SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ' |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ' |
|
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
General |
|
We operate our businesses as three segments: electric, gas and other. The Empire District Electric Company (EDE), a Kansas corporation organized in 1909, is an operating public utility engaged in the generation, purchase, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in parts of Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma and Arkansas. As part of our electric segment, we also provide water service to three towns in Missouri. The Empire District Gas Company (EDG) is our wholly owned subsidiary engaged in the distribution of natural gas in Missouri. Our other segment consists of our fiber optics business. See Note 12. Our gross operating revenues in 2013 were derived as follows: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electric segment sales* | | | 90.3 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gas segment sales | | | 8.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other segment sales | | | 1.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
* |
Sales from our electric segment include 0.4% from the sale of water. |
|
The utility portions of our business are subject to regulation by the Missouri Public Service Commission (MPSC), the State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas (KCC), the Corporation Commission of Oklahoma (OCC), the Arkansas Public Service Commission (APSC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Our accounting policies are in accordance with the ratemaking practices of the regulatory authorities and conform to generally accepted accounting principles as applied to regulated public utilities. |
|
Our electric operations serve approximately 168,800 customers as of December 31, 2013, and the 2013 electric operating revenues were derived as follows: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Customer | | % of revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | 42.6 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | 30.4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Industrial | | | 15.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wholesale on-system | | | 3.7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wholesale off-system | | | 2.9 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Miscellaneous sources, primarily public authorities | | | 2.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other electric revenues | | | 2.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Our retail electric revenues for 2013 by jurisdiction were as follows: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jurisdiction | | % of revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Missouri | | | 89.8 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kansas | | | 4.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Arkansas | | | 2.5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Oklahoma | | | 2.9 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Our gas operations serve approximately 44,000 customers as of December 31, 2013, and the 2013 gas operating revenues were derived as follows: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Customer | | % of revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | | | 63.1 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | | 27.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Industrial | | | 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other | | | 8.6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EDE, EDG, and our other subsidiaries. The consolidated entity is referred to throughout as "we" or the "Company". All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. See Note 12 for additional information regarding our three segments. |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Areas in the financial statements significantly affected by estimates and assumptions include unbilled utility revenues, collectibility of accounts receivable, depreciable lives, asset impairment and goodwill impairment evaluations, employee benefit obligations, contingent liabilities, asset retirement obligations, the fair value of stock based compensation, tax provisions and derivatives. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates. |
|
Accounting for the Effects of Regulation |
|
In accordance with the Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) guidance for regulated operations, our financial statements reflect ratemaking policies prescribed by the regulatory commissions having jurisdiction over our regulated generation and other utility operations (the MPSC, the KCC, the OCC, the APSC and the FERC). |
|
We record a regulatory asset for all or part of an incurred cost that would otherwise be charged to expense in accordance with the ASC guidance for regulated operations which say that an asset should be recorded if it is probable that future revenue in an amount at least equal to the capitalized cost will be allowable for costs for rate making purposes and the current available evidence indicates that future revenue will be provided to permit recovery of the cost. This guidance also indicates that a liability should be recorded when a regulator has provided current recovery for a cost that is expected to be incurred in the future. We follow this guidance for incurred costs or credits that are subject to future recovery from or refund to our customers in accordance with the orders of our regulators. |
|
Historically, all costs of this nature, which are determined by our regulators to have been prudently incurred, have been recoverable through rates in the course of normal ratemaking procedures. Regulatory assets and liabilities are ratably amortized through a charge or credit, respectively, to earnings while being recovered in revenues and fully recognized if and when it is no longer probable that such amounts will be recovered through future revenues. We continually assess the recoverability of our regulatory assets. Although we believe it unlikely, should retail electric competition legislation be passed in the states we serve, we may determine that we no longer meet the criteria set forth in the ASC guidance for regulated operations with respect to continued recognition of some or all of the regulatory assets and liabilities. Any regulatory changes that would require us to discontinue application of this guidance based upon competitive or other events may also impact the valuation of certain utility plant investments. Impairment of regulatory assets or utility plant investments could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. (See Note 3 for further discussion of regulatory assets and liabilities). |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
For our utility operations, we use cycle billing and accrue estimated, but unbilled, revenue for services provided between the last bill date and the period end date. Unbilled revenues represent the estimate of receivables for energy and natural gas services delivered, but not yet billed to customers. The accuracy of our unbilled revenue estimate is affected by factors including fluctuations in energy demands, weather, line losses and changes in the composition of customer classes. During 2012, the Company recorded an increase in electric unbilled revenues as a result of certain changes to the assumptions used in determining estimated unbilled revenues. |
|
Municipal Franchise Taxes |
|
Municipal franchise taxes are collected for and remitted to their respective entities and are included in operating revenues and other taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Municipal franchise taxes of $11.2 million, $10.4 million and $11.0 million were recorded for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
Accounts receivable are recorded at the tariffed rates for customer usage, including applicable taxes and fees and do not bear interest. We review the outstanding accounts receivable monthly, as well as the bad debt write-offs experienced in the past, and establish an allowance for doubtful accounts. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when management determines it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. |
|
Property, Plant & Equipment |
|
The costs of additions to utility property and replacements for retired property units are capitalized. Costs include labor, material, an allocation of general and administrative costs, and an allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC). The original cost of units retired or disposed of and the costs of removal are charged to accumulated depreciation, unless the removed property constitutes an operating unit or system. In this case a gain or loss is recognized upon the disposal of the asset. Maintenance expenditures and the removal of minor property items are charged to income as incurred. A liability is created for any additions to electric or gas utility property that are paid for by advances from developers. For a period of five years the Company refunds, to the developer, a pro rata amount of the original cost of the extension for each new customer added to the extension. Nonrefundable payments at the end of the five year period are applied as a reduction to the cost of the plant in service. The liability as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $4.2 million and $5.2 million, respectively. |
|
Depreciation |
|
Provisions for depreciation are computed at straight-line rates in accordance with GAAP consistent with rates approved by regulatory authorities. These rates are applied to the various classes of utility assets on a composite basis. Provisions for depreciation for our other segment are computed at straight-line rates over the estimated useful life of the properties (See Note 2 for additional details regarding depreciation rates). |
|
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had recorded accrued cost of removal of $81.3 million and $77.3 million, respectively, for our electric operating segment. This represents an estimated cost of dismantling and removing plant from service upon retirement, accrued as part of our depreciation rates. We accrue cost of removal in depreciation rates for mass property (including transmission, distribution and general plant assets). These accruals are not considered an asset retirement obligation under the guidance provided on asset retirement obligations within the ASC. We reclassify the accrued cost of dismantling and removing plant from service upon retirement from accumulated depreciation to a regulatory liability. We have a similar cost of removal regulatory liability for our gas operating segment. This amount at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $7.2 million and $6.1 million, respectively. These amounts are net of our actual cost of removal expenditures. |
|
Asset Retirement Obligation |
|
We record the estimated fair value of legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets in the period in which the liabilities are incurred and capitalize a corresponding amount as part of the book value of the related long-lived asset. In subsequent periods, we are required to adjust asset retirement obligations based on changes in estimated fair value, and the corresponding increases in asset book values are depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Uncertainties as to the probability, timing or cash flows associated with an asset retirement obligation affect our estimate of fair value. |
|
We have identified asset retirement obligations associated with the future removal of certain river water intake structures and equipment at the Iatan Power Plant, in which we have a 12% ownership. We also have a solid waste land fill at the Plum Point Energy Station, and asset retirement obligations associated with the removal of asbestos located at the Riverton and Asbury Plants, and a liability for containment of the ash landfill at the Riverton Power Plant. As a result of the fuel use transition from coal to natural gas at the Riverton Power Plant, the closure of the Riverton ash landfill is underway (Note 11). |
|
In addition, we have a liability for the removal and disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) contaminants associated with our transformers and substation equipment. These liabilities have been estimated based upon either third party costs or historical review of expenditures for the removal of similar past liabilities. The potential costs of these future expenditures are based on engineering estimates of third party costs to remove the assets in satisfaction of the associated obligations. This liability will be accreted over the period up to the estimated settlement date. |
|
All of our recorded asset retirement obligations have been estimated as of the expected retirement date, or settlement date, and have been discounted using a credit adjusted risk-free rate ranging from 4.5% to 5.52% depending on the settlement date. Revisions to these liabilities could occur due to changes in the cost estimates, anticipated timing of settlement or federal or state regulatory requirements. During the 2012 year, the liabilities for both the ash landfill at the Riverton Power Plant, and PCB contaminants were re-evaluated. Changes in the cost estimates and timing resulted in cash flow revisions for these liabilities. |
|
The balances at the end of 2012 and 2013 are shown below. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(000's) | | Liability | | Liabilities | | Liabilities | | Accretion | | Cash Flow | | Liability | |
Balance 12/31/12 | Recognized | Settled | Revisions | Balance at |
| | | | 12/31/13 |
Asset Retirement Obligation | | $ | 4,711 | | $ | — | | $ | (734 | ) | $ | 213 | | $ | — | | $ | 4,190 | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(000's) | | Liability | | Liabilities | | Liabilities | | Accretion | | Cash Flow | | Liability | |
Balance 12/31/11 | Recognized | Settled | Revisions | Balance at |
| | | | 12/31/12 |
Asset Retirement Obligation | | $ | 3,944 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 252 | | $ | 515 | | $ | 4,711 | |
|
Upon adoption of the standards on the retirement of long lived assets and conditional asset retirement obligations, we recorded a liability and regulatory asset because we expect to recover these costs of removal in electric and gas rates either through depreciation accruals or direct expenses. We also defer the liability accretion and depreciation expense as a regulatory asset. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, our regulatory assets relating to asset retirement obligations totaled $4.7 million and $4.4 million, respectively. |
|
Also as noted previously under property, plant and equipment, we reclassify the accrued cost of dismantling and removing plant from service upon retirement, which is not considered an asset retirement obligation under this guidance, from accumulated depreciation to a regulatory liability. This balance sheet reclassification has no impact on results of operations. |
|
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction |
|
As provided in the FERC regulatory Uniform System of Accounts, utility plant is recorded at original cost, including an allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) when first placed in service. The AFUDC is a utility industry accounting practice whereby the cost of borrowed funds and the cost of equity funds applicable to our construction program are capitalized as a cost of construction. This accounting practice offsets the effect on earnings of the cost of financing current construction, and treats such financing costs in the same manner as construction charges for labor and materials. |
|
AFUDC does not represent current cash income. Recognition of this item as a cost of utility plant is in accordance with regulatory rate practice under which such plant costs are permitted as a component of rate base and the provision for depreciation. |
|
In accordance with the methodology prescribed by the FERC, we utilized aggregate rates (on a before-tax basis) of 7.3% for 2013, 5.6% for 2012, and 5.2% for 2011, compounded semiannually.. The specific Iatan 2 AFUDC rate was a result of our Experimental Regulatory Plan approved by the MPSC on August 2, 2005, and it terminated on June 15, 2011. In this agreement, we were allowed to receive the regulatory amortization discussed above, in rates prior to the completion of Iatan 2. As a result, the equity portion of our AFUDC rate for the Iatan 2 project was reduced by 2.5 percentage points (See Note 3 for additional discussion of our regulatory plan). |
|
Asset Impairments (excluding goodwill) |
|
We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. To the extent that certain assets may be impaired, analysis is performed based on undiscounted forecasted cash flows to assess the recoverability of the assets and, if necessary, the fair value is determined to measure the impairment amount. None of our assets were impaired as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. |
|
Goodwill |
|
As of December 31, 2013, the consolidated balance sheet included $39.5 million of goodwill. All of this goodwill was derived from our gas acquisition and recorded in our gas segment, which is also the reporting unit for goodwill testing purposes. Accounting guidance requires us to test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or circumstances indicate possible impairment. Absent an indication of fair value from a potential buyer or a similar specific transaction, a combination of the market and income approaches is used to estimate the fair value of goodwill. |
|
We use the market approach which estimates fair value of the gas reporting unit by comparing certain financial metrics to comparable companies. Comparable companies whose securities are actively traded in the public market are judgmentally selected by management based on operational and economic similarities. We utilize EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) multiples of the comparable companies in relation to the EBITDA results of the gas reporting unit to determine an estimate of fair value. |
|
We also utilize a valuation technique under the income approach which estimates the discounted future cash flows of operations. Our procedures include developing a baseline test and performing sensitivity analysis to calculate a reasonable valuation range. The sensitivities are derived from altering those assumptions which are subjective in nature and inherent to a discounted cash flows calculation. Other qualitative factors and comparisons to industry peers are also used to further support the assumptions and ultimately the overall evaluation. A key qualitative assumption considered in our evaluation is the impact of regulation, including rate regulation and cost recovery for the gas reporting unit. Some of the key quantitative assumptions included in our tests involve: regulatory rate design and results; the discount rate; the growth rate; capital spending rates and terminal value calculations. If negative changes occurred to one or more key assumptions, an impairment charge could result. With the exception of the capital spending rate, the key assumptions noted are significantly determined by market factors and significant changes in market factors that impact the gas reporting unit would somewhat be mitigated by our current and future regulatory rate design. Other risks and uncertainties affecting these assumptions include: changes in business, industry, laws, technology and economic conditions. Actual results for the gas reporting unit indicate a slight decline in gas customer count and demand. A continued decline in customer count or demand coupled with an increase in the discount rate would have adverse impacts on the valuation and could result in an impairment charge in the future. Our forecast anticipate flat customer counts over the next several years. |
|
We weight the results of the two approaches discussed above in order to estimate the fair value of the gas reporting unit. Our annual test performed as of October 2013 indicated the estimated fair market value of the gas reporting unit to be $10-14 million higher than its carrying value at that time. While we believe the assumptions utilized in our analysis were reasonable, adverse developments in future periods could negatively impact goodwill impairment considerations, which could adversely impact earnings. Specifically, the quantitative assumptions noted previously, such as an increase to the discount rate or decline in the terminal value calculation could lead to an impairment charge in the future. |
|
Fuel and Purchased Power |
|
Electric Segment |
|
Fuel and purchased power costs are recorded at the time the fuel is used, or the power purchased. This amount is adjusted to reflect regulatory treatment for our Missouri and Kansas fuel adjustment mechanisms discussed below. |
|
In our Missouri jurisdiction, the MPSC established a base cost for the recovery of fuel and purchased power expenses used to supply energy for our fuel adjustment clause (FAC). The FAC permits the distribution to customers of 95% of the changes in fuel and purchased power costs prudently incurred above or below the base cost. Off-system sales margins are also part of the recovery of fuel and purchased power costs. As a result, nearly the entire off-system sales margin flows back to the customer. Rates related to the fuel adjustment clause are modified twice a year subject to the review and approval by the MPSC. In accordance with the ASC guidance for regulated operations, 95% of the difference between the actual costs of fuel and purchased power and the base cost of fuel and purchased power recovered from our customers is recorded as an adjustment to fuel and purchased power expense with a corresponding regulatory asset or regulatory liability. If the actual fuel and purchased power costs are higher or lower than the base fuel and purchased power costs billed to customers, 95% of these amounts will be recovered or refunded to our customers when the fuel adjustment clause is modified. |
|
In our Kansas jurisdiction, the costs of fuel are recovered from customers through a fuel adjustment clause, based upon estimated fuel costs and purchased power. The adjustments are subject to audit and final determination by regulators. The difference between the costs of fuel used and the cost of fuel recovered from our Kansas customers is recorded as a regulatory asset or a regulatory liability if the actual costs are higher or lower than the costs billed to customers, in accordance with the ASC guidance for regulated operations. Similar fuel recovery mechanisms are in place for our Oklahoma, Arkansas and FERC jurisdictions. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, our Missouri, Kansas and Oklahoma fuel and purchased power costs were in a net over-recovered position by $0.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively, which are reflected in our regulatory assets and liabilities. |
|
We receive the renewable attributes associated with the power purchased through our purchased power agreements with Elk River Windfarm LLC and Cloud County Windfarm, LLC. These renewable attributes are converted into renewable energy credits, which are considered inventory, and recorded at zero cost (See Note 11). Revenue from the sale of renewable energy credits reduces fuel and purchased power expense. |
|
We have a Stipulation and Agreement with the MPSC granting us authority to manage our SO2 allowance inventory in accordance with our SO2 Allowance Management Policy (SAMP). The SAMP allows us to exchange banked allowances for future vintage allowances and/or monetary value and, in extreme market conditions, to sell SO2 allowances outright for monetary value. We have not yet exchanged or sold any allowances. We classify our allowances as inventory and they are recorded at cost, with allocated allowances being recorded at zero cost. The allowances are removed from inventory on a FIFO basis, and used allowances are considered to be a part of fuel expense (See Note 11). We had 1,834 and 5,187 SO2 allowances in inventory at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. . |
|
Gas Segment |
|
Fuel expense for our gas segment is recognized when the natural gas is delivered to our customers, based on the current cost recovery allowed in rates. A Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) clause allows EDG to recover from our customers, subject to audit and final determination by regulators, the cost of purchased gas supplies and related carrying costs associated with the Company's use of natural gas financial instruments to hedge the purchase price of natural gas. This PGA clause allows us to make rate changes periodically (up to four times) throughout the year in response to weather conditions and supply demands, rather than in one possibly extreme change per year. |
|
We calculate the PGA factor based on our best estimate of our annual gas costs and volumes purchased for resale. The calculated factor is reviewed by the MPSC staff and approved by the MPSC. Elements considered part of the PGA factor include cost of gas supply, storage costs, hedging contracts, revenue and refunds, prior period adjustments and transportation costs. |
|
Pursuant to the provisions of the PGA clause, the difference between actual costs incurred and costs recovered through the application of the PGA (including costs, cost reductions and carrying costs associated with the use of financial instruments) are reflected as a regulatory asset or liability. The balance is amortized as amounts are reflected in customer billings. |
|
Derivatives |
|
We utilize derivatives to help manage our natural gas commodity market risk resulting from purchasing natural gas, to be used as fuel in our electric business or sold in our natural gas business, on the spot market and to manage certain interest rate exposure. We also acquire Transmission Congestion Rights (TCR) in an attempt to mitigate congestion costs associated with the power we will purchase from the SPP Integrated Market (see Note 14). |
|
Electric Segment |
|
Pursuant to the ASC guidance on accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities, derivatives are required to be recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. On the date a derivative contract is entered into, the derivative is designated as (1) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability ("cash-flow" hedge); or (2) an instrument that is held for non-hedging purposes (a "non-hedging" instrument). We record the mark-to-market gains or losses on derivatives used to hedge our fuel and congestion costs as regulatory assets or liabilities. This is in accordance with the ASC guidance on regulated operations, given that those regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of recovery through our fuel adjustment mechanism. |
|
We also enter into fixed-price forward physical contracts for the purchase of natural gas, coal and purchased power. These contracts, if they meet the definition of a derivative, are not subject to derivative accounting because they are considered to be normal purchase normal sales (NPNS) transactions. If these transactions don't qualify for NPNS treatment, they would be marked to market for each reporting period through regulatory assets or liabilities. |
|
Gas Segment |
|
Financial hedges for our natural gas business are recorded at fair value on our balance sheet. Because we have a commission approved natural gas cost recovery mechanism (PGA), we record the mark-to-market gain/loss on natural gas financial hedges each reporting period to a regulatory asset/liability account. The regulatory asset/liability account tracks the difference between revenues billed to customers for natural gas costs and actual natural gas expense which is trued up at the end of August each year and included in the Actual Cost Adjustment (ACA) factor to be billed to customers during the next year. This is consistent with the ASC guidance on regulated operations, in that we will be recovering our costs after the annual true up period (subject to a prudency review by the MPSC). |
|
Cash flows from hedges for both electric and gas segments are classified within cash flows from operations. |
|
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits |
|
We recognize expense related to pension and other postretirement benefits as earned during the employee's period of service. Related assets and liabilities are established based upon the funded status of the plan compared to the projected benefit obligation. Our pension and OPEB expense or benefit includes amortization of previously unrecognized net gains or losses. Additional income or expense may be recognized when our unrecognized gains or losses as of the most recent measurement date exceed 10% of our postretirement benefit obligation or fair value of plan assets, whichever is greater. For pension benefits and OPEB benefits, unrecognized net gains or losses as of the measurement date are amortized into actuarial expense over ten years. |
|
Pensions |
|
We have rate orders with Missouri, Kansas and Oklahoma that allow us to recover pension costs consistent with our GAAP policy noted above. In accordance with the rate orders, we prospectively calculate the value of plan assets using a market-related value method as allowed by the ASC guidance on pension benefits. As a result, we are allowed to record the Missouri, Kansas and Oklahoma portion of any costs above or below the amount included in rates as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively. The MPSC has allowed us to adopt this pension cost recovery methodology for EDG as well. |
|
Other Postretirement Benefits (OPEB) |
|
We have regulatory treatment for our OPEB costs similar to the treatment described above for pension costs. This includes the use of a market-related value of assets, the amortization of unrecognized gains or losses into actuarial expense over ten years and the recognition of regulatory assets and liabilities as described above. |
|
In accordance with the guidance provided in the ASC on the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) and net cost recognized for OPEB reflects the effects of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act). The Act provides for a federal subsidy, beginning in 2006, of 28% of prescription drug costs between $250 and $5,000 for each Medicare-eligible retiree who does not join Medicare Part D, to companies whose plans provide prescription drug benefits to their retirees that are "actuarially equivalent" to the prescription drug benefits provided under Medicare. Equivalency must be certified annually by the Federal Government. Our plan provides prescription drug benefits that are "actuarially equivalent" to the prescription drug benefits provided under Medicare and have been certified as such. |
|
Additional guidance in the ASC on employers' accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans requires an employer to recognize the over funded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity. The guidance also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position, with limited exceptions. Pension and other postretirement employee benefits tracking mechanisms are utilized to allow for future rate recovery of these obligations. We record these as regulatory assets on the balance sheet rather than as reductions of equity through comprehensive income (See Note 8). |
|
Unamortized Debt Discount, Premium and Expense |
|
Discount, premium and expense associated with long-term debt are amortized over the lives of the related issues. Costs, including gains and losses, related to refunded long-term debt are amortized over the lives of the related new debt issues, in accordance with regulatory rate practices. |
|
Liability Insurance |
|
We are primarily self-insured for workers' compensation claims, general liabilities, benefits paid under employee healthcare programs and long-term disability benefits. Accruals are primarily based on the estimated undiscounted cost of claims. We self-insure up to certain limits that vary by segment and type of risk. Periodically, we evaluate the level of insurance coverage over the self-insured limits and adjust insurance levels based on risk tolerance and premium expense. We carry excess liability insurance for workers' compensation and public liability claims for our electric segment. In order to provide for the cost of losses not covered by insurance, an allowance for injuries and damages is maintained based on our loss experience. Our gas segment is covered by excess liability insurance for public liability claims, and workers' compensation claims are covered by a guaranteed cost policy (See Note 11). |
|
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities are comprised of accruals and other accounting estimates not sufficiently large enough to merit individual disclosure. At December 31, 2013, the balance of other noncurrent liabilities is primarily comprised of accruals for self-insurance, customer advances for construction and asset retirement obligations. |
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
|
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and temporary investments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less. It also includes checks and electronic funds transfers that have been issued but have not cleared the bank, which are also reflected in current accrued liabilities and were $22.1 million and $19.7 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
|
Restricted Cash |
|
As part of our Plum Point ownership agreement, we are required to have funds available in an escrow account which guarantees payment of certain operating and construction costs. The cash is held at a financial institution and restricted as to withdrawal or use. The restrictions on these funds related to construction costs, which were approximately $2.5 million at December 31, 2012, were released by all parties in January 2013. The amounts restricted for operating costs, which were $1.8 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, may increase or decrease based on an annual review. |
|
We are required to post secured collateral with Southwest Power Pool (SPP) to participate in Transmission Congestion Rights (TCR) auctions. The cash is held at a financial institution and restricted as to withdrawal or use. The restrictions on these funds were $1.1 million at December 31, 2013. |
|
Fuel, Materials and Supplies |
|
Fuel, materials and supplies consist primarily of coal, natural gas in storage and materials and supplies, which are reported at average cost. These balances are as follows (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electric fuel inventory | | $ | 17,003 | | $ | 27,954 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Natural gas inventory | | | 3,584 | | | 4,776 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Materials and supplies | | | 28,224 | | | 29,140 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL | | $ | 48,811 | | $ | 61,870 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax consequences of transactions that have been treated differently for financial reporting and tax return purposes, measured using statutory tax rates (See Note 9). |
|
Investment tax credits utilized in prior years were deferred and are being amortized over the useful lives of the properties to which they relate. The longest remaining amortization period for investment tax credits is approximately 50 years. |
|
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes |
|
In 2006, the FASB issued guidance which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with the ASC guidance on accounting for income taxes. We file consolidated income tax returns in the U.S. federal and state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2009. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, our balance sheet did not include any unrecognized tax benefits. We do not expect any material changes to unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months. We recognize interest accrued and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in other expenses. |
|
Computations of Earnings Per Share |
|
The ASC guidance on earnings per share requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share does not include potentially dilutive securities and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share assumes the issuance of common shares pursuant to the Company's stock-based compensation plans at the beginning of each respective period, or at the date of grant or award if later. Shares attributable to stock options are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share if the effect would be antidilutive. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average Number Of Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 42,781,382 | | | 42,256,641 | | | 41,851,759 | | | | | | | | | | |
Dilutive Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance-based restricted stock awards | | | 12,142 | | | 14,500 | | | 18,222 | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividend equivalents | | | — | | | 6,329 | | | 9,585 | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee stock purchase plan | | | 1,729 | | | 1,996 | | | 3,815 | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | | 61 | | | 3,160 | | | 3,240 | | | | | | | | | | |
Time-based restricted stock awards | | | 7,907 | | | 1,820 | | | 807 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total dilutive securities | | | 21,839 | | | 27,805 | | | 35,669 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted weighted average number of shares | | | 42,803,221 | | | 42,284,446 | | | 41,887,428 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Antidilutive Shares | | | 107,100 | | | 128,500 | | | 128,500 | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Potentially dilutive shares are not expected to have a material impact unless significant appreciation of the Company's stock price occurs. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
We have several stock-based compensation plans, which are described in more detail in Note 4. In accordance with the ASC guidance on stock-based compensation, we recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period of all stock-based compensation awards based upon the fair-value of the award as of the date of issuance. |
|
Recently Issued and Proposed Accounting Standards |
|
Balance Sheet Offsetting: In December 2011, the FASB amended the guidance governing the offsetting, or netting, of assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. Under the revised guidance, an entity would be required to disclose both the gross and net information about instruments and transactions that are eligible for offset on the balance sheet, as well as instruments or transactions subject to a master netting agreement. This standard is effective for annual periods beginning after January 1, 2013. The application of this standard did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity. |
|
Presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit: In July 2013, The FASB issued new guidance on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits. Under this guidance, an unrecognized tax benefit would be presented as a reduction to a deferred tax asset when a tax credit carryforward, net operating loss carryforward, or similar tax loss exists. To the extent that the loss or credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date, or the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such a purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented as a liability and not be combined with deferred tax assets. This standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The application of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity. |
|