Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. |
OR
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number:0-21918
FLIR Systems, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Oregon | 93-0708501 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
| 27700 SW Parkway Avenue, Wilsonville, Oregon | 97070 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) | |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (503) 498-3547
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
Common Stock, $0.01 par value | NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filerx Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨ Smaller reporting company¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of June 30, 2010, the aggregate market value of the shares of voting and non-voting stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates was $4,561,437,465.
As of February 16, 2011, there were 159,509,585 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
The registrant has incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K, portions of its Proxy Statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Table of Contents
FLIR Systems, Inc.
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”), including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding future events and the future results of FLIR Systems, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (“FLIR” or the “Company”) that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions about the Company’s business. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “sees,” “estimates” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements due to numerous factors including, but not limited to, those discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7, and elsewhere in this Report as well as those discussed from time to time in the Company’s other Securities and Exchange Commission filings and reports. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry, economic and market conditions. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document, and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Report, or for changes made to this document by wire services or Internet service providers. If we update or correct one or more forward-looking statements, investors and others should not conclude that we will make additional updates or corrections with respect to other forward-looking statements.
PART I
| ITEM 1. | BUSINESS |
Overview
FLIR Systems, Inc. (“FLIR,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a world leader in sensor systems that enhance perception and awareness. We were founded in 1978 to empower people with the ability to see at night using infrared technology and have since become a premier designer, manufacturer, and marketer of thermal imaging systems. Our advanced sensors and integrated sensor systems enable the gathering and analysis of critical information through a wide variety of applications in commercial, industrial, and government markets worldwide.
Our goal is to both enable our customers to benefit from the valuable information produced by advanced sensing technologies and to deliver sustained superior financial performance for our shareholders. We create value for our customers by providing advanced surveillance and tactical defense capabilities, improving personal and public safety and security, facilitating air, ground, and maritime navigation, enhancing enjoyment of the outdoors, providing infrastructure inefficiency information, conveying pre-emptive structural deficiency data, displaying process irregularities, and enabling commercial business opportunities through our continual support and development of new thermal imaging data and analytics applications. Our business model meets the needs of a multitude of customers—we sell off-the-shelf products to a wide variety of markets in an efficient, timely, and affordable manner as well as offer a variety of system configurations to suit specific customer requirements. Centered on the design of products for low cost manufacturing and high volume distribution, our commercial operating model has been developed over time and provides us with a unique ability to adapt to market changes and meet our customers’ needs.
Our business is organized into two divisions: Commercial Systems and Government Systems. Within these divisions, we had five reporting segments in 2010: Thermography, Commercial Vision Systems, and Raymarine, which comprise the Commercial Systems division; and Government Systems and ICx, which make up our Government Systems division.
1
Table of Contents
Thermography products are generally sold for commercial and industrial applications, typically where imaging and temperature measurement together are required. Products range from highly sensitive cameras with extensive analytic capabilities and sophisticated image processing to less expensive cameras offering excellent performance and value for less demanding applications. Our Thermography products range in price from slightly over $1,000 for a value hand-held camera to over $150,000 for our most sophisticated science cameras. Revenue from Thermography has grown at a compound annual rate of 15 percent since 2001 and was $317.9 million, or 23 percent of consolidated revenue in 2010.
Commercial Vision Systems (“CVS”) is focused on the emerging commercial markets for infrared imaging technology where the primary need is to see at night or in adverse conditions, such as through smoke or light fog. As the cost of infrared technology has declined, demand in large untapped markets such as commercial security, automotive, marine, airborne, personal night vision, and first responder markets has grown rapidly. Our infrared sensor business, which sells focal plane arrays and camera cores internally as well as to third parties on an original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) basis, is also a part of CVS. Since 2005, CVS revenue has grown at a compound annual rate of 25 percent. CVS revenue was $256.1 million, or 18 percent of our consolidated revenue in 2010.
Raymarine designs, develops, and markets electronics for the maritime market and is a leading global provider of fully integrated “stem to stern” networked electronic systems for boats of all sizes. Products include multifunction displays used to control multiple onboard electronic components, radar systems, thermal imaging cameras, autopilot systems, sonar modules, connectivity software, and various other instruments used to monitor factors such as boat speed, direction, and location. The business distributes its products through a vast network of independent distributors and retailers as well as through its relationships with boat builders, providing both first fitment and aftermarket solutions. For the period from our acquisition of the business in May of 2010, Raymarine has generated revenue of $104.1 million and represented 8 percent of consolidated 2010 revenue.
Government Systems (“GS”) is focused on selling advanced imaging systems to government customers and markets where high performance is required. Typical applications include intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (“ISR”), force protection, drug interdiction, search and rescue, special operations, and target designation. GS products are often customized for specific applications and frequently incorporate additional sensors, including visible light cameras, radars, low light cameras, laser rangefinders, laser illuminators, and laser designators. GS products range in price from under $10,000 for certain hand-held and weapon-mounted systems to over $1 million for our most advanced stabilized targeting systems. Since 2005, GS revenue has grown at a compound annual rate of 22 percent. GS is our largest segment with 2010 revenue of $661.1 million, or 48 percent of consolidated revenue.
ICx primarily produces sensor systems that detect and identify chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives (“CBRNE”) threats and deliver actionable intelligence for wide area surveillance, intrusion detection, and facility security. With superior technological expertise, ICx integrates advanced sensors into effective force protection, homeland security, and commercial solutions. ICx has unique strength in understanding the nature of sophisticated security threats, the technological potential of security solutions, and the complex procurement processes of government customers. With a history of entering into government-funded design and development contracts, ICx has built relationships with key government customers and has experience in converting highly specialized technologies into commercial solutions that are marketable to a global customer base. We acquired ICx in October 2010, and during the period of our ownership, ICx has generated $46.1 million of revenue, representing 3 percent of consolidated 2010 revenue.
For additional information concerning the Company’s segments, including revenues from external customers, earnings from operations and total assets by segment presented in accordance with our segment structure, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
2
Table of Contents
Infrared Technology Overview
Infrared is a portion of the electro-magnetic spectrum that is adjacent to the visible spectrum, but is invisible to the human eye due to its longer wavelengths. Unlike visible light, infrared radiation (or heat) is emitted directly by all objects above absolute zero in temperature. Thermal imaging systems detect this infrared radiation and convert it into an electronic signal, which is then processed into a video signal and displayed on a video screen. Thermal imaging systems are different than other types of “low light” vision systems, such as visible light intensification used in green or gray sighted night vision goggles. Infrared imaging systems are not adversely affected by the presence of visible light, so they can be used day or night, and they are not susceptible to rapid changes in visible light levels. Since infrared systems are detecting emitted infrared radiation, they are passive and thus more covert than certain “active” or “illuminated” systems. Additionally, thermal imaging systems can measure very small temperature differences, a critical feature for a variety of commercial, industrial, and scientific applications.
An infrared detector, which collects or absorbs infrared radiation and converts it into an electronic signal, is a sensor assembly that is the primary component of thermal imaging systems. The two types of infrared detectors we manufacture and use in our systems are often referred to as “cooled” and “uncooled.” Cooled detectors utilize a mechanical micro-cooler to reduce the operating temperature of the infrared sensor to -200° C, and offer high sensitivity and resolution for long-range applications or those requiring high measurement precision. These systems, while more sensitive and thus able to see farther, result in a product that is more expensive, heavier, more complex, and uses more power than those using uncooled detectors. Uncooled detectors operate at room temperature and thus do not require a micro-cooler, resulting in products that are lighter, use less power and are less expensive to produce than cooled systems. While the performance of uncooled detectors is improving, uncooled detectors are still less sensitive than cooled detectors. The cost of both types of detectors is declining and we expect to continue reducing costs as volumes rise and the technology advances in the future. We currently expect demand for both types of systems to increase.
Recent Acquisitions
Since 2003, we have made a total of thirteen acquisitions. Most recently, we acquired Raymarine Holdings, Ltd. (“Raymarine”) in May 2010 and ICx Technologies, Inc. (“ICx”) in October 2010. The Raymarine acquisition significantly enhanced the distribution capabilities of our thermal marine products business by adding approximately 1,000 dealer outlets and 400 marine OEM relationships. Additionally, Raymarine provided us the opportunity to build an integrated product line that offers thermal imaging cameras coupled with Raymarine’s multifunction displays, radars, depth sounders, global positioning systems, and autopilots products to create the broadest, most effective, and easiest to use suite of products in the marine electronics industry. The acquisition of ICx expanded our capabilities into advanced sensor technologies that detect CBRNE threats, including products that are currently sold to the defense and homeland security markets. ICx also enhanced our existing intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance product suite by adding advanced radars, imaging, and integrated platforms solutions. Both businesses are reported as individual business segments in 2010.
We are selective and opportunistic in our acquisitions, seeking to purchase companies that are strategically significant and additive or adjacent to our existing technologies, distribution network, or product portfolio. We are continuously evaluating opportunities for additional acquisitions, but cannot predict the timing, size, or nature of any future activity.
In February 2011, we announced an organizational change that will impact our Government Systems division and will result in three operating and reporting segments. The new Surveillance segment comprises our former Government Systems segment and ICx’s imaging and radars operations and focuses on developing, manufacturing, and marketing thermal imaging and wide-area surveillance systems. The Detection segment has been created to focus on the CBRNE products and markets that we added with our ICx acquisition. The Integrated Systems segment will focus on large programmatic and multi-function solutions for diverse tactical
3
Table of Contents
security and defense uses and will draw from Surveillance and Detection products, as well as products sourced outside of the Company. We believe this new structure will better align our sales, marketing, and operations to drive further product awareness, sales growth, and cost savings.
FLIR Systems, Inc. is an Oregon corporation and was incorporated in 1978. The Company’s headquarters are located at 27700 SW Parkway Avenue, Wilsonville, Oregon 97070-8238, and the telephone number at this location is (503) 498-3547. Information about the Company is available on our website at www.flir.com.
Competitive Strengths
With our decades of experience in developing and marketing infrared sensor products, we have built several unique competitive advantages that are core to our success. We look to leverage these strengths to continue to increase the ownership and application of advanced sensing technologies and to grow our revenue and profitability:
Commercial Operating Model
A key differentiator of our business model is our pervasive commercial mindset. This is characterized by our focus on superior customer service, unparalleled new product speed-to-market, consistency in exceeding customer expectations, innovation of new technologies and unique products, ability to design for large-volume and low cost production, and control of multiple production inputs through our vertically integrated operations. Our manufacturing capabilities, which reach across the world in both developed and emerging regions, increase the effectiveness and efficiency of meeting customer needs and delivering value.
Vertically Integrated Manufacturing
We have built a vertically integrated manufacturing operation that provides control over certain key component technologies. Through acquisitions and internal development, we have created this internal supply network that allows for optimized manufacturing throughput, increased product design flexibility, enhanced product reliability, and independence in designing key components. Further, this integrated approach enables us to lower costs and to improve the functionality of critical components so that they work together efficiently within our products. In comparison to competitors that do not possess a similar level of integration, we can deliver products in a more timely and cost-effective manner as we rely less on third-party suppliers for performance and innovation.
Industry-Leading Market Position
We are a leading developer of highly advanced, proprietary sensor systems that are highly reliable, accurate, and effective. We believe that none of our competitors have comparable penetration into as many markets as we do, including the government, industrial, commercial, and consumer sectors. Having a leading position in the markets we serve allows us to secure new and continuing business while also achieving manufacturing economies of scale. Increased unit volumes works to reduce costs throughout our business, which allows us to lower our prices. This creates a virtuous cycle whereby we are able to make advanced sensor technologies more affordable to a wide array of end-users while reducing costs. This established presence across multiple markets creates a production and profitability barrier for our competitors.
Broad Product Line
We offer a wide array of sensor products, including infrared imaging cameras and systems, detector cores, CBRNE threat detectors, test and measurement instruments, radars, maritime electronics, and related products and solutions. Our customers can buy these products off-the-shelf or request a customized sensor solution. This ability to serve a variety of customers with disparate needs and specifications allows us to be successful in facilitating the use of advanced sensors in a broad range of applications. We have the ability to rapidly concept,
4
Table of Contents
design, prototype, and manufacture new products to meet the evolving landscapes of the markets we serve. Our spiral development process iterates new products from our successes in existing products. The process, which considers significant customer satisfaction and field-use data, results in the rapid creation of new features that are able to address the changing needs of the end-user. This continual evolution of our products has proven successful through our high level of customer retention and strong revenue and income growth.
Internally-Funded Innovation
We have expertise in developing sensing instruments that are both highly advanced from a technical standpoint and commercially viable and salable across multiple pools of customers. Since 2000, we have invested over $700 million in research and development of new technologies and products. The vast majority of this expense is paid for with our internal funds. Utilizing our own funds for research and development (“R&D”) provides us with full ownership of the development process and the end product, and also focuses our R&D teams on projects that will result in products that are commercially viable and can be marketed to multiple markets for multiple applications.
Diverse Customer Base
We sell our products to thousands of commercial and government customers for use in a variety of applications and markets worldwide. The buyers and users of our products include government agencies and militaries, aerospace and defense contractors, electricians and tradesmen, commercial ports, first responders, critical infrastructure operators, electrical generation and gas processing plants, heating and air conditioning technicians, building inspectors, food processors, automobile parts manufacturers, commercial and residential security providers, research and lab technicians, manufacturing companies, doctors and veterinarians, recreational boaters, and the general consumer market. We believe that the diversity of our customers, end-user markets, and applications helps to mitigate fluctuations in demand from any particular customer or market. The diversity of our customers and of the end-users of sensor technologies provides us with multiple long-term growth opportunities.
Global Distribution Capabilities
Our core infrared imaging products have evolved from a niche technology sold primarily to military customers and high-end research firms to become a valuable information gathering and assessment tool to a multitude of industrial, government, and commercial entities. With the widening adoption of these technologies, distribution has become a key advantage to our business globally. We believe our sales and distribution organization is among the largest in the industry and effectively covers the world with a combination of direct sales, third-party representatives and distributors, independent dealers, application engineers, and service and training centers. Internationally, we have invested heavily to build a strong presence to sell and service our products, a key advantage in penetrating particular markets, such as foreign governments. Our sales representatives, including third-party distributors, undergo a comprehensive training program on each product’s technical specifications, functions, and applications. We also continuously update our training programs to incorporate technological and competitive shifts and changes. We sell in many distinct markets and have established specific sales channels for each market.
We continue to expand this distribution platform through internal growth and outside acquisitions. In 2010, we acquired Raymarine, which further enhanced our distribution network by adding approximately 2,400 independent dealer outlets and 250 OEM relationships to our maritime business. Additionally, our 2010 acquisition of ICx provided us with threat detection sensor sales functions and delivered long-standing relationships with many government customers.
5
Table of Contents
Consistent Generation and Distribution of Cash Flow
Our earnings, combined with our modest capital expenditure requirements, result in the generation of significant free cash flow. In the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, our net cash provided by operating activities was $255.4 million and $271.8 million, respectively. Over the past 5 years, our operating cash flow has exceeded our net earnings every year except in 2007. This ability to consistently convert revenues into net operating cash provides us significant flexibility in making growth and capital deployment decisions, such as executing strategic acquisitions, undertaking new product or technology development initiatives, building out our distribution and marketing presence, making capital investments, or repurchasing shares of our common stock in the open market. Since 2003, we have utilized $775 million of cash for acquisitions, $400 million for share repurchases, and $285 million for capital expenditures.
Growth Strategies
Our clear and consistent strategy has enabled strong and steady performance in our business while allowing expansion into areas of growth. We look to build on our leading position in advanced sensor systems by leveraging our key competitive strengths through a focused corporate strategy that will yield growth in both revenue and profitability. Key elements of the FLIR growth strategy include:
Grow Existing and Enter New Markets
A key element of our success is our ability to deliver high-value sensor technologies with various specifications and price points to reach a vast and expanding range of customers. While our commercial operating model and innovative development teams work to continually increase the availability, value, and effectiveness of our products, our sizable and growing end-user population often discover new uses for our technologies that will create a new line of business. We will continue to enable our existing markets, facilitate these application breakthroughs, and expand into new areas of opportunity by making investments in the development of advanced multi-use products, best-in-class field-located sales and service capabilities, proactive technical and application communication forums, integrated and expert sales and marketing organizations, comprehensive customer training, and capabilities to rapidly deploy new products and solutions.
Design and Develop Innovative Sensor Systems
We intend to continue to broaden our product line by developing next-generation sensor technologies by leveraging our internally-funded innovation centers and, in limited situations that are strategically beneficial to our commercial model, by using customer funds. Creating a regular flow of new products that incorporate novel features and technologies while also reducing their size, weight, and power consumption is critical to our continued success in our existing and future markets. We allocate significant resources to business and product development, concentrating on tracking and analyzing industry and technology trends. By being aware of our changing customers’ needs and the trends within our markets, we expect to bring to market the most cutting-edge and innovative products that provide critical information to secure, protect and improve lives and resources.
Continually Reduce Costs
Our ability to continue penetrating and expanding on our leading market position and into the markets for advanced sensor systems is predicated on our success at reducing our internal costs to manufacture systems. Through our commercial operating model, we have had great success designing and manufacturing products that benefit from economies of scale and thus reduce our cost to deliver a product to our customers. We expect to further leverage this model and accelerate the virtuous cycle our business has created where increased unit volume output reduces our costs, allowing us to lower selling prices, which increases demand and sales volume for our products. We intend to continue to reduce costs, through continuing to vertically integrate our operations, expanding our use of shared services, rationalizing our strategic sourcing processes, and diversifying our manufacturing operations, which we believe will result in an increase in market demand for our products.
6
Table of Contents
Expand Global Reach
Expanding and strengthening our already vast distribution network is vital to our ability to keep pace with demand and the growing adoption of advanced infrared and threat detection systems. Investing in our direct sales force and building relationships with independent distributors and partners is a key priority. Building a presence in new international markets has been successful, most recently in regions of the Middle East, and we intend to continue the development of our global reach. Developing countries such as India and China are areas of focus, as they are emerging economies for our technologies. Additionally, as our sensor technologies become more affordable and prevalent in consumer markets, we have worked to strengthen our marketing and sales channels to better communicate with and serve the millions of potential customers that transact over the internet, through catalogs, and at retail locations.
Build Application Awareness and Our Brand
Both thermal imaging and CBRNE detection technologies are still in the early stages of adoption in many of our markets. We believe that as people understand and recognize the extensive commercial, consumer, and industrial uses for the information our sensors provide, our business will continue to grow rapidly. As such, we strive to communicate the benefits of thermal and detection sensors to new market participants in order to drive demand for our products. We leverage our distribution channels to focus on marketing activities that incorporate internet promotion, advertising, direct mail, press and demonstration tours, technical articles for publications, and sponsorship of and participation in most major trade shows. Additionally, we strive to support the advancement of new sensor uses, provide world-class service and support, and listen to customer feedback and incorporate the findings into our solutions to further build the awareness of our solutions and our brand. These activities give us the opportunity to educate potential customers about the key features and attributes of our products and how they may be used to address specific customer needs. As an example, we have partnered with various television and internet outlets to exhibit the FLIR product line and demonstrate the unique value of our products.
Complement Core Competencies with Strategic Acquisitions
Infrared imaging has been and remains our core business. Our unique position as a leading infrared imaging products company has enabled us to build an integrated sensors company, having recently added CBRNE detection, radar, maritime, and test and measurement products. We intend to continue investing in adjacent technologies, products, and distribution channels to grow our business and become an integrated, single-source provider of advanced sensor systems and solutions.
Focus on Financial Performance
We are focused on translating success in selling our products into high margins and increasing profits. We have been consistently successful in doing so through cost discipline, considering the margin impact of all business decisions, and benchmarking our business against some of the best performing companies in the world. Coupling consistent sales growth with a focus on controlling costs has yielded significant financial flexibility. The cash flow that our business generates has allowed us to invest in growth initiatives as well as return value to our shareholders. Since 2001, our revenue, earnings per share, and operating cash flow have grown at annual rates of 23%, 25%, and 28%, respectively. In any deployment of our cash flow, we analyze the long-term profitability impact on our business and choose only those initiatives that have a positive cost-adjusted payoff based on conservative assumptions.
Business Segments
Thermography
The Thermography market has traditionally addressed thermal imaging applications where both imaging and temperature measurement are required. This market has grown in size and breadth as prices have declined, volumes have increased, and new applications have emerged. Our strategies in this business are to continue to
7
Table of Contents
develop products for high-end applications while introducing new products at lower price points, and to capitalize on highly price-elastic demand in numerous emerging markets. Over the past several years, markets have grown rapidly and expanded beyond the traditional industrial predictive and preventive maintenance segments. We expect new markets to continue to develop in the future.
Markets
Predictive Maintenance | Thermal imaging systems are used for monitoring the condition of mechanical and electrical equipment. Such monitoring assists our customers in identifying equipment faults (manifested as hot spots) so they can be repaired before they fail. This increases equipment productivity and avoids catastrophic failures or major damage, which reduces operating expenses by lowering repair costs and reducing downtime. Improved functionality of image analysis software, smaller size and weight, and simplicity of system operation are critical factors for this well established market segment. |
Research & Development | Infrared’s unique ability to detect very small differences in temperature while detailing complex thermal dynamics and patterns makes Thermography systems a useful tool in a wide variety of research and development applications. Our systems provide the ability to view thermal distribution in real time for products ranging in size from small hybrid integrated circuits to jet engines. Common applications include product development of microelectronics, cell phones, laptop computers, telecommunications equipment, consumer appliances, automotive components, and aircraft engines. Systems used in research and development applications typically require very high imaging performance and measurement precision, coupled with extensive analysis and reporting software. We have a complete line of both cooled and uncooled infrared imagers specifically designed for high-end research and development applications. |
Manufacturing Process Control | Thermal imaging applications for manufacturing process control include applications where temperature consistency is critical, including monitoring the quality of metal, plastic and glass cast parts, which are highly dependent upon the temperature distribution in the mold; monitoring the quality of paper, which is dependent upon proper and even moisture distribution during the drying process; and monitoring the quality of products such as rubber gloves, which can be thermally examined to locate abnormally warm or cool spots, indicating non-uniform thickness that may result in a quality defect. |
Building Inspection | Infrared imagers can detect missing insulation, electrical faults, water intrusion and pest infiltration, gauge energy efficiency, and help detect the presence of moisture. Market segments include building diagnostics, energy auditing and home inspection, property and facility management, HVAC and plumbing, and moisture detection and restoration. This market has grown rapidly as costs have declined and new uses for thermal imaging systems have emerged. Building inspection represented one of the largest single Thermography markets for us in 2010. |
8
Table of Contents
Gas Detection | Specially designed infrared systems can detect and image hydrocarbon gas emissions or leaks. Using this technology, we have established a market focused on leak detection at gas production, transmission and storage locations, as well as compliance monitoring by environmental and other regulatory agencies. New applications are emerging for this technology. For example, we now have a system that detects sulfur hexafluoride, a dangerous pollutant and potential fire hazard used as an insulator in electrical transformers. During 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued a requirement that large-scale extractors and distributors of greenhouse gases begin to annually self-report the amount of greenhouse gas that is emitted from their facilities. The issuance noted that the EPA will allow, and in certain situations require, the use of optical gas imaging systems such as ours to be used to perform the emission analysis. |
Emerging Markets | Over the past seven years, we have successfully introduced progressively lower priced thermal imaging systems that have enabled us to expand traditional Thermography markets and open new markets for our products. These products, the latest of which is the i-family, have met with strong market acceptance in the higher volume building and electrical inspection markets, and we expect additional market segments for thermal imaging to develop as prices continue to decline. These market segments may include healthcare and screening, food service and distribution, veterinary science, automotive care, aircraft inspection, and maritime vessel inspections. |
Training | We offer fee-based training on the principles of thermography and the use of our products through ITC®, our Infrared Training Center, which provides comprehensive instruction, training, certification and applications engineering from several FLIR locations or at the customer’s site. We also license Infrared Training Centers to qualified third parties in certain countries. In 2010, over 10,000 people received training at our Infrared Training Centers worldwide. |
Sales and Distribution
We sell our Thermography products worldwide through a direct sales staff and a network of distributors and representatives. Our Thermography business continues to expand distribution, particularly in Asia and Latin America. At the end of 2010, our Thermography segment employed over 130 direct sales personnel and utilized approximately 750 distributors. In 2007, we acquired Extech Instruments Corporation, a distributor of hand-held test and measurement equipment. We have utilized its distribution channels, particularly into catalogs and retailers, to expand our distribution in the United States. In January 2008, we acquired Cedip Infrared Systems which has provided additional distribution capability, particularly in international markets.
Thermography order backlog, defined as orders received for products or services for which a sales agreement is in place and delivery is expected within twelve months, was $22 million as of December 31, 2010, compared with $27 million at the end of 2009. Thermography is among our least backlog intensive segment, as shipment of product typically occurs within a few weeks of receipt of orders.
9
Table of Contents
Customers
Typical Thermography customers include research and development facilities, universities, industrial companies, utility companies, building inspectors, electrical contractors, thermography consultants, damage restoration contractors, and numerous commercial enterprises. Given the high-value nature of many of our Thermography instruments, our revenues tend to be correlated with seasonal trends, in particular capital spending trends. In general, customers in markets like predictive maintenance and R&D are sensitive to the broad economy because our cameras are viewed as capital expense items. The sales of our lower priced cameras are somewhat less sensitive to economic cycles due to their lower price points.
Competition
Thermography is a highly competitive market that has both large and niche providers of thermal camera equipment. While our market share in Thermography products is significant, estimated to be 60% based on independent industry research, we view the market as highly competitive. We strive to grow our market share through continuing our innovation of advanced imaging products and controlling our costs to facilitate lower prices to the end-user. Our primary competitors in Thermography include Fluke (a division of Danaher), NEC, Testo, and Wuhan Guide.
Commercial Vision Systems (“CVS”)
Commercial Vision Systems is focused on commercial markets where the primary need is to see at night and in adverse conditions. While these markets are broad and growing rapidly, they exhibit low penetration of infrared technology and require distinct distribution channels. CVS is focused on expanding its product line and expanding distribution. This strategy focuses efforts on building distribution channel relationships, accelerating design cycles, reducing manufacturing costs, and providing excellent customer service. As in Thermography, price elasticity of demand is high, and as prices fall further, we expect sales volumes to continue to increase. Significant markets for CVS products today include:
Markets
Security and Surveillance | Thermal imaging systems have been used for surveillance and perimeter security of government, military and industrial facilities for many years. Over the past few years, we have introduced a series of lower priced, purpose built systems targeted at the commercial security market and are actively expanding distribution in this market. Our security products are now being used to protect critical infrastructure, ports, borders, commercial sites, and residential homes. Demand for security systems utilizing thermal imaging technology is growing rapidly across all segments. |
Automotive Night Vision | We offer a night vision system for passenger automobiles that provides drivers with the ability to see at night and through obscurants, such as fog, at distances much further and wider than can be seen with traditional headlights. We currently provide cameras for certain Audi, BMW, and Rolls Royce models. We work with Autoliv Electronics, a major supplier of automotive safety equipment, to distribute theses systems, and we expect to continue to expand the technology into new makes and models over the next several years. |
Other Transportation Night Vision | We are actively promoting our products in other transportation markets, such as trucks, trains, recreational vehicles and first responder vehicles, as well as aftermarket sales in the automotive |
10
Table of Contents
market. Use of thermal imaging in mining and heavy industrial transport has increased and has become a valuable application of our technology. These markets are in the early stages of adoption of infrared technology, but we believe they offer significant future growth opportunities. |
Marine | In 2006, we introduced the first cost-effective infrared device specifically designed for recreational boating, cruise lines, commercial fishing and merchant marine vessels, ferries, and other maritime markets. Since then we have aggressively expanded distribution through a combination of direct sales and a network of dealers. Our acquisition of Raymarine has greatly expanded our distribution capabilities as well as our product breadth. We now offer an integrated suite of maritime electronics that utilizes multifunction displays, infrared cameras, depth sounders, GPS, auto pilots, and advanced command and control software. |
Personal Vision | We are pioneering the use of advanced thermal imaging technology for consumer applications. Our easy to use, affordable, and lightweight personal vision thermal cameras give people the ability to see at night and stay safe in various settings. We enhance people’s enjoyment of the outdoors by enabling them to keep track of their camping party, see and track animals, and navigate during deteriorated weather conditions. In the home, our cameras can be used for numerous household and security applications, such as locating heat leaks, evaluating insulation coverage, detecting water damage, identifying intruders, and locating pests. |
Law Enforcement | We are a leader in the supply of low cost, hand-held systems to the law enforcement market. These cameras provide a lightweight, cost-effective, high performance tool for police officers and other law enforcement professionals to conduct search and rescue, surveillance, or pursuit missions. |
OEM Markets | We supply cooled and uncooled camera cores, sensors, and readout integrated circuits on an OEM basis for a broad range of applications where customers require a product at a lower level of integration than a fully developed thermal imaging system. Examples of major customers in this segment are Mine Safety Appliances, Inc. (firefighting); Bullard (firefighting); AeroVironment, Inc. (unmanned aerial vehicles); Northrop Grumman Corporation (cooled cores for military applications); Hologic (readout integrated circuits for digital X-ray); and various makers of security systems worldwide. |
Sales and Distribution
Commercial Vision Systems is actively expanding its distribution network by hiring additional direct sales personnel and expanding third-party distribution networks in specific markets. At the end of 2010, our Commercial Vision Systems sales organization employed approximately 80 direct sales personnel as well as a global network of dealers across many distinct markets. In certain markets, CVS has chosen to supply camera cores on an OEM basis to companies with well established distribution networks. Examples include firefighting, where we supply cores to Mine Safety Appliances, Inc. and Bullard, and automotive, where we are partnered with Autoliv Electronics.
11
Table of Contents
With our further expansion into the low cost segment of the commercial markets, we have developed greater competencies in market research, electronic marketing, marketing communications, and business development. Our ability to identify new markets, adapt our product solutions to meet unique market needs, quickly develop marketing communications that highlight our unique features, and leverage existing and new distribution channels to develop incremental business are important aspects of our marketing and communications efforts.
Commercial Vision Systems carries backlog in certain markets, but the business is less backlog dependent than our Government Systems segment. Commercial Vision Systems backlog as of December 31, 2010, was $114 million, compared with $103 million at the end of 2009.
Customers
Commercial Vision Systems serves customers such as OEMs, automotive suppliers, aircraft manufacturers and dealers, marine electronics dealers, major integrators of security systems, and increasingly, consumers. Although we have hundreds of customers for our CVS products, there remains tremendous opportunity to expand this business. The emerging personal vision systems market is becoming increasingly accessible as we leverage our business model to reduce the price of advanced thermal imaging products. This consumer market is a key strategic area of focus given the vast size of the customer base and the opportunities it provides us to expand our volumes and brand name. Our established distribution network, broad product portfolio, and product and technical development capabilities set a foundation for future success as we continue to leverage our commercial operating model to reduce our costs in creating advanced imaging products. As we continue to make our products accessible to a larger population of end-users and build awareness of the advantages of thermal imaging applications, we anticipate our CVS segment will provide significant revenue and profitability for our business.
Competition
The markets that CVS addresses are emerging from the early-adopter environments to broader based demand, which has attracted competitors. We believe the key drivers of success in these markets are: technological proficiency in imaging sensors, product design and functionality, product cost, ability to deliver in a timely manner, distribution reach, brand name, and scalability of operations. We are uniquely positioned to operate in this competitive environment given our demonstrated ability to innovate high-quality sensors at low cost due to our operating model, our advanced research and development capabilities, our established and reliable distribution network, our diversified manufacturing operations, and our broad product offering. The primary competitors vary market by market, but include divisions of General Dynamics (Axsys), L-3 Communications, Sofradir (ULIS), Axis and numerous smaller companies.
Raymarine
Raymarine is a leading provider of marine electronics, and continues as the pioneer in the use of digital control systems. The comprehensive suite of products that Raymarine develops and markets is intended to fulfill all of the marine electronic needs of recreational boaters and offer best-in-class integrated control solutions for all of their onboard instrumentation. The current product portfolio includes multifunction displays, autopilots, thermal imaging cameras, radars, sonar modules, and other instruments which interconnect through Raymarine’s proprietary networking solutions. This broad product range is differentiated by the reliability, usability, and interconnectivity of the instruments we provide. Raymarine’s core capability, providing a comprehensive and centralized control, navigation, and communication system that can be managed with a single integrated data output, is valuable to its customers, who increasingly look for quality, technologically advanced products from a single-source.
Our key strategies for Raymarine, as we continue to integrate the business into our operations, include rationalizing and leveraging the significant R&D engineering expertise of the business, incorporating thermal imaging cameras into the integrated product suite while building the awareness of the significant value of thermal imaging to the recreational marine industry, and enhancing the integration capabilities of the business through
12
Table of Contents
investments in software and networking solutions. We have invested significant resources in evolving Raymarine’s product line, consolidating its distribution network, and rationalizing its operations and outsourced manufacturing relationships. While the boating market that Raymarine serves is sizable, the industry has been in a cyclical trough. We believe that recent operational improvements have positioned the business to benefit significantly as global demand returns to historical levels.
Markets
Recreational Boating OEMs | A main focus of Raymarine has been to establish relationships with boat manufacturers in order to sell a fully integrated electronic “backbone” on new boats, with the intention of driving brand continuity with a large installed base of end-users. Medium sized (26 to 45 feet in length) and large boats (in excess of 45 feet in length) have a unique need for sophisticated electronics and multifunction control solutions. Additionally, in recent years, demand has grown for scaled-down instruments in the much larger segment for small boats (comprising inflatable and rigid motor craft below 25 feet in length). Raymarine’s comprehensive product offering has evolved to serve these evolving boat manufacturers’ needs well. |
Aftermarket | Due to the comparatively long life of a recreational boat, the growing importance and usefulness of marine electronic equipment and the pace of technological development, the aftermarket is large for electronics systems refits and upgrades. Raymarine has ensured that both its instruments and its networking software are capable of integrating with third party platforms and instruments, which has become a key driver of demand in the aftermarket. |
Sales and Distribution
Raymarine’s products are sold through a combination of direct sales, captive and third-party distributors, service partners, and retail outlets. Raymarine has strong relationships with a large number of key boat builder OEMs, most of which are supplied directly with the latest Raymarine systems. Many of these relationships are long-term in nature and have evolved over a number of years with important exchanges of product development ideas. Raymarine’s OEM customers have typically built up important embedded technical product fitting and integration knowledge over a period of time. They have also established confidence in the critical electronic systems fitted to the products they supply to their customers. In addition to supplying OEMs directly, a number are supplied through Raymarine’s distribution network.
Raymarine also supplies a global network of approximately 2,400 wholesalers, national distributors (both owned and third party), and retailers. Many of these partnerships are on an exclusive basis, whereby Raymarine is the only electronic boating equipment stocked. Raymarine also has a global network of approximately 2,000 dealers and service centers which are able to sell, repair, and install Raymarine’s products. This global support and repair service network is a key competitive advantage as many of our products are critical to the operation of a boat. Additionally, the business has established a presence at retail locations and boat shows, which serves to build the Raymarine brand in both the new-build and aftermarket spaces. Having a strong consumer brand name and a large installed base of users created through our first fitments drives business in the aftermarket as boaters look to upgrade or replace instrumentation, often with the brand with which they are familiar.
Raymarine backlog as of December 31, 2010, was $11 million. Similar to our Thermography business, Raymarine is not considered a backlog intensive business, as shipment of product typically occurs within a few weeks of receipt of orders.
13
Table of Contents
Customers
Raymarine sells its products via diverse distribution channels to a wide variety of customers. Raymarine has established long-term relationships with approximately 250 OEM boat builders, each of which have experience and knowledge of the product capabilities, quality, and reliability. These OEMs value the breadth of the Raymarine product line and our global dealership service network. We supply a number of OEMs directly, who outfit their new boats with integrated Raymarine electronic systems. As a result of Raymarine’s long standing relationships with OEMs and its ability to provide fully integrated electronic systems, including an electronic “backbone” to a boat, there is a high level of business from consumers purchasing replacement or upgrade equipment for their outfitted boats. We also sell discrete instruments to consumers who are looking to install new or upgrade existing marine electronics on their small, medium, or large boats.
Competition
The maritime electronics markets are competitive with many established brands and companies. We compete with these companies through innovation, product capabilities and perceived value, relationships with OEMs and distributors, and product availability and service. We believe we compete successfully with our strength in distribution, established brand name, engineering capabilities, and renewed financial flexibility. Our principal competitors in the recreational boating market include Furuno, Garmin, Navico, and a number of small companies.
Government Systems
Government Systems focuses on providing enhanced vision capabilities to a wide variety of military, paramilitary, law enforcement, public safety, and other government customers. Our systems typically provide the capability to see over long distances, day or night, through adverse weather conditions, and from a wide variety of vehicle, man portable, and fixed installation platforms. Currently, the majority of our Government Systems infrared imaging systems use cooled technology to identify objects from long distances; however, uncooled thermal imaging systems are growing rapidly in certain markets such as weapon sights, hand-held monoculars/binoculars, military vehicles, and unmanned aerial vehicles. Many of our customers require systems that operate in demanding environments such as extreme climatic conditions, battlefield and military environments, or maritime conditions. Systems are often installed onto larger platforms and must be able to integrate with such other systems as aircraft avionics, radars, laser systems, and large, broad-based security networks.
Government Systems offers a very wide array of products across multiple applications. For airborne applications, we have developed highly stabilized platforms, known as gimbals, which typically contain multiple payloads in addition to the infrared imaging system, as well as sophisticated software and analytic capabilities. For land applications, we manufacture three types of products: hand-held products, platform mounted products, and targeting products. Platform mounted units are typically housed in a weather-tight enclosure and feature remote control capabilities and multi-sensor integration capability (e.g., closed circuit TV, laser rangefinder, compass or global positioning system). Hand-held ground products are ruggedized and have optional lenses and target location capabilities. Ground-based targeting products are designed to attach to existing daylight sights to provide bore-sighted, nighttime capabilities. For maritime applications, we manufacture shipborne products which are similar to our airborne gimbals, but are inverted and customized for the marine environment.
We address our core markets through either a commercial, off-the-shelf (“COTS”) model or a commercially developed, military qualified (“CDMQ”™) model. The products we develop under the COTS model are applicable to a range of commercial and government customers and markets, including military applications. CDMQ products are specifically designed to meet military specifications. In both the COTS and CDMQ product development models, we use internally generated funds for research and development, and we generally own all rights to the products and their design.
14
Table of Contents
Markets
Search and Rescue | Thermal imaging systems are used in airborne and shipborne search and rescue missions to rescue individuals in danger or distress on boats or vehicles, or wounded or lost in adverse conditions. Such systems are in use today by organizations such as the United States Army, United States Coast Guard, the United States Marine Corps, the United States Air National Guard and the United Kingdom Ministry of Defense. |
Force Protection | In instances where military or other personnel are deployed in hostile areas, thermal imaging systems mounted on towers or other platforms are deployed to identify and defeat potential threats at an early stage. Our systems are deployed for this purpose by the United States Army, United States Marine Corps and others worldwide. |
Border and Maritime Patrol | Thermal imaging systems are used in airborne, shipborne, hand-held and fixed installation applications for border and maritime surveillance, particularly at night, to enforce borders and coastal waters, to monitor national fishing boundaries and to prevent smuggling. Our cameras are currently deployed along numerous borders worldwide, including in the United States, Europe and the Middle East. |
Surveillance and Reconnaissance | Thermal imaging systems are used in surveillance and reconnaissance applications for the precise positioning of objects or people from substantial distances and for enhanced situational awareness, particularly at night or in conditions of reduced or obscured visibility. These systems are installed on fixed platforms, manned mobile platforms, and unmanned aerial vehicles. |
Airborne Law Enforcement | We are a leader in the supply of stabilized airborne thermal imaging systems for federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. Agencies with this type of equipment have the ability to track suspects, locate lost persons, and provide situational awareness to officers on the ground. |
Targeting | We offer several products that provide precise target location and designation capabilities in applications ranging from clip-on rifle scope devices to high-precision, stabilized, airborne laser designator systems. |
Federal Drug Interdiction | Thermal imaging systems enable government agencies to expand their drug interdiction and support activities by allowing greater surveillance and detection capabilities. Our systems are in use by the United States Customs Service, the United States Drug Enforcement Agency and the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation, as well as by international government agencies. |
Sales and Distribution
Our Government Systems business has a direct sales staff of approximately 80 individuals and a network of independent representatives and distributors covering major government markets worldwide. Included in this
15
Table of Contents
total are technical and customer support staff in the United States, Europe, the Middle East and Asia Pacific who provide application development, technical training and operational assistance to direct and indirect sales personnel as well as to customers.
We enter into contracts and subcontracts which are subject to certain risks related to doing business with the United States government and may be subject to termination, reduction and/or amendment at the election of the United States government. For a discussion of these risks, see sections “We depend on the United States government for a material portion of our business and changes in government spending could adversely affect our business” and “As a United States government contractor, we are subject to a number of procurement rules and regulations” in Item 1A “Risk Factors.”
Government Systems typically has the highest backlog of our segments relative to revenue and in absolute terms. At December 31, 2010, Government Systems backlog totaled $325 million, compared with $433 million at December 31, 2009. The decline in Government Systems backlog is primarily due to significant deliveries in 2010 on certain large programs, primarily with US Government agencies, and reductions in US Government spending in 2010.
Customers
Government Systems customers generally consist of United States and international government agencies, including civilian, military, paramilitary, and police forces, as well as defense contractors and aircraft manufacturers. A substantial portion of our consolidated revenue is derived from sales to United States and international government agencies and our business will continue to be substantially dependent upon such sales. Aggregate sales to United States government agencies accounted for 34 percent of our consolidated revenue in 2010, 43 percent in 2009, and 41 percent in 2008. We expect revenue outside the United States to continue to account for a significant portion of our Government Systems revenue, as demand for our equipment is increasing rapidly outside the United States. The Government Systems segment is susceptible to some seasonality in its orders primarily based on the United States government budget year end. The result is that the third quarter tends to exhibit the largest amount of orders for our Government Systems segment. However, fiscal policy trends, budget delays, and general economic trends can overshadow this seasonality in any given year.
Competition
The Government Systems segment operates in highly competitive markets that evolve rapidly with the advent of new technologies and requirements. Many of our competitors in the government sector are well established contractors for various governments and have more financial and other resources than we possess. The principal competitive factors in the government markets include technical innovation, agency relationships, product quality and reliability, price and ability to deliver. We believe we compete successfully in these markets with our best-in-class technologies, our products’ abilities to outperform customer requirements and competitors’ products, our lower priced solutions that result from our commercial operating model, and our service and support functions that exist in the field and near the customer. Our current principal competitors in the Government Systems markets include divisions of BAE Systems, DRS (a Finmeccanica company), Elbit Systems, General Dynamics, L-3 Communications, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Sagem, Smiths Group, Sofradir, and Thales.
ICx
With our acquisition of ICx in October 2010, we added leading capabilities in the development of advanced sensor technologies used to detect and identify CBRNE threats. ICx also adds highly-complementary thermal imaging, wide area radar surveillance, platform integration, and software solutions to our product suite. ICx leverages an established technical research and development organization which, we believe, enables the business to offer the highest quality, most sensitive, and easiest to use products that meet the evolving needs of government and commercial security providers.
16
Table of Contents
ICx manufactures and markets the leading portable explosive detector, the smallest spectroscopic radiation detector, and the most accurate mobile solutions for perimeter surveillance available in the market today. This product success has allowed ICx to build a leadership position in the homeland security market, and the business intends to expand on this position through continued development of innovative technologies. With significant experience in managing government-funded research and development projects, ICx has developed entrenched relationships with various government decision makers and has deep knowledge of the governmental procurement process.
Markets
CBRNE | ICx designs, develops and manufactures detection instruments that sense and identify chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive threats. These instruments are compact, rugged, and portable for use in the field. The methods ICx CBRNE solutions utilize to test and monitor areas for threats include continuous air sampling mass spectrometry (indoor and outdoor), point detection, spray-based analysis, gamma ray detection, vapor testing, liquids screening, and Raman spectroscopy. |
Wide Area Surveillance | ICx offers wide-area surveillance radar systems that identify potential threats before they cross a perimeter. Providing high-resolution millimeter wave and frequency-modulated continuous wave radars, ICx allows fewer people to detect more threats within a large area. These radar technologies are very complimentary to our core thermal imaging systems in that they allow us to integrate them with our thermal imaging cameras to provide a robust slew-to-cue solution that can survey and detect movement within a large perimeter and automatically direct a thermal camera towards the movement to provide a specific field of view. |
Tactical Solutions | Combining sensor and surveillance technologies to create turn-key solutions for a multitude of security applications, ICx develops and manufactures platforms for surveillance, assessment, and response. TheCerberus mobile unmanned towers and mannedSkyWatch towers are fully networkable platform solutions that integrate various sensor suites, including infrared thermal or visible light cameras, ground surveillance radar, video motion detection, and unattended ground sensors. Additionally, ICx offers an open-source software system calledCohesionthat is a flexible integration framework enabling CBRNE sensors to be incorporated into standard command and control software systems and is specifically designed to support or integrate with our or third-party advanced sensors and devices. |
Sales and Distribution
ICx sells its products worldwide primarily through a direct sales force, but also utilizes third-party sales representatives, value-added resellers, and systems integrators. With a centralized sales organization and specialized sales teams that serve specific markets, ICx has been successful at building and leveraging strong relationships with key decision makers at various government agencies and commercial entities. As some ICx products are designed as components or sub-systems, the business utilizes value-added resellers or systems integrators for incorporation into their products or systems. For example, ICx provides video integration software for security command centers, access control software and firmware for building-wide security systems, bio-samplers for first responders, and multi-channel analyzers for radiation portals.
17
Table of Contents
ICx derives a portion of its revenue, approximately 27% in the fourth quarter of 2010, from funding received from agencies of the United States government pursuant to research projects. The revenue that we recognize under these contracts represents reimbursement by the customer for time periods ranging from several months to several years. Our participation in these and other development programs has culminated in the development of a number of commercial products. In general, our United States government contracts permit us to retain all rights in patents emerging from the funded research and development, subject to the United States government’s license to use the technology we develop.
At December 31, 2010, ICx had a total backlog of $62 million. Backlog represents orders that have been received for products, contract research and development, or other services for which a contractual agreement is in place and delivery or performance is expected to occur within twelve months.
Customers
ICx sells its products, systems, and services to a broad base of federal, state and local government customers, to all branches of the U.S. military, foreign militaries, and to private sector businesses and commercial ports both in the United States and internationally. Utilizing an internal sales force, the business sells to agencies of the U.S. government, such as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and its Customs and Border Protection branch, the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Transportation Security Administration, Federal Bureau of Investigation, NASA, U.S. Secret Service, U.S. Coast Guard, as well as agencies of various state and local governments in the United States, such as the New York Police Department, and the California Department of Transportation. Additionally, we provide products, components, and sub-systems to value-added resellers and system integrators in both the security industry, who either resell our products or integrate them into comprehensive security installations, and the non-security sector, where end-users utilize our technologies for industrial, environmental, medical, and other applications.
Competition
The diverse product portfolio that ICx possesses places the business in competition with a wide variety of companies in the homeland security, defense, and industrial sectors. The markets in which ICx competes are dynamic and highly competitive. Success in these markets depends on our ability to develop new technologies to meet rapidly evolving customer needs, reduce production and development costs, integrate with third-party devices and systems, establish and foster relationships with key government and commercial customers, and recruit highly technical personnel. While we do not compete with any one competitor across the full range of our products, we do compete with several single-point providers, diversified enterprises, and divisions of large technology companies, such as: Axis AB, BAE Systems, Canberra Industries, DRS Technologies, General Electric, Goodrich Corporation, Honeywell, L-3 Communications, Smiths Detection, and United Technologies.
Discontinued Operations
ICx has certain operations that offer engineering and project management solutions that help governments enable the safe and reliable transportation of people and goods and operations that offer sensor instruments that serve various non-security commercial markets. We have determined that these operations are not strategic to our business and that we intend to sell them.
18
Table of Contents
Technology and Capabilities
We use our expertise in product design, infrared imaging sensors, mass spectronomy, sensing material, optics, lasers, image processing, systems integration and other technologies, to develop and produce sophisticated thermal, multi-sensor imaging, and threat detection systems. We integrate the following capabilities and disciplines into our manufacturing processes:
System Design and Integration | We have developed extensive competencies in the design and integration of numerous capabilities and payloads into integrated systems or sub-systems. Competencies such as stabilization, packaging and systems integration allow us to effectively combine a wide variety of technologies and payloads to design and manufacture complex systems to suit our customers’ needs. |
Radiometry | Our ability to produce thermal imaging systems that can accurately measure temperature is critical in many of our Thermography markets. We have demonstrated know-how in designing and producing systems that can measure temperature to within very precise tolerances while maintaining accuracy and stability over time and over a wide range of ambient temperatures. We believe our skills in this area, known as radiometry, offer an important competitive advantage over many of our competitors. |
Mechanical Engineering | Our design and production of thermal imaging systems involves highly sophisticated mechanical engineering techniques, particularly in the design and assembly of the supporting structures for system components such as detector arrays, coolers, scanners and optics. We also have expertise in designing stabilized assemblies used in our gimbal mounted products utilizing electro-mechanical control, gyroscopes and electronic stabilization, and specialized control mechanisms. |
Infrared Detector Design Manufacturing | We design and manufacture both cooled and uncooled infrared detector arrays, in high volumes and at low cost. We believe our uncooled vanadium oxide microbolometers and cooled detectors using indium antimonide and indium gallium arsenide are among the highest performing infrared detectors of their type available in the world. Internal design and manufacturing of detectors provides significant cost and engineering advantages compared with the use of third-party detectors. |
Integrated Circuits and Electronic Design | We have significant electronic design capabilities across several specialized areas, including readout integrated circuit design, signal processing, image processing, and electronics integration. Our design expertise lies in the areas of reliability, low power consumption and extreme environmental survivability. |
Sensing Materials | Our sensors use new materials with novel characteristics, such as innovative semiconductors, crystals, polymers, reagents, and other recently developed materials. Some materials are extraordinarily sensitive, responding to trace exposures of chemical compounds such |
19
Table of Contents
as explosives, nerve agents, or biological proteins. Other materials respond to low-intensity radioactive emissions of electromagnetic energy, such as specific bands of infrared light. Many of these materials did not exist a few years ago or could not be sufficiently purified or economically assembled into functional structures. |
Software Development | Software is an increasingly important aspect of our overall engineering and design activity. We offer networking capability, video analytics and other software and middleware inside many of our camera systems, and such applications are growing in importance. Our systems are also able to interface with many standard external software protocols. |
Motion Control Systems | Our acquisition of Directed Perception in 2009 added significantly to our motion control system design and manufacturing capabilities. In addition to highly accurate stabilized gimbaled systems for airborne and other applications, we also offer a line of high precision, repeatable pan and tilt systems for use with a wide variety of payloads. |
Optical Design, Fabrication and Coating | We design and manufacture sophisticated infrared optics using materials such as silicon and germanium that are required to produce a thermal imaging system. This capability allows us to rapidly develop optics optimized for use with our cameras and avoid costs and delays associated with reliance on third-party optics suppliers. We also have the ability to apply custom vapor deposited coatings to improve the transmission of the unique lens materials that are used in infrared systems. |
Micro-Coolers | We manufacture the industry’s smallest, lightest and lowest power micro-coolers for use in cooling infrared detectors. Our coolers are especially effective in hand-held applications, where light weight and long battery life are essential. |
Lasers and Laser Components | Many of our more sophisticated systems are increasingly being offered with various types of laser payloads, including pointers, illuminators, rangefinders and designators. We design and manufacture purpose-built laser rangefinders and designators for inclusion in some of our gimbaled systems. We also manufacture certain laser-related components for customers. |
Tactical Platforms | With our acquisition of ICx we have added the capability to develop and manufacture comprehensive and integrated solutions for surveillance, assessment, and response. These platform solutions draw from our surveillance and detection products, as well as products sourced outside of the Company. These unmanned and manned networkable mobile and vehicle mounted tower systems, branded underCerberusandSkyWatch names, can be deployed in nearly any environment and have provided security at borders, at theme parks, for police and military forces, at national monuments, and at high profile events. |
20
Table of Contents
Research & Development
Our success has been and will be in the future substantially affected by our ability to innovate new products and technologies that both augment our existing solutions and create new avenues for growth. We strive to differentiate ourselves from our competition with our R&D operations. Our internally funded research and development expenses were $116.4 million, $91.3 million, and $90.0 million in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. We intend to continue to have significant internal research and development expenses in the future to provide a continuing flow of innovative and high quality products to maintain and enhance our competitive position in each of our business segments. In addition to these internally-funded amounts, in 2010, 2009, 2008, we spent $12.3 million, $5.4 million, and $6.0 million, respectively, on research and development projects that were reimbursed by government agencies or prime contractors pursuant to development contracts we undertook.
Focusing on projects that have the highest probability for commercial marketability, our R&D teams are located within our business segments. These teams work to develop products that will fulfill their specific customers’ constantly evolving needs while also sharing findings, successes, technologies, tools, and best practices with one another. One method that our R&D teams use to ensure our new products evolve with our customers is a spiral development process. This process is particularly useful within our Government Systems R&D teams in that it facilitates rapid field testing and refinement of new technologies in order to get end-users the critical protection and information tools they need as quickly as possible. A key tenet of the spiral development philosophy is seeking and receiving end-user feedback on new or upgraded products. Engineers in the field work with the end-users in real-time in order to revise and tune products quickly and efficiently. The solicitation and effectiveness of the end-user feedback has proven integral to our success in creating the most technologically advanced yet user-friendly solutions.
Proprietary Rights
We have numerous patents, trademarks, trade secrets and other intellectual property that are important for our success. We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, and trade secret laws, confidentiality agreements, and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. Our intellectual property provides important competitive advantages, and we have intensified our efforts to protect our intellectual property from misappropriation. We will continue to actively seek intellectual property protection for our innovations and intend to emphasize initiatives that will promote innovation and leadership in marketable technology. We cannot, however, be certain or give any assurance that we can maintain our competitive advantage or that competitors will not develop similar or superior capabilities.
Manufacturing
We manufacture many of the critical components for our products, including infrared detectors, gimbals, pan-tilts, optics and coatings, laser sub-systems and micro-coolers, and develop much of the necessary software and middleware for our systems. This vertical integration minimizes lead times, facilitates prompt delivery of our products, controls costs and ensures that these components satisfy our quality standards. We purchase other parts pre-assembled, including certain detectors, certain coolers and optics, circuit boards, cables and wire harnesses. These purchased and manufactured components are then assembled into finished systems and tested at one of our primary production facilities located in the U.S., Sweden, Estonia, France, Germany and Canada. Certain components and finished goods are produced by contract manufacturers.
Our manufacturing operations are, from time to time, audited by certain OEM customers, which include several major aircraft manufacturers, and have been certified as meeting their quality standards. Substantially all of our manufacturing locations are either ISO 9001:2000 or :2008 certified with certain locations having higher certifications.
21
Table of Contents
Customer Service
We maintain service facilities at many locations worldwide. Each of our service facilities has the capability to perform the complex calibrations required to service thermal imaging systems. We also maintain field service capabilities under the direction of our independent representatives or distributors in locations outside the United States.
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, we had 3,215 employees of which 2,051 were located in the United States and 1,164 were located outside of the United States. We have generally been successful in attracting highly skilled technical, marketing and management personnel. None of our employees in the United States are represented by a union or other bargaining group. Certain employees in Europe are represented by unions and workers councils whose contracts are subject to periodic renegotiations. We believe our relationships with our employees, unions and workers councils are good.
Available Information
Our internet website address is www.flir.com. This Report, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and other required filings are available through our internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Report.
| ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
The following are important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. In addition, the risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Unforeseen risks could arise and problems or issues that we now view as minor could become more significant. If we are unable to adequately respond to these risks and uncertainties, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Additionally, we cannot be certain or give any assurance that any actions taken to reduce known risks and uncertainties will be effective.
General economic conditions may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition
Our operations and performance depend significantly on worldwide economic conditions and their impact on levels of capital investment and consumer spending. Economic factors that could adversely influence demand for the Company’s products include uncertainty about global economic conditions leading to reduced levels of investment, changes in government spending levels and/or priorities, the size and availability of government budgets, customers’ and suppliers’ access to credit, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors affecting government, industrial or consumer spending behavior.
Our primary markets are volatile and unpredictable
Our business depends on the demand for our thermal imaging systems in a variety of commercial, industrial and government markets. In the past, the demand for our products in these markets has fluctuated due to a variety of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:
| • | the timing, number and size of orders from, and shipments to, our customers, as well as the relative mix of those orders; |
| • | variations in the volume of orders for a particular product or product line in a particular quarter; |
22
Table of Contents
| • | the size and timing of new contract awards; |
| • | the timing of the release of government funds for procurement of our products; and |
| • | the timing of orders and shipments within a given fiscal quarter. |
Seasonal fluctuations in our operating results result from:
| • | the seasonal pattern of contracting by the United States government and certain foreign governments; |
| • | the desire of customers to take delivery of equipment prior to fiscal year ends due to funding considerations; and |
| • | the tendency of commercial enterprises to fully utilize annual capital budgets prior to expiration. |
We depend on the United States government for a material portion of our business and changes in government spending could adversely affect our business
We derive significant revenue from contracts or subcontracts funded by United States government agencies. A significant reduction in the purchase of our products by these agencies or contractors for these agencies would have an adverse effect on our business. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, approximately 34 percent, 43 percent and 41 percent, respectively, of our revenues were derived directly or indirectly from contracts with the United States government and its agencies. The funding of contracts awarded to us depends on the overall United States government budget and appropriations process, which is beyond our control. In addition, at its discretion, the United States government may change its spending priorities and/or terminate, reduce or modify contracts.
As a United States government contractor, we are subject to a number of procurement rules and regulations
Government contractors must comply with specific procurement regulations and other requirements and are subject to routine audits and investigations by United States government agencies. If we fail to comply with these rules and regulations, the results could include: reductions in the value of contracts; contract modifications or termination; the assessment of penalties and fines; and/or suspension or debarment from government contracting or subcontracting for a period of time or permanently.
Our future success will depend on our ability to respond to the rapid technological change in the markets in which we compete, our ability to introduce new or enhanced products and enter into new markets
The markets in which we compete, including the thermal imaging industry, are characterized by rapid technological developments and frequent new product introductions, enhancements and modifications. Our ability to develop new products and technologies that anticipate changing customer requirements, reduce costs and otherwise retain or enhance our competitive position in existing and new markets will be an important factor in our future results from operations. We will continue to make substantial capital expenditures and incur significant research and development costs to improve our manufacturing capability, reduce costs, and develop and introduce new products and enhancements. If we fail to develop and introduce new products and technologies in a timely manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected. In addition, we cannot be certain that our new products and technologies will be successful or that customers will accept any of our new products.
We must successfully manage an increasingly complex global organization
As the Company has grown, the size and scope of the Company’s worldwide operations have also increased substantially. We now design, manufacture and market numerous product lines across our segments in numerous locations worldwide. Significant management time and effort is required to effectively manage the increased
23
Table of Contents
complexity of the business and our failure to successfully do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we manufacture our products at various facilities. Our inability to continue to manufacture our products at one or more of our facilities as a result of, for example, a prolonged power outage, earthquake, fire or other natural disaster, or labor or political unrest, could prevent us from supplying products to our customers and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face risks from international sales and business activities
We market and sell our products worldwide and international sales have accounted for, and are expected to continue to account for, a significant portion of our revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, international sales accounted for 47 percent, 41 percent and 38 percent, respectively, of our total revenue. We also manufacture certain products and subassemblies in Europe and we have several contract manufacturing agreements with third parties in Europe and in Asia. Our international business activities are subject to a number of risks, including:
| • | the imposition of and changes to governmental controls; |
| • | restrictions on the export of critical technology; |
| • | trade restrictions; |
| • | difficulty in collecting receivables; |
| • | inadequate protection of intellectual property; |
| • | labor union activities; |
| • | changes in tariffs and taxes; |
| • | restriction on the importation and exportation of goods and services; |
| • | compliance with anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws; |
| • | difficulties in staffing and managing international operations; and |
| • | political and economic instability. |
No assurance can be given that these factors will not have a material adverse effect on our future international sales and operations and, consequently, on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Operating margins may be negatively impacted by a downturn in sales
Our expense levels are based, in part, on our expectations regarding future sales and these expenses are largely fixed in the short term. Some expenses, such as those related to research and development activities, would likely be maintained in the event of a sales downturn in order to maintain and enhance the long-term competitiveness of the Company. In addition, to enable us to promptly fill orders, we maintain inventories of finished goods, components and raw materials. As a result, we commit to considerable costs in advance of anticipated sales. Accordingly, we may not be able to reduce our costs in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfall between forecasted and actual sales. Any significant shortfall of sales may result in us carrying higher levels of inventories of finished goods, components and raw materials thereby increasing our risk of inventory obsolescence and corresponding inventory write-downs and write-offs.
24
Table of Contents
Competition in our markets is intense and our failure to compete effectively could adversely affect our business
Competition in the markets for our products is intense. The speed with which companies can identify new applications for thermal imaging, develop products to meet those needs and supply commercial quantities at low prices to the market are important competitive factors. We believe the principal competitive factors in our markets are product performance, price, customer service and training, product reputation, and effective marketing and sales efforts. Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical, research and development, and marketing resources than we do. All of these factors, as well as the potential for increased competition from new competitors, require us to continue to invest in, and focus on, research and development and new product innovation. No assurance can be given that we will be able to compete effectively in the future and a failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Dependence on sole source and limited source suppliers of components for our products exposes us to risks that could result in delays in satisfying customer demand, increased costs and loss of revenue
We currently rely on a number of sole source and limited source suppliers to provide certain key components for our products. We have increased our internal sources of supply for certain critical components, in particular, cooled and uncooled infrared detectors, coolers, optics and optical coatings, and laser components, but we rely on sole or limited source third-party suppliers for other key components including laser rangefinders, gyros, inertial measurement units, certain machined parts, optics, motors and electronic components. Many of these suppliers are small and we are often one of their most important customers. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected in the event that we are unable to source certain of these components on a timely basis or if such components are defective or they do not otherwise meet our performance standards.
Based on past experience, we expect to occasionally receive late deliveries or to experience inadequate supplies of certain components. If critical components provided by any significant supplier become unavailable, our manufacturing operations could be disrupted. Unless we have sufficient lead-time and are otherwise able to identify and qualify acceptable replacement components or redesign our products with different components, we might not be able to obtain necessary components on a timely basis or at acceptable prices. Any extended interruption in the supply of sole or limited source components could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our future success depends in part on attracting and retaining key senior management and qualified technical, sales and other personnel
Our future success depends in part on the efforts and continued services of our key executives and our ability to attract and retain qualified technical, sales and other personnel. Significant competition exists for such personnel and we cannot assure the retention of our key executives, technical and sales personnel or our ability to attract, integrate and retain other such personnel that may be required in the future. We cannot assure that employees will not leave and subsequently compete against us. If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may be unable to successfully integrate recent or future acquisitions into our operations, thereby disrupting our business and harming our financial condition and results of operations
We have made thirteen acquisitions of various sizes in the past eight years. Our most recent acquisitions include Raymarine and ICx in 2010 and Salvador, OmniTech and Directed Perception in 2009. Raymarine and ICx are among the largest acquisitions we have completed and the integration of businesses, personnel, product lines and technologies can be difficult, time consuming and subject to significant risks. For example, we could lose key personnel from companies that we acquire, incur unanticipated costs, lose major sources of revenue, fail
25
Table of Contents
to integrate critical technologies, suffer business disruptions, fail to capture anticipated synergies, fail to establish satisfactory internal controls, or incur unanticipated liabilities. Any of these difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees, increase our expenses and decrease our revenue.
We frequently evaluate strategic opportunities available to us and it is likely that we will make additional acquisitions in the future. Such acquisitions may vary in size and complexity. Any future acquisitions are subject to the risks described above. Furthermore, we might assume or incur additional debt or issue additional equity securities to pay for future acquisitions. Additional debt may negatively impact our results and increase our financial risk, and the issuance of any additional equity securities could dilute our then existing shareholders’ ownership. No assurance can be given that we will realize anticipated benefits of any future acquisitions, or that any such acquisition or investment will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may experience impairment in the value of our tangible and intangible assets
Our industry is subject to rapid changes in technology, which may result in unexpected obsolescence or impairment of our assets. As of December 31, 2010, our intangible assets, including goodwill, totaled $659.4 million and represented 36 percent of our total assets. Most of these intangibles are the result of acquisitions in which the purchase price exceeded the value of the tangible assets acquired. We amortize certain of these intangibles over their anticipated useful life and review goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if warranted by events. To date we have not experienced any impairment of our intangible assets, but there can be no assurance that we will not experience such impairment in the future. In addition, certain of our tangible assets such as inventory and machinery and equipment may experience impairment in their value as a result of such events as the introduction of new products, changes in technology or changes in customer demand patterns. We depreciate our machinery and equipment at levels we believe are adequate; however, there can be no assurance that there will not be a future impairment that may have a material impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face risks from currency fluctuations
Historically, currency fluctuations have affected our operating results. Changes in the value of foreign currencies in which our sales or costs incurred are denominated have in the past caused, and could in the future cause, fluctuations in our operating results. We seek to reduce our exposure to currency fluctuations by denominating, where possible, our international sales in United States dollars, by balancing expenses and revenues in various currencies and by undertaking limited hedging of forecasted currency exposures. With respect to international sales denominated in United States dollars, a decrease in the value of foreign currencies relative to the United States dollar could make our products less price competitive.
Our inability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights and avoid infringing the rights of others could harm our competitive position and our business
Our ability to compete successfully and achieve future revenue growth depends, in part, on our ability to protect our proprietary technology and operate without infringing the rights of others. To accomplish this, we rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, confidentiality agreements and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. Many of our proprietary rights are held in confidence as trade secrets and are not covered by patents, making them more difficult to protect. Although we currently hold United States patents covering certain aspects of our technologies and products, and we are actively pursuing additional patents, we cannot be certain that we will obtain additional patents or trademarks on our technology, products and trade names. Furthermore, we cannot be certain that our patents or trademarks will not be challenged or circumvented by our competitors or that measures taken by us to protect our proprietary rights will adequately deter their misappropriation or disclosure. Any failure by us to meaningfully protect our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
26
Table of Contents
Moreover, because intellectual property does not necessarily prevent our competitors from entering the thermal imaging industry, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our competitive advantage or that our competitors will not develop capabilities equal or superior to ours.
Litigation over patents and other intellectual property is common in our industry. We have been the subject of patent and other intellectual property litigation in the past and cannot be sure that we will not be subject to such litigation in the future. Similarly, there exists the possibility we will assert claims in litigation to protect our intellectual property. Lawsuits defending or prosecuting intellectual property claims and related legal and administrative proceedings could result in substantial expense to us and significant diversion of effort of our personnel. An adverse determination in a patent suit or in any other proceeding in which we are a party could subject us to significant liabilities, result in the loss of intellectual property rights we claim or impact our competitive position. Additionally, an adverse determination could require us to seek licenses from third parties. If such licenses are not available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may not be successful in obtaining the necessary export licenses to conduct operations abroad and the United States government may prevent proposed sales to foreign governments
Export licenses are required from United States government agencies under the Export Administration Act, the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 and the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 for export of many of our products. We can give no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining these licenses. In the aftermath of 9/11, heightened government scrutiny of export licenses for products in our markets has resulted in lengthened review periods for our license applications. Failure to obtain or delays in obtaining these licenses would prevent or delay us from selling our products outside the United States and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on information systems, electronic communication systems, internal and external data and application software in our operations. Systems failures, security breaches and other disruptions, whether internal or external, could have an adverse affect on our business and results of operations
The efficient operation of our business is dependent on computer hardware, software and communication systems. Even the most well protected information systems are vulnerable to systems failures. Such failures could be caused by internal or external events such as incursions by intruders or hackers, computer viruses, power shortages or cyber terrorists. The unavailability of the information systems, the failure of these systems to perform as anticipated for any reason or any significant breach of security could disrupt our business and result in numerous effects, including reduced effectiveness and efficiency of our operations and increased overhead costs and the loss or compromise of important information or data, causing our business and results of operations to be adversely affected.
Our products may suffer from defects or errors leading to substantial damage or warranty claims
We include complex system designs and components in our products that may contain errors or defects, particularly when we incorporate new technology into our products or release new versions. If any of our products are defective, we might be required to redesign or recall those products or pay substantial damages or warranty claims. Such an event could result in significant expenses including expenses arising from product liability and warranty claims, disrupt sales and affect our reputation and that of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We maintain product liability insurance but cannot be certain that it is adequate or will remain available on acceptable terms.
27
Table of Contents
We are subject to certain restrictive covenants under our credit facility which may limit our operational and financial flexibility
On February 8, 2011, we replaced our $300 million secured revolving credit agreement with a new $200 million unsecured revolving credit agreement. Both agreements contain financial covenants that require the maintenance of certain leverage and interest coverage ratios. As of December 31, 2010, there were no amounts borrowed and outstanding under the $300 million credit agreement. The $200 million credit agreement expires on February 8, 2016.
Our ability to meet our debt service obligations and comply with the financial covenants under our credit facility will be dependent upon our future performance, which will be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which are beyond our control. Our inability to comply with the required financial covenants could result in a default under the credit agreement. In the event of any such default, the lenders under our credit facility could elect to declare all outstanding debt, accrued interest and fees under the facility to be due and immediately payable.
Changes in our effective income tax rate may have an adverse effect on our results of operations
Our future effective tax rate may be adversely affected by a number of factors including:
| • | the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed; |
| • | the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities; |
| • | changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; |
| • | adjustments to estimated taxes upon finalization of various tax returns; |
| • | increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes; |
| • | changes in available tax credits; |
| • | changes in share-based compensation expense; |
| • | changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws and changes in generally accepted accounting principles; and/or |
| • | the repatriation of earnings from outside the United States for which we have not previously provided for United States taxes. |
Any significant increase in our future effective tax rates could adversely impact net income for future periods. In addition, the United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other tax authorities regularly examine our income tax returns. Our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted if any assessments resulting from the examination of our income tax returns by the IRS or other taxing authorities are not resolved in our favor.
Oregon law and our charter documents contain provisions that could discourage or prevent a potential takeover, even if the transaction would benefit our shareholders
Other companies may seek to acquire or merge with us. An acquisition or merger of our Company could result in benefits to our shareholders, including an increase in the value of our common stock. Some provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, including our ability to issue preferred stock without further action by our shareholders, as well as provisions of Oregon law, may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that a shareholder may consider favorable.
| ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
28
Table of Contents
| ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES |
At December 31, 2010, we conducted manufacturing, research and development, and sales and administration in 85 facilities world-wide. Of these, we owned 6 facilities with approximately 678 thousand square feet and leased 34 facilities with approximately 696 thousand square feet in the United States, and we owned 5 facilities with approximately 204 thousand square feet and leased 40 facilities with approximately 432 thousand square feet outside the United States, primarily in Europe. Our headquarters is located in Wilsonville, Oregon.
Our major facilities include the following locations:
Location | Owned | Leased | ||||||
| (Square feet in Thousands) | ||||||||
Wilsonville (Portland), Oregon | 154 | — | ||||||
Danderyd (Stockholm), Sweden | — | 125 | ||||||
Arninge (Stockholm), Sweden | 178 | — | ||||||
North Billerica (Boston), Massachusetts | 133 | — | ||||||
Goleta (Santa Barbara), California | 169 | 137 | ||||||
Portsmouth, United Kingdom | — | 77 | ||||||
Other | 248 | 789 | ||||||
Total | 882 | 1,128 | ||||||
Our reportable segments operate out of facilities as follows:
Thermography: Danderyd, Sweden; North Billerica, Massachusetts and 2 facilities in the US and 18 facilities located outside the US.
Commercial Vision Systems: Goleta, California and 3 facilities in the US and 10 facilities located outside the US.
Raymarine: Portsmouth, UK and 1 facility in the US and 11 facilities located outside the US.
Government Systems: Wilsonville, Oregon; North Billerica, Massachusetts; Arninge, Sweden and 4 facilities in the US and 4 facilities located outside the US.
ICx: 26 facilities in the US and 8 facilities located outside the US.
We believe all of our properties are suitable for their intended use, adequate to meet our current and near-term business needs, and in good condition. We do not anticipate difficulty in renewing existing leases as they expire or in finding alternative facilities.
| ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Company and its subsidiary, Indigo Systems Corporation (now known as FLIR Commercial Systems, Inc.), (together, the “FLIR Parties”), were named in a lawsuit filed by Raytheon Company (“Raytheon”) on March 2, 2007, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. On August 11, 2008, Raytheon Company was granted leave to file a second amended complaint. The complaint, as amended, asserted claims for tortious interference, patent infringement, trade secret misappropriation, unfair competition, breach of contract and fraudulent concealment. The FLIR Parties filed an answer to the second amended complaint and counterclaims on September 2, 2008, in which they denied all material allegations. On August 31, 2009, the court entered an order granting the FLIR Parties’ motion for summary judgment on Raytheon’s trade secret
29
Table of Contents
misappropriation claim based on the FLIR Parties’ statute of limitations defense. Raytheon abandoned all of its other claims except its claims relating to four patents (the “Patent Claims”). On August 11, 2010, the FLIR Parties and Raytheon entered into an agreement in principle to resolve the remaining Patent Claims. On October 27, 2010, the parties finalized the agreement which results in a payment of $3 million by the FLIR Parties to Raytheon. The agreement entitles the FLIR Parties to certain license rights in the patents that were the subject of the Patent Claims. A final judgment was entered on January 7, 2011. The parties have appealed certain rulings of the district court to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this matter and is unable to estimate the amount or range of potential loss, if any, which might result if the outcome in this matter is unfavorable.
On July 10, 2008, William J. Parrish and E. Timothy Fitzgibbons (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an action against FLIR Systems, Inc., its affiliate Indigo Systems Corporation (now known as FLIR Commercial Systems, Inc.), Earl R. Lewis and James A. Fitzhenry (collectively, “Defendants”) in California Superior Court for the County of Santa Barbara asserting claims for negligent and intentional tortious interference with prospective economic relations. The claims arose from a prior action in the same court in which then-defendants Parrish and Fitzgibbons prevailed. On November 20, 2009, Plaintiffs amended their complaint to add a malicious prosecution claim, as well as two additional claims for negligent and intentional tortious interference with prospective economic relations. On July 19, 2010, Plaintiffs further amended their complaint to name the Company’s former outside counsel in a prior action as a defendant. The claims against the former outside counsel were subsequently dismissed without prejudice. All tortious interference claims have been dismissed as to all defendants. The case is currently set for trial in May 2011. Defendants intend to vigorously defend themselves in this matter and are unable to estimate the amount or range of potential loss, if any, which might result if the outcome in this matter is unfavorable.
We are also subject to other legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We make a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We believe we have recorded adequate provisions for any probable and estimable losses. While the outcome of such matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
30
Table of Contents
PART II
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
The common stock of the Company has been traded on the NASDAQ Global Market since June 22, 1993, under the symbol “FLIR.” The following table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the high and low closing sales price for our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, a segment of the NASDAQ Global Market.
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||
First Quarter | $ | 32.93 | $ | 26.49 | $ | 31.76 | $ | 18.87 | ||||||||
Second Quarter | 31.42 | 26.73 | 26.55 | 20.70 | ||||||||||||
Third Quarter | 30.66 | 24.38 | 28.64 | 20.71 | ||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter | 29.97 | 24.61 | 33.19 | 26.73 | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2010, there were approximately 132 holders of record of our common stock and 159,211,723 shares outstanding. On February 9, 2011, we announced the adoption of a dividend policy under which we intend to pay quarterly cash dividends for the first time in our history. The first quarterly cash dividend will be $0.06 per share of outstanding common stock, representing a planned annual 2011 cash dividend of $0.24 per share.
The graph below shows a comparison of the five-year cumulative total shareholder return for the Company’s common stock with the cumulative total returns on the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index, the S&P 400 Electronic Equipment & Instruments Index and the S&P 500 Electronic Equipment & Instruments Index for the same five-year period. The data used for this graph assumes that $100 was invested in the Company and in each index on December 31, 2004, and that all dividends were reinvested.
31
Table of Contents
The stock performance graph was plotted using the following data:
| Dec 05 | Dec 06 | Dec 07 | Dec 08 | Dec 09 | Dec 10 | |||||||||||||||||||
FLIR Systems, Inc. | $ | 100.00 | $ | 142.54 | $ | 280.34 | $ | 274.79 | $ | 293.15 | $ | 266.46 | ||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | 100.00 | 115.79 | 122.16 | 76.96 | 97.33 | 111.99 | ||||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Electronic Equipment & Instruments Index | 100.00 | 110.96 | 123.58 | 52.57 | 82.81 | 94.53 | ||||||||||||||||||
The Company has also been included in the NASDAQ-100 Index since 2008.
The following table summarizes our 2010 common stock repurchases:
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased(1) | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased at December 31, 2010 Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||
May 1 to May 31, 2010 | 281,957 | $ | 27.25 | 281,957 | ||||||||||||
June 1 to June 30, 2010 | 924,761 | $ | 27.69 | 924,761 | ||||||||||||
August 1 to August 31, 2010 | 99,410 | $ | 24.49 | 99,410 | ||||||||||||
Total | 1,306,128 | $ | 27.35 | 1,306,128 | 15,462,172 | |||||||||||
| (1) | All shares were purchased in open market transactions. |
All share repurchases are subject to applicable securities laws, and are at times and in amounts as management deems appropriate. All shares of our common stock repurchased in 2010 were repurchased under authorization by our Board of Directors, granted on February 4, 2009, pursuant to which we were authorized to repurchase up to 20.0 million shares of our outstanding common stock in the open market. This authorization expired on February 4, 2011.
On February 9, 2011 our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to 20.0 million shares of our outstanding common stock in the open market. This authorization will expire on February 9, 2013.
32
Table of Contents
| ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statement of Income Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 1,385,301 | $ | 1,147,087 | $ | 1,076,974 | $ | 779,397 | $ | 575,000 | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 622,690 | 488,558 | 470,832 | 346,167 | 260,087 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 762,611 | 658,529 | 606,142 | 433,230 | 314,913 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 116,381 | 91,301 | 89,964 | 72,458 | 60,584 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 285,658 | 219,941 | 231,687 | 168,940 | 117,374 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 402,039 | 311,242 | 321,651 | 241,398 | 177,958 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings from operations | 360,572 | 347,287 | 284,491 | 191,832 | 136,955 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 2,884 | 6,882 | 14,336 | 15,309 | 13,735 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income | (1,258 | ) | (1,749 | ) | (7,397 | ) | (5,619 | ) | (3,352 | ) | ||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net | (3,993 | ) | 1,761 | (12,766 | ) | (3,932 | ) | (1,260 | ) | |||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 362,939 | 340,393 | 290,318 | 186,074 | 127,832 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax provision | 114,326 | 110,180 | 89,418 | 52,502 | 29,879 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 248,613 | 230,213 | 200,900 | 133,572 | 97,953 | |||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | (487 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 248,126 | $ | 230,213 | $ | 200,900 | $ | 133,572 | $ | 97,953 | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | 1.59 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.45 | $ | 0.99 | $ | 0.72 | ||||||||||
Discontinued operations | (0.00 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 1.59 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.45 | $ | 0.99 | $ | 0.72 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.45 | $ | 1.28 | $ | 0.89 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||||||
Discontinued operations | (0.00 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.45 | $ | 1.28 | $ | 0.89 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Working capital | $ | 704,856 | $ | 793,142 | $ | 640,227 | $ | 494,606 | $ | 316,097 | ||||||||||
Total assets | 1,857,352 | 1,494,544 | 1,241,077 | 1,019,161 | 791,053 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term debt | 104 | 19 | 21 | 19,007 | 45,507 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, excluding current portion | — | 57,992 | 182,825 | 194,270 | 188,326 | |||||||||||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 1,522,548 | 1,203,749 | 844,725 | 631,736 | 410,352 | |||||||||||||||
33
Table of Contents
| ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Overview
FLIR Systems, Inc. (“FLIR,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a world leader in sensor systems that enhance perception and awareness. We were founded in 1978 to empower people with the ability to see at night using infrared technology and have since become a premier designer, manufacturer, and marketer of thermal imaging systems. Our advanced sensors and integrated sensor systems enable the gathering and analysis of critical information through a wide variety of applications in commercial, industrial, and government markets worldwide.
Our goal is to both enable our customers to benefit from the valuable information produced by advanced sensing technologies and to deliver sustained superior financial performance for our shareholders. We create value for our customers by providing advanced surveillance and tactical defense capabilities, improving personal and public safety and security, facilitating air, ground, and maritime navigation, enhancing enjoyment of the outdoors, providing infrastructure inefficiency information, conveying pre-emptive structural deficiency data, displaying process irregularities, and enabling commercial business opportunities through our continual support and development of new thermal imaging data and analytics applications. Our business model meets the needs of a multitude of customers – we sell off-the-shelf products to a wide variety of markets in an efficient, timely, and affordable manner as well as offer a variety of system configurations to suit specific customer requirements. Centered on the design of products for low cost manufacturing and high volume distribution, our commercial operating model has been developed over time and provides us with a unique ability to adapt to market changes and meet our customers’ needs.
Our business is organized into two divisions: Commercial Systems and Government Systems. Within these divisions, we had five reporting segments in 2010: Thermography, Commercial Vision Systems, and Raymarine, which comprise the Commercial Systems division; and Government Systems and ICx, which make up our Government Systems division. For a more detailed description of our segments, see “Business Segments” within Item 1.
In 2011, due to reorganizations and integrations within both of our divisions, we intend to report our segments as follows: Commercial and Raymarine within our Commercial Systems division and Surveillance, Detection and Integrated Systems within our Government Systems division.
International revenue accounted for approximately 47 percent, 41 percent and 38 percent of our revenue in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant percentage of revenue in the future. We have exposure to foreign exchange fluctuations and changing dynamics of foreign competitiveness based on variations in the value of the United States dollar relative to other currencies. Factors contributing to this variability include significant manufacturing activity in Europe, significant sales denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar, and cross currency fluctuations between such currencies as the United States dollar, euro, Swedish kroner and British pound sterling. The impact of those fluctuations is reflected throughout our consolidated financial statements, but in the aggregate, did not have a material impact on our results of operations.
We experience fluctuations in orders and sales due to seasonal variations and customer sales cycles, such as the seasonal pattern of contracting by the United States and certain foreign governments, the desire of customers to take delivery of equipment prior to fiscal year ends due to funding considerations, and the tendency of commercial enterprises to fully utilize annual capital budgets prior to expiration. Such events have resulted and could continue to result in fluctuations in quarterly results in the future. As a result of such quarterly fluctuations in operating results, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicators of future performance.
34
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, inventories, goodwill, warranty obligations, contingencies and income taxes on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. We believe the following critical accounting policies and the related judgments and estimates affect the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue recognition. The majority of our revenue is recognized upon shipment of the product to the customer at a fixed or determinable price and with a reasonable assurance of collection, passage of title to the customer as indicated by the shipping terms and fulfillment of all significant obligations.
We design, market and sell our products primarily as commercial, off-the-shelf products. Certain customers request different system configurations, generally based on standard options or accessories that we offer. In general, our revenue arrangements do not involve acceptance provisions based upon customer specified acceptance criteria. In those limited circumstances when customer specified acceptance criteria exist, revenue is deferred until customer acceptance if we cannot demonstrate that the system meets those specifications prior to shipment. For any contracts with multiple elements (i.e., training, installation, additional parts, etc.) undelivered at the end of a reporting period, we recognize revenue on the delivered elements only after we have determined that the delivered elements have stand alone value and any undelivered elements have objective and reliable evidence of fair value. In addition, judgments are required in evaluating the credit worthiness of our customers. Credit is not extended to customers and revenue is not recognized until we have determined that collectability is reasonably assured.
Allowance for doubtful accounts. Our policy is to maintain allowances for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. Credit limits are established through a process of reviewing the financial history and stability of each customer. Where appropriate, we obtain credit rating reports and financial statements of the customer when determining or modifying their credit limits. We regularly evaluate the collectability of our trade receivable balances based on a combination of factors. When a customer’s account balance becomes past due, we initiate dialogue with the customer to determine the cause. If it is determined that the customer will be unable to meet its financial obligation to us, such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing, deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position or other material events impacting their business, we record a specific allowance to reduce the related receivable to the amount we expect to recover given all information presently available. Actual write-offs during the past three years have not been material to our results of operations.
We also record an allowance for all other customers based on certain other factors including the length of time the receivables are past due and historical collection experience with individual customers. As of December 31, 2010, our accounts receivable balance of $339.7 million is reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $5.1 million. We believe our reported allowances at December 31, 2010, are adequate. If the financial conditions of those customers were to deteriorate, however, resulting in their inability to make payments, we may need to record additional allowances that would result in additional selling, general and administrative expenses being recorded for the period in which such determination is made.
35
Table of Contents
Inventory. Our policy is to record inventory write-downs when conditions exist that indicate that our inventories are likely to be in excess of anticipated demand or are obsolete based upon our assumptions about future demand for our products and market conditions. We regularly evaluate the ability to realize the value of our inventories based on a combination of factors including the following: historical usage rates, forecasted sales or usage, product end of life dates, estimated current and future market values and new product introductions. Purchasing requirements and alternative usage avenues are explored within these processes to mitigate inventory exposure. When recorded, our write-downs are intended to reduce the carrying value of our inventories to their net realizable value and establish a new cost basis. As of December 31, 2010, our inventories of $303.2 million are stated net of inventory write-downs. If actual demand for our products deteriorates or market conditions are less favorable than those that we project, additional inventory write-downs may be required in the future.
Goodwill. We have recorded goodwill in connection with our business acquisitions. We review goodwill in June of each year, or on an interim basis if required, for impairment to determine if events or changes in business conditions indicate that the carrying value of the goodwill may not be recoverable. Such reviews assess the fair value of the assets based upon our estimates of the future cash flows we expect the assets to generate within the boundaries of the applicable business divisions of the Company. Our current review indicates that no adjustments are necessary for the goodwill assets, which have a carrying value of $482.0 million as of December 31, 2010.
Product warranties. Our products are sold with warranty provisions that require us to remedy deficiencies in quality or performance of our products over a specified period of time, generally twelve to twenty-four months, at no cost to our customers. Our policy is to establish warranty reserves at levels that represent our estimate of the costs that will be incurred to fulfill those warranty requirements at the time that revenue is recognized. We believe that our recorded liability of $18.7 million at December 31, 2010 is adequate to cover our future cost of materials, labor and overhead for the servicing of our products sold through that date. If actual product failures or material or service delivery costs differ from our estimates, our warranty liability would need to be revised accordingly.
Contingencies. We are subject to the possibility of loss contingencies arising in the normal course of business. We consider the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss is accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted.
Income taxes. We record our deferred tax assets when the benefits are more likely than not to be recognized. Valuation allowances against deferred tax assets are recorded when a determination is made that the deferred tax assets are not more likely than not to be realized in the future. In making that determination, on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis, we estimate our future taxable income based upon historical operating results and external market data. Future levels of taxable income are dependent upon, but not limited to, general economic conditions, competitive pressures and other factors beyond our control. As of December 31, 2010, we have determined that a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets of $7.3 million is required. If we should determine that we may be unable to realize our deferred tax assets to the extent reported, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be recorded in the period such determination is made.
36
Table of Contents
Consolidated Operating Results
The following table sets forth for the indicated periods certain items as a percentage of revenue:
| Year Ended December 31,(1) | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Revenue | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Cost of goods sold | 44.9 | 42.6 | 43.7 | |||||||||
Gross profit | 55.1 | 57.4 | 56.3 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||
Research and development | 8.4 | 8.0 | 8.4 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 20.6 | 19.1 | 21.5 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 29.0 | 27.1 | 29.9 | |||||||||
Earnings from operations | 26.1 | 30.3 | 26.4 | |||||||||
Interest expense | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.3 | |||||||||
Interest income | (0.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||||||
Other income, net | (0.3 | ) | 0.2 | (1.2 | ) | |||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 26.3 | 29.7 | 27.0 | |||||||||
Income tax provision | 8.3 | 9.6 | 8.3 | |||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 18.0 | 20.1 | 18.7 | |||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | (0.0 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Net earnings | 18.0 | % | 20.1 | % | 18.7 | % | ||||||
| (1) | Totals may not recompute due to rounding |
The following discussion of operating results provides an overview of our operations by addressing key elements in our Consolidated Statements of Income. The “Segment Operating Results” section that follows describes the contributions of each of our business segments to our consolidated revenue and earnings from operations for 2010, 2009 and 2008. Given the nature of our business, we believe revenue and earnings from operations (including operating margin percentage) are most relevant to an understanding of our performance at a segment level. Additionally, at the segment level we disclose backlog, which represents orders received for products or services for which a sales agreement is in place and delivery is expected within twelve months.
Revenue. Revenue for 2010 totaled $1,385.3 million, an increase of 20.8 percent over 2009 revenue of $1,147.1 million. The increase was primarily due to an 11.4 percent increase in Thermography revenue, a 24.1 percent increase in Commercial Vision Systems revenue and the revenue reported by Raymarine and ICx which were acquired on May 14, 2010 and October 4, 2010, respectively. Revenues from the dates of acquisition for those businesses totaled $150.2 million. Excluding Raymarine and ICx, revenue for 2010 increased by 7.7 percent from 2009.
Revenue for 2009 totaled $1,147.1 million, an increase of 6.5 percent over 2008 revenue of $1,077.0 million. The increase was primarily due to a 15.2 percent increase in Government Systems and a 14.2 percent increase in Commercial Vision Systems, partially offset by a 12.8 percent decrease in Thermography.
International revenue in 2010 totaled $652.3 million, representing 47.1 percent of revenue. This compares with international revenue in 2009 which totaled $474.8 million, representing 41.4 percent of revenue and $407.8 million in 2008, representing 37.9 percent of revenue. While the sales mix between United States and international sales may fluctuate from year to year, we expect revenue from customers outside the United States to continue to comprise a significant portion of our total revenue on a long-term basis.
37
Table of Contents
Gross profit. Gross profit in 2010 was 55.1 percent of revenue compared to 57.4 percent of revenue in 2009. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to gross margins at Raymarine and ICx (which have historically lower gross margins than our other three business segments) and the product mix in our Government Systems division, partially offset by production efficiencies related to increased volumes and lower production costs in our Thermography and Commercial Vision Systems manufacturing facilities. Excluding Raymarine and ICx, gross profit was 56.8 percent of revenue in 2010.
Gross profit in 2009 was 57.4 percent of revenue, compared to 56.3 percent in 2008. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to cost and production efficiencies related to increased volume, product mix and lower production costs in our Thermography manufacturing facilities.
Cost of goods sold includes materials, labor and overhead costs incurred in the manufacturing of products and services sold in the period as well as warranty costs. Material costs include raw materials, purchased components and sub-assemblies, outside processing and inbound freight costs. Labor and overhead costs consist of direct and indirect manufacturing costs, including wages and fringe benefits, operating supplies, depreciation and amortization, occupancy costs, and purchasing, receiving and inspection costs.
Research and development. Research and development expenses were $116.4 million, or 8.4 percent of revenue in 2010, compared to $91.3 million, or 8.0 percent of revenue, in 2009, and $90.0 million, or 8.4 percent of revenue, in 2008. The increase in research and development expenses as a percentage of revenue in 2010 was due to higher expenditures for new product development in all business segments, including acquisitions made during 2009 and 2010. The decrease in research and development expenses as a percentage of revenue in 2009 was primarily due to cost containment efforts, such as salary freezes and reduction of consultant expenses, in response to weak economic conditions and due to currency translation.
We believe that spending levels are sufficient to support the development of new products and the continued growth of the business. We expect research and development expenses to be approximately 8 to 10 percent of revenue on a long-term basis.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $285.7 million, or 20.6 percent of revenue in 2010 compared to $219.9 million, or 19.2 percent of revenue, in 2009 and $231.7 million, or 21.5 percent of revenue, in 2008. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses from 2009 to 2010 was primarily due to increased spending in each of our business segments to support future growth, as well as the operating expenses of businesses acquired during 2009 and 2010, acquisition related costs incurred in 2010 of $9.2 million and a $3.0 million litigation settlement recorded in the third quarter of 2010. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses from 2008 to 2009 was primarily due to cost containment efforts in response to economic conditions, currency translation and lower annual incentive compensation costs. During 2009 and 2008 we incurred significant legal costs related to the Raytheon legal matter described in Note 13, “Contingencies,” of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We anticipate selling, general and administrative expenses in the future to increase at a slower rate than revenue.
Interest expense. Interest expense totaled $2.9 million, $6.9 million and $14.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest expense is primarily attributable to interest on the convertible notes that were issued in June 2003, the amortization of the discounts recorded on the notes and the costs related to the issuance of the notes. The decrease in interest expense in 2010 compared to 2009 is primarily due to the conversions of our outstanding convertible notes in 2009 and 2010, all of which were fully converted by June 2010. The decrease in interest expense in 2009 is primarily due to the conversion of some of our outstanding convertible notes in the fourth quarter of 2008, the third and fourth quarters of 2009 and the exchange of a portion of the convertible notes pursuant to the Company’s exchange offer in the first quarter of 2009.
38
Table of Contents
Interest income. Interest income was $1.3 million, $1.7 million and $7.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in interest income in 2010 and 2009 compared to 2008 was primarily due to lower interest rates and less invested cash.
Other income, net. We reported other income of $4.0 million in 2010, other expense of $1.8 million in 2009 and other income of $12.8 million in 2008. The other income in 2010 is primarily currency gain and rental income. The other expense in 2009 is primarily currency losses offset by investment gains. The other income in 2008 is primarily currency gains.
Income taxes. Our income tax provision was $114.3 million, $110.2 million and $89.4 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The effective tax rates for 2010, 2009 and 2008 were 31.5 percent, 32.4 percent and 30.8 percent, respectively. The mix in taxable income between our United States and international operations impacted the income tax provisions in each of these years. Our effective tax rate is lower than the United States federal tax rate of 35 percent because of lower foreign tax rates, the effect of foreign tax credits and other federal and state tax credits.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had United States tax net operating loss carry-forwards totaling approximately $109.5 million which expire between 2025 – 2030. In addition, the Company has various state net operating loss carry-forwards totaling approximately $90.9 million which expire between 2011 – 2030. The federal and state net operating losses were generated by ICx Technologies, Inc. which was acquired by FLIR Systems Inc during 2010.
Tax benefits as described above are recorded as assets when the benefits are more likely than not to be recognized. To the extent that we assess the realization of such assets to not be more likely than not, a valuation allowance is required to be recorded. We believe that the net deferred tax assets of $32.7 million reflected on the December 31, 2010 Consolidated Balance Sheet are materially realizable based on future forecasts of taxable income over a relatively short time horizon, but we have determined that a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets of $7.3 million is required, primarily related to certain acquired net operating losses. A valuation allowance is required when it is more-likely-than-not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets may not be realized. A review of all available positive and negative evidence is considered, including past and future performance, the market environment in which the Company operates, utilization of tax attributes in the past, length of carryback and carryforward periods, and evaluation of potential tax planning strategies when evaluating the realizability of deferred tax assets.
Discontinued operations. Certain operations that were included in the acquisition of ICx have been identified as available for sale and their results are reported as discontinued operations.
Segment Operating Results
Thermography
Thermography operating results are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 317,936 | $ | 285,482 | $ | 327,324 | ||||||
Earnings from operations | 89,693 | 72,897 | 70,471 | |||||||||
Operating margin | 28.2 | % | 25.5 | % | 21.5 | % | ||||||
Backlog | 22,000 | 27,000 | 20,000 | |||||||||
39
Table of Contents
Revenue increased by 11.4 percent in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily due to increased revenue in the United States and the Asia Pacific region and across most of the segment’s product lines. The improvement in the United States is partially attributable to improved economic conditions in the commercial markets and the improvement in the Asia Pacific region is partially due to further market and country penetration. The improvement in operating margins from 2009 to 2010 is primarily due to production efficiencies in our manufacturing facilities and our ability to increase our operating expenses at a lower rate than our increase in revenue.
Revenue decreased by 12.8 percent in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily due to worldwide economic conditions experienced in 2009 and lower demand for our high value products. While our revenue declined from 2008 to 2009, our operating margin improved due to operating efficiencies in our manufacturing facilities and cost containment efforts in response to the worsened economic conditions.
Commercial Vision Systems
Commercial Vision Systems operating results are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 256,102 | $ | 206,323 | $ | 180,622 | ||||||
Earnings from operations | 74,073 | 49,322 | 37,493 | |||||||||
Operating margin | 28.9 | % | 23.9 | % | 20.8 | % | ||||||
Backlog | 114,000 | 103,000 | 91,000 | |||||||||
Revenue increased by 24.1 percent in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily due to increased unit sales in our security, transportation and maritime product lines and the introduction in 2010 of the personal night vision systems products. Earnings from operations increased by 50.2% due to the increase in revenue and manufacturing efficiencies resulting from higher production volumes and lower material costs on new products.
Revenue increased by 14.2 percent in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily due to increased units deliveries across most of the segment’s product lines. The production efficiencies that resulted from the increase in unit volumes were the primary reason for the increase in operating margin from 2008 to 2009.
Raymarine
Raymarine operating results are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, 2010 | ||||
Revenue | $ | 104,089 | ||
Earnings from operations | 8,284 | |||
Operating margin | 8.0 | % | ||
Backlog | 11,000 | |||
Raymarine was acquired on May 14, 2010 and the operating results are for the period since the acquisition. The earnings from operations include the impact of the amortization of intangible assets of $2.1 million.
40
Table of Contents
Government Systems
Government Systems operating results are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 661,072 | $ | 655,282 | $ | 569,028 | ||||||
Earnings from operations | 251,842 | 286,361 | 233,803 | |||||||||
Operating margin | 38.1 | % | 43.7 | % | 41.1 | % | ||||||
Backlog | 325,000 | 433,000 | 552,000 | |||||||||
Revenue increased by 0.9 percent in 2010 compared to 2009. Higher deliveries of ground-based products and the revenue from a business acquired in October 2009 was offset by decreases in revenue from airborne and maritime products as spending by US Government agencies declined in 2010. The change in product mix and increased operating expenses of the segment resulted in the decline in earnings from operations and operating margin from 2009 to 2010. The decline in backlog from 2009 to 2010 was primarily due to deliveries on US Government programs that were booked in prior years and the reduced procurement activity by our US Government customers in 2010.
Revenue increased by 15.2 percent in 2009 compared to 2008. The increase was primarily due to the increase in unit deliveries of airborne products on certain US Government agency programs. The increase in earnings from operations from 2008 to 2009 was attributable to the increase in revenue. The decline in backlog from 2008 to 2009 was primarily due to deliveries on large US Government programs that were booked in 2008.
ICx
ICx operating results are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, 2010 | ||||
Revenue | $ | 46,102 | ||
Earnings from operations | 2,088 | |||
Operating margin | 4.5 | % | ||
Backlog | 62,000 | |||
ICx was acquired on October 4, 2010 and the operating results are for the period since the acquisition. The earnings from operations include the impact of the amortization of intangible assets of $1.5 million and the fair value adjustments on inventory of $3.6 million during the reporting period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2010, we had $193.1 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $422.0 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to cash used for business acquisitions, capital expenditures and repurchases of our common stock, partially offset by cash provided by operations and cash proceeds and tax benefits generated from our stock-based compensation programs.
Cash provided by operating activities in 2010 totaled $255.4 million compared to $271.8 million in 2009 and $218.3 million in 2008. The decrease in cash provided from operating activities in 2010 was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable, inventories, and deferred tax assets, offset by an increase in net earnings compared to 2009. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2009 compared to 2008 was primarily due to an increase in net earnings and a lower level of net cash used in 2009 for operating assets and liabilities.
41
Table of Contents
Cash used for investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 totaled $465.4 million, primarily consisting of the acquisitions of Raymarine for $174.7 million and ICx for $228.0 million and capital expenditures of $66.0 million. Capital expenditures in 2010 included the purchase of two buildings for $36.2 million. Cash used for investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 totaled $107.7 million, primarily consisting of the acquisitions of Salvador, OmniTech, and Directed Perception and capital expenditures of $41.9 million which include the purchase of a building for $9.7 million. Cash used for investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 totaled $114.0 million, primarily consisting of the acquisitions of Cedip and Ifara Technologias and capital expenditures.
Cash used for financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 totaled $6.5 million, primarily consisting of the repurchase of approximately 1.3 million shares of our common stock, offset by proceeds from shares issued for, and tax benefits recognized from, our stock-based compensation plans. Cash used from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 totaled $43.5 million, primarily consisting of the repurchase of approximately 3.2 million shares of our common stock, offset by proceeds from shares issued for, and tax benefits recognized from, our stock-based compensation plans. Cash provided from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 totaled $2.6 million, primarily consisting of proceeds from shares issued for, and tax benefits recognized from, our stock-based compensation plans, offset by the repurchase of approximately 1.2 million shares of our common stock and repayments of short-term debt.
On October 6, 2006, we signed a Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A., Union Bank of California, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association and other Lenders. The Credit Agreement provided for a $300 million, five-year revolving line of credit. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had no amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement. We had $6.5 million and $7.8 million of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which reduced the total available credit. This credit facility was terminated on February 8, 2011.
On July 7, 2010, we entered into an uncommitted letter of credit agreement with Bank of America to support letters of credit whose expiration would extend beyond the Credit Agreement. At December 31, 2010, the total value of letters of credit outstanding under this facility was $8.6 million.
On February 8, 2011, we signed a new Credit Agreement (“New Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A and other Lenders. The New Credit Agreement provides for a $200 million, five-year revolving line of credit. We have the right, subject to certain conditions including approval of additional commitments by qualified lenders, to increase the line of credit by an additional $150 million until October 8, 2016. The New Credit Agreement allows us and certain designated subsidiaries to borrow in US dollars, euro, kroner, pound sterling and other agreed upon currencies. The New Credit Agreement requires us to pay a commitment fee on the amount of unused credit at a rate, based on the Company’s leverage ratio, which ranges from 0.25 percent to 0.40 percent. The New Credit Agreement contains two financial covenants that require the maintenance of certain leverage ratios. The five-year revolving line of credit available under the New Credit Agreement is not secured by any of our assets.
Our Sweden subsidiary has a 30 million Swedish kroner (approximately $4.4 million) line of credit with an interest rate at 2.158 percent at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, we had no amounts outstanding on this line of credit. The 30 million Swedish kroner line of credit is secured primarily by accounts receivable and inventories of the Sweden subsidiary and is subject to automatic renewal on an annual basis.
We believe that our existing cash combined with the cash we anticipate generating from operating activities, and our available credit facilities and financing available from other sources will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the next twelve months. We do not have any significant commitments nor are we aware of any significant events or conditions that are likely to have a material impact on our liquidity or capital resources.
42
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2010, we leased our non-owned facilities under operating lease agreements. We also leased certain operating machinery and equipment and office equipment under operating lease agreements. Except for these operating lease agreements, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2010, our contractual obligations were as follows (in thousands):
| Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Less than 1 Year | 1 – 3 Years | 3 – 5 Years | More than 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases | $ | 63,027 | $ | 17,750 | $ | 23,036 | $ | 11,142 | $ | 11,099 | ||||||||||
Licensing rights | 3,575 | 550 | 1,100 | 1,100 | 825 | |||||||||||||||
Post-retirement obligations | 22,246 | 545 | �� | 13,091 | 1,028 | 7,582 | ||||||||||||||
Other obligations | 2,387 | 1,820 | 567 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| $ | 91,235 | $ | 20,665 | $ | 37,794 | $ | 13,270 | $ | 19,506 | |||||||||||
Operating leases and licensing rights obligations are based upon contractual terms. Actual payments may differ in terms of both timing and amounts.
We did not include $30.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows as of December 31, 2010. We are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities and the total amounts of income tax payable and the timing of such tax payments may depend on the resolution of current and future tax examinations which cannot be estimated.
We did not include approximately $15.1 million of standby letters of credit and performance bonds due to the unlikely event of payment, if any, of amounts under those arrangements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.
| ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our credit agreements. The credit agreements are at variable rates. A change in interest rates under the credit agreements impacts the interest that we incur and our cash flows. At December 31, 2010, no amounts were outstanding under our credit agreements; consequently, no sensitivity analysis is presented.
We have assets and liabilities outside the United States that are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Similarly, certain revenues from products sold in countries outside the United States and costs associated with non-US operations are denominated in foreign currencies. For more information on our foreign currency translation, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Assets and liabilities located outside the United States are primarily located in Europe. Our investments in subsidiaries outside the United States with functional currencies other than the United States dollar are considered long-term. We currently engage in limited forward currency exchange contracts and other similar hedging activities to reduce our
43
Table of Contents
economic exposure to changes in exchange rates. At December 31, 2010, exchange contracts with a notional amount of approximately $66.8 million were outstanding. Because we market, sell and license our products throughout the world, we could be adversely affected by weak economic conditions in international markets that could reduce demand for our products.
Our net investment in subsidiaries outside the United States, translated into United States dollars using the period-end exchange rates at December 31, was approximately $486.9 million and $404.1 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The potential loss in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10 percent adverse change in foreign exchange rates would be approximately $48.7 million and $40.4 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in the potential loss in fair value is primarily due to the increase in the net investment of subsidiaries outside the United States. We have no plans to liquidate any of our subsidiaries outside the United States, and therefore, foreign exchange rate gains or losses on our international investments are reflected as a cumulative translation adjustment and do not increase or reduce our reported net earnings.
| ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
This item includes the following financial information:
44
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and
Shareholders of FLIR Systems, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of FLIR Systems, Inc. (an Oregon Corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FLIR Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), FLIR Systems Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 1, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Portland, Oregon
March 1, 2011
45
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 1,385,301 | $ | 1,147,087 | $ | 1,076,974 | ||||||
Cost of goods sold | 622,690 | 488,558 | 470,832 | |||||||||
Gross profit | 762,611 | 658,529 | 606,142 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||
Research and development | 116,381 | 91,301 | 89,964 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 285,658 | 219,941 | 231,687 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 402,039 | 311,242 | 321,651 | |||||||||
Earnings from operations | 360,572 | 347,287 | 284,491 | |||||||||
Interest expense | 2,884 | 6,882 | 14,336 | |||||||||
Interest income | (1,258 | ) | (1,749 | ) | (7,397 | ) | ||||||
Other (income) expense, net | (3,993 | ) | 1,761 | (12,766 | ) | |||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 362,939 | 340,393 | 290,318 | |||||||||
Income tax provision | 114,326 | 110,180 | 89,418 | |||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 248,613 | 230,213 | 200,900 | |||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | (487 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 248,126 | $ | 230,213 | $ | 200,900 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share: | ||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | 1.59 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.45 | ||||||
Discontinued operations | (0.00 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 1.59 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.45 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share: | ||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.45 | $ | 1.28 | ||||||
Discontinued operations | (0.00 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.45 | $ | 1.28 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
46
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except for par value)
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 193,137 | $ | 422,047 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net | 339,723 | 234,974 | ||||||
Inventories | 303,156 | 216,500 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 95,663 | 93,276 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 23,128 | 13,231 | ||||||
Total current assets | 954,807 | 980,028 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 189,119 | 139,112 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 22,742 | 5,322 | ||||||
Goodwill | 482,019 | 262,331 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 177,385 | 59,180 | ||||||
Other assets | 31,280 | 48,571 | ||||||
| $ | 1,857,352 | $ | 1,494,544 | |||||
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 85,881 | $ | 53,319 | ||||
Deferred revenue | 17,867 | 20,986 | ||||||
Accrued payroll and related liabilities | 54,894 | 39,809 | ||||||
Accrued product warranties | 15,711 | 9,438 | ||||||
Advance payments from customers | 22,616 | 8,616 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | 36,578 | 25,941 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes | 8,218 | 15,504 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 8,186 | 13,273 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 249,951 | 186,886 | ||||||
Long-term debt | — | 57,991 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 13,163 | 2,222 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes | 19,793 | 4,550 | ||||||
Pension and other long-term liabilities | 51,897 | 39,146 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 12 and 13) | ||||||||
Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued at December 31, 2010 or 2009 | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000 shares authorized, 159,212 and 152,826 shares issued at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and additional paid-in capital | 465,467 | 389,316 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 1,055,429 | 807,303 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings | 1,652 | 7,130 | ||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 1,522,548 | 1,203,749 | ||||||
| $ | 1,857,352 | $ | 1,494,544 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
47
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
(in thousands)
| Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings (Loss) | Total Shareholder’s Equity | Annual Comprehensive Earnings | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 | 136,770 | $ | 218,813 | $ | 376,190 | $ | 36,733 | $ | 631,736 | |||||||||||||||
Net earnings for the year | — | — | 200,900 | — | 200,900 | $ | 200,900 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit of common stock options exercised | — | 27,350 | — | — | 27,350 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (1,381 | ) | (40,739 | ) | — | — | (40,739 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to stock-based compensation plans, net | 4,324 | 38,764 | — | — | 38,764 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | — | 21,151 | — | — | 21,151 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible debt | 1,674 | 17,510 | — | — | 17,510 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in minimum liability for pension plans, net of tax effects of $1,954 | — | — | — | (3,369 | ) | (3,369 | ) | (3,369 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment | — | — | — | (48,578 | ) | (48,578 | ) | (48,578 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 | 141,387 | 282,849 | 577,090 | (15,214 | ) | 844,725 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive earnings, year ended December 31, 2008 | $ | 148,953 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings for the year | — | — | 230,213 | — | 230,213 | $ | 230,213 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit of common stock options exercised | — | 9,245 | — | — | 9,245 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (3,232 | ) | (73,169 | ) | — | — | (73,169 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to stock-based compensation plans, net | 2,717 | 17,581 | — | — | 17,581 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | — | 23,888 | — | — | 23,888 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible debt | 11,954 | 128,427 | — | — | 128,427 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital contribution | — | 495 | — | — | 495 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in minimum liability for pension plans, net of tax effects of $402 | — | — | — | 781 | 781 | 781 | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment | — | — | — | 21,563 | 21,563 | 21,563 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 | 152,826 | 389,316 | 807,303 | 7,130 | 1,203,749 | |||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive earnings, year ended December 31, 2009 | $ | 252,557 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings for the year | — | — | 248,126 | — | 248,126 | $ | 248,126 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit of common stock options exercised | — | 8,263 | — | — | 8,263 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (1,306 | ) | (35,725 | ) | — | — | (35,725 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to stock-based compensation plans, net | 2,397 | 17,388 | — | — | 17,388 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | — | 25,352 | — | — | 25,352 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible debt | 5,295 | 58,752 | — | — | 58,752 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for acquisitions | — | 2,121 | — | — | 2,121 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in minimum liability for pension plans, net of tax effects of $350 | — | — | — | 664 | 664 | 664 | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment | — | — | — | (6,142 | ) | (6,142 | ) | (6,142 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 | 159,212 | $ | 465,467 | $ | 1,055,429 | $ | 1,652 | $ | 1,522,548 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive earnings, year ended December 31, 2010 | $ | 242,648 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
48
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 248,126 | $ | 230,213 | $ | 200,900 | ||||||
Income items not affecting cash: | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 61,297 | 42,426 | 45,323 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (14,099 | ) | (608 | ) | (8,756 | ) | ||||||
Stock-based compensation arrangements | 25,575 | 23,955 | 20,974 | |||||||||
Inducement loss on exchange offer for convertible notes | — | 1,997 | — | |||||||||
Other non-cash items | 10,320 | (1,749 | ) | (450 | ) | |||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: | ||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable | (47,711 | ) | 9,981 | (40,640 | ) | |||||||
Increase in inventories | (25,151 | ) | (301 | ) | (30,178 | ) | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets | 23,975 | (22,946 | ) | (3,750 | ) | |||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets | (28,573 | ) | (10,906 | ) | 3,904 | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | 11,563 | 3,293 | (7,324 | ) | ||||||||
(Decrease) increase in deferred revenue | (15,448 | ) | (6,214 | ) | 10,842 | |||||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued payroll and other liabilities | (5,753 | ) | (20,327 | ) | 28,176 | |||||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued income taxes | (2,928 | ) | 13,887 | 1,246 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in pension and other long-term liabilities | 14,058 | 9,059 | (1,951 | ) | ||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities | 255,251 | 271,760 | 218,316 | |||||||||
CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Additions to property and equipment | (65,973 | ) | (41,874 | ) | (27,641 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds on sale of property and equipment | 225 | 2,892 | 2 | |||||||||
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (402,721 | ) | (73,565 | ) | (78,762 | ) | ||||||
Other investments | 3,080 | 4,850 | (7,553 | ) | ||||||||
Cash used by investing activities | (465,389 | ) | (107,697 | ) | (113,954 | ) | ||||||
CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
Repayments of credit agreement | — | — | (19,000 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds (repayments) of long-term debt, including current portion | 65 | (30 | ) | (3,387 | ) | |||||||
Cash inducement on exchange offer for convertible notes | — | (1,997 | ) | — | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (35,725 | ) | (73,169 | ) | (40,739 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from shares issued pursuant to stock-based compensation plans | 21,469 | 22,325 | 42,063 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefit of stock options exercised | 7,649 | 8,834 | 23,676 | |||||||||
Capital contribution | 55 | 495 | — | |||||||||
Cash (used) provided by financing activities | (6,487 | ) | (43,542 | ) | 2,613 | |||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | (12,285 | ) | 12,084 | (21,214 | ) | |||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (228,910 | ) | 132,605 | 85,761 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 422,047 | 289,442 | 203,681 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | $ | 193,137 | $ | 422,047 | $ | 289,442 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
49
Table of Contents
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Note 1. | Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies |
FLIR Systems, Inc. is a world leader in sensor systems that enhance perception and awareness. The Company was founded in 1978 to empower people with the ability to see at night using infrared technology and has since become a premier designer, manufacturer, and marketer of thermal imaging systems. The Company’s advanced sensors and integrated sensor systems enable the gathering and analysis of critical information through a wide variety of applications in commercial, industrial, and government markets worldwide.
The Company’s goal is to both enable its customers to benefit from the valuable information produced by advanced sensing technologies and to deliver sustained superior financial performance for its shareholders. The Company creates value for its customers by providing advanced surveillance and tactical defense capabilities, improving personal and public safety and security, facilitating air, ground, and maritime navigation, enhancing enjoyment of the outdoors, providing infrastructure inefficiency information, conveying pre-emptive structural deficiency data, displaying process irregularities, and enabling commercial business opportunities through its continual support and development of new thermal imaging data and analytics applications. The Company’s business model meets the needs of a multitude of customers—it sells off-the-shelf products to a wide variety of markets in an efficient, timely, and affordable manner as well as offers a variety of system configurations to suit specific customer requirements. Centered on the design of products for low cost manufacturing and high volume distribution, the Company’s commercial operating model has been developed over time and provides it with a unique ability to adapt to market changes and meet its customers’ needs.
Reclassification
A reclassification of $9.3 million has been made from other current assets to other current liabilities on the December 31, 2009 balance sheet to properly classify the balance of value added taxes payable as a current liability. This reclassification had no impact on previously reported results of operations or shareholders’ equity.
Principles of consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions were eliminated.
Foreign currency translation
The assets and liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries outside the United States are translated into United States dollars at current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at monthly average exchange rates. Resulting translation adjustments are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive earnings within shareholders’ equity. Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are reflected as other income, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income as incurred.
The cumulative translation adjustment included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is a gain of $6.4 million and $12.6 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Transaction gains and losses included in other income, net, are a net gain of $0.7 million, a net loss of $3.9 million, and a net gain of $12.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is primarily recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, upon delivery of the product to the customer at a fixed or determinable price with a reasonable assurance of collection, passage of title and risk of loss to the customer as indicated by the shipping terms and fulfillment of all significant obligations.
50
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 1. | Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued) |
Revenue recognition—(Continued)
The Company designs, markets and sells products primarily as commercial, off-the-shelf products. Many of the Company’s Government Systems and Commercial Vision Systems customers, particularly those who use its airborne systems, request different system configurations, based on standard options or accessories that the Company offers. In general, revenue arrangements do not involve acceptance provisions based upon customer specified acceptance criteria. In those limited circumstances when customer specified acceptance criteria exist, revenue is deferred until customer acceptance if the Company cannot demonstrate the system meets those specifications prior to shipment. For any contracts with multiple elements (i.e., training, installation, additional parts, etc.) undelivered at the end of a reporting period, the Company recognizes revenue for the delivered elements only after it has determined that the delivered elements have stand alone value and any undelivered elements have objective and reliable evidence of fair value. Credit is not extended to customers and revenue is not recognized until the Company has determined that the risk of uncollectability is minimal.
The Company’s products are sold with warranty provisions that require it to remedy deficiencies in quality or performance of the Company’s products over a specified period of time, generally twelve to twenty-four months, at no cost to its customers. Warranty reserves are established at the time that revenue is recognized at levels that represent the Company’s estimate of the costs that will be incurred to fulfill those warranty requirements.
Provisions for estimated losses on sales or related receivables are recorded when identified. Revenue includes certain shipping and handling costs and is stated net of representative commissions and sales taxes. Service revenue is deferred and recognized over the contract period, as is the case for extended warranty contracts, or recognized as services are provided.
Cost of goods sold
Cost of goods sold includes materials, labor and overhead costs incurred in the manufacturing of products and services sold in the period as well as warranty costs. Material costs include raw materials, purchased components and sub-assemblies, outside processing and inbound freight costs. Labor and overhead costs consist of direct and indirect manufacturing costs, including wages and fringe benefits, operating supplies, depreciation, occupancy costs, and purchasing, receiving and inspection costs.
Research and development
Expenditures for research and development activities are expensed as incurred.
Cash equivalents
The Company considers short-term investments that are highly liquid, readily convertible into cash and have maturities of less than three months when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $27.2 million and $313.6 million, respectively, which were primarily investments in money market funds.
Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable are stated at the amounts the Company expects to collect. Credit limits are established through a process of reviewing the financial history and stability of each customer. The Company regularly
51
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 1. | Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued) |
Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts—(Continued)
evaluates the collectability of its trade receivables balances based on a combination of factors. If it is determined that a customer will be unable to fully meet its financial obligation, the Company records a specific allowance to reduce the related receivable to the amount expected to be recovered.
Inventories
Inventories are generally stated at the lower of cost or market and include materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead. Cost is determined based on a currently adjusted standard cost basis that approximates actual manufacturing cost on a first-in, first-out basis.
Inventory write-downs are recorded when conditions exist to indicate that inventories are likely to be in excess of anticipated demand or are obsolete based upon the Company’s assumptions about future demand for its products and market conditions. The Company regularly evaluates its ability to realize the value of inventories based on a combination of factors including the following: historical usage rates, forecasted sales or usage, product end of life dates, estimated current and future market values and new product introductions. When recorded, write-downs reduce the carrying value of the Company’s inventories to their net realizable value and create a new cost-basis in the inventories. Write-downs are reflected in cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Demonstration units
The Company’s products which are being used as demonstration units are stated at the lower of cost or market and are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Demonstration units are available for sale and the Company periodically evaluates them as to marketability and realizable values. The carrying value of demonstration units was $28.7 million and $23.6 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using a straight-line methodology over their estimated useful lives. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred.
Goodwill
Goodwill is reviewed in June of each year, or more frequently if required, for impairment to determine if events or changes in business conditions indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets, other than goodwill, are amortized using a straight-line methodology over their estimated useful lives.
Long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Impairment exists when the carrying value is greater than the expected undiscounted future cash flows expected to be provided by the asset. If impairment exists, the asset is written down to its fair value.
52
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 1. | Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued) |
Advertising costs
Advertising costs, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses, are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $9.2 million, $8.2 million and $7.3 million, respectively.
Cost-basis investments
The Company has private company investments, which consist of investments for which the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence, and are accounted for under the cost method. The investments are carried at cost and adjusted only when the Company believes that events have occurred that are likely to have a significant other-than-temporary adverse effect on the estimated fair value of the investments. If no such events have occurred, the fair value of the investments is not calculated as it is not practicable to do so. The carrying value of those investments at December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $10.4 million and $9.2 million, respectively. The investments are included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Contingencies
The Company is subject to the possibility of loss contingencies arising in the normal course of business. An estimated loss is accrued when the Company determines that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company regularly evaluates current available information to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the weighted shares outstanding are increased to include additional shares from the assumed exercise of stock options, if dilutive, assumed issuance of unvested restricted stock awards and from the assumed conversion of the convertible notes.
53
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 1. | Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued) |
Earnings per share—(Continued)
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and denominator utilized in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Numerator for earnings per share: | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 248,613 | $ | 230,213 | $ | 200,900 | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | (487 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Net earnings for basic earnings per share | 248,126 | 230,213 | 200,900 | |||||||||
Interest associated with convertible notes, net of tax | 935 | 3,585 | 7,250 | |||||||||
Net earnings available to common shareholders—diluted | $ | 249,061 | $ | 233,798 | $ | 208,150 | ||||||
Denominator for earnings per share: | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 156,141 | 149,405 | 138,490 | |||||||||
Assumed exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock awards, net of shares assumed reacquired under the treasury stock method | 3,196 | 3,518 | 5,591 | |||||||||
Assumed conversion of convertible notes | 2,293 | 8,646 | 18,820 | |||||||||
Diluted shares outstanding | 161,630 | 161,569 | 162,901 | |||||||||
The effect of stock-based compensation awards for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 that aggregated 418,000, 515,000 and 9,000 shares have been excluded for purposes of diluted earnings per share since the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Supplemental cash flow disclosure (in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Cash paid for: | ||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 1,631 | $ | 2,972 | $ | 7,108 | ||||||
Taxes | $ | 111,778 | $ | 116,733 | $ | 83,644 | ||||||
Non-cash transactions: | ||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible notes to common stock | $ | 58,752 | $ | 132,637 | $ | 18,577 | ||||||
Stock issued for business acquisition | $ | 2,121 | — | — | ||||||||
Stock-based compensation
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of all stock-based compensation awards on the date of grant, except for restricted stock unit awards which are valued at the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company recognizes the compensation expense for time-based options and restricted stock unit awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of each award. The compensation expense for each tranche of performance-based options is recognized over the vesting period of the applicable tranche because each tranche is independent of the others and if the performance criteria of earnings per share targets in a particular year are not met, the related tranche does not vest.
54
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 1. | Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued) |
Stock-based compensation—(Continued)
The following table sets forth the stock-based compensation expense and related tax benefit recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | $ | 3,694 | $ | 3,297 | $ | 2,721 | ||||||
Research and development | 5,015 | 4,943 | 4,882 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 16,866 | 15,715 | 13,371 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes | 25,575 | 23,955 | 20,974 | |||||||||
Income tax benefit | (8,011 | ) | (7,011 | ) | (5,589 | ) | ||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense after income taxes | $ | 17,564 | $ | 16,944 | $ | 15,385 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense capitalized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Capitalized in inventory | $ | 673 | $ | 896 | $ | 963 | ||||||
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $32.5 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.
The fair value of the stock-based awards, as determined under the Black-Scholes model, granted in the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 reported above was estimated with the following weighted-average assumptions:
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Stock option awards: | ||||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 1.6 | % | 1.5 | % | 2.8 | % | ||||||
Expected dividend yield | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
Expected term | 4.3 years | 4.3 years | 4.1 years | |||||||||
Expected volatility | 45.1 | % | 46.9 | % | 40.8 | % | ||||||
Employee stock purchase plan: | ||||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.20 | % | 0.25 | % | 1.4 | % | ||||||
Expected dividend yield | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
Expected term | 6 months | 6 months | 6 months | |||||||||
Expected volatility | 27.1 | % | 49.5 | % | 56.0 | % | ||||||
The Company uses the United States Treasury (constant maturity) interest rate on the date of grant as the risk-free interest rate and uses historical volatility as the expected volatility. The Company’s determination of expected term is based on an analysis of historical and expected exercise patterns. In 2010, all stock options granted were time-based options. In 2009, approximately 30 percent of stock options granted were performance-based options and approximately 70 percent were time-based options and in 2008, all stock options granted were
55
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 1. | Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued) |
Stock-based compensation – (Continued)
performance-based options. The difference in the nature of these awards has been taken into consideration in determining the expected term. The Company uses an estimated forfeiture rate of 5 percent of the stock-compensation expense of non-executive employees based on an analysis of historical and expected forfeitures.
The weighted-average fair value of stock-based compensation awards granted and vested, and the intrinsic value of options exercised during the period were (in thousands, except per share amounts):
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Stock option awards: | ||||||||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value per share | $ | 11.52 | $ | 9.96 | $ | 12.25 | ||||||
Total fair value of awards granted | $ | 7,299 | $ | 10,534 | $ | 7,175 | ||||||
Total fair value of awards vested | $ | 7,281 | $ | 6,964 | $ | 8,243 | ||||||
Total intrinsic value of options exercised | $ | 33,920 | $ | 34,648 | $ | 93,023 | ||||||
Restricted stock unit awards: | ||||||||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value per share | $ | 29.91 | $ | 25.38 | $ | 34.31 | ||||||
Total fair value of awards granted | $ | 16,011 | $ | 16,793 | $ | 18,981 | ||||||
Employee stock purchase plan: | ||||||||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value per share | $ | 6.59 | $ | 8.37 | $ | 10.48 | ||||||
Total fair value of shares estimated to be issued | $ | 1,885 | $ | 1,073 | $ | 2,073 | ||||||
The Company also issued stock options and restricted stock units as replacement awards valued at $2.1 million in connection with the acquisition of ICx Technologies, Inc. (“ICx”) in 2010 (see Note 18). The total fair value of these replacement awards that vested during the year ended December 31, 2010 was $0.6 million.
The total amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options in the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $15.5 million, $17.0 million and $36.7 million, respectively, and the related tax benefit realized from the exercise of the stock options was $8.3 million, $9.2 million and $27.4 million, respectively.
The Company elected to adopt the “long-haul” method to calculate the historical pool of windfall tax benefits, which calculates on a grant by grant basis, the windfall or excess tax benefit that arose upon the exercise of each stock option, based on a comparison to the total tax deduction to the “as-if” deferred tax asset that would have been recorded had the Company followed the recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation,” since its effective date of January 1, 2006. Additionally, the Company elected to adopt the “tax-law ordering” method of measuring the timing in which tax deductions on stock option exercises should be recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
Concentration of risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of trade receivables. Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables is limited because a relatively large number of geographically diverse customers make up the Company’s customer base, thus diversifying the trade credit risk. The Company controls credit risk through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring procedures. The Company performs credit evaluations for all new customers and requires letters of credit, bank guarantees and advanced payments, if deemed necessary.
56
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 1. | Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies—(Continued) |
Concentration of risk—(Continued)
A substantial portion of the Company’s revenue is derived from sales to United States and foreign government agencies (see Note 17). The Company also purchases certain key components from sole or limited source suppliers.
The Company maintains cash deposits with major banks that from time to time may exceed federally insured limits. The Company periodically assesses the financial condition of the institutions and instruments in which it invests, and adjusts its investment balances to mitigate the risk of principal loss.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and judgments made by management of the Company include matters such as collectability of accounts receivable, realizability of inventories, recoverability of deferred tax assets, impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets, loss contingencies and adequacy of warranty accruals. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company believes that the estimates used are reasonable.
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings includes cumulative translation adjustments and changes in minimum liability for pension plans. Foreign currency translation adjustments included in comprehensive income were not tax affected as investments in international affiliates are deemed to be indefinite in duration.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (“ASU 2009-13”), which provides amendments to the criteria in Subtopic 605-25, “Revenue Recognition—Multiple-Element Arrangements,” for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements and expands the disclosures related to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company early adopted ASU 2009-13 on January 1, 2010. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2009-13 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-14, “Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (“ASU 2009-14”), which changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. ASU 2009-14 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company early adopted ASU 2009-14 on January 1, 2010. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2009-14 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
57
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 2. | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Cash equivalents at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $27.2 million and $313.6, respectively, which were primarily investments in money market funds. The Company has categorized its cash and cash equivalents as a Level 1 financial asset, measured at fair value based on quoted prices in active markets of identical assets, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” All cash equivalents are in instruments that are convertible to cash daily. The Company does not have any other material financial assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value.
The carrying amount of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued payroll and related liabilities approximates the fair value of those instruments due to their short-term nature. The fair value of the foreign currency exchange contracts as of December 31, 2010 is not significant.
| Note 3. | Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk |
The Company’s foreign businesses enter into contracts with customers and vendors that are denominated in currencies other than their functional currencies. To protect the functional currency equivalent cash flows associated with certain of these contracts, the Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts. The Company’s activities involving foreign currency forward contracts are designed to hedge the changes in the functional currency equivalent cash flows due to movements in foreign exchange rates compared to the functional currency. The foreign currencies hedged are primarily the euro, the Swedish kroner, the British pound sterling, and the Australian dollar. The Company manages exposure to counterparty non-performance credit risk by entering into foreign currency forward contracts only with major financial institutions that are expected to fully perform under the terms of such contracts. Gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts are recognized in income at the end of each reporting period based on the difference between the contract rate and the spot rate. The net amount of the gains and losses related to outstanding derivative instruments recorded in other expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 was a net loss of $0.7 million. These gains and losses are offset in the Consolidated Statement of Income by the reciprocal gains and losses from the underlying assets or liabilities which originally gave rise to the exposure.
Notional amounts are used to measure the volume of foreign currency forward contracts and do not represent exposure to foreign currency gains or losses. The table below presents the notional amounts of the Company’s outstanding foreign currency forward contracts by currency at December 31, 2010 (in millions):
Euro | $ | 41.0 | ||
Swedish kroner | 23.2 | |||
British pound sterling | 1.6 | |||
Australian dollar | 1.0 | |||
| $ | 66.8 | |||
At December 31, 2010, the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts, in general, had maturities of 45 days or less.
58
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 4. | Accounts Receivable |
Accounts receivable are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The following table summarizes the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts and the activity for 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts, beginning of year | $ | 1,957 | $ | 1,294 | $ | 1,327 | ||||||
Charges to costs and expenses | 1,010 | 1,056 | 678 | |||||||||
Write-offs of uncollectible accounts, net of recoveries | (92 | ) | (497 | ) | (527 | ) | ||||||
Business acquisitions | 2,330 | 12 | — | |||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | (101 | ) | 92 | (184 | ) | |||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts, end of year | $ | 5,104 | $ | 1,957 | $ | 1,294 | ||||||
| Note 5. | Inventories |
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Raw material and subassemblies | $ | 185,359 | $ | 144,555 | ||||
Work-in-progress | 48,788 | 37,732 | ||||||
Finished goods | 69,009 | 34,213 | ||||||
| $ | 303,156 | $ | 216,500 | |||||
| Note 6. | Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| Estimated Useful Life | December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Land | — | $ | 19,944 | $ | 6,942 | |||||||
Buildings | 30 years | 72,924 | 39,208 | |||||||||
Machinery and equipment | 3 to 7 years | 139,422 | 116,458 | |||||||||
Office equipment and other | 3 to 7 years | 95,009 | 79,424 | |||||||||
| 327,299 | 242,032 | |||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (138,180 | ) | (102,920 | ) | ||||||||
| $ | 189,119 | $ | 139,112 | |||||||||
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $34.2 million, $26.1 million and $23.1 million, respectively.
| Note 7. | Goodwill |
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded goodwill in connection with its acquisitions of Raymarine Holdings, Ltd. (“Raymarine”), ICx Technologies, Inc. (“ICx”) and Directed Perception, Inc. and during the year ended December 31 2009, the Company recorded goodwill in connection
59
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 7. | Goodwill—(Continued) |
with its acquisition of Salvador Imaging, Inc., OmniTech Partners, Inc. and Infrared Korea, Ltd. (see Note 18). The Company reviews its goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently, if there is a triggering event. A two-step test is performed to assess goodwill for impairment. First, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is required. The second step is performed if the carrying value exceeds the fair value. The implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill must be determined and compared to the carrying value of the goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss equal to the difference will be recorded. In determining the fair value of the reporting units, the Company relied upon the Income Approach and the Market Approach. Under the Income Approach, the fair value of a business is based on the cash flows it can be expected to generate over its remaining life. The estimated cash flows are converted to their present value equivalent using an appropriate rate of return and are analyzed within the boundary of the overall market capitalization of the Company. Under the Market Approach, the fair value of the business is based on forecasted earnings multiplied by an average earnings multiplier of a group of the Company’s peers and compared to the carrying value of the goodwill.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company has determined that there is no impairment of its recorded goodwill and as of December 31, 2010, there have been no triggering events that would require an updated impairment review.
The carrying value of goodwill by reporting segment and the activity for the two year period ending December 31, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
| Thermography | Commercial Vision Systems | Raymarine | Government Systems | ICx | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 | $ | 102,313 | $ | 110,570 | $ | — | $ | 12,802 | $ | — | $ | 225,685 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill from acquisitions | 1,323 | 8,585 | — | 24,476 | — | 34,384 | ||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | 2,448 | 107 | — | 306 | — | 2,861 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other activity | (583 | ) | (16 | ) | — | — | — | (599 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 | 105,501 | 119,246 | — | 37,584 | — | 262,331 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill from acquisitions | — | 14,065 | 91,643 | — | 110,646 | 216,354 | ||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustments | (2,082 | ) | (545 | ) | 5,623 | 292 | — | 3,288 | ||||||||||||||||
Other activity | (4 | ) | — | — | 50 | — | 46 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 | $ | 103,415 | $ | 132,766 | $ | 97,266 | $ | 37,926 | $ | 110,646 | $ | 482,019 | ||||||||||||
60
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 8. | Intangible Assets |
Intangible assets are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| Weighted Average Estimated Useful Life | December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Product technology | 11 years | $ | 88,078 | $ | 43,959 | |||||||
Customer relationships | 10 years | 85,362 | 50,151 | |||||||||
Trademarks and tradename portfolios | 14 years | 7,947 | 7,947 | |||||||||
Tradename portfolio not subject to amortization | Indefinite | 32,250 | — | |||||||||
Other | 5 years | 23,010 | 2,580 | |||||||||
Acquired identifiable intangibles | 236,647 | 104,637 | ||||||||||
Less accumulated amortization | (66,793 | ) | (47,495 | ) | ||||||||
Net acquired identifiable intangibles | 169,854 | 57,142 | ||||||||||
Patents | 17 years | 4,277 | 3,981 | |||||||||
Less accumulated amortization | (3,287 | ) | (2,850 | ) | ||||||||
Net patents | 990 | 1,131 | ||||||||||
Cooperation agreement and other | 7 years | 10,881 | 3,554 | |||||||||
Less accumulated amortization | (4,340 | ) | (2,647 | ) | ||||||||
Net cooperation agreement and other | 6,541 | 907 | ||||||||||
| $ | 177,385 | $ | 59,180 | |||||||||
During the year ended December 31, 2010, identifiable intangible assets acquired as part of acquisitions were (in thousands):
Raymarine | $ | 67,723 | ||
ICx | 57,430 | |||
Directed Perception | 4,760 | |||
| $ | 129,913 | |||
In addition, the Company recorded an intangible asset of $5.9 million for the fair value of tenant leases acquired with the purchase of a building in 2010.
The aggregate amortization expense recorded in 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $25.8 million, $16.4 million and $16.8 million, respectively. For intangible assets recorded at December 31, 2010, the estimated future aggregate amortization expense for the years ending December 31, 2011 through 2015 is approximately (in thousands):
2011 | $ | 23,016 | ||
2012 | 21,690 | |||
2013 | 20,114 | |||
2014 | 15,694 | |||
2015 | 11,576 |
The Company continually monitors for events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the Company’s intangible assets may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances occur, the Company will assess the recoverability of intangible assets by determining whether the
61
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 8. | Intangible Assets—(Continued) |
carrying value of such assets will be recovered through their expected future cash flows. If the future undiscounted cash flows are determined to be less than the carrying amount of the intangible assets, the Company will recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. The Company did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
| Note 9. | Credit Agreements |
On October 6, 2006, the Company signed a Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A., Union Bank of California, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association and other Lenders. The Credit Agreement provides for a $300 million, five-year revolving line of credit. Under the Credit Agreement, borrowings bore interest based upon the prime lending rate of the Bank of America or Eurodollar rates with a provision for a spread over Eurodollar rates based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The Eurodollar interest rate was 1.053 percent and the prime lending rate was 3.25 percent at December 31, 2010. These rates were 1.001 percent and 3.25 percent, respectively, at December 31, 2009. The Credit Agreement required the Company to pay a commitment fee on the amount of unused credit at a rate, based on the Company’s leverage ratio, which ranges from 0.175 percent to 0.325 percent. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the commitment fee rate was 0.175 percent. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement. The Company had $6.5 million and $7.8 million of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which reduces the total available credit. This credit facility was terminated on February 8, 2011.
On July 7, 2010, the Company entered into an uncommitted letter of credit agreement with Bank of America to support letters of credit whose expiration would extend beyond the current Credit Agreement. At December 31, 2010, the total value of letters of credit outstanding under this facility was $8.6 million.
On February 8, 2011, the Company signed a new Credit Agreement (“New Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A and other Lenders. The New Credit Agreement provides for a $200 million, five-year revolving line of credit. The Company has the right, subject to certain conditions including approval of additional commitments by qualified lenders, to increase the line of credit by an additional $150 million until October 8, 2016. The New Credit Agreement allows the Company and certain designated subsidiaries to borrow in euro, kroner, pound sterling and other agreed upon currencies. The New Credit Agreement requires the Company to pay a commitment fee on the amount of unused credit at a rate, based on the Company’s leverage ratio, which ranges from 0.25 percent to 0.40 percent. The New Credit Agreement contains two financial covenants that require the maintenance of certain leverage ratios. The five-year revolving line of credit available under the New Credit Agreement is not secured by any of the Company’s assets.
The Company, through its Sweden subsidiary, has a 30 million Swedish kroner (approximately $4.4 million) line of credit with an interest rate at 2.158 percent at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, the Company had no amounts outstanding on this line of credit. The 30 million Swedish kroner line of credit is secured primarily by accounts receivable and inventories of the Company’s Swedish subsidiary and is subject to automatic renewal on an annual basis.
62
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 10. | Accrued Product Warranties |
The Company generally provides a twelve to twenty-four month warranty on its products. A provision for the estimated future costs of warranty, based upon historical cost and product performance experience, is recorded when revenue is recognized. The following table summarizes the Company’s warranty liability and activity for 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Accrued product warranties, beginning of year | $ | 9,438 | $ | 7,826 | $ | 6,594 | ||||||
Amounts paid for warranty services | (2,029 | ) | (8,861 | ) | (8,428 | ) | ||||||
Warranty provisions for products sold | 2,073 | 10,038 | 9,894 | |||||||||
Business acquisitions | 8,969 | 202 | 354 | |||||||||
Currency translation adjustments and other | 235 | 233 | (588 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued product warranties, end of year | $ | 18,686 | $ | 9,438 | $ | 7,826 | ||||||
At December 31, 2010, $3.0 million of the accrued product warranties are classified as long-term as the outstanding warranty period is greater than twelve months.
| Note 11. | Long-Term Debt |
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Convertible notes | $ | — | $ | 58,782 | ||||
Issuance cost and discount of the convertible notes | — | (791 | ) | |||||
| $ | — | $ | 57,991 | |||||
In June 2003, the Company issued $210 million of 3.0 percent senior convertible notes due in 2023 in a private offering pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The net proceeds from the issuance were approximately $203.9 million. Interest was payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
On February 5, 2009, the Company commenced an exchange offer for any and all of its outstanding convertible notes. Holders who elected to exchange their notes in this offer and whose notes were accepted for exchange by the Company received 90.1224 shares of the Company’s common stock and a cash payment of $20 per $1,000 principal amount of notes. The offer expired on March 9, 2009. Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $99.9 million were exchanged pursuant to the exchange offer and were converted into approximately 9.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company recognized a gain of $2.2 million from the extinguishment of the notes; the gain and the $2.0 million expense associated with the cash inducement are reported in other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
In addition, in July 2009, convertible notes with an aggregate principal amount of $30.1 million were converted into approximately 2.7 million shares of the Company’s common stock, and in December 2009, convertible notes with an aggregate principal amount of $2.7 million were converted into 244,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In June 2010, the remaining $58.8 million of the outstanding convertible notes were converted into 5.3 million shares of the Company’s common stock.
63
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 11. | Long-Term Debt—(Continued) |
The convertible notes were classified as a long-term liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet because the stated contractual maturity was 2023.
The Company determined that the expected life of the notes should be seven years since the notes were first redeemable in June 2010. The Company estimated that its nonconvertible borrowing rate for debt with a seven year maturity issued in June 2003 was 6.0 percent. Accordingly, the value of the liability component of the notes at the time of issuance was $174.4 million and the value of the equity component was $35.6 million.
The carrying amounts of the convertible notes are as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Liability component: | ||||||||
Principal amount | $ | — | $ | 58,782 | ||||
Unamortized discount | — | (706 | ) | |||||
Unamortized issuance costs | — | (85 | ) | |||||
| $ | — | $ | 57,991 | |||||
Equity component | $ | (119,724 | ) | $ | (119,724 | ) | ||
The effective interest rate of the convertible notes was 6.0 percent. Interest and amortization expense of the convertible notes recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Cash interest (3% coupon) | $ | 735 | $ | 2,558 | $ | 6,284 | ||||||
Amortization of discount | 706 | 2,594 | 5,502 | |||||||||
Amortization of issuance costs | 84 | 324 | 724 | |||||||||
| $ | 1,525 | $ | 5,476 | $ | 12,510 | |||||||
| Note 12. | Commitments |
The Company leases some of its primary facilities under various operating leases that expire in 2011 through 2023. The Company also leases certain operating machinery and equipment and office equipment under operating lease agreements. Total net rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $13.3 million, $10.1 million and $10.5 million, respectively.
64
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 12. | Commitments—(Continued) |
The future minimum obligations under all non-cancelable leases, net of expected sublease income, and other contractual obligations are as follows (in thousands):
| Net Operating Leases | Other Contractual Obligations | |||||||
2011 | $ | 16,831 | $ | 2,370 | ||||
2012 | 14,132 | 1,092 | ||||||
2013 | 8,876 | 575 | ||||||
2014 | 6,875 | 550 | ||||||
2015 | 4,267 | 550 | ||||||
Thereafter | 11,100 | 825 | ||||||
Total minimum payments | $ | 62,081 | $ | 5,962 | ||||
| Note 13. | Contingencies |
The Company and its subsidiary, Indigo Systems Corporation (now known as FLIR Commercial Systems, Inc.), (together, the “FLIR Parties”), were named in a lawsuit filed by Raytheon Company (“Raytheon”) on March 2, 2007, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. On August 11, 2008, Raytheon Company was granted leave to file a second amended complaint. The complaint, as amended, asserted claims for tortious interference, patent infringement, trade secret misappropriation, unfair competition, breach of contract and fraudulent concealment. The FLIR Parties filed an answer to the second amended complaint and counterclaims on September 2, 2008, in which they denied all material allegations. On August 31, 2009, the court entered an order granting the FLIR Parties’ motion for summary judgment on Raytheon’s trade secret misappropriation claim based on the FLIR Parties’ statute of limitations defense. Raytheon abandoned all of its other claims except its claims relating to four patents (the “Patent Claims”). On August 11, 2010, the FLIR Parties and Raytheon entered into an agreement in principle to resolve the remaining Patent Claims. On October 27, 2010, the parties finalized the agreement which results in a payment of $3 million by the FLIR Parties to Raytheon. The Company recorded a $3 million loss during the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The agreement entitles the FLIR Parties to certain license rights in the patents that were the subject of the Patent Claims. A final judgment was entered on January 7, 2011. The parties have appealed certain rulings of the district court to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this matter and is unable to estimate the amount or range of potential loss, if any, which might result if the outcome in this matter is unfavorable.
On July 10, 2008, William J. Parrish and E. Timothy Fitzgibbons (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an action against FLIR Systems, Inc., its affiliate Indigo Systems Corporation (now known as FLIR Commercial Systems, Inc.), Earl R. Lewis and James A. Fitzhenry (collectively, “Defendants”) in California Superior Court for the County of Santa Barbara asserting claims for negligent and intentional tortious interference with prospective economic relations. The claims arose from a prior action in the same court in which then-defendants Parrish and Fitzgibbons prevailed. On November 20, 2009, Plaintiffs amended their complaint to add a malicious prosecution claim, as well as two additional claims for negligent and intentional tortious interference with prospective economic relations. On July 19, 2010, Plaintiffs further amended their complaint to name the Company’s former outside counsel in a prior action as a defendant. The claims against the former outside counsel were subsequently dismissed without prejudice. All tortious interference claims have been dismissed as to all defendants. The case is currently set for trial in May 2011. Defendants intend to vigorously defend themselves in this matter and are unable to estimate the amount or range of potential loss, if any, which might result if the outcome in this matter is unfavorable.
65
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 13. | Contingencies—(Continued) |
The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company makes a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company believes it has recorded adequate provisions for any probable and estimable losses. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, the Company does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve such matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
| Note 14. | Income Taxes |
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events and basis differences that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements and tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amount and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Pre-tax earnings by significant geographical locations are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
United States | $ | 248,109 | $ | 241,470 | $ | 195,356 | ||||||
Foreign | 114,343 | 98,923 | 94,962 | |||||||||
| $ | 362,452 | $ | 340,393 | $ | 290,318 | |||||||
The provisions for income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Current tax expense: | ||||||||||||
Federal | $ | 79,551 | $ | 75,698 | $ | 73,039 | ||||||
State | 16,511 | 10,621 | 7,171 | |||||||||
Foreign | 32,883 | 24,931 | 17,298 | |||||||||
| 128,945 | 111,250 | 97,508 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit): | ||||||||||||
Federal | (10,183 | ) | 1,744 | (7,824 | ) | |||||||
State | (1,571 | ) | 92 | (67 | ) | |||||||
Foreign | (2,865 | ) | (2,906 | ) | (199 | ) | ||||||
| (14,619 | ) | (1,070 | ) | (8,090 | ) | |||||||
Total provision | $ | 114,326 | $ | 110,180 | $ | 89,418 | ||||||
66
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 14. | Income Taxes—(Continued) |
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) are composed of the following components (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 800 | $ | 364 | ||||
Accrued product warranties | 2,862 | 2,412 | ||||||
Inventory basis differences | 7,957 | 5,399 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities | 10,121 | 4,056 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 1,256 | 2,407 | ||||||
Current net operating loss | 376 | — | ||||||
Other | (746 | ) | (1,407 | ) | ||||
Foreign accrued liabilities | 568 | — | ||||||
Foreign intangibles | (1,312 | ) | — | |||||
Foreign inventory | 893 | — | ||||||
Foreign other | 353 | — | ||||||
Net current deferred tax assets | $ | 23,128 | $ | 13,231 | ||||
Foreign accrued liabilities | $ | — | $ | 310 | ||||
Foreign intangibles | — | (919 | ) | |||||
Foreign other | — | 90 | ||||||
Net current deferred tax liabilities | $ | — | (519 | ) | ||||
Net operating loss carry-forwards | $ | 39,531 | $ | 2,164 | ||||
Credit carry-forwards | 2,477 | — | ||||||
Domestic depreciation | (11,796 | ) | (10,745 | ) | ||||
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 6,415 | 6,942 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation | 10,690 | 7,233 | ||||||
Intangibles | (26,888 | ) | (7,042 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue | 3,704 | 4,077 | ||||||
Other | 4,172 | 2,693 | ||||||
Valuation allowance | (5,563 | ) | — | |||||
Net long-term deferred tax assets | $ | 22,742 | $ | 5,322 | ||||
Foreign net operating loss recapture | $ | (531 | ) | $ | (499 | ) | ||
Foreign credit carry-forwards | 166 | — | ||||||
Foreign depreciation | 3,426 | (574 | ) | |||||
Foreign stock-based compensation | 1,080 | 1,007 | ||||||
Foreign social costs | (860 | ) | (1,285 | ) | ||||
Foreign intangibles | (17,543 | ) | (2,539 | ) | ||||
Foreign pension | 26 | 146 | ||||||
Foreign net operating loss carry-forwards | 2,438 | 682 | ||||||
Foreign other | 381 | 840 | ||||||
Valuation allowance | (1,746 | ) | — | |||||
Long-term deferred tax liabilities | $ | (13,163 | ) | $ | (2,222 | ) | ||
67
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 14. | Income Taxes—(Continued) |
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of tax determined by applying the applicable United States statutory federal income tax rate to pretax income as a result of the following differences:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Statutory federal tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in rates resulting from: | ||||||||||||
Foreign rate differential | (1.9 | ) | (4.0 | ) | (6.6 | ) | ||||||
Federal and state income tax credits | (1.5 | ) | (4.7 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||||
State taxes | 2.6 | 2.6 | 1.9 | |||||||||
Non-deductible expenses | (1.6 | ) | 3.0 | 1.6 | ||||||||
Other | (1.1 | ) | 0.5 | 0.1 | ||||||||
Effective tax rate | 31.5 | % | 32.4 | % | 30.8 | % | ||||||
At December 31, 2010, the Company had United States tax net operating loss carry-forwards totaling approximately $109.5 million which expire between 2025 – 2030. In addition, the Company has various state net operating loss carry-forwards totaling approximately $90.9 million which expire between 2011 – 2030. The federal and state net operating losses were generated by ICx Technologies, which was acquired by FLIR Systems Inc during 2010.
The tax benefits described above are recorded as an asset when the benefits are more likely than not to be recognized. To the extent that management assesses the realization of such assets to not be more likely than not, a valuation allowance is required to be recorded. We believe that the net deferred tax assets of $32.7 million reflected on the December 31, 2010 Consolidated Balance Sheet are mostly realizable based on future forecasts of taxable income over a relatively short time horizon, but we have determined that a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets of $7.3 million is required, primarily related to certain acquired net operating losses. A valuation allowance is required when it is more-likely-than-not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets may not be realized. A review of all available positive and negative evidence is considered, including past and future performance, the market environment in which the Company operates, utilization of tax attributes in the past, length of carryback and carryforward periods, and evaluation of potential tax planning strategies when evaluating the realizability of deferred tax assets. The Company may be required to record additional valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets in future periods if its future forecasts of taxable income are not achieved.
United States income taxes have not been provided on accumulated undistributed earnings of certain subsidiaries outside the United States, as the Company currently intends to reinvest the earnings in operations outside the United States indefinitely. As of December 31, 2010, the cumulative amount of earnings upon which United States income taxes have not been provided is approximately $383.6 million. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable.
68
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 14. | Income Taxes—(Continued) |
The following table summarizes the activity related to unrecognized tax benefits, including amounts accrued for potential interest and penalties (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 8,297 | $ | 5,697 | $ | 4,276 | ||||||
Increases related to current year tax positions | 2,339 | 2,528 | 1,333 | |||||||||
Increases related to prior year tax positions | 1,561 | 227 | 19 | |||||||||
Decreases related to prior year tax positions | (11 | ) | (29 | ) | (112 | ) | ||||||
Acquisitions | 25,716 | — | — | |||||||||
Lapse of statute of limitations | (6,953 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Settlements | — | (126 | ) | — | ||||||||
Reclassification to income tax receivable | — | — | 181 | |||||||||
Balance, end of year | $ | 30,949 | $ | 8,297 | $ | 5,697 | ||||||
The unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2010 relate to the United States, United Kingdom and various foreign jurisdictions.
Approximately $1.1 million of the above tax positions are expected to reverse during the next 12 month period due to the expiration of the statute of limitations and are recorded as current accrued income taxes on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010. All remaining amounts are recorded as a long term liability or an offset to the deferred tax assets.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $30.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits, $20.9 million of which would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. Over the next twelve months, the Company expects to have increases to its unrecognized tax benefits consistent with prior year increases, including increases for interest and penalties.
The Company classifies interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $3.1 million of accrued interest and penalties ($2.7 million net of federal and state benefits) related to uncertain tax positions that are recorded as current and non-current accrued income taxes on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The Company files United States, state and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The Company currently has the following tax years open to examination by major taxing jurisdictions:
| Tax Years: | ||||
United States Federal | 2007 – 2009 | |||
State of Oregon | 2006 – 2009 | |||
State of Massachusetts | 2007 – 2009 | |||
State of California | 2005 – 2009 | |||
Sweden | 2003 – 2009 | |||
United Kingdom | 2007 – 2009 | |||
France | 2006 – 2009 | |||
69
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 15. | Stock-based Compensation |
Stock Incentive Plans
The Company has a stock-based compensation program that provides equity incentives for employees, consultants and directors. This program includes incentive and non-statutory stock options and nonvested stock awards (referred to as restricted stock unit awards) granted under three plans: the FLIR Systems, Inc. 1992 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1992 Plan”), the FLIR Systems, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “1993 Plan”) and the FLIR Systems, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”). Prior to January 1, 2006, all stock options granted were time-based with vesting schedules ranging from immediate vesting to vesting over three years and generally expired ten years from the grant date. The Company has discontinued issuing option awards out of the 1992 Plan and the 1993 Plan, but previously granted options under those plans remain outstanding until their expiration.
During 2006, the Company also began granting performance-based options and time-based restricted stock unit awards. The vesting of performance-based options is contingent upon meeting certain diluted earnings per share growth targets primarily in three independent tranches over a three year period and the options expire ten years from the grant date. The vesting of each tranche is not dependent on the other tranches. Restricted stock unit awards generally vest over a three year period. Shares issued as a result of stock option exercises and the distribution of vested restricted stock units are new shares.
The Company also has stock options that it issued as replacement options in connection with the acquisition of Indigo Systems Corporation in 2004 and stock options and restricted stock units issued as replacement awards in connection with the acquisition of ICx in 2010.
Information with respect to stock option activity for 2010 is as follows:
| Shares (in thousands) | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 | 8,387 | $ | 15.81 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||
Granted | 633 | 30.27 | ||||||||||||||
Business acquisitions | 149 | 18.69 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised | (1,739 | ) | 8.90 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited | (27 | ) | 27.16 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 | 7,403 | $ | 18.69 | 5.6 | $ | 84,792 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2010 | 6,005 | $ | 16.48 | 4.8 | $ | 81,539 | ||||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2010 | 7,333 | $ | 18.60 | 5.6 | $ | 84,630 | ||||||||||
70
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 15. | Stock-based Compensation—(Continued) |
Stock Incentive Plans—(Continued)
Information with respect to restricted stock unit activity for 2010 is as follows:
| Shares (in thousands) | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 | 1,226 | $ | 27.41 | |||||
Granted | 536 | 29.91 | ||||||
Business acquisitions | 182 | 25.06 | ||||||
Vested | (536 | ) | 26.16 | |||||
Forfeited | (57 | ) | 28.32 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 | 1,351 | $ | 28.54 | |||||
As of December 31, 2010, there are 9,750,000 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under all of the stock incentive plans.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) which allows employees to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at 85 percent of the fair market value at the lower of either the date of enrollment or the purchase date. The Company has reserved 5,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the ESPP.
There were 252,000 shares issued during 2010 and 4,621,000 shares remain available under the ESPP at December 31, 2010 for future issuance. Shares issued for ESPP purchases are new shares.
| Note 16. | Other Employee Benefit Plans |
Employee 401(k) Plans
The Company has a 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) to provide for voluntary salary deferral contributions on a pre-tax basis for employees within the United States in accordance with Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Plan allows for contributions by the Company. The Company made and expensed matching contributions of $4.9 million, $4.4 million and $4.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Pension Plans
The Company previously offered most of the employees outside the United States participation in a defined benefit pension plan that has been curtailed. In addition, the Company provides a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) for certain officers of the Company based in the United States.
The Company has recorded the minimum pension liability to accumulated other comprehensive earnings and the estimated benefit to be paid in 2011 has been reported in other current liabilities. The measurement date used for the pension plans is December 31.
71
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 16. | Other Employee Benefit Plans—(Continued) |
Pension Plans—(Continued)
Amounts recognized in other comprehensive earnings during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, net of tax, are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) | $ | 396 | $ | 493 | $ | (2,340 | ) | |||||
Prior service cost | 297 | 313 | (989 | ) | ||||||||
Transition obligation | (29 | ) | (25 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||||
| $ | 664 | $ | 781 | $ | (3,369 | ) | ||||||
Components of accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss) related to the Company’s pension plans as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (3,539 | ) | $ | (3,935 | ) | ||
Prior service cost | (1,220 | ) | (1,517 | ) | ||||
Transition obligation | — | 29 | ||||||
| $ | (4,759 | ) | $ | (5,423 | ) | |||
A summary of the components of the net periodic pension expense for the benefit obligation and fund assets of the plans is as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Change in benefit obligation: | ||||||||
Benefit obligation at January 1 | $ | 22,220 | $ | 21,237 | ||||
Service costs | 142 | 125 | ||||||
Interest costs | 1,135 | 1,085 | ||||||
Actuarial loss (gain) | 1,319 | (219 | ) | |||||
Benefits paid | (4,541 | ) | (353 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency exchange changes | 289 | 345 | ||||||
Benefit obligation at December 31 | $ | 20,564 | $ | 22,220 | ||||
Fair value of plan assets at December 31 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
Unfunded status at December 31 | $ | 20,564 | $ | 22,220 | ||||
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets: | ||||||||
Current liabilities | $ | 420 | $ | 372 | ||||
Non-current liabilities | 20,144 | 21,848 | ||||||
72
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 16. | Other Employee Benefit Plans—(Continued) |
Pension Plans—(Continued)
The weighted average assumptions used are as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net periodic benefit cost: | ||||||||
SERP: | ||||||||
Discount rate | 5.50 | % | 5.50 | % | ||||
Rate of increase in compensation levels | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||
Defined benefit pension plan for employees outside the | ||||||||
Discount rate | 4.70 | % | 3.85 | % | ||||
Funded status and projected benefit obligation: | ||||||||
SERP: | ||||||||
Discount rate | 5.15 | % | 5.50 | % | ||||
Rate of increase in compensation levels | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||
Defined benefit pension plan for employees outside the | ||||||||
Discount rate | 4.70 | % | 3.85 | % | ||||
The discount rates used are based upon publicly listed indices for instruments with average maturities estimated to be consistent with the respective obligations.
A pension liability of $7.6 million and $8.6 million as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, have been recognized for the pension plans representing the excess of the unfunded accumulated benefit obligation over the accrued pension costs.
Benefits expected to be paid under the plans are approximately (in thousands):
2011 | $ | 420 | ||
2012 | 410 | |||
2013 | 12,430 | |||
2014 | 381 | |||
2015 | 398 | |||
Five years thereafter | 6,488 | |||
| $ | 20,527 | |||
Components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Service costs | $ | 142 | $ | 125 | $ | 153 | ||||||
Interest costs | 1,135 | 1,085 | 820 | |||||||||
Net amortization and deferral | 967 | 1,045 | 366 | |||||||||
Settlement loss | 1,392 | — | — | |||||||||
Net periodic pension costs | $ | 3,636 | $ | 2,255 | $ | 1,339 | ||||||
73
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 16. | Other Employee Benefit Plans—(Continued) |
Pension Plans—(Continued)
Components of net periodic benefit cost expected to be recognized from amounts in accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss) during the year ending December 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ending December 31, 2011 | ||||
Net loss | $ | 258 | ||
Net prior service cost | 298 | |||
| $ | 556 | |||
| Note 17. | Operating Segments and Related Information |
Operating Segments
The Company has determined its operating segments to be the Thermography, Commercial Vision Systems, Raymarine, Government Systems, and ICx market segments.
The Thermography segment addresses a broad range of commercial and industrial applications, typically where imaging and temperature measurement together are required. Products range from highly sensitive cameras with extensive analytic capabilities and sophisticated image processing to less expensive cameras offering excellent performance and value for less demanding applications.
The Commercial Vision Systems segment is focused on the emerging commercial markets for infrared imaging technology where the primary need is to see at night or in adverse conditions, such as through smoke or light fog. Markets include commercial security, automotive, marine, airborne, personal night vision, and first responder markets. Also included in this segment is the Company’s infrared sensor business, which sells focal plane arrays and camera cores internally as well as to third parties on an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) basis.
The Raymarine segment designs, develops, and markets electronics for the maritime industry and is a provider of fully integrated “stem to stern” networked electronic systems for boats of all sizes. Products include multifunction displays used to control multiple onboard electronic components, radar systems, thermal imaging cameras, autopilot systems, sonar modules, connectivity software, and various other instruments used to monitor factors such as boat speed, direction, and location. The business distributes its products through a vast network of independent distributors and retailers as well as through its relationships with boat builders, providing both first fitment and aftermarket solutions.
The Government Systems segment is focused on selling advanced imaging systems to government customers and markets where very high performance is required. Typical applications include surveillance, force protection, drug interdiction, search and rescue, special operations, and target designation. GS products are often customized for specific applications and frequently incorporate additional sensors, including visible light cameras, radars, low light cameras, laser rangefinders, laser illuminators, and laser designators.
The ICx segment primarily produces sensor systems that detect and identify chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives threats and deliver actionable intelligence for wide area surveillance, intrusion detection, and facility security. ICx integrates advanced sensors for force protection, homeland security, and commercial applications.
74
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 17. | Operating Segments and Related Information—(Continued) |
Operating Segments—(Continued)
The accounting policies of each of the segments are the same. The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer evaluates the performance of each segment based upon its revenue and earnings from operations. On a consolidated basis, these amounts represent revenue and earnings from operations as represented in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Other consists of corporate expenses and certain other operating expenses not allocated to the operating segments for management reporting purposes. Intersegment revenues are recorded at an estimated arms length basis and are eliminated in consolidation.
Accounts receivable and inventories for operating segments are regularly reviewed by management and are reported below as segment assets. All remaining assets, liabilities, capital expenditures and depreciation are managed on a Company-wide basis.
Operating segment information is as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Revenue—External Customers: | ||||||||||||
Thermography | $ | 317,936 | $ | 285,482 | $ | 327,324 | ||||||
Commercial Vision Systems | 256,102 | 206,323 | 180,622 | |||||||||
Raymarine | 104,089 | — | — | |||||||||
Government Systems | 661,072 | 655,282 | 569,028 | |||||||||
ICx | 46,102 | — | — | |||||||||
| $ | 1,385,301 | $ | 1,147,087 | $ | 1,076,974 | |||||||
Revenue—Intersegments: | ||||||||||||
Thermography | $ | 8,574 | $ | 10,104 | $ | 8,698 | ||||||
Commercial Vision Systems | 27,413 | 18,374 | 22,433 | |||||||||
Raymarine | — | — | — | |||||||||
Government Systems | 28,284 | 28,412 | 30,170 | |||||||||
ICx | — | — | — | |||||||||
Eliminations | (64,271 | ) | (56,890 | ) | (61,301 | ) | ||||||
| $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Earnings (loss) from operations: | ||||||||||||
Thermography | $ | 89,693 | $ | 72,897 | $ | 70,471 | ||||||
Commercial Vision Systems | 74,073 | 49,322 | 37,493 | |||||||||
Raymarine | 8,284 | — | — | |||||||||
Government Systems | 251,842 | 286,361 | 233,803 | |||||||||
ICx | 2,088 | — | — | |||||||||
Other | (65,408 | ) | (61,293 | ) | (57,276 | ) | ||||||
| $ | 360,572 | $ | 347,287 | $ | 284,491 | |||||||
75
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 17. | Operating Segments and Related Information—(Continued) |
Operating Segments—(Continued)
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Segment assets (accounts receivable, net and inventories): | ||||||||
Thermography | $ | 100,809 | $ | 105,156 | ||||
Commercial Vision Systems | 97,610 | 62,635 | ||||||
Raymarine | 58,236 | — | ||||||
Government Systems | 316,748 | 283,683 | ||||||
ICx | 69,476 | — | ||||||
| $ | 642,879 | $ | 451,474 | |||||
Revenue and Long-Lived Assets by Geographic Area
Information related to revenue by significant geographical location, determined by the end customer, is as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
United States | $ | 732,989 | $ | 672,270 | $ | 669,215 | ||||||
Europe | 318,321 | 242,498 | 239,438 | |||||||||
Other foreign | 333,991 | 232,319 | 168,321 | |||||||||
| $ | 1,385,301 | $ | 1,147,087 | $ | 1,076,974 | |||||||
Long-lived assets are comprised of net property and equipment, net identifiable intangible assets, goodwill and other long-term assets. Long-lived assets by significant geographic locations are as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
United States | $ | 583,299 | $ | 387,169 | ||||
Europe | 287,081 | 116,850 | ||||||
Other | 9,423 | 5,175 | ||||||
| $ | 879,803 | $ | 509,194 | |||||
Major Customers
Revenue derived from major customers is as follows (in thousands):
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
United States government | $ | 473,948 | $ | 494,641 | $ | 441,818 | ||||||
76
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 18. | Business Acquisitions |
In May 2010, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Raymarine Holdings Limited (“Raymarine”), a leading provider of a comprehensive range of electronic equipment for recreational boating and light commercial marine markets, for approximately $177.8 million in cash.
The Company has recorded $67.7 million of identifiable intangible assets and $91.6 million of goodwill, in conjunction with the Raymarine acquisition, which has been recorded in the Company’s Raymarine business segment. Goodwill consists largely of the ability of the Company and Raymarine, working together, to grow the combined businesses through the integration of each other’s products, market presence, distribution channels and domain knowledge.
The allocation of the purchase price is as follows (in thousands):
Cash acquired | $ | 3,171 | ||
Accounts receivable, net | 30,929 | |||
Inventories | 20,803 | |||
Property and equipment | 15,807 | |||
Other assets | 17,356 | |||
Liabilities | (41,926 | ) | ||
Net tangible assets | 46,140 | |||
Identifiable intangible assets | 67,723 | |||
Goodwill | 91,643 | |||
Deferred taxes, net | (27,743 | ) | ||
Purchase price | $ | 177,763 | ||
None of the goodwill recognized is deductible for income tax purposes. Acquisition-related costs, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $4.6 million.
The identifiable intangible assets and the estimated useful life of each are as follows (in thousands):
| Estimated Useful Life | Amount | |||||||
Trade Name | Indefinite | $ | 30,294 | |||||
Customer Relationships | 15 years | 31,021 | ||||||
Patented/Proprietary Technology | 5 years | 6,408 | ||||||
| $ | 67,723 | |||||||
Raymarine’s revenue and net earnings included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2010 were (in thousands):
Revenue | $ | 104,089 | ||
Net earnings | 8,284 |
77
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 18. | Business Acquisitions—(Continued) |
In October 2010, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of ICx, a leading provider of integrated advanced sensing technologies for homeland security, force protection and critical infrastructure applications, for approximately $264.2 million in cash. In addition, the Company assumed certain outstanding ICx stock options and unvested restricted stock units. As a result, 331,386 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $2.1 million are issuable by the Company upon exercise of the ICx stock options and vesting of ICx restricted stock units.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company has begun pursuing the sale of certain business units, including Transportation Solutions, which are not a strategic fit with the Company and expects to complete the sale in 2011. The net loss of $0.5 million for these business units have been reported as discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2010. These business units had assets totaling approximately $17.9 million and liabilities of approximately $3.5 million as of December 31, 2010.
The Company has recorded $57.4 million of identifiable intangible assets and $110.6 million of goodwill, in conjunction with the ICx acquisition, which has been recorded in the Company’s ICx business segment. Goodwill consists largely of the ability of the Company to expand the Company’s capabilities into advanced sensors for chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives detection for defense and homeland security markets. The acquisition also enhances the Company’s existing intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance product suite through the addition of ICx’s advanced radars and integrated platforms.
The preliminary allocation of the purchase price is as follows (in thousands):
Cash acquired | $ | 36,197 | ||
Accounts receivable, net | 24,405 | |||
Inventories | 41,982 | |||
Property and equipment | 9,016 | |||
Other assets | 14,325 | |||
Liabilities | (41,729 | ) | ||
Net tangible assets | 84,196 | |||
Identifiable intangible assets | 57,430 | |||
Goodwill | 110,646 | |||
Deferred taxes, net | 14,069 | |||
Purchase price | $ | 266,341 | ||
Certain tax attributes and the allocation of goodwill are pending final valuation and are expected to be finalized by June 30, 2011. None of the goodwill recognized is deductible for income tax purposes. Acquisition-related costs, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $4.5 million.
78
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 18. | Business Acquisitions—(Continued) |
The identifiable intangible assets and the estimated useful life of each are as follows (in thousands):
| Estimated Useful Life | Amount | |||||||
In-process Research and Development | Indefinite | $ | 1,290 | |||||
Customer Contracts | 5 years | 20,000 | ||||||
Patented/Proprietary Technology | 14 years | 36,140 | ||||||
| $ | 57,430 | |||||||
ICx’s revenue and earnings from continuing operations included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2010 were (in thousands):
Revenue | $ | 46,102 | ||
Earnings from continuing operations | 2,088 |
The pro-forma revenue and net earnings of the Company had the acquisition date of Raymarine and ICx been January 1, 2009, were (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenue | $ | 1,571,399 | $ | 1,493,290 | ||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 224,532 | 182,449 | ||||||
The pro-forma results above represent the combined revenue and net earnings of the Company, Raymarine and ICx as reported. These pro-forma results include intangible asset amortization in both periods and assume that acquisition costs were incurred in 2009.
In 2009, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Salvador Imaging, Inc. and OmniTech Partners, Inc. and certain assets of Infrared Korea, Ltd. for approximately $57.1 million in cash. Purchase accounting allocations recorded in 2009 in relation to these acquisitions included recording identifiable intangible assets of approximately $17.1 million, goodwill of approximately $34.4 million, and contingent consideration of approximately $1.9 million. The contingent consideration was paid in January 2011.
Additionally, in December 2009, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of Directed Perception, Inc. for approximately $20.2 million in cash. Purchase accounting allocations recorded in 2010 included recording identifiable intangible assets of approximately $4.5 million and goodwill of approximately $14.1 million.
The operating results of these acquisitions are included in the Company’s results of operations since their respective dates of acquisition.
These acquisitions are not significant, either individually or in the aggregate, as defined in Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission, compared to the Company’s overall financial position.
79
Table of Contents
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| Note 19. | Repurchase of Company Stock |
In February 2007 and February 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 12.0 million shares and 20.0 million shares, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock in the open market. The February 2007 authorization expired in February 2009 and the February 2009 authorization expired in February 2011. Under these authorizations, the Company has repurchased 1,306,000 shares for a total of $35.7 million, 3,232,000 shares for a total of $73.2 million and 1,381,000 shares for a total of $40.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
In February 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 20.0 million shares of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock in the open market. This authorization expires in February 2013.
| Note 20. | Subsequent Event |
On February 9, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a new dividend policy under which the Company intends to pay quarterly cash dividends on its common stock. The first dividend of $0.06 per share of outstanding common stock will be paid to shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 22, 2011, with a payment date of March 10, 2011. The total cash payment of this dividend will be approximately $9.6 million.
80
Table of Contents
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
(In thousands, except per share data)
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | |||||||||||||
2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 287,298 | $ | 331,133 | $ | 332,497 | $ | 434,373 | ||||||||
Gross profit | 165,354 | 183,323 | 182,108 | 231,826 | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 55,895 | 59,454 | 62,955 | 70,309 | ||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | — | — | — | (487 | ) | |||||||||||
Net earnings | 55,895 | 59,454 | 62,955 | 69,822 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.44 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations | — | — | — | (0.00 | ) | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.44 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.44 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations | — | — | — | (0.00 | ) | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||||
2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 271,996 | $ | 277,978 | $ | 285,553 | $ | 311,560 | ||||||||
Gross profit | 157,715 | 161,948 | 162,817 | 176,049 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings | 54,272 | 55,653 | 60,035 | 60,253 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.40 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.38 | ||||||||
The sum of the quarterly earnings per share does not always equal the annual earnings per share as a result of the computation of quarterly versus annual average shares outstanding.
81
Table of Contents
| ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
| ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2010, the Company completed its annual evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in theInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).
The Company acquired Raymarine Holdings Limited on May 14, 2010 and ICx Technologies, Inc. on October 4, 2010 (the Acquisitions). Management excluded the Acquisitions from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. The Acquisitions represent 12.9% of the Company’s total assets and 10.9% of the Company’s total revenues as reported in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Based on our evaluation using theInternal Control—Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
82
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and
Shareholders of FLIR Systems, Inc.:
We have audited FLIR Systems, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).FLIR Systems, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, FLIR Systems, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
FLIR Systems, Inc. acquired Raymarine Holdings Limited on May 14, 2010 and ICx Technologies, Inc. on October 4, 2010 (the Acquisitions) and management excluded the Acquisitions from its assessment of the effectiveness of FLIR Systems, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, the Acquisitions represent 12.9% of FLIR Systems Inc.’s total assets and 10.9% of FLIR Systems Inc.’s total revenues as reported in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of FLIR Systems Inc. also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the Acquisitions.
83
Table of Contents
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of FLIR Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and our report dated March 1, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Portland, Oregon
March 1, 2011
84
Table of Contents
| ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS.
Earl R. Lewis. On February 28, 2011, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Earl R. Lewis, pursuant to which Mr. Lewis is employed by the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer. The Agreement constitutes an amendment and restatement of the Employment Agreement between Mr. Lewis and the Company dated as of May 5, 2010. The Agreement is for a term ending January 1, 2013, and provides for a minimum annual base salary of $850,000 for 2011 and $875,000 for 2012. Pursuant to the Agreement, Mr. Lewis will also be eligible for bonuses, incentive payments, and equity grants as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. If Mr. Lewis terminates the Agreement or the Company terminates the Agreement for “Cause” (as defined in the Agreement), Mr. Lewis would be paid through the date of termination. In the event that the Agreement terminates as a result of the death of Mr. Lewis, the Company would be required to pay an amount equal to one year’s base salary to Mr. Lewis’ estate or designated beneficiary. If the Company terminates the Agreement without Cause, the Company would be required to continue to pay Mr. Lewis an amount equal to his base salary in effect at the time of termination for a period equal to the greater of 18 months or the remaining term of the Agreement plus a severance payment in an amount not less than one year’s base salary. In addition, if the Company terminates the Agreement without Cause, all equity awards granted to Mr. Lewis would immediately vest. If Mr. Lewis’s employment is terminated at a time when a successor as CEO has been identified, he will be paid through termination and will be eligible to receive a prorated award under the Company’s annual incentive plan then in effect. The Agreement also provides that Mr. Lewis will be entitled to all benefits made available to other executive officers. The foregoing description of the Employment Agreement with Mr. Lewis does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the agreement, which is filed as an exhibit to this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
85
Table of Contents
PART III
| ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Information with respect to directors and executive officers of the Company is included under “Election of Directors,” “Management,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance and Related Matters” and “Information Concerning the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Audit Committee Report” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and persons performing similar duties. The Code of Ethics is publicly available on the Company’s website (www.flir.com) in the Governance area of the Investor Relations segment of the website. None of the material on the Company’s website is part of this Annual Report. If there is any waiver from any provision of the Code of Ethics for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and persons performing similar duties, the Company will disclose the nature of such waiver on its website.
| ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Information with respect to executive compensation is included under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report,” “Compensation of Executive Officers,” and “Director Compensation” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
| ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is included under “Stock Owned by Management and Principal Shareholders” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Information with respect to equity compensation plans is included under “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
| ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
Information with respect to certain relationships and related transactions is included under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. Information with respect to Director independence is included under “Corporate Governance and Related Matters—Board of Directors Committees” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
| ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
Information with respect to principal accountant fees and services is included under “Information Concerning the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Fees Paid to KPMG LLP” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
86
Table of Contents
PART IV
| ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a)(1)Financial Statements
The financial statements are included in Item 8 above.
(a)(2)Financial Statement Schedules
No schedules are included because the required information is inapplicable, not required or are presented in the financial statements or the related notes thereto.
(a)(3)Exhibits
Number | Description | |
| 3.1 | Second Restated Articles of Incorporation of FLIR Systems, Inc., as amended through May 12, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 27, 2009). | |
| 3.2 | Second Restated Bylaws of FLIR Systems, Inc., as amended through August 6, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 10, 2009). | |
| 10.1 | 1992 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-62582)).(1) | |
| 10.2 | 1993 Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-62582)).(1) | |
| 10.3 | FLIR Systems, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, amended April 21, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 4, 2005).(1) | |
| 10.4 | FLIR Systems, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2005).(1) | |
| 10.5 | FLIR Systems, Inc. 2007 Executive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2007).(1) | |
| 10.6 | Form of 2007 Executive Bonus Plan Performance Award Agreement dated as of March 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2007).(1) | |
| 10.7 | Form of Stock Option Agreement for 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2007). (1) | |
| 10.8 | Form of Deferred Stock Agreement for 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2007). (1) | |
| 10.9 | Form of Change in Control Agreement dated as of May 6, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 8, 2009).(1) | |
| 10.10 | Amended and Restated FLIR Systems, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated on October 22, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 26, 2010).(1) | |
| 10.11 | Professional Services Agreement between FLIR Systems, Inc. and Stephen M. Bailey dated as of May 5, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2010). (1) | |
| 10.12 | Professional Services Agreement between FLIR Systems, Inc. and Arne Almerfors dated as of June 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2010) . (1) | |
87
Table of Contents
Number | Description | |
| 10.13 | Executive Employment Agreement between FLIR Systems, Inc. and Earl R. Lewis dated as of February 28, 2011. (1) | |
| 10.14 | Credit Agreement by and among FLIR Systems, Inc. and certain subsidiaries of FLIR Systems, Inc., as borrowers, Bank of America, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A and other Lenders identified therein as of February 8, 2011. | |
| 21.0 | Subsidiaries of FLIR Systems, Inc. | |
| 23.0 | Consent of KPMG LLP. | |
| 31.1 | Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302. | |
| 31.2 | Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302. | |
| 32.1 | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 32.2 | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
| 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |
| (1) | This exhibit constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
88
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 1st day of March 2011.
FLIR SYSTEMS, INC. | ||
(Registrant) | ||
By: | /S/ ANTHONY L. TRUNZO
| |
Anthony L. Trunzo Sr. Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 1, 2011.
Signature | Title | |
/S/ EARL R. LEWIS Earl R. Lewis | Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer | |
/S/ ANTHONY L. TRUNZO Anthony L. Trunzo | Sr. Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | |
/S/ DAVID A. MUESSLE David A. Muessle | Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) | |
/S/ JOHN D. CARTER John D. Carter | Director | |
/S/ WILLIAM W. CROUCH William W. Crouch | Director | |
/S/ ANGUS L. MACDONALD Angus L. Macdonald | Director | |
/S/ MICHAEL T. SMITH Michael T. Smith | Director | |
/S/ JOHN W. WOOD, JR. John W. Wood, Jr. | Director | |
/S/ STEVEN E. WYNNE Steven E. Wynne | Director | |
89