UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended | October 4, 2014 |
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ............................................................................. to.....................................................................................
Commission file number: 1-10689
| KATE SPADE & COMPANY |
|
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
Delaware |
| 13-2842791 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or |
| (I.R.S. Employer |
2 Park Avenue, New York, New York |
| 10016 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
| (Zip Code) |
| (212) 354-4900 |
|
| (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
|
Not Applicable | ||
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding at October 24, 2014 was 127,111,444.
KATE SPADE & COMPANY
October 4, 2014
(Unaudited)
|
| PAGE |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| 4 | |
|
|
|
| 5 | |
|
|
|
| 6 | |
|
|
|
| 7 | |
|
|
|
| 8 – 32 | |
|
|
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 33 – 50 | |
|
|
|
51 | ||
|
|
|
51 | ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
51 | ||
|
|
|
52 | ||
|
|
|
52 | ||
|
|
|
52 | ||
|
|
|
53 | ||
|
|
|
54 |
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this Form 10-Q, future filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, our press releases, and oral statements made by, or with the approval of, our authorized personnel, that relate to our future performance or future events are forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are indicated by words or phrases such as “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “estimate,” “target,” “aim,” “forecast,” “project,” “expect,” “believe,” “we are optimistic that we can,” “current visibility indicates that we forecast,” “contemplation” or “currently envisions” and similar phrases.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, these expectations may not prove to be correct or we may not achieve the financial results, savings or other benefits anticipated in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are necessarily estimates reflecting the best judgment of our senior management and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which may be beyond our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:
· our ability to complete the transition to a mono-brand business centered on the KATE SPADE family of brands, including our ability to successfully complete the transition of our management and operations;
· our ability to operate as a mono-brand business and to successfully implement our long-term strategic plans;
· general economic conditions in the United States, Asia, Europe and other parts of the world;
· our exposure to currency fluctuations;
· levels of consumer confidence, consumer spending and purchases of discretionary items, including fashion apparel and related products, such as ours;
· changes in the cost of raw materials, occupancy, labor, advertising and transportation which could impact prices of our products;
· our ability to expand into markets outside of the US, such as India, Russia, Southeast Asia, and South America, as well as continued expansion in China, Japan and Brazil, including our ability to promote brand awareness in our international markets, find suitable partners in certain of those markets and hire and retain key employees for those markets;
· our ability to maintain targeted profit margins and levels of promotional activity;
· our ability to achieve the business plan for our KATE SPADE SATURDAY business, including our ability to attract new customers and achieve margin targets;
· issues related to our current level of debt, including an inability to pursue certain business strategies because of the restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our debt and our potential inability to obtain the capital resources needed to operate and grow our business;
· restrictions in the credit and capital markets, which would impair our ability to access additional sources of liquidity, if needed;
· our ability to expand our retail footprint with profitable store locations;
· our ability to implement operational improvements and realize economies of scale in finished product and raw material costs in connection with growth in our business;
· our ability to expand the KATE SPADE family of brands into new product categories;
· our ability to successfully implement our marketing initiatives;
· risks associated with the sale of the Lucky Brand business, including collection of the full amount of principal and interest due and owing pursuant to a three year note issued by Lucky Brand Dungarees, LLC, an affiliate of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., to us as partial consideration for the purchase of the Lucky Brand business and compliance with our transition service requirements;
· risks associated with the sale of the Juicy Couture intellectual property to Authentic Brands Group, including our ability to complete the transition plan for the Juicy Couture business in a satisfactory manner and to manage the remaining associated transition costs, the impact of the transition plan and the announced future plans for the Juicy Couture brand on our relationships with our employees, our major customers, vendors and landlords and unanticipated expenses and charges that may occur as a result of the transition plan and the announced future plans for the Juicy Couture brand, such as litigation risks, including litigation regarding employment and workers’ compensation;
· our dependence on a limited number of large US department store customers, and the risk of consolidations, restructurings, bankruptcies and other ownership changes in the retail industry and financial difficulties at our larger department store customers;
· whether we will be successful operating the KATE SPADE businesses in Japan and Southeast Asia and the risks associated with such operations, including with respect to the conclusion of transition services provided by our former operating partners;
· risks associated with decreased diversification of our business as a result of the reduction of our brand portfolio to the KATE SPADE and Adelington Design Group businesses;
· risks associated with material disruptions in our information technology systems, both owned and licensed, and with our third party e-commerce platforms and operations;
· risks associated with data security, including privacy breaches;
· risks associated with credit card fraud and identity theft;
· our ability to anticipate and respond to constantly changing consumer demands and tastes and fashion trends, across multiple brands, product lines, shopping channels and geographies;
· our ability to attract and retain talented, highly qualified executives, and maintain satisfactory relationships with our employees;
· our ability to adequately establish, defend and protect our trademarks and other proprietary rights;
· risks associated with the dependence of our Adelington Design Group business on third party arrangements and partners;
· the impact of the highly competitive nature of the markets within which we operate, both within the US and abroad;
· our reliance on independent foreign manufacturers, including the risk of their failure to comply with safety standards or our policies regarding labor practices;
· risks associated with our buying/sourcing agreement with Li & Fung Limited, which results in a single third party foreign buying/sourcing agent for a significant portion of our products;
· risks associated with our arrangement to operate our leased Ohio distribution facility with a third party operations and labor management company that provides distribution operations services, including risks related to increased operating expenses, systems capabilities and operating under a third party arrangement;
· risks associated with severe weather, natural disasters, public health crises, war, terrorism or other catastrophic events;
· a variety of legal, regulatory, political and economic risks, including risks related to the importation and exportation of product, tariffs and other trade barriers;
· our ability to adapt to and compete effectively in the current quota environment in which general quota has expired on apparel products, but political activity seeking to re-impose quota has been initiated or threatened;
· risks associated with third party service providers, both domestic and overseas, including service providers in the area of e-commerce;
· limitations on our ability to utilize all or a portion of our US deferred tax assets if we experience an “ownership change”; and
· the outcome of current and future litigation and other proceedings in which we are involved.
The list of factors above is illustrative, but by no means exhaustive. All forward-looking statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent uncertainty. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning the matters addressed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are qualified by these cautionary statements.
Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations only and are not guarantees of future performance, and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in “Item 1A – Risk Factors” in this report as well as in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We may change our intentions, beliefs or expectations at any time and without notice, based upon any change in our assumptions or otherwise. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. In addition, some factors are beyond our control. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
KATE SPADE & COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
| October 4, 2014 |
| December 28, 2013 |
| September 28, 2013 | ||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 123,334 |
|
| $ | 130,222 |
|
| $ | 6,832 |
|
Accounts receivable - trade, net |
| 62,275 |
|
| 89,554 |
|
| 121,833 |
| |||
Inventories, net |
| 220,725 |
|
| 184,634 |
|
| 310,638 |
| |||
Deferred income taxes |
| 369 |
|
| 218 |
|
| 806 |
| |||
Other current assets |
| 40,077 |
|
| 45,031 |
|
| 58,846 |
| |||
Assets held for sale |
| -- |
|
| 202,054 |
|
| -- |
| |||
Total current assets |
|
| 446,780 |
|
| 651,713 |
|
| 498,955 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Property and Equipment, Net |
| 176,359 |
|
| 149,071 |
|
| 244,471 |
| |||
Goodwill |
| 68,871 |
|
| 49,111 |
|
| 52,679 |
| |||
Intangibles, Net |
| 92,689 |
|
| 90,678 |
|
| 122,602 |
| |||
Deferred Income Taxes |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
|
| 64 |
| |||
Note Receivable |
| 87,853 |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
| |||
Other Assets |
| 33,038 |
|
| 36,881 |
|
| 38,241 |
| |||
Total Assets |
| $ | 905,646 |
|
| $ | 977,511 |
|
| $ | 957,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Short-term borrowings |
| $ | 7,446 |
|
| $ | 3,407 |
|
| $ | 137,440 |
|
Accounts payable |
| 111,612 |
|
| 142,654 |
|
| 217,754 |
| |||
Accrued expenses |
| 150,236 |
|
| 200,178 |
|
| 209,370 |
| |||
Income taxes payable |
| 1,864 |
|
| 2,631 |
|
| 1,326 |
| |||
Liabilities held for sale |
| -- |
|
| 96,370 |
|
| -- |
| |||
Total current liabilities |
| 271,158 |
|
| 445,240 |
|
| 565,890 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Long-Term Debt |
| 401,351 |
|
| 390,794 |
|
| 391,279 |
| |||
Other Non-Current Liabilities |
| 145,650 |
|
| 157,335 |
|
| 198,878 |
| |||
Deferred Income Taxes |
| 17,321 |
|
| 16,624 |
|
| 21,680 |
| |||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized shares – 50,000,000, issued shares – none |
| -- |
|
| -- |
|
| -- |
| |||
Common stock, $1.00 par value, authorized shares – 250,000,000, issued shares – 176,437,234 |
| 176,437 |
|
| 176,437 |
|
| 176,437 |
| |||
Capital in excess of par value |
| 193,602 |
|
| 155,984 |
|
| 151,572 |
| |||
Retained earnings |
| 1,021,668 |
|
| 1,020,633 |
|
| 838,027 |
| |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| (25,108 | ) |
| (20,879 | ) |
| (17,201 | ) | |||
|
| 1,366,599 |
|
| 1,332,175 |
|
| 1,148,835 |
| |||
Common stock in treasury, at cost – 49,327,555, 53,501,234 and 53,750,374 shares |
| (1,296,433 | ) |
| (1,364,657 | ) |
| (1,369,550 | ) | |||
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) |
| 70,166 |
|
| (32,482 | ) |
| (220,715 | ) | |||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) |
| $ | 905,646 |
|
| $ | 977,511 |
|
| $ | 957,012 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
KATE SPADE & COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Sales |
| $ | 740,029 |
| $ | 527,942 |
| $ | 250,417 |
| $ | 192,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of goods sold |
| 289,982 |
| 201,146 |
| 93,103 |
| 74,390 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gross Profit |
| 450,047 |
| 326,796 |
| 157,314 |
| 118,222 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses |
| 463,499 |
| 336,450 |
| 153,767 |
| 116,251 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Impairment of intangible asset |
| -- |
| 3,300 |
| -- |
| 3,300 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating (Loss) Income |
| (13,452 | ) | (12,954 | ) | 3,547 |
| (1,329 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other (expense) income, net |
| (1,717 | ) | (1,809 | ) | (1,805 | ) | 893 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Impairment of cost investment |
| -- |
| (6,109 | ) | -- |
| -- |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| (16,914 | ) | (1,707 | ) | -- |
| (599 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
| (18,185 | ) | (35,877 | ) | (2,189 | ) | (12,117 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Loss Before (Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes |
| (50,268 | ) | (58,456 | ) | (447 | ) | (13,152 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
| (500 | ) | 3,042 |
| (3,070 | ) | 1,013 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations |
| (49,768 | ) | (61,498 | ) | 2,623 |
| (14,165 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
| 82,404 |
| (50,679 | ) | (11,753 | ) | (2,701 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | 32,636 |
| $ | (112,177 | ) | $ | (9,130 | ) | $ | (16,866 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) Earnings per Share, Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations |
| $ | (0.40 | ) | $ | (0.51 | ) | $ | 0.02 |
| $ | (0.12 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | 0.26 |
| $ | (0.93 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) Earnings per Share, Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations |
| $ | (0.40 | ) | $ | (0.51 | ) | $ | 0.02 |
| $ | (0.12 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | 0.26 |
| $ | (0.93 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted Average Shares, Basic |
| 125,972 |
| 120,480 |
| 126,971 |
| 122,396 |
| ||||
Weighted Average Shares, Diluted |
| 125,972 |
| 120,480 |
| 127,610 |
| 122,396 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
KATE SPADE & COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | 32,636 |
| $ | (112,177 | ) | $ | (9,130 | ) | $ | (16,866 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Net of Income Taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of income taxes of $0 |
| (3,927 | ) | (7,671 | ) | (5,415 | ) | 257 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of income taxes of $(185), $333, $264 and $(288), respectively |
| (302 | ) | 544 |
| 430 |
| (469 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
| $ | 28,407 |
| $ | (119,304 | ) | $ | (14,115 | ) | $ | (17,078 | ) |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
KATE SPADE & COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| October 4, 2014 |
| September 28, 2013 |
| ||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) |
| $ | 32,636 |
| $ | (112,177 | ) |
Adjustments to arrive at loss from continuing operations |
| (82,404 | ) | 50,679 |
| ||
Loss from continuing operations |
| (49,768 | ) | (61,498 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing operations to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 39,240 |
| 27,311 |
| ||
Impairment of intangible asset |
| -- |
| 3,300 |
| ||
Loss on asset disposals and impairments, including streamlining initiatives, net |
| 2,653 |
| 7,928 |
| ||
Share-based compensation |
| 31,772 |
| 3,756 |
| ||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 16,914 |
| 1,707 |
| ||
Foreign currency losses, net |
| 2,287 |
| 7,192 |
| ||
Other, net |
| 1,358 |
| 1,051 |
| ||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Decrease in accounts receivable — trade, net |
| 2,324 |
| 6,327 |
| ||
Increase in inventories, net |
| (82,144 | ) | (49,557 | ) | ||
Increase in other current and non-current assets |
| (8,759 | ) | (15,994 | ) | ||
Increase in accounts payable |
| 9,071 |
| 23,622 |
| ||
Decrease in accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities |
| (22,522 | ) | (15,220 | ) | ||
Net change in income tax assets and liabilities |
| (174 | ) | 3,099 |
| ||
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations |
| (17,823 | ) | (65,198 | ) | ||
Net cash used in operating activities |
| (75,571 | ) | (122,174 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
| -- |
| 20,264 |
| ||
Purchases of property and equipment |
| (67,534 | ) | (46,225 | ) | ||
Payments for in-store merchandise shops |
| (4,318 | ) | (1,621 | ) | ||
Payments for purchases of businesses |
| (32,268 | ) | -- |
| ||
Investments in and advances to equity investee |
| -- |
| (5,500 | ) | ||
Net proceeds from disposition |
| -- |
| 4,000 |
| ||
Other, net |
| (30 | ) | 372 |
| ||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of discontinued operations |
| 137,922 |
| (34,925 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
| 33,772 |
| (63,635 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from borrowings under revolving credit agreement |
| 5,063 |
| 495,696 |
| ||
Repayment of borrowings under revolving credit agreement |
| (4,960 | ) | (359,543 | ) | ||
Proceeds from capital lease |
| -- |
| 8,673 |
| ||
Principal payments under capital lease obligations |
| (303 | ) | (3,747 | ) | ||
Proceeds from issuance of Term Loan |
| 398,000 |
| -- |
| ||
Repayment of Senior Notes |
| (390,693 | ) | -- |
| ||
Repayment of Term Loan |
| (1,000 | ) | -- |
| ||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
| 41,410 |
| 2,326 |
| ||
Payment of deferred financing fees |
| (9,282 | ) | (5,271 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
| 38,235 |
| 138,134 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| (3,324 | ) | (4,895 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| (6,888 | ) | (52,570 | ) | ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
| 130,222 |
| 59,402 |
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
| $ | 123,334 |
| $ | 6,832 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
KATE SPADE & COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise noted, all amounts are in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Kate Spade & Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) included herein have been prepared, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted from this report, as is permitted by such rules and regulations; however, the Company believes that its disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Information presented as of December 28, 2013 is derived from audited financial statements.
Effective February 25, 2014, the Company completed its previously announced corporate name change from Fifth & Pacific Companies, Inc. to reflect the Company’s mono-brand focus following the sale of the Lucky Brand business and the sale of its Juicy Couture brandname and related intellectual property assets (the “Juicy Couture IP”). The Company’s stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) as Kate Spade & Company under the symbol “KATE.”
During the second quarter of 2014, the Company determined it would disaggregate its former KATE SPADE reportable segment into two reportable segments, KATE SPADE North America and KATE SPADE International. The Company operates its kate spade new york, KATE SPADE SATURDAY and JACK SPADE brands through one operating segment in North America and four operating segments internationally: Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe and South America. The Company’s Adelington Design Group reportable segment is also an operating segment. The three reportable segments described below represent the Company’s activities for which separate financial information is available and which is utilized on a regular basis by the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) to evaluate performance and allocate resources. In identifying the Company’s reportable segments, the Company considers its management structure and the economic characteristics, products, customers, sales growth potential and long-term profitability of its operating segments. As such, the Company configured its operations into the following three reportable segments:
· KATE SPADE North America segment – consists of the Company’s kate spade new york, KATE SPADE SATURDAY and JACK SPADE brands in North America.
· KATE SPADE International segment – consists of the Company’s kate spade new york, KATE SPADE SATURDAY and JACK SPADE brands in International markets (principally in Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe and South America).
· Adelington Design Group segment – consists of: (i) exclusive arrangements to supply jewelry for the LIZ CLAIBORNE and MONET brands; (ii) the wholesale non-apparel operations of the TRIFARI brand and licensed KENSIE brand; (iii) the wholesale apparel and wholesale non-apparel operations of the licensed LIZWEAR brand and other brands; and (iv) the licensed LIZ CLAIBORNE NEW YORK brand.
On February 5, 2014, the Company, through its Kate Spade, LLC and Kate Spade Hong Kong Ltd. subsidiaries, reacquired existing KATE SPADE businesses in Southeast Asia from Globalluxe Kate Spade HK Limited (“Globalluxe”) for $32.3 million, including $2.3 million for working capital and other previously agreed adjustments (see Note 2 – Acquisition).
On February 3, 2014, the Company completed the sale of 100.0% of the capital stock of Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. (“Lucky Brand”) to LBD Acquisition Company, LLC (“LBD Acquisition”), a Delaware limited liability company and affiliate of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P. (“Leonard Green”), for an aggregate payment of $225.0 million, comprised of $140.0 million cash consideration and a three-year $85.0 million note (the “Lucky Brand Note”) issued by Lucky Brand Dungarees, LLC (“Lucky Brand LLC”) at closing, subject to working capital and other adjustments (the “Lucky Brand Transaction”). The assets and liabilities of the former Lucky Brand business
were segregated and reported as held for sale as of December 28, 2013 (see Note 3 – Discontinued Operations). The Lucky Brand Note matures in February 2017 and is guaranteed by substantially all of Lucky Brand LLC’s subsidiaries. The Lucky Brand Note is secured by second-priority lien on all accounts receivable and inventory of Lucky Brand LLC and the guarantor subsidiaries and a first-priority lien on all other collateral of Lucky Brand LLC and the guarantors. The accounts receivable and inventory secure Lucky Brand LLC’s asset-based revolving loan facility on a first-priority basis, and the other collateral secures that loan facility on a second-priority basis. The principal amount of the Lucky Brand Note increases by $5.0 million per year in equal monthly increments and bears cash interest of $8.0 million per year, payable semiannually in arrears. The Lucky Brand Note is prepayable at any time by Lucky Brand LLC without a prepayment premium, subject to certain restrictions as to the minimum amount that may be prepaid without the Company’s consent.
On November 6, 2013, the Company completed the sale of the Juicy Couture IP to an affiliate of Authentic Brands Group (“ABG”) for a total purchase price of $195.0 million. An additional payment may be payable to the Company in an amount of up to $10.0 million if certain conditions regarding future performance are achieved. The Juicy Couture IP is licensed back to the Company until December 31, 2014 to accommodate the wind-down of operations, which was substantially completed in the second quarter of 2014. Juicy Couture paid guaranteed minimum royalties to ABG of $10.0 million during the term of the wind-down license. On March 29, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its Juicy Couture business in Europe to an operating partner of ABG for $8.6 million, subject to working capital adjustments. The transaction closed on April 7, 2014.
On November 19, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement to terminate the lease of the Juicy Couture flagship store on Fifth Avenue in New York City in exchange for $51.0 million. On May 15, 2014, the Company surrendered such premises to the landlord and received proceeds of $45.8 million (net of taxes and fees), in addition to $5.0 million previously received by the Company.
The activities of the Company’s former Lucky Brand and Juicy Couture businesses have been segregated and reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Summarized financial data for the aforementioned brands that are classified as discontinued operations are provided in Note 3 – Discontinued Operations.
In the opinion of management, the information furnished reflects all adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the reported interim periods. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. Management has evaluated events or transactions that have occurred from the balance sheet date through the date the Company issued these financial statements.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Kate Spade & Company is engaged primarily in the design and marketing of a broad range of accessories and apparel. The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to December 31. The 2014 fiscal year, ending January 3, 2015, reflects a 53-week period, resulting in a 13-week, three-month period and a 40-week, nine-month period for the third quarter. The 2013 fiscal year, ending December 28, 2013, reflects a 52-week period, resulting in a 13-week, three-month period and a 39-week, nine-month period for the third quarter.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
USE OF ESTIMATES AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company’s critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of its financial condition and results of operations in conformity with US GAAP. These critical accounting policies are applied in a consistent manner. The Company’s critical accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013.
The application of critical accounting policies requires that the Company make estimates and assumptions about future events and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Estimates by their
nature are based on judgments and available information. Therefore, actual results could materially differ from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The Company continues to monitor the critical accounting policies to ensure proper application of current rules and regulations. During the third quarter of 2014, there were no significant changes in the critical accounting policies discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
On December 29, 2013, the first day of the Company’s 2014 fiscal year, the Company adopted new accounting guidance on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits, which requires an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows: to the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or that the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use; and the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The adoption of the new accounting guidance did not affect the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
2. ACQUISITION
On February 5, 2014, the Company, through its Kate Spade, LLC and Kate Spade Hong Kong Ltd. subsidiaries, reacquired existing KATE SPADE businesses in Southeast Asia from Globalluxe for a purchase price of $32.3 million, including $2.3 million for working capital and other previously agreed adjustments.
In Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan, the Company directly owns and operates the related businesses previously operated by Globalluxe. The Company’s distribution partner operates the KATE SPADE businesses in Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand through distribution agreements and funded approximately $1.5 million to Globalluxe to acquire operating assets in those regions. Globalluxe and its distribution partners operated six stores and one concession in Hong Kong, one concession in Taiwan, one store in Macau, two stores and one concession in Singapore, two stores in Malaysia, three stores and one concession in Indonesia, and two stores and six concessions in Thailand. Prior to the transaction, the Company maintained wholesale distribution to Globalluxe. Following the transaction, the Company maintains wholesale distribution to distributors who operate the businesses in Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand and recognizes direct-to-consumer sales in Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.
The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was based upon the estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets is reflected as goodwill. Accordingly, the Company recorded $21.8 million of goodwill, which is reflected in the KATE SPADE International reportable segment. The recorded goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired as of the acquisition date:
In thousands |
|
| |
Assets acquired: |
|
| |
Current assets |
| $ | 3,549 |
Property and equipment, net |
| 1,267 | |
Goodwill and intangibles, net |
| 26,592 | |
Other assets |
| 860 | |
Total assets acquired |
| $ | 32,268 |
The following table presents details of the acquired intangible assets:
In thousands |
| Useful Life |
| Estimated Fair Value | |
Reacquired distribution rights |
| 1.7 years |
| $ | 4,500 |
Retail customer list |
| 3 years |
| 256 |
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The components of Assets held for sale and Liabilities held for sale related to the former Lucky Brand business as of December 28, 2013 were as follows:
In thousands |
| December 28, 2013 | |
Assets held for sale: |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 163 |
Accounts receivable – trade, net |
| 41,709 | |
Inventories, net |
| 80,503 | |
Property and Equipment, net |
| 68,533 | |
Other assets |
| 11,146 | |
Assets held for sale |
| $ | 202,054 |
Liabilities held for sale: |
|
| |
Accounts payable |
| $ | 52,977 |
Accrued expenses |
| 27,773 | |
Other liabilities |
| 15,620 | |
Liabilities held for sale |
| $ | 96,370 |
The Company completed the sale of Lucky Brand in February 2014 and substantially completed the wind-down operations of the Juicy Couture business in the second quarter of 2014.
The Company recorded pretax income (charges) of $131.0 million and $(31.6) million ($128.0 million and $(31.6) million, after tax) during the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively, and $(2.8) million and $(7.8) million ($(5.8) million and $(7.8) million, after tax) during the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively, to reflect the estimated difference between the carrying value of the net assets disposed and their estimated fair value, less costs to dispose, including transaction costs.
Summarized results of discontinued operations are as follows:
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| ||||
In thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net sales |
| $ | 209,179 |
| $ | 656,402 |
| $ | 521 |
| $ | 237,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) income before provision for income taxes |
| $ | (44,913 | ) | $ | (18,371 | ) | $ | (5,970 | ) | $ | 5,378 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
| 656 |
| 693 |
| 13 |
| 255 |
| ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
| $ | (45,569 | ) | $ | (19,064 | ) | $ | (5,983 | ) | $ | 5,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
| $ | 127,973 |
| $ | (31,615 | ) | $ | (5,770 | ) | $ | (7,824 | ) |
In connection with the sale of the Juicy Couture IP, the Company initiated actions to reduce staff at Juicy Couture during the fourth quarter of 2013. Also, as a result of the requirement to wind down the Juicy Couture operations, the Company closed Juicy Couture offices and retail locations. These actions, which were substantially completed by the end of the second quarter of 2014, resulted in charges related to asset impairments, severance and other items. For the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, the Company recorded charges of $25.4 million and $2.6 million, respectively, and recorded charges of $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively, related to its streamlining initiatives within Discontinued operations, net of income taxes.
4. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Activity for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 in the Capital in excess of par value, Retained earnings and Common stock in treasury, at cost accounts was as follows:
In thousands |
| Capital in Excess |
| Retained |
| Common Stock in |
| ||||
Balance as of December 28, 2013 |
|
| $ | 155,984 |
| $ | 1,020,633 |
| $ | (1,364,657 | ) |
Net income |
|
| -- |
| 32,636 |
| -- |
| |||
Exercise of stock options |
|
| -- |
| (22,430 | ) | 63,840 |
| |||
Restricted shares issued, net of cancellations and shares withheld for taxes |
|
| -- |
| (9,171 | ) | 4,384 |
| |||
Share-based compensation |
|
| 37,618 |
| -- |
| -- |
| |||
Balance as of October 4, 2014 |
|
| $ | 193,602 |
| $ | 1,021,668 |
| $ | (1,296,433 | ) |
Activity for the nine months ended September 28, 2013 in the Capital in excess of par value, Retained earnings and Common stock in treasury, at cost accounts was as follows:
In thousands |
| Capital in Excess |
| Retained |
| Common Stock in |
| ||||
Balance as of December 29, 2012 |
|
| $ | 147,018 |
| $ | 1,071,551 |
| $ | (1,511,862 | ) |
Net loss |
|
| -- |
| (112,177 | ) | -- |
| |||
Exercise of stock options |
|
| -- |
| (3,773 | ) | 6,099 |
| |||
Restricted shares issued, net of cancellations and shares withheld for taxes |
|
| -- |
| (5,344 | ) | 3,212 |
| |||
Share-based compensation |
|
| 5,206 |
| -- |
| -- |
| |||
Exchanges of Convertible Senior Notes, net |
|
| (652 | ) | (112,230 | ) | 133,001 |
| |||
Balance as of September 28, 2013 |
|
| $ | 151,572 |
| $ | 838,027 |
| $ | (1,369,550 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income consisted of the following:
In thousands |
| October 4, 2014 |
| December 28, 2013 |
| September 28, 2013 |
| |||||
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of income taxes of $0 |
|
| $ | (25,789 | ) |
| $ | (21,862 | ) | $ | (17,745 | ) |
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedging derivatives, net of income taxes of $417, $602 and $333, respectively |
|
| 681 |
|
| 983 |
| 544 |
| |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes |
|
| $ | (25,108 | ) |
| $ | (20,879 | ) | $ | (17,201 | ) |
The following table presents the change in each component of Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes for the nine months ended October 4, 2014:
In thousands |
| Cumulative Translation |
| Unrealized Gains |
| ||||||
Balance as of December 28, 2013 |
|
| $ | (21,862 | ) |
|
| $ | 983 |
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassification |
|
| (3,927 | ) |
|
| 336 |
|
| ||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
| -- |
|
|
| (638 | ) |
| ||
Net current-period other comprehensive loss |
|
| (3,927 | ) |
|
| (302 | ) |
| ||
Balance as of October 4, 2014 |
|
| $ | (25,789 | ) |
|
| $ | 681 |
|
|
The following table presents the change in each component of Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes for the nine months ended September 28, 2013:
In thousands |
| Cumulative Translation |
| Unrealized Gains |
| ||||||
Balance as of December 29, 2012 |
|
| $ | (10,074 | ) |
|
| $ | -- |
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassification |
|
| (7,671 | ) |
|
| 1,099 |
|
| ||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
| -- |
|
|
| (555 | ) |
| ||
Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
| (7,671 | ) |
|
| 544 |
|
| ||
Balance as of September 28, 2013 |
|
| $ | (17,745 | ) |
|
| $ | 544 |
|
|
The following table presents the change in each component of Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes for the three months ended October 4, 2014:
In thousands |
| Cumulative Translation |
| Unrealized Gains | |||||||
Balance as of July 5, 2014 |
|
| $ | (20,374 | ) |
|
| $ | 251 |
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassification |
|
| (5,415 | ) |
|
| 578 |
|
| ||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
| -- |
|
|
| (148 | ) |
| ||
Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
| (5,415 | ) |
|
| 430 |
|
| ||
Balance as of October 4, 2014 |
|
| $ | (25,789 | ) |
|
| $ | 681 |
|
|
The following table presents the change in each component of Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes for the three months ended September 28, 2013:
In thousands |
| Cumulative Translation |
| Unrealized Gains | |||||||
Balance as of June 29, 2013 |
|
| $ | (18,002 | ) |
|
| $ | 1,013 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification |
|
| 257 |
|
|
| (101 | ) |
| ||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
| -- |
|
|
| (368 | ) |
| ||
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
| 257 |
|
|
| (469 | ) |
| ||
Balance as of September 28, 2013 |
|
| $ | (17,745 | ) |
|
| $ | 544 |
|
|
5. INVENTORIES, NET
Inventories, net consisted of the following:
In thousands |
| October 4, 2014 |
| December 28, 2013 |
| September 28, 2013 | ||||||||
Raw materials and work in process |
| $ | 622 |
| $ | 1,028 |
|
| $ | 1,999 |
| |||
Finished goods |
|
| 220,103 |
|
| 183,606 |
|
|
| 308,639 |
| |||
Total inventories, net |
| $ | 220,725 |
| $ | 184,634 |
|
| $ | 310,638 |
| |||
6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:
In thousands |
| October 4, 2014 |
| December 28, 2013 |
| September 28, 2013 | |||||||
Land and buildings |
|
| $ | 9,300 |
|
| $ | 9,300 |
|
| $ | 9,300 |
|
Machinery and equipment (a) |
|
| 155,568 |
|
| 171,811 |
|
| 209,196 |
| |||
Furniture and fixtures (a) |
|
| 59,422 |
|
| 83,753 |
|
| 142,707 |
| |||
Leasehold improvements (a) |
|
| 124,521 |
|
| 173,207 |
|
| 269,515 |
| |||
|
|
| 348,811 |
|
| 438,071 |
|
| 630,718 |
| |||
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization (a) |
|
| 172,452 |
|
| 289,000 |
|
| 386,247 |
| |||
Total property and equipment, net |
|
| $ | 176,359 |
|
| $ | 149,071 |
|
| $ | 244,471 |
|
(a) The decrease in the balance compared to September 28, 2013 primarily reflected the sale of the former Lucky Brand business and the wind-down of the Juicy Couture business, including non-cash impairment charges recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013 was $26.5 million and $18.9 million, respectively, which included depreciation for property and equipment under capital leases of $0.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment for the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013 was $9.4 million and $6.6 million, respectively, which included depreciation for property and equipment under capital leases of $0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Property and equipment under capital leases was $9.3 million, $9.3 million and $31.9 million as of October 4, 2014, December 28, 2013 and September 28, 2013, respectively.
During the third quarter of 2013, the Company sold its West Chester, OH distribution center (the “Ohio Facility”) for net proceeds of $20.3 million and entered into a sale-leaseback arrangement with the buyer for a 10-year term, which was classified as an operating lease. The Company realized a gain of $9.5 million associated with the sale-leaseback, which has been deferred and will be recognized as a reduction to Selling, general & administrative expenses (“SG&A”) over the lease term.
7. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES, NET
The following tables disclose the carrying value of all intangible assets:
In thousands |
| Weighted |
| October 4, 2014 |
| December 28, 2013 |
| September 28, 2013 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Gross carrying amount: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Owned trademarks (a) |
| 5 years |
| $ | 2,000 |
| $ | 2,000 |
| $ | 3,479 |
|
Customer relationships |
| 11 years |
| 7,493 |
| 7,273 |
| 7,335 |
| |||
Merchandising rights (b) |
| 4 years |
| 10,322 |
| 6,087 |
| 17,188 |
| |||
Reacquired rights (c) |
| 2 years |
| 15,323 |
| 11,299 |
| 12,131 |
| |||
Other |
| 4 years |
| 2,322 |
| 2,322 |
| 2,322 |
| |||
Subtotal |
|
|
| 37,460 |
| 28,981 |
| 42,455 |
| |||
Accumulated amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Owned trademarks |
|
|
| (400 | ) | (100 | ) | (1,475 | ) | |||
Customer relationships |
|
|
| (4,637 | ) | (4,022 | ) | (3,843 | ) | |||
Merchandising rights |
|
|
| (3,716 | ) | (2,595 | ) | (10,974 | ) | |||
Reacquired rights |
|
|
| (8,715 | ) | (4,394 | ) | (3,707 | ) | |||
Other |
|
|
| (2,203 | ) | (2,092 | ) | (2,054 | ) | |||
Subtotal |
|
|
| (19,671 | ) | (13,203 | ) | (22,053 | ) | |||
Net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Owned trademarks |
|
|
| 1,600 |
| 1,900 |
| 2,004 |
| |||
Customer relationships |
|
|
| 2,856 |
| 3,251 |
| 3,492 |
| |||
Merchandising rights |
|
|
| 6,606 |
| 3,492 |
| 6,214 |
| |||
Reacquired rights |
|
|
| 6,608 |
| 6,905 |
| 8,424 |
| |||
Other |
|
|
| 119 |
| 230 |
| 268 |
| |||
Total amortized intangible assets, net |
|
|
| 17,789 |
| 15,778 |
| 20,402 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Unamortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Owned trademarks (d) |
|
|
| 74,900 |
| 74,900 |
| 102,200 |
| |||
Total intangible assets |
|
|
| $ | 92,689 |
| $ | 90,678 |
| $ | 122,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Goodwill (c) |
|
|
| $ | 68,871 |
| $ | 49,111 |
| $ | 52,679 |
|
(a) The change in the balance reflected the sale of the Lucky Brand business and the Juicy Couture IP (see Note 1 – Basis of Presentation).
(b) The decrease in the balance compared to September 28, 2013 primarily reflected the sale of the Lucky Brand business and the wind-down of the Juicy Couture business, including impairment charges recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013.
(c) The increase in the balance compared to September 28, 2013 primarily reflected the reacquired existing KATE SPADE businesses in Southeast Asia (see Note 2 – Acquisition).
(d) The decrease in the balance compared to September 28, 2013 primarily reflected the sale of the Juicy Couture IP.
Amortization expense of intangible assets was $6.5 million and $4.4 million for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively, and $1.9 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively.
The estimated amortization expense for intangible assets for the next five fiscal years is as follows:
Fiscal Year |
| Amortization Expense |
| |
(In millions) |
|
|
| |
2014 |
| $ | 9.2 |
|
2015 |
| 8.0 |
| |
2016 |
| 2.4 |
| |
2017 |
| 1.9 |
| |
2018 |
| 1.1 |
| |
The changes in carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 were as follows:
In thousands |
|
| KATE SPADE |
|
|
| Adelington |
|
|
| Total |
| |||
Balance as of December 28, 2013 |
|
| $ | 47,664 |
|
|
| $ | 1,447 |
|
|
| $ | 49,111 |
|
Acquisition of existing KATE SPADE businesses in Southeast Asia |
|
| 21,836 |
|
|
| -- |
|
|
| 21,836 |
| |||
Translation adjustment |
|
| (2,006 | ) |
|
| (70 | ) |
|
| (2,076 | ) | |||
Balance as of October 4, 2014 |
|
| $ | 67,494 |
|
|
| $ | 1,377 |
|
|
| $ | 68,871 |
|
The changes in carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 28, 2013 were as follows:
In thousands |
|
| KATE SPADE |
|
|
| Adelington |
|
|
| Total |
| |||
Balance as of December 29, 2012 |
|
| $ | 58,669 |
|
|
| $ | 1,554 |
|
|
| $ | 60,223 |
|
Translation adjustment |
|
| (7,493 | ) |
|
| (51 | ) |
|
| (7,544 | ) | |||
Balance as of September 28, 2013 |
|
| $ | 51,176 |
|
|
| $ | 1,503 |
|
|
| $ | 52,679 |
|
The Company completed its annual goodwill impairment tests as of the first day of the third quarter of 2014. No impairment was recognized as of that date.
8. INCOME TAXES
During the third quarter of 2014 and 2013, the Company continued to record a full valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in most jurisdictions due to the combination of its history of pretax losses and its inability to carry back tax losses or credits.
The Company’s benefit for income taxes for the nine and three months ended October 4, 2014 primarily represented an income tax benefit within continuing operations due to the recognition of tax expense within discontinued operations, partially offset by increases in deferred tax liabilities for indefinite-lived intangible assets, current tax on operations in certain jurisdictions and an increase in the accrual for interest related to uncertain tax positions. During the nine and three months ended October 4, 2014, the Company recorded a tax charge of $3.0 million within discontinued operations related to the dispositions of the Lucky Brand business and Juicy Couture IP and recognized an income tax benefit of a corresponding amount within continuing operations as a result of an intra-period allocation.
The Company’s provision for income taxes for the nine and three months ended September 28, 2013 primarily represented increases in deferred tax liabilities for indefinite-lived intangible assets, current tax on operations in certain jurisdictions and an increase in the accrual for interest related to uncertain tax positions.
The number of years with open tax audits varies depending upon the tax jurisdiction. The major tax jurisdictions include the US, Japan, United Kingdom, Canada and Brazil. The Company is no longer subject to US Federal examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the years 2009 and prior and, with a few exceptions, this applies to tax examinations by state authorities as well. As a result of a 2009 US Federal tax law change extending the carryback period from two to five years and the Company’s carryback of its 2009 tax loss to 2004 and 2005, the IRS has the ability to re-open its past examinations of 2004 and 2005. The statute of limitations for these years
expires in December of 2014. In addition, the IRS and other taxing authorities can also subject the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards to further review when such net operation loss carryforwards are utilized.
The Company expects a reduction in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, inclusive of interest and penalties, by an amount between $85.5 million and $87.6 million within the next 12 months due to either settlement or the expiration of the statute of limitations. As of October 4, 2014, uncertain tax positions of $80.6 million exist, which would provide an effective rate impact in the future if subsequently recognized.
For interim financial statement purposes, US GAAP income tax expense related to ordinary income is determined by applying an estimated annual effective income tax rate against the Company’s ordinary income. Income tax expense (benefit) related to items not characterized as ordinary income is recognized as a discrete item when incurred. The estimation of the Company’s annual effective income tax rate requires the use of management forecasts and other estimates, a projection of jurisdictional taxable income and losses, application of statutory income tax rates, and an evaluation of valuation allowances. The Company’s estimated annual effective income tax rate may be revised, if necessary, in each interim period during the fiscal year.
9. DEBT AND LINES OF CREDIT
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
In thousands |
| October 4, 2014 |
| December 28, 2013 |
| September 28, 2013 |
| |||
10.5% Senior Secured Notes, due April 2019 (a) |
| $ | -- |
| $ | 382,209 |
| $ | 382,588 |
|
Term Loan credit facility, due April 2021 (a)(b) |
| 397,106 |
| -- |
| -- |
| |||
Revolving credit facility |
| 3,000 |
| 2,997 |
| 136,233 |
| |||
Capital lease obligations (c) |
| 8,691 |
| 8,995 |
| 9,898 |
| |||
Total debt |
| 408,797 |
| 394,201 |
| 528,719 |
| |||
Less: Short-term borrowings (d) |
| 7,446 |
| 3,407 |
| 137,440 |
| |||
Long-term debt |
| $ | 401,351 |
| $ | 390,794 |
| $ | 391,279 |
|
(a) The Senior Notes were refinanced in the second quarter of 2014 with proceeds from the issuance of term loans in an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million (collectively, the “Term Loan”).
(b) The balance as of October 4, 2014 reflected the issuance of the Term Loan, an amortization payment of $1.0 million and an unamortized debt discount of $1.9 million.
(c) The decrease in the balance compared to September 28, 2013 primarily reflected the expiration of a capital lease for machinery and equipment during the fourth quarter of 2013.
(d) At October 4, 2014, the balance consisted of $4.0 million of Term Loan amortization payments, outstanding borrowings under the Company’s amended and restated revolving credit facility (as amended to date, the “ABL Facility”) and obligations under capital leases. At December 28, 2013 and September 28, 2013, the balance consisted of outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility and obligations under capital leases.
Convertible Notes
During the first quarter of 2013, a holder of $11.2 million aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 6.0% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2014 (the “Convertible Notes”) converted all of such outstanding Convertible Notes into 3,171,670 shares of the Company’s common stock. During the third quarter of 2013, holders of the remaining $8.8 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes converted all of such outstanding Convertible Notes into 2,462,509 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company recognized pretax losses of $1.7 million and $0.6 million on the extinguishment of debt related to the Convertible Notes for the nine and three months ended September 28, 2013.
Senior Notes
On April 7, 2011, the Company completed an offering of $220.0 million principal amount of 10.5% Senior Secured Notes due April 2019 (the “Original Notes,” together with the June 2012 issuance of $152.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10.5% Senior Notes (the “Additional Notes”), the “Senior Notes”). The Company used the net proceeds of $212.9 million from such issuance of the Original Notes primarily to fund a tender offer of then outstanding 128.5 million euro aggregate principal amount of 5.0% Euro Notes due July 8, 2013 (the “Euro Notes”) on April 8, 2011. The remaining proceeds were used for general corporate purposes. On June 8, 2012, the Company completed the offering of the Additional Notes, at 108.25% of par value. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds of $160.6 million from the offering of the Additional Notes to repay outstanding borrowings under its ABL
Facility and to fund the redemption of 52.9 million euro aggregate principal amount of Euro Notes on July 12, 2012. The Company used the remaining proceeds to fund a portion of the acquisition of a 51.0% interest in Kate Spade Japan Co., Ltd (“KSJ”).
Pursuant to registration rights agreements executed as part of the offering of Original Notes and the Additional Notes, the Company was required to complete SEC-registered offers to issue new Senior Notes (with substantially the same terms and principal amount) in exchange for the Original Notes and the Additional Notes. The Company was required to pay additional interest on the Senior Notes through the completion of the exchange offers on March 20, 2013. All accrued and unpaid additional interest was paid (together with regular interest on the Senior Notes) on April 15, 2013.
On April 14, 2014, the Company redeemed $37.2 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes at a price equal to 103.0% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest using cash on hand. On May 12, 2014, the Company redeemed the remaining $334.8 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes at a price equal to 105.25% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest, with the proceeds from the Term Loan. The Company recognized a $16.9 million loss on extinguishment of debt related to these transactions in the second quarter of 2014.
Term Loan
On April 10, 2014, the Company entered into a term loan credit agreement (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”), which provides for term loans in an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million, maturing in April 2021. The Term Loan is subject to amortization payments of $1.0 million per quarter, which commenced on October 1, 2014, with the balance due at maturity. Interest on the outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan accrues at a rate equal to LIBOR (with a floor of 1.0%) plus 3.0% per annum, payable in cash. The Term Loan was funded on May 12, 2014, and the Company used $354.8 million of the net proceeds of $392.0 million from the Term Loan to redeem the Company’s remaining outstanding Senior Notes on May 12, 2014 as discussed above. The Term Loan and other obligations under the Term Loan Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s restricted subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”), which include (i) all of the Company’s existing material domestic restricted subsidiaries, (ii) all future wholly owned restricted subsidiaries of the Company (other than foreign subsidiaries, CFCs, CFC holding companies and subsidiaries of any of the foregoing and certain immaterial subsidiaries) and (iii) all future non-wholly owned restricted subsidiaries of the Company that guarantee capital markets debt securities or term indebtedness of the Company or any Guarantor.
The Term Loan Credit Agreement permits the Company to incur, from time to time, additional incremental term loans under the Term Loan Credit Agreement (subject to obtaining commitments for such term loans) and other pari passu lien indebtedness, subject to an overall limit of $100.0 million plus such additional amount that would cause the Company’s consolidated net total secured debt ratio not to exceed 3.75 to 1.0 on a pro forma basis. Any such incremental term loans and other pari passu lien indebtedness are permitted to share in the collateral described below on a pari passu basis with the Term Loan. The Term Loan may be prepaid, at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at any time at par plus accrued interest; provided that if the Term Loan is prepaid or refinanced in connection with a repricing transaction within six months after the initial borrowing, a 1.0% penalty is applicable.
Subject to certain permitted liens and other exclusions and exceptions, the Term Loan is secured (i) on a first-priority basis by a lien on the Company’s KATE SPADE trademarks and certain related rights owned by the Company and the Guarantors (the “Term Priority Collateral”) and (ii) by a second-priority security interest in the Company’s and the Guarantors’ other assets (the “ABL Priority Collateral” and together with the Term Priority Collateral, the “Collateral”), which secure the Company’s ABL Facility on a first-priority basis.
The Term Loan is required to be prepaid in an amount equal to 50.0% of the Company’s Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Term Loan Credit Agreement) with respect to each fiscal year ending on or after January 2, 2016. The percentage of Excess Cash Flow that must be so applied is reduced to 25.0% if the Company’s consolidated net total debt ratio is less than 2.75 to 1.0 and to 0% if the Company’s consolidated net total debt ratio is less than 2.25 to 1.0. Lenders may elect not to accept mandatory prepayments.
The Term Loan Credit Agreement limits the Company’s and restricted subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur indebtedness, make dividend payments or other restricted payments, create liens, sell assets (including securities of the Company’s restricted subsidiaries), permit certain restrictions on dividends and transfers of assets by the Company’s restricted subsidiaries, enter into certain types of transactions with shareholders and affiliates and enter into mergers, consolidations or sales of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, in each case subject to
certain designated exceptions and qualifications. The Term Loan Credit Agreement also contains certain affirmative covenants and events of default that are customary for credit agreements governing term loans.
ABL Facility
In May 2014, the Company terminated its prior revolving credit agreement and completed a fourth amendment to and restatement of the ABL Facility, which extended the maturity date of the facility to May 2019. Availability under the ABL Facility shall be an amount equal to the lesser of $200.0 million and a borrowing base that is computed monthly and comprised of the Company’s eligible cash, accounts receivable and inventory. The ABL Facility also includes a swingline subfacility of $30.0 million, a multicurrency subfacility of $35.0 million and the option to expand the facility by up to $100.0 million under certain specified conditions. A portion of the facility provided under the ABL Facility of up to $125.0 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit, and standby letters of credit may not exceed $40.0 million in the aggregate. The ABL Facility allows two borrowing options: one borrowing option with interest rates based on euro currency rates and a second borrowing option with interest rates based on the alternate base rate, as defined in the ABL Facility, with a spread based on the aggregate availability under the ABL Facility.
The ABL Facility is guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s current domestic subsidiaries, certain of the Company’s future domestic subsidiaries and certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. The ABL Facility is secured by a first-priority lien on substantially all of the assets of the Company and the other borrowers and guarantors (other than certain trademark collateral in which the lenders under the Term Loan Credit Agreement have a first-priority lien, which trademark collateral secures the obligations under the ABL Facility on a second-priority lien basis).
The ABL Facility limits the Company’s, and its restricted subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create liens, undergo certain fundamental changes, make investments, sell certain assets, enter into hedging transactions, make restricted payments and pay certain indebtedness, enter into transactions with affiliates, permit certain restrictions on dividends and transfers of assets by the Company’s restricted subsidiaries and enter into sale and leaseback transactions. These covenants are subject to important exceptions and qualifications, and many of the covenants are subject to an exception based on meeting the fixed charge coverage ratio and/or certain minimum availability tests. The ABL Facility also contains representations and warranties (some of which are brought down to the time of each borrowing made), affirmative covenants and events of default that are customary for asset-based revolving credit agreements.
In addition, the terms and conditions of the ABL Facility: (i) provide for a decrease in fees and interest rates compared to the Company’s previous asset-based revolving loan facility (including eurocurrency spreads of 1.50% to 2.00% over LIBOR, depending on the level of aggregate availability), (ii) require the Company to maintain pro forma compliance with a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0:1.0 on a trailing four-quarter basis if availability under the ABL Facility for three consecutive business days falls below the greater of $15.0 million and 10.0% of the lesser of the aggregate commitments and the borrowing base and (iii) require the Company to apply substantially all cash collections to reduce outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility if availability under the ABL Facility for three consecutive business days falls below the greater of $20.0 million and 12.5% of the lesser of the aggregate commitments and the borrowing base.
The funds available under the ABL Facility may be used for working capital and for general corporate purposes. The Company currently believes that the financial institutions under the ABL Facility are able to fulfill their commitments, although such ability to fulfill commitments will depend on the financial condition of the Company’s lenders at the time of borrowing.
As of October 4, 2014, availability under the Company’s ABL Facility was as follows:
In thousands |
| Total |
| Borrowing |
| Outstanding |
| Letters of |
| Available |
| Excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility (a) |
| $200,000 |
| $231,216 |
| $3,000 |
| $14,819 |
| $182,181 |
| $162,181 |
|
(a) Availability under the ABL Facility is an amount equal to the lesser of $200.0 million and a borrowing base that is computed monthly and comprised of the Company’s eligible cash, accounts receivable and inventory.
(b) Excess capacity represents available capacity reduced by the minimum required aggregate borrowing availability under the ABL Facility of $20.0 million.
Capital Lease Obligations
In the second quarter of 2013, the Company entered into a sale-leaseback agreement for its office building in North Bergen, NJ, which included a sale price of $8.7 million and total lease payments of $26.9 million over a 12-year lease term. The Company’s capital lease obligations of $8.7 million, $9.0 million and $9.9 million as of October 4, 2014, December 28, 2013 and September 28, 2013, respectively, included $0.4 million, $0.4 million and $1.2 million within Short-term borrowings on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company utilizes the following three level hierarchy that defines the assumptions used to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value:
Level 1 – | Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
Level 2 – | Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and |
Level 3 – | Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions developed by the Company, which reflect those that a market participant would use. |
The following table presents the financial assets and liabilities the Company measured at fair value on a recurring basis, based on the fair value hierarchy:
|
| Level 2 |
| |||||||
In thousands |
| October 4, 2014 |
| December 28, 2013 |
| September 28, 2013 |
| |||
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Derivatives |
| $ | 1,580 |
| $ | 1,701 |
| $ | 525 |
|
Financial Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Derivatives |
| $ | -- |
| $ | -- |
| $ | (373 | ) |
The fair values of the Company’s Level 2 derivative instruments were primarily based on observable forward exchange rates. Unobservable quantitative inputs used in the valuation of the Company’s derivative instruments included volatilities, discount rates and estimated credit losses.
The following table presents the non-financial assets the Company measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in 2014, based on the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Losses |
| ||||||||
|
| Net Carrying |
| Fair Value Measured and Recorded |
| Nine Months |
| Three Months |
| ||||||||||
In thousands |
| October 4, 2014 |
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| October 4, 2014 |
| October 4, 2014 |
| ||||||
Property and equipment |
| $ | 110 |
| $ | -- |
| $ | -- |
| $ | -- |
| $ | 336 |
| $ | -- |
|
The following table presents the non-financial assets the Company measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in 2013, based on the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Losses |
| ||||||||
|
| Net Carrying |
| Fair Value Measured and Recorded |
| Nine Months |
| Three Months |
| ||||||||||
In thousands |
| September 28, |
| Level 1 |
| Level 2 |
| Level 3 |
| September 28, |
| September 28, |
| ||||||
Property and equipment |
| $ | -- |
| $ | -- |
| $ | -- |
| $ | -- |
| $ | 667 |
| $ | -- |
|
Intangibles, net |
| 2,000 |
| -- |
| -- |
| 2,000 |
| 3,300 |
| 3,300 |
| ||||||
Other assets |
| -- |
| -- |
| -- |
| -- |
| 6,109 |
| -- |
| ||||||
As a result of the 2013 decision to revise the Company’s plan to outsource its distribution function (see Note 12 - Streamlining Initiatives), an impairment analysis was performed on certain property and equipment. The Company determined that a portion of the assets exceeded their fair values, resulting in an impairment charge, which was recorded in SG&A on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
In the third quarter of 2013, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $3.3 million, which reflected the difference in the estimated fair value and carrying value of the TRIFARI trademark. The Company estimated the fair value of the trademark using the income-based relief-from-royalty valuation method which assumes that, in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to obtain the rights to use a comparable asset. The Company assumed a market royalty rate of 3.5%, a discount rate of 14.0% and a long-term growth rate of 2.0%.
Subsequent to the sale of its former global Mexx business, the Company retained a noncontrolling ownership interest in such business and accounted for its investment at cost. The Company performed an impairment test based on market multiples of comparable transactions and determined that the carrying value of the investment exceeded its fair value, resulting in an impairment charge, which was recorded in Impairment of cost investment on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The fair values of the Company’s Level 3 Property and equipment and Intangibles, net are based on either a market approach or an income approach using the Company’s forecasted cash flows over the estimated useful lives of such assets, as appropriate.
The fair values and carrying values of the Company’s debt instruments are detailed as follows:
|
| October 4, 2014 |
| December 28, 2013 |
| September 28, 2013 |
| ||||||||||||
In thousands |
| Fair Value |
| Carrying |
| Fair Value |
| Carrying |
| Fair Value |
| Carrying |
| ||||||
10.5% Senior Secured Notes, due April 2019 (a) |
| $ | -- |
| $ | -- |
| $ | 400,830 |
| $ | 382,209 |
| $ | 405,480 |
| $ | 382,588 |
|
Term Loan credit facility, due April 2021 (a) |
| 388,776 |
| 397,106 |
| -- |
| -- |
| -- |
| -- |
| ||||||
Revolving credit facility (b) |
| 3,000 |
| 3,000 |
| 2,997 |
| 2,997 |
| 136,233 |
| 136,233 |
| ||||||
(a) Carrying values include unamortized debt discount or premium.
(b) Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest based on market rate; accordingly its fair value approximates its carrying value.
The fair values of the Company’s debt instruments were estimated using market observable inputs, including quoted prices in active markets, market indices and interest rate measurements. Within the hierarchy of fair value measurements, these are Level 2 fair values. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair value of the Lucky Brand Note approximates its carrying value.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Buying/Sourcing
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Hong Kong-based, global consumer goods exporter Li & Fung Limited (“Li & Fung”), whereby Li & Fung was appointed as the Company’s buying/sourcing agent for all of the Company’s brands and products (other than jewelry) and the Company received a payment of $75.0 million at closing and an additional payment of $8.0 million in the second quarter of 2009 to offset specific, incremental, identifiable expenses associated with the transaction. The Company’s agreement with Li & Fung provides for a refund of a portion of the closing payment in certain limited circumstances, including a change of control of the Company, the divestiture of any current brand, or certain termination events. The Company is also obligated to use Li & Fung as its buying/sourcing agent for a minimum value of inventory purchases each year through the termination of the agreement in 2019. Since 2009, the Company has completed various disposition transactions, including the licensing arrangements with J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. (“JCPenney”) in the US and Puerto Rico and with QVC, Inc. (“QVC”), the sales of the KENSIE, KENSIE GIRL and MAC & JAC trademarks, the sale of the Juicy Couture IP and the sale of Lucky Brand, which resulted in the removal of buying/sourcing for such products from the Li & Fung buying/sourcing arrangement. As a result, the Company refunded $24.3 million of the closing payment in the second quarter of 2010, refunded $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2012 and settled $6.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. The Company was not required to make any payments to Li & Fung as a result of the sale of Lucky Brand. In addition, the Company’s agreement with Li & Fung is not exclusive; however, the Company is required to source a specified percentage of product purchases from Li & Fung.
Leases
In connection with the disposition of the Lucky Brand business, LIZ CLAIBORNE Canada retail stores, the LIZ CLAIBORNE branded outlet stores in the US and Puerto Rico and certain Mexx Canada retail stores, an aggregate of 277 store leases were assigned to third parties, for which the Company remains secondarily liable for the remaining obligations on 204 such leases. As of October 4, 2014, the future aggregate payments under these leases amounted to $177.9 million and extended to various dates through 2025.
During the second quarter of 2013, the Company entered into a sale-leaseback agreement for its North Bergen, NJ office with a 12-year term and two five-year renewal options. This leaseback was classified as a capital lease and recorded at fair value. As of October 4, 2014, the estimated future minimum lease payments under the noncancelable capital lease were as follows:
In thousands |
|
|
| |
2014 |
| $ | 501 |
|
2015 |
| 2,036 |
| |
2016 |
| 2,089 |
| |
2017 |
| 2,141 |
| |
2018 |
| 2,194 |
| |
Thereafter |
| 15,328 |
| |
Total |
| 24,289 |
| |
Less: Amounts representing interest and executory costs |
| (15,598 | ) | |
Net present values |
| 8,691 |
| |
Less: Capital lease obligations included in short-term debt |
| (446 | ) | |
Long-term capital lease obligations |
| $ | 8,245 |
|
Other
The Company is a party to various pending legal proceedings and claims. Although the outcome of any such actions cannot be determined with certainty, management is of the opinion that the final outcome of any of these actions should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.
12. STREAMLINING INITIATIVES
2014 Actions
In connection with the sale of the Juicy Couture IP and former Lucky Brand business, the Board of Directors of the Company approved various changes to its senior management, which resulted in charges related to severance in the first nine months of 2014. As discussed in Note 17 – Share-Based Compensation, the Company’s Compensation Committee approved the continued vesting of unvested options and restricted stock awards without any required service period or the accelerated vesting of such awards for former employees, including former executive officers. In addition, as a result of the reduction of office space in the Company’s former New York office, the Company recorded charges related to contract terminations and other charges in the first quarter of 2014.
2011 Actions
In the second quarter of 2011, the Company initiated actions to close the Ohio Facility, which were expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2012. In August 2012, the Company encountered systems and operational issues that delayed the planned migration of the Company’s product distribution function out of the Ohio Facility. Subsequently, the Company determined that it would continue to use the Ohio Facility and discontinue the migration of the product distribution function to Li & Fung, and the Company mutually agreed with Li & Fung to allow the distribution agreement with Li & Fung to expire as of January 31, 2013. On February 5, 2013, the Company entered into a contract with a third-party distribution center operations and labor management company to provide distribution operations services at the Ohio Facility. These actions resulted in charges related to contract terminations, severance, asset impairments and other charges and were substantially completed in the second quarter of 2013.
For the nine months ended October 4, 2014, the Company recorded pretax charges totaling $35.0 million related to these initiatives. The Company expects to pay approximately $7.4 million of accrued streamlining costs in the next 12 months. In addition, the Company expects to pay approximately $18.3 million of accrued streamlining costs
classified as discontinued operations in the next 12 months. For the nine months ended September 28, 2013, the Company recorded pretax charges of $3.3 million related to these initiatives, including $1.5 million of asset write-downs and disposals and $1.8 million of other costs. Approximately $18.2 million and $1.5 million of these charges were non-cash during the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively.
For the nine and three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, expenses associated with the Company’s streamlining actions were primarily recorded in SG&A on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and impacted reportable segments and Corporate as follows:
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||||||
In thousands |
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| ||||
KATE SPADE North America |
| $ | 3,178 |
| $ | 528 |
| $ | 23 |
| $ | (383 | ) |
Adelington Design Group |
| 222 |
| 164 |
| 6 |
| (227 | ) | ||||
Other (a) |
| 31,579 |
| 2,620 |
| 1,105 |
| (438 | ) | ||||
Total |
| $ | 34,979 |
| $ | 3,312 |
| $ | 1,134 |
| $ | (1,048 | ) |
(a) Other consists of unallocated corporate restructuring costs and Juicy Couture and Lucky Brand restructuring charges principally related to distribution functions that are not directly attributable to Juicy Couture or Lucky Brand and therefore have not been included in discontinued operations.
A summary rollforward of the liability for streamlining initiatives is as follows:
In thousands |
| Payroll and |
| Contract |
| Asset |
| Other Costs |
| Total |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance at December 28, 2013 |
| $ | 3,036 |
| $ | 2,151 |
| $ | -- |
| $ | 11,707 |
| $ | 16,894 |
|
2014 provision (a) |
| 32,603 |
| 1,260 |
| 931 |
| 185 |
| 34,979 |
| |||||
2014 asset write-downs |
| -- |
| -- |
| (931 | ) | -- |
| (931 | ) | |||||
Translation difference |
| -- |
| (48 | ) | -- |
| (3 | ) | (51 | ) | |||||
2014 spending (a) |
| (33,948 | ) | (2,395 | ) | -- |
| (3,961 | ) | (40,304 | ) | |||||
Balance at October 4, 2014 (b) |
| $ | 1,691 |
| $ | 968 |
| $ | -- |
| $ | 7,928 |
| $ | 10,587 |
|
(a) Payroll and related costs provision and spending include $17.2 million of non-cash share-based compensation expense.
(b) The balance in other costs at October 4, 2014 includes $7.9 million for a withdrawal liability incurred in 2011 related to a multi-employer pension plan that the Company will pay through June 1, 2016.
13. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share (“EPS”).
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| Three Months Ended |
| ||||||||
In thousands |
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| ||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
| $ | (49,768 | ) | $ | (61,498 | ) | $ | 2,623 |
| $ | (14,165 | ) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
| 82,404 |
| (50,679 | ) | (11,753 | ) | (2,701 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) |
| $ | 32,636 |
| $ | (112,177 | ) | $ | (9,130 | ) | $ | (16,866 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
| 125,972 |
| 120,480 |
| 126,971 |
| 122,396 |
| ||||
Stock options and nonvested shares (a)(b) |
| -- |
| -- |
| 639 |
| -- |
| ||||
Convertible Notes (c) |
| -- |
| -- |
| -- |
| -- |
| ||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (a)(b)(c) |
| 125,972 |
| 120,480 |
| 127,610 |
| 122,396 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
| $ | (0.40 | ) | $ | (0.51 | ) | $ | 0.02 |
| $ | (0.12 | ) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
| $ | 0.66 |
| $ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) |
Net income (loss) |
| $ | 0.26 |
| $ | (0.93 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
| $ | (0.40 | ) | $ | (0.51 | ) | $ | 0.02 |
| $ | (0.12 | ) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
| $ | 0.66 |
| $ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) |
Net income (loss) |
| $ | 0.26 |
| $ | (0.93 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) |
(a) Because the Company incurred a loss from continuing operations for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and the nine and three months ended September 28, 2013, all outstanding stock options and nonvested shares are antidilutive for such periods. Accordingly, for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and the nine and three months ended September 28, 2013, approximately 1.1 million and 5.7 million outstanding stock options, respectively, and approximately 1.7 million and 0.6 million outstanding nonvested shares, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share.
(b) Excludes approximately 0.5 million nonvested shares for the nine and three months ended September 28, 2013, for which the performance criteria were not achieved.
(c) Because the Company incurred a loss from continuing operations for the nine and three months ended September 28, 2013, approximately 2.0 million and 0.3 million potentially dilutive shares issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, respectively, were considered antidilutive for such periods, and were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share.
14. ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Licensing-Related Transactions
In the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company sold (i) the global trademark rights for the LIZ CLAIBORNE family of brands and the trademark rights in the United States and Puerto Rico for the MONET brand to JCPenney for $267.5 million and (ii) the KENSIE, KENSIE GIRL and MAC & JAC trademarks.
In November 2011, in connection with the Company’s sale of its LIZ CLAIBORNE brand and certain rights to its MONET brand to JCPenney, the Company entered into an agreement with JCPenney to develop exclusive brands for JCPenney, which included payment to the Company of a $20.0 million refundable advance. The agreement terminated by its terms without being exercised on February 1, 2013, and the $20.0 million advance was refunded to JCPenney on February 8, 2013, pursuant to the terms of the agreement.
In connection with these transactions, the Company maintains: (i) an exclusive supplier arrangement to provide JCPenney with LIZ CLAIBORNE and MONET branded jewelry; (ii) a royalty free license through July 2020 for the LIZ CLAIBORNE NEW YORK brand, which is sold exclusively at QVC through the 2009 previously existing license between the Company and QVC; (iii) a royalty-free license through July 2020 to use the LIZWEAR brand to design, manufacture and distribute LIZWEAR-branded products to the club store channel; and (iv) an exclusive license to produce and sell jewelry under the KENSIE brand name.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Supplementary Disclosures
During the nine months ended October 4, 2014, the Company received net income tax refunds of $0.3 million. During the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, the Company made interest payments of $29.9 million and $22.8 million, respectively. As of October 4, 2014, December 28, 2013 and September 28, 2013, the Company accrued capital expenditures totaling $14.2 million, $13.3 million and $10.7 million, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013 included $6.1 million and $4.5 million, respectively, related to amortization of deferred financing costs.
On February 3, 2014, the Company received a three-year $85.0 million note issued by Lucky Brand LLC (see Note 1 – Basis of Presentation), which is reflected in Note Receivable on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
During the nine months ended September 28, 2013, holders of $19.9 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes converted all of such outstanding Convertible Notes into 5,634,179 shares of the Company’s common stock.
During the first quarter of 2013, the Company refunded the $20.0 million advance to JCPenney, which was included within Decrease in accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Related Party Transactions
In June 2011, the Company established a joint venture in China with E-Land Fashion China Holdings, Limited. The joint venture is a Hong Kong limited liability company and its purpose is to market and distribute small leather goods and other fashion products and accessories in China under the KATE SPADE brand. The joint venture operates under the name of KS China Co., Limited (“KSC”) for an initial 10 year period and commenced operations in the fourth quarter of 2011. The Company accounts for its 40.0% interest in KSC under the equity method of accounting. The Company made capital contributions of $5.5 million to KSC during the first nine months of 2013.
The Company’s equity in losses of its equity investee was $1.4 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively, and $1.2 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively. As of October 4, 2014, December 28, 2013 and September 28, 2013, the Company recorded $8.0 million, $9.4 million and $9.6 million, respectively, related to its investments in KSC, which was included in Other assets on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
15. SEGMENT REPORTING
During the second quarter of 2014, the Company determined it would disaggregate its former KATE SPADE reportable segment into two reportable segments, KATE SPADE North America and KATE SPADE International. The Company operates its kate spade new york, KATE SPADE SATURDAY and JACK SPADE brands through one operating segment in North America and four operating segments internationally: Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe and South America. The Company’s Adelington Design Group reportable segment is also an operating segment. The three reportable segments described below represent the Company’s activities for which separate financial information is available and which is utilized on a regular basis by the Company’s CODM to evaluate performance and allocate resources. In identifying the Company’s reportable segments, the Company considers its management structure and the economic characteristics, products, customers, sales growth potential and long-term profitability of its operating segments. As such, the Company configured its operations into the following three reportable segments:
· KATE SPADE North America segment – consists of the Company’s kate spade new york, KATE SPADE SATURDAY and JACK SPADE brands in North America.
· KATE SPADE International segment – consists of the Company’s kate spade new york, KATE SPADE SATURDAY and JACK SPADE brands in International markets (principally in Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe and South America).
· Adelington Design Group segment – consists of: (i) exclusive arrangements to supply jewelry for the LIZ CLAIBORNE and MONET brands; (ii) the wholesale non-apparel operations of the TRIFARI brand and licensed KENSIE brand; (iii) the wholesale apparel and wholesale non-apparel operations of the licensed LIZWEAR brand and other brands; and (iv) the licensed LIZ CLAIBORNE NEW YORK brand.
As discussed in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation, the Company completed the sale of Lucky Brand on February 3, 2014 and substantially completed the wind-down operations of the Juicy Couture brand during the second quarter of 2014.
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the CODM. The Company’s measure of segment profitability is Adjusted EBITDA of each reportable segment. Accordingly, the CODM evaluates performance and allocates resources based primarily on Segment Adjusted EBITDA. Segment Adjusted EBITDA excludes: (i) depreciation and amortization; (ii) charges due to streamlining initiatives, brand-exiting activities and acquisition related costs; and (iii) losses on asset disposals and impairments. In connection with the decision to disaggregate the Company’s reportable segments, the costs of all corporate departments that serve the respective segment are fully allocated. The Company does not allocate amounts reported below Operating income (loss) to its reportable segments, other than equity income (loss) in the Company’s equity method investee. The Company’s definition of Segment Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
The accounting policies of the Company’s reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1 – Basis of Presentation. Sales are reported based on a destination basis. The Company, as licensor, also licenses to third parties the right to produce and market products bearing certain Company-owned trademarks.
Dollars in thousands |
| Net Sales |
| % to Total |
| Adjusted |
| % of Sales |
| ||
Nine Months Ended October 4, 2014 (40 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Reportable Segments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
KATE SPADE North America |
| $ | 565,021 |
| 76.4 | % | $ | 69,614 |
| 12.3 | % |
KATE SPADE International |
| 153,512 |
| 20.7 | % | 81 |
| 0.1 | % | ||
Adelington Design Group |
| 21,496 |
| 2.9 | % | 1,020 |
| 4.7 | % | ||
Other (a) |
| -- |
| -- | % | (685 | ) | -- | % | ||
Totals |
| $ | 740,029 |
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Nine Months Ended September 28, 2013 (39 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Reportable Segments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
KATE SPADE North America |
| $ | 380,588 |
| 72.1 | % | $ | 20,550 |
| 5.4 | % |
KATE SPADE International |
| 106,897 |
| 20.2 | % | (614 | ) | (0.6 | )% | ||
Adelington Design Group |
| 40,457 |
| 7.7 | % | 7,337 |
| 18.1 | % | ||
Other (a) |
| -- |
| -- | % | (4,779 | ) | -- | % | ||
Totals |
| $ | 527,942 |
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands |
| Net Sales |
| % to Total |
| Adjusted |
| % of Sales |
| ||
Three Months Ended October 4, 2014 (13 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Reportable Segments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
KATE SPADE North America |
| $ | 192,886 |
| 77.0 | % | $ | 21,130 |
| 11.0 | % |
KATE SPADE International |
| 50,906 |
| 20.3 | % | (1,346 | ) | (2.6 | )% | ||
Adelington Design Group |
| 6,625 |
| 2.7 | % | 1,030 |
| 15.5 | % | ||
Other (a) |
| -- |
| -- | % | (90 | ) | -- | % | ||
Totals |
| $ | 250,417 |
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Three Months Ended September 28, 2013 (13 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Reportable Segments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
KATE SPADE North America |
| $ | 141,383 |
| 73.4 | % | $ | 10,253 |
| 7.3 | % |
KATE SPADE International |
| 38,344 |
| 19.9 | % | (666 | ) | (1.7 | )% | ||
Adelington Design Group |
| 12,885 |
| 6.7 | % | 3,260 |
| 25.3 | % | ||
Other (a) |
| -- |
| -- | % | (2,097 | ) | -- | % | ||
Totals |
| $ | 192,612 |
| 100.0 | % |
|
|
|
|
(a) Other consists of expenses principally related to distribution functions that were included in Juicy Couture and Lucky Brand historical results, but are not directly attributable to those businesses and therefore have not been included in discontinued operations.
The following tables provide a reconciliation to (Loss) income from continuing operations:
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
|
| October 4, |
|
| September 28, |
|
| October 4, |
|
| September 28, |
| ||||||||
In thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Reportable Segments Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
KATE SPADE North America |
|
| $ | 69,614 |
|
|
| $ | 20,550 |
|
|
| $ | 21,130 |
|
|
| $ | 10,253 |
|
KATE SPADE International (a) |
|
| 81 |
|
|
| (614 | ) |
|
| (1,346 | ) |
|
| (666 | ) | ||||
Adelington Design Group |
|
| 1,020 |
|
|
| 7,337 |
|
|
| 1,030 |
|
|
| 3,260 |
| ||||
Other (b) |
|
| (685 | ) |
|
| (4,779 | ) |
|
| (90 | ) |
|
| (2,097 | ) | ||||
Total Reportable Segments Adjusted EBITDA |
|
| 70,030 |
|
|
| 22,494 |
|
|
| 20,724 |
|
|
| 10,750 |
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization, net (c) |
|
| (34,033 | ) |
|
| (24,015 | ) |
|
| (11,752 | ) |
|
| (8,330 | ) | ||||
Charges due to streamlining initiatives, brand-exiting activities, acquisition related costs and loss on asset disposals and impairments, net (d) |
|
| (19,035 | ) |
|
| (8,660 | ) |
|
| (870 | ) |
|
| (2,758 | ) | ||||
Share-based compensation (e) |
|
| (31,772 | ) |
|
| (3,756 | ) |
|
| (5,740 | ) |
|
| (1,412 | ) | ||||
Equity loss included in Reportable Segments Adjusted EBITDA |
|
| 1,358 |
|
|
| 983 |
|
|
| 1,185 |
|
|
| 421 |
| ||||
Operating (Loss) Income |
|
| (13,452 | ) |
|
| (12,954 | ) |
|
| 3,547 |
|
|
| (1,329 | ) | ||||
Other (expense) income, net (a) |
|
| (1,717 | ) |
|
| (1,809 | ) |
|
| (1,805 | ) |
|
| 893 |
| ||||
Impairment of cost investment |
|
| -- |
|
|
| (6,109 | ) |
|
| -- |
|
|
| -- |
| ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
| (16,914 | ) |
|
| (1,707 | ) |
|
| -- |
|
|
| (599 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
| (18,185 | ) |
|
| (35,877 | ) |
|
| (2,189 | ) |
|
| (12,117 | ) | ||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
|
| (500 | ) |
|
| 3,042 |
|
|
| (3,070 | ) |
|
| 1,013 |
| ||||
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations |
|
| $ | (49,768 | ) |
|
| $ | (61,498 | ) |
|
| $ | 2,623 |
|
|
| $ | (14,165 | ) |
(a) Amounts include equity in the losses of the Company’s equity method investee of $1.4 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively and $1.2 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively.
(b) Other consists of expenses principally related to distribution functions that were included in Juicy Couture and Lucky Brand historical results, but are not directly attributable to those businesses and therefore have not been included in discontinued operations.
(c) Excludes amortization included in Interest expense, net.
(d) See Note 12 – Streamlining Initiatives for a discussion of streamlining charges.
(e) Includes share-based compensation expense of $17.2 million and $0.3 million in the nine and three months ended October 4, 2014, respectively, that was classified as restructuring.
GEOGRAPHIC DATA:
Dollars in thousands |
| Net Sales |
| % to Total |
| |
Nine Months Ended October 4, 2014 (40 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Domestic |
| $ | 572,073 |
| 77.3 % |
|
International |
| 167,956 |
| 22.7 % |
| |
Totals |
| $ | 740,029 |
| 100.0 % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nine Months Ended September 28, 2013 (39 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Domestic |
| $ | 416,375 |
| 78.9 % |
|
International |
| 111,567 |
| 21.1 % |
| |
Totals |
| $ | 527,942 |
| 100.0 % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Dollars in thousands |
| Net Sales |
| % to Total |
| |
Three Months Ended October 4, 2014 (13 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Domestic |
| $ | 192,805 |
| 77.0 % |
|
International |
| 57,612 |
| 23.0 % |
| |
Totals |
| $ | 250,417 |
| 100.0 % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Three Months Ended September 28, 2013 (13 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Domestic |
| $ | 151,172 |
| 78.5 % |
|
International |
| 41,440 |
| 21.5 % |
| |
Totals |
| $ | 192,612 |
| 100.0 % |
|
There were no significant changes in segment assets during the nine months ended October 4, 2014.
16. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the Company utilizes foreign currency collars, forward contracts and swap contracts for the purpose of hedging the specific exposure to variability in forecasted cash flows associated primarily with inventory purchases mainly by KSJ. As of October 4, 2014, the Company had forward contracts maturing through December 2015 to sell 2.3 billion yen for $22.1 million.
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts outside the cash flow hedging program to manage currency risk associated with intercompany loans. As of October 4, 2014, the Company had forward contracts to sell 4.0 billion yen for $36.7 million maturing through December 2014. Transaction gains (losses) of $1.3 million and $5.8 million related to these derivative instruments were reflected within Other income (expense), net for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively, and $2.4 million and $(0.4) million for the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively. These transaction gains and losses were substantially offset by transaction gains and losses on the corresponding intercompany loans.
The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for derivatives designated as hedging instruments and derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
| Foreign Currency Contracts Designated as Hedging Instruments |
| ||||||||||
In thousands |
| Asset Derivatives |
| Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||||
Period |
| Balance Sheet |
| Notional |
| Fair Value |
| Balance Sheet |
| Notional |
| Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 4, 2014 |
| Other current assets |
| $ 22,050 |
| $ 1,233 |
| Accrued expenses |
| $ -- |
| $ -- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28, 2013 |
| Other current assets |
| 21,050 |
| 1,317 |
| Accrued expenses |
| -- |
| -- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 28, 2013 |
| Other current assets |
| 10,148 |
| 525 |
| Accrued expenses |
| 21,400 |
| 132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Foreign Currency Contracts Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
| ||||||||||
In thousands |
| Asset Derivatives |
| Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||||
Period |
| Balance Sheet |
| Notional |
| Fair Value |
| Balance Sheet |
| Notional |
| Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 4, 2014 |
| Other current assets |
| $ 36,748 |
| $ 347 |
| Accrued expenses |
| $ -- |
| $ -- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28, 2013 |
| Other current assets |
| 38,403 |
| 384 |
| Accrued expenses |
| -- |
| -- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 28, 2013 |
| Other current assets |
| -- |
| -- |
| Accrued expenses |
| 40,454 |
| 241 |
|
The following table summarizes the effect of foreign currency exchange contracts on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:
In thousands |
| Amount of Gain or |
| Location of Gain or |
| Amount of Gain |
| Amount |
|
Nine months ended |
| $ 541 |
| Cost of goods sold |
| $ 1,028 |
| $ -- |
|
Nine months ended |
| 1,772 |
| Cost of goods sold |
| 895 |
| -- |
|
Three months ended |
| 933 |
| Cost of goods sold |
| 239 |
| -- |
|
Three months ended |
| (164 | ) | Cost of goods sold |
| 593 |
| -- |
|
17. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company recognizes the cost of all employee share-based awards on a straight-line attribution basis over their respective vesting periods, net of estimated forfeitures.
The Company issues stock options and restricted shares as well as shares with performance features to employees under share-based compensation plans. Stock options are issued at the current market price, have a three-year vesting period and a contractual term of 7-10 years.
Compensation expense for restricted shares, including shares with performance features, is measured at fair value on the date of grant based on the number of shares granted and the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock. Such value is recognized as expense over the vesting period of the award, net of estimated forfeitures.
Compensation expense for restricted share units with performance features and a market condition is measured at fair value, subject to the market condition on the date of grant and based on the number of shares expected to vest
subject to the performance condition. Such value is recognized as expense over the vesting period of the award, net of estimated forfeitures.
During 2014, the Company’s Compensation Committee approved the continued vesting of unvested options and restricted stock awards without any required service period or the accelerated vesting of such awards for former employees, including former executive officers, upon their separation from the Company. Compensation expense related to the Company’s share-based payment awards totaled $31.8 million and $3.8 million for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively, and $5.8 million and $1.5 million for the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively. Compensation expense included $17.2 million and $0.3 million for the nine and three months ended October 4, 2014, respectively, that was classified as restructuring.
Stock Options
The Company utilizes the Binomial lattice pricing model to estimate the fair value of options granted. The Company believes this model provides the best estimate of fair value due to its ability to incorporate inputs that change over time, such as volatility and interest rates and to allow for actual exercise behavior of option holders.
|
| Nine Months Ended |
Valuation Assumptions: |
| September 28, 2013 |
Weighted-average fair value of options granted |
| $10.32 |
Historic volatility |
| 59.5% |
Weighted-average volatility |
| 59.5% |
Expected term (in years) |
| 4.9 |
Dividend yield |
| — |
Risk-free rate |
| 0.1% to 3.9% |
Expected annual forfeiture |
| 12.4% |
Expected volatilities are based on a term structure of implied volatility, which assumes changes in volatility over the life of an option. The Company utilizes historical optionee behavioral data to estimate the option exercise and termination rates that are used in the valuation model. The expected term represents an estimate of the period of time options are expected to remain outstanding. The expected term provided in the above table represents an option weighted-average expected term based on the estimated behavior of distinct groups of employees who received options in 2013. The range of risk-free rates is based on a forward curve of interest rates at the time of option grant.
A summary of award activity under stock option plans as of October 4, 2014 and changes therein during the nine month period then ended are as follows:
|
| Shares |
| Weighted |
| Weighted |
| Aggregate | ||
Outstanding at December 28, 2013 |
| 5,166,375 |
| $ | 11.26 |
| 3.4 |
| $ | 108,498 |
Exercised |
| (3,936,081 | ) | 10.52 |
|
|
| 41,410 | ||
Cancelled/expired |
| (125,075 | ) | 37.21 |
|
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at October 4, 2014 |
| 1,105,219 |
| $ | 10.98 |
| 4.0 |
| $ | 17,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Vested or expected to vest at October 4, 2014 |
| 1,091,380 |
| $ | 10.87 |
| 4.0 |
| $ | 17,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Exercisable at October 4, 2014 |
| 611,654 |
| $ | 6.90 |
| 3.3 |
| $ | 12,404 |
As of October 4, 2014, there were approximately 0.5 million nonvested stock options. The weighted average grant date fair value per award for nonvested stock options was $8.09.
As of October 4, 2014, there was $0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Company’s stock option plans. That expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 year. The total fair value of shares vested during the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013 was $3.2 million and $4.3 million, respectively.
Restricted Stock
In the first quarter of 2014, the Company granted 1,239,639 market share units (“MSUs”) to a group of key executives with an aggregate grant date fair value of $62.0 million as staking grants (“Staking Grants”) and as part of an annual long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”). The Staking Grants have a grant date fair value of $52.2 million and vest 50% on the third anniversary of grant and 50% on the fifth anniversary of grant. The MSUs included in the LTIP represent a portion of the awards granted under that plan, have a grant date fair value of $9.8 million and vest 50% on each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant date. The MSUs issued as Staking Grants and as part of the LTIP have a minimum earnout of 30% of target. The MSUs earned will vary from 30% to 200% of the number of MSUs awarded depending on the actual performance of the Company’s stock price over the vesting periods.
In the second quarter of 2014, the Company granted 51,848 MSUs to a group of key executives with an aggregate grant date fair value of $2.9 million as Staking Grants and as part of an annual LTIP. The Staking Grants have a grant date fair value of $2.8 million and vest 50% on the third anniversary of grant and 50% on the fifth anniversary of grant. The MSUs included in the LTIP represent a portion of the awards granted under that plan, have a grant date fair value of $0.1 million and vest 50% on each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant date. The MSUs issued as Staking Grants and as part of the LTIP have a minimum earnout of 30% of target. The MSUs earned will vary from 30% to 200% of the number of MSUs awarded depending on the actual performance of the Company’s stock price over the vesting periods.
The fair value for the MSUs granted was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation model. For the nine months ended October 4, 2014, the following assumptions were used in determining fair value:
|
| Nine Months Ended |
Valuation Assumptions: |
| October 4, 2014 |
Weighted-average fair value |
| $50.24 |
Expected volatility |
| 52.3% |
Dividend yield |
| — |
Risk-free rate |
| 1.68% |
Weighted-average expected annual forfeiture |
| 4.8% |
The other portion of the LTIP consists of an award of 202,541 performance shares that vests on the third anniversary of the grant date. The number of performance shares earned will vary from zero to 200% of the number of awards granted depending on the Company’s Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) relative to the TSR of the S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index. The performance shares have a grant date fair value of $8.9 million that was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. For the nine months ended October 4, 2014, the following assumptions were used in determining fair value:
|
| Nine Months Ended |
Valuation Assumptions: |
| October 4, 2014 |
Weighted-average fair value |
| $43.93 |
Expected volatility |
| 44.2% |
Dividend yield |
| — |
Risk-free rate |
| 0.66% |
Weighted-average expected annual forfeiture |
| 4.0% |
In 2012, the Company granted 535,000 performance share units with a two year performance period and a three year service period, subject to a market condition adjustment, to a group of key executives. The performance criteria included certain earnings metrics for consecutive periods through December 2013. These awards were determined to be unearned by the Compensation Committee based upon the review of performance at the conclusion of fiscal 2013, and were cancelled according to their terms.
A summary of award activity under restricted stock plans as of October 4, 2014 and changes therein during the nine month period then ended are as follows:
|
| Shares |
| Weighted Average | |
Nonvested stock at December 28, 2013 |
| 1,035,250 |
| $ 14.93 |
|
Granted |
| 1,614,778 |
| 48.34 |
|
Vested |
| (396,000 | ) | 17.13 |
|
Cancelled (a) |
| (521,042 | ) | 15.20 |
|
Nonvested stock at October 4, 2014 |
| 1,732,986 |
| $ 45.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to vest as of October 4, 2014 (b) |
| 1,480,433 |
| $ 45.54 |
|
(a) Includes performance shares granted to a group of key executives with certain performance conditions measured through December 2013 and a market and service condition through December 2014. These shares which were contingently issuable based on 2013 performance were deemed not earned and cancelled.
(b) Excludes the potential impact of the performance share multiplier, which will vary from 30% to 200% of the number of MSUs awarded depending on the actual performance of the Company’s stock price over the vesting periods and zero to 200% of the number of LTIP awards granted depending on the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of the S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index.
As of October 4, 2014, there was $53.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards granted under restricted stock plans. That expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.0 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013 was $6.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
18. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In April 2014, new accounting guidance on the reporting of discontinued operations was issued, which revises the threshold for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. The adoption of the new guidance is not expected to affect the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2014, new accounting guidance on the accounting for revenue recognition was issued, which requires entities to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of the new guidance on its financial statements.
In June 2014, new accounting guidance on the accounting for share-based compensation was issued, which requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This guidance further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period for which the requisite service has already been rendered. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2015. The adoption of the new guidance is not expected to affect the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In August 2014, new accounting guidance on the disclosure of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern was issued, which requires disclosure regarding management’s responsibility in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This guidance is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for interim and annual periods thereafter. The adoption of the new guidance is not expected to affect the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Business Segments
During the second quarter of 2014, we determined we would disaggregate our former KATE SPADE reportable segment into two reportable segments, KATE SPADE North America and KATE SPADE International. We operate our kate spade new york, KATE SPADE SATURDAY and JACK SPADE brands through one operating segment in North America and four operating segments internationally: Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe and South America. Our Adelington Design Group reportable segment is also an operating segment. The three reportable segments described below represent activities for which separate financial information is available and which is utilized on a regular basis by our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) to evaluate performance and allocate resources. In identifying our reportable segments, we considered our management structure and the economic characteristics, products, customers, sales growth potential and long-term profitability of our operating segments. As such, we configured our operations into the following three reportable segments:
· | KATE SPADE North America segment – consists of our kate spade new york, KATE SPADE SATURDAY and JACK SPADE brands in North America. |
· | KATE SPADE International segment – consists of our kate spade new york, KATE SPADE SATURDAY and JACK SPADE brands in International markets (principally in Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe and South America). |
· | Adelington Design Group segment – consists of: (i) exclusive arrangements to supply jewelry for the LIZ CLAIBORNE and MONET brands; (ii) the wholesale non-apparel operations of the TRIFARI brand and licensed KENSIE brand; (iii) the wholesale apparel and wholesale non-apparel operations of the licensed LIZWEAR brand and other brands; and (iv) the licensed LIZ CLAIBORNE NEW YORK brand. |
We, as licensor, also license to third parties the right to produce and market products bearing certain Company-owned trademarks.
Market Environment
The industries in which we operate have historically been subject to cyclical variations, including recessions in the general economy. Our results are dependent on a number of factors impacting consumer spending, including but not limited to, general economic and business conditions; consumer confidence; wages and employment levels; the housing market; levels of perceived and actual consumer wealth; consumer debt levels; availability of consumer credit; credit and interest rates; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; fuel and energy costs; energy shortages; the performance of the financial equity and credit markets; tariffs and other trade barriers; taxes; general political conditions, both domestic and abroad; and the level of customer traffic within department stores, malls and other shopping and selling environments.
Macroeconomic challenges and uncertainty continue to dampen consumer spending, job growth remains inconsistent, with stagnating real wages in certain markets in which we operate, consumer retail traffic remains inconsistent and the retail environment remains promotional. In addition, as economic conditions improve in certain real estate markets in which we operate, the landlord community is requiring higher rents and occupancy costs. Furthermore, economic conditions in international markets in which we operate, including Europe and Asia, remain uncertain and volatile. We continue to focus on the execution of our strategic plans and improvements in productivity, with a primary focus on operating cash flow generation, retail execution and international expansion.
Competitive Profile
We operate in global fashion markets that are intensely competitive and subject to, among other things, macroeconomic conditions and consumer demands, tastes and discretionary spending habits. As we anticipate that the global economic uncertainty will continue into the foreseeable future, we will continue to carefully manage liquidity and spending.
In summary, the measure of our success in the future will depend on our ability to continue to navigate through an uncertain macroeconomic environment with challenging market conditions, execute on our strategic vision,
including attracting and retaining the management talent necessary for such execution, designing and delivering products that are acceptable to the marketplaces that we serve, sourcing the manufacture and distribution of our products on a competitive and efficient basis, and continuing to drive profitable growth. Our operating and financial goals are based on the following strategies: (i) fueling top line growth by opening new retail locations in North America, Japan, Brazil, the United Kingdom and Southeast Asia, evolving price points to create access for new customers and to aspirational categories, focusing on expansion of certain product categories with broad distribution opportunities and high branding relevance, including watches, jewelry, sunglasses and fragrance and launching e-commerce platforms in Europe; (ii) evolving our customer experience with a channel agnostic approach including improved Customer Relationship Management (“CRM”) capability, expanding selling and service programs at selected retail stores and enhancing the e-commerce experience; (iii) expanding our use of partnerships for margin expansion; (iv) strengthening the foundation of KATE SPADE SATURDAY; and (v) increased investments in marketing that leverage CRM capability and focus on acquiring new full price customers. The Adjusted EBITDA margin expansion that we experienced during the first nine months of 2014 in our KATE SPADE North America segment is expected to moderate for the full year.
Reference is also made to the other economic, competitive, governmental and technological factors affecting our operations, markets, products, services and prices as set forth in this report, including, without limitation, under “Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 1A – Risk Factors” in this Form 10-Q and in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Recent Developments and Operational Initiatives
We continue to pursue transactions and initiatives with a focus on becoming a multi-national, mono-brand business and which improve our operations or liquidity.
On February 5, 2014, we reacquired the existing KATE SPADE businesses in Southeast Asia from Globalluxe Kate Spade HK Limited (“Globalluxe”) for $32.3 million, including $2.3 million for working capital and other previously agreed adjustments. Prior to the transaction, we sold to Globalluxe under a wholesale distribution agreement. Following the transaction, we maintain wholesale distribution to distributors who operate the businesses in Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand and recognize direct-to-consumer sales in Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.
On February 3, 2014, we completed the sale of 100.0% of the capital stock of Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. (“Lucky Brand”) to LBD Acquisition Company, LLC (“LBD Acquisition”), a Delaware limited liability company and affiliate of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., for aggregate consideration of $225.0 million, comprised of $140.0 million cash consideration and a three-year $85.0 million note (the “Lucky Brand Note”) issued by Lucky Brand Dungarees, LLC (“Lucky Brand LLC”).
The Lucky Brand Note matures in February 2017 and is guaranteed by substantially all of Lucky Brand LLC’s subsidiaries. The Lucky Brand Note is secured by a second-priority lien on all accounts receivable and inventory of Lucky Brand LLC and the guarantor subsidiaries and a first-priority lien on all other collateral of Lucky Brand LLC and the guarantors. The accounts receivable and inventory secure Lucky Brand LLC’s asset-based revolving loan facility on a first-priority basis, and the other collateral secures that loan facility on a second-priority basis. The principal amount of the Lucky Brand Note increases by $5.0 million per year in equal monthly increments and bears cash interest of $8.0 million per year, payable semiannually in arrears. The Lucky Brand Note is prepayable at any time by Lucky Brand LLC without a prepayment premium, subject to certain restrictions as to the minimum amount that may be prepaid without our consent. Under a transition services agreement with Lucky Brand LLC, we are required to provide Lucky Brand LLC with certain transitional services, such as IT support, accounting services, tax services and other services that were provided at the corporate level while Lucky Brand was owned by us. The services will be provided at cost for up to a maximum of two years from the closing date, subject to earlier termination of the various services by Lucky Brand LLC.
On November 6, 2013, we sold the Juicy Couture brandname and related intellectual property assets (the “Juicy Couture IP”) to an affiliate of Authentic Brands Group (“ABG”) for a total purchase price of $195.0 million (an additional payment may be payable to us in an amount of up to $10.0 million if certain conditions regarding future performance are achieved). The Juicy Couture IP is licensed back to us until December 31, 2014 to accommodate the wind-down of operations, which was substantially completed in the second quarter of 2014. We paid guaranteed minimum royalties to ABG of $10.0 million during the term of the wind-down license. On April 7, 2014, we sold our Juicy Couture business in Europe to an operating partner of ABG for $8.6 million, subject to working capital adjustments.
On November 19, 2013, we entered into an agreement to terminate the lease of our Juicy Couture flagship store on Fifth Avenue in New York City in exchange for a $51.0 million payment. On May 15, 2014, we surrendered such premises to the landlord and received proceeds of $45.8 million (net of taxes and fees), in addition to $5.0 million previously received.
Debt and Liquidity Enhancements
In May 2014, we terminated our prior revolving credit agreement and completed a fourth amendment to and restatement of our revolving credit facility (as amended to date, the “ABL Facility”), which extended the maturity date of the facility to May 2019. Availability under the ABL Facility is in an amount equal to the lesser of $200.0 million and a borrowing base that is computed monthly and comprised our eligible cash, accounts receivable and inventory.
On April 10, 2014, we entered into a term loan credit agreement (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”), which provides for term loans in an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million (collectively, the “Term Loan”) maturing in April 2021. The Term Loan is subject to amortization payments of $1.0 million per quarter, which commenced on October 1, 2014, with the balance due at maturity. Interest on the outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan accrues at a rate equal to LIBOR (with a floor of 1.0%) plus 3.0% per annum, payable in cash. We drew on the Term Loan on May 12, 2014 and used $354.8 million of the net proceeds of $392.0 million to redeem all of our remaining outstanding 10.5% Senior Secured Notes due April 2019 (the “Senior Notes”). See “Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
On April 14, 2014, we redeemed $37.2 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes at a price equal to 103.0% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest using cash on hand. On May 12, 2014, we redeemed the remaining $334.8 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes at a price equal to 105.25% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest. As a result of these transactions, no Senior Notes remain outstanding.
Our cost reduction efforts have included tighter controls surrounding discretionary spending and streamlining initiatives that have included rationalization of distribution centers and office space and staff reductions, including consolidation of certain support and production functions and outsourcing certain corporate functions. We have also engaged more extensively in direct shipping and other arrangements. We expect that our streamlining initiatives will provide long-term cost savings. We will also continue to closely manage spending, with 2014 capital expenditures expected to be approximately $100.0 million, compared to $67.6 million in 2013.
For a discussion of certain risks relating to our recent initiatives, see “Item 1A – Risk Factors” in this Form 10-Q and in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Discontinued Operations
The activities of our former Lucky Brand and Juicy Couture businesses have been segregated and reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Overall Results for the Nine Months Ended October 4, 2014
Net Sales
Net sales for the first nine months of 2014 were $740.0 million, an increase of $212.1 million, or 40.2%, compared to net sales for the first nine months of 2013, including an estimated $18.4 million increase in net sales resulting from the inclusion of an additional week in the first nine months of 2014. Net sales increased in our KATE SPADE North America and KATE SPADE International segments, partially offset by a decline in net sales within our Adelington Design Group segment.
Gross Profit and Loss from Continuing Operations
Gross profit in the first nine months of 2014 was $450.0 million, an increase of $123.2 million compared to the first nine months of 2013, primarily due to increased net sales in our KATE SPADE North America and KATE SPADE International segments, partially offset by decreased net sales in our Adelington Design Group segment. Our gross profit rate decreased from 61.9% in 2013 to 60.8% in 2014, primarily reflecting the impact of off-price sales
associated with the liquidation of excess KATE SPADE SATURDAY launch year inventory and a more promotional retail environment.
We recorded a loss from continuing operations of $49.8 million in the first nine months of 2014, as compared to a loss from continuing operations of $61.5 million in the first nine months of 2013. The period-over-period change primarily reflected: (i) an increase in Selling, general & administrative expenses (“SG&A”), including charges related to streamlining initiatives, brand-exiting activities and acquisition related costs; (ii) an increase in the loss on extinguishment of debt; (iii) an increase in gross profit; (iv) a decrease in Interest expense, net; and (v) the absence in the first nine months of 2014 of an impairment of cost investment of $6.1 million that was incurred in the first nine months of 2013.
Balance Sheet
We ended the first nine months of 2014 with a net debt position (total debt less cash and marketable securities) of $285.5 million as compared to $521.9 million at the end of the first nine months of 2013. The $236.4 million decrease in our net debt primarily reflected: (i) the receipt of net proceeds of $330.4 million from the dispositions of the Juicy Couture IP and Lucky Brand; (ii) the funding of $91.6 million of capital and in-store shop expenditures over the last 12 months; (iii) the receipt of proceeds of $43.9 million from the exercise of stock options; (iv) the payment of $32.3 million for the acquisition of the existing KATE SPADE business in Southeast Asia from Globalluxe; and (v) the generation of $43.0 million in cash from other activities of our discontinued operations over the past 12 months. We also used $34.7 million of cash from continuing operating activities over the past 12 months.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As discussed above, we present our results based on three reportable segments.
NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 4, 2014 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2013
The following table sets forth our operating results for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 (comprised of 40 weeks) compared to the nine months ended September 28, 2013 (comprised of 39 weeks):
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| Variance | ||||||||||
Dollars in millions |
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| $ |
| % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Sales |
| $ | 740.0 |
| $ | 527.9 |
| $ | 212.1 |
|
| 40.2 | % | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gross Profit |
| 450.0 |
| 326.8 |
| 123.2 |
|
| 37.7 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses |
| 463.5 |
| 336.5 |
| (127.0 | ) |
| (37.8 | )% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Impairment of intangible asset |
| -- |
| 3.3 |
| 3.3 |
|
| * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Loss |
| (13.5 | ) | (13.0 | ) | (0.5 | ) |
| (3.8 | )% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other expense, net |
| (1.7 | ) | (1.8 | ) | 0.1 |
|
| 5.1 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Impairment of cost investment |
| -- |
| (6.1 | ) | 6.1 |
|
| * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| (16.9 | ) | (1.7 | ) | (15.2 | ) |
| * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
| (18.2 | ) | (35.9 | ) | 17.7 |
|
| 49.3 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
| (0.5 | ) | 3.0 |
| 3.5 |
|
| * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Loss from Continuing Operations |
| (49.8 | ) | (61.5 | ) | 11.7 |
|
| 19.1 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
| 82.4 |
| (50.7 | ) | 133.1 |
|
| * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | 32.6 |
| $ | (112.2 | ) | $ | 144.8 |
|
| * |
| |
|
| |||||||||||||
* Not meaningful.
Net Sales
Net sales for the first nine months of 2014 were $740.0 million, an increase of $212.1 million, or 40.2%, compared to the first nine months of 2013, including an estimated $18.4 million increase in net sales resulting from the inclusion of an additional week in the first nine months of 2014. Excluding the additional week in 2014, comparable direct-to-consumer net sales, including e-commerce, increased by 23.0% in the first nine months of 2014; excluding e-commerce net sales, comparable direct-to-consumer net sales increased by 22.6%. Including the additional week in 2014, comparable direct-to-consumer net sales, including e-commerce, increased by 25.0% in the first nine months of 2014; excluding e-commerce net sales, comparable direct-to-consumer net sales increased by 24.0%.
Net sales results for our reportable segments are provided below:
· | KATE SPADE North America net sales were $565.0 million for the first nine months of 2014, a 48.5% increase compared to 2013, reflecting net sales increases within our kate spade new york and KATE SPADE SATURDAY brands. | |
|
| |
| We ended the first nine months of 2014 with 98 specialty retail stores and 57 outlet stores, reflecting the net addition over the last 12 months of 21 specialty retail stores and 18 outlet stores. Key operating metrics for our North America retail operations included the following: | |
| — | Average retail square footage in the first nine months of 2014 was approximately 298 thousand square feet, a 46.7% increase compared to 2013; and |
| — | Sales productivity was $961 per average square foot for the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $820 for the first nine months of 2013. |
|
| |
· | KATE SPADE International net sales were $153.5 million for the first nine months of 2014, a 43.6% increase compared to 2013, reflecting increases across all geographies in the segment. Net sales for the first nine months of 2014 included $15.6 million of incremental net sales from the acquisition of the KATE SPADE businesses in Southeast Asia. | |
|
| |
| We ended the first nine months of 2014 with 43 specialty retail stores, 11 outlet stores and 50 concessions, reflecting the net addition over the last 12 months of 7 specialty retail stores, 1 outlet store and 7 concessions and the acquisition of 6 specialty retail stores, 2 concessions and 1 outlet store. Key operating metrics for our International retail operations included the following: | |
| — | Average retail square footage, including concessions, in the first nine months of 2014 was approximately 91 thousand square feet, a 34.8% increase compared to 2013; and |
| — | Sales productivity was $1,340 per average square foot for the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $1,148 for the first nine months of 2013. |
|
|
|
· | Adelington Design Group net sales were $21.5 million for the first nine months of 2014, a decrease of $19.0 million, or 46.9%, compared to 2013, reflecting the following: | |
| — | A net $8.7 million decrease primarily related to the LIZWEAR, LIZ CLAIBORNE NEW YORK and private label jewelry businesses; |
| — | A $7.1 million decrease related to the licensed LIZ CLAIBORNE and MONET brands; and |
| — | A $3.2 million decrease primarily related to the expiration of our former Dana Buchman brand supplier agreement. |
|
|
|
Comparable direct-to-consumer net sales are calculated as follows:
| · New stores become comparable after 14 full fiscal months of operations (on the first day of the 15th full fiscal month); · Except in unusual circumstances, closing stores become non-comparable one full fiscal month prior to the scheduled closing date; · A remodeled store will be changed to non-comparable when there is a 20.0% or more increase/decrease in its selling square footage (effective at the start of the fiscal month when construction begins). The store becomes comparable again after 14 full fiscal months from the re-open date; · A store that relocates becomes non-comparable when the new location is materially different from the original location (in respect to selling square footage and/or traffic patterns); · Stores that are acquired are not comparable until they have been reflected in our results for a period of 12 months; and · E-commerce sales are comparable after 12 full fiscal months from the website launch date (on the first day of the 13th full month). |
We evaluate sales productivity based on net sales per average square foot, which is defined as net sales divided by the average of beginning and end of period gross square feet and excludes e-commerce net sales.
Gross Profit
Gross profit in the first nine months of 2014 was $450.0 million (60.8% of net sales), compared to $326.8 million (61.9% of net sales) in the first nine months of 2013. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to increased net sales in our KATE SPADE North America and KATE SPADE International segments, partially offset by decreased
net sales in our Adelington Design Group segment. Our gross profit rate decreased from 61.9% in 2013 to 60.8% in 2014, primarily reflecting the impact of off-price sales associated with the liquidation of excess KATE SPADE SATURDAY launch year inventory and a more promotional retail environment.
Expenses related to warehousing activities, including receiving, storing, picking, packing and general warehousing charges are included in SG&A; accordingly, our gross profit may not be directly comparable to others who may include these expenses as a component of cost of goods sold.
Selling, General & Administrative Expenses
SG&A increased $127.0 million, or 37.8%, to $463.5 million in the first nine months of 2014 compared to the first nine months of 2013. The increase in SG&A reflected the following:
· | A $70.2 million increase in SG&A in our KATE SPADE North America segment, primarily related to direct-to-consumer expansion reflecting: (i) increased rent and other store operating expenses; (ii) increased compensation related expenses; and (iii) increased e-commerce fees and advertising expenses; |
· | A $36.4 million increase in SG&A in our KATE SPADE International segment, primarily related to direct-to-consumer expansion reflecting: (i) increased rent, concession fees and other store operating expenses; (ii) increased compensation related expenses; and (iii) increased advertising expenses. The increase also included incremental SG&A associated with the KATE SPADE businesses in Southeast Asia; |
· | A $29.8 million increase in expenses associated with our streamlining initiatives, brand-exiting activities and acquisition related costs; |
· | A $4.0 million decrease associated with reduced costs at our Adelington Design Group segment; and |
· | A $5.4 million decrease in expenses related principally to distribution functions that were included in the Juicy Couture and Lucky Brand historical results, but are not directly attributable to Juicy Couture or Lucky Brand and therefore, have not been included in discontinued operations. |
SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 62.6% in the first nine months of 2014 and 63.7% in 2013.
Impairment of Intangible Asset
We recorded a $3.3 million non-cash impairment charge in our Adelington Design Group segment related to our trademark for the TRIFARI brand in the third quarter of 2013.
Operating Loss
Operating loss for the first nine months of 2014 was $13.5 million ((1.8)% of net sales) compared to an operating loss of $13.0 million ((2.5)% of net sales) in 2013.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net amounted to $1.7 million and $1.8 million in the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively. Other expense, net consisted primarily of (i) foreign currency transaction losses and gains and (ii) equity in the losses of KS China Co., Limited (“KSC”), our equity method investee.
Impairment of Cost Investment
During the first nine months of 2013, we recorded a $6.1 million impairment charge related to our former investment in the Mexx business.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
During the first nine months of 2014, we recorded a $16.9 million loss on the extinguishment of debt in connection with the redemption of the Senior Notes, which were refinanced with proceeds from the issuance of the Term Loan. During the first nine months of 2013, we recorded a $1.7 million loss on the extinguishment of debt in connection with the conversion of $19.9 million of our 6.0% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2014 (the “Convertible Notes”) into 5.6 million shares of our common stock.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net was $18.2 million for the nine months ended October 4, 2014, as compared to $35.9 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2013, primarily reflecting (i) the recognition of $8.1 million of interest income in 2014 related to the Lucky Brand Note; (ii) a net decrease of $8.0 million in interest expense due to the refinancing of the Senior Notes with the net proceeds from the Term Loan in the second quarter of 2014; (iii) a decrease of $2.3 million related to reduced borrowings under the ABL Facility and the extinguishment of the Convertible Notes; and
(iv) a $2.3 million write-off of deferred financing fees in 2014 as a result of a reduction in the size of our ABL Facility.
(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes
The income tax benefit of $(0.5) million for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 primarily represented the recognition of an income tax benefit of $(3.0) million within continuing operations due to the recognition of a corresponding tax expense within discontinued operations, substantially offset by increases in deferred tax liabilities for indefinite-lived intangible assets, current tax on operations in certain jurisdictions and an increase in the accrual for interest related to uncertain tax positions. The income tax provision of $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2013 primarily represented increases in deferred tax liabilities for indefinite-lived intangible assets, current tax on operations in certain jurisdictions and an increase in the accrual for interest related to uncertain tax positions.
Loss from Continuing Operations
Loss from continuing operations in the first nine months of 2014 decreased to $49.8 million, or (6.7)% of net sales, from $61.5 million in the first nine months of 2013, or (11.6)% of net sales. Earnings per share, Basic and Diluted (“EPS”) from continuing operations was $(0.40) in 2014 and $(0.51) in 2013.
Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
Income from discontinued operations in the first nine months of 2014 was $82.4 million, reflecting a gain on disposal of discontinued operations of $128.0 million and a $(45.6) million loss from discontinued operations. Loss from discontinued operations in the first nine months of 2013 was $50.7 million, reflecting a loss on disposal of discontinued operations of $31.6 million and a $19.1 million loss from discontinued operations. EPS from discontinued operations was $0.66 in 2014 and $(0.42) in 2013.
Net Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) in the first nine months of 2014 was $32.6 million and $(112.2) million in the first nine months of 2013. EPS was $0.26 in 2014 and $(0.93) in 2013.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA
Our Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the CODM. Our measure of segment profitability is Adjusted EBITDA of each reportable segment. Accordingly, the CODM evaluates performance and allocates resources based primarily on Segment Adjusted EBITDA. Segment Adjusted EBITDA excludes: (i) depreciation and amortization; (ii) charges due to streamlining initiatives, brand-exiting activities and acquisition related costs; and (iii) losses on asset disposals and impairments. In connection with the decision to disaggregate the Company’s reportable segments, the costs of all corporate departments that serve the respective segment are fully allocated. We do not allocate amounts reported below Operating income (loss) to our reportable segments, other than equity income (loss) in our equity method investee. Our definition of Segment Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA for our reportable segments are provided below.
|
| Nine Months Ended |
| Variance | ||||||||||||
Dollars in thousands |
| October 4, |
| September 28, 2013 |
| $ |
| % | ||||||||
Reportable Segments Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
KATE SPADE North America |
|
| $ | 69,614 |
| $ | 20,550 |
| $ | 49,064 |
| 238.8 | % | |||
KATE SPADE International (a) |
|
| 81 |
| (614 | ) | 695 |
|
| * | ||||||
Adelington Design Group |
|
| 1,020 |
| 7,337 |
| (6,317 | ) | (86.1 | )% | ||||||
Other (b) |
|
| (685 | ) | (4,779 | ) | 4,094 |
| 85.7 | % | ||||||
Total Reportable Segments Adjusted EBITDA |
|
| 70,030 |
| 22,494 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Depreciation and amortization, net (c) |
|
| (34,033 | ) | (24,015 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Charges due to streamlining initiatives, brand-exiting activities, acquisition related costs and loss on asset disposals and impairments, net (d) |
|
| (19,035 | ) | (8,660 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Share-based compensation (e) |
|
| (31,772 | ) | (3,756 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Equity loss included in Reportable Segments Adjusted EBITDA |
|
| 1,358 |
| 983 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Operating Loss |
|
| (13,452 | ) | (12,954 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Other expense, net (a) |
|
| (1,717 | ) | (1,809 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Impairment of cost investment |
|
| -- |
| (6,109 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
| (16,914 | ) | (1,707 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest expense, net |
|
| (18,185 | ) | (35,877 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
|
|
| (500 | ) |
| 3,042 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Loss from Continuing Operations |
|
| $ | (49,768 | ) | $ | (61,498 | ) |
|
|
|
| ||||
* Not meaningful.
(a) Amounts include equity in the losses of our equity method investee of $1.4 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively.
(b) Other consists of expenses principally related to distribution functions that were included in Juicy Couture and Lucky Brand historical results, but are not directly attributable to Juicy Couture or Lucky Brand and therefore have not been included in discontinued operations.
(c) Excludes amortization included in Interest expense, net.
(d) See Note 12 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of streamlining charges.
(e) Includes share-based compensation expense of $17.2 million in 2014 that was classified as restructuring.
A discussion of Segment Adjusted EBITDA of our reportable segments for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013 follows:
· | KATE SPADE North America Adjusted EBITDA for the first nine months of 2014 was $69.6 million (12.3% of net sales), compared to $20.6 million (5.4% of net sales) in 2013. The period-over-period increase reflected an increase in gross profit, as discussed above, partially offset by an increase in SG&A related to direct-to-consumer expansion, including an increase in rent and other store operating expenses, payroll related expenses, e-commerce fees and advertising expenses. |
· | KATE SPADE International Adjusted EBITDA for the first nine months of 2014 was $0.1 million (0.1 % of net sales), compared to $(0.6) million ((0.6)% of net sales) in 2013. The period-over-period increase reflected an increase in gross profit, as discussed above, substantially offset by an increase in SG&A related to direct-to-consumer expansion, including an increase in rent, concession fees and other store operating expenses, payroll related expenses and advertising expenses. KATE SPADE International Adjusted EBITDA for the first nine months of 2014 included $1.8 million of incremental Adjusted EBITDA from the acquisition of the KATE SPADE businesses in Southeast Asia. |
· | Adelington Design Group Adjusted EBITDA for the first nine months of 2014 was $1.0 million (4.7% of net sales), compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $7.3 million (18.1% of net sales) in 2013. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA reflected decreased gross profit, partially offset by reduced SG&A. |
THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 4, 2014 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2013
The following table sets forth our operating results for the three months ended October 4, 2014 (comprised of 13 weeks) compared to the three months ended September 28, 2013 (comprised of 13 weeks):
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Variance | |||||||||
Dollars in millions |
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| $ |
| % | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Sales |
| $ | 250.4 |
| $ | 192.6 |
| $ | 57.8 |
| 30.0 | % | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gross Profit |
| 157.3 |
| 118.2 |
| 39.1 |
| 33.1 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses |
| 153.8 |
| 116.3 |
| (37.5 | ) | (32.3 | )% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Impairment of intangible asset |
| -- |
| 3.3 |
| 3.3 |
| * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
| 3.5 |
| (1.4 | ) | 4.9 |
| * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other (expense) income, net |
| (1.8 | ) | 0.9 |
| (2.7 | ) | * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| -- |
| (0.6 | ) | 0.6 |
| * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
| (2.2 | ) | (12.1 | ) | 9.9 |
| 81.9 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
| (3.1 | ) | 1.0 |
| 4.1 |
| * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
| 2.6 |
| (14.2 | ) | 16.8 |
| * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
| (11.7 | ) | (2.7 | ) | (9.0 | ) | * |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Loss |
| $ | (9.1 | ) | $ | (16.9 | ) | $ | 7.8 |
| 45.9 | % | |
|
| ||||||||||||
* Not meaningful.
Net Sales
Net sales for the third quarter of 2014 were $250.4 million, an increase of $57.8 million, or 30.0%, compared to the third quarter of 2013. Net sales increased in our KATE SPADE North America and KATE SPADE International segments, partially offset by a decline in net sales within our Adelington Design Group segment. Comparable direct-to-consumer net sales for the KATE SPADE North America and KATE SPADE International segments, including e-commerce, increased by 15.2% in the third quarter of 2014; excluding e-commerce net sales, comparable direct-to-consumer net sales increased by 13.2%.
· | KATE SPADE North America net sales were $192.9 million for the third quarter of 2014, a 36.4% increase compared to 2013, primarily driven by our kate spade new york brand.
Key operating metrics for our North America retail operations included the following: | |
| — | Average retail square footage in the third quarter of 2014 was approximately 332 thousand square feet, a 47.0% increase compared to 2013; and |
| — | Sales productivity was $328 per average square foot for the third quarter of 2014 as compared to $294 for the third quarter of 2013. |
· | KATE SPADE International net sales were $50.9 million for the third quarter of 2014, a 32.8% increase compared to 2013, primarily driven by increased net sales in our operations in Japan and Southeast Asia. Net sales for the third quarter of 2014 included $6.0 million of incremental net sales from the acquisition of the KATE SPADE businesses in Southeast Asia.
Key operating metrics for our International retail operations included the following: | |
| — | Average retail square footage in the third quarter of 2014 was approximately 96 thousand square feet, a 33.7% increase compared to 2013; and |
| — | Sales productivity was $427 per average square foot for the third quarter of 2014 as compared to $373 for the third quarter of 2013. |
|
|
|
· | Adelington Design Group net sales were $6.6 million for the third quarter of 2014, a decrease of $6.3 million, or 48.6%, compared to 2013, due to the following: | |
| — | A $3.7 million decrease related to the licensed LIZ CLAIBORNE and MONET brands; |
| — | A net $2.0 million decrease primarily related to the LIZ CLAIBORNE NEW YORK and private label jewelry businesses; and |
| — | A $0.6 million decrease related to the expiration of our former Dana Buchman brand supplier agreement. |
Gross Profit
Gross profit in the third quarter of 2014 was $157.3 million (62.8% of net sales), compared to $118.2 million (61.4% of net sales) in the third quarter of 2013. The increase in gross profit is primarily due to increased net sales in our KATE SPADE North America and KATE SPADE International segments, partially offset by decreased net sales in our Adelington Design Group segment. Our gross profit rate increased from 61.4% in 2013 to 62.8% in 2014, primarily reflecting the benefit of the shift of the Fourth of July holiday and our semi-annual sale into the second quarter of 2014 and controlled promotional activity.
Selling, General & Administrative Expenses
SG&A increased $37.5 million, or 32.3%, to $153.8 million in the third quarter of 2014 compared to the third quarter of 2013. The increase in SG&A reflected the following:
· | A $27.8 million increase in SG&A in our KATE SPADE North America segment, primarily related to direct-to-consumer expansion reflecting: (i) increased rent and other store operating expenses; (ii) increased compensation related expenses; and (iii) increased advertising expenses; |
· | A $12.0 million increase in SG&A in our KATE SPADE International segment, primarily related to direct-to-consumer expansion reflecting (i) increased rent and other store operating expenses and (ii) increased compensation related expenses. The increase also included incremental SG&A associated with the KATE SPADE businesses in Southeast Asia; |
· | A $1.4 million increase in expenses associated with our streamlining initiatives, brand-exiting activities and acquisition related costs; |
· | A $1.1 million decrease associated with reduced costs at our Adelington Design Group segment; and |
· | A $2.6 million decrease in expenses related principally to distribution functions that were included in the Juicy Couture and Lucky Brand historical results, but are not directly attributable to Juicy Couture or Lucky Brand and therefore, have not been included in discontinued operations. |
SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 61.4% in the third quarter of 2014 and 60.4% in the third quarter of 2013.
Impairment of Intangible Asset
During the third quarter of 2013, we recorded a $3.3 million non-cash impairment charge in our Adelington Design Group segment related to our trademark for the TRIFARI brand.
Operating Income (Loss)
Operating income for the third quarter of 2014 was $3.5 million (1.4% of net sales) compared to an operating loss of $(1.4) million ((0.7)% of net sales) in 2013.
Other (Expense) Income, Net
Other (expense) income, net amounted to $(1.8) million and $0.9 million in the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively. Other (expense) income, net consisted primarily of (i) foreign currency transaction gains and losses; and (ii) equity in the losses of KSC.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
During the third quarter of 2013, we recorded a $0.6 million loss on extinguishment of debt in connection with the conversion of the remaining $8.8 million aggregate principal amount of our Convertible Notes into 2.5 million shares of our common stock.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net was $2.2 million for the three months ended October 4, 2014, as compared to $12.1 million for the three months ended September 28, 2013, primarily reflecting: (i) a net decrease of $5.5 million in interest expense related to the refinancing of the Senior Notes in the second quarter of 2014 with the Term Loan; (ii) the recognition of $3.0 million of interest income in 2014 related to the Lucky Brand Note; and (iii) a decrease of $0.7 million related to the ABL Facility and the extinguishment of the Convertible Notes.
(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes
The income tax benefit of $(3.1) million for the three months ended October 4, 2014 primarily represented: (i) the recognition of an income tax benefit of $(3.0) million within continuing operations due to the recognition of a corresponding tax expense within discontinued operations; (ii) increases in deferred tax liabilities for indefinite-lived intangible assets; (iii) current tax on operations in certain jurisdictions; and (iv) an increase in the accrual for interest related to uncertain tax positions. The income tax provision of $1.0 million for the three months ended September 28, 2013 primarily represented increases in deferred tax liabilities for indefinite-lived intangible assets, current tax on operations in certain jurisdictions and an increase in the accrual for interest related to uncertain tax positions.
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Income (loss) from continuing operations in the third quarter of 2014 was $2.6 million, or 1.0% of net sales, compared to $(14.2) million in the third quarter of 2013, or (7.4)% of net sales. EPS from continuing operations was $0.02 in 2014 and $(0.12) in 2013.
Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
Loss from discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2014 was $(11.7) million, reflecting a loss on disposal of discontinued operations of $(5.7) million and an $(6.0) million loss from discontinued operations. Loss from discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2013 was $(2.7) million, reflecting a loss on disposal of discontinued operations of $(7.8) million and $5.1 million of income from discontinued operations. EPS from discontinued operations was $(0.09) in 2014 and $(0.02) in 2013.
Net Loss
Net loss in the third quarter of 2014 decreased to $9.1 million from $16.9 million in the third quarter of 2013. EPS was $(0.07) in 2014 and $(0.14) in 2013.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA
Segment Adjusted EBITDA for our reportable segments are provided below.
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Variance |
| |||||||
Dollars in thousands |
| October 4, |
| September 28, |
| $ |
| % |
| |||
Reportable Segments Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
KATE SPADE North America |
| $ | 21,130 |
| $ | 10,253 |
| $ | 10,877 |
| 106.1 | % |
KATE SPADE International (a) |
| (1,346 | ) | (666 | ) | (680 | ) | (102.1 | ) % | |||
Adelington Design Group |
| 1,030 |
| 3,260 |
| (2,230 | ) | (68.4 | ) % | |||
Other (b) |
| (90 | ) | (2,097 | ) | 2,007 |
| 95.7 | % | |||
Total Reportable Segments Adjusted EBITDA |
| 20,724 |
| 10,750 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Depreciation and amortization, net (c) |
| (11,752 | ) | (8,330 | ) |
|
|
|
| |||
Charges due to streamlining initiatives, brand-exiting activities, acquisition related costs and loss on asset disposals and impairments, net (d) |
| (870 | ) | (2,758 | ) |
|
|
|
| |||
Share-based compensation (e) |
| (5,740 | ) | (1,412 | ) |
|
|
|
| |||
Equity loss included in Reportable Segments Adjusted EBITDA |
| 1,185 |
| 421 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Operating Income (Loss) |
| 3,547 |
| (1,329 | ) |
|
|
|
| |||
Other (expense) income, net (a) |
| (1,805 | ) | 893 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| -- |
| (599 | ) |
|
|
|
| |||
Interest expense, net |
| (2,189 | ) | (12,117 | ) |
|
|
|
| |||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
| (3,070 | ) | 1,013 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
| $ | 2,623 |
| $ | (14,165 | ) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
* | Not meaningful. | |
(a) | Amounts include equity in the losses of our equity method investee of $1.2 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013. | |
(b) | Other consists of expenses related principally to distribution functions that were included in the Juicy Couture and Lucky Brand historical results, but are not directly attributable to those businesses and therefore, have not been included in discontinued operations. | |
(c) | Excludes amortization included in Interest expense, net. | |
(d) | See Note 12 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of streamlining charges. | |
(e) | Includes share-based compensation expense of $0.3 million in 2014 that was classified as restructuring. |
A discussion of Segment Adjusted EBITDA of our reportable segments for the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013 follows:
• | KATE SPADE North America Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2014 was $21.1 million (11.0% of net sales), compared to $10.3 million (7.3% of net sales) in 2013. The period-over-period increase reflected an increase in gross profit, partially offset by an increase in SG&A related to direct-to-consumer expansion, including an increase in rent and other store operating expenses, payroll related expenses and advertising expenses. Adjusted EBITDA margin increased primarily due to the growth in gross profit rate. |
• | KATE SPADE International Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2014 was $(1.3) million ((2.6)% of net sales), compared to $(0.7) million ((1.7)% of net sales) in 2013. The period-over-period change reflected: (i) an increase in SG&A related to direct-to-consumer expansion, including an increase in rent and other store operating expenses and payroll related expenses; (ii) increased equity losses in KSC; and (iii) an increase in gross profit, as discussed above. KATE SPADE International Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2014 included $0.8 million of incremental Adjusted EBITDA from the acquisition of the KATE SPADE businesses in Southeast Asia. |
• | Adelington Design Group Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2014 was $1.0 million (15.5% of net sales), compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $3.3 million (25.3% of net sales) in 2013. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA reflected decreased gross profit, partially offset by reduced SG&A. |
FINANCIAL POSITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Requirements
Our primary ongoing cash requirements are to: (i) fund seasonal working capital needs (primarily accounts receivable and inventory); (ii) fund capital expenditures related to the opening and refurbishing of our specialty retail and outlet stores and normal maintenance activities; (iii) fund outstanding liabilities and any remaining efforts associated with our streamlining initiatives and dispositions, including contract termination costs, employee related costs and other costs associated with the sale of the Juicy Couture IP and Lucky Brand; (iv) invest in our information systems; (v) fund operational and contractual obligations; and (vi) potentially repurchase or retire debt obligations. We expect that our streamlining initiatives will provide long-term cost savings.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our historical sources of liquidity to fund ongoing cash requirements include cash flows from operations, cash and cash equivalents, as well as borrowings through our lines of credit.
Term Loan. On April 10, 2014, we entered into the Term Loan Credit Agreement, which provides for term loans in an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million, maturing in April 2021. The Term Loan is subject to amortization payments of $1.0 million per quarter, which commenced on October 1, 2014, with the balance due at maturity. Interest on the outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan accrues at a rate equal to LIBOR (with a floor of 1.0%) plus 3.0% per annum, payable in cash. The Term Loan was funded on May 12, 2014, and we used $354.8 million of the net proceeds of $392.0 million from the Term Loan to redeem all of our remaining outstanding Senior Notes on May 12, 2014 as discussed above. The Term Loan and other obligations under the Term Loan Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of our restricted subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”), which include (i) all of our existing material domestic restricted subsidiaries, (ii) all of our future wholly owned restricted subsidiaries (other than foreign subsidiaries, CFCs, CFC holding companies and subsidiaries of any of the foregoing and certain immaterial subsidiaries) and (iii) all of our future non-wholly owned restricted subsidiaries that guarantee capital markets debt securities or term indebtedness of the Company or any Guarantor.
The Term Loan Credit Agreement permits us to incur, from time to time, additional incremental term loans under the Term Loan Credit Agreement (subject to obtaining commitments for such term loans) and other pari passu lien indebtedness, subject to an overall limit of $100.0 million plus such additional amount that would cause our consolidated net total secured debt ratio not to exceed 3.75 to 1.0 on a pro forma basis. Any such incremental term loans and other pari passu lien indebtedness are permitted to share in the collateral described below on a pari passu basis with the Term Loan. The Term Loan may be prepaid, at our option, in whole or in part, at any time at par plus accrued interest; provided that if the Term Loan is prepaid or refinanced in connection with a repricing transaction within six months after the initial borrowing, a 1.0% penalty is applicable.
Subject to certain permitted liens and other exclusions and exceptions, the Term Loan is secured (i) on a first-priority basis by a lien on our KATE SPADE trademarks and certain related rights owned by us and the Guarantors (the “Term Priority Collateral”) and (ii) by a second-priority security interest in our and the Guarantors’ other assets (the “ABL Priority Collateral” and together with the Term Priority Collateral, the “Collateral”), which secure our ABL Facility on a first-priority basis.
The Term Loan is required to be prepaid in an amount equal to 50.0% of our Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Term Loan Credit Agreement) with respect to each fiscal year ending on or after January 2, 2016. The percentage of Excess Cash Flow that must be so applied is reduced to 25.0% if our consolidated net total debt ratio is less than 2.75 to 1.0 and to 0% if our consolidated net total debt ratio is less than 2.25 to 1.0. Lenders may elect not to accept mandatory prepayments.
The Term Loan Credit Agreement limits our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur indebtedness, make dividend payments or other restricted payments, create liens, sell assets (including securities of our restricted subsidiaries), permit certain restrictions on dividends and transfers of assets by our restricted subsidiaries, enter into certain types of transactions with shareholders and affiliates and enter into mergers, consolidations or sales of all or substantially all of our assets, in each case subject to certain designated exceptions and qualifications. The Term Loan Credit Agreement also contains certain affirmative covenants and events of default that are customary for credit agreements governing term loans.
ABL Facility. In May 2014, we terminated our prior revolving credit agreement and completed a fourth amendment to and restatement of the ABL Facility, which extended the maturity date of the facility to May 2019. Availability under the ABL Facility shall be in an amount equal to the lesser of $200.0 million and a borrowing base that is computed monthly and comprised of our eligible cash, accounts receivable and inventory. The ABL Facility also includes a swingline subfacility of $30.0 million, a multicurrency subfacility of $35.0 million and the option to expand the facility by up to $100.0 million under certain specified conditions. A portion of the facility provided under the ABL Facility of up to $125.0 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit, and standby letters of credit may not exceed $40.0 million in the aggregate. The ABL Facility allows two borrowing options: one borrowing option with interest rates based on euro currency rates and a second borrowing option with interest rates based on the alternate base rate, as defined in the ABL Facility, with a spread based on the aggregate availability under the ABL Facility.
The ABL Facility is guaranteed by substantially all of our current domestic subsidiaries, certain of our future domestic subsidiaries and certain of our foreign subsidiaries. The ABL Facility is secured by a first-priority lien on substantially all of our assets and the assets of the other borrowers and guarantors (other than certain trademark collateral in which the lenders under the Term Loan Credit Agreement have a first-priority lien, which trademark collateral secures the obligations under the ABL Facility on a second-priority lien basis).
The ABL Facility limits our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create liens, undergo certain fundamental changes, make investments, sell certain assets, enter into hedging transactions, make restricted payments and pay certain indebtedness, enter into transactions with affiliates, permit certain restrictions on dividends and transfers of assets by our restricted subsidiaries and enter into sale and leaseback transactions. In addition, the terms and conditions: (i) provide for a decrease in fees and interest rates compared to our previous asset-based revolving loan facility (including eurocurrency spreads of 1.50% to 2.00% over LIBOR, depending on the level of aggregate availability), (ii) require us to maintain pro forma compliance with a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0:1.0 on a trailing four-quarter basis if availability under the ABL Facility for three consecutive business days falls below the greater of $15.0 million and 10.0% of the lesser of the aggregate commitments and the borrowing base and (iii) require us to apply substantially all cash collections to reduce outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility if availability under the ABL Facility for three consecutive business days falls below the greater of $20.0 million and 12.5% of the lesser of the aggregate commitments and the borrowing base.
Based on our forecast of borrowing availability under the ABL Facility, we anticipate that cash flows from operations and the projected borrowing availability under our ABL Facility will be sufficient to fund our liquidity requirements for at least the next 12 months.
There can be no certainty that availability under the ABL Facility will be sufficient to fund our liquidity needs. Should we be unable to comply with the requirements in the ABL Facility, we would be unable to borrow under such agreement and any amounts outstanding would become immediately due and payable, unless we were able to secure a waiver or an amendment under the ABL Facility. Should we be unable to borrow under the ABL Facility, or if outstanding borrowings thereunder become immediately due and payable, our liquidity would be significantly impaired, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, an acceleration of amounts outstanding under the ABL Facility would likely cause cross-defaults under our other outstanding indebtedness, including the Term Loan.
The sufficiency and availability of our projected sources of liquidity may be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including, without limitation: (i) the level of our operating cash flows, which will be impacted by retailer and consumer acceptance of our products, general economic conditions and the level of consumer discretionary spending; (ii) the status of, and any adverse changes in, our credit ratings; (iii) our ability to maintain required levels of borrowing availability under the ABL Facility and to comply with other covenants included in our debt and credit facilities; (iv) the financial wherewithal of our larger department store and specialty retail store customers; and (v) interest rate and exchange rate fluctuations.
Because of the continuing uncertainty and risks relating to future economic conditions, we may, from time to time, explore various initiatives to improve our liquidity, including issuance of debt securities, sales of various assets, additional cost reductions and other measures. In addition, where conditions permit, we may also, from time to time, seek to retire, exchange or purchase our outstanding debt in privately-negotiated transactions or otherwise. We may not be able to successfully complete any such actions.
Cash and Debt Balances. We ended the first nine months of 2014 with $123.3 million in cash and marketable securities, compared to $6.8 million at the end of the first nine months of 2013 and with $408.8 million of debt outstanding at the end of the first nine months of 2014, compared to $528.7 million at the end of the first nine months of 2013. The $236.4 million decrease in our net debt primarily reflected: (i) the receipt of net proceeds of $330.4 million from the dispositions of the Juicy Couture IP and Lucky Brand; (ii) the funding of $91.6 million of capital and in-store shop expenditures over the last 12 months; (iii) the receipt of proceeds of $43.9 million from the exercise of stock options; (iv) the payment of $32.3 million for the acquisition of the existing KATE SPADE business in Southeast Asia from Globalluxe; and (v) the generation of $43.0 million in cash from other activities of our discontinued operations over the past 12 months. We also used $34.7 million of cash from continuing operating activities over the past 12 months.
Accounts Receivable decreased $59.6 million, or 48.9%, at October 4, 2014 compared to September 28, 2013, primarily due to the sale of the Lucky Brand business and the wind-down of the Juicy Couture operations, partially offset by an increase in KATE SPADE accounts receivable due to increased wholesale sales. Accounts receivable decreased $27.3 million, or 30.5%, at October 4, 2014 compared to December 28, 2013, primarily reflecting the wind-down of the Juicy Couture operations and the timing of wholesale shipments.
Inventories decreased $89.9 million, or 28.9% at October 4, 2014 compared to September 28, 2013, primarily due to the sale of the Lucky Brand business and the wind-down of the Juicy Couture operations, partially offset by an increase in KATE SPADE inventory to support growth initiatives. Inventories increased $36.1 million, or 19.5%, compared to December 28, 2013, primarily due to an increase in KATE SPADE inventory to support growth initiatives.
Borrowings under our ABL Facility peaked at $5.1 million during the first nine months of 2014, compared to a peak of $145.4 million during the first nine months of 2013. Outstanding borrowings were $3.0 million at October 4, 2014, compared to $136.2 million at September 28, 2013.
Net cash used in operating activities of our continuing operations was $57.7 million in the first nine months of 2014, compared to $57.0 million in the first nine months of 2013. This $0.7 million period-over-period change was primarily due to a $51.2 million decrease in working capital items, substantially offset by increased earnings in 2014 (excluding depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation expense, losses on extinguishment of debt, impairment charges and other non-cash items). The operating activities of our discontinued operations used $17.8 million and $65.2 million of cash in the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively.
Net cash used in investing activities of our continuing operations was $104.2 million in the first nine months of 2014, compared to $28.7 million in the first nine months of 2013. Net cash used in investing activities in the nine months ended October 4, 2014 primarily reflected the use of $71.9 million for capital and in-store shop expenditures and the payment of $32.3 million for the acquisition of the existing KATE SPADE business in Southeast Asia from Globalluxe. Net cash used in investing activities in the nine months ended September 28, 2013 primarily reflected: (i) the use of $47.8 million for capital and in-store shop expenditures; (ii) the use of $5.5 million for investments in and advances to KSC; (iii) the receipt of net proceeds from the sale of property and equipment of $20.3 million; and (iv) the receipt of proceeds of $4.0 million from the disposition of our investment in Mexx Lifestyle, B.V. The investing activities of our discontinued operations provided $137.9 million and used $34.9 million of cash in the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $38.2 million in the first nine months of 2014, compared to $138.1 million in the first nine months of 2013. The $99.9 million period-over-period change primarily reflected: (i) the receipt of proceeds of $398.0 million from the issuance of the Term Loan; (ii) the use of $390.7 million for the redemption of the Senior Notes; (iii) a decrease in net cash provided by borrowing activities under our ABL Facility of $136.1 million; (iv) an increase in proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $39.1 million; and (v) the receipt of net proceeds of $8.7 million from the sale-leaseback of our North Bergen, NJ office building in 2013.
Commitments and Capital Expenditures
During the first quarter of 2009, we entered into an agreement with Hong Kong-based, global consumer goods exporter Li & Fung, whereby Li & Fung was appointed as our buying/sourcing agent for all of our brands and products (other than jewelry) and we received a payment of $75.0 million at closing and an additional payment of $8.0 million in the second quarter of 2009 to offset specific, incremental, identifiable expenses associated with the transaction. Our agreement with Li & Fung provides for a refund of a portion of the closing payment in certain
limited circumstances, including a change of control of the Company, the divestiture of any current brand, or certain termination events. We are also obligated to use Li & Fung as our buying/sourcing agent for a minimum value of inventory purchases each year through the termination of the agreement in 2019. Since 2009, we have completed various disposition transactions, including the licensing arrangements with J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. in the US and Puerto Rico and with QVC, Inc., the sales of the KENSIE, KENSIE GIRL and MAC & JAC trademarks, the sale of the Juicy Couture IP and the sale of Lucky Brand, which resulted in the removal of buying/sourcing for such products from the Li & Fung buying/sourcing arrangement. As a result, we refunded $24.3 million of the closing payment in the second quarter of 2010, refunded $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2012 and settled $6.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. We were not required to make any payments to Li & Fung as a result of the sale of Lucky Brand. In addition, our agreement with Li & Fung is not exclusive; however, we are required to source a specified percentage of product purchases from Li & Fung.
In connection with the disposition of the former Lucky Brand business, the LIZ CLAIBORNE Canada retail stores, the LIZ CLAIBORNE branded outlet stores in the US and Puerto Rico and certain Mexx Canada retail stores, an aggregate of 277 store leases were assigned to or assumed by third parties, for which we remain secondarily liable for the remaining obligations on 204 such leases. As of October 4, 2014, the future aggregate payments under these leases amounted to $177.9 million and extended to various dates through 2025.
Our 2014 capital expenditures are expected to be $100.0 million, compared to $67.6 million in 2013. These expenditures primarily relate to our plan to open or acquire 65-70 retail stores or concessions globally in 2014, the continued technological upgrading of our management information systems and costs associated with the refurbishment of selected specialty retail and outlet stores. We expect capital expenditures and working capital cash needs to be financed with cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under our ABL Facility.
Debt consisted of the following:
In thousands |
| October 4, 2014 |
| December 28, 2013 |
| September 28, 2013 |
| |||
10.5% Senior Secured Notes (a) |
| $ | -- |
| $ | 382,209 |
| $ | 382,588 |
|
Term Loan credit facility (a)(b) |
| 397,106 |
| -- |
| -- |
| |||
Revolving credit facility | 3,000 |
| 2,997 |
| 136,233 |
| ||||
Capital lease obligations (c) |
| 8,691 |
| 8,995 |
| 9,898 |
| |||
Total debt |
| $ | 408,797 |
| $ | 394,201 |
| $ | 528,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(a) | The Senior Notes were refinanced with proceeds from the issuance of the Term Loan. | |
(b) | The balance as of October 4, 2014 reflected the issuance of the Term Loan in an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million, an amortization payment of $1.0 million and an unamortized debt discount of $1.9 million. | |
(c) | The decrease in the balance compared to September 28, 2013 primarily reflected the expiration of a capital lease for machinery and equipment during the fourth quarter of 2013. |
For information regarding our debt and credit instruments, refer to Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Availability under the ABL Facility is an amount equal to the lesser of $200.0 million and a borrowing base that is computed monthly and comprised of our eligible cash, accounts receivable and inventory. The ABL Facility also includes a swingline subfacility of $30.0 million, a multicurrency subfacility of $35.0 million and the option to expand the facility by up to $100.0 million under certain specified conditions. A portion of the facility provided under the ABL Facility of up to $125.0 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit, and standby letters of credit may not exceed $40.0 million in the aggregate.
As of October 4, 2014, availability under our ABL Facility was as follows:
In thousands |
| Total |
| Borrowing |
| Outstanding |
| Letters of |
| Available |
| Excess |
|
Revolving credit facility (a) |
| $200,000 |
| $ 231,216 |
| $ 3,000 |
| $ 14,819 |
| $ 182,181 |
| $ 162,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(a) | Availability under the ABL Facility is an amount equal to the lesser of $200.0 million and a borrowing base that is computed monthly and comprised of our eligible cash, accounts receivable and inventory. | |
(b) | Excess capacity represents available capacity reduced by the minimum required aggregate borrowing availability under the ABL Facility of $20.0 million. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of October 4, 2014, we had not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Hedging Activities
Our operations are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we use foreign currency collars, forward contracts and swap contracts to hedge specific exposure to variability in forecasted cash flows associated primarily with inventory purchases mainly of our KATE SPADE business in Japan. As of October 4, 2014, the Company had forward contracts maturing through December 2015 to sell 2.3 billion yen for $22.1 million.
We use foreign currency forward contracts outside the cash flow hedging program to manage currency risk associated with intercompany loans. As of October 4, 2014, the Company had forward contracts to sell 4.0 billion yen for $36.7 million maturing through December 2014. Transaction gains (losses) related to these derivative instruments were $1.3 million and $5.8 million for the nine months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively, and $2.4 million and $(0.4) million for the three months ended October 4, 2014 and September 28, 2013, respectively and were reflected within Other income (expense), net. These transaction gains and losses were substantially offset by transaction gains and losses on the corresponding intercompany loans. See Note 16 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
USE OF ESTIMATES AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. These estimates and assumptions also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses.
Critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our most critical accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7, each included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013. There were no significant changes in our critical accounting policies during the nine months ended October 4, 2014. In applying such policies, management must use some amounts that are based upon its informed judgments and best estimates. Due to the uncertainty inherent in these estimates, actual results could differ from estimates used in applying the critical accounting policies. Changes in such estimates, based on more accurate future information, may affect amounts reported in future periods.
Estimates by their nature are based on judgments and available information. The estimates that we make are based upon historical factors, current circumstances and the experience and judgment of our management. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis and may employ outside experts to assist in our evaluations. Therefore, actual results could materially differ from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For a discussion of recently adopted and recently issued accounting pronouncements, see Notes 1 and 18 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We finance our capital needs through available cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, operating cash flows, letters of credit and our ABL Facility. Our floating rate Term Loan and ABL Facility expose us to market risk for changes in interest rates. Loans thereunder bear interest at rates that vary with changes in prevailing market rates.
We do not speculate on the future direction of interest rates. As of October 4, 2014, December 28, 2013 and September 28, 2013, our exposure to changing market rates related to our ABL Facility was as follows:
Dollars in millions |
| October 4, 2014 |
| December 28, 2013 |
| September 28, 2013 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
| $3.0 |
| $3.0 |
| $136.2 |
|
Average interest rate |
| 1.69% |
| 3.06% |
| 2.57% |
|
A ten percent change in the average rate would have a minimal impact to interest expense during the nine months ended October 4, 2014. The Term Loan interest is based on LIBOR (with a floor of 1.0%) plus 3.0% per annum; therefore a ten percent change in the average LIBOR rate would not impact interest expense, since the LIBOR rate was below the floor of 1.0% at October 4, 2014.
As of October 4, 2014, we had forward contracts with net notional amounts of $58.8 million. Unrealized gains (losses) for outstanding foreign currency forward contracts were $0.7 million. A sensitivity analysis to changes in foreign currency exchange rates indicated that if the yen weakened by 10.0% against the US dollar, the fair value of these instruments would increase by $5.2 million at October 4, 2014. Conversely, if the yen strengthened by 10.0% against the US dollar, the fair value of these instruments would decrease by $6.4 million at October 4, 2014. Any resulting changes in the fair value of the instruments would be partially offset by changes in the underlying balance sheet positions. We do not hedge all transactions denominated in foreign currency.
We are exposed to credit related losses if the counterparties to our derivative instruments fail to perform their obligations. We systemically measure and assess such risk as it relates to the credit ratings of these counterparties, all of which currently have satisfactory credit ratings and therefore we do not expect to realize losses associated with counterparty default.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures at the end of our third fiscal quarter. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of October 4, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that all information required to be disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified, and that information required to be filed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended October 4, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
The Company is a party to various pending legal proceedings and claims. Although the outcome of any such actions cannot be determined with certainty, management is of the opinion that the final outcome of any of these actions should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.
You should carefully consider the risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013, in addition to other information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including under the section entitled, “Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” and in other documents we file with the SEC, in evaluating the Company and its business. If any of the risks occur, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. We caution the reader that these risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a continually changing business environment and new risks emerge from time to time. Management cannot predict such new risk factors, nor can we assess the impact, if any, of such new risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may impact our business.
There have not been any material changes during the third quarter ended October 4, 2014 from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table summarizes information about purchases by the Company during the three months ended October 4, 2014 of equity securities that are registered by the Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act:
Period |
| Total Number |
| Average Price |
| Total Number of |
| Maximum |
| ||
July 6, 2014 – August 2, 2014 |
| -- |
| $ | -- |
| -- |
| $ | 28,749 |
|
August 3, 2014 – September 6, 2014 |
| -- |
| -- |
| -- |
| 28,749 |
| ||
September 7, 2014 – October 4, 2014 |
| -- |
| -- |
| -- |
| 28,749 |
| ||
Total – 13 Weeks Ended October 4, 2014 |
| -- |
| $ | -- |
| -- |
| $ | 28,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(a) | Includes shares withheld to cover tax-withholding requirements relating to the vesting of restricted stock issued to employees pursuant to the Company’s shareholder-approved stock incentive plans. | |
(b) | The Company initially announced the authorization of a share buyback program in December 1989. Since its inception, the Company’s Board of Directors has authorized the purchase under the program of an aggregate of $2.275 billion of the Company’s stock. The ABL Facility currently restricts the Company’s ability to repurchase stock. |
None.
|
|
31(a) | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31(b) | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32(a)* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32(b)* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
|
|
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
101.PRE | Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
* | A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and forwarded to the SEC or its staff upon request. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DATE: November 6, 2014
KATE SPADE & COMPANY |
| KATE SPADE & COMPANY | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: | /s/ Thomas Linko |
| By: | /s/ Michael Rinaldo |
|
| THOMAS LINKO |
|
| MICHAEL RINALDO |
|
| Chief Financial Officer |
|
| Vice President - Corporate Controller and |
|