Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products | Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products The Company consolidates SIPs, which consist of both VOEs and VIEs, when it has a controlling financial interest. The Company has a controlling financial interest when it owns a majority of the voting interest in a VOE or when it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. A VIE is an entity in which the equity investment holders have not contributed sufficient capital to finance its activities or they do not have defined rights and obligations normally associated with an equity investment. The Company ’ s VIEs are all investment entities, and its variable interests consist of its equity ownership interest in and certain investment management fees earned from these entities. The Company adopted new accounting guidance on October 1, 2016 that modifies the consolidation framework for certain investment entities and all limited partnerships. As a result of the modifications, certain SIPs changed from VOEs to VIEs and became subject to a lower threshold for consolidation. Additionally, there is now a single model to determine whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The Company is the primary beneficiary if it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE ’ s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of or right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Investment management fees earned from VIEs are excluded from the primary beneficiary determination if they are deemed to be at market and commensurate with service. The key estimates and assumptions used in the analyses include the amount of assets under management (“AUM”), investment management fee rates, the life of the investment product, prepayment rates and the discount rate. The new guidance did not change the consolidation framework for VOEs. Consolidated SIPs consist of mutual and other investment funds, limited partnerships and similar structures and CLOs, which are asset-backed financing entities collateralized by a pool of corporate debt securities. The Company consolidated 63 SIPs, including one CLO, as of March 31, 2017 and 40 SIPs, including three CLOs, as of September 30, 2016 . The CLO consolidated as of March 31, 2017 is in the process of liquidation, which is expected to be completed by September 30, 2017. Amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to combine amounts previously presented separately as consolidated SIPs and consolidated VIEs. The balances of consolidated SIPs included in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows: (in millions) March 31, September 30, 2016 Assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 488.5 $ 236.2 Receivables 273.7 47.9 Investments, at fair value 3,108.2 1,513.4 Other assets 0.9 1.4 Total Assets $ 3,871.3 $ 1,798.9 Liabilities Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 117.8 $ 65.2 Debt 306.1 682.2 Other liabilities 11.5 8.5 Total liabilities 435.4 755.9 Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests 1,659.8 61.1 Stockholders ’ Equity Franklin Resources, Inc.’s interests 1,521.6 414.1 Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests 254.5 567.8 Total stockholders’ equity 1,776.1 981.9 Total Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Stockholders ’ Equity $ 3,871.3 $ 1,798.9 The consolidated SIPs did not have a significant impact on net income attributable to the Company during the three and six months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 . The Company has no right to the consolidated SIPs’ assets, other than its direct equity investments in them and investment management fees earned from them. The debt holders of the consolidated SIPs have no recourse to the Company’s assets beyond the level of its direct investment, therefore the Company bears no other risks associated with the SIPs’ liabilities. SIPs are typically consolidated when the Company makes an initial investment in a newly launched investment entity. They are typically deconsolidated when the Company no longer has a controlling financial interest due to redemptions of its investment or increases in third-party investments. The Company’s investments in SIPs subsequent to deconsolidation are accounted for as trading or available-for-sale investment securities, or equity method or cost method investments depending on the structure of the SIP and the Company’s role and level of ownership. Investments Investments of consolidated SIPs consisted of the following: (in millions) March 31, September 30, Investment securities, trading $ 2,705.1 $ 287.8 Other debt securities 115.1 618.3 Other equity securities 288.0 607.3 Total $ 3,108.2 $ 1,513.4 Investment securities, trading consist of equity and debt securities that are traded in active markets. Other debt securities consist of debt securities of entities in emerging markets and corporate debt securities held by CLOs. Other equity securities consist of equity securities of entities in emerging markets and fund products. Investments in fund products for which fair value was estimated using reported net asset value (“NAV”) as a practical expedient were as follows: (in millions) Redemption Frequency March 31, September 30, Real estate and private equity funds Nonredeemable $ 147.0 $ 444.2 Hedge funds Monthly, quarterly or triennially — 1.8 Total $ 147.0 $ 446.0 The investments in real estate and private equity funds are expected to be returned through distributions as a result of liquidations of the funds’ underlying assets over a weighted-average period of 4.9 years and 3.2 years at March 31, 2017 and September 30, 2016 . The consolidated SIPs’ unfunded commitments to these funds totaled $2.0 million and $74.4 million at March 31, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , of which the Company was contractually obligated to fund $0.4 million and $2.2 million based on its ownership percentage in the SIPs. Fair Value Measurements Assets and liabilities of consolidated SIPs measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows: (in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 NAV as a Practical Expedient Total as of March 31, 2017 Assets Cash and cash equivalents of CLO $ 210.9 $ — $ — $ — $ 210.9 Receivables of CLO — 43.7 — — 43.7 Investments Equity securities 301.0 101.9 140.7 147.0 690.6 Debt securities 4.7 2,298.5 114.4 — 2,417.6 Total Assets Measured at Fair Value $ 516.6 $ 2,444.1 $ 255.1 $ 147.0 $ 3,362.8 Liabilities Other liabilities $ 0.5 $ 11.0 $ — $ — $ 11.5 (in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 NAV as a Practical Expedient Total as of September 30, 2016 Assets Cash and cash equivalents of CLOs $ 146.4 $ — $ — $ — $ 146.4 Receivables of CLOs — 23.6 — — 23.6 Investments Equity securities 155.4 0.5 160.3 446.0 762.2 Debt securities — 618.9 132.3 — 751.2 Total Assets Measured at Fair Value $ 301.8 $ 643.0 $ 292.6 $ 446.0 $ 1,683.4 Liabilities Other liabilities $ 0.1 $ 8.4 $ — $ — $ 8.5 Investments in fund products for which fair value was estimated using NAV as a practical expedient are not classified in the fair value hierarchy. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, or into or out of Level 3, during the six months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 . Changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows: 2017 2016 (in millions) Equity Debt Total Equity Debt Total for the three months ended March 31, Balance at beginning of period $ 131.6 $ 124.4 $ 256.0 $ 188.1 $ 123.9 $ 312.0 Realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in investment and other income, net 4.2 (14.2 ) (10.0 ) 6.1 (3.0 ) 3.1 Purchases 4.5 5.6 10.1 0.3 7.0 7.3 Sales — (1.9 ) (1.9 ) (30.1 ) (4.5 ) (34.6 ) Foreign exchange revaluation 0.4 0.5 0.9 2.4 2.0 4.4 Balance at End of Period $ 140.7 $ 114.4 $ 255.1 $ 166.8 $ 125.4 $ 292.2 Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income relating to assets held at end of period $ 4.2 $ (14.3 ) $ (10.1 ) $ 4.4 $ (3.3 ) $ 1.1 2017 2016 (in millions) Equity Debt Total Equity Debt Total for the six months ended March 31, Balance at beginning of period $ 160.3 $ 132.3 $ 292.6 $ 191.6 $ 130.2 $ 321.8 Adoption of new accounting guidance (45.4 ) (0.5 ) (45.9 ) — — — Realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in investment and other income, net 0.9 (14.5 ) (13.6 ) 5.0 (1.9 ) 3.1 Purchases 25.5 7.8 33.3 0.3 9.5 9.8 Sales (0.1 ) (8.3 ) (8.4 ) (30.1 ) (14.1 ) (44.2 ) Foreign exchange revaluation (0.5 ) (2.4 ) (2.9 ) — 1.7 1.7 Balance at End of Period $ 140.7 $ 114.4 $ 255.1 $ 166.8 $ 125.4 $ 292.2 Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income relating to assets held at end of period $ 0.8 $ (15.0 ) $ (14.2 ) $ 2.8 $ (2.9 ) $ (0.1 ) Valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in recurring Level 3 fair value measurements were as follows: (in millions) as of March 31, 2017 Fair Value Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Inputs Range (Weighted Average) Equity securities $ 93.8 Market comparable companies EBITDA multiple 6.0–12.3 (10.0) 32.0 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 5.7%–19.8% (14.8%) 14.9 Market pricing Price to earnings ratio 10.0 Debt securities 102.5 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 5.0%–50.0% (11.4%) Risk premium 0.0%–25.0% (8.2%) 11.9 Market pricing Private sale pricing $57 per $100 of par (in millions) as of September 30, 2016 Fair Value Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Inputs Range (Weighted Average) Equity securities $ 113.1 Market comparable companies EBITDA multiple 5.0–14.2 (10.3) Discount for lack of marketability 25.0%–50.0% (36.6%) 24.3 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 5.0%–19.0% (13.7%) 22.9 Market pricing Price to book value ratio 1.8–2.3 (2.0) Debt securities 119.7 Discounted cash flow Discount rate 6.0%–15.0% (10.4%) Risk premium 0.0%–28.0% (9.7%) EBITDA multiple 5.5 12.6 Market pricing Private sale pricing $57 per $100 of par Following are descriptions of the sensitivity of the Level 3 recurring fair value measurements to changes in the significant unobservable inputs presented in the above tables. For securities utilizing the market comparable companies valuation technique, a significant increase (decrease) in the EBITDA multiple in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. A significant increase (decrease) in the discount for lack of marketability in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The discount for lack of marketability used to determine fair value may include other factors such as liquidity or credit risk. For securities utilizing the discounted cash flow valuation technique, a significant increase (decrease) in the discount rate or risk premium in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the discount rate is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the risk premium. A significant increase (decrease) in the EBITDA multiple in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. For securities utilizing a market pricing valuation technique, a significant increase (decrease) in the price to earnings ratio, private sale pricing or price to book value ratio would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Financial instruments of consolidated SIPs that were not measured at fair value were as follows: (in millions) Fair Value Level March 31, 2017 September 30, 2016 Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value Financial Assets Cash and cash equivalents 1 $ 277.6 $ 277.6 $ 89.8 $ 89.8 Financial Liabilities Debt of CLOs 1 2 or 3 251.8 240.5 607.2 594.5 Other debt 3 54.3 54.2 75.0 74.6 _________________ 1 Substantially all is Level 2. Debt Debt of consolidated SIPs consisted of the following: March 31, 2017 September 30, 2016 (in millions) Amount Effective Interest Rate Amount Effective Interest Rate Debt of CLOs $ 251.8 3.41% $ 607.2 2.24% Other debt 54.3 5.59% 75.0 4.79% Total $ 306.1 $ 682.2 The debt of CLOs had floating interest rates ranging from 2.48% to 10.46% at March 31, 2017 , and from 1.02% to 10.16% at September 30, 2016 . The debt matures in fiscal year 2024 at March 31, 2017 , and from fiscal years 2018 to 2024 at September 30, 2016 . The other debt had fixed and floating interest rates ranging from 2.36% to 6.38% at March 31, 2017 , and from 2.36% to 6.19% at September 30, 2016 . The debt maturities ranged from fiscal years 2017 to 2019 at both March 31, 2017 and September 30, 2016 . At March 31, 2017 , maturities for debt of consolidated SIPs were as follows: (in millions) Carrying Amount for the fiscal years ending September 30, 2017 $ 21.2 2018 5.2 2019 27.9 2020 — 2021 — Thereafter 251.8 Total $ 306.1 The debt of the CLO consolidated at March 31, 2017 will be repaid as part of the liquidation of the CLO. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests Changes in redeemable noncontrolling interests of consolidated SIPs were as follows: (in millions) for the six months ended March 31, 2017 2016 Balance at beginning of period $ 61.1 $ 59.6 Adoption of new accounting guidance 824.7 — Net loss (3.2 ) (0.5 ) Net subscriptions and other 349.2 68.6 Net consolidations (deconsolidations) 428.0 (90.9 ) Balance at End of Period $ 1,659.8 $ 36.8 Collateralized Loan Obligations The Company recognized $0.9 million of net losses and $0.2 million of net gains during the three and six months ended March 31, 2017 , and $0.7 million and $0.8 million of net gains during the three and six months ended March 31, 2016 related to its own economic interests in the CLOs. The unpaid principal balance and fair value of the investments of the CLOs were as follows: (in millions) March 31, September 30, Unpaid principal balance $ 0.7 $ 496.0 Difference between unpaid principal balance and fair value 0.2 (8.2 ) Fair Value $ 0.9 $ 487.8 There were no investments 90 days or more past due at March 31, 2017 or September 30, 2016 . The unpaid principal balance of the debt of the CLOs was $237.2 million and $653.8 million at March 31, 2017 and September 30, 2016 . |