4. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Of the eligible Franklin Templeton long-term mutual funds tracked by Lipper, 34, 47, 55 and 41 funds ranked in the top quartile and 33, 18, 12 and 17 funds ranked in the second quartile for the one-, three-, five- and 10-year periods, respectively, for their respective Lipper peer groups. |
5. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Of the eligible Franklin Templeton equity funds tracked by Lipper, 15, 11, 20 and 12 funds ranked in the top quartile and 10, 13, 6 and 7 funds ranked in the second quartile for the one-, three-, five- and 10-year periods, respectively, for their respective Lipper peer groups. |
6. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Of the eligible Franklin Templeton non-money market fixed income funds tracked by Lipper, 19, 36, 35 and 29 funds ranked in the top quartile and 23, 5, 6 and 10 funds ranked in the second quartile for the one-, three-, five- and 10-year periods, respectively, for their respective Lipper peer groups. |
7. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Of the eligible Franklin Templeton non-money market taxable fixed income funds tracked by Lipper, 3, 5, 5 and 5 funds ranked in the top quartile and 7, 3, 3 and 1 funds ranked in the second quartile for the one-, three-, five- and 10-year periods, respectively, for their respective Lipper peer groups. |
8. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Of the eligible Franklin Templeton non-money market tax-free fixed income funds tracked by Lipper, 16, 31, 30 and 24 funds ranked in the top quartile and 16, 2, 3 and 9 funds ranked in the second quartile for the one-, three-, five- and 10-year periods, respectively, for their respective Lipper peer groups. |
9. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Franklin Income Fund Class A ranked 85 in a universe of 263 funds in Lipper's "Income Funds" group for the one-year period, 22 of 158 for the three-year period, 9 of 107 for the five-year period and 3 of 26 for the 10-year period. |
10. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Franklin Aggressive Growth Fund Class A ranked 29 in a universe of 418 funds in Lipper's "Multi-Cap Growth Funds" group for the one-year period, 25 of 359 for the three-year period and 58 of 288 for the five-year period. |
11. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Franklin Balance Sheet Investment Fund Class A ranked 28 in a universe of 263 funds in Lipper's "Mid-Cap Value Funds" group for the one-year period, 67 of 214 for the three-year period, 26 of 139 for the five-year period and 13 of 51 for the 10-year period. |
12. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Franklin Convertible Securities Fund Class A ranked 15 in a universe of 75 funds in Lipper's "Convertible Securities Funds" group for the one-year period, 1 of 60 for the three-year period, 4 of 57 for the five-year period and 7 of 35 for the 10-year period. |
13. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income Fund Class A ranked 79 in a universe of 256 funds in Lipper's "General Municipal Debt Funds" group for the one-year period, 25 of 249 for the three-year period, 34 of 220 for the five-year period and 26 of 142 for the 10-year period. |
14. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Class A ranked 6 in a universe of 122 funds in Lipper's "California Municipal Debt Funds" group for the one-year period, 4 of 117 for the three-year period, 5 of 98 for the five-year period and 5 of 68 for the 10-year period. |
15. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Templeton Global Bond Fund Class A ranked 20 in a universe of 91 funds in Lipper's "Global Income Funds" group for the one-year period, 6 of 88 for the three-year period, 2 of 71 for the five-year period and 5 of 44 for the 10-year period. |
16. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Mutual Beacon Fund Class Z ranked 230 in a universe of 875 funds in Lipper's "Multi-Cap Core Funds" group for the one-year period, 131 of 608 for the three-year period, 36 of 438 for the five-year period and 29 of 149 for the 10-year period. |
17. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Mutual Qualified Fund Class Z ranked 107 in a universe of 875 funds in Lipper's "Multi-Cap Core Funds" group for the one-year period, 71 of 608 for the three-year period, 19 of 438 for the five-year period and 24 of 149 for the 10-year period. |
18. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Mutual Financial Services Fund Class Z ranked 7 in a universe of 119 funds in Lipper's "Financial Services Funds" group for the one-year period, 18 of 103 for the three-year period, and 12 of 88 for the five-year period. |
19. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. A Lipper Leaders distinction does not imply that a fund named as a Lipper Leader had the best performance in its category. Lipper Leaders Awards are based on Class A shares. Lipper ratings for Consistent Return reflect funds’ historical risk-adjusted returns, adjusted for volatility, relative to peers. Lipper ratings for Total Return reflect funds’ historical total return performance relative to peers. Lipper ratings for Preservation reflect funds’ historical loss avoidance relative to other funds within the same asset class. Preservation |
ratings are relative, rather than absolute, measures, and funds named Lipper Leaders for Preservation may still experience losses periodically; those losses may be larger for equity and mixed equity funds than for fixed income funds. Lipper ratings for Tax Efficiency reflect funds' historical success in postponing taxable distributions relative to peers. Lipper ratings for Expense reflect funds' expense minimization relative to peers with similar load structures. Lipper ratings are computed for all Lipper classifications with five or more distinct portfolios and span both equity and fixed-income funds (e.g., large-cap core, general U.S. Treasury, etc.). The Lipper ratings are subject to change every month and are based on an equal-weighted average of percentile ranks for the Consistent Return, Total Return, Preservation, Tax-Efficiency, and Expense metrics over three-, five-, and 10-year periods (if applicable). 20% of funds in each peer group are named Lipper Leaders, the next 20% receive a score of 2, the middle 20% are scored 3, the next 20% are scored 4, and the lowest 20% are scored 5. Franklin Income Fund, in Lipper’s Income Funds classification, received the following ratings for the three-, five- and 10-year periods respectively: Total Return: Lipper Leader [158], Lipper Leader [107], Lipper Leader [26]. Franklin Aggressive Growth Fund, in Lipper’s Multi-Cap Growth classification, received the following ratings for the three-, five- and 10-year periods respectively: Total Return: Lipper Leader [359], 2 [288], N/A [93]; Tax Efficiency: Lipper Leader [359], Lipper Leader [288], N/A [93]. Franklin Balance Sheet Investment Fund, in Lipper’s Mid-Cap Value classification, received the following ratings for the three-, five- and 10-year periods respectively: Total Return: 2 [214], Lipper Leader [139], 2 [51]; Preservation (in Equity asset class): 2 [8094], Lipper Leader [6263], Lipper Leader [2177]; Expense: Lipper Leader [76], Lipper Leader [60], Lipper Leader [27]. Franklin Convertible Securities Fund, in Lipper’s Convertible Securities Funds classification, received the following ratings for the three-, five- and 10-year periods respectively: Total Return: Lipper Leader [60], Lipper Leader [57], Lipper Leader [35]; Expense: Lipper Leader [22], Lipper Leader [21], Lipper Leader [18]. Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income Fund, in Lipper’s General Municipal Debt classification, received the following ratings for the three-, five- and 10-year periods respectively: Total Return: Lipper Leader [249], Lipper Leader [220], Lipper Leader [142]. Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund, in Lipper’s California Municipal Debt Funds classification, received the following ratings for the three-, five- and 10-year periods respectively: Total Return: Lipper Leader [117], Lipper Leader [98], Lipper Leader [68]; Tax Efficiency: Lipper Leader [117], Lipper Leader [98], Lipper Leader [68]. Templeton Global Bond Fund, in Lipper's Global Income Funds classification, received the following ratings for the three-, five- and 10-year periods respectively: Total Return: Lipper Leader [88], Lipper Leader [71], Lipper Leader [44]. Mutual Beacon Fund, in Lipper’s Multi-Cap Core Funds classification, received the following ratings for the three-, five- and 10-year periods respectively: Total Return: 2 [608], Lipper Leader [438], N/A [149]; Preservation (in Equity asset class): Lipper Leader [8094], Lipper Leader [6263], N/A [2177]. Mutual Qualified Fund, in Lipper’s Multi-Cap Core Funds classification, received the following ratings for the three-, five- and 10-year periods respectively: Total Return: Lipper Leader [608], Lipper Leader [438], N/A [149]; Preservation (in Equity asset class): Lipper Leader [8094], Lipper Leader [6263], N/A [2177]. Mutual Financial Services Fund, in Lipper’s Financial Services Funds classification, received the following ratings for the three-, five- and 10-year periods respectively: Total Return: Lipper Leader [103], Lipper Leader [88], N/A [13]; Preservation (in Equity asset class): Lipper Leader [8094], Lipper Leader [6263], N/A [2177]. Lipper ratings are not intended to predict future results, and Lipper does not guarantee the accuracy of this information. More information is available at www.lipperleaders.com. Lipper Leader Copyright 2003, Reuters, All Rights Reserved.
20. | Source: [Morningstar]© 3/31/06. For each fund with at least a three-year history, Morningstar calculates a Morningstar Rating based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure that accounts for variation in a fund's monthly performance (including the effects of sales charges, loads, and redemption fees), placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of funds in each category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. (Each share class is counted as a fraction of one fund within this scale and rated separately, which may cause slight variations in the distribution percentages.) The Overall Morningstar Rating for a fund is derived from a weighted-average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five- and 10-year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Morningstar Rating is for the A share class only; other classes may have different performance characteristics. The following fund was rated against 262; 158; 56 Mid-Cap Value funds for the respective three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, as applicable. For the three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, the Morningstar ratings were: Franklin Balance Sheet Investment Fund 3, 4, 5. The following fund was rated against 126; 106; N/A Specialty-Financial funds for the respective three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, as applicable. For the three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, the Morningstar ratings were: Mutual Financial Services Fund 4, 4, N/A. The following fund was rated against 285; 173; 62 Conservative Allocation funds for the respective three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, as applicable. For the three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, the Morningstar ratings were: Franklin Income Fund 5, 5, 5. The following fund was rated against 152; 130; 77 World Bond funds for the respective three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, as applicable. For the three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, the Morningstar ratings were: Templeton Global Bond Fund 5, 5, 4. The following fund was rated against 299; 276; 196 Muni National Long funds for the respective three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, as applicable. For the three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, the Morningstar ratings were: Franklin Federal Tax-Free Income Fund 4, 3, 4. The following fund was rated against 164; 143; 110 Muni California Long funds for the respective three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, as applicable. For the three-, five- and 10-year periods ended 3/31/06, the Morningstar ratings were: Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund 5, 5, 5. |
21. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Of the eligible Franklin long-term mutual funds tracked by Lipper, 28, 40, 46 and 34 funds ranked in the top quartile, 30, 17, 9 and 14 funds ranked in the second quartile, 14, 9, 12 and 6 funds ranked in the third quartile, and 6, 4, 2 and 4 funds ranked in the fourth quartile. |
22. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Of the eligible Templeton long-term mutual funds tracked by Lipper, 1, 4, 4 and 3 funds ranked in the top quartile, 1, 1, 2 and 3 funds ranked in the second quartile, 2, 1, 3 and 2 funds ranked in the third quartile, and 7, 4, 0 and 1 funds ranked in the fourth quartile. |
23. | Source: Lipper® Inc., 3/31/06. Of the eligible Mutual Series long-term mutual funds tracked by Lipper, 5, 3, 5 and 4 funds ranked in the top quartile, 2, 0, 1 and 0 funds ranked in the second quartile, 0, 3, 0 and 0 funds ranked in the third quartile, and 0, 0, 0 and 0 funds ranked in the fourth quartile. |
Forward-Looking Statements:
The financial results in this press release are preliminary. The company is still in the process of evaluating its treatment of certain intangible assets related to the reorganization of Fiduciary in the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Statements in this press release regarding Franklin Resources, Inc., which are not historical facts, are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors, some of which are listed below, that could cause the actual results and outcomes to differ materially from any future results or outcomes expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These and other risks, uncertainties and other important factors are described in more detail in Franklin's recent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, in Risk Factors and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Franklin's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, and Franklin's Form 10-Q filings.
• The potential impact of the company’s evaluation of its treatment of certain intangible assets related to the reorganization of Fiduciary in the quarter ended March 31, 2006 on its financial statements for various periods and its internal controls over financial reporting. |
• Our ability to repatriate foreign earnings at the amount currently anticipated is based on current interpretations of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, timely completion of the planned repatriation and relatively stable foreign exchange rates. |
• We are subject to extensive and often complex, overlapping and frequently changing regulation domestically and abroad. |
• Regulatory and legislative actions and reforms, particularly those specifically focused on the mutual fund industry, are making the regulatory environment in which we operate more costly and future actions and reforms could adversely impact our assets under management, increase costs and negatively impact our profitability and future financial results. |
• Any significant limitation or failure of our software applications and other technology systems that are critical to our operations could constrain our operations. |
• We face risks, and corresponding potential costs and expenses, associated with conducting operations and growing our business in numerous foreign countries. |
• We depend on key personnel and our financial performance could be negatively affected by the loss of their services. |
• Strong competition from numerous and sometimes larger companies with competing offerings and products could limit or reduce sales of our products, potentially resulting in a decline in our market share, revenues and net income. |
• Changes in the distribution channels on which we depend could reduce our revenues and hinder our growth. |
• The amount or mix of our assets under management are subject to significant fluctuations and could negatively impact our revenues and income. |
• Our increasing focus on international markets as a source of investments and sales of investment products subject us to increased exchange rate and other risks in connection with earnings and income generated overseas. |
• Poor investment performance of our products could affect our sales or reduce the level of assets under management, potentially negatively impacting our revenues and income. |
• We could suffer losses in earnings or revenue if our reputation is harmed. |
• Our future results are dependent upon maintaining an appropriate level of expenses, which are subject to fluctuation. |
• Our ability to successfully integrate widely varied business lines can be impeded by systems and other technological limitations. |
• Our inability to successfully recover should we experience a disaster or other business continuity problem could cause material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability. |
• Certain of the portfolios we manage, including our emerging market portfolios, are vulnerable to market-specific political, economic or other risks, any of which may negatively impact our revenues and income. |
• Our revenues, earnings and income could be adversely affected if the terms of our management agreements are significantly altered or these agreements are terminated by the funds we advise. |
• Diverse and strong competition limits the interest rates that we can charge on consumer loans. |
• Future sales of our common stock in the public market, such as upon conversion of our outstanding convertible securities, could adversely affect our stock price. |
• Civil litigation arising out of or relating to previously settled governmental investigations or other matters, governmental or regulatory investigations and/or examinations and the legal risks associated with our business could adversely impact our assets under management, increase costs and negatively impact our profitability and/or our future financial results. |
• Our ability to meet cash needs depends upon certain factors, including our asset value, credit worthiness and the market value of our stock. |
###