So – and then there’s the cost synergies. And there’s always execution risk on any deal. But I feel like the guys have been very 00:19:22 have been very conservative on how they approach to what they think they can do. And there’s a lot of things that are not in the plan right now that very well could be and – but we believe that as upside. But we think that the $90 million is eminently achievable by the end of year three certainly.
Next slide. So, in terms of the detail we’re going to acquire or sell for $24.68 a share and funded through a combination of cash, about $1.75 billion of cash and stock. Total equity value of the deals with just under $6 billion. All the shareholders will receive just over $7 per common share and then $0.1055 of common stock for each accounting share that they own.
All those shareholders will end up with about 38% of the overall company. And then, of course, Quidel’s stockholders will receive once the – the combined company for each Quidel share that they own. The management team will be combined. We will go through a process of looking across a number of executives throughout the company.
But at the end of the day, we made a decision upfront that I would be the Chairman and CEO; Rob would be the President and CEO; Joe Bujarski will come on board as Randy retires as Chief Financial Officer; and Mike Iskra will be our Chief Commercial Officer. In terms of the board, it’s a split that basically is very much aligned around percentage ownership. And so, eight of the directors will come from Quidel and four will come from 00:21:18
So, the first thing that I think is the most impressive, you look at Quidel as a stand-alone and you say, without COVID, you guys said over the long range plan that you think you can grow this thing, 17% around the 00:21:31 and toxicology of – these are the things. Aren’t you going to slow yourself down as a result of buying something that’s a solid grower but at a lower rate? And the honest answer is, sure. But at the same time, 9% to 11% compounded which is in the deal model, is pretty darn good. And compared with other companies in our space, this would be one of the faster growing diagnostic companies in the world.
So even combining the two organizations, we’ll still be able to sustain a reasonable growth rate at the same time while increasing our margin. So, we’ll still be above 30%, which is also unique in terms of EBITDA, EBITDA as a percentage of sales. There aren’t too many companies, period, that have EBITDA as a percentage greater than 30%. And we will be accretive within 12 months to close. The ROIC is also respectable. It’s over 10%, but it’s certainly going to be in the high single digits at the end of the day. So this transaction was unanimously approved by both boards of directors. Obviously subject to approval by our shareholders, and we expect to close in the first half of this year.
So, next slide, Scott 00:22:59. I won’t bore you with a lot of detail here, but when you just look at the addressable market, the growth rate EBITDA increase in cash flow and ROIC, it’s all here in one page. And this is a pretty, pretty good deal for both companies and both sets of shareholders of the program of company moving forward.
Next slide. So very complimentary, it was not a whole lot of overlap, of course, we’re going point of care which is unique. But we’re also in clinical laboratories for their products, and so is Ortho. I think there’s a really nice commercial synergy there. And then, of course, the transfusion business, Ortho has been a leader in that space for a very, very long time, does extremely well.
There’s multiple drivers to the creation of value: scale, broader portfolio, the leverage. It’s going to be phenomenal for us. Enhanced R&D. I like the programs they have in place. They’re a little bit further out. So the introduction of some products like Savanna, 00:24:19, and all that, while we’ve continued to develop the other Ortho products, I think is a nice fit in terms of timing.
Next slide. It would give us a bit more scale. At the end of the day, where you fit in the stat ranking, I’m not sure how important that is. But if we’re starting at number seven and we have an idea of moving up in the rank, I don’t think that’s going to surprise anybody that we know who’s ahead of us and we know who we’re chasing. And I think most of our staff on both sides are pretty darn competitive. So let’s see what we do here in the next couple of years.
Ortho is a good offset to our volatility and our seasonality factors. I love the fact that their products are so robust that once customers have them on board, they effectively stay with them for a very long time. So a very high percentage of their revenue is recurring.
Their EBITDA, for being in the clinical chemistry space, as well as immunoassays, is quite good, and the installed base is really – is impressive. And I love the fact also that strong presence in emerging markets and our products on the Quidel side it’s huge 00:25:43 representation on these segments as well.
So next slide. Together, we will be one of the larger, pure play diagnostic companies. And here is some ways to look at that global infrastructure. Stable growing revenue on the Ortho side, combined with, you know, arguably one of the better technology companies in our space, but one that had been perhaps under sized in terms of our commercial power.