Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 3 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Principles of Consolidation |
|
The Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) include the accounts of Bolt Technology Corporation and its subsidiary companies. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
| | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. |
| | | | | | | |
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Inventories |
|
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with cost principally determined on an average cost method that approximates the first-in, first-out method. The Company maintains an inventory valuation reserve to provide for slow moving and obsolete inventory. Amounts are charged to the reserve when the Company scraps or disposes of inventory. |
| | | | | | | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Goodwill, Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives and Other Long-Lived Assets |
|
Goodwill represents the unamortized excess cost over the value of net assets acquired in business combinations. The Financial Accounting Standards Board guidance for testing goodwill for impairment provides the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity elects to perform a qualitative assessment and determines that an impairment is more likely than not, the entity is then required to perform a two-step quantitative impairment test, otherwise no further analysis is required. An entity also may elect not to perform the qualitative assessment and, instead, proceed directly to the two-step quantitative impairment test. The ultimate outcome of the goodwill impairment review for a reporting unit should be the same whether an entity chooses to perform the qualitative assessment or proceeds directly to the two-step quantitative impairment test. |
|
The Company conducted an assessment of qualitative factors regarding the A-G reporting unit at June 30, 2014. The qualitative assessment indicated no impairment of the A-G goodwill balance at June 30, 2014. |
|
For the RTS reporting unit, the Company performed the quantitative impairment test at June 30, 2014 using the capitalized cash flow method and the market price method. The impairment test for the RTS reporting unit indicated no impairment of the goodwill balance at June 30, 2014. |
|
For the SBX reporting unit, the Company performed the quantitative test at December 31, 2013 using the capitalized cash flow method and the market price method, as well as the discounted cash flow method, and the test indicated no impairment of the goodwill balance. The Company’s review of the SBX goodwill balance at June 30, 2014 did not result in any indicators of impairment. |
|
The Company reviewed A-G, RTS and SBX goodwill as of September 30, 2014 and no indicators of impairment were identified. |
|
Intangible assets with indefinite lives must be tested annually or more frequently if there are indicators of impairment, to determine if events and circumstances still justify the carrying value of such asset. The test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value. Any such loss would be recognized in the period in which the impairment arose. The SBX intangible asset with an indefinite life was tested for impairment at December 31, 2013 and the test indicated no impairment. |
|
The Company reviewed the RTS and SBX intangible assets with indefinite lives at September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014 and no indicators of impairment were identified. |
|
The Company’s other long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment, other intangible assets with definite lives and other non-current assets. The Company reviews these assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount is considered impaired when anticipated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying amount. The Company’s reviews as of June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014 did not identify any indicators of impairment. |
| | | | | | | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most critical estimates made by the Company are those relating to inventory reserves, the potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, other long-lived assets impairment, valuation of acquisitions, contingent earnout liability and realization of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
| | | | | | | |
Valuation Of Acquisition [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Valuation of Acquisitions |
|
The Company allocates the amounts it pays for each acquisition to the assets it acquires and the liabilities it assumes based on estimated fair values at acquisition date. The Company determines the estimated fair values of identifiable intangible assets based on detailed valuations that use historical information and market assumptions. The Company allocates any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired to goodwill. The use of different valuation assumptions, including estimated cash flows and discount rates, or different estimated useful life assumptions could result in different purchase price allocations and intangible asset amortization expense in current and future periods. |
| | | | | | | |
Contingent Liability Reserve Estimate, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Contingent Earnout Liability |
|
In the SBX acquisition, the Company is obligated under an earnout arrangement to make cash payments to the former SBX stockholders if certain revenue and gross profit margin thresholds are achieved. The Company recorded a contingent earnout liability at the acquisition date at its estimated fair value, which takes into account the range and probability of projected future revenues of the acquired entity over the earnout period. The Company revalues the contingent earnout liability at the close of each accounting period and records any change in the estimated fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Income as adjustment of contingent earnout liability. |
|
Increases or decreases in the fair value of the SBX contingent earnout liability can result from changes in assumed revenues, probabilities of achieving revenue and gross profit margin thresholds and discount rates. Significant judgment is used in determining the appropriateness of fair value assumptions at the acquisition date and in subsequent periods. As a result, actual contingent earnout payments can differ from estimates, and the differences could be material. |
| | | | | | | |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Computation of Earnings Per Share |
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted (loss) earnings per share is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period including common share equivalents (which includes stock option grants and restricted stock awards) assuming dilution. Unvested shares of restricted stock are included in computing basic (loss) earnings per share because they contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends. |
| | | | | | | |
|
The following is a reconciliation of basic (loss) earnings per share to diluted (loss) earnings per share for the three month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013: |
|
| | Three Months Ended | |
September 30, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders | | $ | -570,000 | | $ | 2,363,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
Divided by: | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares | | | 8,694,083 | | | 8,643,400 | |
Weighted average common share equivalents | | | - | | | 10,026 | |
Total weighted average common shares and common share equivalents | | | 8,694,083 | | | 8,653,426 | |
| | | | | | | |
Basic (loss) earnings per share | | $ | -0.07 | | $ | 0.27 | |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share | | $ | -0.07 | | $ | 0.27 | |
|
For the three month period ended September 30, 2014, the calculations do not include options to acquire 70,876 shares, since the inclusion of these shares would have been anti-dilutive. For the three month period ended September 30, 2013, the calculation included all options to acquire shares because they were all dilutive. |
| | | | | | | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Recent Accounting Developments |
|
None. |
| | | | | | | |