Goodrich 10-Q 2007 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to                    

Commission file number 1-892

GOODRICH CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York
(State of Incorporation)

Four Coliseum Centre
2730 West Tyvola Road
Charlotte, North Carolina
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) 34-0252680
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



28217
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (704) 423-7000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

     Large Accelerated Filer þ                    Accelerated Filer o                    Non-Accelerated Filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of June 30, 2007, there were 125,244,228 of common stock outstanding (excluding 14,000,000 shares held by a wholly owned subsidiary). There is only one class of common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1. Financial Statements.
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
	Item 1A. Risk Factors.
	Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
	Item 6. Exhibits.
SIGNATURE
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit 10.1
Exhibit 10.2
Exhibit 10.3
Exhibit 15
Exhibit 31
Exhibit 32

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Goodrich Corporation as of June 30, 2007, and the related condensed consolidated statement of income for the three-month and six-months period ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Goodrich Corporation as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, not presented herein; and in our report dated February 19, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP  

Charlotte, North Carolina
July 26, 2007

2

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Sales	$	1,622.4		$	1,483.2		$	3,210.9		$	2,907.0
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of sales		1,139.1			1,088.0			2,272.8			2,131.9
Selling and administrative costs		261.1			227.3			516.9			464.5
		1,400.2			1,315.3			2,789.7			2,596.4
Operating Income		222.2			167.9			421.2			310.6
Interest expense		(30.8	)		(31.3	)		(62.4	)		(63.3	)
Interest income		1.5			1.1			3.3			2.2
Other income (expense) — net		(17.7	)		(20.9	)		(33.3	)		(31.5	)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		175.2			116.8			328.8			218.0
Income tax benefit (expense)		(50.1	)		(35.7	)		(103.9	)		63.4
Income From Continuing Operations		125.1			81.1			224.9			281.4
Income (loss) from discontinued operations — net of income taxes		(0.3	)		(0.1	)		(0.3	)		0.5
Cumulative effect of change in accounting		—			—			—			0.6
Net Income	$	124.8		$	81.0		$	224.6		$	282.5
Basic Earnings Per Share
Continuing operations	$	1.00		$	0.65		$	1.79		$	2.27
Discontinued operations		—			—			—			—
Cumulative effect of change in accounting		—			—			—			0.01
Net Income	$	1.00		$	0.65		$	1.79		$	2.28
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Continuing operations	$	0.98		$	0.64		$	1.76		$	2.23
Discontinued operations		—			—			—			—
Cumulative effect of change in accounting		—			—			—			0.01
Net Income	$	0.98		$	0.64		$	1.76		$	2.24
Dividends Declared Per Common Share	$	0.20		$	0.20		$	0.40		$	0.40

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

3

CONSENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2007			2006
	(Dollars in millions,
	except share amounts)
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	213.4		$	201.3
Accounts and notes receivable, less allowances for doubtful receivables ($19.6 at June 30, 2007 and $19.8 at December 31, 2006)		1,039.9			912.4
Inventories — net		1,749.6			1,551.8
Deferred income taxes		232.8			250.3
Prepaid expenses and other assets		83.0			91.7
Total Current Assets		3,318.7			3,007.5
Property, plant and equipment — net		1,351.5			1,327.7
Prepaid pension		2.6			2.3
Goodwill		1,350.7			1,341.3
Identifiable intangible assets — net		466.9			472.0
Deferred income taxes		43.4			35.5
Other assets		736.8			714.9
Total Assets	$	7,270.6		$	6,901.2
Current Liabilities
Short-term debt	$	10.4		$	11.8
Accounts payable		661.1			584.6
Accrued expenses		867.6			819.0
Income taxes payable		102.6			212.5
Deferred income taxes		3.3			3.3
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		1.1			1.4
Total Current Liabilities		1,646.1			1,632.6
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		1,720.5			1,721.7
Pension obligations		535.0			612.1
Postretirement benefits other than pensions		371.2			379.1
Long-term income taxes payable		148.5			—
Deferred income taxes		60.5			57.2
Other non-current liabilities		533.0			521.8
Commitments and contingent liabilities		—			—
Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock — $5 par value
Authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued 141,455,931 shares at June 30, 2007 and 139,041,884 shares at December 31, 2006 (excluding 14,000,000 shares held by a wholly owned subsidiary)		707.3			695.2
Additional paid-in capital		1,401.6			1,313.3
Income retained in the business		850.6			666.5
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(151.8	)		(260.8	)
Common stock held in treasury, at cost (16,211,703 shares at June 30, 2007 and 14,090,913 shares at December 31, 2006)		(551.9	)		(437.5	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity		2,255.8			1,976.7
Total Liabilities And Shareholders’ Equity	$	7,270.6		$	6,901.2

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

4

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2007			2006
	(Dollars in millions)
Operating Activities
Net income	$	224.6		$	282.5
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
(Income) loss from discontinued operations		0.3			(0.5	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting		—			(0.6	)
Restructuring and consolidation:
Expenses		0.8			3.6
Payments		(2.1	)		(3.6	)
Pension and postretirement benefits:
Expenses		61.3			73.9
Contributions and benefit payments		(114.7	)		(32.3	)
Asset impairments		—			0.9
Depreciation and amortization		124.6			117.6
Excess tax benefits related to share-based payment arrangements		(9.6	)		(4.0	)
Share-based compensation expense		32.2			28.6
Loss on exchange and extinguishment of debt		—			1.0
Deferred income taxes		(20.3	)		(19.4	)
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures:
Receivables		(113.0	)		(134.3	)
Change in receivables sold, net		—			(97.1	)
Inventories, net of pre-production and excess-over-average		(104.5	)		(100.3	)
Pre-production and excess-over-average inventories		(64.3	)		(52.5	)
Other current assets		9.1			11.9
Accounts payable		66.2			64.7
Accrued expenses		32.0			(21.1	)
Income taxes payable		76.2			(38.3	)
Other non-current assets and liabilities		(1.1	)		(25.8	)
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities		197.7			54.9
Investing Activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(96.2	)		(95.1	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		0.7			1.4
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities		(95.5	)		(93.7	)
Financing Activities
Increase (decrease) in short-term debt, net		(1.8	)		8.0
Loss on exchange or extinguishment of debt		—			(3.5	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		—			512.8
Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		(0.7	)		(534.0	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		68.1			46.1
Purchases of treasury stock		(113.3	)		(1.9	)
Dividends		(50.5	)		(49.8	)
Excess tax benefits related to share-based payment arrangements		9.6			4.0
Distributions to minority interest holders		(2.5	)		(1.9	)
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities		(91.1	)		(20.2	)
Discontinued Operations
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(0.7	)		11.2
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		—			—
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations		(0.7	)		11.2
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		1.7			4.9
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		12.1			(42.9	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		201.3			251.3
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	213.4		$	208.4

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

5

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 1. Basis of Interim Financial Statement Preparation and Use of Estimates

The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Goodrich Corporation and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. Unless indicated otherwise or the context requires, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Goodrich” or “Company” refer to Goodrich Corporation and its subsidiaries. The Company believes that all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain amounts in prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Operating results for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the twelve months ending December 31, 2007. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Unless otherwise noted, disclosures pertain to the Company’s continuing operations.

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts recognized. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed and updated regularly as new information becomes available.

Note 2. New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits an entity to elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for many financial assets and liabilities. Entities electing the fair value option would be required to recognize changes in fair value in earnings. Entities electing the fair value option would also be required to distinguish, on the face of the statement of financial position, the fair value of assets and liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected and similar assets and liabilities measured using another measurement attribute. SFAS 159 is effective for the fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adjustment to reflect the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount would be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the date of initial adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 159 on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

6

Fair Value Measurement

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for the fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 157 on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Accounting for Income Tax Benefits on Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards

In July 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Tax Force No. 06-11 “Accounting for the Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payments Awards” (EITF 06-11). EITF 06-11 requires companies to recognize the tax benefits of dividends on unvested share-based payments in equity and reclassify those tax benefits from additional paid-in capital (APIC) to the income statement when the related award is forfeited or no longer expected to vest. The amount reclassified is limited to the amount of the Company’s APIC pool balance on the reclassification date. EITF 06-11 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of EITF 06-11 on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Associated with Split-Dollar Life Insurance

In September 2006, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefits Associated with Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (EITF 06-4) and in March 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 06-10, “Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.” EITF 06-4 requires deferred compensation or postretirement benefit aspects of an endorsement-type split-dollar life insurance arrangement to be recognized as a liability by the employer and states the obligation is not effectively settled by the purchase of a life insurance policy. The liability for future benefits should be recognized based on the substantive agreement with the employee, which may be either to provide a future death benefit or to pay for the future cost of the life insurance. EITF 06-10 provides recognition guidance for postretirement benefit liabilities related to collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangements, as well as recognition and measurement of the associated asset on the basis of the terms of the collateral assignment split - -dollar life insurance arrangement. EITF 06-4 and EITF 06-10 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of EITF 06-4 and EITF 06-10 on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

7

Note 3. Business Segment Information

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company realigned its businesses within its three reporting segments. Under the new organizational structure, several businesses were combined into larger strategic business units and several businesses were moved into different segments from the prior reporting structure. The segment reporting structure was designed to accelerate the Company’s focus on operational excellence and to further enhance the Company’s alignment with its key product and technology areas. Along with the segment realignment, the results of the Company’s customer services business were allocated to the business that manufactures the product or system. Additionally, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation costs that are not directly associated with a specific business and a pension curtailment charge were reported as a component of corporate administrative expense. Prior period results have been reclassified to conform to the new organizational structure. Effective January 1, 2007, the Company’s three business segments are as follows.

• The Actuation and Landing Systems segment provides systems, components and related services pertaining to aircraft taxi, take-off, flight control, landing and stopping, as well as engine components, including fuel delivery systems and rotating assemblies, and airframe maintenance.

• The Nacelles and Interior Systems segment produces products and provides maintenance, repair and overhaul services associated with aircraft engines, including thrust reversers, cowlings, nozzles and their components, and aircraft interior products, including slides, seats, cargo and lighting systems.

• The Electronic Systems segment produces a wide array of systems and components that provide flight performance measurements, flight management, fuel controls, electrical systems, and control and safety data, as well as reconnaissance and surveillance systems.

8

The Company measures each reporting segments’ profit based upon operating income. Accordingly, the Company does not allocate net interest expense, other income (expense) — net and income taxes to its reporting segments. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those for the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(Dollars in millions)
Sales:
Actuation and Landing Systems	$	635.3		$	561.9		$	1,244.5		$	1,100.3
Nacelles and Interior Systems		533.6			514.9			1,080.5			1,008.7
Electronic Systems		453.5			406.4			885.9			798.0
	$	1,622.4		$	1,483.2		$	3,210.9		$	2,907.0
Intersegment sales:
Actuation and Landing Systems	$	6.7		$	6.4		$	13.4		$	12.6
Nacelles and Interior Systems		4.9			4.6			9.3			8.2
Electronic Systems		7.5			7.0			17.1			16.6
	$	19.1		$	18.0		$	39.8		$	37.4
Operating income:
Actuation and Landing Systems	$	61.0		$	39.3		$	110.9		$	62.6
Nacelles and Interior Systems		135.3			114.8			261.6			219.6
Electronic Systems		62.6			54.1			117.4			97.0
		258.9			208.2			489.9			379.2
Corporate general and administrative expenses		(32.7	)		(23.9	)		(61.4	)		(51.1	)
ERP implementation costs		(4.0	)		(5.5	)		(7.3	)		(6.6	)
Pension curtailment		—			(10.9	)		—			(10.9	)
Total operating income	$	222.2		$	167.9		$	421.2		$	310.6

	June 30,		December 31,
	2007		2006
Total assets:
Actuation and Landing Systems	$	2,354.6	$	2,182.0
Nacelles and Interior Systems		2,311.9		2,150.1
Electronic Systems		1,955.5		1,904.7
Corporate		648.6		664.4
	$	7,270.6	$	6,901.2

Note 4. Other Income (Expense) — Net

Other Income (Expense) — Net consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(Dollars in millions)
Retiree health care expenses related to previously owned businesses	$	(4.4	)	$	(4.2	)	$	(9.2	)	$	(9.0	)
Loss on exchange and extinguishment of debt		—			(4.8	)		—			(4.8	)
Expenses related to previously owned businesses		(5.6	)		(6.6	)		(11.3	)		(8.0	)
Minority interest and equity in affiliated companies		(7.2	)		(3.6	)		(12.8	)		(7.4	)
Other — net		(0.5	)		(1.7	)		—			(2.3	)
Other income (expense) — net	$	(17.7	)	$	(20.9	)	$	(33.3	)	$	(31.5	)

“Expenses related to previously owned businesses” primarily relates to litigation and costs to remediate environmental issues.

9

Note 5. Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations were as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(Dollars in millions)						(Dollars in millions)
Sales	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Operating income	$	(0.5	)	$	(0.1	)	$	(0.5	)	$	0.9
Income tax benefit (expense)	$	0.2		$	—		$	0.2		$	(0.4	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	(0.3	)	$	(0.1	)	$	(0.3	)	$	0.5

Income from discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006 included insurance settlements with several insurers relating to the recovery of environmental remediation costs at a former plant previously recorded as a discontinued operation, net of related expenses.

Note 6. Earnings Per Share

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for income from continuing operations is as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
	(In millions, except per share amounts)
Numerator
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share — income from continuing operations	$	125.1	$	81.1	$	224.9	$	281.4
Denominator
Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted-average shares		125.3		124.5		125.3		124.0
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options, employee stock purchase plan, restricted shares and restricted share units		2.5		1.8		2.4		1.9
Other deferred compensation shares		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1
		2.6		1.9		2.5		2.0
Denominator for diluted earnings per share — adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversion		127.9		126.4		127.8		126.0
Per share income from continuing operations
Basic	$	1.00	$	0.65	$	1.79	$	2.27
Diluted	$	0.98	$	0.64	$	1.76	$	2.23

At June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company had approximately 5.1 million and 6.3 million outstanding stock options, respectively. Stock options are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation using the treasury stock method, unless the effect of including the stock options would be anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, diluted earnings per share excludes 650 stock options that are anti-dilutive, due to the current market price of the Company’s stock being less than the exercise price, and 715,000 of stock options, that vest solely based upon a market condition. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, approximately 33,000 anti-dilutive stock options were excluded from diluted earnings per share.

During the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company issued approximately 2.4 million and 1.7 million, respectively, of shares of common stock pursuant to stock option exercises and other stock-based compensation plans.

10

During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company repurchased approximately 2 million shares under the share repurchase program that was approved by the Board of Directors on October 24, 2006.

Note 7. Sale of Receivables

Prior to June 30, 2006, the Company had in place a variable rate trade receivables securitization program pursuant to which the Company could sell receivables up to a maximum of $140 million.
Effective June 30, 2006, the Company terminated the variable rate trade receivable securitization program and repaid the balance of $97.1 million.

Note 8. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2007			2006
	(Dollars in millions)
FIFO or average cost (which approximates current costs):
Finished products	$	342.7		$	334.9
In-process		989.1			880.9
Raw materials and supplies		497.2			416.0
		1,829.0			1,631.8
Less:
Reserve to reduce certain inventories to LIFO basis		(49.5	)		(48.5	)
Progress payments and advances		(29.9	)		(31.5	)
Total	$	1,749.6		$	1,551.8

In-process inventory includes $463.5 million and $399 million as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, for the following: (1) pre-production and excess-over-average inventory accounted for under long-term contract accounting; and (2) engineering costs recoverable under long-term contractual arrangements. The June 30, 2007 balance of $463.5 million includes $267 million related to Boeing 787 contracts.

The Company uses the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of valuing inventory at certain locations. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time.

Note 9. Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment are as follows:

			Business
	Balance		Combinations		Foreign		Balance
	December 31,		Completed or		Currency		June 30,
	2006		Finalized		Translation		2007
	(Dollars in millions)
Actuation and Landing Systems	$	326.3	$	—	$	4.7	$	331.0
Nacelles and Interior Systems		422.9		—		1.9		424.8
Electronic Systems		592.1		—		2.8		594.9
	$	1,341.3	$	—	$	9.4	$	1,350.7

11

Note 10. Financing Arrangements

The Company has a $500 million committed global syndicated revolving credit facility. In May 2007, the Company and the lenders agreed to amend the facility, which included extending the maturity of the facility by one year from May 2011 to May 2012. Borrowings under this facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at rates tied to the agent bank’s prime rate or, for U.S. Dollar or Great Britain Pounds Sterling borrowings, the London interbank offered rate and for Euro Dollar borrowings, the EURIBO rate, the amount borrowed, and the Company’s public debt rating by Standard & Poor, Moody’s and Fitch.

At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, there were $34.9 million in borrowings and $20.4 million in letters of credit outstanding under the facility. The level of unused borrowing capacity under the Company’s committed syndicated revolving credit facility varies from time to time depending in part upon its compliance with financial and other covenants set forth in the related agreement, including the consolidated net worth requirement and maximum leverage ratio. The Company is currently in compliance with all such covenants. As of June 30, 2007, the Company had borrowing capacity under this facility of $444.7 million, after reductions for borrowings and letters of credit outstanding under the facility.

At June 30, 2007, the Company also maintained $75 million of uncommitted domestic money market facilities and $165.8 million of uncommitted and committed foreign working capital facilities with various banks to meet short-term borrowing requirements. At June 30, 2007, there were $10.4 million borrowings outstanding under these facilities. At December 31, 2006, there were $11.8 million outstanding borrowings under these facilities. These credit facilities are provided by a small number of commercial banks that also provide the Company with committed credit through the syndicated revolving credit facility described above and with various cash management, trust and other services.

The Company’s committed syndicated revolving credit facility contains various restrictive covenants that, among other things, place limitations on the payment of cash dividends and the repurchase of the Company’s common stock. Under the most restrictive of these covenants, $1,269.3 million of income retained in the business and additional paid in capital was free from such limitations at June 30, 2007.

Lease Commitments

The Company finances certain of its office and manufacturing facilities as well as machinery and equipment, including corporate aircraft, under various committed lease arrangements provided by financial institutions.

Certain of these arrangements allow the Company to claim a deduction for tax depreciation on the assets, rather than the lessor, and allow the Company to lease aircraft and equipment having a maximum unamortized value of $150 million at June 30, 2007. These leases are priced at a spread over LIBOR and are extended periodically, unless notice is provided, through the end of the lease terms. At June 30, 2007, future payments under these leases total $15.7 million through the end of the lease terms. At June 30, 2007, the Company had guarantees of residual values on lease obligations of $32 million. The Company is obligated to either purchase or remarket the leased assets at the end of the lease term.

Future minimum lease payments under the standard operating leases approximated $127.2 million at June 30, 2007.

12

Note 11. Pensions and Postretirement Benefits

Pensions

The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit costs (income) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. The net periodic benefit costs (income) for divested or discontinued operations retained by the Company are included in the amounts below.

	U.S. Plans						U.K. Plans						Other Non-U.S. Plans
	Three Months						Three Months						Three Months
	Ended						Ended						Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006			2007			2006
	(Dollars in millions)
Service cost	$	12.2		$	12.2		$	7.0		$	7.2		$	1.2		$	1.0
Interest cost		40.5			37.9			9.5			8.2			1.3			1.3
Expected rate of return on plan assets		(49.8	)		(43.5	)		(15.0	)		(12.8	)		(1.5	)		(1.2	)
Amortization of prior service cost		1.9			2.5			(0.2	)		(0.5	)		—			—
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss		17.1			10.2			—			(0.3	)		0.2			0.3
Periodic benefit cost (income)		21.9			19.3			1.3			1.8			1.2			1.4
Settlements and curtailments (gain) loss		—			10.9			—			—			—			—
Special termination benefit charge (credit)		—			—			—			0.2			—			—
Net benefit cost (income)	$	21.9		$	30.2		$	1.3		$	2.0		$	1.2		$	1.4

	U.S. Plans						U.K. Plans						Other Non-U.S. Plans
	Six Months						Six Months						Six Months
	Ended						Ended						Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006			2007			2006
	(Dollars in millions)
Service cost	$	23.5		$	25.9		$	14.5		$	14.4		$	2.3		$	2.1
Interest cost		80.5			76.2			19.5			16.3			2.6			2.5
Expected rate of return on plan assets		(98.6	)		(89.4	)		(29.8	)		(24.6	)		(2.9	)		(2.6	)
Amortization of prior service cost		3.8			4.7			(0.5	)		(0.5	)		—			—
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss		32.7			26.2			—			—			0.5			0.6
Periodic benefit cost (income)		41.9			43.6			3.7			5.6			2.5			2.6
Settlements and curtailments (gain) loss		—			10.9			—			—			—			—
Special termination benefit charge (credit)		—			—			—			0.2			—			—
Net benefit cost (income)	$	41.9		$	54.5		$	3.7		$	5.8		$	2.5		$	2.6

The following table provides the weighted-average assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit costs (income).

	U.S. Plans		U.K. Plans		Other Non-U.S. Plans
	Three and Six Months Ended		Three and Six Months Ended		Three and Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2007	2006	2007	2006	2007	2006
Discount rate 2007	5.89%	N.A.	5.00%	N.A.	4.88%	N.A.
Discount rate 1/1/06-4/10/06	N.A.	5.64%	N.A.	4.75%	N.A.	4.76%
Discount rate 4/11/06-5/18/06	N.A.	6.01%	N.A.	4.75%	N.A.	4.76%
Discount rate 5/19/06-6/30/06	N.A.	6.34%	N.A.	4.75%	N.A.	4.76%
Expected long-term return on assets	9.00%	9.00%	8.50%	8.50%	8.28%	8.34%
Rate of compensation increase	3.86%	3.63%	3.50%	3.50%	3.36%	3.34%

Two significant events occurred in the second quarter of 2006 which required remeasurement of plan obligations and assets for the U.S. pension plans. Assumptions were reevaluated at April 11, 2006 to remeasure plan obligations and assets in connection with the Company’s definitive agreement to divest the turbomachinery products business (which agreement was subsequently terminated). On May 19, 2006, pension assumptions were again reevaluated to remeasure plan obligations and assets due to the closure of the election period for the Company’s Retirement Choice Program.

13

Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

The following table sets forth the components of net periodic postretirement benefit costs for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. Other postretirement benefits (OPEB) related to divested and discontinued operations retained by the Company are included in the amounts below.

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2007			2006		2007			2006
				(Dollars in millions)
Service cost	$	0.5		$	0.7	$	1.0		$	0.7
Interest cost		5.6			5.2		11.5			9.8
Amortization of prior service cost		(0.1	)		—		(0.1	)		(0.1	)
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss		(0.7	)		0.8		0.8			0.6
Periodic benefit cost		5.3			6.7		13.2			11.0
Settlements and curtailments (gain) loss		—			—		—			—
Special termination benefit charge (credit)		—			—		—			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	5.3		$	6.7	$	13.2		$	11.0

The following table provides the assumptions used to determine the net periodic postretirement benefit costs.

	Three and Six Months Ended June 30,
	2007	2006
Discount rate	5.79%	5.55%
Healthcare trend rate	9% in 2007 to 5% in 2013	9% in 2006 to 5% in 2010

Note 12. Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Total comprehensive income consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2007		2006			2007		2006
			(Dollars in millions)
Net income	$	124.8	$	81.0		$	224.6	$	282.5
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during period		46.8		64.1			58.2		75.9
Pension/OPEB liability adjustments during the period		9.9		109.3			26.5		109.3
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedges		32.6		46.5			24.3		50.1
Gain (loss) on certain investments		—		(0.1	)		—		(0.1	)
Total comprehensive income	$	214.1	$	300.8		$	333.6	$	517.7

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2007			2006
	(Dollars in millions)
Cumulative unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses)	$	306.6		$	248.4
Pension/OPEB liability adjustments		(537.1	)		(563.6	)
Accumulated gains (losses) on cash flow hedges		78.7			54.4
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(151.8	)	$	(260.8	)

The pension/OPEB liability amounts above are net of deferred taxes of $337.6 million and $341.8 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The accumulated gain on cash flow hedges above is net of deferred taxes of $42 million and $30.1 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. No income taxes are provided on foreign currency translation gains as foreign earnings are considered permanently invested.

14

Note 13. Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was 28.6%. Significant items that had an impact on the effective tax rate included tax benefit from domestic production activities which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 1 percentage point, domestic and foreign tax credits which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 4 percentage points, earnings in foreign jurisdictions taxed at rates different from the statutory U.S. federal rate which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 3 percentage points, an elimination of certain valuation allowances against the net operating losses of a foreign subsidiary which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 6 percentage points, deemed repatriation of non-U.S. earnings which increased the effective tax rate by approximately 2 percentage points, adjustments to reserves for tax contingencies, including interest thereon (net of related tax benefit), which increased the effective tax rate by approximately 2 percentage points and state income taxes (net of related tax benefit) which increased the effective tax rate by approximately 3 percentage points.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized approximately a $10 million increase to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings with a corresponding decrease to reserves for tax contingencies. The Company had a $209.2 million liability recorded for unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007, which included interest and penalties of $118 million. The Company continues to record interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The total amount of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would have affected the effective tax rate was $163 million. At June 30, 2007, the Company had a $225.7 million liability recorded for unrecognized tax benefits, which includes interest and penalties of $122.9 million. The total amount of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would have affected the effective tax rate was $177.8 million.

The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. state jurisdictions and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local examinations for years before 2000 and non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002. The current Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examination cycle began in 2005 and involves the taxable years ended December 31, 2000 through December 31, 2004. The examination team has substantially completed field work. There were numerous issues raised by the IRS as part of the current examination, including, but not limited to, transfer pricing, research and development credits, foreign tax credits, tax accounting for long-term contracts, tax accounting for inventory, depreciation, amortization and the proper timing for certain other deductions for income tax purposes. The Company believes that agreement could be reached with the IRS on most of these issues during 2007. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the current IRS examination. However, it is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months some portion of previously unrecognized tax benefits could be recognized which could be material to the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.

15

Note 14. Contingencies

General

There are pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries various claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings, arising from the ordinary course of business, including commercial, product liability, asbestos and environmental matters, which seek remedies or damages. Although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company believes that any liability that may finally be determined with respect to commercial and non-asbestos product liability claims should not have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow. From time to time, the Company is also involved in legal proceedings as a plaintiff involving tax, contract, patent protection, environmental and other matters. Gain contingencies, if any, are recognized when they are realized. Legal costs are expensed as incurred.

Environmental

The Company is subject to various domestic and international environmental laws and regulations which may require that the Company investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites associated with past and present operations, including divested sites for which the Company has contractual obligations relating to the environmental conditions of such site. At certain sites, the Company has been identified as a potentially responsible party under the federal Superfund laws and comparable state laws. The Company is currently involved in the investigation and remediation of a number of sites under these laws.

Estimates of the Company’s environmental liabilities are based on current facts, laws, regulations and technology, and take into consideration the Company’s prior experience and professional judgment of the Company’s environmental specialists in consultation with outside environmental specialists, when necessary. Estimates of the Company’s environmental liabilities are further subject to uncertainties regarding the nature and extent of site contamination, the range of remediation alternatives available, evolving remediation standards, imprecise engineering evaluations and cost estimates, the extent of corrective actions that may be required and the number and financial condition of other potentially responsible parties, as well as the extent of their responsibility for the remediation.

Accordingly, as investigation and remediation proceed, it is likely that adjustments in the Company’s accruals will be necessary to reflect new information. The amounts of any such adjustments could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and cash flows in a given period. Based on currently available information, however, the Company does not believe that future environmental costs in excess of those accrued with respect to sites for which the Company has been identified as a potentially responsible party are likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition. There can be no assurance, however, that future developments will not have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or cash flows in a given period.

16

Environmental liabilities are recorded when the liability is probable and the costs are reasonably estimable, which generally is not later than at completion of a feasibility study or when the Company has recommended a remedy or has committed to an appropriate plan of action. The liabilities are reviewed periodically and, as investigation and remediation proceed, adjustments are made as necessary. Liabilities for losses from environmental remediation obligations do not consider the effects of inflation and anticipated expenditures are not discounted to their present value. The liabilities are not reduced by possible recoveries from insurance carriers or other third parties, but do reflect anticipated allocations among potentially responsible parties at federal Superfund sites or similar state-managed sites and an assessment of the likelihood that such parties will fulfill their obligations at such sites.

The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet included an accrued liability for environmental remediation obligations of $71.5 million and $74.3 million at June 30, 2007 and at December 31, 2006, respectively. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, $16.2 million and $17.7 million, respectively, of the accrued liability for environmental remediation were included in current liabilities as accrued expenses. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, $30.1 million and $31 million, respectively, was associated with ongoing operations and $41.4 million and $43.3 million, respectively, was associated with previously owned businesses.

The Company expects that it will expend present accruals over many years, and will generally complete remediation in less than 30 years at all sites for which it has been identified as a potentially responsible party. This period includes operation and monitoring costs that are generally incurred over 15 to 25 years. The timing of expenditures depends on a number of factors that vary by site, including the nature and extent of contamination, the number of potentially responsible parties, the timing of regulatory approvals, the complexity of the investigation and remediation, and the standards for remediation.

Asbestos

The Company and a number of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various actions by plaintiffs alleging injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos fibers in products, or which may have been present in its facilities. A number of these cases involve maritime claims, which have been and are expected to continue to be administratively dismissed by the court. These actions primarily relate to previously owned businesses. The Company believes that pending and reasonably anticipated future actions are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. There can be no assurance, however, that future legislative or other developments will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows in a given period.

17

Insurance Coverage

Kemper Insurance (Kemper) provided the Company’s pre-1976 primary layer of insurance coverage for third party claims. Kemper is currently operating under a “run-off” plan under the supervision of the Illinois Division of Insurance. On May 1, 2007, the Company commuted the Kemper policies in return for a cash payment. The agreement with Kemper was approved by the State of Illinois.

In addition, a portion of the Company’s primary and excess layers of pre-1986 insurance coverage for third party claims was provided by certain insurance carriers who are either insolvent or undergoing solvent schemes of arrangement. The Company has entered into settlement agreements with a number of these insurers pursuant to which the Company agreed to give up its rights with respect to certain insurance policies in exchange for negotiated payments. These settlements represent negotiated payments for the Company’s loss of insurance coverage, as it no longer has insurance available for claims that may have qualified for coverage. A portion of these settlements was recorded as income for reimbursement of past claim payments under the settled insurance policies and a portion was recorded as a deferred settlement credit for future claim payments.

At June 30, 2007, the deferred settlement credit was approximately $54.7 million for which approximately $10.9 million was reported in accrued expenses and approximately $43.8 million was reported in other non-current liabilities. The proceeds from such insurance settlements were reported as a component of net cash provided by operating activities in the period payments were received.

Liabilities of Divested Businesses

Asbestos

In May 2002, the Company completed the tax-free spin-off of its Engineered Products (EIP) segment, which at the time of the spin-off included EnPro Industries, Inc. (EnPro) and Coltec Industries Inc (Coltec). At that time, two subsidiaries of Coltec were defendants in a significant number of personal injury claims relating to alleged asbestos-containing products sold by those subsidiaries. It is possible that asbestos-related claims might be asserted against the Company on the theory that it has some responsibility for the asbestos-related liabilities of EnPro, Coltec or its subsidiaries, even though the activities that led to those claims occurred prior to the Company’s ownership of any of those subsidiaries. Also, it is possible that a claim might be asserted against the Company that Coltec’s dividend of its aerospace business to the Company prior to the spin-off was made at a time when Coltec was insolvent or caused Coltec to become insolvent. Such a claim could seek recovery from the Company on behalf of Coltec of the fair market value of the dividend.

18

A limited number of asbestos-related claims have been asserted against the Company as “successor” to Coltec or one of its subsidiaries. The Company believes that it has substantial legal defenses against these claims, as well as against any other claims that may be asserted against the Company on the theories described above. In addition, the agreement between EnPro and the Company that was used to effectuate the spin-off provides the Company with an indemnification from EnPro covering, among other things, these liabilities. The success of any such asbestos-related claims would likely require, as a practical matter, that Coltec’s subsidiaries were unable to satisfy their asbestos-related liabilities and that Coltec was found to be responsible for these liabilities and was unable to meet its financial obligations. The Company believes any such claims would be without merit and that Coltec was solvent both before and after the dividend of its aerospace business to the Company. If the Company is ultimately found to be responsible for the asbestos-related liabilities of Coltec’s subsidiaries, it believes such finding would not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, but could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations and cash flows in a particular period. However, because of the uncertainty as to the number, timing and payments related to future asbestos-related claims, there can be no assurance that any such claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. If a claim related to the dividend of Coltec’s aerospace business were successful, it could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Other

In connection with the divestiture of the Company’s tire, vinyl and other businesses, the Company has received contractual rights of indemnification from third parties for environmental and other claims arising out of the divested businesses. Failure of these third parties to honor their indemnification obligations could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Aerostructures Long-Term Contracts

The aerostructures business has several long-term contracts in the pre-production and early production phases (e.g., Boeing 787, Airbus A380 and A350 XWB). The pre-production phase includes design of the product to meet customer specifications as well as design of the processes to manufacture the product. Also involved in this phase is securing supply of material and subcomponents produced by third party suppliers that are generally accomplished through long-term supply agreements. In addition to these factors, contracts in the early production phase include excess-over-average inventories, which represent the excess of current manufactured cost over the estimated average manufactured cost over the life of the contract. Cost estimates over the life of the contract are affected by estimates of future cost reductions including learning curve efficiencies. Because these contracts cover periods of up to 20 years or more, there is risk that estimates of future costs made during the pre-production and early production phases will be different from actual costs and that difference could be significant.

19

Tax

The Company is continuously undergoing examination by the IRS, as well as various state and foreign jurisdictions. The IRS and other taxing authorities routinely challenge certain deductions and credits reported by the Company on its income tax returns.

The current IRS examination cycle began in 2005 and involves the taxable years ended December 31, 2000 through December 31, 2004. The examination team has substantially completed field work. There were numerous issues raised by the IRS, including, but not limited to, transfer pricing, research and development credits, foreign tax credits, tax accounting for long-term contracts, tax accounting for inventory, depreciation, amortization and the proper timing for certain other deductions for income tax purposes. The Company believes that agreement could be reached with the IRS on most of these issues during 2007. The Company cannot, however, predict the ultimate outcome of the current IRS examination.

The prior examination cycle, which began in 2002, includes the consolidated income tax groups in the audit periods identified below:

Coltec Industries Inc and Subsidiaries
Goodrich Corporation and Subsidiaries
December, 1997 — July, 1999 (through date of acquisition)
1998-1999 (including Rohr and Coltec)

The IRS and the Company previously reached final settlement on all but one of the issues raised related to the prior examination cycle. The Company received statutory notices of deficiency dated June 14, 2007 related to the prior examination cycles. The Company anticipates filing a petition with the U.S. Tax Court to contest the remaining unresolved issue which involves the proper timing of certain deductions. The Company believes the amount of the estimated tax liability if the IRS were to prevail is fully reserved. The Company cannot predict the timing or ultimate outcome of this matter.

Rohr has been under examination by the State of California for the tax years ended July 31, 1985, 1986 and 1987. The State of California has disallowed certain expenses incurred by one of Rohr’s subsidiaries in connection with the lease of certain tangible property. California’s Franchise Tax Board held that the deductions associated with the leased equipment were non-business deductions. The additional tax associated with the Franchise Tax Board’s position is approximately $4.5 million. The amount of accrued interest associated with the additional tax is approximately $21 million as of June 30, 2007. In addition, the State of California enacted an amnesty provision that imposes nondeductible penalty interest equal to 50% of the unpaid interest amounts relating to taxable years ended before 2003. The penalty interest is approximately $10.5 million as of June 30, 2007. The tax and interest amounts continue to be contested by Rohr. The Company believes that it is adequately reserved for this contingency. During 2005, Rohr made payments of approximately $3.9 million ($0.6 million for tax and $3.3 million for interest) related to items that were not being contested and approximately $4.5 million related to items that are being contested. No payment has been made for the $21 million of interest or $10.5 million of penalty interest. Under California law, Rohr may be required to pay the full amount of interest prior to filing any suit for refund. If required, Rohr expects to make this payment and file suit for a refund in late 2007 or early 2008.

20

Note 15. Guarantees

The Company extends financial and product performance guarantees to third parties. As of June 30, 2007, the following environmental remediation indemnification and financial guarantees were outstanding:

	Maximum		Carrying
	Potential		Amount of
	Payment		Liability
Environmental remediation indemnification (Note 14)	No limit		$	16.9
Debt and lease payments	$	2.0	$	—
Residual value on leases (Note 10)	$	32.0	$	—
Letter of credit and bank guarantees	$	52.2	$	—

The letters of credit and bank guarantees of $52.2 million are inclusive of $20.4 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Company’s syndicated revolving credit facility, which are discussed in Note 10, “Financing Arrangements”. The debt and lease payments primarily represent obligations of the Company under industrial development revenue bonds to finance additions to facilities that have since been divested. Each of these obligations was assumed by a third party in connection with the Company’s divestiture of the related facilities. If the assuming parties default, the Company will be liable for payment of the obligations. The industrial development revenue bonds mature in February 2008. It is not practical to obtain independent estimates of the fair values for the contingent liability for guaranteed debt and lease payments and for letters of credit.

Service and Product Warranties

The Company provides service and warranty policies on certain of its products. The Company accrues liabilities under service and warranty policies based upon specific claims and a review of historical warranty and service claim experience in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”. Adjustments are made to accruals as claim data and historical experience change. In addition, the Company incurs discretionary costs to service its products in connection with product performance issues.

The changes in the carrying amount of service and product warranties for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows:

	(Dollars in millions)
Balance at December 31,2006	$	160.3
Net provisions for warranties issued during the year		23.3
Net (benefit) provisions for warranties existing at the beginning of the year		(3.8	)
Payments		(17.6	)
Foreign currency translation		2.8
Balance at June 30, 2007	$	165.0

The current and long-term portions of service and product warranties were as follows:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2007		2006
	(Dollars in millions)
Short-term liabilities	$	66.5	$	57.5
Long-term liabilities		98.5		102.8
Total	$	165.0	$	160.3

21

Note 16. Derivatives and Hedging Activities

The Company utilizes certain financial instruments to manage risk, including foreign currency and interest rate exposures that exist as part of ongoing business operations. A description of the Company’s use of derivative instruments is included in Note 19, “Derivatives and Hedging Activities” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Foreign Currency Contracts

The Company enters forward contracts to manage its Great Britain Pounds Sterling, Euros, Canadian Dollars and Polish Zloty foreign currency exposures.

The total fair value of the Company’s forward contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges was a gain of $122.8 million (before deferred taxes of $42 million) at June 30, 2007. The notional value of the forward contracts at June 30, 2007 was $1,828.2 million. As of June 30, 2007, the amount of accumulated other comprehensive income that would be reclassified into earnings as an increase in sales to offset the effect of the hedged item in the next 12 months is a gain of $51 million. These forward contracts mature on a monthly basis with maturity dates that range from July 2007 to December 2011.

The Company also uses forward contracts to manage its foreign currency risk related to the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the relevant functional currency. These contracts are not designated as hedges. Accordingly, the gains or losses on these contracts are recorded in cost of sales. The notional amounts are adjusted periodically to reflect changes in net monetary asset balances. Under this program, as of June 30, 2007, the Company had forward contracts with a notional value of $236 million, of which approximately $213 million matures monthly and $23 million matures through 2011.

Interest Rate Swaps

The notional amounts of outstanding interest rate swaps accounted for as fair value hedges at June 30, 2007 totaled $193 million with maturity dates ranging from 2008 to 2016. The fair value of the interest rate swaps was a net liability/loss of $3.3 million at June 30, 2007.

Note 17. Share-Based Compensation

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company expensed share-based compensation awards under the Goodrich Corporation 2001 Equity Compensation Plan and the Goodrich Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan for employees and under the Outside Director Deferral and Outside Director Phantom Share plans for non-employee directors. A detailed description of the awards under these plans is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The compensation cost recorded for share-based compensation plans during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 totaled $16 million and $6.7 million, respectively. The compensation cost recorded for share-based compensation plans during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 totaled $32.2 million and $28.6 million, respectively.

22

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

YOU SHOULD READ THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS DOCUMENT.

THIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE “FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO RISK AND UNCERTAINTY” FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN OF THE UNCERTAINTIES, RISKS AND ASSUMPTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE STATEMENTS.

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREIN, DISCLOSURES PERTAIN ONLY TO OUR CONTINUING OPERATIONS.

OVERVIEW

We are one of the largest worldwide suppliers of aerospace components, systems and services to the commercial and general aviation airplane markets. We are also a leading supplier of systems and products to the global defense and space markets. Our business is conducted globally with manufacturing, service and sales undertaken in various locations throughout the world. Our products and services are principally sold to customers in North America, Europe and Asia.

Key Market Channels for Products and Services, Growth Drivers and Industry and our Highlights

We participate in three key market channels: commercial and general aviation airplane original equipment (OE); commercial and general aviation airplane aftermarket; and defense and space.

Commercial and General Aviation Airplane OE

Commercial and general aviation airplane OE includes sales of products and services for new airplanes produced by Airbus S.A.S. (Airbus) and The Boeing Company (Boeing), as well as regional, business and small airplane manufacturers.

The key growth drivers in this market channel include the number of orders for new airplanes, which will be delivered to the manufacturers’ customers over a period of several years, OE manufacturer production and delivery rates and introductions of new airplane models such as the Boeing 787 and 747-8, the Airbus A380 and A350 XWB and the Embraer 190 airplanes.

We have significant sales content on most of the airplanes manufactured in this market channel. We have benefited from increased production rates and deliveries of Airbus and Boeing airplanes and from our substantial content on many of the regional and general aviation airplanes. We were also awarded several new contracts for our products on airplanes currently in a pre-production or early development stage, including the Boeing 787 and 747-8 and the Airbus A380 and A350 XWB, which should provide substantial future sales growth for us.

23

The commercial airplane manufacturers have a significant backlog of orders and are continuing to experience strong new order flow. Airlines worldwide continue to increase capacity, and it now appears that the U.S. airlines will largely return to profitability in 2007. These trends bode very well for large commercial aircraft production over the next several years.

Commercial and General Aviation Airplane Aftermarket

The commercial and general aviation airplane aftermarket channel includes sales of products and services for existing commercial and general aviation airplanes, primarily to airlines and package carriers around the world.

The key growth drivers in this channel include worldwide passenger capacity growth measured by Available Seat Miles (ASM) and the size and activity level of the airplane fleet. Other important factors affecting growth in this market channel are the age of the airplanes in the fleet and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) trends in countries and regions around the world.

Capacity in the global airline system, as measured by ASMs, is expected to grow at about 4% to 5% in 2007. Goodrich sales to airline and package carriers for large commercial and regional aircraft aftermarket parts and services are expected to grow by 13% to 15% in 2007 compared to 2006.

We have significant product content on most of the airplane models that are currently in service. We have benefited from growth in ASMs, especially in Asia, and from the aging of the worldwide fleet of airplanes.

Defense and Space

Worldwide defense and space sales include sales to prime contractors such as Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, the U.S. Government and foreign companies and governments.

The key growth drivers in this channel include the level of defense spending by the U.S. and foreign governments, the number of new platform starts, the level of military flight operations and the level of upgrade, overhaul and maintenance activities associated with existing platforms.

The market for our defense and space products is global, and is not dependent on any single program, platform or customer. While we anticipate fewer new platform starts over the next several years, which are expected to negatively affect OE sales, we anticipate that upgrades on existing defense and space platforms will be necessary and will provide long-term growth in this market channel. Additionally, we are participating in, and developing new products for the rapidly expanding homeland security and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance sectors, which should further strengthen our position in this market channel.

24

Long-term Sustainable Growth

We believe that we are well positioned to continue to grow our commercial airplane OE and aftermarket and defense and space sales due to:

• Awards for key products on important new and expected programs, including the Airbus A380 and A350 XWB, the Boeing 787 and 747-8, the Embraer 190, the Dassault Falcon 7X and the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II and F-22 Raptor;

• Growing commercial airplane fleet, which should fuel sustained aftermarket strength;

• Balance in the large commercial airplane market, with strong sales to both Airbus and Boeing;

• Aging of the existing large commercial and regional airplane fleets, which should result in increased aftermarket support;

• Increased number of long-term agreements for product sales on new and existing commercial airplanes;

• Increased opportunities for aftermarket growth due to airline outsourcing;

• Growth in global maintenance, repair and overhaul opportunities for our systems and components, particularly in Europe, Asia and the Middle East, where we are expanding our capacity; and

• Expansion of our product offerings in support of high growth areas in the defense and space market channel, such as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance products.

Second Quarter 2007 Sales Content by Market Channel

During the second quarter 2007, approximately 95% of our sales were from our three primary market channels described above. Following is a summary of the percentage of sales by market channel:

Airbus Commercial OE	13	%
Boeing Commercial OE	11	%
Regional and General Aviation Airplane OE	8	%
Total Commercial and General Aviation Airplane OE	32	%
Large Commercial Airplane Aftermarket	29	%
Regional and General Aviation Airplane Aftermarket	7	%
Heavy Airplane Maintenance	3	%
Total Commercial and General Aviation Airplane Aftermarket	39	%
Total Defense and Space	24	%
Other	5	%
Total	100	%

25

Summary Performance — Second Quarter 2007 as Compared to Second Quarter 2006

	Second Quarter
	2007			2006			% Change
	(Dollars in millions, except diluted EPS)
Sales	$	1,622.4		$	1,483.2			9.4
Segment operating income(1)	$	258.9		$	208.2			24.4
Percent of sales		16.0	%		14.0	%
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	175.2		$	116.8			50.0
Income from continuing operations	$	125.1		$	81.1			54.3
Net income	$	124.8		$	81.0			54.1
Effective tax rate		28.6	%		30.6	%
Diluted EPS:
Continuing operations	$	0.98		$	0.64			53.1
Net income	$	0.98		$	0.64			53.1

(1) Segment operating income is total segment revenue reduced by operating expenses directly identifiable with our business segments except for certain Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system implementation expenses and pension curtailment expenses in 2006, which were not allocated to the segments. Segment operating income is used by management to assess the operating performance of the segments. For a reconciliation of total segment operating income to total operating income, see Note 3, “Business Segment Information” to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The sales increase of 9.4% in the second quarter 2007 as compared to the second quarter 2006 was driven by changes in each of our major market channels as follows:

• Large commercial airplane original equipment sales decreased by approximately 1%;

• Regional, business and general aviation airplane original equipment sales increased by approximately 26%;

• Large commercial, regional and general aviation airplane aftermarket sales increased by approximately 14%; and

• Defense and space sales of both original equipment and aftermarket products and services increased by approximately 8%.

The segment operating income growth of 24.4% was generated by strong sales growth, favorable pricing and product mix and improved operational performance in most businesses.

The change in income from continuing operations before income taxes during the second quarter 2007 as compared to the second quarter 2006 was also impacted by the following items:

	Increase (Decrease)
	Before			After			Diluted
	Tax			Tax			EPS
	(Dollars in millions, except diluted EPS)
Foreign exchange rate impact, including net monetary asset remeasurement	$	(3.4	)	$	(2.1	)	$	(0.02	)
Loss on exchange and extinguishment of debt in 2006	$	4.8		$	3.0		$	0.02
Higher share-based compensation	$	(9.3	)	$	(5.6	)	$	(0.05	)
Lower net pension expense, including 2006 pension curtailment	$	9.0		$	5.6		$	0.04

26

Summary Performance — Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 as Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

	Six Months Ended,
	June 30
	2007			2006			% Change
	(Dollars in millions, except diluted EPS)
Sales	$	3,210.9		$	2,907.0			10.5
Segment operating income(1)	$	489.9		$	379.2			29.2
Percent of sales		15.3	%		13.0	%
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	328.8		$	218.0			50.8
Income from continuing operations	$	224.9		$	281.4			(20.1	)
Net income	$	224.6		$	282.5			(20.5	)
Effective tax rate (benefit)(2)		31.6	%		(29.1	)%
Diluted EPS:
Continuing operations	$	1.76		$	2.23			(21.1	)
Net income	$	1.76		$	2.24			(21.4	)

(1)

Segment operating income is total segment revenue reduced by operating expenses directly identifiable with our business segments except for certain enterprise ERP system implementation expenses and pension curtailment expenses in 2006, which were not allocated to the segments. Segment operating income is used by management to assess the operating performance of the segments. For a reconciliation of total segment operating income to total operating income, see Note 3, “Business Segment Information” to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)

The change in our effective tax rate resulted primarily from the reversal of tax reserves in connection with the favorable Rohr and Coltec tax settlements, which reduced the tax rate by approximately 60 percentage points, or $1.05 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

The sales increase of 10.5% during the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 was driven primarily by growth in each of our major market channels as follows:

• Large commercial airplane original equipment sales increased by approximately 2%;

• Regional, business and general aviation airplane original equipment sales increased by approximately 16%;

• Large commercial, regional and general aviation airplane aftermarket sales increased by approximately 18%; and

• Defense and space sales of both original equipment and aftermarket products and services increased by approximately 8%.

The segment operating income growth of 29.2% was generated by higher volume in all of our segments, including strong aftermarket sales growth in all of our major businesses, and improved product performance in our aircraft wheel and brake business unit.

27

The change in income from continuing operations before income taxes during the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006 was also impacted by the following items:

	Increase (Decrease)
	Before			After			Diluted
	Tax			Tax			EPS
	(Dollars in millions, except diluted EPS)
Foreign exchange rate impact, including net monetary asset remeasurement	$	(14.1	)	$	(8.8	)	$	(0.07	)
Loss on exchange and extinguishment of debt in 2006	$	4.8		$	3.0		$	0.02
Lower net pension expense, including 2006 pension curtailment	$	14.6		$	9.1		$	0.07

Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $197.7 million, an increase of $142.8 million from net cash provided by operating activities of $54.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The increase was primarily due to increased before tax income of $111 million and a non-recurring cash outlay of approximately $97 million relating to the termination of our accounts receivable securitization program in 2006. These increases were offset by higher first half 2007 pension plan contributions of approximately $83 million.

2007 Outlook

We expect the following results for the year ending December 31, 2007:

	2007 Outlook	2006 Actual
Sales	$6.5-$6.6 billion	$5.9 billion
Diluted EPS — Net Income	$3.50-$3.60 per share	$3.81 per share*
Capital Expenditures	$270-$290 million	$256.8 million
Operating Cash Flow net of Capital Expenditures	60%-75% of income from continuing operations	4% of income from continuing operations

* includes a tax benefit of $1.15 related primarily to the Rohr and Coltec tax settlements in 2006.

We continue to expect that 2007 will be another year of strong sales growth with improving segment operating income margins. Full year 2007 sales expectations have been increased to $6.5 to $6.6 billion, compared with prior expectations of $6.3 to $6.5 billion provided in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. The outlook for 2007 net income per diluted share has been increased to $3.50 to $3.60,compared with prior expectations of $3.20 to $3.35, reflecting sales growth in all major market channels and margin expansion driven by sales growth, favorable mix and improved operating efficiencies.

The 2007 outlook assumes, among other factors, a full-year effective tax rate of 31% to 33%, which may vary from quarter-to-quarter depending on many factors, including settlements with state, federal and international tax authorities.

To provide the most meaningful comparison between 2006 results and the outlook for 2007 net income per diluted share, we believe that the 2006 net income per diluted share of $3.81 should be adjusted for the impact of the $1.15 per diluted share related to tax settlements that were completed during 2006. Excluding these tax settlements, net income per diluted share for 2006 was $2.66, compared to expected results of $3.50 to $3.60 for 2007.

28

We continue to expect net cash provided by operating activities, minus capital expenditures, to be in the range of 60% to 75% of net income in 2007. This outlook reflects a continuation of cash expenditures for investments in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner and the Airbus A350 XWB and capital expenditures for facility expansions to support increased aftermarket demand, low cost country manufacturing and productivity initiatives that are expected to enhance margins over the near and long-term. We continue to expect capital expenditures for 2007 to be in a range of $270 to $290 million. Of these capital expenditures, approximately 40% are expected to be associated with investments in low cost country manufacturing, previously announced Maintenance, Repair and Operation (MRO) facility expansions and new facilities to support aftermarket sales growth, and expenditures related to the implementation of a company-wide ERP system.

The current sales, net income and net cash provided by operating activities outlooks for 2007 do not include the impact of acquisitions or divestitures or resolution of an A380 claim against Northrop Grumman.

Our 2007 outlook includes a new long-term agreement with Boeing under which we will continue as the exclusive supplier of OE and aftermarket landing gear for the 737, 747, 767 and 777 Commercial Airplanes programs, and is based on certain market assumptions, including the following:

• Deliveries of Airbus and Boeing large commercial aircraft are expected to increase by approximately 8% to 10% in 2007 compared to 2006. Our sales of large commercial aircraft original equipment products are projected to grow by about 10% in 2007 compared to 2006.

• Capacity in the global airline system, as measured by available seat miles (ASMs), is expected to grow at approximately 4% to 5% in 2007. Our sales to airlines and package carriers for large commercial and regional aircraft aftermarket parts and services are expected to grow by 13% to 15% in 2007 compared to 2006.

• Total regional and business aircraft production is expected to increase slightly in 2007 compared to 2006. Deliveries to Embraer in support of its Embraer 190 aircraft, which includes a significant amount of our content, are expected to enable us to increase sales in this market channel by about 15% in 2007 compared to 2006.

• Defense and space sales (original equipment and aftermarket) are expected to grow by approximately 10% in 2007 compared to 2006. Growth is expected in all three segments.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Second Quarter 2007 Compared with Second Quarter 2006

	Second Quarter						$
	2007			2006			Change
	(Dollars in millions)
Sales	$	1,622.4		$	1,483.2		$	139.2
Segment Operating Income	$	258.9		$	208.2		$	50.7
Corporate General and Administrative Costs		(32.7	)		(23.9	)		(8.8	)
ERP Implementation Costs		(4.0	)		(5.5	)		1.5
Pension Curtailment		—			(10.9	)		10.9
Total Operating Income		222.2			167.9			54.3
Net Interest Expense		(29.3	)		(30.2	)		0.9
Other Income (Expense) — Net		(17.7	)		(20.9	)		3.2
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit		(50.1	)		(35.7	)		(14.4	)
Income from Continuing Operations		125.1			81.1			44.0
Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations		(0.3	)		(0.1	)		(0.2	)
Net Income	$	124.8		$	81.0		$	43.8

29

Changes in sales and segment operating income are discussed within the “Business Segment Performance” section below.

Corporate general and administrative costs increased for the second quarter 2007 as compared to the second quarter 2006 primarily due to higher incentive compensation and non-qualified pension benefit expense.

During the second quarter 2006, we recorded a pension curtailment charge of $10.9 million related to the implementation of changes to our pension and retirement savings plans.

Other income (expense) — net decreased for the second quarter 2007 as compared to the second quarter 2006, primarily as a result of expenses related to transaction costs for a long-term debt exchange program incurred in 2006, partially offset by higher minority interest costs in 2007.

For the second quarter 2007, we reported an effective tax rate of 28.6%, including a benefit of approximately 6 percentage points for the elimination of certain valuation allowances against net operating losses of a foreign subsidiary and a benefit of approximately 2 percentage points related to U.S. Research and Development (R&D) Credits. During the second quarter 2006, we reported an effective tax rate of 30.6%, including a net benefit of approximately 5 percentage points primarily related to the refund of prior year U.S. Research and Development (R&D) Credits connected with the Coltec litigation and for several additional settlements and refunds. Our effective rate during the second quarter 2006 was not reduced for the benefit of U.S. R&D Credits because the federal statute authorizing the R&D Credit had not been extended beyond December 31, 2005. On December 20, 2006, the R&D Credit was extended to December 31, 2007. We estimate that the effective rate as of June 30, 2006 would have been approximately 1 percentage point lower had we been able to consider the tax benefits associated with the R&D Credit.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,						$
	2007			2006			Change
	(Dollars in millions)
Sales	$	3,210.9		$	2,907.0		$	303.9
Segment Operating Income	$	489.9		$	379.2		$	110.7
Corporate General and Administrative Costs		(61.4	)		(51.1	)		(10.3	)
ERP Implementation Costs		(7.3	)		(6.6	)		(0.7	)
Pension Curtailment		—			(10.9	)		10.9
Total Operating Income		421.2			310.6			110.6
Net Interest Expense		(59.1	)		(61.1	)		2.0
Other Income (Expense) — Net		(33.3	)		(31.5	)		(1.8	)
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit		(103.9	)		63.4			(167.3	)
Income from Continuing Operations		224.9			281.4			(56.5	)
Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations		(0.3	)		0.5			(0.8	)
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting		—			0.6			(0.6	)
Net Income	$	224.6		$	282.5		$	(57.9	)

Changes in sales and segment operating income are discussed within the “Business Segment Performance” section below.

Corporate general and administrative costs increased for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, due to higher incentive compensation and non-qualified pension benefit expense.

30

During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded a pension curtailment charge of $10.9 million related to the implementation of changes to our pension and retirement savings plans.

Other income (expense) - net increased for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily as a result of higher minority interest costs and legal expenses related to previously owned businesses, partially offset by expenses related to transaction costs for a long-term debt exchange program incurred in 2006.

For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we reported an effective tax rate of 31.6%, including a benefit of approximately 3 percentage points for the elimination of certain valuation allowances against net operating losses of a foreign subsidiary and a benefit of approximately 2 percentage points related to U.S. Research and Development (R&D) Credits. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we reported an effective tax rate benefit of (29.1%), including a benefit of approximately 63 percentage points related to the Rohr and Coltec tax settlements and for several additional one time settlements and refunds. The effective tax rate excluding the benefit related to these one time items would have been approximately 33.9%. Our effective rate during the six months ended June 30, 2006 was not reduced for the benefit of U.S. R&D Credits because the federal statute authorizing the R&D Credit had not been extended beyond December 31, 2005. On December 20, 2006, the R&D Credit was extended to December 31, 2007. We estimate that the effective rate as of June 30, 2006 would have been approximately 1 percentage point lower had we been able to consider the tax benefits associated with the R&D Credit.

The cumulative effect from the change in accounting resulted in a gain of $0.6 million from the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Accounting for Share-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123(R)) on January 1, 2006.

BUSINESS SEGMENT PERFORMANCE

Effective January 1, 2007, we realigned our businesses within our three reporting segments. Under the new organizational structure, several businesses were combined into larger strategic business units and several businesses were moved into different segments from the prior reporting structure. The current segment reporting structure was designed to accelerate our focus on operational excellence and to further enhance our alignment within key product and technology areas. Along with the segment realignment, the results of our customer services business were allocated to the business that manufactures the product or system. Additionally, ERP implementation costs that are not directly associated with a specific business were reclassified as a component of corporate administrative expense. Prior period results have been reclassified to conform to the new organizational structure.

31

Effective January 1, 2007, our three business segments are as follows.

• The Actuation and Landing Systems segment provides systems, components and related services pertaining to aircraft taxi, take-off, flight control, landing and stopping, as well as engine components, including fuel delivery systems and rotating assemblies, and airframe maintenance.

• The Nacelles and Interior Systems segment produces products and provides maintenance, repair and overhaul services associated with aircraft engines, including thrust reversers, cowlings, nozzles and their components, and aircraft interior products, including slides, seats, cargo and lighting systems.

• The Electronic Systems segment produces a broad array of systems and components that provide flight performance measurements, flight management information, engine controls, fuel controls, electrical power systems, safety data, and reconnaissance and surveillance systems.

We measure each reporting segments’ profit based upon operating income, excluding the indirect costs related to the company-wide ERP implementation and pension curtailment in 2006. Accordingly, we do not allocate net interest expense, other income (expense) — net and income taxes to the reporting segments. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those for our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. For a reconciliation of total segment operating income to total operating income, see Note 3, “Business Segment Information” to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Second Quarter 2007 Compared with Second Quarter 2006

											��
	Second Quarter				Increase/		%		% of Sales
	2007		2006		(Decrease)		Change		2007		2006
NET CUSTOMER SALES
Actuation and Landing Systems	$	635.3	$	561.9	$	73.4		13.1
Nacelles and Interior Systems		533.6		514.9		18.7		3.6
Electronic Systems		453.5		406.4		47.1		11.6
	$	1,622.4	$	1,483.2	$	139.2		9.4
SEGMENT OPERATING INCOME
Actuation and Landing Systems	$	61.0	$	39.3	$	21.7		55.2		9.6		7.0
Nacelles and Interior Systems		135.3		114.8		20.5		17.9		25.4		22.3
Electronic Systems		62.6		54.1		8.5		15.7		13.8		13.3
	$	258.9	$	208.2	$	50.7		24.4		16.0		14.0

32

Actuation and Landing Systems:Actuation and Landing Systems segment sales for the second quarter 2007 increased from the second quarter 2006 primarily due to the following:

• Higher large commercial airplane aftermarket sales of approximately $22 million, primarily in our landing gear, aircraft wheels and brakes and actuation business units;

• Higher large commercial airplane OE sales of approximately $21 million, primarily in our landing gear business unit;

• Higher regional and business OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $10 million, primarily in our aircraft wheels and brakes and landing gear business units;

• Higher military OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $6 million, primarily in our actuation and aircraft wheels and brakes business units; and

• Higher airframe heavy maintenance sales of approximately $5 million.

Actuation and Landing Systems segment operating income for the second quarter 2007 increased from the second quarter 2006 primarily due to the following:

• Higher sales volume and favorable product mix across all business units, which resulted in higher income of approximately $25 million;

• Improved brake-life performance in the aircraft wheels and brakes business unit and higher pricing in our landing gear, aircraft wheels and brakes and actuation business units, offset by increased operating costs, primarily in our landing gear business unit; and

• Unfavorable foreign exchange impact of approximately $4 million.

Nacelles and Interior Systems:Nacelles and Interior Systems segment sales for the second quarter 2007 increased from the second quarter 2006 primarily due to the following:

• Higher large commercial airplane aftermarket sales, including spare parts and MRO volume of approximately $39 million, primarily in our aerostructures and interiors business units; and

• Higher regional, business, and general aviation aircraft OE sales primarily from our aerostructures business unit of approximately $11 million.

Partially offsetting these higher sales were lower commercial OE sales of approximately $37 million, related to the completion of certain customer contracts in 2006.

Nacelles and Interior Systems segment operating income for the second quarter 2007 increased from the second quarter 2006 due to higher sales volume, primarily in our aerostructures and interiors business units, which resulted in higher income of approximately $27 million. Favorable changes in estimates for certain long-term contracts at our aerostructures business unit during the second quarter 2007 resulted in an increase to segment operating income of approximately $10 million. These increases in segment operating income were partially offset by higher research and development and administrative costs, primarily in our aerostructures business unit.

33

Electronic Systems:Electronic Systems segment sales for the second quarter 2007 increased from the second quarter 2006 primarily due to:

• Higher defense and space OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $20 million across all of our business units;

• Higher regional and general aviation airplane OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $15 million in our sensor and integrated systems and engine control and electrical power business units;

• Higher commercial OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $7 million in our sensors and integrated systems business unit; and

• Higher sales of products to the helicopter market of approximately $5 million in our sensors and integrated systems and engine controls and electrical power business units.

Electronic Systems segment operating income for the second quarter 2007 increased from the second quarter 2006 primarily as a result of higher sales volume, which resulted in higher operating income of approximately $19 million. This increase in segment operating income was offset by higher costs of approximately $8 million, primarily in our sensors and integrated systems and engine control and electrical power business units and unfavorable foreign exchange impact of approximately $3 million.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

	Six Months Ended June 30,
					Increase/		%		% of Sales
	2007		2006		(Decrease)		Change		2007		2006
NET CUSTOMER SALES
Actuation and Landing Systems	$	1,244.5	$	1,100.3	$	144.2		13.1
Nacelles and Interior Systems		1,080.5		1,008.7		71.8		7.1
Electronic Systems		885.9		798.0		87.9		11.0
	$	3,210.9	$	2,907.0	$	303.9		10.5
SEGMENT OPERATING INCOME
Actuation and Landing Systems	$	110.9	$	62.6	$	48.3		77.2		8.9		5.7
Nacelles and Interior Systems		261.6		219.6		42.0		19.1		24.2		21.8
Electronic Systems		117.4		97.0		20.4		21.0		13.3		12.2
	$	489.9	$	379.2	$	110.7		29.2		15.3		13.0

34

Actuation and Landing Systems:Actuation and Landing Systems segment sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007 increased from the six months ended June 30, 2006 primarily due to the following:

• Higher large commercial airplane aftermarket sales of approximately $48 million, primarily in our landing gear, aircraft wheels and brakes and actuation business units;

• Higher large commercial airplane OE sales of approximately $37 million, primarily in our landing gear business unit;

• Higher regional and business OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $28 million, primarily in our aircraft wheels and brakes and landing gear business units;

• Higher airframe heavy maintenance sales of approximately $10 million; and

• Higher military OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $8 million, primarily in our actuation, aircraft wheels and brakes, and engine components business units.

Actuation and Landing Systems segment operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 increased from the six months ended June 30, 2006 primarily as a result of the following:

• Higher sales volume and favorable product mix across all business units, which resulted in higher income of approximately $40 million;

• Higher operating income of approximately $18 million, driven primarily by higher pricing across most of our business units and improved brake-life performance in the aircraft wheels and brakes business unit, partially offset by increased operating costs, primarily in our landing gear and aircraft wheels and brakes business units; and

• Unfavorable foreign exchange impact of approximately $10 million.

35

Nacelles and Interior Systems:Nacelles and Interior Systems segment sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007 increased from the six months ended June 30, 2006 primarily due to the following:

• Higher large commercial airplane aftermarket sales, including spare parts and MRO volume of approximately $83 million, primarily in our aerostructures and interiors business units; and

• Higher defense OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $10 million, primarily in our interiors business unit; and

• Higher regional, business, and general aviation aircraft OE sales primarily from our aerostructures business of approximately $10 million.

Partially offsetting these higher sales were lower commercial OE sales of approximately $50 million, related to the completion of certain customer contracts in 2006.

Nacelles and Interior Systems segment operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 increased from the six months ended June 30, 2006 due to higher sales volume and favorable product mix of approximately $58 million, primarily in our aerostructures and interiors business units. Favorable changes in estimates for certain long-term contracts at our aerostructures business unit during the six months ended June 30, 2007 resulted in an increase to segment operating income of approximately $14 million. These increases in segment operating income were partially offset by higher research and development and administrative costs, primarily in our aerostructures business unit.

Electronic Systems:Electronic Systems segment sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007 increased from the six months ended June 30, 2006 primarily due to:

• Higher defense and space OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $35 million across all of our business units;

• Higher regional and general aviation airplane OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $31 million in our sensors and integrated systems and engine control and electrical power business units;

• Higher sales of products to the helicopter market of approximately $12 million in our sensors and integrated systems and engine controls and electrical power business units; and

• Higher commercial OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $9 million in our engine control and electrical power business unit.

Electronic Systems segment operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 increased from the six months ended June 30, 2006 primarily as a result of higher sales volume, which resulted in higher operating income of approximately $32 million. These increases in segment operating income were offset by higher costs of approximately $13 million, primarily in our sensors and integrated systems and engine control and electrical power business units and unfavorable foreign exchange impact of approximately $4 million.

36

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We currently expect to fund expenditures for capital requirements, as well as other liquidity needs from a combination of cash, internally generated funds and financing arrangements. We believe that our internal liquidity, together with access to external capital resources, will be sufficient to satisfy existing plans and commitments including our stock repurchase program, and also provide adequate financial flexibility.

Cash

At June 30, 2007, we had cash and marketable securities of $213.4 million, as compared to $201.3 million at December 31, 2006.

Credit Facilities

We have the following amounts available under our credit facilities:

• $500 million committed global revolving credit facility that expires in May 2012, of which $444.7 million was available as of June 30, 2007; and

• $75 million of uncommitted domestic money market facilities and $165.8 million of uncommitted and committed foreign working capital facilities with various banks to meet short-term borrowing requirements, of which $230.6 million was available as of June 30, 2007.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Lease Commitments

We finance certain of our office and manufacturing facilities as well as machinery and equipment, including corporate aircraft, under various committed lease arrangements provided by financial institutions.

Certain of these arrangements allow us to claim a deduction for tax depreciation on the assets, rather than the lessor, and allow us to lease aircraft and equipment having a maximum unamortized value of $150 million at June 30, 2007. These leases are priced at a spread over LIBOR and are extended periodically, unless notice is provided, through the end of the lease terms. At June 30, 2007, future payments under these leases total $15.7 million through the end of the lease terms. At June 30, 2007, we had guarantees of residual values on lease obligations of $32 million. We are obligated to either purchase or remarket the leased assets at the end of the lease term.

Future minimum lease payments under the standard operating leases approximated $127.2 million at June 30, 2007.

Sale of Receivables

Effective June 30, 2006, we terminated the variable rate trade receivables securitization program and repaid the outstanding balance of $97.1 million.

37

Derivatives

The Company utilizes certain financial instruments to enhance its ability to manage risk, including foreign currency and interest rate exposures that exist as part of ongoing business operations as follows:

• Foreign Currency Contracts Designated as Cash Flow Hedges:Our contracts had a notional amount of $1,828.2 million, fair value of $122.8 million and maturity dates ranging from July 2007 to December 2011. The amount of accumulated other comprehensive income that would be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months is a gain of $51 million. During the second quarter of 2007 and 2006, we realized net gains of $15.1 million and $12.9 million, respectively, related to contracts that settled. During the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we realized net gains of $30.6 million and $20.6 million respectively, related to contracts that settled.

• Foreign Currency Contracts not Designated as Hedges:Our contracts, most of which mature monthly, had a notional amount of $236 million and a fair value of a net asset/gain of $0.4 million. During the second quarter of 2007, we realized a net gain of $1.4 million related to contracts that settled compared to a net loss of $2.2 million during the second quarter of 2006 related to contracts that settled. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we realized a net gain of $0.5 million compared to a net loss of $0.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006 related to contracts that settled.

• Interest Rate Swaps Designated as Fair Value Hedges:Our contracts had a notional amount of $193 million, fair value of $3.3 million net liability/loss and maturity dates ranging from April 2008 to July 2016.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments

There have been no material changes to the table presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The table excludes our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which totaled $209.2 million as of January 1, 2007 and $314 million as of June 30, 2007, since we cannot predict with reasonable reliability the timing of cash settlements to the respective taxing authorities.

CASH FLOW

The following table summarizes our cash flow activity for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:

	Six Months Ended June 30,						$
	2007			2006			Change
	(Dollars in millions)
Operating activities of continuing operations	$	197.7		$	54.9		$	142.8
Investing activities of continuing operations	$	(95.5	)	$	(93.7	)	$	(1.8	)
Financing activities of continuing operations	$	(91.1	)	$	(20.2	)	$	(70.9	)
Discontinued operations	$	(0.7	)	$	11.2		$	(11.9	)

38

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 as Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

Operating Activities of Continuing Operations

The increase in net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from the six months ended June 30, 2007 was primarily comprised of the following:

• Increased before tax income of approximately $111 million; and

• A non-recurring cash outlay of approximately $97 million relating to the termination of our accounts receivable securitization program in 2006; partially offset by

• Increased pension plan contributions of approximately $83 million.

We expect cash flow from operating activities net of capital expenditures to approximate 60% to 75% of net income in 2007.

Investing Activities of Continuing Operations

Net cash used by investing activities for the six month ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 included capital expenditures of $96.2 million and $95.1 million, respectively.

We expect capital expenditures in 2007 to be in the range of $270 million to $290 million, reflecting continued cash expenditures for investments in programs such as the Boeing 787 and the Airbus A350 XWB, capital expenditures for facility expansions to support increased aftermarket demand, low cost country manufacturing and productivity initiatives that are expected to enhance margins over the near and long-term. Of these capital expenditures, approximately 40% are expected to be associated with investments in low cost country manufacturing, previously announced MRO facility expansions and new facilities to support aftermarket sales growth, and expenditures related to the company-wide implementation of an ERP system.

Financing Activities of Continuing Operations

The increase in net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from the six months ended June 30, 2006 was primarily comprised of the following:

• Purchases of our common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2007 totaling $113.3 million, primarily in conjunction with the share repurchase program announced on October 24, 2006;

• Repayments of short-term debt totaling $1.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to increased short-term debt of $8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006; partially offset by

• An increase of $22 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock, primarily for share-based compensation awards, to $68.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $46.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006; and

• The cash premiums of $20.5 million we paid in connection with the exchange of $533.2 million principal amount of our long-term notes for similar notes of longer duration during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

39

On October 24, 2006, our Board of Directors approved a program that authorizes us to repurchase up to $300 million of our common stock. The primary purpose of the program is to reduce dilution to existing shareholders from our share-based compensation plans. While no time limit was set for completion of the program, we expect repurchases to occur over a three year period. Repurchases under the program may be made through open market or privately negotiated transactions at times and in such amounts as we deem appropriate, subject to market conditions, regulatory requirements and other factors. The program does not obligate us to repurchase any particular amount of common stock, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice. As of June 30, 2007, we have purchased approximately 2.4 million shares for approximately $126.3 million.

On April 24, 2007, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share on our common stock, paid July 2, 2007 to shareholders of record as of June 4, 2007.

Discontinued Operations

Net cash provided by discontinued operations was $11.2 million in the six months ended 2006 primarily from insurance settlements, net of tax, with several insurers relating to the recovery of environmental remediation costs at a former plant previously recorded as a discontinued operation.

CONTINGENCIES

General

There are pending or threatened against us or our subsidiaries various claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings, arising in the ordinary course of business, including commercial, product liability, asbestos and environmental matters, which seek remedies or damages. Although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of these matters, we believe that any liability that may finally be determined with respect to commercial and non-asbestos product liability claims should not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. From time to time, we are also involved in legal proceedings as a plaintiff involving tax, contract, patent protection, environmental and other matters. Gain contingencies, if any, are recognized when they are realized. Legal costs are expensed when incurred.

Environmental

We are subject to various domestic and international environmental laws and regulations which may require that we investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites associated with past and present operations, including divested sites for which we have contractual obligations relating to the environmental condition of such site. At certain sites we have been identified as a potentially responsible party under the federal Superfund laws and comparable state laws. We are currently involved in the investigation and remediation of a number of sites under these laws.

40

Estimates of our environmental liabilities are based on current facts, laws, regulations and technology. These estimates take into consideration our prior experience and professional judgment of our environmental specialists in consultation with outside environmental specialists, when necessary. Estimates of our environmental liabilities are further subject to uncertainties regarding the nature and extent of site contamination, the range of remediation alternatives available, evolving remediation standards, imprecise engineering evaluations and cost estimates, the extent of corrective actions that may be required and the number and financial condition of other potentially responsible parties, as well as the extent of their responsibility for the remediation.

Accordingly, as investigation and remediation proceed, it is likely that adjustments in our accruals will be necessary to reflect new information. The amounts of any such adjustments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in a given period. Based on currently available information, however, we do not believe that future environmental costs in excess of those accrued with respect to sites for which we have been identified as a potentially responsible party are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. There can be no assurance, however, that future developments will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in a given period.

Environmental liabilities are recorded when the liability is probable and the costs are reasonably estimable, which generally is not later than at completion of a feasibility study or when we have recommended a remedy or have committed to an appropriate plan of action. The liabilities are reviewed periodically and, as investigation and remediation proceed, adjustments are made as necessary. Liabilities for losses from environmental remediation obligations do not consider the effects of inflation and anticipated expenditures are not discounted to their present value. The liabilities are not reduced by possible recoveries from insurance carriers or other third parties, but do reflect anticipated allocations among potentially responsible parties at federal Superfund sites or similar state-managed sites and an assessment of the likelihood that such parties will fulfill their obligations at such sites.

Our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet included an accrued liability for environmental remediation obligations of $71.5 million and $74.3 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, $16.2 million, and $17.7 million, respectively, of the accrued liability for environmental remediation was included in current liabilities as accrued expenses. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, $30.1 million and $31 million, respectively, was associated with ongoing operations and $41.4 million and $43.3 million, respectively, was associated with businesses previously disposed of or discontinued.

We expect that we will expend present accruals over many years, and will generally complete remediation in less than 30 years at all sites for which we have been identified as a potentially responsible party. This period includes operation and monitoring costs that are generally incurred over 15 to 25 years. The timing of expenditures depends on a number of factors that vary by site, including the nature and extent of contamination, the number of potentially responsible parties, the timing of regulatory approvals, the complexity of the investigation and remediation, and the standards for remediation.

41

Asbestos

We and a number of our subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various actions by plaintiffs alleging injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos fibers in products, or which may have been present in our facilities. A number of these cases involve maritime claims, which have been and are expected to continue to be administratively dismissed by the court. These actions primarily relate to previously owned businesses. We believe that pending and reasonably anticipated future actions are not likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. There can be no assurance, however, that future legislative or other developments will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in a given period.

Insurance Coverage

Kemper Insurance (Kemper) provided the Company’s pre-1976 primary layer of insurance coverage for third party claims. Kemper is currently operating under a “run-off” plan under the supervision of the Illinois Division of Insurance. On May 1, 2007, the Company commuted the Kemper policies in return for a cash payment. The agreement with Kemper was approved by the State of Illinois.

In addition, a portion of our primary and excess layers of pre-1986 insurance coverage for third party claims was provided by certain insurance carriers who are either insolvent or undergoing solvent schemes of arrangement. We have entered into settlement agreements with a number of these insurers pursuant to which we agreed to give up our rights with respect to certain insurance policies in exchange for negotiated payments. These settlements represent negotiated payments for our loss of insurance coverage, as we no longer have insurance available for claims that may have qualified for coverage. A portion of these settlements was recorded as income for reimbursement of past claim payments under the settled insurance policies and a portion was recorded as a deferred settlement credit for future claim payments.

At June 30, 2007, the deferred settlement credit was approximately $55 million for which approximately $11 million was reported in accrued expenses and approximately $44 million as a long-term liability. The proceeds from such insurance settlements were reported as a component of net cash provided by operating activities in the period payments were received.

Liabilities of Divested Businesses

Asbestos

In May 2002, we completed the tax-free spin-off of our Engineered Products (EIP) segment, which at the time of the spin-off included EnPro Industries, Inc. (EnPro) and Coltec Industries Inc (Coltec). At that time, two subsidiaries of Coltec were defendants in a significant number of personal injury claims relating to alleged asbestos-containing products sold by those subsidiaries. It is possible that asbestos-related claims might be asserted against us on the theory that we have some responsibility for the asbestos-related liabilities of EnPro, Coltec or its subsidiaries, even though the activities that led to those claims occurred prior to our ownership of any of those subsidiaries. Also, it is possible that a claim might be asserted against us that Coltec’s dividend of its aerospace business to us prior to the spin-off was made at a time when Coltec was insolvent or caused Coltec to become insolvent. Such a claim could seek recovery from us on behalf of Coltec of the fair market value of the dividend.

42

A limited number of asbestos-related claims have been asserted against us as “successor” to Coltec or one of its subsidiaries. We believe that we have substantial legal defenses against these claims, as well as against any other claims that may be asserted against us on the theories described above. In addition, the agreement between EnPro and us that was used to effectuate the spin-off provides us with an indemnification from EnPro covering, among other things, these liabilities. The success of any such asbestos-related claims would likely require, as a practical matter, that Coltec’s subsidiaries were unable to satisfy their asbestos-related liabilities and that Coltec was found to be responsible for these liabilities and was unable to meet its financial obligations. We believe any such claims would be without merit and that Coltec was solvent both before and after the dividend of its aerospace business to us. If we are ultimately found to be responsible for the asbestos-related liabilities of Coltec’s subsidiaries, we believe such finding would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, but could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows in a particular period. However, because of the uncertainty as to the number, timing and payments related to future asbestos-related claims, there can be no assurance that any such claims will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. If a claim related to the dividend of Coltec’s aerospace business were successful, it could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Other

In connection with the divestiture of our tire, vinyl and other businesses, we have received contractual rights of indemnification from third parties for environmental and other claims arising out of the divested businesses. Failure of these third parties to honor their indemnification obligations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Guarantees

At June 30, 2007, we had an outstanding contingent liability for guarantees of debt and lease payments of $2 million, letters of credit and bank guarantees of $52.2 million and residual value of lease obligations of $32 million. See Note 15, “Guarantees” to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Aerostructures Long-Term Contracts

Our aerostructures business has several long-term contracts in the pre-production and early production phases (e.g., Boeing 787, Airbus A380 and A350 XWB). The pre-production phase includes design of the product to meet customer specifications as well as design of the processes to manufacture the product. Also involved in this phase is securing supply of material and subcomponents produced by third party suppliers that are generally accomplished through long-term supply agreements. In addition to these factors, contracts in the early production phase include excess-over-average inventories, which represent the excess of current manufactured cost over the estimated average manufactured cost over the life of the contract. Cost estimates over the life of the contract are affected by estimates of future cost reductions including learning curve efficiencies. Because these contracts cover periods of up to 20 years or more, there is risk that estimates of future costs made during the pre-production and early production phases will be different from actual costs and that difference could be significant.

43

Tax

We are continuously undergoing examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), as well as various state and foreign jurisdictions. The IRS and other taxing authorities routinely challenge certain deductions and credits reported by us on our income tax returns.

The current IRS examination cycle began in 2005 and involves the taxable years ended December 31, 2000 through December 31, 2004. The examination team has substantially completed field work. There were numerous issues raised by the IRS, including, but not limited to, transfer pricing, research and development credits, foreign tax credits, tax accounting for long-term contracts, tax accounting for inventory, depreciation, amortization and the proper timing for certain other deductions for income tax purposes. We believe that agreement could be reached with the IRS on most of these issues during 2007. We cannot, however, predict the ultimate outcome of the current IRS examination.

The prior examination cycle, which began in 2002, includes the consolidated income tax groups in the audit periods identified below:

Coltec Industries Inc and Subsidiaries	December, 1997 — July, 1999 (through date of acquisition)
Goodrich Corporation and Subsidiaries	1998-1999 (including Rohr and Coltec)

We previously reached final settlement with the IRS on all but one of the issues raised related to the prior examination cycle. We received statutory notices of deficiency dated June 14, 2007 related to the prior examination cycles. We anticipate filing a petition with the U.S. Tax Court to contest the remaining unresolved issue which involves the proper timing of certain deductions. We believe the amount of the estimated tax liability if the IRS were to prevail is fully reserved. We cannot predict the timing or ultimate outcome of this matter.

Rohr has been under examination by the State of California for the tax years ended July 31, 1985, 1986 and 1987. The State of California has disallowed certain expenses incurred by one of Rohr’s subsidiaries in connection with the lease of certain tangible property. California’s Franchise Tax Board held that the deductions associated with the leased equipment were non-business deductions. The additional tax associated with the Franchise Tax Board’s position is approximately $4.5 million. The amount of accrued interest associated with the additional tax is approximately $21 million as of June 30, 2007. In addition, the State of California enacted an amnesty provision that imposes nondeductible penalty interest equal to 50% of the unpaid interest amounts relating to taxable years ended before 2003. The penalty interest is approximately $10.5 million as of June 30, 2007. The tax and interest amounts continue to be contested by Rohr. We believe that we are adequately reserved for this contingency. During 2005, Rohr made payments of approximately $3.9 million ($0.6 million for tax and $3.3 million for interest) related to items that were not being contested and approximately $4.5 million related to items that are being contested. No payment has been made for the $21 million of interest or $10.5 million of penalty interest. Under California law, Rohr may be required to pay the full amount of interest prior to filing any suit for refund. If required, Rohr expects to make this payment and file suit for a refund in late 2007 or early 2008.

44

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NOT YET ADOPTED

Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits an entity to elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for many financial assets and liabilities. Entities electing the fair value option would be required to recognize changes in fair value in earnings. Entities electing the fair value option would also be required to distinguish, on the face of the statement of financial position, the fair value of assets and liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected and similar assets and liabilities measured using another measurement attribute. SFAS 159 is effective for the fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adjustment to reflect the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount would be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the date of initial adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 159 on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Fair Value Measurement

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for the fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 157 on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Accounting for Income Tax Benefits on Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards

In July 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Tax Force No. 06-11 “Accounting for the Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payments Awards” (EITF 06-11). EITF 06-11 requires companies to recognize the tax benefits of dividends on unvested share-based payments in equity and reclassify those tax benefits from additional paid-in capital (APIC) to the income statement when the related award is forfeited or no longer expected to vest. The amount reclassified is limited to the amount of our APIC pool balance on the reclassification date. EITF 06-11 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of EITF 06-11 on our financial condition and results of operations.

45

Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Associated with Split-Dollar Life Insurance

In September 2006, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefits Associated with Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (EITF 06-4) and in March 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 06-10, “Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.” EITF 06-4 requires deferred compensation or postretirement benefit aspects of an endorsement-type split-dollar life insurance arrangement to be recognized as a liability by the employer and states the obligation is not effectively settled by the purchase of a life insurance policy. The liability for future benefits should be recognized based on the substantive agreement with the employee, which may be either to provide a future death benefit or to pay for the future cost of the life insurance. EITF 06-10 provides recognition guidance for postretirement benefit liabilities related to collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangements, as well as recognition and measurement of the associated asset on the basis of the terms of the collateral assignment split - -dollar life insurance arrangement. EITF 06-4 and EITF 06-10 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of EITF 06-4 and EITF 06-10 on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to customer programs and incentives, product returns, bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, income taxes, financing obligations, warranty obligations, excess component order cancellation costs, restructuring, long-term service contracts, pensions and other postretirement benefits, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Contract Accounting-Percentage of Completion

Revenue Recognition

We have sales under long-term contracts, many of which contain escalation clauses, requiring delivery of products over several years and frequently providing the buyer with option pricing on follow-on orders. Sales and profits on each contract are recognized in accordance with the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, primarily using the units-of-delivery method. We follow the requirements of Statement of Position 81-1 (SOP 81-1), “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts” (the contract method of accounting), using the cumulative catch-up method in accounting for revisions in estimates. Under the cumulative catch-up method, the impact of revisions in estimates related to units shipped to date is recognized immediately when changes in estimated contract profitability are known.

46

Estimates of revenue and cost for our contracts span a period of many years from the inception of the contracts to the date of actual shipments and are based on a substantial number of underlying assumptions. We believe that the underlying factors are sufficiently reliable to provide a reasonable estimate of the profit to be generated. However, due to the significant length of time over which revenue streams will be generated, the variability of the assumptions of the revenue and cost streams can be significant if the factors change. The factors include but are not limited to estimates of the following:

• Projected number of units to be delivered under the contracts;

• Escalation of future sales prices under the contracts;

• Costs, including material and labor costs and related escalation;

• Labor improvements due to the learning curve experience; and

• Supplier pricing including escalation where applicable.

Inventory

Inventoried costs on long-term contracts include certain pre-production costs, consisting primarily of tooling and design costs and production costs, including applicable overhead. The costs attributed to units delivered under long-term commercial contracts are based on the estimated average cost of all units expected to be produced and are determined under the learning curve concept, which anticipates a predictable decrease in unit costs as tasks and production techniques become more efficient through repetition. During the early years of a contract, manufacturing costs per unit delivered are typically greater than the estimated average unit cost for the total contract. This excess manufacturing cost for units shipped results in an increase in inventory (referred to as “excess-over-average”) during the early years of a contract.

If in-process inventory plus estimated costs to complete a specific contract exceeds the anticipated remaining sales value of such contract, such excess is charged to cost of sales in the period recognized, thus reducing inventory to estimated realizable value.

Income Taxes

In accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting” and FASB Interpretation No. 18, “Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods,” as of each interim reporting period, we estimate an effective income tax rate that is expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year. In addition, we establish reserves for tax contingencies in accordance with FIN 48. The estimate of our effective income tax rate involves significant judgments regarding the application of complex tax regulations across many jurisdictions and estimates as to the amount and jurisdictional source of income expected to be earned during the full fiscal year. Further influencing this estimate are evolving interpretations of new and existing tax laws, rulings by taxing authorities and court decisions. Due to the subjective and complex nature of these underlying issues, our actual effective tax rate and related tax liabilities may differ from our initial estimates. Differences between our estimated and actual effective income tax rates and related liabilities are recorded in the period they become known. The resulting adjustment to our income tax expense could have a material effect on our results of operations in the period the adjustment is recorded.

47

Identifiable Intangible Assets

Impairments of identifiable intangible assets are recognized when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, or related groups of assets, may not be recoverable and our estimate of undiscounted cash flows over the assets’ remaining useful lives is less than the carrying value of the assets. The determination of undiscounted cash flow is based on our segments’ plans. The revenue growth is based upon aircraft build projections from aircraft manufacturers and widely available external publications. The profit margin assumption is based upon the current cost structure and anticipated cost reductions. Changes to these assumptions could result in the recognition of impairment.

Other Assets

As with any investment, there are risks inherent in recovering the value of participation payments, entry fees, sales incentives and flight certification costs. Such risks are consistent with the risks associated in acquiring a revenue-producing asset in which market conditions may change or the risks that arise when a manufacturer of a product on which a royalty is based has business difficulties and cannot produce the product. Such risks include but are not limited to the following:

• Changes in market conditions that may affect product sales under the program, including market acceptance and competition from others;

• Performance of subcontract suppliers and other production risks;

• Bankruptcy or other less significant financial difficulties of other program participants, including the aircraft manufacturer, the OEM and other program suppliers or the aircraft customer; and

• Availability of specialized raw materials in the marketplace.

Participation Payments

Certain of our businesses make cash payments under long-term contractual arrangements to OE manufacturers (OEM) or system contractors in return for a secured position on an aircraft program. Participation payments are capitalized, when a contractual liability has been incurred, as other assets and amortized as cost of sales. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the carrying amount of participation payments was $124.1 million and $124.7 million, respectively. The carrying amount of participation payments is evaluated for recovery at least annually or when other indicators of impairment, such as a change in the estimated number of units or a revision in the economics of the program. If such estimates change, amortization expense is adjusted and/or an impairment charge is recorded, as appropriate, for the effect of the revised estimates. No such impairment charges were recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2007 or 2006.

48

Entry Fees

Certain businesses in our Nacelles and Interior Systems and Electronic Systems segments make cash payments to an OEM under long-term contractual arrangements related to new engine programs. The payments are referred to as entry fees and entitle us to a controlled access supply contract and a percentage of total program revenue generated by the OEM. Entry fees are capitalized in other assets and are amortized on a straight-line basis to cost of sales or as a reduction of sales, as appropriate. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the carrying amount of entry fees was $135.7 million and $135.3 million, respectively. The carrying amount of entry fees is evaluated for recovery at least annually or when other significant assumptions or economic conditions change. Recovery of entry fees is assessed based on the expected cash flow from the program over the remaining program life as compared to the recorded amount of entry fees. If the carrying value of the entry fees exceeds the cash flow to be generated from the program, a charge would be recorded for the amount by which the carrying amount of the entry fee exceeds its fair value. No such impairment charges were recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2007 or 2006.

Sales Incentives

We offer sales incentives such as up-front cash payments, merchandise credits and/or free products to certain airline customers in connection with sales contracts. The cost of these incentives is recognized in the period incurred unless recovery of these costs is specifically guaranteed by the customer in the contract. If the contract contains such a guarantee, then the cost of the sales incentive is capitalized as other assets and amortized to cost of sales. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the carrying amount of sales incentives was $60.7 million and $61.2 million, respectively. The carrying amount of sales incentives is evaluated for recovery when indicators of potential impairment exist. The carrying value of the sales incentives is also compared annually to the amount recoverable under the terms of the guarantee in the customer contract. If the amount of the carrying value of the sales incentives exceeds the amount recoverable in the contract, the carrying value is reduced. No such impairment charges were recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2007 or 2006.

Flight Certification Costs

When a supply arrangement is secured, certain of our businesses may agree to supply hardware to an OEM to be used in flight certification testing and/or make cash payments to reimburse an OEM for costs incurred in testing the hardware. The flight certification testing is necessary to certify aircraft systems/components for the aircraft’s airworthiness and allows the aircraft to be flown and thus sold in the country certifying the aircraft. Flight certification costs are capitalized in other assets and are amortized to cost of sales. At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the carrying amount of flight certification costs was $29.8 million and $26.3 million, respectively. The carrying amount of flight certification costs is evaluated for recovery when indicators of impairment exist or when the estimated number of units to be manufactured changes. No such impairment charges were recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2007 or 2006.

49

Service and Product Warranties

We provide service and warranty policies on certain of our products. We accrue liabilities under service and warranty policies based upon specific claims and a review of historical warranty and service claim experience in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”. Adjustments are made to accruals as claim data and historical experience change. In addition, we incur discretionary costs to service its products in connection with product performance issues.

Our service and product warranty reserves are based upon a variety of factors. Any significant change in these factors could have a material impact on our results of operations. Such factors include but are not limited to the following:

• The historical performance of our products and changes in performance of newer products;

• The mix and volumes of products being sold; and

• The impact of product changes.

Pension and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

We consult with an outside actuary as to the appropriateness for many of the assumptions used in determining the benefit obligations and the annual expense for our pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions. Assumptions such as the rate of compensation increase and the long-term rate of return on plan assets are based upon our historical and benchmark data, as well as our outlook for the future. Health care cost projections and the mortality rate assumption are evaluated annually. The U.S. discount rate was determined based on a customized yield curve approach. Our projected pension and postretirement benefit payment cash flows were each plotted against a yield curve composed of a large, diverse group of Aa-rated corporate bonds. The resulting discount rate was used to determine the benefit obligations. In Canada and the U.K., a similar approach to determining discount rates in the U.S. was utilized. The appropriate benchmarks by applicable country were used for pension plans other than those in the U.S., U.K., and Canada to determine the discount rate assumptions.

50

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO RISK AND UNCERTAINTY

Certain statements made in this document are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding our future plans, objectives and expected performance. Specifically, statements that are not historical facts, including statements accompanied by words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “should,” “estimate,” or “plan,” are intended to identify forward-looking statements and convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. We caution readers that any such forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that we believe are reasonable, but are subject to a wide range of risks, and actual results may differ materially.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected performance include, but are not limited to:

• demand for and market acceptance of new and existing products, such as the Airbus A350 XWB and A380, the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, the EMBRAER 190, the Dassault Falcon 7X and the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II and F-22 Raptor;

• our ability to extend our commercial original equipment contracts beyond the initial contract periods;

• cancellation or delays of orders or contracts by customers or with suppliers;

• successful development of products and advanced technologies;

• the health of the commercial aerospace industry, including the impact of bankruptcies and/or consolidations in the airline industry;

• global demand for aircraft spare parts and aftermarket services;

• changing priorities or reductions in the defense budgets in the U.S. and other countries, U.S. foreign policy and the level of activity in military flight operations;

• the resolution of contractual disputes with Northrop Grumman related to the purchase of aeronautical systems;

• the possibility of restructuring and consolidation actions beyond those previously announced by us;

• threats and events associated with and efforts to combat terrorism;

• the extent to which expenses relating to employee and retiree medical and pension benefits change;

• competitive product and pricing pressures;

• our ability to recover from third parties under contractual rights of indemnification for environmental and other claims arising out of the divestiture of our tire, vinyl and other businesses;

• possible assertion of claims against us on the theory that we, as the former corporate parent of Coltec Industries Inc, bear some responsibility for the asbestos-related liabilities of Coltec and its subsidiaries, or that Coltec’s dividend of its aerospace business to us prior to the EnPro spin-off was made at a time when Coltec was insolvent or caused Coltec to become insolvent;

• the effect of changes in accounting policies;

• cumulative catch-up adjustments or loss contract reserves on long-term contracts accounted for under the percentage of completion method of accounting;

• domestic and foreign government spending, budgetary and trade policies;

• economic and political changes in international markets where we compete, such as changes in currency exchange rates, inflation, deflation, recession and other external factors over which we have no control; and

• the outcome of contingencies including completion of acquisitions, divestitures, tax audits, litigation and environmental remediation efforts.

51

We caution you not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this document, which speak only as of the date on which such statements are made. We undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statements were made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business operations, including risks from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, which could impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through regular operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments. We intend to use such derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for speculative investment purposes. Our discussion of market risk in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K provides more discussion as to the types of instruments used to manage risk. Refer to Note 16, “Derivatives and Hedging Activities” of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part 1 — Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for a description of current developments involving our hedging activities. At June 30, 2007, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in reference interest rates would increase annual interest expense by $2.5 million. At June 30, 2007, a hypothetical 10 percent strengthening of the U.S. dollar against other foreign currencies would decrease the value of our forward contracts by $195.2 million. The fair value of these forward contracts was $122.8 million at June 30, 2007. Because we hedge only a portion of our exposure, a strengthening of the U.S. Dollar as described above would have a more than offsetting benefit to our financial results in future periods.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s disclosure control objectives.

We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report (the Evaluation Date). Based upon that evaluation, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date to provide reasonable assurance regarding management’s disclosure control objectives.

52

Changes in Internal Control

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As part of our previously disclosed plan for a single, integrated ERP system across all of our strategic business units, we implemented the ERP system at our corporate headquarters during the second quarter 2007.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We and certain of our subsidiaries are defendants in various claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings. In addition, we have been notified that we are among potentially responsible parties under federal environmental laws, or similar state laws, relative to the cost of investigating and in some cases remediating contamination by hazardous materials at several sites. See the disclosure under the captions “General”, “Environmental”, “Asbestos”, “Liabilities of Divested Businesses-Asbestos” and “Tax” in Note 14, “Contingencies” to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1, of this Form 10-Q, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In addition to other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. The risks described in our Annual Report of Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(c) The following table summarizes Goodrich Corporation’s purchases of its common stock for the three months ended June 30, 2007:

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

					(c) Total Number of		(d) Maximum Number
					Shares Purchased as		(or Approximate Dollar
	(a) Total Number				Part of Publicly		Value) of Shares that May
	of Shares		(b) Average Price		Announced Plans or		Yet Be Purchased Under
Period	Purchased (1)		Paid Per Share		Programs (2)		the Plans or Programs (2)
April 2007		29,652	$	51.85		23,000
May 2007		942,746		57.81		928,000
June 2007		7,000		58.34		7,000
Total		979,398	$	57.64		958,000	$174 million

(1)	The category includes 21,398 shares delivered to us by employees to pay withholding taxes due upon vesting of a restricted unit award and to pay the exercise price of employee stock options.
(2)	This balance represents the number of shares that were repurchased under our repurchase program that was announced on October 24, 2006 (the “Program”). Under the Program we are authorized to repurchase up to $300 million of our common stock. Unless terminated earlier by resolution of our Board of Directors, the Program will expire when we have purchased all shares authorized for repurchase.

53

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on April 24, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern time at the Company’s headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina. As described in the 2007 Proxy Statement, the following actions were taken:

• The eleven nominees for director were elected;

• The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2007 was ratified; and

• The shareholder proposal regarding Pay-For-Superior-Performance was not approved.

The votes were as follows:

Election of Directors:

	Number of Shares Voted For		Number of Shares Vote Withheld
Diane C. Creel		112,507,444		1,656,307
George A. Davidson, Jr.		110,911,062		3,252,688
Harris E. DeLoach, Jr.		112,728,478		1,435,272
James W. Griffith		112,194,430		1,969,320
William R. Holland		112,687,209		1,476,542
John P. Jumper		112,869,236		1,294,514
Marshall O. Larsen		111,182,981		2,980,769
Lloyd W. Newton		112,639,859		1,523,891
Douglas E. Olesen		111,239,256		2,924,495
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr.		111,228,546		2,935,204
A. Thomas Young		110,930,652		3,233,098

Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:

111,282,359 shares voted for; 2,160,906 shares voted against; and 720,482 shares abstained from voting.

Shareholder Proposal regarding Pay-For-Superior-Performance:

35,177,454 shares voted for; 63,980,348 shares voted against; and 1,110,843 shares abstained from voting.

54

Item 6. Exhibits.

The following exhibits have been filed with this report:

Exhibit 3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Goodrich Corporation, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Goodrich Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 1-892), is incorporated herein by reference.
Exhibit 3.2	By-Laws of Goodrich Corporation, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Goodrich Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 26, 2007, is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, Goodrich Corporation hereby undertakes to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request, a copy of all instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt.
Exhibit 10.1	Amendment Number One to the Goodrich Corporation Pension Benefit Restoration Plan.
Exhibit 10.2	Amendment Number Two to the Goodrich Corporation Outside Director Phantom Share Plan.
Exhibit 10.3	Amendment Number Two to the Goodrich Corporation Outside Director Deferral Plan.
Exhibit 15	Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information.
Exhibit 31	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications.
Exhibit 32	Section 1350 Certifications.

55

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

July 30, 2007	GOODRICH CORPORATION
	/s/ SCOTT E. KUECHLE
	Scott E. Kuechle
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	/s/ SCOTT A. COTTRILL
	Scott A. Cottrill
	Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

56

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit 3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Goodrich Corporation, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Goodrich Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 1-892), is incorporated herein by reference.
Exhibit 3.2	By-Laws of Goodrich Corporation, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Goodrich Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 26, 2007, is incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, Goodrich Corporation hereby undertakes to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request, a copy of all instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt.
Exhibit 10.1	Amendment Number One to the Goodrich Corporation Pension Benefit Restoration Plan.*
Exhibit 10.2	Amendment Number Two to the Goodrich Corporation Outside Director Phantom Share Plan.*
Exhibit 10.3	Amendment Number Two to the Goodrich Corporation Outside Director Deferral Plan.*
Exhibit 15	Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information.*
Exhibit 31	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications.*
Exhibit 32	Section 1350 Certifications.*

* Submitted electronically herewith.

57