- OSBC Dashboard
- Financials
- Filings
-
Holdings
- Transcripts
- ETFs
- Insider
- Institutional
- Shorts
-
DEF 14A Filing
Old Second Bancorp (OSBC) DEF 14ADefinitive proxy
Filed: 16 Apr 21, 11:59am
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
| | |
Filed by the Registrant ⌧ | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ◻ | ||
Check the appropriate box: | ||
◻ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
◻ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
⌧ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
◻ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
◻ | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 | |
| | |
Old Second Bancorp, Inc. | ||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | ||
| ||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) | ||
| ||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||
⌧ | No fee required. | |
◻ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | |
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | |
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| | |
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| | |
| (5) | Total fee paid: |
| | |
◻ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |
◻ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
| | |
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| | |
| (3) | Filing Party: |
| | |
| (4) | Date Filed: |
| | |
OLD SECOND BANCORP, INC.
37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 18, 2021
TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS:
The annual meeting of stockholders of Old Second Bancorp, Inc., will be held on Tuesday, May 18, 2021, at 9:00 a.m., central time. As noted below, due to health and safety concerns related to the coronavirus (COVID-19), this year’s annual meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders. You can attend the meeting via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/OSBC2021 by using the 16-digit control number which appears on your proxy card and the instructions included in these proxy materials. The meeting will be held for the following purposes:
1. | to elect the four Class II director nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement; |
2. | to conduct an advisory, non-binding vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers; |
3. | to approve the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the plan by 1,200,000 shares, from 600,000 shares to 1,800,000 shares; |
4. | to ratify the appointment of Plante & Moran, PLLC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021; and |
5. | to transact such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting. |
The board of directors is not aware of any other business to come before the meeting. Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 26, 2021 are the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting and any and all adjournments or postponements of the meeting.
Our board of directors and management is sensitive to the evolving developments associated with COVID-19, including current Illinois government health directives to use social distancing and to limit the size of gatherings. The health and well-being of our employees, stockholders, directors, officers and other stakeholders are paramount. Your virtual attendance at the meeting affords you the same rights and opportunities to participate as you would have at an in-person annual meeting.
Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the annual meeting, we urge you to vote now to make sure there will be a quorum for the meeting. Voting by the Internet is fast and convenient, and your vote is immediately confirmed and tabulated. You may also vote by completing, signing, dating and returning the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed return envelope furnished for that purpose. If you attend the meeting virtually over the Internet, you may continue to have your shares of common stock voted as instructed in a previously delivered proxy or you may vote your shares of common stock via the Internet during the meeting.
Important Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: Our 2021 proxy statement, proxy card and 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders are available free of charge online at www.oldsecond.com under “2021 Annual Meeting Materials.”
| |
| By order of the board of directors |
| |
| James L. Eccher |
Aurora, Illinois
April 16, 2021
OLD SECOND BANCORP, INC.
37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the board of directors of Old Second Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation, of proxies to be voted at the annual meeting of stockholders. This meeting is to be held virtually over the Internet, on May 18, 2021 at 9:00 a.m., central time, or at any postponements or adjournments of the meeting. Instructions for attending the meeting are included below. Old Second conducts full service community banking and trust business through its wholly owned subsidiary, Old Second National Bank.
A copy of our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2020, which includes audited financial statements, is enclosed. This proxy statement was first mailed to our stockholders on or about April 16, 2021. As used in this proxy statement, the terms “Old Second,” “the Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” all refer to Old Second Bancorp, Inc., and its subsidiaries. Additionally, references to the “Bank” refer to Old Second National Bank.
Why am I receiving this proxy statement and proxy card?
You are receiving a proxy statement and proxy card from us because on March 26, 2021, the record date for the annual meeting, you owned shares of our common stock. This proxy statement describes the matters that will be presented for consideration by the stockholders at the annual meeting. It also gives you information concerning these matters to assist you in making an informed decision.
When you sign the enclosed proxy card, you appoint the proxy holder as your representative at the meeting. The proxy holder will vote your shares as you have instructed in the proxy card, ensuring that your shares will be voted whether or not you attend the meeting. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we urge you to complete, sign and return your proxy card in advance of the annual meeting in case your plans change.
How can I attend the annual meeting?
This year, due to the public health and travel concerns our stockholders may have related to COVID-19 and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments have imposed on public gatherings, including current Illinois government health directives to use social distancing and to limit the size of gatherings, our meeting will be conducted online, in a fashion similar to an in-person meeting. We designed the format of this year’s virtual annual meeting to ensure that our stockholders who attend our annual meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. Our board members and executive officers will attend the meeting virtually and be available for questions.
Access to the Audio Webcast of the Meeting: The live audio webcast of the meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. central time. Online access to the audio webcast will open approximately 15 minutes prior to the start of the meeting to allow time for you to log in and test the computer audio system. We encourage our stockholders to access the meeting prior to the start time to allow ample time to complete the online check-in process.
Log-in Instructions: To attend the virtual meeting, login at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/OSBC2021. Stockholders will need their unique 16-digit control number which appears on your proxy card and the instructions included in these proxy materials.
How can I ask questions during the meeting?
Stockholders may submit questions in real time during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/OSBC2021 and entering the 16-digit control number. We intend to respond to all questions submitted during the meeting in accordance with the annual meeting’s Rules of Conduct which are pertinent to the Company and the meeting matters, as time permits. The Rules of Conduct will be posted at the virtual annual meeting forum at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/OSBC2021. Responses to any such questions that are not addressed during the meeting will be published following the meeting on our website at www.oldsecond.com under the link “Investor Relations.” Questions and responses will be grouped by topic and substantially similar questions will be grouped and responded to once.
1
What can I do if I need technical assistance during the meeting?
If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual annual meeting log-in page.
What matters will be voted on at the meeting?
You are being asked to vote on four matters:
● | the election of four Class II director nominees named in this proxy statement; |
● | a non-binding, advisory proposal to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, which we refer to as the “say-on-pay” proposal; |
● | a proposal to approve the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated, to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the plan by 1,200,000 shares, from 600,000 shares to 1,800,000 shares; and |
● | the ratification of Plante & Moran, PLLC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021. |
How does the board of directors recommend that I vote?
● | “FOR” the election of each Class II director nominee; |
● | “FOR” the approval of the say-on-pay proposal; |
● | “FOR” the approval of the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated; and |
● | “FOR” the ratification of Plante & Moran, PLLC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021. |
If I am a stockholder of record, how do I vote?
If you are a stockholder of record, you may:
● | Vote via the Internet Before the Meeting: You may vote via the Internet 24 hours a day, seven days a week, by visiting www.proxyvote.com before the day of the virtual annual meeting. |
● | Vote by Proxy: If you choose to vote by proxy, simply mark your proxy card, date and sign it and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided. If you receive more than one proxy card, it means that you have multiple accounts in our stock transfer records. Please sign and return all proxy cards to be sure that ALL of your shares are voted. |
● | Vote via the Internet During the Meeting: You may choose to vote electronically via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/OSBC2021 during the virtual annual meeting. Stockholders will need their unique control number which appears on the proxy card (printed in the box and marked by the arrow) and the instructions that accompanied the proxy materials. |
Regardless of whether you plan to participate in the audio webcast of the meeting, you are urged to either vote via the Internet before the meeting or sign, date, and return your proxy card. If you participate in the audio webcast, you may continue to have your shares of common stock voted as you instructed in a previously delivered proxy.
If I hold shares in “street” name through a bank, broker or other nominee, how do I vote?
If you hold your shares in street name and you received this proxy statement from your bank, broker or other nominee (collectively, a “broker”), your broker will provide you with instructions for voting your shares. The availability of online voting during the meeting may depend on the voting procedures of the broker that holds your shares. If you have any questions about voting or your control number, please contact the broker that holds your shares.
2
What if I change my mind after I return my proxy card?
If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close at the annual meeting. You may do this by:
● | timely delivering a new valid proxy bearing a later date either by mail or electronic vote over the Internet, or |
● | sending notice to our Stockholder Relations Manager, Shirley Cantrell, at Old Second Bancorp, Inc., 37 S. River St., Aurora, Illinois 60507, that you are revoking your proxy, or |
● | attending the meeting and voting via the Internet during the live audio webcast of the meeting. |
If you hold your shares in the name of your broker or other fiduciary and desire to revoke your proxy, you will need to contact that party to revoke your proxy or change your vote.
What is a broker non-vote?
If you hold your shares in street name, your brokerage firm may vote your shares under certain circumstances. Brokerage firms have authority under stock exchange rules to vote their customers’ unvoted shares on certain “routine” matters. We expect that brokers will be allowed to exercise discretionary authority for beneficial owners who have not provided voting instructions ONLY with respect to Proposal 4, the ratification of Plante & Moran, PLLC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021, but not with respect to any of the other proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, please provide voting instructions to your bank, broker or other nominee so that your shares may be voted on all other proposals.
When a brokerage firm votes its customers’ unvoted shares on routine matters, these shares are counted for purposes of establishing a quorum to conduct business at the meeting. If a brokerage firm indicates on a proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote certain shares on a particular matter, then those shares will be treated as “broker non-votes”.
What is the quorum requirement for the annual meeting?
We will have a quorum and will be able to conduct the business of the annual meeting if the holders of a majority of our issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote are present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. On March 26, 2021, the record date, we had 29,018,637 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as shares present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares will be counted for quorum purposes if they are represented at the meeting for any purpose other than solely to object to holding the meeting or transacting business at the meeting.
How many votes may I cast?
You are entitled to cast one vote for each share of stock you owned on the record date with respect to each of the proposals. Stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights. The proxy card included with this proxy statement indicates the number of shares owned by an account attributable to you.
What happens if any nominee is unable to stand for re-election?
The board may, by resolution, provide for a lesser number of directors or designate a substitute nominee. In the latter case, shares represented by proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee. Proxies cannot be voted for more than four nominees. The board has no reason to believe any nominee will be unable to stand for re-election.
What is the required vote for each proposal?
Assuming a quorum is present, the required vote for each proposal is as follows:
● | Proposal 1: Class II directors will be elected by a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting, |
● | Proposal 2: The say-on-pay proposal requires the approval of a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting, |
3
● | Proposal 3: The approval of the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, requires the approval of a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting, and |
● | Proposal 4: The ratification of Plante & Moran, PLLC as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021 requires the approval of a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting. |
For each proposal, this means that the number of votes cast “FOR” each proposal must exceed the number of votes cast “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to that proposal. This includes the proposal regarding the election of directors in accordance with the policy of majority voting in uncontested director elections set forth in our bylaws.
Broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of voting on a particular proposal, including the election of directors, but abstentions and withheld votes will have the effect of a vote against the applicable proposal or director.
Please note that, because the say-on-pay vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the board of directors or the Compensation Committee.
All valid proxies that we receive will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated in such proxies. As noted above, if you hold your shares in street name through a broker and you do not give voting instructions, your broker is not permitted to vote your shares on any proposal other than Proposal 4, which is the only routine proposal on the agenda. If no instructions are indicated in an otherwise properly executed proxy, it will be voted “FOR” each of the Class II director nominees named in this proxy statement, “FOR” the say-on-pay proposal, “FOR” the approval of the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, and “FOR” the ratification of Plante & Moran, PLLC as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021. If any other matters are presented at the annual meeting, the persons named as proxies on the enclosed proxy will have discretionary authority to vote for you on those matters.
Where do I find the voting results for the annual meeting?
If available, we will announce voting results at the meeting. The voting results will also be disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) within four business days of the meeting.
4
PROPOSAL 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our board of directors is divided into three classes approximately equal in number, serving staggered three-year terms. As a result, the terms of only approximately one-third of our board members expire at each annual meeting. The current term of our Class II directors will expire at this year’s annual meeting. The term of our Class III directors will expire at the 2022 annual meeting and the term of our Class I directors will expire at the 2023 annual meeting.
Each proposed Class II director nominee currently serves as a Class II director.
Following a review and nomination from our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, our board has proposed that the following Class II directors be elected as Class II directors at our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders for a term that will expire at our 2024 annual meeting and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.
Class II Director Nominees
| | | | |
Name |
| Age |
| Served as Director Since |
James Eccher | | 55 | | 2006 |
Barry Finn | | 61 | | 2004 |
Hugh McLean | | 62 | | 2018 |
James F. Tapscott | | 70 | | 2015 |
Each Class II director nominee will be elected if the number of shares voted “FOR” the nominee constitutes a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting. Accordingly, broker non-votes will not have any effect on the outcome of voting, but abstentions will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the applicable nominee.
The board of directors recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the above Class II director nominees.
Set forth below is information concerning our other directors, whose term of office will continue after the annual meeting, including their age, year first elected or appointed as a director.
Continuing Directors
| | | | |
Name |
| Age |
| Served as Director Since |
Class III (term expires 2022) | | | | |
Edward Bonifas | | 61 | | 2000 |
Gary Collins | | 63 | | 2016 |
William B. Skoglund | | 70 | | 1992 |
Duane Suits | | 71 | | 2012 |
Jill York | | 57 | | 2020 |
| | | | |
Class I (term expires 2023) | | | | |
William Kane | | 70 | | 1999 |
John Ladowicz | | 68 | | 2008 |
Billy J. Lyons, Jr. | | 60 | | 2020 |
Patti Temple Rocks | | 61 | | 2015 |
All directors will hold office for the terms indicated, or until their earlier death, resignation, removal or disqualification and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.
There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the nominees, directors or executive officers and any other person pursuant to which any of our nominees, directors or executive officers have been selected for their respective positions.
No nominee, member of the board of directors or executive officer is related to any other nominee, member of the board of directors or executive officer.
5
Director Experience
Biographical information regarding each of our director nominees and continuing directors is set forth below, including the particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the board to conclude that each member is qualified to serve on the board and any committee he or she serves.
Mr. Bonifas: Mr. Bonifas is the Executive Vice President of Alarm Detection Systems, Inc., a producer and installer of alarm systems, closed circuit video systems and card access control systems, a position he has held since 2000. We consider Mr. Bonifas to be qualified for service on the board, the Risk Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee due to his skills and expertise acquired as a leader of a successful business and his prominence in the communities we serve. Mr. Bonifas also serves on our Information Technology Steering committee where he uses his business expertise for cybersecurity oversight.
Mr. Collins: Mr. Collins has served as our Vice Chairman since October 2016. Before that, he was Vice Chairman of Talmer Bancorp, Inc., a publicly traded bank holding company, from 2011 until 2016. He also served as a director of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. from 2010 until 2016. Mr. Collins served as Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Lake Shore Wisconsin Corporation, a bank holding company, from 2010 until 2011, and as a founding Managing Director and Vice Chairman of The Private Bank — Chicago from 1991 until 2009. We consider Mr. Collins to be qualified for service on the board due to his experience focused within mortgage banking and real estate opportunities among residential, multi-family, and commercial lending.
Mr. Eccher: Mr. Eccher has served as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company since 2015 and as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since 2003. He also serves as Chief Operating Officer of the Company, a position he has held since 2007, and served as Senior Vice President and Branch Director of the Bank from 1999 until 2003. Before that, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank of Sugar Grove from 1996 until 1999. We consider Mr. Eccher to be qualified for service on the board due to his experience in the financial services industry and his familiarity with our operations.
Mr. Finn: Mr. Finn served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Rush-Copley Medical Center from 2002 until his retirement in 2019. Before that, Mr. Finn served as the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Rush-Copley Medical Center from 1996 until 2002. We consider Mr. Finn to be a qualified candidate for service on the board, including as our Lead Director, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Information Technology Steering Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee due to his business and financial expertise acquired as an executive at a successful local medical center, as well as his prominence in the communities we serve.
Mr. Kane: Mr. Kane is a Partner of Label Printers, Inc., a printing company, a position he has held since 1977. We consider Mr. Kane to be a qualified candidate for service on the board, the Compensation Committee, the Risk Committee (as Chairman) and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee due to his experience as a partner at a successful local business, his general experience in business and his prominence in the communities we serve.
Mr. Ladowicz: Mr. Ladowicz is the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of HeritageBanc, Inc. and Heritage Bank, where he served from 1996 until 2008, when it was acquired by the Company. We consider Mr. Ladowicz to be a qualified candidate for service on the board, the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee (as Chairman) due to his previous experience as a chief executive officer in the financial services industry, as well as his extensive knowledge of the market areas we entered through the acquisition of HeritageBanc, Inc. in 2008.
Mr. McLean: Mr. McLean has been a Partner with Rock Island Capital since November 2016. Before that, Mr. McLean served as Regional President and Managing Director of Talmer Bank from 2010 until October 2016. From 2009 until 2010, he was President and Director of Lake Shore Wisconsin Corporation. Mr. McLean was Vice Chairman of The PrivateBank, a publicly traded commercial bank headquartered in Chicago, from 1996 until 2008, and was a Managing Director of The PrivateBank from 1996 until 2001. He also held senior commercial banking positions with Firstar Bank and American National Bank prior to joining the PrivateBank in 1996. We consider Mr. McLean to be a qualified candidate for service on the board, the Audit Committee and the Information Technology Steering Committee due to his previous experience in the financial industry.
Mr. Lyons: Mr. Lyons served for over 30 years with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, most recently as a National Bank Examiner, before his retirement in December 2019. We consider Mr. Lyons to be a qualified candidate for service on the board and the Risk Committee and Loan Committee of the Bank’s board of directors due to his extensive bank regulatory and bank supervision experience with the bank’s primary federal regulator.
Mr. Skoglund: Mr. Skoglund serves as the Chairman of the Company and the Bank. From 1998 until 2014, Mr. Skoglund served as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of the Bank from 1996 until 2014.
6
We consider Mr. Skoglund to be qualified for service on the board due to his skills and experience in the financial services industry and his familiarity with our operations as our former Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Suits: Mr. Suits was a founding Partner of Sikich LLC, a financial services firm, from 1982 until his retirement in 2004. We consider Mr. Suits to be a qualified candidate for service on the board, the Audit Committee (as Chairman in 2020), the Risk Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee due to his skills and experience in the financial services industry.
Mr. Tapscott: Mr. Tapscott was a Partner of RSMUS LLP, an audit, tax and consulting firm, from 1991 until his retirement in 2015. Before that, he was a Partner with Wilkes Besterfield and Co., Ltd., from 1972 until 1991. We consider Mr. Tapscott to be a qualified candidate for service on the board, the Risk Committee and the Audit Committee (as Chairman in 2020) due to his previous experience in accounting and financial matters as a partner of RSMUS LLP and Wilkes Besterfield and Co., Ltd.
Ms. Temple Rocks: Ms. Temple Rocks is Senior Partner, head of Client Impact, for ICF Next, a global communications agency, a position she has held since 2019, where she is responsible for client leadership in both the Chicago and Minneapolis office for the agency. Before that, she was the Managing Director of the Chicago office of Golin, a global communications agency from 2011 until 2018. We consider Ms. Temple Rocks to be a qualified candidate for service on the board, the Compensation Committee and the Information Technology Steering Committee due to her business experience and familiarity with the greater Chicago market through her positions with ICF Next and Golin.
Ms. York: Ms. York most recently served as President, Head of Equipment Finance and Leasing Solutions for Fifth Third Bank, until April 2020. Before that, she held various executive level positions with MB Financial Inc., including serving as its Chief Financial Officer, and most recently serving as its Vice President and as Executive Vice President, Specialty Banking and Mergers and Acquisitions, of its subsidiary bank, until it was sold to Fifth Third Bank in March 2019. We consider Ms. York to be a qualified candidate for service on the board, the Audit Committee and the IT Steering Committee of the Bank’s board of directors due to her extensive executive-level experience in the banking industry, including her service as a Chief Financial Officer for a public company.
Biographical Information for Executive Officers
| | |
Name |
| Title |
James Eccher | | President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank |
Bradley Adams | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
Gary Collins | | Vice Chairman |
Donald Pilmer | | Executive Vice President, Chief Lending Officer |
Richard Gartelmann | | Executive Vice President, Wealth Management |
Because each of Mr. Eccher and Mr. Collins also serves on our board of directors, we have provided biographical information for them above. Biographical information for each of Mr. Adams, Mr. Gartelmann and Mr. Pilmer is provided below:
Mr. Adams, age 47, joined the Company and the Bank in May 2017 to serve as an Executive Vice President and our Chief Financial Officer. From November 2016 until joining us, he served as Executive Vice President and Director of Corporate Development and Strategy for TCF National Bank, where he oversaw corporate development and strategy. Before that, he served as Executive Managing Director, Corporate Development, of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. from 2011 and 2016. While at Talmer, Mr. Adams was responsible for management of internal financial reporting, budgeting, mortgage bank accounting, investor relations, strategic planning and corporate development activities. Prior to joining Talmer, Mr. Adams also held positions as Managing Director of W2 Freedom, LLC, a private investment fund manager focused on investing in community banks, and as Director of Investor Relations for Fifth Third Bancorp.
Mr. Gartelmann, age 52, joined the Company and the Bank in 2011. He currently serves as Executive Vice President (a position he has held since 2018) and Head of Wealth Management (a position he has held since 2016). Before that, he was Senior Vice President and Head of Investments. Mr. Gartelmann has over 24 years of investment experience and over 22 years of banking experience.
Mr. Pilmer, age 56, joined the Company and the Bank in 1989. He currently serves as Executive Vice President (a position he has held since 2012) and as Chief Lending Officer (a position he has held since 2016). Mr. Pilmer manages the Commercial Banking unit and has more than 25 years of experience in the Commercial Banking industry.
7
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
General
Currently, the board of directors is made up of thirteen directors, who are elected by the holders of our common stock every three years to serve staggered terms. In accordance with our corporate governance procedures, the board does not involve itself in our day-to-day operations, which are monitored by our executive officers and management. Our directors fulfill their duties and responsibilities by attending regular meetings of the board and through committee membership, which is discussed below.
Director Attendance
The board of directors held four meetings during 2020. All of the directors attended at least 75% of these meetings and the meetings of the committees on which they served. We typically schedule a board meeting in conjunction with our annual meeting and expect that our directors will attend our annual meeting. Last year, all of our then serving directors attended our annual meeting.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The board of directors believes that it is important to encourage the highest level of corporate ethics and responsibility. Among other things, the board adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, as well as a procedure for allowing employees to anonymously report any problems they may detect with respect to our financial reporting. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as other information pertaining to our committees, corporate governance and reporting with the Securities and Exchange Commission, can be found on our website at www.oldsecond.com. We will post on our website any amendments to, or waiver from, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics as it applies to any director or officer to the extent required to be disclosed by applicable NASDAQ or SEC requirements.
Director Independence
The board of directors has standing Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Compensation Committees, each of which is made up solely of directors who are deemed to be “independent” under the rules of NASDAQ. NASDAQ’s independence rules include certain instances that will preclude a director from being deemed independent and the board reviews those requirements each year to determine a director’s status as an independent director. The board has determined that all of the directors and nominees are “independent” as defined by the NASDAQ Stock Market, with the exception of Messrs. Eccher and Collins, each of whom is an executive officer.
During its review of director independence, the board reviewed certain transactions between Alarm Detection Systems, Inc. and the Company. Mr. Bonifas is an Executive Vice President of Alarm Detections Systems, Inc. The board determined that Mr. Bonifas qualified as an independent director because the amounts paid by the Company to Alarm Detection Systems in 2020, which totaled approximately $305,774, were less than 1% of Alarm Detection System’s gross revenues for 2020 and because Mr. Bonifas had no interest in the transaction with the Company, except an indirect and de minimis interest as a stockholder of Alarm Detection Systems.
Actions taken by each committee of the board are reported to the full board, usually at its next meeting. The principal responsibilities of each of the committees are described below.
Board Resignation Policy
Our board of directors has adopted a resignation policy that provides that no person will be elected to serve, or will continue to serve, as a director of the Company after attaining age 73, and each director candidate or nominee has agreed that upon attaining age 73 during his or her tenure as director, the director will be deemed, effective at such time, to have resigned his or her directorship.
Our bylaws further provide that a nominee for director in an uncontested election will be elected by a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting. Under our resignation policy, if a nominee receives more votes “against” his or her election than votes “for” his or her election, the director must promptly tender a written offer of resignation to the Chairman of the board of directors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will promptly consider the director’s offer of resignation and recommend to the board of directors whether to accept or reject it. The board will act on the committee’s recommendation and will publicly disclose its decision within 120 days after the election results are certified.
8
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our board committees are currently composed as follows (M — member; C — chair):
| | | | | | | | | IT |
Name |
| Audit |
| Compensation |
| Nominating and |
| Risk | IT Steering Committee |
Edward Bonifas | | | | M | | M | | M | M(2) |
Gary Collins | | | | | | | | | M |
James Eccher | | | | | | | | | |
Barry Finn | | M | | M | | C | | | M |
William Kane | | | | M | | M | | C | |
John Ladowicz | | M | | C | | M | | | |
Billy J. Lyons, Jr. | | | | | | | | M | |
Hugh McLean | | M | | M | | | | | M |
William B. Skoglund | | | | | | | | M | |
Duane Suits | | M(1) | | | | M | | M | |
James Tapscott | | C(1) | | | | | | M | |
Patti Temple Rocks | | | | M | | | | | C(2) |
Jill York | | M | | | | | | | M |
(1) | Mr. Suits served as Audit Committee chair in 2020 and until February 16, 2021 when Mr. Tapscott was appointed as chair. |
(2) | Mr. Bonifas served as IT Steering Committee chair in 2020 and until February 16, 2021 when Ms. Temple Rocks was appointed as chair. |
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee assists the board in carrying out its oversight responsibilities for our financial reporting process, audit process and internal controls. The Audit Committee is solely responsible for the pre-approval of all required audit and non-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and exercises its authority to do so in accordance with a policy that it has adopted. The committee’s duties, responsibilities and functions are further described in its charter, which is available on our website at www.oldsecond.com, in the “Governance Documents” section under “Investor Relations.” You can request a copy of the committee’s charter by sending a written request to the Corporate Secretary at 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507, or by requesting via e-mail to corporatesecretary@oldsecond.com.
The members of our Audit Committee during 2020 were Mr. Tapscott (who serves as Chairman), Mr. Finn, Mr. Ladowicz, Mr. McLean, Mr. Suits (who previously served as Chairman), and Ms. York, each of whom is deemed to be an independent director under SEC Rule 10A-3 and NASDAQ’s listing requirements. The Audit Committee met four times in 2020.
The board has designated each of Mr. Suits, Mr. Finn, Mr. Tapscott and Ms. York as an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined by the regulations of the SEC. The board believes that each of the other members of the Audit Committee possesses knowledge and experience sufficient to understand the complexities of our financial statements. Mr. Tapscott and other audit committee members met on a quarterly basis during 2020 with our independent registered public accounting firm.
To review our annual Audit Committee report, please see “Proposal 4 — Ratification of Our Independent Registered Public Accounts — Audit Committee Report.”
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of our executive officers and establishes their compensation levels. The committee also has the authority, among other things, to:
● | review and approve the compensation of our chief executive officer and other executive officers; |
● | approve performance goals and objectives relevant to the chief executive officer and other executive officers and evaluate, at least annually, the performance of the chief executive officer and other executive officers in light of those goals and objectives; review and approve (and administer) supplemental retirement benefit plans, employment agreements, and any severance arrangements or plans, including any benefits provided in connection with a change in control for our executive officers; |
● | administer our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans; |
9
● | in consultation with our chief executive officer, review our management succession planning; and |
● | review and evaluate the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices to determine whether our incentive compensation policies and practices are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. |
The committee’s duties, responsibilities and functions are described more fully in its charter, which is available on our website at www.oldsecond.com, in the “Governance Documents” section under “Investor Relations.” You can request a copy of the committee’s charter by sending a written request to the Corporate Secretary at 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507, or by requesting via e-mail to corporatesecretary@oldsecond.com.
The members of our Compensation Committee during 2020 were Mr. Ladowicz (who serves as Chairman), Mr. Bonifas, Mr. Finn, Mr. Kane, Mr. McLean and Ms. Temple Rocks, each of whom is deemed to be an independent director under NASDAQ’s listing requirements. The Compensation Committee met four times in 2020.
The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to select, or receive advice from, advisors (including compensation consultants). In 2020, the committee continued its engagement of McLagan Partners, Inc., as independent advisors to assist the committee in determining and evaluating executive compensation. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of McLagan Partners, Inc., taking into consideration all factors specified in NASDAQ listing standards. Based on this assessment, the Compensation Committee determined the engagement of McLagan Partners, Inc. did not raise any conflict of interest.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the qualifications of, and recommends to the board for nomination, candidates to stand for election at each annual meeting or to fill vacancies on the board as they may occur during the year. The committee also reviews on at least an annual basis whether each director is “independent” under NASDAQ listing requirements. Additionally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing our policies, procedures and structure as they relate to corporate governance. The committee’s duties, responsibilities and functions are further described in its charter, which is available on our website at www.oldsecond.com, in the “Governance Documents” section under “Investor Relations.” You can request a copy of the committee’s charter by sending a written request to the Corporate Secretary at 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507, or by requesting via e-mail to corporatesecretary@oldsecond.com.
The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in 2020 were Mr. Finn (who serves as Chairman), Mr. Bonifas, Mr. Kane, Mr. Ladowicz, Mr. Suits, and Ms. Temple Rocks, each of whom is deemed to be an independent director under NASDAQ’s listing requirements. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met one time in 2020.
Board and Committee Evaluation Process
Under its charter, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews and assesses the performance of our board of directors, including each committee of the board, and makes recommendations for areas of improvement as it deems appropriate. In this regard, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also oversees an annual assessment of each director’s individual performance, which may be accomplished through a self-evaluation process. Each of the key committees of the board of directors (Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance) also performs an annual assessment of its performance and charter.
Director Nominations and Qualifications
In making its nominations for persons to be elected to the board of directors and included in our proxy statement, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates incumbent directors, board nominees and persons nominated by stockholders, if any. The committee reviews each candidate in light of the criteria that we believe each director should possess. Included in the criteria are whether each nominee: (i) meets the minimum requirements for service on the board of directors contained in our bylaws; (ii) possesses the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values; (iii) has, in the committee’s opinion, a sufficient educational and professional background and relevant past and current employment affiliations, board affiliations and experience for service on the board; (iv) has demonstrated effective leadership and sound judgment in his or her professional life; (v) has a strong sense of service to the communities in which we serve; (vi) has exemplary management and communication skills; (vii) is free of conflicts of interest that would prevent him or her from serving on the board; (viii) will ensure that other existing and future commitments do not materially interfere with his or her service as a director; (ix) will review and agree to meet the standards and duties set forth in the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; (x) is willing to devote sufficient time to carrying out their duties and responsibilities effectively; and (xi) is committed to serving on the board for an extended period of time. While we do not have a separate diversity policy, the committee does consider the diversity of its directors and nominees in terms of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise and
10
other demographics which may contribute to the board. The committee also evaluates potential nominees to determine if they have any conflicts of interest that may interfere with their ability to serve as effective board members and to determine whether they are “independent” in accordance with NASDAQ requirements (to ensure that at least a majority of the directors will, at all times, be independent).
The committee, when considering potential board members, will look at all of the foregoing criteria. The various qualifications and criteria are normally considered by the committee in connection with its evaluation of who the committee will recommend as our director nominees. Generally, each incumbent director standing for re-election should have and will have, at a minimum, attended at least 75% of board meetings during the past year and attended 75% of committee meetings of which he or she is a member. The committee retains the ability to make exceptions to this attendance requirement as individual circumstances warrant.
All of the nominees for election as directors at the 2021 annual meeting were recommended for nomination by the committee. The committee did not receive any formal nominations for directors from our common stockholders.
Board Diversity
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is focused on board diversity. Our board of directors is comprised of 13 directors, of whom eleven are independent, two are female and one is African American.
Common Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors
In order to align the interests of board members and stockholders, we require each non-employee director to develop a significant equity stake in the company. The Compensation Committee is responsible for monitoring compliance with these stock ownership and retention guidelines.
Non-employee directors are expected to acquire, and hold during their service as board members, shares of our common stock equal in value to at least three times the annual cash retainer for non-employee directors. Each non-employee director will have five years from the date they first become subject to these guidelines to achieve these target ownership levels. Individuals who acquire shares of common stock under our equity-based incentive plans must hold at least 50% of all net after-tax acquired shares until these stock ownership guidelines are satisfied.
The following share types are included under these guidelines: shares directly owned, family-owned shares, retirement plan shares and unvested time-based restricted stock. Stock options that are unexercised, regardless of their vesting status and in-the-money value, are not counted toward satisfaction of these guidelines. Unvested performance-based restricted stock is also not counted toward stock ownership.
All of our non-employee directors are currently in compliance with these guidelines.
Board Leadership Structure
The roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are separate positions within our Company. Mr. Skoglund, our former Chief Executive Officer, serves as our Chairman, and Mr. Eccher serves as our Chief Executive Officer and President. We currently separate the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in recognition of the differences between the two roles.
Our board of directors has also created the position of a “Lead Independent Director”, who assists the board of directors in assuring effective corporate governance, and serves as chairman when the board of directors meets in independent director sessions. In 2020, our board of directors designated Mr. Finn to serve as Lead Independent Director. In this role, he may call and preside over executive sessions of the independent directors, without management present, as he deems necessary, serves as a liaison between the chair or the chief executive officer and the independent directors on certain matters, and has power to provide formal input on the agenda for meetings of the board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews this appointment annually and the full board has the opportunity to ratify the committee’s selection.
Our board of directors believes this structure is appropriate for our Company because it allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on our strategic direction and our day-to-day leadership and performance, while allowing us to leverage the experience and perspective of our Chairman through his guidance to our Chief Executive Officer and senior management, as well as to the board of directors. In addition, the Lead Independent Director, who is an independent member of our board, provides independent leadership within our board that strengthens its effectiveness and oversight of our business.
11
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
General
Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including general economic risks, credit risks, regulatory risks, audit risks, cyber security risk, reputational risks and others, such as the impact of competition. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks we face, while the board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, the board of directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed.
While the full board of directors is charged with ultimate oversight responsibility for risk management, various committees of the board and members of management also have responsibilities with respect to our risk oversight. In particular, the Risk Committee plays a large role in monitoring and assessing our financial, legal and organizational risks, and receives regular reports from the management team’s senior risk officer regarding comprehensive organizational risk as well as particular areas of concern. The board’s Compensation Committee monitors and assesses the various risks associated with compensation policies, and oversees incentives that encourage a level of risk-taking consistent with our overall strategy.
We believe that establishing the right “tone at the top” and providing for full and open communication between management and the board of directors are essential for effective risk management and oversight. Our executive management meets regularly with our other senior officers to discuss strategy and risks facing the Company. Senior officers attend many of the board meetings, or, if not in attendance, are available to address any questions or concerns raised by the board on risk management-related and any other matters. Additionally, each of our board-level committees provides regular reports to the full board and apprises the board of our comprehensive risk profile and any areas of concern.
Cyber and Information Security
Our IT Steering Committee, chaired by Ms. Temple Rocks, is responsible for cybersecurity oversight, which is also incorporated into our overall enterprise risk management program overseen by our Risk Committee. Both our IT Steering and Risk Committees meet at least quarterly. Meetings of our IT Steering Committee are regularly attended by our Chief Technology Officer and Information Security Officer. While the IT Steering Committee and the board of directors to which it reports, oversees our cybersecurity risk management, management is responsible for the day-to-day cybersecurity risk management processes. Threats from cyber-attacks is severe, attacks are sophisticated and increasing in volume, and attackers respond rapidly to changes in defensive measures. Our systems and those of our customers and third-party service providers are under constant threat and it is possible that we could experience a significant event in the future. While we believe that our cybersecurity programs are appropriate and have been effective to prevent material incidents thus far, risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of Internet banking, mobile banking and other technology-based products and services by us and our customers.
Our enterprise information security program was designed by using elements from the FFIEC Information Security and Cybersecurity guidance, ISO 27000 series and National Institution of Standards of Technology. We use a variety of tools to continually monitor our threat environment including a robust asset management program, network security monitoring, regular patch management, threat intelligence, third party service oversight, training and testing of key controls. We maintain a multifaceted Business Continuity Plan and Incident Response Plan that is routinely updated and tested. Our staff receives formal information security training under a multifaceted approach that includes tabletop exercises, web-based training and regular phishing and social engineering training. We maintain a standalone cyber insurance policy that is intended to defray the costs of an information security breach. Our information security program is independently audited no less than annually and we perform routine internal and external penetration testing.
Corporate Social Responsibility
We know that many of our stockholders expect that we conduct our business in a socially responsible manner through our actions and interactions with our customers, colleagues and within the communities that we serve. Since we were founded, we have worked to integrate corporate social responsibility into our activities. We strive to be a good corporate citizen by operating as an employer that is committed to our team members and, through our bank branches, by maintaining strong ties to the communities in
12
which our customers live, work and do business. Although not an exhaustive list, examples of our activities that reflect our strong commitment to corporate social responsibility include:
Giving back to the communities we serve has always been an important part of our culture as a local community bank. We proudly support the communities in which we operate, not only through our banking operations, but through our employees’ volunteer and community-service efforts.
● | We currently maintain an “Outstanding” rating under the Community Reinvestment Act. |
● | In 2020, we offered all of our employees four hours of paid time-off to volunteer in our communities. |
Employee Engagement and Welfare
We believe that our continued growth and future success will depend in large part on the quality of service provided by our employees. We understand that a highly engaged and empowered workforce is key to driving success for our customers, our business, our communities and our stockholders.
Sustainable Business Practices
We recognize the opportunity to advance economic and social impact through sustainable business operations. In our efforts to promote greater environmental responsibility and operate at an increased level of resource efficiency we:
● | Encourage conservation and recycling in the communities we serve via paperless statements and other electronic deliveries to our customers. |
● | Are in the process of replacing water bottle services with water filtration systems to reduce plastic waste. |
● | Seek opportunities to expand recycling programs throughout our locations, in addition to existing paper recycling and shred services in all of our locations. |
13
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Statement of Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons
Transactions by us with related parties are subject to regulatory requirements and restrictions. These requirements and restrictions include Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (which govern certain transactions by us with our affiliates) and the Federal Reserve’s Regulation O (which governs certain loans by us to our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders). We have also adopted policies to comply with these regulatory requirements and restrictions, including policies governing the approval of related party transactions. Our Audit Committee reviews and approves all related person transactions between the Company and related parties in accordance with NASDAQ’s rules and regulations. For purposes of this review, related person transactions are those transactions required to be disclosed under applicable SEC regulations.
Banking Relationships
Certain of our executive officers and directors have, from time to time, engaged in banking transactions with Old Second National Bank and are expected to continue such relationships in the future. All loans or other extensions of credit made by Old Second National Bank to such individuals were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated third parties and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
For the year ended December 31, 2020, our Compensation Committee consisted of Mr. Ladowicz (chair), Mr. Bonifas, Mr. Finn, Mr. Kane, Mr. McLean, and Ms. Temple Rocks. No member of our Compensation Committee in 2020 was, during the last fiscal year, an officer or employee of the Company or formerly an officer of the Company. In addition, none has had any relationship with the Company of the type that is required to be disclosed under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.” During 2020, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors, compensation committee or other board committee performing equivalent functions of another entity that had one or more executive officers serving as a member of the board of directors or Compensation Committee of the Company.
Vote Standard for Bylaw Amendments
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws authorize our board of directors to adopt, amend or repeal our bylaws by a majority vote. In addition, under Delaware law, our stockholders also have the power to adopt, amend or repeal our bylaws. Under our bylaws, such an action would require a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting.
Stockholder Communications with Our Directors
Our stockholders may contact any member of the board of directors (including our Chairman or Lead Independent Director), or the board as a whole, through our Corporate Secretary, by mail at 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507, or by e-mail at corporatesecretary@oldsecond.com. Any such communication should indicate whether the sender is an Old Second stockholder. Any communication will be forwarded promptly to the board as a group or to the attention of the specified director per your request. Communications that are personal grievances, commercial solicitations, customer complaints, incoherent, or obscene will not be communicated to our board or any director or committee of our board.
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations
Stockholder Nominations of Directors. Under our certificate of incorporation a stockholder may nominate a candidate for election at a stockholder meeting by giving written notice, delivered to or mailed, to our Corporate Secretary, at 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507, not fewer than 14 days nor more than 60 days before any meeting of the stockholders called for the election of directors. If notice of the meeting is given to stockholders less than 21 days before the date of the meeting, such written nomination must be delivered or mailed, as prescribed, to our Corporate Secretary, not later than the close of business on the seventh day following the day on which notice of the meeting was mailed to stockholders Each written nomination must set forth (a) the name, age, business address and, if known, residence address of each nominee proposed in such written nomination; (b) the principal occupation or employment of each such nominee for the past five years and (c) the number of shares of our stock beneficially owned by each such nominee and by the nominating stockholder.
Stockholder Proposal at the Meeting. A stockholder seeking to present any business at an annual meeting must submit a notice in writing to our Corporate Secretary, at 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507, not earlier than 120 days and not later than
14
90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provide that, if the date of the annual meeting is moved to more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the anniversary date of the previous year’s meeting, for notice by the stockholder to be timely it must be delivered to us not earlier than 120 days prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than 90 days prior to the date of such annual meeting or, if the first public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is less than 100 days prior to the date of such annual meeting, then the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company. Our bylaws require the stockholder’s notice to the Company with respect to a stockholder proposal (other than a director nomination) for an annual meeting of stockholders, to include, among other things, (a) the stockholder’s name and address; (b) information about the stockholder’s stock ownership in the Company and certain interests and relationships; and c) a description of the business the stockholder desires to bring before the meeting.
Proposals in Our Proxy Statement. Under SEC rules, for a stockholder’s proposal to be included in our proxy statement and proxy card for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, you must file a written notice of the proposal with our Corporate Secretary, at 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507, not less than 120 calendar days before the date of our proxy statement released to stockholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting, or December 17, 2021, and must otherwise comply with the rules and regulations set forth by the SEC. However, if the date of next year’s annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from the date of this year’s meeting, then the deadline is a reasonable time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials.
15
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 26, 2021, by each director or nominee for director, by each named executive officer, by all of our directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group, and each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock.
Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table is c/o Old Second Bancorp, Inc., 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the tables below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws. We have based our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership on 29,018,637 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 26, 2021. Beneficial ownership has been determined for this purpose in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, under which a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities if he or she has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to such securities or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of securities within 60 days of March 26, 2021.
| | | | | |
|
| Shares Beneficially |
| |
|
Name | | Owned | | Percent of Class |
|
Directors and named executive officers: |
|
|
|
| |
Bradley Adams(1) |
| 84,228 |
| * | |
Edward Bonifas(2) |
| 160,551 |
| * | |
Gary Collins(3) |
| 141,777 |
| * | |
James Eccher(4) |
| 239,094 |
| * | |
Barry Finn(5) |
| 61,807 |
| * | |
Richard Gartelmann(6) | | 21,693 | | * | |
William Kane(7) |
| 49,080 |
| * | |
John Ladowicz(8) |
| 235,494 |
| * | |
Billy J. Lyons, Jr (9) | | 3,975 | | * | |
Hugh McLean(10) | | 137,421 | | * | |
Donald Pilmer(11) |
| 43,696 |
| * | |
William B. Skoglund(12) |
| 86,252 |
| * | |
Duane Suits(13) |
| 35,530 |
| * | |
James Tapscott(14) |
| 36,921 |
| * | |
Patti Temple Rocks(15) |
| 20,474 |
| * | |
Jill York(16) | | 8,000 | | * | |
| | | | | |
All directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons) |
| 1,365,993 |
| 4.7 | % |
| | | | | |
5% Stockholders: | | | | | |
BlackRock, Inc.(17) |
| 2,164,781 |
| 7.5 | % |
The Banc Funds Company(18) | | 1,550,994 | | 5.3 | % |
FJ Capital Management LLC(19) | | 1,551,212 | | 5.3 | % |
* | Denotes ownership of less than 1%. |
(1) | Consists of: (i) 66,800 shares held in a brokerage account; and (ii) 17,428 shares held in Mr. Adams’ name alone. Excludes 43,415 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Adams. |
(2) | Consists of: (i) 160,551 shares held in a brokerage account. Excludes 6,773 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Bonifas. |
(3) | Consists of: (i) 67,236 shares held in a brokerage account; (ii) 73,648 shares held in an IRA account in Mr. Collins’ name; (iii) 893 shares held in our 401(k) plan. Excludes 41,762 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Collins. |
(4) | Consists of: (i) 212,210 shares held in a brokerage account; (ii) 148 shares held jointly with his spouse; (iii) 22,206 shares held in our 401(k) plan; (iv) 4,530 shares held in our profit sharing plan and trust. Excludes 86,952 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Eccher. |
(5) | Consists of: (i) 61,807 shares held in a brokerage account in Mr. Finn’s names alone. Excludes 6,773 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Finn. |
16
(6) | Consists of: (i) 12,922 shares held in a brokerage account; (ii) 6,491 shares held in our 401(k) plan; and (iii) 2,280 shares held in Mr. Gartelmann’s name outright. Excludes 13,427 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Gartelmann. |
(7) | Consists of: (i) 49,080 shares held in a brokerage account. Excludes 6,773 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Kane. |
(8) | Consists of: (i) 15,717 shares held in Mr. Ladowicz’s name alone; and (ii) 219,777 shares held in a Roth IRA. Excludes 6,773 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Ladowicz. |
(9) | Consists of: (i) 3,975 shares held in a brokerage account in Mr. Lyons’ name alone. Excludes 5,273 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Lyons. |
(10) | Consists of: (i) 137,421 shares held jointly with his spouse. Excludes 6,773 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. McLean. |
(11) | Consists of: (i) 10 shares held with Mr. Pilmer as custodian; (ii) 38,318 shares held in a brokerage account; (iii) 1,450 shares held by spouse in a brokerage account; (iv) 2,992 shares held in our 401(k) plan; and (v) 926 shares held in our profit sharing plan and trust. Excludes 26,381 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Pilmer. |
(12) | Consists of: (i) 86,252 shares held in a trust account in Mr. Skoglund’s name. Excludes 6,773 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Skoglund. |
(13) | Consists of: (i) 2,500 shares in Mr. Suits’ name held in a brokerage account; (ii) 32,530 shares held in an IRA; and (iii) 500 shares held in a Trust with his spouse. Excludes 6,773 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Suits. |
(14) | Consists of: (i) 29,421 shares held in a brokerage account; (ii) 3,500 shares held in an IRA; and (iii) 4,000 shares held in his spouse’s Trust. Excludes 6,773 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Mr. Tapscott. |
(15) | Consists of: (i) 7,421 shares held outright in Ms. Temple Rocks’ name; and (ii) 13,053 shares held in a brokerage account in Ms. Temple Rocks’ name alone. Excludes 6,773 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Ms. Temple Rocks. |
(16) | Consists of: (i) 4,000 shares held in an IRA in Ms. York’s name and (ii) 4,000 shares in a joint living Trust with spouse. Excludes 5,273 shares subject to restricted stock unit awards that are currently unvested and that are not deemed to be shares beneficially owned by Ms. York. |
(17) | This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on January 29. 2021, reporting that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 2,128,627 shares and sole dispositive power over 2,164,781 shares. BlackRock, Inc.’s business address is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. |
(18) | This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G/A filed by The Banc Funds Company, LLC with the SEC on February 9, 2021, reporting that Banc Fund X L.P. has sole voting and dispositive power over 449,518 shares, Banc Fund VIII L.P., has sole voting and dispositive power over 459,466 shares and Banc Fund IX L.P. has sole voting and dispositive power over 642,010 shares. The Schedule 13G/A also reports that Charles J. Moore, as the manager Banc Fund X L.P, and Banc Fund VIII L.P and Banc Fund IX L.P has voting and dispositive power over all of the shares held by those entities. The Bank Funds Company, L.L.C’s. business address is 20 North Wacker Drive, Suite 3300, Chicago, IL 60606. |
(19) | This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G/A filed by FJ Capital Management LLC with the SEC on February 10, 2021, reporting that Financial Opportunity Fund, LLC has shared voting and dispositive power over 1,154,120 shares; Financial Opportunity Long/Short Fund, LLC has shared voting and dispositive power over 43,527 shares; each of FJ Capital Management, LLC and Martin Friedman has shared voting power over 1,551,212 shares and shares dispositive power over 1,443,165 shares; each of Bridge Equities XI, LLC, SunBridge Manager, LLC , SunBridge Holdings, LLC and Realty Investment Company, Inc. has shared voting and dispositive power over 108,047 shares. FJ Capital Management, LLC’s business address is 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 306, McLean, Virginia 22101. |
17
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) is intended to assist our stockholders in understanding our compensation programs, the philosophy underlying our compensation strategy and the fundamental elements of the compensation paid to our “named executive officers” whose 2020 compensation information is provided in the tables following this discussion. Our named executive officers as of December 31, 2020, are noted in the following table, along with their current titles:
| | |
Name |
| Title |
James Eccher | | President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank |
Bradley Adams | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
Gary Collins | | Vice Chairman |
Donald Pilmer | | Executive Vice President, Chief Lending Officer |
Richard Gartelmann | | Executive Vice President, Head of Wealth Management |
Introduction
Our CD&A is organized as follows:
● | Overview and Executive Summary. We provide background context and financial and operational highlights that puts our overall disclosure into perspective. |
● | Objectives of Our Compensation Program. The objectives of our executive compensation program are based on our business model and the competitive pressures we face in attracting and retaining executive talent. We structure our executive compensation program to reflect our compensation philosophy and related operating principles. |
● | Elements of Compensation. The key components of our compensation program are base salary, annual cash incentive payments and long-term equity awards, with an emphasis on tying executive compensation to performance. |
● | Severance and Change in Control Arrangements. We provide certain severance benefits in the event of Mr. Eccher’s involuntary termination and “double-trigger” change in control benefits to each of our named executive officers. |
● | Compensation Process. Our executive compensation program is regularly reviewed by the Compensation Committee to ensure that we meet our compensation objectives and to ensure that our compensation program does not pose material risks to the Company. |
● | Analysis of 2020 Compensation. Decisions on 2020 compensation are analyzed and explained in the context of our compensation objectives and performance. |
● | Regulatory Considerations. We consider guidance established by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and other bank regulatory agencies, in addition to various other regulatory requirements, in making decisions about executive compensation. |
Overview and Executive Summary
Business Overview. We provide lending, deposit, and trust services for businesses and individuals. We offer competitive commercial and personal banking products and are committed to providing superior customer service. We place a high priority on community service and are actively involved with many civic and community projects in the communities where we conduct our business. We operate in an intensely competitive and uncertain business environment. From a business perspective, not only do we compete with numerous companies in our markets for customers, but we also compete with many different types and sizes of organizations for senior leadership capable of executing our business strategies. Among other challenges, our business model requires experienced leaders with banking and operational expertise who are capable of taking on high levels of personal responsibility in an ever-evolving banking industry and economy.
Financial and Operational Performance. During 2020, we continued our emphasis on sustaining profitability and growth, within the context of a complex and volatile business environment driven by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Specific accomplishments in 2020 that directly impacted those objectives include:
● | Net income of $27.8 million for 2020; and |
18
● | An efficiency ratio (GAAP) of 60.26% in 2020. |
Overview of Performance Metrics. In 2020, our Compensation Committee selected, among others, corporate performance metrics for our annual incentive plan based on our:
● | Adjusted net income, which excluded after-tax losses on mortgage servicing rights, after-tax net security gains, and bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) death benefits, and was earned at 110% of target based on our 2020 adjusted net income of $30.8 million, which was above our peer group median for return on average assets; and |
● | Adjusted efficiency ratio, which was earned at 85.5% of target based on our adjusted efficiency ratio (tax-exempt, non-GAAP) of 59.45% at year-end 2020. Our adjusted efficiency ratio was calculated as noninterest expense, excluding OREO expenses and amortization of core deposits, divided by the sum of net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis, and total noninterest income less net gains and losses on securities, net losses on mortgage servicing rights, and including a tax equivalent adjustment on the increase in the cash surrender value of BOLI. |
Overview of Our Executive Compensation Programs. The Company and the Bank share an executive management team. The compensation packages of our named executive officers are determined and approved by our Compensation Committee based on their performance and roles for both the Company and the Bank.
We are committed to paying for performance. This commitment is reflected by the significant portion of our named executive officers’ compensation that is provided through performance-based programs. Our executive compensation programs evolve and are adjusted over time to support our business goals and to promote both near- and long-term profitable growth. Total compensation for each named executive officer varies with performance in achieving financial and nonfinancial objectives.
Accordingly, our executive compensation, particularly metrics for our short-term incentive plans, focused on the following goals and accountabilities: our net income growth; loan growth; asset-credit quality risk reduction and a reduction in classified assets; cost savings initiatives; and specific profit center performance. These metrics were prudently designed to contain and minimize risk while at the same time emphasizing growth and profitability.
Say-on-Pay. At our 2020 annual meeting, approximately 96.9% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal were in favor of approving the compensation of our named executive officers. Our board and the Compensation Committee pay careful attention to communications received from stockholders regarding executive compensation, including the results of the say-on-pay vote. The Compensation Committee believes that these voting results reflect strong confidence in our board to exercise good judgement in structuring thoughtful executive compensation programs that benefit our stockholders. We considered the result of the 2020 advisory vote on executive compensation but not for specific 2020 compensation decisions. Based on this consideration and the other factors described in this CD&A, the Compensation Committee did not alter the policies or structure for named executives’ compensation for 2020.
Objectives of Our Compensation Program
The goal of our compensation program is to align the interests of management with those of our stockholders while minimizing undue risk-taking. The Compensation Committee has designed our executive compensation program in a manner that does not provide our executives with incentives to engage in business activities or other behavior that would threaten our value or the investments of our stockholders.
The executive compensation program is intended to accomplish the following objectives:
● | pay for performance; |
● | tie equity compensation to long-term value creation for our stockholders; |
● | align the financial interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders; |
● | maintain a corporate environment that encourages stability and a long-term focus for both us and our management; |
● | maintain a program that: |
o | clearly motivates personnel to perform and succeed according to our current goals; |
o | attracts and retains key personnel critical to our long-term success; and |
19
o | does not encourage undue risk-taking; and |
● | ensure that management: |
o | fulfills its oversight responsibility to its constituents which include stockholders, customers, employees, the community and government regulatory agencies; |
o | conforms its business conduct to the highest ethical standards; |
o | remains free from any influences that could impair or appear to impair the objectivity and impartiality of its judgments or treatment of our constituents; and |
o | continues to avoid any conflict between its responsibilities to us and each individual’s personal interests. |
Below we summarize certain governance practices we have implemented to drive performance and those we have not implemented because we do not believe they would serve our stockholders’ long-term interests.
What We Do | |
Pay-for-Performance | We have structured compensation so that a meaningful portion of pay for our executive officers is subject to the attainment of key performance objectives. |
Risk Management | We annually review our compensation programs to ensure that they do not encourage excessive risk-taking. |
Caps on Annual Cash Incentive Payments | We have appropriate caps on annual cash incentive payments. |
Stock Ownership Guidelines | We maintain stock ownership guidelines of 3x salary for our chief executive officer and 3x annual retainer for our non-employee directors. |
Double Trigger Change in Control Provisions | Our change in control provisions require a double trigger. |
Compensation Consultant | We engage an independent compensation consultant to assist in the development of our executive compensation program and to provide information on market trends and developments. |
What We Don’t Do | |
No Tax Gross-Ups | We do not provide our executive officers excise tax gross-ups on benefits or under any change in control provisions or agreements. |
No Excessive Perquisites | We do not offer excessive perquisites and those perquisites we do offer are limited and primarily serve to enhance our executives’ business development activities. |
No Hedging or Pledging | We prohibit hedging of the pledging of our securities of our securities in a margin account or as collateral for a loan. |
No Repricing of Options | Our Equity Incentive Plan prohibits repricing of underwater options without prior stockholder approval |
Elements of Compensation
Our named executive officers’ compensation program consists of four main components: (a) base salary, (b) annual cash incentives, (c) equity awards, and (d) additional benefits.
The Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding each of the components for the named executive officers are based in part on the Compensation Committee’s subjective judgment and consider qualitative and quantitative factors, as discussed below. In reviewing an executive officer’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considers and evaluates all components of the officer’s total compensation package. This involves reviewing base salary, bonus/cash incentives, equity incentive awards, perquisites,
20
participation in our non-qualified executive plans, participation in our 401(k) plan and any other payments, awards or benefits that an officer earns. Additionally, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration any amounts an executive officer is entitled to upon retirement, termination or a change-in-control event.
The following overview explains the structure and rationale of the elements of compensation used for 2020.
Base Salary. The Compensation Committee believes that base compensation should offer security to each executive sufficient to maintain a stable management team and environment. In establishing an executive officer’s initial base salary the Compensation Committee considers, among other things, the executive’s level of responsibility, prior experience, breadth of knowledge, the competitive salary practices at peer companies, internal performance objectives, education, internal pay equity, potential bonus and equity awards, level of benefits and perquisites and the tax deductibility of base salary.
The Compensation Committee reviews salaries of the named executive officers on an annual basis. As with all of its decisions regarding compensation levels, when reviewing salaries the Compensation Committee considers the levels of all aspects and components of the officer’s compensation, including the individual’s potential bonus and equity awards as well as the level of benefits and perquisites offered. All of these factors are considered on a subjective basis in the aggregate, and none of the factors is accorded a specific weight.
Annual Cash Incentives. The Compensation Committee believes that annual cash incentive compensation is an integral component of our total compensation program that links executive decision-making and performance with our annual strategic objectives. We use this component to focus management on the achievement of corporate financial goals while considering the mitigation of any risks which may affect our overall financial performance.
In February 2020, the Compensation Committee established performance metrics under the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Plan, which we refer to as our “Incentive Plan.” Under the Incentive Plan, as soon as practicable at the beginning of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, selects key performance objectives, which will be used to determine the actual incentive cash payment to be awarded to our executive officers upon the achievement of the selected performance objectives. Generally speaking, performance targets are set so that improvement in a performance objective is necessary in order to receive any or all of the incentive award with respect to that objective. In addition, under the Incentive Plan, in order to be eligible for a cash incentive payment with respect to a particular year, the executive must also meet the expectations of his position during such year.
Maximum incentive opportunities are capped under the Incentive Plan to avoid encouraging excessive risk-taking and to avoid any focus on maximizing short-term results at the expense of our long-term soundness.
Equity Awards. The Compensation Committee believes that senior management equity ownership effectively aligns the interests of senior management with those of our stockholders. Accordingly, we have implemented equity-based incentives to both encourage our management’s long-term service and give management a more direct interest in our future success. The equity incentive plan in effect in 2020, which was approved by our stockholders on May 21, 2019 (the “Equity Incentive Plan”), authorizes the granting of qualified stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights.
All awards are at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and are generally subjective in nature. In determining the number of equity awards to be granted to executive officers, the Compensation Committee considers individual and corporate performance goals and achievement as measured by those goals, the executive’s position and his or her ability to affect profits and stockholder value, as well as the level of awards granted to individuals with similar positions at our peer organizations. Because of the nature of equity awards, the Compensation Committee also evaluates prior awards of stock options and restricted stock and considers the overall wealth accumulation of a given executive officer through such awards.
As discussed below in “Analysis of 2020 Compensation—Long-Term Equity Compensation,” in 2020, the Compensation Committee granted our named executive officers service-based restricted stock units that are subject to three-year cliff vesting. In addition, with respect to Mr. Eccher, Mr. Adams and Mr. Collins, in 2018, the Compensation Committee awarded performance-based restricted stock units subject to specified performance conditions to be measured over the three year period ending December 31, 2020. We awarded additional performance-based restricted stock units to Mr. Eccher, Mr. Adams and Mr. Collins in 2021, with a three year performance period ending on December 31, 2023.
Additional Benefits
Retirement Benefits. We sponsor a tax-qualified 401(k) savings plan and trust intended to be qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Virtually all employees are eligible to participate after meeting certain age and service requirements.
21
Eligible employees are permitted to contribute up to a dollar limit set by law. Participants can choose between several different investment options under the 401(k) plan, including shares of our common stock.
During 2020, we provided a matching contribution on elective deferrals to eligible participants in an amount equal to 100% of the first 3% of each participant’s contributions, and 50% of the next 2% of the participant’s contributions. There is also a profit-sharing portion of the 401(k) plan which provides for an annual discretionary contribution to the retirement account of each employee based in part on our profitability in a given year and on each participant’s annual compensation. The contribution amount granted each year is on a discretionary basis and there is no set formula used by the Compensation Committee. For 2020, the Compensation Committee elected not to make a discretionary profit sharing contribution.
Deferred Compensation. In 2020 we sponsored an executive deferred compensation plan (the “Executive Deferred Compensation Plan”), which provided a means for certain executives to voluntarily defer all or a portion of their salary and/or bonus, if any, without regard to the statutory limitations applicable to tax-qualified plans, such as our 401(k) plan. The Executive Deferred Compensation Plan provided for participant deferrals, company matching contributions and discretionary employer profit-sharing contributions. A company matching contribution was credited to the plan on behalf of a participant when the participant elected to defer the maximum amount permitted under the 401(k) plan (including catch-up contributions, if applicable) and kept that level of deferral for the entire plan year. The company matching contribution was an amount up to 4% of the participant’s combined base salary and bonuses, less any matching contribution paid to the 401(k) plan on the participant’s behalf. The determination of whether a profit-sharing contribution was made and in what amount was entirely at the Compensation Committee’s discretion and there was no set formula.
On September 23, 2020, the Board of Directors adopted the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Restated Deferred Compensation Plan”), which amends and restates the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. The Restated Deferred Compensation Plan became effective on January 1, 2021 and, among other things, removes the mandatory company matching contributions for 2021 and beyond. However, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, make supplemental contributions (“Company Contributions”) to a participant’s retirement distribution account in the form of (i) matching contributions on behalf of participants who elect to make the maximum permissible deferral amount under the applicable 401(k) Plan, including catch-up contributions, and (ii) profit sharing contributions. Company Contributions vest according to the schedule specified by the Compensation Committee on or before the time such contributions are made.
Under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and the Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, participants are permitted to make hypothetical investments with respect to their account balances. The participants may select such hypothetical investments from an array of publicly-traded mutual funds that are held in an insurance company separate account. Participants may elect to receive their Executive Deferred Compensation Plan balance in a lump sum or in installments. Participants may make a withdrawal from the plan during their employment in the event of hardship as approved by the plan’s administrator. The plan is administered through an independent service provider. Messrs. Eccher, Collins, Adams, and Gartelmann currently have account balances under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and the Restated Deferred Compensation Plan.
Perquisites and Other Benefits. We provide general and customary benefit programs to executive officers and other employees. Benefits offered to executives are intended to serve a different purpose than base salary, bonus, cash incentive and equity incentive awards. While the benefits offered are competitive with the marketplace and help attract and retain executives, the benefits also provide financial security for employees for retirement as well as in the event of illness, disability or death. The benefits we offer to executive officers are generally those offered to other employees with some variation to promote tax efficiency and replacement of benefit opportunities lost to regulatory limits although there are some additional perquisites that may only be offered to executive officers. Because of the nature of the benefits offered, the Compensation Committee normally does not adjust the level of benefits offered on a year-to-year basis. We will continue to offer benefits, the amount of which shall be determined from time-to-time in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.
22
The following table summarizes the benefits and perquisites we do and do not provide as well as identifies those employees that may be eligible to receive them:
| | | | | | |
|
| Executive |
| Other Designated |
| Full-Time |
Health Plans: | | | | | | |
Life & Disability Insurance | | X | | X | | X |
Medical/Dental/Vision Plans | | X | | X | | X |
Retirement Plans: | | | | | | |
401(k) Plan/Profit-Sharing | | X | | X | | X |
Deferred Compensation Plan | | X | | X | | Not Offered |
Perquisites: | | | | | | |
Car Allowance | | X | | Not Offered | | Not Offered |
Country Club Membership | | X | | Not Offered | | Not Offered |
It is our belief that perquisites for executive officers should be very limited in scope and value. Due to this philosophy, we have generally provided very nominal benefits to executives that are not available to full-time employees, and we plan to continue this approach in the future. We do provide country club memberships to certain executives and managers in the ordinary course of business to give them the opportunity to bring in and recruit new business opportunities. These individuals are eligible to use the club membership for their own personal use. Additionally, we provide Messrs. Eccher, Adams, Collins, Pilmer and Gartelmann with an automobile allowance to enable them to visit our banking locations on a regular basis as well as to call on our customers. We have disclosed the value of all perquisites to named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table even if they fall below the disclosure thresholds under the SEC rules. We will continue to offer perquisites, the amount of which shall be determined from time-to-time in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.
Severance and Change in Control Arrangements
Employment Agreements and Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreements. Under his employment agreement, we provide Mr. Eccher with certain “double trigger” severance benefits in the event of his involuntary termination following a change in control, as well as salary continuation following certain other involuntary terminations. We have also entered into Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreements with each of our other named executive officers which also provide “double trigger” severance benefits in the event of a qualifying termination following a change in control. We believe these agreements help us recruit and retain executives with the experience, skills, knowledge and background needed to achieve our business goals and strategy. For a detailed description of the severance and change in control benefits applicable to our named executive officers, see the discussion below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Acceleration of Equity Awards. All employees, including our named executive officers, who receive equity awards under our Equity Incentive Plan will immediately vest in any unvested equity awards held by such employees upon the occurrence of a change in control if (a) the equity plan and the respective awards are not assumed by the surviving entity or (b) the plan and the respective awards are assumed by the surviving entity but the individual is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason. Additionally, under the terms of the Employment Agreement and Assurance Agreements noted above and described in greater detail below, all equity awards held by a named executive officer will become vested and exercisable upon a qualifying termination following a change in control.
No Tax Gross-Ups. We do not provide excise tax gross-ups on benefits under any change in control provisions or other agreements with named executive officers. All of our named executive officers currently have employment agreements or Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreements that provide that in the event the officer would be subject to excise tax for any amounts payable under such agreement, the amounts to be paid will be reduced to such lesser extent that would result in no portion of such amounts being subject to excise taxes.
Compensation Process
The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for evaluating the compensation plans, policies and programs relating to our executive officers. Further, as required by guidance issued by the Federal Reserve and other financial institution regulatory agencies, and the SEC’s guidance regarding risk associated with compensation arrangements (each as described more fully below), the Compensation Committee is also responsible for a more expansive risk review with respect to the compensation plans, policies and programs maintained for our employees.
During 2020, the Compensation Committee convened in February, May, August and December. Mr. Ladowicz, as Chairman of the Compensation Committee, also met, as needed, with internal staff members to compile compensation information for this proxy
23
statement. The Compensation Committee also met in February 2021 to approve salaries, incentive plans and performance metrics for 2021, as well as approving officer incentives earned during 2020.
Role of Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee’s charter gives it the authority to delegate its responsibility to members or subcommittees of the Compensation Committee. Also, the charter gives the Compensation Committee the authority to hire outside consultants to further its objectives and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee retained McLagan Partners, Inc. in 2020 to provide services in connection with a review and analysis of compensation paid to our named executive officers and board of directors, including soliciting advice with respect to the increase in the number of shares authorized under our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated. In keeping with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy of comparing our compensation with that of the competitive marketplace on an annual basis, McLagan Partners, Inc. also provided the Compensation Committee an updated market analysis of our executive compensation program.
Role of Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee relies upon the input of management, when carrying out its responsibilities in establishing executive compensation. The Compensation Committee relies on Mr. Eccher’s input in establishing compensation for our named executive officers other than himself. Management provides the Compensation Committee with evaluations as to employee performance, guidance on establishing performance targets and objectives and recommends salary levels and equity awards. The Compensation Committee also consults with management on matters that are relevant to executive compensation and benefit plans where board or stockholder action is expected, including the adoption of new plans or the amendment of existing plans. Finally, the Compensation Committee consults with our management, specifically the Bank’s Chief Risk Officer, in completing the risk review with respect to employee compensation plans. No executive officer participates in any recommendation, discussion or decision regarding his or her own compensation.
Peer Group. Market pay practices are one of many factors we consider in setting executive pay levels and designing compensation programs. Information on pay levels and practices is gathered from a group of publicly traded companies selected based on their business focus, scope and location of operations, size and other considerations. Our peer group of 20 financial institutions was jointly presented by McLagan Partners, Inc. and management and approved by the Compensation Committee. The group is periodically reviewed, with changes made to reflect merger and acquisition activity, financial situation and development, and other considerations. The institutions included in the peer group for 2020 include:
| | |
Enterprise Financial Services Corp. Home Street Inc. First Foundation Inc. Westamerica Bancorp Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. Byline Bancorp, Inc. Univest Financial Bancorp Amalgamated Bank Peapack-Gladstone Financial Bryn Mawr Bank Corp. |
| Republic First Bancorp Inc. HarborOne Bancorp Inc. Cambridge Bancorp Guaranty Bancshares Inc. Howard Bancorp Inc. Baycom Corp. FS Bancorp Inc. PCB Bancorp. LCNB Corp. BankFinancial Corp. |
Analysis of 2020 Compensation
This section describes the decisions made by the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation for our named executive officers for 2020.
Base Salary. We annually review the base salaries of the named executive officers to determine whether or not they will be adjusted, as described above. The salaries for 2020, determined by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of 2020, are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table below. In determining base salary levels, we generally considered the following:
● | the compensation philosophy and guiding principles described above; |
● | the general economic factors in the financial industry beyond our control and our financial performance compared to our peers; |
● | the experience and industry knowledge of our named executive officers and the quality and effectiveness of their leadership; |
● | all of the components of executive compensation, including annual cash incentives, equity awards, retirement and death benefits, as well as other benefits and perquisites; and |
● | internal pay equity among our executives. |
24
The following table details the base salary of our named executive officers for the periods presented.
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| Percent |
Name |
| Position |
| ($) |
| ($) |
| Increase (#) |
James Eccher |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | | 535,353 | | 572,828 | | 7.0 |
Bradley Adams |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | | 320,580 | | 331,800 | | 3.5 |
Gary Collins |
| Vice Chairman | | 316,727 | | 326,229 | | 3.0 |
Donald Pilmer |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Lending Officer | | 276,620 | | 286,301 | | 3.5 |
Richard Gartelmann |
| Executive Vice President, Head of Wealth Management | | 216,912 | | 224,503 | | 3.5 |
For 2020, the Compensation Committee increased the base salary of all executives listed based on our overall corporate performance in 2019, including net income growth, and each officer’s own individual performance. In addition, Mr. Pilmer’s increase also related to growth in commercial loans and commercial treasury management. Mr. Gartelmann’s base salary increase in 2020 compared to 2019 was commensurate with growth in wealth management income and assets under management in 2019 compared to 2018.
Annual Cash Incentive Payments. As discussed above, under our Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, selects key performance objectives, which will be used to determine the actual incentive cash payment to be awarded to our executive officers upon the achievement of the selected performance objectives. In addition, under the Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee also determines each executive officer’s target incentive opportunity, expressed as a percentage of base salary.
For 2020, the Compensation Committee set the target potential incentive payment, expressed as a percentage of base salary, as follows:
| | | | |
|
| Percentage of |
| Target Incentive |
| | Base Salary | | Payment |
Name | | (%) | | ($) |
James Eccher |
| 65 | | 372,338 |
Bradley Adams |
| 50 | | 165,900 |
Gary Collins |
| 45 | | 146,803 |
Donald Pilmer |
| 45 | | 128,836 |
Richard Gartelmann |
| 35 | | 78,576 |
For 2020, the Compensation Committee selected five performance objectives, as identified in the following table (and described in more detail below), and assigned a weight for each performance objective, stated as a percentage of the total target incentive payment.
The performance objectives chosen by the Compensation Committee and the assigned weight for each objective for 2020 performance were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Adjusted |
| Commercial |
| Adjusted |
| Adjusted |
| Department/ |
| |
|
| | Net Income | | Loan & Deposit | | Classified | | Efficiency | | Personal | | |
|
| | Growth | | Growth | | Assets Ratio | | Ratio | | Performance | | Total(1) |
|
Name | | (%) | | (%) | | (%) | | (%) | | (%) | | (%) | |
James Eccher |
| 45 | | - | | 15 | | 5 | | - | | 65 | |
Bradley Adams |
| 35 | | - | | - | | 10 | | 5 | | 50 | |
Gary Collins |
| 30 | | - | | 10 | | 5 | | - | | 45 | |
Donald Pilmer |
| 30 | | 5 | | 10 | | - | | - | | 45 | |
Richard Gartelmann |
| 11 | | - | | - | | - | | 24 | | 35 | |
(1) | Represents each officer’s target incentive payment expressed as a percentage of their base salary. As discussed below, under the incentive plan, the Committee has set threshold and maximum performance levels for certain objectives. |
The Compensation Committee established threshold, target and maximum performance levels and weights for each selected corporate goal. Threshold represents the minimum level of performance at which, if achieved, a payment is earned on each corporate goal. If performance is below the threshold level for any particular corporate goal, no payment will be earned; however, payment will be earned for other corporate objectives that are achieved at least at a threshold level of performance. Maximum represents the maximum level of performance at which, if achieved, a maximum payment is earned on each corporate goal. If performance exceeds the maximum level for any corporate goal, no further incentive above the maximum incentive for such corporate goal is earned. Actual performance between threshold, target and maximum performance levels will be interpolated to determine the amount of payment based on relative achievement of the corporate objectives.
25
How we defined each of these corporate objects is set forth below.
Adjusted Net Income Growth
Each named executive officer participating in the incentive plan had a portion of their annual incentive tied to this performance objective in 2020. The Compensation Committee believes that our growth, as measured by our adjusted net income, is an appropriate performance measure because it focuses on our financial performance, which in turn affects stockholder value. The Compensation Committee defined adjusted net income in 2020 as net income, excluding after-tax losses on mortgage servicing rights, after-tax net security gains, and BOLI death benefits. In addition, the Compensation Committee defined a return on average assets (“ROAA”) metric for our performance, defined as net income divided by average assets, as compared to our peer group. The ROAA metric superseded the adjusted net income performance metric if we performed as well as, or better than, the median ROAA of our peer group.
The Compensation Committee applied the following scale to determine how much of the total assigned weight for this performance objective each named executive officer could receive based on our net income:
| | | | | |
|
| |
| Percent of |
|
| | | | Assigned | |
Adjusted Net Income | | Notes | | Weight (%) |
|
$29.5 million |
| 85% of 2020 budgeted net income |
| 40 | (1) |
$31.2 million |
| 90% of 2020 budgeted net income |
| 60 | |
$33.0 million |
| 95% of 2020 budgeted net income |
| 80 | |
$34.7 million |
| 2020 budgeted net income |
| 100 | (2) |
ROAA |
| Peer group median ROAA or better | | 110 | |
ROAA |
| > 50% of peer group median ROAA |
| 115 | (3) |
(1) | Represents the threshold level of performance necessary to earn any portion of this objective, which will result in 40% of the assigned weight being earned. |
(2) | Represents the target level of performance for this objective, which will result in 100% of the assigned weight being earned. |
(3) | Represents the maximum level of performance for this objective, which will result in 115% of the assigned weight being earned. The median return on average assets, or ROAA, for all peers listed above under “Compensation Process — Peer Group”, was used as a baseline for this metric. |
Our adjusted net income in 2020 was $30.8 million, and our reported net income was $27.8 million. However, our ROAA was in excess of our peer group median, but less than 50% above our peer group median. Accordingly, each named executive officer earned 110.0% of the assigned weight for this performance objective.
Commercial Loan and Deposit Growth
Mr. Pilmer had a performance objective tied to commercial loan and deposit growth weighted at 5.0%, comprised of 2.5% for loan growth and 2.5% for deposit growth year over year. The Compensation Committee set a threshold of 60% of budget to achieve a 50% performance measurement, and a maximum of 110% of budget to achieve 110% performance measurement. Accordingly, growth below the threshold level would result in no payment for this objective and growth above the maximum level would result in payment at the maximum level.
The commercial loan growth performance objective was measured based on 2020 budgeted organic growth, excluding any acquired loans, over 2019 results, as detailed in the following table.
| | | | | |
2020 Budgeted Organic |
| As a % of |
| Percent of |
|
Commercial Loan Growth | | Budget | | Assigned Weight | |
(%) | | (%) | | (%) |
|
3.00 | | 60 | | 50 | (1) |
3.75 | | 75 | | 75 | |
5.00 | | 100 | | 100 | (2) |
5.50 | | 110 | | 110 | (3) |
(1) | Represents the threshold level of performance necessary to earn any portion of this objective, which will result in 50% of the assigned weight being earned. |
(2) | Represents the target level of performance for this objective, which will result in 100% of the assigned weight being earned. |
(3) | Represents the maximum level of performance for this objective, which will result in 110% of the assigned weight being earned. |
26
The commercial deposit growth performance objective was measured based on 2020 budgeted organic growth, over 2019 results, as detailed in the following table.
| | | | | |
2020 Budgeted Organic |
| |
| |
|
Commercial Deposit | | As a % of | | Percent of |
|
Growth | | Budget | | Assigned Weight | |
(%) | | (%) | | (%) |
|
3.00 | | 60 | | 50 | (1) |
3.75 | | 75 | | 75 | (2) |
5.00 | | 100 | | 100 | |
5.50 | | 110 | | 110 | (2) |
(1) | Represents the threshold level of performance necessary to earn any portion of this objective, which will result in 50% of the assigned weight being earned. |
(2) | Represents the target level of performance for this objective, which will result in 100% of the assigned weight being earned. |
(3) | Represents the maximum level of performance for this objective, which will result in 110% of the assigned weight being earned. |
Actual commercial loan growth, including leases and excluding Paycheck Protection Program loans originated, was 2.16% for 2020 compared to 2019, and commercial deposit growth in 2020 was greater than the 2.5% maximum possible payout year over year. Therefore, Mr. Pilmer earned 4.66% of the possible 5.00% assigned weight for this performance objective.
Asset/Credit Quality
Mr. Eccher, Mr. Collins and Mr. Pilmer each had a performance objective related to asset quality, measured with 50% of the metric related to our adjusted classified assets ratio and 50% related to the maintenance of a satisfactory asset quality rating with bank regulators. Management monitors a ratio of classified assets as a percent of the sum of Bank Tier 1 capital and the allowance for credit losses, which is referred to as the “classified assets ratio.” The adjusted classified assets ratio is our classified assets ratio, excluding any loans that were in nonperforming status due to deferral under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act. The Compensation Committee believes that a continued focus by these executives on our asset/credit quality will ensure that we are working toward sustainable growth and profitability.
| | | |
Adjusted Classified |
| Percent of |
|
Assets Ratio | | Assigned Weight |
|
(%) | | (%) |
|
10.00 | | 50 | (1) |
9.50 | | 75 | |
9.00 | | 100 | (2) |
8.00 | | 110 | (3) |
(1) | Represents the threshold level of performance necessary to earn any portion of this objective, which will result in 50% of the assigned weight being earned. |
(2) | Represents the target level of performance for this objective, which will result in 100% of the assigned weight being earned. |
(3) | Represents the maximum level of performance for this objective, which will result in 110% of the assigned weight being earned. |
At December 31, 2020, our adjusted classified assets ratio was 9.00%, and, therefore, 100% of the incentive was paid out for this performance metric. We also maintained a satisfactory rating by the regulators for asset quality. Therefore Mr. Eccher, Mr. Collins and Mr. Pilmer each earned 100% of the assigned weight for this performance objective.
Adjusted Efficiency Ratio
The Compensation Committee believes that expense control and efficiency of operations is a goal we should continually strive for in order to provide for the best financial return for our stockholders. Further, the Compensation Committee believes that our named executive officers are best situated to impact our efforts in this regard. As such, Mr. Eccher, Mr. Adams, and Mr. Collins each had a portion of their annual incentive tied to our adjusted efficiency ratio, as noted in the following table. For 2020, our adjusted efficiency ratio was calculated as noninterest expense, excluding OREO expenses and amortization of core deposits, divided by the sum of net
27
interest income, on a fully tax equivalent basis, and total noninterest income, less net gains and losses on securities and net losses on mortgage servicing rights, and including a tax equivalent adjustment on the increase in the cash surrender value of BOLI.
| | | |
Adjusted |
| Percent of |
|
Efficiency Ratio | | Assigned | |
(%) | | Weight (%) |
|
≤ to 62.0 |
| 50 | (1) |
≤ to 60.0 |
| 75 | |
≤ to 59.0 |
| 100 | (2) |
≤ to 57.5 |
| 110 | (3) |
(1) | Represents the threshold level of performance necessary to earn any portion of this objective, which will result in 50% of the assigned weight being earned. |
(2) | Represents the target level of performance for this objective, which will result in 100% of the assigned weight being earned. |
(3) | Represents the maximum level of performance for this objective, which will result in 110% of the assigned weight being earned. |
For 2020, our adjusted efficiency ratio at year-end was 59.45% and, therefore, Mr. Eccher, Mr. Adams, and Mr. Collins earned 85.50% of their applicable assigned weight for this performance objective.
Department and Individual Performance
The Compensation Committee also set performance metrics for Mr. Adams and Mr. Gartelmann, related to their respective departments and/or individual performance to promote the leadership and development of our various lines of business. For 2020, Mr. Adams was evaluated on Finance and Accounting Department strategies and efficiencies, and earned 3% of a possible 5% as one large project was partially completed. Mr. Gartelmann was evaluated on the performance of our Wealth Management Department, including growth of wealth management income and assets under management, and earned 5.7% of a possible 19% for this metric. In addition, Mr. Gartelmann was also evaluated on trust department regulatory compliance, and he earned 5.0% out of 5.0% for this metric.
Total 2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan Awards
As outlined above, the Compensation Committee reviewed our performance and the performance of each department and executive officer, as applicable. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee approved awards at an amount equal to an interpolated amount between the total potential threshold incentive and the total maximum incentive for each performance objective (if the threshold performance level was obtained for such objective). Our named executive officers’ actual cash incentive awards for 2020 are noted in the table below, along with the percentage of the total target incentive each officer achieved.
| | | | |
|
| |
| Percentage of |
| | | | Target Incentive |
| | Actual Award | | Payment Achieved |
Name | | ($) | | (%) |
James Eccher | | 393,962 |
| 105.8 |
Bradley Adams | | 164,407 |
| 99.1 |
Gary Collins | | 154,225 |
| 108.2 |
Donald Pilmer | | 136,451 |
| 105.9 |
Richard Gartelmann | | 51,187 |
| 65.1 |
Long-Term Equity Compensation.
2020 Awards. In 2020, the Compensation Committee approved equity grants for our named executive officers comprised of time-vesting restricted stock units, or TRSUs, as shown in the following table.
| | |
Name | | TRSUs (#) |
James Eccher | | 23,500 |
Bradley Adams | | 11,767 |
Gary Collins | | 10,334 |
Donald Pilmer | | 9,025 |
Richard Gartelmann | | 4,423 |
28
The TRSUs are subject to three-year cliff vesting, with accelerated vesting in certain circumstances as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” section below.
The Compensation Committee determined not to grant any performance-based equity awards, or PRSUs, in 2020, given the grants of PRSUs to Mr. Eccher, Mr. Adams and Mr. Collins, in 2018, with vesting as discussed below.
Results of 2018 PRSU Awards. The final performance period for our 2018 PRSUs ended on December 31, 2020. While each performance metric was measured annually (other than the relative stockholder return, which was measured over the three-year period), the awards were also subject to a service requirement through the date we issued our 2020 audited financial statements. The PRSUs had a payout range from 0% of target for below threshold performance, 75% of target for threshold performance, 100% of target for target performance and 125% of target for maximum performance. The performance metrics, weight and relative goals are disclosed in the below table, along with the percent of target achieved, as measured over the three-year period.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Percent of |
| | Weight | | | | | | | | Target |
Performance Metric | | (%) | | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum | | Achieved (%) |
Annual growth in cumulative adjusted earnings per share | | 40 | | 8% | | 10% | | 12% | | 48 |
Annual return on tangible common equity | | 25 | | 13% | | 15% | | 17% | | 84 |
Annual efficiency ratio | | 25 | | 65% | | 60% | | 55% | | 116 |
Relative stockholder return(1) | | 10 | | 45th %ile | | 65th %ile | | 75th %ile | | - |
(1) | Measured relative to the KBW NASDAQ Regional Banking Index. |
The settlement of earned PRSUs occurs on the date of the issuance of the audit opinion with respect to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending on the last day of the performance period.
Perquisites and Other Benefits. While the Compensation Committee reviews and monitors the level of other compensation offered to the named executive officers, the Compensation Committee typically does not adjust the level of benefits offered on an annual basis. The Compensation Committee does consider the benefits and perquisites offered to the named executive officers in its evaluation of the total compensation received by each. The perquisites received by the named executive officers in 2020 are reported in the Summary Compensation Table below. The benefits offered in 2020 to the named executive officers are expected to continue for 2021.
Regulatory Considerations
As a publicly-traded financial institution, we must contend with several often overlapping layers of regulations when considering and implementing compensation-related decisions. These regulations do not set specific parameters within which compensation decisions must be made, but do require the Compensation Committee to be mindful of the risks that often go hand-in-hand with compensation programs designed to incentivize the achievement of better than average performance. While the regulatory focus on risk assessment has been heightened over the last several years, the incorporation of general concepts of risk assessment into compensation decisions is not a recent development.
The Compensation Committee continues to believe in and practice a sensible approach to balancing risk-taking and rewarding reasonable, but not necessarily easily attainable, goals and this has always been a component of its overall assessment of the compensation plans, programs and arrangements it has put in place for our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes we have adequate policies and procedures in place to balance and control any risk-taking that may be incentivized by the employee compensation plans. The Compensation Committee further believes that such policies and procedures will work to limit the risk that any employee would manipulate reporting earnings in an effort to enhance his or her compensation.
In making decisions about executive compensation, in addition to the above, we also consider the impact of other regulatory provisions, including: the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), such as Code Section 162(m) that may limit the tax deductibility of certain compensation; Code Section 409A regarding nonqualified deferred compensation; and Code Section 280G regarding excise taxes and deduction limitations on golden parachute payments made in connection with a change in control. In making decisions about executive compensation, we also consider how various elements of compensation will impact our financial results. For example, we consider the impact of FASB ASC Topic 718, which requires us to recognize the compensation cost of grants of equity awards based upon the grant date fair value of those awards.
Code Section 162(m) generally prohibits a federal income tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to a “covered employee.” A “covered employee” includes (a) the Chief Executive Officer, (b) the Chief Financial Officer, (c) the
29
three other most highly compensated executive officers, and (d) any individual who was a covered employee for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016. Before 2018, we were permitted to receive a federal income tax deduction for qualifying “performance-based” compensation as defined under Code Section 162(m) without regard to this $1,000,000 limitation. However, recent U.S. tax legislation eliminated the performance-based exception. These new rules became effective starting in 2018 for us. To the extent that in 2018 or any later year, the aggregate amount of any covered employee’s salary, bonus, and amount realized from vesting of restricted stock units or other equity awards, and certain other compensation amounts that are recognized as income for federal income tax purposes by the covered employee exceeds $1,000,000 in any year, we will not be entitled to a U.S. federal income tax deduction for the amount over $1,000,000 in that year. The Compensation Committee has not adopted a formal policy regarding tax deductibility of compensation paid to our executive officers, and may determine it is appropriate to provide compensation that may exceed deductibility limits in order to recognize performance, meet market demands, retain key executives, and take into account other appropriate considerations.
Compensation-Related Governance Policies
Common Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Our Chief Executive Officer
In order to align the interests of our chief executive officer with our stockholders, we have adopted a policy that requires our chief executive officer to develop a significant equity stake in the company. The Compensation Committee is responsible for monitoring compliance with these stock ownership and retention guidelines.
Under the policy our chief executive officer must acquire and hold shares of our common stock equal in value to at least three times his or her annual base salary. The officer will have five years from the date he or she first becomes subject to these guidelines to achieve these target ownership levels. If the officer acquires share of common stock under our equity-based incentive plans he or she must hold at least 50% of all net after-tax acquired shares until these stock ownership guidelines are satisfied. The following share types are included under these guidelines: shares directly owned, family-owned shares, retirement plan shares and unvested time-based restricted stock. Stock options that are unexercised, regardless of their vesting status and in-the-money value, are not counted toward satisfaction of these guidelines. Unvested performance-based restricted stock is also not counted toward stock ownership. Currently, our chief executive officer is in compliance with these guidelines.
Prohibitions on Hedging and Pledging
We consider it improper and inappropriate for our directors, officers and employees to engage in short-term or speculative transactions in our securities or in other transactions in our securities that may lead to inadvertent violations of the insider trading laws. Accordingly, under our Insider Trading Policy, we prohibited:
● | trading in puts, calls or similar options on any of our securities or the sale of any of our securities “short”; |
● | hedging or monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts, which allow a director, officer or employee to lock in much of the value of his or her stock holdings, often in exchange for all or part of the potential for upside appreciation in the stock; and |
● | holding our securities in a margin account or pledging our securities as collateral for a loan. |
30
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing CD&A with management. Based on the Compensation Committee’s review and discussion with management, the Compensation Committee has recommended to our board of directors that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement and in Old Second’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Submitted by:
Mr. John Ladowicz, Chairman
Mr. Edward Bonifas
Mr. Barry Finn
Mr. William Kane
Mr. Hugh McLean
Ms. Patti Temple Rocks
Members of the Compensation Committee
31
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our named executive officers:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Change in |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Pension Value | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Non-Equity | | and Nonqualified | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Incentive | | Deferred | | All | | |
| | | | | | | | Stock | | Plan | | Compensation | | Other | | |
Name and | | | | Salary | | Bonus | | Awards | | Compensation | | Earnings | | Compensation | | Total |
Principal Position(1) | | Year | | ($) | | ($) | | ($)(2) | | ($)(3) | | ($)(4) | | ($)(5) | | ($) |
James Eccher |
| 2020 |
| 566,582 |
| - | | 288,110 | | 393,962 | | - |
| 81,659 |
| 1,330,313 |
President and Chief Executive |
| 2019 |
| 530,303 |
| - | | 290,475 | | 285,731 | | - |
| 57,333 |
| 1,163,842 |
Officer |
| 2018 |
| 501,042 |
| 50,000 | (6) | 841,000 | | 296,212 | | - | | 40,665 |
| 1,728,919 |
Bradley S. Adams |
| 2020 |
| 329,933 |
| - | | 144,263 | | 164,407 | | - | | 27,585 |
| 666,188 |
Executive Vice President | | 2019 |
| 318,525 |
| - | | 131,630 | | 151,464 | | - | | 35,434 |
| 637,053 |
and Chief Financial Officer | | 2018 | | 306,875 | | 50,000 | (6) | 463,750 | | 164,914 | | - | | 26,194 | | 1,011,733 |
Gary Collins |
| 2020 |
| 324,645 |
| - | | 126,695 | | 154,225 | | - | | 58,740 |
| 664,305 |
Vice Chairman |
| 2019 |
| 315,314 |
| - | | 131,630 | | 126,266 | | - | | 54,684 |
| 627,894 |
| | 2018 |
| 306,875 |
| 50,000 | (6) | 463,750 | | 136,401 | | - | | 42,203 |
| 999,229 |
Donald Pilmer |
| 2020 |
| 284,688 |
| - | | 110,647 | | 136,451 | | - | | 30,934 |
| 562,720 |
Executive Vice President, |
| 2019 |
| 275,386 |
| - | | 93,572 | | 87,690 | | - | | 29,030 |
| 485,678 |
Commercial Lending |
| 2018 |
| 267,909 |
| - |
| 90,283 | | 89,918 | | - | | 31,142 |
| 479,252 |
Richard Gartelmann(7) |
| 2020 |
| 223,238 |
| - |
| 54,226 | | 51,187 | | - | | 27,009 |
| 355,660 |
Executive Vice President, |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wealth Management |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Reflects current principal positions. |
(2) | The amounts represent the grant date fair value for equity awards in accordance with ASC 718 — “Compensation — Stock Compensation.” A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the values may be found in Note 1 to our audited financial statements included in our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
(3) | See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis —Analysis of 2020 Compensation—Annual Cash Incentive Payments” above for a description of how the Compensation Committee determined the incentive payments awarded in 2020. |
(4) | There were no above-market or preferential earnings on our nonqualified deferred compensation plan. |
(5) | The 2020 amounts set forth in this column include the following: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Mr. Eccher |
| Mr. Adams |
| Mr. Collins |
| Mr. Pilmer |
| Mr. Gartelmann | |||||
| | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | |||||
401(k) match | | | 11,400 | | | 11,400 | | | 11,400 | | | 11,400 | | | 11,400 |
Deferred Compensation Plan contributions | | | 44,350 | | | - | | | 15,750 | | | - | | | 898 |
Life insurance | |
| 474 | |
| 474 | |
| 474 | |
| 474 | |
| 474 |
Car allowance | |
| 10,800 | |
| 6,000 | |
| 7,800 | |
| 6,000 | |
| 5,500 |
Country club/Social club dues | |
| 11,760 | | | 7,200 | | | 22,021 | | | 11,910 | |
| 7,500 |
TRSU dividend equivalents | | | 2,875 | | | 1,791 | | | 575 | | | 1,150 | | | 517 |
Other(a) | |
| - | |
| 720 | |
| 720 | |
| - | |
| 720 |
Total | | | 81,659 | | | 27,585 | | | 58,740 | | | 30,934 | | | 27,009 |
a. | “Other” includes cell phone reimbursement. |
(6) | Represents a discretionary cash bonus paid to Messrs. Eccher, Adams and Collins for the successful completion of our acquisition of Greater Chicago Financial Corp. and its subsidiary bank, ABC Bank, completed on April 20, 2018. |
(7) | Mr. Gartelmann became a named executive officer for the first time in 2020. |
32
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table shows plan-based awards granted to our named executive officers in 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | All Other | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Stock Awards: | | Grant Date |
| | | | Estimated Possible Payouts Under | | Number of | | Fair Value | ||||
| | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | | Shares of Stock | | of Stock | ||||
Name |
| Grant Date |
| Threshold ($) |
| Target ($) |
| Maximum ($) |
| or Units (#)(2) |
| Awards ($)(3) |
James Eccher |
| 2/18/2020 |
| 160,392 |
| 372,338 |
| 422,461 |
| 23,500 |
| 288,110 |
Bradley S. Adams |
| 2/18/2020 |
| 83,042 |
| 165,900 |
| 186,638 |
| 11,767 |
| 144,263 |
Gary Collins |
| 2/18/2020 |
| 61,762 |
| 146,803 |
| 161,531 |
| 10,334 |
| 126,695 |
Donald Pilmer |
| 2/18/2020 |
| 55,829 |
| 128,836 |
| 146,014 |
| 9,025 |
| 110,647 |
Richard Gartelmann |
| 2/18/2020 |
| 13,470 |
| 78,576 |
| 83,627 |
| 4,423 |
| 54,226 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Amounts reported represent the potential payouts pursuant to our Incentive Plan subject to the evaluation criteria set by the Compensation Committee, with all payments subject to achievement of Company and/or individual and departmental goals as discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis —Analysis of 2020 Compensation—Annual Cash Incentive Payments.” Actual amounts earned by each named executive officer are included in the column entitled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” of the “Summary Compensation Table” above. |
(2) | Represents the award of TRSUs that will cliff vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. |
(3) | This amount represents the grant date fair value for equity awards in accordance with ASC 718 – “Compensation – Stock Compensation”. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth information concerning the outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2020, held by the individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Stock Awards | |||||||
| | | | | | | Equity Incentive | | Equity Incentive Plan |
|
| Number of | | | Market value of |
| Plan Awards: |
| Awards: Market value |
| | shares or units of | | | of shares or | | Number of shares | | of PRSU shares or |
| | stock that have | | units of stock that | | or units of stock | | units of stock that | |
|
| not vested |
| have not vested |
| that have not vested |
| have not vested | |
Name |
| (#) (TRSUs) | | ($) (TRSUs)(1) |
| (#) (PRSUs) | | ($)(1) | |
James Eccher |
| 93,600 | (2) | | 944,424 |
| - | | - |
Bradley Adams |
| 47,213 | (3) | | 476,379 |
| - | | - |
Gary Collins |
| 45,780 | (4) | | 461,920 |
| - | | - |
Donald Pilmer |
| 22,839 | (5) | | 230,446 |
| - | | - |
Richard Gartelmann |
| 11,959 | (6) | | 120,666 |
| - | | - |
(1) | Based upon the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2020, of $10.09 per share. |
(2) | Represents the following unvested TRSUs/PRSUs granted to Mr. Eccher: |
● | 20,000 TRSUs that vest on February 20, 2021 |
● | 22,500 TRSUs that vest on May 21, 2022 |
● | 23,500 TRSUs that vest on February 18, 2023 |
● | 27,600 earned PRSUs with a performance period that ended December 31, 2020, but that remained subject to a service-based vesting condition until the date we issued our audit opinion with respect to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020. |
(3) | Represents the following unvested TRSUs/PRSUs granted to Mr. Adams: |
● | 8,000 that vest on February 20, 2021 |
● | 10,196 that vest on May 21, 2022 |
● | 11,767 that vest on February 18, 2023 |
● | 17,250 earned PRSUs with a performance period that ended December 31, 2020, but that remained subject to a service-based vesting condition until the date we issued our audit opinion with respect to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020. |
(4) | Represents the following unvested TRSUs/PRSUs granted to Mr. Collins: |
● | 8,000 that vest on February 20, 2021 |
● | 10,196 that vest on May 21, 2022 |
● | 10,334 that vest on February 18, 2023 |
33
● | 17,250 earned PRSUs with a performance period that ended December 31, 2020, but that remained subject to a service-based vesting condition until the date we issued our audit opinion with respect to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020. |
(5) | Represents the following unvested TRSUs granted to Mr. Pilmer: |
● | 6,566 that vest on February 20, 2021 |
● | 7,248 that vest on May 21, 2022 |
● | 9,025 that vest on February 18, 2023 |
(6) | Represents the following unvested TRSUs granted to Mr. Gartelmann: |
● | 3,486 that vest on February 20, 2021 |
● | 4,050 that vest on May 21, 2022 |
● | 4,423 that vest on February 18, 2023 |
Stock Vested
The following table provides information concerning stock awards that vested in 2020 for our named executive officers. No stock options were exercised by our named executive officers in 2020.
| | | | |
| | Stock Awards | ||
|
| Number of |
| Value |
| | shares acquired | | realized on |
| | on vesting | | vesting(1) |
Name | | (#) | | ($) |
James Eccher |
| 25,000 |
| 316,750 |
Bradley S. Adams |
| 25,000 |
| 197,750 |
Gary Collins |
| 5,000 |
| 63,350 |
Donald Pilmer |
| 10,000 |
| 126,700 |
Richard Gartelmann |
| 4,500 |
| 57,015 |
(1) | The dollar values reported in this column were calculated using the per share closing price of our common stock on the vesting date of the awards. |
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
We sponsor the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which is described in the CD&A above, and the Director Deferred Compensation Plan, which is described below following the Directors Compensation Table. The plans provide a means by which certain executives and directors may voluntarily defer all or a portion of their compensation. The plans are funded by participant deferrals and, in the case of the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, company matching contributions and discretionary employer profit sharing contributions. With respect to their deferrals and our contributions, participants are permitted to make hypothetical investment elections in publicly-traded mutual funds, which are held in an insurance company separate account. Earnings are credited to the participant accounts under the plan based on the performance of their hypothetical investment elections. The deferrals to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan are credited for earnings based on stock prices of their holdings. Participants may elect to receive their plan balance in a lump sum or in installments. Participants are permitted, in the discretion of the administrator, to make a withdrawal from the plan during their employment in the event of hardship.
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Executive |
| Registrant |
| Aggregate |
| Aggregate |
| Aggregate |
| | contributions | | contributions | | gains (losses) | | withdrawals/ | | balance at |
| | in last FY | | in last FY | | in last FY | | distributions | | last FYE |
Name | | ($)(1) | | ($)(2) | | ($)(3) | | ($) | | ($)(4) |
James Eccher |
| 17,321 |
| 44,350 |
| 24,820 |
| - |
| 360,455 |
Bradley S. Adams |
| - |
| - |
| 2,056 |
| - |
| 14,900 |
Gary Collins |
| 16,622 |
| 15,750 |
| (1,502) |
| - |
| 133,987 |
Don Pilmer |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
Richard Gartelmann |
| 2,292 |
| 898 |
| 1,282 |
| - |
| 9,146 |
(1) | The amounts shown in this column are reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2) | The amounts shown in this column are included in the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(3) | There were no above-market or preferential earnings or appreciation in 2020 or previous years. Amounts included in this column are not included in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(4) | The aggregate balance at last fiscal year-end shown in this column includes contributions in prior years which were reported as “Salary” and “All Other Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. |
34
Employment Agreement and Offer Letters
Mr. Eccher’s Employment Agreement
On September 16, 2014, but effective January 1, 2015, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Eccher to serve as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and the Bank. The employment agreement had an initial term of one year, and will be automatically renewed for successive one-year terms, unless either party gives at least 90 days prior written notice of non-renewal; provided, that, the term will be extended for a two-year period immediately following a change in control that occurs during the term. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Eccher initially received an annual base salary of $400,000. The base salary will be reviewed annually and may be increased, but not decreased, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. His current base salary is $590,013.
In addition to his base salary, Mr. Eccher is eligible to receive performance-based annual incentive bonuses, in accordance with the Company’s annual incentive plan, a monthly car allowance of $900, reimbursement for costs associated with maintaining a country club membership, and also to receive employee benefits on as favorable a basis as other similarly situated senior executives of the Company.
We may terminate Mr. Eccher’s employment with or without cause, and Mr. Eccher may terminate his employment with or without good reason. Mr. Eccher is also eligible for certain severance benefits upon a change in control. Further detail on our severance obligations to Mr. Eccher, including the definitions of “cause”, “good reason” and “change in control,” are set forth below under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Mr. Eccher’s employment agreement also contains provisions related to non-competition that generally preclude Mr. Eccher, for a period of 12 months following his termination without cause by the Company or for good reason by him, if he is terminated outside of the 24 month period following a change in control, from, among other things, engaging or investing in, managing, owning, operating, financing, controlling, participating in the ownership, management, operation or control of, being employed by, associated with, or in any manner connected with, serving as a director, officer or consultant to, any person or business entity that owns, operates or is in the process of forming a bank, savings bank, savings and loan association, credit union or similar financial institution, with an office within 25 miles from any banking or other office of the Company and its affiliates. In addition, during the term and 12 months following his termination for any reason, he cannot (a) induce or attempt to induce any employee of the Company or any of its affiliates to leave their employment, (b) interfere with the relationship between the Company or its affiliates and any employee of the Company or its affiliates; or (c) induce or attempt to induce any customer, supplier, licensee, or other business relation of the Company or its affiliates with whom he had an ongoing business relationship to cease doing business with the Company or its affiliates or interfere with, induce or attempt to induce any customer, supplier, licensee or other business relation of the Company or its affiliates with whom he had an ongoing business relationship to cease doing business with the Company or its affiliates.
Mr. Adams’ Offer Letter
On April 3, 2017, we entered into an offer letter with Mr. Adams, as amended on April 15, 2017 and April 19, 2017, to serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank effective May 2, 2017. Under the offer letter, Mr. Adams has an annual base salary of $300,000, which will be reviewed annually for merit increases by the board of directors. His current base salary is $341,754. In addition to his base salary, Mr. Adams is eligible to receive a performance-based annual incentive bonus of 50% of his base salary in accordance with the Company’s officer incentive plan, a monthly car allowance of $500, costs associated with maintaining a country club membership of up to $600 per month, and other benefits, including normal employee insurance benefits and 401(k) and profit sharing plans.
As provided in the offer letter, we also entered into a Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreement with Mr. Adams that provides him with certain severance benefits if he is terminated following a change in control. Further detail regarding our severance obligations to Mr. Adams, including the definition of “change in control,” are set forth below under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Mr. Collins’ Offer Letter
On August 1, 2016, we entered into a revised offer letter with Mr. Collins (which superseded and replaced his April 1, 2016 offer letter), to serve as Vice Chairman of the Company and the Bank effective October 2016. Under the offer letter, Mr. Collins has an annual base salary of $300,000, which will be reviewed annually for merit increases by the board of directors. His current base salary is $336,016. In addition to his base salary, Mr. Collins is eligible to receive a performance-based annual incentive bonus of 45% of his base salary. He is also eligible to participate in the Bank’s Deferred Compensation Plan and in other benefits plans, including normal employee insurance benefits and 401(k) and profit sharing plans. As provided in the offer letter, we also entered into a Compensation
35
and Benefits Assurance Agreement with Mr. Collins that provides him with certain severance benefits if he is terminated following a change in control. Further detail regarding our severance obligations to Mr. Collins, including the definition of “change in control,” are set forth below under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The board of directors believes that the interests of stockholders will be best served if the interests of executive management are aligned with the stockholders, and that providing change in control benefits should eliminate, or at least reduce, the reluctance of executive management to pursue potential change in control transactions that may be in the best interests of stockholders.
The employment agreement for Mr. Eccher provides for certain payments and benefits if we terminate Mr. Eccher’s employment without cause or if Mr. Eccher terminate his employment for good reason. Mr. Eccher is also eligible for certain severance benefits upon a change in control.
In addition, each of Mr. Adams, Mr. Collins, Mr. Pilmer and Mr. Gartelmann have entered into substantially similar Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreements with us that provide for payments and benefits if the executive is terminated following a change in control. On March 16, 2021, we entered into an amended Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreement with Mr. Gartelmann, which superseded and replaced his prior agreement dated June 17, 2014. The new agreement, among other things, removed the provision related to certain tax gross-up payments to Mr. Gartelmann, in the event any severance or other payments from the Company would constitute an excess parachute payment.
Employment Agreement with Mr. Eccher
The employment agreement provides for severance benefits in the event Mr. Eccher is terminated by the Company without cause or by the executive for good reason (each a “Termination”). For a Termination during the employment period that does not occur in connection with a “change in control” of the Company (as defined below), Mr. Eccher is entitled to receive 24 months of base salary continuation.
For purposes of his employment agreement, “cause” is generally defined to mean the occurrence of any one or more of the following events:
● | his demonstrably willful and deliberate act or his failure to act (other than as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness) which is committed in bad faith, without reasonable belief that such action or inaction is in the best interests of the Company, which causes actual material financial injury to the Company, or any of its affiliates, and which act or inaction is not remedied within 15 business days of written notice from the Company or the affiliate for which he works; |
● | his conviction for committing an act of fraud, embezzlement, theft, or any other act constituting a felony involving moral turpitude which causes material harm, financial or otherwise, to the Company or any of its affiliates; |
● | his death; or |
● | if he is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve months, or if he is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than three months under an accident or health plan covering employees of the Company. |
For purposes of his employment agreement, “good reason” is generally defined to mean the occurrence of any one or more of the following events, unless he agrees in writing that such event will not constitute “good reason”:
● | a material and adverse change in the nature, scope, or status of his position, authorities, or duties; |
● | a material reduction in his base salary or a material reduction in his aggregate benefits or other compensation plans; |
● | a relocation of his primary place of employment of more than 25 miles; |
● | the failure by an acquirer to assume his employment at the time of a change in control; or |
36
● | a material breach by the Company of his employment agreement. |
For a Termination that occurs within 24 months after a change in control of the Company, which we refer to herein as the “Covered Period,” Mr. Eccher is entitled to receive an amount equal to three times the sum of his current base salary plus an amount equal to his average bonus paid for the three calendar years preceding the year of Termination (including deferred amounts). Any severance paid in connection with a Termination during the Covered Period will be paid in a single lump sum. In addition, Mr. Eccher will be entitled to immediate and full vesting of any outstanding, unvested equity awards, continued health insurance for him and his dependents for up to 18 months following the Termination at a cost that is the same as paid by active employees, and one year of outplacement services at the Company’s expense.
For purposes of his employment agreement, “change in control” will generally be deemed to have occurred upon, the first to occur of any of the following events:
● | any person (as defined in the employment agreement) is or becomes the beneficial owner (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 33% or more of the total voting power represented by the Company’s then outstanding voting securities; or |
● | during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the board and any new director whose election by the board or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority thereof; or |
● | consummation of: (a) a merger or consolidation to which the Company is a party if the stockholders before such merger or consolidation do not, as a result of such merger or consolidation, own, directly or indirectly, more than 67% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the entity resulting from such merger or consolidation in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of the combined voting power of the Company’s voting securities outstanding immediately before such merger or consolidation; or (b) a complete liquidation or dissolution or an agreement for the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. |
All severance benefits under the employment agreement are contingent upon Mr. Eccher’s execution and non-revocation of a general release and waiver of claims against the Company.
Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreements with Mr. Adams, Mr. Collins, Mr. Pilmer and Mr. Gartelmann
Each of Mr. Adams, Mr. Collins, Mr. Pilmer and Mr. Gartelmann have entered into a Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreement with us. Each agreement has an initial term of one-year and, unless earlier terminated by either party, will automatically renew for successive one-year periods. In addition, on the effective date of a “change in control,” the agreement will automatically renew for a two-year period, which we refer to as the “extended period,” and thereafter will automatically terminate.
Each agreement provides that, in the case of: (a) a termination of employment by us without “cause” within six months prior to or 24 months immediately following, a change in control, or (b) a termination of employment by the executive for “good reason” within 24 months following a change in control, the executive officer will be entitled to:
● | a lump sum payment of accrued base salary, accrued vacation pay, unreimbursed business expenses and all other items earned by or owed to the executive through and including the date of termination. |
● | a lump sum severance payment equal to two times the sum of (i) the greater of the executive’s annual rate of base salary in effect upon the date of termination or the executive’s annual rate of base salary in effect immediately prior to the occurrence of the change in control and (ii) the average of the annual cash bonus paid to the executive (including any portion of such bonus, payment of which the executive elected to defer) for the three calendar years immediately preceding the year in which the termination occurs. |
● | immediate 100% vesting of all stock options and any other awards which have been provided to the executive by us under any of our incentive compensation plans. |
● | at the exact same cost to the executive, and at the same coverage level as in effect as of the executive’s termination, a continuation of the executive’s (and the executive’s eligible dependents) health insurance coverage for 24 months from the date of termination. If the executive (and/or his dependents, if any) becomes covered under the terms of any other health insurance |
37
coverage of a subsequent employer which does not contain any exclusion or limitation with respect to any pre-existing condition of the executive or the executive’s eligible dependents, coverage under our plans will cease for the executive (and/or his dependents, if any). |
● | at our expense, standard outplacement services for a period of up to one year from the date of executive’s termination, with a maximum amount to be paid by us for such outplacement services limited to $20,000. |
For purposes of each agreement, “cause” is generally defined to mean the occurrence of any one or more of the following events:
● | a demonstrably willful and deliberate act or failure to act by the executive (other than as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness) which is committed in bad faith, without reasonable belief that such action or inaction is in the best interests of the Company, which causes actual material financial injury to the Company, or any of its subsidiaries, and which act or inaction is not remedied within 15 business days of written notice from the Company or the subsidiary for which the executive works; or |
● | the executive’s conviction for committing an act of fraud, embezzlement, theft, or any other act constituting a felony involving moral turpitude which causes material harm, financial or otherwise, to the Company or any of its subsidiaries. |
For purposes of each agreement, “good reason” is generally defined to mean the occurrence of any one or more of the following events within the extended period:
● | a material reduction or alteration in the nature or status of his authorities, duties, or responsibilities from those in effect as of 90 days prior to the change in control; |
● | the requirement that the executive be based at a location in excess of 25 miles from his principal job location or office immediately prior to the change in control; |
● | a reduction in the executive’s current base salary and/or other benefits or perquisites; or |
● | the failure of the Company, or any of its subsidiaries, to keep in effect any of the compensation, health and welfare benefits, or perquisite programs under which the executive receives value, as such programs exist immediately prior to the change in control, or the failure of the Company or one of its subsidiaries, to meet the funding requirements, if any, of each of the programs. However, the replacement of an existing program with a new program will be permissible (and not grounds for a good reason termination) if done for all employees generally; or |
● | the Company, or any successor company commits a material breach of any provision of the agreement including, but not limited to the Company failing to obtain the assumption of, or the successor company refusing to assume the obligations of the agreement. |
For purposes of each agreement, the term “change in control” generally has the meaning ascribed to it in Mr. Eccher’s employment agreement as described above under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control — Employment Agreement with Mr. Eccher.”
In exchange for the payments and benefits provided, under each agreement, the executive officers have agreed to be bound by a certain restrictive covenant. The restrictive covenant will prohibit the executive officers from using, attempting to use, disclosing or otherwise making known to any person or entity (other than our board of directors) confidential or proprietary knowledge or information which the executive officers may acquire during their employment.
Equity Award Agreements
Retirement, Death and Disability. Generally speaking, a termination of employment due to retirement, death or disability does not entitle the named executive officers to any payments or benefits that are not available to other employees. Following a termination due to death or disability, each named executive officer (or his estate) shall be entitled to the following:
● | Upon a termination due to death or disability, all unvested stock options shall become immediately 100% vested and an employee or beneficiary shall have a period of twelve months following such termination during which to exercise his vested stock options. |
38
● | Any unvested restricted stock or TRSUs outstanding at the time of an employee’s termination due to death or disability shall become immediately 100% vested upon such termination. |
● | Upon a termination of employment due to retirement (as defined in the applicable award agreement), all unvested stock options and TRSUs shall become immediately 100% vested. |
● | With respect to unvested PRSUs, if the executive dies or is disabled, or if the executive provides one year written notice before his intended retirement (as defined in the Equity Plan), then the executive will be issued (a) with respect to PRSUs for which the performance period has already ended, such shares that have vested and the continuous employment requirement will be waived, and (b) with respect to PRSUs’ for which the performance period has not ended, the continuous employment requirement will be waived and a pro rata number of PRSUs will vest determined based on (i) the target (100%) level of PRSUs that can be issued multiplied by (ii) the quotient of (x) the number of full months that have elapsed between the first day of the performance period and the effective date of the executive’s termination and (y) the total number of full months in the respective performance period. |
Acceleration of Vesting Upon a Change in Control. With respect to unvested TRSUs and stock options awarded to our named executive officers, such awards will vest following a change in control if (i) the Equity Plan and the respective awards are not assumed by the surviving entity or (ii) the Equity Plan and the respective awards are assumed by the surviving entity but the executive is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason.
With respect to the PRSUs, the award agreement provides that, in the event of a change in control, if the awards are assumed by the surviving entity, then the PRSUs will be fixed at the target (100%) performance level and will vest as of the end of the performance period, provided that the executive does not incur a termination of service; and provided further that, if within two years of the change in control, the executive is terminated without cause by us or the executive terminates his employment for good reason, all unvested PRSUs will immediately vest at the target (100%) performance level and be settled within 30-days of termination. If the PRSU agreement is not assumed by the surviving entity, the fair market value of the target (100%) number of PRSUs will be determined as of the date of the change in control and such amount will be paid in cash at the end of the performance period; provided that, if within two years of the change in control, the executive is terminated without cause by us or the executive terminates his employment for good reason, then the cash value of the PRSUs will be paid within 30-days of termination.
39
Potential Post-Employment Payments Due to Mr. Eccher, Mr. Adams, Mr. Collins, Mr. Pilmer and Mr. Gartelmann
The table below sets forth the estimated amount of compensation payable to Mr. Eccher, Mr. Adams, Mr. Collins, Mr. Pilmer and Mr. Gartelmann in the event of (1) the executive’s involuntary termination (termination by the Company without cause or by the officer for good reason), (2) the executive’s involuntary termination following a change in control, and (3) the executive’s retirement, death or disability. The amounts shown assume termination was effective as of December 31, 2020, and that the per share price of our common stock as of termination was the closing price of $10.09 on December 31, 2020 (the last trading day of the year).
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
| Payments Upon |
| Payments Upon |
| | | ||
| | | | Involuntary | | Involuntary | | Payments Upon | |||
| | | | Termination(2) — | | Termination(2) — | | Retirement, | |||
| | | | No Change in | | Change in | | Death or | |||
Name | | Type of Payment(1) | | Control ($) | | Control ($) | | Disability ($) | |||
James Eccher |
| Cash Severance | | | 1,145,655 | (3) | | 2,043,785 | (4) | | - |
|
| Continuation of Insurance | |
| - | |
| 23,597 | (5) | | - |
|
| Acceleration of Stock Awards | |
| - | |
| 944,424 | | | 944,424 |
|
| Outplacement Services | |
| - | |
| 20,000 | | | - |
Bradley Adams |
| Cash Severance | |
| - | |
| 823,862 | (4) | | - |
|
| Continuation of Insurance | |
| - | |
| 31,462 | (5) | | - |
|
| Acceleration of Stock Awards | |
| - | |
| 476,379 | | | 476,379 |
|
| Outplacement Services | |
| - | |
| 20,000 | | | - |
Gary Collins |
| Cash Severance | |
| - | |
| 791,422 | (4) | | - |
|
| Continuation of Insurance | |
| - | |
| 26,819 | (5) | | - |
|
| Acceleration of Stock Awards | |
| - | |
| 461,920 | | | 461,920 |
|
| Outplacement Services | |
| - | |
| 20,000 | | | - |
Donald Pilmer |
| Cash Severance | |
| - | |
| 677,289 | (4) | | - |
|
| Continuation of Insurance | |
| - | |
| 31,462 | (5) | | - |
|
| Acceleration of Stock Awards | |
| - | |
| 230,446 | | | 230,446 |
|
| Outplacement Services | |
| - | |
| 20,000 | | | - |
Richard Gartelmann |
| Cash Severance | |
| - | |
| 466,069 | (4) | | - |
|
| Continuation of Insurance | |
| - | |
| 29,462 | (5) | | - |
|
| Acceleration of Stock Awards | |
| - | |
| 120,666 | | | 120,666 |
|
| Outplacement Services | |
| - | |
| 20,000 | | | - |
(1) | Payments due to all named executive officers in connection with a change in control are subject to reduction to the extent necessary to avoid an excess parachute payment under Code Section 280G. |
(2) | An “involuntary termination” is a termination by the employer without “cause” or a resignation by the executive for “good reason.” |
(3) | Represents 24 months of salary continuation. |
(4) | For Mr. Eccher, represents three times his current base salary plus his average bonus paid over the past three years. For each other executive, represents two times his base salary plus average bonus paid over the past three years. |
(5) | Represents the monthly premium paid by us for the continuation of health insurance for a period of 18 months with respect to Mr. Eccher and 24 months for each other executive. |
Pay Ratio
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and President, James Eccher.
For 2020, our last completed fiscal year:
● | the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than Mr. Eccher) was $75,171; and |
● | the total annual compensation of our Chief Executive Officer was $1,330,313. |
Based on this information, for 2020 the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Eccher, our Chief Executive Officer and President, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 18 to 1.
40
To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our Chief Executive Officer, we took the following steps:
1. | We determined that as of December 31, 2020, our employee population consisted of 550 individuals with all of these individuals located in the United States. This population included our full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees. However, it did not include independent contractors who were employed by and had their compensation determined by unaffiliated third parties. |
2. | To identify the “median employee” from our employee population, we compared the wages of our employees as reflected in our payroll records and reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 for 2020. In making this determination, we annualized the compensation of full-time and part-time permanent employees who were employed on December 31, 2020, but did not work for us the entire year. No full-time equivalent adjustments were made for part time employees. |
3. | We identified our median employee using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all of our employees included in the calculation. |
4. | Since all of our employees are located in the United States, as is our Chief Executive Officer, we did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying our “median employee.” |
5. | Once we identified our median employee, we combined all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2020 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $75,171. The difference between such employee’s wages and the employee’s total compensation represents the estimated value of such employee’s life insurance, health care benefits, and company 401(k) contribution (estimated for the employee and such employee’s eligible dependents at $15,174.) |
6. | With respect to the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement, adjusted as follows. To maintain consistency between the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and the median employee, we added the estimated value of our Chief Executive Officer’s health care benefits (estimated for our Chief Executive Officer and his eligible dependents at $15,731 to the amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table. This resulted in annual total compensation for purposes of determining the ratio in the amount of $1,346,044, which exceeds the amount reported for him in the Summary Compensation Table by $15,731. |
41
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
We do not pay our “inside” employee-directors any additional compensation for their service as directors. In 2020, we paid our non-employee directors the following quarterly cash fees, as follows:
● | $10,625 to our Chairman (Mr. Skoglund); |
● | $9,250 to our Audit Committee Chair (Mr. Tapscott) and Lead Independent Director (Mr. Finn); |
● | $8,750 to our Compensation Committee Chair (Mr. Ladowicz) and Risk Committee Chair (Mr. Kane); and |
● | $7,500 to all other directors, other than our two new directors appointed in October 2020. |
We also paid our directors $750 for every committee meeting attended, if there were no other company-level meetings held that day.
We also grant our directors annual equity awards in the form of restricted stock units. These awards cliff vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. The grant date of the 2020 equity awards was February 18, 2020, and these awards will vest on February 18, 2023.
The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our non-employee directors in 2020:
| | | | | | |
|
| Fees earned or |
| Stock |
| |
| | paid in cash(1) | | Awards(2)(3) | | Total |
Name | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) |
Edward Bonifas |
| 39,750 |
| 18,390 |
| 58,140 |
Barry Finn |
| 48,250 |
| 18,390 |
| 66,640 |
William Kane |
| 41,750 |
| 18,390 |
| 60,140 |
John Ladowicz |
| 46,250 |
| 18,390 |
| 64,640 |
Billy J. Lyons, Jr.(4) | | - | | 12,960 | | 12,960 |
Hugh McLean | | 46,250 | | 18,390 | | 64,640 |
William B. Skoglund |
| 48,500 |
| 18,390 |
| 66,890 |
Duane Suits |
| 43,250 |
| 18,390 |
| 61,640 |
James Tapscott |
| 45,500 |
| 18,390 |
| 63,890 |
Patti Temple Rocks |
| 36,000 |
| 18,390 |
| 54,390 |
Jill York(4) | | - | | 12,960 | | 12,960 |
(1) | We maintain the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. Amended and Restated Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (the “Director Deferred Compensation Plan”) under which directors are permitted to defer receipt of their directors’ fees. The directors who participate in the plan are permitted to make hypothetical investments in publicly-traded funds that are held in an insurance company separate account, with respect to the contributions credited to their plan accounts. We may, but are not required to, contribute the deferred fees into a trust, which may hold our stock. The plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan and the directors have no interest in the trust. The deferred fees and any earnings thereon are our unsecured obligations. Any shares held in the trust are treated as treasury shares and may not be voted on any matter presented to stockholders. We do not pay any above-market interest on the compensation or fees deferred by the directors. |
(2) | The amounts represent the grant date fair value for equity awards in accordance with ASC 718 — “Compensation-Stock Compensation.” A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the values may be found in Note 1 of our audited financial statements included in our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
(3) | Outstanding stock awards as of December 31, 2020, held by each director, other than Mr. Lyons and Ms. York, consisted of 9,500 unvested restricted stock units, which includes awards granted in 2018 through 2020. Mr. Lyons and Ms. York each hold 1,500 unvested restricted stock units as of December 31, 2020. |
(4) | Mr. Lyons and Ms. York were appointed to the board of directors in October 2020. |
42
PROPOSAL 2:
NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
Section 14A of the Exchange Act, as created by Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, require publicly traded companies, such as the Company, to conduct a separate stockholder advisory vote to approve the compensation of the registrant’s executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote. In accordance with these requirements, we are providing stockholders with an advisory vote on the compensation of our executive officers.
As described in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, the overall objectives of our compensation programs have been to align executive officer compensation with the success of meeting our strategic operating and financial goals. Stockholders are urged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, as well as the compensation tables and narrative disclosure that describe the compensation of our named executive officers in 2020. The Compensation Committee and the board of directors believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and achieving our goals, and that the compensation of our named executive officers in fiscal year 2020 reflects and supports these compensation policies and procedures.
In accordance with the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the following resolution is submitted for stockholder approval:
“RESOLVED, that our stockholders approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion contained in our proxy statement dated April 16, 2021.”
Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. Abstention will be counted as a vote present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal. A broker non-vote will not be considered entitled to vote on this proposal and will therefore have no effect on the outcome.
While this say-on-pay vote is required, as provided in Section 14A of the Exchange Act, it is not binding on the Compensation Committee or our board of directors and may not be construed as overruling any decision by the Compensation Committee or our board. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future compensation arrangements.
The board of directors recommends that you vote “FOR” this proposal.
43
PROPOSAL 3:
APPROVAL OF THE 2019 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the plan by 1,200,000 shares, from 600,000 shares to 1,800,000 shares
At the annual meeting, our stockholders will be asked to approve the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated (the “Restated Equity Incentive Plan”), which has been amended, subject to stockholder approval, to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the plan by 1,200,000 shares, from 600,000 shares to 1,800,000 shares. The Restated Equity Incentive Plan does not include any other amendments to the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2019 Equity Incentive Plan”), which was originally approved by our stockholders at our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.
If the Restated Equity Incentive Plan is not approved by our stockholders, it will not be adopted, the shares available for issuance under the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan will not be increased and we will continue to operate under our existing 2019 Equity Incentive Plan.
Rationale for the Request for Additional Shares
The board of directors believes that the Restated Equity Incentive Plan is in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company, because equity awards provide a key compensation component to our executive officers and key employees, which helps to attract, retain and motivate key personnel, align employee and stockholder interests and link employee compensation to company performance. In order to give us the flexibility to continue to provide long-term incentive awards as a key component of our overall compensation program, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the board that we request our stockholders approve an additional 1,200,000 shares for issuance under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan. In the event the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan is not approved and our existing plan expires, or ceases to have shares available to grant, we believe that higher cash compensation may be required to attract and retain key employees and other individuals. As of March 26, 2021, the record date for our annual meeting, the closing market price per share of our common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market was $13.69.
As part of the Compensation Committee’s recommendation to the board to approve the increase in the total number of shares authorized for issuance under the Restated Equity Plan, the Compensation Committee solicited the advice of McLagan Partners, Inc., its independent compensation consultant.
Historical Burn Rate
Basic burn rate, which is a measure of share utilization rate in equity compensation plans, is an important factor for investors concerned about stockholder dilution. Basic burn rate is defined as the gross number of equity-based awards granted during a calendar year divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year.
| | | | | | | | |
Equity Award Vehicle | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 3-Yr Avg. |
A. Full Value Awards (1) | | 254,281 | | 171,356 | | 219,964 | | 215,200 |
B. Stock Options Granted | | - | | - | | - | | - |
C. Total (A + B) | | 254,281 | | 171,356 | | 219,964 | | 215,200 |
| | | | | | | | |
D. Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding | | 29,728,308 | | 29,891,046 | | 29,623,333 | | 29,747,562 |
| | | | | | | | |
E. Basic Burn Rate (C/D) | | 0.86% | | 0.57% | | 0.74% | | 0.72% |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) | Our PRSUs have a payout range from 0% of target for below threshold performance, 75% of target for threshold performance, 100% of target for target performance, and 125% of target for maximum performance. PRSUs included in the table assume achievement at the target performance level. |
During the past three fiscal years, in addition to our historical equity award grant practices with respect to existing directors, officers and employees, the Compensation Committee granted restricted stock units in connection with attracting certain commercial lending teams to join our Company. Also, in 2018, the Compensation Committee granted a substantial number of performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) in order to provide new long-term incentives and payment for performance, which increased our 2018 equity grant levels. These PRSUs had a performance period that ended on December 31, 2020. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Compensation—Results of 2018 PRSU Awards.”
44
Our board of directors currently anticipates that, absent a strategic transaction, our burn rate will not exceed an average of 220,000 shares per year over the next three years, and so we currently believe that the additional 1,200,000 shares to be authorized for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan will be sufficient for approximately five years.
The performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2018 could have been earned from 0% to 125% of the number of units originally granted depending on satisfaction of the established performance conditions, and actually vested at 69% of target upon satisfaction of the service requirement at the end of the restricted period. Time-based-restricted stock units granted in 2018, 2019 and 2020 cliff vest three years after the grant date.
In 2018, 66.7% of the equity-based compensation awarded to our Chief Executive Officer were performance-based RSUs with a three year performance period, and 33.3% of his equity grants were time-based vesting RSUs with a three year cliff vesting period. In 2019 and 2020, all of the equity-based compensation awarded to our Chief Executive Officer were time-based vesting RSUs with a three year cliff vesting period. In 2021, we awarded additional performance-based restricted stock units to our Chief Executive Officer with a three year performance period ending on December 31, 2023.
Overhang
Basic and diluted overhang are a commonly used measures to assess the dilutive impact of equity programs such as the Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Basic and diluted overhang shows how much existing stockholder ownership would be diluted if all outstanding equity-based awards plus all remaining shares available for equity-based awards were introduced into the market. Basic overhang is equal to the number of equity-award shares currently outstanding plus the number of equity-award shares available to be granted and the number of shares available under the proposed plan, divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted overhang is equal to the number of equity-award shares currently outstanding plus the number of equity-award shares available to be granted plus the number of shares available under the proposed plan, divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding plus the number of equity-award shares available to be granted and the number of shares available under the proposed plan. The 1,800,000 shares subject to the Restated Equity Incentive Plan would bring our basic overhang from 2.6% to 6.7% and our diluted overhang from 2.5% to 6.3%. The table below provides updated overhang data as of March 26, 2021:
| |
Outstanding Equity Awards | # of Shares |
A. TRSUs | 474,991 |
B. PRSUs (1) | 41,818 |
C. Stock Options | - |
D. Total (A + B + C) | 516,809 |
| |
Shares Available for Grant | # of Shares |
E. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan | 225,020 |
F. Restated Equity Incentive Plan (if approved) | 1,200,000 |
G. Total (E + F) | 1,425,020 |
| |
H. Total Grant Outstanding + Shares Available for Grant (D + G) | 1,941,829 |
| |
I. Common Shares Outstanding as of Record Date (3/26/2021) | 29,018,637 |
| |
J. Basic Overhang (H / I) | 6.7% |
| |
K. Diluted Overhang (H / H + I) | 6.3% |
(1) | The PRSUs have a payout range from 0% of target for below threshold performance, 75% of target for threshold performance, 100% of target for target performance, and 125% of target for maximum performance. PRSUs included in the table assume achievement at the target performance level. |
45
Important Plan Features
A summary of the material provisions of the Restated Equity Incentive Plan is set forth below. A copy of the Restated Equity Incentive Plan is set forth as Appendix A to this proxy statement.
The Restated Equity Incentive Plan includes the following features that we consider to be best practices:
● | Multiple Award Types. The Restated Equity Incentive Plan permits the issuance of restricted stock units, options, restricted stock and other types of equity and cash incentive grants, subject to the share limits of the plan. This breadth of award types will enable the plan administrator to tailor awards in light of the accounting, tax and other standards applicable at the time of grant. Historically, these standards have changed over time. |
● | No Evergreen Feature. The number of authorized shares under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan will increase by 1,200,000 shares and be fixed at 1,800,000 shares. The number of shares approved for grant under our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan was 600,000. As of the record date, 225,020 shares remain available for grant under the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan. As of March 26, 2021, we had no awards subject to vesting or forfeiture or available for reuse under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. The Restated Equity Incentive Plan does not include an “evergreen” feature that would cause the number of authorized shares to automatically increase in future years. |
● | Repricings Prohibited. Repricing of options and SARs generally is prohibited without prior stockholder approval, with customary exceptions for stock dividends or splits, reorganizations, recapitalizations and similar events. |
● | Discount Stock Options and SARs Prohibited. All options and SARs must have an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair market value of our common stock on the date the option or SAR is granted. |
● | Conservative Change in Control Provisions. The Restated Equity Incentive Plan does not include a special change in control price payable to award holders. The change in control provisions under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan provide for acceleration of vesting in the event of a change in control only if the Restated Equity Incentive Plan does not become an obligation of the successor entity or the participant incurs a termination of service without cause or for good reason following the change in control. |
● | Clawback Policy Implementation. All cash and equity awards under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan will be subject to any applicable law respecting recapture of compensation or Company clawback policy in effect from time to time. |
● | Responsible Share Recycling. Any shares surrendered to pay the option or SAR exercise price or satisfy tax withholding related to such awards, or repurchased by the Company with option exercise proceeds, will not be added back (recycled) to the Restated Equity Incentive Plan. The Restated Equity Incentive Plan also provides that the gross number of stock appreciation rights exercised or settled, and not just the net shares issued upon exercise or settlement, will count against the aggregate limit on the number of shares that may be issued under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Shares surrendered or withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations with respect to restricted stock award and restricted stock unit awards (full value awards) will become available for delivery under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan. |
● | No Dividend Equivalents Distributed on Unvested Performance Awards. The Restated Equity Incentive Plan prohibits payment of dividends or dividend equivalents on stock options and stock appreciation rights, prohibits payment of dividends on any restricted stock subject to performance vesting unless and until those shares are earned and vested and prohibits dividend equivalents to be paid on restricted stock units unless and until those awards are earned and vested. |
● | Independent Oversight. The Restated Equity Incentive Plan will be administered by a committee of independent board members. |
● | Minimum Vesting Period of One Year. At least 95% of all equity-based awards granted under the plan must have a minimum vesting period of at least one year. |
Purpose
The Restated Equity Incentive Plan was established by our board of directors, subject to stockholder approval, to promote our long-term financial success, to attract, retain and reward persons who can contribute to our success, and to further align the participants’ interests with those of our stockholders. The Restated Equity Incentive Plan will be administered by a committee selected by the board,
46
currently our Compensation Committee, which will select award recipients from the eligible participants, determine the types of awards to be granted, the number of shares covered by the awards, and determine the applicable terms, conditions, performance criteria, restrictions and other provisions of such awards, including any vesting or accelerated vesting requirements or conditions applicable to an award or awards.
General
The Restated Equity Incentive Plan incorporates a broad variety of equity-based and cash-based incentive compensation elements to provide the Compensation Committee with significant flexibility to address the requirements and limitations of applicable legal, regulatory and financial accounting standards in a manner mutually consistent with the purposes of the Restated Equity Incentive Plan and our best interests.
The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be delivered to participants, or their beneficiaries, under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan is 1,800,000 (all of which may be granted as incentive stock options), with adjustments for certain corporate transactions and for forfeited shares. As of March 26, 2021, we had no awards subject to vesting or forfeiture or available for reuse under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan.
The Restated Equity Incentive Plan’s effective date would be the date of its approval by our stockholders. If approved, the Restated Equity Incentive Plan will continue in effect until terminated by the board. However, no awards may be granted under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan after the 10-year anniversary of the effective date of the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, or May 21, 2029. Any awards that are outstanding after such date will remain subject to the terms of the Restated Equity Incentive Plan.
The Compensation Committee may use shares available under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan as the form of payment for grants or rights earned or due under any of our (or a subsidiary’s) compensation plans or arrangements, including the plans and arrangements of our (or a subsidiary’s) assumed in business combinations.
In the event of a corporate transaction involving our stock (such as a stock dividend, stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination or exchange of shares), the foregoing share limitations and all outstanding awards will automatically be adjusted proportionally and uniformly to reflect such event. However, the Compensation Committee may adjust awards, or prevent the automatic adjustment of awards, to preserve the benefits or potential benefits of awards under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan.
Awards granted under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan generally will not be transferable except as designated by the participant by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order. However, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to permit the transfer of awards under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan to immediate family members of participants, trusts and other entities established for the primary benefit of such family members, as long as the transfers are made without value to the participant.
Eligibility
Our selected employees, directors, and eligible service providers are eligible to become participants in the Restated Equity Incentive Plan, except that non-employees may not be granted incentive stock options. The Compensation Committee will determine the specific individuals who will be granted awards under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan and the type and amount of any such awards. As of March 26, 2021, we had eleven non-employee directors, 33 employees (including five executive officers), and no service providers eligible to participate in the Restated Equity Incentive Plan. We have not traditionally granted equity awards to eligible service providers and we do not have any current intent to do so.
Options
The Compensation Committee may grant incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options to purchase stock at a specified exercise price. Each award must be pursuant to an award agreement setting forth the provisions of the individual award. Awards of options must expire no later than ten years from the date of grant (and no later than five years for incentive stock options granted to a person that beneficially owns 10% or more of our common stock).
The exercise price for any option may not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date the option is granted. In addition, the exercise price of an incentive stock option granted to a person that beneficially owns 10% or more of our common stock at the time of grant may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the stock on the date the option is granted. The exercise price of an option may, however, be higher or lower than the fair market value for an option granted in replacement of an existing award held by an employee or director of, or service provider to, a third party that we or one of our subsidiaries acquire. The
47
exercise price of an option may not be decreased after the date of grant nor may an option be surrendered to us as consideration for the grant of a replacement option with a lower exercise price, except as approved by our stockholders, as adjusted for corporate transactions described above, or in the case of options granted in replacement of existing awards granted under a predecessor plan.
Options awarded under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan will be exercisable in accordance with the terms established by the Compensation Committee. Any incentive stock option granted under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan that fails to continue to qualify as an incentive stock option will be deemed to be a nonqualified stock option and the Compensation Committee may unilaterally modify any incentive stock option to disqualify it as an incentive stock option. The full purchase price of each share of stock purchased upon the exercise of any option must be paid at the time of exercise of an option. As determined by the Compensation Committee, the exercise price of an option may be paid in cash, by personal, certified or cashiers’ check, in shares of our common stock (valued at fair market value as of the day of exercise), by net exercise, by other property deemed acceptable by the board or by irrevocably authorizing a third party to sell shares of our common stock and remit a sufficient portion of the proceeds to us to satisfy the exercise price (sometimes referred to as a “cashless exercise”) to the extent permitted by applicable laws and regulations, or in any combination of the foregoing methods deemed acceptable by the Compensation Committee. In a net exercise, the person exercising the option does not pay any cash and the net number of shares received is equal in value to the number of shares as to which the option is being exercised, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the fair market value less the exercise price, and the denominator of which is fair market value.
Stock Appreciation Rights
SARs entitle the participant to receive cash or stock equal in value to, or based on the value of, the amount by which the fair market value of a specified number of shares on the exercise date exceeds an exercise price established by the Compensation Committee. Except as described below, the exercise price for an SAR may not be less than the fair market value of the stock on the date the SAR is granted. However, the exercise price may be higher or lower than fair market value for an SAR granted in replacement of an existing award held by an employee, director or service provider of a third party that we or one of our subsidiaries acquires, or for SARs granted under a predecessor plan. SARs will be exercisable in accordance with the terms established by the Compensation Committee.
Stock Awards
A stock award is a grant of shares of our common stock or a right to receive shares of our common stock, an equivalent amount of cash or a combination thereof in the future. Awards may include stock units, bonus shares, performance shares, performance units, restricted stock or restricted stock units or any other equity-based award as determined by the Compensation Committee. Any specific performance measures, performance objectives or period of service requirements may be set by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.
Cash Incentive Awards
A cash incentive award is the grant of a right to receive a payment of cash, determined on an individual basis or as an allocation of an incentive pool (or our common stock having a value equivalent to the cash otherwise payable) that is contingent on the achievement of performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may grant cash incentive awards (including the right to receive payment of cash or our common stock having the value equivalent to the cash otherwise payable) that may be contingent on achievement of performance objectives over a specified period established by the Compensation Committee. The grant of cash incentive awards may also be subject to such other conditions, restrictions and contingencies, as determined by the Compensation Committee.
Forfeiture
Unless specifically provided to the contrary in the applicable award agreement, if a participant’s service is terminated for cause, any outstanding award held by the participant will be forfeited immediately and the participant will have no further rights under the award.
Further, except as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, if a participant breaches a non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disclosure, non-disparagement or other restrictive covenant in any agreement between us (or a subsidiary) and the participant, whether during or after the participant’s termination of service, the participant will, in addition to any other penalties or restrictions that may apply under such agreements, state law, or otherwise, forfeit or pay the following to us:
● | All outstanding awards granted to the participant under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan, including awards that have become vested or exercisable; |
48
● | Any shares held by the participant in connection with the Restated Equity Incentive Plan that were acquired after the participant’s termination of service and within the 12-month period immediately preceding the participant’s termination of service; |
● | The profit realized by the participant from the exercise of any stock options and SARs that the participant exercised after the participant’s termination of service and within the 12-month period immediately preceding the participant’s termination of service; and |
● | The profit realized by the participant from the sale or other disposition of any shares received by the participant in connection with the Restated Equity Incentive Plan after the participant’s termination of service and within the 12-month period immediately preceding the participant’s termination of service, where such sale or disposition occurs in such similar time period. |
Performance-Based Compensation
Any award under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan may be conditioned on the achievement of one or more performance measures. The performance measures that may be used for awards designated as intended to be “performance-based compensation” will be based on, among others, any one or more of the following performance measures as selected by the Compensation Committee: earnings (including earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; and earnings per share; all as may be defined by the Compensation Committee); financial return ratios (including return on investment; return on invested capital; return on equity; and return on assets; all as may be defined by the Compensation Committee); “Texas Ratio”; expense ratio; efficiency ratio; increase in revenue, operating or net cash flows; cash flow return on investment; total stockholder return; market share; net operating income, operating income or net income; debt load reduction; loan and lease losses; expense management; economic value added; stock price; book value; overhead; assets; asset quality level; charge offs; loan loss reserves; loans; deposits; nonperforming assets; growth of loans, deposits or assets; interest sensitivity gap levels; regulatory compliance; improvement of financial rating; achievement of balance sheet or income statement objectives; improvements in capital structure; profitability; profit margins; budget comparisons or strategic business objectives, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specific cost targets, business expansion goals and goals relating to acquisitions or divestitures. Performance measures may be based on our performance as a whole or of any one or more of our subsidiaries, business units or financial reporting segments, or any combination thereof, and may be measured relative to a peer group, an index or a business plan. The terms of any award may provide that partial achievement of performance criteria may result in partial payment or vesting of the award. Additionally, in establishing the performance measures, the Compensation Committee may provide for the inclusion or exclusion of certain items.
Limitations on Grants to Non-Employee Directors
The maximum number of shares subject to an award granted under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan or otherwise during any one calendar year to any non-employee director, taken together with any cash fees we paid to such non-employee director during such calendar year for service on our board of directors, shall not exceed $285,000 in total value, or, with respect to the calendar year in which a non-employee director is first appointed or elected to our board of directors, $370,000. These amounts shall be determined without regard to grants of awards or cash fees paid during any period in which such individual was our (or our subsidiary’s) employee or consultant.
Change In Control
Unless otherwise provided in an award agreement, upon the occurrence of a change in control, all stock options and SARs under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan then held by the participant will become fully exercisable immediately if, and all stock awards and cash incentive awards will become fully earned and vested immediately if, (i) the Restated Equity Incentive Plan is not an obligation of the successor entity following a change in control or (ii) the Restated Equity Incentive Plan is an obligation of the successor entity following a change in control and the participant incurs a termination of service without cause or for good reason following the change in control. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence, if the vesting of an award is conditioned upon the achievement of performance measures, then such vesting will be subject to the following: if, at the time of the change in control, the performance measures are less than 50% attained (pro rata based upon the time of the period through the change in control), the award will become vested and exercisable on a fractional basis with the numerator being equal to the percentage of attainment and the denominator being 50%; and if, at the time of the change in control, the performance measures are at least 50% attained (pro rata based upon the time of the period through the change in control), the award will become fully earned and vested immediately upon the change in control.
For purposes of the Restated Equity Incentive Plan, a “change in control” generally will be deemed to occur when (i) any person acquires the beneficial ownership of 33% or more of our combined voting power, except that the acquisition of an interest by a benefit plan we sponsor or a corporate restructuring in which another member of our controlled group acquires such an interest generally
49
will not be a change in control for purposes of the Restated Equity Incentive Plan, (ii) during any 12-month period, a majority of the board members serving as of the Restated Equity Incentive Plan’s effective date, or whose election was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors then in office, no longer serves as directors, (iii) we combine or merge with another company and, immediately after the combination, our stockholders immediately prior to the combination hold, directly or indirectly, 67% or less of the voting stock of the resulting company or (iv) the consummation of a complete liquidation or dissolution of, or an agreement for the disposition of all or substantially all of our assets.
In the event an award under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan constitutes “deferred compensation” for purposes of Code Section 409A, and the settlement or distribution of the award is triggered by a change in control, then such settlement or distribution will be subject to the event constituting the change in control also constituting a “change in control event” for purposes of Code Section 409A. In no event will we reimburse a recipient of an award under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan for any taxes imposed or other costs incurred as a result of Code Section 409A.
Amendment and Termination
Our board may at any time amend or terminate the Restated Equity Incentive Plan or any award agreement under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan, but any amendment or termination generally may not impair the rights of any participant or beneficiaries under any awards granted prior to the amendment or termination without participant’s written consent. Our board may not amend any provision of the Restated Equity Incentive Plan to materially increase the original number of shares that may be issued under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan (other than as provided in the Restated Equity Incentive Plan), materially increase the benefits accruing to a participant or materially modify the requirements for participation in the Restated Equity Incentive Plan without approval of our stockholders. However, our board may amend the Restated Equity Incentive Plan at any time, retroactively or otherwise, to ensure that the Restated Equity Incentive Plan complies with current or future law without stockholder approval, and our board may unilaterally amend the Restated Equity Incentive Plan and any outstanding award, without participant consent, in order to avoid the application of, or to comply with, Code Section 409A.
Clawback Policy
All awards, amounts and benefits received under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan will be subject to potential cancellation, recoupment, rescission, payback or other action in accordance with the terms of any applicable Company clawback policy or any applicable law even if adopted after the Restated Equity Incentive Plan becomes effective.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following is a summary of the current U.S. federal income tax consequences that may arise in conjunction with participation in the Restated Equity Incentive Plan.
Nonqualified Stock Options. The grant of a nonqualified stock option generally will not result in taxable income to the participant. Except as described below, the participant generally will realize ordinary income at the time of exercise in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired over the exercise price for those shares and we generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. Gains or losses realized by the participant upon disposition of such shares generally will be treated as capital gains and losses, with the basis in such shares equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise.
Incentive Stock Options. The grant of an incentive stock option generally will not result in taxable income to the participant. The exercise of an incentive stock option generally will not result in taxable income to the participant, provided that the participant was, without a break in service, our (or a subsidiary’s) employee during the period beginning on the date of the grant of the option and ending on the date three months prior to the date of exercise (one year prior to the date of exercise if the participant is disabled, as that term is defined in the Code).
The excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise of an incentive stock option over the exercise price generally will be an adjustment that is included in the calculation of the participant’s alternative minimum taxable income for the tax year in which the incentive stock option is exercised. For purposes of determining the participant’s alternative minimum tax liability for the year of disposition of the shares acquired pursuant to the incentive stock option exercise, the participant generally will have a basis in those shares equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise.
If the participant does not sell or otherwise dispose of the shares within two years from the date of the grant of the incentive stock option or within one year after the transfer of such stock to the participant, then, upon disposition of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the exercise price generally will be taxed to the participant as capital gain. A capital loss generally will be recognized to the extent that the amount realized is less than the exercise price.
50
If the foregoing holding period requirements are not met, the participant generally will realize ordinary income at the time of the disposition of the shares, in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price, or (ii) the excess, if any, of the amount realized upon disposition of the shares over the exercise price, and we generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. If the amount realized exceeds the value of the shares on the date of exercise, any additional amount generally will be capital gain. If the amount realized is less than the exercise price, the participant generally will recognize no income, and a capital loss will be recognized equal to the excess of the exercise price over the amount realized upon the disposition of the shares.
Stock Appreciation Rights. The grant of an SAR generally will not result in taxable income to the participant. Upon exercise of an SAR, the fair market value of shares received generally will be taxable to the participant as ordinary income and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. Gains and losses realized by the participant upon disposition of any such shares generally will be treated as capital gains and losses, with the basis in such shares equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise.
Stock Awards. A participant who has been granted a stock award generally will not realize taxable income at the time of grant, provided that the stock subject to the award is not delivered at the time of grant, or if the stock is delivered, it is subject to restrictions that constitute a “substantial risk of forfeiture” for U.S. income tax purposes. Upon the later of delivery or vesting of shares subject to an award, the holder generally will realize ordinary income in an amount equal to the then fair market value of those shares and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. Gains or losses realized by the participant upon disposition of such shares generally will be treated as capital gains and losses, with the basis in such shares equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of delivery or vesting. Dividends paid to the holder during the restriction period, if so provided, generally will also be compensation income to the participant and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.
Cash Incentive Awards. A participant who has been granted a cash incentive award generally will not realize taxable income at the time of grant, provided that no cash is actually paid at the time of grant. Upon the payment of any cash in satisfaction of the cash incentive award, the participant generally will realize ordinary income in an amount equal to the cash award received and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.
Withholding of Taxes. We may withhold amounts from participants to satisfy withholding tax requirements. If permitted by the Compensation Committee, participants may have shares withheld from awards or may tender previously own shares to us to satisfy tax withholding requirements. The shares withheld from awards may not be used to satisfy more than our maximum statutory withholding obligation.
Change in Control. Any acceleration of the vesting or payment of awards under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan in the event of our change in control may cause part or all of the consideration involved to be treated as an “excess parachute payment” under the Code, which may subject the participant to a 20% excise tax and preclude our corresponding tax deduction.
Tax Advice
The preceding discussion is based on U.S. federal tax laws and regulations presently in effect, which are subject to change, and the discussion does not purport to be a complete description of the U.S. federal income tax aspects of the Restated Equity Incentive Plan. A participant may also be subject to state and local taxes in connection with the grant of awards under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan. We strongly encourage participants to consult with their individual tax advisors to determine the applicability of the tax rules to the awards granted to them in their personal circumstances.
The number and types of awards to be made pursuant to the Restated Equity Incentive Plan is subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee and is not determinable at this time.
Under applicable law, the adoption of the Restated Equity Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of the majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal. In tabulating the votes on this proposal, broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. However, any other abstentions by shares present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting are effectively equivalent to votes against this proposal.
Estimate of Benefits
The Company currently is not able to estimate the number or terms of grants and awards that may be made under the Restated Equity Incentive Plan.
The table sets forth information for (i) all equity compensation plans previously approved by the Company’s stockholders and (ii) all equity compensation plans not previously approved by the Company’s stockholders. Equity compensation includes options,
51
warrants, rights and restricted stock units which may be granted from time to time. As of March 26, 2020, the below equity awards were outstanding:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Numbers of |
| | | | | | Securities |
| | Numbers of | | Weighted | | Remaining |
| | Securities to be | | average | | Available for |
| | Issued Upon | | exercise price | | Future Issuance |
| | the Exercise of | | of outstanding | | under Equity |
| | Outstanding | | options | | Plans (excluding |
| | Options, Warrants | | warrants and | | securities reflected |
Plan Category | | and Rights (a) | | rights (b) | | in column (a) |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | | 527,263 | | - | | 214,566 |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | - | | - | | - |
Total | | 527,263 | | - | | 214,566 |
(1) Column (a) consists of shares of our common stock issuable upon vesting of restricted stock units, including 474,991 TRSUs and 52,272 PRSUs issued under our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted stock units are settled for shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis. The PRSUs have a payout range from 0% of target for below threshold performance, 75% of target for threshold performance, 100% of target for target performance and 125% of target for maximum performance. PRSUs are reported in column (a) assuming achievement at the maximum performance level. Restricted stock units have no exercise price and, therefore, we have no weighted-average exercise price to report in column (b). Column (c) consists of shares reserved for future issuance under our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan.
Board Recommendation
The board of directors recommends stockholders vote to approve the Restated Equity Incentive Plan, as described in this proxy statement, by voting “FOR” this proposal. Proxies properly signed and returned will be voted “FOR” this proposal unless stockholders specify otherwise.
52
PROPOSAL 4:
RATIFICATION OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
General
Our stockholders are also being asked to adopt a resolution to ratify the appointment of Plante & Moran, PLLC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of Plante & Moran, PLLC at the annual meeting, the Audit Committee will consider selecting another firm of independent public accountants. Representatives from Plante & Moran, PLLC are expected to be present at the annual meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they so desire, as well as to respond to appropriate questions that may be asked by stockholders.
Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. Abstention will be counted as a vote present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal and will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal. The ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm is considered a routine matter. Therefore, no broker non-votes are expected with respect to this proposal.
The board of directors recommends that you vote “FOR” this proposal.
Accountant Fees
The table below aggregates fees for professional services rendered in or provided for 2020 and 2019, as applicable, by Plante & Moran, PLLC:
| | | | | | |
Type of Fees | | | 2020 | | | 2019 |
Audit Fees(1) | | $ | 356,366 | | $ | 388,234 |
Audit-Related Fees(2) | |
| 30,500 | |
| 30,976 |
Tax Fees(3) | |
| - | |
| 5,510 |
All Other Fees(4) | |
| 11,000 | |
| 14,645 |
Total Fees | | $ | 397,866 | | $ | 439,365 |
(1) | Audit Fees. Audit fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of our consolidated financial statements, including procedures required to comply with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, review of the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, annual report on Form 10-K, consent on Form S-8 in 2020, and consulting on financial accounting and reporting standards in 2020 and 2019. Audit fees are those billed or expected to be billed for audit services related to each fiscal year. |
(2) | Audit Related Fees. Audit-related fees cover other audit and attest services, services provided in connection with certain agreed-upon procedures and other attestation reports and the employee benefit plan audit. Fees for audit-related services are those billed or expected to be billed for services rendered during each fiscal year. |
(3) | Tax Fees. Tax fees cover tax compliance/preparation and other tax services billed or expected to be billed for services rendered during each fiscal year. |
(4) | All Other Fees. Consists of fees for all other services provided other than those reported above and are comprised of non-tax related advisory and consulting services and review of other regulatory filings. |
Pre-Approval Policy
The Audit Committee has a Pre-Approval Policy to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. All services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm are either within general pre-approved limits or specifically approved by the Audit Committee. The general pre-approval limits are detailed as to each particular service and are limited by a specific dollar amount for each type of service per project. The authority to grant pre-approvals may be delegated to one or more members of the Audit Committee. The Pre-Approval Policy requires the Audit Committee to be informed of the services provided under the pre-approval guidelines at the next regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting. All services provided by Plante & Moran, PLLC, and all fees related thereto, were approved pursuant to the pre-approval policy. The Pre-Approval Policy is available on our website at www.oldsecond.com.
53
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee assists the board in carrying out its oversight responsibilities for our financial reporting process, audit process and internal controls. The Audit Committee also reviews the audited financial statements and recommends to the board that they be included in our annual report on Form 10-K. The committee is comprised solely of directors who are independent under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, with our management and Plante & Moran, PLLC, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our financial statements for that period. The committee has discussed with Plante & Moran, PLLC the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and by SAS 114 (The Auditor’s Communication With Those Charged With Governance) and received and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from Plante & Moran, PLLC required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 (Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence). Based on the review and discussions with management and Plante & Moran, PLLC, the Audit committee has recommended to the board that the audited financial statements be included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, for filing with the SEC.
Submitted by:
Mr. James Tapscott (Chairman)
Mr. Barry Finn
Mr. John Ladowicz
Mr. Hugh McLean
Mr. Duane Suits
Ms. Jill York
Members of the Audit Committee
54
HOUSEHOLDING
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports, or Notices Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, if applicable, with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement and annual report, or Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, if applicable, addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies. In accordance with these rules, only one proxy statement and annual report, or Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, if applicable, may be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the proxy statement and annual report at their address and would like to request “householding” of their communications should contact their broker if they are beneficial owners or direct their request to our Stockholder Relations Manager at the contact information below if they are registered holders.
If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement and annual report, or Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, if applicable, please notify your broker, if you are a beneficial owner or, if you are a registered holder, direct your written request to our Stockholder Relations Manager at the contact information below.
If requested, we will also promptly deliver, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of the proxy statement and annual report to any stockholder residing at an address to which only one copy was mailed. Please address such requests to our Stockholder Relations Manager at the contact information below.
Stockholder Relations Manager, Shirley Cantrell
Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
37 S. River St.
Aurora, Illinois 60507
Telephone: 630-906-2303
55
GENERAL
We will bear the cost of this proxy solicitation. Solicitation will be made primarily through the use of the mail, but our officers, directors or employees may solicit proxies personally, by telephone or through any other mode of communication, without additional remuneration to our officers, directors or employees for such activity. In addition, we will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees or fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owner of such shares.
As of the date of this proxy statement, we do not know of any other matters to be brought before the annual meeting. However, if any other matters should properly come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote thereon in accordance with their best judgment.
| |
| By order of the board of directors |
| |
| James L. Eccher |
Aurora, Illinois April 16, 2021 | |
56
Appendix A
OLD SECOND BANCORP, INC.
2019 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Effective as of May 21, 2019
As Amended and Restated through May 18, 2021
INTRODUCTION
AWARDS
SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN
Following the Effective Date, any Shares that are covered under an outstanding Prior Plan award that otherwise would become available for reuse under the terms of the Prior Plan due to forfeiture, termination, expiration or lapse without being exercised (to the extent applicable) (or, solely with respect to any Prior Plan award that is not exercisable for or convertible into Shares, if such Prior Plan award is settled for cash without the delivery of Shares), or as a result of tax withholding obligations with respect to restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit awards (“full value” awards) being satisfied by delivering Shares (either actually or through attestation) or withholding Shares relating to such full value awards, shall instead become available for delivery under the Plan. Provided, for the avoidance of doubt, that if the exercise price of any stock option or SAR, or if the tax withholding obligations relating to any award (other than restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit awards), outstanding under a Prior Plan award are satisfied by delivering Shares (either actually or through attestation) or withholding Shares relating to such award, the gross number of Shares subject to the award shall nonetheless be deemed to have been delivered and shall not become available for delivery under the Plan, and that the gross number of SARs that are outstanding under a Prior Plan award that are exercised or settled, and not just the net Shares issued upon exercise or settlement, shall be deemed to have been delivered and shall not become available for delivery under the Plan.
CHANGE IN CONTROL
A-6
COMMITTEE
A-7
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
GENERAL TERMS
Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
37 South River Street
Aurora, Illinois 60507
Such communications shall be deemed given:
provided, however, that in no event shall any communication be deemed to be given later than the date it is actually received, provided it is actually received. In the event a communication is not received, it shall be deemed received only upon the showing of an original of the applicable receipt, registration or confirmation from the applicable delivery Service Provider. Communications that are to be delivered by U.S. mail or by overnight service to the Company shall be directed to the attention of the Company’s senior human resources officer and corporate secretary.
A-10
DEFINED TERMS; CONSTRUCTION
Further, the Participant shall be deemed to have terminated for Cause if, after the Participant’s Termination of Service, facts and circumstances arising during the course of the Participant’s employment with the Company are discovered that would have constituted a termination for Cause.
Further, all rights a Participant has or may have under the Plan shall be suspended automatically during the pendency of any investigation by the Board or its designee or during any negotiations between the Board or its designee and the Participant regarding any actual or alleged act or omission by the Participant of the type described in the applicable definition of “Cause.”
Notwithstanding any provision of this definition to the contrary, prior to the Participant’s Termination of Service for Good Reason, the Participant must give the Company written notice of the existence of any condition set forth in clause (i) - (iii) immediately above within 90 days of its initial existence and the Company shall have 30 days from the date of such notice in which to cure the condition giving rise to Good Reason, if curable. If, during such 30-day period, the Company cures the condition giving rise to Good Reason, the condition shall not constitute Good Reason. Further notwithstanding any provision of this definition to the contrary, in order to constitute a termination for Good Reason, such termination must occur within 12 months of the initial existence of the applicable condition.
A-14
VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 17, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. OLD SECOND BANCORP, INC. ATTN: SHIRLEY CANTRELL 37 SOUTH RIVER STREET AURORA, IL 60507-4172 During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/OSBC2021 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D48683-P55697 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. OLD SECOND BANCORP, INC. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each director nominee in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4. 1. Proposal to elect four Class II director nominees to serve for a term expiring in 2024: Nominees: For Against Abstain For Against Abstain ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1a. James Eccher 3. Proposal to approve the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the plan by 1,200,000 shares, from 600,000 shares to 1,800,000 shares. 1b. Barry Finn 1c. Hugh McLean For Against Abstain ! ! ! 1d. James F. Tapscott 4. Proposal to ratify the appointment of Plante & Moran, PLLC as the Company's independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. For Against Abstain ! ! ! 2. Proposal to approve on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as described in the Company's Proxy Statement. NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice, Proxy Statement, this form of Proxy and our 2020 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. D48684-P55697 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF OLD SECOND BANCORP, INC. TO BE HELD ON MAY 18, 2021 This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints Gary Collins and Bradley Adams, or either of them, with full power to act alone, the true and lawful proxies of the undersigned, each with full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote all of the shares of common stock of Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), that the undersigned is entitled to vote, as fully as the undersigned could do if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, a virtual meeting conducted via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/OSBC2021 on Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder. If no direction is made and the proxy is signed and returned, this proxy will be voted "FOR" each director nominee listed in Proposal 1, "FOR" Proposals 2, 3, and 4, and the named proxies will vote on any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments of it in accordance with their discretion. The undersigned acknowledged receipt of the Notice and Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Continued and to be signed on reverse side |