisition costs		243,259			54,051			6,855									(1,519	)(7)		302,646
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition costs		99,398			67,259			46									(213	)(3)		166,490
Insurance administrative expense(2)														133,080			1,155	(5)		134,235
Parent expense														6,734			500	(6)		7,234
Stock compensation expense														19,376						19,376
Interest expense											61,381									61,381
Total expenses		1,009,014			703,278			(2,605	)		385,943			159,190			29,827			2,284,647
Subtotal		407,845			172,419			3,006			164,072			(157,220	)		(39,890	)		550,232
Nonoperating items																	21,334	(1,5,6,7)		21,334
Amortization of low-income housing																	18,556	(4)		18,556
Measure of segment profitability (pretax)	$	407,845		$	172,419		$	3,006		$	164,072		$	(157,220	)	$	0			590,122
Deduct applicable income taxes																				(193,109	)
Segment profits after tax																				397,013

Add back income taxes applicable to segment profitability		193,109
Add (deduct) realized investment gains (losses)		6,465
Deduct Part D adjustment(1)		(12,573	)
Deduct amortization of low-income housing(4)		(18,556	)
Deduct Guaranty Fund Assessment(5)		(1,155	)
Deduct legal settlement expenses(6)		(9,125	)
Add Family Heritage Life acquisition adjustments(7)		1,519
Pretax income from continuing operations perConsolidated Statement of Operations	$	556,697

(1) Medicare Part D items adjusted to GAAP from the segment analysis, which matches expected benefits with policy premium.

(2) Administrative expense is not allocated to insurance segments.

(3) Elimination of intersegment commission.

(4) Amortization of low-income housing expense, considered a component of income tax expense in the segment analysis.

(5) Guaranty Fund Assessment.

(6) Legal settlement expenses.

(7) Family Heritage Life acquisition adjustments.

19

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

NOTE F—Business Segments (continued)

Reconciliation of Segment Operating Information to the Consolidated Statement of Operations

	For the nine months ended September 30, 2012
	Life			Health			Annuity			Investment			Other & Corporate			Adjustments			Consolidated
Revenue:
Premium	$	1,356,527		$	760,825		$	440								$	6,125	(1)	$	2,123,917
Net investment income										$	535,325						(16,628	)(2,5)		518,697
Other income													$	1,501			(247	)(4)		1,254
Total revenue		1,356,527			760,825			440			535,325			1,501			(10,750	)		2,643,868
Expenses:
Policy benefits		879,317			539,212			32,997									25,047	(1)		1,476,573
Required interest on:
Policy reserves		(360,454	)		(28,242	)		(44,690	)		433,386									0
Deferred acquisition costs		122,453			13,710			1,721			(137,884	)								0
Amortization of acquisition costs		231,926			47,536			7,653												287,115
Commissions, premium taxes, and non-deferred acquisition costs		102,696			45,752			53									(247	)(4)		148,254
Insurance administrative expense(3)														120,942						120,942
Parent expense														6,203			615	(6)		6,818
Stock compensation expense														16,547						16,547
Interest expense											58,965						198	(2)		59,163
Total expenses		975,938			617,968			(2,266	)		354,467			143,692			25,613			2,115,412
Subtotal		380,589			142,857			2,706			180,858			(142,191	)		(36,363	)		528,456
Nonoperating items																	19,537	(1,6)		19,537
Amortization of low-income housing																	16,826	(5)		16,826
Measure of segment profitability (pretax)	$	380,589		$	142,857		$	2,706		$	180,858		$	(142,191	)	$	0			564,819
Deduct applicable income taxes																				(184,800	)
Segment profits after tax																				380,019

Add back income taxes applicable to segment profitability		184,800
Add (deduct) realized investment gains (losses)		16,950
Deduct Part D adjustment(1)		(18,922	)
Deduct amortization of low-income housing(5)		(16,826	)
Deduct Family Heritage Life acquisition expense(6)		(615	)
Pretax income from continuing operations perConsolidated Statement of Operations	$	545,406

(1) Medicare Part D items adjusted to GAAP from the segment analysis, which matches expected benefits with policy premium.

(2) Reclassification of interest amount due to accounting rule requiring deconsolidation of Trust Preferred Securities. Management views the Trust Preferreds as consolidated debt.

(3) Administrative expense is not allocated to insurance segments.

(4) Elimination of intersegment commission.

(5) Amortization of low-income housing expense, considered a component of income tax expense in the segment analysis.

(6) Family Heritage Life acquisition expense.

20

TORCHMARK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)

Note F—Business Segments (continued)

The following table summarizes the measures of segment profitability for comparison. It also reconciles segment profits to net income.

Analysis of Profitability by Segment

	Nine months ended September 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2013			2012			Amount			%
Life insurance	$	407,845		$	380,589		$	27,256			7
Health insurance		172,419			142,857			29,562			21
Annuity		3,006			2,706			300
Investment		164,072			180,858			(16,786	)		(9	)
Other and corporate:
Other income		1,970			1,501			469			31
Administrative expense		(133,080	)		(120,942	)		(12,138	)		10
Corporate		(26,110	)		(22,750	)		(3,360	)		15
Pretax total		590,122			564,819			25,303			4
Applicable taxes		(193,109	)		(184,800	)		(8,309	)		4
Total		397,013			380,019			16,994			4
Reconciling items, net of tax:
Realized gains (losses)–Investments		2,974			11,017			(8,043	)
Part D adjustment		(8,172	)		(12,299	)		4,127
Family Heritage acquisition adjustments and expense		522			(400	)		922
Guaranty fund assessment		(751	)		0			(751	)
Legal settlement expenses		(5,931	)		0			(5,931	)
Net income	$	385,655		$	378,337		$	7,318			2

21

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations

Acquisition. On November 1, 2012, Torchmark acquired Family Heritage Life Insurance Company of America (Family Heritage), a specialty insurer focused primarily on selling individual supplemental health insurance products through a captive agency force. The results of Family Heritage subsequent to our acquisition are included in this discussion primarily within our health insurance segment.

Summary of Operations. Torchmark’s operations are segmented into its insurance underwriting and investment operations as described inNote F—Business Segments. The measures of profitability described inNote Fare useful in evaluating the performance of the segments and the marketing groups within each insurance segment, because each of our distribution units operates in a niche market. These measures enable management to view period-to-period trends, and to make informed decisions regarding future courses of action.

The tables inNote F—Business Segments demonstrate how the measures of profitability are determined. Those tables also reconcile our revenues and expenses by segment to major income statement line items for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. Additionally, a table in that note,Analysis of Profitability by Segment, provides a summary of the profitability measures that demonstrates year-to-year comparability and reconciles those measures to our net income. That summary represents our overall operations in the manner that management views the business, and is a basis of the following highlights discussion.

A discussion of operations by each segment follows later in this report. These discussions compare the first nine months of 2013 with the same period of 2012, unless otherwise noted. The following discussions are presented in the manner we view our operations, as described inNote F—Business Segments.

Highlights, comparing the first nine months of 2013 with the first nine months of 2012. Net income per diluted share increased 7% to $4.12 from $3.84. Included in net income in 2013 were after-tax realized investment gains of $3 million ($.03 per share) compared with gains of $11 million or $.11 per share in 2012. Realized investment gains and losses are presented more fully under the captionRealized Gains and Losses in this report.

We use three statistical measures as indicators of future premium growth: “annualized premium in force,” “net sales,” and “first-year collected premium.” Annualized premium in force is defined as the premium income that would be received over the following twelve months at any given date on all active policies if those policies remain in force throughout the twelve-month period. Annualized premium in force is an

22

indicator of potential growth in premium revenue. Net sales is defined as annualized premium issued, net of cancellations in the first thirty days after issue, except for Direct Response, where net sales is annualized premium issued at the time the first full premium is paid after any introductory offer has expired. Annualized premium issued is the gross premium that would be received during the policies’ first year in force, assuming that none of the policies lapsed or terminated. Although lapses and terminations will occur, we believe that net sales is a useful indicator of the rate of acceleration of premium growth. First-year collected premium is the premium collected during the reporting period for all policies in their first policy year. First-year collected premium takes lapses into account in the first policy year when lapses are more likely to occur, and thus is a useful indicator of how much new premium is expected to be added to premium income in the future.

Total premium income rose 8% in 2013 to $2.3 billion. Total net sales declined 5% to $353 million. After removing the impact of sales of Medicare Part D, which increased significantly in 2012 as a result of the addition of automatic enrollees discussed later in this report, net sales rose 8% to $327 million. Additionally, if the net sales of Family Heritage were excluded, net sales would have declined 3% to $294 million. First-year collected premium was $323 million for the 2013 period, compared with $348 million for the 2012 period. Excluding Part D and Family Heritage, there was a 1% increase in first year premium.

Life insurance premium income grew 4% to $1.4 billion. Life net sales declined 2% to $256 million. First-year collected life premium gained 1% to $194 million. Life underwriting margins increased 7% to $408 million.

Health insurance premium income, excluding Medicare Part D, rose 23% or $122 million to $649 million. The addition of Family Heritage accounted for $142 million of the 2013 premium. Health net sales, excluding Part D, rose 65% to $71 million for the nine months, as a result of the inclusion of Family Heritage health sales of $32 million. First-year collected health premium, excluding Part D, also rose 65% to $75 million for the period. Again, the increase resulted primarily from the addition of Family Heritage health first-year premium of $27 million.

Our Medicare Part D prescription drug business is a component of the health insurance segment. In the manner we view our Medicare Part D business as described inNote F—Business Segments, policyholder premium was $227 million in 2013 compared with $234 million in 2012, a decline of 3%. As discussed under the captionHealth Insurance in this report, we expect a slight decline in Part D premium in the full year 2013. However, we qualified to receive new automatic enrollees in 15 regions for the plan year 2014, compared with 7 regions in 2013, which should result in increases in Part D sales and premium in 2014.

As explained inNote F—Business Segments, differences in our estimate of interim results for Medicare Part D as we view this product for segment purposes and GAAP financial statement purposes resulted in a $8 million after-tax charge to earnings

23

in 2013 ($.09 per share) and a $12 million charge in 2012 ($.12 per share). We expect our 2013 full year benefit ratios to be approximately the same as those for interim periods, as was the case in 2012 and prior years. For this reason, there should be no difference in our segment versus financial statement reporting by year end 2013, as it relates to Medicare Part D. The decline in this adjustment in 2013 resulted primarily from an increase in the amount of government risk-sharing premium recognized in 2013 due to a change in plan design.

Excess investment income per diluted share decreased 4% in 2013 to $1.75 from $1.83, while the dollar amount of excess investment income declined 9% to $164 million. The lower decrease in per share excess investment income in relation to the decline in dollar amount resulted from share purchases over the past twelve months, as discussed later in this report. Net investment income rose $15 million or 3% to $550 million, even though our average investment portfolio at amortized cost grew 10%, as a result of a decline in average yields. The average effective yield on the fixed-maturity portfolio, which represented 95% of our investments at amortized cost, decreased to 5.95% in the 2013 period from 6.42% in the prior period. This decrease in yield was primarily due to lower new money rates and a large number of calls of bank-issued hybrid securities, as discussed under the captionInvestments (excess investment income) later in this report. Excess investment income declined despite the $15 million increase in net investment income. This decline was primarily caused by the $29 million, or 10%, increase in required interest on net insurance policy liabilities. Financing costs also rose 4% in the period to $61 million, as a result of increased average long-term debt outstanding in the 2013 period. Please refer to the discussion underCapital Resources for more information on debt and interest expense.

In the first nine months of 2013, we invested new money in our fixed-maturity portfolio at an effective annual yield on new investments of 4.37%, compared with 4.54% in the same period of 2012. Our fixed maturity portfolio yield was 5.91% as of September 30, 2013 and the portfolio had an average rating of A-. Approximately 95% of the portfolio at amortized cost was investment grade at September 30, 2013. Cash and short-term investments were $175 million at that date, compared with $157 million at December 31, 2012.

During the third quarter of 2013, we repaid the $94 million par amount of our 7.375% Notes upon its maturity. This debt was repaid with liquid funds in the Parent Company.

The net unrealized gain position in our fixed-maturity portfolio declined from $1.6 billion at December 31, 2012 to $490 million during the first nine months of 2013, largely due to an increase in market interest rates during 2013. The fixed maturity portfolio was rated A- at September 30, 2013, the same as at the previous year end. The fixed-maturity portfolio contains no commercial mortgage-backed securities or securities backed by subprime or Alt-A mortgages (loans for which some of the typical documentation was not provided by the borrower). We are not a

24

party to any counterparty risk, with no credit default swaps or other derivative contracts. We do not engage in securities lending, and have only insignificant exposure to European sovereign debt consisting of $11 million in German bonds.

Insurance administrative expenses rose 10% to $133 million, largely due to the addition of Family Heritage’s expenses and increased pension costs.

We have an on-going share repurchase program which began in 1986 and was reaffirmed by the Board of Directors at their August, 2013 meeting. With no specified authorization amount, we determine the amount of repurchases based on the amount of our excess cash flow, general market conditions, and other alternative uses. These purchases are made at the Parent with excess cash flow. Share purchases are also made with the proceeds from option exercises by current and former employees, in order to reduce dilution. The following chart summarizes share purchases for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Analysis of Share Purchases

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2013						2012
	Shares		Amount		Average Price		Shares		Amount		Average Price
Purchases with:
Excess cash flow		4,246	$	265,134	$	62.44		6,635	$	318,227	$	47.96
Option exercise proceeds		1,267		77,686		61.29		3,091		147,872		47.84
Total		5,513	$	342,820	$	62.18		9,726	$	466,099	$	47.92

Throughout the remainder of this discussion, share purchases will only refer to those made from excess cash flow.

A detailed discussion of our operations by component segment follows.

Life insurance, comparing the first nine months of 2013 with the first nine months of 2012. Life insurance is our predominant segment, representing 62% of premium income and 70% of insurance underwriting margin in the first nine months of 2013. In addition, investments supporting the reserves for life business generate the majority of excess investment income attributable to the investment segment. Life insurance premium income increased 4% to $1.4 billion. The following table presents Torchmark’s life insurance premium by distribution method.

25

Life Insurance

Premium by Distribution Method

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,								Increase
	2013				2012				(Decrease)
	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount			%
American Income Exclusive Agency	$	533,348		38	$	492,381		36	$	40,967			8
Direct Response		501,333		35		476,888		35		24,445			5
Liberty National Exclusive Agency		208,369		15		212,552		16		(4,183	)		(2	)
Other Agencies		173,809		12		174,706		13		(897	)		(1	)
Total Life Premium	$	1,416,859		100	$	1,356,527		100	$	60,332			4

Net sales, defined earlier in this report as an indicator of new business production, declined 2% to $256 million. An analysis of life net sales by distribution group is presented below.

Life Insurance

Net Sales by Distribution Method

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,								Increase
	2013				2012				(Decrease)
	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount			%
American Income Exclusive Agency	$	115,022		45	$	119,049		46	$	(4,027	)		(3	)
Direct Response		109,990		43		109,055		42		935			1
Liberty National Exclusive Agency		22,856		9		23,743		9		(887	)		(4	)
Other Agencies		8,091		3		8,355		3		(264	)		(3	)
Total Life Net Sales	$	255,959		100	$	260,202		100	$	(4,243	)		(2	)

26

First-year collected life premium, defined earlier in this report, was $194 million in the 2013 period, rising 1%. First-year collected life premium by distribution group is presented in the table below.

Life Insurance

First-Year Collected Premium by Distribution Method

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,								Increase
	2013				2012				(Decrease)
	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount			%
American Income Exclusive Agency	$	96,529		50	$	94,031		49	$	2,498			3
Direct Response		70,531		36		71,755		37		(1,224	)		(2	)
Liberty National Exclusive Agency		19,485		10		20,154		10		(669	)		(3	)
Other Agencies		7,608		4		7,136		4		472			7
Total	$	194,153		100	$	193,076		100	$	1,077			1

TheAmerican Income Exclusive Agency has historically marketed primarily to members of labor unions. While labor unions are still the premier market for this agency, American Income has diversified in recent years by focusing heavily on other affinity groups and referrals to help to ensure sustainable growth. The life business of this agency is Torchmark’s highest margin business and is the largest contributor to life premium of any of Torchmark’s distribution systems at 38% of Torchmark’s total life premium. This group produced premium income of $533 million, an increase of 8%. This agency is also our fastest growing life insurance agency on the basis of premium growth. First-year collected premium rose 3% to $97 million. However, net sales declined 3% to $115 million. Increases in sales in our captive agencies are generally dependent on growth in the size of the agency force. Although the American Income agent count rose 5% to 5,449 at September 30, 2013 over the count at December 31, 2012 (5,176), the count was essentially flat when compared with the prior year (5,472). The American Income Agency has been focusing on growing and strengthening middle management to support sustainable growth of the agency force. To accomplish this, we have placed an increased emphasis on agent training programs and financial incentives that appropriately reward agents at all levels for helping develop and train personnel. The agency has also begun providing more home-office and webinar training programs. These programs are designed to provide each agent, from new recruits to top level managers, coaching and instruction specifically designed for each individual’s level of experience and responsibilities. This agency has recently opened new offices in territories where there are existing offices but an excess capacity of leads.

TheDirect Response Unit targets its market through a variety of direct-to-consumer marketing approaches which include direct mailings, insert media, internet, and inbound telephone calls. These different approaches support and complement one another in the unit’s efforts to reach the consumer. The Direct Response Unit’s growth has been fueled by constant innovation. In recent years, the internet and inbound call center production has grown rapidly as management has aggressively increased internet marketing activities and focused on driving traffic to the inbound call center. Direct Response focuses primarily on young and middle-income households with

27

children. The juvenile life insurance policy is a key product. Not only is the juvenile market an important source of sales, but it also is a vehicle to reach the parents and grandparents of the juvenile policyholders, who are more likely to respond favorably to a Direct Response solicitation for life coverage on themselves than is the general adult population. Also, both the juvenile policyholders and their parents are low acquisition-cost targets for sales of additional coverage over time.

Direct Response’s life premium income rose 5% to $501 million, representing 35% of Torchmark’s total life premium in 2013. Net sales of $110 million for this group increased 1% due to increases in response rates. First-year collected premium fell 2% to $71 million.

We have introduced certain new initiatives to increase response rates in this unit from which we have seen positive results. These initiatives include lower premium rates as well as offerings of higher face amounts on the adult products.

TheLiberty National Exclusive Agencymarkets life insurance to middle-income customers. Life premium income for this agency was $208 million in the 2013 period, a 2% decline compared with $213 million in the 2012 period. First-year collected premium declined 3% to $19 million.

Net sales for the Liberty Agency declined 4% to $23 million. Liberty had 1,320 producing agents at September 30, 2013, compared with 1,401 a year earlier, a decline of 6%. The agent count has declined 7% since December 31, 2012, when it stood at 1,419. Our long term plans to grow this agency involve expansion from small-town markets in the southeast to more densely populated areas with larger pools of potential agent recruits and customers. Five new offices were opened in larger metropolitan areas during 2013. We believe that expansion of this Agency’s presence into more heavily populated, less-penetrated areas will help reverse the recent decline in agent count and create long term agency growth.

We have changed the cost structure of this agency to a more commission-driven model, which has increased the profitability of new sales by reducing fixed non-deferrable costs. This Agency also benefitted from favorable obligation ratios in 2013. Margins in the Liberty Agency were $56 million in 2013, compared with $54 million in 2012, an increase of 4% even as premium declined. As a percentage of premium, they were 27% in 2013 versus 25% in 2012.

TheOther Agenciesdistribution systems offering life insurance include the Military Agency, the UA Independent Agency (which predominantly writes health insurance), and various smaller distribution channels. The Other Agencies distribution group contributed $174 million of life premium income, or 12% of Torchmark’s total in the 2013 period, but contributed only 3% of net sales.

28

Life Insurance

Summary of Results

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2013				2012				Increase
	Amount		% of Premium		Amount		% of Premium		Amount		%
Premium and policy charges	$	1,416,859		100	$	1,356,527		100	$	60,332		4
Net policy obligations		542,758		38		518,863		38		23,895		5
Commissions and acquisition expense		466,256		33		457,075		34		9,181		2
Insurance underwriting income before other income and administrative expense	$	407,845		29	$	380,589		28	$	27,256		7

Life insurance underwriting income before insurance administrative expense was $408 million, increasing 7%. Increases in margin were due in large part to growth in premium income. Margin was also benefitted by a decreased rate of amortization of deferred acquisition costs due to improved persistency resulting from our conservation program, an increase in the deferral of internet-related direct response acquisition costs, and a decrease in other non-deferrable acquisition costs. As a percentage of premium, underwriting income rose 1% of premium to 29% in 2013.

29

Health insurance, comparing the first nine months of 2013 with the first nine months of 2012. Health insurance sold by Torchmark includes primarily Medicare Supplement and Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage, cancer coverage, accident coverage, and other limited-benefit supplemental health products. All health coverage plans other than Medicare Supplement and Part D are classified here as limited-benefit plans. Medicare Part D business is shown as a separate health component and will be discussed separately in the analysis of the health segment.

As explained inNote F—Business Segments, management does not view the government risk-sharing premium for Medicare Part D as a component of premium income. Excluding this risk-sharing premium, health insurance premium for the 2013 period was $876 million, increasing 15%. A reconciliation between segment reporting for Medicare Part D and GAAP is presented in the chart inNote F—Business Segments, and those differences are fully discussed in that note. An analysis of the component of changes in our health premium income is as follows:

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012			% Change
Reported health premium*	$	884,403		$	766,950			15
Part D risk sharing adjustment		(8,706	)		(6,125	)		42
Premium per segment analysis*	$	875,697		$	760,825			15

* Health premium in 2013 includes Family Heritage premium of $142 million, compared w ith $0 in 2012.

Including Part D health premium, health premium accounted for 38% of our total premium in the 2013 period, while the health underwriting margin accounted for 30% of total underwriting margin, reflective of the lower underwriting margin as a percent of premium for health compared with life insurance. As noted under the captionLife Insurance, we have emphasized life insurance sales relative to health, due to life’s superior profitability and its greater contribution to excess investment income.

While health premium income rose 15% to $876 million, the addition of Family Heritage accounted for $142 million of the increase. Excluding Family Heritage, health premium declined 4% from $761 million in 2012 to $734 million in 2013.

30

The following table is an analysis of our health premium by distribution method.

Health Insurance

Premium by Distribution Method

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,								Increase
	2013				2012				(Decrease)
	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount			%
United American Independent Agency
Limited-benefit plans	$	17,365			$	19,372			$	(2,007	)		(10	)
Medicare Supplement		206,122				204,215				1,907			1
		223,487		35		223,587		43		(100	)		0
Liberty National Exclusive Agency
Limited-benefit plans		114,546				122,799				(8,253	)		(7	)
Medicare Supplement		68,418				77,281				(8,863	)		(11	)
		182,964		28		200,080		38		(17,116	)		(9	)
Family Heritage Agency
Limited-benefit plans		141,808				0				141,808
Medicare Supplement		0				0				0
		141,808		22		0		0		141,808
American Income Exclusive Agency
Limited-benefit plans		59,353				59,142				211			0
Medicare Supplement		440				521				(81	)		(16	)
		59,793		9		59,663		11		130			0
Direct Response
Limited-benefit plans		242				262				(20	)		(8	)
Medicare Supplement		40,624				43,422				(2,798	)		(6	)
		40,866		6		43,684		8		(2,818	)		(6	)
Total Health Premium (Before Part D)
Limited-benefit plans		333,314		51		201,575		38		131,739			65
Medicare Supplement		315,604		49		325,439		62		(9,835	)		(3	)
Total (Before Part D)		648,918		100		527,014		100		121,904			23
Medicare Part D *		226,779				233,811				(7,032	)		(3	)
Total Health Premium *	$	875,697			$	760,825			$	114,872			15

* Total Medicare Part D premium and health premium exclude the risk-sharing premiums of $8.7 million in 2013 and $6.1 million in 2012 receivable from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services consistent with the Medicare Part D contract. This risk-sharing amount is a portion of the excess or deficiency of actual over expected claims, and therefore we view this payment as a component of policyholder benefits in our segment analysis.

31

Presented below is a table of health net sales by distribution method.

Health Insurance

Net Sales by Distribution Method

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,								Increase
	2013				2012				(Decrease)
	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount			%
United American Independent Agency
Limited-benefit plans	$	705			$	753			$	(48	)		(6	)
Medicare Supplement		18,757				20,603				(1,846	)		(9	)
		19,462		28		21,356		50		(1,894	)		(9	)
Liberty National Exclusive Agency
Limited-benefit plans		9,767				10,353				(586	)		(6	)
Medicare Supplement		263				534				(271	)		(51	)
		10,030		14		10,887		26		(857	)		(8	)
Family Heritage Agency
Limited-benefit plans		32,476				0				32,476
Medicare Supplement		0				0				0
		32,476		46		0		0		32,476
American Income Exclusive Agency
Limited-benefit plans		5,057				6,567				(1,510	)		(23	)
Medicare Supplement		0				0				0			0
		5,057		7		6,567		15		(1,510	)		(23	)
Direct Response
Limited-benefit plans		580				678				(98	)		(14	)
Medicare Supplement		2,950				3,223				(273	)		(8	)
		3,530		5		3,901		9		(371	)		(10	)
Total Net Sales (Before Part D)
Limited-benefit plans		48,585		69		18,351		43		30,234			165
Medicare Supplement		21,970		31		24,360		57		(2,390	)		(10	)
Total (Before Part D)		70,555		100		42,711		100		27,844			65
Medicare Part D*		26,115				68,925				(42,810	)		(62	)
Total Net Sales *	$	96,670			$	111,636			$	(14,966	)		(13	)

* Net sales for Medicare Part D represents only new first-time enrollees.

32

The following table presents health insurance first-year collected premium by distribution method.

Health Insurance

First-Year Collected Premium by Distribution Method

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,								Increase
	2013				2012				(Decrease)
	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total		Amount			%
United American Independent Agency
Limited-benefit plans	$	606			$	629			$	(23	)		(4	)
Medicare Supplement		27,716				22,970				4,746			21
		28,322		38		23,599		52		4,723			20
Liberty National Exclusive Agency
Limited-benefit plans		9,143				9,961				(818	)		(8	)
Medicare Supplement		444				889				(445	)		(50	)
		9,587		13		10,850		24		(1,263	)		(12	)
Family Heritage Agency
Limited-benefit plans		27,409				0				27,409
Medicare Supplement		0				0				0
		27,409		36		0		0		27,409
American Income Exclusive Agency
Limited-benefit plans		6,928				7,813				(885	)		(11	)
Medicare Supplement		0				0				0			0
		6,928		9		7,813		17		(885	)		(11	)
Direct Response
Limited-benefit plans		424				485				(61	)		(13	)
Medicare Supplement		2,476				2,794				(318	)		(11	)
		2,900		4		3,279		7		(379	)		(12	)
Total First-Year Collected Premium (Before Part D)
Limited-benefit plans		44,510		59		18,888		41		25,622			136
Medicare Supplement		30,636		41		26,653		59		3,983			15
Total (Before Part D)		75,146		100		45,541		100		29,605			65
Medicare Part D*		54,050				109,261				(55,211	)		(51	)
Total First-Year Collected Premium*	$	129,196			$	154,802			$	(25,606	)		(17	)

* First-year collected premium for Medicare Part D represents only premium collected from new first-time enrollees in their first policy year.

33

Health insurance, excluding Medicare Part D. Health premium, excluding Part D premium, rose 23% to $649 million in the 2013 period. However, if the premium of Family Heritage were removed for comparability, health premium excluding Part D would have declined 4%. Medicare Supplement premium declined 3% to $316 million, while other limited-benefit health premium increased 65% to $333 million, including $142 million of Family Heritage premium. Because of the addition of Family Heritage, limited-benefit premium now provides Torchmark with the greatest amount of non-Part D health premium, representing 51% of such premium for the 2013 period, compared with only 38% a year earlier.

Health net sales, excluding Part D, increased 65% to $71 million, as a result of the inclusion of Family Heritage’s sales. Otherwise, sales would have declined 11%, as net sales for Medicare Supplement and limited-benefit products declined. Medicare Supplement net sales decreased 10% to $22 million in the 2013 period. Limited-benefit net sales, excluding Family Heritage, declined 12% to $16 million. Non-Part D health first-year collected premium rose 65% to $75 million. However, excluding Family Heritage first-year collected premium, first-year collected premium rose 5% to $48 million.

TheUA Independent Agency consists of independent agencies appointed with Torchmark who may also sell for other companies. The UA Independent Agency was Torchmark’s largest health agency in terms of non-Part D health premium income. Premium income was $223 million, representing 35% of Torchmark’s total non-Part D health premium. Net sales were $19 million, or 28% of Torchmark’s non-Part D health sales. This agency is also Torchmark’s largest producer of Medicare Supplement insurance, with Medicare Supplement premium income of $206 million. The UA Independent Agency represents approximately 65% of all Torchmark Medicare Supplement premium and 85% of Medicare Supplement net sales. Medicare Supplement premium in this agency rose 1% but total health premium was flat. Net sales of these products declined 9% in 2013. Group Medicare Supplement sales have historically fluctuated from period to period.

TheFamily Heritage Agency was acquired in Torchmark’s acquisition of Family Heritage on November 1, 2012. This agency markets primarily limited-benefit supplemental health insurance in non-urban areas. Most of their policies include a cash-back feature, such as a return of premium whereby any excess of premiums over claims paid is returned to the policyholder at the end of a specified period stated within the insurance policy. Management expects to grow this agency through geographic expansion and incorporation of Torchmark’s recruiting programs. The Family Heritage Agency is our fastest growing health agency in terms of net sales, adding $32 million in net sales in the 2013 nine months. This agency’s $142 million in health premium income during the nine-month period of 2013 represented 22% of Torchmark’s total. Annualized health premium in force at September 30, 2013 was $198 million. The producing agent count was 717 agents at September, 2013 compared with 702 at December, 2012.

34

TheLiberty National Exclusive Agency represented 28% of all Torchmark non-Part D health premium income at $183 million in 2013. The Liberty Agency markets limited-benefit health supplemental products consisting primarily of cancer insurance. Much of Liberty’s health business is now generated through worksite marketing targeting small businesses of 10 to 25 employees. In 2013, health premium income in the Agency declined 9% from prior year premium of $200 million. Liberty’s health premium decline has been due primarily to the runoff of a block of discontinued hospital-surgical products and the declining Medicare Supplement block resulting from reduced sales of Medicare Supplement products by this agency in recent years.

Other distribution. Certain of our other distribution channels market health products, although their main emphasis is on life insurance. On a combined basis, they accounted for 15% of health premium excluding Part D in the 2013 period. The American Income Exclusive Agency markets a variety of limited-benefit plans, primarily accident. The Direct Response group markets primarily Medicare Supplements to employer or union-sponsored groups. Direct Response is also involved in marketing Medicare Part D. On a combined basis, the health net sales of these agencies excluding Part D declined 18%, from $10.5 million in 2012 to $8.6 million in 2013, primarily due to a lower focus on health sales at American Income.

Medicare Part D. Coverage under Torchmark’s Medicare Part D prescription drug plan for Medicare beneficiaries is provided through United American. The Medicare Part D plan is a stand-alone prescription drug plan for Medicare beneficiaries which is regulated and partially funded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for participating private insurers. These products are marketed through our Direct Response unit and to groups through our UA Independent Agency. As described inNote F—Business Segments, we report our Medicare Part D business for segment analysis purposes as we view the business, in which expected full-year benefits are matched with the related premium income which is received evenly throughout the policy year. At this time, we have expensed benefits based on our expected benefit ratio of approximately 83% for the entire 2013 contract year. This ratio was 84% or the full year 2012. We describe the differences between the segment analysis and the GAAP operating results inNote F. Due to the design of the Medicare prescription drug product, claims are expected to be heaviest early in the calendar year. Management believes that the use of the full-year loss ratio is an appropriate measure for interim results, and also that these reporting differences will arise only on an interim basis and will be eliminated at the end of a full year, as they were in the full year of 2012.

Medicare Part D premium was $227 million in 2013, compared with $234 million in 2012, after removal of the risk-sharing adjustment in both periods. This represents a decrease in premium of 3%. Growth in premium in 2012 resulted from a new lower-cost Part D plan which qualified us to receive a large number of low-income automatic enrollees and to grow our own individual sales. However, we anticipate a slight decline in Part D premium for the full year 2013. Due to intensified price competition for the

35

2013 plan year, we did not qualify for as many new auto-enrollees in 2013 as we did in 2012, resulting in a lower average number of enrollees in 2013. For the plan year 2014, Torchmark qualified to receive new Part D auto-enrollees in 15 regions, an increase of 8 new regions over 2013. This increase in the number of regions should result in an increase in Part D sales and premium in 2014.

Medicare Part D underwriting results are presented in the following chart. The adjustments which reconcile Part D results in accordance with our health segment analysis to Part D GAAP results are presented in the charts inNote F—Business Segments.

Medicare Part D

Summary of Medicare Part D Results

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2013				2012
	Per Segment Analysis		GAAP		Per Segment Analysis		GAAP
Insurance underwriting income before other income and administrative expense	$	25,320	$	12,747	$	23,374	$	4,452

Since the Medicare Part D plan is a government-sponsored program, regulatory changes could alter the outlook for this market.

36

The following table presents underwriting margin data for health insurance.

Health Insurance

Summary of Results

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30, 2013
	Health*		% of Premium		Medicare Part D		% of Premium		Total Health		% of Premium
Premium and policy charges	$	648,918		100	$	226,779		100	$	875,697		100
Net policy obligations		375,649		58		188,816		83		564,465		64
Commissions and acquisition expense		126,170		19		12,643		6		138,813		16
Insurance underwriting income before other income and administrative expense	$	147,099		23	$	25,320		11	$	172,419		20
	Nine months ended September 30, 2012
	Health*		% of Premium		Medicare Part D		% of Premium		Total Health		% of Premium
Premium and policy charges	$	527,014		100	$	233,811		100	$	760,825		100
Net policy obligations		312,336		59		198,634		85		510,970		67
Commissions and acquisition expense		95,195		18		11,803		5		106,998		14
Insurance underwriting income before other income and administrative expense	$	119,483		23	$	23,374		10	$	142,857		19

* Health other than Medicare Part D.

Underwriting income for health insurance rose to $172 million or 21% in 2013. The addition of Family Heritage accounted for $27 million or 19 points of the increase. Medicare Part D underwriting income rose from $23 million to $25 million, while non-Part D health underwriting income, including Family Heritage’s added supplemental-health business, gained $28 million or 23% to $147 million in the period. As a percentage of health premium, underwriting margins rose 1% to 20%, primarily as a result of an improved claim ratio on policies sold by the American Income Agency.

Annuities. While we do underwrite annuities, they represent an insignificant part of our business and are not expected to be important to our marketing strategy going forward.

37

Operating expenses, comparing the first nine months of 2013 with the first nine months of 2012. Operating expenses consist of insurance administrative expenses and parent company expenses. Also included is stock compensation expense, which is viewed by us as a parent company expense. Insurance administrative expenses relate to premium income for a given period; therefore, we measure those expenses as a percentage of premium income. Total expenses are measured as a percentage of total revenues. An analysis of operating expenses is shown below.

Operating Expenses Selected Information

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2013					2012
	Amount			% of Premium		Amount			% of Premium
Insurance administrative expenses:
Salaries	$	61,523			2.7	$	56,421			2.6
Other employee costs		25,640			1.1		20,516			1.0
Other administrative costs		39,140			1.7		37,602			1.8
Legal expense		6,777			0.3		6,403			0.3
Total insurance administrative expenses		133,080			5.8		120,942			5.7
Parent company expense		6,734					6,203
Stock compensation expense		19,376					16,547
Guaranty Fund Assessment		1,155					0
Family Heritage acquisition expense		0					615
Legal settlement expense		500					0
Total operating expenses, per
Consolidated Statements of Operations	$	160,845				$	144,307
Insurance administrative expenses:
Increase (decrease) over prior year		10.0	%				2.7	%
Total operating expenses:
Increase (decrease) over prior year		11.5	%				1.6	%

Insurance administrative expenses increased $12 million or 10% in 2013 when compared with the prior year period. Of the $12 million increase, $7 million was due to the addition of Family Heritage’s administration expense. As a percentage of total premium, insurance administrative expenses rose slightly from 5.7% to 5.8%. Total operating expenses rose 11% in 2013. In 2013, employee costs increased 25%, primarily as a result of increased pension benefit costs. Stock compensation expense rose 17% to $19 million, primarily as a result of an increase in the market price of Torchmark stock in 2012 and 2013, which caused higher grant prices for restricted stock and options. As described inNote F in theConsolidated Financial Statements,we recorded two non-operating charges during the 2013 nine months affecting operating expense, a state guaranty fund assessment and a legal settlement involving a non-insurance matter. In 2012, we incurred certain acquisition costs concerning our acquisition of Family Heritage.

38

Investments (excess investment income), comparing the first nine months of 2013 with the first nine months of 2012. We manage our capital resources including investments, debt, and cash flow through the investment segment. Excess investment income represents the profit margin attributable to investment operations. It is the measure that we use to evaluate the performance of the investment segment as described inNote F—Business Segments in theNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.It is defined as net investment income less the required interest on net policy liabilities and the interest cost associated with capital funding or “financing costs.” We also view excess investment income per diluted share as an important and useful measure to evaluate the performance of the investment segment. It is defined as excess investment income divided by the total diluted weighted average shares outstanding, representing the contribution by the investment segment to the consolidated earnings per share of the Company. Since implementing our share repurchase program in 1986, we have used $5.6 billion of cash flow to repurchase Torchmark shares after determining that the repurchases provided a greater return than other investment alternatives. Share repurchases reduce excess investment income because of the foregone earnings on the cash that would otherwise have been invested in interest-bearing assets, but they also reduce the number of shares outstanding. In order to put all capital resource uses on a comparable basis, we believe that excess investment income per diluted share is an appropriate measure of the investment segment.

39

The following table summarizes Torchmark’s investment income, excess investment income, and excess investment income per diluted share.

Excess Investment Income

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,						Increase (Decrease)
	2013			2012			Amount			%
Net investment income*	$	550,015		$	535,325		$	14,690			3
Required interest on net insurance policy liabilities		(324,562	)		(295,502	)		(29,060	)		10
Financing costs:
Interest on funded debt		(57,383	)		(54,630	)		(2,753	)		5
Interest on short-term debt		(3,998	)		(4,335	)		337			(8	)
Total financing costs		(61,381	)		(58,965	)		(2,416	)		4
Excess investment income	$	164,072		$	180,858		$	(16,786	)		(9	)
Excess investment income per diluted share	$	1.75		$	1.83		$	(0.08	)		(4	)
Average invested assets (at amortized cost)	$	12,782,072		$	11,584,173		$	1,197,899			10
Average net insurance policy liabilities**		7,788,647			6,976,612			812,035			12
Average debt and preferred securities (at amortized cost)		1,074,252			1,161,356			(87,104	)		(8	)

* Net investment income per Torchmark’s segment analysis does not agree with Net investment income per theConsolidated Statements of Operations because management views the amortization of certain low-income housing interests as an adjustment to increase tax expense while GAAP requires that it reduce net investment income, as presented in the Reconciliation inNote F—Business Segments. Additionally, management views our Trust Preferred Securities as consolidated debt, as also presented inNote F. GAAP requires those debt securities to be deconsolidated.

** Net of deferred acquisition costs, excluding the attributed unrealized gains and losses thereon.

As shown in the above table,excess investment income for the 2013 period declined 9% to $164 million. Excess investment income has been pressured in recent periods as a result of the impact of lower interest rates on net investment income coupled with the increase in required interest on net policy liabilities discussed later under this caption. However, excess investment income per share only declined by 4% as a result of our share purchases over the past 12 months.Net investment income rose $15 million or 3% in 2013, while average invested assets (with fixed maturities at amortized cost) rose 10% year over year. In the 2013 nine months, fixed maturity yields averaged 5.95% on a tax-equivalent and effective-yield basis, compared with 6.42% a year earlier. The reduction in the average rate of return was primarily a result of reinvesting proceeds from bonds that matured or were called at yield rates less than the rates we earned on the bonds before they matured or were called. While Family Heritage added $16 million to net investment income during 2013, its lower-yielding portfolio contributed to the decline in the average fixed-maturity yield.

40

Another factor negatively affecting net investment income was calls of fixed-maturity securities. During the past fifteen months, we had an unusually large number of these calls, including $467 million of bank-issued hybrid securities. Fixed maturity securities are more likely to be called in a declining interest-rate environment, as these callable securities can often be refinanced at lower prevailing rates. In addition to bonds with scheduled call dates, our portfolio includes bank-issued hybrid securities with provisions allowing the security to be called in the event of a change in capital treatment. Many banks chose to call their hybrid securities in 2012, and to a lesser extent in 2013, because the Dodd-Frank Act phases out the partial equity credit historically allowed for these securities. Of our $12.3 billion fixed maturity portfolio at amortized cost as of September 30, 2013, we held $134 million book value of bank hybrid securities with a weighted average yield of 6.87% that were callable without a make-whole provision and $174 million of other fixed maturity securities with a weighted average yield of 5.86% that were callable solely at the discretion of the issuer but that had not been called at September 30, 2013. In addition, we also held $173 million book value of non-bank hybrid securities with a weighted average yield of 5.94% that become callable solely at the discretion of the issuer on various scheduled dates during the next three years. Many factors can be involved in an issuer’s decision to call a bond. Therefore, it is difficult to predict whether or not a bond will be called in the future, and, if so, when it will be called. If these bonds were to be called, there would be a reduction in future net investment income if the average yield on called securities exceeds prevailing new money rates. Approximately 66% of the callable bank hybrid securities were rated below-investment-grade. If called, both the ratio of below-investment-grade securities to our investment portfolio and statutory required capital would also decrease.

Excess investment income is reduced by therequired interest on net insurance policy liabilities, because we consider these amounts to be components of the profitability of our insurance segments. Required interest is based on the actuarial interest assumptions used in discounting the benefit reserve liability and the amortization of deferred acquisition costs for our insurance policies in force. The great majority of our life and health insurance policies are fixed interest-rate protection policies, not investment products, and are accounted for under current accounting guidance for long-duration insurance products (formerly SFAS 60, now incorporated into ASC 944-20-05), which mandates that interest rate assumptions be “locked in” for the life of that block of business. Each calendar year, we set the discount rate to be used to calculate the benefit reserve liability and the deferred acquisition cost asset for all insurance policies issued that year. That rate is based on the new money yields that we expect to earn on premiums received in the future from policies of that issue year, and cannot be changed.

The discount rate used for policies issued in the current year has no impact on the in force policies issued in prior years as the rates of all prior issue years are also locked in. As such, the overall discount rate for the entire in force block is a weighted average of the discount rates being used from all issue years. Changes in the overall weighted-average discount rate over time are caused by changes in the mix of the

41

reserves and the deferred acquisition cost asset by issue year on the entire block of in force business. Business issued in the current year has very little impact on the overall weighted-average discount rate due to the size of our in force business.

Required interest on net insurance policy liabilities increased $29 million or 10% to $325 million. The increase in required interest was slightly lower than the 12% growth in average net interest-bearing insurance policy liabilities. This was primarily due to the impact of Family Heritage, as the discount rate associated with Family Heritage’s net policy reserves was less than the weighted average discount rate on other business.

Financing costs rose 4% or $2.4 million to $61 million, as a result of a $3.3 million increase in additional interest from the funded debt issuances and repayments that occurred in late 2012, partially offset by the $1.2 million reduction in interest from the maturity of our $94 million 7 ³/₈% Notes in August, 2013. Because of these transactions, interest on funded debt will decline slightly going forward. More information concerning debt can be found in theCapital Resources section of this report.

As previously mentioned, excess investment income declines when the growth in investment income is less than the growth of the required interest on net insurance policy liabilities and financing costs, such as we have experienced in recent periods. In an extended low-interest-rate environment, the growth in investment income is negatively impacted as higher-yielding assets mature, are called, or are sold and we reinvest the proceeds of the dispositions at lower yield rates. We believe, however, that any such potential negative impact in the near term will be mitigated by the fact that only 1% to 2% of fixed maturities on average are expected to run off each year over the next five years.

We have been encouraged by higher market interest rates in 2013 because of the positive impact that higher rates should have on our excess investment income. Even at current new money rates, we would expect to see only modest declines in the average portfolio yield rate over the next few years compared to the larger declines in recent years. This development is due to the significant reduction in our holdings of bank hybrid securities and future maturities of bonds with lower interest rates than in the past. Excess investment income benefits from increases in long-term rates available on new investments and decreases in short-term borrowing rates. Of these two factors, higher investment rates have the greater impact because the amount of cash that we invest at long-term interest rates is significantly greater than the amount that we borrow at short-term rates. Therefore, Torchmark benefits when rates rise, especially long-term rates. Even a sudden, significant increase in interest rates would be beneficial because Torchmark has very little disintermediation risk. Also, we are not concerned with potential interest-rate driven unrealized losses in our fixed maturity portfolio because we have the intent, and more importantly, the ability to hold our fixed maturities to maturity.

42

In response to lower interest rates and their negative impact on margins, we raised the premium rates for new business on major life products in 2012. The increased premium has provided additional margin to help offset the possible future reductions in excess investment income and has not had a detrimental impact on sales.

Because actuarial discount rates are locked in for life on essentially all of our business, existing future policy benefits and deferred acquisition costs are not affected by changes in investment yields unless a loss recognition event occurs. Due to the strength of our underwriting margins and the current positive spread between the yield on our investment portfolio and the weighted-average discount rate of our in force block, we do not expect that an extended low-interest-rate environment would cause a loss recognition event for Torchmark.

Investments (acquisitions), comparing the first nine months of 2013 with the first nine months of 2012. Torchmark’s investment policy calls for investing almost exclusively in fixed maturities that are investment grade and meet our quality and yield objectives. We generally prefer to invest in securities with longer maturities because they more closely match the long-term nature of our policy liabilities. We believe this strategy is appropriate because our cash flows are generally stable and predictable. If available longer-term securities do not meet our quality and yield objectives, new money is generally invested in shorter-term fixed maturities.

The following table summarizes selected information for fixed-maturity purchases. The effective annual yield shown is the yield calculated to the “worst call date.” For non-callable bonds, the worst-call date is always the maturity date. For callable bonds, the worst-call date is the call date that produces the lowest yield (or the maturity date, if the yield calculated to the maturity date is lower than the yield calculated to each call date).

43

Fixed Maturity Acquisitions Selected Information

(Dollar amounts in millions)

	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Cost of acquisitions:
Investment-grade corporate securities	$	807		$	749
Taxable municipals		0		$	1
Other		18			5
Total fixed-maturity acquisitions	$	825		$	755
Effective annual yield*		4.37	%		4.54	%
Average life, in years to:
Next call		26.4			24.3
Maturity		27.0			26.0
Average rating		A-			BBB+

* One-year compounded yield on a tax-equivalent basis, whereby the yield on tax-exempt securities is adjusted to produce a yield equivalent to the pretax yield on taxable securities.

Acquisitions in both periods consisted primarily of corporate bonds, with securities spanning a diversified range of issuers, industry sectors, and geographical regions. All of the acquired securities were investment grade.

Investments (portfolio composition). The composition of the investment portfolio at book value on September 30, 2013 was as follows:

Invested Assets At September 30, 2013

(Dollar amounts in millions)

	Amount		% of Total
Fixed maturities(at amortized cost)	$	12,267		95	%
Equities (at cost)		1		0
Policy loans		442		4
Other long-term investments		15		0
Short-term investments		136		1
Total	$	12,861		100	%

Approximately 95% of our investments at book value are in a diversified fixed-maturity portfolio. Policy loans, which are secured by policy cash values, make up approximately 4% of our investments. We also have insignificant investments in equity securities and other long-term investments. Because fixed maturities represent such a significant portion of our investment portfolio, the remainder of the discussion of portfolio composition will focus on fixed maturities.

44

Fixed Maturities. The following table summarizes certain information about our fixed-maturity portfolio by component at September 30, 2013.

Fixed Maturities by Component

(Dollar amounts in millions)

										% of Total Fixed Maturities
	Cost or Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		at Amortized Cost		at Fair Value
Corporates	$	9,882	$	749	$	(278	)	$	10,353		81		81
Redeemable preferred stock		523		28		(17	)		534		4		4
Municipals		1,278		84		(10	)		1,352		10		11
Government-sponsored enterprises		354		0		(52	)		302		3		2
Governments & agencies		122		2		(3	)		121		1		1
Residential mortgage-backed*		8		0		0			8		0		0
Collateralized debt obligations		68		0		(15	)		53		1		1
Other asset-backed securities		32		2		0			34		0		0
Total fixed maturities	$	12,267	$	865	$	(375	)	$	12,757		100		100

* Includes GNMA’s

At September 30, 2013, fixed maturities had a fair value of $12.8 billion, compared with $13.5 billion at December 31, 2012. The net unrealized gain position in the fixed-maturity portfolio declined from a net gain of $1.6 billion at December 31, 2012 to a net gain of $490 million at September 30, 2013, as a result of an increase in market interest rates. While our September 30, 2013 net unrealized gain of $490 million consisted of gross unrealized gains of $865 million offset by $375 million of gross unrealized losses, our December, 2012 net unrealized gain consisted of a gross unrealized gain of $1.7 billion and gross unrealized loss of $89 million.

Investments in fixed-maturity securities are diversified over a wide range of industry sectors. The following table summarizes certain information about our fixed-maturity portfolio by sector at September 30, 2013.

45

Fixed Maturities by Sector

(Dollar amounts in millions)

	Cost or Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		% of Total Fixed Maturities
										Amortized Cost			Fair Value
Financial - Life/Health/PC Insurance	$	1,778	$	152	$	(23	)	$	1,907		15	%		15	%
Financial - Bank		690		46		(22	)		714		6			6
Financial - Other		570		49		(15	)		604		5			5
Subtotal Financial		3,038		247		(60	)		3,225		26			26
Utilities		2,191		182		(62	)		2,311		18			18
Government (US, municipal, and foreign)		1,755		85		(66	)		1,774		14			14
Energy		1,399		105		(23	)		1,481		11			11
Basic Materials		865		41		(30	)		876		7			7
Other Industrials		784		41		(36	)		789		6			6
Consumer, Non-cyclical		752		68		(32	)		788		6			6
Transportation		551		35		(27	)		559		4			4
Communications		480		40		(17	)		503		4			4
Consumer, Cyclical		376		21		(7	)		390		3			3
Collateralized debt obligations		68		0		(15	)		53		1			1
Mortgage-backed Securities		8		0		0			8		0			0
Total fixed maturities	$	12,267	$	865	$	(375	)	$	12,757		100	%		100	%

At September 30, 2013, approximately 44% of the fixed-maturity assets at amortized cost and fair value were in the financial and utility sectors. The balance of the portfolio is spread among 392 issuers in a wide variety of sectors. The financial sector had a net unrealized gain of $187 million at September 30, 2013, compared with a gain of $339 million at December 31, 2012. We expect our investment in temporarily impaired securities to be fully recoverable.

An analysis of the fixed-maturity portfolio at September 30, 2013 by a composite quality rating is shown in the table below. The composite rating for each security is the average of the security’s ratings as assigned by Moody’s Investor Service, Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings, and Dominion Bond Rating Service, LTD. The ratings assigned by these four nationally recognized statistical rating organizations are evenly weighted when calculating the average.

46

Fixed Maturities by Rating

(Dollar amounts in millions)

	Amortized Cost		%		Fair Value		%
Investment grade:
AAA	$	786		6	$	746		6
AA		1,293		11		1,381		11
A		3,330		27		3,560		28
BBB+		2,779		23		2,896		23
BBB		2,592		21		2,689		21
BBB-		901		7		953		7
Investment grade		11,681		95		12,225		96
Below investment grade:
BB		330		3		316		2
B		151		1		133		1
Below B		105		1		83		1
Below investment grade		586		5		532		4
	$	12,267		100	$	12,757		100

Of the $12.3 billion of fixed maturities at September 30, 2013, $11.7 billion or 95% at amortized cost were investment grade with an average rating of A-. Below-investment-grade bonds were $586 million with an average rating of B+ and were 5% of fixed maturities, the same as at the end of 2012. Below-investment-grade bonds at amortized cost were 17% of our shareholders’ equity, excluding the effect of unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturities as of September 30, 2013. Overall, the total portfolio was rated A- based on amortized cost, the same as at the end of 2012.

An analysis of the changes in our portfolio ofbelow-investment-grade bonds at amortized cost during the first nine months of 2013 is as follows:

(Dollar amounts in millions)

Balance as of December 31, 2012	$	585
Downgrades by rating agencies		99
Upgrades by rating agencies		(38	)
Disposals		(62	)
Amortization and other		2
Balance as of September 30, 2013	$	586

Our investment policy is to acquire only investment-grade obligations. Thus, any increases in below-investment-grade issues are a result of ratings downgrades of existing holdings. Our investment portfolio contains no commercial mortgage-backed securities or securities backed by sub-prime or Alt-A mortgages. We have no direct investments in residential mortgages, nor do we have any counterparty risks as we are

47

not a party to any credit default swaps or other derivative contracts. We do not participate in securities lending, we have no off-balance sheet investments, and we have only insignificant exposure to European Sovereign debt consisting of $11 million in German bonds.

Additional information concerning the fixed-maturity portfolio is as follows.

Fixed Maturity Portfolio Selected Information

	At September 30, 2013			At December 31, 2012			At September 30, 2012
Average annual effective yield(1)		5.91	%		6.04	%		6.33	%
Average life, in years, to:
Next call(2)		18.5			18.3			17.9
Maturity(2)		21.6			22.3			22.4
Effective duration to:
Next call(2),(3)		10.4			10.8			10.5
Maturity(2),(3)		11.7			12.3			11.9

(1) Tax-equivalent basis, whereby the yield on tax-exempt securities is adjusted to produce a yield equivalent to the pretax yield on taxable securities.

(2) Torchmark calculates the average life and duration of the fixed-maturity portfolio two ways: (a) based on the next call date which is the next call date for callable bonds and the maturity date for noncallable bonds, and (b) based on the maturity date of all bonds, whether callable or not.

(3) Effective duration is a measure of the price sensitivity of a fixed-income security to a particular change in interest rates.

Realized Gains and Losses, comparing the first nine months of 2013 with the first nine months of 2012. As discussed inNote F—Business Segments, our core business of providing insurance coverage requires us to maintain a large and diverse investment portfolio to support our insurance liabilities. From time to time, investments are disposed of or written down prior to maturity, resulting in realized gains or losses. Because these dispositions and writedowns are outside the course of our normal operations, management removes the effects of such gains and losses when evaluating its overall core operating results.

48

The following table summarizes our tax-effected realized gains (losses) by component.

Analysis of Realized Gains (Losses), Net of Tax

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except for per share data)

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2013						2012
	Amount			Per Share			Amount			Per Share
Fixed maturities and equities:
Investment sales	$	(1,236	)	$	(0.01	)	$	8,037		$	0.08
Investments called or tendered		5,123			0.05			2,759			0.03
Real estate:
Sold		(159	)		0.00			292			0.00
Other-than-temporary impairments		(1,741	)		(0.02	)		0			0.00
Other		987			0.01			(71	)		0.00
Total	$	2,974		$	0.03		$	11,017		$	0.11

Financial Condition

Liquidity. Liquidity provides Torchmark with the ability to meet on demand the cash commitments required by our business operations and financial obligations. Our liquidity is evidenced by positive cash flow, a portfolio of marketable investments, and the availability of a line of credit facility.

Insurance subsidiary liquidity. The operations of our insurance subsidiaries have historically generated substantial cash inflows in excess of immediate cash needs. Sources of cash flows for the insurance subsidiaries include primarily premium and investment income. Cash outflows from operations include policy benefit payments, commissions, administrative expenses, and taxes. The funds to provide for policy benefits, the majority of which are paid in future periods, are invested primarily in long-term fixed maturities to meet these long-term obligations. In addition to investment income, maturities and scheduled repayments in the investment portfolio are sources of cash. Excess cash available from the insurance subsidiaries’ operations is generally distributed as a dividend to the parent company, subject to regulatory restriction. The dividends are generally paid in amounts equal to the subsidiaries’ prior year statutory net income excluding realized capital gains.

Parent Company liquidity. An important source of Parent Company liquidity is the dividends from the insurance subsidiaries noted above. These dividends are used by the Parent Company to pay dividends on common and preferred stock, interest and principal repayment requirements on Parent Company debt, and operating expenses of the Parent Company. In the first nine months of 2013, the Parent Company received $392 million of cash dividends from the life insurance subsidiaries. This compared with $417 million in 2012, including certain transfers. For the full year 2013, cash dividends from the life insurance subsidiaries are expected to total approximately $488 million.

49

Additional sources of liquidity for the Parent Company are cash, intercompany receivables, and a credit facility. At September 30, 2013, the Parent Company had $117 million of invested cash and net intercompany receivables. The credit facility is discussed below under the caption“Short-term borrowings.”

Short-term borrowings. We have a credit facility in place with a group of lenders which allows for unsecured borrowings and stand-by letters of credit up to $600 million. The facility may be expanded by $200 million if certain conditions are met. Up to $250 million in letters of credit can be issued against the facility. The facility is further designated as a back-up credit line for a commercial paper program under which we may either borrow from the credit line or issue commercial paper at any time, with total commercial paper outstanding not to exceed the facility maximum, less any letters of credit issued. Interest is charged at variable rates. The facility has no ratings-based acceleration triggers which would require early repayment. The facility terminates January 7, 2015. In accordance with the agreement, we are subject to certain covenants regarding capitalization and interest coverage with which we were in full compliance at September 30, 2013.

Short-term debt consists of our commercial paper outstanding as noted above. In August, 2013, we repaid our $94 million par value 7  ³/₈% Notes which were previously classified as short-term debt because of their maturity within one year. They were redeemed with funds held at the Parent Company. The following table presents certain information about our commercial paper borrowings.

Short-term Borrowings - Commercial Paper

(Dollar amounts in millions)

	At September 30, 2013			At December 31, 2012			At September 30, 2012
Balance at end of period (par value)	$	228.0		$	225.2		$	225.9
Annualized interest rate		.30	%		.36	%		.45	%
Letters of credit outstanding	$	198.0		$	198.0		$	198.0
Remaining amount available under credit line	$	174.0		$	176.8		$	176.1
	For the nine months ended
	September 30, 2013			September 30, 2012
Average balance outstanding during period (par value)	$	274.7		$	256.3
Daily-weighted average interest rate (annualized)		.31	%		.44	%
Maximum daily amount outstanding during period (par value)	$	314.0		$	385.0

Our balance of commercial paper outstanding at September 30, 2013 was $228 million, compared with $225 million at the previous year end. We have had no difficulties in accessing the commercial paper market under this facility during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

50

In summary, Torchmark expects to have readily available funds for the foreseeable future to conduct its operations and to maintain target capital ratios in the insurance subsidiaries through internally generated cash flow and the credit facility. In the unlikely event that more liquidity is needed, the Company could generate additional funds through multiple sources including, but not limited to, the issuance of debt, an additional short-term credit facility, and intercompany borrowing.

Consolidated liquidity. Consolidated net cash inflows from operations were $771 million in the first nine months of 2013, compared with $698 million in the same period of 2012. In addition to cash inflows from operations, our companies have received $349 million in investment calls and tenders and $105 million in scheduled maturities or repayments during the 2013 period. As previously noted under the captionShort-term borrowings, we have in place a line of credit facility. The insurance companies have no additional outstanding credit facilities.

Cash and short term investments were $175 million at September 30, 2013, compared with $157 million at December 31, 2012. In addition to these liquid assets, the entire $12.8 billion (fair value at September 30, 2013) portfolio of fixed-income and equity securities is available for sale in the event of an unexpected need. Substantially all of our fixed-income and equity securities are publicly traded. We generally expect to hold fixed-income securities to maturity, and even though these securities are classified as available for sale, we have the ability and intent to hold any securities which are temporarily impaired until they mature. Our strong cash flows from operations, investment maturities, and credit line availability make any need to sell securities for liquidity highly unlikely.

Capital Resources.Our insurance subsidiaries maintain capital at a level adequate to support their current operations and meet the requirements of the regulatory authorities and the rating agencies. Our insurance subsidiaries generally target a capital ratio of around 325% of Company Action Level required regulatory capital under Risk-Based Capital (RBC), a measure established by insurance regulatory authorities to monitor the adequacy of capital. The 325% target is considered sufficient because of the insurance companies’ strong reliable cash flows, the relatively low risk of their product mix, and because that ratio exceeds regulatory requirements and is in line with rating agency expectations for Torchmark. As of December 31, 2012, our insurance subsidiaries had a consolidated RBC ratio of 347%. In the event of a decline in the RBC ratios of the insurance companies due to ratings downgrades in the investment portfolios, impairments, or other circumstances, we have available cash on hand and credit availability at the Parent Company to make additional contributions as necessary to maintain the ratio at or above 325%.

51

On a consolidated basis, Torchmark’s capital structure consists of short-term debt (comprised of the commercial paper outstanding discussed above), long-term funded debt, and shareholders’ equity. The outstanding long-term debt at book value was $991 million at September 30, 2013, compared with $990 million at December 31, 2012. An analysis of long-term debt issues outstanding is as follows at September 30, 2013.

Long Term Debt at September 30, 2013

(Dollar amounts in millions)

Instrument	Year Due		Interest Rate			Par Value		Book Value		Fair Value
Senior Notes		2016		6.375	%	$	250.0	$	248.7	$	279.3
Senior Notes		2019		9.250			292.7		290.2		382.2
Senior Notes(1)		2022		3.800			150.0		147.3		147.7
Notes		2023		7.875			165.6		163.6		206.0
Junior Subordinated Debentures		2052		5.875			125.0		120.8		110.3
Junior Subordinated Debentures(2)		2036		3.554	(3)		20.0		20.0		20.0
Total long-term debt						$	1,003.3	$	990.6	$	1,145.5

(1) An additional $150 million par value and book value is held by insurance subsidiaries that eliminates in consolidation.

(2) Assumed upon November 1, 2012 acquisition of Family Heritage.

(3) Interest paid at 3 month LIBOR plus 330 basis points, resets each quarter.

During the third quarter of 2012, we issued $300 million principal amount of our 3.8% Senior Notes and $125 million of our 5 ⁷/₈% Junior Subordinated Debentures. As a part of the offering of the 3.8% Senior Notes, $150 million principal amount were purchased by our insurance subsidiaries and were eliminated in consolidation. Proceeds from the Senior Notes provided a portion of the funding for the Family Heritage purchase in November, 2012. In the fourth quarter of 2012, we used the proceeds from the Junior Subordinated Debentures to call and redeem our 7.1% Trust Originated Preferred Securities in the principal amount of $120 million. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2012, we assumed $20 million principal amount of floating-rate Junior Subordinated Debentures as part of the acquisition price of Family Heritage. Interest is computed as the three-month LIBOR plus 330 basis points. These debt transactions in 2012, together with the repayment of the $94 million of 7.375% Notes in the third quarter of 2013, resulted in approximately $2.7 million in increased interest cost in the first nine months of 2013. These transactions should result in slightly reduced interest cost going forward.

Shareholders’ equity was $3.8 billion at September 30, 2013. This compares with $4.4 billion at December, 31, 2012 and $4.3 billion at September 30, 2012. During the nine months since December 31, 2012, shareholders’ equity was decreased by $343 million because of share purchases. Equity was also decreased by after-tax

52

unrealized losses of $699 million in the fixed-maturity portfolio, as interest rates have risen over this period of time. Net income added $386 million over the same nine-month period.

As previously noted under the captionHighlights in this report, we acquired 4.2 million of our outstanding common shares under our share repurchase program during the first nine months of 2013. These shares were acquired at a cost of $265 million (average of $62.44 per share), compared with purchases of 6.6 million shares at a cost of $318 million in the first nine months of 2012.

We are required by GAAP to revalue our available-for-sale fixed-maturity portfolio to fair market value at the end of each accounting period. These changes, net of their associated impact on deferred acquisition costs and income tax, are reflected directly in shareholders’ equity.

While GAAP requires our fixed-maturity assets to be revalued, it does not permit interest-bearing insurance policy liabilities supported by those assets to be valued at fair value in a consistent manner, with changes in value applied directly to shareholders’ equity. However, due to the size of both the investment portfolio and our policy liabilities, this inconsistency in measurement can have a material impact on shareholders’ equity. Because of the long-term nature of our fixed maturities and liabilities and the strong cash flows generated by our insurance subsidiaries, we have the intent and ability to hold our securities to maturity. As such, we do not expect to incur realized gains or losses due to fluctuations in the market value of fixed maturities caused by interest rate changes or losses caused by temporarily illiquid markets. Accordingly, management removes the effect of this rule when analyzing Torchmark’s balance sheet, capital structure, and financial ratios in order to provide a more consistent and meaningful portrayal of the Company’s financial position from period to period.

The following table presents selected data related to capital resources. Additionally, the table presents the effect of this GAAP requirement on relevant line items, so that investors and other financial statement users may determine its impact on our capital structure.

53

Selected Financial Data

	At September 30, 2013						At December 31, 2012						At September 30, 2012
	GAAP			Effect of Accounting Rule Requiring Revaluation(1)			GAAP			Effect of Accounting Rule Requiring Revaluation(1)			GAAP			Effect of Accounting Rule Requiring Revaluation(1)
Fixed maturities (millions)	$	12,757		$	490		$	13,541		$	1,578		$	12,503		$	1,574
Deferred acquisition costs (millions)		3,306			(13	)		3,198			(25	)		2,995			(27	)
Total assets (millions)		18,138			477			18,777			1,553			17,940			1,547
Short-term debt (millions)		228			0			319			0			320			0
Long-term debt (millions)		991			0			990			0			1,089			0
Shareholders’ equity (millions)		3,777			310			4,362			1,009			4,309			1,006
Book value per diluted share		40.97			3.37			45.85			10.61			44.86			10.47
Debt to capitalization(2)		24.4	%		(1.6	)%		23.1	%		(5.0	)%		24.6	%		(5.3	)%
Diluted shares outstanding (thousands)		92,195						95,138						96,058
Actual shares outstanding (thousands)		90,754						94,236						94,882

(1) Amount added to (deducted from) comprehensive income to produce the stated GAAP item, per accounting rule ASC 320-10-35-1, formerly SFAS 115.

(2) Torchmark’s debt covenants require that the effect of this accounting rule be removed to determine this ratio. This ratio is computed by dividing total debt by the sum of total debt and shareholders’ equity.

Interest coverage was 10.1 times in the 2013 nine months, compared with 10.2 times in the 2012 period. Interest coverage is computed by dividing interest expense into the sum of pretax income and interest expense.

Cautionary Statements

We caution readers regarding certain forward-looking statements contained in the previous discussion and elsewhere in this document, and in any other statements made by, or on behalf of Torchmark whether or not in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any statement that is not a historical fact or that might otherwise be considered an opinion or projection concerning Torchmark or its business, whether express or implied, is meant as and should be considered a forward-looking statement. Such statements represent management’s opinions concerning future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. We specifically disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement because of new information, future developments, or otherwise.

Forward-looking statements are based upon estimates and assumptions that are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. If these estimates or assumptions prove to be incorrect, the

54

actual results of Torchmark may differ materially from the forward-looking statements made on the basis of such estimates or assumptions. Whether or not actual results differ materially from forward-looking statements may depend on numerous foreseeable and unforeseeable events or developments, which may be national in scope, related to the insurance industry generally, or applicable to Torchmark specifically. Such events or developments could include, but are not necessarily limited to:

1) Changing general economic conditions leading to unexpected changes in lapse rates and/or sales of our policies, as well as levels of mortality, morbidity, and utilization of health care services that differ from Torchmark’s assumptions;

2) Regulatory developments, including changes in governmental regulations (particularly those impacting taxes and changes to the Federal Medicare program that would affect Medicare Supplement and Medicare Part D insurance);

3) Market trends in the senior-aged health care industry that provide alternatives to traditional Medicare (such as Health Maintenance Organizations and other managed care or private plans) and that could affect the sales of traditional Medicare Supplement insurance;

4) Interest rate changes that affect product sales and/or investment portfolio yield;

5) General economic, industry sector or individual debt issuers’ financial conditions that may affect the current market value of securities we own, or that may impair an issuer’s ability to make principal and/or interest payments due on those securities;

6) Changes in pricing competition;

7) Litigation results;

8) Levels of administrative and operational efficiencies that differ from our assumptions;

9) Our inability to obtain timely and appropriate premium rate increases for health insurance policies due to regulatory delay;

10) The customer response to new products and marketing initiatives; and

11) Reported amounts in the financial statements which are based on management’s estimates and judgments which may differ from the actual amounts ultimately realized.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There have been no quantitative or qualitative changes with respect to market risk exposure during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

55

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Torchmark, under the direction of the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Torchmark in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The disclosure controls and procedures are also intended to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to Torchmark’s management, including the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As of the end of the fiscal quarter completed September 30, 2013, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of Torchmark management, including the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Torchmark’s disclosure controls and procedures (as those terms are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon their evaluation, the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that Torchmark’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the date of this Form 10-Q. In compliance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), each of these officers executed a Certification included as an exhibit to this Form 10-Q.

As of the date of this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, there have not been any changes in Torchmark’s internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect this control over financial reporting subsequent to the date of their evaluation which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Torchmark’s internal control over financial reporting. No material weaknesses in such internal controls were identified in the evaluation and as a consequence, no corrective action was required to be taken.

Part II – Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Torchmark and its subsidiaries, in common with the insurance industry in general, are subject to litigation, including claims involving tax matters, alleged breaches of contract, torts, including bad faith and fraud claims based on alleged wrongful or fraudulent acts of agents of Torchmark’s subsidiaries, employment discrimination, and miscellaneous other causes of action. Based upon information presently available, and in light of legal and other factual defenses available to Torchmark and its subsidiaries, management does not believe that such litigation will

56

have a material adverse effect on Torchmark’s financial condition, future operating results or liquidity; however, assessing the eventual outcome of litigation necessarily involves forward-looking speculation as to judgments to be made by judges, juries and appellate courts in the future. This bespeaks caution, particularly in states with reputations for high punitive damage verdicts such as Alabama and Mississippi. Torchmark’s management recognizes that large punitive damage awards bearing little or no relation to actual damages continue to be awarded by juries in jurisdictions in which Torchmark and its subsidiaries have substantial business, particularly Alabama and Mississippi, creating the potential for unpredictable material adverse judgments in any given punitive damage suit.

As previously reported in filings with the SEC, Torchmark subsidiary, United American was named as defendant in purported class action litigation filed on May 31, 2011 in Cross County Arkansas Circuit Court and subsequently removed to the United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas (Kennedy v. United American Insurance Company (Case No. 2:11-cv-00131-SWW). In the litigation, filed on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of owners of certain limited benefit hospital and surgical expense policies from United American, the plaintiff alleged that United American breached the policy by failing and/or refusing to pay benefits for the total number of days an insured is confined to a hospital and by limiting payment to the number of days for which there are incurred hospital room charges despite policy obligations allegedly requiring United American to pay benefits for services and supplies in addition to room charges. Claims for unjust enrichment, breach of contract, bad faith refusal to pay first party benefits, breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, bad faith, and violation of the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act were initially asserted. The plaintiff sought declaratory relief, restitution and/or monetary damages, punitive damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. In September 2011, the plaintiff dismissed all causes of action, except for the breach of contract claim. On November 14, 2011, plaintiff filed an amended complaint based upon the same facts asserting only breach of contract claims on behalf of a purported nationwide restitution/monetary relief class or, in the first alternative, a purported multiple- state restitution/monetary relief class or, in the second alternative, a purported Arkansas statewide restitution/monetary relief class. Restitution and/or monetary relief for United American’s alleged breach of contract, costs, attorney’s fees and expenses, expert fees, prejudgment interest and other relief sought on behalf of the plaintiff and members of the class. On December 7, 2011, United American filed a Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff’s amended complaint, which the Court subsequently denied on July 24, 2012. On September 28, 2012, plaintiff filed a second amended and supplemental complaint with the same allegations on behalf of a nationwide class or alternatively, an Arkansas statewide class limited to GSP2 policies. Plaintiff filed a third supplemental and amending class action complaint and a motion for leave to file an amended complaint on November 21, 2012 again with the same allegations but a different plaintiff class and alternatively, for sub-classes or a multistate class, which was opposed by United American. Plaintiff also filed a motion for class certification on November 21, 2012. On December 28, 2012, United American filed its response to

57

plaintiff’s motion for class certification. On April 3, 2013, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion for class certification and plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. The case was settled by the parties on September 12, 2013 and the dismissal was filed with the Court on September 24, 2013.

As previously reported in filings with the SEC, Torchmark and its subsidiary, United American were named as defendants in purported class action litigation filed November 27, 2012 in U. S. District Court for the Southern District of California (Friedman, et al. v. Torchmark Corporation, et al.,Case No. 12CV2837 IEGBGS). In the litigation, filed on behalf of a nationwide class of persons who had, within four years of the filing of the complaint, received any sales or solicitation telephone calls from Torchmark and United American to telephone numbers registered with the National Do Not Call Registry and who had not maintained a business relationship with the defendants within eighteen months of receiving defendants’ calls, plaintiff asserted violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 27 et seq.) by virtue of pre-recorded calls inviting the plaintiff to contact United American to attend a “recruiting webinar”. Monetary damages for each separate violation of TCPA were sought. On January 3, 2013, motions to dismiss were filed on behalf of Torchmark (not objected to by plaintiff) and United American (objected to by plaintiff). The Court granted Torchmark’s motion to dismiss on February 20, 2013 and United American’s motion to dismiss on April 16, 2013, with leave to the plaintiff to file an amended complaint against United American by May 7, 2013. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on May 7, 2013 and on May 17, 2013, United American filed a motion to dismiss this amended complaint, which was opposed by the plaintiff. The Court granted United American’s motion to dismiss on August 13, 2013 and the plaintiffs did not appeal the dismissal.

Torchmark’s subsidiary, First United American Life Insurance Company was named as a defendant in litigation filed August 5, 2011 in New York Supreme Court, King’s County (Maimonides Medical Center v. First United American Life Insurance Company, Index No. 17935/2011). In the litigation, Maimonides, a New York not-for-profit hospital, alleged that First United American owed approximately $15 million in unpaid claims for medical services provided to six of First United American’s Medicare supplement insureds who had exhausted Medicare. Maimonides asserted that New York Insurance Law §3224-a (the “Prompt Pay Law”) mandated that once Medicare is exhausted, the Medicare supplement insurer must pay the provider’s billed amounts as opposed to the Medicare-approved amounts, which were the amounts paid by First United American. First United American filed a partial motion to dismiss based upon the lack of a private right of action under New York’s Prompt Pay Law in October 2011. The Court denied the motion to dismiss on February 22, 2012, holding that Maimonides could bring a private cause of action. First United American appealed this ruling to the Appellate Division in March 2012 and oral arguments on the appeal were held in May 2013. Mediation of this matter was held on August 6, 2013 and all parties entered into a confidential settlement of this matter on October 4, 2013.

58

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Torchmark has had no material changes to its risk factors.

Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

(e) Purchases of Certain Equity Securities by the Issuer and Others

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased		(b) Average Price Paid Per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number of Shares (or Approximate Dollar Amount) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1-31, 2013		292,000	$	68.55		292,000
August 1-31, 2013		706,300		70.67		706,300
September 1-30, 2013		368,000		71.72		368,000

At its August 7, 2013 meeting, the Board of Directors reaffirmed the Company’s share repurchase program in amounts and with timing that management, in consultation with the Board, determines to be in the best interest of the Company. The program has no defined expiration date or maximum shares to be repurchased.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

(10.1)	Compensation of Chairman of the Board
(11)	Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings
(31.1)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Larry M. Hutchison
(31.2)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Gary L. Coleman
(31.3)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Frank M. Svoboda
(32.1)	Section 1350 Certification by Larry M. Hutchison, Gary L. Coleman, and Frank M. Svoboda
(101)	Interactive Data Files for the Torchmark Corporation Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013

59

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	TORCHMARK CORPORATION
Date: November 8, 2013	/s/  Larry M. Hutchison
	Larry M. Hutchison
	Co-Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 8, 2013	/s/  Gary L. Coleman
	Gary L. Coleman
	Co-Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 8, 2013	/s/  Frank M. Svoboda
	Frank M. Svoboda
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

60