EXHIBIT 10.30
CITIZENS BANKING CORPORATION
MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
2006
MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
2006
I. | PURPOSE: |
1. | Ensure achievement of strategic goals. | ||
2. | Align management more closely with shareholder | ||
3. | Strengthen links between pay and performance. |
II. | ELIGIBILITY: | |
Senior Vice Presidents and above and certain other officers based upon corporate responsibility who are not participants in another established incentive plan with payment amounts determined by performance in relation to goal. Awards will be pro-rated based on months served for staff members with less than 12 months of service in a Plan Year. Staff members become eligible to participate in the plan by virtue of promotion or new hire. A staff member who terminates employment before the Plan Year is not eligible to receive an award. | ||
III. | PARTICIPATION RATE: | |
The participation rate for individual positions is benchmarked from market data research provided by various surveys and consultants. | ||
VI. | INCENTIVE COMPONENTS: | |
The Management Incentive Plan components consist of: |
• | Initial factors: Net Interest Income, Low Cost Deposits, Total Deposits, Fee Income, Net Charge-Offs, Non-Performing Assets and Expense Management. | ||
• | Secondary factors: A weighted EPS and ROE factor will be placed against the initial factor weighted average to determine an adjusted weighted average payout. | ||
• | Tertiary factors: An NII Peer Ranking vs. Peer Group factor may be used to determine the FINAL weighted average factor for the Corporate Component portion of the payout. |
V. | AWARD DETERMINATION: | |
Salary x Participation Rate x Service Factor = Pool |
Pool is broken for theLeadership Group Members as follows:
75% | |||||
Components | Percentage | ||||
Net Interest Income | 25 | % | |||
Low Cost Deposits | 20 | % | |||
Total Deposits | 10 | % | |||
Fee Income | 15 | % | |||
Net Charge-Offs | 10 | % | |||
Non Performing Assets | 10 | % | |||
Expense Management | 10 | % |
25% | ||||
Component | Percentage | |||
Discretionary | 100 | % |
üAll independent components
Pool is broken for theSenior Management and other Participants as follows:
65% | |||||
Components | Percentage | ||||
Net Interest Income | 25 | % | |||
Low Cost Deposits | 20 | % | |||
Total Deposits | 10 | % | |||
Fee Income | 15 | % | |||
Net Charge-Offs | 10 | % | |||
Non Performing Assets | 10 | % | |||
Expense Management | 10 | % |
35% | ||||||||
Component | Percentage | |||||||
Line of Business | ü | |||||||
Market | ý | 100 | % | |||||
Discretionary | þ |
üAll independent components
VI. | PERFORMANCE FACTOR: | |
For the discretionary component, a performance indicator of 0% to 150% will be applied. Goals should be set at levels that are challenging to reach at 100% — Achievement should be based on meeting all expectations in every way. It is possible to exceed 100% performance but this type of evaluation should be reserved for truly extraordinary performance | ||
VII. | SERVICE FACTOR: | |
The service factor is equal to the number of months the participant is employed with the corporation during the plan year.Example: 1.0 is equal to 12 months, .5 is equal to 6 months. | ||
VIII. | AWARD PAYMENTS: | |
All awards earned under Management Incentive Plan will be paid as soon as practical following approval by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee. | ||
IX. | ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: | |
The Management Incentive Plan shall be administered by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Corporation. | ||
While all attempts will be made to follow the incentive formulas and metrics, subjective adjustments occasionally can and will be made both upwards and downwards based on management discretion which will require CEO approval. Adjustments will be considered based on value of an individual’s contribution to performance during the year and not based on comparison to prior year awards, comparison to peer’s incentive levels, attitude, effort, etc. In general, subjective adjustments will be the exception and not the rule. Management will however reserve the right to make these subjective adjustments if necessary to be equally fair to shareholders and plan participants. | ||
The incentive award for the Chairman and President and CEO will be determined by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of Citizens Banking Corporation Board of Directors. | ||
A special award fund (Discretionary) equal to 15% of the aggregate incentive award will be available for individual awards as determined by the President and CEO. Awards from this fund are made to staff members who are not participants in the Management Incentive Plan. | ||
Awards for the Discretionary Fund will be made only in recognition of exemplary achievements. Distribution of all available amounts in this fund is not mandatory. | ||
Participation in the Management Incentive Plan shall not be construed as giving any employee the right to continued employment with the corporation for the full or for any subsequent period. |
Performance Plan Guidelines
• | If participant is on corrective action on the last day of the quarter/year they are not eligible for incentive payment | ||
• | Minimum annual performance rating of Productive required in most recent Annual Performance Review in both Key Performance Activities and Competencies | ||
• | This plan does not represent a contract with any individual plan participant | ||
• | The plan may be changed, modified or terminated at any time throughout the plan year |
X. | DISCRETIONARY AWARD GUIDELINES: | |
Objectives:Recognize and promote exemplary individual performance or initiative. | ||
Eligible Participants:All staff members are eligible except staff members who are in established incentive plans with payment amounts determined by performance in relation to established goals. | ||
Nomination Process:Managers would nominate staff member(s) according to established guidelines. They would also obtain concurrence and approval from their respective Direct Report to the CEO. | ||
Monetary Guidelines:Range of $500 to $3000. Larger amounts could be given in exceptional circumstances. | ||
Guidelines:Discretionary awards should be given in recognition for one or more of the following performance criteria: |
Earnings:
• | Expense reduction | ||
• | Revenue enhancement |
Innovation:
• | Continuous improvement efforts | ||
• | Innovative delivery alternatives | ||
• | Foresight and planning to prevent crises |
Achievement:
• | Unique/specialized skills or knowledge of value to the company, i.e., Key Performers | ||
• | Sustained high performance | ||
• | Exemplary performance during unusual circumstances or specific events | ||
• | Special projects completed in an exceptional manner or ahead of schedule | ||
• | Extraordinary client service |
MIP will be initially calculated based on the following components and payout tier structure.
Budget | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25% | Net Interest Income | Actual | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 Actual = 275.3 | % to Actual (Actual/Budget) | <98.7 | % | 98.7 | % | 98.9 | % | 99.1 | % | 99.3 | % | 99.5 | % | 99.6 | % | 99.8 | % | 100 | % | 100.2 | % | 100.4 | % | 100.5 | % | 100.7 | % | 100.9 | % | 101.1 | % | 101.3 | % | No Cap | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Actual = 275.7 | Payout Factor | 0 | % | 50 | % | 55 | % | 60 | % | 65 | % | 70 | % | 75 | % | 80 | % | 85 | % | 90 | % | 95 | % | 100 | % | 105 | % | 110 | % | 115 | % | 120 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Budget = * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20% | Low Cost Deposits | Actual | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Actual = 2,747 | % to Actual (Actual/Budget) | <90 | % | 90 | % | 91 | % | 92 | % | 93 | % | 94 | % | 95 | % | 96 | % | 97 | % | 98 | % | 99 | % | 100 | % | 101.7 | % | 103.5 | % | 105.2 | % | 107.0 | % | No Cap | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Budget = * | Payout Factor | 0 | % | 50 | % | 55 | % | 60 | % | 65 | % | 70 | % | 75 | % | 80 | % | 85 | % | 90 | % | 95 | % | 100 | % | 105 | % | 110 | % | 115 | % | 120 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(YE Avg Bal) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10% | Total Deposits | Actual | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Actual = 5,091 | % to Actual (Actual/Budget) | <97.5 | % | 97.5 | % | 97.9 | % | 98.2 | % | 98.6 | % | 98.9 | % | 99.3 | % | 99.6 | % | 100 | % | 100.4 | % | 100.7 | % | 101.1 | % | 101.4 | % | 101.8 | % | 102.1 | % | 102.5 | % | No Cap | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Budget = * | Payout Factor | 0 | % | 50 | % | 55 | % | 60 | % | 65 | % | 70 | % | 75 | % | 80 | % | 85 | % | 90 | % | 95 | % | 100 | % | 105 | % | 110 | % | 115 | % | 120 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(YE Avg Bal) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15% | Fee Income | Actual | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 Actual = 93.4 | % to Actual (Actual/Budget) | < 94.2 | % | 94.2 | % | 95.1 | % | 95.9 | % | 96.7 | % | 97.5 | % | 98.4 | % | 99.2 | % | 100 | % | 100.8 | % | 101.6 | % | 102.5 | % | 103.3 | % | 104.1 | % | 104.9 | % | 105.8 | % | No Cap | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Actual = 91.5 | Payout Factor | 0 | % | 50 | % | 55 | % | 60 | % | 65 | % | 70 | % | 75 | % | 80 | % | 85 | % | 90 | % | 95 | % | 100 | % | 105 | % | 110 | % | 115 | % | 120 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Budget = * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10% | Net Charge-Offs | Actual | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 Actual = 20.8 | % to Actual (Actual/Budget) | > 119.0 | % | 119.0 | % | 116.3 | % | 113.6 | % | 110.9 | % | 108.1 | % | 105.4 | % | 102.7 | % | 100 | % | 97.8 | % | 95.6 | % | 93.4 | % | 89.0 | % | 84.6 | % | 80.1 | % | 75.7 | % | 71.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Actual = 14.6 | Payout Factor | 0 | % | 50 | % | 55 | % | 60 | % | 65 | % | 70 | % | 75 | % | 80 | % | 85 | % | 90 | % | 95 | % | 100 | % | 110 | % | 120 | % | 130 | % | 140 | % | 150 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Budget = * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10% | Non Performing Loans | Actual | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 Actual = 50.8 | % to Actual (Actual/Budget) | > 111.1 | % | 111.1 | % | 109.5 | % | 107.9 | % | 106.3 | % | 104.7 | % | 103.2 | % | 101.6 | % | 100 | % | 99.1 | % | 98.3 | % | 97.4 | % | 95.7 | % | 94.0 | % | 92.3 | % | 90.6 | % | 88.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Actual = 46.6 | Payout Factor | 0 | % | 50 | % | 55 | % | 60 | % | 65 | % | 70 | % | 75 | % | 80 | % | 85 | % | 90 | % | 95 | % | 100 | % | 110 | % | 120 | % | 130 | % | 140 | % | 150 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Budget = * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10% | Expense | Actual | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 Actual = 244.8 | % to Actual (Actual/Budget) | >101.8 | % | 101.8 | % | 101.5 | % | 101.3 | % | 101.0 | % | 100.8 | % | 100.5 | % | 100.3 | % | 100 | % | 99.9 | % | 99.7 | % | 99.6 | % | 99.3 | % | 99.0 | % | 98.8 | % | 98.5 | % | 98.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Actual = 243.0 | Payout Factor | 0 | % | 50 | % | 55 | % | 60 | % | 65 | % | 70 | % | 75 | % | 80 | % | 85 | % | 90 | % | 95 | % | 100 | % | 110 | % | 120 | % | 130 | % | 140 | % | 150 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Budget = * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100% | Payout % is incremental between tiers (ex. Each % over budget earns x% additional incentive) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPS and ROE factors will provide an additional weighted average calculation to be applied against the above results. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60% | EPS Factor | Actual | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 Actual = 1.74 | % to Actual (Actual/Budget) | < 96.3 | % | 96.3 | % | 97.1 | % | 97.8 | % | 98.5 | % | 99.3 | % | 100 | % | 100.7 | % | 101.5 | % | 102.2 | % | 102.9 | % | 103.7 | % | No Cap | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Actual = 1.85 | Payout Factor | 0 | % | 85 | % | 88 | % | 91 | % | 94 | % | 97 | % | 100 | % | 103 | % | 106 | % | 109 | % | 112 | % | 115 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Budget = * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40% | ROE Factor | Actual | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 Actual = 11.90 | % to Actual (Actual/Budget) | < 94.4 | % | 94.4 | % | 95.5 | % | 96.7 | % | 97.8 | % | 98.9 | % | 100 | % | 101.1 | % | 102.2 | % | 103.2 | % | 104.3 | % | 105.4 | % | No Cap | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Actual = 12.33 | Payout Factor | 0 | % | 85 | % | 88 | % | 91 | % | 94 | % | 97 | % | 100 | % | 103 | % | 106 | % | 109 | % | 112 | % | 115 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Budget = * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
100% | Payout % is incremental between tiers (ex. Each % over budget earns x% additional incentive) |
Discretionary Modifier — Guidelines Only
An additional peer group ranking modifier may be used to determine final payouts of MIP
Component | Weighting | |
NII | 50% | |
EPS | 50% |
Equates to x% payout | ||||
Peer Ranking | Factor | @ 100% of budget | ||
Above 75th Percentile | 118% | 100% | ||
Below 25th Percentile | 59% | 50% | ||
2006 vs 2005 performance | (factor x 85%) |
Peer Group*
1Discretion may be used by the comp committee to over-ride the formula under appropriate circumstances
2Any adjustments for unusual items (such as acquisitions, divestitures) will require comp committee approval
3The above numbers will not include the impact of extra-ordinary items
4The above numbers will be adjusted to neutralize the impact of equity compensation
5The above numbers will be adjusted to normalize the impact of equity adjustments due to interest rate movements
* | Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Citizens’ request to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |