Belo 10-Q 2006 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2006

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 1-8598

Belo Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	75-0135890
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. employer identification no.)
P. O. Box 655237
Dallas, Texas	75265-5237
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(214) 977-6606

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.
None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesþ          Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Large Accelerated Filerþ           Accelerated Filero          Non Accelerated Filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yeso          No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at October 31, 2006
Common Stock, $1.67 par value	102,120,089*

* Consisting of 87,650,439 shares of Series A Common Stock and 14,469,650 shares of Series B Common Stock.

BELO CORP.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements		1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		11
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		25
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		25
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		26
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		26
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		26
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		27
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		27
Item 5.	Other Information		27
Item 6.	Exhibits		27
	Signatures		32

PART I

Item 1. Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
Belo Corp. and Subsidiaries

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
In thousands, except per share amounts (unaudited)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Net Operating Revenues	$	376,395		$	373,420		$	1,151,675	��	$	1,113,834
Operating Costs and Expenses
Salaries, wages and employee benefits		145,098			137,358			435,936			409,564
Other production, distribution and operating costs		120,313			116,205			355,739			319,754
Newsprint, ink and other supplies		30,715			37,149			101,620			104,107
Depreciation		21,575			21,612			65,663			65,858
Amortization		2,087			2,087			6,261			6,293
Total operating costs and expenses		319,788			314,411			965,219			905,576
Earnings from operations		56,607			59,009			186,456			208,258
Other Income and Expense
Interest expense		(24,944	)		(23,536	)		(73,036	)		(68,048	)
Other income, net		260			524			9,960			1,365
Total other income and expense		(24,684	)		(23,012	)		(63,076	)		(66,683	)
Earnings
Earnings before income taxes		31,923			35,997			123,380			141,575
Income taxes		12,705			13,856			44,203			53,813
Net earnings	$	19,218			22,141			79,177			87,762
Net earnings per share
Basic	$	.19		$	.20		$	.76		$	.78
Diluted	$	.19		$	.20		$	.76		$	.77
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic		102,153			111,784			104,186			113,081
Diluted		102,251			113,323			104,472			114,677
Dividends declared per share	$	.25		$	.20		$	.35		$	.30

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

1

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Belo Corp. and Subsidiaries

In thousands, except share and per share amounts	September 30,			December 31,
(Current year unaudited)	2006			2005
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments	$	43,546		$	33,243
Accounts receivable, net		245,558			262,240
Other current assets		66,709			60,794
Total current assets		355,813			356,277
Property, plant and equipment, net		530,523			534,112
Intangible assets, net		2,576,305			2,582,566
Other assets		111,751			116,258
Total assets	$	3,574,392		$	3,589,213
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	55,574		$	91,210
Accrued expenses		103,536			97,142
Short term debt		249,350			—
Other current liabilities		75,077			59,077
Total current liabilities		483,537			247,429
Long-term debt		1,048,924			1,244,875
Deferred income taxes		442,536			445,730
Other liabilities		122,455			117,698
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value. Authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued
Common stock, $1.67 par value. Authorized 450,000,000 shares
Series A: Issued 87,227,429 shares at September 30, 2006 and 92,132,169 shares at December 31, 2005		145,669			153,860
Series B: Issued 14,828,406 shares at September 30, 2006 and 15,602,253 shares at December 31, 2005		24,763			26,056
Additional paid-in capital		868,700			901,091
Retained earnings		478,204			492,870
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(40,396	)		(40,396	)
Total shareholders’ equity		1,476,940			1,533,481
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	3,574,392		$	3,589,213

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

2

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Belo Corp. and Subsidiaries

	Nine months ended September 30,
In thousands (unaudited)	2006			2005
Operations
Net earnings	$	79,177		$	87,762
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization		71,924			72,151
Deferred income taxes		(3,813	)		192
Employee retirement benefit expense		9,599			13,311
Share-based compensation		11,144			—
Other non-cash expenses		7,760			8,657
Equity in earnings from partnerships		(991	)		(990	)
Other, net		(4,299	)		(992	)
Net change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		16,074			10,107
Other current assets		233			(4,135	)
Accounts payable		(35,636	)		(17,020	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		10,162			(1,843	)
Interest payable		16,110			11,502
Income taxes payable		(11,328	)		(13,974	)
Net cash provided by operations		166,116			164,728
Investments
Capital expenditures		(62,562	)		(29,511	)
Other investments		4,137			(7,400	)
Other, net		(15	)		1,578
Net cash used for investments		(58,440	)		(35,333	)
Financing
Net proceeds from revolving debt		299,790			445,525
Payments on revolving debt		(444,665	)		(437,825	)
Net proceeds from issuance of senior notes		248,883			—
Redemption of senior notes		(50,650	)		—
Payment of dividends		(33,866	)		(33,956	)
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options		4,677			14,882
Purchase of treasury stock		(121,838	)		(111,392	)
Other		296			(1,977	)
Net cash used for financing		(97,373	)		(124,743	)
Net increase in cash and temporary cash investments		10,303			4,652
Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of period		33,243			28,610
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period	$	43,546		$	33,262
Supplemental Disclosures
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized	$	56,968		$	56,546
Income taxes paid, net of refunds	$	59,022		$	73,735

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

3

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Belo Corp. and Subsidiaries
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(1)	The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of Belo Corp. and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Belo”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The balance sheet at December 31, 2005 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
	In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
	Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) 123R, “Share-Based Payments.” See Note (3) for an explanation of the impact the adoption of this standard has on the Company’s financial statements.
	Certain amounts for the preceding year have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
(2)	The following table sets forth the reconciliation between weighted average shares used for calculating basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share		102,153		111,784		104,186		113,081
Effect of employee stock options		98		1,539		286		1,596
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share		102,251		113,323		104,472		114,677
Options excluded due to exercise price in excess of average market price Number outstanding		16,030		4,643		9,741		4,643
Weighted average exercise price	$	21.16	$	26.53	$	23.42	$	26.53

(3)

Belo has a long-term incentive plan under which awards may be granted to employees and outside directors in the form of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units or stock appreciation rights, the basis of which is Belo’s long-term performance. In addition, options may be accompanied by stock appreciation rights and limited stock appreciation rights. Rights and limited rights may also be issued without accompanying options. Cash bonus awards are also available under the plan. The non-qualified options granted to employees and outside directors under Belo’s long-term incentive plan become exercisable in cumulative installments over periods of one to three years and expire after 10 years. The restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted to employees and outside directors under the long-term incentive plan have service and/or performance conditions and are issued in installments over periods of one to three years. Shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the plan were 8,301,679 at September 30, 2006.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R using the modified prospective application method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, includes the applicable amounts of:

4

(a) compensation expense of all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and previously presented in the pro forma footnote disclosures), and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R). Belo uses the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation method to determine the fair value of stock options granted as of the grant date. For the RSUs, Belo uses the stock price as of the grant date to determine the fair value. Results for prior periods have not been adjusted.

The following table summarizes the impact of recognizing compensation expense related to stock options using the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006:

	Three months ended			Nine months ended
	September 30, 2006			September 30, 2006
Share-based compensation expense recognized in salaries, wages and employee benefits (for stock options only)	$	1,971		$	6,759
Less: income taxes		(784	)		(2,422	)
Decrease in net income	$	1,187		$	4,337
Decrease in basic earnings per share	$	.01		$	.04
Decrease in diluted earnings per share	$	.01		$	.04

Recognition of share-based compensation related to RSUs was not impacted by the adoption of SFAS 123R. Compensation expense, including dividend equivalents, for RSUs totaled $892 and $4,509 for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively, and is included in salaries, wages and employee benefits expense. Total share-based compensation expense, which includes expense from both stock options and RSUs, including dividend equivalents, totaled $2,863 and $11,268 for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Share-based compensation has been allocated between the Company’s two reporting segments (Television Group and Newspaper Group) and Corporate.

Prior to adopting SFAS 123R, the Company presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise of non-qualified stock options as operating cash flows. SFAS 123R requires the cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits related to stock options to be classified as a part of cash flows from financing activities. As a result of adopting SFAS 123R effective January 1, 2006, $296 of excess tax benefits for the nine-months ended September 30, 2006, have been classified as financing cash flows.

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for awards granted under the long-term incentive plans following the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related Interpretations, as permitted by SFAS 123. Because it is Belo’s policy to grant stock options at the market price on the date of grant, the intrinsic value of these grants was zero and, therefore, no compensation expense was recorded. Under the modified prospective application method, results for prior periods have not been adjusted to reflect the effects of implementing SFAS 123R. The following pro forma information, as required by SFAS 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure,” is presented for comparative purposes and illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to share-based employee compensation prior to January 1, 2006:

5

	Three months ended		Nine months ended
	September 30, 2005		September 30, 2005
Net earnings, as reported	$	22,141	$	87,762
Less: Share-based compensation expense determined under fair value-based method, net of tax		1,831		5,476
Net earnings, pro forma	$	20,310	$	82,286
Per share amounts:
Basic net earnings per share, as reported	$	.20	$	.78
Basic net earnings per share, pro forma	$	.18	$	.73
Diluted net earnings per share, as reported	$	.20	$	.77
Diluted net earnings per share, pro forma	$	.18	$	.72

The fair values for awards granted for the three months ended September 30, 2005, were estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation method with the weighted average assumptions listed below:

Weighted average grant date fair value	$	24.49
Weighted average assumptions used:
Expected volatility		22.60	%
Expected lives	5 yrs
Risk-free interest rates		3.92	%
Expected dividend yields		1.63	%

(4) Stock-based activity in the long-term incentive plan related to stock options for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, is summarized in the following table:

				Weighted
	Number of			Average
	Options			Price
Outstanding at January 1, 2006		16,270,228		$	21.17
Granted		210,010		$	18.98
Exercised		(249,529	)	$	18.74
Canceled		(202,750	)	$	22.78
Outstanding at September 30, 2006		16,027,959		$	21.16
Exercisable at September 30, 2006		13,652,799		$	20.67
Weighted average fair value of options granted	$	4.55

The following table summarizes information (net of estimated forfeitures) related to stock options outstanding at September 30, 2006:

	Number of		Weighted Average		Weighted Average		Number of		Weighted Average
Range of	Options		Remaining		Exercise		Options		Exercise
Exercise Prices	Outstanding(a)		Life (years)		Price		Exercisable		Price
$15–18		6,287,845		3.46	$	17.64		6,189,190	$	17.65
$19-21		4,539,802		5.31	$	20.39		3,712,298	$	20.16
$22-29		5,103,160		5.82	$	26.10		3,668,399	$	26.16
$15-29		15,930,807		4.74	$	21.14		13,569,887	$	20.64

(a) Comprised of Series B shares

As of September 30, 2006, stock options outstanding and stock options exercisable had no aggregate intrinsic value. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, the total intrinsic value of

6

options exercised was $845. The amount of the tax benefit realized related to those exercises for the same periods was $296.

The fair values for stock options granted for the three months ended September 30, 2006, were estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation method with the weighted average assumptions listed below:

Weighted average grant date fair value	$	16.33
Weighted average assumptions used:
Expected volatility		27.70	%
Expected lives	7 yrs
Risk-free interest rates		4.66	%
Expected dividend yields		3.06	%

Volatility is calculated using an analysis of historical volatility. The Company believes that the historical volatility of the Company’s stock is the best method for estimating future volatility. The expected lives of options are determined based on the Company’s historical share option exercise experience using a rolling one-year average. The Company believes the historical experience method is the best estimate of future exercise patterns currently available. The risk-free interest rates are determined using the implied yield currently available for zero-coupon U.S. government issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options. The expected dividend yields are based on the approved annual dividend rate in effect and current market price of the underlying common stock at the time of grant. No assumption for a future rate increase has been included.

Each RSU is exchanged for a share of common stock once the RSU is vested. In the nine months ended September 30, 2006, no RSUs became vested and therefore none were exchanged for shares of common stock. There were no RSUs granted in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Stock-based activity in the long-term incentive plan related to RSUs for the nine-months ended September 30, 2006, is summarized in the following table.

				Weighted
	Number of			Average
	RSUs			Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2006		364,900		$	21.62
Granted		226,710		$	20.74
Canceled		(11,100	)	$	21.62
Outstanding at September 30, 2006		580,510		$	21.27
Weighted average remaining life	2.3 yrs

As of September 30, 2006, there was $14,998 of total unrecognized compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, related to all non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted in the Company’s long-term incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.

(5) The net periodic pension cost for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 includes the following components:

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Service cost – benefits earned during the period	$	2,659		$	2,687		$	8,684		$	8,175
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		7,202			6,937			21,531			20,627
Expected return on assets		(8,437	)		(7,786	)		(25,589	)		(23,353	)
Amortization of net loss		1,874			2,139			5,313			5,681
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost		154			76			462			453
Net periodic pension cost	$	3,452		$	4,053		$	10,401		$	11,583

7

	In the first nine months of 2006, the Company did not make any contributions to its defined benefit pension plan. The Company does not expect to make any contributions to the plan during 2006.
	On November 2, 2006, the Company announced that it will freeze benefits under The G. B. Dealey Retirement Pension Plan (the “Plan”) effective March 31, 2007 and that it plans to provide transition benefits to affected employees, including the granting of five years of additional credited service and supplemental contributions for a period of up to five years to a defined contribution plan for the benefit of those affected by these changes.
	In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS 158, “Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans”. SFAS 158 amends SFAS 87, SFAS 88, SFAS 106 and SFAS 132(R). Among other items, SFAS 158 requires the recognition of the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in a company’s balance sheet and to recognized changes in that funded status in the year in which those changes occur through comprehensive income. The effective date of SFAS 158 for the Company is December 15, 2006.
	The Company is currently evaluating the effect of the changes to the Plan and the adoption of SFAS 158 on its pension liability and related accounts.
(6)	On January 5, 2006, CBS Radio Stations, Inc. (formerly Infinity Radio, Inc.), plaintiff and a subsidiary of CBS Corporation, filed a complaint against Belo Corp. and Belo TV, Inc., a subsidiary of Belo Corp., in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York alleging, among other matters, that Belo breached obligations under the asset purchase agreement between Belo and plaintiff to purchase substantially all of the assets of WUPL-TV, then the UPN affiliate in New Orleans, Louisiana, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Plaintiff’s amended complaint seeks damages in the amount of the difference between the $14,500 purchase price of the station and the station’s market value in December 2005, along with unspecified costs and expenses, interest, attorneys’ fees and court costs. On June 8, 2006, Belo filed its response to the amended complaint, and discovery is ongoing. On July 27, 2006, the court entered a preliminary conference order setting forth the case schedule, and on October 17, 2006, the court held a status conference. The Company believes the complaint is without merit and intends to vigorously defend against it.
	On June 3, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed by a purported individual shareholder of the Company in the 191st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against Robert W. Decherd, Dennis A. Williamson, Dunia A. Shive and John L. Sander, all of whom are executive officers of the Company; James M. Moroney III, an executive officer ofThe Dallas Morning News; Barry Peckham, a former executive officer ofThe Dallas Morning News;and Louis E. Caldera, Judith L. Craven, Stephen Hamblett, Dealey D. Herndon, Wayne R. Sanders, France A. Córdova, Laurence E. Hirsch, J. McDonald Williams, Henry P. Becton, Jr., Roger A. Enrico, William T. Solomon, Lloyd D. Ward, M. Anne Szostak and Arturo Madrid, current and former directors of the Company. The lawsuit makes various claims asserting mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty related to the circulation overstatement atThe Dallas Morning Newsannounced by the Company in August 2004.The defendants filed a joint pleading on August 1, 2005, seeking the lawsuit’s dismissal based on the failure of the purported individual shareholder to make demand on Belo to take action on his claims prior to filing the lawsuit. On September 9, 2005, the plaintiff filed his response alleging that demand is legally excused. The defendants replied to plaintiff’s response on September 26, 2005. On September 30, 2005, discovery in this matter was stayed by court order.
	On August 23, 2004, August 26, 2004 and October 5, 2004, respectively, three related lawsuits were filed by purported shareholders of the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against the Company, Robert W. Decherd and Barry Peckham. The complaints arise out of the circulation overstatement atThe Dallas Morning News, alleging that the overstatement artificially inflated Belo’s financial results and thereby injured investors. The plaintiffs seek to represent a purported class of shareholders who purchased Belo common stock between May 12, 2003 and August 6, 2004. The complaints allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On October 18, 2004, the court ordered the consolidation of all cases arising out of the same facts and presenting the same claims, and on February 7, 2005, plaintiffs filed an amended, consolidated complaint adding as defendants John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, Dennis A. Williamson and James M. Moroney III.

8

	On April 8, 2005, plaintiffs filed their unopposed motion for leave to file a first amended consolidated complaint, which motion was granted on April 11, 2005. On August 1, 2005, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On March 30, 2006, the defendants’ motion to dismiss was granted. On May 11, 2006, plaintiffs replead their allegations in a second amended consolidated complaint. On July 27, 2006, defendants filed motions to dismiss the second amended consolidated complaint. On October 10, 2006, plaintiffs filed a consolidated opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended consolidated complaint. No class or classes have been certified and no amount of damages has been specified. The Company believes the complaints are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.
	In 2005, the Company received subpoenas from the Dallas County District Attorney’s office for documents related to the circulation overstatement atThe Dallas Morning News. The Company has cooperated with the Dallas County District Attorney’s office in responding to the subpoenas and will continue to respond to any additional information needs of the District Attorney’s office.
	In 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) notified the Company that the staff was conducting a newspaper industry-wide inquiry into circulation practices, and inquired specifically aboutThe Dallas Morning News’circulation overstatement. The Company has briefed the SEC onThe Dallas Morning Newscirculation situation and related matters. The information voluntarily provided to the SEC relates toThe Dallas Morning News, as well asThe Providence JournalandThe Press-Enterprise. The Company will continue to respond to additional requests for information that the SEC may have.
	A number of other legal proceedings are pending against the Company, including several actions for alleged libel and/or defamation. In the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these other legal proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, liquidity or financial position of the Company.
(7)	Belo now operates its business in two primary reporting segments, the Television Group and the Newspaper Group. In the fourth quarter of 2005, Belo combined the Other Group operations, consisting primarily of the Company’s cable news operations, into the Television Group. As a result, the Company has reclassified the September 30, 2005 previously reported segment amounts to conform to the current year presentation. For the Television Group, Belo’s operating segments are defined as its television stations and cable news channels within a given market. These operating segments are aggregated into the Television Group. For the Newspaper Group, Belo’s operating segments are defined as its newspapers within a given market. These operating segments are aggregated into the Newspaper Group. Belo’s operating segments share content at no cost.
	Management uses segment EBITDA as the primary measure of profitability to evaluate operating performance and to allocate capital resources and bonuses to eligible operating company employees. Segment EBITDA represents a segment’s earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Other income (expense), net is not allocated to the Company’s operating segments because it consists primarily of equity earnings (losses) from investments in partnerships and joint ventures and other non-operating income (expense).

9

Net operating revenues and segment EBITDA by segment, along with a reconciliation of total segment EBITDA to net earnings, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are shown below.

	Three months ended							Nine months ended
	September 30,							September 30,
	2006				2005			2006			2005
Net Operating Revenues
Television Group	$	179,137			$	167,500		$	547,155		$	511,788
Newspaper Group		197,258		��		205,920			604,520			602,046
Total net operating revenues	$	376,395			$	373,420		$	1,151,675		$	1,113,834
Segment EBITDA
Television Group	$	69,853			$	58,269		$	220,011		$	192,706
Newspaper Group		34,731				38,901			107,546			132,306
Corporate		(24,315	)			(14,462	)		(69,177	)		(44,603	)
Total segment EBITDA	$	80,269			$	82,708		$	258,380		$	280,409
Other income (expense), net		260				524			9,960			1,365
Depreciation and amortization		(23,662	)			(23,699	)		(71,924	)		(72,151	)
Interest expense		(24,944	)			(23,536	)		(73,036	)		(68,048	)
Income taxes		(12,705	)			(13,856	)		(44,203	)		(53,813	)
Net earnings	$	19,218			$	22,141		$	79,177		$	87,762

(8) In May 2006, Belo issued $250,000 of 6-3/4% Senior Notes due May 30, 2013 at a premium of approximately $1,118. Interest on these 6-3/4% Senior Notes is due semi-annually on November 30 and May 30 of each year. The 6-3/4% Senior Notes are unsubordinated and unsecured obligations ranking equally with all of the Company’s existing and future unsubordinated and unsecured obligations. The Company may redeem the 6-3/4% Senior Notes at its option at any time in whole or from time to time in part at a redemption price calculated in accordance with the indenture under which the notes were issued. The net proceeds were used to repay debt previously outstanding under Belo’s revolving credit facility with the remaining proceeds invested in short-term investments for working capital needs at September 30, 2006. The $1,118 premium associated with the issuance of these 6-3/4% Senior Notes is being amortized over the term of the 6-3/4% Senior Notes using the effective interest rate method.

(9) On June 7, 2006, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated $1,000,000 Five-Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement amended and restated the Company’s existing $1,000,000 Five-Year Credit Agreement by, among other things, extending the term of the existing facility to June 2011. The facility may be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including letters of credit. Revolving credit borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable interest rate based on either LIBOR or a base rate, in either case plus an applicable margin that varies depending upon the rating of the Company’s senior unsecured long-term, non-credit enhanced debt. Competitive advance borrowings bear interest at a rate obtained from bids selected in accordance with JPMorgan Chase Bank’s standard competitive advance procedures. Commitment fees depending on the Company’s credit rating, of up to .25 percent per year of the total unused commitment, accrue and are payable under the facility. The Credit Agreement contains usual and customary covenants for credit facilities of this type, including covenants limiting liens, mergers and substantial asset sales. The Company is required to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage ratios specified in the agreement. As of September 30, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenant requirements. As of September 30, 2006, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement and all unused borrowings were available for borrowing.

(10) In May 2006, the State of Texas enacted legislation replacing its franchise tax with a new margin tax. Despite an effective date of January 1, 2008, the signing into law of the Tax Reform Bill represents a change in tax law and SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” requires that effects of the change must be reflected in the financial statements in the quarter in which the new tax is enacted. The enactment of

10

	the new margin tax resulted in a one-time net reduction in deferred income taxes and income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 of approximately $3,813.
	In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” FIN 48 is an interpretation of SFAS 109. Among other things, FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this interpretation and does not expect it to have a material impact on its financial statements.
(11)	In December 2005, the Company entered into a construction contract with Austin Commercial, L.P. relating to the new distribution and production center forThe Dallas Morning Newsin southern Dallas, Texas. The revised contract provides for total payments of approximately $16,138. Approximately $9,115 has been paid since the inception of the contract with approximately $8,560 paid in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. William T. Solomon, a member of Belo’s Board of Directors, is Chairman of Austin Industries, Inc., the parent company of Austin Commercial, L.P.
(12)	On September 14, 2006, the Company completed a voluntary severance program for newsroom employees atThe Dallas Morning News. The voluntary severance affected approximately 112 positions. The total charge for severance costs and other expenses related to this reduction in workforce is expected to be approximately $6,715 of which $5,364 was recorded in the third quarter of 2006. In April 2006, the Company announced its technology optimization initiative. Part of this initiative is the elimination of approximately 60 positions. The total charge for severance costs and other expenses related to this initiative is expected to be approximately $1,716 of which $1,368 was recorded in the third quarter of 2006. Approximately $1,275 of the technology initiative charges were recorded in the Newspaper Group with the remaining amount recorded in Corporate expenses. Of the $6,732 in charges recorded in salaries, wages and employee benefits as of September 30, 2006, approximately $4,920 was paid in the third quarter with the majority of the remainder to be paid by December 31, 2006.
(13)	In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements” among other items, SFAS 157 establishes a framework for fair value measurements in the financial statements by providing a single definition of fair value, provides guidance on the methods used to estimate fair value and increases disclosures about estimates of fair value. The effective date of SFAS 157 for the Company is January 1, 2008. The Company will evaluate the impact of the adoption of this standard.
(14)	Subsequent to September 30, 2006, the Company repurchased approximately $12,904 of the outstanding 7-1/8% Senior Notes due June 1, 2007. The total consideration paid was $13,032.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and related Notes filed as part of this report.

Overview

Belo Corp. (“Belo” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, began as a Texas newspaper company in 1842. Belo today is one of the nation’s largest media companies with a diversified group of market-leading television broadcasting, newspaper publishing, cable news and interactive media operations. A Fortune 1000 company with $1.52 billion in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005, Belo operates news and information franchises in some of America’s most dynamic markets and regions. The Company owns 19 television stations (six in the top 15 U.S. markets) that reach 14 percent of U.S. television households, and manages one television station through a local marketing agreement (“LMA”). In addition, Belo owns one local and two regional cable news channels and holds ownership interests in four others. Belo’s daily newspapers areThe Dallas Morning News,The Providence Journal,The Press-Enterprise(Riverside, CA) and theDenton Record-Chronicle (Denton, TX). Belo operates more than 30 Web sites, participates in several interactive alliances and offers a broad range of Internet-based products.

Belo now operates its business in two primary reporting segments, the Television Group and the Newspaper Group. In the fourth quarter 2005, Belo combined the Other Group operations, consisting primarily of the Company’s cable news operations, into the Television Group. As a result, the Company has reclassified the previously reported segment amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, to conform to the current year presentation. The Television Group consists of the Company’s 19 television stations, one station operated under an LMA and three wholly-owned cable news channels, along with its ownership interests in four other cable news channels. The Newspaper Group consists of the Company’s four daily newspapers, various niche publications in the same markets and Belo’s commercial printing businesses. Both segments operate within the United States and compete against similar and other types of media on a local, regional and national basis.

11

The following tables set forth the Company’s major media assets by segment as of September 30, 2006:

Television Group

						Number of
			Year			Commercial Stations		Station Audience
	Market	Station/	Belo		Analog	in	Station Rank in	Share in
Market	Rank(1)	News Channel	Acquired/ Started	Network Affiliation	Channel	Market(2)	Market(3)	Market(4)
Dallas/Fort Worth	6	WFAA	1950	ABC	8	16	1	10
Dallas/Fort Worth	6	TXCN	1999	IND	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Houston	10	KHOU	1984	CBS	11	15	1*	11
Phoenix	13	KTVK	1999	IND	3	13	1*	8
Phoenix	13	KASW	2000	CW(9)	61	13	7*	3
Seattle/Tacoma	14	KING	1997	NBC	5	13	1	13
Seattle/Tacoma	14	KONG	2000	IND	16	13	5*	2
Seattle/Tacoma	14	NWCN	1997	IND	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
St. Louis	21	KMOV	1997	CBS	4	8	2	13
Portland	23	KGW	1997	NBC	8	8	1	11
Charlotte	26	WCNC	1997	NBC	36	8	3*	8
San Antonio	37	KENS	1997	CBS	5	10	1	13
San Antonio(5)	37	KCWX	—	CW(9)	2	10	8*	1
Hampton/Norfolk	42	WVEC	1984	ABC	13	8	1	12
Louisville	48	WHAS	1997	ABC	11	7	1*	11
Austin	52	KVUE	1999	ABC	24	7	1	11
New Orleans	54	WWL	1994	CBS	4	8	1(6)	18(6)
Tucson	70	KMSB	1997	FOX	11	9	4*	4
Tucson	70	KTTU	2002	MNTV(9)	18	9	5	2
Spokane	77	KREM	1997	CBS	2	7	2	14
Spokane	77	KSKN	2001	CW(9)	22	7	4*	3
Boise(7)(8)	118	KTVB	1997	NBC	7	7	1	23

(1)	Market rank is based on the relative size of the television market Designated Market Area (“DMA”), among the 210 generally recognized DMAs in the United States, based on the November 2006 Nielsen Media Research report.
(2)	Represents the number of analog television stations (both VHF and UHF) broadcasting in the market, excluding public stations, low power broadcast stations and cable channels.
(3)	Station rank is derived from the station’s rating, which is based on the July 2006 Nielsen Media Research report of the number of television households tuned to the Company’s station for the Sunday-Saturday 5:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. period (“sign-on/sign-off”) as a percentage of the number of television households in the market.
(4)	Station audience share is based on the July 2006 Nielsen Media Research report of the number of television households tuned to the station as a percentage of the number of television households with sets in use in the market for the sign-on/sign-off period.
(5)	Effective April 7, 2006, KBEJ-TV changed its call letters to KCWX-TV. Belo entered into an agreement to operate KCWX (formerly KBEJ) through a local marketing agreement (“LMA”) in May 1999; the station’s on-air date was August 3, 2000.
(6)	Represents the station rank and audience share of WWL as of the July 2005 Nielsen Media Research report, prior to Hurricane Katrina. More recent information is unavailable because Nielsen has not included New Orleans in its ratings since July 2005.
(7)	The Company also owns KTFT-LP (NBC), a low power television station in Twin Falls, Idaho.
(8)	Using its digital multicast capabilities, KTVB launched “24/7 Local News Channel,” an around-the-clock local news and weather channel.
(9)	In September 2006, the UPN and WB networks ceased operations and a new network, The CW, was formed by merging the UPN and WB networks. Also in September 2006, a new network, My Network TV (“MNTV”) began operations. Three of our four former WB or UPN affiliated stations signed affiliation agreements with The CW. The fourth former WB or UPN affiliated station signed an affiliation agreement with MNTV.
*	Tied with one or more stations in the market.

Newspaper Group

		Belo Acquired	Daily			Sunday
Newspaper	Location	/Started	Circulation(1)			Circulation
The Dallas Morning News	Dallas, TX	October 1885		475,489	(2)		649,709	(2)
The Providence Journal	Providence, RI	February 1997		159,787	(3)		212,971	(3)
The Press-Enterprise	Riverside, CA	July 1997		169,361	(3)		178,788	(3)
Denton Record-Chronicle	Denton, TX	June 1999		13,484	(4)		16,888	(4)

(1)	Daily circulation is defined as a Monday through Saturday six-day average.
(2)	Average paid circulation data forThe Dallas Morning Newsis according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations’ (the “Audit Bureau”) Publisher’s Statement for the six months ended March 31, 2006. In April 2006, the Company ceased including third-party barter circulation in reported circulation figures and limited other third-party circulation. In addition, the Company stopped distributingThe Dallas Morning Newsto areas approximately 200 miles or more outside the Dallas/Fort Worth area.
(3)	Average paid circulation data forThe Providence JournalandThe Press-Enterpriseis according to the Audit Bureau’s FAS-FAX report for the six months ended September 30, 2006.
(4)	Circulation data for theDenton Record-Chronicleis taken from the Certified Audit of Circulations (“CAC”) Publisher’s Statement for the six months ended March 31, 2006.

The Company intends for the discussion of its financial condition and results of operations that follows to provide information that will assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those statements from period to period and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles, policies and estimates affect the Company’s financial statements. The discussion of results of operations at the consolidated level is followed by a more detailed discussion of results of operations by segment.

12

Results of Operations
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Consolidated Results of Operations

	Three months ended September 30,									Nine months ended September 30,
	Percentage									Percentage
	2006			Change			2005			2006			Change			2005
Net operating revenues	$	376,395			0.8	%	$	373,420		$	1,151,675			3.4	%	$	1,113,834
Operating costs and expenses		319,788			1.7	%		314,411			965,219			6.6	%		905,576
Earnings from operations		56,607			(4.1	%)		59,009			186,456			(10.5	%)		208,258
Other income (expense)		(24,684	)		7.3	%		(23,012	)		(63,076	)		(5.4	%)		(66,683	)
Earnings before income taxes		31,923			(11.3	%)		35,997			123,380			(12.9	%)		141,575
Income taxes		(12,705	)		(8.3	%)		(13,856	)		(44,203	)		(17.9	%)		(53,813	)
Net earnings	$	19,218			(13.2	%)	$	22,141		$	79,177			(9.8	%)	$	87,762

Total net operating revenue increased $2,975, or 0.8 percent, from $373,420 in the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $376,395 in the three months ended September 30, 2006. This increase is primarily due to an increase of $11,637 in the Television Group primarily related to increases in local, national and political advertising revenues. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $8,662 in the Newspaper Group primarily related to decreases in retail, general and classified advertising.

Total net operating revenue increased $37,841, or 3.4 percent, from $1,113,834 in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $1,151,675 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This increase is due to an increase of $35,367 in the Television Group primarily related to increases in local, national and political advertising revenues, and an increase of $2,474 in the Newspaper Group primarily related to the change in distribution methods atThe Dallas Morning News.

Operating costs and expenses increased $5,377, or 1.7 percent, from $314,411 in the three months ended September 30, 2005 to $319,788 in the three months ended September 30, 2006. Salaries, wages and employee benefits expense increased $7,740, or 5.6 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the prior year period. In the third quarter 2006, the Company recorded $6,732 in severance costs and other expenses related to the voluntary severance program of newsroom employees atThe Dallas Morning Newsand the technology optimization initiative announced in April 2006. Approximately $4,920 of these charges were paid in the third quarter. This increase and the increase due to the incremental expense from share-based compensation of $2,863, was partially offset by a decrease in estimated self-insured medical and workers compensation insurance expense of $3,216 and a decrease in pension expense of $754. Other production, distribution and operating costs increased $4,108, or 3.5 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005, due to an increase of $7,829 in outside services primarily attributable to consulting costs related to the technology initiative and circulation matters,and an increase of $2,750 in distribution expenses primarily related to the change in distribution methods atThe Dallas Morning News. Belo expects the consulting costs to continue throughout 2006 but to moderate in the fourth quarter. The increase in distribution costs will also continue though they will have less of an incremental effect beginning in the fourth quarter 2006. Newsprint, ink and other supplies decreased $6,434, or 17.3 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the year-earlier period. The average cost per metric ton of newsprint increased approximately 12.0 percent in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005. Newsprint consumption decreased 27.3 percent compared to the year-earlier period primarily because the Company stopped distributingThe Dallas Morning Newsto areas approximately 200 miles or more outside of the Dallas/Fort Worth area.

Operating costs and expenses increased $59,643, or 6.6 percent, from $905,576 in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to $965,219 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Salaries, wages and employee benefits expense increased $26,372, or 6.4 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to an increase in full time salaries of $9,005 due to merit increases, and incremental expenses of $11,268 in share-based compensation. Additionally, in the third quarter 2006, the Company recorded $6,732 in severance costs and other expenses related to the voluntary severance program of

13

newsroom employees atThe Dallas Morning Newsand the technology optimization initiative announced in April 2006. Approximately $4,920 of these charges were paid in the third quarter. There will be additional charges of approximately $1,699 recorded and paid in the fourth quarter. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in estimated self-insured medical and workers compensation insurance expense of $3,797 and a decrease in pension expense of $1,334. Other production, distribution and operating costs increased $35,985, or 11.3 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, due to an increase of $23,854 in outside services primarily attributable to consulting costs related to the technology initiative and circulation matters,and an increase of $16,247 in distribution expenses primarily related to the change in distribution methods atThe Dallas Morning News. Belo expects the consulting costs to continue throughout 2006 but to moderate in the fourth quarter. The increased level of distribution costs will also continue though they will have less of an incremental impact beginning in the fourth quarter 2006, as the change will have been effective for more than a year. Newsprint, ink and other supplies decreased $2,487, or 2.4 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the year-earlier period. The average cost per metric ton of newsprint increased approximately 13.7 percent in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Newsprint consumption decreased 14.9 percent compared to the year-earlier period.

Interest expense increased $1,408, or 6.0 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2006, and $4,988, or 7.3 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared with the same periods in the prior year, primarily due to interest on the 6-3/4% Senior Notes the Company issued in May 2006.

Other income, net decreased $264, or 50.4 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2006, and increased $8,595, or 629.7 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared with same periods in the prior year primarily because the Company recorded a one-time gain of $7,536 in miscellaneous income related to a payment associated with a change in control provision in one of Belo’s vendor contracts.

Income taxes decreased $1,151, or 8.3 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to lower estimated taxable income. Income taxes decreased $9,610, or 17.9 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to lower estimated taxable income and a $3,813 reduction in tax expense related to Texas state tax reforms. In May 2006, the State of Texas enacted legislation replacing its franchise tax with a new margin tax. Despite an effective date of January 1, 2008, the signing into law of the Tax Reform Bill represents a change in tax law and SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” requires that effects of the change must be reflected in the financial statements in the quarter in which the new tax is enacted.

As a result of the factors discussed above, net earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2006, decreased to $19,218 (19 cents per share) from $22,141 (20 cents per share) for the three months ended September 30, 2005. Net earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, decreased to $79,177 (76 cents per share) from $87,762 (78 cents per share) for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

The Company defines Consolidated EBITDA as net earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Consolidated EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP. Management uses Consolidated EBITDA in internal analyses as a supplemental measure of the financial performance of the Company to assist it with determining consolidated performance targets and performance comparisons against its peer group of companies, as well as capital spending and other investing decisions. Consolidated EBITDA is also a common alternative measure of performance used by investors, financial analysts, and rating agencies to evaluate financial performance. Consolidated EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net earnings, operating income, cash flows provided by operating activities or other income or cash flow data prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and this non-GAAP measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

14

The following table presents a reconciliation of Consolidated EBITDA to net earnings for the three and nine-months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:

	Three months ended September 30,									Nine months ended September 30,
	Percentage									Percentage
	2006			Change			2005			2006			Change			2005
Consolidated EBITDA	$	80,529			(3.2	%)	$	83,232		$	268,340			(4.8	%)	$	281,774
Depreciation and amortization		(23,662	)		(0.2	%)		(23,699	)		(71,924	)		(0.3	%)		(72,151	)
Interest expense		(24,944	)		6.0	%		(23,536	)		(73,036	)		7.3	%		(68,048	)
Income taxes		(12,705	)		(8.3	%)		(13,856	)		(44,203	)		(17.9	%)		(53,813	)
Net earnings	$	19,218			(13.2	%)	$	22,141		$	79,177			(9.8	%)	$	87,762

Consolidated EBITDA decreased $2,703, or 3.2 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to an increase in Corporate expenses of $9,853, and a decrease of $4,170 in Newspaper Group segment EBITDA, partially offset by an increase in Television Group segment EBITDA of $11,584.

Consolidated EBITDA decreased $13,434, or 4.8 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to an increase in Corporate expenses of $24,574 and a decrease of $24,760 in Newspaper Group segment EBITDA, partially offset by an increase of $27,305 in Television Group segment EBITDA.

Television Group

The following discussion reviews segment results for the Company’s Television Group, which currently consists of 19 owned stations and one station operated through an LMA, plus three wholly-owned cable news channels. The Television Group’s operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared with the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, were as follows:

	Three months ended September 30,							Nine months ended September 30,
	Percentage							Percentage
	2006		Change			2005		2006		Change			2005
Net operating revenues	$	179,137		6.9	%	$	167,500	$	547,155		6.9	%	$	511,788
Segment costs and expenses		109,284		0.0	%		109,231		327,144		2.5	%		319,082
Segment EBITDA(a)	$	69,853		19.9	%	$	58,269	$	220,011		14.2	%	$	192,706

Note:

Certain amounts for the prior year have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

(a)

Belo’s management uses segment EBITDA as the primary measure of profitability to evaluate operating performance and to allocate capital resources and bonuses to eligible operating company employees. Segment EBITDA represents a segment’s earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Other income (expense), net is not allocated to the Company’s operating segments because it consists primarily of equity earnings (losses) from investments in partnerships and joint ventures and other non-operating income (expense).

Net Operating Revenues

Television Group revenues increased 6.9 percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, over the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. The table below presents the components of net operating revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared with the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005:

15

	Three months ended September 30,							Nine months ended September 30,
	Percentage							Percentage
	2006		Change			2005		2006		Change			2005
Local and national advertising	$	159,879		5.1	%	$	152,085	$	497,342		5.4	%	$	471,853
Political advertising		7,505		385.4	%		1,546		15,418		290.6	%		3,947
Other		11,753		(15.3	%)		13,869		34,395		(4.4	%)		35,988
Net operating revenues	$	179,137		6.9	%	$	167,500	$	547,155		6.9	%	$	511,788

Local and national advertising revenues increased $7,794, or 5.1 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005. This increase is a combination of a $6,489, or 4.3 percent, increase in spot revenue and a $1,473, or 44.8 percent, increase in revenue generated from the Television Group’s Web sites as compared with the three months ended September 30, 2005. For the three months ended September 30, 2005, the Company had approximately $3,000 in lost revenues due to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. In addition to advertising revenue increases due to that favorable comparison, spot revenue increases in the automotive, healthcare, and home improvement categories were partially offset by decreases in the department store and pharmaceutical categories. Political advertising revenues increased $5,959, or 385.4 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared with the three months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to local political advertising in the Seattle/Tacoma, Phoenix, St. Louis, Portland and Hampton/Norfolk markets. Political advertising revenues generally are higher in even numbered years than in odd numbered years due to elections for various state and national offices. Additionally, other revenue decreased $2,116, or 15.3 percent, primarily due to a decrease in network compensation of $4,166. In the third quarter 2005, the Company recognized approximately $3,500 of previously deferred network compensation revenues. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in retransmission revenues. Retransmission revenues are the fees that cable and satellite companies pay for the right to transmit the Company’s broadcast signals over their systems.

Local and national advertising revenues increased $25,489, or 5.4 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. This increase is a combination of a $20,939, or 4.6 percent, increase in local and national spot revenue primarily from the 2006 Super Bowl and Winter Olympics and a $4,974, or 58.3 percent, increase in revenue generated from the Television Group’s Web sites as compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Spot revenue increases in the healthcare, automotive, telecom and home improvement categories were partially offset by decreases in the pharmaceutical, department store and food products categories. Political advertising revenues increased $11,471, or 290.6 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to local political advertising in the Seattle/Tacoma, Phoenix, St. Louis, Portland and Hampton/Norfolk markets as well as earlier local political advertising in the New Orleans and Dallas/Fort Worth markets. Political advertising revenues generally are higher in even numbered years than in odd numbered years due to elections for various state and national offices. Additionally, other revenue decreased $1,593, or 4.4 percent, primarily due to a decrease in network compensation of $5,523. In the third quarter 2005, the Company recognized approximately $3,500 of previously deferred network compensation revenues. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in retransmission revenues.

Segment Costs and Expenses

Television Group segment costs and expenses remained relatively flat in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005. Increases in salaries and wages, including share-based compensation, were offset by decreases in estimated self-insured medical and workers compensation insurance and pension expense. Increases in outside services and music license fees were offset by decreases in communications expense, sales expense and bad debt expense. Segment EBITDA for the Television Group increased 19.9 percent in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the prior-year period primarily as a result of the increase in revenues.

Television Group segment costs and expenses increased $8,062, or 2.5 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the year-earlier period. Salaries, wages and employee benefits increased primarily due to increase in salaries and wages due to merit increases, the recognition of share-based compensation, and an increase in sales commissions related to the increase in advertising revenue, partially offset by a decrease in estimated self insured medical insurance costs. Segment EBITDA for the Television Group increased 14.2 percent

16

in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the prior-year period primarily as a result of the increase in revenues.

Newspaper Group

The following discussion reviews segment results for the Company’s Newspaper Group, which consists of four daily newspapers, various niche publications and commercial printing. Discussion of the three major newspapers generally includes the operations of the related niche publications and products within their respective markets. The Newspaper Group’s operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, were as follows:

	Three months ended September 30,							Nine months ended September 30,
	Percentage							Percentage
	2006		Change			2005		2006		Change			2005
Net operating revenues	$	197,258		(4.2	%)	$	205,920	$	604,520		0.4	%	$	602,046
Segment costs and expenses		162,527		(2.7	%)		167,019		496,974		5.8	%		469,740
Segment EBITDA(a)	$	34,731		(10.7	%)	$	38,901	$	107,546		(18.7	%)	$	132,306

Note:

Certain amounts for the prior year have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

(a)

Belo’s management uses segment EBITDA as the primary measure of profitability to evaluate operating performance and to allocate capital resources and bonuses to eligible operating company employees. Segment EBITDA represents a segment’s earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Other income (expense), net is not allocated to the Company’s operating segments because it consists primarily of equity earnings (losses) from investments in partnerships and joint ventures and other non-operating income (expense).

Net Operating Revenues

Newspaper Group revenues decreased 4.2 and increased 0.4 percent in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, as compared with the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. The table below presents the components of Newspaper Group net operating revenues for those periods:

	Three months ended September 30,							Nine months ended September 30,
	Percentage							Percentage
	2006		Change			2005		2006		Change			2005
Advertising	$	161,562		(5.5	%)	$	170,985	$	496,738		(1.3	%)	$	503,093
Circulation		29,229		6.6	%		27,424		87,150		14.7	%		76,004
Other		6,467		(13.9	%)		7,511		20,632		(10.1	%)		22,949
Net operating revenues	$	197,258		(4.2	%)	$	205,920	$	604,520		0.4	%	$	602,046

Advertising revenues accounted for approximately 82 percent of total Newspaper Group revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to approximately 83 percent and 84 percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. Circulation revenue accounted for approximately 15 percent and 14 percent of total Newspaper Group revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, compared to approximately 13 percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. For each of the periods, commercial printing made up most of the remainder of Newspaper Group revenues.

Net operating revenues forThe Dallas Morning Newsdecreased by $5,928, or 4.8 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005. Advertising revenues decreased by $7,581, or 7.3 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005. General advertising revenues decreased $2,573, or 15.8 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the telecommunications, financial, travel and automotive categories. Retail advertising revenue decreased $1,522, or 6.5 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the apparel and accessories, department stores, professional services and entertainment categories. Classified advertising revenues decreased $2,057, or 5.9 percent, primarily due to decreases in the automotive category. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in circulation revenue. AtThe Dallas Morning News, circulation revenue increased $2,099, or 13.5 percent, in the

17

three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared with the three months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to an estimated $5,154 related to the change in distribution methods from a buy-sell arrangement to a fee-for-delivery arrangement. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of approximately $2,027 related to discounts associated with a promotional campaign to increase subscribers and by a decrease of $1,028 related to lower circulation.

Net operating revenues forThe Dallas Morning Newsincreased by $4,262, or 1.2 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. AtThe Dallas Morning News,circulation revenue increased $12,779, or 32 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to an estimated $21,600 related to the change in distribution methods from a buy-sell arrangement to a fee-for-delivery arrangement. The increase in circulation revenues attributable to the change in distribution methods is expected to continue.The Dallas Morning Newshas experienced a decrease in circulation over the past few years. Efforts to improve the circulation include a promotional campaign involving discounts of approximately $5,723 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The decreases in circulation revenue due to the discounts partially offset the increases in circulation revenue due to the change in distribution methods.The Dallas Morning Newsis moving towards concentrating its circulation efforts on its core readership. Belo expects circulation and circulation revenue to fluctuate during this process. The increases in circulation revenue were partially offset by decreases in advertising revenue. Total advertising revenues decreased $7,833, or 2.6 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. General advertising revenues decreased $960, or 2.1 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the automotive and telecommunications categories, partially offset by an increase in the financial category. Retail advertising revenue decreased $6,050, or 8.7 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the furniture, department stores, entertainment and general retail categories. Additionally, classified advertising revenue decreased $3,646, or 3.4 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the automotive and real estate categories, partially offset by an increase in the employment category.

Net operating revenues forThe Providence Journaldecreased by $2,022, or 4.9 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005. Advertising revenues decreased $1,461, or 4.3 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005. Retail advertising revenues decreased $1,240, or 10.8 percent, due to decreases in the automotive, furniture and home accessories and telecommunications categories. General advertising revenues decreased $387, or 40.2 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the automotive and travel categories. These decreases were partially offset by a slight increase in classified advertising. Classified advertising revenue increased slightly with increases in the real estate category offset by decreases in employment and automotive categories in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005. Total Market Coverage (“TMC”) and preprint revenue decreased $445, or 6.4 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005, due to decreases in the food and general merchandise categories. Circulation revenue decreased $537, or 7.5 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to lower circulation and an increase in discounts related to an overall promotional campaign to improve circulation.

Net operating revenues forThe Providence Journaldecreased by $1,618, or 1.3 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Advertising revenues were flat for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Retail advertising revenues decreased $1,943, or 5.8 percent, due to decreases in the automotive and furniture and home accessories and telecommunications categories for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. General advertising revenues decreased $1,211, or 35.6 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the automotive, pharmaceuticals and travel categories. These decreases in retail and general advertising revenues were partially offset by an increase in classified advertising revenue. Classified advertising revenue increased $1,142, or 3.1 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to increases in the real estate category partially offset by decreases in the employment and automotive categories. Additionally, TMC and preprint revenue increased $839, or 4.0 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to increases in the general merchandise and electronics categories. Circulation revenue

18

declined $1,504, or 7.0 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to lower overall circulation and an increase in discounts related to a promotional campaign to improve circulation.

Net operating revenues forThe Press-Enterprisedecreased by $711, or 1.8 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005. Total advertising revenues decreased $382, or 1.2 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2005. Retail advertising revenues decreased $462, or 9.3 percent, primarily due to decreases in department store and grocery categories, partially offset by increases in the furniture category. General advertising revenues decreased $848, or 25.4 percent, due to decreases in telecommunications and automotive categories partially offset by increases in the financial category. These decreases were partially offset by increases of $526, or 3.3 percent, in classified advertising primarily due to increases in the real estate category, partially offset by decreases in the automotive and employment categories. Circulation revenue atThe Press-Enterpriseincreased $244, or 5.1 percent, when comparing the three months ended September 30, 2006, to the three months ended September 30, 2005. Commercial printing and other revenue atThe Press-Enterprisedeclined $573, or 31.3 percent, for the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005.

Net operating revenues forThe Press-Enterprisewere flat in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Total advertising revenues increased $1,503, or 1.5 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Classified advertising revenues increased $2,648, or 5.7 percent, primarily due to increases in the real estate category, partially offset by decreases in the automotive and employment categories. Preprints and TMC revenues increased $769, or 5.5 percent, due to strong gains in the drug store and grocery categories. Offsetting these increases were decreases in retail and general advertising revenues and commercial printing revenue. Retail advertising revenues decreased $522, or 3.5 percent, primarily due to decreases in the department store and grocery categories partially offset by an increase in the furniture category. General advertising revenues decreased $1,666, or 16.6 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, when compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the telecommunications category. Circulation revenue atThe Press-Enterprisewas flat when comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2006, to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Commercial printing and other revenue atThe Press-Enterprisedeclined $1,543, or 26.5 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

Segment Costs and Expenses

Newspaper Group segment costs and expenses decreased $4,492, or 2.7 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the prior year period primarily due to decreases in newsprint, ink and other supplies and other production, distribution and operating costs. The decrease in newsprint is due to 27.3 percent decrease in consumption. The decrease in consumption was partially offset by a 12.0 percent increase in price. The net decrease in newsprint due to lower consumption is related to lower circulation and reduced advertising inches. Other production, distribution and operating costs decreased $1,564, or 2.7 percent, primarily due to decreases in outside solicitation and advertising and promotion partially offset by an increase in distribution costs. The decrease in outside solicitation is primarily due to lower sales commissions based on reduced circulation atThe Dallas Morning News. The decrease in advertising and promotion is primarily due to decreases atThe Dallas Morning News. The increase in distribution costs is due to approximately $3,656 in additional costs related to the change in distribution methods atThe Dallas Morning News.Belo expects this increased level of distribution costs atThe Dallas Morning Newsto continue. The decreases discussed above were partially offset by an increase in salaries wages and employee benefits. In the third quarter 2006, the Company completed a voluntary severance program for newsroom employees atThe Dallas Morning News. The voluntary severance affected approximately 112 positions. Additionally, the Company recorded severance charges related to the technology optimization initiative announced in April 2006. In total, the Company recorded charges totaling $6,639 for severance costs and other expenses related to the reduction in workforce in the third quarter of 2006. This increase and the increase due to the incremental expense from share-based compensation was partially offset by a decrease in estimated self-insured medical and workers’ compensation insurance costs and a decrease in pension expense.

Newspaper Group segment costs and expenses increased $27,234, or 5.8 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the prior year period primarily due to increases in salaries, wages and employee benefits and other production, distribution and operating costs partially offset by a decrease in newsprint, ink and other supplies. Salaries, wages and employee benefits increased primarily due to severance costs atThe Dallas Morning News,increased salary and wages expense due to merit increases and incremental share-based

19

compensation expenses. These increases were partially offset by decreases in sales commissions, estimated self-insured medical and workers’ compensation insurance costs and decreases in pension expenses. Other production, distribution and operating costs increased primarily due to increased distribution and outside services costs. The increase in distribution costs is due to approximately $17,356 in additional costs related to the change in distribution methods atThe Dallas Morning News.Belo expects this increased level of distribution costs atThe Dallas Morning Newsto continue though they will have less of an incremental impact beginning in the fourth quarter 2006, as the change will have been effective for more than a year. Outside services increased primarily due to increased consulting expenses related to circulation matters. Belo expects the consulting costs to continue throughout 2006. The decrease in newsprint is due to 14.9 percent decrease in consumption. The decrease in consumption was partially offset by a 13.7 percent increase in price.

Corporate

Corporate costs and expenses increased $9,853, or 68.1 percent, in the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to incremental expenses of $6,955 in consulting fees related to the technology initiatives and $1,599 in share-based compensation. Belo expects consulting fees to continue throughout 2006 but to moderate in the fourth quarter.

Corporate costs and expenses increased $24,574, or 55.1 percent, in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005, primarily due to incremental expenses of $15,104 in consulting fees primarily related to the technology initiatives and $7,238 in share-based compensation. Belo expects consulting fees to continue throughout 2006 but to moderate in the fourth quarter. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company recorded a one-time gain of $7,536 in miscellaneous income related to a payment associated with a change-in-control provision in one of Belo’s vendor contracts. Additionally, Belo recorded a one-time net reduction of $3,813 in tax expense related to the enactment of the new State of Texas margin tax discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operations, bank borrowings and term debt are Belo’s primary sources of liquidity. Net cash provided by operations was $166,116 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared with $164,728 in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The changes in cash flows from operations are primarily caused by lower net earnings and normal changes in its working capital requirements. The Company used net cash provided by operations and proceeds from stock option exercises to purchase treasury shares, fund capital expenditures and dividend payments, and pay debt.

The Company did not make any contributions to its defined benefit pension plan in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. In the second quarter 2006, the Company reviewed its pension requirements and does not expect to make any contributions in 2006.

Recent pension reform legislation approved by Congress is expected to significantly increase the costs and funding requirements of defined benefit retirement plans like Belo’s pension plan. On November 2, 2006, the Company announced that it will freeze benefits under The G. B. Dealey Retirement Pension Plan (the “Plan”) effective March 31, 2007 and that it plans to provide transition benefits to affected employees, including the granting of five years of additional credited service and supplemental contributions for a period of up to five years to a defined contribution plan for the benefit of those affected by these changes. The Company is evaluating the impact of this legislation and its pension changes on the Company’s pension liability and related accounts.

As of September 30, 2006, the balance sheet reflects a negative working capital position with current liabilities in excess of current assets. The reclassification from long-term to short-term of $300,000 in 7-1/8% Senior Notes due June 1, 2007 is the reason for the negative position. In the third quarter 2006, the Company redeemed $50,650 of the outstanding notes. Subsequent to September 30, 2006, the Company has repurchased approximately $12,904 of the outstanding notes. The Company may repay the Senior Notes due June 1, 2007 with borrowings under its credit facility. The Company believes its current financial condition and credit relationships are adequate to fund both its current obligations as well as near-term growth.

20

Investing Cash Flows

Net cash flows used in investing activities were $58,440 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared with $35,333 in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. These cash uses are primarily attributable to capital expenditures as more fully described below.

Capital Expenditures

Total capital expenditures were $62,562 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared with $29,511 in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. These were primarily for Television Group and Newspaper Group facilities and equipment and Corporate driven technology initiatives.

On April 13, 2006, the Company broke ground for a new distribution and production center in southern Dallas forThe Dallas Morning News. The total cost of the land, building and land improvements, and equipment is projected to be approximately $55,000 over a three-year period, of which approximately $18,282 was incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, and approximately $31,758 has been incurred since the beginning of the project through September 30, 2006.

On January 20, 2006, the Company announced plans to build a state-of-the-art media center building forThe Press-Enterprise.The 150,000 square foot, five-story office building will centralize all news, editorial, advertising, sales and marketing, technology, production support and administrative functions for the organization’s operations. The new building will be adjacent to the newspaper’s current building. Construction began in the first quarter 2006 and the new building is scheduled to be completed and ready for occupancy in the first half of 2007. The cost of the new building is projected to be approximately $40,000 of which approximately $12,090 was incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, and approximately $16,442 has been incurred since the beginning of the project through September 30, 2006.

The Company is reexamining its major capital expenditure plans for the remainder of 2006 through 2009, based on current competitive conditions and anticipated changes in operating requirements. The Company plans to reduce total capital spending to approximately $75,000 per year for 2007 through 2009, down from the approximately $120,000 per year estimated previously. Capital expenditures for 2006 are expected to be slightly less than the previously announced estimate of approximately $120,000.

Financing Cash Flows

Net cash flows used in financing activities were $97,373 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to $124,743 in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. These cash flows are primarily attributable to borrowings and repayments under the Company’s revolving credit facility, issuance of the Company’s 6-3/4% Senior Notes due 2013, dividends on common stock, proceeds from exercises of stock options and purchases of treasury stock, all as more fully described below.

Long-Term Debt

In May 2006, Belo issued $250,000 of 6-3/4% Senior Notes due May 30, 2013 at a premium of approximately $1,118. Interest on these 6-3/4% Senior Notes is due semi-annually on November 30 and May 30 of each year. The 6-3/4% Senior Notes are unsubordinated and unsecured obligations ranking equally with all of the Company’s existing and future unsubordinated and unsecured obligations. The Company may redeem the 6-3/4% Senior Notes at its option at any time in whole or from time to time in part at a redemption price calculated in accordance with the indenture under which the notes were issued. The net proceeds were used to repay debt then outstanding under Belo’s revolving credit facility and for working capital needs. The $1,118 premium associated with the issuance is being amortized over the term of the 6-3/4% Senior Notes using the effective interest rate method. As of September 30, 2006, there is approximately $8,753 of unused proceeds in short-term investments.

On June 1, 2006, the Company reclassified $300,000 of 7-1/8% Senior Notes due June 1, 2007, from long-term debt to short-term debt because the debt is due in less than one year. In the third quarter 2006, the Company redeemed $50,650 of the outstanding notes. The Company may repay the remaining outstanding notes on or before their due date with borrowings under its credit facility.

21

On June 7, 2006, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated $1,000,000 Five-Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement amends and restates the Company’s existing $1,000,000 Five-Year Credit Agreement by, among other things, extending the term of the existing facility to June 2011. The facility may be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including letters of credit. Revolving credit borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable interest rate based on either LIBOR or a base rate, in either case plus an applicable margin that varies depending upon the rating of the Company’s senior unsecured long-term, non-credit enhanced debt. Competitive advance borrowings bear interest at a rate obtained from bids selected in accordance with JPMorgan Chase Bank’s standard competitive advance procedures. Commitment fees depending on the Company’s credit rating, of up to .25 percent per year of the total unused commitment accrue and are payable under the facility. The Credit Agreement contains usual and customary covenants for credit facilities of this type, including covenants limiting liens, mergers and substantial asset sales. The Company is required to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage ratios specified in the agreement. As of September 30, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenant requirements. As of September 30, 2006, no borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Agreement and all unused borrowings were available for borrowing.

At September 30, 2006, Belo had $1,299,350 in fixed-rate debt securities as follows: $249,350 of 7-1/8% Senior Notes due 2007; $350,000 of 8% Senior Notes due 2008; $250,000 of 6-3/4% Senior Notes due 2013; $200,000 of 7-3/4% Senior Debentures due 2027; and $250,000 of 7-1/4% Senior Debentures due 2027. The weighted average effective annual interest rate for the fixed-rate debt instruments is 7.4 percent. Future borrowings of variable-rate debt are expected to be used to pay down fixed-rate debt in whole or in part or for other corporate needs as determined by management.

In addition, the Company has uncommitted lines of credit of $60,000, at September 30, 2006, of which there were no borrowings outstanding. The uncommitted lines of credit have variable interest rates. These borrowings may be converted at the Company’s option to revolving debt under the Credit Agreement. Accordingly, such borrowings would be classified as long-term debt in the Company’s financial statements. All unused borrowings under the Company’s uncommitted lines of credit were available for borrowing as of September 30, 2006.

Dividends

On September 1, 2006, the Company paid second quarter 2006 dividends of $12,749 on Series A and Series B common stock outstanding, to shareholders of record on August 11, 2006. On June 2, 2006, the Company paid first quarter 2006 dividends of $10,501 on Series A and Series B common stock outstanding, to shareholders of record on May 12, 2006. On March 3, 2006, the Company paid fourth quarter 2005 dividends of $10,616 on Series A and Series B common stock outstanding, to shareholders of record on February 10, 2006.

On September 29, 2006, the Company declared third quarter dividends of 12.5 cents per share on Series A and Series B common stock outstanding, to be paid on December 1, 2006 to shareholders of record on November 10, 2006. This dividend reflects the 25 percent increase in the Company’s annual cash dividend rate which was announced May 9, 2006.

Share Repurchase Programs

In the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company purchased 6,320,000 shares of its Series A common stock under a stock repurchase program pursuant to authorization from Belo’s Board of Directors in July 2000. On December 9, 2005, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional 15,000,000 shares of common stock. As of September 30, 2006, no shares were repurchased under the December 9, 2005, authorization. The remaining authorization for the repurchase of shares as of September 30, 2006, under both these authorities was 15,279,219 shares. In addition, the Company has a stock repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $2,500 of common stock annually. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, no shares were repurchased under this program. There is no expiration date for these repurchase programs. The total cost of the treasury shares purchased in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, was $121,838. All shares repurchased in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, were retired as of September 30, 2006.

22

Other

The Company has various options available to meet its 2006 capital and operating commitments, including cash on hand, short-term investments, internally generated funds and the $1,000,000 revolving credit facility. The Company believes its resources are adequate to meet its foreseeable needs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 158, “Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans”. SFAS 158 is an amendment to SFAS 87, SFAS 88, SFAS 106 and SFAS 132(R). Among other items, SFAS 158 requires the recognition of the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in a company’s balance sheet and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which those changes occur through comprehensive income. The effective date of SFAS 158 for the Company is December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” Among other items, SFAS 157 establishes a framework for fair value measurements in the financial statements by providing a single definition of fair value, provides guidance on the methods used to estimate fair value and increases disclosures about estimates of fair value. The effective date of SFAS 157 for the Company is January 1, 2008. The Company will evaluate the impact of the adoption of this standard.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” FIN 48 is an interpretation of SFAS 109. Among other things, FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this interpretation.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, “Share-Based Payments,” using the modified prospective application method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, includes the applicable amounts of: (a) compensation expense of all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and previously presented in the pro forma footnote disclosures), and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R). Results for prior periods have not been adjusted. See Note (3) to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1, for a description of share-based awards.

The following is the effect for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, of adopting SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006:

	Three months ended			Nine months ended
	September 30, 2006			September 30, 2006
Share-based compensation expense recognized in salaries, wages and employee benefits (for stock options only)	$	1,971		$	6,759
Less: income taxes		(784	)		(2,422	)
Decrease in net income	$	1,187			4,337
Decrease in basic earnings per share	$	.01		$	.04
Decrease in diluted earnings per share	$	.01		$	.04

The amounts above include the impact of recognizing compensation expense related to stock options. Compensation expense related to restricted stock units (“RSUs”) was recognized before implementation of SFAS 123R. Compensation expense for RSUs, including dividend equivalents, totaled $889 and $4,509 for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively, and is included in salaries, wages and employee benefits expense. Total share-based compensation expense, which includes expense from both stock options and RSUs, including dividend equivalents, totaled $2,863 and $11,268 for the three and nine-month periods ended

23

September 30, 2006, respectively. Share-based compensation has been allocated among the Company’s two segments (Television Group and Newspaper Group) and Corporate.

Prior to adopting SFAS 123R, the Company presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise of non-qualified stock options as operating cash flows. SFAS 123R requires the cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits related to stock options to be classified as a part of cash flows from financing activities. As a result of adopting SFAS 123R effective January 1, 2006, $296 of excess tax benefits for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, have been classified as financing cash flows.

Other Matters

On November 2, 2006, the Company announced that it will freeze benefits under The G. B. Dealey Retirement Pension Plan effective March 31, 2007, and that it plans to provide transition benefits to affected employees, including the granting of five years of additional credited service and supplemental contributions for a period of up to five years to a defined contribution plan for the benefit of those affected by these changes. The Company is evaluating the impact of this legislation and its pension changes on the Company’s pension liability and related accounts.

On January 5, 2006, CBS Radio Stations, Inc. (formerly Infinity Radio, Inc.), plaintiff and a subsidiary of CBS Corporation, filed a complaint against Belo Corp. and Belo TV, Inc., a subsidiary of Belo Corp., in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York alleging, among other matters, that Belo breached obligations under the asset purchase agreement between Belo and plaintiff to purchase substantially all of the assets of WUPL-TV, then the UPN affiliate in New Orleans, Louisiana, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Plaintiff’s amended complaint seeks damages in the amount of the difference between the $14,500 purchase price of the station and the station’s market value in December 2005, along with unspecified costs and expenses, interest, attorneys’ fees and court costs. On June 8, 2006, Belo filed its response to the amended complaint, and discovery is ongoing. On July 27, 2006, the court entered a preliminary conference order setting forth the schedule for the case, and on October 17, 2006, a status conference was held. The Company believes the complaint is without merit and intends to vigorously defend against it.

On June 3, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed by a purported individual shareholder of the Company in the 191^st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against Robert W. Decherd, Dennis A. Williamson, Dunia A. Shive and John L. Sander, all of whom are executive officers of the Company; James M. Moroney III, an executive officer ofThe Dallas Morning News; Barry Peckham, a former executive officer ofThe Dallas Morning News;and Louis E. Caldera, Judith L. Craven, Stephen Hamblett, Dealey D. Herndon, Wayne R. Sanders, France A. Córdova, Laurence E. Hirsch, J. McDonald Williams, Henry P. Becton, Jr., Roger A. Enrico, William T. Solomon, Lloyd D. Ward, M. Anne Szostak and Arturo Madrid, current and former directors of the Company. The lawsuit makes various claims asserting mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty related to the circulation overstatement atThe Dallas Morning Newsannounced by the Company in August 2004.The defendants filed a joint pleading on August 1, 2005, seeking the lawsuit’s dismissal based on the failure of the purported individual shareholder to make demand on Belo to take action on his claims prior to filing the lawsuit. On September 9, 2005, the plaintiff filed its response alleging that demand is legally excused. The defendants replied to plaintiff’s response on September 26, 2005. On September 30, 2005, discovery in this matter was stayed by court order.

On August 23, 2004, August 26, 2004 and October 5, 2004, respectively, three related lawsuits were filed by purported shareholders of the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against the Company; Robert W. Decherd and Barry Peckham. The complaints arise out of the circulation overstatement atThe Dallas Morning News, alleging that the overstatement artificially inflated Belo’s financial results and thereby injured investors. The plaintiffs seek to represent a purported class of shareholders who purchased Belo common stock between May 12, 2003 and August 6, 2004. The complaints allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On October 18, 2004, the court ordered the consolidation of all cases arising out of the same facts and presenting the same claims, and on February 7, 2005, plaintiffs filed an amended, consolidated complaint adding as defendants John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, Dennis A. Williamson and James M. Moroney III. On April 8, 2005, plaintiffs filed their unopposed motion for leave to file a first amended consolidated complaint, which motion was granted on April 11, 2005. On August 1, 2005, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On March 30, 2006, the defendants’ motion to dismiss was granted. On May 11, 2006, plaintiffs replead their allegations in a second amended consolidated complaint naming Robert W. Decherd, James M. Moroney III and Barry Peckham as defendants. On July 27, 2006, defendants filed motions to dismiss the second amended consolidated complaint. On October 10, 2006, plaintiffs filed a consolidated opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended consolidated complaint. No class or classes

24

have been certified and no amount of damages has been specified. The Company believes the complaints are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.

In 2005, the Company received subpoenas from the Dallas County District Attorney’s office for documents related to the circulation overstatement atThe Dallas Morning News. The Company has cooperated with the Dallas County District Attorney’s office in responding to the subpoenas and will continue to respond to any additional information needs of the District Attorney’s office.

In 2004, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) notified the Company that the staff was conducting a newspaper industry-wide inquiry into circulation practices, and inquired specifically aboutThe Dallas Morning News’circulation overstatement. The Company has briefed the SEC onThe Dallas Morning Newscirculation situation and related matters. The information voluntarily provided to the SEC relates toThe Dallas Morning News, as well asThe Providence JournalandThe Press-Enterprise. The Company will continue to respond to additional requests for information that the SEC may have.

A number of other legal proceedings are pending against the Company, including several actions for alleged libel and/or defamation. In the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these other legal proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, liquidity or financial position of the Company.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this Form 10-Q concerning Belo’s business outlook or future economic performance, anticipated profitability, revenues, expenses, dividends, capital expenditures, investments, future financings or other financial and non-financial items that are not historical facts, are “forward-looking statements” as the term is defined under applicable federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those statements.

Such risks, uncertainties and factors include, but are not limited to, changes in capital market conditions and prospects, and other factors such as changes in advertising demand, interest rates and newsprint prices; newspaper circulation matters, including changes in readership, and audits and related actions (including the censure ofThe Dallas Morning News) by the Audit Bureau of Circulations; technological changes, including the transition to digital television and the development of new systems to distribute television and other audio-visual content; development of Internet commerce; industry cycles; changes in pricing or other actions by competitors and suppliers; regulatory changes; adoption of new accounting standards or changes in existing accounting standards by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other accounting standard-setting bodies or authorities; the effects of Company acquisitions and dispositions; the recovery of the New Orleans market (where the Company owns and operates market-leading television station WWL-TV, the CBS affiliate) from the effects of Hurricane Katrina; general economic conditions; and significant armed conflict, as well as other risks detailed in Belo’s other public disclosures, and filings with the SEC, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Other than as disclosed, there have been no material changes in the Company’s exposure to market risk from the disclosure included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Belo’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed in the Company’s SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified

25

in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In addition to the proceedings disclosed below and those previously disclosed (see Note (6) to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 and Management's Discussion and Analysis — Other Matters in Part I, Item 2), for which there are no material developments to report, a number of other legal proceedings are pending against the Company, including several actions for alleged libel and/or defamation. In the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these other legal proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, liquidity or financial position of the Company.

On August 23, 2004, August 26, 2004 and October 5, 2004, respectively, three related lawsuits were filed by purported shareholders of the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against the Company, Robert W. Decherd and Barry Peckham. The complaints arise out of the circulation overstatement atThe Dallas Morning News, alleging that the overstatement artificially inflated Belo’s financial results and thereby injured investors. The plaintiffs seek to represent a purported class of shareholders who purchased Belo common stock between May 12, 2003 and August 6, 2004. The complaints allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On October 18, 2004, the court ordered the consolidation of all cases arising out of the same facts and presenting the same claims, and on February 7, 2005, plaintiffs filed an amended, consolidated complaint adding as defendants John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, Dennis A. Williamson and James M. Moroney III. On April 8, 2005, plaintiffs filed their unopposed motion for leave to file a first amended consolidated complaint, which motion was granted on April 11, 2005. On August 1, 2005, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On March 30, 2006, the defendants’ motion to dismiss was granted. On May 11, 2006, plaintiffs replead their allegations in a second amended consolidated complaint naming Robert W. Decherd, James M. Moroney III and Barry Peckham as defendants. On July 27, 2006, defendants filed motions to dismiss the second amended consolidated complaint. On October 10, 2006, plaintiffs filed a consolidated opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended consolidated complaint. No class or classes have been certified and no amount of damages has been specified. The Company believes the complaints are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the Company’s risk factors from the disclosure included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There have been no unregistered sales of equity securities in the last three years. All repurchases of securities detailed below were retired in the quarter they were repurchased.

26

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table provides information about the Company’s Series A Common Stock repurchases during the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The Company did not repurchase any shares of Series B Common Stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

					(c)		(d)
					Total Number of Shares		Maximum Number of
	(a)		(b)		Purchased as Part of		Shares that May Yetbe
	Total Number of		Average Price Paid		Publicly Announced		Purchased Under the
Period	Shares Purchased		per Share		Plans or Programs		Plans or Programs(1)
July 1, 2006 through July 31, 2006		1,200,000	$	15.62		1,200,000		15,279,219
August 1, 2006 through August 31, 2006		—		—		—		15,279,219
September 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006		—		—		—		15,279,219
Total		1,200,000	$	15.62		1,200,000		15,279,219

(1) In July 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 25,000,000 shares of common stock. In December 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional 15,000,000 shares of common stock. As of September 30, 2006, the Company had 15,279,219 remaining shares under these purchase authorities. In addition, Belo has a stock repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $2,500 of Company stock annually. There is no expiration date for these repurchase programs.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits marked with an asterisk (*) are incorporated by reference to documents previously filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as indicated. All other documents are filed with this report. Exhibits marked with a tilde (~) are management contracts, compensatory plan contracts or arrangements filed pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K.

Exhibit
Number	Description
3.1      *	Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 15, 2000 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598) (the “1999 Form 10-K”))
3.2      *	Certificate of Correction to Certificate of Incorporation dated May 13, 1987 (Exhibit 3.2 to the 1999 Form 10-K)
3.3      *	Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company dated April 16, 1987 (Exhibit 3.3 to the 1999 Form 10-K)
3.4      *	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated May 4, 1988 (Exhibit 3.4 to the 1999 Form 10-K)
3.5      *	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated May 3, 1995 (Exhibit 3.5 to the 1999 Form 10-K)

27

Exhibit
Number	Description
3.6      *	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated May 13, 1998 (Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 002-74702)(the “2nd Quarter 1998 Form 10-Q”))
3.7      *	Certificate of Ownership and Merger, dated December 20, 2000, but effective as of 11:59 p.m. on December 31, 2000 (Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2000)(Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)
3.8       *	Amended Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company dated May 4, 1988 (Exhibit 3.7 to the 1999 Form 10-K)
3.9      *	Certificate of Designation of Series B Common Stock of the Company dated May 4, 1988 (Exhibit 3.8 to the 1999 Form 10-K)
3.10      *	Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective December 31, 2000 (Exhibit 3.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 13, 2001 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “2000 Form 10-K”))
3.11      *	Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective February 7, 2003 (Exhibit 3.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 12, 2003 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “2002 Form 10-K”))
3.12      *	Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective May 9, 2005 (Exhibit 3.12 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005)(Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “1st Quarter 2005 Form 10-Q”)
4.1	Certain rights of the holders of the Company’s Common Stock are set forth in Exhibits 3.1-3.12 above
4.2      *	Specimen Form of Certificate representing shares of the Company’s Series A Common Stock (Exhibit 4.2 to the 2000 Form 10-K)
4.3       *	Specimen Form of Certificate representing shares of the Company’s Series B Common Stock (Exhibit 4.3 to the 2000 Form 10-K)
4.4	Instruments defining rights of debt securities:

(1	)	*	Indenture dated as of June 1, 1997 between the Company and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (the “Indenture”)(Exhibit 4.6(1) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 002-74702)(the “2nd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q”))
(2	)	*	(a)$200 million 7-1/8% Senior Note due 2007 (Exhibit 4.6(3)(a) to the 2nd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)
		*	(b)$100 million 7-1/8% Senior Note due 2007 (Exhibit 4.6(3)(b) to the 2nd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)
(3	)	*	$200 million 7-3/4% Senior Debenture due 2027 (Exhibit 4.6(4) to the 2nd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)
(4	)	*	Officers’ Certificate dated June 13, 1997 establishing terms of debt securities pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Indenture (Exhibit 4.6(5) to the 2nd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)

28

Exhibit
Number					Description
		(5	)	*	(a)  $200 million 7-1/4% Senior Debenture due 2027 (Exhibit 4.6(6)(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 002-74702) (the “3rdQuarter 1997 Form 10-Q”))
				*	(b)  $50 million 7-1/4% Senior Debenture due 2027 (Exhibit 4.6(6)(b) to the 3rd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)
		(6	)	*	Officers’ Certificate dated September 26, 1997 establishing terms of debt securities pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Indenture (Exhibit 4.6(7) to the 3rd Quarter 1997 Form 10-Q)
		(7	)	*	$350 million 8.00% Senior Note due 2008 (Exhibit 4.7(8) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001(Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “3rd Quarter 2001 Form 10-Q”))
		(8	)	*	Officers’ Certificate dated November 1, 2001 establishing terms of debt securities pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Indenture (Exhibit 4.7(9) to the 3rd Quarter 2001 Form 10-Q)
		(9	)	*	$250 million 6-3/4% Senior Note due 2013 (Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 26, 2006(Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “May 26, 2006 Form 8-K”))
		(10	)	*	Officers’ Certificate dated May 26, 2006 establishing terms of debt securities pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Indenture (Exhibit 4.2 to the May 26, 2006 Form 8-K)
		(11	)	*	Underwriting Agreement Standard Provisions (Debt Securities), dated May 24, 2006 (Exhibit 1.1 to the May 26, 2006 Form 8-K)
		(12	)	*	Underwriting Agreement, dated May 24, 2006, between the Company, Banc of America Securities LLC and JPMorgan Securities, Inc. (Exhibit 1.2 to the May 26, 2006 Form 8-K)
10.1	Financing agreements:
		(1	)	*	Amended and Restated Five-Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated as of June 7, 2006 among the Company, as Borrower; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent; J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners; Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent; and SunTrust Bank, The Bank of New York, and BNP Paribas, as Documentation Agents; and Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., as Co-Documentation Agent (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 7, 2006) (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)
10.2	Compensatory plans:
		~	(1)		Belo Savings Plan:
				*	(a)  Belo Savings Plan Amended and Restated effective August 1, 2004 (Exhibit 10.2(1)(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “2nd Quarter 2004 Form 10-Q”))
				*	(b)  First Amendment to the Belo Savings Plan (as Amended and Restated effective August 1, 2004)(Exhibit 10.2(1)(b) to the Company’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “1st Quarter 2006 Form 10-Q”))

29

Exhibit
Number			Description
		*	(c)     Second Amendment to the Belo Savings Plan (as Amended and Restated effective August 1, 2004)(Exhibit 10.2(1)(c) to the 1st Quarter 2006 Form 10-Q)
			(d)     Third Amendment to the Belo Savings Plan (as Amended and Restated effective August 1, 2004)
	~(2)		Belo 1986 Long-Term Incentive Plan:
		*	(a)     Belo Corp. 1986 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Effective May 3, 1989, as amended by Amendments 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) (Exhibit 10.3(2) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 10, 1997 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “1996 Form 10-K”))
		*	(b)     Amendment No. 6 to 1986 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.3(2)(b) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 19, 1998 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 002-74702)(the “1997 Form 10-K”))
		*	(c)     Amendment No. 7 to 1986 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.2(2)(c) to the 1999 Form 10-K)
		*	(d)     Amendment No. 8 to 1986 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.3(2)(d) to the 2nd Quarter 1998 Form 10-Q)
	~(3)	*	Belo 1995 Executive Compensation Plan, as restated to incorporate amendments through December 4, 1997 (Exhibit 10.3(3) to the 1997 Form 10-K)
		*	(a)     Amendment to 1995 Executive Compensation Plan, dated July 21, 1998 (Exhibit 10.2(3)(a) to the 2nd Quarter 1998 Form 10-Q)
		*	(b)     Amendment to 1995 Executive Compensation Plan, dated December 16, 1999 (Exhibit 10.2(3)(b) to the 1999 Form 10-K)
		*	(c)     Amendment to 1995 Executive Compensation Plan, dated December 5, 2003 (Exhibit 10.3(3)(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 4, 2004 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “2003 Form 10-K”))
		*	(d)     Form of Belo Executive Compensation Plan Award Notification for Employee Awards (Exhibit 10.2(3)(d) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 6, 2006 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “2005 Form 10-K”))
	~(4)	*	Management Security Plan (Exhibit 10.3(1) to the 1996 Form 10-K)
		*	(a)    Amendment to Management Security Plan of Belo Corp. and Affiliated Companies (as Restated Effective January 1, 1982) (Exhibit 10.2(4)(a) to the 1999 Form 10-K)
	~(5)		Belo Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
		*	(a)     Belo Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2004 (Exhibit 10.2(5)(a) to the 2003 Form 10-K)
	~(6)	*	Belo 2000 Executive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 4.15 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 333-43056) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2000)
		*	(a)     First Amendment to Belo 2000 Executive Compensation Plan effective as of December 31, 2000 (Exhibit 10.2(6)(a) to the 2002 Form 10-K)
		*	(b)     Second Amendment to Belo 2000 Executive Compensation Plan dated December 5, 2002 (Exhibit 10.2(6)(b) to the 2002 Form 10-K)
		*	(c)     Third Amendment to Belo 2000 Executive Compensation Plan dated December 5, 2003 (Exhibit 10.2(6)(c) to the 2003 Form 10-K)
		*	(d)     Form of Belo Executive Compensation Plan Award Notification for Employee Awards (Exhibit 10.2(6)(d) to the 2005 Form 10-K)
	~(7)	*	Belo 2004 Executive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10.2(6) to the 2nd Quarter 2004 Form 10-Q)

30

Exhibit
Number			Description
		*	(a) Form of Belo 2004 Executive Compensation Plan Award Notification for Executive Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 2, 2006(Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598)(the “March 2, 2006 Form 8-K”))
		*	(b) Form of Belo 2004 Executive Compensation Plan Award Notification for Employee Awards (Exhibit 10.2 to the March 2, 2006 Form 8-K)
		*	(c) Form of Award Notification under the Belo 2004 Executive Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Director Awards (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 12, 2005(Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-08598) (the “December 12, 2005 Form 8-K”))
	~(8)	*	Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation (Exhibit 10.3 to the December 12, 2005 Form 8-K)

12	Statements re: Computation of Ratios
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	BELO CORP.
November 9, 2006	By:	/s/ Dennis A. Williamson
		Dennis A. Williamson
		Executive Vice President/ Chief Financial Officer (Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

November 9, 2006	By:	/s/ Alison K. Engel
		Alison K. Engel
		Vice President/Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

32