Proposed Merger with Cintas Corporation | Proposed Merger with Cintas Corporation On August 15, 2016, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Cintas and Merger Sub, pursuant to which, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, the Merger will be consumated. As a result of the Merger, Merger Sub will cease to exist and the Company will survive as a wholly owned subsidiary of Cintas. The Merger is currently expected to close not later than the second quarter of calendar year 2017, subject to customary closing conditions, including, without limitation, (i) the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act, and the requisite approval from the Competition Bureau of Canada pursuant to the Canada Competition Act being obtained and (ii) the requisite shareholder approval being received. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, upon the consummation of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of common stock of the Company (“Class A Common Stock”), issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than dissenting shares and shares held by the Company or any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company or Cintas, Merger Sub or any other direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Cintas) will be converted into the right to receive $ 97.50 in cash. The Merger Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and covenants that we must observe, including certain interim operating covenants that may restrict our operations during the pendency of the Merger, subject to certain exceptions. If the Merger is completed, certain change of control and severance provisions of our compensation arrangements will be triggered at the Effective Time. In addition, the Merger Agreement also contains certain termination rights that may require us to pay Cintas a $60,000 termination fee. For additional details of the Merger and the terms thereof, refer to the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is included as Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2016. During the three months ended October 1, 2016 , we incurred costs of $6,056 related to the pending Merger for employee-related expenses, professional services and regulatory fees. Many of these expenses are non-deductible for income tax purposes. The after-tax effect of these items is $4,737 which represents $0.24 per share. On September 29, 2016, each of the Company and Cintas received a request for additional information and documentary material, commonly referred to as a “second request,” from the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), pursuant to the HSR Act, in connection with the Merger. A “second request” is a routine part of the FTC’s review of proposed transactions. The FTC’s “second request” has the effect of extending the waiting period applicable to the consummation of the Merger until the 30th day after substantial compliance by the Company and Cintas with the “second request,” unless the waiting period is extended voluntarily by the parties or terminated sooner by the FTC. On October 12, 2016, each of the Company and Cintas received a supplemental information request, commonly referred to as SIR, from the Competition Bureau of Canada, pursuant to the Canada Competition Act, in connection with the Merger. SIR is part of the prescribed process for review of proposed transactions in Canada and has the effect of extending the waiting period applicable to the consummation of the Merger until the 30th day after compliance by the Company and Cintas with the SIR. Litigation Related to the Merger On September 26, 2016, a putative shareholder class action lawsuit, captioned Klein v. G&K Services, Incorporated, et al., Civil Action No. 16-cv-03198 (DWF) (KMM), was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, against the Company and the members of the Company's Board of Directors. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and alleges, among other things, that the Company’s proxy statement contains false and misleading statements and/or omits material information. The complaint seeks, among other things, injunctive relief preventing consumption of the Merger, monetary damages and an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses. On October 28, 2016, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the SEC making supplemental disclosures to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on September 29, 2016. Also on October 28, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation, and the court entered an order, dismissing this action with prejudice as to the named plaintiff and without prejudice as to all other putative class members, with the court retaining jurisdiction over the action for the purpose of considering any application by plaintiff’s counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses. |