(a) As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics (the “Section 406 Standards for Investment Companies - Ethical Standards for Principal Executive and Financial Officers”) that applies to the registrant’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer; the registrant’s Principal Financial Officer also serves as the Principal Accounting Officer.
(c) There was no amendment to the registrant’s code of ethics described in Item 2(a) above during the period covered by the report.
(d) There was no waiver granted, either actual or implicit, from a provision to the registrant’s code of ethics described in Item 2(a) above during the period covered by the report.
(e) Not Applicable
(f)(3) The registrant hereby undertakes to provide any person, without charge, upon request, a copy of the code of ethics. To request a copy of the code of ethics, contact the registrant at 1-800-341-7400, and ask for a copy of the Section 406 Standards for Investment Companies - Ethical Standards for Principal Executive and Financial Officers.
| Item 3. | Audit Committee Financial Expert |
The registrant’s Board has determined that each of the following members of the Board’s Audit Committee is an “audit committee financial expert,” and is “independent,” for purposes of this Item 3: Thomas M. O’Neill and John S. Walsh.
| Item 4. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
| (a) | Audit Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years: |
Fiscal year ended 2024 – $35,000
Fiscal year ended 2023 - $33,654
| (b) | Audit-Related Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years: |
Fiscal year ended 2024 - $0
Fiscal year ended 2023 - $0
Amount requiring approval of the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $0 and $0 respectively.
| (c) | Tax Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years: |
Fiscal year ended 2024 - $0
Fiscal year ended 2023 - $0
Amount requiring approval of the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $0 and $0 respectively.
| (d) | All Other Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years: |
Fiscal year ended 2024 - $0
Fiscal year ended 2023 - $0
Amount requiring approval of the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $0 and $0 respectively.
| (e)(1) | Audit Committee Policies regarding Pre-approval of Services. |
The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor in order to assure that the provision of such services do not impair the auditor’s independence. Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent auditor has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
Certain services have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The term of the general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period. The Audit Committee will annually review the services that may be provided by the independent auditor without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee and may grant general pre-approval for such services. The Audit Committee will revise the list of general pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations. The Audit Committee will not delegate to management its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor.
The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its chairman (the “Chairman”) for services that do not exceed a specified dollar threshold. The Chairman or Chief Audit Executive will report any such pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Committee will designate another member with such pre-approval authority when the Chairman is unavailable.
AUDIT SERVICES
The annual audit services engagement terms and fees will be subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will approve, if necessary, any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope, registered investment company (RIC) structure or other matters.
In addition to the annual audit services engagement specifically approved by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval for other audit services, which are those services that only the independent auditor reasonably can provide. The Audit Committee has pre-approved certain audit services; with limited exception, all other audit services must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
AUDIT-RELATED SERVICES
Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the RIC’s financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor. The Audit Committee believes that the provision of audit-related services does not impair the independence of the auditor, and has pre-approved certain audit-related services; all other audit-related services must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
TAX SERVICES
The Audit Committee believes that the independent auditor can provide tax services to the RIC such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice without impairing the auditor’s independence. However, the Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the independent auditor in connection with a transaction initially recommended by the independent auditor, the purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Audit Committee has pre-approved certain tax services; with limited exception, all tax services involving large and complex transactions must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
ALL OTHER SERVICES
With respect to the provision of permissible services other than audit, review or attest services the pre-approval requirement is waived if:
| (1) | With respect to such services rendered to the Funds, the aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more than five percent of the total amount of revenues paid by the audit client to its accountant during the fiscal year in which the services are provided; and, |
| (2) | With respect to such services rendered to the Fund’s investment adviser ( the “Adviser”)and any entity controlling, controlled by to under common control with the Adviser such as affiliated non-U.S. and U.S. funds not under the Audit Committee’s purview and which do not fall within a category of service which has been determined by the Audit Committee not to have a direct impact on the operations or financial reporting of the RIC, the aggregate amount of all services provided constitutes no more than five percent of the total amount of revenues paid to the RIC’s auditor by the RIC, its Adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser during the fiscal year in which the services are provided; and |
| (3) | Such services were not recognized by the issuer or RIC at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and |
| (4) | Such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Audit Committee and approved prior to the completion of the audit by the Audit Committee or by one or more members of the Audit Committee who are members of the Board of Directors to whom authority to grant such approvals has been delegated by the Audit Committee. |
The Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to those permissible non-audit services which qualify for pre-approval and which it believes are routine and recurring services, and would not impair the independence of the auditor.
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) rules and relevant guidance should be consulted to determine the precise definitions of these services and applicability of exceptions to certain of the prohibitions.
PRE-APPROVAL FEE LEVELS
Pre-approval fee levels for all services to be provided by the independent auditor will be established annually by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding these levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Audit Committee by the Fund’s Principal Accounting Officer and/or the Chief Audit Executive of Federated Hermes, Inc., only after those individuals have determined that the request or application is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.
| (e)(2) | Percentage of services identified in items 4(b) through 4(d) that were approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X: |
4(b)
Fiscal year ended 2024 – 0%
Fiscal year ended 2023 - 0%
Percentage of services provided to the registrant’s Adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.
4(c)
Fiscal year ended 2024 – 0%
Fiscal year ended 2023 – 0%
Percentage of services provided to the registrant’s Adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.
4(d)
Fiscal year ended 2024 – 0%
Fiscal year ended 2023 – 0%
Percentage of services provided to the registrant’s Adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.
| (g) | Non-Audit Fees billed to the registrant, the registrant’s Adviser, and certain entities controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser: |
Fiscal year ended 2024 - $179,174
Fiscal year ended 2023 - $229,927
| (h) | The registrant’s Audit Committee has considered that the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant’s Adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence. |
| Item 5. | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants |
Not Applicable
| Item 6. | Schedule of Investments |
(a) The registrant’s Schedule of Investments is included as part of the Financial Statements filed under Item 7 of this form.
(b) Not Applicable
| Item 7. | Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End Management Companies |
Annual Financial Statements
and Additional Information
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund
A Portfolio of Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal TrustNot FDIC Insured ▪ May Lose Value ▪ No Bank Guarantee
Portfolio of Investments
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Black Belt Energy Gas District, AL, Gas Prepay Revenue Bonds Project No. 4 (Series 2019A-1), (Morgan Stanley GTD), 4.000%, Mandatory Tender 12/1/2025 | |
| | Black Belt Energy Gas District, AL, Gas Project Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2023D-1), (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GTD), 5.500%, Mandatory Tender 2/1/2029 | |
| | Black Belt Energy Gas District, AL, Gas Revenue Bonds (Series 2022B-1), (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GTD), 4.000%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2027 | |
| | Columbia, AL IDB PCRB (Alabama Power Co.), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2014-D), 3.810%, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2028 | |
| | Jefferson County, AL (Jefferson County, AL Sewer System), Sewer Revenue Warrants (Series 2024), 5.000%, 10/1/2037 | |
| | Prattville, AL IDB (International Paper Co.), Environmental Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2019B), 2.000%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024 | |
| | Prattville, AL IDB (International Paper Co.), Recovery Zone Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2019C), 2.000%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024 | |
| | Southeast Energy Authority, AL, Commodity Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2023B), (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2030 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Chandler, AZ IDA (Intel Corp.), Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Series 2019), 4.000%, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2029 | |
| | Coconino County, AZ Pollution Control Corp. (Nevada Power Co.), PCRBs (Series 2017A), 4.125%, Mandatory Tender 3/31/2026 | |
| | Maricopa County, AZ, IDA (Banner Health), Revenue Bonds (Series 2023A-1), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 5/15/2026 | |
| | Tempe, AZ IDA (Mirabella at ASU), Revenue Bonds (Series 2023A), 4.700%, 10/1/2028 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank (Los Angeles County Museum of Art), Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2021A), 1.200%, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2028 | |
| | California Public Finance Authority (Kendal at Sonoma), Enso Village TEMPS-70 Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series B-2), 2.375%, 11/15/2028 | |
| | California State, UT GO Various Purpose Refunding Bonds, 5.000%, 9/1/2027 | |
| | California State, UT GO Various Purpose Refunding Bonds, 5.000%, 9/1/2028 | |
| | Carlsbad, CA (Mariposa Apartments), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), (Federal National Mortgage Association COL), 4.600%, 2/1/2036 | |
| | San Diego, CA Housing Authority (Rancho del Norte Apartments), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2003C), (Federal National Mortgage Association COL), 4.600%, 2/1/2036 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Colorado Health Facilities Authority (Advent Health System/Sunbelt Obligated Group), Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2024), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 11/15/2029 | |
| | Colorado Health Facilities Authority (Christian Living Communities), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2016), 5.000%, 1/1/2025 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Connecticut State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2022D), 5.000%, 9/15/2026 | |
| | Connecticut State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2022D), 5.000%, 9/15/2027 | |
| | Connecticut State, UT GO SIFMA Index Bonds (Series 2013A) FRNs, 4.870% (SIFMA 7-day +0.990%), 3/1/2025 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Broward County, FL HFA (St. Joseph Manor II, LLLP), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2023), (United States Treasury COL), 3.500%, Mandatory Tender 4/1/2026 | |
| | Florida Development Finance Corp. (Tampa General Hospital), Healthcare Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2024B), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2031 | |
| | Lee County, FL HFA (Crossings at Cape Coral Apartments), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2023), (United States Treasury GTD), 3.500%, Mandatory Tender 2/1/2026 | |
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
| | | |
| | MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued | |
| | | |
| | Orlando, FL Utilities Commission, Utility System Revenue Bonds (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 10/1/2038 | |
| | Orlando, FL Utilities Commission, Utility System Revenue Bonds (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 10/1/2039 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Burke County, GA Development Authority (Georgia Power Co.), Vogtle Project PCRB (First Series 2013), 3.375%, Mandatory Tender 3/12/2027 | |
| | Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., GA, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2023C), (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 9/1/2030 | |
| | Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., GA, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2023D), (Citigroup, Inc. GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 12/1/2030 | |
| | Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., GA, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2023E-1), (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2031 | |
| | Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., GA, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2024B), (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 3/1/2032 | |
| | Main Street Natural Gas, Inc., GA, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2024C), (Citigroup, Inc. GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 12/1/2031 | |
| | Monroe County, GA Development Authority (Georgia Power Co.), Scherer Plant PCRBs (First Series 1995), 2.250%, 7/1/2025 | |
| | Monroe County, GA Development Authority (Georgia Power Co.), Scherer Project PCRBs (First Series 2012), 3.875%, Mandatory Tender 3/6/2026 | |
| | Savannah, GA EDA (International Paper Co.), Recovery Zone Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2019A), 2.000%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Granite City, IL (Waste Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 1.250%, 5/1/2027 | |
| | Illinois Finance Authority (OSF Health Care Systems), Revenue Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 11/15/2024 | |
| | Illinois Finance Authority (Presbyterian Homes Obligated Group, IL), Revenue Bonds (Series 2021B) FRNs, 4.580% (SIFMA 7-day +0.700%), Mandatory Tender 5/1/2026 | |
| | Illinois State, UT GO Bonds (Series 2017D), 5.000%, 11/1/2026 | |
| | Illinois State, UT GO Bonds (Series 2017D), 5.000%, 11/1/2027 | |
| | Illinois State, UT GO Bonds (Series 2023D), 5.000%, 7/1/2028 | |
| | Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, IL, Tobacco Settlement Revenue Bonds (Series 2017), (United States Treasury PRF), 5.000%, 6/1/2026 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Iowa Finance Authority (Lifespace Communities, Inc.), Revenue Bonds (Series 2021B) FRNs, 4.288% (SOFR x 0.70 +0.550%), Mandatory Tender 5/15/2026 | |
| | | |
| | Louisville & Jefferson County, KY Metropolitan Government (Louisville Gas & Electric Co.), PCRBs (Series 2005A), 1.750%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2026 | |
| | Public Energy Authority of Kentucky, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2024A-1), (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2030 | |
| | Trimble County, KY (Louisville Gas & Electric Co.), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2016A), 1.300%, Mandatory Tender 9/1/2027 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Louisiana State Housing Corporation (Atrium Ridge, LP), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2024B), (United States Treasury GTD), 3.750%, Mandatory Tender 2/1/2027 | |
| | Louisiana State Offshore Terminal Authority (Loop LLC), Deepwater Port Revenue Bonds (Series 2007A), 4.150%, 9/1/2027 | |
| | St. John the Baptist Parish, LA (Marathon Oil Corp.), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2017B-2), 2.375%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2026 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Commonwealth of Massachusetts, UT GO Consolidated Loan Bonds (Series 2023A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. GTD), 5.000%, 5/1/2038 | |
| | Commonwealth of Massachusetts, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2023B), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. GTD), 5.000%, 5/1/2038 | |
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
| | | |
| | MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued | |
| | | |
| | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Mass General Brigham), Revenue Bonds (Series 2019T-1) FRNs, 4.480% (SIFMA 7-day +0.600%), Mandatory Tender 1/29/2026 | |
| | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Waste Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 1.250%, 5/1/2027 | |
| | Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, SFM Revenue Bonds (Series 172), 4.000%, 6/1/2045 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Lansing, MI Board of Water & Light, Utility System Revenue Bonds (Series 2021B), 2.000%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2026 | |
| | Michigan State Building Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds Facilities Program (Series 2023-II), 5.000%, 10/15/2037 | |
| | Michigan State Finance Authority (McLaren Health Care Corp.), Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2015D-2), 1.200%, Mandatory Tender 4/13/2028 | |
| | Michigan State Strategic Fund (Waste Management, Inc.), Revenue Bonds, 0.580%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2024 | |
| | Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Senior Current Interest Bonds (Series 2020A Class 1), 5.000%, 6/1/2025 | |
| | Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Senior Current Interest Bonds (Series 2020A Class 1), 5.000%, 6/1/2031 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Missouri State HEFA (Lutheran Senior Services), Senior Living Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2016B), 5.000%, 2/1/2025 | |
| | Missouri State HEFA (Lutheran Senior Services), Senior Living Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2016B), 5.000%, 2/1/2026 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Nebraska Public Power District, General Revenue Bonds (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 7/1/2028 | |
| | | |
| | Clark County, NV Airport System, Airport System Subordinate Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2019A), 5.000%, 7/1/2026 | |
| | Washoe County, NV (Sierra Pacific Power Co.), Gas and Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2016B), 3.625%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2029 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living), Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), 4.000%, 1/1/2025 | |
| | National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living), Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), 4.000%, 1/1/2026 | |
| | National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living), Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), 4.000%, 1/1/2027 | |
| | National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living), Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), 4.000%, 1/1/2028 | |
| | National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living), Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), 4.000%, 1/1/2029 | |
| | National Finance Authority, NH (Springpoint Senior Living), Senior Living Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), 4.000%, 1/1/2030 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Facilities Construction Refunding Bonds (Series 2023RRR), 5.000%, 3/1/2026 | |
| | New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Facilities Construction Refunding Bonds (Series 2023RRR), 5.000%, 3/1/2028 | |
| | New Jersey EDA (New Jersey State), School Facilities Construction Refunding SIFMA Index Bonds (Series 2013 I) FRNs, 5.130% (SIFMA 7-day +1.250%), 9/1/2025 | |
| | New Jersey EDA (New Jersey-American Water Co., Inc.), Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2020D), 1.100%, Mandatory Tender 12/1/2027 | |
| | New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority (New Jersey State), Higher Education Capital Improvement Fund (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 9/1/2035 | |
| | New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority (New Jersey State), Higher Education Capital Improvement Fund (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 9/1/2036 | |
| | New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority (New Jersey State), Higher Education Capital Improvement Fund (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 9/1/2037 | |
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
| | | |
| | MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued | |
| | | |
| | New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority (New Jersey State), Higher Education Capital Improvement Fund (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 9/1/2038 | |
| | New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority (New Jersey State), Transportation System Bonds (Series 2023AA), 5.000%, 6/15/2025 | |
| | New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority (New Jersey State), Transportation System Bonds (Series 2023AA), 5.000%, 6/15/2026 | |
| | New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority (New Jersey State), Transportation System Bonds (Series 2023AA), 5.000%, 6/15/2038 | |
| | New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Turnpike Revenue Bonds (Series 2017A), 5.000%, 1/1/2027 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Farmington, NM (Public Service Co., NM), PCR Refunding Bonds San Juan Project (Series 2010E), 3.875%, Mandatory Tender 6/1/2029 | |
| | New Mexico State Hospital Equipment Loan Council (Presbyterian Healthcare Services), Hospital System Revenue Bonds (Series 2019B), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2025 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY (MTA Transportation Revenue), Transportation Revenue Variable Rate Refunding Bonds (Series 2002G-1F) FRNs, 4.008% (SOFR x 0.67 +0.430%), 11/1/2026 | |
| | Monroe County, NY IDA (Andrews Terrace Community Partners, LP), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2023B-1), (United States Treasury GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2027 | |
| | Monroe County, NY IDA (Andrews Terrace Community Partners, LP), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2023B-2), (United States Treasury GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2027 | |
| | New York City Housing Development Corp., Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2024B-2), 3.700%, Mandatory Tender 7/3/2028 | |
| | New York City, NY IDA (Yankee Stadium LLC), PILOT Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS), 5.000%, 3/1/2029 | |
| | New York City, NY IDA (Yankee Stadium LLC), PILOT Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS), 5.000%, 3/1/2030 | |
| | New York City, NY Transitional Finance Authority, Future Tax Secured Subordinate Bonds (Series 2024A-1), 5.000%, 5/1/2037 | |
| | New York City, NY Transitional Finance Authority, Future Tax Secured Subordinate Bonds (Series 2024A-1), 5.000%, 5/1/2038 | |
| | New York City, NY, UT GO Bonds (Fiscal 2023 Series D), 5.000%, 8/1/2025 | |
| | New York Transportation Development Corporation (American Airlines, Inc.), Special Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2021), 2.250%, 8/1/2026 | |
| | New York Transportation Development Corporation (JFK International Air Terminal LLC), Special Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 12/1/2029 | |
| | New York Transportation Development Corporation (JFK International Air Terminal LLC), Special Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2020C), 5.000%, 12/1/2028 | |
| | New York Transportation Development Corporation (JFK International Air Terminal LLC), Special Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2020C), 5.000%, 12/1/2029 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Columbus County, NC Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control Financing Authority (International Paper Co.), Environmental Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2019A), 2.000%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024 | |
| | North Carolina HFA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2017 38-B), 4.000%, 7/1/2047 | |
| | North Carolina Medical Care Commission (United Methodist Retirement Homes), Retirement Community Revenue Bonds TEMPS-50 (Series 2024B-2), 3.750%, 10/1/2028 | |
| | North Carolina Medical Care Commission (United Methodist Retirement Homes), Retirement Community Revenue Bonds TEMPS-85 (Series 2024B-1), 4.250%, 10/1/2028 | |
| | North Carolina Medical Care Commission (United Methodist Retirement Homes), Retirement Facilities First Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2024), 5.000%, 10/1/2039 | |
| | North Carolina State Turnpike Authority, Triangle Expressway System Senior Lien Turnpike Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2018), 5.000%, 1/1/2027 | |
| | North Carolina State Turnpike Authority, Triangle Expressway System Senior Lien Turnpike Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2018), 5.000%, 1/1/2028 | |
| | | |
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
| | | |
| | MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued | |
| | | |
| | Columbus, OH, UT GO Various Purpose Bonds (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 8/15/2038 | |
| | Columbus-Franklin County, OH Finance Authority (Dering Family Homes Owner, LLC), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2023), (United States Treasury GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 2/1/2027 | |
| | Lancaster, OH Port Authority, Gas Supply Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2019), (Royal Bank of Canada GTD), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 2/1/2025 | |
| | Ohio HFA (Riverview San Marco, LLC), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2023), (United States Treasury COL), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2025 | |
| | Ohio HFA (Springboro Sherman, LP), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2024), (United States Treasury GTD), 3.530%, Mandatory Tender 2/1/2027 | |
| | Ohio State Air Quality Development Authority (American Electric Power Co., Inc.), Air Quality Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2014A), 2.400%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2029 | |
| | Ohio State Hospital Revenue (Cleveland Clinic), Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2019C), 2.750%, Mandatory Tender 5/1/2028 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Oklahoma County, OK Finance Authority (Choctaw-Nicoma Park Public Schools), Educational Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 2023), 5.000%, 9/1/2026 | |
| | Oklahoma County, OK Finance Authority (Choctaw-Nicoma Park Public Schools), Educational Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 2023), 5.000%, 9/1/2028 | |
| | Oklahoma County, OK Finance Authority (Choctaw-Nicoma Park Public Schools), Educational Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 2023), 5.000%, 9/1/2030 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Multnomah County, OR Hospital Facilities Authority (Terwilliger Plaza, Inc.), Parkview Project TEMPS-65 Revenue and Refunding Bonds (Series 2021B-1), 1.200%, 6/1/2028 | |
| | | |
| | Bethlehem, PA Area School District Authority, School Revenue Bonds (Series 2021C) FRNs, 3.928% (SOFR x 0.67 +0.350%), Mandatory Tender 11/1/2025 | |
| | Montgomery County, PA IDA (Constellation Energy Generation LLC), Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2023A), 4.100%, Mandatory Tender 4/3/2028 | |
| | Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority (Waste Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2011), 2.150%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2024 | |
| | Pennsylvania State Economic Development Financing Authority (UPMC Health System), Revenue Bonds (Series 2023A-1), 5.000%, 5/15/2031 | |
| | Pittsburgh, PA Water & Sewer Authority, Water and Sewer System First Lien Revenue Bonds (Series 2023B), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS), 5.000%, 9/1/2038 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | South Carolina Jobs-EDA (Novant Health, Inc.), Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2024A), 5.000%, 11/1/2038 | |
| | | |
| | Metropolitan Government Nashville & Davidson County, TN IDB (Waste Management, Inc.), Revenue Bonds, 0.580%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2024 | |
| | Tennergy Corp., TN Gas Revenue, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2021A), (Morgan Stanley GTD), 4.000%, Mandatory Tender 9/1/2028 | |
| | Tennessee Housing Development Agency, Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 220142C), 4.000%, 1/1/2045 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Austin, TX Airport System, Revenue Bonds (Series 2019B), 5.000%, 11/15/2026 | |
| | Boerne, TX Independent School District, UT GO School Building Bonds (Series 2024), (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 4.000%, Mandatory Tender 2/1/2028 | |
| | Dallas, TX, GO Refunding and Improvement Bonds (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 2/15/2039 | |
| | Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, Joint Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2020A), 5.000%, 11/1/2026 | |
| | Eanes, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate UT School Building Bonds (Series 2019B), (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 1.750%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2025 | |
| | Eanes, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate UT School Building Bonds (Series 2019B), (United States Treasury PRF 8/1/2024@100), 1.750%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2024 | |
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
| | | |
| | MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued | |
| | | |
| | Ector County, TX Independent School District, UT GO School Building Bonds (Series 2024B), (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 4.000%, Mandatory Tender 8/15/2027 | |
| | Fort Bend, TX Independent School District, UT GO School Building and Refunding Bonds (Series 2024B), (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 4.000%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2027 | |
| | Fort Bend, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate UT School Building and Refunding Bonds (Series 2020B), (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 0.875%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2025 | |
| | Grand Parkway Transportation Corp., TX, Subordinate Tier Toll Revenue Bonds (Series 2023 TELA Supported), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 4/1/2028 | |
| | Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority (Waste Management, Inc.), Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2003B), 1.500%, 5/1/2028 | |
| | Harlandale, TX Independent School District, Fixed and Variable Rate UT Refunding Bonds (Series 2020), (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 0.750%, Mandatory Tender 8/15/2025 | |
| | Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Baylor College of Medicine), Medical Facilities Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2024A), 5.000%, 5/15/2029 | |
| | Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Memorial Hermann Health System), Revenue Bonds (Series 2024C), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 7/1/2029 | |
| | Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Texas Medical Center), Revenue Bonds (Series 2020A), 0.900%, Mandatory Tender 5/15/2025 | |
| | Lower Colorado River Authority, TX (LCRA Transmission Services Corp.), Transmission Contract Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2019), 5.000%, 5/15/2027 | |
| | Lower Colorado River Authority, TX (LCRA Transmission Services Corp.), Transmission Contract Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2019), 5.000%, 5/15/2028 | |
| | Lower Colorado River Authority, TX (LCRA Transmission Services Corp.), Transmission Contract Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2023A), (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS), 5.000%, 5/15/2038 | |
| | Matagorda County, TX Navigation District No. 1 (AEP Texas, Inc.), PCR Refunding Bonds (Central Power and Light Company Project) (Series 1996), 4.250%, 5/1/2030 | |
| | Matagorda County, TX Navigation District No. 1 (AEP Texas, Inc.), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2001A), 2.600%, 11/1/2029 | |
| | New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation (Brazos Presbyterian Homes Holding, Inc.), Retirement Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2017), 5.000%, 1/1/2025 | |
| | New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation (Westminster Manor), Revenue Bonds (Series 2016), 5.000%, 11/1/2024 | |
| | New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation (Westminster Manor), Revenue Bonds (Series 2016), 5.000%, 11/1/2025 | |
| | North East, TX Independent School District, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2024), (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 3.750%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2027 | |
| | North East, TX Independent School District, Variable Rate UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2019), (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD), 2.200%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2024 | |
| | North Texas Tollway Authority, First Tier Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 1/1/2026 | |
| | North Texas Tollway Authority, First Tier Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 1/1/2027 | |
| | Texas Water Development Board, State Revolving Fund Revenue Bonds (Series 2023), 5.000%, 8/1/2038 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Intermountain Power Agency, Power Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 7/1/2038 | |
| | Utah State Housing Corporation (Silos Affordable, LLC), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2024), (United States Treasury GTD), 3.700%, Mandatory Tender 8/1/2027 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Amelia County, VA IDA (Waste Management, Inc.), Tax-Exempt Adjustable Mode Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 1.450%, 4/1/2027 | |
| | Charles City County, VA IDA (Waste Management, Inc.), Tax-Exempt Adjustable Mode Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 1.450%, 4/1/2027 | |
| | Chesapeake, VA Redevelopment and Housing Authority (Standard Hunter’s Point I Venture LP), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2023), (United States Treasury COL), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 5/1/2026 | |
| | Northampton County and Towns, VA EDA (Myrtle Landing Renewal LLC), Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2023), (United States Treasury COL), 4.500%, Mandatory Tender 4/1/2025 | |
| | Virginia Beach, VA Development Authority (Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay), Residential Care Facility Revenue Bonds TEMPS-70 (Series 2023B-2), 5.750%, 9/1/2030 | |
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
| | | |
| | MUNICIPAL BONDS—continued | |
| | | |
| | Virginia Peninsula Port Authority (Dominion Terminal Associates), Coal Terminal Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2003), 3.800%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2024 | |
| | Wise County, VA IDA (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), Solid Waste and Sewage Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2010A), 3.800%, Mandatory Tender 5/28/2027 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Energy Northwest, WA (Bonneville WA Power Administration), Columbia Generating Station Electric Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 7/1/2038 | |
| | King County, WA Housing Authority (New Kirkland Heights LLLP), Affordable Housing Revenue Bonds Kirkland Heights Project (Series 2023A-2), 5.000%, 1/1/2028 | |
| | Port of Seattle, WA Revenue, Intermediate Lien Revenue Bonds (Series 2019), 5.000%, 4/1/2026 | |
| | Washington State, UT GO Motor Vehicle Fuel and Vehicle Related Fees Refunding Bonds (Series 2023B), 5.000%, 7/1/2027 | |
| | Washington State, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2023A), 5.000%, 8/1/2026 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Public Finance Authority (Duke Energy Progress LLC), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2022A-1), 3.300%, Mandatory Tender 10/1/2026 | |
| | Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Advocate Aurora Health), Revenue Bonds (Series 2018B-2), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 6/24/2026 | |
| | Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Advocate Aurora Health), Revenue Bonds (Series 2018C-4), 5.000%, Mandatory Tender 6/22/2029 | |
| | Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Forensic Science and Protective Medicine Collaboration, Inc.), Revenue Bonds (Series 2024), 5.000%, 8/1/2027 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Sweetwater County, WY PCRB (Idaho Power Co.), PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2006), 1.700%, 7/15/2026 | |
| | TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS
(IDENTIFIED COST $374,730,725) | |
| | SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS—2.2% | |
| | | |
| | Los Angeles, CA Community Redevelopment Agency (DWF V Hollywood & Vine, LP), Mizuho 3a-7 (Series 2022-MIZ9089) Daily VRDNs, (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. GTD)/(Mizuho Bank Ltd. LIQ), 5.300%, 7/1/2024 | |
| | | |
| | Meade County, KY Industrial Building Revenue Authority (Nucor Corp.), (Series 2020B-1) Daily VRDNs, 5.400%, 7/1/2024 | |
| | | |
| | Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust, PUTTERs 3a-7 (VMTP 5029) Daily VRDNs, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 5.200%, 7/1/2024 | |
| | | |
| | Ohio State Hospital Revenue (University Hospitals Health System, Inc.), (Series B) VRENs, 4.200%, 7/1/2024 | |
| | TOTAL SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS
(IDENTIFIED COST $8,200,000) | |
| | TOTAL INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES—99.6%
(IDENTIFIED COST $382,930,725)3 | |
| | OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET—0.4%4 | |
| | | |
Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 12.5% of the Fund’s portfolio as calculated based upon total market value (unaudited).
| Current rate and current maturity or next reset date shown for floating rate notes and variable rate notes/demand instruments. Certain variable rate securities are not based on a published reference rate and spread but are determined by the issuer or agent and are based on current market conditions. These securities do not indicate a reference rate and spread in their description above. |
| Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or availing of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At June 30, 2024, these restricted securities amounted to $3,600,961, which represented 1.0% of total net assets. |
| The cost of investments for federal tax purposes amounts to $382,894,653. |
| Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at June 30, 2024.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). Also includes securities valued at amortized cost.
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
As of June 30, 2024, all investments of the Fund utilized Level 2 inputs in valuing the Fund’s assets carried at fair value.
The following acronym(s) are used throughout this portfolio: | |
| |
| —Economic Development Authority |
| |
| |
| |
| —Health and Education Facilities Authority |
| —Housing Finance Authority |
| —Industrial Development Authority |
| —Industrial Development Bond |
| |
| |
| |
| —Pollution Control Revenue |
| —Pollution Control Revenue Bond(s) |
| —Payment in Lieu of Taxes |
| |
| —Puttable Tax-Exempt Receipts |
| |
| —Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association |
| —Secured Overnight Financing Rate |
| —Toll Equity Loan Agreement |
| —Tax Exempt Mandatory Paydown Securities |
| |
| —Variable Municipal Term Preferred |
| —Variable Rate Demand Notes |
| —Variable Rate Extendible Notes |
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Financial Highlights–Class A Shares
(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)
| |
| | | | | |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | | | | | |
Income From Investment Operations: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | | | |
TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Distributions from net investment income | | | | | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Expense waiver/reimbursement5 | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Per share numbers have been calculated using the average shares method. |
| Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable. |
| Amount does not reflect net expenses incurred by investment companies in which the Fund may invest. |
| The net expense ratios are calculated without reduction for expense offset arrangements. The net expense ratios are 0.72%, 0.72% and 0.81% for the years ended June 30, 2024, 2023 and 2020, respectively, after taking into account these expense reductions. |
| This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above. Amount does not reflect expense waiver/ reimbursement recorded by investment companies in which the Fund may invest. |
| Securities that mature are considered sales for purposes of this calculation. |
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Financial Highlights–Institutional Shares
(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)
| |
| | | | | |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | | | | | |
Income From Investment Operations: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | | | |
TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Distributions from net investment income | | | | | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Expense waiver/reimbursement5 | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Per share numbers have been calculated using the average shares method. |
| Based on net asset value. |
| Amount does not reflect net expenses incurred by investment companies in which the Fund may invest. |
| The net expense ratios are calculated without reduction for expense offset arrangements. The net expense ratios are 0.47%, 0.47% and 0.46% for the years ended June 30, 2024, 2023 and 2020, respectively, after taking into account these expense reductions. |
| This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above. Amount does not reflect expense waiver/ reimbursement recorded by investment companies in which the Fund may invest. |
| Securities that mature are considered sales for purposes of this calculation. |
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Financial Highlights–Service Shares
(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)
| |
| | | | | |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | | | | | |
Income From Investment Operations: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | | | |
TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Distributions from net investment income | | | | | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Ratios to Average Net Assets: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Expense waiver/reimbursement5 | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Per share numbers have been calculated using the average shares method. |
| Based on net asset value. |
| Amount does not reflect net expenses incurred by investment companies in which the Fund may invest. |
| The net expense ratios are calculated without reduction for expense offset arrangements. The net expense ratios are 0.70%, 0.70% and 0.70% for the years ended June 30, 2024, 2023 and 2020, respectively, after taking into account these expense reductions. |
| This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above. Amount does not reflect expense waiver/ reimbursement recorded by investment companies in which the Fund may invest. |
| Securities that mature are considered sales for purposes of this calculation. |
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Statement of Assets and LiabilitiesJune 30, 2024
| |
Investment in securities, at value (identified cost $382,930,725) | |
| |
| |
Receivable for shares sold | |
| |
| |
Payable for investments purchased | |
Payable for shares redeemed | |
Income distribution payable | |
Payable for portfolio accounting fees | |
Payable for other service fees (Notes 2 and 5) | |
Payable for investment adviser fee (Note 5) | |
Payable for administrative fee (Note 5) | |
Accrued expenses (Note 5) | |
| |
Net assets for 38,208,170 shares outstanding | |
| |
| |
Total distributable earnings (loss) | |
| |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share: | |
| |
Net asset value per share ($122,784,015 ÷ 12,384,793 shares outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized | |
Offering price per share (100/99.00 of $9.91) | |
Redemption proceeds per share | |
| |
Net asset value per share ($249,303,307 ÷ 25,141,998 shares outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized | |
| |
Redemption proceeds per share | |
| |
Net asset value per share ($6,760,013 ÷ 681,379 shares outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized | |
| |
Redemption proceeds per share | |
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Statement of OperationsYear Ended June 30, 2024
| |
| |
| |
Investment adviser fee (Note 5) | |
Administrative fee (Note 5) | |
| |
| |
Directors’/Trustees’ fees (Note 5) | |
| |
| |
Distribution services fee (Note 5) | |
Other service fees (Notes 2 and 5) | |
Portfolio accounting fees | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Waiver, Reimbursement and Reduction: | |
Waiver of investment adviser fee (Note 5) | |
Reimbursement of other operating expenses (Notes 2 and 5) | |
Reduction of custodian fees (Note 6) | |
TOTAL WAIVER, REIMBURSEMENT AND REDUCTION | |
| |
| |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments: | |
Net realized loss on investments | |
Net change in unrealized depreciation of investments | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | |
Change in net assets resulting from operations | |
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
| | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | |
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | | |
Distributions to Shareholders: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS | | |
| | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | |
| | |
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| On October 27, 2023, Class A2 Shares were converted to Class A Shares. |
See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Notes to Financial Statements
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust (the “Trust”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of one diversified portfolio, Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund (the “Fund”). The Fund offers three classes of shares: Class A Shares, Institutional Shares and Service Shares. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class-specific matters. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide dividend income which is exempt from federal regular income tax. The Fund pursues this investment objective by investing its assets so that normally distributions of annual interest income are exempt from federal regular income tax. Interest from the Fund’s investments may be subject to (or may be a specific preference item for purposes of) federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) for individuals. Distributions may be subject to state and local taxes.
At the close of business on October 27, 2023, Class A2 Shares were converted into the Fund’s existing Class A Shares pursuant to a Plan of Conversion approved by the Fund’s Board of Trustees (the “Trustees”). The conversion occurred on a tax-free basis. The cash value of a shareholder’s investment was not changed as a result of the share class conversion. No action was required by shareholders to effect the conversion.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
In calculating its net asset value (NAV), the Fund generally values investments as follows:
■
Fixed-income securities are fair valued using price evaluations provided by a pricing service approved by Federated Investment Management Company (the “Adviser”).
■
Shares of other mutual funds or non-exchange-traded investment companies are valued based upon their reported NAVs, or NAV per share practical expedient, as applicable.
■
Derivative contracts listed on exchanges are valued at their reported settlement or closing price, except that options are valued at the mean of closing bid and ask quotations.
■
Over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contracts are fair valued using price evaluations provided by a pricing service approved by the AdviserAdviser.
■
For securities that are fair valued in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the AdviserAdviser, certain factors may be considered, such as: the last traded or purchase price of the security, information obtained by contacting the issuer or dealers, analysis of the issuer’s financial statements or other available documents, fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, the movement of the market in which the security is normally traded, public trading in similar securities or derivative contracts of the issuer or comparable issuers, movement of a relevant index, or other factors including but not limited to industry changes and relevant government actions.
If any price, quotation, price evaluation or other pricing source is not readily available when the NAV is calculated, if the Fund cannot obtain price evaluations from a pricing service or from more than one dealer for an investment within a reasonable period of time as set forth in the Adviser’s valuation policies and procedures for the Fund, or if information furnished by a pricing service, in the opinion of the Adviser’s valuation committee (“Valuation Committee”), is deemed not representative of the fair value of such security, the Fund uses the fair value of the investment determined in accordance with the procedures described below. There can be no assurance that the Fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it sold the investment at approximately the time at which the Fund determines its NAV per share, and the actual value obtained could be materially different.
Fair Valuation Procedures
Pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the Act, the Fund’s Trustees have designated the Adviser as the Fund’s valuation designee to perform any fair value determinations for securities and other assets held by the Fund. The Adviser is subject to the Trustees’ oversight and certain reporting and other requirements intended to provide the Trustees the information needed to oversee the Adviser’s fair value determinations.
The Adviser, acting through its Valuation Committee, is responsible for determining the fair value of investments for which market quotations are not readily available. The Valuation Committee is comprised of officers of the Adviser and certain of the Adviser’s affiliated companies and determines fair value and oversees the calculation of the NAV. The Valuation Committee is also authorized to use pricing services to provide fair value evaluations of the current value of certain investments for purposes of calculating the NAV. The Valuation Committee employs various methods for reviewing third-party pricing-service evaluations including periodic reviews of third-party pricing services’ policies, procedures and valuation methods (including key inputs, methods, models and assumptions), transactional back-testing, comparisons of evaluations of different pricing services and review of price challenges by the Adviser based on recent market activity. In the event that market quotations and price evaluations are not available for an investment, the Valuation Committee determines the fair value of the investment in accordance with procedures adopted by the Adviser. The Trustees periodically review the fair valuations made by the Valuation Committee. The Trustees have also approved the Adviser’s fair valuation and significant events procedures as part of the Fund’s compliance program and will review any changes made to the procedures.
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Factors considered by pricing services in evaluating an investment include the yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, call rights and other potential prepayments, terms and type, reported transactions, indications as to values from dealers and general market conditions. Some pricing services provide a single price evaluation reflecting the bid-side of the market for an investment (a “bid” evaluation). Other pricing services offer both bid evaluations and price evaluations indicative of a price between the prices bid and ask for the investment (a “mid” evaluation). The Fund normally uses bid evaluations for any U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities. The Fund normally uses mid evaluations for any other types of fixed-income securities and any OTC derivative contracts. In the event that market quotations and price evaluations are not available for an investment, the fair value of the investment is determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Adviser.
Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses and Distributions
Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade-date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified-cost basis. Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Dividend income and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value. Amortization/accretion of premium and discount is included in investment income. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that select classes will bear certain expenses unique to those classes. The detail of the total fund expense waiver, reimbursement and reduction of $712,579 is disclosed in this Note 2, Note 5 and Note 6. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.
The Fund may pay other service fees up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund’s Class A Shares, Institutional Shares and Service Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. Subject to the terms described in the Expense Limitation note, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for other service fees. For the year ended June 30, 2024, other service fees for the Fund were as follows:
| Other Service
Fees Incurred | Other Service
Fees Reimbursed |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Prior to their conversion to Class A Shares at the close of business on October 27, 2023, the Class A2 Shares were also subject to the Plan at 0.25% of average daily net assets of the Class A2 Shares. For the year ended, the Class A2 Shares did not incur other service fees.
It is the Fund’s policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary. As of and during the year ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not have a liability for any uncertain tax positions. The Fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to tax liabilities as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. As of June 30, 2024, tax years 2021 through 2024 remain subject to examination by the Fund’s major tax jurisdictions, which include the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
When-Issued and Delayed-Delivery Transactions
The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed-delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.
The Fund may purchase securities which are considered restricted. Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer’s expense, either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. The Fund’s restricted securities, like other securities, are priced in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Adviser.
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Additional information on restricted securities held at June 30, 2024, is as follows:
| | | |
Matagorda County, TX Navigation District No. 1 (AEP Texas, Inc.), PCR Refunding Bonds (Central Power and Light Company Project) (Series 1996), 4.250%, 5/1/2030 | | | |
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation (Westminster Manor), Revenue Bonds (Series 2016), 5.000%, 11/1/2024 | | | |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ materially from those estimated. The Fund applies investment company accounting and reporting guidance.
3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST
The following tables summarize share activity:
| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | |
Conversion of Class A2 Shares to Class A Shares1 | | | | |
| | | | |
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS A SHARE TRANSACTIONS | | | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | |
Conversion of Class A2 Shares to Class A Shares1 | | | | |
| | | | |
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS A2 SHARE TRANSACTIONS | | | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | |
| | | | |
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS | | | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | |
| | | | |
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS | | | | |
NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM TOTAL FUND SHARE TRANSACTIONS | | | | |
| On October 27, 2023, Class A2 Shares were converted to Class A Shares. Within the Statement of Changes in Net Assets, the conversion from Class A2 Shares is within the Cost of shares redeemed and the conversion to Class A Shares is within Proceeds from sale of shares. |
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION
The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended June 30, 2024 and 2023, was as follows:
As of June 30, 2024, the components of distributable earnings on a tax-basis were as follows:
Undistributed tax-exempt income | |
Net unrealized depreciation | |
Capital loss carryforwards | |
| |
At June 30, 2024, the cost of investments for federal tax purposes was $382,894,653. The net unrealized depreciation of investments for federal tax purposes was $5,594,442. This consists of unrealized appreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of value over cost of $1,704,815 and unrealized depreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of cost over value of $7,299,257. The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized depreciation is attributable to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities.
As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had a capital loss carryforward of $40,747,084 which will reduce the Fund’s taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code, thereby reducing the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income tax. Pursuant to the Code, these net capital losses retain their character as either short-term or long-term and do not expire.
The following schedule summarizes the Fund’s capital loss carryforwards:
5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
The advisory agreement between the Fund and the Adviser provides for an annual fee equal to 0.39% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. Under the investment advisory contract, which is subject to annual review by the Trustees, the Adviser will reimburse the amount, limited to the amount of the advisory fee, by which the Fund’s Institutional Shares aggregate annual operating expenses, including the investment advisory fee, but excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, expenses of registering and qualifying the Fund and its shares under federal and state laws and regulations, expenses of withholding taxes and extraordinary expenses, exceed 0.45% of the Fund’s Institutional Shares average daily net assets. To comply with the 0.45% limitation imposed under the investment advisory contract, the Adviser may waive its advisory fee and/or reimburse its advisory fee or other Fund expenses, affiliates of the Adviser may waive, reimburse or reduce amounts otherwise included in the aggregate annual operating expenses of the Fund, or there may be a combination of waivers, reimbursements and/or reductions by the Adviser and its affiliates. The amount that the Adviser waives/reimburses under the investment advisory contract will be reduced to the extent that affiliates of the Adviser waive, reimburse or reduce amounts that would otherwise be included in the aggregate annual operating expenses of the Fund. In addition, subject to the terms described in the Expense Limitation note, the Adviser may also voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. For the year ended June 30, 2024, the Adviser waived $529,463 of its fee.
Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. For purposes of determining the appropriate rate breakpoint, “Investment Complex” is defined as all of the Federated Hermes Funds subject to a fee under the Administrative Services Agreement. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average daily net assets of the Investment Complex as specified below:
| Average Daily Net Assets
of the Investment Complex |
| on assets up to $50 billion |
| on assets over $50 billion |
Subject to the terms described in the Expense Limitation note, FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. For the year ended June 30, 2024, the annualized fee paid to FAS was 0.079% of average daily net assets of the Fund.
In addition, FAS may charge certain out-of-pocket expenses to the Fund.
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Distribution Services Fee
The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund’s Class A Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses at the following percentages of average daily net assets annually, to compensate FSC.
For the year ended June 30, 2024, distribution services fees for the Fund were as follows:
| Percentage of Average Daily
Net Assets of Class |
| |
Prior to their conversion to Class A Shares at the close of business on October 27, 2023, the Class A2 Shares were also subject to the Plan at 0.25% of average daily net assets of the Class A2 Shares.
Subject to the terms described in the Expense Limitation note, FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. For the year ended June 30, 2024, distribution services fees for the Fund were as follows:
| Distribution Services
Fees Incurred |
| |
When FSC receives fees, it may pay some or all of them to financial intermediaries whose customers purchase shares. For the year ended June 30, 2024, FSC retained all of the fees paid by the Fund.
For the year ended June 30, 2024, the Fund’s Class A Shares did not incur a distribution services fee; however, it may begin to incur this fee upon approval of the Trustees.
For the year ended June 30, 2024, FSSC received $1,041 and reimbursed $181,733 of other service fees disclosed in Note 2.
In addition to the contractual fee waiver described under “Investment Adviser Fee” above with regards to the Fund’s Institutional Shares, the Adviser and certain of its affiliates (which may include FSC, FAS and FSSC) on their own initiative have agreed to waive certain amounts of their respective fees and/or reimburse expenses. Effective September 1, 2024, total annual fund operating expenses (as shown in the financial highlights, excluding interest expense, extraordinary expenses and proxy-related expenses, if any) paid by the Fund’s Class A Shares, Institutional Shares and Service Shares (after the voluntary waivers and reimbursements) will not exceed 0.65%, 0.40% and 0.65% (the “Fee Limit”), respectively, up to but not including the later of (the “Termination Date”): (a) September 1, 2025; or (b) the date of the Fund’s next effective Prospectus. Prior to September 1, 2024, the Fee Limit for the Class A Shares, Institutional Shares and Service Shares were 0.72%, 0.47% and 0.72%, respectively. While the Adviser and its applicable affiliates currently do not anticipate terminating or increasing these arrangements prior to the Termination Date, these arrangements may only be terminated or the Fee Limit increased prior to the Termination Date with the agreement of the Trustees.
During the year ended June 30, 2024, the Fund engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Trustees and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $57,450,000 and $71,525,000, respectively. Net realized gain (loss) recognized on these transactions was $0.
Directors’/Trustees’ and Miscellaneous Fees
Certain Officers and Directors of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of certain of the above companies. To efficiently facilitate payment, Independent Directors’/Trustees’ fees and certain expenses related to conducting meetings of the Directors/Trustees and other miscellaneous expenses are paid by an affiliate of the Adviser which in due course are reimbursed by the Fund. These expenses related to conducting meetings of the Directors/Trustees and other miscellaneous expenses may be included in the Accrued and Miscellaneous Expenses on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and the Statement of Operations, respectively.
Through arrangements with the Fund’s custodian, net credits realized as a result of uninvested cash balances were used to offset custody expenses. For the year ended June 30, 2024, the Fund’s expenses were offset by $1,383 under these arrangements.
7. INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of investments, excluding long-term U.S. government securities and short-term obligations, for the year ended June 30, 2024, were as follows:
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
8. LINE OF CREDIT
The Fund participates with certain other Federated Hermes Funds, on a several basis, in an up to $500,000,000 unsecured, 364-day, committed, revolving line of credit (LOC) agreement dated June 18, 2024. The LOC was made available to temporarily finance the repurchase or redemption of shares of the Fund, failed trades, payment of dividends, settlement of trades and for other short-term, temporary or emergency general business purposes. The Fund cannot borrow under the LOC if an inter-fund loan is outstanding. The Fund’s ability to borrow under the LOC also is subject to the limitations of the Act and various conditions precedent that must be satisfied before the Fund can borrow. Loans under the LOC are charged interest at a fluctuating rate per annum equal to (a) the highest, on any day, of (i) the federal funds effective rate, (ii) the published secured overnight financing rate plus an assigned percentage, and (iii) 0.0%,plus (b) a margin. Any fund eligible to borrow under the LOC pays its pro rata share of a commitment fee based on the amount of the lenders’ commitment that has not been utilized, quarterly in arrears and at maturity. As of June 30, 2024, the Fund had no outstanding loans. During the year ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not utilize the LOC.
Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Fund, along with other funds advised by subsidiaries of Federated Hermes, Inc., may participate in an interfund lending program. This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the Fund to borrow from other participating affiliated funds. As of June 30, 2024, there were no outstanding loans. During the year ended June 30, 2024, the program was not utilized.
Under the Fund’s organizational documents, its Officers and Directors/Trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund (other than liabilities arising out of their willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of their duties to the Fund). In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund provides certain indemnifications under arrangements with third parties. Typically, obligations to indemnify a third party arise in the context of an arrangement entered into by the Fund under which the Fund agrees to indemnify such third party for certain liabilities arising out of actions taken pursuant to the arrangement, provided the third party’s actions are not deemed to have breached an agreed-upon standard of care (such as willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of their duties under the contract). The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet arisen. The Fund does not anticipate any material claims or losses pursuant to these arrangements at this time, and accordingly expects the risk of loss to be remote.
11. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, 100% of distributions from net investment income is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FEDERATED HERMES SHORT-INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL FUND:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund (the “Fund”) (the sole portfolio constituting Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust (the “Trust”)), including the portfolio of investments, as of June 30, 2024, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund (the sole portfolio constituting Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust), at June 30, 2024, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and its financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Fund’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Trust in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of June 30, 2024, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and others; when replies were not received from brokers or others, we performed other auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the auditor of one or more Federated Hermes investment companies since 1979.
Boston, Massachusetts
August 22, 2024
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract–May 2024
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund (the “Fund”)
At its meetings in May 2024 (the “May Meetings”), the Fund’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”), including those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Fund, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Independent Trustees”), reviewed and unanimously approved the continuation of the investment advisory contract between the Fund and Federated Investment Management Company (the “Adviser”) (the “Contract��) for an additional one-year term. The Board’s determination to approve the continuation of the Contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment after considering all of the information and factors believed to be relevant and appropriate on whether to approve the continuation of the existing arrangement. The information, factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board’s approval are summarized below.
Information Received and Review Process
At the request of the Independent Trustees, the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer (the “CCO”) furnished to the Board in advance of its May Meetings an independent written evaluation of the Fund’s management fee (the “CCO Fee Evaluation Report”). The Board considered the CCO Fee Evaluation Report, along with other information, in evaluating the reasonableness of the Fund’s management fee and in determining to approve the continuation of the Contract.
In addition to the extensive materials that comprise and accompany the CCO Fee Evaluation Report, the Board considered information specifically prepared in connection with the approval of the continuation of the Contract that was presented at the May Meetings. In this regard, in the months preceding the May Meetings, the Board requested and reviewed written responses and supporting materials prepared by the Adviser and its affiliates (collectively, “Federated Hermes”) in response to requests posed to Federated Hermes by independent legal counsel on behalf of the Independent Trustees encompassing a wide variety of topics, including those summarized below. The Board also considered such additional matters as the Independent Trustees deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the Contract, which included detailed information about the Fund and Federated Hermes furnished to the Board at its meetings throughout the year and in between regularly scheduled meetings on particular matters as the need arose.
The Board’s consideration of the Contract included review of materials and information covering the following matters, among others: (1) copies of the Contracts; (2) the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by Federated Hermes; (3) Federated Hermes’ business and operations; (4) the Adviser’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes; (5) the Fund’s investment objectives and strategies; (6) the Fund’s short-term and long-term performance - in absolute terms (both on a gross basis and net of expenses) and relative to an appropriate group of peer funds and its benchmark; (7) the Fund’s fees and expenses, including the advisory fee and the overall expense structure of the Fund - in absolute terms and relative to an appropriate group of peer funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations (if any); (8) the financial condition of Federated Hermes; (9) the Adviser’s profitability with respect to managing the Fund; (10) distribution and sales activity for the Fund; and (11) the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund’s portfolio securities (if any).
The Board also considered judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees charged to other registered funds in evaluating the Contract. Using these judicial decisions as a guide, the Board considered several factors they deemed relevant to an adviser’s fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund, including: (1) the nature and quality of the services provided by the adviser to the fund and its shareholders, including the performance of the fund, its benchmark and comparable funds; (2) the adviser’s cost of providing the services and the profitability to the adviser of providing advisory services to the fund; (3) the extent to which the adviser may realize “economies of scale” as the fund grows larger and, if such economies of scale exist, whether they have been appropriately shared with the fund and its shareholders or the family of funds; (4) any “fall-out” benefits that accrue to the adviser because of its relationship with the fund, including research services received from brokers that execute fund trades and any fees paid to affiliates of the adviser for services rendered to the fund; (5) comparative fees and expenses, including a comparison of management fees paid to the adviser with those paid by similar funds managed by the same adviser or other advisers as well as management fees charged to institutional and other advisory clients of the same adviser for what might be viewed as like services; and (6) the extent of care, conscientiousness and independence with which the fund’s board members perform their duties and their expertise, including whether they are fully informed about all facts the board deems relevant to its consideration of the adviser’s services and fees. The Board considered that the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) disclosure requirements regarding the basis for a fund board’s approval of the fund’s investment advisory contract generally align with the factors listed above. The Board was guided by these factors in its evaluation of the Contract to the extent it considered them to be appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below. The Board considered and weighed these factors in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated Hermes on matters relating to the oversight of the other funds advised by Federated Hermes (each, a “Federated Hermes Fund” and, collectively, the “Federated Hermes Funds”).
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
In addition, the Board considered the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and the potential disruptions of the Fund’s operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew the Contract. In particular, the Board recognized that many shareholders likely have invested in the Fund based on the strength of Federated Hermes’ industry standing and reputation and with the expectation that Federated Hermes will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board observed that there are a range of investment options available to the Fund’s shareholders in the marketplace, and such shareholders, having had the opportunity to consider other investment options, have effectively selected Federated Hermes by virtue of investing in the Fund.
In determining to approve the continuation of the Contract, the members of the Board reviewed and evaluated information and factors they believed to be relevant and appropriate through the exercise of their reasonable business judgment. While individual members of the Board may have weighed certain factors differently, the Board’s determination to approve the continuation of the Contract was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Board throughout the year and specifically with respect to the continuation of the Contract. The Board recognized that its evaluation process is evolutionary and that the factors considered and emphasis placed on relevant factors may change in recognition of changing circumstances in the registered fund marketplace. The Independent Trustees were assisted throughout the evaluation process by independent legal counsel. In connection with their deliberations at the May Meetings, the Independent Trustees met separately in executive session with their independent legal counsel and without management present to review the relevant materials and consider their responsibilities under applicable laws. In addition, senior management representatives of Federated Hermes also met with the Independent Trustees and their independent legal counsel to discuss the materials and presentations furnished to the Board at the May Meetings. The Board considered the approval of the Contract for the Fund as part of its consideration of agreements for funds across the family of Federated Hermes Funds, but its approvals were made on a fund-by-fund basis.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
The Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and the resources of Federated Hermes dedicated to the Fund. In this regard, the Board evaluated, among other things, the terms of the Contract and the full range of services provided to the Fund by Federated Hermes. The Board considered the Adviser’s personnel, investment philosophy and process, investment research capabilities and resources, trade operations capabilities, experience and performance track record. The Board reviewed the qualifications, backgrounds and responsibilities of the portfolio management team primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund and evaluated Federated Hermes’ ability and experience in attracting and retaining qualified personnel to service the Fund. The Board considered the trading operations by the Advisers, including the execution of portfolio transactions and the selection of brokers for those transactions. The Board also considered the Adviser’s ability to deliver competitive investment performance for the Fund when compared to the Fund’s Performance Peer Group (as defined below), which was deemed by the Board to be a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund’s investment program.
In addition, the Board considered the financial resources and overall reputation of Federated Hermes and its willingness to consider and make investments in personnel, infrastructure, technology, cybersecurity, business continuity planning and operational enhancements that are designed to benefit the Federated Hermes Funds. The Board noted the benefits of the previous significant acquisition of Hermes Fund Managers Limited by Federated Hermes, which has deepened Federated Hermes’ investment management expertise and capabilities and expanded its access to analytical resources related to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) factors and issuer engagement on ESG matters where appropriate. The Board considered Federated Hermes’ oversight of the securities lending program for the Federated Hermes Funds that engage in securities lending and noted the income earned by the Federated Hermes Funds that participate in such program. In addition, the Board considered the quality of Federated Hermes’ communications with the Board and responsiveness to Board inquiries and requests made from time to time with respect to the Federated Hermes Funds. The Board also considered that Federated Hermes is responsible for providing the Federated Hermes Funds’ officers.
The Board received and evaluated information regarding Federated Hermes’ regulatory and compliance environment. The Board considered Federated Hermes’ compliance program and compliance history and reports from the CCO about Federated Hermes’ compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including responses to regulatory developments and any compliance or other issues raised by regulatory agencies. The Board also noted Federated Hermes’ support of the Federated Hermes Funds’ compliance control structure and the compliance-related resources devoted by Federated Hermes in support of the Fund’s obligations pursuant to Rule 38a-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, including Federated Hermes’ commitment to respond to rulemaking and other regulatory initiatives of the SEC. The Board considered Federated Hermes’ approach to internal audits and risk management with respect to the Federated Hermes Funds and its day-to-day oversight of the Federated Hermes Funds’ compliance with their investment objectives and policies as well as with applicable laws and regulations, noting that regulatory and other developments had over time led, and continue to lead, to an increase in the scope of Federated Hermes’ oversight in this regard.
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
In addition, the Board noted Federated Hermes’ commitment to maintaining high quality systems and expending substantial resources to prepare for and respond to ongoing changes due to the market, regulatory and control environments in which the Fund and its service providers operate.
The Board considered Federated Hermes’ efforts to provide shareholders in the Federated Hermes Funds with a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies. The Board considered the expenses that Federated Hermes had incurred, as well as the entrepreneurial and other risks assumed by Federated Hermes, in sponsoring and providing on-going services to new funds to expand these opportunities for shareholders. The Board noted the benefits to shareholders of being part of the family of Federated Hermes Funds, which include the general right to exchange investments between the same class of shares without the incurrence of additional sales charges.
Based on these considerations, the Board concluded that it was satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser to the Fund.
Fund Investment Performance
The Board considered the investment performance of the Fund. In evaluating the Fund’s investment performance, the Board considered performance results in light of the Fund’s investment objective, strategies and risks. The Board considered detailed investment reports on, and the Adviser’s analysis of, the Fund’s performance over different time periods that were provided to the Board throughout the year and in connection with the May Meetings. These reports included, among other items, information on the Fund’s gross and net returns, the Fund’s investment performance compared to one or more relevant categories or groups of peer funds and the Fund’s benchmark index, performance attribution information and commentary on the effect of market conditions. The Board considered that, in its evaluation of investment performance at meetings throughout the year, it focused particular attention on information indicating less favorable performance of certain Federated Hermes Funds for specific time periods and discussed with Federated Hermes the reasons for such performance as well as any specific actions Federated Hermes had taken, or had agreed to take, to seek to enhance Fund investment performance and the results of those actions.
The Board also reviewed comparative information regarding the performance of other registered funds in the category of peer funds selected by Morningstar, Inc. (the “Morningstar”), an independent fund ranking organization (the “Performance Peer Group”). The Board noted the CCO’s view that comparisons to fund peer groups may be helpful, though not conclusive, in evaluating the performance of the Adviser in managing the Fund. The Board considered the CCO’s view that, in evaluating such comparisons, in some cases there may be differences in the funds’ objectives or investment management techniques, or the costs to implement the funds, even within the same Performance Peer Group.
The Board also considered comparative performance data from Lipper, Inc. that was included in reports provided to the Board throughout the year. The Board noted that differences may exist between the Performance Peer Group and Lipper peers and that the results of these performance comparisons may vary.
For the periods ended December 31, 2023, the Fund’s performance fell below the Performance Peer Group median for the three-year and five-year periods, and was above the Performance Peer Group median for the one-year period. The Board discussed the Fund’s performance with the Adviser and recognized the efforts being taken by the Adviser in the context of other factors considered relevant by the Board.
Based on these considerations, the Board concluded that it had continued confidence in the Adviser’s overall capabilities to manage the Fund.
The Board considered the advisory fee and overall expense structure of the Fund and the comparative fee and expense information that had been provided in connection with the May Meetings. In this regard, the Board was presented with, and considered, information regarding the contractual advisory fee rates, net advisory fee rates, total expense ratios and each element of the Fund’s total expense ratio (i.e., gross and net advisory fees, administrative fees, custody fees, portfolio accounting fees and transfer agency fees) relative to an appropriate group of peer funds compiled by Federated Hermes from the overall category of peer funds selected by Morningstar (the “Expense Peer Group”). The Board received a description of the methodology used to select the Expense Peer Group from the overall Morningstar category. The Board also reviewed comparative information regarding the fees and expenses of the broader group of funds in the overall Morningstar category.
While mindful that courts have cautioned against giving too much weight to comparative information concerning fees charged to funds by other advisers, the use of comparisons between the Fund and its Expense Peer Group assisted the Board in its evaluation of the Fund’s fees and expenses. The Board focused on comparisons with other registered funds more heavily than non-registered fund products or services because such comparisons are believed to be more relevant.
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
The Board considered that other registered funds are the products most like the Fund, in that they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle, in fact, chosen and maintained by the Fund’s shareholders. The Board noted that the range of such other registered funds’ fees and expenses, therefore, appears to be a relevant indicator of what investors have found to be reasonable in the marketplace in which the Fund competes.
The Board reviewed the contractual advisory fee rate, net advisory fee rate and other expenses of the Fund and noted the position of the Fund’s fee rates relative to its Expense Peer Group. In this regard, the Board noted that the contractual advisory fee rate was above the median of the Expense Peer Group, but the Board noted the applicable waivers and reimbursements, and that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive in the context of other factors considered by the Board. The Board considered the fact that the Adviser committed to permanently reduce fees of the Fund by 1 basis point, such reduction to be effective September 1, 2023.
The Board also received and considered information about the nature and extent of services offered and fees charged by Federated Hermes to other types of clients with investment strategies similar to those of the Federated Hermes Funds, including non-registered fund clients (such as institutional separate accounts) and third-party unaffiliated registered funds for which the Adviser or its affiliates serve as sub-adviser. The Board noted the CCO’s conclusion that non-registered fund clients are inherently different products due to the following differences, among others: (i) different types of targeted investors; (ii) different applicable laws and regulations; (iii) different legal structures; (iv) different average account sizes and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows and different associated costs; (v) the time spent by portfolio managers and their teams (among other personnel across various departments, including legal, compliance and risk management) in reviewing securities pricing; (vi) different SEC mandated risk management programs with respect to fund liquidity and use of derivatives; (vii) different administrative responsibilities; (viii) different degrees of risk associated with management; and (ix) a variety of different costs. The Board also considered information regarding the differences in the nature of the services required for Federated Hermes to manage its proprietary registered fund business versus managing a discrete pool of assets as a sub-adviser to another institution’s registered fund, noting the CCO’s view that Federated Hermes generally performs significant additional services and assumes substantially greater risks in managing the Fund and other Federated Hermes Funds than in its role as sub-adviser to an unaffiliated third-party registered fund. The Board noted that the CCO did not consider the fees for providing advisory services to other types of clients to be determinative in judging the appropriateness of the Federated Hermes Funds’ advisory fees.
In the case of the Fund, the Board noted that Federated Hermes does not manage any other types of clients that are comparable to the Fund.
Based on these considerations, the Board concluded that the fees and total operating expenses of the Fund, in conjunction with other matters considered, are reasonable in light of the services provided.
The Board received and considered profitability information furnished by Federated Hermes. Such profitability information included revenues reported on a fund-by-fund basis and estimates of the allocation of expenses made on a fund-by-fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the CCO and described to the Board. The Board considered the CCO’s view that, while these cost allocation reports apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs on a fund-by-fund basis continues to cause the CCO to question the precision of the process and to conclude that such reports may be unreliable because a single change in an allocation estimate may dramatically alter the resulting estimate of cost and/or profitability of a Federated Hermes Fund and may produce unintended consequences. In addition, the Board considered the CCO’s view that the allocation methodologies used by Federated Hermes in estimating profitability for purposes of reporting to the Board in connection with the continuation of the Contract are consistent with the methodologies previously reviewed by an independent consultant. The Board noted that the independent consultant had previously conducted a review of the allocation methodologies and reported to the Board that, although there is no single best method to allocate expenses, the methodologies used by Federated Hermes are reasonable. The Board considered the CCO’s view that the estimated profitability to the Adviser from its relationship with the Fund was not unreasonable in relation to the services provided.
The Board also reviewed information compiled by Federated Hermes comparing its profitability information to other publicly-held fund management companies, including information regarding profitability trends over time. The Board recognized that profitability comparisons among fund management companies are difficult because of the variation in the type of comparative information that is publicly available, and the profitability of any fund management company is affected by numerous factors. The Board considered the CCO’s conclusion that, based on such profitability information, Federated Hermes’ profit margins did not appear to be excessive. The Board also considered the CCO’s view that Federated Hermes appeared financially sound, with the resources necessary to fulfill its obligations under its contracts with the Federated Hermes Funds.
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Economies of Scale
The Board received and considered information about the notion of possible realization of “economies of scale” as a fund grows larger, the difficulties of isolating and quantifying economies of scale at an individual fund level, and the extent to which potential scale benefits are shared with shareholders. In this regard, the Board considered that Federated Hermes has made significant and long-term investments in areas that support all of the Federated Hermes Funds, such as: portfolio management, investment research and trading operations; shareholder services; compliance; business continuity, cybersecurity and information security programs; internal audit and risk management functions; and technology, systems capabilities and use of data. The Board noted that Federated Hermes’ investments in these areas are extensive and are designed to provide enhanced or expanded services to the Federated Hermes Funds and their shareholders. The Board considered that the benefits of these investments are likely to be shared with the family of Federated Hermes Funds as a whole. In addition, the Board considered that fee waivers and expense reimbursements are another means for potential economies of scale to be shared with shareholders and can provide protection from an increase in expenses if a Federated Hermes Fund’s assets decline. The Board considered that, in order for the Federated Hermes Funds to remain competitive in the marketplace, Federated Hermes has frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses for the Federated Hermes Funds and has disclosed to shareholders and/or reported to the Board its intention to do so (or continue to do so) in the future. The Board also considered that Federated Hermes has been active in managing expenses of the Federated Hermes Funds in recent years, which has resulted in benefits being realized by shareholders.
The Board also received and considered information on adviser-paid fees (commonly referred to as “revenue sharing” payments) that was provided to the Board throughout the year and in connection with the May Meetings. The Board considered that Federated Hermes and the CCO believe that this information is relevant to considering whether Federated Hermes had an incentive to either not apply breakpoints, or to apply breakpoints at higher levels, but should not be considered when evaluating the reasonableness of advisory fees. The Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on economies of scale, which is compounded by the lack of any uniform methodology or pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with breakpoints that serve to reduce the fees as a fund attains a certain size.
The Board considered information regarding the compensation and other ancillary (or “fall-out”) benefits that Federated Hermes derived from its relationships with the Federated Hermes Funds. The Board noted that, in addition to receiving advisory fees under the Federated Hermes Funds’ investment advisory contracts, Federated Hermes’ affiliates also receive fees for providing other services to the Federated Hermes Funds under separate service contracts including for serving as the Federated Hermes Funds’ administrator and distributor. In this regard, the Board considered that Federated Hermes’ affiliates provide distribution and shareholder services to the Federated Hermes Funds, for which they may be compensated through distribution and servicing fees paid pursuant to Rule 12b-1 plans or otherwise. The Board also received and considered information detailing the benefits, if any, that Federated Hermes may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute portfolio trades for the Federated Hermes Funds.
The Board considered: (i) the CCO’s conclusion that his observations and the information accompanying the CCO Fee Evaluation Report show that the management fee for the Fund is reasonable; and (ii) the CCO’s recommendation that the Board approve the management fee. The Board noted that, under these circumstances, no changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of, the Contract by the CCO. The CCO also recognized that the Board’s evaluation of the Federated Hermes Funds’ advisory and sub-advisory arrangements is a continuing and ongoing process that is informed by the information that the Board requests and receives from management throughout the course of the year and, in this regard, the CCO noted certain items, and management has committed to reviewing certain items, for future reporting to the Board as the Board continues its ongoing oversight of the Federated Hermes Funds.
On the basis of the information and factors summarized above, among other information and factors deemed relevant by the Board, and the evaluation thereof, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously voted to approve the continuation of the Contract. The Board based its determination to approve the Contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view of past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were necessarily deemed to be relevant to the Fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative.
Annual Financial Statements and Additional Information
Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.
This information is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund’s Prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses and other information.
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund
Federated Hermes Funds
4000 Ericsson Drive
Warrendale, PA 15086-7561
Contact us at FederatedHermes.com/us
or call 1-800-341-7400.
Federated Securities Corp., Distributor
CUSIP 313907305
CUSIP 313907107
CUSIP 313907206
© 2024 Federated Hermes, Inc.
| Item 8. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End Management Investment Companies |
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund: Not Applicable.
| Item 9. | Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies. |
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund: Not Applicable.
| Item 10. | Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of Open-End Management Investment Companies. |
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund: The Fund’s disclosure of remuneration items is included as part of the Financial Statements filed under Item 7 of this form.
| Item 11. | Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Advisory Contract. |
Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Municipal Fund: The Fund’s Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract summary by fund appear in the Financial Statements filed under Item 7 of this form.
| Item 12. | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies |
Not Applicable
| Item 13. | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not Applicable
| Item 14. | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers. |
Not Applicable
| Item 15. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
No Changes to Report
| Item 16. | Controls and Procedures. |
(a) The registrant’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Act) are effective in design and operation and are sufficient to form the basis of the certifications required by Rule 30a-(2) under the Act, based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR.
(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Item 17. | Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. |
Not Applicable
| Item 18. | Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation |
(a) Not Applicable
(b) Not Applicable
(a)(1) Not Applicable.
(a)(2) Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.
(a)(3) Not Applicable.
(a)(4) Not Applicable.
(b) Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant: Federated Hermes Short-Intermediate Duration Municipal Trust
By: /s/ Jeremy D. Boughton
Jeremy D. Boughton, Principal Financial Officer
Date: August 22, 2024
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ John B. Fisher
John B. Fisher, President - Principal Executive Officer
Date: August 22, 2024
By: /s/ Jeremy D. Boughton
Jeremy D. Boughton, Principal Financial Officer
Date: August 22, 2024
