The following table presents the consolidated net sales and results of operations of Omnicare for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands, except per share amounts).
(a) “EBITDA” represents earnings before interest (net of investment income), income taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Company believes that certain investors find EBITDA to be a useful tool for measuring a company’s ability to service its debt, which is also the primary purpose for which management uses this financial measure. However, EBITDA does not represent net cash flows from operating activities, as defined by United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”), and should not be considered as a substitute for operating cash flows as a measure of liquidity. The Company’s calculation of EBITDA may differ from the calculation of EBITDA by others.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 vs. 2004
Consolidated
Total net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2005 rose to $1,455.0 million from $1,053.9 million in the comparable prior year period. Diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2005 were $0.54 versus $0.52 in the same prior year period. Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2005 was $58.5 million versus $55.9 million earned in the comparable 2004 period. EBITDA totaled $162.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as compared with $120.5 million for the same period of 2004.
The three months ended September 30, 2005 included the following charges:
(i) Operating income included a restructuring charge of approximately $8.9 million pretax ($5.6 million aftertax, or $0.05 per diluted share) in connection with the Company’s previously disclosed consolidation efforts associated with the NeighborCare integration plan and other productivity initiatives. See further discussion of the restructuring charge at the “Restructuring Program” section of this MD&A.
(ii) Interest expense included a charge of approximately $7.5 million pretax ($4.7 million aftertax, or $0.04 per diluted share) in connection with the write-off of certain deferred financing fees related to the refinancing of the Company’s old term A loan and revolving credit facility, the expensing of certain debt issuance costs related to the new term A loan and revolving credit facility, and debt costs related to the 364-day credit facility entered into this quarter. See further discussion of the associated financing transactions at the “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this MD&A.
The three months ended September 30, 2004 included a charge totaling $5.2 million pretax ($3.2 million aftertax or $0.03 per diluted share) in connection with certain state Medicaid audits related to prior periods, lowering gross profit by approximately $2.7 million and increasing operating expenses by approximately $2.5 million.
Pharmacy Services Segment
Omnicare’s Pharmacy Services Segment recorded sales of $1,410.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, exceeding the 2004 amount of $1,021.0 million by $389.7 million, or 38.2%. At September 30, 2005, Omnicare served long-term care facilities and other chronic care settings comprising approximately 1,441,000 beds as compared with approximately 1,071,000 beds served at September 30, 2004. Contributing in large measure to the increase in sales and in beds served was the completion of several acquisitions, particularly, the acquisitions of NeighborCare, excelleRx and RxCrossroads as discussed below. Additionally, Pharmacy Services sales increased due to higher acuity in certain areas, and the continued implementation and expansion of the Company’s clinical and other service programs, drug price inflation and the further market penetration of newer branded drugs targeted at the diseases of the elderly, which often carry higher prices but are significantly more effective in reducing overall healthcare costs than those they replace. These factors were partially offset by the increased use of generic drugs and the continued impact of intensified competitive pricing pressures, Medicaid reimbursement reductions, including overall reimbursement formula changes in certain states, as well as drug-specific pricing reductions or limitations on certain generic drugs. While the Company is focused on reducing the impact of these factors, there can be no assurance that these or other
30
pricing and governmental reimbursement pressures will not continue to impact the Pharmacy Services Segment.
Operating income of the Pharmacy Services Segment was $153.8 million in the third quarter of 2005, a $38.9 million improvement as compared with the $114.9 million earned in the comparable period of 2004. The increased operating income was primarily the result of increased sales, particularly from the acquisitions of NeighborCare, excelleRx and RxCrossroads, and productivity enhancement initiatives, as well as the overall synergies from the integration of prior period acquisitions. In addition, the three months ended September 30, 2004 included the previously discussed charge of $5.2 million pretax in connection with certain state Medicaid audits related to prior periods. These positive factors were partially offset by the previously mentioned intensified competitive pricing and Medicaid reimbursement pressures, as well as, the previously mentioned restructuring charge of which approximately $4.4 million was included in the Pharmacy Services Segment. In addition, operating margins were unfavorably impacted by the addition of the large base of lower-margin NeighborCare business, which has not been fully integrated at this time. Although operating margins were initially unfavorably impacted by the addition of lower-margin institutional pharmacy acquisitions, the integration efforts have historically resulted in drug purchasing improvements, the consolidation of redundant pharmacy locations and other economies of scale, which served to leverage the Company’s operating cost structure and have historically resulted in improved operating margins in the long-term as cost synergies were realized.
On July 28, 2005, Omnicare closed its $34.75 per share cash tender offer (the “Offer”) for all of the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock (the “Shares”) of NeighborCare. Approximately 42,897,600 Shares were tendered in the Offer, representing approximately 97.2% of the then-outstanding Shares. On July 28, 2005, Omnicare accepted for payment all Shares validly tendered and not properly withdrawn. In the Offer, after giving effect to the settlement of Shares tendered that were subject to guaranteed delivery, the Company acquired the aggregate of 42,011,760 Shares, representing approximately 95.2% of the outstanding Shares. All Shares not tendered in the Offer were converted into the right to receive the same consideration per Share paid in the Offer.
The acquisition of NeighborCare was accounted for as a purchase business combination and included cash consideration and transaction costs of approximately $1.9 billion. The cash consideration included the payoff of certain NeighborCare debt totaling approximately $328 million, of which $78 million was retired by Omnicare immediately following the acquisition. In addition, on August 27, 2005 the Company closed its tender offer for cash to purchase all of the $250 million outstanding principal amount of NeighborCare’s 6.875% senior subordinated notes due 2013 (the “NeighborCare Notes”). All of the NeighborCare Notes were validly tendered in the offer. The total consideration, excluding accrued and unpaid interest, for each $1,000 principal amount of NeighborCare Notes validly tendered was $1,096.85.
At the time of the acquisition, NeighborCare was an institutional pharmacy provider serving long term care and skilled nursing facilities, specialty hospitals and assisted and independent living communities comprising approximately 295,000 beds in 34 states and the District of Columbia. NeighborCare also provided infusion therapy services, home medical equipment, respiratory therapy services, community-based retail pharmacies and group purchasing.
31
On August 12, 2005, Omnicare completed the acquisition of excelleRx. The acquisition included cash consideration at closing of approximately $269 million. At the time of the acquisition, excelleRx provided pharmaceutical products and care services to approximately 400 hospice programs with approximately 48,000 patients in 46 states.
On August 15, 2005, Omnicare completed the acquisition of RxCrossroads. The acquisition included cash consideration at closing of approximately $235 million. At the time of the acquisition, RxCrossroads provided specialty distribution, product support and mail order pharmacy services for pharmaceutical manufacturers and biotechnology companies, generally for high-cost drugs used in the treatment of chronic disease states.
The Company financed the acquisitions of NeighborCare, excelleRx and RxCrossroads with proceeds from a new $3.4 billion credit agreement as further discussed at the “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this MD&A. The Company has engaged an independent valuation firm to assist with the purchase price allocation for these acquisitions, including the identification of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets. Omnicare expects to achieve certain economies of scale and operational efficiencies from these acquisitions. The net assets and operating results of these acquisitions have been included from their respective dates of acquisition in the Company’s financial statements.
The Company derives approximately one-half of its revenues directly from government sources, principally state Medicaid and to a lesser extent federal Medicare programs, and one-half from the private sector, including individual residents, third-party insurers and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”).
As part of ongoing operations, the Company and its customers are subject to regulatory changes in the level of reimbursement received from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Since 1997, Congress has passed a number of federal laws that have effected major changes in the healthcare system.
The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (the “BBA”) sought to achieve a balanced federal budget by, among other things, changing the reimbursement policies applicable to various healthcare providers. In a significant change for the SNF industry, the BBA provided for the introduction in 1998 of the prospective payment system (“PPS”) for Medicare-eligible residents of SNFs. Prior to PPS, SNFs under Medicare received cost-based reimbursement. Under PPS, Medicare pays SNFs a fixed fee per patient per day based upon the acuity level of the resident, covering substantially all items and services furnished during a Medicare-covered stay, including pharmacy services. PPS resulted in a significant reduction of reimbursement to SNFs. Admissions of Medicare residents, particularly those requiring complex care, declined in many SNFs due to concerns relating to the adequacy of reimbursement under PPS. This caused a weakness in Medicare census leading to a significant reduction of overall occupancy in the SNFs the Company serves. This decline in occupancy and acuity levels adversely impacted Omnicare’s results beginning in 1999, as the Company experienced lower utilization of Omnicare services, coupled with PPS-related pricing pressure from Omnicare’s SNF customers. The BBA also imposed numerous other cost-saving measures affecting Medicare SNF services.
In 1999 and 2000, Congress sought to restore some of the reductions in reimbursement resulting from PPS. Omnicare believes this legislation improved the financial condition of SNFs
32
and provided incentives to increase occupancy and Medicare admissions, particularly among the more acutely ill. While certain of the payment increases mandated by these laws expired October 1, 2002, one provision gave SNFs a temporary rate increase for certain high-acuity patients, including medically-complex patients with generally higher pharmacy costs, beginning April 1, 2000 and ending when the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, (“CMS”) implements a refined resource utilization group (“RUG”) patient classification system that better accounts for medically-complex patients. For several years, CMS did not implement such refinements, thus continuing the additional rate increases for certain high-acuity patients through federal fiscal year 2005. On July 28, 2005, CMS issued, and on August 4, 2005 published in the Federal Register, its final SNF PPS rule for fiscal year 2006. Under the rule, CMS added nine patient classification categories to the PPS patient classification system, thus triggering the expiration of the high-acuity payment add-ons. However, CMS estimates that the rule will have no net financial impact on SNFs in fiscal year 2006 because the $1.02 billion reduction from the expiration of the add-on payments will be more than offset by a $510 million increase in the nursing case-mix weight for all of the RUG categories and a $530 million increase associated with various updates to the payment rates (including updates to the wage and market basket indexes), resulting in a $20 million overall increase in payments for fiscal year 2006. The new patient classification refinements will be effective on January 1, 2006, and the market basket increase became effective October 1, 2005. While the fiscal year 2006 SNF PPS rates will not decrease payments to skilled nursing facilities, the loss of revenues associated with future changes in skilled nursing facility payment rates could, in the future, have an adverse effect on the financial condition of Omnicare’s SNF clients which could, in turn, adversely affect the timing or level of their payments to Omnicare.
In December 2003, Congress enacted the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, (“MMA”), which includes a major expansion of the Medicare prescription drug benefit under a new Medicare Part D. Until the Part D benefit goes into effect on January 1, 2006, Medicare beneficiaries can receive assistance with their outpatient prescription drug costs through a new prescription drug discount card program, which began in September 2004, and which gives enrollees access to negotiated discounted prices for prescription drugs.
Under the new prescription drug benefit, Medicare beneficiaries may enroll in prescription drug plans offered by private entities (or in a “fallback” plan offered on behalf of the government through a contractor, to the extent private entities fail to offer a plan in a given area), which will provide coverage of outpatient prescription drugs (collectively, “Part D Plans”). Part D Plans will include both plans providing the drug benefit on a stand alone basis and Medicare Advantage plans providing drug coverage as a supplement to an existing medical benefit under that Medicare Advantage plan, most commonly a health maintenance organization plan. Medicare beneficiaries generally will have to pay a premium to enroll in a Part D Plan, with the premium amount varying from plan to plan, although CMS will provide various federal subsidies to Part D Plans to reduce the cost to beneficiaries. Medicare beneficiaries who are also entitled to benefits under a state Medicaid program (so-called “dual eligibles”) will have their prescription drug costs covered by the new Medicare drug benefit, including the nursing home residents the Company serves, whose drug costs are currently covered by state Medicaid programs.
33
CMS will provide premium and cost-sharing subsidies to Part D Plans with respect to dual eligible residents of nursing homes. Therefore, such dual eligibles will not be required to pay a premium for enrollment in a Part D Plan, so long as the premium for the Part D Plan in which they are enrolled is at or below the premium subsidy. Dual eligible residents of nursing homes will be entitled to have their entire prescription drug costs covered by a Part D Plan, provided that the prescription drugs which they are taking are either on the Part D Plan’s formulary, or an exception to the plan’s formulary is granted. CMS has reviewed the formularies of Part D Plans and has indicated that it will require their formularies to include the types of drugs most commonly needed by Medicare beneficiaries. CMS also will ensure that plans’ formulary exceptions criteria provide for coverage of drugs determined by the plan to be medically necessary for the enrollee.
Pursuant to the Part D final rule, Omnicare will obtain reimbursement for drugs the Company provides to enrollees of a given Part D Plan in accordance with the terms of agreements negotiated between Omnicare and that Part D Plan. Omnicare has negotiated such agreements with many Part D Plan sponsors, including national, regional and local plans, under which the Company will provide drugs and associated services to their enrollees. Omnicare continues to negotiate agreements with other Part D plans. Until all such agreements are finalized and Medicare beneficiaries enroll in the plans, Omnicare will not be able to determine the impact of the new Part D drug benefit on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition. The MMA will not change the manner in which Medicare pays for drugs for Medicare beneficiaries covered in a Part A stay. Omnicare will continue to receive reimbursement for drugs provided to such residents from the SNFs, in accordance with the terms of the agreements the Company has negotiated with each SNF.
CMS has issued subregulatory guidance on many aspects of the final Part D rule, including the provision of pharmaceutical services to long-term care residents, and the agency will continue to issue guidance as the new program is implemented. Omnicare is continuing to monitor implementation of the new Part D benefit, and cannot predict the ultimate effect of the final rule or the outcome of other potential developments relating to its implementation on our business or results of operations.
The MMA also reforms the Medicare Part B prescription drug payment methodology. With certain exceptions, in 2004 most Part B drugs were reimbursed at 85 percent of the April 1, 2003 average wholesale price. In 2005, Medicare Part B payment generally equals 106 percent of the lesser of (i) the wholesale acquisition cost of the product, or (ii) the average sales price, or ASP, of the product, with certain exceptions and adjustments. More significant reforms are planned for 2006, when most drugs will be reimbursed under either an ASP methodology or under a “competitive acquisition program.” The Company’s revenues for drugs dispensed under Medicare Part B are not significant in comparison to total revenues. The MMA also includes provisions that will institute administrative reforms designed to improve Medicare program operations. The impact that the MMA’s legislative reforms or future Medicare reform legislation ultimately will have on Omnicare is uncertain at this time.
Discounted average wholesale price, (“AWP”), plus a dispensing fee is the basis for many state Medicaid programs’ reimbursement of drugs to pharmacy providers for Medicaid beneficiaries generally as well as under certain private reimbursement programs. If government or private health insurance programs discontinue or modify the use of AWP or otherwise
34
implement payment methods that reduce the reimbursement for drugs and biologicals, it could adversely affect the Company’s level of reimbursement.
With respect to Medicaid, the BBA repealed the “Boren Amendment” federal payment standard for Medicaid payments to Medicaid nursing facilities, effective October 1, 1997, giving states greater latitude in setting payment rates for such facilities. The law also granted states greater flexibility to establish Medicaid managed care programs without the need to obtain a federal waiver. Although these waiver programs generally exempt institutional care, including nursing facilities and institutional pharmacy services, some states do use managed care principles in their long-term care programs. Moreover, no assurances can be given that additional Medicaid programs ultimately will not change the reimbursement system for long-term care, including pharmacy services, from fee-for-service to managed care negotiated or capitated rates. Omnicare’s operations have not been adversely affected in states with managed care programs in effect.
In addition, some states continue to face budget shortfalls, and most states are taking steps to implement cost controls within their Medicaid programs. Likewise, the federal government may consider changes to Medicaid designed to rein in program spending. A Medicaid Commission has been established to advise the Secretary of HHS on, among other things, ways to achieve $10 billion in Medicaid savings over five years. In addition, Congress is considering various proposals to reduce Medicaid spending. There can be no assurance that future changes in Medicaid payments to pharmacies, nursing facilities or managed care systems will not have an adverse impact on the Company’s business. While Omnicare has endeavored to adjust to these pricing pressures to date, these pressures are likely to continue or escalate, particularly if economic recovery does not emerge, and there can be no assurance that such occurrence will not have an adverse impact on the Company’s business.
Further, in order to rein in healthcare costs, Omnicare anticipates that federal and state governments will continue to review and assess alternate healthcare delivery systems, payment methodologies and operational requirements for healthcare providers, including long-term care facilities and pharmacies. Given the continuous debate regarding the cost of healthcare, managed care and other healthcare issues, Omnicare cannot predict with any degree of certainty what additional healthcare initiatives, if any, will be implemented or the effect any future legislation or regulation will have on the Company. Longer term, funding for federal and state healthcare programs must consider the aging of the population and the growth in enrollees as eligibility is expanded; the escalation in drug costs owing to higher drug utilization among seniors and the introduction of new, more efficacious but also more expensive medications; the implementation of the Medicare drug benefit for seniors; and the long-term financing of the entire Medicare program. Given competing national priorities, it remains difficult to predict the outcome and impact on Omnicare of any changes in healthcare policy relating to the future funding of the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Further, Medicaid and/or Medicare payment rates for pharmaceutical supplies and services may not continue to be based on current methodologies or remain comparable to present levels. Any future healthcare legislation or regulation may adversely affect the Company.
CRO Services Segment
Omnicare’s CRO Services Segment recorded revenues of $44.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, which were $11.3 million, or 34.2%, higher than the $33.0
35
million recorded in the same prior year period. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 01-14, “Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for ‘Out-of-Pocket’ Expenses Incurred” (“EITF No. 01-14”), the Company included $6.5 million and $4.5 million of reimbursable out-of-pockets in its CRO Services Segment reported revenue and direct cost amounts for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2005 were higher than in the same prior year period due primarily to the impact of the December 2004 Clinimetrics acquisition and the aforementioned increase in reimbursable out-of-pockets of $2.0 million under EITF No. 01-14.
Operating income in the CRO Services Segment was $0.03 million in the third quarter of 2005 compared with $3.2 million in the same 2004 period. The decrease is attributable to the previously mentioned restructuring charge, of which approximately $3.7 million was included in the CRO Services Segment. Backlog at September 30, 2005 was $258.3 million, representing an increase of $76.1 million from the September 30, 2004 backlog of $182.2 million largely due to the Clinimetrics acquisition, and an $18.6 million decline from the December 31, 2004 backlog of $276.9 million.
Consolidated
The Company’s consolidated gross profit of $361.1 million increased $102.5 million during the third quarter of 2005 from the same prior-year period amount of $258.6 million. Gross profit as a percentage of total net sales of 24.8% in the three months ended September 30, 2005, was higher than the 24.5% experienced during the same period of 2004. Positively impacting overall gross profit margin were the Company’s purchasing leverage associated with the procurement of pharmaceuticals and benefits realized from the Company’s formulary compliance program, the increased use of generic drugs, the impact of productivity enhancements, and the addition of the higher-margin RxCrossroads and excelleRx businesses. In addition, the three months ended September 30, 2004 included the previously discussed charge in connection with certain state Medicaid audits related to prior periods, which lowered gross profit by approximately $2.7 million. These favorable year-over-year factors were partially offset by the addition of the large base of lower-margin NeighborCare business, the previously mentioned intensified competitive pricing and reimbursement pressures, as well as further market penetration of newer branded drugs targeted at the diseases of the elderly, which typically produce higher gross profit but lower gross profit margins.
Omnicare’s selling, general and administrative (“operating”) expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of $213.0 million were higher than the comparable year amount of $152.2 million by $60.8 million, due primarily to the completion of several acquisitions, including NeighborCare, excelleRx and RxCrossroads. Operating expenses as a percentage of total net sales amounted to 14.6% in the third quarter of 2005, representing an increase from the 14.4% experienced in the comparable prior-year period. This increase as a percentage of total net sales is due primarily to a $4.3 million increase in amortization expense and the impact of the 2005 acquisitions, including the addition of the NeighborCare business, which had a higher operating cost structure at the time of the acquisition and has not been fully integrated at this time. As the NeighborCare integration plan is completed and expected cost synergies are realized, operating expenses as a percentage of net sales should be reduced. Partially offsetting the increased operating expenses were the favorable impact of leveraging of fixed and variable overhead costs over a larger sales base in 2005 than that which existed in 2004 and the
36
Company’s continued productivity enhancements. In addition, the third quarter of 2004 included the previously discussed charge in connection with certain state Medicaid audits related to prior periods, which increased operating expenses by approximately $2.5 million.
Investment income for the three months ended September 30, 2005 of $1.2 million was higher than the $0.7 million earned in the comparable prior year quarter, largely attributable to higher interest rates and average invested plan asset balances versus the prior year.
Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2005 of $46.9 million was higher than the $17.6 million in the comparable prior-year period due to increased borrowings under the new Credit Agreement and increased interest rates for variable rate loans. In addition, interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2005 included a charge of approximately $7.5 million pretax related to the debt extinguishment and new debt issuance costs in connection with the new Credit Agreement.
The effective income tax rate was 37.4% in the third quarter of 2005, marginally lower than the comparable prior year period rate of 37.5%. The effective tax rates in 2005 and 2004 are higher than the federal statutory rate largely as a result of the combined impact of state and local income taxes and various nondeductible expenses.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 vs. 2004
Consolidated
Total net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 rose to $3,674.5 million from $3,046.8 million in the comparable prior year period. Diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were $1.67 versus $1.65 in the same prior year period. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was $178.2 million versus $179.8 million earned in the comparable 2004 period. EBITDA totaled $420.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared with $376.4 million for the same period of 2004.
The nine months ended September 30, 2005 included the following charges:
(i) Operating income included a restructuring charge of approximately $8.9 million pretax ($5.6 million aftertax, or $0.05 per diluted share) in connection with the Company’s previously disclosed consolidation efforts associated with the NeighborCare integration plan and other productivity initiatives. See further discussion of the restructuring charge at the “Restructuring Program” section of this MD&A.
(ii) Interest expense included a charge of approximately $7.5 million pretax ($4.7 million aftertax, or $0.04 per diluted share) in connection with the write-off of certain deferred financing fees related to the refinancing of the Company’s old term A loan and revolving credit facility, the expensing of certain debt issuance costs related to the new term A loan and revolving credit facility, and debt costs related to the 364-day credit facility entered into this quarter. See further discussion of the associated financing transactions at the “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this MD&A.
(iii) Operating expenses included a charge of $1.2 million pretax in connection with the issuance of the Series B 4.00% Trust Preferred Income Equity Redeemable Securities (the “New Trust PIERS”) of Omnicare Capital Trust II (the “New Trust”). See further discussion of
37
this transaction, as well as the impact of EITF No. 04-8, “The Effect of Contingently Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings per Share” (“EITF No. 04-8”) on Omnicare’s first nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 earnings, at the “Disclosures About Aggregate Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” and “Diluted Earnings Per Share” sections, respectively, of this MD&A.
(iv) Operating expenses included a charge of $1.1 million pretax for acquisition-related expenses pertaining to a proposed transaction that was not consummated.
The nine months ended September 30, 2004 included a charge totaling $5.2 million pretax ($3.2 million aftertax or $0.03 per diluted share) in connection with certain state Medicaid audits related to prior periods, lowering gross profit by approximately $2.7 million and increasing operating expenses by approximately $2.5 million.
Pharmacy Services Segment
Omnicare’s Pharmacy Services Segment recorded sales of $3,534.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, exceeding the 2004 amount of $2,946.3 million by $587.7 million, or 19.9%. At September 30, 2005, Omnicare served long-term care facilities and other chronic care settings comprising approximately 1,441,000 beds as compared with approximately 1,071,000 beds served at September 30, 2004. Contributing in large measure to the increase in sales and in beds served was the completion of several acquisitions, particularly the acquisitions of NeighborCare, excelleRx and RxCrossroads as previously discussed. Additionally, Pharmacy Services sales increased due to improved year-over-year occupancy and acuity in certain areas, and the continued implementation and expansion of the Company’s clinical and other service programs, drug price inflation and the further market penetration of newer branded drugs targeted at the diseases of the elderly, which often carry higher prices but are significantly more effective in reducing overall healthcare costs than those they replace. These factors were partially offset by the increased use of generic drugs and the continued impact of intensified competitive pricing pressures, Medicaid reimbursement reductions, including overall reimbursement formula changes in certain states, as well as drug-specific pricing reductions or limitations on certain generic drugs. While the Company is focused on reducing the impact of these factors, there can be no assurance that these or other pricing and governmental reimbursement pressures will not continue to impact the Pharmacy Services Segment.
Operating income of the Pharmacy Services Segment was $405.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a $46.5 million improvement as compared with the $358.9 million earned in the same period of 2004. The increased operating income was primarily the result of increased sales and productivity enhancement initiatives, as well as the overall synergies from the integration of prior period acquisitions. In addition, the nine months ended September 30, 2004 included the previously discussed charge of $5.2 million pretax in connection with certain state Medicaid audits related to prior periods. These positive factors were partially offset by the previously mentioned intensified competitive pricing and Medicaid reimbursement pressures, as well as, the previously mentioned restructuring charge of which approximately $4.4 million was included in the Pharmacy Services Segment. In addition, operating margins were unfavorably impacted by the addition of the large base of lower-margin NeighborCare business, which has not been fully integrated at this time. Although operating margins were initially unfavorably impacted by the addition of lower-margin institutional pharmacy acquisitions, the
38
integration efforts have historically resulted in drug purchasing improvements, the consolidation of redundant pharmacy locations and other economies of scale, which served to leverage the Company’s operating cost structure and have historically resulted in improved operating margins in the long-term as cost synergies were realized.
CRO Services Segment
Omnicare’s CRO Services Segment recorded revenues of $140.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, which were $40.0 million, or 39.8%, higher than the $100.6 million recorded in the same prior year period. In accordance with EITF No. 01-14, the Company included $22.3 million and $13.6 million of reimbursable out-of-pockets in its CRO Services Segment reported revenue and direct cost amounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were higher than in the same prior year period due primarily to the impact of the December 2004 Clinimetrics acquisition and the aforementioned increase in reimbursable out-of-pockets of $8.7 million under EITF No. 01-14.
Operating income in the CRO Services Segment was $6.3 million in the first nine months of 2005 compared with $9.6 million in the same 2004 period. Operating income in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was impacted by the previously mentioned restructuring charge of which approximately $3.7 million was included in the CRO Services Segment. Operating income versus the comparable prior-year period was also unfavorably affected, especially in the first three months of the year, by the impact of the Clinimetrics acquisition, largely as a result of the early completion of a large data management project, the results of which were accepted by the Food and Drug Administration more rapidly than anticipated. This resulted in lower revenues to coincide with the existent operating cost structure, which has since been modified.
Consolidated
The Company’s consolidated gross profit of $905.2 million increased $136.3 million during the first nine months of 2005 from the same prior-year period amount of $768.9 million. Gross profit as a percentage of total net sales of 24.6% in the nine months ended September 30, 2005, was lower than the 25.2% experienced during the same period of 2004. Positively impacting overall gross profit margin were the Company’s purchasing leverage associated with the procurement of pharmaceuticals and benefits realized from the Company’s formulary compliance program, the increased use of generic drugs and the impact of productivity enhancements, and the addition of the higher-margin RxCrossroads and excelleRx businesses. In addition, the nine months ended September 30, 2004 included the previously discussed charge in connection with certain state Medicaid audits related to prior periods, which lowered gross profit by approximately $2.7 million. These favorable year-over-year factors were more than offset by the addition of the large base of lower-margin NeighborCare business, the previously mentioned intensified competitive pricing and reimbursement pressures, as well as the further market penetration of newer branded drugs targeted at the diseases of the elderly, which typically produce higher gross profit but lower gross profit margins.
Omnicare’s operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 of $527.7 million were higher than the comparable year amount of $434.2 million by $93.5 million, due
39
primarily to the completion of several acquisitions, including NeighborCare, excelleRx and RxCrossroads. Operating expenses as a percentage of total net sales amounted to 14.4% for the first nine months of 2005, slightly higher than the comparable prior-year period of 14.3%. Operating expenses in the first nine months of 2005 were unfavorably impacted by a $7.5 million increase in amortization expense, the 2005 acquisitions, the aforementioned $1.2 million special charge for professional fees and expenses related to the first quarter 2005 trust PIERS exchange offering, the aforementioned $1.1 million special charge for acquisition-related expenses, and the addition of the NeighborCare business, which had a higher operating cost structure at the time of the acquisition and has not been fully integrated at this time. As the NeighborCare integration plan is completed and expected cost synergies are realized, operating expenses as a percentage of net sales should be reduced. Partially offsetting these factors were the favorable impact of the leveraging of fixed and variable overhead costs over a larger sales base in 2005 than that which existed in 2004 and the Company’s continued productivity enhancements. In addition, the nine months ended September 30, 2004 included the previously discussed charge in connection with certain state Medicaid audits related to prior periods, which increased operating expenses by approximately $2.5 million.
Investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 of $3.5 million was higher than the $2.2 million earned in the comparable prior year period, largely attributable to higher interest rates and average invested plan asset balances versus the prior year.
Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 of $87.2 million was higher than the $51.5 million in the comparable prior-year period due to increased borrowings under the new Credit Agreement and increased interest rates for variable rate loans. In addition, interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 included a charge of approximately $7.5 million pretax related to the debt extinguishment and new debt issuance costs in connection with the new Credit Agreement.
The effective income tax rate was 37.4% in the year-to-date 2005 period, marginally higher than the comparable prior year period rate of 37.0%. The effective tax rates in 2005 and 2004 are higher than the federal statutory rate largely as a result of the combined impact of state and local income taxes and various nondeductible expenses.
Restructuring Program
In connection with the previously disclosed second phase of its productivity and consolidation initiative (the “Phase II Program”), the Company had liabilities of $3.3 million at December 31, 2004, of which $2.9 million was utilized in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The remaining liabilities of $0.4 million at September 30, 2005 represent amounts not yet paid relating to actions taken and will be adjusted as these matters are settled.
In the third quarter of 2005, the Company announced the implementation of certain consolidation plans and other productivity initiatives to streamline operations, maximize workforce and operating asset utilization, and produce a more cost-efficient, operating infrastructure. These consolidation and productivity initiatives are primarily related to the integration of NeighborCare. Given the geographic overlap of the NeighborCare and Omnicare pharmacies, substantial opportunities for consolidation exist. While the majority of
40
consolidations will result in NeighborCare pharmacies being consolidated into Omnicare pharmacies, depending on location, capacity and operating performance, certain Omnicare pharmacies have also been identified for consolidation into NeighborCare locations. Additionally, as part of the evaluation process on how best to integrate the two organizations, the Company also focused broadly on ways to lower operating infrastructure costs to maximize efficiencies and asset utilization and identified opportunities to right-size the business, streamline operations and eliminate redundant assets. This portion of the consolidation activity and other productivity initiatives are expected to result in the closure of 17 facilities, of which 15 are pharmacy operations. It will also lead to a net reduction in force of approximately 730 positions. Of this reduction in force, approximately 93% are in pharmacy operations and the remaining reductions are at the corporate headquarters or the Company’s contract research operations.
In connection with this program, these particular consolidation and productivity initiatives are expected to be completed within 12 months, and are expected to generate approximately $40 million in pretax savings. Given the timing of the initiatives, the Company expects the bulk of these savings to occur beginning in 2006. These initiatives are currently estimated to require a total restructuring charge of approximately $20 million before taxes, which relates solely to the costs associated with the consolidation of Omnicare pharmacies into NeighborCare pharmacies and the other productivity initiatives described above. Approximately $18 million of this pretax restructuring charge will occur in the quarters ending September 30, 2005 (approximately $8.9 million pretax) and December 31, 2005 (approximately $9 million pretax). The remaining charges of approximately $2 million are expected to occur in the first and second quarters of 2006.
In connection with this program, the Company expensed approximately $8.9 million ($5.6 million aftertax, or $0.05 per diluted share) for restructuring charges, during the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The restructuring charges primarily include severance pay, the buy-out of employment agreements, and lease terminations. Details of the pretax restructuring charges and associated utilization relating to this productivity and consolidation program follow (in thousands):
| | 2005 Provision | | Utilized during 2005 | | Balance at September 30, 2005 | |
Restructuring charges: | | | | | | | | | | |
Employee severance | | $ | 5,426 | | $ | (554) | | $ | 4,872 | |
Employment agreement buy-outs | | | 493 | | | (44) | | | 449 | |
Lease terminations | | | 3,031 | | | (249) | | | 2,782 | |
Total restructuring charges | | $ | 8,950 | | $ | (847) | | $ | 8,103 | |
As of September 30, 2005, the Company had incurred approximately $0.6 million of severance and other employee-related costs relating to the reduction of approximately 210 employees. The remaining liabilities at September 30, 2005 represent amounts not yet paid relating to actions taken in connection with the program (primarily severance payments and lease payments), and will be adjusted as these matters are settled.
41
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2005 were $211.1 million compared with $84.4 million at December 31, 2004 (including restricted cash amounts of $7.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively).
The Company generated positive net cash flows from operating activities of $175.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2005, compared with net cash flows from operating activities of $133.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Largely contributing to net cash flows from operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was operating results during the period. Year-over-year cash flow was unfavorably impacted by $39.7 million owing to the continuation of the broad-based delay in receipts from the Illinois Department of Public Aid. Net cash flow from operating activities included a year-over-year favorable impact of a one-time deposit of $44.0 million made during the first quarter of 2004, due to a change in payment terms under the Company’s new contract with its drug wholesaler. In addition, the 2004 period was unfavorably impacted by a statewide administrative backup in the transfer of Medi-Cal provider numbers affecting California-based pharmacies acquired in certain acquisitions that created a temporary delay in cash receipts of approximately $37 million through September 30, 2004. Operating cash flows, as well as borrowings under the new Credit Agreement, were used primarily for acquisition-related payments, debt repayment, capital expenditures and dividends.
Net cash used in investing activities was $2,586.9 million and $258.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Acquisitions of businesses required cash payments of $2,566.3 million (including amounts payable pursuant to acquisition agreements relating to pre-2005 acquisitions) in 2005, which were largely funded by borrowings under the new Credit Agreement, as discussed below. Acquisitions of businesses during the first nine months of 2004 required $239.9 million of cash payments (including amounts payable pursuant to acquisition agreements relating to pre-2004 acquisitions) which were primarily funded by borrowings under the Company’s old credit facility, existing cash balances and operating cash flows. Omnicare’s capital requirements are primarily comprised of its acquisition program, and capital expenditures, largely relating to investments in the Company’s information technology systems.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $2,532.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to $43.1 million for the comparable prior year period. Borrowings during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were primarily related to the Company entering into the new $3.4 billion Credit Agreement as further discussed below. Proceeds from the new Credit Agreement were primarily used for the acquisitions of NeighborCare, excelleRx and RxCrossroads and the refinancing of the old term A loan and revolving credit facility. Additional borrowings of long-term debt totaled approximately $42 million during the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 and were largely used for payments relating to the acquisition of businesses.
On August 4, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of 2.25 cents per common share for an indicated annual rate of 9 cents per common share for
42
2005. Aggregate dividends of $7.1 million and $7.0 million were paid during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The Company entered into a new $3.4 billion Credit Agreement during the quarter consisting of a $1.9 billion 364-day loan facility, maturing between July 27, 2006 and August 17, 2006 (the “364-Day Loans”), an $800 million revolving credit facility, maturing on July 28, 2010 (the “Revolving Loans”) and a $700 million senior term A loan facility, maturing on July 28, 2010 (the “Term Loans”). Interest on the outstanding balances of the 364-Day Loans is payable, at the Company’s option, (i) at a Eurodollar Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus a margin of 0.75% or (ii) at an Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement). The 364-Day Loans were drawn at various intervals during the third quarter of 2005, with each separate borrowing having a slightly different interest rate based on the timing of the borrowing. As a result, the weighted average interest rate on the 364-Day Loans was 4.55% at September 30, 2005. Interest on the outstanding balances of the Revolving Loans and the Term Loans is payable, at the Company’s option, (i) at a Eurodollar Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus a margin based on the Company’s senior unsecured long-term debt securities rating and the Company’s capitalization ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement), that can range from 0.50% to 1.75% or (ii) at an Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement). The interest rate on the Revolving Loans and Term Loans was 4.49% at September 30, 2005. The Credit Agreement requires the Company to meet certain financial covenants, including a minimum consolidated net worth and a minimum fixed charges coverage ratio, and customary affirmative and negative covenants.
The Company primarily used the net proceeds from the Credit Agreement to repay amounts outstanding under the Company’s old term A loan of $123.1 million and old revolving credit facility of $181 million, and for the acquisitions of NeighborCare, excelleRx and RxCrossroads. At September 30, 2005, there was $1.9 billion outstanding under the 364-Day Loans, $180 million outstanding under the Revolving Loans and $700 million outstanding under the Term Loan.
In connection with the completion of the new Credit Agreement, the Company has deferred debt issuance costs of $11.7 million, which consisted of $2.7 million deferred from the old term A loan and the old revolving credit facility and $9.0 million of new debt issuance costs. Interest expense included a charge of approximately $7.5 million pretax in connection with the write-off of certain deferred financing fees related to the refinancing of the Company’s old term A loan and revolving credit facility, the expensing of certain debt issuance costs related to the new term A loan and revolving credit facility, and debt costs related to the new 364-day loan facility. The Company amortized approximately $0.4 million of the $11.7 million in deferred debt issuance costs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005.
The Company believes that net cash flows from operating activities, the new Credit Agreement and any other short- and long-term debt financings will be sufficient to satisfy its future working capital needs, acquisition contingency commitments, debt servicing, capital expenditures and other financing requirements for the foreseeable future. Omnicare is currently evaluating its capital requirements and is considering longer-term financing alternatives. The Company may, in the future, refinance its indebtedness, issue additional indebtedness, and/or issue additional equity as considered appropriate. The Company believes that, if needed, these additional sources of financing are readily available.
43
Disclosures About Aggregate Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Aggregate Contractual Obligations:
The following summarizes the Company’s aggregate contractual obligations at September 30, 2005, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on the Company’s liquidity and cash flows in future periods (in thousands):
| | Total | | Less Than 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | 4-5 Years | | After 5 Years | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt obligations(a) | | $ | 3,798,256 | | $ | 1,901,264 | | $ | 3,915 | | $ | 923,077 | | $ | 970,000 | |
Capital lease obligations | | | 16,652 | | | 4,125 | | | 11,829 | | | 698 | | | – | |
Operating lease obligations | | | 168,378 | | | 37,991 | | | 57,001 | | | 36,011 | | | 37,375 | |
Purchase obligations(b) | | | 61,731 | | | 53,731 | | | 8,000 | | | – | | | – | |
Other current obligations(c) | | | 407,489 | | | 407,489 | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
Other long-term obligations(d) | | | 172,602 | | | – | | | 71,444 | | | 1,656 | | | 99,502 | |
Total contractual cash obligations | | $ | 4,625,108 | | $ | 2,404,600 | | $ | 152,189 | | $ | 961,442 | | $ | 1,106,877 | |
(a) | The above debt obligation amounts represent the principal portion of the associated debt obligations. |
(b) | Purchase obligations primarily consist of open inventory purchase orders, as well as obligations for other goods and services, at period end. |
(c) | Other current obligations primarily consist of accounts payable at period end. |
(d) | Other long-term obligations is largely comprised of pension and excess benefit plan obligations, acquisition-related liabilities and the obligation associated with the interest rate swap agreement. |
During the first quarter of 2005, Omnicare completed its offer to exchange up to $345 million aggregate liquidation amount of 4.00% Trust Preferred Income Equity Redeemable Securities (the “Old Trust PIERS”) of the Omnicare Capital Trust I (the “Old Trust”), for an equal amount of the New Trust PIERS of the New Trust. The New Trust PIERS have substantially similar terms to the Old Trust PIERS, except that the New Trust PIERS have a net share settlement feature. Additional information regarding the 4.00% junior subordinated convertible debentures underlying the Old Trust PIERS and the New Trust PIERS is summarized below.
4.00% Junior Subordinated Convertible Debentures
During the first quarter of 2005, the composition of the Company’s 4.00% junior subordinated convertible debentures underlying the trust PIERS was impacted by the completion of the aforementioned exchange offering, and explained in further detail throughout the remainder of this section of MD&A.
44
Original 4.00% Junior Subordinated Convertible Debentures
In connection with the offering of the Old Trust PIERS in the second quarter of 2003, the Company issued a corresponding amount of original 4.00% junior subordinated convertible debentures (“Old 4.00% Debentures”) due 2033 to the Old Trust. The Old Trust is a 100%-owned finance subsidiary of the Company. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the securities of the Old Trust. The Old Trust PIERS offer fixed cash distributions at a rate of 4.00% per annum payable quarterly, and a fixed conversion price of $40.82 under a contingent conversion feature whereby the holders may convert their Old Trust PIERS if the closing sales price of Omnicare common stock for a predetermined period, beginning with the quarter ending September 30, 2003, is more than 130% of the then-applicable conversion price or, during a predetermined period, if the daily average of the trading prices for the Old Trust PIERS is less than 105% of the average of the conversion values for the Old Trust PIERS through 2028 (98% for any period thereafter through maturity). The Old Trust PIERS also will pay contingent distributions, commencing with the quarterly distribution period beginning June 15, 2009, if the average trading prices of the Old Trust PIERS for a predetermined period equals 115% or more of the stated liquidation amount of the Old Trust PIERS. Embedded in the Old Trust PIERS are two derivative instruments, specifically, a contingent interest provision and a contingent conversion parity provision. The embedded derivatives are periodically valued by a third-party advisor, and at September 30, 2005, the values of both derivatives embedded in the Old Trust PIERS were not material. However, the values are subject to change, based on market conditions, which could affect the Company’s future financial position, cash flows and results of operations. Omnicare irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees, on a subordinated basis, certain payments to be made by the Old Trust in connection with the Old Trust PIERS. Subsequent to the first quarter 2005 exchange offer discussed in further detail at the Series B 4.00% Junior Subordinated Convertible Debentures caption below, the Company has $11,233,050 aggregate liquidation amount of the Old Trust PIERS and underlying Old 4.00% Debentures remaining outstanding at September 30, 2005.
Series B 4.00% Junior Subordinated Convertible Debentures
On March 8, 2005, the Company completed the exchange of $333,766,950 aggregate liquidation amount of the Old Trust PIERS (representing approximately 96.7% of the total liquidation amount of the Old Trust PIERS outstanding) for an equal amount of newly issued New Trust PIERS of the New Trust, plus an exchange fee of $0.125 per $50 stated liquidation amount of the Old Trust PIERS. Each New Trust PIERS represents an undivided beneficial interest in the assets of the New Trust, which assets consist solely of a corresponding amount of Series B 4.00% junior subordinated convertible debentures (“New 4.00% Debentures”) issued by Omnicare, Inc. with a stated maturity of June 15, 2033. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the securities of the New Trust. Subsequent to the completion of the exchange offering and at September 30, 2005, the Company has $333,766,950 of New 4.00% Debentures outstanding.
The terms of the New Trust PIERS are substantially identical to the terms of the Old Trust PIERS, except that the New Trust PIERS are convertible into cash and, if applicable, shares of Omnicare common stock, whereas the outstanding Old Trust PIERS are convertible only into Omnicare common stock (except for cash in lieu of fractional shares).
The purpose of the exchange offer was to change the conversion settlement provisions of the Old Trust PIERS. The Company made this change in response to the ratification by the
45
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) of EITF No. 04-8, which, effective December 15, 2004, changed the accounting rules applicable to the Old Trust PIERS and requires Omnicare to include the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Old Trust PIERS in Omnicare’s diluted shares outstanding, regardless of whether the market trigger has been met (see further discussion of EITF No. 04-8 at the “Diluted Earnings Per Share” caption below). By committing to pay up to the stated liquidation amount of the New Trust PIERS to be converted in cash upon conversion, Omnicare is able to account for the New Trust PIERS under the treasury stock method, which is expected to be less dilutive to earnings per share than the “if converted” method required by EITF No. 04-8.
In connection with the issuance of the Old 4.00% Debentures and the New 4.00% Debentures, the Company has deferred $11.8 million in debt issuance costs, of which approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million was amortized in each of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As previously disclosed, the nine months ended September 30, 2005 included a special charge to operating expenses totaling $1.2 million pretax in connection with the issuance of the New Trust PIERS.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements:
At September 30, 2005, the Company had two unconsolidated entities, the Old Trust and the New Trust, which were established for the purpose of facilitating the offerings of the Old Trust PIERS and the New Trust PIERS, respectively. For financial reporting purposes, the Old Trust and New Trust are treated as equity method investments of Omnicare. The Old Trust and New Trust are 100%-owned finance subsidiaries of the Company. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the securities of the Old Trust and New Trust. The Old 4.00% Debentures issued by the Company to the Old Trust and the New 4.00% Debentures issued by the Company to the New Trust in connection with the issuance of the Old Trust PIERS and the New Trust PIERS, respectively, are presented as a single line item on Omnicare’s consolidated balance sheet, and the related disclosures concerning the Old Trust PIERS and the New Trust PIERS, the guarantees and the Old 4.00% Debentures and New 4.00% Debentures are included in Omnicare’s notes to consolidated financial statements. Omnicare records interest payable to the Old Trust and New Trust as interest expense in its consolidated statement of income.
At September 30, 2005, the Company had no other unconsolidated entities, or any financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which might have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Collection of accounts receivable from customers is the Company’s primary source of operating cash flow and is critical to Omnicare’s operating performance. Omnicare’s primary collection risk relates to facility and private pay customers. The Company provides for accounts receivable that could become uncollectible by establishing an allowance to reduce the carrying value of such receivables to their estimated net realizable value. Omnicare establishes this allowance for doubtful accounts using the specific identification approach, and considering such factors as historical collection experience (i.e., payment history and credit losses) and creditworthiness, specifically identified credit risks, aging of accounts receivable by payor
46
category, current and expected economic conditions and other relevant factors. Management reviews this allowance on an ongoing basis for appropriateness. Judgment is used to assess the collectibility of account balances and the economic ability of customers to pay.
The Company computes and monitors its accounts receivable days sales outstanding (“DSO”) in order to evaluate the liquidity and collection patterns of its accounts receivable. DSO is calculated by averaging the beginning and end of quarter accounts receivable, less contractual allowances and the allowance for doubtful accounts, to derive “average accounts receivable”; and dividing average accounts receivable by the sales amount (excluding reimbursable out-of-pockets) for the related quarter. The resultant percentage is multiplied by the days in the quarter to derive the DSO amount. Omnicare’s DSO of 72 days at September 30, 2005 increased from 71 days at December 31, 2004, largely attributable to an incremental slowdown in Medicaid reimbursement from the state of Illinois. The allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2005 was $160.3 million compared with $123.3 million at December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily due to acquisition related growth, particularly NeighborCare, completed during the nine months ended September 30, 2005. These allowances represent 11.3% and 12.8% of gross receivables (net of contractual allowances) as of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Although no near-term changes are expected, unforeseen changes to future allowance percentages could materially impact overall financial results. A one percentage point increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross receivables as of September 30, 2005 would result in an increase to the allowance for doubtful accounts and bad debt expense of approximately $14.2 million.
The following table is an aging of the Company’s September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 gross accounts receivable (net of allowances for contractual adjustments, and prior to allowances for doubtful accounts), aged based on payment terms and categorized based on the four primary overall types of accounts receivable characteristics (in thousands):
| | September 30, 2005 |
| | Current and 0-180 Days Past Due | | 181 Days and Over Past Due | | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Medicaid, Medicare Part B and Third Party payors | | $ | 437,299 | | | $ | 40,056 | | | $ | 477,355 | |
Facility payors | | | 530,200 | | | | 160,745 | | | | 690,945 | |
Private Pay payors | | | 158,834 | | | | 69,029 | | | | 227,863 | |
CRO | | | 20,157 | | | | 216 | | | | 20,373 | |
Total gross accounts receivable (net of contractual allowance adjustments) | | $ | 1,146,490 | | | $ | 270,046 | | | $ | 1,416,536 | |
47
| | December 31, 2004 |
| | Current and 0-180 Days Past Due | | 181 Days and Over Past Due | | Total |
Medicaid, Medicare Part B and Third Party payors | | $ | 303,638 | | | $ | 29,871 | | | $ | 333,509 | |
Facility payors | | | 355,593 | | | | 97,449 | | | | 453,042 | |
Private Pay payors | | | 120,579 | | | | 40,783 | | | | 161,362 | |
CRO | | | 13,085 | | | | 995 | | | | 14,080 | |
Total gross accounts receivable (net of contractual allowance adjustments) | | $ | 792,895 | | | $ | 169,098 | | | $ | 961,993 | |
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE |
In October 2004, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 04-8, which requires the shares underlying contingently convertible debt instruments to be included in diluted earnings per share computations using the “if-converted” accounting method, regardless of whether the market price trigger has been met. Under that method, the convertible debentures are assumed to be converted to common shares (weighted for the number of days assumed to be outstanding during the period), and interest expense, net of taxes, related to the convertible debentures is added back to net income. Diluted earnings per common share amounts have been retroactively restated for 2004 to give effect to the application of EITF No. 04-8 as it relates to the Old 4.00% Debentures issued in the second quarter of 2003. The effect of Omnicare’s fourth quarter 2004 adoption of EITF No. 04-8 was to decrease diluted earnings per share $0.02 and $0.07 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004. For purposes of the “if-converted” calculation, 8,451,000 shares were assumed to be converted for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004. Additionally, interest expense, net of taxes, of $2.3 million and $6.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, was added back to net income for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share using this method. The effect of EITF No. 04-8 on the Company’s 2005 earnings results was to decrease diluted earnings per share by $0.02 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The impact had no effect on diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2005. See further discussion of the trust PIERS exchange offering in the “Debt” note at Part I, Item 1 of this Filing.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS |
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Shared-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”). This Statement requires the Company to record compensation costs relating to equity-based payments, in its financial statements, over the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). This Statement is effective for the Company in the period beginning January 1, 2006. The Company currently intends to elect the “modified prospective application” method of implementing SFAS 123R. This method requires that SFAS 123R be applied to all new awards whose service inception date follows the effective date of January 1, 2006, and all existing awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after January 1, 2006. In addition, this method requires compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered (i.e., nonvested portion) and are outstanding as of
48
January 1, 2006 to be recognized as the requisite service is rendered on or after January 1, 2006. Omnicare is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 123R to the Company, but has not yet quantified the effect of this new standard on its financial results for 2006 and future years.
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION |
In addition to historical information, this report contains certain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are made on the basis of management’s views and assumptions regarding business performance as of the time the statements are made, and management does not undertake any obligation to update these statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, all statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations regarding the matters discussed or incorporated by reference in this document (including statements as to “beliefs,” “expectations,” “anticipations,” “intentions” or similar words) and all statements which are not statements of historical fact.
Forward-looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to, the following: expectations concerning the Company’s financial performance, results of operations, sales, earnings or business outlook; expectations regarding acquisitions; the impact of the NeighborCare acquisition on Omnicare's earnings and the ability to implement Omnicare's consolidation efforts and other productivity initiatives and to realize anticipated benefits; trends in the long-term healthcare and contract research industries generally; expectations concerning the Company’s ability to leverage its core business; anticipated growth in alternative institutional markets such as correctional facilities, hospice care, mental health and personal care or supportive living facilities; expectations concerning continued relative stability in the operating environment in the long-term care industry; anticipated demographic trends in the healthcare industry; the impact of drug price inflation; changes in government and other reimbursement formulas to take into account drug price inflation or deflation; the ability to allocate resources in order to enhance gross profit margins; the ability to continue the Company’s value creation strategy through expanding its core pharmaceutical business and leveraging that business through the development and expansion of clinical information services; the Company’s ability to continue to leverage fixed and variable overhead costs through internal and acquired growth; other factors affecting the Company’s strategy for future growth; the effectiveness of the Company’s unit-of-use controls and computerized documentation system; the effectiveness of the Company’s health and outcomes management programs; the ability to leverage the Company’s CRO business and its core pharmacy business as anticipated; expectations concerning product and market development efforts; trends concerning the commencement, continuation or cancellation of CRO projects and backlog; the effectiveness of recent cost reduction efforts in the CRO; volatility in the CRO business; anticipated business performance of the CRO in 2005; expectations in the CRO business resulting from streamlining and globalization efforts, the Company’s unique capabilities in the geriatric market and strength of presence in the drug development marketplace; trends in healthcare funding issues, including, but not limited to, state Medicaid budgets, enrollee eligibility, escalating drug prices due to higher utilization among seniors and the aging of the population; expectations concerning increasing Medicare admissions and improving occupancy rates; the introduction of more expensive medications, and increasing use of generic medications; the impact of any changes in healthcare policy relating to the future
49
funding of the Medicaid and Medicare programs; the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceuticals in treating chronic illnesses for the elderly; the effectiveness of the Company’s formulary compliance program; the effectiveness of the Company’s pharmaceutical purchasing programs and its ability to obtain discounts and manage pharmaceutical costs; the adequacy and availability of the Company’s sources of liquidity and capital; payments of future quarterly dividends; the adequacy of the Company’s net cash flows from operating activities, credit facilities and other long- and short-term debt financings to satisfy the Company’s future working capital needs, acquisition contingency commitments, debt servicing, capital expenditures and other financing requirements for the foreseeable future; the ability, if necessary, to refinance indebtedness or issue additional indebtedness or equity; interest rate risk on the Company’s outstanding debt; valuations of derivative instruments embedded in the Old Trust PIERS and New Trust PIERS instruments; the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts; expectations concerning inventory write-offs; the adequacy of insurance expense estimates and methodology; the adequacy of the provisions for current or deferred taxes; the impact of reduced government reimbursement rates to the Company’s SNF clients which could adversely affect the timing or level of SNF payments to the Company; the impact of the MMA, including the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit, effective January 1, 2006, as implemented pursuant to CMS regulations and subregulatory guidance; the impact of continued pressure on federal and state Medicaid budgets and budget shortfalls which have led to decreasing reimbursement rates and other cost control measures in certain states; the Company’s ability to respond to such federal and state budget shortfalls and corresponding reductions in Medicaid reimbursement rates; the effect of any changes and considerations in long-term healthcare funding policies for Medicare and Medicaid programs; expected demand for long-term care; the pace and quality of new drug development targeted at diseases of the elderly; the impact of newer drugs that, although more expensive, are more efficient at treating illness and thereby reduce overall healthcare costs; trends and expectations concerning long-term growth prospects for the geriatric care industry and the containment of healthcare costs for the elderly; expectations concerning the growth in the elderly population; anticipated changes in healthcare delivery systems and payment methodologies in order to fund growing demand; the ability of the Company to utilize its expertise in geriatric pharmaceutical care and pharmaceutical cost management and its database on drug utilization and outcomes in the elderly to meet the anticipated challenges of the healthcare environment; the effectiveness of the Company’s growth strategy in allowing the Company to maximize cash flow, maintain a strong financial position, enhance the efficiency of its operations and continue to develop the Company’s franchise in the geriatric pharmaceutical market; the ability of expansion in the Company’s core business to provide the Company greater ability to leverage its clinical services and information business, thereby enhancing cost advantages in the institutional pharmacy market; the belief that new drug discovery will remain an important priority for pharmaceutical manufacturers; and expectations concerning opportunities for future growth and the continued need for pharmaceutical manufacturers to utilize contract research businesses in optimizing research and development efforts.
These forward-looking statements, together with other statements that are not historical, involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those stated. Such risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, include, but are not limited to: overall economic, financial, political and business conditions; trends in the long-term healthcare and contract research industries; competition in the pharmaceutical, long-term care and contract research industries; the impact of consolidation in
50
the pharmaceutical and long-term care industries; trends in long-term care occupancy rates and demographics; the ability to attract new clients and service contracts and retain existing clients and service contracts; the ability to consummate pending acquisitions; trends for the continued growth of the Company’s businesses; expectations concerning the development and performance of the Company’s informatics business; the effectiveness of the Company’s formulary compliance program; trends in drug pricing, including the impact and pace of pharmaceutical price increases; delays and reductions in reimbursement by the government and other payors to customers and to the Company as a result of pressures on federal and state budgets or for other reasons; the overall financial condition of the Company’s customers; the ability of the Company to assess and react to the financial condition of its customers; the effectiveness of the Company’s pharmaceutical purchasing programs and its ability to obtain discounts and manage pharmaceutical costs; the ability of vendors and business partners to continue to provide products and services to the Company; the continued successful integration of acquired companies and the ability to realize anticipated revenues, economies of scale, cost synergies and profitability; the continued availability of suitable acquisition candidates; pricing and other competitive factors in the industry; increases or decreases in reimbursement rates and the impact of other cost control measures; the impact on the Company’s revenues, profits and margins resulting from market trends in the use of newer branded drugs versus generic drugs; the number and usage of generic drugs and price competition in the drug marketplace; the ability to attract and retain needed management; competition for qualified staff in the healthcare industry; the impact and pace of technological advances; the ability to obtain or maintain rights to data, technology and other intellectual property; the demand for the Company’s products and services; variations in costs or expenses; the ability to implement productivity, consolidation and cost reduction efforts and to realize anticipated benefits; the ability of clinical research projects to produce revenues in future periods; the ability to benefit from streamlining and globalization efforts at the CRO; trends concerning CRO backlog; the effectiveness of the Company’s implementation and expansion of its clinical and other service programs; the effect of new legislation, government regulations, and/or executive orders, including those relating to reimbursement and drug pricing policies and changes in the interpretation and application of such policies; the impact of the MMA, including the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit effective January 1, 2006, as implemented pursuant to CMS regulations and subregulatory guidance; legislation and regulations affecting payment and reimbursement rates for SNFs; trends in federal and state budgets and their impact on Medicaid reimbursement rates; government budgetary pressures and shifting priorities; the Company’s ability to adjust to federal and state budget shortfalls; efforts by payors to control costs; the failure of the Company or the long-term care facilities it serves to obtain or maintain required regulatory approvals or licenses; loss or delay of contracts pertaining to the Company’s CRO business for regulatory or other reasons; the outcome of litigation; potential liability for losses not covered by, or in excess of, insurance; the impact of differences in actuarial assumptions and estimates pertaining to employee benefit plans; events or circumstances which result in an impairment of assets, including but not limited to, goodwill; market conditions which adversely affect the valuation of the Old Trust PIERS and the New Trust PIERS; the outcome of audit, compliance, administrative or investigatory reviews; volatility in the market for the Company’s stock and in the financial markets generally; access to adequate capital and financing; changes in international economic and political conditions and currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and other currencies; changes in tax laws and regulations; changes in accounting rules and standards; and other risks and uncertainties described in the Company’s reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
51
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Except as otherwise required by law, the Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Omnicare’s primary market risk exposure relates to variable interest rate risk through its borrowings. Accordingly, market risk loss is primarily defined as the potential loss in earnings due to higher interest rates on variable-rate debt of the Company. The modeling technique used by Omnicare for evaluating interest rate risk exposure involves performing sensitivity analysis on the variable-rate debt, assuming a change in interest rates of 100 basis-points. The Company’s debt obligations at September 30, 2005 include $700 million outstanding under the variable-rate term A loan, $1,943.1 million borrowed on variable-rate short-term debt facilities, and $180.0 million on a variable-rate revolving credit facility at a cumulative weighted-average interest rate of 4.52% at September 30, 2005 (a 100 basis-point change in the interest rates for variable-rate debt in the aggregate would increase or decrease pretax interest expense by approximately $28.2 million per year); $375.0 million outstanding under its fixed-rate 8.125% senior subordinated notes, due 2011 (“8.125% Senior Notes”); $250.0 million outstanding under its fixed-rate 6.125% senior subordinated notes, due 2013 (“6.125% Senior Notes”); and $345.0 million outstanding under its fixed-rate 4.00% junior subordinated convertible debentures underlying the Old Trust PIERS and the New Trust PIERS, due 2033. In connection with its offering of $250.0 million of 6.125% Senior Notes, during the second quarter of 2003, the Company entered into a Swap Agreement on all $250.0 million of its aggregate principal amount of the 6.125% Senior Notes. Under the Swap Agreement, which hedges against exposure to long-term U.S. dollar interest rates, the Company will receive a fixed rate of 6.125% and pay a floating rate based on LIBOR with a maturity of six months plus a spread of 2.27%. The estimated LIBOR-based floating rate for the Swap Agreement was 6.58% at September 30, 2005 (a 100 basis-point change in the interest rate would increase or decrease pretax interest expense by approximately $2.5 million per year). The Swap Agreement, which matches the terms of the 6.125% Senior Notes, is designated and accounted for as a fair value hedge. The Company is accounting for the Swap Agreement in accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended, so changes in the fair value of the Swap Agreement are offset by changes in the recorded carrying value of the related 6.125% Senior Notes. The fair value of the Swap Agreement of approximately $18.4 million at September 30, 2005 is recorded as a noncurrent liability and a reduction to the carrying value of the related 6.125% Senior Notes. At September 30, 2005, the fair value of Omnicare’s variable-rate long-term debt facilities approximates the carrying value, and the fair value of the 8.125% Senior Notes, 6.125% Senior Notes, Old 4.00% Debentures and New 4.00% Debentures is approximately $391.9 million, $245.0 million, $16.6 million and $485.4 million, respectively.
Embedded in the Old Trust PIERS and the New Trust PIERS are two derivative instruments, specifically, a contingent interest provision and a contingent conversion parity provision. The embedded derivatives are periodically valued by a third-party advisor, and at
52
September 30, 2005, the values of both derivatives embedded in the Old Trust PIERS and New Trust PIERS were not material. However, the values are subject to change, based on market conditions, which could affect the Company’s future financial position, cash flows and results of operations.
The Company has operations and revenue that occur outside of the United States and transactions that are settled in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, exposing it to market risk related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. However, the substantial portion of the Company’s operations and revenues and the substantial portion of the Company’s cash settlements are exchanged in U.S. dollars. Therefore, changes in foreign currency exchange rates do not represent a substantial market risk exposure to the overall Company. In connection with the acquisition of Canadian (“CDN”)-based Medico pharmacy, Omnicare entered into a CDN $50 million foreign exchange transaction arrangement on December 29, 2004. This arrangement expired on January 7, 2005, and had an immaterial impact on the consolidated financial position, income statement and cash flows of the Company.
The Company does not have any financial instruments held for trading purposes.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
(a) Based on a recent evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in periodic reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Omnicare is an acquisitive company that continuously acquires and integrates new businesses. Throughout and following an acquisition, Omnicare focuses on analyzing the acquiree’s procedures and controls to determine their effectiveness and, where appropriate, implements changes to conform them to the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures.
(b) On July 28, 2005, Omnicare completed its acquisition of NeighborCare, Inc., upon which NeighborCare became a subsidiary of Omnicare, Inc. The Company considers the acquisition of NeighborCare material to the results of its operations, financial position and cash flows from the date of acquisition through September 30, 2005 and considers the internal controls and procedures of NeighborCare to be reasonably likely to materially affect the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Other than as set forth in the preceding sentence, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. However, Omnicare is continuing to analyze, and expects to make changes in, the controls and procedures in place with respect to all its recent acquisitions. In this process of evaluation and testing, the Company may identify deficiencies that would require remediation.
53
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
A summary of the Company’s repurchases of Omnicare, Inc. common stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased (a) | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
July 1-31, 2005 | | – | | $ | – | | – | | – | |
August 1-31, 2005 | | 4 | | | 47.90 | | – | | – | |
September 1-30, 2005 | | – | | | – | | – | | – | |
Total | | 4 | | $ | 47.90 | | – | | – | |
(a) During the third quarter of 2005, the Company purchased 4 shares of Omnicare common stock in connection with its employee benefit plans, including purchases associated with the vesting of restricted stock awards. These purchases were not made pursuant to a publicly announced repurchase plan or program.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See Index of Exhibits.
54
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| | Omnicare, Inc.
|
| | Registrant |
| | | |
Date: November 8, 2005
| | By: | /s/ David W. Froesel, Jr.
|
| | | David W. Froesel, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
55
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
Number and Description of Exhibit (Numbers Coincide with Item 601 of Regulation S-K) | | Document Incorporated by Reference from a Previous Filing, Filed Herewith or Furnished Herewith, as Indicated Below |
| | | |
(2.1) | Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Omnicare, Inc., Nectarine Acquisition Corp. and NeighborCare, Inc. dated as of July 6, 2005 | | Form 8-K July 7, 2005 |
(2.2) | Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Omnicare, Inc., RxCrossroads, L.L.C., RxInnovations, L.L.C., Making Distribution Intelligent, L.L.C. and Louisville Public Warehouse Company dated as of July 1, 2005 | | Form 8-K July 8, 2005 |
(2.3) | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 9, 2005, by and between Omnicare, Inc., Hospice Acquisition Corp., excelleRx, Inc. and certain of the stockholders and option holders of excelleRx, Inc. | | Form 8-K July 14, 2005 |
(3.1) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Omnicare, Inc. (as amended) | | Form 10-K March 27, 2003 |
(3.3) | Second Amended and Restated By-Laws of Omnicare, Inc. | | Form 10-Q November 14, 2003 |
(4.7) | Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 8, 2005, between Omnicare, Inc. & SunTrust Bank, as Trustee | | Form 8-K March 9, 2005
|
(4.10) | Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of Omnicare Capital Trust II, dated as of March 8, 2005 | | Form 8-K March 9, 2005 |
(4.11) | Guarantee Agreement of Omnicare, Inc. relating to the Series B 4.00% Trust Preferred Income Equity Redeemable Securities of Omnicare Capital Trust II, dated as of March 8, 2005 | | Form 8-K March 9, 2005 |
E-1
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
Number and Description of Exhibit (Numbers Coincide with Item 601 of Regulation S-K) | | Document Incorporated by Reference from a Previous Filing, Filed Herewith or Furnished Herewith, as Indicated Below |
| | | |
(10.22) | Amendment to Employment Agreement with J.F. Gemunder dated as of March 24, 2005* | | Form 8-K March 29, 2005 |
(10.23) | Amendment to Employment Agreement with P.E. Keefe dated as of March 24, 2005* | | Form 8-K March 29, 2005 |
(10.24) | Amendment to Employment Agreement with C.D. Hodges dated as of March 24, 2005* | | Form 8-K March 29, 2005 |
(10.28) | Form of Restricted Stock Award Letter (Executive Officers)* | | Form 8-K March 29, 2005 |
(10.29) | Form of Restricted Stock Award Letter (Employees Other than Executive Officers)* | | Form 8-K March 29, 2005 |
(10.30) | Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2005, among Omnicare, Inc., as borrower, the lenders named therein, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as a joint syndication agent, Lehman Brothers Inc., as a joint syndication agent, CIBC World Markets Corp., as a co-documentation agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as a co-documentation agent, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as a co-documentation agent, and SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent. | | Form 8-K August 3, 2005 |
(10.31) | Employment Agreement with Glen C. Laschober dated as of August 5, 2005* | | Form 8-K August 11, 2005 |
(12) | Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges | | Filed Herewith |
E-2
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
Number and Description of Exhibit (Numbers Coincide with Item 601 of Regulation S-K) | | Document Incorporated by Reference from a Previous Filing, Filed Herewith or Furnished Herewith, as Indicated Below |
| | | |
(31.1) | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Omnicare, Inc. in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | Filed Herewith |
(31.2) | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Omnicare, Inc. in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | Filed Herewith |
(32.1) | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Omnicare, Inc. in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** | | Furnished Herewith |
(32.2) | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Omnicare, Inc. in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** | | Furnished Herewith |
* Indicates management contract or compensatory arrangement.
** A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Omnicare, Inc. and will be retained by Omnicare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
E-3