Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| 12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2009
|
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block] |
1.Summary of significant accounting policies (In thousands, except for estimated useful lives which are stated in years):
Basis of consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Forest Laboratories, Inc. (or the Company) and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned.All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Estimates and assumptions: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.Estimates are made when accounting for sales allowances, returns, rebates and other pricing adjustments, depreciation, amortization, tax assets and liabilities and certain contingencies.The Company is subject to risks and uncertainties, which may include but are not limited to competition, federal or local legislation and regulations, litigation and overall changes in the healthcare environment that may cause actual results to vary from estimates.The Company reviews all significant estimates affecting the financial statements on a recurring basis and records the effect of any adjustments when necessary.
Reclassifications: Certain amounts as previously reported have been reclassified to conform to current year classifications.
Foreign currency translation: The statements of earnings of the Companys foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using average exchange rates.The net assets of the Companys foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates.The U.S. dollar effects that arise from translating the net assets of these subsidiaries at changing rates are recorded in the foreign currency translation adjustment account, which is included in Accumulated other comprehensive income.
Cash equivalents: Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less and are readily convertible into cash at par value (cost).
Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined on the first-in, first-out basis.
Pre-launch inventories: The Company may scale-up and make commercial quantities of certain of its product candidates prior to the date it anticipates that such products will receive final FDA approval.The scale-up and commercial production of pre-launch inventories involves the risk that such products may not be approved for marketing by the FDA on a timely basis, or ever.This risk notwithstanding, the Company plans to continue to scale-up and build pre-launch inventories of certain products that have not yet received final governmental approval when the Company believes that such action is appropriate in relation to the commercial value of the product launch opportunity.As of fiscal years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had no such pre-launch inventory quantities.
Marketable securities: Marketable securities, which are all accounted for as available-for-sale, are stated at fair value based on quoted ma |
Net Income Per Share [Text Block] |
2.Net income per share (In thousands):
A reconciliation of shares used in calculating basic and diluted net income per share follows:
Years ended March 31,
2009
2008
2007
Basic
303,609
314,660
318,539
Effect of assumed conversion of employee stock options and restricted stock
791
1,473
4,242
Diluted
304,400
316,133
322,781
Options to purchase approximately 16,571, 12,312 and 6,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $20.55 to $76.66 per share were outstanding during a portion of fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive.These options expire through 2019. |
Business Operations [Text Block] |
3.Business operations (In thousands):
The Company and its principal operating subsidiaries, which are located in the United States, Ireland and the United Kingdom, manufacture and market ethical pharmaceutical products and other healthcare products.The Company operates in only one segment.Sales are made primarily in the United States and European markets.The net sales and long-lived assets for the years ended March 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, are from the Company's or one of its subsidiaries' country of origin, as follows:
2009
2008
2007
Net sales
Long-lived assets
Net sales
Long-lived assets
Net sales
Long-lived assets
United States $ 3,567,989 $ 333,345 $ 3,433,233 $ 371,442 $ 3,121,091 $ 410,211
Ireland 19,926 520,548 17,729 513,559 13,680 121,610
United Kingdom 48,140 6,410 50,840 9,459 48,553 10,761
$ 3,636,055 $ 860,303 $ 3,501,802 $ 894,460 $ 3,183,324 $ 542,582
Net sales exclude sales between the Company and its subsidiaries.
Net sales by therapeutic class are as follows:
Years ended March 31,
2009
2008
2007
Central nervous system (CNS) $ 3,268,561 $ 3,137,878 $ 2,794,685
Cardiovascular 94,359 35,616 50,199
Other 273,135 328,308 338,440
$ 3,636,055 $ 3,501,802 $ 3,183,324
The Company's CNS franchise consisting of Lexapro, Celexa and Namenda accounted for 90% of the Company's net sales for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 and 88% for 2007.
The following illustrates net sales to the Companys principal customers:
2009
2008
2007
McKesson Drug Company
37%
38%
37%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
33%
30%
27%
AmeriSource Bergen Corporation
19%
15%
13%
|
Accounts Receivable [Text Block] |
4.Accounts receivable (In thousands):
Accounts receivable, net, consists of the following:
March 31,
2009
2008
Trade $ 351,697 $ 377,779
Other 97,747 68,208
$ 449,444 $ 445,987
|
Inventories [Text Block] |
5.Inventories (In thousands):
Inventories, net of reserves for obsolescence, consist of the following:
March 31,
2009
2008
Raw materials $ 126,292 $ 234,288
Work in process 982 1,360
Finished goods 266,253 189,490
$ 393,527 $ 425,138
|
Acquisitions [Text Block] |
6.Acquisitions (In thousands):
On January 10, 2007, the Company acquired Cerexa, Inc. (or Cerexa), a biopharmaceutical company based in Oakland, California for approximately $494,000 in a merger pursuant to which Cerexa became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company acquired worldwide development and marketing rights (excluding Japan) to ceftaroline acetate (or ceftaroline), a next generation, broad-spectrum, hospital-based injectable cephalosporin antibiotic. The acquisition of Cerexa also included a second development-stage hospital-based antibiotic, ME1036, which had shown activity against both aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in preclinical studies. The Company has discontinued development of the ME1036 compound.The rights to ceftaroline and ME1036 are in-licensed by Cerexa on an exclusive basis from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company and Meiji Seika Kaisha, Ltd., respectively. The Company will be obligated to pay an additional $100,000 in the event that annual United States sales of ceftaroline exceed $500,000 during the five year period following product launch.The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and accordingly, Cerexas results of operations are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the acquisition date.
Of the $494,000 purchase price, $476,000 was assigned as in-process research and development (or IPRD).Substantially all of this charge represented the value assigned to ceftaroline, which had completed a Phase II clinical trial program in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (or cSSSI).Ceftaroline is being developed initially for the cSSSI indication and the treatment of community acquired pneumonia (or CAP).Phase III studies of ceftaroline for cSSSI began in February 2007.ME1036 was still in preclinical development at the acquisition date.These compounds had not yet achieved regulatory approval for marketing and consequently, the IPRD was taken as a charge against income during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.This charge was not deductible for tax purposes.
In order to determine the estimated fair value of IPRD, the income method was utilized.This method applies a probability weighting to the estimated future net cash flows that are derived from projected sales revenues and estimated costs.These projections are based on factors such as relevant market size, patent protection, historical pricing of similar products and expected industry trends.The estimated future net cash flows were then discounted to the present value using a discount rate of 16%.This analysis was performed for each compound independently.
For purposes of applying the income method, the projected launch dates following FDA approval were estimated for ceftaroline and ME1036, at which times the Company would expect the resulting products to generate cash flows.The cost to complete these development programs will depend on whether these programs are brought to their final stages of development and are ultimately submitted to the FDA for approval.All internal and external research and development expenses are expensed as incurr |
Fair Value Measurements [Text Block] |
7.Fair value measurements (In thousands):
In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company adopted SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements.This pronouncement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and requires expanded disclosures about fair value measurements.SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather generally applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.SFAS 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.SFAS 157 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost).These valuation techniques are based upon observable and unobservable inputs.Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Companys market assumptions.SFAS 157 utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to fair value measurement techniques into three broad levels.The following is a brief description of those three levels:
Level 1:
Observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2:
Observable inputs other than quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for similar or identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions.
The Companys financial assets adjusted to fair value at March 31, 2009 are its commercial paper investments included in cash and cash equivalents, money market accounts, municipal bonds and notes, variable rate demand notes, floating rate notes and auction rate securities (or ARS).These assets are subject to the measurement and disclosure requirements of SFAS 157. The Company adjusts the value of these instruments to fair value each reporting period. No adjustment to retained earnings resulted from the adoption of SFAS 157.
The following table presents the level within the fair value hierarchy at which the Companys financial assets are carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis:
Description
Fair value at
March 31, 2009
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
(Level 1)
Significant other observable market inputs
(Level 2)
Unobservable market inputs
(Level 3)
Money market accounts $ 1,144,662 $ 1,144,662
Municipal bonds and notes 218,246 $ 218,246
Commercial paper 969,446 411,530 557,916
V |
Marketable Securities [Text Block] |
8.Marketable securities (In thousands):
Available-for-sale debt securities consist of the following:
March31, 2009
Estimated fair value
Gains in accumulated other comprehensive income
Losses in accumulated other comprehensive income
Current:
Variable rate demand notes $ 158,309
Municipal bonds and notes 145,845 $ 1,269
Commercial paper 856,349 3,156
Floating rate notes 81,514 $ (1,287 )
Total current securities 1,242,017 4,425 (1,287 )
Noncurrent:
Municipal bonds and notes 72,401 609
Commercial paper 54,320 (463 )
Auction rate notes 36,839
Floating rate notes 286,233 (68,503 )
Total noncurrent securities 449,793 609 (68,966 )
Total available-for-sale debt securities $ 1,691,810 $ 5,034 $ (70,253 )
March31, 2008
Estimated fair value
Gains in accumulated other comprehensive income
Losses in accumulated other comprehensive income
Current:
Variable rate demand notes $ 307,045 $ 10
Municipal bonds and notes 59,144 309
Commercial paper 684,506 3,393
Floating rate notes 22,422 $ (506 )
Total current securities 1,073,117 3,712 (506 )
Noncurrent:
Municipal bonds and notes 70,009 798
Auction rate notes 55,340
Floating rate notes 409,131 ( 18,297 )
Total noncurrent securities 534,480 798 (18,297 )
Total available-for-sale debt securities $ 1,607,597 $ 4,510 $ (18,803 )
Proceeds from the sales of available-for-sale debt securities were $2,151,929 and $2,983,699 during fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively.Gross realized gains on those sales during fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were $20,077 and $22,318, respectively.For purposes of determining gross realized gains and losses, the cost of securities is based on average cost.Net unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale debt securities in the amount of $65,219 and $14,293 for the years ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively, have been included in Stockholders equity:Accumulated other comprehensive income.
Contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities at March 31, 2009, are as follows:
Estimated fair value
Within one year $ 1,242,017
1-5 years 360,327
5-10 years 44,007
After 10 years 45,459
$ 1,691,810
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call penalties.
The Company currently invests funds in variable rate demand notes that have major bank liquidity agreements, municipal bonds and notes, commercial paper including money market instruments, auction |
Intangible Assets and License Agreements [Text Block] |
9.Intangible assets and license agreements (In thousands, except amortization periods which are stated in years):
License agreements, product rights and other intangibles consist of the following:
March 31, 2009
March 31, 2008
Weighted average amortization period
Gross carrying amount
Accumulated amortization
Gross carrying amount
Accumulated amortization
Amortized intangible assets:
License agreements 12 $ 196,300 $ 110,643 $ 191,300 $ 95,374
Product rights 11 68,206 35,394 71,350 29,963
Buy-out of royalty agreements 11 465,061 91,274 465,061 82,768
Trade names 20 34,190 28,573 34,190 26,076
Non-compete agreements 13 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000
Other 1 3,921 3,897 3,921 3,854
Total 11 $ 783,678 $ 285,781 $ 781,822 $ 254,035
Amortization of license agreements, product rights and other intangibles was charged to selling, general and administrative expense for fiscal years ended March 2009, 2008 and 2007 and amounted to approximately $53,241, $44,646 and $54,736, respectively.Future annual amortization expense expected is as follows:
Years ending March 31,
2010 $ 30,675
2011 22,397
2012 38,186
2013 42,020
2014 42,303
$ 175,581
In January 2009, the Company received marketing approval for Savella, its selective serotonin and norepinephrine dual reuptake inhibitor for the management of fibromyalgia.Upon approval, the Company paid Cypress Bioscience, Inc., its licensor for the product, $25,000.This milestone payment is currently being amortized using the straight-line method over the useful life of the product and is being recorded to selling, general and administrative expense.
In fiscal 2009, the Company entered into two license agreements: the first was with Phenomix Corporation to co-develop and co-promote dutogliptin, a proprietary orally administered, small molecule dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor that is being developed for Type II diabetes.The second was with Pierre Fabre Medicament to develop and commercialize F2695, a propriety selective norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is being developed for the treatment of depression and other central nervous system disorders.Pursuant to each of these agreements, the Company paid an upfront license fee of $75,000 to each partner.These fees were recorded to research and development expense since these products are in the early stages of development.
In fiscal 2008, the Company made a milestone payment of $20,000 to Daiichi Sankyo (or Sankyo) for the co-promotion rights to Azor.In May 2008 the Company and Sankyo terminated this co-promotion agreement for Azor, effective July 1, 2008.As a result of terminating the agreement, the Company recorded a one-time charge of approximately $44,100 to selling, general and administrative expense which was comprised of a termination fee of approximately $26,600 and $17,500 related to the |
Accrued Expenses [Text Block] |
10. Accrued expenses (In thousands):
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
March 31,
2009
2008
Managed care and Medicaid rebates $ 213,384 $ 173,705
Employee compensation and other benefits 101,041 111,129
Clinical research and development costs 51,085 65,608
Reserve for USAO investigation (see Note 14) 170,000
Other 165,126 36,663
$ 700,636 $ 387,105
|
Debt Facility [Text Block] |
11.Debt facility (In thousands):
On December 7, 2007, the Company established a $500,000 revolving credit facility for the purpose of providing additional financial liquidity for the financing of business development and corporate strategic initiatives.The facility can be increased up to $750,000 based upon agreement with the participating lenders and expires on December 7, 2012.As of May 28, 2009, the Company has not drawn any funds from the available credit.The utilization of the revolving credit facility is subject to the adherence to certain financial covenants such as leverage and interest coverage ratios.
|
Commitments [Text Block] |
12.Commitments (In thousands):
Leases:The Company leases manufacturing, office and warehouse facilities, equipment and automobiles under operating leases expiring through fiscal 2018.Rent expense approximated $35,857, $34,630 and $33,149 for fiscal years ended March 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.Future minimum rental payments under noncancellable leases are as follows:
Years ending March 31,
2010 $ 35,438
2011 28,605
2012 19,162
2013 13,310
2014 12,249
Thereafter 36,469
$ 145,233
Royalty agreements: The Company has royalty agreements on certain of its licensed products.Royalties are paid based on a percentage of sales, as defined.For fiscal years ended March 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, royalty expense amounted to $616, $1,071 and $4,742, respectively.
License agreements: The Company has entered into several license and collaboration agreements for products currently under development.Pursuant to these agreements, the Company may be obligated in future periods to make additional milestone payments totaling approximately $966,000.These milestone payments become due and are payable only upon the achievement of certain research and development (approximately $460,000) and regulatory approval (approximately $506,000) milestones.The specific timing of such milestones cannot be predicted and depend upon future clinical developments as well as regulatory agency actions which cannot be predicted with certainty (including actions which may never occur).Further, under the terms of certain licensing agreements, the Company may be obligated to pay commercial milestones contingent upon the achievement of specific sales levels.Due to the long-range nature of such commercial milestone amounts, they are neither probable at this time nor predictable.
Inventory purchase commitments: The Company has inventory purchase commitments of $112,256 as of March 31, 2009. |
Stockholders' Equity [Text Block] |
13.Stockholders' equity (In thousands, except per share data):
In August 2007, the stockholders of the Company voted to adopt the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (or the 2007 Plan) which replaces and supersedes all prior stock option plans.Under the 2007 Plan, 13,950 shares were authorized to be issued to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries at prices not less than the fair market value of the common stock at the date of grant.The 2007 Plan provides for the granting of incentive and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights and stock equivalent units.These awards generally vest in three to five years.Stock option grants may be exercisable for up to ten years from the date of issuance.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at March 31, 2009:
Options outstanding
Options exercisable
Range of exercise prices
Number outstanding
Weighted average remaining contractual life
(in years)
Weighted average exercise price
Number exercisable
Weighted average exercise price
$ 12.29to$30.00 3,283 6.2 $ 19.86 1,288 $ 13.35
30.01to50.00 12,564 4.2 39.74 7,448 39.55
50.01to76.66 3,006 4.0 54.18 1,739 55.99
18,853 4.5 38.58 10,475 39.05
Transactions under the stock option plan are summarized as follows:
Shares
Weighted average exercise price
Weighted average remaining contractual life (in years)
Aggregate intrinsic value
Stock options:
Outstanding at March 31, 2006 (at $4.55 to $76.66 per share) 24,065 $ 33.98
Granted (at $38.94 to $51.54 per share) 3,859 49.35
Exercised (at $4.55 to $53.23 per share) (8,568 ) 24.84
Forfeited (1,132 ) 38.90
Outstanding at March 31, 2007 (at $5.64 to $76.66 per share) 18,224 40.91
Granted (at $37.26 to $51.96 per share) 3,248 38.68
Exercised (at $5.64 to $53.23 per share) (734 ) 36.68
Forfeited (1,444 ) 44.62
Outstanding at March 31, 2008 (at $9.77 to $76.66 per share) 19,294 40.38
Granted (at $20.55 to $38.33 per share) 2,989 28.62
Exercised (at $9.77 to $38.94 per share) (715 ) 14.88
Forfeited (2,715 ) 46.13
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 (at $12.29 to $76.66 per share) 18,853 $ 38.58 4.5 $ 11
Exercisable at March 31, 2009 10,475 $ 39.05 2.8 $ 11
Shares
Weighted average grant date fair value
Restricted stock:
Outstanding at March 31, 2007
Granted 453 $ 37.33
Vested (2 ) 39.88
Out |
Contingencies [Text Block] |
14.Contingencies (In thousands):
The Company remains a defendant in actions filed in various federal district courts alleging certain violations of the federal anti-trust laws in the marketing of pharmaceutical products.In each case, the actions were filed against many pharmaceutical manufacturers and suppliers and allege price discrimination and conspiracy to fix prices in the sale of pharmaceutical products.The actions were brought by various pharmacies (both individually and, with respect to certain claims, as a class action) and seek injunctive relief and monetary damages.The Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation ordered these actions coordinated (and, with respect to those actions brought as class actions, consolidated) in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) under the caption In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation.
On November 30, 1998, the defendants remaining in the consolidated federal class action (which proceeded to trial beginning in September 1998), including the Company, were granted a directed verdict by the trial court after the plaintiffs had concluded their case.In ruling in favor of the defendants, the trial judge held that no reasonable jury could reach a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and stated the evidence of conspiracy is meager, and the evidence as to individual defendants paltry or non-existent.The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit subsequently affirmed the granting of the directed verdict in the federal class case in the Companys favor.
Following the Seventh Circuits affirmation of the directed verdict in the Companys favor, the Company secured the voluntary dismissal of the conspiracy allegations contained in all of the federal cases brought by individual plaintiffs who elected to opt-out of the federal class action, which cases were included in the coordinated proceedings, as well as the dismissal of similar conspiracy and price discrimination claims pending in various state courts.The Company remains a defendant, together with other manufacturers, in many of the federal opt-out cases included in the coordinated proceedings to the extent of claims alleging price discrimination in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act.While no discovery or other significant proceedings with respect to the Company has been taken to date in respect of such claims, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be required to actively defend such claims or to pay substantial amounts to dispose of such claims.However, by way of a decision dated January 25, 2007, the judge handling the Robinson-Patman Act cases for certain of a smaller group of designated defendants whose claims are being litigated on a test basis, granted summary judgment to those designated defendants due to plaintiffs failure to demonstrate any antitrust injury.Subsequently, the Court also granted the designated defendants motion for summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs effort to obtain injunctive relief.It is likely that the plaintiffs will pursue an appeal of both rulings.
In December 2008, the Company entered into a definitive Stipulation of Settlement with respect to |
Income Taxes [Text Block] |
15.Income taxes (In thousands):
The components of income before income tax expense were:
Years ended March 31,
2009
2008
2007
U.S. $ 238,219 $ 440,271 $ (26,935 )
Foreign 732,315 770,126 735,779
Income before income tax expense $ 970,534 $ 1,210,397 $ 708,844
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
Years ended March 31,
2009
2008
2007
Current:
U.S. federal $ 149,739 $ 194,491 $ 248,846
State and local 20,263 18,139 15,397
Foreign 46,884 56,885 61,230
216,886 269,515 325,473
Deferred:
U.S. (11,943 ) (26,549 ) (79,147 )
Foreign (2,152 ) (502 ) 8,415
(14,095 ) (27,051 ) (70,732 )
$ 202,791 $ 242,464 $ 254,741
The reasons for the difference between the provision for income taxes and expected federal income taxes at statutory rates are as follows:
Years ended March 31, (percentage of income
before income tax expense)
2009
2008
2007
U.S. statutory rate
35.0%
35.0%
35.0%
Acquired in-process research and development
23.5
Effect of foreign operations
(18.9)
(14.5)
(21.8)
Research credit
(1.3)
(1.6)
(2.2)
State and local taxes, less federal tax benefit
0.7
1.4
2.4
Government investigation
3.1
0.0
0.0
Permanent differences and other items
2.3
(0.3)
(1.0)
20.9%
20.0%
35.9%
The Companys effective tax rate for fiscal years 2009 and 2008 is lower than the federal statutory rate principally as a result of the proportion of earnings generated in lower-taxed foreign jurisdictions as compared with the United States.The Company's effective tax rate in fiscal 2007 was higher than the federal statutory rate principally as a result of the in-process RD expensed as part of the Cerexa acquisition completed in January 2007.
Net deferred income taxes relate to the following timing differences:
March 31,
2009
2008
Inventory reserves $ 53,505 $ 47,278
Receivable allowances and other reserves 40,302 93,900
Depreciation 1,430 (2,097 )
Amortization 82,871 52,212
Carryforwards and credits 73,305 81,334
Accrued liabilities 12,732 21,548
Employee stock option tax benefits 8,455 1,932
Other (includes reserve for legal contingencies) 67,242 12,723
339,842 308,830
Valuation allowance (21,273 ) (23,772 )
Deferred taxes, net $ 318,569 $ 285,058
The Company has certain state and local net operating loss carryforwards as well as excess charitable contribution carryovers which are available to reduce future U.S. federal and state taxable income, expiring at various times between 2009 and 2025.Although not material, valuation allowances have been established for a portion of deferred tax assets |
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) [Text Block] |
16.Quarterly financial data (unaudited) (In thousands, except per share data):
(In thousands, except per share data)
Net sales
Gross profit
Net income
Diluted earnings per share
2009
First quarter $ 893,745 $ 696,405 $ 242,920 $ 0.79
Second quarter 925,570 720,569 244,086 0.80
Third quarter 920,013 713,359 187,975 0.62
Fourth quarter 896,727 689,042 92,762 0.31
2008
First quarter $ 842,616 $ 656,376 $ 268,162 $ 0.83
Second quarter 842,337 652,345 225,244 0.71
Third quarter 918,146 704,640 301,757 0.96
Fourth quarter 898,703 688,327 172,770 0.55
|