(1) We currently maintain a $5.0 million senior revolving credit facility with the Branch Banking and Trust Company. Indebtedness under this credit facility accrues interest at BB&T's prime rate less one eighth. The maturity date under this agreement is January 2008. We have collateralized the credit facility with all our assets. |
|
(2) We lease various pieces of equipment that qualify for capital lease treatment. These lease arrangements require monthly lease payments expiring at various dates through May 2008. |
|
(3) We lease the Louisville, Kentucky facility from K&R, LLC, the sole member of which is Harry Kletter, our chief executive officer, under an operating lease expiring December 2007. We have monthly rental payments of $42,106 through December 2007. In the event of a change of control, the monthly payments become $62,500. |
|
We also lease a management services operations facility and various pieces of equipment in Dallas, Texas for which monthly payments of $2,525 are due through September 2007. |
Long-term debt increased $1,500,000 as of March 31, 2006 compared to no long term debt December 31, 2005. |
|
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
|
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment," which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and amends SFAS No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows." Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an option. The provisions of Statement No. 123(R) are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. |
|
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, we historically accounted for stock option grants in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and, as the strike price of options issued was equal to grant date fair value, we did not recognize compensation cost for employee stock option issuances. We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method. The adoption had no impact on us as the outstanding options were fully vested. |
|
SFAS No. 154,Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements, and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. |
|
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
|
Fluctuating commodity prices affect market risk in our recycling segment. We mitigate this risk by selling our product on a monthly contract basis. Each month we negotiate selling prices for all commodities. Based on these monthly agreements, we determine purchase prices based on a margin needed to cover processing and administrative expenses. |
|
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our floating rate borrowings. As of March 31, 2006, variable rate borrowings consisted of outstanding borrowings of $1.5 million under our credit agreement. Borrowings on our credit agreement bear interest at the prime rate. Any increase in prime rate would lead to higher interest expense. We do not have any interest rate swaps or caps in place, which would mitigate our exposure to fluctuations in the interest rate on this indebtedness. Based on our average anticipated borrowings under our credit agreement in fiscal 2006, a hypothetical increase or decrease in the prime rate by 1% would increase or decrease interest expense on our variable borrowings by approximately $15,000 per year, with a corresponding change in cash flows. |
|
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
|
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. |
|
Based on the evaluation of the ISA Chief Executive Officer and the ISA Chief Financial Officer of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2006, it has been concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the purposes contemplated by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d -- 15(e) promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
(b) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. |
|
There have been no significant changes to ISA's internal controls or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, these controls over financial reporting subsequent to March 31, 2006. |