SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 | |
Or | |
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _____________ to _____________ | |
Commission file number 0-11129
COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Kentucky | 61-0979818 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | IRS Employer Identification No. |
346 North Mayo Trail Pikeville, Kentucky (address of principal executive offices) | 41501 (Zip Code) |
(606) 432-1414
(Registrant's telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesü | No |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yesü | No |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.
Common stock - 14,871,948 shares outstanding at April 30, 2005
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements
The accompanying information has not been audited by independent registered public accountants; however, in the opinion of management such information reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all of the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or those normally made in the Registrant's annual report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, the reader of the Form 10-Q should refer to the Registrant's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for further information in this regard.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands) | March 31 2005 | December 31 2004 | |||||
Assets: | |||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 81,507 | $ | 78,725 | |||
Federal funds sold | 88,181 | 50,855 | |||||
Securities available-for-sale at fair value | |||||||
(amortized cost of $470,340 and $480,671, respectively) | 467,443 | 482,280 | |||||
Securities held-to-maturity at amortized cost | |||||||
(fair value of $58,379 and $61,947, respectively) | 59,752 | 62,671 | |||||
Loans | 1,937,285 | 1,902,519 | |||||
Allowance for loan losses | (27,509 | ) | (27,017 | ) | |||
Net loans | 1,909,776 | 1,875,502 | |||||
Premises and equipment, net | 52,559 | 53,111 | |||||
Goodwill | 60,122 | 60,122 | |||||
Core deposit intangible (net of accumulated amortization of $3,856 and | |||||||
$3,711, respectively) | 3,104 | 3,249 | |||||
Other assets | 43,014 | 42,579 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 2,765,458 | $ | 2,709,094 | |||
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity: | |||||||
Deposits | |||||||
Noninterest bearing | $ | 403,537 | $ | 403,792 | |||
Interest bearing | 1,762,319 | 1,736,626 | |||||
Total deposits | 2,165,856 | 2,140,418 | |||||
Repurchase agreements | 109,807 | 88,404 | |||||
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings | 9,955 | 4,240 | |||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank | 162,255 | 162,391 | |||||
Long-term debt | 59,500 | 59,500 | |||||
Other liabilities | 20,014 | 17,972 | |||||
Total liabilities | 2,527,387 | 2,472,925 | |||||
Shareholders’ equity: | |||||||
Preferred stock, 300,000 shares authorized and unissued | |||||||
Common stock, $5 par value, shares authorized 25,000,000; | |||||||
shares outstanding 2005 - 14,862,687; 2004 - 14,845,217 | 74,313 | 74,226 | |||||
Capital surplus | 145,371 | 145,023 | |||||
Retained earnings | 20,270 | 15,874 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (1,883 | ) | 1,046 | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 238,071 | 236,169 | |||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 2,765,458 | $ | 2,709,094 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(unaudited)
Three months ended | |||||||
March 31 | |||||||
(in thousands except per share data) | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Interest income: | |||||||
Interest and fees on loans, including loans held for sale | $ | 30,467 | $ | 26,859 | |||
Interest and dividends on securities | |||||||
Taxable | 5,052 | 3,696 | |||||
Tax exempt | 537 | 573 | |||||
Other, including interest on federal funds sold | 442 | 169 | |||||
Total interest income | 36,498 | 31,297 | |||||
Interest expense: | |||||||
Interest on deposits | 8,946 | 6,879 | |||||
Interest on repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings | 619 | 383 | |||||
Interest on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank | 1,240 | 40 | |||||
Interest on long-term debt | 1,314 | 1,314 | |||||
Total interest expense | 12,119 | 8,616 | |||||
Net interest income | 24,379 | 22,681 | |||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,367 | 2,133 | |||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 23,012 | 20,548 | |||||
Noninterest income: | |||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 4,047 | 4,237 | |||||
Gains on sales of loans, net | 305 | 459 | |||||
Trust income | 740 | 561 | |||||
Securities gains, net | 0 | 1 | |||||
Other | 2,613 | 2,757 | |||||
Total noninterest income | 7,705 | 8,015 | |||||
Noninterest expense: | |||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 10,261 | 9,691 | |||||
Occupancy, net | 1,541 | 1,441 | |||||
Equipment | 998 | 972 | |||||
Data processing | 1,140 | 997 | |||||
Stationery, printing, and office supplies | 373 | 326 | |||||
Taxes other than payroll, property, and income | 787 | 803 | |||||
FDIC insurance | 72 | 79 | |||||
Legal and professional fees | 834 | 865 | |||||
Other | 3,201 | 3,020 | |||||
Total noninterest expense | 19,207 | 18,194 | |||||
Income before income taxes | 11,510 | 10,369 | |||||
Income taxes | 3,549 | 3,089 | |||||
Net income | 7,961 | 7,280 | |||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | |||||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) | (2,929 | ) | 1,193 | ||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 5,032 | $ | 8,473 |
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.49 | |||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.48 | |||
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic | 14,857 | 14,814 | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted | 15,148 | 15,084 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
Three months ended | |||||||
March 31 | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||
Net income | $ | 7,961 | $ | 7,280 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,213 | 1,091 | |||||
Provision for loan and other real estate losses | 1,367 | 2,187 | |||||
Securities gains, net | 0 | (1 | ) | ||||
Gains on sale of mortgage loans held for sale | (305 | ) | (459 | ) | |||
Gains (losses) on sale of assets, net | (6 | ) | 4 | ||||
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale | 12,817 | 17,652 | |||||
Funding of loans held for sale | (12,512 | ) | (17,558 | ) | |||
Amortization of securities premiums, net | 376 | 293 | |||||
Change in mortgage loans held for sale, net | 0 | (365 | ) | ||||
Changes in: | |||||||
Other liabilities | 2,606 | 1,888 | |||||
Other assets | 871 | 8,523 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 14,388 | 20,535 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||
Securities available-for-sale: | |||||||
Proceeds from sales | 1,800 | 60,600 | |||||
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities | 19,456 | 27,728 | |||||
Purchase of securities | (11,232 | ) | (31,723 | ) | |||
Securities held-to-maturity: | |||||||
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities | 2,849 | 8,532 | |||||
Change in loans, net | (36,320 | ) | (36,042 | ) | |||
Purchase of premises, equipment, and other real estate | (531 | ) | (1,070 | ) | |||
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment | 21 | 19 | |||||
Proceeds from sale of other real estate | 539 | 402 | |||||
Additional investment in OREO | (153 | ) | 0 | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (23,571 | ) | 28,446 | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||
Change in deposits, net | 25,438 | (12,012 | ) | ||||
Change in repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings, net | 27,118 | (8,246 | ) | ||||
Payments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank | (136 | ) | (394 | ) | |||
Issuance of common stock | 437 | 543 | |||||
Purchase of common stock | 0 | (1,400 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid | (3,566 | ) | (3,101 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 49,291 | (24,610 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 40,108 | 24,371 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 129,580 | 88,961 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 169,688 | $ | 113,332 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (which consist of normal recurring accruals) necessary, to present fairly the condensed consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2005, the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, these statements do not include certain information and footnote disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete annual financial statements. Financial information as of December 31, 2004 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”). The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Principles of Consolidation - The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its separate and distinct, wholly owned subsidiaries Community Trust Bank, Inc. (the“Bank”) and Community Trust and Investment Company. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Ø Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities -In January 2003,the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")issued Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin 51. The primary objectives of this interpretation are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (variable interest entities) and how to determine when and which business enterprise (the primary beneficiary) should consolidate the variable interest entity. This new model for consolidation applies to an entity in which either (a) the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial interest, or (b) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that the primary beneficiary, as well as all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a variable interest entity, make additional disclosures. Certain disclosure requirements of FIN 46 were effective for financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. In December 2003, FASB issued FIN 46 (revised December 2003),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities ("FIN 46-R") to address certain FIN 46 implementation issues. The provisions of FIN 46 were applicable for variable interests in entities obtained after January 31, 2003. The adoption of the provisions applicable to special purpose entities ("SPEs") and all other variable interests obtained after January 31, 2003 did not have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. Effective March 31, 2004, the Corporation adopted the provisions of FIN 46-R applicable to non-SPEs created prior to February 1, 2003. Adoption of FIN 46-R had no impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Ø Accounting for Certain Loans and Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer - In December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 03-3,Accounting for Certain Loans and Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer. SOP 03-3 addresses the accounting for certain acquired loans that show evidence of credit deterioration since their origination (i.e. impaired loans) and for which a loss is deemed probable of occurring. SOP 03-3 prohibits the carryover of an allowance for loan loss on certain acquired loans within its scope. SOP 03-3 is effective for loans that are acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. The Corporation will evaluate the applicability of this SOP for all prospective loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. The adoption of this Statement had no material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Ø Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments -In March 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff released Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 105,Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments. This SAB disallows the inclusion of expected future cash flows related to the servicing of a loan in the determination of the fair value of a loan commitment. Further, no other internally developed intangible asset should be recorded as part of the loan commitment derivative. Recognition of intangible assets would only be appropriate in a third-party transaction, such as a purchase of a loan commitment or in a business combination. The SAB is effective for all loan commitments entered into after March 31, 2004, but does not require retroactive adoption for loan commitments entered into on or before March 31, 2004. Adoption of this SAB did not have a material effect on the Corporation's consolidated financial statements.
Ø The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments -In March 2004, a consensus was reached on the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue 03-1,The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. The EITF reached a consensus on an other-than-temporary impairment model for debt and equity securities accounted for underStatement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS")No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and cost method investments. The basic model developed to evaluate whether an investment within the scope of Issue 03-1 is other-than-temporarily impaired involves a three-step process including determining whether an investment is impaired (fair value less than cost), evaluating whether the impairment is other-than-temporary (including the Corporation's intent and ability to hold the impaired securities until the cost is recovered) and, if other-than-temporary, requiring recognition of an impairment loss equal to the difference between the investment's cost and its fair value. The first step in the model used to determine other-than-temporary impairments shall be applied prospectively to all current and future investments in interim or annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. The second and third steps in the model have been delayed pending issuance of proposed FASB Staff Position EITF 03-1-a.,Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.At March 31, 2005, the Corporation had approximately $2.9 million in gross unrealized losses, none of which is considered to be other than temporary impairment.
Ø Stock-Based Employee Compensation- The Corporation currently maintains two incentive stock option plans covering key employees; however, only one plan is active. The 1998 Stock Option Plan ("1998 Plan") was approved by the Board of Directors and the Shareholders in 1998. All options granted have a maximum term of ten years. Options granted as management retention options vest after five years, all other options vest ratably over four years. The Corporation has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB Opinion No. 25, because the exercise price of all employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation expense is recognized.
Had compensation cost for the Corporation’s stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 been determined under the fair value approach described in SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Corporation’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
(in thousands, except per share amounts) Years ended December 31 | March 31 2005 | March 31 2004 | ||||||||
Net income as reported | $ | 7,961 | $ | 7,280 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | (826 | ) | (272 | ) | ||||||
Tax effect | 289 | 95 | ||||||||
Net income pro forma | $ | 7,424 | $ | 7,103 | ||||||
Basic net income per share | As reported | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.49 | |||||
Pro forma | 0.50 | 0.48 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per share | As reported | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.48 | |||||
Pro forma | 0.49 | 0.47 |
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25. Among other items, SFAS No. 123R eliminates the use of APB Opinion No. 25 and the intrinsic value method of accounting and requires companies to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments, based on the grant date fair value of those awards, in the financial statements. The effective date of SFAS No. 123R was to be the first reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005, which is the third quarter 2005 for calendar year companies; however, the effective date has been postponed until January 1, 2006.
SFAS No. 123R permits companies to adopt its requirements using either a "modified prospective" method, or a "modified retrospective" method. Under the "modified prospective" method, the compensation cost is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123R for all share-based payments granted after that date, and based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123R. Under the "modified retrospective" method, the requirements are the same as under the "modified prospective" method, but this method also permits entities to restate financial statements of previous periods based on pro forma disclosures made in accordance with SFAS No. 123. The Corporation currently utilizes a standard option pricing model (i.e., Black-Scholes) to measure the fair value of stock options granted to employees. While SFAS No. 123R permits entities to continue to use such a model, the standard also permits the use of a "lattice" model. The Corporation has not yet determined which model it will use to measure the fair value of employee stock options upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. SFAS No. 123R also requires that the benefits associated with the tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after the effective date. These future amounts cannot be estimated, because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options. The Corporation has not yet determined which of the aforementioned adoption methods it will use.
Note 2 - Securities
Securities are classified into held-to-maturity and available-for-sale categories. Held-to-maturity securities are those that the Corporation has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are those that the Corporation may decide to sell if needed for liquidity, asset-liability management or other reasons. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses included as a separate component of equity, net of tax.
The amortized cost and fair value of securities at March 31, 2005 are summarized as follows:
Available-for-Sale
(in thousands) | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||
U.S. Treasury and Government agencies | $ | 1,002 | $ | 1,002 | |
State and political subdivisions | 46,463 | 48,154 | |||
U.S. agency mortgage-backed pass through certificates | 361,579 | 357,302 | |||
Collateralized mortgage obligations | 2,088 | 2,125 | |||
Total debt securities | 411,132 | 408,583 | |||
Marketable equity securities | 59,208 | 58,860 | |||
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 470,340 | $ | 467,443 |
Held-to-Maturity
(in thousands) | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||
U.S. Treasury and Government agencies | $ | 500 | $ | 505 | |
State and political subdivisions | 3,183 | 3,189 | |||
U.S. agency mortgage-backed pass through certificates | 56,069 | 54,685 | |||
Total held-to-maturity securities | $ | 59,752 | $ | 58,379 |
The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of December 31, 2004 are summarized as follows:
Available-for-Sale
(in thousands) | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||
U.S. Treasury and Government agencies | $ | 1,006 | $ | 1,004 | |
State and political subdivisions | 47,048 | 49,435 | |||
U.S. agency mortgage-backed pass through certificates | 379,503 | 378,834 | |||
Collateralized mortgage obligations | 2,336 | 2,394 | |||
Other debt securities | 10,000 | 9,835 | |||
Total debt securities | 439,893 | 441,502 | |||
Marketable equity securities | 40,778 | 40,778 | |||
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 480,671 | $ | 482,280 |
Held-to-Maturity
(in thousands) | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||
U.S. Treasury and Government agencies | $ | 500 | $ | 500 | |
State and political subdivisions | 3,285 | 3,335 | |||
U.S. agency mortgage-backed pass through certificates | 58,886 | 58,112 | |||
Total held-to-maturity securities | $ | 62,671 | $ | 61,947 |
Note 3 - Loans
Major classifications of loans are summarized as follows:
(in thousands) | March 31 2005 | December 31 2004 | |||||
Commercial construction | $ | 88,948 | $ | 75,078 | |||
Commercial secured by real estate | 618,031 | 613,059 | |||||
Commercial other | 284,828 | 276,921 | |||||
Real estate construction | 30,144 | 30,456 | |||||
Real estate mortgage | 509,282 | 499,410 | |||||
Consumer | 394,284 | 395,588 | |||||
Equipment lease financing | 11,768 | 12,007 | |||||
Total loans | $ | 1,937,285 | $ | 1,902,519 |
Note 4 - Borrowings
Short-term debt consists of the following:
(in thousands) | March 31 2005 | December 31 2004 | |||
Subsidiaries: | |||||
Repurchase agreements | $ | 109,807 | $ | 88,404 | |
Federal funds purchased | 9,955 | 4,240 | |||
Total short-term debt | $ | 119,762 | $ | 92,644 |
On April 29, 2005, the Corporation entered into a revolving note agreement for a line of credit in the amount of $12 million, all of which is currently available to meet any future cash needs. The agreement will mature on April 28, 2006.
All federal funds purchased and the majority of repurchase agreements mature and reprice daily. The average rates paid for federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements on March 31, 2005 were 2.85% and 2.67%, respectively.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances consisted of the following monthly amortizing and term borrowings:
(in thousands) | March 31 2005 | December 31 2004 | ||
Monthly amortizing | $ | 2,255 | $ | 2,391 |
Term | 160,000 | 160,000 | ||
$ | 162,255 | $ | 162,391 |
The advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank that require monthly principal payments were due for repayment as follows:
Principal Payments Due by Period at March 31, 2005 | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | Total | Within 1 Year | 1-5 Years | 5-10 Years | After 10 Years | |||||
Outstanding advances, weighted average interest rate -5.27 % | $ | 2,255 | $ | 613 | $ | 1,582 | $ | 41 | $ | 19 |
Principal Payments Due by Period at December 31, 2004 | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | Total | Within 1 Year | 1-5 Years | 5-10 Years | After 10 Years | |||||
Outstanding advances, weighted average interest rate - 5.33% | $ | 2,391 | $ | 604 | $ | 1,120 | $ | 646 | $ | 21 |
The term advances that require the total payment to be made at maturity follow:
(in thousands) | March 31 2005 | December 31 2004 | ||
Advance #143, 2.37%, due 8/30/05 | $ | 40,000 | $ | 40,000 |
Advance #144, 2.88%, due 8/30/06 | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||
Advance #145, 3.31%, due 8/30/07 | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||
Advance #146, 3.70%, due 8/30/08 | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||
$ | 160,000 | $ | 160,000 |
The advances are collateralized by Federal Home Loan Bank stock of $21.0 million and certain first mortgage loans totaling $219.0 million as of March 31, 2005. Advances totaled $162.3 million at March 31, 2005 with fixed interest rates ranging from 1.00% to 7.05% with a weighted average rate of 3.10%.
Long-term debt consists of the following:
(in thousands) | March 31 2005 | December 31 2004 | |||
Junior subordinated debentures, 9.00%, due 3/31/27 | $ | 34,500 | $ | 34,500 | |
Junior subordinated debentures, 8.25%, due 3/31/32 | 25,000 | 25,000 | |||
Total long-term debt | $ | 59,500 | $ | 59,500 |
Note 5 - Other Events
On March 15, 2005, the Corporation announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Heritage Community Bank of Danville, Kentucky with assets of approximately $100 million. The merger agreement calls for the payment of $25.75 per share for a total transaction price of approximately $12.2 million. The agreement is subject to certain conditions, including regulatory approval and the approval of Heritage Community Bank shareholders.This acquisition is scheduled to close in June 2005.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
Overview
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Pikeville, Kentucky. At March 31, 2005, the Corporation owned one commercial bank and one trust company. Through its subsidiaries, the Corporation has seventy-seven banking locations ineastern, northeast, central, and south central Kentucky and southern West Virginia, two loan production offices in Kentucky, and five trust offices across Kentucky. The banking locations are segmented into eighteen markets within four regions. The Corporation had total assets of $2.8 billion and total shareholders’ equity of $238.1 million as of March 31, 2005. The Corporation’s common stock is listed on NASDAQ under the symbol CTBI. Current market participants areFTN Midwest Research Securities Corp., Cleveland, Ohio; Goldman, Sachs & Co., New York, New York; Howe Barnes Investments, Inc., Chicago, Illinois; J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, Inc., Louisville, Kentucky; Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., New York, New York; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, New York, New York;Monroe Securities, Inc., Chicago, Illinois;Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, New York, New York; and Sandler O'Neill & Partners, New York, New York.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates. Such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.
We believe the application of accounting policies and the estimates required therein are reasonable. These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change. Historically, we have found our application of accounting policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from those determined using necessary estimates.
Our accounting policies are more fully described in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements incorporated in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. We have identified the following critical accounting policies:
Loans - -Loans are reported at the carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest and an allowance for loan losses. Income is recorded on the level yield basis. Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest. Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded once principal recovery is reasonably assured. Loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments are brought current and future payments appear reasonably certain.
Allowance for Loan Losses -The adequacy of the allowance is reviewed quarterly by management using a methodology that includes several key factors. The Corporation utilizes an internal risk grading system for commercial credits, and those larger commercial credits identified through this grading system as having weaknesses are individually reviewed for the customer's ability and potential to repay their loans. The borrower’s cash flow, adequacy of collateral held for the loan, and other options available to the Corporation including legal avenues are all evaluated. Based upon this individual credit evaluation, a specific allocation to the allowance may be made for the loan.
For other commercial loans that are not individually evaluated, an allowance allocation is determined by applying an eight-quarter moving average historical loss rate for this group of loans. Consumer installment and residential mortgage loans are not individually risk graded. Allowance allocations are provided for these pools of loans based upon an eight-quarter moving average historical loss rate for each of these categories of loans.
An unallocated portion of the allowance is also determined in recognition of the inherent inability to precisely determine the loss potential in any particular loan or pool of loans. The factors considered by management in determining this amount of inherent risk include delinquency trends, current economic conditions and trends, strength of the supervision and administration of the loan portfolio, level of nonperforming loans, trend in loan losses, recovery rates associated with previously charged-off loans, concentrations within commercial credits, problem loan identification strengths and weaknesses, collateral evaluation strengths and weaknesses, and the level of financial statement exceptions. These factors are reviewed quarterly and weighted as deemed appropriate by management. The total of these weighted factors is then applied against the total loan portfolio and the allowance is adjusted accordingly.
Investments - -Management determines the classification of securities at purchase. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, the Corporation classifies securities into held-to-maturity or available-for-sale categories. Held-to-maturity securities are those which the Corporation has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are those the Corporation may decide to sell if needed for liquidity, asset/liability management, or other reasons. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax. If declines in fair value are not temporary, the carrying value of the securities is written down to fair value as a permanent impairment.
Gains or losses on disposition of securities are computed by specific identification for all securities except for shares in mutual funds, which are computed by average cost. Interest and dividend income, adjusted by amortization of purchase premium or discount, is included in earnings.
Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated market value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized in a valuation allowance by charges to income.
Goodwill - -The Corporation evaluates total goodwill for impairment, based upon SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and SFAS No. 147,Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions, using fair value techniques including multiples of price/equity. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis.
Effects of Accounting Changes
Ø Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities -In January 2003,the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")issued Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin 51. The primary objectives of this interpretation are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (variable interest entities) and how to determine when and which business enterprise (the primary beneficiary) should consolidate the variable interest entity. This new model for consolidation applies to an entity in which either (a) the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial interest, or (b) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that the primary beneficiary, as well as all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a variable interest entity, make additional disclosures. Certain disclosure requirements of FIN 46 were effective for financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. In December 2003, FASB issued FIN 46 (revised December 2003),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities ("FIN 46-R") to address certain FIN 46 implementation issues. The provisions of FIN 46 were applicable for variable interests in entities obtained after January 31, 2003. The adoption of the provisions applicable to special purpose entities ("SPEs") and all other variable interests obtained after January 31, 2003 did not have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. Effective March 31, 2004, the Corporation adopted the provisions of FIN 46-R applicable to non-SPEs created prior to February 1, 2003. Adoption of FIN 46-R had no impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Ø Accounting for Certain Loans and Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer - In December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 03-3,Accounting for Certain Loans and Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer. SOP 03-3 addresses the accounting for certain acquired loans that show evidence of credit deterioration since their origination (i.e. impaired loans) and for which a loss is deemed probable of occurring. SOP 03-3 prohibits the carryover of an allowance for loan loss on certain acquired loans within its scope. SOP 03-3 is effective for loans that are acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. The Corporation will evaluate the applicability of this SOP for all prospective loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. The adoption of this Statement had no material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Ø Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments -In March 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff released Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 105,Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments. This SAB disallows the inclusion of expected future cash flows related to the servicing of a loan in the determination of the fair value of a loan commitment. Further, no other internally developed intangible asset should be recorded as part of the loan commitment derivative. Recognition of intangible assets would only be appropriate in a third-party transaction, such as a purchase of a loan commitment or in a business combination. The SAB is effective for all loan commitments entered into after March 31, 2004, but does not require retroactive adoption for loan commitments entered into on or before March 31, 2004. Adoption of this SAB did not have a material effect on the Corporation's consolidated financial statements.
Ø The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments -In March 2004, a consensus was reached on the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue 03-1,The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. The EITF reached a consensus on an other-than-temporary impairment model for debt and equity securities accounted for underStatement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS")No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and cost method investments. The basic model developed to evaluate whether an investment within the scope of Issue 03-1 is other-than-temporarily impaired involves a three-step process including determining whether an investment is impaired (fair value less than cost), evaluating whether the impairment is other-than-temporary (including the Corporation's intent and ability to hold the impaired securities until the cost is recovered) and, if other-than-temporary, requiring recognition of an impairment loss equal to the difference between the investment's cost and its fair value. The first step in the model used to determine other-than-temporary impairments shall be applied prospectively to all current and future investments in interim or annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. The second and third steps in the model have been delayed pending issuance of proposed FASB Staff Position EITF 03-1-a.,Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.At March 31, 2005, the Corporation had approximately $2.9 million in gross unrealized losses, none of which is considered to be other than temporary impairment.
Ø Stock-Based Employee Compensation- The Corporation currently maintains two incentive stock option plans covering key employees; however, only one plan is active. The 1998 Stock Option Plan ("1998 Plan") was approved by the Board of Directors and the Shareholders in 1998. All options granted have a maximum term of ten years. Options granted as management retention options vest after five years, all other options vest ratably over four years. The Corporation has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB Opinion No. 25, because the exercise price of all employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation expense is recognized.
Had compensation cost for the Corporation’s stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 been determined under the fair value approach described in SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Corporation’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
(in thousands, except per share amounts) Years ended December 31 | March 31 2005 | March 31 2004 | ||||||||
Net income as reported | $ | 7,961 | $ | 7,280 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | (826 | ) | (272 | ) | ||||||
Tax effect | 289 | 95 | ||||||||
Net income pro forma | $ | 7,424 | $ | 7,103 | ||||||
Basic net income per share | As reported | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.49 | |||||
Pro forma | 0.50 | 0.48 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per share | As reported | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.48 | |||||
Pro forma | 0.49 | 0.47 |
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25. Among other items, SFAS No. 123R eliminates the use of APB Opinion No. 25 and the intrinsic value method of accounting and requires companies to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments, based on the grant date fair value of those awards, in the financial statements. The effective date of SFAS No. 123R was to be the first reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005, which is the third quarter 2005 for calendar year companies; however, the effective date has been postponed until January 1, 2006.
SFAS No. 123R permits companies to adopt its requirements using either a "modified prospective" method, or a "modified retrospective" method. Under the "modified prospective" method, the compensation cost is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123R for all share-based payments granted after that date, and based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123R. Under the "modified retrospective" method, the requirements are the same as under the "modified prospective" method, but this method also permits entities to restate financial statements of previous periods based on pro forma disclosures made in accordance with SFAS No. 123. The Corporation currently utilizes a standard option pricing model (i.e., Black-Scholes) to measure the fair value of stock options granted to employees. While SFAS No. 123R permits entities to continue to use such a model, the standard also permits the use of a "lattice" model. The Corporation has not yet determined which model it will use to measure the fair value of employee stock options upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. SFAS No. 123R also requires that the benefits associated with the tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after the effective date. These future amounts cannot be estimated, because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options. The Corporation has not yet determined which of the aforementioned adoption methods it will use.
Dividends
The following schedule shows the quarterly cash dividends paid for the past six quarters:
Pay Date | Record Date | Amount Per Share |
April 1, 2005 | March 15, 2005 | $0.24 |
January 1, 2005 | December 15, 2004 | $0.24 |
October 1, 2004 | September 15, 2004 | $0.21 |
July 1, 2004 | June 15, 2004 | $0.21 |
April 1, 2004 | March 15, 2004 | $0.21 |
January 1, 2004 | December 15, 2004 | $0.21 |
Statement of Income Review
The Corporation had earnings for the first quarter 2005 of $8.0 million or $0.54 per basic share compared to $7.3 million or $0.49 per basic share earned during the first quarter of 2004 and $7.9 million or $0.53 per basic share earned during the fourth quarter of 2004. The Corporation's basic earnings per share for the first quarter 2005 reflects an increase of 10.2% over the first quarter 2004 and 1.9% over fourth quarter 2004.
The Corporation had basic weighted average shares outstanding of 14.9 million and 14.8 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. The following table sets forth on an annualized basis the return on average assets and return on average shareholders’ equity for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:
Three months ended | |||||||
March 31 | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Return on average shareholders' equity | 13.50 | % | 12.97 | % | |||
Return on average assets | 1.18 | % | 1.18 | % |
Net Interest Income
Our net interest margin of 3.97% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 decreased 12 basis points from March 31, 2004 but remained flat to prior quarter. During the past year, the Corporation’s deposit pricing was more aggressive to increase its core deposits and repurchase agreements for funding purposes, contributing to our cost of interest bearing funds increasing by 50 basis points from the first quarter 2004 and 21 basis points from the fourth quarter 2004. With its current liquidity position, the Corporation’s deposit strategy is to price competitively but not aggressively for deposit growth.
The following table summarizes the annualized net interest spread and net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
Three months ended | |||||||
March 31 | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Yield on interest earning assets | 5.91 | % | 5.62 | % | |||
Cost of interest bearing funds | 2.36 | % | 1.86 | % | |||
Net interest spread | 3.55 | % | 3.76 | % | |||
Net interest margin | 3.97 | % | 4.09 | % |
Provision for Loan Losses
The analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses and selected ratios is set forth below:
Three months ended | |||||||
March 31 | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Allowance balance at January 1 | $ | 27,017 | $ | 24,653 | |||
Additions to allowance charged against operations | 1,367 | 2,133 | |||||
Recoveries credited to allowance | 1,077 | 929 | |||||
Losses charged against allowance | (1,952 | ) | (2,564 | ) | |||
Allowance balance at March 31 | $ | 27,509 | $ | 25,151 | |||
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans | 1.42 | % | 1.42 | % | |||
Average loans, net of unearned income | $ | 1,920,843 | $ | 1,744,992 | |||
Provision for loan losses to average loans, annualized | 0.29 | % | 0.49 | % | |||
Loan charge-offs net of recoveries, to average loans, annualized | 0.18 | % | 0.38 | % |
Net loan charge-offs during the first quarter of 2005 of $0.9 million, or 0.2% of total loans, at March 31, 2005 was a 46.5% decrease from the $1.6 million, or 0.4% of total loans, at March 31, 2004 and a decrease of 59.4% from the $2.2 million, or 0.5% of total loans, at December 31, 2004.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income of $7.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 decreased 3.9% from the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and 6.1% from the quarter ended December 31, 2004. The following table displays the quarterly activity in the various significant noninterest income accounts.
Noninterest Income Summary | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | 1Q 2005 | 4Q 2004 | 1Q 2004 | |||||||
Deposit related fees | $ | 4,047 | $ | 4,434 | $ | 4,237 | ||||
Loan related fees | 1,218 | 1,377 | 1,144 | |||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | 226 | 83 | (600 | ) | ||||||
Trust revenue | 740 | 643 | 561 | |||||||
Gains on sales of loans | 305 | 382 | 459 | |||||||
Securities gains | 0 | 50 | 1 | |||||||
Other revenue | 1,169 | 1,238 | 2,213 | |||||||
Total noninterest income | $ | 7,705 | $ | 8,207 | $ | 8,015 |
Deposit related fees decreased from prior quarter and prior year first quarter primarily as a result of the implementation and marketing of free consumer and business checking accounts. Noninterest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 was negatively impacted by a charge to our valuation reserve for capitalized mortgage servicing rights of $0.6 million. However, the fourth quarter 2004 and the first quarter 2005 were positively impacted by approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, because of the improvement in the fair market value of our capitalized mortgage servicing rights.
Due to the current interest rate environment, the gains on sales of residential real estate loans continue to be lower than prior quarters, as customers are selecting adjustable rate and 3 and 5-year adjustable rate mortgages that are retained in the Corporation’s loan portfolio.
Noninterest income was positively impacted by $0.8 million during the first quarter 2004 derived from the adjustment of the carrying value of loans acquired with the 2002 acquisition of Citizens National Bank of Hazard to its net realizable value. There was minimal recapture during the fourth quarter 2004 and the first quarter 2005.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of $19.2 million was a 5.6% increase from the $18.2 million for the first quarter 2004 and a 2.6% decrease from the fourth quarter 2004. The increase in noninterest expense from prior year was primarily attributable to increased personnel expense due to annual salary increases and the staffing costs of new branch locations that have come on line during the past year.
Balance Sheet Review
The Corporation’s total assets increased 12.4% from March 31, 2004 to $2.8 billion at March 31, 2005. Average earning assets grew $266 million from March 31, 2004 and $48 million from December 31, 2004. The Corporation's loan portfolio grew at a rate of 9.4% from March 31, 2004 and at an annualized rate of 7.4% from December 31, 2004 to $1.9 billion at March 31, 2005. Total deposits and repurchase agreements of $2.3 billion at March 31, 2005 reflect a 6.2% growth over March 31, 2004 and an annualized 8.5% growth over December 31, 2004. With the Corporation’s current liquidity position, its deposit pricing strategy is market competitive.
Shareholders’ equity of $238.1 million on March 31, 2005 was a 5.4% increase from the $225.9 million on March 31, 2004 and an increase of 0.8% from the $236.2 million on December 31, 2004. The Corporation's annualized dividend yield to shareholders as of March 31, 2005 was 3.33%.
Loans
Total loans of $1.94 billion was an increase of 9.4% from March 31, 2004 and an annualized 7.4% from December 31, 2004. Loan growth was primarily in commercial and residential real estate loans.
Asset quality improved during the first quarter of 2005. Nonperforming loans at March 31, 2005 of $17.9 million was a 10.9% decrease from the $20.1 million at December 31, 2004 and was relatively flat to March 31, 2004.
Foreclosed properties at March 31, 2005 of $5.0 million decreased from the $6.8 million at March 31, 2004 but increased from the $4.8 million at December 31, 2004. Commercial properties account for 55% of foreclosed properties at March 31, 2005. The majority of this amount is one group of properties originally acquired in December 2003 at $3.1 million and currently being carried at $2.3 million, after adjusting the carrying value for additional investments in certain properties and the sale of five units. The Corporation continues to aggressively manage the liquidation of this property. The remaining foreclosed properties are residential real estate which traditionally liquidate with minimal loss.
The following tables summarize the Corporation’s nonperforming loans as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
(in thousands) | Nonaccrual loans | As a % of Loan Balances by Category | Restructured Loans | As a % of Loan Balances by Category | Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More | As a % of Loan Balances by Category | Total Loan Balances | ||||||||
March 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial construction | $ | 271 | 0.30 | % | $ | 0 | 0.00 | % | $ | 97 | 0.11 | % | $ | 88,948 | |
Commercial secured by real estate | 4,683 | 0.76 | 828 | 0.13 | 2,097 | 0.34 | 618,031 | ||||||||
Commercial other | 3,899 | 1.37 | 106 | 0.04 | 598 | 0.21 | 284,828 | ||||||||
Consumer real estate construction | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 30,144 | ||||||||
Consumer real estate secured | 4,222 | 0.83 | 0 | 0.00 | 760 | 0.15 | 509,282 | ||||||||
Consumer other | 26 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.00 | 318 | 0.08 | 394,284 | ||||||||
Equipment lease financing | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 11,768 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 13,101 | 0.68 | % | $ | 934 | 0.05 | % | $ | 3,870 | 0.20 | % | $ | 1,937,285 |
(in thousands) | Nonaccrual loans | As a % of Loan Balances by Category | Restructured Loans | As a % of Loan Balances by Category | Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More | As a % of Loan Balances by Category | Total Loan Balances | ||||||||
December 31, 2004 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial construction | $ | 271 | 0.36 | % | $ | 0 | 0.00 | % | $ | 650 | 0.87 | % | $ | 75,078 | |
Commercial secured by real estate | 5,093 | 0.83 | 858 | 0.14 | 2,603 | 0.42 | 613,059 | ||||||||
Commercial other | 3,473 | 1.25 | 116 | 0.04 | 569 | 0.21 | 276,921 | ||||||||
Consumer real estate construction | 114 | 0.37 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 30,456 | ||||||||
Consumer real estate secured | 4,828 | 0.97 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,131 | 0.23 | 499,410 | ||||||||
Consumer other | 29 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.00 | 366 | 0.09 | 395,588 | ||||||||
Equipment lease financing | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 12,007 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 13,808 | 0.73 | % | $ | 974 | 0.05 | % | $ | 5,319 | 0.28 | % | $ | 1,902,519 |
Loans on non-accrual decreased $0.7 million from December 31, 2004 to March 31, 2005. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more decreased $1.4 million from December 31, 2004 to March 31, 2005, and restructured loans decreased $40 thousand during this period.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses balance is maintained by management at a level considered adequate to cover anticipated probable losses based on past loss experience, general economic conditions, information about specific borrower situations including their financial position and collateral values, and other factors and estimates which are subject to change over time. This analysis is completed quarterly and forms the basis for allocation of the loan loss reserve and what charges to the provision may be required. For further discussion of the allowance for loan losses, see the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section presented earlier in Item 2.
Securities
The Corporation uses its securities held-to-maturity for production of income and to manage cash flow needs through expected maturities. The Corporation uses its securities available-for-sale for income and balance sheet liquidity management. Securities available-for-sale reported at fair value decreased from $482.3 million as of December 31, 2004 to $467.4 million at March 31, 2005; the excess of market over cost decreased from a positive $1.6 million to a negative $2.9 million. Securities held-to-maturity decreased from $62.7 million to $59.8 million during the same period. Total securities as a percentage of total assets were 20.1% as of December 31, 2004 and 19.1% as of March 31, 2005.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Corporation’s liquidity objectives are to ensure that funds are available for the subsidiary bank to meet deposit withdrawals and credit demands without unduly penalizing profitability. Additionally, the Corporation's objectives ensure that funding is available for the Corporation to meet ongoing cash needs while maximizing profitability. The Corporation continues to identify ways to provide for liquidity on both a current and long-term basis. The subsidiary bank relies mainly on core deposits, certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more, repayment of principal and interest on loans and securities and federal funds sold and purchased to create long-term liquidity. The subsidiary bank also has available the sale of securities under repurchase agreements, securities available-for-sale, and Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") borrowings as secondary sources of liquidity.
Due to the nature of the markets served by the subsidiary bank, management believes that the majority of its certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more are no more volatile than its core deposits. During periods of interest rate volatility, these deposit balances have remained stable as a percentage of total deposits. In addition, an arrangement has been made with a correspondent bank for the purchase of federal funds on an unsecured basis, up to $20 million, if necessary, to meet the Corporation’s liquidity needs.
The Corporation owns securities with an estimated fair value of $467.4 million that are designated as available-for-sale and available to meet liquidity needs on a continuing basis. The Corporation also has available Federal Home Loan Bank advances for both liquidity and management of its asset/liability position. FHLB advances remained relatively stable at $162.3 million at March 31, 2005 compared to $162.4 million at December 31, 2004. FHLB borrowing capacity at March 31, 2005 was $195.9 million. Long-term debt remained at $59.5 million from December 31, 2004 to March 31, 2005.At March 31, 2005, the Corporation had $88.2 million in federal funds sold compared to $50.9 million at December 31, 2004. Additionally, management projects cash flows from the Corporation's investment portfolio to generate additional liquidity over the next 90 days.
The Corporation generally relies upon net inflows of cash from financing activities, supplemented by net inflows of cash from operating activities, to provide cash for its investing activities. As is typical of many financial institutions, significant financing activities include deposit gathering, use of short-term borrowing facilities such as federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements, and issuance of long-term debt. The Corporation currently has a $12 million revolving line of credit, all of which is currently available to meet any future cash needs. The Corporation’s primary investing activities include purchases of securities and loan originations; however, as discussed in note 5 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Corporation has entered into an agreement to acquire the Heritage Community Bank of Danville, Kentucky (“Heritage”). This acquisition is scheduled to close in June 2005 and is expected to require approximately $12.2 million in cash. The cash used for the purchase of Heritage is expected to be funded from normal operating cash flow.
The investment portfolio continues to consist of conservative, high-quality short-term issues. The majority of the investment portfolio is in U.S. Government and agency issuances. The average life of the portfolio is 3.33 years. Available-for-sale ("AFS") securities comprise 89% of the total investment portfolio. At the end of the first quarter, the AFS portfolio was $467.4 million or 196% of equity capital. Seventy-one percent of the pledge eligible portfolio is pledged.
The Corporation's stock repurchase program began in December 1998 with the authorization to acquire up to 500,000 shares and was increased by an additional 1,000,000 shares in July 2000. The Corporation issued a press release on May 13, 2004 announcing its intention to repurchase up to 1,000,000 additional shares.The Corporation’s stock repurchase program continues to be accretive to shareholder value. During the first three months of 2005, the Corporation acquired no shares of the Corporation's stock.As of March 31, 2005, a total of 1,921,481 shares have been repurchased through this program.
In conjunction with maintaining a satisfactory level of liquidity, management monitors the degree of interest rate risk assumed on the consolidated balance sheet. The Corporation monitors its interest rate risk by use of the static gap model and dynamic gap model at the one-year interval. The Corporation uses the Sendero system to monitor its interest rate risk. The static gap model monitors the difference in interest rate sensitive assets and interest rate sensitive liabilities as a percentage of total assets that mature within the specified time frame. The dynamic gap model goes further in that it assumes that interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities will be reinvested. The Corporation desires an interest sensitivity gap of not more than fifteen percent of total assets at the one-year interval.
The Corporation’s principal source of funds used to pay dividends to shareholders and service long-term debt is the dividends it receives from the subsidiary bank. Various federal statutory provisions, in addition to regulatory policies and directives, limit the amount of dividends that subsidiary banks can pay without prior regulatory approval. These restrictions have had no major impact on the Corporation’s dividend policy or its ability to service long-term debt, nor is it anticipated that they would have any major impact in the foreseeable future.During the remainder of 2005, approximately $34.9 million plus any remaining 2005 net profits can be paid by the Corporation’s banking subsidiary without prior regulatory approval.
The primary source of capital for the Corporation is retained earnings. The Corporation paid cash dividends of $0.24 per share during the first three months of 2005. Basic earnings per share for the same period was $0.54, respectively. The Corporation retained 55.6% of earnings for the first three months of 2005.
Under guidelines issued by banking regulators, the Corporation and its subsidiary bank are required to maintain a minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4% and a minimum total risk-based ratio of 8%. In order to be considered “well-capitalized” the Corporation must maintain ratios of 6% and 10%, respectively. Risk-based capital ratios weight the relative risk factors of all assets and consider the risk associated with off-balance sheet items. The Corporation must also maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. The well-capitalized ratio for Tier 1 leverage is 5%. The Corporation’s Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1 risk-based, and total risk-based ratios were 8.81%, 11.71%, and 12.95%, respectively, as of March 31, 2005, all exceeding the threshold for meeting the definition of well-capitalized.
As of March 31, 2005, management is not aware of any current recommendations by banking regulatory authorities which, if they were to be implemented, would have, or would be reasonably likely to have, a material adverse impact on the Corporation’s liquidity, capital resources, or operations.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The majority of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Therefore, the Corporation differs greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investment in nonmonetary assets, such as fixed assets and inventories. However, inflation does have an important impact on the growth of assets in the banking industry and on the resulting need to increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain an appropriate equity to assets ratio. Inflation also affects other expenses, which tend to rise during periods of general inflation.
Management believes one of the most significant impacts on financial and operating results is the Corporation’s ability to react to changes in interest rates. Management seeks to maintain an essentially balanced position between interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against the effects of wide interest rate fluctuations.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain of the statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. The Corporation’s actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may increase,” “may fluctuate,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.” These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, economic conditions, portfolio growth, the credit performance of the portfolios, including bankruptcies, and seasonal factors; changes in general economic conditions including the performance of financial markets, the performance of coal and coal related industries, prevailing inflation and interest rates, realized gains from sales of investments, gains from asset sales, and losses on commercial lending activities; results of various investment activities; the effects of competitors’ pricing policies, of changes in laws and regulations on competition and of demographic changes on target market populations’ savings and financial planning needs; industry changes in information technology systems on which we are highly dependent; failure of acquisitions to produce revenue enhancements or cost savings at levels or within the time frames originally anticipated or unforeseen integration difficulties; the adoption by the Corporation of an FFIEC policy that provides guidance on the reporting of delinquent consumer loans and the timing of associated credit charge-offs for financial institution subsidiaries; and the resolution of legal proceedings and related matters. In addition, the banking industry in general is subject to various monetary and fiscal policies and regulations, which include those determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and state regulators, whose policies and regulations could affect the Corporation’s results. These statements are representative only on the date hereof, and the Corporation undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest rate risk management focuses on maintaining consistent growth in net interest income within Board-approved policy limits. The Corporation uses an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates. Given a 200 basis point increase to the yield curve used in the simulation model, it is estimated net interest income for the Corporation would increase by 5.36 percent over one year and by 4.61 percent over two years. A 25 basis point decrease in the yield curve would decrease net interest income by an estimated 0.66 percent over one year and by 0.42 percent over two years. For further discussion of the Corporation's market risk, see the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Market Risk included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Corporation's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of March 31, 2005, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Controller, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2005 were effective in ensuring material information required to be disclosed in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis. Additionally, there were no changes in the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting.
Management's responsibilities related to establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures include maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting that are designed to produce reliable financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. There have been no significant changes in the Corporation's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to March 31, 2005.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | None |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | None |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | None |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | None |
Item 5. | Other Information: | |
The Corporation's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have furnished to the SEC the certifications with respect to this Form 10-Q that are required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
Item 6. | a. Exhibits: | |
(1) Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Exhibit 31.1 Exhibit 31.2 | |
(2) Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Exhibit 32.1 Exhibit 32.2 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC. | ||
| | |
Date: May 9, 2005 | By: | /s/ Jean R. Hale |
Jean R. Hale | ||
Chairman, President and CEO |
| | |
By: | /s/ Kevin J. Stumbo | |
Kevin J. Stumbo | ||
Executive Vice President/Controller |