Notes to Financial Statements | |
| 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2009
USD / shares
|
Notes to Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
A. Basis of Presentation |
A. Basis of Presentation The interim Consolidated Financial Statements (the Financial Statements) of Alcoa Inc. and its subsidiaries (Alcoa or the Company) are unaudited. The Financial Statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary by management to fairly state the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows. The results reported in these Financial Statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. The 2008 year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, which were revised in the current period to reflect changes in the presentation of minority interests (see Note B), but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. This Form 10-Q report should be read in conjunction with Alcoas Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2008, which includes all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Certain amounts in previously issued financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. |
B. Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
B. Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Adopted
On June30, 2009, Alcoa adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.165, Subsequent Events, (SFAS 165). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, SFAS 165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The adoption of SFAS 165 had no impact on the Financial Statements as management already followed a similar approach prior to the adoption of this standard (see Note Q).
On January1, 2009, Alcoa adopted SFAS No.157, Fair Value Measurements, (SFAS 157) as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. The adoption of SFAS 157, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, had no impact on the Financial Statements. The provisions of SFAS 157 will be applied at such time a fair value measurement of a nonfinancial asset or nonfinancial liability is required, which may result in a fair value that is materially different than would have been calculated prior to the adoption of SFAS 157.
On January1, 2009, Alcoa adopted SFAS No.161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activitiesan amendment of FASB Statement No.133, (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities, including (i)how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii)how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No.133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (SFAS 133), and (iii)how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Other than the required disclosures (see the Derivatives section of Note P), the adoption of SFAS 161 had no impact on the Financial Statements.
On January1, 2009, Alcoa adopted SFAS No.160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statementsan amendment of ARB No.51, (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin No.51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to establish accounting and reporting standar |
C. Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale |
C. Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale For all periods presented in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations, the Electrical and Electronic Solutions (EES) business was classified as discontinued operations.
The following table details selected financial information for the EES business included within discontinued operations:
Secondquarterended June30, Sixmonthsended June30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Sales $ 118 $ 375 $ 273 $ 752
Loss from operations before income taxes $ (195 ) $ (11 ) $ (219 ) $ (5 )
Benefit for income taxes 53 4 60 2
Loss from discontinued operations $ (142 ) $ (7 ) $ (159 ) $ (3 )
In the 2009 second quarter and six-month period, the loss from discontinued operations was comprised of a $120 loss on the divestiture of the wire harness and electrical portion of the EES business (see Note E) and the remainder was the operational results of the EES business. In the 2008 second quarter and six-month period, the loss from discontinued operations represents the operational results of the EES business.
For both periods presented in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet, the assets and liabilities of operations classified as held for sale include the electronics portion of the EES business, the Global Foil business, the Transportation Products Europe business, and the Hawesville, KY automotive casting facility. Additionally, the wire harness and electrical portion of the EES Business, the wireless component of the previously divested telecommunications business, and a small automotive casting business in the U.K. were classified as held for sale as of December31, 2008.
The major classes of assets and liabilities of operations held for sale are as follows:
June30, 2009 December31, 2008
Assets:
Receivables $ 75 $ 99
Inventories 40 102
Properties, plants, and equipment 36 30
Other assets 25 16
Assets held for sale $ 176 $ 247
Liabilities:
Accounts payable, trade $ 43 $ 101
Accrued expenses 21 28
Other liabilities 1
Liabilities of operations held for sale $ 64 $ 130
|
D. Restructuring and Other Charges |
D. Restructuring and Other Charges In the second quarter and six-month period of 2009, Alcoa recorded restructuring and other charges of $82 ($56 after-tax and noncontrolling interests) and $151 ($102 after-tax and noncontrolling interests), respectively. Restructuring and other charges in the 2009 second quarter include $42 ($30 after-tax and noncontrolling interests) for the layoff of approximately 1,560 employees (1,320 in the Flat-Rolled Products segment; 120 in the Alumina segment; 60 in the Primary Metals segment; and 60 in Corporate) to continue to address the impact of the global economic downturn on Alcoas businesses; $23 ($15 after-tax) in adjustments to the Global Foil and Transportation Products Europe businesses mainly due to unfavorable foreign currency movements; a $9 ($6 after-tax) curtailment charge due to the remeasurement of pension plans as a result of the workforce reductions (see NoteO); and $8 ($5 after-tax and noncontrolling interests) in net charges associated with previously approved restructuring programs. In the 2009 six-month period, restructuring and other charges include $90 ($62 after-tax and noncontrolling interests) for the layoff of approximately 4,060 employees (2,190 in the Engineered Products and Solutions segment; 1,380 in the Flat-Rolled Products segment; 220 in the Primary Metals segment; 120 in the Alumina segment; and 150 in Corporate) to continue to address the impact of the global economic downturn on Alcoas businesses; the previously mentioned $23 ($15 after-tax) in adjustments to businesses held for sale and the $9 ($6 after-tax) curtailment charge; $18 ($12 after-tax) for the write-off of previously capitalized third-party costs related to potential business acquisitions due to the adoption of SFAS 141(R) (see Note B); and $11 ($7 after-tax and noncontrolling interests) in net charges associated with previously approved restructuring programs.
In the second quarter and six-month period of 2008, Alcoa recorded restructuring and other charges of less than $1 and $38 ($31 after-tax and noncontrolling interests), respectively. Restructuring and other charges include $5 ($3 after-tax) and $41 ($31 after-tax) in the 2008 second quarter and six-month period, respectively, as a result of the loss recognized on the sale of the businesses within the former Packaging and Consumer segment. The $5 was offset by a net credit of $5 ($3 after-tax and noncontrolling interests) in the 2008 second quarter, primarily as a result of adjustments to severance reserves associated with previously approved restructuring programs due to changes in facts and circumstances. The $41 was slightly offset by a net credit in the 2008 six-month period, primarily as a result of the previously mentioned adjustments partially offset by severance and other exit costs associated with previously approved restructuring programs.
Alcoa does not include restructuring and other charges in the segment results. The pretax impact of allocating restructuring and other charges to the segment results would have been as follows:
Secondquarterended June30, Sixmonthsended June30,
2009 2008 2009 |
E. Acquisitions and Divestitures |
E. Acquisitions and Divestitures On June15, 2009, Alcoa completed the divestiture of the wire harness and electrical portion of the EES business to Platinum Equity effective June1, 2009. Alcoa paid $193 upon consummation of the transaction and recognized a loss of $120 in discontinued operations (see Note C) on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations. The cash payment was comprised of the agreed upon transaction price of $175 and a working capital adjustment of $18 based on the provisions of the purchase agreement. This transaction is subject to certain post-closing adjustments as defined in the purchase agreement. Proceeds from the sale of assets and businesses on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows include this payment as a cash outflow. The wire harness and electrical portion of the EES business generated sales of $1,114 in 2008 and, at the time of divestiture, had operations in 13 countries employing approximately 16,200 employees.
On March31, 2009, Alcoa completed the non-cash exchange of its 45.45% stake in the Sapa AB joint venture for Orkla ASAs (Orkla) 50% stake in the Elkem Aluminium ANS joint venture (Elkem). Alcoa now owns 100% of Elkem and Orkla now owns 100% of Sapa AB. Prior to the completion of the exchange transaction, Alcoa accounted for its investments in Sapa AB and Elkem on the equity method and the carrying values were $475 and $435, respectively, at December31, 2008. Elkem includes aluminum smelters in Lista and Mosjen, Norway with a combined output of 282 kmt (thousand metric tons) and the anode plant in Mosjen in which Alcoa already holds an 82% stake. These three facilities employ approximately 700 workers combined. The individual assets and liabilities of Elkem were included in the Primary Metals segment at March31, 2009 (the final amounts to be recorded will be based on valuation and other studies that have not yet been completed) and Elkems results of operations were reflected in this segment starting on April1, 2009. The exchange transaction resulted in the recognition of a $188 gain ($133 after-tax), comprised of a $156 adjustment to the carrying value of Alcoas existing 50% interest in Elkem in accordance with the fair value measurement provisions of SFAS 141(R) and a $32 adjustment for the finalization of the estimated fair value of the Sapa AB joint venture. The $188 gain was reflected in Other expenses, net on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations, of which $156 ($112 after-tax) was reflected in the Primary Metals segment and $32 ($21 after-tax) was reflected in Corporate. The portion of the gain reflected in Corporate was because the original write-down of the 45.45% Sapa AB investment to its estimated fair value in December 2008 was reflected in Corporate. At the time the exchange transaction was completed, Elkem had $18 in cash, which was reflected in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows on the acquisitions line. |
F. Inventories |
F. Inventories
June30, 2009 December31, 2008
Finished goods $ 494 $ 747
Work-in-process 678 960
Bauxite and alumina 601 724
Purchased raw materials 464 575
Operating supplies 256 232
$ 2,493 $ 3,238
At June30, 2009 and December31, 2008, 35% and 39% of total inventories, respectively, were valued on a last in, first out (LIFO) basis. If valued on an average-cost basis, total inventories would have been $974 and $1,078 higher at June30, 2009 and December31, 2008, respectively. |
G. Investments |
G. Investments On February12, 2009, Alcoa and the Aluminum Corporation of China (Chinalco) entered into an agreement in which Chinalco redeemed the convertible senior secured note (the note) that was previously issued by a special purpose vehicle called Shining Prospect Pte. Ltd., which is a private limited liability company created solely for the purpose of acquiring shares of Rio Tinto plc (RTP). Alcoa had joined with Chinalco on February1, 2008 to acquire 12% of the U.K. common stock of RTP for approximately $14,000. Alcoa had contributed $1,200 of the $14,000 through the purchase of the note. Under the agreement executed on February12, 2009, Alcoa will receive $1,021 in cash in three installments over a six-month period ending July31, 2009, of which $501 was received through June30, 2009 and is reflected in Sales of investments on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows. The remaining $520 was included in Other receivables on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet and was not reflected in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows as it represents a non-cash activity. As a result of this transaction, Alcoa realized a loss of $182 ($118 after-tax), which is reflected in Other expenses, net on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations, and reversed the unrealized loss that had been recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet since the initial investment was made. |
H. Debt |
H. Debt On March24, 2009, Alcoa issued $575 of 5.25% convertible notes due 2014 (the convertible notes). The issuance of the convertible notes includes $75 related to the exercise of an over-allotment option by the underwriters. The underwriting discount and third-party expenses for the issuance of the convertible notes was $13 and will be amortized to interest expense over the five-year term of the convertible notes. The convertible notes were issued under Alcoas shelf registration statement dated March10, 2008.
Interest on the convertible notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on March15th and September15th each year, commencing on September15, 2009. If there is an event of default under the convertible notes, the principal amount of the convertible notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, may be declared immediately due and payable. These amounts automatically become due and payable if an event of default relating to certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency, or reorganization occurs.
Alcoa does not have the right to redeem the convertible notes prior to the stated maturity date. Holders of the convertible notes have the option to convert their notes into shares of Alcoas common stock at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day (March 13, 2014) immediately preceding the stated maturity date (March 15, 2014). The initial conversion rate for the convertible notes is 155.4908 shares of Alcoas common stock per $1,000 (in whole dollars) principal amount of notes (89,407,210 shares), equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $6.43 per share, subject to adjustment, as defined in the convertible notes. Other than receiving cash in lieu of fractional shares, holders do not have the option to receive cash instead of shares of common stock upon conversion. Accrued and unpaid interest that exists upon conversion of a note will be deemed paid by the delivery of shares of Alcoas common stock and no cash payment or additional shares will be given to holders.
On the issuance date of the convertible notes, the market price of Alcoas common stock was above the stated conversion price of $6.43 creating a beneficial conversion option to the holders, as the convertible notes were in-the-money. The beneficial conversion option is defined as a benefit provided to the holders in the form of non-cash interest expense to the Company. As a result, Alcoa recorded a $66 increase to additional capital and a corresponding decrease in the carrying value of the convertible notes representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion option. The $66 decrease will be amortized to interest expense over the five-year term of the convertible notes effectively accreting the carrying value of the convertible notes to $575 by the stated maturity date.
If Alcoa undergoes a fundamental change, as defined in the convertible notes, holders may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of their notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the repurchase date. Such a repurchase will be made in cash.
The convert |
I. Commitments and Contingencies |
I. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
On February27, 2008, Alcoa Inc. received notice that Aluminium Bahrain B.S.C. (Alba) had filed suit against Alcoa Inc. and Alcoa World Alumina LLC (collectively, Alcoa), and others, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (the Court), Civil Action number 08-299, styled Aluminium Bahrain B.S.C. v. Alcoa Inc., Alcoa World Alumina LLC, William Rice, and Victor Phillip Dahdaleh. The complaint alleges that certain Alcoa entities and their agents, including Victor Phillip Dahdaleh, have engaged in a conspiracy over a period of 15 years to defraud Alba. The complaint further alleges that Alcoa and its employees or agents (1)illegally bribed officials of the government of Bahrain and (or) officers of Alba in order to force Alba to purchase alumina at excessively high prices, (2)illegally bribed officials of the government of Bahrain and (or) officers of Alba and issued threats in order to pressure Alba to enter into an agreement by which Alcoa would purchase an equity interest in Alba, and (3)assigned portions of existing supply contracts between Alcoa and Alba for the sole purpose of facilitating alleged bribes and unlawful commissions. The complaint alleges that Alcoa and the other defendants violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and committed fraud. Albas complaint seeks compensatory, consequential, exemplary, and punitive damages, rescission of the 2005 alumina supply contract, and attorneys fees and costs. Alba seeks treble damages with respect to its RICO claims.
On February26, 2008, Alcoa Inc. had advised the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that it had recently become aware of these claims, had already begun an internal investigation, and intended to cooperate fully in any investigation that the DOJ or the SEC may commence. On March17, 2008, the DOJ notified Alcoa that it had opened a formal investigation and Alcoa has been cooperating with the government.
In response to a motion filed by the DOJ on March27, 2008, the Court ordered the suit filed by Alba to be administratively closed and that all discovery be stayed to allow the DOJ to fully conduct an investigation without the interference and distraction of ongoing civil litigation. The Court further ordered that the case will be reopened at the close of the DOJs investigation. The Company is unable to reasonably predict an outcome or to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss.
In November 2006, in Curtis v. Alcoa Inc., Civil Action No.3:06cv448 (E.D. Tenn.), a class action was filed by plaintiffs representing approximately 13,000 retired former employees of Alcoa or Reynolds Metals Company and spouses and dependents of such retirees alleging violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Labor-Management Relations Act by requiring plaintiffs, beginning January1, 2007, to pay health insurance premiums and increased co-payments and co-insurance for certain medical procedures and prescription drugs. Plaintiffs allege these changes to their retiree health care plans violate their rights to vested |
J. Other Income, Net |
J. Other Income, Net
Secondquarterended June30, Sixmonthsended June30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Equity (income) loss $ (1 ) $ (22 ) $ 22 $ (50 )
Interest income (13 ) (18 ) (14 ) (32 )
Foreign currency gains, net (60 ) (67 ) (46 ) (20 )
Losses (gains) from asset sales 10 (9 ) (17 ) (8 )
Other, net (25 ) 20 (4 ) 72
$ (89 ) $ (96 ) $ (59 ) $ (38 )
In the 2009 six-month period, Losses (gains) from asset sales include a $188 gain related to the Elkem/Sapa AB exchange transaction (see Note E) and a $182 loss on the sale of the Shining Prospect investment (see Note G).
|
K. Segment Information |
K. Segment Information In May 2009, management approved the movement of Alcoas hard alloy extrusions business from the Flat-Rolled Products segment to the Engineered Products and Solutions segment. This move was made to capture market, customer, and manufacturer synergies through the combination of the hard alloy extrusions business with the power and propulsion forgings business. Prior period amounts were reclassified to reflect this change.
Alcoas reportable segments, reclassified to exclude discontinued operations and assets held for sale (see NoteC), are as follows (differences between segment totals and consolidated totals are in Corporate):
Alumina Primary Metals Flat- Rolled Products Engineered Products and Solutions Packaging and Consumer Total
Second quarter ended June30, 2009
Sales:
Third-party sales $ 441 $ 1,146 $ 1,427 $ 1,194 $ $ 4,208
Intersegment sales 306 349 23 678
Total sales $ 747 $ 1,495 $ 1,450 $ 1,194 $ $ 4,886
Profit and loss:
Equity income $ 1 $ 4 $ $ $ $ 5
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization 67 139 55 46 307
Income taxes (21 ) (119 ) (1 ) 40 (101 )
After-tax operating income (ATOI) (7 ) (178 ) (35 ) 88 (132 )
Second quarter ended June30, 2008
Sales:
Third-party sales $ 717 $ 2,437 $ 2,363 $ 1,660 $ 19 $ 7,196
Intersegment sales 766 1,108 65 1,939
Total sales $ 1,483 $ 3,545 $ 2,428 $ 1,660 $ 19 $ 9,135
Profit and loss:
Equity income $ 2 $ 10 $ $ $ $ 12
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization 67 128 59 41 295
Income taxes 67 131 20 75 293
ATOI 190 428 48 172 838
Alumina Primary Metals Flat- Rolled Products Engineered Products and Solutions Packaging and Consumer Total
Six months ended June30, 2009
Sales:
Third-party sales $ 871 $ 1,990 $ 2,937 $ 2,464 $ $ 8,262
Intersegment sales 690 742 49 1,481
Total sales $ 1,561 $ 2,732 $ 2,986 $ 2,464 $ $ 9,743
Profit and loss:
Equity income (loss) $ 3 $ (26 ) $ $ $ $ (23 )
Deprecia |
L. Preferred and Common Stock |
L. Preferred and Common Stock On March24, 2009, Alcoa issued 172.5million shares of common stock (par value of $1 per share) at a price of $5.25 per share. The issuance of common stock includes 22.5million shares related to the exercise of an over-allotment option by the underwriters. The underwriting discount and third-party expenses for the issuance of the common stock was $30 and was recorded as a decrease to additional capital. The common stock was issued under Alcoas shelf registration statement dated March10, 2008. Alcoa is authorized to issue up to 1.8 billion shares of common stock. As of June30, 2009, there were 1,097,074,538 common shares issued and 974,286,776 common shares outstanding.
The net proceeds from the issuance of common stock ($876) and the convertible notes (see Note H) were used to prepay the $1,300 outstanding under Alcoas 364-day revolving credit facility (see Note H). The remaining net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
In March 2009, the quarterly common stock dividend was reduced from $0.17 per share to $0.03 per share in connection with a series of financial actions initiated to improve liquidity. |
M. Earnings Per Share |
M. Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share (EPS) amounts are computed by dividing earnings after the deduction of preferred stock dividends by the average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS amounts assume the issuance of common stock for all potentially dilutive share equivalents outstanding. The information used to compute basic and diluted EPS on (loss) income from continuing operations attributable to Alcoa common shareholders is as follows (shares in millions):
Secondquarterended June30, Sixmonthsended June30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to Alcoa common shareholders $ (312 ) $ 553 $ (792 ) $ 852
Less: preferred stock dividends 1 1
(Loss) income from continuing operations available to Alcoa common shareholders $ (312 ) $ 553 $ (791 ) $ 851
Average shares outstanding basic 974 816 896 817
Effect of dilutive securities:
Potential shares of common stock, attributable to stock options, stock awards, and performance awards 9 9
Average shares outstanding diluted 974 825 896 826
In the 2009 second quarter and six-month period, basic average shares outstanding and diluted average shares outstanding were the same because the effect of dilutive securities was anti-dilutive since Alcoa generated a loss from continuing operations. As a result, 27million stock options, 7million stock and performance awards, and 89million share equivalents related to the convertible notes were not included in the computation of diluted EPS. Had Alcoa generated income from continuing operations in the 2009 second quarter and six-month period, 94million and 53million, respectively, potential shares of common stock related to the stock options, stock and performance awards, and convertible notes would have been included in diluted average shares outstanding.
Options to purchase 40million and 30million shares of common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $35.27 and $39.57 per share were outstanding as of June30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because they were anti-dilutive, as the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of Alcoas common stock. |
N. Income Taxes |
N. Income Taxes The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2009 and 2008 was 25.4% (benefit on a loss) and 27.1% (provision on income), respectively. The rate for the 2009 second quarter differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to lower tax rates in foreign jurisdictions, a $21 tax charge for unbenefitted operational losses that are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate calculation, and a $5 discrete income tax charge related to the Elkem/Sapa AB exchange transaction. The rate for the 2008 second quarter differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to foreign income being taxed in lower rate jurisdictions and a $9 discrete income tax benefit associated with the sale of the businesses within the former Packaging and Consumer segment, mainly as a result of changes in tax assumptions surrounding transaction costs and the finalization of the divestiture of certain foreign locations.
The effective tax rate for the 2009 and 2008 six-month periods was 34.5% (benefit on a loss) and 31.0% (provision on income), respectively. The rate for the 2009 six-month period differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to lower tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and a $6 tax charge for unbenefitted operational losses that are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate calculation, both of which were mostly offset by a $28 discrete income tax benefit related to a Canadian tax law change allowing a tax return to be filed in U.S. dollars and a $6 discrete income tax benefit related to the Elkem/Sapa AB exchange transaction. The rate for the 2008 six-month period differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to foreign income being taxed in lower rate jurisdictions and the $9 discrete income tax benefit mentioned above, partially offset by a $28 discrete income tax charge related to the allocation of the sale proceeds of the businesses within the former Packaging and Consumer segment to higher tax rate jurisdictions as opposed to the allocation previously contemplated.
Alcoa has recorded deferred tax assets associated with tax loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. As of December31, 2008, deferred tax assets related to tax loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards were $1,017 and $320, respectively. These deferred tax asset amounts increased during the 2009 six-month period as a result of Alcoas current operating loss position. Alcoa has recorded a valuation allowance against a portion of the tax loss carryforwards but has not recorded a valuation allowance against the tax credit carryforwards. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. Deferred tax assets for which no valuation allowance is recorded may not be realized if sufficient income is not generated in the future in certain jurisdictions. |
O. Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits |
O. Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
Secondquarterended June30, Sixmonthsended June30,
Pension benefits 2009 2008 2009 2008
Service cost $ 35 $ 42 $ 70 $ 87
Interest cost 170 171 337 343
Expected return on plan assets (192 ) (203 ) (383 ) (409 )
Amortization of prior service cost 4 5 8 9
Recognized actuarial loss 28 26 56 49
Curtailments 4 4 2
Settlements 3 14
Net periodic benefit cost $ 49 $ 44 $ 92 $ 95
Secondquarterended June30, Sixmonthsended June30,
Postretirement benefits 2009 2008 2009 2008
Service cost $ 6 $ 6 $ 11 $ 13
Interest cost 46 48 92 96
Expected return on plan assets (3 ) (5 ) (6 ) (9 )
Amortization of prior service benefit (3 ) (2 ) (6 ) (5 )
Recognized actuarial loss 10 11 21 23
Curtailments (1 ) (1 ) 3
Net periodic benefit cost $ 55 $ 58 $ 111 $ 121
During the second quarter of 2009, Alcoa completed the divestiture of the wire harness and electrical portion of the EES business to Platinum Equity (see Note E) and continued to execute its global workforce reduction plan (see NoteD). As a result, certain pension and postretirement benefit plans were remeasured and Alcoa recognized curtailment gains and losses due to the significant reduction in the expected aggregate years of future service of the employees of the EES business and the employees subject to the global workforce reduction plan, respectively. In the second quarter of 2009, Alcoa recorded curtailment gains of $5 and $1 related to the pension and postretirement benefit plans, respectively, that include the EES employees in Loss from discontinued operations and curtailment losses of $9 related to the pension plans that include the employees subject to the global workforce reduction plan in Restructuring and other charges on the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations. The curtailment gains and losses include recognition of the change in the projected benefit obligation (PBO) or accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) and a portion of the previously unrecognized prior service cost reflecting the reduction in expected future service.
The remeasurement of these pension plans generated a net increase in 2009 annual net periodic benefit cost of $9 of which $1 was recognized in the 2009 second quarter and the remainder will be recognized ratably over the second half of 2009. The remeasurement of these postretirement benefit plans generated a decrease in 2009 annual net periodic benefit cost of less than $1. Also, the pension plans PBO and plan assets decreased by $197 and $74, res |
P. Derivatives and Other Financial Instruments |
P. Derivatives and Other Financial Instruments
Derivatives
Alcoa is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations, including financial, market, political, and economic risks. The following discussion provides information regarding Alcoas exposure to the risks of changing commodity prices, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates.
Alcoas commodity and derivative activities are subject to the management, direction, and control of the Strategic Risk Management Committee (SRMC). The SRMC is composed of the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, and other officers and employees that the chief executive officer selects. The SRMC reports to the Board of Directors on the scope of its activities.
The aluminum, energy, interest rate, and foreign exchange contracts are held for purposes other than trading. They are used primarily to mitigate uncertainty and volatility, and to cover underlying exposures. The Company is not involved in trading activities for energy, weather derivatives, or other nonexchange commodity trading activities.
The fair value of outstanding derivative contracts recorded as assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet were as follows:
Asset Derivatives
Balance Sheet Location June30, 2009 December31, 2008
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133:
Aluminum contracts Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 70 $
Interest rate contracts Prepaid expenses and other current assets 23 14
Foreign exchange contracts Prepaid expenses and other current assets 6
Aluminum contracts Other assets 68 26
Interest rate contracts Other assets 90 146
Foreign exchange contracts Other assets 6
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 $ 263 $ 186
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133*:
Aluminum contracts Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 11 $ 35
Energy contracts Prepaid expenses and other current assets 4 17
Energy contracts Other assets 1
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 $ 15 $ 53
Less margin held:
Interest rate contracts Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 17 $ 3
Aluminum contracts Prepaid expenses and other current assets 2
Interest rate contracts Other assets 37 64
Sub-total $ 56 $ 67
Total Asset Derivatives $ 222 $ 172
* See the Other section within Note P for additional information on Alcoas purpose for entering into derivatives not designated as hedging instruments and its overall risk management strategies.
The fair value of outstanding derivative contracts recorded as liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet were as follows:
Liability Derivatives
Balance Sheet Location |
Q. Subsequent Events |
Q. Subsequent Events Management evaluated all activity of Alcoa through July23, 2009 (the issue date of the Financial Statements) and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the Financial Statements or disclosure in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |