July 1, 2014
BY EDGAR AND ELECTRONIC MAIL
Daniel F. Duchovny, Esq.
Special Counsel
Office of Mergers and Acquisitions
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Mail Stop 3628
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
| Re: | Forward Industries, Inc. |
| Soliciting Materials filed pursuant to Rule 14a-12 |
| Responses to June 17, 2014 Comment Letter |
Dear Mr. Duchovny:
We acknowledge receipt of the comment letter of the Staff (the “Staff”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) dated June 27, 2014 (the “Staff Letter”) with regard to the above-referenced matter. We have reviewed the Staff Letter with our client, Forward Industries, Inc. (“Forward” or the “Company”), and we provide the following responses on Forward’s behalf. For ease of reference, the comments in the Staff Letter are reproduced in italicized form below.
1. | We reissue prior comment 1 as it relates to the following: |
| · | with respect to the statement referenced in our first bullet point, please ensure that you disclose, when referring to any control gained by Mr. Wise, the fiduciary duties with which any directors have to comply and not simply imply or state that Mr. Wise’s nominees will act as he directs them to act. |
The Staff is advised that shortly after the filing of Forward’s response to the initial comment letter, Mr. Wise submitted a second nomination letter notifying the Company of his intent to nominate three additional individuals for election to the Board of Directors of the Company at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Annual Meeting”). Accordingly, instead of seeking to elect a majority-slate, Mr. Wise is now seeking to replace the entire Board with himself and his designees. Forward believes this pattern of events clarifies and supports its view, discussed in further detail in the initial response letter, that Mr. Wise is seeking control of the Company. In addition, given the escalation of Mr. Wise’s campaign and his seeking control of the full Board, Forward believes it is reasonable for it to imply that Mr. Wise’s nominees may act as he directs them to act. Mr. Wise is free to rebut this implication in his communications to shareholders, and in doing so Forward believes it would be more appropriate for him to direct shareholders that his nominees will be subject to fiduciary duties if elected at the Annual Meeting.