EMC INSURANCE GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
(Unaudited)
The term “Company” is used below interchangeably to describe EMC Insurance Group Inc. (Parent Company only) and EMC Insurance Group Inc. and its subsidiaries. The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q, and the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of the Company’s 2009 Form 10-K.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides issuers the opportunity to make cautionary statements regarding forward-looking statements. Accordingly, any forward-looking statement contained in this report is based on management’s current beliefs, assumptions and expectations of the Company’s future performance, taking all information currently available into account. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as the result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to management. If a change occurs, the Company’s business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plan s and objectives may vary materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the actual results of the Company include, but are not limited to, the following:
● | catastrophic events and the occurrence of significant severe weather conditions; |
| |
● | the adequacy of loss and settlement expense reserves; |
| |
● | state and federal legislation and regulations; |
| |
● | changes in the property and casualty insurance industry, interest rates or the performance of financial markets and the general economy; |
| |
● | rating agency actions; |
| |
● | “other-than-temporary” investment impairment losses; and |
| |
● | other risks and uncertainties inherent to the Company’s business, including those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
Management intends to identify forward-looking statements when using the words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “project” or similar expressions. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
The Company, a 60 percent owned subsidiary of Employers Mutual Casualty Company (Employers Mutual), is an insurance holding company with operations in property and casualty insurance and reinsurance.
Property and casualty insurance operations are conducted through three subsidiaries and represent the most significant segment of the Company’s business, totaling approximately 81 percent of consolidated premiums earned during the first three months of 2010. The property and casualty insurance operations are integrated with the property and casualty insurance operations of Employers Mutual through participation in a reinsurance pooling agreement. Because the Company conducts its property and casualty insurance operations together with Employers Mutual through the reinsurance pooling agreement, the Company shares the same business philosophy, management , employees and facilities as Employers Mutual and offers the same types of insurance products.
Reinsurance operations are conducted through EMC Reinsurance Company, and represented approximately 19 percent of consolidated premiums earned during the first three months of 2010. The principal business activity of EMC Reinsurance Company is to assume, through a quota share reinsurance agreement, the voluntary reinsurance business written directly by Employers Mutual with unaffiliated insurance companies (subject to certain limited exceptions). Effective January 1, 2009, EMC Reinsurance Company began writing a small amount of German assumed reinsurance business on a direct basis (outside the quota share agreement) as a result of regulatory changes in Germany.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the interim periods reported are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies considered by management to be critically important in the preparation and understanding of the Company’s financial statements and related disclosures are presented in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of the Company’s 2009 Form 10-K.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Segment information and consolidated net income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
| | Three months ended | |
| | March 31, | |
($ in thousands) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Property and Casualty Insurance | | | | | | |
Premiums earned | | $ | 74,787 | | | $ | 76,082 | |
Losses and settlement expenses | | | 44,014 | | | | 40,845 | |
Acquisition and other expenses | | | 29,657 | | | | 31,480 | |
Underwriting profit | | $ | 1,116 | | | $ | 3,757 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss and settlement expense ratio | | | 58.9 | % | | | 53.7 | % |
Acquisition expense ratio | | | 39.6 | % | | | 41.4 | % |
Combined ratio | | | 98.5 | % | | | 95.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Losses and settlement expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Insured events of current year | | $ | 57,626 | | | $ | 57,684 | |
Decrease in provision for insured events of prior years | | | (13,612 | ) | | | (16,839 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total losses and settlement expenses | | $ | 44,014 | | | $ | 40,845 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Catastrophe and storm losses | | $ | 2,364 | | | $ | 2,244 | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | March 31, | |
($ in thousands) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Reinsurance | | | | | | |
Premiums earned | | $ | 17,558 | | | $ | 16,373 | |
Losses and settlement expenses | | | 12,029 | | | | 12,932 | |
Acquisition and other expenses | | | 4,928 | | | | 3,491 | |
Underwriting profit (loss) | | $ | 601 | | | $ | (50 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss and settlement expense ratio | | | 68.5 | % | | | 79.0 | % |
Acquisition expense ratio | | | 28.1 | % | | | 21.3 | % |
Combined ratio | | | 96.6 | % | | | 100.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Losses and settlement expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Insured events of current year | | $ | 19,837 | | | $ | 17,151 | |
Decrease in provision for insured events of prior years | | | (7,808 | ) | | | (4,219 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total losses and settlement expenses | | $ | 12,029 | | | $ | 12,932 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Catastrophe and storm losses | | $ | 1,057 | | | $ | 1,468 | |
| | Three months ended | |
| | March 31, | |
($ in thousands) | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Consolidated | | | | | | |
REVENUES | | | | | | |
Premiums earned | | $ | 92,345 | | | $ | 92,455 | |
Net investment income | | | 12,517 | | | | 12,277 | |
Realized investment gains (losses) | | | 525 | | | | (8,592 | ) |
Other income | | | 207 | | | | 153 | |
| | | 105,594 | | | | 96,293 | |
LOSSES AND EXPENSES | | | | | | | | |
Losses and settlement expenses | | | 56,043 | | | | 53,777 | |
Acquisition and other expenses | | | 34,585 | | | | 34,971 | |
Interest expense | | | 225 | | | | 225 | |
Other expense | | | 198 | | | | 393 | |
| | | 91,051 | | | | 89,366 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income before income tax expense | | | 14,543 | | | | 6,927 | |
Income tax expense | | | 4,665 | | | | 1,123 | |
Net income | | $ | 9,878 | | | $ | 5,804 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income per share | | $ | 0.75 | | | $ | 0.44 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss and settlement expense ratio | | | 60.7 | % | | | 58.2 | % |
Acquisition expense ratio | | | 37.4 | % | | | 37.8 | % |
Combined ratio | | | 98.1 | % | | | 96.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Losses and settlement expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Insured events of current year | | $ | 77,463 | | | $ | 74,835 | |
Decrease in provision for insured events of prior years | | | (21,420 | ) | | | (21,058 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total losses and settlement expenses | | $ | 56,043 | | | $ | 53,777 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Catastrophe and storm losses | | $ | 3,421 | | | $ | 3,712 | |
The Company reported net income of $9,878,000 ($0.75 per share) for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $5,804,000 ($0.44 per share) for the same period in 2009. This improvement in net income is primarily attributed to a significant decrease in “other-than-temporary” investment impairment losses; however, the impact of the decline in impairment losses was partially offset by a decline in the property and casualty insurance segment’s underwriting profitability. Investment impairment losses totaled $352,000 ($0.02 per share after tax) in the first quarter of 2010 compared to $8,357,000 ($0.41 per share after tax) in the first quarte r of 2009 during the collapse of the financial markets. The decline in the property and casualty insurance segment’s underwriting results is due to an increase in claim frequency, largely from the harsh winter season, and increased workers’ compensation losses.
Premiums Earned
Premiums earned were relatively flat at $92,345,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $92,455,000 for the same period in 2009. The moderate decline in overall premium rate levels during the previous two years continues to have a negative impact on the current year’s earned premiums, but this was largely offset by the addition of new business, mostly in personal lines, and increased premiums from the reinsurance segment. While premium rates stabilized during 2009, the use of discretionary underwriting credits as a tool to compete for business has offset the limited increases in rates that are obtained, keeping overall premium rates flat to slightly lower. Pricing in the reinsurance marketplace was essentially flat during the January 1, 2010 renewals, as well as through the first quarter. Rates seem to be firming for personal lines in many territories, and management anticipates that rates will begin to firm for commercial lines toward the latter half of 2010.
Premiums earned for the property and casualty insurance segment decreased 1.7 percent to $74,787,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $76,082,000 for the same period in 2009, primarily due to a 1.9 percent decline in premium rate levels implemented in 2008 and 2009. Premium rates are improving somewhat in the personal lines of business, but the commercial lines of business, which account for more than 80 percent of the property and casualty insurance segment’s premiums, remain very competitive. The competitiveness in the commercial lines of business is being driven, at least in part, by the weak economy. Most companies are content to retain their good business at current pricing levels and wait for the economy to improve. New business premium increased approximately 7 percent during the first quarter of 2010 over the comparable period in 2009, and accounted for approximately 18 percent of net written premiums, but was largely offset by premium declines resulting from prior year rate reductions and policies not retained. Policy retention rates are holding relatively stable, with commercial lines at approximately 86 percent and personal lines down slightly to approximately 85 percent. The decline in personal lines is primarily due to management’s decision to exit from personal lines in some regions of the country. Policy counts increased slightly in both the commercial and personal lines of business during the first quarter of 2010.
Premiums earned for the reinsurance segment increased 7.2 percent to $17,558,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $16,373,000 for the same period in 2009. This increase is primarily associated with the addition of new facility business during 2010 (includes facultative and property and casualty reinsurance business from small to mid-size insurance companies) as well as new property business being written in central and eastern Europe. Due to the mild hurricane season of 2009 and a recovery in reinsurance company capital levels, premium rate levels were generally flat for the January 1, 2010 renewal season and through the first quarter of 2010.
Losses and settlement expenses
Losses and settlement expenses increased 4.2 percent to $56,043,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $53,777,000 for the same period in 2009. The loss and settlement expense ratio increased to 60.7 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from 58.2 percent for the same period in 2009. The increase in the loss and settlement expense ratio is from the property and casualty insurance segment, and reflects an increase in claim frequency (largely from the harsh winter season), increased workers’ compensation losses, and continued declines in premium rate levels. This was partially offset by an improvement in the reinsurance segme nt’s loss and settlement expense ratio. The most recent completed actuarial analysis indicates that the level of reserve adequacy at December 31, 2009 is consistent with other recent evaluations. From management’s perspective, this measure is more relevant to an understanding of the Company’s results of operations than the composition of the underwriting results between the current and prior accident years.
The loss and settlement expense ratio for the property and casualty insurance segment increased to 58.9 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from 53.7 percent for the same period in 2009. This increase is from a variety of sources including an increase in loss frequency from weather related property claims, higher workers’ compensation losses, and previously implemented premium rate level reductions. The weather related property claims are not included in the catastrophe and storm losses, and are primarily related to the harsh winter season, including damage from ice dams and roof collapse from the weight of ice and snow. The decline in the workers’ compensation line’s results is primarily due to unusually low losses for this line during the first quarter of 2009. The property and casualty insurance segment continues to report favorable development on prior years’ reserves, though the amount declined during the first quarter of 2010 in comparison to 2009. In aggregate, the favorable development continues to arise from claims that are closed with payments below reserve estimates.
The loss and settlement expense ratio for the reinsurance segment decreased to 68.5 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from 79.0 percent for the same period in 2009. This decrease reflects a larger amount of favorable development on prior years’ reserves in 2010, primarily on years 2007 through 2009. The favorable development of both years is primarily attributed to changes in IBNR reserves during those periods, with the change in 2010 predominantly on property pro rata and catastrophe and casualty excess business.
Acquisition and other expenses
Acquisition and other expenses decreased 1.1 percent to $34,585,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $34,971,000 for the same period in 2009. The acquisition expense ratio decreased to 37.4 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from 37.8 percent for the same period in 2009. This decrease is attributed to the property and casualty insurance segment and primarily reflects a decline in policyholder dividends. An increase in commission and contingent commission expenses in the reinsurance segment partially offset the decrease in expenses in the property and casualty insurance segment.
For the property and casualty insurance segment, the acquisition expense ratio decreased to 39.6 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from 41.4 percent for the same period in 2009. This decrease is primarily attributed to a decline in policyholder dividends, which is largely due to decreases from several of the Company’s safety dividend groups.
For the reinsurance segment, the acquisition expense ratio increased to 28.1 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 21.3 percent for the same period in 2009. The increase is primarily attributed to a large increase in contingent commissions, as well as an increase in regular commission expense. The increase in contingent commission expense is due to a few property contracts, which had favorable reserve development that in turn resulted in increases in contingent commission expense. The increase in regular commissions includes an increase in the estimate of commissions payable on earned but not reported premiums.
Investment results
Net investment income increased 2.0 percent to $12,517,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $12,277,000 for the same period in 2009. This increase is the result of a higher average balance of fixed maturity securities, which reflects the reinvestment of short-term holdings into Build America Bonds and other securities. During the first three months of 2009, the Company experienced a high level of call activity on fixed maturity securities as a result of the low interest rate environment. The proceeds were invested in low yielding short-term investments until attractive long-term opportunities could be identified.
The Company reported a net realized investment gain of $525,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to a net realized investment loss of $8,592,000 for the same period of 2009. The loss in 2009 is primarily comprised of “other-than-temporary” investment impairment losses totaling $8,357,000 on 24 equity securities and one fixed maturity security. The impairment losses on the equity securities were a result of the severe and prolonged turmoil in the financial markets, while the impairment loss on the fixed maturity security ($2,220,000) was attributed to a bankruptcy filing. Impairment losses declined significantly during the f irst quarter of 2010, with losses totaling $148,000 on three equity securities and $204,000 from the determination of a credit loss (all contractual cash flows are not expected to be collected) on two residential mortgage-backed securities.
The total rate of return on the Company’s equity portfolio for the first three months of 2010 was 6.51 percent, compared to 5.39 percent for the S&P 500. The current annualized yield on the bond portfolio is 5.13 percent and the effective duration is 5.89 years, which is down from 5.27 percent and 6.12 years at December 31, 2009.
Income tax
Income tax expense increased 315.4 percent to $4,665,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $1,123,000 for the same period in 2009. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was 32.1 percent, compared to 16.2 percent for the same period in 2009. The increase in the effective tax rate reflects the combination of an increase in pre-tax income earned in 2010 relative to the amount of tax-exempt interest income earned, as well as tax law changes included in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590) and the follow-up Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872) signed into law on March 23, 2010 and March 30, 2010 respectively (the "Acts"). In accordance with these Acts, beginning in 2013 the Company will no longer be able to claim a tax deduction for drug expenses that are reimbursed under the Medicare Part D retiree drug subsidy program. Although this tax change does not take effect until 2013, the Company is required to recognize the financial impact in the period in which the Acts were signed. As a result of the Acts, the Company recognized a decrease in its deferred tax asset of $794,000 during the first quarter of 2010.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet cash obligations. The Company had negative cash flows from operations of $2,125,000 and $5,958,000 during the first three months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company typically generates substantial positive cash flows from operations because cash from premium payments is generally received in advance of cash payments made to settle claims. These positive cash flows provide the foundation of the Company’s asset/liability management program and are the primary drivers of the Company’s liquidity. When investing funds made available fr om operations, the Company invests in securities with maturities that approximate the anticipated payments of losses and settlement expenses of the underlying insurance policies. In addition, the Company maintains a portion of its investment portfolio in relatively short-term and highly liquid assets as a secondary source of liquidity should net cash flows from operating activities prove insufficient to fund current operating needs. As of March 31, 2010, the Company did not have any significant variations between the maturity dates of its investments and the expected payments of its loss and settlement expense reserves.
The Company is a holding company whose principal asset is its investment in its insurance subsidiaries. As a holding company, the Company is dependent upon cash dividends from its insurance company subsidiaries to meet all obligations, including cash dividends to stockholders and the funding of the Company’s stock repurchase program. State insurance regulations restrict the maximum amount of dividends insurance companies can pay without prior regulatory approval. The maximum amount of dividends that the insurance company subsidiaries can pay to the Company in 2010 without prior regulatory approval is approximately $44,986,000. The Compa ny received $4,000,000 and $4,000,000 of dividends from its insurance company subsidiaries and paid cash dividends to its stockholders totaling $2,364,000 and $2,382,000 in the first three months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The excess dividends received from the insurance company subsidiaries in 2009 and 2010 are being used to partially fund the Company’s $25,000,000 stock repurchase program. At March 31, 2010, approximately $7,100,000 of the stock repurchase program remains available for the purchase of additional shares, which will necessitate the dividend of additional funds from the insurance company subsidiaries to the holding company.
The Company’s insurance and reinsurance company subsidiaries must have adequate liquidity to ensure that their cash obligations are met; however, because of their participation in the pooling agreement and the quota share agreement, they do not have the daily liquidity concerns normally associated with an insurance or reinsurance company. This is because under the terms of the pooling and quota share agreements, Employers Mutual receives all premiums and pays all losses and expenses associated with the insurance business produced by the pool participants and the assumed reinsurance business ceded to the Company’s reinsurance subsidiary, and then settles the inter - -company balances generated by these transactions with the participating companies within 45 days after the end of each quarter.
At the insurance company subsidiary level, the primary sources of cash are premium income, investment income and maturing investments. The principal outflows of cash are payments of claims, commissions, premium taxes, operating expenses, income taxes, dividends, interest and principal payments on debt, and investment purchases. Cash outflows vary because of uncertainties regarding settlement dates for unpaid losses and the potential for large losses, either individually or in the aggregate. Accordingly, the insurance company subsidiaries maintain investment and reinsurance programs intended to provide adequate funds to pay claims without forced sales of investments. In addition, the insurance company subsidiaries have access to a line of credit maintained by Employers Mutual with the Federal Home Loan Bank to provide additional liquidity if needed.
The Company maintains a portion of its investment portfolio in relatively short-term and highly liquid investments to ensure the availability of funds to pay claims and expenses. At March 31, 2010, approximately 18 percent of the Company’s fixed maturity securities were in U.S. government or U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, which is approximately the same as at December 31, 2009. A variety of maturities are maintained in the Company’s investment portfolio to assure adequate liquidity. The maturity structure of the fixed maturity securities is also established by the relative attractiveness of yields on short, intermediate and lon g-term securities. The Company does not invest in high-yield, non-investment grade debt securities. Any non-investment grade securities held by the Company are the result of rating downgrades subsequent to their purchase.
The Company invests for the long term and generally purchases fixed maturity securities intending to hold them to maturity. Despite this intent, the Company currently classifies purchases of fixed maturity securities as available-for-sale to provide flexibility in the management of its investment portfolio. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had net unrealized holding gains, net of deferred taxes, on its fixed maturity securities available-for-sale of $22,672,000 and $17,541,000, respectively. The fluctuation in the fair value of these investments is primarily due to changes in the interest rate environment during this time period, but also reflects fluctuations in risk premium spreads over U.S. Treasuries for corporate and U.S. government-sponsored agency securities. Since the Company does not actively trade in the bond market, such fluctuations in the fair value of these investments are not expected to have a material impact on the operations of the Company, as forced liquidations of investments are not anticipated. The Company closely monitors the bond market and makes appropriate adjustments in its portfolio as conditions warrant.
The majority of the Company’s assets are invested in fixed maturity securities. These investments provide a substantial amount of investment income that supplements underwriting results and contributes to net earnings. As these investments mature, or are called, the proceeds are reinvested at current rates, which may be higher or lower than those now being earned; therefore, more or less investment income may be available to contribute to net earnings depending on the interest rate level.
The Company currently participates in a securities lending program administered by Mellon Bank, N.A. whereby certain fixed maturity securities from the investment portfolio are loaned to other institutions for short periods of time; however, during the fourth quarter of 2009, management decided to discontinue its participation in the securities lending program and as a result, began to unwind the program. The Company receives a fee for each security loaned out under this program and requires initial collateral equal to 102 percent of the fair value of the loaned securities. The collateral is primarily cash, but other forms of collateral are occasionally accepted, including letters of credit or U.S. Treasury securities. The cash collateral is invested in a Delaware business trust that is managed by Mellon Bank. In this trust, cash collateral funds of the Company are pooled with cash collateral funds of other security lenders administered by Mellon Bank, and these funds are invested in securities with high credit quality standards, maturity restrictions, and liquidity levels consistent with the short-term nature of securities lending transactions. The acceptable investments include time deposits, commercial paper, floating rate notes, asset-backed floating rate notes, and repurchase agreements. The earnings from this trust are used, in part, to pay the fee the Company receives for each security loaned under the program. The Company has a risk of losses associated with the collateral pool if the aggregate fair value of the collateral pool were to decline below the aggregate liability represented by the collateral, a ssuming all securities loaned and backed by the collateral pool were returned. The Company had securities on loan with a fair value of $5,661,000 and $14,493,000 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Collateral held in connection with these loaned securities totaled $5,911,000 and $14,942,000 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The Company held $43,000 and $47,000 in minority ownership interests in limited partnerships and limited liability companies at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The Company does not hold any other unregistered securities.
The Company’s cash balance was $534,000 and $279,000 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
During the first three months of 2010, Employers Mutual made no contributions to either the pension plan or the postretirement benefit plans. In 2010, Employers Mutual expects to make contributions totaling $25,000,000 to the pension plan and $2,750,000 to the postretirement benefit plans.
Employers Mutual contributed $17,000,000 to its pension plan and $2,550,000 to its postretirement benefit plans in 2009. During the first three months of 2009, Employers Mutual made no contributions to either the pension plan or the postretirement benefit plans. The Company reimbursed Employers Mutual $5,204,000 for its share of the 2009 pension contribution and $724,000 for its share of the 2009 postretirement benefit plans contribution (no reimbursements were paid in the first three months of 2009).
Capital Resources
Capital resources consist of stockholders’ equity and debt, representing funds deployed or available to be deployed to support business operations. For the Company’s insurance and reinsurance company subsidiaries, capital resources are required to support premium writings. Regulatory guidelines suggest that the ratio of a property and casualty insurer’s annual net premiums written to its statutory surplus should not exceed three to one. On an annualized basis, all of the Company’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries were well under this guideline at March 31, 2010.
The Company’s insurance subsidiaries are required to maintain a certain minimum level of surplus on a statutory basis, and are subject to regulations under which the payment of dividends from statutory surplus is restricted and may require prior approval of their domiciliary insurance regulatory authorities. The Company’s insurance subsidiaries are also subject to Risk Based Capital (RBC) requirements that may further impact their ability to pay dividends. RBC requirements attempt to measure minimum statutory capital needs based upon the risks in a company’s mix of products and investment portfolio. At December 31, 2009, the Comp any’s insurance subsidiaries had total adjusted statutory capital of $327,244,000, which was well in excess of the minimum RBC requirement of $56,862,000.
The Company’s total cash and invested assets at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows:
| | March 31, 2010 | |
| | | | | | | | Percent of | | | | |
| | Amortized | | | Fair | | | total | | | Carrying | |
($ in thousands) | | cost | | | value | | | fair value | | | value | |
Fixed maturity securities held-to-maturity | | $ | 405 | | | $ | 458 | | | | — | % | | $ | 405 | |
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale | | | 880,417 | | | | 915,297 | | | | 86.8 | | | | 915,297 | |
Equity securities available-for-sale | | | 74,007 | | | | 95,975 | | | | 9.1 | | | | 95,975 | |
Cash | | | 534 | | | | 534 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 534 | |
Short-term investments | | | 42,591 | | | | 42,591 | | | | 4.0 | | | | 42,591 | |
Other long-term investments | | | 43 | | | | 43 | | | | — | | | | 43 | |
| | $ | 997,997 | | | $ | 1,054,898 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 1,054,845 | |
| | December 31, 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | Percent of | | | | |
| | Amortized | | | Fair | | | total | | | Carrying | |
($ in thousands) | | cost | | | value | | | fair value | | | value | |
Fixed maturity securities held-to-maturity | | $ | 410 | | | $ | 461 | | | | 0.1 | % | | $ | 410 | |
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale | | | 872,195 | | | | 899,181 | | | | 86.0 | | | | 899,181 | |
Equity securities available-for-sale | | | 73,115 | | | | 90,190 | | | | 8.6 | | | | 90,190 | |
Cash | | | 279 | | | | 279 | | | | — | | | | 279 | |
Short-term investments | | | 55,390 | | | | 55,390 | | | | 5.3 | | | | 55,390 | |
Other long-term investments | | | 47 | | | | 47 | | | | — | | | | 47 | |
| | $ | 1,001,436 | | | $ | 1,045,548 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 1,045,497 | |
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities at March 31, 2010 were as follows:
| | | | | Gross | | | Gross | | | | |
| | Amortized | | | unrealized | | | unrealized | | | Estimated | |
($ in thousands) | | cost | | | gains | | | losses | | | fair value | |
Securities held-to-maturity: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed maturity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential mortgage-backed | | $ | 405 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 458 | |
Total securities held-to-maturity | | $ | 405 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 458 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed maturity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. treasury | | $ | 4,741 | | | $ | 212 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,953 | |
U.S. government-sponsored agencies | | | 156,968 | | | | 1,901 | | | | 136 | | | | 158,733 | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 380,498 | | | | 15,050 | | | | 2,969 | | | | 392,579 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed | | | 77,696 | | | | 9,133 | | | | 4 | | | | 86,825 | |
Residential mortgage-backed | | | 28,342 | �� | | | 1,058 | | | | 570 | | | | 28,830 | |
Other asset-backed | | | 8,917 | | | | 755 | | | | — | | | | 9,672 | |
Corporate | | | 223,255 | | | | 11,397 | | | | 946 | | | | 233,706 | |
Total fixed maturity securities | | | 880,417 | | | | 39,506 | | | | 4,625 | | | | 915,298 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stocks: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial services | | | 7,817 | | | | 3,905 | | | | — | | | | 11,722 | |
Information technology | | | 13,584 | | | | 6,327 | | | | 16 | | | | 19,895 | |
Healthcare | | | 9,333 | | | | 3,027 | | | | 8 | | | | 12,352 | |
Consumer staples | | | 6,436 | | | | 1,570 | | | | — | | | | 8,006 | |
Consumer discretionary | | | 6,191 | | | | 2,949 | | | | 1 | | | | 9,139 | |
Energy | | | 7,700 | | | | 1,796 | | | | 19 | | | | 9,477 | |
Industrials | | | 6,059 | | | | 1,493 | | | | 1 | | | | 7,551 | |
Other | | | 7,387 | | | | 1,634 | | | | 27 | | | | 8,994 | |
Non-redeemable preferred stocks | | | 9,500 | | | | 177 | | | | 839 | | | | 8,838 | |
Total equity securities | | | 74,007 | | | | 22,878 | | | | 911 | | | | 95,974 | |
Total securities available-for-sale | | $ | 954,424 | | | $ | 62,384 | | | $ | 5,536 | | | $ | 1,011,272 | |
The Company’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries have $25,000,000 of surplus notes issued to Employers Mutual at an interest rate of 3.60 percent. Reviews of the interest rate are conducted by the Inter-Company Committees of the Boards of Directors of the Company and Employers Mutual every five years. Payment of interest and repayment of principal can only be made out of the applicable subsidiary’s statutory surplus and is subject to prior approval by the insurance commissioner of the respective state of domicile. The surplus notes are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all obligations or liabilities of the applicable in surance subsidiaries. Total interest expense incurred on these surplus notes was $225,000 during the first three months of both 2010 and 2009. At December 31, 2009, the Company’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries had received approval for the payment of interest accrued on the surplus notes during 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had no material commitments for capital expenditures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Employers Mutual receives all premiums and pays all losses and expenses associated with the assumed reinsurance business ceded to the reinsurance subsidiary and the insurance business produced by the pool participants, and then settles the inter-company balances generated by these transactions with the participating companies on a quarterly basis. When settling the inter-company balances, Employers Mutual provides the reinsurance subsidiary and the pool participants with full credit for the premiums written during the quarter and retains all receivable amounts. Any receivable amounts that are ultimately deemed to be uncollectible are charged-off by Employers Mutua l and the expense is charged to the reinsurance subsidiary or allocated to the pool members on the basis of pool participation. As a result, the Company has an off-balance sheet arrangement with an unconsolidated entity that results in a credit-risk exposure that is not reflected in the Company’s financial statements. Based on historical data, this credit-risk exposure is not considered to be material to the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
Investment Impairments and Considerations
The Company recorded “other-than-temporary” investment impairment losses totaling $352,000 on three equity securities and two residential mortgage-backed securities in the first quarter of 2010, and $8,357,000 on 24 equity securities and one fixed maturity security in the same period of 2009. The impairment loss on the fixed maturity security in 2009 ($2,220,000) was attributed to a bankruptcy filing made by Great Lakes Chemical Corporation, now known as Chemtura Corporation. The impairment losses on the equity securities during 2009 were reflective of the severe and prolonged turmoil in the financial markets.
The Company has no direct exposure to sub-prime residential lending, and holds no sub-prime residential collateralized debt obligations or sub-prime collateralized mortgage obligations. The Company does have indirect exposure to sub-prime residential lending markets as it has significant holdings of government agency securities, prime and Alt-A collateralized mortgage obligations, as well as fixed maturity and equity securities in both the banking and financial services sectors. While these holdings do not include companies engaged in originating residential lending as their primary business, they do include companies that may be indirectly engaged in this type of lending.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities as presented in the table below. The estimated fair value is based on quoted market prices, where available. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on a variety of valuation techniques depending on the type of security. None of these securities are considered to be in concentrations by either security type or industry. The Company uses several factors to determine whether the carrying value of an individual security has been “other-than-temporarily” impaired. Such factors include, but are not limit ed to, the security’s value and performance in the context of the overall markets, length of time and extent the security’s fair value has been below carrying value, key corporate events and collateralization of fixed maturity securities. Based on these factors, the absence of management’s intent to sell these securities prior to recovery or maturity, and the fact that management does not anticipate that it will be forced to sell these securities prior to recovery or maturity, it was determined that the carrying value of these securities were not “other-than-temporarily” impaired at March 31, 2010. This schedule includes $25,000 of unrealized loss on an “other-than-temporarily” impaired residential mortgage-backed security that is considered the non-credit component of the impairment. Risks and uncertainties inherent in the methodology utilized in this evaluation process include interest rate risk, equity price risk, and the overall p erformance of the economy, all of which have the potential to adversely affect the value of the Company’s investments. Should a determination be made at some point in the future that these unrealized losses are “other-than-temporary”, the Company’s earnings would be reduced by approximately $3,598,000 net of tax; however, the Company’s financial position would not be affected because unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities are reflected in the Company’s financial statements as a component of stockholders’ equity, net of deferred taxes.
Following is a schedule of the length of time securities have continuously been in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2010.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2010 | | Less than twelve months | | | Twelve months or longer | | | Total | |
($ in thousands) | | Fair | | | Unrealized | | | Fair | | | Unrealized | | | Fair | | | Unrealized | |
| | value | | | losses | | | value | | | losses | | | value | | | losses | |
Fixed maturity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. government-sponsored agencies | | $ | 33,692 | | | $ | 136 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 33,692 | | | $ | 136 | |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 65,616 | | | | 2,399 | | | | 6,358 | | | | 570 | | | | 71,974 | | | | 2,969 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed | | | 1,926 | | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,926 | | | | 4 | |
Residential mortgage-backed | | | 4,180 | | | | 78 | | | | 7,146 | | | | 492 | | | | 11,326 | | | | 570 | |
Corporate | | | 19,447 | | | | 406 | | | | 18,870 | | | | 540 | | | | 38,317 | | | | 946 | |
Total, fixed maturity securities | | | 124,861 | | | | 3,023 | | | | 32,374 | | | | 1,602 | | | | 157,235 | | | | 4,625 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stocks: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Information technology | | | 772 | | | | 16 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 772 | | | | 16 | |
Healthcare | | | 677 | | | | 8 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 677 | | | | 8 | |
Consumer staples | | | 110 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 110 | | | | — | |
Consumer discretionary | | | 193 | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 193 | | | | 1 | |
Energy | | | 960 | | | | 19 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 960 | | | | 19 | |
Industrials | | | 663 | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 663 | | | | 1 | |
Other | | | 226 | | | | 27 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 226 | | | | 27 | |
Non-redeemable preferred stocks | | | 500 | | | | — | | | | 4,162 | | | | 839 | | | | 4,662 | | | | 839 | |
Total, equity securities | | | 4,101 | | | | 72 | | | | 4,162 | | | | 839 | | | | 8,263 | | | | 911 | |
Total temporarily impaired securities | | $ | 128,962 | | | $ | 3,095 | | | $ | 36,536 | | | $ | 2,441 | | | $ | 165,498 | | | $ | 5,536 | |
All non-investment grade fixed maturity securities held at March 31, 2010 (American Airlines, Weyerhaeuser Company and eight residential mortgage-backed securities) had an aggregate unrealized loss of $340,000. The Company does not purchase non-investment grade securities. Any non-investment grade securities held by the Company are the result of rating downgrades that occurred subsequent to their purchase. Six of the residential mortgage-backed securities were the only securities on this list with unrealized losses at March 31, 2010. These securities were part of a 2008 investment strategy that targeted high-quality residential mortgage-backe d securities.
Following is a schedule of gross realized losses recognized in the first quarter of 2010 from the sale of securities and from “other-than-temporary” investment impairments. The schedule is aged according to the length of time the underlying securities were in an unrealized loss position. This schedule does not include realized losses stemming from corporate actions such as calls, pay-downs, redemptions, etc.
| | Three months ended March 31, 2010 | |
| | Realized losses from sales | | | “Other-than- | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | Gross | | | temporary” | | | gross | |
| | Book | | | Sales | | | realized | | | impairment | | | realized | |
($ in thousands) | | value | | | price | | | losses | | | losses | | | losses | |
Fixed maturity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three months or less | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Over three months to six months | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Over six months to nine months | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Over nine months to twelve months | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Over twelve months | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 204 | | | | 204 | |
| | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 204 | | | | 204 | |
Equity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three months or less | | | 1,661 | | | | 1,635 | | | | 26 | | | | 112 | | | | 138 | |
Over three months to six months | | | 46 | | | | 37 | | | | 9 | | | | 36 | | | | 45 | |
Over six months to nine months | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Over nine months to twelve months | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Over twelve months | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 1,707 | | | | 1,672 | | | | 35 | | | | 148 | | | | 183 | |
| | $ | 1,707 | | | $ | 1,672 | | | $ | 35 | | | $ | 352 | | | $ | 387 | |
LEASES, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
One of the Company’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries leases office facilities in Bismarck, North Dakota with lease terms expiring in 2014. Employers Mutual has entered into various leases for branch and service office facilities with lease terms expiring through 2021. All lease costs are included as expenses under the pooling agreement, after allocation of a portion of the expenses to the subsidiaries that do not participate in the pooling agreement. The Company’s contractual obligations as of March 31, 2010 did not change materially from that presented in the Company’s 2009 Form 10-K.
The participants in the pooling agreement are subject to guaranty fund assessments by states in which they write business. Guaranty fund assessments are used by states to pay policyholder liabilities of insolvent insurers domiciled in those states. Many states allow assessments to be recovered through premium tax offsets. Estimated guaranty fund assessments of $1,241,000 and $1,236,000 and related premium tax offsets of $1,277,000 and $692,000 have been accrued as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The guaranty fund assessments are expected to be paid over the next two years and the premium tax offsets are expected to be r ealized within ten years of the payments. The participants in the pooling agreement are also subject to second-injury fund assessments, which are designed to encourage employers to employ a worker with a pre-existing disability. Estimated second-injury fund assessments of $1,514,000 and $1,709,000 have been accrued as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The second injury fund assessment accruals are based on projected loss payments. The periods over which the assessments will be paid is not known.
The participants in the pooling agreement have purchased annuities from life insurance companies, under which the claimant is payee, to fund future payments that are fixed pursuant to specific claim settlement provisions. The Company’s share of case loss reserves eliminated by the purchase of these annuities was $1,712,000 at December 31, 2009. The Company has a contingent liability of $1,712,000 at December 31, 2009 should the issuers of these annuities fail to perform. The probability of a material loss due to failure of performance by the issuers of these annuities is considered remote. The Company’s share of the amount due fro m any one life insurance company does not equal or exceed one percent of its subsidiaries’ aggregate policyholders’ surplus.
NEW ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) updated its guidance related to the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 of the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (ASC) to require additional disclosures regarding transfers in and out of fair value measurement levels 1 and 2, the display of level 3 activity on a gross basis (rather than net), fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities (rather than by line item within the statement of finan cial position), and additional disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in level 3 fair value measurements, which is effective for fiscal years (and interim periods of those fiscal years) beginning after December 15, 2010. Adoption of this guidance had no effect on the consolidated financial position or operating results of the Company.
In May 2009, the FASB updated its guidance related to the Subsequent Events Topic 855 of the FASB ASC (issued as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 165, “Subsequent Events”), which sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management shall evaluate events or transactions for potential recognition or disclosure, the circumstances under which an entity shall recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date, and disclosures to make about events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. This guidance was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. & #160;In February 2010, the FASB updated its guidance related to the Subsequent Events Topic 855 to remove the requirement to disclose the date through which subsequent events were evaluated for Securities and Exchange Commission filers. This updated guidance was effective immediately. Adoption of this updated guidance had no effect on the consolidated financial position or operating results of the Company.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The main objectives in managing the Company’s investment portfolios are to maximize after-tax investment return while minimizing credit risks, in order to provide maximum support for the underwriting operations. Investment strategies are developed based upon many factors including underwriting results, regulatory requirements, fluctuations in interest rates and consideration of other market risks. Investment decisions are centrally managed by investment professionals and are supervised by the investment committees of the respective boards of directors for each of the Company’s subsidiaries.
Market risk represents the potential for loss due to adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments, and is directly influenced by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded. The market risks of the financial instruments of the Company relate to the investment portfolio, which exposes the Company to interest rate (inclusive of credit spreads) and equity price risk and, to a lesser extent, credit quality and prepayment risk. Monitoring systems and analytical tools are in place to assess each of these elements of market risk; however, there can be no assurance that future changes in interest rates, credi tworthiness of issuers, prepayment activity, liquidity available in the market and other general market conditions will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial position.
Two categories of influences on market risk exist as it relates to financial instruments. First are systematic aspects, which relate to the investing environment and are out of the control of the investment manager. Second are non-systematic aspects, which relate to the construction of the investment portfolio through investment policies and decisions, and are under the direct control of the investment manager. The Company is committed to controlling non-systematic risk through sound investment policies and diversification.
Further analysis of the components of the Company’s market risk (including interest rate risk, equity price risk, credit quality risk, and prepayment risk) can be found in the Company’s 2009 Form 10-K.
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely making known to them material information relating to the Company and the Company’s consolidated s ubsidiaries required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act.
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first quarter of 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
EMC INSURANCE GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
The following table sets forth information regarding purchases of equity securities by the Company and affiliated purchasers for the three months ended March 31, 2010:
Period | | | | | | | | (c) Total number of shares (or units) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs | | | (d) Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares (or units) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (2 & 3) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
1/1/10 - 1/31/10 | | | 6,540 | (1) | | $ | 22.10 | | | | — | | | $ | 11,638,663 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2/1/10 - 2/28/10 | | | 22 | (1) | | | 20.48 | | | | — | | | | 11,638,663 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3/1/10 - 3/31/10 | | | 1,397 | (1) | | | 22.33 | | | | — | | | | 11,638,663 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 7,959 | | | $ | 22.14 | | | | — | | | | | |
(1) | Included in these amounts are 53, 22 and 1,397 shares purchased in the open market in January, February and March, respectively, to fulfill the Company’s obligations under its dividend reinvestment and common stock purchase plan. 6,487 shares were purchased in the open market during January under Employers Mutual Casualty Company’s employee stock purchase plan. |
| |
(2) | On March 10, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a $15,000,000 stock repurchase program and on October 31, 2008, announced an extension of the program, authorizing an additional $10,000,000. This purchase program was effective immediately and does not have an expiration date. A total of $7,148,102 remains available in this plan for the purchase of additional shares. |
| |
(3) | On May 12, 2005, the Company announced that its parent company, Employers Mutual Casualty Company, had initiated a $15,000,000 stock purchase program under which Employers Mutual would purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in the open market. This purchase program was effective immediately and does not have an expiration date; however, this program is currently dormant and will remain so while the Company’s repurchase program is active. A total of $4,490,561 remains in this plan. |
| | |
ITEM 6. | | EXHIBITS | |
| | |
10.2.4 | | 2009 Executive Contingent Salary Plan – EMC Reinsurance Company |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
EMC INSURANCE GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on May 7, 2010.
| |
| EMC INSURANCE GROUP INC. |
| Registrant |
| |
| /s/ Bruce G. Kelley |
| Bruce G. Kelley |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |
| |
| /s/ Mark E. Reese |
| Mark E. Reese |
| Senior Vice President and |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Accounting Officer) |
EMC INSURANCE GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES