U.S. Bancorp (USB) 10-K 2006 FY Annual report

2006annual report and form 10-kp o s i t i v e r e s u l t sstrategic acquisitions return to shareholdersfinancial performanceenhanced customer data protectiontop banking teamagency ratingscredit quality expanded distributioninvestments in our business european payments expansion new products

Positive results

Come in various forms—sustainable earnings, geographic expansion, technological advances, customer service, competitive advantages, shareholder return, innovative products and dedicated employees. we delivered positive results on many fronts in 2006.

CORPORATE PROFILE

U.S. Bancorp, with total assets of $219 billion at year-end 2006, is a diversified financial holding company serving more than 14.2 million customers. U.S. Bancorp is the parent company of U.S. Bank, the sixth largest commercial bank in the U.S. U.S. Bank operates 2,472 banking offices in 24 states, primarily in the lower and upper Midwest and throughout the Southwest and Northwest, and conducts financial business in all 50 states.

Our company’s diverse business mix of products and services is provided through four major lines of business: Wholesale Banking, Payment Services, Wealth Management and Consumer Banking. Detailed information about these businesses can be found throughout this report. U.S. Bancorp is headquartered in Minneapolis, MN. U.S. Bancorp employs approximately 50,000 people.

Visit U.S. Bancorp online at usbank.com

CONTENTS

page 2	corporate overview
page 4	selected financial highlights
page 5	financial summary
page 6	letter to shareholders
page 8	positive results

FINANCIALS

page 18	management’s discussion and analysis
page 61	reports of management and independent accountants
page 64	consolidated financial statements
page 68	notes to consolidated financial statements
page 103	five-year consolidated financial statements
page 105	quarterly consolidated financial data
page 108	supplemental financial data
page 109	annual report on form 10-k
page 120	CEO and CFO certifications
page 123	executive officers
page 125	directors
inside back cover	corporate information

“Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.This report contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. These statements often include the words “may,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements cover, among other things, anticipated future revenue and expenses and the future plans and prospects of U.S. Bancorp. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including changes in general business and economic conditions, changes in interest rates, legal and regulatory developments, increased competition from both banks and non-banks, changes in customer behavior and preferences, effects of mergers and acquisitions and related integration, and effects of critical accounting policies and judgments. These and other risks that may cause actual results to differ from expectations are described throughout this report, which you should read carefully, including the sections entitled “Corporate Risk Profile” beginning on page 32 and “Risk Factors” beginning on page 111. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and U.S. Bancorp undertakes no obligation to update them in light of new information or future events.

corporate overview

u.s. bancorp is positioned for the current economic environment, as well as future challenges and opportunities. we are leaders in the industry in key financial measurements, and we continue to invest in high-value businesses and to implement strategies that enhance cross-selling, increase customer loyalty, streamline product development and expand distribution.

T H E B U S I N E S S E S A N DCANADAS C O P E O F U. S. B A N C O R P S P E C I A L I Z E D S E R V I C E S / O F F I C E S Commercial Banking Consumer Banking Corporate Banking Commercial Real Estate Payment Services Wealth Management Technology and Operations ServicesPayment Processing Nationally and in EuropeM E T R O P O L I TA N A N D C O M M U N I T Y B A N K I N GUNITED STATES2,472 banking offices in 24 statesNORWAY24 — H O U R B A N K I N GSWEDENATMs: 4,841DENMARKInternet: usbank.comIRELANDUNITEDTelephone: 800-USBANKSKINGDOM NETHERLANDSBELGIUMPOLANDGERMANYAUSTRIA FRANCEITALY SPAIN2U.S. BANCORP

U.S . BANCORP AT A GLANCE

	U.S. Bank is
	6th largest U.S.
Ranking	commercial bank
Asset size	$219 billion
Deposits	$125 billion
Loans	$144 billion
Earnings per share(diluted)	$2.61
Return on average assets	2.23%
Return on average common equity	23.6%
Efficiency ratio	45.4%
Tangible efficiency ratio	42.8%
Customers	14.2 million
Primary banking region	24 states
Bank branches	2,472
ATMs	4,841
NYSE symbol	USB

At year-end 2006

REVENUE MIX BY BUSINESS LINE

WHOLESALE BANKING

U.S. Bancorp provides expertise, resources, prompt decision-making and commitment to partnerships that make us a leader in Corporate, Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Banking. From real-time cash flow management to working capital financing to equipment leasing and more, our complete set of traditional and online services is seamlessly integrated with the needs of our customers.

PAYMENT SERVICES

U.S. Bancorp is a world leader in payment services. Our Multi Service Aviation and Voyager fleet fuel and maintenance programs set the standard in the industry. PowerTrack^®provides an enterprise payment solution for both public and private sectors. Our subsidiary NOVA Information Systems, Inc. is among the top payment processors in the world and growing, and we are among the largest ATM processors and credit, debit and gift card issuers in the industry.

WEALTH MANAGEMENT

U.S. Bancorp provides personalized, professional guidance to help individuals, businesses and municipalities build, manage, preserve and protect wealth through financial planning, private banking and personal trust, corporate and institutional trust and custody services, insurance and investment management. From retirement plans and health savings accounts to escrows and estate planning, our clients receive quality products and exceptional service.

CONSUMER BANKING

Convenience, customer service, accessibility and a comprehensive set of quality products make U.S. Bank the first choice of nearly 13 million consumers across our primary 24-state footprint. From basic checking and savings to flexible credit and loan options to mortgage, insurance and investment products, we streamline personal and small business banking to make banking straightforward and trouble-free.

INDUSTRY LEADING PERFORMANCE METRICS
Full year 2006

	USB	Peer Median	USB Rank
Return on Average Assets	2.23%	1.38%	1
Return on Average Common Equity	23.6%	15.1%	1
Efficiency Ratio	45.4%	58.6%	1
Tangible Efficiency Ratio	42.8%	57.3%	1

Peer Banks: BAC, BBT, CMA, FITB, KEY, NCC, PNC (excludes BlackRock/MLIM transaction), RF, STI, USB, WB, WFC and WM

Efficiency ratio is computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses), net.

Tangible efficiency ratio is computed as the efficiency ratio excluding intangible amortization expense.

DBRS =	A A
Fitch =	A A-
Moody’s =	A a2
S& P =	A A

SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS

The senior unsecured debt ratings established for U.S. Bancorp by Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s, Fitch, and Dominion Bond Rating Service reflect the rating agencies’ recognition of the strong, consistent financial performance of the company and the quality of the balance sheet.

REPUTATION AND PERFORMANCE

U.S. Bancorp is the top performing large bank in the country, according toBank Directormagazine’s 2006 Bank Performance Scorecard. The large-bank ranking included 25 banks and thrifts with total assets of $50 billion or more and was based on publicly available data over four linked quarters — Q3 and Q4 2005 and Q1 and Q2 2006.

U.S. BANCORP3

selectedfinancialhighlightsDILUTEDEARNINGSDIVIDENDSD CLAREDNETINCOMEPERCOMMONSHAREPERCOMMONSHARE(DollarsinMillions)(InDollars)(InDollars)5,0003.001.40 3904,75161.22304,48942.14,167.218.2020.3,73393.11855.2,5003,1681.5065..701780.000020304050602030405060203040506RETURNONRETURNONAVERAGEAVERAGEASETSCOMMONEQUITY DIVIDENDPAYOUTRATIO(InPercents)(InPercents)(InPercents)2.424606.23..52321.22224.17.21.72.2522.3.5099.3.19472.14684.1811.441.21230000020304050602030405060203040506NETINTERESTMARGIN(TAXABLE-EQUIVALENTBASIS) EFFICIENCYRATIO(a)TIER1CAPITAL(InPercents)(InPercents)(InPercents)5.0050108.4865.6.3..41453.45.9445.849.44.642.882 5.840.97.8365.32.50255000020304050602030405060203040506AVERAGESHAREHOLDERS’TOTALRISK-BASEDAVERAGEASSETSEQUITYCAPITAL (DollarsinMillions)(DollarsinMillions)(InPercents)220,00025,000156.131.4135..6187,630191,593203,198213,51219,95320,710.121212171,94817,27319,39319,459 110,00012,5007.5000020304050602030405060203040506

(a) Computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses), net.

4U.S. BANCORP

financial summary

Year Ended December 31										2006			2005
(Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data)	2006			2005			2004			v 2005			v 2004
Total net revenue (taxable-equivalent basis)	$	13,636		$	13,133		$	12,659			3.8	%		3.7	%
Noninterest expense		6,180			5,863			5,785			5.4			1.3
Provision for credit losses		544			666			669
Income taxes and taxable-equivalent adjustments		2,161			2,115			2,038
Net Income	$	4,751		$	4,489		$	4,167			5.8			7.7
Net Income applicable to common equity	$	4,703		$	4,489		$	4,167			4.8			7.7
PER COMMON SHARE
Earnings per share	$	2.64		$	2.45		$	2.21			7.8			10.9
Diluted earnings per share		2.61			2.42			2.18			7.9			11.0
Dividends declared per share		1.39			1.23			1.02			13.0			20.6
Book value per share		11.44			11.07			10.52			3.3			5.2
Market value per share		36.19			29.89			31.32			21.1			(4.6	)
Average common shares outstanding		1,778			1,831			1,887			(2.9	)		(3.0	)
Average diluted common shares outstanding		1,804			1,857			1,913			(2.9	)		(2.9	)
FINANCIAL RATIOS
Return on average assets		2.23	%		2.21	%		2.17	%
Return on average common equity		23.6			22.5			21.4
Net interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis)		3.65			3.97			4.25
Efficiency ratio (a)		45.4			44.3			45.3
AVERAGE BALANCES
Loans	$	140,601		$	131,610		$	120,670			6.8	%		9.1	%
Investment securities		39,961			42,103			43,009			(5.1	)		(2.1	)
Earning assets		186,231			178,425			168,123			4.4			6.1
Assets		213,512			203,198			191,593			5.1			6.1
Deposits		120,589			121,001			116,222			(.3	)		4.1
Total shareholders’ equity		20,710			19,953			19,459			3.8			2.5
PERIOD END BALANCES
Loans	$	143,597		$	136,462		$	124,941			5.2	%		9.2	%
Allowance for credit losses		2,256			2,251			2,269			.2			(.8	)
Investment securities		40,117			39,768			41,481			.9			(4.1	)
Assets		219,232			209,465			195,104			4.7			7.4
Deposits		124,882			124,709			120,741			.1			3.3
Shareholders’ equity		21,197			20,086			19,539			5.5			2.8
Regulatory capital ratios
Tier 1 capital		8.8	%		8.2	%		8.6	%
Total risk-based capital		12.6			12.5			13.1
Leverage		8.2			7.6			7.9
Tangible common equity		5.5			5.9			6.4

(a) Computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses), net.

U.S. BANCORP5

letter to shareholders

the year 2006 was a year of challenge, change and achievement for u.s. bancorp, and one of positive results.

FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS:

Achieving record net income

U.S. Bancorp reported record net income for 2006. Net income increased to $4.8 billion, or $2.61 per diluted common share, compared with $4.5 billion, or $2.42 per diluted common share in 2005. Once again, we achieved industry-leading profitability metrics with a return on average assets of 2.23 percent and return on average common equity of 23.6 percent.

We are pleased with the financial results, particularly given the challenging economic environment that our company, and the banking industry as a whole, have faced during this past year. Although the growth in diluted earnings per common share for 2006 of 7.9 percent was lower than it has been in the past few years, we believe the emphasis we have placed on growing our fee-based businesses, stabilizing net interest margin, maintaining high credit quality and our disciplined expense control significantly lessened the impact of a disadvantageous yield curve, heightened competition and excess liquidity that the market offered.

During 2006, U.S. Bancorp continued generating increased earnings from non-interest income, reducing vulnerability to rate fluctuations, and we continued taking risk out of the portfolio. In addition, we affirmed U.S. Bank as a leader in corporate trust, with strategic acquisitions of a number of corporate and institutional trust businesses.

Over the past year, we have become even more convinced that our strategy of investing in high-value, high-return fee-based businesses is the right one. The revenue stream and the competitive advantage have been particularly beneficial as the industry has wrestled with the flattened yield curve. To that end, we acquired additional card portfolios and expanded our merchant acquiring and processing business in Western Europe and Canada.

Preparing U.S. Bancorp for future growth

We are excited about the transitioning to a new CEO, and elsewhere on these pages you will see information regarding U.S. Bancorp succession planning. We have worked closely together since 1993 in building the new U.S. Bancorp, and we intend to continue on the successful path which has led us to achieving the positive results you’ll read about in this report.

The long-term goals of our company have not changed. Tactics may change as circumstances do, but the underlying goals and guiding principles remain. Chief among these is our steadfast commitment to our shareholders. That includes producing a minimum return on average common equity of 20 percent, targeting an 80 percent return of earnings to shareholders and growing earnings per share by ten percent over the long term.

We are also committed to developing skilled leadership for the future, investing for growth in our businesses, staying ahead of the ever-advancing technological curve and continuing to expand our reach. These goals, combined with disciplined financial management and the flexibility and readiness to seize an opportunity, give us a true sense of confidence in the bright future of this company.

We want to thank our 50,000 employees who delivered on our promises to customers and whose performance made possible our positive results. We are particularly proud thatU.S. Bankermagazine has ranked U.S. Bancorp number one in the nation for its team of women in executive positions at the company. The “Top Banking Team” award was announced in the October 2006 issue of the magazine.

6U.S. BANCORP

T OTA L S H A R E H O L D E R R E T U R N(A $100 investment in U.S. Bancorp in 1996 was worth $487 at year-end 2006)$500$487U.S. Bancorp400$276300S&P Commercial Bank Index$224200S&P 500 Index1009697 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 0506

RETURNING 80% OF EARNINGS TO SHAREHOLDERS(Earnings)59100%63 80 40 5053504620ReturntoShareholdersShareRepurchase RetentionDividend Payout 00604 0506

New board member

In October 2006, we were pleased to welcome Olivia F. Kirtley to the board of directors. Ms. Kirtley serves on the company’s governance and audit committees. Her extensive experience in those areas makes her a valuable addition to our board. Ms. Kirtley, a Certified Public Accountant, is a business consultant on strategic and corporate governance issues and previously served as vice president of finance and chief financial officer of Vermont American Corporation, a global manufacturer. Prior to joining Vermont American, she was with the accounting firm of Ernst & Young.

Managing U.S. Bancorp to create
shareholder value

During the fourth quarter of 2006 we announced a 21 percent increase in the dividend rate on U.S. Bancorp common stock. This increased dividend payout allows our superior, industry-leading profitability to be transferred to our shareholders, while allowing us the financial flexibility we need to support balance sheet growth, capital expenditures and small cash acquisitions.

The dividend action continues 35 consecutive years of increasing our dividend. Since 1993, our dividend has shown a compound annual growth rate of 20.8 percent, ranking number one among our peer banking companies. U.S. Bancorp has paid a dividend for 144 consecutive years.

We value and appreciate your investment in U.S. Bancorp. From the hiring and development of talented, dedicated employees to providing outstanding customer service to our strategic direction and our everyday management, we work to increase the value of your investment in this company. It’s the reason we come to work each day.

Sincerely,

Richard K. Davis
President and Chief Executive Officer
U.S. Bancorp

Jerry A. Grundhofer
Chairman of the Board
U.S. Bancorp
February 26, 2007

Richard Davis succeeds Jerry
Grundhofer as CEO, December 12, 2006.

In accordance with an established succession plan, and a move designed to sustain our company’s growth and profitability, on December 12, 2006, Richard K. Davis succeeded Jerry A. Grundhofer as CEO of U.S. Bancorp. Richard will retain his title of president in addition to his new title of chief executive officer. Jerry will remain with U.S. Bancorp as chairman of the board until December 31, 2007. Richard had been president and chief operating officer of U.S. Bancorp since October 2004, and Jerry had been chief executive officer since 1993.

U.S. BANCORP7

wholesale banking

continued demand for corporate and commercial loans in 2006, stabilized net interest margin and exceptional leveraging of cross - sell opportunities position us well .

We believe that key indicators in the commercial sector are positive; however, challenges of competitive credit and deposit pricing continued. The credit profile of our company remains excellent as we maintain our disciplined underwriting standards and focus on quality loans. Loans in the Wholesale Banking business line grew five percent in 2006. Although we may experience some increase in charge-offs in coming quarters, they should remain manageable. If interest rates hold steady, we would expect to see continued loan growth and profitability.

During the year, we took a number of actions to further strengthen our commercial and corporate banking industry position. We added new expertise at the senior levels in Corporate Banking and Commercial Real Estate and in our food and agribusiness specialized lending division. We opened new Commercial Real Estate offices in Atlanta, Boston, Houston and Philadelphia, bringing our number of CRE offices to 31 across the country, and opened a new foreign exchange office in Los Angeles, joining those already in Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Portland, St. Louis and Seattle. We launched a number of new products and expanded several existing services to provide customer efficiency, fraud protection, treasury management, and market entry into electronic records management.

KEY BUSINESS UNITS

Middle Market Commercial Banking
Commercial Real Estate
National Corporate Banking
Correspondent Banking
Dealer Commercial Services
Community Banking
Equipment Finance
Foreign Exchange
Government Banking
International Banking
Treasury Management
Small Business Equipment Finance
Small Business Administration
(SBA) Division
Title Industry Banking

8U.S. BANCORP

FULL FINANCIAL PARTNERSHIPS

Extending credit is a critical component of Wholesale Banking, but not the only one. Our financial partnership with our business customers extends beyond lending to deposit and payment solutions, employee services, asset management, and trust services, just to name a few. But our most important contribution to our customers’ businesses is our expertise - in traditional, as well as very specialized services.

Among those specialized areas is Government Banking. U.S. Bank has provided financial services to federal, state, city, county, special districts and authorities for more than a century and currently has more than 5,000 government relationships across the country.

Other areas of specialized expertise include energy industries, food and agribusiness, healthcare, not-for-profit companies, broker dealer businesses and international trade finance. Whatever the market, the industry, the size or financial goals of business, U.S. Bank makes it our business to generate mutually positive results.

• December 2006
U.S. Bank launches Image Cash Letter allowing financial institutions to electronically clear their cash letters.

• Throughout 2006
U.S. Bank opens commercial real estate offices in Atlanta, Boston, Houston and Philadelphia.

• July 2006
U.S. Bank Equipment Finance expands specialty services to `the material handling and construction industries, launching their Distribution Finance Group.

• June 2006
U.S. Bank expands Positive Pay fraud protection service giving check writers payee name verification, which detects altered payee names on deposited items and at the teller line.

• January 2006
U.S. Bank opens Los Angeles Foreign Exchange office providing competitive prices, expertise and customized foreign exchange hedging solutions.

U.S. BANCORP9

payment services

this growing business is a strong driver of non - interest income and plays a crucial part in our plans for the future. our expertise, strategic expansion and superlative processing capabilities are commanding competitive advantages.

Our Payment Services line of business is a primary contributor to our growing percentage of fee-based income and contributes nearly a quarter of our total revenue. In a challenging rate environment such as we have seen in 2006, our fee-based revenue is a bold illustration of the benefits of a diversified business mix. U.S. Bancorp has the skill, scale and infrastructure to make the most of its payment and processing services.

We have invested heavily in the technology to support our delivery systems and our expansion of Payment Services. Payment Services is supported through a rich portfolio of products and processing solutions; retail payment solutions for debit, credit and gift cards; ATM processing and servicing; and specialized programs for financial institutions, the U.S. government, and hospitality and healthcare providers.

Payment Services is a business based on economies of scale, and we have been an active acquirer in this area, making 30 strategic payments business acquisitions since the year 2000. Each has been a purposeful expansion of distribution or product enhancement, and each added to scale and efficiency, solidifying our leadership position in the industry. NOVA Information Systems, Inc., a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp, is the nation’s third-largest payments processor. U.S. Bank is the processor for over 10 percent of all ATMs in the United States.

KEY BUSINESS UNITS

Corporate Payment Systems
Merchant Payment Services
NOVA Information Systems, Inc.
Retail Payment Solutions: Debit, Credit,
Specialty Cards and Gift Cards
Transactions Services:
ATM and Debit Processing and Services

10U.S. BANCORP

PAYMENT SERVICES DRIVES SUCCESS AND REVENUE

U.S. Bank is now the world’s leading provider of freight audit and payments through PowerTrack^®, our patented, electronic business-to-business payment network. PowerTrack processes more than 25 million electronic documents annually with more than 25,000 registered users worldwide. In 2006, the acquisition of Schneider Payment Services added approximately $7 billion in freight payments to the portfolio. In 2006, PowerTrack was named among the top 100 innovators bySupply & Demand Chain Executivemagazine.

U.S. Bank’s Voyager Fleet Card program is a universal fuel and maintenance card accepted at more than 200,000 locations throughout the U.S. The program provides a single source for all card issuance, billing, payment and customer service, and it services more than 1.6 million vehicles nationwide.

In June, NOVA Information Systems’ European affiliate, euroConex, was awarded the title of “Merchant Acquirer of the Year” at the Cards International Global Awards. Judges cited the company’s international expansion and high cross-border competence. There are currently more than 200,000 merchants in the euroConex portfolio. Combined, NOVA and its affiliates First Horizon Merchant Services, euroConex and Elan provide global merchant processing services to financial institutions and clients in the United States, Canada and Europe, serving approximately 850,000 merchants worldwide.

• December 2006
U.S. Bancorp establishes bank, Elavon Financial Services, in Dublin, Ireland, to support credit card merchant acquiring and processing in Europe.

• November 2006
U.S. Bank launches contactless credit card pilot in Denver.

• October 2006
NOVA and Discover Financial Services sign merchant processing agreement.

• October 2006
U.S. Bank Canada acquires CIBC’s Visa^®purchasing and corporate credit card portfolio.

• July 2006
U.S. Bank issues 10 millionth gift card and remains the largest Visa gift card issuer in the United States.

• June 2006
NOVA’s European affiliate, euroConex, named merchant acquirer of the year at Cards International global award event.

• June 2006
U.S. Bank joins MoneyPass ATM network, gives customers surcharge-free access to more than 12,000 ATMs.

• January 2006
NOVA buys First Horizon Merchant Services business; adds 53,000 merchants and expands hospitality portfolio.

• January 2006
U.S. Bank Voyager acquires Advent Business Systems, Inc.

U.S. BANCORP11

wealth management

a commitment to superior performance and customer service enhances our full range of investment management services and the services of our fast - growing corporate and institutional trust and custody businesses .

U.S. Bancorp is a major provider of wealth management services to individuals, businesses, corporations and non-profit organizations. With more than 100 years’ experience in these fields, we bring the long-term commitment and expertise that our clients demand for today’s complex and changing financial environment.

The sophisticated wealth management expertise and solutions of The Private Client Group provide the foundation to support the unique situations and needs of high net worth individuals, families and professional service corporations for whom we develop customized strategies to build, manage and protect their wealth.

We have been steadily expanding our Corporate Trust and Institutional Trust and Custody businesses, both by growing our existing client base and by strategic acquisitions. We are a leading provider of the full spectrum of corporate trust products and services required by corporations and municipalities for raising capital. We are also experts in trust, custody, retirement and health savings account solutions for corporations, businesses, public and non-profit entities.

Through FAF Advisors, we have been significantly increasing distribution of our proprietary mutual fund family, First American Funds, to third party retail mutual-fund distributors, retirement plans, and key accounts. FAF Advisors serves as the investment advisor to First American Funds, as well as to a wide variety of institutional clients.

KEY BUSINESS UNITS

The Private Client Group
Corporate Trust Services
Institutional Trust & Custody
FAF Advisors, Inc.
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.
U.S. Bancorp Insurance Services, LLC

12U.S. BANCORP

GROWING SHARE AND SCALE

U.S. Bancorp invests heavily in technology, new products and distribution channels to support the development and delivery of our services to customers. We also invest in the acquisition of high-value, high-return businesses that will increase performance, revenue and earnings. This is especially true in our Corporate and Institutional Trust businesses, where recent business acquisitions have solidified our leadership position, diversified our geographic presence and increased market share and scale.

In 2006, we continued these strategic acquisitions, enhancing our Corporate Trust and Institutional Trust and Custody capabilities through acquisitions from Wachovia, SunTrust and LaSalle Bank, the United States subsidiary of ABN AMRO Bank N.V. These acquisitions complement our existing businesses, and are following the same successful integration and customer retention paths as our 12 previous similar acquisitions over the past few years.

U.S. Bank is now the number one ABF/MBS/CDO trustee in the nation, number two for new tax-exempt debt issuances, number four as corporate debt trustee, and number nine in global assets under custody. Upon completion of our most recent acquisition of the Municipal Trustee business from LaSalle, U.S. Bank’s corporate trust division will have $2.5 trillion in assets under administration, 725,000 bondholders and more than 86,500 client issuances.

• November 2006
U.S. Bank signs agreement to purchase the municipal bond trustee business of LaSalle Bank, will acquire 2,875 new client issuances and $30 billion in assets under administration.

• September 2006
U.S. Bank acquires the municipal and corporate bond trustee business from SunTrust Banks, adding 4,700 new client issuances and $123 billion in assets under administration.

• June 2006
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services is awarded top-rated status byGlobal Custodianfor all core services and scores highest in the survey for customer service.

• May 2006
The Private Client Group introduces customized Separately Managed Accounts, offering a wide range of money managers and investment choices.

• March 2006
U.S. Bancorp Asset Management changes its name to FAF Advisors to more closely align company with its First American Funds family of mutual funds and facilitate continued expansion.

• January 2006
U.S. Bank completes acquisition of the corporate trust and institutional custody businesses from Wachovia.

U.S. BANCORP13

consumer banking

our continued investment in convenience, customer service and accessibility helps make u.s. bank the bank of choice among consumers. in 2006, we made two small but high - value acquisitions and launched “power banking.”

In 2006 we made two strategic acquisitions that expanded our market share in the western part of our franchise - purchasing 23 new branch locations in western Colorado and Denver and doubling our branch presence in Montana. Together, these transactions expand U.S. Bank’s distribution in rapidly growing and demographically attractive markets in western Colorado, add to our base in Denver and boost our Montana franchise significantly.

Reaching a major milestone, we opened our 500th in-store banking office in November. We operate the third-largest in-store branch network in the nation, and our in-store business model has been very successful for us, our customers and our retail partners.

We introduced an innovative online tool for U.S. branch bankers to design custom solutions for our customers. “My Choice Banking,” currently offered at more than 400 branches, allows customers to make the most advantageous banking choices in the context of their total financial picture, addressing both current and future needs.

In Small Business Banking, we increased SBA loan total by 38 percent in 2006, according to the Small Business Administration (SBA), providing 4,703 SBA guaranteed loans to small businesses, a U.S. Bank record. U.S. Bank ranks second among SBA bank lenders in loan dollar volume.

KEY BUSINESS UNITS

Community Banking
Metropolitan Branch Banking
In-store and Corporate On-site Banking
Small Business Banking
Consumer Lending
24-Hour Banking & Financial Sales
Home Mortgage
Community Development
Workplace and Student Banking

14U.S. BANCORP

FORTIFYING POSITIONS OF STRENGTH

U.S. Bank inaugurated its “power bank” sales and customer service initiative in the St. Louis market in 2006 with plans to roll it out to other key markets over the next several years. The initiative is designed to solidify our leadership position in markets where U.S. Bank is dominant, protecting market share. Key elements of the initiative are more aggressive marketing, extended branch hours, heavier branch staffing, and customer amenities, including children’s entertainment areas, coin counters and more.

We have seen good results from the St. Louis launch, and we anticipate the same increased traffic, account opening and elevated customer satisfaction scores in the other targeted markets as well. It’s another way we are investing in our Consumer Banking business and enhancing the customer experience at U.S. Bank.

• November 2006
U.S. Bank opens 500th in-store branch.

• November 2006
U.S. Bancorp to double branch presence in Montana with agreement to acquire United Financial Corp., parent of Heritage Bank.

• November 2006
U.S. Bank celebrates one-year anniversary offering MoneyGram global funds transfer at all branches.

• September 2006
U.S. Bank completes purchase of Vail Banks, Inc., bringing branch total in Colorado to 135.

• April 2006
Longer branch hours, extra staff and special amenities mark “power banking” introduction in St. Louis.

U.S. BANCORP15

building strong communities

u.s. bancorp places a high priority on investing in the communities we serve, communities in which our customers, our employees and our shareholders live and work.

We work to connect directly with the people and the organizations of our communities, not only by providing needed financial services and credit, but also through collaborative investments and efforts through our Community Development divisions. These are focused on affordable housing investments, economic development support, education, arts and culture and community service. It’s through these initiatives and investments and our partnerships with local and national organizations that our resources - financial and human - have the best potential to stimulate economic growth and enhance the quality of life.

In addition, more than $20 million is contributed in grants and charitable contributions to thousands of organizations through the U.S. Bancorp Foundation.

Here, we highlight just a few of the hundreds of ways we are involved in our communities.

U.S. BANCORP FOUNDATION 2006 CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS BY PROGRAM AREA

Community Build Day

U.S. Bank is a national co-sponsor of Community Build Day, in partnership with The Financial Services Roundtable, a trade association of 100 of the largest financial services companies in the country. During this annual event, companies and employees volunteer to build, paint, repair and renovate homes in their communities. In 2006, U.S. Bank and our employees participated in 55 Community Build Day projects including 31 building, repairing and remodeling projects, nine running and walking events and various other activities.

Five Star Volunteer Award

U.S. Bank’s Five Star Volunteer Award honors employees for their exceptional community service. In 2006, we presented the award to 130 employees in recognition of their time and dedication to their communities. Through this awards program in 2005 and 2006, U.S. Bank contributed $340,000 to various organizations across our corporate footprint. In 2006, employees in 24 states were recognized for their outstanding efforts.

United Way

One of our key partnerships is with United Way. U.S. Bancorp and our employees have a strong history of generous support, leadership and involvement in United Way. Last year, together, pledges by our employees across the company and contributions by the U.S. Bancorp Foundation totaled more than $9.7 million.

16U.S. BANCORP

positive results: a closer look

now that you have read some of the highlights of the year 2006 in our lines of business and seen our goals and achievements, take a closer look at the full story of our financial performance in management’s discussion and analysis on the following pages.

FINANCIALS

page 18	• management’s discussion and analysis
page 61	• reports of management and independent accountants
page 64	• consolidated financial statements
page 68	• notes to consolidated financial statements
page 103	• five-year consolidated financial statements
page 105	• quarterly consolidated financial data
page 108	• supplemental financial data
page 109	• annual report on form 10-k
page 120	• CEO and CFO certifications
page 123	• executive officers
page 125	• directors
inside back cover	• corporate information

U.S. BANCORP17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Restated Certificate of Incorporation

Agreement dated January 19, 2007

Statement re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

OVERVIEW

In 2006, U.S. Bancorp and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) demonstrated its financial strength and shareholder focus despite a particularly challenging economic environment for the banking industry. While credit quality within the industry continued to be relatively strong, the flat yield curve throughout most of the year, excess liquidity in the markets and competitiveness for credit relationships have created significant pressures on net interest margins for most banks. The Company achieved record earnings in 2006 and grew earnings per common share, on a diluted basis, by 7.9 percent through its focus on organic growth, investing in business initiatives that strengthen its presence and product offerings for customers, and acquiring fee-based businesses with operating scale. This strategic focus over the past several years has created a well diversified business generating strong fee-based revenues that represented over 50 percent of total net revenue in 2006. As a result, the Company’s fee-based revenue grew 11.1 percent over 2005, with growth in most product categories. Fee income growth was led by trust and investment management fees and revenues generated by payment processing businesses. In addition, average loans outstanding rose 6.8 percent year-over-year despite very competitive credit pricing. The Company’s performance was also driven by the continued strong credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolios. During the year nonperforming assets declined 8.9 percent from a year ago and total net charge-offs decreased to .39 percent of average loans outstanding in 2006, compared with .52 percent in 2005. Finally, the Company’s efficiency ratio (the ratio of noninterest expense to taxable-equivalent net revenue excluding net securities gains or losses) was 45.4 percent in 2006, compared with 44.3 percent in 2005, and continues to be a leader in the banking industry. The Company’s ability to effectively manage its cost structure has provided a strategic advantage in this highly competitive environment. As a result of these factors, the Company achieved a return on average common equity of 23.6 percent in 2006.

     The Company’s strong performance is also reflected in its capital levels and the favorable credit ratings assigned by various credit rating agencies. Equity capital of the Company continued to be strong at 5.5 percent of tangible assets at December 31, 2006, compared with 5.9 percent at December 31, 2005. The Company’s regulatory Tier 1 capital ratio increased to 8.8 percent at December 31, 2006, compared with 8.2 percent at December 31, 2005. In 2006, the Company’s credit ratings were upgraded by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and Dominion Bond Rating Service. Credit ratings assigned by various credit rating agencies reflect the rating agencies’ recognition of the Company’s sector-leading earnings performance and credit risk profile.

     In concert with this financial performance, the Company achieved its objective of returning at least 80 percent of earnings to shareholders in the form of dividends and share repurchases by returning 112 percent of 2006 earnings to shareholders. In December 2006, the Company increased its cash dividend resulting in a 21.2 percent increase from the dividend rate of the fourth quarter of 2005. Throughout 2006, the Company continued to repurchase common shares under share repurchase programs announced in December 2004 and August 2006.

     In 2007, the Company’s financial and strategic objectives are unchanged from those goals that have enabled it to deliver industry leading financial performance. The Company desires to achieve 10 percent long-term growth in earnings per common share and a return on common equity of at least 20 percent. The Company will continue to focus on effectively managing credit quality and maintaining an acceptable level of credit and earnings volatility. The Company intends to achieve these financial objectives by providing high-quality customer service and continuing to make strategic investments in businesses that diversify and generate fee-based revenues, enhance the Company’s distribution network or expand its product offerings. Finally, the Company continues to target an 80 percent return of earnings to its shareholders through dividends or shares repurchased.

Earnings Summary The Company reported net income of $4.8 billion in 2006, or $2.61 per diluted common share, compared with $4.5 billion, or $2.42 per diluted common share, in 2005. Return on average assets and return on average common equity were 2.23 percent and 23.6 percent, respectively, in 2006, compared with returns of 2.21 percent and 22.5 percent, respectively, in 2005.

     Total net revenue, on a taxable-equivalent basis for 2006 was $503 million (3.8 percent) higher than 2005 despite the adverse impact of rising rates on product margins generally experienced by the banking industry. The increase in net revenue was comprised of a 13.3 percent increase in noninterest income, partially offset by a 4.2 percent decline in net interest income. Noninterest income growth was driven by higher fee-based revenues from organic business growth, expansion in trust and payment processing businesses, higher trading income, and gains in 2006 from the initial public offering and subsequent sale of the equity interest in a card association and the sale of a 401(k) defined contribution recordkeeping business. These favorable changes in fee-based revenues
were partially offset by lower mortgage banking revenue

18  U.S. BANCORP

principally due to the impact of adopting the fair value method of accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156 “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets” (“SFAS 156”) in the first quarter of 2006. In addition, noninterest income included a $120 million favorable change in net securities gains (losses) as compared with 2005. The decline in net interest income reflected growth in average earning assets, more than offset by lower net interest margins. In 2006, average earning assets increased $7.8 billion (4.4 percent), compared with 2005, primarily due to growth in total average loans, partially offset by a decrease in investment securities. The net interest margin in 2006 was 3.65 percent, compared with 3.97 percent in 2005. The year-over-year decline in net interest margin reflected the competitive lending environment and the impact of a flatter yield curve compared to a year ago. The net interest margin also declined due to funding incremental asset growth with higher cost wholesale funding, share repurchases and asset/liability decisions designed to reduce the Company’s interest rate sensitivity position. These adverse factors impacting the net interest margin were offset somewhat by the margin benefit of net free funds in a rising rate environment and higher loan fees.

     Total noninterest expense in 2006 increased $317 million (5.4 percent), compared with 2005, primarily

 Table 1   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Year Ended December 31
(Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data)		2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
CONDENSED INCOME STATEMENT
Net interest income (taxable-equivalent basis) (a)		$	6,790		$	7,088		$	7,140		$	7,217		$	6,847
Noninterest income			6,832			6,151			5,624			5,068			4,911
Securities gains (losses), net			14			(106	)		(105	)		245			300
	Total net revenue		13,636			13,133			12,659			12,530			12,058
Noninterest expense			6,180			5,863			5,785			5,597			5,740
Provision for credit losses			544			666			669			1,254			1,349
	Income from continuing operations before taxes		6,912			6,604			6,205			5,679			4,969
Taxable-equivalent adjustment			49			33			29			28			33
Applicable income taxes			2,112			2,082			2,009			1,941			1,708
	Income from continuing operations		4,751			4,489			4,167			3,710			3,228
Discontinued operations (after-tax)			—			—			—			23			(23	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change (after-tax)			—			—			—			—			(37	)
	Net income	$	4,751		$	4,489		$	4,167		$	3,733		$	3,168
	Net income applicable to common equity	$	4,703		$	4,489		$	4,167		$	3,733		$	3,168
PER COMMON SHARE
Earnings per share from continuing operations		$	2.64		$	2.45		$	2.21		$	1.93		$	1.68
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations			2.61			2.42			2.18			1.92			1.68
Earnings per share			2.64			2.45			2.21			1.94			1.65
Diluted earnings per share			2.61			2.42			2.18			1.93			1.65
Dividends declared per share			1.390			1.230			1.020			.855			.780
Book value per share			11.44			11.07			10.52			10.01			9.62
Market value per share			36.19			29.89			31.32			29.78			21.22
Average common shares outstanding			1,778			1,831			1,887			1,924			1,916
Average diluted common shares outstanding			1,804			1,857			1,913			1,936			1,925
FINANCIAL RATIOS
Return on average assets			2.23	%		2.21	%		2.17	%		1.99	%		1.84	%
Return on average common equity			23.6			22.5			21.4			19.2			18.3
Net interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis)(a)			3.65			3.97			4.25			4.49			4.65
Efficiency ratio (b)			45.4			44.3			45.3			45.6			48.8
AVERAGE BALANCES
Loans		$	140,601		$	131,610		$	120,670		$	116,937		$	113,182
Loans held for sale			3,663			3,290			3,079			5,041			3,915
Investment securities			39,961			42,103			43,009			37,248			28,829
Earning assets			186,231			178,425			168,123			160,808			147,410
Assets			213,512			203,198			191,593			187,630			171,948
Noninterest-bearing deposits			28,755			29,229			29,816			31,715			28,715
Deposits			120,589			121,001			116,222			116,553			105,124
Short-term borrowings			24,422			19,382			14,534			10,503			10,116
Long-term debt			40,357			36,141			35,115			33,663			32,172
Shareholders’ equity			20,710			19,953			19,459			19,393			17,273
PERIOD END BALANCES
Loans		$	143,597		$	136,462		$	124,941		$	116,811		$	114,905
Allowance for credit losses			2,256			2,251			2,269			2,369			2,422
Investment securities			40,117			39,768			41,481			43,334			28,488
Assets			219,232			209,465			195,104			189,471			180,027
Deposits			124,882			124,709			120,741			119,052			115,534
Long-term debt			37,602			37,069			34,739			33,816			31,582
Shareholders’ equity			21,197			20,086			19,539			19,242			18,436
Regulatory capital ratios
	Tier 1 capital		8.8	%		8.2	%		8.6	%		9.1	%		8.0	%
	Total risk-based capital		12.6			12.5			13.1			13.6			12.4
	Leverage		8.2			7.6			7.9			8.0			7.7
	Tangible common equity		5.5			5.9			6.4			6.5			5.7

(a) Presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a tax rate of 35 percent.

(b) Computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses), net.

U.S. BANCORP  19

reflecting incremental operating and business integration costs associated with recent acquisitions, increased pension costs and higher expenses related to certain tax-advantaged investments. This increase was partially offset by lower intangible expense and debt prepayment charges in 2006 compared with a year ago. The decline in intangible expense from 2005 was primarily due to the adoption of SFAS 156. The efficiency ratio was 45.4 percent in 2006, compared with 44.3 percent in 2005.

     The provision for credit losses was $544 million for 2006, a decrease of $122 million (18.3 percent) from 2005, principally due to strong credit quality reflected in the relatively low level of nonperforming assets and declining net charge-offs compared with 2005. Net charge-offs were $544 million in 2006, compared with $685 million in 2005. The decline in net charge-offs from a year ago was principally due to the impact of changes in bankruptcy legislation enacted in the fourth quarter of 2005.

STATEMENT OF INCOME ANALYSIS

Net Interest Income Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, was $6.8 billion in 2006, $7.1 billion in 2005 and $7.1 billion in 2004. The $298 million decline in net interest income in 2006 reflected compression of the net interest margin, somewhat offset by growth in average earning assets. Average earning assets were $186.2 billion for 2006, compared with $178.4 billion and $168.1 billion for 2005 and 2004, respectively. The $7.8 billion (4.4 percent) increase in average earning assets for 2006, compared with 2005, was primarily driven by growth in total average loans of 6.8 percent, partially offset by a decrease in average investment securities of 5.1 percent from a year ago. The net interest margin in 2006 was 3.65 percent, compared with 3.97 percent and 4.25 percent in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The 32 basis point decline in 2006 net interest margin, compared with 2005, reflected the competitive lending environment and the impact of a flatter yield curve from a year ago. Compared with 2005, credit spreads tightened by approximately 17 basis points in 2006 across most lending products due to competitive pricing and a change in mix reflecting growth in lower-spread, fixed-rate credit products. The net interest margin also declined due to funding incremental asset growth with higher cost wholesale funding, share repurchases, and asset/liability decisions. An increase in the margin benefit of net free funds and loan fees partially offset these factors. Beginning in the third quarter of 2006, the Federal Reserve Bank paused from its policies of increasing interest rates and tightening the money supply that began in mid-2004. As of December 31, 2006, the yield curve was relatively flat and the current consensus in the market is that it will remain flat or slightly inverted throughout much of 2007. This market condition will continue to be challenging for the banking industry. If the Federal Reserve Bank leaves rates unchanged over the next several quarters, the Company expects its net interest margin to remain relatively stable as asset repricing occurs and funding costs moderate. Net interest income growth is primarily expected to be driven by earning asset growth during this timeframe.

     Average loans in 2006 were $9.0 billion (6.8 percent) higher than 2005, driven by growth in residential mortgages, commercial loans and retail loans of $3.0 billion (16.7 percent), $2.8 billion (6.6 percent) and $2.4 billion

 Table 2   ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME

											2006			2005
(Dollars in Millions)		2006			2005			2004			v 2005			v 2004
COMPONENTS OF NET INTEREST INCOME
	Income on earning assets (taxable-equivalent basis) (a)	$	12,351		$	10,584		$	9,215		$	1,767		$	1,369
	Expense on interest-bearing liabilities		5,561			3,496			2,075			2,065			1,421
Net interest income (taxable-equivalent basis)		$	6,790		$	7,088		$	7,140		$	(298	)	$	(52	)
Net interest income, as reported		$	6,741		$	7,055		$	7,111		$	(314	)	$	(56	)
AVERAGE YIELDS AND RATES PAID
	Earning assets yield (taxable-equivalent basis)		6.63	%		5.93	%		5.48	%		.70	%		.45	%
	Rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities (taxable-equivalent basis)		3.55			2.37			1.53			1.18			.84
Gross interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis)			3.08	%		3.56	%		3.95	%		(.48	)%		(.39	)%
Net interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis)			3.65	%		3.97	%		4.25	%		(.32	)%		(.28	)%
AVERAGE BALANCES
	Investment securities	$	39,961		$	42,103		$	43,009		$	(2,142	)	$	(906	)
	Loans		140,601			131,610			120,670			8,991			10,940
	Earning assets		186,231			178,425			168,123			7,806			10,302
	Interest-bearing liabilities		156,613			147,295			136,055			9,318			11,240
	Net free funds (b)		29,618			31,130			32,068			(1,512	)		(938	)

(a)	Interest and rates are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a tax rate of 35 percent.
(b)	Represents noninterest-bearing deposits, allowance for loan losses, unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, non-earning assets, other noninterest-bearing liabilities and equity.

20  U.S. BANCORP

(5.5 percent), respectively. The growth in residential mortgages was due to increased retention of loans throughout 2005, primarily related to adjustable-rate residential mortgages. However during the first quarter of 2006, the Company began selling an increased proportion of its residential mortgage loan production and anticipates that residential mortgage loan balances will grow only moderately in future periods. Slower growth rates of commercial and retail loans reflected the competitive market conditions for credit lending and excess liquidity available to many business customers in 2006. Total average commercial real estate loans increased only 2.8 percent relative to 2005, reflecting customer refinancing activities given liquidity available in the financial markets, a decision by the Company to reduce condominium construction financing and an economic slowdown in residential homebuilding during 2006.

     Average investment securities were $2.1 billion (5.1 percent) lower in 2006, compared with 2005. The decrease principally reflected asset/liability management decisions to reduce the focus on residential mortgage-backed assets given the changing interest rate environment and mix of loan growth experienced during the year. Additionally, the Company reclassified approximately $.5 billion of principal-only securities to its trading account effective January 1, 2006, in connection with the adoption of SFAS 156. Refer to the “Interest Rate Risk Management” section for further information on the sensitivity of net interest income to changes in interest rates.

     Average noninterest-bearing deposits in 2006 were $474 million (1.6 percent) lower than 2005. The year-over-year decrease reflected a decline in personal and business demand deposits, partially offset by higher corporate trust deposits related to recent acquisitions. The change in demand balances reflected a migration of customer accounts to interest-bearing products given the rising interest rate environment. The decline in business customer balances also reflected customer utilization of excess liquidity to fund their business growth.

     Average total savings products declined $2.1 billion (3.6 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005, due to reductions in average money market savings and other savings accounts, partially offset by an increase in interest checking balances. Average money market savings balances declined year-over-year by $2.6 billion (9.0 percent), primarily due to a decline in branch-based balances. The decline was partially offset by an increase in balances held by broker-dealers. The overall year-over-year decrease in average money market savings balances was primarily the result of the Company’s deposit pricing decisions for money

 Table 3   NET INTEREST INCOME — CHANGES DUE TO RATE AND VOLUME (a)

				2006 v 2005									2005 v 2004
(Dollars in Millions)				Volume			Yield/Rate			Total			Volume			Yield/Rate			Total
Increase (decrease) in
INTEREST INCOME
	Investment securities			$	(100	)	$	201		$	101		$	(39	)	$	165		$	126
	Loans held for sale				20			35			55			9			38			47
	Loans
		Commercial			164			304			468			185			103			288
		Commercial real estate			51			249			300			39			222			261
		Residential mortgages			167			56			223			211			(22	)		189
		Retail			167			410			577			210			238			448
			Total loans		549			1,019			1,568			645			541			1,186
	Other earning assets				45			(2	)		43			4			6			10
			Total earning assets		514			1,253			1,767			619			750			1,369
INTEREST EXPENSE
	Interest-bearing deposits
		Interest checking			5			93			98			6			58			64
		Money market savings			(32	)		243			211			(25	)		148			123
		Savings accounts			(1	)		5			4			–			–			–
		Time certificates of deposit less than $100,000			17			118			135			3			45			48
		Time deposits greater than $100,000			51			331			382			123			297			420
			Total interest-bearing deposits		40			790			830			107			548			655
	Short-term borrowings				179			373			552			88			339			427
	Long-term debt				145			538			683			27			312			339
			Total interest-bearing liabilities		364			1,701			2,065			222			1,199			1,421
	Increase (decrease) in net interest income			$	150		$	(448	)	$	(298	)	$	397		$	(449	)	$	(52	)

(a) This table shows the components of the change in net interest income by volume and rate on a taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a tax rate of 35 percent. This table does not take into account the level of noninterest-bearing funding, nor does it fully reflect changes in the mix of assets and liabilities. The change in interest not solely due to changes in volume or rates has been allocated on a pro-rata basis to volume and yield/rate.

U.S. BANCORP  21

market products in relation to other fixed-rate deposit products offered. During 2006, a portion of branch-based money market savings account balances migrated to fixed-rate time certificates to take advantage of higher interest rates for these products.

     Average time certificates of deposit less than $100,000 were $562 million (4.3 percent) higher in 2006, compared with 2005. Average time deposits greater than $100,000 grew $1.6 billion (7.7 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005. This growth was primarily driven by the migration of money market balances within the Consumer Banking and Wealth Management business lines, as customers migrated balances to higher rate deposits.

     The decline in net interest income in 2005, compared with 2004, reflected growth in average earning assets, more than offset by a lower net interest margin. The $10.3 billion (6.1 percent) increase in average earning assets for 2005, compared with 2004, was primarily driven by increases in residential mortgages, commercial loans and retail loans. The 28 basis point decline in 2005 net interest margin, compared with 2004, reflected the competitive lending environment and the impact of changes in the yield curve. The net interest margin was also adversely impacted by share repurchases, funding incremental growth of earning assets with higher cost wholesale funding, and asset/liability decisions designed to reduce the Company’s rate sensitivity position including issuing longer-term fixed-rate debt and reducing the Company’s net receive-fixed interest rate swap positions. Slightly higher loan fees and the increasing margin benefit of deposits and net free funds partially offset these factors.

     Average loans in 2005 were higher by $11.0 billion (9.1 percent), compared with 2004, primarily driven by growth in residential mortgages, commercial loans and retail loans. Average investment securities were $906 million (2.1 percent) lower in 2005, compared with 2004, principally reflecting maturities and prepayments utilized to fund earning asset growth and the net impact of repositioning the investment portfolio as part of asset/liability risk management decisions. Average noninterest-bearing deposits in 2005 were $587 million (2.0 percent) lower than in 2004. The year-over-year change in the average balances of noninterest-bearing deposits was impacted by product changes in the Consumer Banking business line. In late 2004, the Company migrated approximately $1.3 billion of noninterest-bearing deposit balances to interest checking accounts as an enhancement to its Silver Elite Checking product. Average total savings products declined $1.7 billion (2.9 percent) year-over-year, compared with 2004, due to reductions in average money market savings account balances and savings accounts, partially offset by higher interest checking balances due to strong new account growth, as well as the $1.3 billion migration of the Silver Elite Checking product. Average money market savings account balances declined from 2004 to 2005 by $3.5 billion (10.8 percent), with declines in both the branches and other business lines. The decline was primarily the result of deposit pricing by the Company for money market products in relation to other fixed-rate deposit products offered. A portion of the money market savings balances migrated to time deposits greater than $100,000 as rates increased on the time deposit products. Average time deposits greater than $100,000 grew $7.0 billion (51.0 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004, most notably in corporate banking, as customers migrated balances to higher rate deposits.

Provision for Credit LossesThe provision for credit losses is recorded to bring the allowance for credit losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on factors discussed in the “Analysis and Determination of Allowance for Credit Losses” section.

     The provision for credit losses was $544 million in 2006, compared with $666 million and $669 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively.

     The $122 million (18.3 percent) decrease in the provision for credit losses in 2006 reflected stable credit quality in 2006 and the adverse impact in the fourth quarter of 2005 on net charge-offs from changes in bankruptcy law in 2005. Nonperforming loans, principally reflecting changes in the quality of commercial loans, declined $74 million from December 31, 2005. However, accruing loans ninety days past due and restructured loans that continue to accrue interest increased by $186 million from a year ago. Net charge-offs declined $141 million from 2005, principally due to the impact of changes in bankruptcy laws that went into effect during the fourth quarter of 2005. In 2005, approximately $64 million of incremental net charge-offs occurred due to the change in bankruptcy laws and a separate policy change related to overdraft balances. As a result of these changes, bankruptcy charge-offs were lower in 2006 while customers experiencing credit deterioration migrated further through contractual delinquencies and bankruptcy levels increased from past bankruptcy reform.

     The $3 million (.4 percent) decline in the provision for credit losses in 2005 reflected improving levels of nonperforming loans, resulting in lower net charge-offs in 2005. Nonperforming loans, principally reflecting changes in the quality of commercial and commercial real estate loans, declined $96 million from December 31, 2004. Net charge-offs declined $82 million from 2004, the result of lower gross charge-offs within the commercial and commercial real estate portfolios. The improvement in commercial and commercial real estate gross charge-offs was partially offset by the impact of bankruptcy legislation enacted in the fourth quarter of 2005 and lower commercial

22  U.S. BANCORP

and commercial real estate recoveries. Refer to “Corporate Risk Profile” for further information on the provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, nonperforming assets and other factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses.

Noninterest IncomeNoninterest income in 2006 was $6.8 billion, compared with $6.0 billion in 2005 and $5.5 billion in 2004. The $801 million (13.3 percent) increase in 2006 over 2005, was driven by organic business growth, expansion in trust and payment processing businesses, higher trading income related to gains on certain interest rate swaps, equity gains from the initial public offering and subsequent sale of the equity interest in a card association during 2006 and a current year gain on the sale of a 401(k) defined contribution recordkeeping business. These favorable changes were partially offset by lower mortgage banking revenue, principally due to the impact of adopting SFAS 156 effective in the first quarter of 2006. In addition, there was a $120 million favorable change in net securities gains (losses) as compared with 2005.

     The growth in credit and debit card revenue of 12.2 percent was principally driven by higher customer transaction sales volumes and fees related to cash advances, balance transfers and over-limit positions. The corporate payment products revenue growth of 14.1 percent reflected organic growth in sales volumes and card usage, enhancements in product pricing and acquired business expansion. ATM processing services revenue was 6.1 percent higher primarily due to the acquisition of an ATM business in May 2005. Merchant processing services revenue was 25.1 percent higher in 2006, compared with 2005, reflecting an increase in sales volume driven by acquisitions, higher same store sales, new merchant signings and associated equipment fees. Trust and investment management fees increased 22.4 percent primarily due to organic customer account growth, improving asset management fees given favorable equity market conditions, and incremental revenue generated by recent acquisitions of corporate and institutional trust businesses. Deposit service charges were 10.2 percent higher year-over-year due to increased transaction-related fees and the impact of net new checking accounts. Mortgage banking revenue declined $240 million in 2006, compared with 2005. The decline was primarily due to a reduction of $210 million related to the adoption of SFAS 156 and lower mortgage loan production offset somewhat by higher mortgage servicing revenues. Other income increased by $220 million (37.1 percent) from 2005, primarily due to gains of $67 million from the initial public offering and subsequent sale of equity interests in a cardholder association and a $52 million gain on the sale of a 401(k) defined contribution recordkeeping business during 2006. In addition, other income was higher due to trading income of $50 million related to certain interest rate swaps, lowerend-of-term lease residual losses, incremental student loan sales gains and the receipt of a favorable settlement of $10 million in the merchant processing business. In light of recent developments with respect to the application of accounting rules related to derivatives, the Company conducted reviews of all its derivatives utilized for hedging purposes. As a result of these reviews, the Company identified certain interest rate swaps and forward commitments designated as accounting hedges that either did not have adequate documentation at the date of inception or misapplied the “short-cut” method under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). As such, the Company determined that changes in the market values of these derivatives, since their inception, should have been recorded as trading income despite the fact that these derivatives effectively reduced the economic risks of the underlying assets or liabilities. The annual impact to net income of these errors was .3 percent and .7 percent for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company evaluated the impact of these hedge accounting practices on its financial statements for

 Table 4   NONINTEREST INCOME

										2006			2005
(Dollars in Millions)		2006		2005			2004			v 2005			v 2004
Credit and debit card revenue		$	800	$	713		$	649			12.2	%		9.9	%
Corporate payment products revenue			557		488			407			14.1			19.9
ATM processing services			243		229			175			6.1			30.9
Merchant processing services			963		770			675			25.1			14.1
Trust and investment management fees			1,235		1,009			981			22.4			2.9
Deposit service charges			1,023		928			807			10.2			15.0
Treasury management fees			441		437			467			.9			(6.4	)
Commercial products revenue			415		400			432			3.8			(7.4	)
Mortgage banking revenue			192		432			397			(55.6	)		8.8
Investment products fees and commissions			150		152			156			(1.3	)		(2.6	)
Securities gains (losses), net			14		(106	)		(105	)		*			1.0
Other			813		593			478			37.1			24.1
	Total noninterest income	$	6,846	$	6,045		$	5,519			13.3	%		9.5	%

* Not meaningful

U.S. BANCORP  23

all quarterly and annual periods presented and concluded that the impact of these errors was not material to each of these financial statements. As a result, the cumulative impact of these accounting differences was recorded during 2006 resulting in $50 million of trading gains in other noninterest income.

     The $526 million (9.5 percent) increase in noninterest income in 2005, compared with 2004, was driven by strong organic growth in most fee income categories, particularly payment processing revenues and deposit service charges. The growth in credit and debit card revenue was principally driven by higher customer transaction volumes and rate changes. The corporate payment products revenue growth reflected growth in sales, card usage, rate changes and the acquisition of a small aviation card business. ATM processing services revenue was higher due to an ATM business acquisition in May of 2005. Merchant processing services revenue was higher, reflecting an increase in merchant sales volume and business expansion in European markets. The increase in trust and investment management fees was primarily attributed to improved equity market conditions and account growth. Deposit service charges grew due to increased transaction-related fees and new account growth in the branches. The growth in mortgage banking revenue was due to origination fees and gains from higher production volumes and increased servicing income. Other income increased primarily due to higher income from equity investments and the cash surrender value of insurance products relative to 2004. Partially offsetting these positive variances were decreases in treasury management fees and commercial products revenue. The decrease in treasury management fees was due to higher earnings credits on customers’ compensating balances, partially offset by growth in treasury management-related service activities. Commercial products revenue declined due to reductions in non-yield loan fees, syndications and fees for letters of credit.

Noninterest ExpenseNoninterest expense in 2006 was $6.2 billion, compared with $5.9 billion and $5.8 billion in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company’s efficiency ratio increased to 45.4 percent in 2006 from 44.3 percent in 2005. The change in the efficiency ratio and the $317 million (5.4 percent) increase in noninterest expenses in 2006, compared with 2005, was primarily driven by incremental operating and business integration costs associated with recent acquisitions, increased pension costs and higher expense related to certain tax-advantaged investments. This was partially offset by a reduction in intangible expense and lower debt prepayment charges in 2006.

     Compensation expense was 5.5 percent higher year-over-year primarily due to the corporate and institutional trust and payments processing acquisitions and other growth initiatives undertaken by the Company. Employee benefits increased 11.6 percent, year-over-year, primarily as a result of higher pension expense. Net occupancy and equipment expense increased 3.0 percent primarily due to business expansion. Professional services expense was 19.9 percent higher primarily due to revenue enhancement-related business initiatives, including establishing a bank charter in Ireland to support pan-European payment processing, and legal costs. Technology and communications expense rose 8.4 percent, reflecting higher outside data processing expense principally associated with expanding a prepaid gift card program and the corporate and institutional trust acquisitions. In connection with the adoption of SFAS 156, the impact of eliminating amortization of mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) and related impairments or reparations of these servicing rights decreased intangible expenses in 2006 by approximately $144 million compared with 2005. Debt prepayment charges declined $21 million (38.9 percent) from 2005 and were related to longer-term callable debt that was prepaid by the Company as part of asset/liability decisions to improve funding costs and reposition the Company’s interest rate risk position. Other expense increased 23.0 percent

 Table 5   NONINTEREST EXPENSE

											2006			2005
(Dollars in Millions)		2006			2005			2004			v 2005			v 2004
Compensation		$	2,513		$	2,383		$	2,252			5.5	%		5.8	%
Employee benefits			481			431			389			11.6			10.8
Net occupancy and equipment			660			641			631			3.0			1.6
Professional services			199			166			149			19.9			11.4
Marketing and business development			217			235			194			(7.7	)		21.1
Technology and communications			505			466			430			8.4			8.4
Postage, printing and supplies			265			255			248			3.9			2.8
Other intangibles			355			458			550			(22.5	)		(16.7	)
Debt prepayment			33			54			155			(38.9	)		(65.2	)
Other			952			774			787			23.0			(1.7	)
	Total noninterest expense	$	6,180		$	5,863		$	5,785			5.4	%		1.3	%
Efficiency ratio (a)			45.4	%		44.3	%		45.3	%

(a) Computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses), net.

24  U.S. BANCORP

primarily due to increased investments in tax-advantaged projects and business integration costs relative to a year ago.

     The $78 million (1.3 percent) increase in noninterest expenses in 2005, compared with 2004, was primarily driven by expenses related to business investments, acquired businesses, and production-based incentives, offset by a $99 million favorable change in MSR amortization and a $101 million decrease in debt prepayment charges. Compensation expense was higher year-over-year principally due to business expansion, including in-store branches, expanding the Company’s payment processing businesses and other product sales initiatives. Employee benefits increased primarily as a result of higher pension expense, medical costs, payroll taxes and other benefits. Professional services expense rose due to increases in legal and other professional services related to business initiatives, technology development and integration costs of specific payment processing businesses. Marketing and business development expense increased due to marketing initiatives, principally related to brand awareness and credit card and prepaid gift card programs. Technology and communications expense was higher, reflecting depreciation of technology investments, network costs associated with the expansion of the payment processing businesses, and higher outside data processing expense associated with expanding a prepaid gift card program. Other expense declined primarily due to lower operating and fraud losses and insurance costs, partially offset by increased investments in affordable housing and other tax-advantaged projects and higher merchant processing costs due to the expansion of the payment processing businesses relative to 2004.

Pension PlansBecause of the long-term nature of pension plans, the administration and accounting for pensions is complex and can be impacted by several factors, including investment and funding policies, accounting methods and the plans’ actuarial assumptions. The Company and its Compensation Committee have an established process for evaluating the plans, their performance and significant plan assumptions, including the assumed discount rate and the long-term rate of return (“LTROR”). Annually the Company’s Compensation Committee, assisted by outside consultants, evaluates plan objectives, funding policies and investment policies considering its long-term investment time horizon and asset allocation strategies. Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements provides further information on funding practices, investment policies and asset allocation strategies.

     Periodic pension expense (or income) includes service costs, interest costs based on the assumed discount rate, the expected return on plan assets based on an actuarially derived market-related value and amortization of actuarial gains and losses. The Company’s pension accounting policy follows generally accepted accounting standards and reflects the long-term nature of benefit obligations and the investment horizon of plan assets. This accounting guidance has the effect of reducing earnings volatility related to short-term changes in interest rates and market valuations. Actuarial gains and losses include the impact of plan amendments and various unrecognized gains and losses related to differences in actual plan experience compared with actuarial assumptions, which are deferred and amortized over the future service periods of active employees. The actuarially derived market-related value utilized to determine the expected return on plan assets is based on fair value adjusted for the difference between expected returns and actual performance of plan assets. The unrealized difference between actual experience and expected returns is included in the actuarially derived market-related value ratably over a five-year period. At September 30, 2006, this accumulated unrecognized gain approximated $249 million, compared with $206 million at September 30, 2005. The impact on pension expense of the unrecognized asset gains will incrementally decrease pension costs in each year from 2007 to 2011, by approximately $18 million, $24 million, $16 million, $12 million and $3 million, respectively. This assumes that the performance of plan assets in 2007 and beyond equals the assumed LTROR. Actual results will vary depending on the performance of plan assets and changes to assumptions required in the future. Refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Company’s accounting policies for pension plans.

     In 2006, the Company recognized a pension cost of $81 million compared with a pension cost of $33 million and $9 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The $48 million increase in pension costs in 2006 was driven by recognition of net deferred actuarial losses and the impact of a lower discount rate. In 2005, pension costs increased by $24 million, compared with 2004, also driven by recognition of deferred actuarial losses and the impact of a lower discount rate.

     In 2007, the Company anticipates that pension costs will decrease by approximately $27 million. The decrease will be primarily driven by utilizing a higher discount rate given the rising interest rate environment and amortization of unrecognized actuarial gains from prior years, accounting for approximately $13 million and $14 million of the anticipated decrease, respectively.

U.S. BANCORP  25

Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements provides a summary of the significant pension plan assumptions. Because of the subjective nature of plan assumptions, a sensitivity analysis to hypothetical changes in the LTROR and the discount rate is provided below:

							Base
LTROR(Dollars in Millions)	6.9%			7.9%			8.9%			9.9%			10.9%
Incremental benefit (cost)	$	(45	)	$	(22	)	$	–		$	22		$	45
Percent of 2006 net income		(.59	)%		(.29	)%		–	%		.29	%		.59	%

							Base
DISCOUNT RATE(Dollars in Millions)	4.0%			5.0%			6.0%			7.0%			8.0%
Incremental benefit (cost)	$	(111	)	$	(50	)	$	–		$	40		$	71
Percent of 2006 net income		(1.45	)%		(.65	)%		–	%		.52	%		.93	%

     Due to the complexity of forecasting pension plan activities, the accounting method utilized for pension plans, management’s ability to respond to factors impacting the plans and the hypothetical nature of this information, the actual changes in periodic pension costs could be different than the information provided in the sensitivity analysis.

Income Tax ExpenseThe provision for income taxes was $2,112 million (an effective rate of 30.8 percent) in 2006, compared with $2,082 million (an effective rate of 31.7 percent) in 2005 and $2,009 million (an effective rate of 32.5 percent) in 2004. The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2005 primarily reflected higher tax exempt income from investment securities and insurance products as well as incremental tax credits from affordable housing and other tax-advantaged investments.

     Included in 2006 was a reduction of income tax expense of $61 million related to the resolution of federal income tax examinations covering substantially all of the Company’s legal entities for all years through 2004 and $22 million related to certain state examinations. Included in the determination of income taxes for 2005 and 2004 were reductions of income tax expense of $94 million and $106 million, respectively, related to the resolution of income tax examinations. The Company anticipates that its effective tax rate for the foreseeable future will approximate 32 percent of pretax earnings.

     For further information on income taxes, refer to Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 Table 6   LOAN PORTFOLIO DISTRIBUTION

				2006					2005					2004					2003					2002
						Percent					Percent					Percent					Percent					Percent
At December 31 (Dollars in Millions)				Amount		of Total			Amount		of Total			Amount		of Total			Amount		of Total			Amount		of Total
COMMERCIAL
	Commercial			$	40,640		28.3	%	$	37,844		27.7	%	$	35,210		28.2	%	$	33,536		28.7	%	$	36,584		31.8	%
	Lease financing				5,550		3.9			5,098		3.7			4,963		4.0			4,990		4.3			5,360		4.7
		Total commercial			46,190		32.2			42,942		31.4			40,173		32.2			38,526		33.0			41,944		36.5
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
	Commercial mortgages				19,711		13.7			20,272		14.9			20,315		16.3			20,624		17.6			20,325		17.7
	Construction and development				8,934		6.2			8,191		6.0			7,270		5.8			6,618		5.7			6,542		5.7
		Total commercial real estate			28,645		19.9			28,463		20.9			27,585		22.1			27,242		23.3			26,867		23.4
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES
	Residential mortgages				15,316		10.7			14,538		10.7			9,722		7.8			7,332		6.3			6,446		5.6
	Home equity loans, first liens				5,969		4.1			6,192		4.5			5,645		4.5			6,125		5.2			3,300		2.9
		Total residential mortgages			21,285		14.8			20,730		15.2			15,367		12.3			13,457		11.5			9,746		8.5
RETAIL
	Credit card				8,670		6.0			7,137		5.2			6,603		5.3			5,933		5.1			5,665		4.9
	Retail leasing				6,960		4.9			7,338		5.4			7,166		5.7			6,029		5.2			5,680	��	4.9
	Home equity and second mortgages				15,523		10.8			14,979		11.0			14,851		11.9			13,210		11.3			13,572		11.8
	Other retail
		Revolving credit			2,563		1.8			2,504		1.8			2,541		2.0			2,540		2.2			2,650		2.3
		Installment			4,478		3.1			3,582		2.6			2,767		2.2			2,380		2.0			2,258		2.0
		Automobile			8,693		6.1			8,112		6.0			7,419		5.9			7,165		6.1			6,343		5.5
		Student			590		.4			675		.5			469		.4			329		.3			180		.2
			Total other retail		16,324		11.4			14,873		10.9			13,196		10.5			12,414		10.6			11,431		10.0
		Total retail			47,477		33.1			44,327		32.5			41,816		33.4			37,586		32.2			36,348		31.6
			Total loans	$	143,597		100.0	%	$	136,462		100.0	%	$	124,941		100.0	%	$	116,811		100.0	%	$	114,905		100.0	%

26  U.S. BANCORP

BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

Average earning assets were $186.2 billion in 2006, compared with $178.4 billion in 2005. The increase in average earning assets of $7.8 billion (4.4 percent) was primarily driven by growth in total average loans, partially offset by a decrease in investment securities. The change in average earning assets was principally funded by increases in wholesale funding.

     For average balance information, refer to Consolidated Daily Average Balance Sheet and Related Yields and Rates on pages 106 and 107.

LoansThe Company’s loan portfolio was $143.6 billion at December 31, 2006, an increase of $7.1 billion (5.2 percent) from December 31, 2005. The increase was driven by growth in commercial loans (7.6 percent), retail loans (7.1 percent), residential mortgages (2.7 percent) and commercial real estate loans (.6 percent). Table 6 provides a summary of the loan distribution by product type, while Table 10 provides a summary of selected loan maturity distribution by loan category. Average total loans increased $9.0 billion (6.8 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005. The increase was due to growth in most loan categories.

CommercialCommercial loans, including lease financing, increased $3.2 billion (7.6 percent) as of December 31, 2006, compared with December 31, 2005. The increase was driven by new customer relationships, revolving credit line utilization by business customers and growth in corporate payment card and commercial leasing balances. Additionally, loans to financial institutions increased 10.6 percent from a year ago. Average commercial loans increased $2.8 billion (6.6 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005, primarily due to an increase in commercial loan demand driven by general economic conditions in 2006.

     Table 7 provides a summary of commercial loans by industry and geographical locations.

Commercial Real EstateThe Company’s portfolio of commercial real estate loans, which includes commercial mortgages and construction loans, increased $.2 billion

 Table 7   COMMERCIAL LOANS BY INDUSTRY GROUP AND GEOGRAPHY

		December 31, 2006					December 31, 2005
INDUSTRY GROUP (Dollars in Millions)		Loans		Percent			Loans		Percent
Consumer products and services		$	9,303		20.1	%	$	8,723		20.3	%
Financial services			6,375		13.8			5,416		12.6
Commercial services and supplies			4,645		10.1			4,326		10.1
Capital goods			3,872		8.4			3,881		9.0
Property management and development			3,104		6.7			3,182		7.4
Agriculture			2,436		5.3			2,693		6.3
Healthcare			2,328		5.0			2,064		4.8
Paper and forestry products, mining and basic materials			2,190		4.7			1,990		4.6
Consumer staples			1,749		3.8			1,785		4.2
Transportation			1,662		3.6			1,565		3.7
Private investors			1,565		3.4			1,477		3.4
Energy			1,104		2.4			842		2.0
Information technology			821		1.8			700		1.6
Other			5,036		10.9			4,298		10.0
	Total	$	46,190		100.0	%	$	42,942		100.0	%
GEOGRAPHY
California		$	4,112		8.9	%	$	3,561		8.3	%
Colorado			2,958		6.4			2,578		6.0
Illinois			2,789		6.0			2,919		6.8
Minnesota			6,842		14.8			6,806		15.8
Missouri			1,862		4.0			2,056		4.8
Ohio			2,672		5.8			2,640		6.2
Oregon			1,870		4.0			1,649		3.8
Washington			2,212		4.8			2,404		5.6
Wisconsin			2,295		5.0			2,421		5.6
Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota			4,308		9.3			3,721		8.7
Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee			2,070		4.5			2,214		5.2
Idaho, Montana, Wyoming			1,015		2.2			825		1.9
Arizona, Nevada, Utah			1,602		3.5			1,163		2.7
	Total banking region		36,607		79.2			34,957		81.4
Outside the Company’s banking region			9,583		20.8			7,985		18.6
	Total	$	46,190		100.0	%	$	42,942		100.0	%

U.S. BANCORP  27

 Table 8   COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE BY PROPERTY TYPE AND GEOGRAPHY

		December 31, 2006					December 31, 2005
PROPERTY TYPE (Dollars in Millions)		Loans		Percent			Loans		Percent
Business owner occupied		$	10,027		35.0	%	$	9,221		32.4	%
Commercial property
	Industrial		939		3.3			1,025		3.6
	Office		2,226		7.8			2,306		8.1
	Retail		2,732		9.5			3,558		12.5
	Other		2,745		9.6			2,704		9.5
Homebuilders
	Condominiums		1,117		3.9			911		3.2
	Other		3,440		12.0			2,988		10.5
Multi-family			3,850		13.4			3,843		13.5
Hotel/motel			1,126		3.9			1,423		5.0
Health care facilities			443		1.6			484		1.7
	Total	$	28,645		100.0	%	$	28,463		100.0	%
GEOGRAPHY
California		$	6,044		21.1	%	$	5,806		20.4	%
Colorado			1,404		4.9			1,366		4.8
Illinois			1,060		3.7			1,025		3.6
Minnesota			1,833		6.4			1,765		6.2
Missouri			1,461		5.1			1,452		5.1
Ohio			1,375		4.8			1,537		5.4
Oregon			1,747		6.1			1,736		6.1
Washington			3,065		10.7			2,846		10.0
Wisconsin			1,547		5.4			1,679		5.9
Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota			1,948		6.8			1,935		6.8
Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee			1,404		4.9			1,565		5.5
Idaho, Montana, Wyoming			1,060		3.7			1,110		3.9
Arizona, Nevada, Utah			2,406		8.4			2,362		8.3
	Total banking region		26,354		92.0			26,184		92.0
Outside the Company’s banking region			2,291		8.0			2,279		8.0
	Total	$	28,645		100.0	%	$	28,463		100.0	%

(.6 percent) at December 31, 2006, compared with December 31, 2005. Construction and development loans increased $.7 billion (9.1 percent) despite developers beginning to slow homebuilding and managing their inventories of residential homes in response to softening market conditions. Additionally, the Company made a decision to reduce financing activities for the construction of condominiums and similar housing projects. Commercial mortgages outstanding decreased $.6 billion (2.8 percent) reflecting reductions in traditional commercial real estate mortgages due to customer refinancing activities, given liquidity available in the financial markets. Average commercial real estate loans increased $.8 billion (2.8 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005, primarily driven by growth in construction and development loans. Table 8 provides a summary of commercial real estate by property type and geographical locations.

     The Company maintains the real estate construction designation until the completion of the construction phase and, if retained, the loan is reclassified to the commercial mortgage category. Approximately $161 million of construction loans were permanently financed and reclassified to the commercial mortgage loan category in 2006. At December 31, 2006, $233 million of tax-exempt industrial development loans were secured by real estate. The Company’s commercial real estate mortgages and construction loans had unfunded commitments of $8.9 billion at December 31, 2006, compared with $9.8 billion at December 31, 2005. The Company also finances the operations of real estate developers and other entities with operations related to real estate. These loans are not secured directly by real estate and are subject to terms and conditions similar to commercial loans. These loans were included in the commercial loan category and totaled $1.7 billion at December 31, 2006.

Residential MortgagesResidential mortgages held in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2006, increased $.6 billion (2.7 percent) from December 31, 2005. The growth was the result of an increase in consumer finance originations, partially offset by the Company’s decision in early 2006 to resume packaging and selling a majority of its residential mortgage loan production in the secondary markets. Average residential mortgages increased $3.0 billion

28  U.S. BANCORP

 Table 9   RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES AND RETAIL LOANS BY GEOGRAPHY

		December 31, 2006					December 31, 2005
(Dollars in Millions)		Loans		Percent			Loans		Percent
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES
California		$	1,356		6.4	%	$	1,351		6.5	%
Colorado			1,480		6.9			1,406		6.8
Illinois			1,359		6.4			1,402		6.8
Minnesota			2,287		10.7			2,350		11.3
Missouri			1,516		7.1			1,549		7.4
Ohio			1,529		7.2			1,487		7.2
Oregon			952		4.5			964		4.6
Washington			1,273		6.0			1,245		6.0
Wisconsin			1,100		5.2			1,136		5.5
Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota			1,512		7.1			1,536		7.4
Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee			1,676		7.9			1,570		7.6
Idaho, Montana, Wyoming			470		2.2			489		2.4
Arizona, Nevada, Utah			1,168		5.5			1,161		5.6
	Total banking region		17,678		83.1			17,646		85.1
Outside the Company’s banking region			3,607		16.9			3,084		14.9
	Total	$	21,285		100.0	%	$	20,730		100.0	%
RETAIL LOANS
California		$	5,769		12.1	%	$	5,142		11.6	%
Colorado			2,284		4.8			2,305		5.2
Illinois			2,429		5.1			2,305		5.2
Minnesota			5,075		10.7			4,920		11.1
Missouri			2,464		5.2			2,438		5.5
Ohio			3,224		6.8			3,236		7.3
Oregon			2,024		4.3			1,906		4.3
Washington			2,278		4.8			2,172		4.9
Wisconsin			2,454		5.2			2,438		5.5
Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota			3,096		6.5			3,014		6.8
Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee			3,588		7.6			3,325		7.5
Idaho, Montana, Wyoming			1,339		2.8			1,241		2.8
Arizona, Nevada, Utah			1,964		4.1			1,773		4.0
	Total banking region		37,988		80.0			36,215		81.7
Outside the Company’s banking region			9,489		20.0			8,112		18.3
	Total	$	47,477		100.0	%	$	44,327		100.0	%

(16.7 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005. During 2005, the Company was retaining a substantial portion of its adjustable-rate residential mortgage loan production in connection with asset/liability management decisions to reduce its risk to rising interest rates. Average residential mortgage loan balances increased as a result of the timing of these asset/liability decisions.

RetailTotal retail loans outstanding, which include credit card, retail leasing, home equity and second mortgages and other retail loans, increased $3.2 billion (7.1 percent) at December 31, 2006, compared with December 31, 2005. The increase was primarily driven by growth in credit card and other retail loans, both of which increased by $1.5 billion during 2006. The increases in these loan

 Table 10   SELECTED LOAN MATURITY DISTRIBUTION

				Over One
		One Year		Through		Over Five
December 31, 2006 (Dollars in Millions)		or Less		Five Years		Years		Total
Commercial		$	20,398	$	22,925	$	2,867	$	46,190
Commercial real estate			8,878		13,049		6,718		28,645
Residential mortgages			938		2,679		17,668		21,285
Retail			15,817		18,802		12,858		47,477
	Total loans	$	46,031	$	57,455	$	40,111	$	143,597
Total of loans due after one year with
	Predetermined interest rates							$	48,776
	Floating interest rates							$	48,790

U.S. BANCORP  29

categories were offset somewhat by a slight reduction in retail leasing balances of $.4 billion during the year. Average retail loans increased $2.4 billion (5.5 percent) in 2006, principally reflecting growth in credit card and installment loans. Credit card growth was driven by balance transfers, balance growth within co-branded card contracts and affinity programs. Of the total retail loans and residential mortgages outstanding, approximately 81.0 percent were to customers located in the Company’s primary banking regions. Table 9 provides a geographic summary of residential mortgages and retail loans outstanding as of December 31, 2006.

Loans Held for SaleAt December 31, 2006, loans held for sale, consisting of residential mortgages, student loans, and other selective loans to be sold in the secondary market, were $3.3 billion, compared with $3.0 billion at

 Table 11   INVESTMENT SECURITIES

			Available-for-Sale									Held-to-Maturity
							Weighted-									Weighted-
							Average		Weighted-							Average		Weighted-
			Amortized		Fair		Maturity in		Average			Amortized		Fair		Maturity in		Average
December 31, 2006 (Dollars in Millions)			Cost		Value		Years		Yield (d)			Cost		Value		Years		Yield (d)
U.S. TREASURY AND AGENCIES
	Maturing in one year or less		$	91	$	91		.4		5.21	%	$	–	$	–		–		–	%
	Maturing after one year through five years			28		29		2.4		7.12			–		–		–		–
	Maturing after five years through ten years			21		21		7.0		6.71			–		–		–		–
	Maturing after ten years			332		326		13.6		5.99			–		–		–		–
		Total	$	472	$	467		10.1		5.94	%	$	–	$	–		–		–	%
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (a)
	Maturing in one year or less		$	437	$	438		.8		5.45	%	$	–	$	–		–		–	%
	Maturing after one year through five years			17,832		17,386		3.3		4.68			7		7		3.1		5.75
	Maturing after five years through ten years			12,676		12,402		6.9		5.30			–		–		–		–
	Maturing after ten years			3,520		3,561		13.1		6.51			–		–		–		–
		Total	$	34,465	$	33,787		5.6		5.10	%	$	7	$	7		3.1		5.75	%
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES (a)
	Maturing in one year or less		$	7	$	7		.1		5.32	%	$	–	$	–		–		–	%
	Maturing after one year through five years			–		–		–		–			–		–		–		–
	Maturing after five years through ten years			–		–		–		–			–		–		–		–
	Maturing after ten years			–		–		–		–			–		–		–		–
		Total	$	7	$	7		.1		5.32	%	$	–	$	–		–		–	%
OBLIGATIONS OF STATE AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS (b)
	Maturing in one year or less		$	50	$	50		.3		6.94	%	$	2	$	2		.5		6.20	%
	Maturing after one year through five years			37		37		2.1		6.84			19		20		2.9		6.07
	Maturing after five years through ten years			3,670		3,746		8.9		6.78			15		18		8.4		7.12
	Maturing after ten years			706		706		14.8		6.16			31		32		16.1		5.52
		Total	$	4,463	$	4,539		9.7		6.68	%	$	67	$	72		10.1		6.06	%
OTHER DEBT SECURITIES
	Maturing in one year or less		$	122	$	122		.1		4.33	%	$	2	$	2		.5		6.94	%
	Maturing after one year through five years			61		61		4.7		6.27			10		10		2.7		5.78
	Maturing after five years through ten years			21		21		9.2		6.29			1		1		5.3		6.09
	Maturing after ten years			790		789		29.3		6.33			–		–		–		–
		Total	$	994	$	993		23.8		6.08	%	$	13	$	13		2.5		5.98	%
OTHER INVESTMENTS			$	229	$	237		–		6.26	%	$	–	$	–		–		–	%
Total investment securities (c)			$	40,630	$	40,030		6.6		5.32	%	$	87	$	92		8.4		6.03	%

(a)	Information related to asset and mortgage-backed securities included above is presented based upon weighted-average maturities anticipating future prepayments.
(b)	Information related to obligations of state and political subdivisions is presented based upon yield to first optional call date if the security is purchased at a premium, yield to maturity if purchased at par or a discount.
(c)	The weighted-average maturity of the available for sale investment securities was 6.1 years at December 31, 2005, with a corresponding weighted-average yield of 4.89 percent. The weighted-average maturity of theheld-to-maturity investment securities was 7.2 years at December 31, 2005, with a corresponding weighted-average yield of 6.44 percent.
(d)	Average yields are presented on a fully-taxable equivalent basis under a tax rate of 35 percent. Yields on available-for-sale andheld-to-maturity securities are computed based on historical cost balances. Average yield and maturity calculations exclude equity securities that have no stated yield or maturity.

		2006					2005
		Amortized		Percent			Amortized		Percent
December 31 (Dollars in Millions)		Cost		of Total			Cost		of Total
U.S. Treasury and agencies		$	472		1.2	%	$	496		1.2	%
Mortgage-backed securities			34,472		84.7			38,169		94.4
Asset-backed securities			7		–			12		.1
Obligations of state and political subdivisions			4,530		11.1			724		1.8
Other debt securities and investments			1,236		3.0			1,029		2.5
	Total investment securities	$	40,717		100.0	%	$	40,430		100.0	%

30  U.S. BANCORP

December 31, 2005. The increase in loans held for sale was principally due to an increase in residential mortgage balances. Average loans held for sale were $3.7 billion in 2006, compared with $3.3 billion in 2005.

Investment SecuritiesThe Company uses its investment securities portfolio for several purposes. It serves as a vehicle to manage interest rate risk, generates interest and dividend income from the investment of excess funds depending on loan demand, provides liquidity and is used as collateral for public deposits and wholesale funding sources. While it is the Company’s intent to hold its investment securities indefinitely, the Company may take actions in response to structural changes in the balance sheet and related interest rate risk and to meet liquidity requirements.

     At December 31, 2006, investment securities, both available-for-sale andheld-to-maturity, totaled $40.1 billion, compared with $39.8 billion at December 31, 2005. The $.3 billion (.9 percent) increase primarily reflected securities purchases of $7.5 billion, partially offset by maturities and prepayments. Additionally, the Company reclassified $.5 billion of principal-only securities to the trading account effective January 1, 2006, in connection with the adoption of SFAS 156. At December 31, 2006, approximately 37 percent of the investment securities portfolio represented adjustable-rate financial instruments, compared with 41 percent at December 31, 2005. Adjustable-rate financial instruments include variable-rate collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities, agency securities, adjustable-rate money market accounts and asset-backed securities. The decline in the percentage of adjustable-rate securities reflects decisions to purchase higher yielding fixed-rate municipal bonds and certain preferred corporate debt instruments. Average investment securities were $2.1 billion (5.1 percent) lower in 2006, compared with 2005. The decline principally reflected asset/liability management decisions to reduce the focus on residential mortgage-backed assets given the changing mix of the Company’s loan growth.

     The weighted-average yield of the available-for-sale portfolio was 5.32 percent at December 31, 2006, compared with 4.89 percent at December 31, 2005. The average maturity of the available-for-sale portfolio increased to 6.6 years at December 31, 2006, up from 6.1 years at December 31, 2005. The relative mix of the type of investment securities maintained in the portfolio is provided in Table 11. At December 31, 2006, the available-for-sale portfolio included a $600 million net unrealized loss, compared with a net unrealized loss of $662 million at December 31, 2005.

DepositsTotal deposits were $124.9 billion at December 31, 2006, compared with $124.7 billion at December 31, 2005, reflecting increases in interest checking and time certificates of deposits less than $100,000, partially offset by decreases in noninterest-bearing deposits, savings accounts, money market savings and balances from time deposits greater than $100,000. Average total deposits decreased $.4 billion (.3 percent) from 2005, reflecting a decline in average noninterest-bearing deposits, money market savings, and other savings accounts. The decreases in these categories were partially offset by higher average interest checking and fixed-rate time certificate balances as branch-based customer balances migrated from lower rate saving products to products with higher interest rate offerings.

     Noninterest-bearing deposits at December 31, 2006, decreased $.1 billion (.3 percent) from December 31, 2005. The decrease was primarily attributed to a decline in business demand deposits as these customers reduced excess liquidity to fund business growth. The change also reflected a migration of customers to interest-bearing products, given rising interest rates. Average noninterest-bearing deposits in 2006 decreased $.5 billion (1.6 percent), compared with 2005, due to similar factors.

     Interest-bearing savings deposits decreased $.3 billion (.6 percent) at December 31, 2006, compared with December 31, 2005. The decline in these deposit balances was primarily related to reductions in money market savings and savings account balances, partially offset by an increase in interest checking accounts. The $1.7 billion (6.1 percent) decrease in money market savings account balances reflected the Company’s deposit pricing decisions for money market products in relation to other fixed-rate deposit products offered. A portion of branch-based money market savings accounts migrated to fixed-rate time certificates in response to higher interest rates for these products. The $1.7 billion (7.1 percent) increase in interest checking account balances was due to an increase in trust and custody and government balances, partially offset by decreases in private banking balances. Average interest-bearing savings deposits in 2006 decreased $2.1 billion (3.6 percent), compared with 2005, primarily driven by a reduction in money market savings account balances of $2.6 billion (9.0 percent), partially offset by higher interest checking account balances of $.8 billion (3.4 percent).

     Interest-bearing time deposits at December 31, 2006, increased $.6 billion (1.7 percent), compared with December 31, 2005, primarily driven by an increase in time certificates of deposit less than $100,000. The increase in time certificates of deposit less than $100,000 was due to the migration of a portion of customer noninterest-bearing and money market savings account balances to fixed-rate deposits. Average time deposits greater than $100,000 increased $1.6 billion (7.7 percent) and average time certificates of deposit less than $100,000 increased $.6 billion (4.3 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005.

U.S. BANCORP  31

 Table 12   DEPOSITS

The composition of deposits was as follows:

			2006					2005					2004					2003					2002
					Percent					Percent					Percent					Percent					Percent
December 31 (Dollars in Millions)			Amount		of Total			Amount		of Total			Amount		of Total			Amount		of Total			Amount		of Total
Noninterest-bearing deposits			$	32,128		25.7	%	$	32,214		25.8	%	$	30,756		25.5	%	$	32,470		27.3	%	$	35,106		30.4	%
Interest-bearing deposits
	Interest checking			24,937		20.0			23,274		18.7			23,186		19.2			21,404		18.0			17,467		15.1
	Money market savings			26,220		21.0			27,934		22.4			30,478		25.2			34,025		28.6			27,753		24.0
	Savings accounts			5,314		4.2			5,602		4.5			5,728		4.8			5,630		4.7			5,021		4.4
		Total of savings deposits		56,471		45.2			56,810		45.6			59,392		49.2			61,059		51.3			50,241		43.5
Time certificates of deposit less than $100,000				13,859		11.1			13,214		10.6			12,544		10.4			13,690		11.5			17,973		15.5
Time deposits greater than $100,000
	Domestic			14,868		11.9			14,341		11.5			11,956		9.9			5,902		4.9			9,427		8.2
	Foreign			7,556		6.1			8,130		6.5			6,093		5.0			5,931		5.0			2,787		2.4
		Total interest-bearing deposits		92,754		74.3			92,495		74.2			89,985		74.5			86,582		72.7			80,428		69.6
	Total deposits		$	124,882		100.0	%	$	124,709		100.0	%	$	120,741		100.0	%	$	119,052		100.0	%	$	115,534		100.0	%

The maturity of time certificates of deposit less than $100,000 and time deposits greater than $100,000 was as follows:

		Time Certificates of		Time Deposits
December 31, 2006 (Dollars in Millions)		Deposit Less Than $100,000		Greater Than $100,000		Total
Three months or less		$	3,521	$	17,101	$	20,622
Three months through six months			3,173		2,071		5,244
Six months through one year			3,304		1,789		5,093
2008			2,673		915		3,588
2009			677		274		951
2010			210		126		336
2011			294		145		439
Thereafter			7		3		10
	Total	$	13,859	$	22,424	$	36,283

Time deposits greater than $100,000 are largely viewed as purchased funds and are managed to levels deemed appropriate given alternative funding sources.

BorrowingsThe Company utilizes both short-term and long-term borrowings to fund earning asset growth in excess of deposit growth. Short-term borrowings, which include federal funds purchased, commercial paper, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings, were $26.9 billion at December 31, 2006, compared with $20.2 billion at December 31, 2005. Short-term funding is managed within approved liquidity policies. The increase of $6.7 billion in short-term borrowings reflected wholesale funding associated with the Company’s earning asset growth and asset/liability management activities.

     Long-term debt was $37.6 billion at December 31, 2006, compared with $37.1 billion at December 31, 2005, reflecting the issuances of $5.5 billion of medium-term and bank notes, $2.5 billion of convertible senior debentures, $2.5 billion of junior subordinated debentures and the addition of $3.1 billion of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances. These additions were partially offset by $7.6 billion of medium-term and bank note maturities, and $3.4 billion of convertible senior debenture repayments. In addition, the Company elected to redeem $1.9 billion of junior subordinated debentures in connection with asset/liability and interest rate risk management decisions. Refer to Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding long-term debt and the “Liquidity Risk Management” section for discussion of liquidity management of the Company.

CORPORATE RISK PROFILE

OverviewManaging risks is an essential part of successfully operating a financial services company. The most prominent risk exposures are credit, residual value, operational, interest rate, market and liquidity risk. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Residual value risk is the potential reduction in theend-of-term value of leased assets or the residual cash flows related to asset securitization and other off-balance sheet structures. Operational risk includes risks related to fraud, legal and compliance risk, processing errors, technology, breaches of internal controls and business continuation and disaster recovery risk. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates, which can affect the repricing of assets and liabilities

32  U.S. BANCORP

differently, as well as their market value. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as trading and available-for-sale securities that are accounted for on amark-to-market basis. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, investors or borrowers. In addition, corporate strategic decisions, as well as the risks described above, could give rise to reputation risk. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could result in costly litigation or cause a decline in the Company’s stock value, customer base or revenue.

Credit Risk ManagementThe Company’s strategy for credit risk management includes well-defined, centralized credit policies, uniform underwriting criteria, and ongoing risk monitoring and review processes for all commercial and consumer credit exposures. The strategy also emphasizes diversification on a geographic, industry and customer level, regular credit examinations and management reviews of loans exhibiting deterioration of credit quality. The credit risk management strategy also includes a credit risk assessment process, independent of business line managers, that performs assessments of compliance with commercial and consumer credit policies, risk ratings, and other critical credit information. The Company strives to identify potential problem loans early, record any necessary charge-offs promptly and maintain adequate reserve levels for probable loan losses inherent in the portfolio. Commercial banking operations rely on prudent credit policies and procedures and individual lender and business line manager accountability. Lenders are assigned lending authority based on their level of experience and customer service requirements. Credit officers reporting to an independent credit administration function have higher levels of lending authority and support the business units in their credit decision process. Loan decisions are documented as to the borrower’s business, purpose of the loan, evaluation of the repayment source and the associated risks, evaluation of collateral, covenants and monitoring requirements, and risk rating rationale. The Company utilizes a credit risk rating system to measure the credit quality of individual commercial loans including the probability of default of an obligor and the loss given default of credit facilities. The Company uses the risk rating system for regulatory reporting, determining the frequency of review of the credit exposures, and evaluation and determination of the specific allowance for commercial credit losses. The Company regularly forecasts potential changes in risk ratings, nonperforming status and potential for loss and the estimated impact on the allowance for credit losses. In the Company’s retail banking operations, standard credit scoring systems are used to assess credit risks of consumer, small business and small-ticket leasing customers and to price consumer products accordingly. The Company conducts the underwriting and collections of its retail products in loan underwriting and servicing centers specializing in certain retail products. Forecasts of delinquency levels, bankruptcies and losses in conjunction with projection of estimated losses by delinquency categories and vintage information are regularly prepared and are used to evaluate underwriting and collection and determine the specific allowance for credit losses for these products. Because business processes and credit risks associated with unfunded credit commitments are essentially the same as for loans, the Company utilizes similar processes to estimate its liability for unfunded credit commitments. The Company also engages in non-lending activities that may give rise to credit risk, including interest rate swap and option contracts for balance sheet hedging purposes, foreign exchange transactions, deposit overdrafts and interest rate swap contracts for customers, and settlement risk, including Automated Clearing House transactions, and the processing of credit card transactions for merchants. These activities are also subject to credit review, analysis and approval processes.

Economic and Other FactorsIn evaluating its credit risk, the Company considers changes, if any, in underwriting activities, the loan portfolio composition (including product mix and geographic, industry or customer-specific concentrations), trends in loan performance, the level of allowance coverage relative to similar banking institutions and macroeconomic factors.

     Since mid-2003, economic conditions have steadily improved as evidenced by stronger earnings across many corporate sectors, higher equity valuations, and stronger retail sales and consumer spending. In late 2003, unemployment rates stabilized and began to decline from a high of 6.13 percent in the third quarter of that year. However, the banking industry continued to have elevated levels of nonperforming assets and net charge-offs in 2003 compared with the late 1990’s.

     Economic conditions have steadily improved during the timeframe from 2004 through 2006, as reflected in strong expansion of the gross domestic product index, lower unemployment rates, expanding retail sales levels, favorable trends related to corporate profits and consumer spending for retail goods and services. Beginning in mid-2004 through the second quarter of 2006, the Federal Reserve Bank pursued a measured approach to increasing short-term rates in an effort to prevent an acceleration of inflation and maintain a moderate rate of economic growth. The rising interest rate environment has caused some softening of residential home and condominium sales. Nationwide sales of condominium units reached a peak in mid-2005 and

U.S. BANCORP  33

have declined since that timeframe. With respect to residential homes, inventory levels approximated a 7 month supply at the end of 2006, up from 4.5 months in the third quarter of 2005. Median home prices, which peaked in mid-2006, have declined somewhat across most domestic markets with more severe price reductions in the Northeast and Southeast regions. Since the second quarter of 2006, retail sales have slowed somewhat and industrial production declined moderately in the fourth quarter of 2006. Beginning in the third quarter of 2006, the Federal Reserve Bank paused from its approach of increasing interest rates and tightening the money supply as growth in inflationary indices began to moderate.

     In addition to economic factors, changes in regulations and legislation can have an impact on the credit performance of the loan portfolios. Beginning in 2005, the Company implemented higher minimum balance payment requirements for its credit card customers in response to industry guidance issued by the banking regulatory agencies. This industry guidance was provided to minimize the likelihood that minimum balance payments would not be sufficient to cover interest, fees and a portion of the principal balance of a credit card loan resulting in negative amortization, or increasing account balances. Also, new bankruptcy legislation was enacted in October 2005, making it more difficult for borrowers to have their debts forgiven during bankruptcy proceedings. As a result of the changes in bankruptcy laws, the levels of consumer and business bankruptcy filings increased dramatically in the fourth quarter of 2005 and declined in early 2006 to levels that were a third of average bankruptcy filings during 2004 and early 2005. While consumer bankruptcies have begun to increase somewhat, bankruptcy filings in the fourth quarter of 2006 approximated only fifty percent of pre-2005 levels. Going forward, the lending industry may experience increasing levels of nonperforming loans, restructured loans and delinquencies due to changing collections strategies for consumer credit.

Credit DiversificationThe Company manages its credit risk, in part, through diversification of its loan portfolio. As part of its normal business activities, it offers a broad array of traditional commercial lending products and specialized products such as asset-based lending, commercial lease financing, agricultural credit, warehouse mortgage lending, commercial real estate, health care and correspondent banking. The Company also offers an array of retail lending products including credit cards, retail leases, home equity, revolving credit, lending to students and other consumer loans. These retail credit products are primarily offered through the branch office network, home mortgage and loan production offices, indirect distribution channels, such as automobile dealers and a consumer finance division. The Company monitors and manages the portfolio diversification by industry, customer and geography. Table 6 provides information with respect to the overall product diversification and changes in the mix during 2006.

     The commercial portfolio reflects the Company’s focus on serving small business customers, middle market and larger corporate businesses throughout its24-state banking region, as well as large national customers. Table 7 provides a summary of the significant industry groups and geographic locations of commercial loans outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The commercial loan portfolio is diversified among various industries with somewhat higher concentrations in consumer products and services, financial services, commercial services and supplies, capital goods (including manufacturing and commercial construction-related businesses), property management and development and agricultural industries. Additionally, the commercial portfolio is diversified across the Company’s geographical markets with 79.2 percent of total commercial loans within the24-state banking region. Credit relationships outside of the Company’s banking region are reflected within the corporate banking, mortgage banking, auto dealer and leasing businesses focusing on large national customers and specifically targeted industries. Loans to mortgage banking customers are primarily warehouse lines which are collateralized with the underlying mortgages. The Company regularly monitors its mortgage collateral position to manage its risk exposure.

     The commercial real estate portfolio reflects the Company’s focus on serving business owners within its footprint as well as regional and national investment-based real estate. At December 31, 2006, the Company had commercial real estate loans of $28.6 billion, or 19.9 percent of total loans, compared with $28.5 billion at December 31, 2005. Within commercial real estate loans, different property types have varying degrees of credit risk. Table 8 provides a summary of the significant property types and geographical locations of commercial real estate loans outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005. At December 31, 2006, approximately 35.0 percent of the commercial real estate loan portfolio represented business owner-occupied properties that tend to exhibit credit risk characteristics similar to the middle market commercial loan portfolio. Generally, the investment-based real estate mortgages are diversified among various property types with somewhat higher concentrations in office and retail properties. While investment-based commercial real estate continues to perform with relatively strong occupancy levels and cash flows, these categories of loans can be adversely impacted during a rising rate environment. During the year, the Company began to reduce the level of its construction financing of condominium projects given the deterioration in unit pricing in several regions of the country. Included in

34  U.S. BANCORP

commercial real estate at year end 2006 was approximately $.7 billion in loans related to land held for development and $2.2 billion of loans related to residential and commercial acquisition and development properties. These loans are subject to quarterly monitoring for changes in local market conditions due to a higher credit risk profile. Acquisition and development loans continued to perform well, despite a slow down in the housing market and softening of demand. The commercial real estate portfolio is diversified across the Company’s geographical markets with 92.0 percent of total commercial real estate loans outstanding at December 31, 2006, within the24-state banking region.

     Residential mortgages represent an important financial product for consumer customers of the Company and are originated through the Company’s branches, loan production offices, a wholesale network of originators and a consumer finance division. With respect to residential mortgages originated through these channels, the Company may either retain the loans on its balance sheet or sell its interest in the balances into the secondary market while retaining the servicing rights and customer relationships. Utilizing the secondary markets enables the Company to effectively reduce its credit and other asset/liability risks. For residential mortgages that are retained in the Company’s portfolio, credit risk is also diversified by geography and by monitoring loan-to-values during the underwriting process.

The following table provides summary information of theloan-to-values of residential mortgages by distribution channel and type at December 31, 2006:

									Percent
			Interest						of
(Dollars in Millions)			Only		Amortizing		Total		Total
CONSUMER FINANCE
	Less than or equal to 80%		$	694	$	2,204	$	2,898		35.9	%
	Over 80% through 90%			746		1,351		2,097		25.9
	Over 90% through 100%			575		2,435		3,010		37.2
	Over 100%			—		79		79		1.0
		Total	$	2,015	$	6,069	$	8,084		100.0	%
TRADITIONAL BRANCH
	Less than or equal to 80%		$	2,464	$	10,224	$	12,688		96.1	%
	Over 80% through 90%			109		232		341		2.6
	Over 90% through 100%			120		52		172		1.3
	Over 100%			—		—		—		—
		Total	$	2,693	$	10,508	$	13,201		100.0	%
TOTAL COMPANY
	Less than or equal to 80%		$	3,158	$	12,428	$	15,586		73.2	%
	Over 80% through 90%			855		1,583		2,438		11.5
	Over 90% through 100%			695		2,487		3,182		14.9
	Over 100%			—		79		79		.4
		Total	$	4,708	$	16,577	$	21,285		100.0	%
Note: loan-to-values determined as of the date of origination.

     Within the consumer finance division approximately $2.8 billion, or 35.1 percent of that division, represents loans to customers that may be defined as sub-prime borrowers. Of these loans, 34.8 percent had a loan-to-value of less than or equal to 80 percent of the origination amount, while 24.2 percent had loan-to-values of over 80 percent through 90 percent and 39.1 percent had loan-to-values of over 90 percent through 100 percent.

The following table provides further information for the consumer finance division:

									Percent
			Interest						of
(Dollars in Millions)			Only		Amortizing		Total		Division
SUB-PRIME BORROWERS
	Less than or equal to 80%		$	4	$	985	$	989		12.3	%
	Over 80% through 90%			6		681		687		8.5
	Over 90% through 100%			34		1,076		1,110		13.7
	Over 100%			—		55		55		.7
		Total	$	44	$	2,797	$	2,841		35.2	%
OTHER BORROWERS
	Less than or equal to 80%		$	690	$	1,219	$	1,909		23.6	%
	Over 80% through 90%			740		670		1,410		17.4
	Over 90% through 100%			541		1,359		1,900		23.5
	Over 100%			—		24		24		.3
		Total	$	1,971	$	3,272	$	5,243		64.8	%
TOTAL CONSUMER FINANCE			$	2,015	$	6,069	$	8,084		100.0	%

     The Company does not have any residential mortgages whose payment schedule would cause balances to increase over time.

     The retail loan portfolio principally reflects the Company’s focus on consumers within its footprint of branches and certain niche lending activities that are nationally focused. Within the Company’s retail loan portfolio approximately 82.7 percent of the credit card balances relate to bank branch, co-branded and affinity programs that generally experience better credit quality performance than portfolios generated through national direct mail programs. At December 31, 2006, approximately 80.8 percent of the student loan portfolio is federally guaranteed through various programs reducing its risk profile.

     Table 9 provides a geographical summary of the residential mortgage and retail loan portfolios.

Loan DelinquenciesTrends in delinquency ratios represent an indicator, among other considerations, of credit risk within the Company’s loan portfolios. The entire balance of an account is considered delinquent if the minimum payment contractually required to be made is not received by the specified date on the billing statement. The Company measures delinquencies, both including and excluding nonperforming loans, to enable comparability with other companies. Advances made pursuant to servicing agreements to Government National Mortgage Association

U.S. BANCORP  35

 Table 13   DELINQUENT LOAN RATIOS AS A PERCENT OF ENDING LOANS BALANCES

At December 31,
90 days or more past dueexcludingnonperforming loans			2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
COMMERCIAL
	Commercial			.06	%		.06	%		.05	%		.06	%		.14	%
	Lease financing			–			–			.02			.04			.10
	Total commercial			.05			.05			.05			.06			.14
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
	Commercial mortgages			.01			–			–			.02			.03
	Construction and development			.01			–			–			.03			.07
	Total commercial real estate			.01			–			–			.02			.04
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES				.45			.32			.46			.61			.90
RETAIL
	Credit card			1.75			1.26			1.74			1.68			2.09
	Retail leasing			.03			.04			.08			.14			.19
	Other retail			.23			.23			.30			.43			.56
	Total retail			.48			.37			.49			.58			.74
		Total loans		.24	%		.19	%		.24	%		.28	%		.37	%

At December 31,
90 days or more past dueincludingnonperforming loans	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
Commercial		.57	%		.69	%		.99	%		1.97	%		2.35	%
Commercial real estate		.53			.55			.73			.82			.90
Residential mortgages (a)		.62			.55			.74			.91			1.44
Retail		.58			.52			.53			.65			.81
Total loans		.57	%		.58	%		.75	%		1.16	%		1.45	%

(a) Delinquent loan ratios exclude advances made pursuant to servicing agreements to Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Including the guaranteed amounts, the ratio of residential mortgages 90 days or more past due was 3.11 percent, 4.35 percent, 5.19 percent, and 6.07 percent at December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Information prior to 2003 is not available.

(“GNMA”) mortgage pools whose repayments of principal and interest are substantially insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs are excluded from delinquency statistics. In addition, under certain situations, a retail customer’s account may be re-aged to remove it from delinquent status. Generally, the intent of a re-aged account is to assist customers who have recently overcome temporary financial difficulties, and have demonstrated both the ability and willingness to resume regular payments. To qualify for re-aging, the account must have been open for at least one year and cannot have been re-aged during the preceding 365 days. An account may not be re-aged more than two times in a five year period. To qualify for re-aging, the customer must also have made three regular minimum monthly payments within the last 90 days. In addition, the Company may re-age the retail account of a customer who has experienced longer-term financial difficulties and apply modified, concessionary terms and conditions to the account. Such additional re-ages are limited to one in a five year period, must meet the qualifications for re-aging described above. All re-aging strategies must be independently approved by the Company’s credit administration function and are limited to credit card and credit line accounts. Commercial loans are not subject tore-aging policies.

     Accruing loans 90 days or more past due totaled $349 million at December 31, 2006, compared with $253 million at December 31, 2005, and $294 million at December 31, 2004. The increase in 90 day delinquent loans from December 31, 2005, to December 31, 2006, was primarily driven by the impact of the bankruptcy legislation in 2005. These loans were not included in nonperforming assets and continue to accrue interest because they are adequately secured by collateral, and/or are in the process of collection and are reasonably expected to result in repayment or restoration to current status. The ratio of 90 day delinquent loans to total loans was .24 percent at December 31, 2006, compared with .19 percent at December 31, 2005.

     To monitor credit risk associated with retail loans, the Company also monitors delinquency ratios in the various stages of collection including nonperforming status.

36  U.S. BANCORP

The following table provides summary delinquency information for residential mortgages and retail loans:

								As a Percent
								of Ending
				Amount				Loan Balances
December 31,
(Dollars in Millions)				2006		2005		2006			2005
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES
		30-89 days		$	154	$	112		.72	%		.55	%
		90 days or more			95		67		.45			.32
		Nonperforming			36		48		.17			.23
			Total	$	285	$	227		1.34	%		1.10	%
RETAIL
	Credit card
		30-89 days		$	204	$	147		2.35	%		2.06	%
		90 days or more			152		90		1.75			1.26
		Nonperforming			31		49		.36			.69
			Total	$	387	$	286		4.46	%		4.01	%
	Retail leasing
		30-89 days		$	34	$	43		.49	%		.59	%
		90 days or more			2		3		.03			.04
		Nonperforming			–		–		–			–
			Total	$	36	$	46		.52	%		.63	%
	Other retail
		30-89 days		$	210	$	206		.66	%		.69	%
		90 days or more			72		70		.23			.23
		Nonperforming			17		17		.05			.06
			Total	$	299	$	293		.94	%		.98	%

Within these product categories, the following table provides information on the amount of delinquent and nonperforming loans and the percent of ending loan balances, by channel as of December 31, 2006:

		Consumer Finance					Traditional Branch
(Dollars in Millions)		Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES		$	134		1.66	%	$	151		1.14	%
RETAIL
	Credit card	$	—		—	%	$	387		4.46	%
	Retail leasing		—		—			36		.52
	Other retail		69		3.02			230		.78

Within the consumer finance division approximately $105 million and $50 million of these delinquent and nonperforming residential mortgages and other retail loans, respectively, were to customers that may be defined as sub-prime borrowers.

Nonperforming AssetsThe level of nonperforming assets represents another indicator of the potential for future credit losses. Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans not performing in accordance with modified terms, other real estate and other nonperforming assets owned by the Company. Interest payments collected from assets on nonaccrual status are typically applied against the principal balance and not recorded as income. At December 31, 2006, total nonperforming assets were $587 million, compared with $644 million at year-end 2005 and $748 million at year-end 2004. The ratio of total nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate decreased to .41 percent at December 31, 2006, compared with .47 percent and .60 percent at the end of 2005 and 2004, respectively. The $57 million decrease in total nonperforming assets in 2006 principally reflected decreases in nonperforming commercial, residential mortgages and retail loans, partially offset by a $24 million increase in other real estate as a result of taking ownership of more residential properties. The decrease in nonperforming commercial loans in 2006 was broad-based across many industry sectors within the commercial loan portfolio including agriculture, commercial supplies, consumer-related sectors, manufacturing and transportation. Some deterioration in credit quality was experienced within the home improvement, furnishing and building sectors during the year. The reduction in nonperforming commercial real estate loans during 2006 extended across most property types and was driven by refinancing of commercial real estate mortgages given the extent of liquidity available in the market. Nonperforming loans related to construction financing have increased somewhat during the year. Nonperforming retail loans decreased from a year ago, primarily due to the run-off of nonaccrual accounts from a discontinued workout program for customers having financial difficulties meeting recent minimum balance payment requirements. Under this program, retail customers that met certain criteria had the terms of their credit card and other loan agreements modified to allow amortization of their balances over a period of up to 60 months. Residential mortgage loans on nonaccrual status decreased during 2006. As a percentage of ending loan balances, nonperforming residential mortgages declined to .17 percent at December 31, 2006 compared with .23 percent at December 31, 2005.

     The $104 million decrease in total nonperforming assets in 2005, as compared with 2004, reflected decreases in nonperforming commercial and commercial real estate loans, partially offset by increases in nonperforming residential mortgages and retail loans. The decrease in nonperforming commercial loans in 2005 was also broad-based across most industry sectors within the commercial loan portfolio including capital goods, customer-related sectors, manufacturing and certain segments of transportation. The increase in nonperforming retail loans during 2005 was directly related to the workout program, discussed above, for customers having financial difficulties meeting recent minimum balance payment requirements.

     Included in nonperforming loans were restructured loans of $38 million and $75 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. At December 31, 2006, the Company had no commitments to lend additional funds under restructured loans, compared with $9 million at December 31, 2005.

U.S. BANCORP  37

 Table 14   NONPERFORMING ASSETS (a)

At December 31, (Dollars in Millions)				2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
COMMERCIAL
	Commercial				$196			$231			$289			$624			$760
	Lease financing				40			42			91			113			167
		Total commercial			236			273			380			737			927
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
	Commercial mortgages				112			134			175			178			175
	Construction and development				38			23			25			40			57
		Total commercial real estate			150			157			200			218			232
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES					36			48			43			40			52
RETAIL
	Credit card				31			49			–			–			–
	Retail leasing				–			–			–			–			1
	Other retail				17			17			17			25			25
		Total retail			48			66			17			25			26
			Total nonperforming loans		470			544			640			1,020			1,237
OTHER REAL ESTATE (b)					95			71			72			73			59
OTHER ASSETS					22			29			36			55			77
			Total nonperforming assets		$587			$644			$748			$1,148			$1,373
Accruing loans 90 days or more past due					$349			$253			$294			$329			$426
Nonperforming loans to total loans					.33	%		.40	%		.51	%		.87	%		1.08	%
Nonperforming assets to total loans plus other real estate (b)					.41	%		.47	%		.60	%		.98	%		1.19	%
Net interest lost on nonperforming loans					$ 39			$ 30			$ 42			$ 67			$ 65

CHANGES IN NONPERFORMING ASSETS

					Commercial and			Retail and
(Dollars in Millions)					Commercial Real Estate			Residential Mortgages (d)			Total
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2005						$457			$187			$644
	Additions to nonperforming assets
		New nonaccrual loans and foreclosed properties				480			66			546
		Advances on loans				36			–			36
			Total additions			516			66			582
	Reductions in nonperforming assets
		Paydowns, payoffs				(240	)		(49	)		(289	)
		Net sales				(95	)		–			(95	)
		Return to performing status				(97	)		(8	)		(105	)
		Charge-offs (c)				(135	)		(15	)		(150	)
			Total reductions			(567	)		(72	)		(639	)
				Net reductions in nonperforming assets		(51	)		(6	)		(57	)
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2006						$406			$181			$587

(a)	Throughout this document, nonperforming assets and related ratios do not include accruing loans 90 days or more past due.
(b)	Excludes $83 million of foreclosed GNMA loans which continue to accrue interest.
(c)	Charge-offs exclude actions for certain card products and loan sales that were not classified as nonperforming at the time the charge-off occurred.
(d)	Residential mortgage information excludes changes related to residential mortgages serviced by others.

Restructured loans performing under the restructured terms beyond a specified timeframe are reported as “restructured loans that continue to accrue interest.”

Restructured Loans Accruing InterestOn a case-by-case basis, management determines whether an account that experiences financial difficulties should be modified as to its interest rate or repayment terms to maximize the Company’s collection of its balance. Loans restructured at a rate equal to or greater than that of a new loan with comparable risk at the time the contract is modified are excluded from restructured loans once repayment performance, in accordance with the modified agreement, has been demonstrated over several payment cycles. Loans that have interest rates reduced below comparable market rates remain classified as restructured loans; however, interest income is accrued at the reduced rate as long as the customer complies with the revised terms and conditions.

The following table provides a summary of restructured loans that continue to accrue interest:

						As a Percent
						of Ending Loan
		Amount				Balances
December 31
(Dollars in Millions)		2006		2005		2006			2005
Commercial		$	18	$	5		.04	%		.01	%
Commercial real estate			1		1		–			–
Residential mortgages			80		59		.38			.28
Credit card			267		218		3.08			3.05
Other retail			39		32		.10			.09
	Total	$	405	$	315		.28	%		.23	%

     Restructured loans that accrue interest were higher at December 31, 2006, compared with December 31, 2005,

38  U.S. BANCORP

 Table 15   NET CHARGE-OFFS AS A PERCENT OF AVERAGE LOANS OUTSTANDING

Year Ended December 31				2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
COMMERCIAL
	Commercial				.15	%		.12	%		.29	%		1.34	%		1.29	%
	Lease financing				.46			.85			1.42			1.65			2.67
		Total commercial			.18			.20			.43			1.38			1.46
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
	Commercial mortgages				.01			.03			.09			.14			.17
	Construction and development				.01			(.04	)		.13			.16			.11
		Total commercial real estate			.01			.01			.10			.14			.15
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES					.19			.20			.20			.23			.23
RETAIL
	Credit card				2.88			4.20			4.14			4.62			4.97
	Retail leasing				.20			.35			.59			.86			.72
	Home equity and second mortgages				.33			.46			.54			.70			.73
	Other retail				.85			1.33			1.35			1.79			2.35
		Total retail			.92			1.30			1.36			1.68			1.91
			Total loans		.39	%		.52	%		.64	%		1.07	%		1.21	%

reflecting the impact of the Company implementing higher minimum balance payment requirements for credit card customers in response to industry guidance issued by the banking regulatory agencies.

Analysis of Loan Net Charge-OffsTotal loan net charge-offs were $544 million in 2006, compared with $685 million in 2005 and $767 million in 2004. The ratio of total loan net charge-offs to average loans was .39 percent in 2006, compared with .52 percent in 2005 and .64 percent in 2004. The overall level of net charge-offs in 2006 and 2005 reflected improving economic conditions and the Company’s efforts to reduce the overall risk profile of the portfolio through ongoing improvement in collection efforts underwriting and risk management. These factors have resulted in improved credit quality and lower gross charge-offs over the past three years.

     Commercial and commercial real estate loan net charge-offs for 2006 were $88 million (.12 percent of average loans outstanding), compared with $90 million (.13 percent of average loans outstanding) in 2005 and $196 million (.29 percent of average loans outstanding) in 2004. The year-over-year improvement in net charge-offs reflected lower gross charge-offs, partially offset by a lower level of recoveries. The Company expects commercial net charge-offs to increase somewhat over the next several quarters due to higher gross charge-offs from cyclical low levels and lower commercial loan recoveries at this stage of the economic cycle. The decrease in commercial and commercial real estate loan net charge-offs in 2005 compared with 2004, was broad-based and extended across most industries within the commercial loan portfolio.

     Retail loan net charge-offs in 2006 were $415 million (.92 percent of average loans outstanding), compared with $559 million (1.30 percent of average loans outstanding) in 2005 and $542 million (1.36 percent of average loans outstanding) in 2004. The decrease in retail loan net charge-offs in 2006, compared with 2005, reflected the impact of the bankruptcy legislation enacted in the fourth quarter of 2005 and improved retail portfolio performance. The Company anticipates charge-offs will return to more normalized levels in future quarters. Higher amounts of retail loan net charge-offs in 2005, compared with 2004, reflected the bankruptcy legislation enacted in the fourth quarter of 2005.

     The Company’s retail lending business utilizes several distinct business processes and channels to originate retail credit, including traditional branch credit, indirect lending and a consumer finance division. Each distinct underwriting and origination activity manages unique credit risk characteristics and prices its loan production commensurate with the differing risk profiles. Within Consumer Banking, U.S. Bank Consumer Finance (“USBCF”) participates in substantially all facets of the Company’s consumer lending activities. USBCF specializes in serving channel-specific and alternative lending markets in residential mortgages, home equity and installment loan financing. USBCF manages loans originated through a broker network, correspondent relationships and U.S. Bank branch offices. Generally, loans managed by the Company’s consumer finance division exhibit higher credit risk characteristics, but are priced commensurate with the differing risk profile.

     The following table provides an analysis of net charge-offs as a percent of average loans outstanding managed by

U.S. BANCORP  39

the consumer finance division, compared with traditional branch related loans:

						Percent of
		Average Loans				Average Loans
Year Ended December 31
(Dollars in Millions)		2006		2005		2006			2005
CONSUMER FINANCE (a)
	Residential mortgages	$	7,414	$	5,947		.51	%		.52	%
	Home equity and second mortgages		1,971		2,431		1.42			1.81
	Other retail		399		393		4.76			5.09
TRADITIONAL BRANCH
	Residential mortgages	$	13,639	$	12,089		.02	%		.04	%
	Home equity and second mortgages		13,175		12,514		.17			.19
	Other retail		15,057		13,670		.74			1.22
TOTAL COMPANY
	Residential mortgages	$	21,053	$	18,036		.19	%		.20	%
	Home equity and second mortgages		15,146		14,945		.33			.46
	Other retail		15,456		14,063		.85			1.33

(a) Consumer finance category included credit originated and managed by USBCF, as well as home equity and second mortgages with aloan-to-value greater than 100 percent that were originated in the branches.

     Within the consumer finance division, the Company originates loans to customers that may be defined as sub-prime borrowers. The following table provides further information on net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans outstanding for the division:

							Percent of
			Average Loans				Average Loans
Year Ended December 31
(Dollars in Millions)			2006		2005		2006			2005
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES
	Sub-prime borrowers		$	2,602	$	1,932		.95	%		.93	%
	Other borrowers			4,812		4,015		.27			.32
		Total	$	7,414	$	5,947		.51	%		.52	%
HOME EQUITY AND SECOND MORTGAGES
	Sub-prime borrowers		$	842	$	781		1.72	%		2.63	%
	Other borrowers			1,129		1,650		1.20			1.43
		Total	$	1,971	$	2,431		1.42	%		1.81	%

Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Credit LossesThe allowance for loan losses provides coverage for probable and estimable losses inherent in the Company’s loan and lease portfolio. Management evaluates the allowance each quarter to determine that it is adequate to cover these inherent losses. The evaluation of each element and the overall allowance is based on a continuing assessment of problem loans, recent loss experience and other factors, including regulatory guidance and economic conditions. Because business processes and credit risks associated with unfunded credit commitments are essentially the same as for loans, the Company utilizes similar processes to estimate its liability for unfunded credit commitments, which is included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Both the allowance for loan losses and the liability for unfunded credit commitments are included in the Company’s analysis of credit losses.

     At December 31, 2006, the allowance for credit losses was $2,256 million (1.57 percent of loans), compared with an allowance of $2,251 million (1.65 percent of loans) at December 31, 2005, and $2,269 million (1.82 percent of loans) at December 31, 2004. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans was 480 percent at December 31, 2006, compared with 414 percent and 355 percent at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to loan net charge-offs at December 31, 2006, was 415 percent, compared with 329 percent and 296 percent at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Management determined that the allowance for credit losses was adequate at December 31, 2006.

     Several factors were taken into consideration in evaluating the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2006, including the risk profile of the portfolios and loan net charge-offs during the period, the level of nonperforming assets, accruing loans 90 days or more past due, delinquency ratios and changes in restructured loan balances compared with December 31, 2005. Management also considered the uncertainty related to certain industry sectors, and the extent of credit exposure to specific borrowers within the portfolio. In addition, concentration risks associated with commercial real estate and the mix of loans, including credit cards, loans originated through the consumer finance division and residential mortgages balances, and their relative credit risks were evaluated. Finally, the Company considered current economic conditions that might impact the portfolio. Management determines the allowance that is required for specific loan categories based on relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its methods for determining the allowance for each element of the portfolio and makes enhancements considered appropriate. Table 17 shows the amount of the allowance for credit losses by portfolio category.

     The allowance recorded for commercial and commercial real estate loans is based, in part, on a regular review of individual credit relationships. The Company’s risk rating process is an integral component of the methodology utilized to determine these elements of the allowance for credit losses. An allowance for credit losses is established for pools of commercial and commercial real estate loans and unfunded commitments based on the risk ratings assigned. An analysis of the migration of commercial and commercial real estate loans and actual loss experience throughout the business cycle is conducted quarterly to assess the exposure for credits with similar risk characteristics. In addition to its risk rating process, the Company separately analyzes the carrying value of impaired

40  U.S. BANCORP

 Table 16   SUMMARY OF ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

(Dollars in Millions)					2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
Balance at beginning of year					$	2,251		$	2,269		$	2,369		$	2,422		$	2,457
CHARGE-OFFS
	Commercial
		Commercial				121			140			244			556			559
		Lease financing				51			76			110			139			189
			Total commercial			172			216			354			695			748
	Commercial real estate
		Commercial mortgages				11			16			29			44			41
		Construction and development				1			3			13			13			9
			Total commercial real estate			12			19			42			57			50
	Residential mortgages					43			39			33			30			23
	Retail
		Credit card				256			313			282			282			305
		Retail leasing				25			38			49			57			45
		Home equity and second mortgages				62			83			89			105			108
		Other retail				193			241			225			268			312
			Total retail			536			675			645			712			770
				Total charge-offs		763			949			1,074			1,494			1,591
RECOVERIES
	Commercial
		Commercial				61			95			144			70			67
		Lease financing				27			34			41			55			40
			Total commercial			88			129			185			125			107
	Commercial real estate
		Commercial mortgages				8			10			11			16			9
		Construction and development				—			6			4			2			2
			Total commercial real estate			8			16			15			18			11
	Residential mortgages					2			3			4			3			4
	Retail
		Credit card				36			35			30			27			25
		Retail leasing				11			12			10			7			6
		Home equity and second mortgages				12			15			13			12			11
		Other retail				62			54			50			50			54
			Total retail			121			116			103			96			96
				Total recoveries		219			264			307			242			218
NET CHARGE-OFFS
	Commercial
		Commercial				60			45			100			486			492
		Lease financing				24			42			69			84			149
			Total commercial			84			87			169			570			641
	Commercial real estate
		Commercial mortgages				3			6			18			28			32
		Construction and development				1			(3	)		9			11			7
			Total commercial real estate			4			3			27			39			39
	Residential mortgages					41			36			29			27			19
	Retail
		Credit card				220			278			252			255			280
		Retail leasing				14			26			39			50			39
		Home equity and second mortgages				50			68			76			93			97
		Other retail				131			187			175			218			258
			Total retail			415			559			542			616			674
				Total net charge-offs		544			685			767			1,252			1,373
Provision for credit losses						544			666			669			1,254			1,349
Acquisitions and other changes						5			1			(2	)		(55	)		(11	)
Balance at end of year					$	2,256		$	2,251		$	2,269		$	2,369		$	2,422
COMPONENTS
	Allowance for loan losses				$	2,022		$	2,041		$	2,080		$	2,184
	Liability for unfunded credit commitments					234			210			189			185
			Total allowance for credit losses		$	2,256		$	2,251		$	2,269		$	2,369
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of
	Period-end loans					1.57	%		1.65	%		1.82	%		2.03	%		2.11	%
	Nonperforming loans					480			414			355			232			196
	Nonperforming assets					384			350			303			206			176
	Net charge-offs					415			329			296			189			176

loans to determine whether the carrying value is less than or equal to the appraised collateral value or the present value of expected cash flows. Based on this analysis, an allowance for credit losses may be specifically established for impaired loans. The allowance established for commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios, including impaired commercial and commercial real estate loans, was $955 million at December 31, 2006, compared with

U.S. BANCORP  41

$929 million and $941 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in the allowance for commercial and commercial real estate loans of $26 million at December 31, 2006, compared with December 31, 2005, reflected the impact of growth in the portfolios and a $81 million increase related to changes in risk classifications, offset somewhat by a $55 million reduction related to changes in loss severity rates.

     The allowance recorded for the residential mortgages and retail loan portfolios is based on an analysis of product mix, credit scoring and risk composition of the portfolio, loss and bankruptcy experiences, economic conditions and historical and expected delinquency and charge-off statistics for each homogenous group of loans. Based on this information and analysis, an allowance was established approximating a rolling twelve-month estimate of net charge-offs. The allowance established for residential mortgages was $58 million at December 31, 2006, compared with $39 million and $33 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in the allowance for the residential mortgage portfolio year-over-year was primarily due to higher loss rates, higher delinquencies and the seasoning of the portfolio during 2006. The allowance established for retail loans was $542 million at December 31, 2006, compared with $558 million and $610 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decline in the allowance for the retail portfolio in 2006 reflected improved credit quality favorably impacting inherent loss ratios and declining delinquency trends, partially offset by the impact of portfolio growth.

     Regardless of the extent of the Company’s analysis of customer performance, portfolio trends or risk management processes, certain inherent but undetected losses are probable within the loan portfolios. This is due to several factors, including inherent delays in obtaining information regarding a customer’s financial condition or changes in their unique business conditions, the judgmental nature of individual loan evaluations, collateral assessments and the interpretation of economic trends. Volatility of economic or customer-specific conditions affecting the identification and estimation of losses from larger non-homogeneous credits and the sensitivity of assumptions utilized to establish allowances for homogeneous groups of loans, loan portfolio concentrations, and other subjective considerations are among other factors. Because of these subjective factors, the process utilized to determine each element of the allowance for credit losses by specific loan category has some imprecision. As such, the Company estimates a range of inherent losses in the portfolio based on statistical analyses and management judgment, and maintains an “allowance available for other factors” that is related to but not allocated to a specific loan category. A statistical analysis attempts to measure the extent of imprecision and other uncertainty by determining the volatility of losses over time across loan categories. Also, management judgmentally considers loan concentrations, risks associated with specific industries, the stage of the business cycle, economic conditions and other qualitative factors. Based on this process, the amount of the allowance available for other factors was $701 million at December 31, 2006, compared with $725 million at December 31, 2005, and $685 million

 Table 17   ELEMENTS OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

			Allowance Amount										Allowance as a Percent of Ending Loan Balances
December 31 (Dollars in Millions)			2006		2005		2004		2003		2002		2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
COMMERCIAL
	Commercial		$	665	$	656	$	664	$	696	$	776		1.64	%		1.73	%		1.89	%		2.08	%		2.12	%
	Lease financing			90		105		106		90		108		1.62			2.06			2.14			1.80			2.01
		Total commercial		755		761		770		786		884		1.63			1.77			1.92			2.04			2.11
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
	Commercial mortgages			126		115		131		170		153		.64			.57			.64			.82			.75
	Construction and development			74		53		40		59		53		.83			.65			.55			.89			.81
		Total commercial real estate		200		168		171		229		206		.70			.59			.62			.84			.77
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES				58		39		33		33		34		.27			.19			.21			.25			.35
RETAIL
	Credit card			298		284		283		268		272		3.44			3.98			4.29			4.52			4.80
	Retail leasing			15		24		44		47		44		.22			.33			.61			.78			.77
	Home equity and second mortgages			52		62		88		101		115		.33			.41			.59			.76			.85
	Other retail			177		188		195		235		269		1.08			1.26			1.48			1.89			2.35
		Total retail		542		558		610		651		700		1.14			1.26			1.46			1.73			1.93
		Total allocated allowance		1,555		1,526		1,584		1,699		1,824		1.08			1.12			1.27			1.46			1.59
		Available for other factors		701		725		685		670		598		.49			.53			.55			.57			.52
Total allowance			$	2,256	$	2,251	$	2,269	$	2,369	$	2,422		1.57	%		1.65	%		1.82	%		2.03	%		2.11	%

42  U.S. BANCORP

at December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2006, approximately $669 million was related to estimated imprecision or uncertainty as described above. Of this amount, commercial and commercial real estate represented approximately 69 percent while residential and retail loans represented approximately 31 percent. The remaining allowance available for other factors of $32 million was related to concentration risk, including risks associated with the residential construction and residential mortgage markets, relative size of the consumer finance and commercial real estate portfolios, highly leveraged enterprise-value credits and other qualitative factors. Given the many subjective factors affecting the credit portfolio, changes in the allowance for other factors may not directly coincide with changes in the risk ratings or the credit portfolio.

     Although the Company determines the amount of each element of the allowance separately and this process is an important credit management tool, the entire allowance for credit losses is available for the entire loan portfolio. The actual amount of losses incurred can vary significantly from the estimated amounts.

Residual Value Risk ManagementThe Company manages its risk to changes in the residual value of leased assets through disciplined residual valuation setting at the inception of a lease, diversification of its leased assets, regular residual asset valuation reviews and monitoring of residual value gains or losses upon the disposition of assets. Commercial lease originations are subject to the same well-defined underwriting standards referred to in the “Credit Risk Management” section which includes an evaluation of the residual risk. Retail lease residual risk is mitigated further by originating longer-term vehicle leases and effectiveend-of-term marketing of off-lease vehicles. Also, to reduce the financial risk of potential changes in vehicle residual values, the Company maintains residual value insurance. The catastrophic insurance maintained by the Company provides for the potential recovery of losses on individual vehicle sales in an amount equal to the difference between: (a) 105 percent or 110 percent of the average wholesale auction price for the vehicle at the time of sale and (b) the vehicle residual value specified by the Automotive Lease Guide (an authoritative industry source) at the inception of the lease. The potential recovery is calculated for each individual vehicle sold in a particular policy year and is reduced by any gains realized on vehicles sold during the same period. The Company will receive claim proceeds under this insurance program if, in the aggregate, there is a net loss for such period. In addition, the Company obtains separate residual value insurance for all vehicles at lease inception where end of lease term settlement is based solely on the residual value of the individual leased vehicles. Under this program, the potential recovery is computed for each individual vehicle sold and does not allow the insurance carrier to offset individual determined losses with gains from other leases. This individual vehicle coverage is included in the calculation of minimum lease payments when making the capital lease assessment. To reduce the risk associated with collecting insurance claims, the Company monitors the financial viability of the insurance carrier based on insurance industry ratings and available financial information.

     Included in the retail leasing portfolio was approximately $4.3 billion of retail leasing residuals at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The Company monitors concentrations of leases by manufacturer and vehicle “make and model.” As of December 31, 2006, vehicle lease residuals related to sport utility vehicles were 42.7 percent of the portfolio while luxury and mid-range vehicle classes represented approximately 23.4 percent and 11.8 percent, respectively. At year-end 2006, the largest vehicle-type concentration represented approximately 7.2 percent of the aggregate residual value of the vehicles in the portfolio. No other vehicle-type exceeded five percent of the aggregate residual value of the portfolio. Because retail residual valuations tend to be less volatile for longer-term leases, relative to the estimated residual at inception of the lease, the Company actively manages lease origination production to achieve a longer-term portfolio. At December 31, 2006, the weighted-average origination term of the portfolio was 50 months. During the past several years, new vehicles sales volumes experienced strong growth driven by manufacturer incentives, consumer spending levels and strong economic conditions. In 2006, sales of new cars have softened somewhat relative to a year ago. In part, this is due to domestic manufacturers reducing sales incentives to consumers. This softness in new vehicle sales became more pronounced during the latter part of 2006. Current expectations are that sales of new vehicles will trend downward in 2007. Given that manufacturers’ inventories of vehicles have declined somewhat during this period, this trend in sales should provide support of residual valuations. With respect to used vehicles, wholesale values for automobiles during 2004 and 2005 performed better than wholesale values for trucks resulting in car prices becoming somewhat inflated and truck prices declining over this period. This has led to a shift in the comparative performance of these two segments, resulting in car values experiencing a decrease of 2.7 percent in 2006, while truck values have experienced an improvement of 1.1 percent over the same timeframe. Sport utility and truck values have also recovered somewhat due to the impact of declining gas prices from earlier in the year. The overall stability in the used car marketplace combined with the mix of the Company’s lease residual portfolio have caused the

U.S. BANCORP  43

exposure to retail lease residual impairments to be relatively stable relative to a year ago.

     At December 31, 2006, the commercial leasing portfolio had $636 million of residuals, compared with $678 million at December 31, 2005. At year-end 2006, lease residuals related to trucks and other transportation equipment were 26.4 percent of the total residual portfolio. Railcars represented 18.6 percent of the aggregate portfolio, while business and office equipment and aircraft were 18.3 percent and 13.5 percent, respectively. No other significant concentrations of more than 10 percent existed at December 31, 2006. In 2006, residual values in general remained stable or were favorable. The transportation industry residual values improved for marine, rail and corporate aircraft. Commercial aircraft continues to experience lower values due to the abundance of supply and technological efficiencies on newer models.

Operational Risk ManagementOperational risk represents the risk of loss resulting from the Company’s operations, including, but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside the Company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements and business continuation and disaster recovery. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity.

     The Company operates in many different businesses in diverse markets and relies on the ability of its employees and systems to process a high number of transactions. Operational risk is inherent in all business activities, and the management of this risk is important to the achievement of the Company’s objectives. In the event of a breakdown in the internal control system, improper operation of systems or improper employees’ actions, the Company could suffer financial loss, face regulatory action and suffer damage to its reputation.

     The Company manages operational risk through a risk management framework and its internal control processes. Within this framework, the Corporate Risk Committee (“Risk Committee”) provides oversight and assesses the most significant operational risks facing the Company within its business lines. Under the guidance of the Risk Committee, enterprise risk management personnel establish policies and interact with business lines to monitor significant operating risks on a regular basis. Business lines have direct and primary responsibility and accountability for identifying, controlling, and monitoring operational risks embedded in their business activities. Business managers maintain a system of controls with the objective of providing proper transaction authorization and execution, proper system operations, safeguarding of assets from misuse or theft, and ensuring the reliability of financial and other data. Business managers ensure that the controls are appropriate and are implemented as designed.

     Each business line within the Company has designated risk managers. These risk managers are responsible for, among other things, coordinating the completion of ongoing risk assessments and ensuring that operational risk management is integrated into business decision-making activities. Business continuation and disaster recovery planning is also critical to effectively manage operational risks. Each business unit of the Company is required to develop, maintain and test these plans at least annually to ensure that recovery activities, if needed, can support mission critical functions including technology, networks and data centers supporting customer applications and business operations. The Company’s internal audit function validates the system of internal controls through risk-based, regular and ongoing audit procedures and reports on the effectiveness of internal controls to executive management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

     Customer-related business conditions may also increase operational risk or the level of operational losses in certain transaction processing business units, including merchant processing activities. Ongoing risk monitoring of customer activities and their financial condition and operational processes serve to mitigate customer-related operational risk. Refer to Note 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on merchant processing.

     While the Company believes that it has designed effective methods to minimize operational risks, there is no absolute assurance that business disruption or operational losses would not occur in the event of a disaster. On an ongoing basis, management makes process changes and investments to enhance its systems of internal controls and business continuity and disaster recovery plans.

Interest Rate Risk ManagementIn the banking industry, changes in interest rates is a significant risk that can impact earnings, market valuations and safety and soundness of an entity. To minimize the volatility of net interest income and the market value of assets and liabilities, the Company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates through asset and liability management activities within guidelines established by its Asset Liability Policy Committee (“ALPC”) and approved by the Board of Directors. ALPC has the responsibility for approving and ensuring compliance with ALPC management policies, including interest rate risk exposure. The Company uses Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis and Market Value of Equity

44  U.S. BANCORP

Modeling for measuring and analyzing consolidated interest rate risk.

Net Interest Income Simulation AnalysisOne of the primary tools used to measure interest rate risk and the effect of interest rate changes on net interest income is simulation analysis. The monthly analysis incorporates substantially all of the Company’s assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, together with forecasted changes in the balance sheet and assumptions that reflect the current interest rate environment. Through this simulation, management estimates the impact on net interest income of a 200 basis point upward or downward gradual change of market interest rates over aone-year period. This represents a change, effective in the first quarter of 2006, from a previous policy of estimating the effect of a 300 basis point upward or downward gradual change in net interest income. The simulation also estimates the effect of immediate and sustained parallel shifts in the yield curve of 50 basis points as well as the effect of immediate and sustained flattening or steepening of the yield curve. This simulation includes assumptions about how the balance sheet is likely to be affected by changes in loan and deposit growth. Assumptions are made to project interest rates for new loans and deposits based on historical analysis, management’s outlook and repricing strategies. These assumptions are validated on a periodic basis. A sensitivity analysis is provided for key variables of the simulation. The results are reviewed by ALPC monthly and are used to guide asset/liability management strategies.

     The table below summarizes the interest rate risk of net interest income based on forecasts over the succeeding 12 months. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s overall interest rate risk position was liability sensitive to changes in interest rates. The Company manages its interest rate risk position by holding assets on the balance sheet with desired interest rate risk characteristics, implementing certain pricing strategies for loans and deposits and through the selection of derivatives and various funding and investment portfolio strategies. The Company manages the overall interest rate risk profile within policy limits. ALPC policy guidelines limit the estimated change in net interest income to 3.0 percent of forecasted net interest income over the succeeding 12 months. At December 31, 2006 and 2005 the Company was within its policy guidelines.

Market Value of Equity ModelingThe Company also utilizes the market value of equity as a measurement tool in managing interest rate sensitivity. The market value of equity measures the degree to which the market values of the Company’s assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments will change given a change in interest rates. ALPC guidelines limit the change in market value of equity in a 200 basis point parallel rate shock to 15 percent of the market value of equity assuming interest rates at December 31, 2006. The up 200 basis point scenario resulted in a 6.7 percent decrease in the market value of equity at December 31, 2006, compared with a 6.8 percent decrease at December 31, 2005. The down 200 basis point scenario resulted in a 1.8 percent decrease in the market value of equity at December 31, 2006, compared with a 4.1 percent decrease at December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company was within its policy guidelines.

     The valuation analysis is dependent upon certain key assumptions about the nature of assets and liabilities with non-contractual maturities. Management estimates the average life and rate characteristics of asset and liability accounts based upon historical analysis and management’s expectation of rate behavior. These assumptions are validated on a periodic basis. A sensitivity analysis of key variables of the valuation analysis is provided to ALPC monthly and is used to guide asset/liability management strategies. The Company also uses duration of equity as a measure of interest rate risk. The duration of equity is a measure of the net market value sensitivity of the assets, liabilities and derivative positions of the Company. The duration of assets was 1.8 years at December 31, 2006, compared with 1.6 years at December 31, 2005. The duration of liabilities was 1.9 years at December 31, 2006, compared with 1.6 years at December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2006, the duration of equity was 1.6 years, compared with 1.8 years at December 31, 2005. The duration of equity measure shows that sensitivity of the market value of equity of the Company was liability sensitive to changes in interest rates.

Use of Derivatives to Manage Interest Rate and Other RisksIn the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative transactions to manage its interest rate, prepayment, credit and foreign currency risks (“asset and liability management positions”) and to accommodate the business requirements of its customers (“customer-

SENSITIVITY OF NET INTEREST INCOME

	December 31, 2006												December 31, 2005
	Down 50			Up 50			Down 200			Up 200			Down 50			Up 50			Down 200			Up 200
	Immediate			Immediate			Gradual			Gradual			Immediate			Immediate			Gradual*			Gradual*
Net interest income		.42	%		(1.43	)%		.92	%		(2.95	)%		.66	%		(.73)	%		1.19	%		(2.60)	%

*  As of January 31, 2006, due to the change to a 200 basis point gradual change policy during the first quarter of 2006.

U.S. BANCORP  45

 Table 18   DERIVATIVE POSITIONS

ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT POSITIONS

																												Weighted-
				Maturing																								Average
																												Remaining
																									Fair			Maturity
December 31, 2006 (Dollars in Millions)				2007			2008			2009			2010			2011			Thereafter			Total			Value			In Years
INTEREST RATE CONTRACTS
	Receive fixed/pay floating swaps
		Notional amount		$	630		$	1,000		$	–		$	–		$	1,500		$	2,215		$	5,345		$	27			22.97
		Weighted-average
			Receive rate		5.05	%		5.80	%		–	%		–	%		5.93	%		6.34	%		5.97	%
			Pay rate		5.44			5.35			–			–			5.35			5.66			5.49
	Pay fixed/receive floating swaps
		Notional amount		$	8,100		$	2,000		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	2,229		$	12,329		$	–			2.33
		Weighted-average
			Receive rate		5.34	%		5.31	%		–	%		–	%		–	%		5.39	%		5.34	%
			Pay rate		4.59			5.18			–			–			–			5.26			4.81
	Futures and forwards
		Buy		$	8		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	8		$	–			.07
		Sell			6,816			–			–			–			–			–			6,816			3			.17
	Options
		Written		$	7,544		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	7,544		$	(1	)		.13
FOREIGN EXCHANGE CONTRACTS
	Cross-currency swaps
		Notional amount		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	386		$	386		$	14			8.61
		Weighted-average
			Receive rate		–	%		–	%		–	%		–	%		–	%		3.80	%		3.80	%
			Pay rate		–			–			–			–			–			5.54			5.54
	Forwards			$	318		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	318		$	1			.02
EQUITY CONTRACTS				$	5		$	–		$	52		$	–		$	29		$	–		$	86		$	4			2.95
CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS				$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	25		$	–		$	25		$	(1	)		4.72

CUSTOMER-RELATED POSITIONS

																				Weighted-
			Maturing																	Average
																				Remaining
																	Fair			Maturity
December 31, 2006 (Dollars in Millions)			2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		Thereafter		Total		Value			In Years
INTEREST RATE CONTRACTS
	Receive fixed/pay floating swaps
		Notional amount	$	1,167	$	1,519	$	1,152	$	1,366	$	1,074	$	4,093	$	10,371	$	(42	)		5.42
	Pay fixed/receive floating swaps
		Notional amount		1,145		1,515		1,145		1,357		1,074		4,105		10,341		98			5.42
	Options
		Purchased		812		269		469		125		197		27		1,899		5			1.92
		Written		812		269		469		125		197		27		1,899		(3	)		1.92
	Risk participation agreements
		Purchased		33		3		34		6		18		112		206		–			6.62
		Written		8		25		71		33		11		208		356		–			6.05
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATE CONTRACTS
	Forwards, spots and swaps
		Buy	$	1,819	$	119	$	88	$	51	$	15	$	–	$	2,092	$	52			.46
		Sell		1,759		117		91		51		15		–		2,033		(43	)		.47
	Options
		Purchased		408		–		–		–		–		–		408		(3	)		.44
		Written		408		–		–		–		–		–		408		3			.44

related positions”). To manage its interest rate risk, the Company may enter into interest rate swap agreements and interest rate options such as caps and floors. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed-rate and variable-rate payments without the exchange of the underlying notional amount on which the interest payments are calculated. Interest rate caps protect against rising interest rates while interest rate floors protect against declining interest rates. In connection with its mortgage banking operations, the Company enters into forward commitments to sell mortgage loans related to fixed-rate mortgage loans held for sale and fixed-rate mortgage loan commitments. The Company also acts as a seller and buyer of interest rate contracts and foreign exchange rate contracts on behalf of customers. The Company minimizes its market and liquidity risks by taking similar offsetting positions.

     All interest rate derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting are recorded at fair value as other assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and are designated as either “fair value” or “cash flow” hedges. The Company performs an assessment, both at inception and quarterly thereafter, when required, to determine whether these derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes in the value of the hedged items. Hedge ineffectiveness for both cash flow and

46  U.S. BANCORP

fair value hedges is recorded in noninterest income. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as fair value hedges, and changes in the fair value of the hedged items, are recorded in earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income until income from the cash flows of the hedged items is realized. Customer-related interest rate swaps, foreign exchange rate contracts, and all other derivative contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recorded at fair value and resulting gains or losses are recorded in trading account gains or losses or mortgage banking revenue. Gains or losses on customer-related derivative positions were not material in 2006.

     By their nature, derivative instruments are subject to market risk. The Company does not utilize derivative instruments for speculative purposes. Of the Company’s $32.9 billion of total notional amount of asset and liability management derivative positions at December 31, 2006, $24.1 billion was designated as either fair value or cash flow hedges, or net investment hedges of foreign operations. The cash flow hedge derivative positions are interest rate swaps that hedge the forecasted cash flows from the underlying variable-rate debt. The fair value hedges are primarily interest rate swaps that hedge the change in fair value related to interest rate changes of underlying fixed-rate debt and subordinated obligations.

     In addition, the Company uses forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to hedge its interest rate risk related to residential mortgage loans held for sale. The Company commits to sell the loans at specified prices in a future period, typically within 90 days. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk during the period between issuing a loan commitment and the sale of the loan into the secondary market. Related to its mortgage banking operations, the Company held $1.4 billion of forward commitments to sell mortgage loans and $1.3 billion of unfunded mortgage loan commitments that were derivatives in accordance with the provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedge Activities.” The unfunded mortgage loan commitments are reported at fair value as options in Table 18. Beginning in March 2006, the Company entered into U.S. Treasury futures and options on U.S. Treasury futures contracts to economically hedge the change in fair value related to the election of fair value measurement for its residential MSRs.

     Derivative instruments are also subject to credit risk associated with counterparties to the derivative contracts. Credit risk associated with derivatives is measured based on the replacement cost should the counterparties with contracts in a gain position to the Company fail to perform under the terms of the contract. The Company manages this risk through diversification of its derivative positions among various counterparties, requiring collateral agreements with credit-rating thresholds, entering into master netting agreements in certain cases and entering into interest rate swap risk participation agreements. These agreements transfer the credit risk related to interest rate swaps from the Company to an unaffiliated third-party. The Company also provides credit protection to third-parties with risk participation agreements, for a fee, as part of a loan syndication transaction.

     At December 31, 2006, the Company had $83 million in accumulated other comprehensive income related to realized and unrealized losses on derivatives classified as cash flow hedges. Unrealized gains and losses are reflected in earnings when the related cash flows or hedged transactions occur and offset the related performance of the hedged items. The estimated amount to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings during the next 12 months is a loss of $29 million.

     The change in fair value of forward commitments attributed to hedge ineffectiveness recorded in noninterest income was a decrease of $3 million and $4 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The change in the fair value of all other asset and liability management derivative positions attributed to hedge ineffectiveness was not material for 2006.

     The Company enters into derivatives to protect its net investment in certain foreign operations. The Company uses forward commitments to sell specified amounts of certain foreign currencies to hedge its capital volatility risk associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The net amount of gains or losses included in the cumulative translation adjustment for 2006 was not material.

     Table 18 summarizes information on the Company’s derivative positions at December 31, 2006. Refer to Notes 1 and 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for significant accounting policies and additional information regarding the Company’s use of derivatives.

Market Risk ManagementIn addition to interest rate risk, the Company is exposed to other forms of market risk as a consequence of conducting normal trading activities. These trading activities principally support the risk management processes of the Company’s customers including their management of foreign currency and interest rate risks. The Company also manages market risk of non-trading business activities including its MSRs and loans held-for-sale. Value at Risk (“VaR”) is a key measure of market risk for the Company. Theoretically, VaR represents the maximum amount that the Company has placed at risk of loss, with a ninety-ninth percentile degree of confidence, to adverse market movements in the course of its risk taking activities.

U.S. BANCORP  47

 Table 19   DEBT RATINGS

								Dominion
				Standard &				Bond
		Moody’s		Poor’s		Fitch		Rating Service
U.S. BANCORP
	Short-term borrowings						F1+		R-1 (middle	)
	Senior debt and medium-term notes		Aa2		AA		AA-		AA
	Subordinated debt		Aa3		AA-		A+		AA (low	)
	Preferred stock		A1		A+		A+
	Commercial paper		P-1		A-1+		F1+		R-1 (middle	)
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
	Short-term time deposits		P-1		A-1+		F1+		R-1 (high	)
	Long-term time deposits		Aa1		AA+		AA		AA (high	)
	Bank notes		Aa1/P-1		AA+/A-1+		AA-/F1+		AA (high	)
	Subordinated debt		Aa2		AA		A+		AA
	Commercial paper		P-1		A-1+		F1+		R-1 (high	)

     VaR modeling of trading activities is subject to certain limitations. Additionally, it should be recognized that there are assumptions and estimates associated with VaR modeling, and actual results could differ from those assumptions and estimates. The Company mitigates these uncertainties through regular monitoring of trading activities by management and other risk management practices, including stop-loss and position limits related to its trading activities. Stress-test models are used to provide management with perspectives on market events that VaR models do not capture.

     The Company establishes market risk limits, subject to approval by the Company’s Board of Directors. Due to the election of fair value measurement of its residential MSRs and related hedging strategy during the first quarter of 2006, the Company increased its VaR limit to $40 million at March 31, 2006, compared with $20 million at December 31, 2005. The VaR limits were $3 million and $37 million at December 31, 2006, for trading and non-trading market risk, respectively. The Company’s market valuation risk, as estimated by the VaR analysis, was $1 million and $30 million at December 31, 2006, compared with $1 million and less than $1 million at December 31, 2005, for trading and non-trading positions, respectively.

Liquidity Risk ManagementALPC establishes policies, as well as analyzes and manages liquidity, to ensure that adequate funds are available to meet normal operating requirements in addition to unexpected customer demands for funds, such as high levels of deposit withdrawals or loan demand, in a timely and cost-effective manner. The most important factor in the preservation of liquidity is maintaining public confidence that facilitates the retention and growth of a large, stable supply of core deposits and wholesale funds. Ultimately, public confidence is generated through profitable operations, sound credit quality and a strong capital position. The Company’s performance in these areas has enabled it to develop a large and reliable base of core funding within its market areas and in domestic and global capital markets. Liquidity management is viewed from long-term and short-term perspectives, as well as from an asset and liability perspective. Management monitors liquidity through a regular review of maturity profiles, funding sources, and loan and deposit forecasts to minimize funding risk.

     The Company maintains strategic liquidity and contingency plans that are subject to the availability of asset liquidity in the balance sheet. Monthly, ALPC reviews the Company’s ability to meet funding requirements due to adverse business events. These funding needs are then matched with specific asset-based sources to ensure sufficient funds are available. Also, strategic liquidity policies require diversification of wholesale funding sources to avoid concentrations in any one market source. Subsidiary companies are members of various Federal Home Loan Banks that provide a source of funding through FHLB advances. The Company maintains a Grand Cayman branch for issuing eurodollar time deposits. The Company also issues commercial paper through its Canadian branch. In addition, the Company establishes relationships with dealers to issue national market retail and institutional savings certificates and short- and medium-term bank notes. The Company’s subsidiary banks also have significant correspondent banking networks and corporate accounts. Accordingly, the Company has access to national fed funds, funding through repurchase agreements and sources of stable, regionally-based certificates of deposit and commercial paper.

     The Company’s ability to raise negotiated funding at competitive prices is influenced by rating agencies’ views of the Company’s credit quality, liquidity, capital and earnings. On September 13, 2006, Fitch revised the Company’s outlook to “Positive”. On October 26, 2006, Dominion Bond Rating Service upgraded the Company’s senior and unsecured subordinated debt ratings to AA and

48  U.S. BANCORP

 Table 20   CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

		Payments Due By Period
				Over One		Over Three
		One Year		Through		Through		Over Five
December 31, 2006 (Dollars in Millions)		or Less		Three Years		Five Years		Years		Total
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
	Long-term debt (a)	$	8,337	$	10,543	$	5,605	$	13,117	$	37,602
	Capital leases		11		20		19		43		93
	Operating leases		175		305		232		442		1,154
	Purchase obligations		151		195		55		22		423
	Benefit obligations (b)		37		90		94		238		459
	Total	$	8,711	$	11,153	$	6,005	$	13,862	$	39,731

(a)	In the banking industry, interest-bearing obligations are principally utilized to fund interest-bearing assets. As such, interest charges on related contractual obligations were excluded from reported amounts as the potential cash outflows would have corresponding cash inflows from interest-bearing assets.
(b)	Amounts only include obligations related to the unfunded non-qualified pension plan and post-retirement medical plans.

AA(low), respectively, from AA(low) and A(high), respectively. On February 14, 2007, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services upgraded the Company’s credit ratings toAA/A-1+. At February 14, 2007, the credit ratings outlook for the Company was considered “Positive” by Fitch and “Stable” by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, Moody’s Investors Service and Dominion Bond Ratings Service. The debt ratings noted in Table 19 reflect the rating agencies’ recognition of the Company’s sector-leading core earnings performance and lower credit risk profile.

     The parent company’s routine funding requirements consist primarily of operating expenses, dividends paid to shareholders, debt service, repurchases of common stock and funds used for acquisitions. The parent company obtains funding to meet its obligations from dividends collected from its subsidiaries and the issuance of debt securities.

     At December 31, 2006, parent company long-term debt outstanding was $11.4 billion, compared with $10.9 billion at December 31, 2005. The $.5 billion increase was primarily due to issuances of $2.5 billion of junior subordinated debentures, $2.5 billion of convertible senior debentures and $1.5 billion of medium-term notes, offset by long-term debt maturities and repayments during 2006. Total parent company debt scheduled to mature in 2007 is $1.5 billion. These debt obligations may be met through medium-term note and capital security issuances and dividends from subsidiaries, as well as from parent company cash and cash equivalents.

     Federal banking laws regulate the amount of dividends that may be paid by banking subsidiaries without prior approval. The amount of dividends available to the parent company from its banking subsidiaries after meeting the regulatory capital requirements for well-capitalized banks was approximately $1.1 billion at December 31, 2006. For further information, see Note 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

     Refer to Table 20 for further information on significant contractual obligations at December 31, 2006.

Off-Balance Sheet ArrangementsOff-balance sheet arrangements include any contractual arrangement to which an unconsolidated entity is a party, under which the Company has an obligation to provide credit or liquidity enhancements or market risk support. Off-balance sheet arrangements include certain defined guarantees, asset securitization trusts and conduits. Off-balance sheet arrangements also include any obligation under a variable interest held by an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, credit enhancement or market risk support.

     In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into an array of commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and various forms of guarantees that may be considered off-balance sheet arrangements. The nature and extent of these arrangements are provided in Note 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

     Asset securitizations and conduits represent a source of funding for the Company through off-balance sheet structures. Credit, liquidity, operational and legal structural risks exist due to the nature and complexity of asset securitizations and other off-balance sheet structures. ALPC regularly monitors the performance of each off-balance sheet structure in an effort to minimize these risks and ensure compliance with the requirements of the structures. The Company utilizes its credit risk management systems to evaluate the credit quality of underlying assets and regularly forecasts cash flows to evaluate any potential impairment of retained interests. Also, regulatory guidelines require consideration of asset securitizations in the determination of risk-based capital ratios. The Company does not rely significantly on off-balance sheet arrangements for liquidity or capital resources.

     The Company sponsors an off-balance sheet conduit, a qualified special purpose entity (“QSPE”), to which it transferred high-grade investment securities, funded by the issuance of commercial paper. Because QSPEs are exempt from consolidation under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46R”), the Company does not consolidate the conduit structure in

U.S. BANCORP  49

 Table 21   REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS

At December 31 (Dollars in Millions)			2006			2005
U.S. BANCORP
Tier 1 capital			$	17,036		$	15,145
	As a percent of risk-weighted assets			8.8	%		8.2	%
	As a percent of adjusted quarterly average assets (leverage ratio)			8.2	%		7.6	%
Total risk-based capital			$	24,495		$	23,056
	As a percent of risk-weighted assets			12.6	%		12.5	%
Tangible common equity			$	11,703		$	11,873
	As a percent of tangible assets			5.5	%		5.9	%
BANK SUBSIDIARIES
	U.S. Bank National Association
		Tier 1 capital		6.5	%		6.5	%
		Total risk-based capital		10.8			10.7
		Leverage		6.1			5.9
	U.S. Bank National Association ND
		Tier 1 capital		12.9	%		12.9	%
		Total risk-based capital		16.7			17.0
		Leverage		11.3			11.2
BANK REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS				Minimum		Well-Capitalized
		Tier 1 capital		4.0	%		6.0	%
		Total risk-based capital		8.0			10.0
		Leverage		4.0			5.0

its financial statements. The conduit held assets of $2.2 billion at December 31, 2006, and $3.8 billion at December 31, 2005. These investment securities include primarily (i) private label asset-backed securities, which are insurance “wrapped” by AAA/ Aaa–rated mono-line insurance companies and (ii) government agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. The conduit had commercial paper liabilities of $2.2 billion at December 31, 2006, and $3.8 billion at December 31, 2005. The Company provides a liquidity facility to the conduit. Utilization of the liquidity facility would be triggered if the conduit is unable to, or does not, issue commercial paper to fund its assets. A liability for the estimate of the potential risk of loss for the Company as the liquidity facility provider is recorded on the balance sheet in other liabilities. The liability is adjusted downward over time as the underlying assets pay down with the offset recognized as other noninterest income. The liability for the liquidity facility was $10 million and $20 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, the Company recorded at fair value its retained residual interest in the investment securities conduit of $13 million and $28 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Capital ManagementThe Company is committed to managing capital for maximum shareholder benefit and maintaining strong protection for depositors and creditors. The Company has targeted returning 80 percent of earnings to its common shareholders through a combination of dividends and share repurchases. During 2006, the Company returned 112 percent of earnings. The Company continually assesses its business risks and capital position. The Company also manages its capital to exceed regulatory capital requirements for well-capitalized bank holding companies. To achieve these capital goals, the Company employs a variety of capital management tools including dividends, common share repurchases, and the issuance of subordinated debt and other capital instruments. Total shareholders’ equity was $21.2 billion at December 31, 2006, compared with $20.1 billion at December 31, 2005. The increase was the result of corporate earnings and the issuance of $1.0 billion of non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock on March 27, 2006, partially offset by share repurchases and dividends.

     On December 12, 2006, the Company increased its dividend rate per common share by 21.2 percent, from $.33 per quarter to $.40 per quarter. On December 20, 2005, the Company increased its dividend rate per common share by 10.0 percent, from $.30 per quarter to $.33 per quarter.

     On December 21, 2004, the Board of Directors approved and announced an authorization to repurchase 150 million shares of common stock during the next 24 months. In 2005, the Company repurchased 62 million shares under the 2004 authorization. The average price paid for the shares repurchased in 2005 was $29.37 per share. On August 3, 2006, the Company announced that the Board of Directors approved an authorization to repurchase 150 million shares of common stock through December 31, 2008. This new authorization replaced the December 21, 2004, share repurchase program. During 2006, the Company repurchased 62 million shares

50  U.S. BANCORP

under the 2004 authorization and 28 million shares under the 2006 authorization. The average price paid for all shares repurchased in 2006 was $31.35 per share. For a complete analysis of activities impacting shareholders’ equity and capital management programs, refer to Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table provides a detailed analysis of all shares repurchased under the 2006 authorization during the fourth quarter of 2006:

		Total Number
		of Shares				Maximum Number of
		Purchased as		Average		Shares that May Yet
		Part of the		Price Paid		Be Purchased Under
Time Period		Program		Per Share		the Program
October			9,634,701	$	33.72	122,084,720
November			18,341		33.86	122,066,379
December			95,010		35.74	121,971,369
	Total		9,748,052	$	33.74	121,971,369

     Banking regulators define minimum capital requirements for banks and financial services holding companies. These requirements are expressed in the form of a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio, total risk-based capital ratio, and Tier 1 leverage ratio. The minimum required level for these ratios is 4.0 percent, 8.0 percent, and 4.0 percent, respectively. The Company targets its regulatory capital levels, at both the bank and bank holding company level, to exceed the “well-capitalized” threshold for these ratios of 6.0 percent, 10.0 percent, and 5.0 percent, respectively. All regulatory ratios, at both the bank and bank holding company level, continue to be in excess of stated “well-capitalized” requirements.

     Table 21 provides a summary of capital ratios as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, including Tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios, as defined by the regulatory agencies. During 2007, the Company expects to target capital level ratios of 8.5 percent Tier 1 capital and 12.0 percent total risk-based capital on a consolidated basis.

FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY

The Company reported net income of $1,194 million for the fourth quarter of 2006, or $.66 per diluted common share, compared with $1,143 million, or $.62 per diluted common share, for the fourth quarter of 2005. Return on average assets and return on average common equity were 2.18 percent and 23.2 percent, respectively, for the fourth quarter of 2006, compared with returns of 2.18 percent and 22.6 percent, respectively, for the fourth quarter of 2005. The Company’s results for the fourth quarter of 2006 improved over the same period of 2005, as net income rose by $51 million (4.5 percent), primarily due to growth in fee-based revenues, lower credit costs and the benefit of a reduction in the effective tax rate from a year ago. This improvement was offset somewhat by lower net interest income and additional operating costs of acquired businesses. In addition, the Company’s results reflect a $52 million gain in the fourth quarter of 2006 from the sale

 Table 22   FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS

		Three Months Ended
		December 31,
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)		2006			2005
CONDENSED INCOME STATEMENT
Net interest income (taxable-equivalent basis) (a)		$	1,695		$	1,785
Noninterest income			1,718			1,595
Securities gains (losses), net			11			(49	)
	Total net revenue		3,424			3,331
Noninterest expense			1,612			1,464
Provision for credit losses			169			205
	Income before taxes		1,643			1,662
Taxable-equivalent adjustment			15			10
Applicable income taxes			434			509
	Net income	$	1,194		$	1,143
	Net income applicable to common equity	$	1,179		$	1,143
PER COMMON SHARE
Earnings per share		$	.67		$	.63
Diluted earnings per share			.66			.62
Dividends declared per share			.40			.33
Average common shares outstanding			1,761			1,816
Average diluted common shares outstanding			1,789			1,841
FINANCIAL RATIOS
Return on average assets			2.18	%		2.18	%
Return on average common equity			23.2			22.6
Net interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis) (a)			3.56			3.88
Efficiency ratio (b)			47.2			43.3

(a)	Interest and rates are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a tax rate of 35 percent.
(b)	Computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses), net.

U.S. BANCORP  51

of a 401(k) defined contribution recordkeeping business and a $60 million favorable change in net securities gains (losses) as compared with the fourth quarter of 2005.

     Total net revenue, on a taxable-equivalent basis for the fourth quarter of 2006, was $93 million (2.8 percent) higher than the fourth quarter of 2005, primarily reflecting an 11.8 percent increase in noninterest income partially offset by a 5.0 percent decline in net interest income. Noninterest income growth was driven by organic business growth and expansion in trust and payment processing businesses, partially offset by lower mortgage banking revenue principally due to the impact of adopting SFAS 156 in the first quarter of 2006 and the net valuation loss on economic hedges in relation to the value of MSRs due to relative changes in interest rates at the end of 2006.

     Fourth quarter net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis was $1,695 million, compared with $1,785 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. Average earning assets increased $6.6 billion (3.6 percent), primarily driven by a $7.0 billion (5.1 percent) increase in total average loans, partially offset by a $1.2 billion (3.0 percent) decrease in investment securities. The positive impact to net interest income from the growth in earning assets was more than offset by a lower net interest margin. The net interest margin in the fourth quarter of 2006 was 3.56 percent, compared with 3.88 percent in the fourth quarter of 2005. The decline in net interest margin reflected the competitive lending environment and the impact of changes in the yield curve from a year ago. Since the fourth quarter of 2005, credit spreads have tightened by approximately 15 basis points across most lending products due to competitive pricing and a change in mix reflecting growth in lower-spread fixed-rate credit products and noninterest-bearing corporate and purchasing card balances. The net interest margin also declined due to funding incremental asset growth with higher cost wholesale funding, share repurchases and asset/liability decisions designed to reduce the Company’s interest rate sensitivity position. An increase in the margin benefit of net free funds partially offset these factors.

     Noninterest income in the fourth quarter of 2006 was $1,729 million, compared with $1,546 million in the same period of 2005. The $183 million (11.8 percent) increase was driven by favorable variances in the majority of fee income categories and a favorable variance of $60 million on net securities gains (losses). Strong growth in fee-based revenue was partially offset by the accounting impact of SFAS 156 on mortgage banking revenue. Credit and debit card revenue and corporate payment products revenue were both higher in the fourth quarter of 2006 than the fourth quarter of 2005 by $13 million (6.6 percent) and $15 million (11.9 percent), respectively. The strong growth in credit and debit card revenue was primarily driven by higher customer transaction volumes. The corporate payment products revenue growth reflected organic growth in sales volumes and card usage and acquired business expansion. Merchant processing services revenue was higher in the fourth quarter of 2006 than the same quarter a year ago by $50 million (25.8 percent), reflecting an increase in sales volume driven by acquisitions, higher same store sales, new merchant signings and associated equipment fees. Trust and investment management fees increased by $61 million (23.6 percent) year-over-year, due to recent acquisitions of corporate and institutional trust businesses, customer account growth and favorable equity market conditions. Deposit service charges grew year-over-year by $21 million (8.8 percent) due to increased transaction-related fees and the impact of net new checking accounts. These favorable changes in fee-based revenue were partially offset by the decline in mortgage banking revenue of $84 million (77.1 percent), principally driven by the adoption of the fair value method of accounting for MSRs and economic hedging results in the fourth quarter of 2006 due to changes in relative interest rates at year end. Other income was higher by $43 million (25.3 percent) as compared with the fourth quarter of 2005, primarily due to a $52 million gain on the sale of a 401(k) defined contribution recordkeeping business and $6 million in trading gains related to certain interest rate swaps that the Company determined did not qualify for hedge accounting, partially offset by a decline in equity investment revenue from a year ago.

     Noninterest expense was $1,612 million in the fourth quarter of 2006, an increase of $148 million (10.1 percent) from the fourth quarter of 2005. Compensation expense was higher year-over-year by $20 million (3.3 percent), primarily due to the corporate and institutional trust and payments processing acquisitions and other growth initiatives undertaken by the Company. Employee benefits expense remained flat from the fourth quarter of 2005 as higher pension costs from a year ago were offset by lower medical benefits costs due to favorable claims experience. Professional services expense increased $22 million (46.8 percent) due primarily to revenue enhancement-related business initiatives, including establishing a bank charter in Ireland to support pan-European payment processing. Other intangibles expense increased $11 million (13.6 percent) from the prior year due to acquisitions in Consumer Banking, Wealth Management and Payment Services. Other expense increased in the fourth quarter of 2006 from the same quarter of 2005 by $69 million (32.9 percent), primarily due to increased investments in tax-advantaged projects and business integration costs relative to a year ago. In addition, noninterest expense in the fourth quarter of 2006 was impacted by $22 million in charges related to the prepayment of certain trust preferred debt securities.

52  U.S. BANCORP

     The provision for credit losses for the fourth quarter of 2006 was $169 million, a decrease of $36 million from the fourth quarter of 2005. The decrease in the provision for credit losses year-over-year reflected the adverse impact in the fourth quarter of 2005 on net charge-offs from changes in bankruptcy law. Net charge-offs in the fourth quarter of 2006 were $169 million, compared with net charge-offs of $213 million during the fourth quarter of 2005.

     The provision for income taxes for the fourth quarter of 2006 declined to an effective tax rate of 26.7 percent from an effective tax rate of 30.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2005. The reduction in the effective rate from the same quarter of the prior year reflected incremental tax credits from tax-advantaged investments and a reduction in tax liabilities after the resolution of federal tax examinations for all years through 2004 and certain state tax examinations during the fourth quarter of 2006. The Company anticipates its effective tax rate for the foreseeable future to approximate 32 percent.

LINE OF BUSINESS FINANCIAL REVIEW

Within the Company, financial performance is measured by major lines of business, which include Wholesale Banking, Consumer Banking, Wealth Management, Payment Services, and Treasury and Corporate Support. These operating segments are components of the Company about which financial information is available and is evaluated regularly in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance.

Basis for Financial PresentationBusiness line results are derived from the Company’s business unit profitability reporting systems by specifically attributing managed balance sheet assets, deposits and other liabilities and their related income or expense. Goodwill and other intangible assets are assigned to the lines of business based on the mix of business of the acquired entity. Within the Company, capital levels are evaluated and managed centrally; however, capital is allocated to the operating segments to support evaluation of business performance. Business lines are allocated capital on a risk-adjusted basis considering economic and regulatory capital requirements. Generally, the determination of the amount of capital allocated to each business line includes credit and operational capital allocations following a Basel II regulatory framework adjusted for regulatory Tier 1 leverage requirements. Interest income and expense is determined based on the assets and liabilities managed by the business line. Because funding and asset liability management is a central function, funds transfer-pricing methodologies are utilized to allocate a cost of funds used or credit for funds provided to all business line assets and liabilities, respectively, using a matched funding concept. Also, each business unit is allocated the taxable-equivalent benefit of tax-exempt products. The residual effect on net interest income of asset/liability management activities is included in Treasury and Corporate Support. Noninterest income and expenses directly managed by each business line, including fees, service charges, salaries and benefits, and other direct revenues and costs are accounted for within each segment’s financial results in a manner similar to the consolidated financial statements. Occupancy costs are allocated based on utilization of facilities by the lines of business. Generally, operating losses are charged to the line of business when the loss event is realized in a manner similar to a loan charge-off. Noninterest expenses incurred by centrally managed operations or business lines that directly support another business line’s operations are charged to the applicable business line based on its utilization of those services primarily measured by the volume of customer activities, number of employees or other relevant factors. These allocated expenses are reported as net shared services expense within noninterest expense. Certain activities that do not directly support the operations of the lines of business or for which the line of business is not considered financially accountable in evaluating their performance are not charged to the lines of business. The income or expenses associated with these corporate activities is reported within the Treasury and Corporate Support line of business. The provision for credit losses within the Wholesale Banking, Consumer Banking, Wealth Management and Payment Services lines of business is based on net charge-offs, while Treasury and Corporate Support reflects the residual component of the Company’s total consolidated provision for credit losses determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Income taxes are assessed to each line of business at a standard tax rate with the residual tax expense or benefit to arrive at the consolidated effective tax rate included in Treasury and Corporate Support.

     Designations, assignments and allocations change from time to time as management systems are enhanced, methods of evaluating performance or product lines change or business segments are realigned to better respond to the Company’s diverse customer base. During 2006, certain organization and methodology changes were made and, accordingly, 2005 results were restated and presented on a comparable basis, including a change in the allocation of risk adjusted capital to the business lines. Due to organizational and methodology changes, the Company’s basis of financial presentation differed in 2004. The presentation of comparative business line results for 2004 is not practical and has not been provided.

U.S. BANCORP  53

Wholesale Bankingoffers lending, equipment finance and small-ticket leasing, depository, treasury management, capital markets, foreign exchange, international trade services and other financial services to middle market, large corporate, commercial real estate, and public sector clients. Wholesale Banking contributed $1,194 million of the Company’s net income in 2006, an increase of $18 million (1.5 percent), compared with 2005. The increase was primarily driven by growth in total net revenue.

     Total net revenue increased $29 million (1.0 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, increased $20 million (1.1 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005, driven by growth in average loan balances of $2.4 billion (5.0 percent) and wider spreads on total deposits due to their funding benefit during a rising interest rate environment, partially offset by reduced credit spreads due to competitive pricing. The increase in average loans was primarily driven by commercial loan growth during 2006. Commercial real estate loan growth was somewhat slower than prior years due to the general slowdown in homebuilding, a decision by the Company to reduce the level of construction financing for condominium projects and the extent of refinancing activities. The $9 million (1.0 percent) increase in noninterest income in 2006, compared with 2005, was due to gains from the sale of securities acquired during a loan workout and higher commercial products revenue, including equipment leasing residual gains, partially offset by lower other non-yield commercial loan and letter of credit fees due to price compression in the competitive lending environment. The change in noninterest income also reflected lower revenues during 2006 from equity investments.

     Noninterest expense was unchanged in 2006 compared with 2005, as slightly higher compensation expense was offset by lower net shared services and other non-personnel expenses.

     The provision for credit losses increased $3 million in 2006, compared with 2005. The unfavorable change was primarily due to fewer commercial loan recoveries during the year. Credit quality continued to be strong within this

 Table 23   LINE OF BUSINESS FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

			Wholesale								Consumer
			Banking								Banking
								Percent							Percent
Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions)			2006		2005			Change			2006		2005		Change
CONDENSED INCOME STATEMENT
Net interest income (taxable-equivalent basis)			$	1,909	$	1,889			1.1	%	$	3,887	$	3,794		2.5	%
Noninterest income				881		887			(.7	)		1,699		1,826		(7.0	)
Securities gains (losses), net				11		(4	)		*			–		–		–
	Total net revenue			2,801		2,772			1.0			5,586		5,620		(.6	)
Noninterest expense				905		905			–			2,471		2,422		2.0
Other intangibles				16		16			–			49		252		(80.6	)
	Total noninterest expense			921		921			–			2,520		2,674		(5.8	)
		Income before provision and income taxes		1,880		1,851			1.6			3,066		2,946		4.1
Provision for credit losses				4		1			*			248		286		(13.3	)
Income before income taxes				1,876		1,850			1.4			2,818		2,660		5.9
Income taxes and taxable-equivalent adjustment				682		674			1.2			1,025		968		5.9
Net income			$	1,194	$	1,176			1.5		$	1,793	$	1,692		6.0
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET DATA
Commercial			$	33,365	$	31,262			6.7	%	$	6,368	$	6,153		3.5	%
Commercial real estate				17,217		16,915			1.8			10,792		10,317		4.6
Residential mortgages				61		63			(3.2	)		20,535		17,570		16.9
Retail				46		36			27.8			34,068		32,622		4.4
	Total loans			50,689		48,276			5.0			71,763		66,662		7.7
Goodwill				1,329		1,329			–			2,131		2,109		1.0
Other intangible assets				53		71			(25.4	)		1,450		1,189		22.0
Assets				56,100		53,411			5.0			81,625		76,151		7.2
Noninterest-bearing deposits				11,667		12,198			(4.4	)		12,698		13,139		(3.4	)
Interest checking				3,537		3,096			14.2			17,586		17,307		1.6
Savings products				5,490		5,318			3.2			21,139		24,203		(12.7	)
Time deposits				12,346		12,891			(4.2	)		18,679		17,078		9.4
	Total deposits			33,040		33,503			(1.4	)		70,102		71,727		(2.3	)
Shareholders’ equity				5,709		5,454			4.7			6,536		6,571		(.5	)

* Not meaningful

54  U.S. BANCORP

business segment. Nonperforming assets within Wholesale Banking were $241 million at December 31, 2006, compared with $268 million at December 31, 2005. Nonperforming assets as a percentage ofend-of-period loans were .47 percent at December 31, 2006, compared with ..55 percent at December 31, 2005. Refer to the “Corporate Risk Profile” section for further information on factors impacting the credit quality of the loan portfolios.

Consumer Bankingdelivers products and services through banking offices, telephone servicing and sales, on-line services, direct mail and ATMs. It encompasses community banking, metropolitan banking, in-store banking, small business banking, consumer lending, mortgage banking, consumer finance, workplace banking, student banking and24-hour banking. Consumer Banking contributed $1,793 million of the Company’s net income in 2006, an increase of $101 million (6.0 percent), compared with 2005. While the retail banking business grew net income 8.5 percent in 2006, the contribution of the mortgage banking business declined 25.6 percent, compared with 2005. The decline in the mortgage banking division was driven by a lower average warehouse portfolio and origination gains, adverse changes in the valuation of MSRs and related economic hedges due to changes in relative interest rates and the Company’s adoption of SFAS 156 in early 2006.

     Total net revenue declined $34 million (.6 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, increased $93 million in 2006, compared with 2005. The year-over-year increase in net interest income was due to growth in average loans of 7.7 percent and the funding benefit of deposits due to rising interest rates. Partially offsetting these increases were reduced spreads on commercial and retail loans due to competitive pricing within the Company’s markets. The increase in average loan balances reflected strong growth in residential mortgages and more moderate growth in retail loans, commercial real estate loans and commercial loans. Residential mortgages, including traditional residential mortgages and first-lien home equity loans, grew

Wealth							Payment							Treasury and									Consolidated
Management							Services							Corporate Support									Company
				Percent							Percent									Percent								Percent
2006		2005		Change			2006		2005		Change			2006			2005			Change			2006		2005			Change
$	505	$	434		16.4	%	$	658	$	597		10.2	%	$	(169	)	$	374			*	%	$	6,790	$	7,088			(4.2	)%
	1,446		1,208		19.7			2,578		2,183		18.1			228			47			*			6,832		6,151			11.1
	–		–		–			–		–		–			3			(102	)		*			14		(106	)		*
	1,951		1,642		18.8			3,236		2,780		16.4			62			319			(80.6	)		13,636		13,133			3.8
	932		823		13.2			1,231		1,072		14.8			286			183			56.3			5,825		5,405			7.8
	88		61		44.3			202		176		14.8			–			(47	)		*			355		458			(22.5	)
	1,020		884		15.4			1,433		1,248		14.8			286			136			*			6,180		5,863			5.4
	931		758		22.8			1,803		1,532		17.7			(224	)		183			*			7,456		7,270			2.6
	3		5		(40.0	)		284		386		(26.4	)		5			(12	)		*			544		666			(18.3	)
	928		753		23.2			1,519		1,146		32.5			(229	)		195			*			6,912		6,604			4.7
	339		274		23.7			552		417		32.4			(437	)		(218	)		*			2,161		2,115			2.2
$	589	$	479		23.0		$	967	$	729		32.6		$	208		$	413			(49.6	)	$	4,751	$	4,489			5.8
$	1,774	$	1,580		12.3	%	$	3,800	$	3,488		8.9	%	$	133		$	158			(15.8	)%	$	45,440	$	42,641			6.6	%
	686		645		6.4			–		–		–			65			87			(25.3	)		28,760		27,964			2.8
	453		397		14.1			–		–		–			4			6			(33.3	)		21,053		18,036			16.7
	2,411		2,321		3.9			8,779		7,941		10.6			44			49			(10.2	)		45,348		42,969			5.5
	5,324		4,943		7.7			12,579		11,429		10.1			246			300			(18.0	)		140,601		131,610			6.8
	1,400		877		59.6			2,426		2,029		19.6			3			–			*			7,289		6,344			14.9
	472		310		52.3			1,125		959		17.3			3			4			(25.0	)		3,103		2,533			22.5
	7,760		6,676		16.2			17,452		15,219		14.7			50,575			51,741			(2.3	)		213,512		203,198			5.1
	3,982		3,680		8.2			337		171		97.1			71			41			73.2			28,755		29,229			(1.6	)
	2,427		2,376		2.1			–		–		–			2			6			(66.7	)		23,552		22,785			3.4
	5,588		5,578		.2			19		16		18.8			30			18			66.7			32,266		35,133			(8.2	)
	2,916		1,462		99.5			3		3		–			2,072			2,420			(14.4	)		36,016		33,854			6.4
	14,913		13,096		13.9			359		190		88.9			2,175			2,485			(12.5	)		120,589		121,001			(.3	)
	2,368		1,670		41.8			4,655		4,001		16.3			1,442			2,257			(36.1	)		20,710		19,953			3.8

U.S. BANCORP  55

16.9 percent in 2006, compared with 2005. This growth rate reflected the Company’s retention of adjustable-rate residential mortgages throughout 2005 given the rising rate environment. However, during the first quarter of 2006, the Company began to moderate the growth of the residential mortgage portfolio by selling an increased proportion of its residential loan production into the secondary markets. Within the retail loan category, the Company experienced strong growth in installment and credit card loan balances. This growth was offset by a reduction in retail leasing balances due to pricing competition. The year-over-year decrease in average deposits of 2.3 percent reflected a reduction in savings and noninterest-bearing deposit products, offset somewhat by growth in time deposits and interest checking. Average time deposit balances grew $1.6 billion (9.4 percent) in 2006, compared with the prior year, as a portion of noninterest-bearing and money market balances migrated to fixed-rate time deposit products. Average savings balances declined $3.1 billion (12.7 percent) compared with 2005, principally related to money market accounts. Fee-based noninterest income within Consumer Banking decreased $127 million in 2006, compared with 2005. Within the retail banking division, fee-based revenues grew 5.4 percent from a year ago, driven
by growth in deposit service charges from increased transaction-related services and net new checking accounts and higher gains from student loan sales. Noninterest income of the mortgage banking division decreased by $202 million from a year ago. The reduction in mortgage banking revenue reflected the impact of adopting a fair value accounting methodology for MSRs as of January 1, 2006.

     Noninterest expense decreased $154 million (5.8 percent) in 2006, compared with the prior year. The decrease was primarily related to the adoption of SFAS 156 which caused the elimination of MSR amortization from other intangible expense. The net impact of this change reduced noninterest expense by approximately $196 million from the prior year. Partially offsetting this decrease were increases in compensation and employee benefits expenses, reflecting the impact of the net addition of 26 in-store and 27 traditional branches at December 31, 2006, compared with December 31, 2005, as well as higher professional services expense due to revenue enhancement-related business initiatives in 2006.

     The provision for credit losses decreased $38 million in 2006, compared with 2005. The improvement was primarily attributed to strong credit quality during the year. As a percentage of average loans outstanding, net charge-offs declined to .35 percent in 2006, compared with ..43 percent in 2005. The decline in net charge-offs was primarily driven by a $41 million decrease in retail loan and residential mortgage net charge-offs, primarily due to lower bankruptcy losses. Commercial and commercial real estate loan net charge-offs increased $2 million in 2006, compared with 2005. Nonperforming assets within Consumer Banking were $283 million at December 31, 2006, compared with $315 million at December 31, 2005. Nonperforming assets as a percentage ofend-of-period loans were .40 percent at December 31, 2006, compared with ..47 percent at December 31, 2005. Refer to the “Corporate Risk Profile” section for further information on factors impacting the credit quality of the loan portfolios.

Wealth Managementprovides trust, private banking, financial advisory, investment management, retail brokerage services, insurance, custody and mutual fund servicing through six businesses: Private Client Group, Corporate Trust, U.S. Bancorp Investments and Insurance, FAF Advisors, Institutional Trust and Custody and Fund Services. During 2006, Wealth Management contributed $589 million of the Company’s net income, an increase of $110 million (23.0 percent) compared with 2005. The growth was primarily attributed to organic customer account growth and the impact of recent acquisitions.

     Total net revenue increased $309 million (18.8 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, grew by 16.4 percent from the prior year. The increase in net interest income was due to 7.7 percent growth in average loan balances, strong growth in total average deposits and the favorable impact of rising interest rates on the funding benefit of customer deposits, partially offset by a decline in credit spreads. The increase in total deposits was attributed to growth in noninterest-bearing deposits and time deposits principally due to acquired businesses. Noninterest income increased $238 million in 2006, compared with 2005, driven by organic customer account growth during the year, increased asset management fees given favorable equity market conditions and the benefits of recent acquisitions of corporate and institutional trust businesses.

     Noninterest expense increased $136 million (15.4 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005, primarily attributed to the recent acquisitions of corporate and institutional trust businesses.

Payment Servicesincludes consumer and business credit cards, stored-value cards, debit cards, corporate and purchasing card services, consumer lines of credit, ATM processing and merchant processing. Payment Services contributed $967 million of the Company’s net income in 2006, or an increase of $238 million (32.6 percent), compared with 2005. The increase was due to growth in total net revenue, driven by strong loan growth, higher transaction volumes, and a lower provision for credit losses, partially offset by an increase in total noninterest expense.

56  U.S. BANCORP

     Total net revenue increased $456 million (16.4 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005. The 2006 increase in net interest income of $61 million, compared with the prior year, was attributed to growth in higher yielding retail and commercial credit card loan balances, partially offset by an increase in noninterest-bearing corporate payments loan products and non-earning intangible assets that resulted in higher funding expense. Noninterest income increased $395 million in 2006, or 18.1 percent compared with 2005. The increase in fee-based revenue was driven by strong growth in credit and debit card revenue, corporate payment products revenue and merchant processing services revenue. Credit and debit card revenue increased primarily due to higher customer transaction volumes. Corporate payment products revenue reflected organic growth in sales volumes and card usage and acquired business expansion. Merchant processing services revenue grew due to an increase in sales volume driven by acquisitions, higher same store sales, new merchant signings and associated equipment fees. Also, included in noninterest income for 2006 was a $10 million favorable settlement award related to the Company’s merchant processing business.

     Noninterest expense increased $185 million (14.8 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005, primarily attributed to the acquisition of merchant acquiring and corporate payments businesses, higher compensation and employee benefit costs for processing activities associated with increased transaction processing volumes and higher ATM processing services volumes.

     The provision for credit losses decreased $102 million in 2006, compared with 2005, due to lower net charge-offs. As a percentage of average loans outstanding, net charge-offs were 2.26 percent in 2006, compared with 3.38 percent in 2005.

Treasury and Corporate Supportincludes the Company’s investment portfolios, funding, capital management and asset securitization activities, interest rate risk management, the net effect of transfer pricing related to average balances and the residual aggregate of those expenses associated with corporate activities that are managed on a consolidated basis. In addition, prior to the adoption of SFAS 156, changes in MSR valuations due to interest rate changes were managed at a corporate level and, as such, reported within this business unit in noninterest expenses. During 2006, Treasury and Corporate Support recorded net income of $208 million, a decrease of $205 million compared with 2005.

     Total net revenue decreased $257 million (80.6 percent) in 2006, compared with 2005, primarily due to a $543 million decrease in net interest income, partially offset by higher noninterest income. The decline of net interest income reflected the impact of a flatter yield curve and asset/liability management decisions, including reducing the investment securities portfolio, changes in interest rate derivative positions and the repayment and issuance of longer-term fixed rate wholesale funding. The increase in noninterest income was driven by gains recognized in 2006 from the initial public offering and subsequent sale of equity interests in a card association, trading income recognized from certain derivatives that did not qualify as accounting hedges, a gain on sale of a 401(k) defined contribution recordkeeping business in 2006, and net securities losses incurred in 2005.

     Noninterest expense increased $150 million in 2006, compared with 2005. The year-over-year increase reflected higher integration costs related to recent acquisitions, operating costs associated with tax-advantaged investments, and reparations related to MSR valuations during 2005.

     The provision for credit losses for this business unit represents the residual aggregate of the net credit losses allocated to the reportable business units and the Company’s recorded provision determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Refer to the “Corporate Risk Profile” section for further information on the provision for credit losses, nonperforming assets and factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses.

     Income taxes are assessed to each line of business at a managerial tax rate of 36.4 percent with the residual tax expense or benefit to arrive at the consolidated effective tax rate included in Treasury and Corporate Support. The consolidated effective tax rate of the Company was 30.8 percent in 2006, compared with 31.7 percent in 2005. The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2005 primarily reflected higher tax exempt income from investment securities and insurance products and incremental tax credits generated from investments in affordable housing and similar tax-advantaged projects.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES

Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements discusses accounting standards adopted in the current year, as well as, accounting standards recently issued but not yet required to be adopted and the expected impact of these changes in accounting standards. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards affects the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable section(s) of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

U.S. BANCORP  57

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and conform to general practices within the banking industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. The financial position and results of operations can be affected by these estimates and assumptions, which are integral to understanding the Company’s financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those policies that management believes are the most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results, and require management to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by management to be critical accounting policies. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical in the preparation of financial statements. These factors include, among other things, whether the estimates are significant to the financial statements, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including third-parties or available prices, and sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be utilized under generally accepted accounting principles. Management has discussed the development and the selection of critical accounting policies with the Company’s Audit Committee.

     Significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Those policies considered to be critical accounting policies are described below.

Allowance for Credit LossesThe allowance for credit losses is established to provide for probable losses inherent in the Company’s credit portfolio. The methods utilized to estimate the allowance for credit losses, key assumptions and quantitative and qualitative information considered by management in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses are discussed in the “Credit Risk Management” section.

     Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is often the most critical of accounting estimates for a banking institution. It is an inherently subjective process impacted by many factors as discussed throughout the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of the Annual Report. Although risk management practices, methodologies and other tools are utilized to determine each element of the allowance, degrees of imprecision exist in these measurement tools due in part to subjective judgments involved and an inherent lagging of credit quality measurements relative to the stage of the business cycle. Even determining the stage of the business cycle is highly subjective. As discussed in the “Analysis and Determination of Allowance for Credit Losses” section, management considers the effect of imprecision and many other factors in determining the allowance for credit losses by establishing an “allowance available for other factors” that is not specifically allocated to a category of loans. If not considered, inherent losses in the portfolio related to imprecision and other subjective factors could have a dramatic adverse impact on the liquidity and financial viability of a bank.

     Given the many subjective factors affecting the credit portfolio, changes in the allowance for credit losses may not directly coincide with changes in the risk ratings of the credit portfolio reflected in the risk rating process. This is in part due to the timing of the risk rating process in relation to changes in the business cycle, the exposure and mix of loans within risk rating categories, levels of nonperforming loans and the timing of charge-offs and recoveries. For example, the amount of loans within specific risk ratings may change, providing a leading indicator of improving credit quality, while nonperforming loans and net charge-offs continue at elevated levels. Also, inherent loss ratios, determined through migration analysis and historical loss performance over the estimated business cycle of a loan, may not change to the same degree as net charge-offs. Because risk ratings and inherent loss ratios primarily drive the allowance specifically allocated to commercial loans, the amount of the allowance for commercial and commercial real estate loans might decline; however, the degree of change differs somewhat from the level of changes in nonperforming loans and net charge-offs. Also, management would maintain an adequate allowance for credit losses by increasing the allowance for other factors during periods of economic uncertainty or changes in the business cycle.

     Some factors considered in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses are quantifiable while other factors require qualitative judgment. Management conducts analysis with respect to the accuracy of risk ratings and the volatility of inherent losses, and utilizes this analysis along with qualitative factors including uncertainty in the economy from changes in unemployment rates, the level of bankruptcies, concentration risks, including risks associated with the airline industry sector and highly leveraged enterprise-value credits, in determining the overall level of the allowance for credit losses. The Company’s determination of the allowance for commercial and commercial real estate loans is sensitive to the assigned credit risk ratings and inherent loss rates at December 31, 2006. In the event that 10 percent of loans within these portfolios experienced downgrades of two risk categories, the allowance for commercial and commercial real estate would increase by approximately $234 million at December 31, 2006. In the event that inherent loss or

58  U.S. BANCORP

estimated loss rates for these portfolios increased by 10 percent, the allowance determined for commercial and commercial real estate would increase by approximately $93 million at December 31, 2006. The Company’s determination of the allowance for residential and retail loans is sensitive to changes in estimated loss rates. In the event that estimated loss rates increased by 10 percent, the allowance for residential mortgages and retail loans would increase by approximately $60 million at December 31, 2006. Because several quantitative and qualitative factors are considered in determining the allowance for credit losses, these sensitivity analyses do not necessarily reflect the nature and extent of future changes in the allowance for credit losses. They are intended to provide insights into the impact of adverse changes in risk rating and inherent losses and do not imply any expectation of future deterioration in the risk rating or loss rates. Given current processes employed by the Company, management believes the risk ratings and inherent loss rates currently assigned are appropriate. It is possible that others, given the same information, may at any point in time reach different reasonable conclusions that could be significant to the Company’s financial statements. Refer to the “Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Credit Losses” section for further information.

Mortgage Servicing RightsMSRs are capitalized as separate assets when loans are sold and servicing is retained or may be purchased from others. MSRs are initially recorded at fair value, if practicable, and at each subsequent reporting date. The Company determines the fair value by estimating the present value of the asset’s future cash flows utilizing market-based prepayment rates, discount rates, and other assumptions validated through comparison to trade information, industry surveys and independent third party appraisals. Changes in the fair value of MSRs are recorded in earnings during the period in which they occur. Risks inherent in the MSRs valuation include higher than expected prepayment rates and/or delayed receipt of cash flows. The Company utilizes futures and options contracts to mitigate the valuation risk. The estimated sensitivity to changes in interest rates of the fair value of the MSRs portfolio and the related derivative instruments at December 31, 2006, to an immediate 25 and 50 basis point downward movement in interest rates would be a decrease of approximately $18 million and $50 million, respectively. An upward movement in interest rates at December 31, 2006, of 25 and 50 basis points would decrease the value of the MSRs and related derivative instruments by approximately $3 million and $36 million, respectively. Refer to Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding MSRs.

Goodwill and Other IntangiblesThe Company records all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill and other intangibles, at fair value as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Goodwill and indefinite-lived assets are no longer amortized but are subject, at a minimum, to annual tests for impairment. Under certain situations, interim impairment tests may be required if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting segment below its carrying amount. Other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using straight-line and accelerated methods and are subject to impairment if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount.

     The initial recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets and subsequent impairment analysis require management to make subjective judgments concerning estimates of how the acquired assets will perform in the future using valuation methods including discounted cash flow analysis. Additionally, estimated cash flows may extend beyond ten years and, by their nature, are difficult to determine over an extended timeframe. Events and factors that may significantly affect the estimates include, among others, competitive forces, customer behaviors and attrition, changes in revenue growth trends, cost structures, technology, changes in discount rates and specific industry and market conditions. In determining the reasonableness of cash flow estimates, the Company reviews historical performance of the underlying assets or similar assets in an effort to assess and validate assumptions utilized in its estimates.

     In assessing the fair value of reporting units, the Company may consider the stage of the current business cycle and potential changes in market conditions in estimating the timing and extent of future cash flows. Also, management often utilizes other information to validate the reasonableness of its valuations including public market comparables, and multiples of recent mergers and acquisitions of similar businesses. Valuation multiples may be based on revenue,price-to-earnings and tangible capital ratios of comparable public companies and business segments. These multiples may be adjusted to consider competitive differences including size, operating leverage and other factors. The carrying amount of a reporting unit is determined based on the capital required to support the reporting unit’s activities including its tangible and intangible assets. The determination of a reporting unit’s capital allocation requires management judgment and considers many factors including the regulatory capital regulations and capital characteristics of comparable public

U.S. BANCORP  59

companies in relevant industry sectors. In certain circumstances, management will engage a third-party to independently validate its assessment of the fair value of its business segments.

     The Company’s annual assessment of potential goodwill impairment was completed during the second quarter of 2006. Based on the results of this assessment, no goodwill impairment was recognized.

Income TaxesThe Company estimates income tax expense based on amounts expected to be owed to various tax jurisdictions. Currently, the Company files tax returns in approximately 143 federal, state and local domestic jurisdictions and 9 foreign jurisdictions. The estimated income tax expense is reported in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Accrued taxes represent the net estimated amount due or to be received from taxing jurisdictions either currently or in the future and are reported in other assets or other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In estimating accrued taxes, the Company assesses the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment considering statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance in the context of the tax position. Because of the complexity of tax laws and regulations, interpretation can be difficult and subject to legal judgment given specific facts and circumstances. It is possible that others, given the same information, may at any point in time reach different reasonable conclusions regarding the estimated amounts of accrued taxes.

     Changes in the estimate of accrued taxes occur periodically due to changes in tax rates, interpretations of tax laws, the status of examinations being conducted by various taxing authorities, and newly enacted statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance that impact the relative merits and risks of tax positions. These changes, when they occur, affect accrued taxes and can be significant to the operating results of the Company. Refer to Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding income taxes.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based upon this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

     During the most recently completed fiscal quarter, there was no change made in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

     The annual report of the Company’s management on internal control over financial reporting is provided on page 61. The attestation report of Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent accountants, regarding the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is provided on page 63.

60  U.S. BANCORP

Report of Management

Responsibility for the financial statements and other information presented throughout the Annual Report on Form 10-K rests with the management of U.S. Bancorp. The Company believes that the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and present the substance of transactions based on the circumstances and management’s best estimates and judgment.

In meeting its responsibilities for the reliability of the financial statements, management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as defined by Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s system of internal controls is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of publicly filed financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

To test compliance, the Company carries out an extensive audit program. This program includes a review for compliance with written policies and procedures and a comprehensive review of the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal control system. Although control procedures are designed and tested, it must be recognized that there are limits inherent in all systems of internal control and, therefore, errors and irregularities may nevertheless occur. Also, estimates and judgments are required to assess and balance the relative cost and expected benefits of the controls. Projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Board of Directors of the Company has an Audit Committee composed of directors who are independent of U.S. Bancorp. The committee meets periodically with management, the internal auditors and the independent accountants to consider audit results and to discuss internal accounting control, auditing and financial reporting matters.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in its Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that the Company designed and maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.

The Company’s independent accountants, Ernst & Young LLP, have been engaged to render an independent professional opinion on the financial statements and issue an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting. Their opinion on the financial statements appearing on page 62 and their attestation on the system of internal controls over financial reporting appearing on page 63 are based on procedures conducted in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

U.S. BANCORP  61

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of U.S. Bancorp:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of U.S. Bancorp as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of U.S. Bancorp at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of U.S. Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 23, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Minneapolis, Minnesota

February 23, 2007

62  U.S. BANCORP

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of U.S. Bancorp:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Report of Management, that U.S. Bancorp maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). U.S. Bancorp’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that U.S. Bancorp maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, U.S. Bancorp maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of U.S. Bancorp as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 and our report dated February 23, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Minneapolis, Minnesota

February 23, 2007

U.S. BANCORP  63

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Balance Sheet

At December 31 (Dollars in Millions)				2006			2005
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks				$	8,639		$	8,004
Investment securities
	Held-to-maturity (fair value $92 and $113, respectively)				87			109
	Available-for-sale				40,030			39,659
Loans held for sale					3,256			3,030
Loans
	Commercial				46,190			42,942
	Commercial real estate				28,645			28,463
	Residential mortgages				21,285			20,730
	Retail				47,477			44,327
		Total loans			143,597			136,462
			Less allowance for loan losses		(2,022	)		(2,041	)
			Net loans		141,575			134,421
Premises and equipment					1,835			1,841
Goodwill					7,538			7,005
Other intangible assets					3,227			2,874
Other assets					13,045			12,522
		Total assets		$	219,232		$	209,465
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits
	Noninterest-bearing			$	32,128		$	32,214
	Interest-bearing				70,330			70,024
	Time deposits greater than $100,000				22,424			22,471
		Total deposits			124,882			124,709
Short-term borrowings					26,933			20,200
Long-term debt					37,602			37,069
Other liabilities					8,618			7,401
		Total liabilities			198,035			189,379
Shareholders’ equity
	Preferred stock, par value $1.00 a share (liquidation preference of $25,000 per share) authorized: 50,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 2006 — 40,000 shares				1,000			–
	Common stock, par value $0.01 a share — authorized: 4,000,000,000 shares; issued: 2006 and 2005 — 1,972,643,007 shares				20			20
	Capital surplus				5,762			5,907
	Retained earnings				21,242			19,001
	Less cost of common stock in treasury: 2006 — 207,928,756 shares; 2005 — 157,689,004 shares				(6,091	)		(4,413	)
	Other comprehensive income				(736	)		(429	)
		Total shareholders’ equity			21,197			20,086
		Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	219,232		$	209,465

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

64  U.S. BANCORP

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Statement of Income

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data)		2006		2005			2004
INTEREST INCOME
Loans		$	9,873	$	8,306		$	7,125
Loans held for sale			236		181			134
Investment securities			2,001		1,954			1,827
Other interest income			153		110			100
	Total interest income		12,263		10,551			9,186
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits			2,389		1,559			904
Short-term borrowings			1,203		690			263
Long-term debt			1,930		1,247			908
	Total interest expense		5,522		3,496			2,075
Net interest income			6,741		7,055			7,111
Provision for credit losses			544		666			669
Net interest income after provision for credit losses			6,197		6,389			6,442
NONINTEREST INCOME
Credit and debit card revenue			800		713			649
Corporate payment products revenue			557		488			407
ATM processing services			243		229			175
Merchant processing services			963		770			675
Trust and investment management fees			1,235		1,009			981
Deposit service charges			1,023		928			807
Treasury management fees			441		437			467
Commercial products revenue			415		400			432
Mortgage banking revenue			192		432			397
Investment products fees and commissions			150		152			156
Securities gains (losses), net			14		(106	)		(105	)
Other			813		593			478
	Total noninterest income		6,846		6,045			5,519
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Compensation			2,513		2,383			2,252
Employee benefits			481		431			389
Net occupancy and equipment			660		641			631
Professional services			199		166			149
Marketing and business development			217		235			194
Technology and communications			505		466			430
Postage, printing and supplies			265		255			248
Other intangibles			355		458			550
Debt prepayment			33		54			155
Other			952		774			787
	Total noninterest expense		6,180		5,863			5,785
Income before income taxes			6,863		6,571			6,176
Applicable income taxes			2,112		2,082			2,009
Net income		$	4,751	$	4,489		$	4,167
Net income applicable to common equity		$	4,703	$	4,489		$	4,167
PER COMMON SHARE
Earnings per common share		$	2.64	$	2.45		$	2.21
Diluted earnings per common share		$	2.61	$	2.42		$	2.18
Dividends declared per common share		$	1.39	$	1.23		$	1.02
Average common shares outstanding			1,778		1,831			1,887
Average diluted common shares outstanding			1,804		1,857			1,913

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

U.S. BANCORP  65

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity

			Common																Other			Total
			Shares			Preferred		Common		Capital			Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive			Shareholders’
(Dollars and Shares in Millions)			Outstanding			Stock		Stock		Surplus			Earnings			Stock			Income			Equity
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2003				1,923		$	–	$	20	$	5,851		$	14,508		$	(1,205	)	$	68		$	19,242
Net income														4,167									4,167
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale																				(123	)		(123	)
Unrealized loss on derivatives																				(43	)		(43	)
Foreign currency translation																				(17	)		(17	)
Realized gain on derivatives																				16			16
Reclassification for realized losses																				32			32
Income taxes																				51			51
		Total comprehensive income																					4,083
Cash dividends declared on common stock														(1,917	)								(1,917	)
Issuance of common and treasury stock				30							(96	)					772						676
Purchase of treasury stock				(94	)												(2,656	)					(2,656	)
Stock option and restricted stock grants											116												116
Shares reserved to meet deferred compensation obligations				(1	)						31						(36	)					(5	)
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2004				1,858		$	–	$	20	$	5,902		$	16,758		$	(3,125	)	$	(16	)	$	19,539
Net income														4,489									4,489
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale																				(539	)		(539	)
Unrealized loss on derivatives																				(58	)		(58	)
Foreign currency translation																				3			3
Realized loss on derivatives																				(74	)		(74	)
Reclassification for realized losses																				39			39
Minimum pension liability																				(38	)		(38	)
Income taxes																				254			254
		Total comprehensive income																					4,076
Cash dividends declared on common stock														(2,246	)								(2,246	)
Issuance of common and treasury stock				19							(81	)					525						444
Purchase of treasury stock				(62	)												(1,807	)					(1,807	)
Stock option and restricted stock grants											84												84
Shares reserved to meet deferred compensation obligations											2						(6	)					(4	)
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2005				1,815		$	–	$	20	$	5,907		$	19,001		$	(4,413	)	$	(429	)	$	20,086
Change in accounting principle														4						(237	)		(233	)
Net income														4,751									4,751
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale																				67			67
Unrealized gain on derivatives																				35			35
Foreign currency translation																				(30	)		(30	)
Realized loss on derivatives																				(199	)		(199	)
Reclassification for realized losses																				33			33
Change in retirement obligation																				(18	)		(18	)
Income taxes																				42			42
		Total comprehensive income																					4,681
Cash dividends declared:
	Preferred													(48	)								(48	)
	Common													(2,466	)								(2,466	)
Issuance of preferred stock							1,000				(52	)											948
Issuance of common and treasury stock				40							(99	)					1,144						1,045
Purchase of treasury stock				(90	)												(2,817	)					(2,817	)
Stock option and restricted stock grants											4												4
Shares reserved to meet deferred compensation obligations											2						(5	)					(3	)
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2006				1,765		$	1,000	$	20	$	5,762		$	21,242		$	(6,091	)	$	(736	)	$	21,197

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

66  U.S. BANCORP

U.S. Bancorp
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions)			2006			2005			2004
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income			$	4,751		$	4,489		$	4,167
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
	Provision for credit losses			544			666			669
	Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment			233			231			244
	Amortization of intangibles			355			458			550
	Provision for deferred income taxes			(3	)		(301	)		281
	Gain on sales of securities and other assets, net			(575	)		(316	)		(104	)
	Loans originated for sale in the secondary market, net of repayments			(22,231	)		(20,054	)		(16,886	)
	Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale			22,035			19,490			16,737
	Other, net			320			(1,186	)		(353	)
		Net cash provided by operating activities		5,429			3,477			5,305
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investment securities				1,441			5,039			8,216
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities				5,012			10,264			12,261
Purchases of investment securities				(7,080	)		(13,148	)		(19,624	)
Net increase in loans outstanding				(5,003	)		(9,095	)		(6,801	)
Proceeds from sales of loans				616			837			845
Purchases of loans				(2,922	)		(3,568	)		(2,719	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired				(600	)		(1,008	)		(322	)
Other, net				(313	)		(1,159	)		(451	)
		Net cash used in investing activities		(8,849	)		(11,838	)		(8,595	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase (decrease) in deposits				(392	)		3,968			1,689
Net increase in short-term borrowings				6,612			7,116			2,234
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt				14,255			15,519			13,704
Principal payments or redemption of long-term debt				(13,120	)		(12,848	)		(12,683	)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock				948			–			–
Proceeds from issuance of common stock				910			371			581
Repurchase of common stock				(2,798	)		(1,855	)		(2,660	)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock				(33	)		–			–
Cash dividends paid on common stock				(2,359	)		(2,245	)		(1,820	)
		Net cash provided by financing activities		4,023			10,026			1,045
		Change in cash and cash equivalents		603			1,665			(2,245	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year				8,202			6,537			8,782
		Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	8,805		$	8,202		$	6,537
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES
Cash paid for income taxes			$	2,263		$	2,131		$	1,768
Cash paid for interest				5,339			3,365			2,030
Net noncash transfers to foreclosed property				145			98			104
Acquisitions
	Assets acquired		$	1,603		$	1,545		$	437
	Liabilities assumed			(899	)		(393	)		(114	)
		Net	$	704		$	1,152		$	323

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

U.S. BANCORP  67

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 Note 1   SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

U.S. Bancorp and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a multi-state financial services holding company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Company provides a full range of financial services including lending and depository services through banking offices principally in 24 states. The Company also engages in credit card, merchant, and ATM processing, mortgage banking, insurance, trust and investment management, brokerage, and leasing activities principally in domestic markets.

Basis of PresentationThe consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its subsidiaries and all variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. The consolidation eliminates all significant intercompany accounts and transactions. Certain items in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Uses of EstimatesThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual experience could differ from those estimates.

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

Within the Company, financial performance is measured by major lines of business based on the products and services provided to customers through its distribution channels. The Company has five reportable operating segments:

Wholesale Bankingoffers lending, equipment finance and small-ticket leasing, depository, treasury management, capital markets, foreign exchange, international trade services and other financial services to middle market, large corporate, commercial real estate and public sector clients.

Consumer Bankingdelivers products and services through banking offices, telephone servicing and sales, on-line services, direct mail and ATMs. It encompasses community banking, metropolitan banking, in-store banking, small business banking, consumer lending, mortgage banking, consumer finance, workplace banking, student banking and24-hour banking.

Wealth Managementprovides trust, private banking, financial advisory, investment management, retail brokerage services, insurance, custody and mutual fund servicing through six businesses: Private Client Group, Corporate Trust, U.S. Bancorp Investments and Insurance, FAF Advisors, Institutional Trust and Custody and Fund Services.

Payment Servicesincludes consumer and business credit cards, stored-value cards, debit cards, corporate and purchasing card services, consumer lines of credit, ATM processing and merchant processing.

Treasury and Corporate Supportincludes the Company’s investment portfolios, funding, capital management and asset securitization activities, interest rate risk management, the net effect of transfer pricing related to average balances and the residual aggregate of those expenses associated with corporate activities that are managed on a consolidated basis.

Segment ResultsAccounting policies for the lines of business are the same as those used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements with respect to activities specifically attributable to each business line. However, the preparation of business line results requires management to establish methodologies to allocate funding costs and benefits, expenses and other financial elements to each line of business. For details of these methodologies and segment results, see “Basis for Financial Presentation” and Table 23 “Line of Business Financial Performance” included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SECURITIES

Realized gains or losses on securities are determined on a trade date basis based on the specific carrying value of the investments being sold.

Trading SecuritiesDebt and equity securities held for resale are classified as trading securities and reported at fair value. Realized gains or losses are reported in noninterest income.

Available-for-sale SecuritiesThese securities are not trading securities but may be sold before maturity in response to changes in the Company’s interest rate risk profile, funding needs or demand for collateralized deposits by public entities. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with unrealized net gains or losses reported within other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. When sold, the amortized cost of the specific securities is used to compute the gain or loss. Declines in fair value that

68  U.S. BANCORP

are deemed other-than-temporary, if any, are reported in noninterest income.

Held-to-maturity SecuritiesDebt securities for which the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are reported at historical cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Declines in fair value that are deemed other than temporary, if any, are reported in noninterest income.

Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Securities Sold Under Agreements to RepurchaseSecurities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are generally accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at the amounts at which the securities were acquired or sold, plus accrued interest. The fair value of collateral received is continually monitored and additional collateral obtained or requested to be returned to the Company as deemed appropriate.

EQUITY INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING ENTITIES

Equity investments in public entities in which ownership is less than 20 percent are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and carried at fair value. Similar investments in private entities are accounted for using the cost method. Investments in entities where ownership interest is between 20 percent and 50 percent are accounted for using the equity method with the exception of limited partnerships and limited liability companies where an ownership interest of greater than 5 percent requires the use of the equity method. If the Company has a voting interest greater than 50 percent, the consolidation method is used. All equity investments are evaluated for impairment at least annually and more frequently if certain criteria are met.

LOANS

Loans are reported net of unearned income. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balances as earned. Loan and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and recognized over the life of the loan and/or commitment period as yield adjustments.

Commitments to Extend CreditUnfunded residential mortgage loan commitments entered into in connection with mortgage banking activities are considered derivatives and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in income. All other unfunded loan commitments are generally related to providing credit facilities to customers of the bank and are not actively traded financial instruments. These unfunded commitments are disclosed as commitments to extend credit in Note 21 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Allowance for Credit LossesManagement determines the adequacy of the allowance based on evaluations of credit relationships, the loan portfolio, recent loss experience, and other pertinent factors, including economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates, including amounts of future cash collections expected on nonaccrual loans, which may be susceptible to significant change. The allowance for credit losses relating to impaired loans is based on the loan’s observable market price, the collateral for certain collateral-dependent loans, or the discounted cash flows using the loan’s effective interest rate.

     The Company determines the amount of the allowance required for certain sectors based on relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. The allowance recorded for commercial loans is based on quarterly reviews of individual credit relationships and an analysis of the migration of commercial loans and actual loss experience. The allowance recorded for homogeneous consumer loans is based on an analysis of product mix, risk characteristics of the portfolio, bankruptcy experiences, and historical losses, adjusted for current trends, for each homogenous category or group of loans. The allowance is increased through provisions charged to operating earnings and reduced by net charge-offs.

     The Company also assesses the credit risk associated with off-balance sheet loan commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives and determines the appropriate amount of credit loss liability that should be recorded. The liability for off-balance sheet credit exposure related to loan commitments and other financial instruments is included in other liabilities.

Nonaccrual LoansGenerally commercial loans (including impaired loans) are placed on nonaccrual status when the collection of interest or principal has become 90 days past due or is otherwise considered doubtful. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Future interest payments are generally applied against principal. Revolving consumer lines and credit cards are charged off by 180 days past due and closed-end consumer loans other than loans secured by 1-4 family properties are charged off at 120 days past due and are, therefore, generally not placed on nonaccrual status. Certain retail customers having financial difficulties may have the terms of their credit card and other loan agreements modified to require only principal payments and, as such, are reported as nonaccrual.

Impaired LoansA loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due (both interest and principal) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.

U.S. BANCORP  69

Restructured LoansIn cases where a borrower experiences financial difficulties and the Company makes certain concessionary modifications to contractual terms, the loan is classified as a restructured loan. Loans restructured at a rate equal to or greater than that of a new loan with comparable risk at the time the contract is modified may be excluded from restructured loans in the calendar years subsequent to the restructuring if they are in compliance with the modified terms.

     Generally, a nonaccrual loan that is restructured remains classified as a nonaccrual loan for a period of six months to demonstrate that the borrower can meet the restructured terms. However, performance prior to the restructuring, or significant events that coincide with the restructuring, are considered in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms and may result in the loan being returned to accrual status at the time of restructuring or after a shorter performance period. If the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is not reasonably assured, the loan remains classified as a nonaccrual loan.

LeasesThe Company engages in both direct and leveraged lease financing. The net investment in direct financing leases is the sum of all minimum lease payments and estimated residual values, less unearned income. Unearned income is added to interest income over the terms of the leases to produce a level yield.

     The investment in leveraged leases is the sum of all lease payments (less nonrecourse debt payments) plus estimated residual values, less unearned income. Income from leveraged leases is recognized over the term of the leases based on the unrecovered equity investment.

     Residual values on leased assets are reviewed regularly for other-than-temporary impairment. Residual valuations for retail automobile leases are based on independent assessments of expected used car sale prices at theend-of-term. Impairment tests are conducted based on these valuations considering the probability of the lessee returning the asset to the Company, re-marketing efforts, insurance coverage and ancillary fees and costs. Valuations for commercial leases are based upon external or internal management appraisals. When there isother-than-temporary impairment in the estimated fair value of the Company’s interest in the residual value of a leased asset, the carrying value is reduced to the estimated fair value with the writedown recognized in the current period.

Loans Held for SaleLoans held for sale (“LHFS”) represent mortgage loan originations intended to be sold in the secondary market and other loans that management has an active plan to sell. LHFS are carried at the lower of cost or market value as determined on an aggregate basis by type of loan. In the event management decides to sell loans receivable, the loans are transferred at the lower of cost or fair value. Loans transferred to LHFS aremarked-to-market (“MTM”) at the time of transfer. MTM losses related to the sale/transfer of non-homogeneous loans that are predominantly credit-related are reflected in charge-offs. With respect to homogeneous loans, the amount of “probable” credit loss determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” methodologies utilized to determine the specific allowance allocation for the portfolio is also included in charge-offs. Any incremental loss determined in accordance with MTM accounting, that includes consideration of other factors such as estimates of inherent losses, is reported separately from charge-offs as a reduction to the allowance for credit losses. Subsequent decreases in fair value are recognized in noninterest income.

Other Real EstateOther real estate (“ORE”), which is included in other assets, is property acquired through foreclosure or other proceedings. ORE is carried at fair value, less estimated selling costs. The property is evaluated regularly and any decreases in the carrying amount are included in noninterest expense.

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative transactions to manage its interest rate, foreign currency and prepayment risk and to accommodate the business requirements of its customers. All derivative instruments are recorded as other assets, other liabilities or short-term borrowings at fair value. Subsequent changes in a derivative’s fair value are recognized currently in earnings, unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.

     All derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting are recorded at fair value and classified either as a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability (“fair value” hedge) or as a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability or a forecasted transaction (“cash flow” hedge). Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and designated as a fair value hedge and the offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged item are recorded in income. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and designated as a cash flow hedge are recognized in other comprehensive income until income from the cash flows of the hedged item is recognized. The Company performs an assessment, both at the inception of the hedge and on a quarterly basis thereafter, when required, to determine whether these derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes in the value of the hedged items. Any change in fair value resulting from hedge ineffectiveness is immediately recorded in noninterest income.

70  U.S. BANCORP

     If a derivative designated as a hedge is terminated or ceases to be highly effective, the gain or loss is amortized to earnings over the remaining life of the hedged asset or liability (fair value hedge) or over the same period(s) that the forecasted hedged transactions impact earnings (cash flow hedge). If the hedged item is disposed of, or the forecasted transaction is no longer probable, the derivative is recorded at fair value with any resulting gain or loss included in the gain or loss from the disposition of the hedged item or, in the case of a forecasted transaction that is no longer probable, included in earnings immediately.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company recognizes revenue as it is earned based on contractual terms, as transactions occur, or as services are provided and collectibility is reasonably assured. In certain circumstances, noninterest income is reported net of associated expenses that are directly related to variable volume-based sales or revenue sharing arrangements or when the Company acts on an agency basis for others. Certain specific policies include the following:

Credit and Debit Card RevenueCredit and debit card revenue includes interchange income from credit and debit cards, annual fees, and other transaction and account management fees. Interchange income is a fee paid by a merchant bank to the card-issuing bank through the interchange network. Interchange fees are set by the credit card associations and are based on cardholder purchase volumes. The Company records interchange income as transactions occur. Transaction and account management fees are recognized as transactions occur or services are provided, except for annual fees, which are recognized over the applicable period. Volume-related payments to partners and credit card associations and expenses for rewards programs are also recorded within credit and debit card revenue. Payments to partners and expenses related to rewards programs are recorded when earned by the partner or customer.

Merchant Processing ServicesMerchant processing services revenue consists principally of transaction and account management fees charged to merchants for the electronic processing of transactions, net of interchange fees paid to the credit card issuing bank, card association assessments, and revenue sharing amounts, and are all recognized at the time the merchant’s transactions are processed or other services are performed. The Company may enter into revenue sharing agreements with referral partners or in connection with purchases of merchant contracts from sellers. The revenue sharing amounts are determined primarily on sales volume processed or revenue generated for a particular group of merchants. Merchant processing revenue also includes revenues related topoint-of-sale equipment recorded as sales when the equipment is shipped or as earned for equipment rentals.

Trust and Investment Management FeesTrust and investment management fees are recognized over the period in which services are performed and are based on a percentage of the fair value of the assets under management or administration, fixed based on account type, or transaction-based fees.

Deposit Service ChargesService charges on deposit accounts primarily represent monthly fees based on minimum balances or transaction-based fees. These fees are recognized as earned or as transactions occur and services are provided.

OTHER SIGNIFICANT POLICIES

Intangible AssetsThe price paid over the net fair value of the acquired businesses (“goodwill”) is not amortized. Other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, using straight-line and accelerated methods. The recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets is evaluated annually, at a minimum, or on an interim basis if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount. The evaluation includes assessing the estimated fair value of the intangible asset based on market prices for similar assets, where available, and the present value of the estimated future cash flows associated with the intangible asset.

Income TaxesDeferred taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences on future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the financial reporting amounts at each year-end.

Mortgage Servicing RightsMortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are capitalized as separate assets when loans are sold and servicing is retained or may be purchased from others. MSRs are initially recorded at fair value, if practicable, and at each subsequent reporting date. The Company determines the fair value by estimating the present value of the asset’s future cash flows utilizing market-based prepayment rates, discount rates, and other assumptions validated through comparison to trade information, industry surveys and independent third party appraisals. Changes in the fair value of MSRs are recorded in earnings during the period in which they occur. Risks inherent in the MSRs valuation include higher than expected prepayment rates and/or delayed receipt of cash flows. The Company utilizes futures and options contracts to mitigate the valuation risk. Fair value changes related to the MSRs and the futures and options contracts, as well as servicing and other related fees, are recorded in mortgage banking revenue.

U.S. BANCORP  71

PensionsFor purposes of its retirement plans, the Company utilizes a measurement date of September 30. At the measurement date, plan assets are determined based on fair value, generally representing observable market prices. The actuarial cost method used to compute the pension liabilities and related expense is the projected unit credit method. The projected benefit obligation is principally determined based on the present value of projected benefit distributions at an assumed discount rate. The discount rate utilized is based on match-funding maturities and interest payments of high quality corporate bonds available in the market place to projected cash flows as of the measurement date for future benefit payments. Periodic pension expense (or income) includes service costs, interest costs based on the assumed discount rate, the expected return on plan assets based on an actuarially derived market-related value and amortization of actuarial gains and losses. Pension accounting reflects the long-term nature of benefit obligations and the investment horizon of plan assets and can have the effect of reducing earnings volatility related to short-term changes in interest rates and market valuations. Actuarial gains and losses include the impact of plan amendments and various unrecognized gains and losses which are deferred and amortized over the future service periods of active employees. The market-related value utilized to determine the expected return on plan assets is based on fair value adjusted for the difference between expected returns and actual performance of plan assets. The unrealized difference between actual experience and expected returns is included in the market-related value ratably over a five-year period. Beginning in 2006, the overfunded or underfunded status of the plans is recorded as an asset or liability on the balance sheet, with changes in that status recognized through other comprehensive income.

Premises and EquipmentPremises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and depreciated primarily on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of the assets. Estimated useful lives range up to 40 years for newly constructed buildings and from 3 to 20 years for furniture and equipment.

     Capitalized leases, less accumulated amortization, are included in premises and equipment. The lease obligations are included in long-term debt. Capitalized leases are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and the amortization is included in depreciation expense.

Statement of Cash FlowsFor purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and money market investments, defined as interest-bearing amounts due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell.

Stock-Based CompensationThe Company grants stock-based awards, including restricted stock and options to purchase common stock of the Company. Stock option grants are for a fixed number of shares to employees and directors with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant. Stock-based compensation for awards is recognized in the Company’s results of operations on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The Company immediately recognizes compensation cost of awards to employees that meet retirement status, despite their continued active employment. The amortization of stock-based compensation reflects estimated forfeitures adjusted for actual forfeiture experience. As compensation expense is recognized, a deferred tax asset is recorded that represents an estimate of the future tax deduction from exercise or release of restrictions. At the time stock-based awards are exercised, cancelled, expire, or restrictions are released, the Company may be required to recognize an adjustment to tax expense.

Per Share CalculationsEarnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting income and outstanding shares, assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, using the treasury stock method.

 Note 2   ACCOUNTING CHANGES

Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement PlansIn September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158 (“SFAS 158”), “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)”, effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2006. This statement requires the recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability on the balance sheet, and the recognition of changes in that funded status through other comprehensive income. The adoption of SFAS 158 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Fair Value MeasurementsIn September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), “Fair Value Measurements”, effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2008. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between valuations obtained from sources independent of the entity and those from the entity’s own unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by observable market data. SFAS 157 expands disclosures about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities

72  U.S. BANCORP

in interim and annual periods subsequent to initial recognition. The disclosures focus on the inputs used to measure fair value and for recurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, the effect of the measurements on earnings or changes in net assets for the period. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this guidance on its financial statements.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income TaxesIn June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,” effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on disclosure and other matters. Currently, the Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on its financial statements.

Accounting for Servicing of Financial AssetsIn March 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets” (“SFAS 156”), which amends accounting and reporting standards for servicing assets and liabilities under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”. Specifically, SFAS 156 requires that all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. For subsequent measurement purposes, SFAS 156 permits an entity to choose to measure servicing assets and liabilities either based on fair value or lower of cost or market (“LOCOM”). The Company elected to adopt SFAS 156 effective January 1, 2006, utilizing the fair value measurement option for MSRs and continuing the LOCOM method for all other servicing assets and liabilities. Adopting the fair value measurement method resulted in the Company recording a cumulative-effect accounting adjustment to increase beginning retained earnings by $4 million (net of tax). Additional information regarding MSRs is disclosed in Note 9 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial LiabilitiesIn February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2008. This Statement provides entities with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the objective to reduce both the complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this guidance on its financial statements.

 Note 3   RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS

Bank subsidiaries are required to maintain minimum average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank. The amount of those reserve balances was approximately $359 million at December 31, 2006.

 Note 4   INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains and losses, and fair value ofheld-to-maturity andavailable-for-sale securities at December 31 were as follows:

			2006									2005
			Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
December 31 (Dollars in Millions)			Cost		Gains		Losses			Value		Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
HELD-TO-MATURITY (a)
	Mortgage-backed securities		$	7	$	–	$	–		$	7	$	8	$	–	$	–		$	8
	Obligations of state and political subdivisions			67		5		–			72		84		5		(1	)		88
	Other debt securities			13		–		–			13		17		–		–			17
		Total held-to-maturity securities	$	87	$	5	$	–		$	92	$	109	$	5	$	(1	)	$	113
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE (b)
	U.S. Treasury and agencies		$	472	$	1	$	(6	)	$	467	$	496	$	2	$	(9	)	$	489
	Mortgage-backed securities			34,465		103		(781	)		33,787		38,161		86		(733	)		37,514
	Asset-backed securities			7		–		–			7		12		–		–			12
	Obligations of state and political subdivisions			4,463		82		(6	)		4,539		640		3		(6	)		637
	Other securities and investments			1,223		13		(6	)		1,230		1,012		2		(7	)		1,007
		Total available-for-sale securities	$	40,630	$	199	$	(799	)	$	40,030	$	40,321	$	93	$	(755	)	$	39,659

(a)	Held-to-maturity securities are carried at historical cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
(b)	Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with unrealized net gains or losses reported within other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.

U.S. BANCORP  73

     The weighted-average maturity of the available-for-sale investment securities was 6.6 years at December 31, 2006, compared with 6.1 years at December 31, 2005. The corresponding weighted-average yields were 5.32 percent and 4.89 percent, respectively. The weighted-average maturity of theheld-to-maturity investment securities was 8.4 years at December 31, 2006, compared with 7.2 years at December 31, 2005. The corresponding weighted-average yields were 6.03 percent and 6.44 percent, respectively.

     Securities carried at $35.8 billion at December 31, 2006, and $36.9 billion at December 31, 2005, were pledged to secure public, private and trust deposits, repurchase agreements and for other purposes required by law. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase where the buyer/lender has the right to sell or pledge the securities were collateralized by securities with an amortized cost of $9.8 billion at December 31, 2006, and $10.9 billion at December 31, 2005, respectively.

The following table provides information as to the amount of interest income from taxable and non-taxable investment securities:

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions)		2006		2005		2004
Taxable			$1,882		$1,938		$1,809
Non-taxable			119		16		18
	Total interest income from investment securities		$2,001		$1,954		$1,827

The following table provides information as to the amount of gross gains and losses realized through the sales of available-for-sale investment securities:

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions)		2006			2005			2004
Realized gains		$	15		$	13		$	104
Realized losses			(1	)		(119	)		(209	)
	Net realized gains (losses)	$	14		$	(106	)	$	(105	)
Income tax (benefit) on realized gains (losses)		$	5		$	(40	)	$	(40	)

     For amortized cost, fair value and yield by maturity date ofheld-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities outstanding at December 31, 2006, refer to Table 11 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

     At December 31, 2006, certain investment securities included in the held-to-maturity and available-for-sale categories had a fair value that was below their amortized cost. The Company conducts a regular assessment of its investment portfolios to determine whether any securities are other-than-temporarily impaired. This assessment is based on the nature of the securities, the financial condition of the issuer, the extent and duration of the loss and the intent and ability of the Company, as of the reporting date, to hold these securities either to maturity or through the expected recovery period.

     Generally, the unrealized losses within each investment category have occurred due to rising interest rates over the past few years. The substantial portion of securities that have unrealized losses are either government securities, issued by government-backed agencies or privately issued securities with high investment grade credit ratings. Unrealized losses within other securities and investments are also the result of a modest widening of credit spreads since the initial purchase date. In general, the issuers of the investment securities do not have the contractual ability to pay them off at less than par at maturity or any earlier call date. As of the reporting date, the Company expects to receive all contractual principal and interest related to these securities. Because the Company has the ability and intent to hold its investment securities until their anticipated recovery in value or maturity, they are not considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2006.

74  U.S. BANCORP

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired based on the period the investments have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2006:

			Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total
			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
(Dollars in Millions)			Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
HELD-TO-MATURITY
	Obligations of state and political subdivisions		$	1	$	–		$	3	$	–		$	4	$	–
		Total	$	1	$	–		$	3	$	–		$	4	$	–
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE
	U.S. Treasury and agencies		$	58	$	–		$	333	$	(6	)	$	391	$	(6	)
	Mortgage-backed securities			2,017		(21	)		26,369		(760	)		28,386		(781	)
	Asset-backed securities			–		–			7		–			7		–
	Obligations of state and political subdivisions			689		(5	)		30		(1	)		719		(6	)
	Other securities and investments			150		(1	)		312		(5	)		462		(6	)
		Total	$	2,914	$	(27	)	$	27,051	$	(772	)	$	29,965	$	(799	)

 Note 5   LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

The composition of the loan portfolio at December 31 was as follows:

(Dollars in Millions)				2006		2005
COMMERCIAL
	Commercial			$	40,640	$	37,844
	Lease financing				5,550		5,098
		Total commercial			46,190		42,942
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
	Commercial mortgages				19,711		20,272
	Construction and development				8,934		8,191
		Total commercial real estate			28,645		28,463
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES
	Residential mortgages				15,316		14,538
	Home equity loans, first liens				5,969		6,192
		Total residential mortgages			21,285		20,730
RETAIL
	Credit card				8,670		7,137
	Retail leasing				6,960		7,338
	Home equity and second mortgages				15,523		14,979
	Other retail
		Revolving credit			2,563		2,504
		Installment			4,478		3,582
		Automobile			8,693		8,112
		Student			590		675
			Total other retail		16,324		14,873
		Total retail			47,477		44,327
			Total loans	$	143,597	$	136,462

     Loans are presented net of unearned interest and deferred fees and costs, which amounted to $1.3 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The Company had loans of $44.8 billion at December 31, 2006, and $44.1 billion at December 31, 2005, pledged at the Federal Home Loan Bank. Loans of $16.2 billion at December 31, 2006, and $18.1 billion at December 31, 2005, were pledged at the Federal Reserve Bank.

     The Company primarily lends to borrowers in the 24 states in which it has banking offices. Collateral for commercial loans may include marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. For details of the Company’s commercial portfolio by industry group and geography as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, see Table 7 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis which is

U.S. BANCORP  75

incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

     For detail of the Company’s commercial real estate portfolio by property type and geography as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, see Table 8 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Such loans are collateralized by the related property.

     Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans not performing in accordance with modified terms, other real estate and other nonperforming assets owned by the Company. For details of the Company’s nonperforming assets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, see Table 14 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table lists information related to nonperforming loans as of December 31:

(Dollars in Millions)	2006		2005
Loans on nonaccrual status	$	432	$	469
Restructured loans		38		75
Total nonperforming loans	$	470	$	544
Interest income that would have been recognized at original contractual terms	$	55	$	48
Amount recognized as interest income		16		18
Forgone revenue	$	39	$	30

Activity in the allowance for credit losses was as follows:

(Dollars in Millions)			2006		2005		2004
Balance at beginning of year			$	2,251	$	2,269	$	2,369
Add
	Provision charged to operating expense			544		666		669
Deduct
	Loans charged off			763		949		1,074
	Less recoveries of loans charged off			219		264		307
	Net loans charged off			544		685		767
Acquisitions and other changes				5		1		(2	)
Balance at end of year (a)			$	2,256	$	2,251	$	2,269
Components
	Allowance for loan losses		$	2,022	$	2,041	$	2,080
	Liability for unfunded credit commitments			234		210		189
		Total allowance for credit losses	$	2,256	$	2,251	$	2,269

(a) Included in this analysis is activity related to the Company’s liability for unfunded commitments, which is separately recorded in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

     A portion of the allowance for credit losses is allocated to commercial and commercial real estate loans deemed impaired. These impaired loans are included in nonperforming assets. A summary of impaired loans and their related allowance for credit losses is as follows:

		2006				2005				2004
		Recorded		Valuation		Recorded		Valuation		Recorded		Valuation
(Dollars in Millions)		Investment		Allowance		Investment		Allowance		Investment		Allowance
Impaired loans
	Valuation allowance required	$	346	$	44	$	388	$	37	$	489	$	64
	No valuation allowance required		–		–		–		–		–		–
Total impaired loans		$	346	$	44	$	388	$	37	$	489	$	64
Average balance of impaired loans during the year		$	344			$	412			$	600
Interest income recognized on impaired loans during the year			4				2				1

     Commitments to lend additional funds to customers whose commercial and commercial real estate loans were classified as nonaccrual or restructured at December 31, 2006, totaled $23 million.

     In addition to impaired commercial and commercial real estate loans, the Company had smaller balance homogenous loans that are accruing interest at rates considered to be below market rate. At December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the recorded investment in these other

76  U.S. BANCORP

restructured loans was $405 million, $315 million and $227 million, respectively, with average balances of $379 million, $278 million, and $229 million, respectively. The Company recognized estimated interest income on these loans of $35 million, $20 million, and $17 million during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

     For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company had net gains on the sale of loans of $104 million, $175 million and $171 million, respectively, which were included in noninterest income, primarily in mortgage banking revenue.

     The Company has equity interests in two joint ventures that are accounted for utilizing the equity method. The principal activity of one entity is to provide commercial real estate financing that the joint venture securitizes and sells to third party investors. The principal activity of the other entity is to provide senior or subordinated financing to customers for the construction, rehabilitation or redevelopment of commercial real estate. In connection with these joint ventures, the Company provides warehousing lines to support the operations. Warehousing advances to the joint ventures are made in the ordinary course of business and repayment of these credit facilities occurs when the securitization is completed or the commercial real estate project is permanently refinanced by others. At December 31, 2006, the Company had $1.3 billion of outstanding loan balances to these joint ventures.

 Note 6   LEASES

The components of the net investment in sales-type and direct financing leases at December 31 were as follows:

(Dollars in Millions)		2006			2005
Aggregate future minimum lease payments to be received		$	13,178		$	13,023
Unguaranteed residual values accruing to the lessor’s benefit			374			392
Unearned income			(1,605	)		(1,556	)
Initial direct costs			265			268
	Total net investment in sales-type and direct financing leases (a)	$	12,212		$	12,127

(a) The accumulated allowance for uncollectible minimum lease payments was $100 million and $112 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The minimum future lease payments to be received from sales-type and direct financing leases were as follows at December 31, 2006:

(Dollars in Millions)
2007	$	1,969
2008		2,583
2009		3,227
2010		2,817
2011		1,659
Thereafter		923

 Note 7   ACCOUNTING FOR TRANSFERS AND SERVICING OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

FINANCIAL ASSET SALES

When the Company sells financial assets, it may retain interest-only strips, servicing rights, residual rights to a cash reserve account, and/or other retained interests in the sold financial assets. The gain or loss on sale depends in part on the previous carrying amount of the financial assets involved in the transfer and is allocated between the assets sold and the retained interests based on their relative fair values at the date of transfer. Quoted market prices are used to determine retained interest fair values when readily available. Since quotes are generally not available for retained interests, the Company estimates fair value based on the present value of future expected cash flows using management’s best estimates of the key assumptions including credit losses, prepayment speeds, forward yield curves, and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. Retained interests and liabilities are recorded at fair value using a discounted cash flow methodology at inception and are evaluated at least quarterly thereafter.

Conduit and SecuritizationThe Company sponsors an off-balance sheet conduit, a qualified special purpose entity (“QSPE”), to which it transferred high-grade investment securities, funded by the issuance of commercial paper. Because QSPE’s are exempt from consolidation under the provisions of Financial Interpretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46R”), the Company does not consolidate the conduit structure in its financial statements. The conduit held assets of $2.2 billion at December 31, 2006, and $3.8 billion at December 31, 2005. These investment securities include primarily (i) private label asset-backed securities, which are insurance “wrapped” by AAA/ Aaa-rated monoline insurance companies and (ii) government agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations.

U.S. BANCORP  77

The conduit had commercial paper liabilities of $2.2 billion at December 31, 2006, and $3.8 billion at December 31, 2005. The Company benefits by transferring the investment securities into a conduit that provides diversification of funding sources in a capital-efficient manner and the generation of income.

     The Company provides a liquidity facility to the conduit. Utilization of the liquidity facility would be triggered if the conduit is unable to, or does not, issue commercial paper to fund its assets. A liability for the estimate of the potential risk of loss the Company has as the liquidity facility provider is recorded on the balance sheet in other liabilities. The liability is adjusted downward over time as the underlying assets pay down with the offset recognized as other noninterest income. The liability for the liquidity facility was $10 million at December 31, 2006, and $20 million at December 31, 2005. In addition, the Company recorded at fair value its retained residual interest in the investment securities conduit of $13 million at December 31, 2006, and $28 million at December 31, 2005. The Company recorded $8 million from the conduit during 2006 and $17 million during 2005, for revenues related to the conduit including fees for servicing, management, administration, and accretion income from retained interests.

Sensitivity AnalysisAt December 31, 2006, key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value of residual cash flows to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in those assumptions for the investment securities conduit were as follows:

December 31, 2006 (Dollars in Millions)
CURRENT ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS (a)
	Carrying value (fair value) of retained interests	$	13
	Weighted average life (in years)		1.0
EXPECTED REMAINING LIFE (IN YEARS)			2.2
	Impact of 10% adverse change	$	(1	)
	Impact of 20% adverse change		(3	)

(a) The residual cash flow discount rate was 4.6 percent of December 31, 2006. The investments are all AAA/ Aaa rated or insured investments, therefore, credit losses are assumed to be zero with no impact for interest rate movements. Also, interest rate movements create no material impact to the value of the residual interest, as the investment securities conduit is mostly match funded.

     These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumptions; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

Cash Flow InformationDuring the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the investment conduit generated $15 million and $22 million of cash flows, respectively, from servicing, other fees and retained interests.

VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

The Company is involved in various entities that are considered to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”) as defined in FASB Interpretation No. 46R. Generally, a VIE is a corporation, partnership, trust or any other legal structure that either does not have equity investors with substantive voting rights or has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. The Company’s investments in VIEs primarily represent private investment funds that make equity investments, provide debt financing or partnerships to support community-based investments in affordable housing, development entities that provide capital for communities located in low-income districts and historic rehabilitation projects that may enable the Company to ensure regulatory compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act.

With respect to these investments, the Company is required to consolidate any VIE in which it is determined to be the primary beneficiary. At December 31, 2006, approximately $90 million of total assets related to various VIEs were consolidated by the Company in its financial statements. Creditors of these VIEs have no recourse to the general credit of the Company. The Company is not required to consolidate other VIEs as it is not the primary beneficiary. In such cases, the Company does not absorb the majority of the entities’ expected losses nor does it receive a majority of the entities’ expected residual returns. The amounts of the Company’s investment in these unconsolidated entities ranged from less than $1 million to $82 million with an aggregate amount of approximately $1.7 billion at December 31, 2006. While the Company believes potential losses from these investments is remote, the Company’s

78  U.S. BANCORP

maximum exposure to these unconsolidated VIEs, including any tax implications, was approximately $2.8 billion at December 31, 2006, assuming that all of the separate investments within the individual private funds are deemed worthless and the community-based business and housing projects, and related tax credits, completely failed and did not meet certain government compliance requirements.

 Note 8   PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment at December 31 consisted of the following:

(Dollars in Millions)		2006			2005
Land		$	331		$	315
Buildings and improvements			2,372			2,313
Furniture, fixtures and equipment			2,352			2,239
Capitalized building and equipment leases			163			136
Construction in progress			11			4
			5,229			5,007
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization			(3,394	)		(3,166	)
	Total	$	1,835		$	1,841

 Note 9   MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS

The Company’s portfolio of residential mortgages serviced for others was $82.9 billion and $69.0 billion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company elected to adopt SFAS 156 utilizing the fair value method for measuring residential mortgage servicing rights. Under this method, the Company initially records MSRs at their estimated fair value and the related gain or loss is reported in mortgage banking revenue. The net impact of subsequent changes in the fair value of the MSRs and related derivatives are also recognized as part of mortgage banking revenue. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 156, the initial carrying value of MSRs was amortized over the estimated life of the intangible asset and changes in valuation, under thelower-of-cost-or-market accounting method, were recognized as impairments or reparation within other intangibles expenses.

     In conjunction with its MSRs, the Company may utilize derivatives, including U.S Treasury futures and options on U.S. Treasury futures contracts, to manage the volatility of changes in the fair value of MSRs. The net impact of changes in the fair value of MSRs and the related derivatives included in mortgage banking revenue was a net loss of $37 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Servicing and other related fees included in mortgage banking revenue were $319 million in 2006.

Changes in fair value of capitalized MSRs are summarized as follows:

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions)			2006			2005			2004
Balance at beginning of period				$1,123			$866			$670
	Rights purchased			52			27			139
	Rights capitalized			398			369			300
	Changes in fair value of MSRs:
		Due to change in valuation assumptions (a)		26			–			–
		Other changes in fair value (b)		(172	)		–			–
	Amortization			–			(197	)		(186	)
	Reparation (impairment)			–			53			(57	)
	Change in accounting principle			–			5			–
Balance at end of period				$1,427			$1,123			$866

(a)	Principally reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, primarily arising from interest rate changes.
(b)	Primarily represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time.

U.S. BANCORP  79

The Company determines fair value by estimating the present value of the asset’s future cash flows utilizing market-based prepayment rates, discount rates, and other assumptions validated through comparison to trade information, industry surveys, and independent third party appraisals. Risks inherent in the valuation of MSRs include higher than expected prepayment rates and/or delayed receipt of cash flows. The estimated sensitivity to changes in interest rates of the fair value of the MSRs portfolio and the related derivative instruments at December 31, 2006, was as follows:

	Down Scenario						Up Scenario
(Dollars in Millions)	50bps			25bps			25bps			50bps
Net fair value	$	(50	)	$	(18	)	$	(3	)	$	(36	)

     The fair value of MSRs and its sensitivity to changes in interest rates is influenced by the mix of the servicing portfolio and characteristics of each segment of the portfolio. The Company’s servicing portfolio consists of the distinct portfolios of Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs (“MRBP”), government-insured mortgages and conventional mortgages. The MRBP division specializes in servicing loans made under state and local housing authority programs. These programs provide mortgages to low-income and moderate-income borrowers and are generally government-insured programs with a favorable rate subsidy, down payment and/or closing cost assistance. Mortgage loans originated as part of government agency and state loan programs tend to experience slower prepayment rates and better cash flows than conventional mortgage loans. The servicing portfolios are predominantly comprised of fixed-rate agency loans (FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA, FHLB and various housing agencies) with limited adjustable-rate or jumbo mortgage loans.

A summary of the Company’s MSRs and related characteristics by portfolio as of December 31, 2006, was as follows:

(Dollars in Millions)	MRBP			Government			Conventional			Total
Servicing portfolio	$	8,277		$	8,671		$	65,944		$	82,892
Fair market value	$	167		$	163		$	1,097		$	1,427
Value (bps) *		202			188			166			172
Weighted-average servicing fees (bps)		40			43			36			37
Multiple (value/servicing fees)		5.05			4.37			4.61			4.65
Weighted-average note rate		5.90	%		6.16	%		5.88	%		5.91	%
Age (in years)		3.3			3.1			2.4			2.6
Expected life (in years)		8.2			7.1			7.2			7.3
Discount rate		11.4	%		11.3	%		10.5	%		10.7	%

*  Value is calculated as fair market value divided by the servicing portfolio.

 Note 10   INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consisted of the following:

		Estimated		Amortization		Balance
December 31 (Dollars in Millions)		Life (a)		Method (b)		2006		2005
Goodwill						$	7,538	$	7,005
Merchant processing contracts			9 years/8  years		SL/AC		797		767
Core deposit benefits			10 years/5  years		SL/AC		212		262
Mortgage servicing rights (c)							1,427		1,118
Trust relationships			15 years/7  years		SL/AC		431		477
Other identified intangibles			8 years/5  years		SL/AC		360		250
	Total					$	10,765	$	9,879

(a) Estimated life represents the amortization period for assets subject to the straight line method and the weighted average amortization period for intangibles subject to accelerated methods. If more than one amortization method is used for a category, the estimated life for each method is calculated and reported separately.

(b) Amortization methods: SL = straight line method
   AC = accelerated methods generally based on cash flows

(c) Mortgage servicing rights are no longer amortized due to the adoption of SFAS 156 in the first quarter of 2006.

80  U.S. BANCORP

Aggregate amortization expense consisted of the following:

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions)		2006		2005		2004
Merchant processing contracts		$	149	$	138	$	132
Core deposit benefits			65		74		81
Mortgage servicing rights (a)			–		144		243
Trust relationships			71		47		49
Other identified intangibles			70		55		45
	Total	$	355	$	458	$	550

(a) Includes mortgage servicing rights reparation of $53 million and impairment of $57 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Below is the estimated amortization expense for the next five years:

(Dollars in Millions)
2007	$	360
2008		309
2009		264
2010		201
2011		153

The following table reflects the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:

		Wholesale		Consumer		Wealth		Payment		Consolidated
(Dollars in Millions)		Banking		Banking		Management		Services		Company
Balance at December 31, 2004		$	1,225	$	2,242	$	843	$	1,931	$	6,241
	Goodwill acquired		–		–		500		248		748
	Other (a)		–		–		–		16		16
Balance at December 31, 2005		$	1,225	$	2,242	$	1,343	$	2,195	$	7,005
	Goodwill acquired		–		70		171		265		506
	Other (a)		–		–		–		27		27
Balance at December 31, 2006		$	1,225	$	2,312	$	1,514	$	2,487	$	7,538

(a) Other changes in goodwill include the effect of foreign exchange translation.

 Note 11   SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

The following table is a summary of short-term borrowings for the last three years:

			2006					2005					2004
(Dollars in Millions)			Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
At year-end
	Federal funds purchased		$	2,554		4.97	%	$	3,133		3.93	%	$	3,379		1.25	%
	Securities sold under agreements to repurchase			9,763		4.57			10,854		3.65			4,848		1.95
	Commercial paper			9,974		4.90			4,419		3.89			2,634		2.11
	Treasury, tax and loan notes			1		4.92			430		3.84			251		1.72
	Other short-term borrowings			4,641		3.95			1,364		3.90			1,972		2.20
		Total	$	26,933		4.62	%	$	20,200		3.76	%	$	13,084		1.84	%
Average for the year
	Federal funds purchased		$	3,458		8.30	%	$	2,916		6.63	%	$	3,823		3.10	%
	Securities sold under agreements to repurchase			10,680		4.24			11,849		2.93			6,144		1.19
	Commercial paper			6,631		4.72			3,326		3.11			1,144		.91
	Treasury, tax and loan notes			166		4.82			142		3.17			804		1.01
	Other short-term borrowings			3,487		5.19			1,149		3.62			2,619		2.01
		Total	$	24,422		5.08	%	$	19,382		3.56	%	$	14,534		1.81	%
Maximum month-end balance
	Federal funds purchased		$	5,886				$	4,659				$	6,342
	Securities sold under agreements to repurchase			13,988					14,931					8,972
	Commercial paper			9,974					4,419					2,687
	Treasury, tax and loan notes			2,804					430					7,867
	Other short-term borrowings			4,756					1,563					3,856

U.S. BANCORP  81

 Note 12   LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt (debt with original maturities of more than one year) at December 31 consisted of the following:

(Dollars in Millions)		Rate Type		Rate (a)		Maturity Date		2006			2005
U.S. BANCORP (Parent Company)
Subordinated notes			Fixed		6.875%		2007	$	220		$	220
			Fixed		7.30%		2007		74			74
			Fixed		7.50%		2026		199			200
Convertible senior debentures			Floating		3.70%		2035		402			2,500
			Floating		3.89%		2035		668			2,000
			Floating		3.62%		2036		2,500			–
Medium-term notes			Fixed		3.13%-5.30%		2007-2010		2,575			2,725
			Floating		5.38%-5.40%		2009-2010		1,000			–
Junior subordinated debentures			Fixed		5.75%-6.60%		2035-2066		3,497			2,842
			Floating		6.13%-6.22%		2027		310			310
Capitalized lease obligations, mortgage indebtedness and other (b)									(26	)		(17	)
	Subtotal								11,419			10,854
SUBSIDIARIES
Subordinated notes			Fixed		6.875%		2006		–			23
			Fixed		6.625%		2006		–			26
			Fixed		6.50%		2008		300			300
			Fixed		6.30%		2008		300			300
			Fixed		5.70%		2008		400			400
			Fixed		7.125%		2009		500			500
			Fixed		6.375%		2011		1,500			1,500
			Fixed		6.30%		2014		963			963
			Fixed		4.95%		2014		1,000			1,000
			Fixed		4.80%		2015		500			500
			Fixed		3.80%		2015		370			370
			Floating		5.65%		2014		550			550
Federal Home Loan Bank advances			Fixed		.50%-8.25%		2007-2026		348			428
			Floating		5.30%-5.40%		2007-2016		6,749			3,613
Bank notes			Fixed		2.40%-4.40%		2007-2009		3,350			4,350
			Floating		5.11%-5.40%		2007-2046		9,145			11,050
Junior subordinated debentures			Fixed		10.18%-10.20%		2031		24			–
Capitalized lease obligations, mortgage indebtedness and other (b)									184			342
	Subtotal								26,183			26,215
	Total							$	37,602		$	37,069

(a)	Weighted average interest rates of medium-term notes, federal home loan bank advances and bank notes were 4.66 percent, 5.34 percent and 4.90 percent, respectively.
(b)	Other includes debt issuance fees and unrealized gains and losses and deferred fees relating to derivative instruments.

Convertible senior debentures issued by the Company pay interest on a quarterly basis until a specified period of time (five or nine years prior to the applicable maturity date). After this period, the Company will not pay interest on the debentures prior to maturity. On the maturity date or on any earlier redemption date, the holder will receive the original principal plus accrued interest. The debentures are convertible at any time on or prior to the maturity date. If the convertible senior debentures are converted, holders of the debentures will generally receive cash up to the accreted principal amount of the debentures plus, if the market price of the Company’s stock exceeds the conversion price in effect on the date of conversion, a number of shares of the Company’s common stock, or an equivalent amount of cash at the Company’s option, as determined in accordance with specified terms. The convertible senior debentures are callable by the Company and putable by the investors at a price equal to 100 percent of the accreted principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. During 2006, investors elected to put debentures with a principal amount of $3.4 billion back to the Company.

82  U.S. BANCORP

The table below summarizes the significant terms of the floating-rate convertible senior debentures issued during 2005 and 2006 at $1,000 per debenture:

(Dollars in Millions)
Original Face amount	$2,500	$2,000	$2,500
Amount outstanding at December 31, 2006	$402	$668	$2,500
Issue date	August 17, 2005	December 9, 2005	September 20, 2006
Interest rate (a)	LIBOR minus 1.68%	LIBOR minus 1.46%	LIBOR minus 1.75%
Interest rate at December 31, 2006	3.70%	3.89%	3.62%
Callable dates	August 21, 2006, and thereafter	December 11, 2006, and thereafter	September 20, 2007, and thereafter
Putable dates	August 21, 2006, 2007, 2010 and every five years, thereafter	March 11, 2007, June 11, 2007, September 11, 2007, December 11, 2007, and 2010, and every five years, thereafter	September 20, 2007, 2008, 2011 and every five years, thereafter
Conversion rate in shares per $1,000 debenture at December 31, 2006	27.8126	27.2409	26.1233
Conversion price per share at December 31, 2006	$35.95	$36.71	$38.28
Maturity date	August 21, 2035	December 11, 2035	September 20, 2036

(a) The interest rate index represents the three month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)

During 2006, the Company issued $2.5 billion of fixed-rate junior subordinated debentures to three separately formed wholly-owned trusts for the purpose of issuing Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities at interest rates ranging from 5.54 percent to 6.60 percent. In addition, the Company elected to redeem $1.9 billion of higher cost fixed-rate junior subordinated debentures that had interest payable at rates ranging from 7.25 percent to 8.32 percent. In connection with the redemption of these debentures, the Company recognized charges of $33 million in 2006. Refer to Note 13, “Junior Subordinated Debentures” for further information on the nature and terms of these debentures.

     The Company’s subsidiary, U.S. Bank National Association, may issue fixed and floating rate subordinated notes to provide liquidity and support its capital requirements. During 2006, subordinated notes of $49 million matured and were repaid by the subsidiary.

     The Company has an arrangement with the Federal Home Loan Bank whereby based on collateral available (residential and commercial mortgages), the Company could have borrowed an additional $21 billion at December 31, 2006.

Maturities of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2006, were:

	Parent
(Dollars in Millions)	Company		Consolidated
2007	$	1,512	$	8,337
2008		504		8,547
2009		1,001		1,996
2010		986		3,002
2011		33		2,603
Thereafter		7,383		13,117
Total	$	11,419	$	37,602

U.S. BANCORP  83

 Note 13   JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

As of December 31, 2006, the Company sponsored and wholly owned 100 percent of the common equity of ten trusts that were formed for the purpose of issuing Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities (“Trust Preferred Securities”) to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the sale of the Trust Preferred Securities solely in junior subordinated debt securities of the Company (the “Debentures”). The Debentures held by the trusts, which totaled $3.8 billion, are the sole assets of each trust. The Company’s obligations under the Debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the obligations of the Trusts. The guarantee covers the distributions and payments on liquidation or redemption of the Trust Preferred Securities, but only to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. The Company used the proceeds from the sales of the Debentures for general corporate purposes.

     In connection with the formation of USB Capital IX, the trust issued redeemable Income Trust Securities (“ITS”) to third party investors, investing the proceeds in Debentures issued by the Company and entered into stock purchase contracts to purchase preferred stock to be issued by the Company in the future. Pursuant to the stock purchase contracts, the Company is required to make contract payments of .65 percent, also payable semi-annually, through a specified stock purchase date expected to be April 15, 2011. Prior to the specified stock purchase date, the Trust is required to remarket and sell the Debentures to third party investors to generate cash proceeds to satisfy its obligation to purchase the Company’s Series A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) pursuant to the stock purchase contracts. The Series A Preferred Stock, when issued pursuant to the stock purchase contracts, is expected to pay quarterly dividends equal to the greater of three-month LIBOR plus 1.02 percent or 3.50 percent. In connection with this transaction, the Company also entered into a replacement capital covenant which restricts the Company’s rights to repurchase the ITS and to redeem or repurchase the Series A Preferred Stock.

The following table is a summary of the Debentures included in long-term debt as of December 31, 2006:

Securities

Debentures

Earliest

Issuance Trust (Dollars in Millions)

Issuance Date

Amount

Amount

Rate Type

Rate

Maturity Date

Redemption Date

RETAIL (a)

USB Capital XI

August 2006

$

765

$

766

Fixed

6.60

September  2066

September 15, 2011

USB Capital X

April 2006

500

501

Fixed

6.50

April 2066

April 12, 2011

USB Capital VIII

December 2005

375

387

Fixed

6.35

December 2065

December 29, 2010

USB Capital VII

August 2005

300

309

Fixed

5.88

August 2035

August 15, 2010

USB Capital VI

March 2005

275

283

Fixed

5.75

March 2035

March 9, 2010

Vail Banks Statutory Trust II

March 2001

7

7

Fixed

10.18

June 2031

June 8, 2011

Vail Banks Statutory Trust I

February 2001

17

17

Fixed

10.20

February 2031

February 22, 2011

INSTITUTIONAL

USB Capital IX (a)

March 2006

1,250

1,251

Fixed

5.54

April 2042

April 15, 2015

Star Capital I (b)

June 1997

150

155

Variable

6.13

June 2027

June 15, 2007

Mercantile Capital Trust I (b)

February 1997

150

155

Variable

6.22

February 2027

February 1, 2007

Total

$

3,789

$

3,831

(a)	The Company has the right to redeem the Debentures in whole or in part, on or after specific dates, at a redemption price specified in the indentures plus any accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date.
(b)	The Company has the right to redeem the Debentures in whole, (but not in part), on or after specific dates, at a redemption price specified in the indentures plus any accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date. The variable-rate Securities and Debentures reprice quarterly based on three-month LIBOR.

84  U.S. BANCORP

 Note 14   SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had authority to issue 4 billion shares of common stock and 50 million shares of preferred stock. The Company had 1,765 million and 1,815 million shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and had 433 million shares of common stock reserved for future issuances, primarily under stock option plans and shares that may be issued in connection with the Company’s convertible senior debentures, at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006, the Company had 40,000 shares of preferred stock outstanding.

     On March 27, 2006, the Company issued depository shares representing an ownership interest in 40,000 shares of Series B Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock with a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock”). The Series B Preferred Stock has no stated maturity and will not be subject to any sinking fund or other obligation of the Company. Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock, if declared, will accrue and be payable quarterly, in arrears, at a rate per annum equal to the greater of three-month LIBOR plus ..60 percent, or 3.50 percent. On April 15, 2011, or thereafter, the Series B Preferred Stock is redeemable at the Company’s option, subject to the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, at a redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus any declared and unpaid dividends, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends. In connection with the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock, the Company also entered into a replacement capital covenant, which restricts the Company’s rights to redeem or repurchase the Series B Preferred Stock. Except in certain limited circumstances, the Series B Preferred Stock does not have any voting rights.

     The Company has a preferred share purchase rights plan intended to preserve the long-term value of the Company by discouraging a hostile takeover of the Company. Under the plan, each share of common stock carries a right to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of preferred stock. The rights become exercisable in certain limited circumstances involving a potential business combination transaction or an acquisition of shares of the Company and are exercisable at a price of $100 per right, subject to adjustment. Following certain other events, each right entitles its holder to purchase for $100 an amount of common stock of the Company, or, in certain circumstances, securities of the acquirer, having a then-current market value of twice the exercise price of the right. The dilutive effect of the rights on the acquiring company is intended to encourage it to negotiate with the Company’s Board of Directors prior to attempting a takeover. If the Board of Directors believes a proposed acquisition is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, the Board may amend the plan or redeem the rights for a nominal amount in order to permit the acquisition to be completed without interference from the plan. Until a right is exercised, the holder of a right has no rights as a shareholder of the Company. The rights expire on February 27, 2011.

     On December 16, 2003, the Board of Directors approved an authorization to repurchase 150 million shares of outstanding common stock during the following 24 months. In 2004, the Company repurchased 89 million shares of common stock under the 2003 plan. On December 21, 2004, the Board of Directors approved an authorization to repurchase 150 million shares of outstanding common stock during the following 24 months. This repurchase program replaced the Company’s December 16, 2003, program. In 2004, the Company repurchased 5 million shares of common stock under this plan. During 2005, all share repurchases were made under the 2004 plan. On August 3, 2006, the Board of Directors approved an authorization to repurchase 150 million shares of outstanding common stock through December 31, 2008. This new authorization replaced the December 21, 2004, repurchase program. During 2006, the Company repurchased 62 million shares of common stock under the 2004 authorization and 28 million shares under the 2006 authorization.

The following table summarizes the Company’s common stock repurchased in each of the last three years:

(Dollars and Shares in Millions)	Shares		Value
2006		90	$	2,817
2005		62		1,807
2004		94		2,656

U.S. BANCORP  85

Shareholders’ equity is affected by transactions and valuations of asset and liability positions that require adjustments to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The reconciliation of the transactions affecting Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income included in shareholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, is as follows:

		Transactions
											Balances
(Dollars in Millions)		Pre-tax			Tax-effect			Net-of-tax			Net-of-Tax
2006
Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale		$	67		$	(25	)	$	42		$	(370	)
Unrealized gain on derivatives			35			(14	)		21			(6	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment			(30	)		11			(19	)		(12	)
Realized loss on derivatives			(199	)		75			(124	)		(77	)
Reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income			33			(12	)		21			–
Change in retirement obligation			(398	)		150			(248	)		(271	)
	Total	$	(492	)	$	185		$	(307	)	$	(736	)
2005
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale		$	(539	)	$	205		$	(334	)	$	(402	)
Unrealized loss on derivatives			(58	)		22			(36	)		(27	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment			3			(1	)		2			7
Realized loss on derivatives			(74	)		28			(46	)		16
Reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income			39			(15	)		24			–
Minimum pension liability adjustment			(38	)		15			(23	)		(23	)
	Total	$	(667	)	$	254		$	(413	)	$	(429	)
2004
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale		$	(123	)	$	47		$	(76	)	$	(135	)
Unrealized loss on derivatives			(43	)		16			(27	)		9
Foreign currency translation adjustment			(17	)		6			(11	)		5
Realized gain on derivatives			16			(6	)		10			105
Reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income			32			(12	)		20			–
	Total	$	(135	)	$	51		$	(84	)	$	(16	)

Regulatory Capital The measures used to assess capital include the capital ratios established by bank regulatory agencies, including the specific ratios for the “well capitalized” designation. Capital adequacy for the Company and its banking subsidiaries is measured based on two risk-based measures, Tier I and total risk-based capital. Tier I capital is considered core capital and includes common shareholders’ equity plus qualifying preferred stock, trust preferred securities and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries (included in other liabilities and subject to certain limitations), and is adjusted for the aggregate impact of certain items included in other comprehensive income. Total risk-based capital includes Tier I capital and other items such as subordinated debt and the allowance for credit losses. Both measures are stated as a percentage of risk-adjusted assets, which are measured based on their perceived credit risk and include certain off-balance sheet exposures, such as unfunded loan commitments, letters of credit, and derivative contracts. The Company is also subject to a leverage ratio requirement, a non risk-based asset ratio, which is defined as Tier I capital as a percentage of average assets adjusted for goodwill and other non-qualifying intangibles and other assets.

The following table provides the components of the Company’s regulatory capital:

				December 31
(Dollars in Millions)				2006			2005
TIER 1 CAPITAL
	Common shareholders’ equity			$	20,197		$	20,086
	Qualifying preferred stock				1,000			–
	Qualifying trust preferred securities				3,639			3,057
	Minority interests				694			215
	Less intangible assets
		Goodwill			(7,423	)		(7,005	)
		Other disallowed intangible assets			(1,640	)		(1,508	)
	Other(a)				569			300
			Total Tier 1 Capital		17,036			15,145
TIER 2 CAPITAL
	Allowance for credit losses				2,256			2,251
	Eligible subordinated debt				5,199			5,659
	Other				4			1
			Total Tier 2 Capital		7,459			7,911
			Total Risk Based Capital	$	24,495		$	23,056
RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS				$	194,659		$	184,353

(a) Includes the impact of items included in other comprehensive income, such as unrealized gains(losses) on available-for-sale securities, accumulated net gains on cash flow hedges, pension liability adjustments, etc.

86  U.S. BANCORP

Minority interests principally represent preferred stock of consolidated subsidiaries. During 2006, the Company’s primary banking subsidiary formed USB Realty Corp, a real estate investment trust, for the purpose of issuing 5,000 shares of Fixed-to-Floating Rate Exchangeable Non-cumulative Perpetual Series A Preferred Stock with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share (“Series A Preferred Securities”) to third party investors, and investing the proceeds in certain assets, consisting predominately of mortgage-backed securities from the Company. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Securities, if declared, will accrue and be payable quarterly, in arrears, at a rate per annum of 6.091 percent from December 22, 2006 to, but excluding, January 15, 2012. After January 15, 2012, the rate will be equal to three-month LIBOR for the related dividend period plus 1.147 percent. If the Company has not declared a dividend on the Series A Preferred Securities before the dividend payment date for any dividend period, such dividend shall not be cumulative and shall cease to accrue and be payable, and the Company will have no obligation to pay dividends accrued for such dividend period, whether or not dividends on the Series A Preferred Securities are declared for any future dividend period.

     The Series A Preferred Securities will be redeemable, in whole or in part, at the option of the Company on the dividend payment date occurring in January 2012 and each fifth anniversary thereafter, or in whole but not in part, at the option of the Company on any dividend date before or after January 2012 that is not a five-year date. Any redemption will be subject to the approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

     For a summary of the regulatory capital requirements and the actual ratios as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, for the Company and its bank subsidiaries, see Table 21 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis, which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 Note 15   EARNINGS PER SHARE

The components of earnings per share were:

(Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data)		2006			2005		2004
Net income		$	4,751		$	4,489	$	4,167
Preferred dividends			(48	)		–		–
	Net income applicable to common equity	$	4,703		$	4,489	$	4,167
Average common shares outstanding			1,778			1,831		1,887
Net effect of the exercise and assumed purchase of stock awards and conversion of outstanding convertible notes			26			26		26
Average diluted common shares outstanding			1,804			1,857		1,913
Earning per common share		$	2.64		$	2.45	$	2.21
Diluted earnings per common share		$	2.61		$	2.42	$	2.18

For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, options to purchase 1 million, 16 million and 36 million shares, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive. Convertible senior debentures that could potentially be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to a specified formula, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share to the extent the conversions were antidilutive.

 Note 16   EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Employee Investment PlanThe Company has a defined contribution retirement savings plan which allows qualified employees to make contributions up to 75 percent of their annual compensation, subject to Internal Revenue Service limits, through salary deductions under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employee contributions are invested, at the employees’ direction, among a variety of investment alternatives. Employee contributions are 100 percent matched by the Company, up to four percent of an employee’s eligible annual compensation. The Company’s matching contribution vests immediately; however, a participant must be employed in an eligible position on the last business day of the year to receive that year’s matching contribution. Although the matching contribution is initially invested in the Company’s common stock, an employee can reinvest the matching contributions among various investment alternatives. Total expense was $58 million, $53 million and $49 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Pension PlansPension benefits are provided to substantially all employees based on years of service and employees’ compensation while employed with the Company. Employees are fully vested after five years of service. Prior to their acquisition dates, employees of certain acquired companies were covered by separate, noncontributory pension plans that provided benefits based on years of service and compensation. Generally, the Company merges

U.S. BANCORP  87

plans of acquired companies into its existing pension plans when it becomes practicable.

     Under the current plan’s benefit structure, a participant’s future retirement benefits are based on a participant’s highest consecutive five-year average annual compensation during his or her last 10 years before retirement or termination from the Company. Prior to the merger with Firstar Corporation, two of the previous companies had cash balance pension benefit structures under which the participants earned retirement benefits based on their average compensation over their entire career, while the former Firstar Corporation retirement benefit structure was based on final average pay and years of service, similar to the current plan. Plan assets primarily consist of various equities, equity mutual funds and other miscellaneous assets.

     In general, the Company’s pension plan objectives include maintaining a funded status sufficient to meet participant benefit obligations over time while reducing long-term funding requirements and pension costs. The Company has an established process for evaluating all the plans, their performance and significant plan assumptions, including the assumed discount rate and the long-term rate of return (“LTROR”). Annually the Company’s Compensation Committee (“the Committee”), assisted by outside consultants, evaluates plan objectives, funding policies and plan investment policies considering its long-term investment time horizon and asset allocation strategies. The process also evaluates significant plan assumptions. Although plan assumptions are established annually, the Company may update its analysis on an interim basis in order to be responsive to significant events that occur during the year, such as plan mergers and amendments.

     In addition to the funded qualified pension plan, the Company maintains a non-qualified plan that is unfunded and the aggregate accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the assets. The assumptions used in computing the present value of the accumulated benefit obligation, the projected benefit obligation and net pension expense are substantially consistent with those assumptions used for the funded qualified plan.

Funding PracticesThe Company’s funding policy is to contribute amounts to its plans sufficient to meet the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, plus such additional amounts as the Company determines to be appropriate. There were no minimum funding requirements in 2006 or 2005 and the Company anticipates no minimum funding requirement in 2007. Any contributions made to the plan are invested in accordance with established investment policies and asset allocation strategies.

Investment Policies and Asset AllocationIn establishing its investment policies and asset allocation strategies, the Company considers expected returns and the volatility associated with different strategies. The independent consultant performs modeling that projects numerous outcomes using a broad range of possible scenarios, including a mix of possible rates of inflation and economic growth. Starting with current economic information, the model bases its projections on past relationships between inflation, fixed income rates and equity returns when these types of economic conditions have existed over the previous 30 years, both in the U.S. and in foreign countries.

     Generally, based on historical performance of the various investment asset classes, investments in equities have outperformed other investment classes but are subject to higher volatility. While an asset allocation including bonds and other assets generally has lower volatility and may provide protection in a declining interest rate environment, it limits the pension plan’s long-term up-side potential. Given the pension plan’s investment horizon and the financial viability of the Company to meet its funding objectives, the Committee has determined that an asset allocation strategy investing in 100 percent equities diversified among various domestic equity categories and international equities is appropriate. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, plan assets of the qualified retirement plans included mutual funds that have asset management arrangements with related parties totaling $1.2 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.

88  U.S. BANCORP

The following table, which is unaudited, except for the actual asset allocations at December 31, 2006 and 2005, provides a summary of asset allocations adopted by the Company compared with a typical asset allocation alternative:

																	2007
		Asset Allocation															Expected Returns
					December 2006						December 2005
		Typical																		Standard
Asset Class		Asset Mix			Actual			Target			Actual			Target			Compound			Deviation
DOMESTIC EQUITIES
	Large Cap		30	%		55	%		55	%		56	%		55	%		9.3	%		16.0	%
	Mid Cap		15			18			19			16			19			10.3			21.0
	Small Cap		15			6			6			5			6			10.3			21.0
INTERNATIONAL EQUITIES			10			19			20			21			20			9.3			19.0
FIXED INCOME			30			–			–			–			–
OTHER			–			2			–			2			–
TOTAL MIX OR WEIGHTED RATES			100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		9.8			16.0
	LTROR assumed		8.9	%					8.9	% (a)					8.9	%
	Standard deviation		12.0	%					16.0	%					17.8	%

(a) The LTROR assumed for the target asset allocation strategy of 8.9 percent is based on a range of estimates evaluated by the Company which were centered around the compound expected return of 9.8 percent reduced for estimated asset management and administrative fees.

     In accordance with its existing practices, the independent pension consultant utilized by the Company updated the analysis of expected rates of return and evaluated peer group data, market conditions and other factors relevant to determining the LTROR assumptions for pension costs for 2006 and 2005. The analysis performed indicated that the LTROR assumption of 8.9 percent, used in both 2006 and 2005, continued to be in line with expected returns based on current economic conditions and the Company expects to continue using this LTROR in 2007. Regardless of the extent of the Company’s analysis of alternative asset allocation strategies, economic scenarios and possible outcomes, plan assumptions developed for the LTROR are subject to imprecision and changes in economic factors. As a result of the modeling imprecision and uncertainty, the Company considers a range of potential expected rates of return, economic conditions for several scenarios, historical performance relative to assumed rates of return and asset allocation and LTROR information for a peer group in establishing its assumptions.

Postretirement Medical PlanIn addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides health care and death benefits to certain retired employees through a retiree medical program. Generally, all active employees may become eligible for retiree health care benefits by meeting defined age and service requirements. The Company may also subsidize the cost of coverage for employees meeting certain age and service requirements. The medical plan contains other cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. The estimated cost of these retiree benefit payments is accrued during the employees’ active service.

Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement PlansEffective for the year ending December 31, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 158. This statement requires the recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability on the balance sheet, and recognition of changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive income.

U.S. BANCORP  89

The Company uses a measurement date of September 30 for its retirement plans. The following table summarizes benefit obligation and plan asset activity for the retirement plans:

								Postretirement
		Pension Plans						Medical Plan
(Dollars in Millions)		2006			2005			2006			2005
PROJECTED BENEFIT OBLIGATION
	Benefit obligation at beginning of measurement period	$	2,147		$	1,951		$	245		$	281
	Service cost		70			63			5			5
	Interest cost		118			112			13			16
	Plan participants’ contributions		–			–			17			17
	Actuarial (gain) loss		(84	)		145			(9	)		(38	)
	Benefit payments		(124	)		(88	)		(35	)		(36	)
	Federal subsidy		–			–			2			–
	Settlements		–			(36	)		–			–
	Benefit obligation at end of measurement period (a)	$	2,127		$	2,147		$	238		$	245
FAIR VALUE OF PLAN ASSETS
	Fair value at beginning of measurement period	$	2,419		$	2,127		$	39		$	39
	Actual return on plan assets		260			398			7			1
	Employer contributions		23			18			155			18
	Plan participants’ contributions		–			–			17			17
	Settlements		–			(36	)		–			–
	Benefit payments		(124	)		(88	)		(35	)		(36	)
	Fair value at end of measurement period	$	2,578		$	2,419		$	183		$	39
FUNDED STATUS
	Funded status at end of measurement period	$	451		$	272		$	(55	)	$	(206	)
	Unrecognized transition (asset) obligation		–			–			–			5
	Unrecognized prior service (credit) cost		–			(39	)		–			(5	)
	Unrecognized net (gain) loss		–			724			–			–
	Fourth quarter contribution		4			11			–			155
	Net amount recognized	$	455		$	968		$	(55	)	$	(51	)
COMPONENTS OF THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
	Prepaid benefit cost and other assets	$	704		$	1,146		$	–		$	–
	Accrued benefit liability (b)		(249	)		(178	)		(55	)		(51	)
	Additional minimum liability		–			(47	)		–			–
	Intangible asset		–			9			–			–
	Accumulated other comprehensive income		–			38			–			–
	Net amount recognized	$	455		$	968		$	(55	)	$	(51	)
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
	Net actuarial (gain) loss	$	480		$	–		$	(13	)	$	–
	Prior service (credit) cost		(32	)		–			(4	)		–
	Transition (asset) obligation		–			–			4			–
	Recognized amount		448			–			(13	)		–
	Deferred tax asset (liability)		169			–			(5	)		–
	Net impact on accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)	$	279		$	–		$	(8	)	$	–

(a)	At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the accumulated benefit obligation for all qualified pension plans was $1.8 billion.
(b)	At December 31, 2006, the estimated current liability of the plans was $13 million.

The following table provides information for pension plans with benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:

(Dollars in Millions)	2006		2005
Projected benefit obligation	$	249	$	236
Accumulated benefit obligation		248		225
Fair value of plan assets		–		–

90  U.S. BANCORP

The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost (income) and other amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income for the retirement plans:

		Pension Plans									Postretirement Medical Plan
(Dollars in Millions)		2006			2005			2004			2006			2005			2004
COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST (INCOME)
	Service cost	$	70		$	63		$	59		$	5		$	5		$	4
	Interest cost		118			112			109			13			16			18
	Expected return on plan assets		(191	)		(194	)		(203	)		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)
	Prior service (credit) cost and transition (asset) obligation amortization		(6	)		(6	)		(6	)		–			–			–
	Actuarial (gain) loss amortization		90			58			50			–			–			2
Net periodic benefit cost (income)		$	81		$	33		$	9		$	17		$	20		$	23
OTHER CHANGES IN PLAN ASSETS AND BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS RECOGNIZED IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
	Current year actuarial (gain) loss	$	(154	)	$	–		$	–		$	(15	)	$	–		$	–
	Actuarial (gain) loss amortization		(90	)		–			–			–			–			–
	Prior service (credit) cost and transition (asset) obligation amortization		6			–			–			–			–			–
Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income		$	(238	)	$	–		$	–		$	(15	)	$	–		$	–
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and accumulated other comprehensive income (a)(b)		$	(157	)	$	33		$	9		$	2		$	20		$	23

(a)	The estimated net loss and prior service credit for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost in 2007 are $63 million and $(6) million, respectively.
(b)	No amounts are estimated to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost in 2007 for the postretirement medical plan.

The following table sets forth the weighted-average plan assumptions and other data:

(Dollars in Millions)			2006			2005			2004
PENSION PLAN ACTUARIAL COMPUTATIONS
	Expected long-term return on plan assets			8.9	%		8.9	%		8.9	%
	Discount rate in determining benefit obligations (a)			6.0			5.7			6.0
	Rate of increase in future compensation			3.5			3.5			3.5
POSTRETIREMENT MEDICAL PLAN ACTUARIAL COMPUTATIONS
	Expected long-term return on plan assets			3.5	%		3.5	%		3.5	%
	Discount rate in determining benefit obligations			6.0			5.7			6.0
	Health care cost trend rate (b)
		Prior to age 65		8.0	%		9.0	%		10.0	%
		After age 65		10.0			11.0			12.0
EFFECT OF ONE PERCENT INCREASE IN HEALTH CARE COST TREND RATE
	Service and interest costs		$	1		$	1		$	1
	Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation			15			18			21
EFFECT OF ONE PERCENT DECREASE IN HEALTH CARE COST TREND RATE
	Service and interest costs		$	(1	)	$	(1	)	$	(1	)
	Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation			(13	)		(16	)		(19	)

(a)	For 2006, the discount rate was developed using Towers Perrin’s cash flow matching bond model with a modified duration of 12.6 years. For 2005, the discount rate approximated the Moody’s Aa corporate bond rating for projected benefit distributions with a duration of 12.7 years.
(b)	The pre-65 and post-65 rates are assumed to decrease gradually to 5.5 percent and 6.0 percent respectively by 2011 and remain at these levels thereafter.

The following table illustrates the incremental effect of adopting SFAS 158 on individual line items in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006:

		Increase
(Dollars in Millions)		(Decrease)
ASSETS
	Intangible and other assets	$	(391	)
	Deferred tax asset		143
LIABILITIES			(11	)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY — ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME			(237	)

U.S. BANCORP  91

The following benefit payments (net of participant contributions) are expected to be paid from the retirement plans:

		Pension		Postretirement
(Dollars in Millions)		Plans		Medical Plan
ESTIMATED FUTURE BENEFIT PAYMENTS
	2007	$	203	$	24
	2008		128		25
	2009		128		26
	2010		130		26
	2011		133		27
	2012 – 2016		708		140

Federal subsidies expected to be received by the postretirement medical plan are not significant to the Company.

 Note 17   STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

As part of its employee and director compensation programs, the Company may grant certain stock awards under the provisions of the existing stock compensation plans, including plans assumed in acquisitions. The plans provide for grants of options to purchase shares of common stock at a fixed price equal to the fair value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. Option grants are generally exercisable up to ten years from the date of grant. In addition, the plans provide for grants of shares of common stock or stock units that are subject to restriction on transfer prior to vesting. Most stock awards vest over three to five years and are subject to forfeiture if certain vesting requirements are not met. Stock incentive plans of acquired companies are generally terminated at the merger closing dates. Option holders under such plans receive the Company’s common stock, or options to buy the Company’s stock, based on the conversion terms of the various merger agreements. The historical stock award information presented below has been restated to reflect the options originally granted under acquired companies’ plans. At December 31, 2006, there were 14 million shares (subject to adjustment for forfeitures) available for grant under various plans.

STOCK OPTION AWARDS

The following is a summary of stock options outstanding and exercised under various stock options plans of the Company:

							Weighted-
							Average
					Weighted-		Remaining		Aggregate
		Stock			Average		Contractual		Intrinsic Value
Year Ended December 31		Options/Shares			Exercise Price		Term		(in millions)
2006
Number outstanding at beginning of period			125,983,461		$	24.38
	Granted		12,464,197			30.16
	Exercised		(38,848,953	)		23.39
	Cancelled (a)		(2,546,484	)		28.09
Number outstanding at end of period (b)			97,052,221		$	25.42		5.1	$	1,045
Exercisable at end of period			71,747,675		$	24.01		4.0	$	874
2005
Number outstanding at beginning of period			134,727,285		$	23.41
	Granted		12,489,062			30.14
	Exercised		(17,719,565	)		20.96
	Cancelled (a)		(3,513,321	)		25.07
Number outstanding at end of period (b)			125,983,461		$	24.38		5.0	$	694
Exercisable at end of period			100,110,188		$	23.64		4.3	$	626
2004
Number outstanding at beginning of period			165,522,354		$	22.93
	Granted		8,741,521			28.46
	Exercised		(27,319,242	)		21.59
	Cancelled (a)		(12,217,348	)		24.56
Number outstanding at end of period (b)			134,727,285		$	23.41		5.6	$	1,065
Exercisable at end of period			101,027,155		$	23.51		4.9	$	789

(a)	Options cancelled includes both non-vested (i.e., forfeitures) and vested options.
(b)	Outstanding options include stock-based awards that may be forfeited in future periods, however the impact of the estimated forfeitures is reflected in compensation expense.

Stock-based compensation expense is based on the estimated fair value of the award at the date of grant or modification. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, requiring the

92  U.S. BANCORP

use of subjective assumptions. Because employee stock options have characteristics that differ from those of traded options, including vesting provisions and trading limitations that impact their liquidity, the determined value used to measure compensation expense may vary from their actual fair value. The following table includes the weighted average estimated fair value and assumptions utilized by the Company for newly issued grants:

	2006			2005			2004
Estimated fair value		$6.26			$6.65			$8.75
Risk-free interest rate		4.3	%		3.6	%		3.5	%
Dividend yield		4.0	%		3.5	%		3.5	%
Stock volatility factor		.28			.29			.40
Expected life of options (in years)		5.4			5.4			5.9

Expected stock volatility is based on several factors including the historical volatility of the Company’s stock, implied volatility determined from traded options and other factors. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations to estimate the expected life of options. The risk-free interest rate for the expected life of the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect on the date of grant. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s expected dividend yield over the life of the options.

     The aggregate fair value of option shares vested was $81 million and $121 million for 2006 and 2005, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercised was $346 million, $161 million and $198 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

     Cash received from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements was $885 million, $367 million and $577 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercises of the share-based payment arrangements totaled $131 million, $60 million and $74 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. To satisfy option exercises, the Company predominantly uses treasury stock.

Additional information regarding stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2006, is as follows:

	Options Outstanding						Exercisable Options
			Weighted-
			Average		Weighted-				Weighted-
			Remaining		Average				Average
			Contractual		Exercise				Exercise
Range of Exercise Prices	Shares		Life (Years)		Price		Shares		Price
$ 8.53 – $10.00		12,422		.3	$	8.91		12,422	$	8.91
$10.01 – $15.00		315,941		2.8		13.06		315,941		13.06
$15.01 – $20.00		12,675,158		4.3		18.83		12,528,415		18.82
$20.01 – $25.00		35,048,398		4.4		22.27		33,872,254		22.29
$25.01 – $30.00		36,943,083		5.3		29.09		21,478,697		28.77
$30.01 – $35.00		11,894,222		7.5		30.53		3,454,324		30.83
$35.01 – $36.95		162,997		1.8		35.76		85,622		35.79
		97,052,221		5.1	$	25.42		71,747,675	$	24.01

RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS

A summary of the status of the Company’s restricted shares of stock is presented below:

		2006					2005					2004
					Weighted-					Weighted-					Weighted-
					Average Grant-					Average Grant-					Average Grant-
Year Ended December 31		Shares			Date Fair Value		Shares			Date Fair Value		Shares			Date Fair Value
NONVESTED SHARES
Number outstanding at beginning of period			2,644,171		$	26.73		2,265,625		$	25.06		1,304,106		$	21.13
	Granted		1,040,201			30.22		1,024,622			30.03		1,338,054			28.42
	Vested		(493,730	)		28.91		(481,323	)		25.58		(315,286	)		22.47
	Cancelled		(270,741	)		29.75		(164,753	)		27.60		(61,249	)		28.35
Number outstanding at end of period			2,919,901		$	27.32		2,644,171		$	26.73		2,265,625		$	25.06

U.S. BANCORP  93

The total fair value of shares vested was $15 million, $15 million, and $9 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

     Stock-based compensation expense was $101 million, $132 million and $176 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At the time employee stock options expire, are exercised or cancelled, the Company determines the tax benefit associated with the stock award and under certain circumstances may be required to recognize an adjustment to tax expense. On an after-tax basis, stock-based compensation was $64 million, $83 million and $139 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of December 31, 2006, there was $98 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based arrangements granted under the plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3 years as compensation.

 Note 18   INCOME TAXES

The components of income tax expense were:

(Dollars in Millions)		2006			2005			2004
FEDERAL
Current		$	1,817		$	2,107		$	1,531
Deferred			1			(281	)		260
	Federal income tax		1,818			1,826			1,791
STATE
Current			298			276			197
Deferred			(4	)		(20	)		21
	State income tax		294			256			218
	Total income tax provision	$	2,112		$	2,082		$	2,009

A reconciliation of expected income tax expense at the federal statutory rate of 35 percent to the Company’s applicable income tax expense follows:

(Dollars in Millions)		2006			2005			2004
Tax at statutory rate (35 percent)		$	2,402		$	2,300		$	2,162
State income tax, at statutory rates, net of federal tax benefit			191			166			142
Tax effect of
	Tax credits		(274	)		(221	)		(146	)
	Tax-exempt income		(91	)		(70	)		(59	)
	Resolution of federal and state income tax examinations		(83	)		(94	)		(106	)
	Other items		(33	)		1			16
Applicable income taxes		$	2,112		$	2,082		$	2,009

     The tax effects of fair value adjustments on securities available-for-sale, derivative instruments in cash flow hedges and certain tax benefits related to stock options are recorded directly to shareholders’ equity as part of other comprehensive income.

     At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company held an aggregate net tax liability of $1.5 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively. This net tax liability represents an estimate of taxes to be paid during the next twelve months or at some future date.

     In preparing its tax returns, the Company is required to interpret complex tax laws and regulations and utilize income and cost allocation methods to determine its taxable income. On an ongoing basis, the Company is subject to examinations by federal and state taxing authorities that may give rise to differing interpretations of these complex laws, regulations and methods. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and matters are resolved. Included in each of the last three years, were reductions in income tax expense and associated liabilities related to the resolution of various federal and state income tax examinations. The federal income tax examination resolutions cover substantially all of the Company’s legal entities for the years through 2004. The Company also resolved several state income tax examinations which cover varying years from 1998 through 2005 in different states. The resolution of these cycles was the result of negotiations held between the Company and representatives of various taxing authorities throughout the examinations.

     Deferred income tax assets and liabilities reflect the tax effect of estimated temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for the same items for income tax reporting purposes.

94  U.S. BANCORP

The significant components of the Company’s net deferred tax liability as of December 31 were:

(Dollars in Millions)		2006			2005
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
Allowance for credit losses		$	871		$	907
Securities available-for-sale and financial instruments			278			254
Stock compensation			255			325
Accrued expenses			135			71
Other investment basis differences			95			(88	)
Accrued severance, pension and retirement benefits			68			19
Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards			66			9
Federal AMT credits and capital losses			–			91
Other deferred tax assets, net			10			90
	Gross deferred tax assets		1,778			1,678
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
Leasing activities			(2,327	)		(2,560	)
Mortgage servicing rights			(290	)		(113	)
Pension and postretirement benefits			(167	)		(267	)
Deferred fees			(81	)		(85	)
Loans			(48	)		(96	)
Intangible asset basis			(29	)		134
Accelerated depreciation			(13	)		(51	)
Other deferred tax liabilities, net			(240	)		(254	)
	Gross deferred tax liabilities		(3,195	)		(3,292	)
Valuation allowance			(66	)		(1	)
NET DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY		$	(1,483	)	$	(1,615	)

     The Company has established a valuation allowance to offset deferred tax assets related to federal, state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards which are subject to various limitations under the respective income tax laws and some of which may expire unused. The Company has approximately $238 million of federal, state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards which expire at various times through 2023.

     Certain events covered by Internal Revenue Code section 593(e), which was not repealed, will trigger a recapture of base year reserves of acquired thrift institutions. The base year reserves of acquired thrift institutions would be recaptured if an entity ceases to qualify as a bank for federal income tax purposes. The base year reserves of thrift institutions also remain subject to income tax penalty provisions that, in general, require recapture upon certain stock redemptions of, and excess distributions to, stockholders. At December 31, 2006, retained earnings included approximately $102 million of base year reserves for which no deferred federal income tax liability has been recognized.

 Note 19   DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative transactions to manage its interest rate, prepayment and foreign currency risks and to accommodate the business requirements of its customers. The Company does not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes. Refer to Note 1 “Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the Company’s accounting policies for derivative instruments. For information related to derivative positions held for asset and liability management purposes and customer-related derivative positions, see Table 18 “Derivative Positions,” included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis, which is incorporated by reference in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT POSITIONS

Cash Flow HedgesThe Company has $12.3 billion of designated cash flow hedges at December 31, 2006. These derivatives are interest rate swaps that are hedges of the forecasted cash flows from the underlying variable-rate debt. All cash flow hedges are highly effective for the year ended December 31, 2006, and the change in fair value attributed to hedge ineffectiveness was not material.

     At December 31, 2006 and 2005, accumulated other comprehensive income included a deferred after-tax net loss of $83 million and $11 million, respectively, related to cash flow hedges. The unrealized loss will be reflected in earnings when the related cash flows or hedged transactions occur and will offset the related performance of the hedged items. The occurrence of these related cash flows and hedged transactions remains probable. The estimated amount of after-tax loss to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings during 2007 is $29 million. This includes gains related to hedges that were

U.S. BANCORP  95

terminated early and the forecasted transactions are still probable.

Fair Value HedgesThe Company may use derivatives that are primarily interest rate swaps that hedge the change in fair value related to interest rate changes of underlying fixed-rate debt, junior subordinated debentures and deposit obligations. In addition, the Company may use forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to hedge its interest rate risk related to residential mortgage loans held for sale. The Company commits to sell the loans at specified prices in a future period, typically within 90 days, and is exposed to interest rate risk during the period between issuing a loan commitment and the sale of the loan into the secondary market.

     The Company has $5.7 billion of designated fair value hedges at December 31, 2006. All fair value hedges are considered highly effective for the year ended December 31, 2006. The change in fair value attributed to hedge ineffectiveness was a loss of $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Net Investment HedgesThe Company enters into derivatives to protect its net investment in certain foreign operations. The Company uses forward commitments to sell specified amounts of certain foreign currencies and foreign denominated debt to hedge its capital volatility risk associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The net amount of gains or losses included in the cumulative translation adjustment for 2006 was not significant.

Other Derivative PositionsThe Company has derivative positions that are used for interest rate risk and other risk management purposes but are not designated as cash flow hedges or fair value hedges in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

     At December 31, 2006, the Company had $2.8 billion of forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to economically hedge the Company’s interest rate risk related to $1.3 billion of unfunded residential loan commitments and $1.8 billion of residential mortgage loans held for sale. Gains and losses on mortgage banking derivatives and the unfunded loan commitments are included in mortgage banking revenue on the statement of income.

CUSTOMER-RELATED POSITIONS

The Company acts as a seller and buyer of interest rate contracts and foreign exchange rate contracts on behalf of customers. At December 31, 2006, the Company had $30.0 billion of aggregate customer derivative positions, including $25.1 billion of interest rate swaps, caps, and floors and $4.9 billion of foreign exchange rate contracts. The Company minimizes its market and liquidity risks by taking similar offsetting positions. Gains or losses on customer-related transactions were not significant for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 Note 20   FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Due to the nature of its business and its customers’ needs, the Company offers a large number of financial instruments, most of which are not actively traded. When market quotes are unavailable, valuation techniques including discounted cash flow calculations and pricing models or services are used. The Company also uses various aggregation methods and assumptions, such as the discount rate and cash flow timing and amounts. As a result, the fair value estimates can neither be substantiated by independent market comparisons, nor realized by the immediate sale or settlement of the financial instrument. Also, the estimates reflect a point in time and could change significantly based on changes in economic factors, such as interest rates. Furthermore, the disclosure of certain financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities is not required. Finally, the fair value disclosure is not intended to estimate a market value of the Company as a whole. A summary of the Company’s valuation techniques and assumptions follows.

Cash and Cash EquivalentsThe carrying value of cash, amounts due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements was assumed to approximate fair value.

SecuritiesInvestment securities were valued using available market quotes. In some instances, for securities that are not widely traded, market quotes for comparable securities were used.

LoansThe loan portfolio includes adjustable and fixed-rate loans, the fair value of which was estimated using discounted cash flow analyses and other valuation techniques. To calculate discounted cash flows, the loans were aggregated into pools of similar types and expected repayment terms. The expected cash flows of loans considered historical prepayment experiences and estimated credit losses for nonperforming loans and were discounted using current rates offered to borrowers of similar credit characteristics. The fair value of adjustable rate loans is assumed to be equal to their par value.

Deposit LiabilitiesThe fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is equal to the amount payable on demand at year-end. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit was estimated by discounting the contractual cash flow using the discount rates implied by high-grade corporate bond yield curves.

Short-Term BorrowingsFederal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper and

96  U.S. BANCORP

other short-term funds borrowed are at floating rates or have short-term maturities. Their par value is assumed to approximate their fair value.

Long-Term DebtThe estimated fair value of medium-term notes, bank notes, and subordinated debt was determined by using discounted cash flow analysis based on high-grade corporate bond yield curves. Floating rate debt is assumed to be equal to par value. Capital trust and other long-term debt instruments were valued using market quotes.

Interest Rate Swaps, Equity Contracts and OptionsThe interest rate options and swap cash flows were estimated using a third-party pricing model and discounted based on appropriate LIBOR, eurodollar futures, swap, treasury note yield curves and equity market prices.

Loan Commitments, Letters of Credit and GuaranteesThe fair value of commitments, letters of credit and guarantees represents the estimated costs to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with a third-party. Residential mortgage commitments are actively traded and the fair value is estimated using available market quotes. Other loan commitments, letters of credit and guarantees are not actively traded. Substantially all loan commitments have floating rates and do not expose the Company to interest rate risk assuming no premium or discount was ascribed to loan commitments because funding could occur at market rates. The Company estimates the fair value of loan commitments, letters of credit and guarantees based on the related amount of unamortized deferred commitment fees adjusted for the probable losses for these arrangements.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31 are shown in the table below.

					2006						2005
					Carrying			Fair			Carrying			Fair
(Dollars in Millions)					Amount			Value			Amount			Value
FINANCIAL ASSETS
	Cash and cash equivalents				$	8,805		$	8,805		$	8,202		$	8,202
	Investment securities					40,117			40,122			39,768			39,772
	Loans held for sale					3,256			3,256			3,030			3,030
	Loans					141,575			140,188			134,421			133,270
		Total financial assets				193,753		$	192,371			185,421		$	184,274
			Nonfinancial assets			25,479						24,044
				Total assets	$	219,232					$	209,465
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
	Deposits				$	124,882		$	124,762		$	124,709		$	124,532
	Short-term borrowings					26,933			26,948			20,200			20,201
	Long-term debt					37,602			37,766			37,069			37,114
		Total financial liabilities				189,417		$	189,476			181,978		$	181,847
			Nonfinancial liabilities			8,618						7,401
			Shareholders’ equity			21,197						20,086
				Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	219,232					$	209,465
DERIVATIVE POSITIONS
	Asset and liability management positions
		Interest rate swaps			$	53		$	53		$	57		$	57
		Futures and forwards				3			3			(15	)		(15	)
		Foreign exchange contracts				15			15			18			18
		Options				(1	)		(1	)		3			3
		Equity contracts				4			4			3			3
		Credit default swaps				(1	)		(1	)		–			–
	Customer related positions
		Interest rate contracts				58			58			53			53
		Foreign exchange contracts				9			9			4			4

     The fair value of unfunded commitments, standby letters of credit and other guarantees is approximately equal to their carrying value. The carrying value of unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit was $261 million. The carrying value of other guarantees was $75 million.

U.S. BANCORP  97

 Note 21   GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

COMMITMENTS TO EXTEND CREDIT

Commitments to extend credit are legally binding and generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. The contractual amount represents the Company’s exposure to credit loss, in the event of default by the borrower. The Company manages this credit risk by using the same credit policies it applies to loans. Collateral is obtained to secure commitments based on management’s credit assessment of the borrower. The collateral may include marketable securities, receivables, inventory, equipment and real estate. Since the Company expects many of the commitments to expire without being drawn, total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent the Company’s future liquidity requirements. In addition, the commitments include consumer credit lines that are cancelable upon notification to the consumer.

LETTERS OF CREDIT

Standby letters of credit are commitments the Company issues to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third-party. The guarantees frequently support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper issuances, bond financings and other similar transactions. The Company issues commercial letters of credit on behalf of customers to ensure payment or collection in connection with trade transactions. In the event of a customer’s nonperformance, the Company’s credit loss exposure is the same as in any extension of credit, up to the letter’s contractual amount. Management assesses the borrower’s credit to determine the necessary collateral, which may include marketable securities, receivables, inventory, equipment and real estate. Since the conditions requiring the Company to fund letters of credit may not occur, the Company expects its liquidity requirements to be less than the total outstanding commitments. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under standby letter of credit arrangements at December 31, 2006, were approximately $11.9 billion with a weighted-average term of approximately 24 months. The estimated fair value of standby letters of credit was approximately $77 million at December 31, 2006.

The contract or notional amounts of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit at December 31, 2006, were as follows:

		Less Than		After
(Dollars in Millions)		One Year		One Year		Total
Commitments to extend credit
	Commercial	$	20,558	$	38,961	$	59,519
	Corporate and purchasing cards (a)		12,866		—		12,866
	Consumer credit cards		41,315		—		41,315
	Other consumer		2,921		13,958		16,879
Letters of credit
	Standby		6,020		5,906		11,926
	Commercial		346		67		413

(a)  Primarily cancelable at the Company’s discretion.

LEASE COMMITMENTS

Rental expense for operating leases amounted to $193 million in 2006, $192 million in 2005 and $187 million in 2004. Future minimum payments, net of sublease rentals, under capitalized leases and noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more, consisted of the following at December 31, 2006:

	Capitalized		Operating
(Dollars in Millions)	Leases		Leases
2007	$	11	$	175
2008		10		160
2009		10		145
2010		10		126
2011		9		106
Thereafter		43		442
Total minimum lease payments		93	$	1,154
Less amount representing interest		34
Present value of net minimum lease payments	$	59

GUARANTEES

Guarantees are contingent commitments issued by the Company to customers or other third-parties. The Company’s guarantees primarily include parent guarantees related to subsidiaries’ third-party borrowing arrangements; third-party performance guarantees inherent in the Company’s business operations such as indemnified securities lending programs and merchant charge-back guarantees; indemnification or buy-back provisions related to certain asset sales; and contingent consideration arrangements related to acquisitions. For certain guarantees, the Company has recorded a liability related to the potential obligation, or has access to collateral to support the guarantee or through the exercise of other recourse provisions can offset some or all of the maximum potential future payments made under these guarantees.

98  U.S. BANCORP

Third-Party Borrowing ArrangementsThe Company provides guarantees to third-parties as a part of certain subsidiaries’ borrowing arrangements, primarily representing guaranteed operating or capital lease payments or other debt obligations with maturity dates extending through 2013. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $444 million at December 31, 2006. The Company’s recorded liabilities as of December 31, 2006, included $5 million representing outstanding amounts owed to these third-parties and required to be recorded on the Company’s balance sheet in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Commitments from Securities LendingThe Company participates in securities lending activities by acting as the customer’s agent involving the loan of securities. The Company indemnifies customers for the difference between the market value of the securities lent and the market value of the collateral received. Cash collateralizes these transactions. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $13.8 billion at December 31, 2006, and represented the market value of the securities lent to third-parties. At December 31, 2006, the Company held assets with a market value of $14.2 billion as collateral for these arrangements.

Assets SalesThe Company has provided guarantees to certain third-parties in connection with the sale of certain assets, primarily loan portfolios and low-income housing tax credits. These guarantees are generally in the form of asset buy-back or make-whole provisions that are triggered upon a credit event or a change in the tax-qualifying status of the related projects, as applicable, and remain in effect until the loans are collected or final tax credits are realized, respectively. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $489 million at December 31, 2006, and represented the proceeds or the guaranteed portion received from the buyer in these transactions where the buy-back or make-whole provisions have not yet expired. Recourse available to the Company includes guarantees from the Small Business Administration (for SBA loans sold), recourse against the correspondent that originated the loan or to the private mortgage issuer, the right to collect payments from the debtors, and/or the right to liquidate the underlying collateral, if any, and retain the proceeds. Based on its establishedloan-to-value guidelines, the Company believes the recourse available is sufficient to recover future payments, if any, under the loan buy-back guarantees.

Merchant ProcessingThe Company, through its subsidiaries, provides merchant processing services. Under the rules of credit card associations, a merchant processor retains a contingent liability for credit card transactions processed. This contingent liability arises in the event of a billing dispute between the merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder’s favor. In this situation, the transaction is “charged-back” to the merchant and the disputed amount is credited or otherwise refunded to the cardholder. If the Company is unable to collect this amount from the merchant, it bears the loss for the amount of the refund paid to the cardholder.
     A cardholder, through its issuing bank, generally has until the latter of up to four months after the date the transaction is processed or the receipt of the product or service to present a charge-back to the Company as the merchant processor. The absolute maximum potential liability is estimated to be the total volume of credit card transactions that meet the associations’ requirements to be valid charge-back transactions at any given time. Management estimates that the maximum potential exposure for charge-backs would approximate the total amount of merchant transactions processed through the credit card associations for the last four months. For the last four months this amount totaled approximately $64.9 billion. In most cases, this contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased and amounts are refunded when items are returned to merchants. However, where the product or service is not provided until a future date (“future delivery”), the potential for this contingent liability increases. To mitigate this risk, the Company may require the merchant to make an escrow deposit, may place maximum volume limitations on future delivery transactions processed by the merchant at any point in time, or may require various credit enhancements (including letters of credit and bank guarantees). Also, merchant processing contracts may include event triggers to provide the Company more financial and operational control in the event of financial deterioration of the merchant.
     The Company’s primary exposure to future delivery is related to merchant processing for airlines, cruise lines and large tour operators. The Company currently processes card transactions for airlines, cruise lines and large tour operators in the United States, Canada and Europe. In the event of liquidation of these merchants, the Company could become financially liable for refunding tickets purchased through the credit card associations under the charge-back provisions. Charge-back risk related to these merchants is evaluated in a manner similar to credit risk assessments and, as such, merchant processing contracts contain various provisions to protect the Company in the event of default. At December 31, 2006, the value of airline, cruise line and

U.S. BANCORP  99

large tour operator tickets purchased to be delivered at a future date was $2.6 billion, with airline tickets representing 90 percent of that amount. The Company held collateral of $1.7 billion in escrow deposits, letters of credit and indemnities from financial institutions, and liens on various assets. With respect to future delivery risk for other merchants, the Company held $40 million of merchant escrow deposits as collateral. In addition to specific collateral or other credit enhancements the Company maintains a liability for its implied guarantees associated with future delivery. At December 31, 2006, the liability was $30 million primarily related to these airlines, cruise lines and large tour operators processing arrangements.

     In the normal course of business, the Company has unresolved charge-backs that are in process of resolution. The Company assesses the likelihood of its potential liability based on the extent and nature of unresolved charge-backs and its historical loss experience. At December 31, 2006, the Company had a recorded liability for potential losses of $19 million.

Contingent Consideration ArrangementsThe Company has contingent payment obligations related to certain business combination transactions. Payments are guaranteed as long as certain post-acquisition performance-based criteria are met or customer relationships are maintained. At December 31, 2006, the maximum potential future payments required to be made by the Company under these arrangements was approximately $34 million. If required, the majority of these contingent payments are payable within the next 12 months.

Minimum Revenue GuaranteesIn the normal course of business, the Company may enter into revenue share agreements with third party business partners who generate customer referrals or provide marketing or other services related to the generation of revenue. In certain of these agreements, the Company may guarantee that a minimum amount of revenue share payments will be made to the third party over a specified period of time. At December 31, 2006, the maximum potential future payments required to be made by the Company under these agreements was $36 million.

Other GuaranteesThe Company provides liquidity and credit enhancement facilities to a Company-sponsored conduit, as more fully described in the “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” section within Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Although management believes a draw against these facilities is remote, the maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $2.2 billion at December 31, 2006. The recorded fair value of the Company’s liability for the credit enhancement liquidity facility was $10 million at December 31, 2006, and was included in other liabilities.

     The Company has also made financial performance guarantees related to the operations of its subsidiaries. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $1.9 billion at December 31, 2006.

OTHER CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

In connection with the spin-off of Piper Jaffray Companies in 2003, the Company has agreed to indemnify Piper Jaffray Companies against losses that may result from third-party claims relating to certain specified matters. The Company’s indemnification obligation related to these specified matters is capped at $18 million and can be terminated by the Company if there is a change in control event for Piper Jaffray Companies. Through December 31, 2006, the Company has paid approximately $12 million to Piper Jaffray Companies under this agreement.

     The Company is subject to various other litigation, investigations and legal and administrative cases and proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its businesses. Due to their complex nature, it may be years before some matters are resolved. While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate resolution or range of financial liability with respect to these contingent matters, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

100  U.S. BANCORP

 Note 22   U.S. BANCORP (PARENT COMPANY)

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET

December 31 (Dollars in Millions)		2006		2005
ASSETS
Deposits with subsidiary banks, principally interest-bearing		$	9,903	$	9,882
Available-for-sale securities			253		107
Investments in bank and bank holding company subsidiaries			22,003		21,681
Investments in nonbank subsidiaries			297		376
Advances to bank subsidiaries			1,000		–
Advances to nonbank subsidiaries			496		10
Other assets			794		659
	Total assets	$	34,746	$	32,715
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Short-term funds borrowed		$	1,055	$	782
Long-term debt			11,419		10,854
Other liabilities			1,075		993
Shareholders’ equity			21,197		20,086
	Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	34,746	$	32,715

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions)		2006			2005			2004
INCOME
Dividends from bank and bank holding company subsidiaries		$	4,205		$	2,609		$	4,900
Dividends from nonbank subsidiaries			–			–			229
Interest from subsidiaries			538			200			54
Other income			43			22			21
	Total income		4,786			2,831			5,204
EXPENSE
Interest on short-term funds borrowed			54			25			8
Interest on long-term debt			630			311			256
Other expense			59			93			47
	Total expense		743			429			311
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries			4,043			2,402			4,893
Income tax credit			(58	)		(73	)		(53	)
Income of parent company			4,101			2,475			4,946
Equity (deficiency) in undistributed income of subsidiaries			650			2,014			(779	)
	Net income	$	4,751		$	4,489		$	4,167

U.S. BANCORP  101

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions)			2006			2005			2004
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income			$	4,751		$	4,489		$	4,167
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities (Equity) deficiency in undistributed income of subsidiaries				(650	)		(2,014	)		779
	Other, net			(77	)		128			43
		Net cash provided by operating activities		4,024			2,603			4,989
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investment securities				11			13			76
Purchases of investment securities				(154	)		–			(76	)
Investments in subsidiaries				(7	)		(43	)		–
Equity distributions from subsidiaries				107			39			1,916
Net (increase) decrease in short-term advances to subsidiaries				(486	)		(5	)		11
Long-term advances to subsidiaries				(1,000	)		–			–
Other, net				(18	)		(18	)		(12	)
		Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(1,547	)		(14	)		1,915
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings				273			99			(16	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt				6,550			5,979			–
Principal payments or redemption of long-term debt				(5,947	)		(1,862	)		(909	)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock				948			–			–
Proceeds from issuance of common stock				910			371			581
Repurchase of common stock				(2,798	)		(1,855	)		(2,660	)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock				(33	)		–			–
Cash dividends paid on common stock				(2,359	)		(2,245	)		(1,820	)
		Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(2,456	)		487			(4,824	)
		Change in cash and cash equivalents		21			3,076			2,080
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year				9,882			6,806			4,726
		Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	9,903		$	9,882		$	6,806

     Transfer of funds (dividends, loans or advances) from bank subsidiaries to the Company is restricted. Federal law requires loans to the Company or its affiliates to be secured and generally limits loans to the Company or an individual affiliate to 10 percent of each bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus. In aggregate, loans to the Company and all affiliates cannot exceed 20 percent of each bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus.

     Dividend payments to the Company by its subsidiary banks are subject to regulatory review and statutory limitations and, in some instances, regulatory approval. The approval of the Comptroller of the Currency is required if total dividends by a national bank in any calendar year exceed the bank’s net income for that year combined with its retained net income for the preceding two calendar years or if the bank’s retained earnings are less than zero. Furthermore, dividends are restricted by the Comptroller of the Currency’s minimum capital constraints for all national banks. Within these guidelines, all bank subsidiaries have the ability to pay dividends without prior regulatory approval. The amount of dividends available to the parent company from the bank subsidiaries at December 31, 2006, was approximately $1.1 billion.

102  U.S. BANCORP

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Balance Sheet — Five Year Summary

																		% Change
December 31 (Dollars in Millions)			2006			2005			2004			2003			2002			2006 v 2005
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks			$	8,639		$	8,004		$	6,336		$	8,630		$	10,758			7.9	%
Held-to-maturity securities				87			109			127			152			233			(20.2	)
Available-for-sale securities				40,030			39,659			41,354			43,182			28,255			.9
Loans held for sale				3,256			3,030			2,813			2,857			5,505			7.5
Loans				143,597			136,462			124,941			116,811			114,905			5.2
	Less allowance for loan losses			(2,022	)		(2,041	)		(2,080	)		(2,184	)		(2,422	)		.9
	Net loans			141,575			134,421			122,861			114,627			112,483			5.3
Other assets				25,645			24,242			21,613			20,023			22,793			5.8
		Total assets	$	219,232		$	209,465		$	195,104		$	189,471		$	180,027			4.7	%
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits
	Noninterest-bearing		$	32,128		$	32,214		$	30,756		$	32,470		$	35,106			(.3	)%
	Interest-bearing			92,754			92,495			89,985			86,582			80,428			.3
		Total deposits		124,882			124,709			120,741			119,052			115,534			.1
Short-term borrowings				26,933			20,200			13,084			10,850			7,806			33.3
Long-term debt				37,602			37,069			34,739			33,816			31,582			1.4
Other liabilities				8,618			7,401			7,001			6,511			6,669			16.4
		Total liabilities		198,035			189,379			175,565			170,229			161,591			4.6
Shareholders’ equity				21,197			20,086			19,539			19,242			18,436			5.5
		Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	219,232		$	209,465		$	195,104		$	189,471		$	180,027			4.7	%

U.S. BANCORP  103

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Statement of Income — Five-Year Summary

															% Change
Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions)		2006		2005			2004			2003		2002			2006 v 2005
INTEREST INCOME
Loans		$	9,873	$	8,306		$	7,125		$	7,231	$	7,691			18.9%
Loans held for sale			236		181			134			243		223			30.4
Investment securities			2,001		1,954			1,827			1,684		1,484			2.4
Other interest income			153		110			100			100		96			39.1
	Total interest income		12,263		10,551			9,186			9,258		9,494			16.2
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits			2,389		1,559			904			1,097		1,485			53.2
Short-term borrowings			1,203		690			263			167		223			74.3
Long-term debt			1,930		1,247			908			805		972			54.8
	Total interest expense		5,522		3,496			2,075			2,069		2,680			58.0
Net interest income			6,741		7,055			7,111			7,189		6,814			(4.5	)
Provision for credit losses			544		666			669			1,254		1,349			(18.3	)
Net interest income after provision for credit losses			6,197		6,389			6,442			5,935		5,465			(3.0	)
NONINTEREST INCOME
Credit and debit card revenue			800		713			649			561		517			12.2
Corporate payment products revenue			557		488			407			361		326			14.1
ATM processing services			243		229			175			166		161			6.1
Merchant processing services			963		770			675			561		567			25.1
Trust and investment management fees			1,235		1,009			981			954		892			22.4
Deposit service charges			1,023		928			807			716		690			10.2
Treasury management fees			441		437			467			466		417			.9
Commercial products revenue			415		400			432			401		479			3.8
Mortgage banking revenue			192		432			397			367		330			(55.6	)
Investment products fees and commissions			150		152			156			145		133			(1.3	)
Securities gains (losses), net			14		(106	)		(105	)		245		300			*
Other			813		593			478			370		399			37.1
	Total noninterest income		6,846		6,045			5,519			5,313		5,211			13.3
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Compensation			2,513		2,383			2,252			2,177		2,167			5.5
Employee benefits			481		431			389			328		318			11.6
Net occupancy and equipment			660		641			631			644		659			3.0
Professional services			199		166			149			143		130			19.9
Marketing and business development			217		235			194			180		171			(7.7	)
Technology and communications			505		466			430			418		392			8.4
Postage, printing and supplies			265		255			248			246		243			3.9
Other intangibles			355		458			550			682		553			(22.5	)
Debt prepayment			33		54			155			–		–			(38.9	)
Other			952		774			787			779		1,107			23.0
	Total noninterest expense		6,180		5,863			5,785			5,597		5,740			5.4
Income from continuing operations before income taxes			6,863		6,571			6,176			5,651		4,936			4.4
Applicable income taxes			2,112		2,082			2,009			1,941		1,708			1.4
Income from continuing operations			4,751		4,489			4,167			3,710		3,228			5.8
Discontinued operations (after-tax)			–		–			–			23		(23	)		–
Cumulative effect of accounting change (after-tax)			–		–			–			–		(37	)		–
Net income		$	4,751	$	4,489		$	4,167		$	3,733	$	3,168			5.8
Net income applicable to common equity		$	4,703	$	4,489		$	4,167		$	3,733	$	3,168			4.8

* Not meaningful

104  U.S. BANCORP

U.S. Bancorp

Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data

		2006								2005
		First		Second		Third		Fourth		First			Second		Third		Fourth
(Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Data)		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter		Quarter			Quarter		Quarter		Quarter
INTEREST INCOME
Loans		$	2,307	$	2,425	$	2,545	$	2,596	$	1,895		$	2,009	$	2,147	$	2,255
Loans held for sale			51		57		64		64		37			42		50		52
Investment securities			490		500		500		511		476			486		492		500
Other interest income			43		36		40		34		27			28		29		26
	Total interest income		2,891		3,018		3,149		3,205		2,435			2,565		2,718		2,833
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits			503		578		640		668		308			361		414		476
Short-term borrowings			270		270		321		342		112			143		205		230
Long-term debt			403		484		528		515		271			307		317		352
	Total interest expense		1,176		1,332		1,489		1,525		691			811		936		1,058
Net interest income			1,715		1,686		1,660		1,680		1,744			1,754		1,782		1,775
Provision for credit losses			115		125		135		169		172			144		145		205
Net interest income after provision for credit losses			1,600		1,561		1,525		1,511		1,572			1,610		1,637		1,570
NONINTEREST INCOME
Credit and debit card revenue			182		202		206		210		154			177		185		197
Corporate payment products revenue			127		139		150		141		107			120		135		126
ATM processing services			59		61		63		60		47			57		64		61
Merchant processing services			213		253		253		244		178			198		200		194
Trust and investment management fees			297		314		305		319		247			253		251		258
Deposit service charges			232		264		268		259		210			234		246		238
Treasury management fees			107		116		111		107		107			117		109		104
Commercial products revenue			104		107		100		104		96			100		103		101
Mortgage banking revenue			24		75		68		25		102			110		111		109
Investment products fees and commissions			38		42		34		36		39			39		37		37
Securities gains (losses), net			–		3		–		11		(59	)		1		1		(49	)
Other			231		179		190		213		154			135		134		170
	Total noninterest income		1,614		1,755		1,748		1,729		1,382			1,541		1,576		1,546
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Compensation			633		627		632		621		567			612		603		601
Employee benefits			133		123		123		102		116			108		106		101
Net occupancy and equipment			165		161		168		166		154			159		162		166
Professional services			35		41		54		69		36			39		44		47
Marketing and business development			40		58		58		61		43			67		61		64
Technology and communications			117		127		128		133		106			113		118		129
Postage, printing and supplies			66		66		66		67		63			63		64		65
Other intangibles			85		89		89		92		71			181		125		81
Debt prepayment			–		11		–		22		–			54		–		–
Other			226		227		220		279		175			199		190		210
	Total noninterest expense		1,500		1,530		1,538		1,612		1,331			1,595		1,473		1,464
Income before income taxes			1,714		1,786		1,735		1,628		1,623			1,556		1,740		1,652
Applicable income taxes			561		585		532		434		552			435		586		509
Net income		$	1,153	$	1,201	$	1,203	$	1,194	$	1,071		$	1,121	$	1,154	$	1,143
Net income applicable to common equity		$	1,153	$	1,184	$	1,187	$	1,179	$	1,071		$	1,121	$	1,154	$	1,143
Earnings per common share		$	.64	$	.66	$	.67	$	.67	$	.58		$	.61	$	.63	$	.63
Diluted earnings per common share		$	.63	$	.66	$	.66	$	.66	$	.57		$	.60	$	.62	$	.62

U.S. BANCORP  105

U.S. Bancorp

Consolidated Daily Average Balance Sheet and

Year Ended December 31				2006								2005
				Average					Yields			Average					Yields
(Dollars in Millions)				Balances			Interest		and Rates			Balances			Interest		and Rates
ASSETS
Investment securities				$	39,961		$	2,063		5.16	%	$	42,103		$	1,962		4.66	%
Loans held for sale					3,663			236		6.45			3,290			181		5.49
Loans (b)
	Commercial				45,440			2,969		6.53			42,641			2,501		5.87
	Commercial real estate				28,760			2,104		7.32			27,964			1,804		6.45
	Residential mortgages				21,053			1,224		5.81			18,036			1,001		5.55
	Retail				45,348			3,602		7.94			42,969			3,025		7.04
			Total loans		140,601			9,899		7.04			131,610			8,331		6.33
Other earning assets					2,006			153		7.64			1,422			110		7.77
			Total earning assets		186,231			12,351		6.63			178,425			10,584		5.93
Allowance for loan losses					(2,052	)							(2,098	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities					(1,007	)							(368	)
Other assets (c)					30,340								27,239
			Total assets	$	213,512							$	203,198
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Noninterest-bearing deposits				$	28,755							$	29,229
Interest-bearing deposits
	Interest checking				23,552			233		.99			22,785			135		.59
	Money market savings				26,667			569		2.13			29,314			358		1.22
	Savings accounts				5,599			19		.35			5,819			15		.26
	Time certificates of deposit less than $100,000				13,761			524		3.81			13,199			389		2.95
	Time deposits greater than $100,000				22,255			1,044		4.69			20,655			662		3.20
			Total interest-bearing deposits		91,834			2,389		2.60			91,772			1,559		1.70
Short-term borrowings					24,422			1,242		5.08			19,382			690		3.56
Long-term debt					40,357			1,930		4.78			36,141			1,247		3.45
		Total interest-bearing liabilities			156,613			5,561		3.55			147,295			3,496		2.37
Other liabilities (d)					7,434								6,721
Shareholders’ equity
	Preferred equity				767								–
	Common equity				19,943								19,953
		Total shareholders’ equity			20,710								19,953
			Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	213,512							$	203,198
Net interest income							$	6,790							$	7,088
Gross interest margin										3.08	%							3.56	%
Gross interest margin without taxable-equivalent increments										3.05								3.54
PERCENT OF EARNING ASSETS
Interest income										6.63	%							5.93	%
Interest expense										2.98								1.96
Net interest margin										3.65	%							3.97	%
Net interest margin without taxable-equivalent increments										3.62	%							3.95	%

*	Not meaningful
(a)	Interest and rates are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a tax rate of 35 percent.
(b)	Interest income and rates on loans include loan fees. Nonaccrual loans are included in average loan balances.
(c)	Includes approximately $1,427 million and $1,733 million of earning assets from discontinued operations in 2003 and 2002, respectively.
(d)	Includes approximately $1,034 million and $1,524 million of interest-bearing liabilities from discontinued operations in 2003 and 2002, respectively.

106  U.S. BANCORP

Related Yields and Rates (a)

2004									2003								2002								2006 v 2005
																									% Change
Average					Yields				Average					Yields			Average					Yields			Average
Balances			Interest		and Rates				Balances			Interest		and Rates			Balances			Interest		and Rates			Balances
$	43,009		$	1,836		4.27	%		$	37,248		$	1,697		4.56	%	$	28,829		$	1,504		5.22	%		(5.1	)%
	3,079			134		4.35				5,041			243		4.82			3,915			223		5.70			11.3
	39,348			2,213		5.62				41,326			2,315		5.60			43,817			2,622		5.98			6.6
	27,267			1,543		5.66				27,142			1,585		5.84			25,723			1,636		6.36			2.8
	14,322			812		5.67				11,696			713		6.10			8,412			595		7.08			16.7
	39,733			2,577		6.49				36,773			2,633		7.16			35,230			2,851		8.09			5.5
								��
	120,670			7,145		5.92				116,937			7,246		6.20			113,182			7,704		6.81			6.8
	1,365			100		7.33				1,582			100		6.32			1,484			96		6.48			41.1
	168,123			9,215		5.48				160,808			9,286		5.77			147,410			9,527		6.46			4.4
	(2,303	)								(2,467	)							(2,542	)							2.2
	(346	)								120								409								*
	26,119									29,169								26,671								11.4
$	191,593								$	187,630							$	171,948								5.1
$	29,816								$	31,715							$	28,715								(1.6	)
	20,933			71		.34				19,104			84		.44			15,631			102		.65			3.4
	32,854			235		.72				32,310			318		.98			25,237			313		1.24			(9.0	)
	5,866			15		.26				5,612			21		.38			4,928			25		.51			(3.8	)
	13,074			341		2.61				15,493			451		2.91			19,283			743		3.86			4.3
	13,679			242		1.77				12,319			223		1.81			11,330			302		2.66			7.7
	86,406			904		1.05				84,838			1,097		1.29			76,409			1,485		1.94			.1
	14,534			263		1.81				10,503			167		1.59			10,116			223		2.20			26.0
	35,115			908		2.59				33,663			805		2.39			32,172			972		3.02			11.7
	136,055			2,075		1.53				129,004			2,069		1.60			118,697			2,680		2.26			6.3
	6,263									7,518								7,263								10.6
	–									–								–								*
	19,459									19,393								17,273								(.1	)
	19,459									19,393								17,273								3.8
$	191,593								$	187,630							$	171,948								5.1	%
			$	7,140								$	7,217							$	6,847
						3.95	%								4.17	%							4.20	%
						3.93									4.15								4.18
						5.48	%								5.77	%							6.46	%
						1.23									1.28								1.81
						4.25	%								4.49	%							4.65	%
						4.23	%								4.47	%							4.63	%

U.S. BANCORP  107

U.S. Bancorp

Supplemental Financial Data

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE SUMMARY	2006		2005		2004		2003		2002
Earnings per common share from continuing operations	$	2.64	$	2.45	$	2.21	$	1.93	$	1.68
Discontinued operations		–		–		–		.01		(.01	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change		–		–		–		–		(.02	)
Earnings per common share	$	2.64	$	2.45	$	2.21	$	1.94	$	1.65
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations	$	2.61	$	2.42	$	2.18	$	1.92	$	1.68
Discontinued operations		–		–		–		.01		(.01	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change		–		–		–		–		(.02	)
Diluted earnings per common share	$	2.61	$	2.42	$	2.18	$	1.93	$	1.65
Dividends per common share		1.390		1.230		1.020		.855		.780

RATIOS
Return on average assets	2.23	%	2.21	%	2.17	%	1.99	%	1.84	%
Return on average common equity	23.6		22.5		21.4		19.2		18.3
Average total equity to average assets	9.7		9.8		10.2		10.3		10.0
Dividends per common share to net income per common share	52.7		50.2		46.2		44.1		47.3

OTHER STATISTICS(Dollars and Shares in Millions)
Common shares outstanding (a)			1,765		1,815		1,858		1,923		1,917
Average common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents
	Earnings per common share		1,778		1,831		1,887		1,924		1,916
	Diluted earnings per common share		1,804		1,857		1,913		1,936		1,925
Number of shareholders (b)			66,313		69,217		71,492		74,341		74,805
Common dividends declared		$	2,466	$	2,246	$	1,917	$	1,645	$	1,488

(a)	Defined as total common shares less common stock held in treasury at December 31.
(b)	Based on number of common stock shareholders of record at December 31.

STOCK PRICE RANGE AND DIVIDENDS

	2006								2005
	Sales Price								Sales Price
					Closing		Dividends						Closing		Dividends
	High		Low		Price		Declared		High		Low		Price		Declared
First quarter	$	31.31	$	28.99	$	30.50	$	.33	$	31.36	$	28.17	$	28.82	$	.30
Second quarter		31.89		30.17		30.88		.33		29.91		26.80		29.20		.30
Third quarter		33.42		30.54		33.22		.33		30.91		27.77		28.08		.30
Fourth quarter		36.85		32.96		36.19		.40		31.21		27.32		29.89		.33

The common stock of U.S. Bancorp is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, under the ticker symbol “USB.”

STOCK PERFORMANCE CHART

The following chart compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company’s common stock during the five years ended December 31, 2006, with the cumulative total return on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Commercial Bank Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2001, in the Company’s common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes the reinvestment of all dividends.

108  U.S. BANCORP

Annual Report on Form 10-K

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

Commission File Number 1-6880

U.S. Bancorp
Incorporated in the State of Delaware
IRS Employer Identification #41-0255900
Address: 800 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-7014
Telephone: (651) 466-3000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act (and listed on the New York Stock Exchange): Common Stock, par value $.01; Depositary Shares (each representing 1/1,000 interest in a share of Series B Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $1.00).

     Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None.

     U.S. Bancorp is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

     U.S. Bancorp is required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

     U.S. Bancorp (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

     Disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is contained in the registrant’s definitive proxy statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.

     U.S. Bancorp is a large accelerated filer, as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act.

     U.S. Bancorp is not a shell company, as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act.

     The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2006, was approximately $55.1 billion based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

     As of January 31, 2007, U.S. Bancorp had 1,771,213,241 shares of common stock outstanding and 66,132 registered holders of its common stock.

     This report incorporates into a single document the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to annual reports on Form 10-K and annual reports to shareholders. Only those sections of this report referenced in the following cross-reference index and the information under the caption ‘Safe Harbor’ statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 are incorporated in the Form 10-K.

Index		Page
Part I
Item 1	Business
	General Business Description	110-111
	Line of Business Financial Performance	53-57
	Website Access to SEC Reports	115
Item 1A	Risk Factors	111-115
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	none
Item 2	Properties	115
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	none
Item 4	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	none
Part II
Item 5	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	5, 50-51, 66, 84-87, 92-94, 108, 109
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	19
Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18-60
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	43-50
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	64-108
Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	none
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	60
Item 9B	Other Information	none
Part III
Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	123-125
Item 11	Executive Compensation	*
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	108*
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	*
Item 14	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	*
Part IV
Item 15	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	117-118
Signatures		119
Certifications		120-122

*  U.S. Bancorp’s definitive proxy statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference, other than the sections entitled “Compensation Committee Report” and “Audit Committee Report.”

U.S. BANCORP  109

General Business DescriptionU.S. Bancorp is a multi-state financial holding company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. U.S. Bancorp was incorporated in Delaware in 1929 and operates as a financial holding company and a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. U.S. Bancorp provides a full range of financial services, including lending and depository services, cash management, foreign exchange and trust and investment management services. It also engages in credit card services, merchant and ATM processing, mortgage banking, insurance, brokerage and leasing.

     U.S. Bancorp’s banking subsidiaries are engaged in the general banking business, principally in domestic markets. The subsidiaries range in size from $35 million to $136 billion in deposits and provide a wide range of products and services to individuals, businesses, institutional organizations, governmental entities and other financial institutions. Commercial and consumer lending services are principally offered to customers within the Company’s domestic markets, to domestic customers with foreign operations and within certain niche national venues. Lending services include traditional credit products as well as credit card services, financing and import/export trade, asset-backed lending, agricultural finance and other products. Leasing products are offered through bank leasing subsidiaries. Depository services include checking accounts, savings accounts and time certificate contracts. Ancillary services such as foreign exchange, treasury management and receivable lock-box collection are provided to corporate customers. U.S. Bancorp’s bank and trust subsidiaries provide a full range of asset management and fiduciary services for individuals, estates, foundations, business corporations and charitable organizations.

     U.S. Bancorp’s non-banking subsidiaries primarily offer investment and insurance products to the Company’s customers principally within its markets and mutual fund processing services to a broad range of mutual funds.

     Banking and investment services are provided through a network of 2,472 banking offices principally operating in 24 states in the Midwest and West. The Company operates a network of 4,841 branded ATMs and provides24-hour, seven day a week telephone customer service. Mortgage banking services are provided through banking offices and loan production offices throughout the Company’s markets. Consumer lending products may be originated through banking offices, indirect correspondents, brokers or other lending sources, and a consumer finance division. The Company is also one of the largest providers of Visa^® corporate and purchasing card services and corporate trust services in the United States. A wholly-owned subsidiary, NOVA Information Systems, Inc. (“NOVA”), provides merchant processing services directly to merchants and through a network of banking affiliations. Affiliates of NOVA provide similar merchant services in Canada and segments of Europe. These foreign operations are not significant to the Company.

     On a full-time equivalent basis, as of December 31, 2006, U.S. Bancorp employed 50,423 people.

CompetitionThe commercial banking business is highly competitive. Subsidiary banks compete with other commercial banks and with other financial institutions, including savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, finance companies, mortgage banking companies, credit unions and investment companies. In recent years, competition has increased from institutions not subject to the same regulatory restrictions as domestic banks and bank holding companies.

Government PoliciesThe operations of the Company’s various operating units are affected by state and federal legislative changes and by policies of various regulatory authorities, including those of the numerous states in which they operate, the United States and foreign governments. These policies include, for example, statutory maximum legal lending rates, domestic monetary policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, United States fiscal policy, international currency regulations and monetary policies, U.S. Patriot Act and capital adequacy and liquidity constraints imposed by bank regulatory agencies.

Supervision and RegulationAs a registered bank holding company and financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act, U.S. Bancorp is subject to the supervision of, and regulation by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

     Under the Bank Holding Company Act, a financial holding company may engage in banking, managing or controlling banks, furnishing or performing services for banks it controls, and conducting other financial activities. U.S. Bancorp must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board before acquiring more than 5 percent of the outstanding shares of another bank or bank holding company, and must provide notice to, and in some situations obtain the prior approval of, the Federal Reserve Board in connection with engaging in, or acquiring more than 5 percent of the outstanding shares of a company engaged in, a new financial activity.

     Under the Bank Holding Company Act, U.S. Bancorp may acquire banks throughout the United States, subject only to state or federal deposit caps and state minimum age requirements.

     National banks are subject to the supervision of, and are examined by, the Comptroller of the Currency. All subsidiary banks of the Company are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and are subject to examination by the FDIC. In practice, the primary federal

110  U.S. BANCORP

regulator makes regular examinations of each subsidiary bank subject to its regulatory review or participates in joint examinations with other federal regulators. Areas subject to regulation by federal authorities include the allowance for credit losses, investments, loans, mergers, issuance of securities, payment of dividends, establishment of branches and other aspects of operations.

Risk FactorsThere are a number of factors, including those specified below, that may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial results or stock price. Additional risks that the Company currently does not know about or currently views as immaterial may also impair the Company’s business or adversely impact its financial results or stock price.

Industry Risk Factors

The Company’s business and financial results are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions.The Company’s business activities and earnings are affected by general business conditions in the United States and abroad. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, monetary supply, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, and the strength of the United States economy and the local economies in which the Company operates. For example, an economic downturn, an increase in unemployment, or other events that affect household and/or corporate incomes could result in a deterioration of credit quality, a change in the allowance for credit losses, or reduced demand for credit or fee-based products and services. Changes in the financial performance and condition of the Company’s borrowers could negatively affect repayment of those borrowers’ loans. In addition, changes in securities market conditions and monetary fluctuations could adversely affect the availability and terms of funding necessary to meet the Company’s liquidity needs.

Changes in the domestic interest rate environment could reduce the Company’s net interest income.The operations of financial institutions such as the Company are dependent to a large degree on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans and investments and interest expense on deposits and borrowings. An institution’s net interest income is significantly affected by market rates of interest, which in turn are affected by prevailing economic conditions, by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and by the policies of various regulatory agencies. Like all financial institutions, the Company’s balance sheet is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. Volatility in interest rates can also result in the flow of funds away from financial institutions into direct investments. Direct investments, such as U.S. Government and corporate securities and other investment vehicles (including mutual funds) generally pay higher rates of return than financial institutions, because of the absence of federal insurance premiums and reserve requirements.

Changes in the laws, regulations and policies governing financial services companies could alter the Company’s business environment and adversely affect operations.The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Its fiscal and monetary policies determine in a large part the Company’s cost of funds for lending and investing and the return that can be earned on those loans and investments, both of which affect the Company’s net interest margin. Federal Reserve Board policies can also materially affect the value of financial instruments that the Company holds, such as debt securities and mortgage servicing rights.

     The Company and its bank subsidiaries are heavily regulated at the federal and state levels. This regulation is to protect depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole. Congress and state legislatures and federal and state agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes in statutes, regulations or policies could affect the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways, including limiting the types of financial services and products that the Company offers and/or increasing the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products. The Company cannot predict whether any of this potential legislation will be enacted, and if enacted, the effect that it or any regulations would have on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

The financial services industry is highly competitive, and competitive pressures could intensify and adversely affect the Company’s financial results.The Company operates in a highly competitive industry that could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. The Company competes with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, finance companies, mortgage banking companies, credit unions and investment companies. In addition, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks. Many of the Company’s competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and some have lower cost structures. Also, the potential need to adapt to industry changes in information technology systems, on which the Company and financial services industry are highly dependent, could present operational issues and require capital spending.

Changes in consumer use of banks and changes in consumer spending and saving habits could adversely affect the Company’s financial results.Technology and other changes now allow many consumers to complete financial transactions without using banks. For example,

U.S. BANCORP  111

consumers can pay bills and transfer funds directly without going through a bank. This “disintermediation” could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and income generated from those deposits. In addition, changes in consumer spending and saving habits could adversely affect the Company’s operations, and the Company may be unable to timely develop competitive new products and services in response to these changes that are accepted by new and existing customers.

Acts or threats of terrorism and political or military actions taken by the United States or other governments could adversely affect general economic or industry conditions.Geopolitical conditions may also affect the Company’s earnings. Acts or threats or terrorism and political or military actions taken by the United States or other governments in response to terrorism, or similar activity, could adversely affect general economic or industry conditions.

Company Risk Factors

The Company’s allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses.Like all financial institutions, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for loan defaults and non-performance. The Company’s allowance for loan losses is based on its historical loss experience as well as an evaluation of the risks associated with its loan portfolio, including the size and composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and geographic concentrations within the portfolio. The Company’s allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual loan losses, and future provisions for loan losses could materially and adversely affect its financial results.

The Company may suffer losses in its loan portfolio despite its underwriting practices.The Company seeks to mitigate the risks inherent in its loan portfolio by adhering to specific underwriting practices. These practices often include: analysis of a borrower’s credit history, financial statements, tax returns and cash flow projections; valuation of collateral based on reports of independent appraisers; and verification of liquid assets. Although the Company believes that its underwriting criteria are appropriate for the various kinds of loans it makes, the Company may incur losses on loans that meet these criteria.

Maintaining or increasing the Company’s market share may depend on lowering prices and market acceptance of new products and services.The Company’s success depends, in part, on its ability to adapt its products and services to evolving industry standards. There is increasing pressure to provide products and services at lower prices. Lower prices can reduce the Company’s net interest margin and revenues from its fee-based products and services. In addition, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including internet services, could require the Company to make substantial expenditures to modify or adapt the Company’s existing products and services. Also, these and other capital investments in the Company’s businesses may not produce expected growth in earnings anticipated at the time of the expenditure. The Company might not be successful in introducing new products and services, achieving market acceptance of its products and services, or developing and maintaining loyal customers.

Because the nature of the financial services business involves a high volume of transactions, the Company faces significant operational risks.The Company operates in many different businesses in diverse markets and relies on the ability of its employees and systems to process a high number of transactions. Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from the Company’s operations, including, but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside of the Company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements and business continuation and disaster recovery. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity. In the event of a breakdown in the internal control system, improper operation of systems or improper employee actions, the Company could suffer financial loss, face regulatory action and suffer damage to its reputation.

The change in residual value of leased assets may have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial results.The Company engages in leasing activities and is subject to the risk that the residual value of the property under lease will be less than the Company’s recorded asset value. Adverse changes in the residual value of leased assets can have a negative impact on the Company’s financial results. The risk of changes in the realized value of the leased assets compared to recorded residual values depends on many factors outside of the Company’s control, including supply and demand for the assets, collecting insurance claims, condition of the assets at the end of the lease term, and other economic factors.

Negative publicity could damage the Company’s reputation and adversely impact its business and financial results.Reputation risk, or the risk to the Company’s earnings and capital from negative publicity, is inherent in the Company’s business. Negative publicity can result from the Company’s actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance

112  U.S. BANCORP

and acquisitions, and actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to those activities. Negative publicity can adversely affect the Company’s ability to keep and attract customers and can expose the Company to litigation and regulatory action. Because most of the Company’s businesses operate under the “U.S. Bank” brand, actual or alleged conduct by one business can result in negative publicity about other businesses the Company operates. Although the Company takes steps to minimize reputation risk in dealing with customers and other constituencies, the Company, as a large diversified financial services company with a high industry profile, is inherently exposed to this risk.

The Company’s reported financial results depend on management’s selection of accounting methods and certain assumptions and estimates.The Company’s accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how the Company records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. The Company’s management must exercise judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and methods so they comply with generally accepted accounting principles and reflect management’s judgment of the most appropriate manner to report the Company’s financial condition and results. In some cases, management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which might be reasonable under the circumstances, yet might result in the Company’s reporting materially different results than would have been reported under a different alternative.

     Certain accounting policies are critical to presenting the Company’s financial condition and results. They require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are uncertain. Materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions or estimates. These critical accounting policies include: the allowance for credit losses; the valuation of mortgage servicing rights; the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets; and income taxes. Because of the uncertainty of estimates involved in these matters, the Company may be required to do one or more of the following: significantly increase the allowance for credit losses and/or sustain credit losses that are significantly higher than the reserve provided; recognize significant impairment on its goodwill and other intangible asset balances; or significantly increase its accrued taxes liability.

     For more information, refer to “Critical Accounting Policies” in this Annual Report and Form 10-K.

Changes in accounting standards could materially impact the Company’s financial statements.From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board changes the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how the Company records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the Company’s restating prior period financial statements.

Acquisitions may not produce revenue enhancements or cost savings at levels or within timeframes originally anticipated and may result in unforeseen integration difficulties.The Company regularly explores opportunities to acquire financial services businesses or assets and may also consider opportunities to acquire other banks or financial institutions. The Company cannot predict the number, size or timing of acquisitions.

     Difficulty in integrating an acquired business or company may cause the Company not to realize expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other projected benefits from the acquisition. The integration could result in higher than expected deposit attrition (run-off), loss of key employees, disruption of the Company’s business or the business of the acquired company, or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Also, the negative effect of any divestitures required by regulatory authorities in acquisitions or business combinations may be greater than expected.

     The Company must generally receive federal regulatory approval before it can acquire a bank or bank holding company. In determining whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition, federal bank regulators will consider, among other factors, the effect of the acquisition on the competition, financial condition, and future prospects. The regulators also review current and projected capital ratios and levels, the competence, experience, and integrity of management and its record of compliance with laws and regulations, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served (including the acquiring institution’s record of compliance under the Community Reinvestment Act) and the effectiveness of the acquiring institution in combating money laundering activities. In addition, the Company cannot be certain when or if, or on what terms and conditions, any required regulatory approvals will be granted. The Company may be required to sell banks or branches as a condition to receiving regulatory approval.

If new laws were enacted that restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to share information about customers, the Company’s financial results could be negatively affected.The Company’s business model depends on sharing information among the family of

U.S. BANCORP  113

companies owned by U.S. Bancorp to better satisfy the Company’s customer needs. Laws that restrict the ability of the companies owned by U.S. Bancorp to share information about customers could negatively affect the Company’s revenue and profit.

The Company’s business could suffer if the Company fails to attract and retain skilled people.The Company’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people in most activities the Company engages in can be intense. The Company may not be able to hire the best people or to keep them.

The Company relies on other companies to provide key components of the Company’s business infrastructure.Third party vendors provide key components of the Company’s business infrastructure such as internet connections, network access and mutual fund distribution. While the Company has selected these third party vendors carefully, it does not control their actions. Any problems caused by these third parties, including as a result of their not providing the Company their services for any reason or their performing their services poorly, could adversely affect the Company’s ability to deliver products and services to the Company’s customers and otherwise to conduct its business. Replacing these third party vendors could also entail significant delay and expense.

Significant legal actions could subject the Company to substantial uninsured liabilities.The Company is from time to time subject to claims related to its operations. These claims and legal actions, including supervisory actions by the Company’s regulators, could involve large monetary claims and significant defense costs. To protect itself from the cost of these claims, the Company maintains insurance coverage in amounts and with deductibles that it believes are appropriate for its operations. However, the Company’s insurance coverage may not cover all claims against the Company or continue to be available to the Company at a reasonable cost. As a result, the Company may be exposed to substantial uninsured liabilities, which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

The Company is exposed to risk of environmental liability when it takes title to properties.In the course of the Company’s business, the Company may foreclose on and take title to real estate. As a result, the Company could be subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. The Company may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation andclean-up costs incurred by these parties in connection with environmental contamination or may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic substances or chemical releases at a property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation activities could be substantial. In addition, if the Company is the owner or former owner of a contaminated site, it may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from the property. If the Company becomes subject to significant environmental liabilities, its financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

A natural disaster could harm the Company’s business.Natural disasters could harm the Company’s operations through interference with communications, including the interruption or loss of the Company’s websites, which would prevent the Company from gathering deposits, originating loans and processing and controlling its flow of business, as well as through the destruction of facilities and the Company’s operational, financial and management information systems.

The Company faces systems failure risks as well as security risks, including “hacking” and “identity theft.”The computer systems and network infrastructure the Company and others use could be vulnerable to unforeseen problems. These problems may arise in both our internally developed systems and the systems of our third-party service providers. Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect computer equipment against damage from fire, power loss or telecommunication failure. Any damage or failure that causes an interruption in our operations could adversely affect our business and financial results. In addition, our computer systems and network infrastructure present security risks, and could be susceptible to hacking or identity theft.

The Company relies on dividends from its subsidiaries for its liquidity needs.The Company is a separate and distinct legal entity from its bank subsidiaries and non-bank subsidiaries. The Company receives substantially all of its cash from dividends paid by its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on the Company’s stock and interest and principal on its debt. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that our bank subsidiaries and certain of our non-bank subsidiaries may pay to the Company. Also, the Company’s right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization is subject to prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors.

The Company has non-banking businesses that are subject to various risks and uncertainties.The Company is a diversified financial services company, and the Company’s business model is based on a mix of businesses that provide

114  U.S. BANCORP

a broad range of products and services delivered through multiple distribution channels. In addition to banking, the Company provides payment services, investments, mortgages and corporate and personal trust services. Although the Company believes its diversity helps lessen the effect of downturns in any one segment of its industry, it also means the Company’s earnings could be subject to various specific risks and uncertainties related to these non-banking businesses.

The Company’s stock price can be volatile.The Company’s stock price can fluctuate widely in response to a variety of factors, including: actual or anticipated variations in the Company’s quarterly operating results; recommendations by securities analysts; significant acquisitions or business combinations; strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by or involving the Company or the Company’s competitors; operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to the Company; new technology used or services offered by the Company’s competitors; news reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the financial services industry; and changes in government regulations.

     General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, including terrorist attacks, economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes, credit loss trends or currency fluctuations, could also cause the Company’s stock price to decrease regardless of the Company’s operating results.

PropertiesU.S. Bancorp and its significant subsidiaries occupy headquarter offices under a long-term lease in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Company also leases eight freestanding operations centers in Cincinnati, Denver, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Portland and St. Paul. The Company owns nine principal operations centers in Cincinnati, Coeur d’Alene, Fargo, Milwaukee, Owensboro, Portland, St. Louis and St. Paul. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s subsidiaries owned and operated a total of 1,466 facilities and leased an additional 1,439 facilities, all of which are well maintained. The Company believes its current facilities are adequate to meet its needs. Additional information with respect to premises and equipment is presented in Notes 8 and 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Website Access to SEC ReportsU.S. Bancorp’s internet website can be found at usbank.com. U.S. Bancorp makes available free of charge on its website its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as well as all other reports filed by U.S. Bancorp with the SEC, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.

CertificationsU.S. Bancorp has filed as exhibits to this annual report on Form 10-K the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. U.S. Bancorp has also submitted the required annual Chief Executive Officer certification to the New York Stock Exchange.

Governance DocumentsThe Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and Board of Directors committee charters are available free of charge on the Company’s web site at usbank.com, by clicking on “About U.S. Bancorp,” then “Corporate Governance.” Shareholders may request a free printed copy of any of these documents from the Company’s investor relations department by contacting them at investorrelations@usbank.com or calling (866) 775-9668.

CAPITAL COVENANTS

The Company has entered into several transactions involving the issuance of capital securities (“Capital Securities”) by Delaware statutory trusts formed by the Company (the “Trusts”), the issuance by the Company of preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”) or the issuance by an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association of preferred stock exchangeable for the Company’s Preferred Stock under certain circumstances (“Exchangeable Preferred Stock”). Simultaneously with the closing of each of those transactions, the Company entered into a replacement capital covenant (each, a “Replacement Capital Covenant” and collectively, the “Replacement Capital Covenants”) for the benefit of persons that buy, hold or sell a specified series of long-term indebtedness of the Company or U.S. Bank National Association (the “Covered Debt”). Each of the Replacement Capital Covenants provides that neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries (including any of the Trusts) will repay, redeem or purchase any of the Preferred Stock, Exchangeable Preferred Stock or the Capital Securities and the securities held by the Trust (the “Other Securities”), as applicable, on or before the date specified in the applicable Replacement Capital Covenant, with certain limited exceptions, except to the extent that, during the 180 days prior to the date of that repayment, redemption or purchase, the Company has received proceeds from the sale of qualifying securities that (i) have equity-like characteristics that are the same as, or more equity-like than, the applicable characteristics of the Preferred Stock, the Exchangeable Preferred Stock, the Capital Securities or Other Securities, as applicable, at the time of repayment, redemption or purchase, and (ii) the Company has obtained

U.S. BANCORP  115

the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, if such approval is then required by the Federal Reserve Board or, in the case of the Exchangeable Preferred Stock, the approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The Company will provide a copy of any Replacement Capital Covenant to a holder of the relevant Covered Debt upon request made to the Investor Relations contact listed inside the back cover of this Annual Report and Form 10-K.

The following table identifies the (i) closing date for each transaction, (ii) issuer, (iii) series of Capital Securities, Preferred Stock or Exchangeable Preferred Stock issued in the relevant transaction, (iv) Other Securities, if any, and (v) applicable Covered Debt.

Closing				Capital Securities or
Date		Issuer		Preferred Stock	Other Securities		Covered Debt
	12/29/05	USB Capital VIII and U.S. Bancorp		USB Capital VIII’s $375,000,000 6.35% Trust Preferred Securities	U.S. Bancorp’s $375,000,000 6.35% Income Capital Obligation Notes due 2066		U.S. Bancorp’s 4.50% Medium-Term Notes, Series P (CUSIP No. 91159HGJ3)
	3/17/06	USB Capital IX and U.S. Bancorp		USB Capital IX’s $1,250,000,000 of 6.189% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Normal Income Trust Securities	(i) U.S. Bancorp’s Remarketable Junior Subordinated Notes and (ii) Stock Purchase Contract to Purchase U.S. Bancorp’s Series A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock		U.S. Bancorp’s 5.875% junior subordinated debentures due 2035, underlying the 5.875% trust preferred securities of USB Capital VII (Cusip No. 903301208)
	3/27/06		U.S. Bancorp	U.S. Bancorp’s 40,000,000 Depositary Shares ($25 per Depositary Share) each representing a 1/1000thinterest in a share of Series B Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock		Not Applicable	U.S. Bancorp’s 5.875% junior subordinated debentures due 2035, underlying the 5.875% trust preferred securities of USB Capital VII (CUSIP No. 903301208)
	4/12/06	USB Capital X and U.S. Bancorp		USB Capital X’s $500,000,000 6.50% Trust Preferred Securities	U.S. Bancorp’s 6.50% Income Capital Obligation Notes due 2066		U.S. Bancorp’s 5.875% junior subordinated debentures due 2035, underlying the 5.875% trust preferred securities of USB Capital VII (CUSIP No. 903301208)
	8/30/06	USB Capital XI and U.S. Bancorp		USB Capital XI’s $765,000,000 6.60% Trust Preferred Securities	U.S. Bancorp’s 6.60% Income Capital Obligation Notes due 2066		U.S. Bancorp’s 5.875% junior subordinated debentures due 2035, underlying the 5.875% trust preferred securities of USB Capital VII (CUSIP No. 903301208)
	12/22/06	USB Realty Corp.(a)and U.S. Bancorp		USB Realty Corp.’s 5,000 shares of Fixed-Floating- Rate Exchangeable Non- cumulative Perpetual Series A Preferred Stock exchangeable for shares of U.S. Bancorp’s Series C Non-cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock(b)		Not applicable	U.S. Bancorp’s 5.875% junior subordinated debentures due 2035, underlying 5.875% trust preferred securities of USB Capital VII (CUSIP No. 903301208)
	2/1/07	USB Capital XII and U.S. Bancorp		USB Capital XII’s $500,000,000 6.30% Trust Preferred Securities	U.S. Bancorp’s 6.30% Income Capital Obligation Notes due 2066		U.S. Bancorp’s 5.875% junior subordinated debentures due 2035, underlying the 5.875% trust preferred securities of USB Capital VII (CUSIP No. 903301208)

(a)  USB Realty Corp. is an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association.

(b)  Under certain circumstances, upon the direction of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, each share of USB Realty Corp.’s Series A Preferred Stock will be automatically exchanged for one share of the U.S. Bancorp’s Series C Non-cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock.

116  U.S. BANCORP

EXHIBITS

     Schedules to the consolidated financial statements required by Regulation S-X are omitted since the required information is included in the footnotes or is not applicable.

     The following Exhibit Index lists the Exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended.
(1)3.2	Restated bylaws, as amended. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001
4.1	[Pursuant to Item 601(b) (4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt are not filed. U.S. Bancorp agrees to furnish a copy thereof to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.]
(1)4.2	Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2002, between U.S. Bancorp and Mellon Investor Services LLC. Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 001-06880) on December 31, 2002
(1)(2)10.1	U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001
(1)(2)10.2	Amendment No. 1 to U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
(1)(2)10.3	U.S. Bancorp 1998 Executive Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
(1)(2)10.4	Summary of U.S. Bancorp 1991 Executive Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
(1)(2)10.5	U.S. Bancorp 2001 Employee Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
(1)(2)10.6	Firstar Corporation 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
(1)(2)10.7	Firstar Corporation 1998 Employee Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
(1)(2)10.8	U.S. Bancorp 2006 Executive Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 21, 2006
(1)(2)10.9	U.S. Bancorp Executive Deferral Plan, as amended. Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999
(1)(2)10.10	Summary of Nonqualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended, of the former U.S. Bancorp. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001
(1)(2)10.11	1991 Performance and Equity Incentive Plan of the former U.S. Bancorp. Filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997
(1)(2)10.12	Form of Director Indemnification Agreement entered into with former directors of the former U.S. Bancorp. Filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997
(1)(2)10.13	U.S. Bancorp Non-Qualified Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
(1)(2)10.14	Appendix B-10 to U.S. Bancorp Non-Qualified Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
(1)(2)10.15	Amendments No. 1, 2 and 3 to U.S. Bancorp Non-Qualified Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
(1)(2)10.16	Amendment No. 4 to U.S. Bancorp Non-Qualified Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2004
(1)(2)10.17	Amendment No. 5 to U.S. Bancorp Non-Qualified Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
(1)(2)10.18	Amendment No. 6 to U.S. Bancorp Non-Qualified Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on October 20, 2005
(1)(2)10.19	U.S. Bancorp Executive Employees Deferred Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
(1)(2)10.20	U.S. Bancorp 2005 Executive Employees Deferred Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2005
(1)(2)10.21	U.S. Bancorp Outside Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003

U.S. BANCORP  117

(1)(2)10.22	U.S. Bancorp 2005 Outside Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2005
(1)(2)10.23	Form of Change in Control Agreement, effective November 16, 2001, between U.S. Bancorp and certain executive officers of U.S. Bancorp. Filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001
(1)(2)10.24	Form of Executive Officer Stock Option Agreement with cliff and performance vesting under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
(1)(2)10.25	Form of Executive Officer Stock Option Agreement with annual vesting under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
(1)(2)10.26	Form of 2006 Executive Officer Stock Option Agreement with annual vesting under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on January 17, 2006
(1)(2)10.27	Form of Executive Officer Restricted Stock Award Agreement under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
(1)(2)10.28	Form of Director Stock Option Agreement under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
(1)(2)10.29	Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
(1)(2)10.30	Form of Executive Officer Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
(1)(2)10.31	Employment Agreement with Jerry A. Grundhofer. Filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001
(1)(2)10.32	Amendment of Employment Agreement with Jerry A. Grundhofer. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
(1)(2)10.33	Amendment No. 2 of Employment Agreement with Jerry A. Grundhofer. Filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
(1)(2)10.34	Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement with Jerry A. Grundhofer dated January 2, 2002. Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
(1)(2)10.35	Offer of Employment to Richard C. Hartnack. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
(1)(2)10.36	Terms of Jerry A. Grundhofer’s service as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. Described in Item 1 of Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2006
(2)10.37	Agreement with David M. Moffett dated January 19, 2007
12	Statement re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
21	Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1	Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(1)	Exhibit has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is incorporated herein as an exhibit by reference to the prior filing.
(2)	Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

118  U.S. BANCORP

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on February 26, 2007, on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

U.S. Bancorp

By: Richard K. Davis

President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on February 26, 2007, by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

Richard K. Davis

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

(principal executive officer)

David M. Moffett

Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)

Terrance R. Dolan

Executive Vice President and Controller

(principal accounting officer)

Jerry A. Grundhofer

Chairman

Victoria Buyniski Gluckman

Director

Arthur D. Collins, Jr.

Director

Peter H. Coors

Director

Joel W. Johnson

Director

Olivia F. Kirtley

Director

Jerry W. Levin

Director

David B. O’Maley

Director

O’dell M. Owens, M.D., M.P.H.

Director

Richard G. Reiten

Director

Craig D. Schnuck

Director

Warren R. Staley

Director

Patrick T. Stokes

Director

U.S. BANCORP  119

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Richard K. Davis, certify that:

(1)	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S. Bancorp;
(2)	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
(3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
(4)	The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/Richard K. Davis

Richard K. Davis

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: February 26, 2007

120  U.S. BANCORP

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, David M. Moffett, certify that:

(1)	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S. Bancorp;
(2)	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
(3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
(4)	The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/David M. Moffett

David M. Moffett

Chief Financial Officer

Dated: February 26, 2007

U.S. BANCORP  121

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify that:

(1)	The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Richard K. Davis
  Richard K. Davis
Chief Executive Officer /s/David M. Moffett
  David M. Moffett
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: February 26, 2007

122  U.S. BANCORP

Executive Officers

Richard K. Davis

Mr. Davis is President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Davis, 48, has served as Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Bancorp since December 2006 and as President since October 2004. He also served as Chief Operating Officer from October 2004 until December 2006. From the time of the merger of Firstar Corporation and U.S. Bancorp in February 2001 until October 2004, Mr. Davis served as Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. From the time of the merger, Mr. Davis was responsible for Consumer Banking, including Retail Payment Solutions (card services), and he assumed additional responsibility for Commercial Banking in 2003. Previously, he had been Vice Chairman of Consumer Banking of Firstar Corporation from 1998 until 2001.

Jennie P. Carlson

Ms. Carlson is Executive Vice President of U.S. Bancorp. Ms. Carlson, 46, has served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources since January 2002. Until that time, she served as Executive Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of U.S. Bancorp since the merger of Firstar Corporation and U.S. Bancorp in February 2001. From 1995 until the merger, she was General Counsel and Secretary of Firstar Corporation and Star Banc Corporation.

Andrew Cecere

Mr. Cecere is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Cecere, 46, has served as Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp since the merger of Firstar Corporation and U.S. Bancorp in February 2001. He assumed responsibility for Private Client and Trust Services in February 2001 and U.S. Bancorp Asset Management in November 2001. Previously, he had served as Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Bancorp from May 2000 through February 2001. Additionally, he served as Vice Chairman of U.S. Bank with responsibility for Commercial Services from 1999 to 2001. Mr. Cecere will succeed David M. Moffett as U.S. Bancorp’s Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer effective February 28, 2007.

William L. Chenevich

Mr. Chenevich is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Chenevich, 63, has served as Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp since the merger of Firstar Corporation and U.S. Bancorp in February 2001, when he assumed responsibility for Technology and Operations Services. Previously, he served as Vice Chairman of Technology and Operations Services of Firstar Corporation from 1999 to 2001.

Michael J. Doyle

Mr. Doyle is Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Doyle, 50, has served in these positions since January 2003. Until that time, he served as Executive Vice President and Senior Credit Officer of U.S. Bancorp since the merger of Firstar Corporation and U.S. Bancorp in February 2001. From 1999 until the merger, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Approval Officer of Firstar Corporation.

Richard C. Hartnack

Mr. Hartnack is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Hartnack, 61, has served in this position since April 2005, when he joined U.S. Bancorp to assume responsibility for Consumer Banking. Prior to joining U.S. Bancorp, he served as Vice Chairman of Union Bank of California from 1991 to 2005 with responsibility for Community Banking and Investment Services.

Richard J. Hidy

Mr. Hidy is Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Hidy, 44, has served in these positions since January 2005. From January 2003 until February 2005, he served as Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of U.S. Bancorp, having served as Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel of U.S. Bancorp and Firstar Corporation since 1999.

U.S. BANCORP  123

Joseph C. Hoesley

Mr. Hoesley is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Hoesley, 52, has served as Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp since June 2006. From June 2002 until June 2006, he served as Executive Vice President and National Group Head of Commercial Real Estate at U.S. Bancorp, having previously served as Senior Vice President and Group Head of Commercial Real Estate at U.S. Bancorp since joining U.S. Bancorp in 1992.

Pamela A. Joseph

Ms. Joseph is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Ms. Joseph, 47, has served as Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp since December 2004. Since November 2004, she has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of NOVA Information Systems, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. Prior to that time, she had been President and Chief Operating Officer of NOVA Information Systems, Inc. since February 2000.

Lee R. Mitau

Mr. Mitau is Executive Vice President and General Counsel of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Mitau, 58, has served in these positions since 1995. Mr. Mitau also serves as Corporate Secretary. Prior to 1995 he was a partner at the law firm of Dorsey & Whitney LLP.

David M. Moffett

Mr. Moffett is Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Moffett, 54, has served in these positions since the merger of Firstar Corporation and U.S. Bancorp in February 2001. Prior to the merger, he was Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of Firstar Corporation, and had served as Chief Financial Officer of Star Banc Corporation from 1993 until its merger with Firstar Corporation in 1998. Mr. Moffett will retire as U.S. Bancorp’s Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer on February 27, 2007.

Joseph M. Otting

Mr. Otting is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Otting, 49, has served in this position since April 2005, when he assumed responsibility for Commercial Banking. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President, East Commercial Banking Group of U.S. Bancorp from June 2003 to April 2005. He served as Market President of U.S. Bank in Oregon from December 2001 until June 2003.

Richard B. Payne, Jr.

Mr. Payne is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Payne, 59, has served in this position since July 2006, when he joined U.S. Bancorp to assume responsibility for Corporate Banking. Prior to joining U.S. Bancorp, he served as Executive Vice President for National City Corporation in Cleveland, with responsibility for Capital Markets, since 2001.

124  U.S. BANCORP

Directors

Jerry A. Grundhofer^1,6

Chairman

U.S. Bancorp

Minneapolis, Minnesota

Richard K. Davis^1,6

President and Chief Executive Officer

U.S. Bancorp

Minneapolis, Minnesota

Victoria Buyniski Gluckman^4,6

President and Chief Executive Officer

United Medical Resources, Inc.,

a wholly owned subsidiary of

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated

Cincinnati, Ohio

Arthur D. Collins, Jr.^1,2,5

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Medtronic, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota

Peter H. Coors^2,5

Vice Chairman

Molson Coors Brewing Company

Golden, Colorado

Joel W. Johnson^3,6

Retired Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

Hormel Foods Corporation

Austin, Minnesota

Olivia F. Kirtley^3,5

Business Consultant

Louisville, Kentucky

Jerry W. Levin^1,2,5

Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

JW Levin Partners LLC

New York, New York

David B. O’Maley^5,6

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

Ohio National Financial Services, Inc.

Cincinnati, Ohio

O’dell M. Owens, M.D., M.P.H.^1,3,4

Independent Consultant and

Hamilton County Coroner

Cincinnati, Ohio

Richard G. Reiten^3,4

Chairman and Retired

Chief Executive Officer

Northwest Natural Gas Company

Portland, Oregon

Craig D. Schnuck^4,6

Former Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

Schnuck Markets, Inc.

St. Louis, Missouri

Warren R. Staley^1,2,3

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Cargill, Incorporated

Minneapolis, Minnesota

Patrick T. Stokes^1,2,6

Chairman

Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.

St. Louis, Missouri

1.	Executive Committee
2.	Compensation Committee
3.	Audit Committee
4.	Community Outreach and Fair Lending Committee
5.	Governance Committee
6.	Credit and Finance Committee

U.S. BANCORP  125

corporate information

Executive Offices

U.S. Bancorp
800 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55402

Common Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar

Mellon Investor Services acts as our transfer agent and registrar, dividend paying agent and dividend reinvestment plan administrator, and maintains all shareholder records for the corporation. Inquiries related to shareholder records, stock transfers, changes of ownership, lost stock certificates, changes of address and dividend payment should be directed to the transfer agent at:

Mellon Investor Services
P.O. Box 3315
South Hackensack, NJ 07606-1915
Phone: 888-778-1311 or 201-680-4000
Internet: melloninvestor.com

For Registered or Certified Mail:
Mellon Investor Services
480 Washington Boulevard
Jersey City, NJ 07310

Telephone representatives are available weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Central Time, and automated support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Specific information about your account is available on Mellon’s internet site by clicking on For Investors and then the Investor ServiceDirect^® link.

Independent Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP serves as the independent auditor for U.S. Bancorp’s financial statements.

Common Stock Listing and Trading

U.S. Bancorp common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol USB.

Dividends and Reinvestment Plan

U.S. Bancorp currently pays quarterly dividends on our common stock on or about the 15th day of January, April, July and October, subject to approval by our Board of Directors. U.S. Bancorp shareholders can choose to participate in a plan that provides automatic reinvestment of dividends and/or optional cash purchase of additional shares of U.S. Bancorp common stock. For more information, please contact our transfer agent, Mellon Investor Services.

Investor Relations Contacts

Judith T. Murphy
Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
judith.murphy@usbank.com
Phone: 612-303-0783 or 866-775-9668

Financial Information

U.S. Bancorp news and financial results are available through our website and by mail.

WebsiteFor information about U.S. Bancorp, including news, financial results, annual reports and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, access our home page on the internet at usbank.com, click on About U.S. Bancorp, then Investor/Shareholder Information.

MailAt your request, we will mail to you our quarterly earnings, news releases, quarterly financial data reported on Form 10-Q and additional copies of our annual reports. Please contact:

U.S. Bancorp Investor Relations
800 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55402
investorrelations@usbank.com
Phone: 866-775-9668

Media Requests

Steven W. Dale
Senior Vice President, Media Relations
steve.dale@usbank.com
Phone: 612-303-0784

Privacy

U.S. Bancorp is committed to respecting the privacy of our customers and safeguarding the financial and personal information provided to us. To learn more about the U.S. Bancorp commitment to protecting privacy, visit usbank.com and click on Privacy Pledge.

Code of Ethics

U.S. Bancorp places the highest importance on honesty and integrity. Each year, every U.S. Bancorp employee certifies compliance with the letter and spirit of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, the guiding ethical standards of our organization. For details about our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, visit usbank.com and click on About U.S. Bancorp, then Ethics at U.S. Bank.

Diversity

U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to developing and maintaining a workplace that reflects the diversity of the communities we serve. We support a work environment where individual differences are valued and respected and where each individual who shares the fundamental values of the company has an opportunity to contribute and grow based on individual merit.

Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action

U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to providing Equal Employment Opportunity to all employees and applicants for employment. In keeping with this commitment, employment decisions are made based upon performance, skill and abilities, not race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry, gender, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation or any other factors protected by law. The corporation complies with municipal, state and federal fair employment laws, including regulations applying to federal contractors.

U.S. Bancorp, including each of our subsidiaries, is an Equal Opportunity Employer committed to creating a diverse workforce.

U.S. Bancorp
800 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55402
 

usbank.com