SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
OR
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ____ to ____
Commission File No. 1-6651
HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana | 35-1160484 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
| |
1069 State Route 46 East Batesville, Indiana | 47006-8835 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(812) 934-7777
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated filer R Accelerated filer £ Non-accelerated filer £ Smaller reporting company £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, without par value – 62,053,052 shares as of April 20, 2012.
HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC.
| Page |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 3 |
| | | |
| | | 4 |
| | | |
| | | 5 |
| | | |
| | | 6 |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | 16 |
| | | |
| | | 23 |
| | | |
| | | 24 |
| | | |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | |
| | | |
| | | 24 |
| | | |
| | | 24 |
| | | |
| | | 25 |
| | | |
| | | 25 |
| | | |
| 26 |
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
| | Quarterly Period Ended March 31 | | | Year To Date Period Ended March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Net Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital sales | | $ | 300.6 | | | $ | 278.8 | | | $ | 567.5 | | | $ | 535.5 | |
Rental revenues | | | 114.5 | | | | 123.3 | | | | 228.7 | | | | 240.8 | |
Total revenues | | | 415.1 | | | | 402.1 | | | | 796.2 | | | | 776.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of goods sold | | | 169.3 | | | | 151.0 | | | | 317.0 | | | | 290.6 | |
Rental expenses | | | 50.0 | | | | 52.5 | | | | 98.3 | | | | 102.6 | |
Total cost of revenues | | | 219.3 | | | | 203.5 | | | | 415.3 | | | | 393.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross Profit | | | 195.8 | | | | 198.6 | | | | 380.9 | | | | 383.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development expenses | | | 16.8 | | | | 16.2 | | | | 32.1 | | | | 31.0 | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | | 125.6 | | | | 130.5 | | | | 245.8 | | | | 250.5 | |
Impairment of other intangibles | | | 8.0 | | | | - | | | | 8.0 | | | | - | |
Special charges (Note 8) | | | 8.0 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 8.0 | | | | 2.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Profit | | | 37.4 | | | | 49.3 | | | | 87.0 | | | | 99.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | (1.2 | ) | | | (2.1 | ) | | | (3.0 | ) | | | (4.2 | ) |
Investment income and other, net | | | 0.6 | | | | 0.7 | | | | 1.2 | | | | 0.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Before Income Taxes | | | 36.8 | | | | 47.9 | | | | 85.2 | | | | 95.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (Note 9) | | | 11.5 | | | | 14.8 | | | | 27.0 | | | | 27.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | | 25.3 | | | | 33.1 | | | | 58.2 | | | | 68.5 | |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 0.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders | | $ | 25.3 | | | $ | 33.1 | | | $ | 58.2 | | | $ | 68.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per Common Share - Basic | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 0.41 | | | $ | 0.53 | | | $ | 0.94 | | | $ | 1.08 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders per Common Share - Diluted | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.93 | | | $ | 1.07 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends per Common Share | | $ | 0.1250 | | | $ | 0.1025 | | | $ | 0.2375 | | | $ | 0.2050 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Common Shares Outstanding - Basic (thousands) (Note 10) | | | 62,154 | | | | 63,000 | | | | 62,023 | | | | 62,989 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Common Shares Outstanding - Diluted (thousands) (Note 10) | | | 62,546 | | | | 63,911 | | | | 62,385 | | | | 64,056 | |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Dollars in millions)
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2012 | | | September 30, 2011 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
Current Assets | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 174.7 | | | $ | 224.6 | |
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances (Note 2) | | | 362.3 | | | | 386.2 | |
Inventories (Note 2) | | | 105.8 | | | | 95.6 | |
Deferred income taxes (Notes 1 and 9) | | | 43.9 | | | | 42.9 | |
Other current assets | | | 44.3 | | | | 42.4 | |
Total current assets | | | 731.0 | | | | 791.7 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 2) | | | 234.0 | | | | 222.8 | |
Investments and investment securities (Notes 1 and 6) | | | 10.5 | | | | 11.1 | |
Goodwill (Note 1) | | | 119.7 | | | | 87.2 | |
Software and other intangible assets, net (Note 2) | | | 138.0 | | | | 126.1 | |
Deferred income taxes (Notes 1 and 9) | | | 33.6 | | | | 33.8 | |
Other assets | | | 24.7 | | | | 26.4 | |
Total Assets | | $ | 1,291.5 | | | $ | 1,299.1 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Trade accounts payable | | $ | 68.6 | | | $ | 64.8 | |
Short-term borrowings (Note 4) | | | 45.2 | | | | 100.3 | |
Accrued compensation | | | 73.5 | | | | 92.7 | |
Accrued product warranties (Note 12) | | | 23.5 | | | | 17.8 | |
Other current liabilities | | | 56.7 | | | | 58.4 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 267.5 | | | | 334.0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt (Note 4) | | | 50.1 | | | | 50.8 | |
Accrued pension and postretirement benefits (Note 5) | | | 87.0 | | | | 87.4 | |
Deferred income taxes (Notes 1 and 9) | | | 44.7 | | | | 36.2 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 43.4 | | | | 49.0 | |
Total Liabilities | | | 492.7 | | | | 557.4 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Common Stock (Note 2) | | | 4.4 | | | | 4.4 | |
Additional paid-in-capital | | | 114.2 | | | | 114.1 | |
Retained earnings | | | 1,353.2 | | | | 1,309.8 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 7) | | | (76.4 | ) | | | (79.0 | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost (Note 2) | | | (596.6 | ) | | | (607.6 | ) |
Total Shareholders' Equity | | | 798.8 | | | | 741.7 | |
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | | $ | 1,291.5 | | | $ | 1,299.1 | |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (Dollars in millions)
| | Year to Date Period Ended March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Operating Activities | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 58.2 | | | $ | 68.5 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by | | | | | | | | |
operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 53.7 | | | | 51.6 | |
Provision for deferred income taxes | | | (4.0 | ) | | | (1.3 | ) |
Loss on disposal of property, equipment leased to others, | | | | | | | | |
intangible assets and impairments | | | 7.8 | | | | 1.0 | |
Stock compensation | | | 6.4 | | | | 6.7 | |
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans | | | (0.9 | ) | | | (4.1 | ) |
Change in working capital excluding cash, current investments, | | | | | | | | |
current debt, acquisitions and dispositions: | | | | | | | | |
Trade accounts receivable | | | 34.6 | | | | (12.5 | ) |
Inventories | | | (0.4 | ) | | | (7.3 | ) |
Other current assets | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 15.1 | |
Trade accounts payable | | | (5.1 | ) | | | (8.1 | ) |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | (23.9 | ) | | | (8.1 | ) |
Other, net | | | (2.6 | ) | | | 6.1 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 123.6 | | | | 107.6 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Capital expenditures and purchase of intangibles | | | (39.3 | ) | | | (30.9 | ) |
Proceeds on sales of property and equipment leased to others | | | 6.4 | | | | 4.3 | |
Payment for acquisition of business, net of cash acquired | | | (77.0 | ) | | | - | |
Proceeds on investment sales and maturities | | | 0.9 | | | | 0.2 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (109.0 | ) | | | (26.4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Financing Activities | | | | | | | | |
Change in short-term debt | | | (7.6 | ) | | | 3.2 | |
Payment of long-term debt | | | (47.4 | ) | | | - | |
Purchase of noncontrolling interest | | | (1.0 | ) | | | (11.2 | ) |
Payment of cash dividends | | | (14.7 | ) | | | (12.9 | ) |
Proceeds on exercise of options | | | 3.8 | | | | 23.1 | |
Proceeds from stock issuance | | | 1.6 | | | | 1.5 | |
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans | | | 0.9 | | | | 4.1 | |
Treasury stock acquired | | | (1.8 | ) | | | (41.6 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (66.2 | ) | | | (33.8 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | 1.7 | | | | 3.3 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Cash Flows | | | (49.9 | ) | | | 50.7 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents: | | | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | | | 224.6 | | | | 184.5 | |
At end of period | | $ | 174.7 | | | $ | 235.2 | |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Hill-Rom,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 (“2011 Form 10-K”) as filed with the United States (“U.S.”) Securities and Exchange Commission. The September 30, 2011 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was derived from audited Consolidated Financial Statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. In the opinion of management, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements herein include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of annual results.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Hill-Rom and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Examples of such estimates include our accounts receivable reserves (Note 2), accrued warranties (Note 12), investments (Note 6), income taxes (Note 9) and commitments and contingencies (Note 14), among others.
Investment Securities
At March 31, 2012, investment securities consisted primarily of AAA rated student loan auction rate securities (“ARS”). These securities are generally insured through the U.S. government’s Federal Family Education Loan Program, to the extent the borrowers meet certain prescribed criteria in their underlying lending practices. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and changes in their fair value are recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (“AOCL”).
We regularly evaluate all investments classified as available-for-sale for possible impairment based on current economic conditions, credit loss experience and other criteria. The evaluation of investments for impairment requires significant judgments to be made including (i) the identification of potentially impaired securities; (ii) the determination of their estimated fair value; (iii) the assessment of whether any decline in estimated fair value is other-than-temporary; and (iv) the likelihood of selling before recovery. If there is a decline in a security’s net realizable value that is other-than-temporary and we are not likely to sell before recovery, the decline is separated into the amount of impairment related to credit loss and the amount of impairment related to all other factors. The decline related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings, while the decline related to all other factors is recognized in AOCL.
See Note 6 for further details on our fair value measurements.
Goodwill
The following summarizes goodwill activity:
| | North America Acute Care | | | North America Post-Acute Care | | | International | | | Total | |
Balances at September 30, 2011: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | $ | 325.0 | | | $ | 114.2 | | | $ | 120.8 | | | $ | 560.0 | |
Accumulated impairment losses | | | (289.5 | ) | | | (68.6 | ) | | | (114.7 | ) | | | (472.8 | ) |
Goodwill, net at September 30, 2011 | | | 35.5 | | | | 45.6 | | | | 6.1 | | | | 87.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in Goodwill during the period: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill related to acquisitions | | | - | | | | - | | | | 34.0 | | | | 34.0 | |
Currency translation effect | | | - | | | | - | | | | (1.5 | ) | | | (1.5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balances at March 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | | 325.0 | | | | 114.2 | | | | 153.3 | | | | 592.5 | |
Accumulated impairment losses | | | (289.5 | ) | | | (68.6 | ) | | | (114.7 | ) | | | (472.8 | ) |
Goodwill, net at March 31, 2012 | | $ | 35.5 | | | $ | 45.6 | | | $ | 38.6 | | | $ | 119.7 | |
During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we recorded an adjustment to goodwill related to the Liko Distributors acquisition completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we acquired Völker and recorded goodwill on the acquisition of $33.7 million on the acquisition. See Note 3 for further details.
Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Units
Taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are directly imposed on a revenue producing transaction between us and our customers, including but not limited to sales taxes, use taxes and value added taxes, are accounted for on a net (excluded from revenues and costs) basis.
Income Taxes
We and our eligible domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. income tax return. Foreign operations file income tax returns in a number of jurisdictions. Deferred income taxes are computed using an asset and liability approach to reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and the corresponding income tax amounts. We have a variety of deferred tax assets in numerous tax jurisdictions. These deferred tax assets are subject to periodic assessment as to recoverability and if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the benefits will not be realized, valuation allowances are recognized. In evaluating whether it is more likely than not that we would recover these deferred tax assets, future taxable income, the reversal of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies are considered.
Entering the fiscal year we had $8.1 million of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, on a tax-effected basis, primarily related to foreign operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes. We believe that our estimates for the valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets are appropriate based on current facts and circumstances.
We account for uncertain income tax positions using a threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The difference between the tax benefit recognized in the financial statements for an uncertain income tax position and the tax benefit claimed in the tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefit.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
There have been no significant changes to our assessment of the impact of recently issued accounting standards included in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Form 10-K except as noted below:
On October 1, 2011, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s (“FASB”) revised authoritative guidance on the annual goodwill impairment test to provide the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the current two-step test. If, as a result of the qualitative assessment, it is determined it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. Our adoption of this guidance will apply prospectively beginning with our fiscal 2012 annual goodwill impairment test performed during the third quarter. We do not expect this to have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
On October 1, 2011, we adopted the FASB’s revised authoritative guidance on business combinations which requires revenues and earnings of the combined entity be disclosed as if the business combination occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. This guidance also requires additional disclosures about adjustments included in the reported proforma revenues and earnings. This guidance will apply prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after October 1, 2011.
In December 2011, the FASB issued a standard regarding disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The standard requires entities to disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the Balance Sheet or those instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting agreement. The standard will be effective beginning October 1, 2013. We do not expect this to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. Supplementary Balance Sheet Information
| | March 31, 2012 | | | September 30, 2011 | |
| | | | | | |
Allowance for possible losses and discounts on trade receivables | | $ | 30.4 | | | $ | 26.7 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Inventories: | | | | | | | | |
Finished products | | $ | 63.0 | | | $ | 55.6 | |
Raw materials and work in process | | | 42.8 | | | | 40.0 | |
Total inventory | | $ | 105.8 | | | $ | 95.6 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accumulated depreciation of property, plant and equipment | | $ | 598.0 | | | $ | 596.8 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accumulated amortization of software and other intangible assets | | $ | 180.2 | | | $ | 163.4 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, without par value: | | | | | | | | |
Shares authorized | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,000,000 | |
Shares issued | | None | | | None | |
| | | | | | | | |
Common stock, without par value: | | | | | | | | |
Shares authorized | | | 199,000,000 | | | | 199,000,000 | |
Shares issued | | | 80,323,912 | | | | 80,323,912 | |
Shares outstanding | | | 62,023,418 | | | | 61,686,372 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Treasury shares | | | 18,300,494 | | | | 18,637,540 | |
3. Acquisitions
On February 13, 2012, we acquired the Germany-based Völker group (“Völker”). Völker is a leading manufacturer of long-term care and acute care bed frames, surfaces and furniture in Europe and around the world. This transaction is expected to strengthen the Company’s channels and product offerings in Europe, and furthers our objective of completing strategically relevant and value-enhancing acquisitions. The complementary Völker products will also further develop the Company’s global portfolio, accelerate international expansion, and leverage existing sales channels and customer relationships. The purchase price for Völker was $80.7 million ($77.0 million net of cash acquired). The results of Völker are included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements since the date of acquisition. During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, our reported revenues included $14.8 million related to Völker products and the impact to net income was not significant.
The following summarizes the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition.
| | Amount | |
Goodwill | | $ | 33.7 | |
Trade name | | | 12.3 | |
Customer relationships | | | 17.5 | |
Net assets acquired | | | 28.7 | |
Deferred tax liability | | | (11.5 | ) |
Total purchase price | | $ | 80.7 | |
The calculation of fair value of the assets and liabilities is preliminary and subject to adjustment based on finalization of intangible asset valuations and the closing balance sheet under the terms of the purchase agreement.
Goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes and was allocated entirely to our International segment. The useful lives assigned to intangibles identified as part of the acquisition are as follows:
| | | Useful Life | |
Trade name | | | 7 | |
Customer relationships | | | 7-10 | |
Our total revenues on an unaudited proforma basis, as if the Völker acquisition had been consummated at the beginning of our 2011 fiscal year, would have been higher by approximately $28.3 million and $60.4 million for the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and $15.4 million and $49.9 million for the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012. The impact to net income on an unaudited proforma basis would not have been significant to our financial results for either year.
Liko Distributors
On September 8, 2011, we acquired the distribution companies for our patient mobility products in France and Switzerland (collectively referred to as “Liko Distributors”) for $22.5 million ($15.5 million net of cash acquired).
During the first quarter of 2012, we made adjustments to the opening balance sheet on the acquisition date as we continue to account for the acquisition and work through the finalization of the purchase price with the seller. The following table summarizes the revised fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date:
| | Amount | |
Goodwill | | $ | 6.4 | |
Customer relationships | | | 7.9 | |
Non-compete agreements | | | 0.6 | |
Net assets acquired | | | 10.3 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | (2.7 | ) |
Total purchase price | | $ | 22.5 | |
The purchase price remains subject to adjustment based on finalization of the closing balance sheet under the terms of the purchase agreement.
Total debt consists of the following:
| | March 31, 2012 | | | September 30, 2011 | |
Outstanding finance credit lines | | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | 7.8 | |
Revolving credit facility | | | 45.0 | | | | 45.0 | |
Unsecured 8.50% debentures due on December 1, 2011 | | | - | | | | 47.5 | |
Unsecured 7.00% debentures due on February 15, 2024 | | | 19.6 | | | | 19.7 | |
Unsecured 6.75% debentures due on December 15, 2027 | | | 29.8 | | | | 29.8 | |
Other | | | 0.7 | | | | 1.3 | |
Total debt | | | 95.3 | | | | 151.1 | |
Less current portion of debt | | | 45.2 | | | | 100.3 | |
Total long-term debt | | $ | 50.1 | | | $ | 50.8 | |
We have trade finance credit lines and uncommitted letter of credit facilities. These lines are associated with the normal course of business and are not currently, nor have they historically, been of material size to the overall business.
Unsecured debentures outstanding at March 31, 2012 have fixed rates of interest. We have deferred gains of less than $1.0 million included in the preceding table from the termination of previous interest rate swap agreements. The deferred gains are being amortized and recognized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining term of the related debt through 2024, and as a result, the effective interest rates on that debt have been and will continue to be lower than the stated interest rates. During the first quarter of 2012, we repaid the unsecured debenture due on December 1, 2011.
We have a $500.0 million senior revolving credit facility, which expires on March 28, 2013 (subject to extension upon satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the credit facility). Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at variable rates specified therein, and the availability of borrowings is subject to our ability at the time of borrowing to meet certain specified conditions, including compliance with covenants contained in the credit agreement governing the facility. The credit agreement contains covenants that, among other matters, require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (each as defined in the credit agreement) of not more than 3.5:1.0 and a ratio of consolidated EBITDA to interest expense of not less than 3.5:1.0. The proceeds of the five-year facility shall be used, as needed: (i) for working capital, capital expenditures, and other lawful corporate purposes; and (ii) to finance acquisitions.
As of March 31, 2012, we had outstanding borrowings of $45.0 million and undrawn letters of credit of $5.8 million under the five-year facility, leaving $449.2 million of borrowing capacity available under the facility.
The book values of our short-term debt instruments approximate fair value. The fair value of our short-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for similar issues or on the current rates offered for debt of the same remaining maturities. As such, our short-term debt fair value measurement is categorized as Level 2. The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices and the rates offered for the debt. Our long-term debt fair value measurement is categorized as Level 1. The estimated fair values of our long-term debt instruments were $56.3 million and $52.6 million at March 31, 2012 and September 30, 2011. (See Note 6 for further explanation of fair value measurement classifications.)
5. Retirement and Postretirement Plans
We sponsor four defined benefit plans: a master defined benefit retirement plan, a nonqualified supplemental executive defined benefit retirement plan and two defined benefit retirement plans covering employees in Germany and France. Benefits for such plans are based primarily on years of service and the employee’s level of compensation during specific periods of employment. We contribute funds to trusts as necessary to provide for current service and for any unfunded projected future benefit obligation over a reasonable period of time. All of our plans have a September 30th measurement date. The following table includes the components of net pension expense for our defined benefit plans.
| | Quarterly Period Ended March 31 | | | Year To Date Period Ended March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Service cost | | $ | 1.4 | | | $ | 1.3 | | | $ | 2.8 | | | $ | 2.6 | |
Interest cost | | | 3.4 | | | | 3.3 | | | | 6.7 | | | | 6.6 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (4.2 | ) | | | (4.2 | ) | | | (8.4 | ) | | | (8.4 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost, net | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.3 | | | | 0.3 | |
Amortization of net loss | | | 1.5 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 2.0 | |
Net pension expense | | $ | 2.2 | | | $ | 1.5 | | | $ | 4.4 | | | $ | 3.1 | |
We also sponsor a domestic postretirement health care plan that provides health care benefits to qualified retirees and dependents until eligible for Medicare. Annual costs related to the domestic postretirement health care plan are not significant.
6. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
| · | Level 1: Financial instruments with unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets and liabilities. |
| · | Level 2: Financial instruments with observable inputs other than those included in Level 1 such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
| · | Level 3: Financial instruments with unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk). Unobservable inputs shall be developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include our own data. |
The following table summarizes our financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, as of March 31, 2012:
| | | | | Fair Value Measurements | |
| | | | | Quoted Prices in | | | Significant Other | | | Significant | |
| | | | | Active Markets for | | | Observable | | | Unobservable | |
| | | | | Identical Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | |
| | Total | | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 174.7 | | | $ | 174.7 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Available-for-sale marketable securities | | | 10.5 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 10.5 | |
Total assets at fair value | | $ | 185.2 | | | $ | 174.7 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 10.5 | |
At March 31, 2012, we had $10.5 million of AAA rated investment securities which consisted primarily of student loan auction rate securities. While we continue to earn interest on the ARS at the contractual rate, these investments are not currently being bought and sold in an active market and therefore do not have readily determinable market values. At March 31, 2012, our investment advisors provided a valuation based on unobservable inputs for the ARS. The investment advisors utilized a discounted cash flow approach (an “income approach”) to arrive at this valuation, which was corroborated by separate and comparable discounted cash flow analysis prepared by us. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates of interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, credit spread related yield and illiquidity premiums and expected holding periods of the ARS. These assumptions are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions and market conditions change. Activity related to our ARS was not significant during the first six months of fiscal 2012.
We include the net-of-tax effect of unrealized gains or losses on our available-for-sale securities, foreign currency translation adjustments and pension or other defined benefit postretirement plans’ actuarial gains or losses and prior service costs or credits in comprehensive income.
The composition of comprehensive income is as follows:
| | Quarterly Period Ended March 31 | | | Year To Date Period Ended March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Net income | | $ | 25.3 | | | $ | 33.1 | | | $ | 58.2 | | | $ | 68.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale securities and currency hedges, net of tax of $(0.1) | | | 0.2 | | | | (0.1 | ) | | | 0.4 | | | | (0.1 | ) |
million and $0.0 million for the quarterly periods, and $(0.1) million | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and $0.0 million for the year to date periods, respectively | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $0.7 million | | | 5.8 | | | | 9.0 | | | | 2.4 | | | | 9.4 | |
and $1.8 million for the quarterly periods, and $(0.2) million | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and $1.2 million for the year to date periods, respectively | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Items not yet recognized as a component of net periodic pension | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and postretirement healthcare costs, net of tax of $0.0 million | | | - | | | | (0.1 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | | (0.3 | ) |
for all periods | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income | | | 31.3 | | | | 41.9 | | | | 60.8 | | | | 77.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (0.2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders | | $ | 31.3 | | | $ | 41.9 | | | $ | 60.8 | | | $ | 77.3 | |
8. Special Charges
Over the past several years, we have placed a focus on improving our cost structure and business processes through various means including consolidation of certain manufacturing and select back office operations, customer rationalizations and various other organizational changes. Activity related to these actions during fiscal 2012 was as follows:
| | Beginning Balance | | | | | | | | | | | | Ending Balance | |
| | September 30, 2011 | | | Expenses | | | Cash Payments | | | Reversals | | | March 31, 2012 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2012 Action | | $ | - | | | $ | 5.0 | | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | 4.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year 2010 Actions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Q2 - Restructuring | | | 0.4 | | | | - | | | | (0.4 | ) | | | - | | | | - | |
Q4 - Restructuring | | | 1.5 | | | | - | | | | (0.8 | ) | | | (0.2 | ) | | | 0.5 | |
Total | | $ | 1.9 | | | $ | 5.0 | | | $ | (1.4 | ) | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 5.3 | |
During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we announced a plan to improve our cost structure and streamline our organization by, among other things, eliminating approximately 200 positions across the Company. This resulted in a special charge of $4.8 million, net of reversals, primarily related to severance and other benefits to be provided to affected employees. We also incurred an impairment of certain tangible assets for which the carrying values could not be fully recovered as a result of various strategic decisions, which resulted in a non-cash charge of $3.2 million. In addition, we incurred an impairment of a previously acquired trade name whose assessment was triggered by strategic changes in how the asset would be utilized on a go forward basis. This resulted in a non-cash impairment charge of $8.0 million. Additional costs associated with these actions of $3.0 to $6.0 million are expected to be incurred over the balance of the fiscal year. These actions and the related cash expenditures will be substantially complete by the end of fiscal year 2012.
9. Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012 was 31.3 and 31.7 percent compared to 30.9 and 28.3 percent for the comparable periods in the prior year.
The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2012 was favorably impacted by the recognition of period tax benefits of $1.0 million primarily related to the release of foreign reserves. This compares to $2.2 million of period tax benefits recorded in the first six months of fiscal 2011 which related primarily to the retroactive reinstatement of the research and development tax credit. The lower favorable period items in first six months of fiscal 2012 increase the effective rate by 1.2 percentage points. Also favorably impacting the effective tax rate in the first six months of fiscal 2011 were international earnings which were not subject to tax as a result of the utilization of previously unrecognized operating loss carryforwards. The utilization of these loss carryforwards, most notably in France, benefited the prior year tax rate for the first six months by approximately 1.7 percentage points. Finally, the expiration of the research and development tax credit effective December 31, 2011 has negatively impacted the current year rate by approximately 1 percentage point, the effect of which will continue until the credit is reinstated.
10. Earnings per Common Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated based upon the weighted average number of outstanding common shares for the period, plus the effect of deferred vested shares. Diluted earnings per share is calculated consistent with the basic earnings per share calculation plus the effect of dilutive unissued common shares related to stock-based employee compensation programs. For all periods presented, anti-dilutive stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. Cumulative treasury stock acquired, less cumulative shares reissued, have been excluded in determining the average number of shares outstanding.
Earnings per share are calculated as follows (share information in thousands):
| | Quarterly Period Ended March 31 | | | Year To Date Period Ended March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to common shareholders | | $ | 25.3 | | | $ | 33.1 | | | $ | 58.2 | | | $ | 68.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average shares outstanding - Basic | | | 62,154 | | | | 63,000 | | | | 62,023 | | | | 62,989 | |
Add potential effect of exercise of stock options | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
and other unvested equity awards | | | 392 | | | | 911 | | | | 362 | | | | 1,067 | |
Average shares outstanding - Diluted | | | 62,546 | | | | 63,911 | | | | 62,385 | | | | 64,056 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to common shareholders per common share - Basic | | $ | 0.41 | | | $ | 0.53 | | | $ | 0.94 | | | $ | 1.08 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to common shareholders per common share - Diluted | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 0.52 | | | $ | 0.93 | | | $ | 1.07 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares with anti-dilutive effect excluded from the computation of Diluted EPS | | | 1,404 | | | | 737 | | | | 1,268 | | | | 580 | |
11. Common Stock
The stock based compensation cost that was charged against income, net of tax, for all plans was $2.5 million and $4.1 million for the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and $2.6 million and $4.3 million for the comparable periods of fiscal 2011.
We routinely grant limited warranties on our products with respect to defects in material and workmanship. The terms of these warranties are generally one year, however, certain components and products have substantially longer warranty periods. We recognize a reserve with respect to these obligations at the time of product sale, with subsequent warranty claims recorded directly against the reserve. The amount of the warranty reserve is determined based on historical trend experience for the covered products. For more significant warranty-related matters which might require a broad-based correction, separate reserves are established when such events are identified and the cost of correction can be reasonably estimated.
A reconciliation of changes in the warranty reserve for the periods covered in this report is as follows:
| | Quarterly Period Ended March 31 | | | Year To Date Period Ended March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | 17.8 | | | $ | 16.0 | | | $ | 17.8 | | | $ | 15.8 | |
Provision for warranties during the period | | | 5.5 | | | | 4.0 | | | | 8.8 | | | | 8.2 | |
Warranty reserves acquired | | | 4.7 | | | | - | | | | 4.7 | | | | - | |
Warranty claims during the period | | | (4.5 | ) | | | (3.5 | ) | | | (7.8 | ) | | | (7.5 | ) |
Balance at end of period | | $ | 23.5 | | | $ | 16.5 | | | $ | 23.5 | | | $ | 16.5 | |
In the normal course of business we enter into various other guarantees and indemnities in our relationships with suppliers, service providers, customers, business partners and others. Examples of these arrangements would include guarantees of product performance, indemnifications to service providers and indemnifications of our actions to business partners. These guarantees and indemnifications have not historically nor do we expect them to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations, although indemnifications associated with our actions generally have no dollar limitations.
In conjunction with our acquisition and divestiture activities, we have entered into select guarantees and indemnifications of performance with respect to the fulfillment of commitments under applicable purchase and sale agreements. The arrangements generally indemnify the buyer or seller for damages associated with breach of contract, inaccuracies in representations and warranties surviving the closing date and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments retained under the applicable contract. With respect to sale transactions, we also routinely enter into non-competition agreements for varying periods of time. Guarantees and indemnifications with respect to acquisition and divestiture activities, if triggered, could have a materially adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
13. Segment Reporting
We disclose segment information that is consistent with the way in which management operates and views the business. Our operating structure contains the following reporting segments:
| · | North America Acute Care - sells and rents our hospital patient support and near-patient technologies, as well as our health information technology solutions and surgical accessories, to North America acute care facilities. |
| · | North America Post-Acute Care - sells and rents a variety of products outside of the hospital setting in North America including long-term acute care, extended care and home care and our respiratory care products in all settings. |
| · | International - sells and rents similar products as our North America businesses in regions outside of the U.S. and Canada. |
Our performance under the operating structure is measured on a divisional income basis before litigation and special charges. Divisional income generally represents the division’s standard gross profit less its direct operating costs along with an allocation of manufacturing and distribution costs, research and development and corporate functional expenses.
Corporate expenses, while not considered a segment, are presented separately to aid in the reconciliation of segment information to consolidated financial information. These costs include corporate costs that support the entire organization such as administration, finance, legal and human resources.
| | Quarterly Period Ended March 31 | | | Year To Date Period Ended March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America Acute Care | | $ | 240.3 | | | $ | 251.3 | | | $ | 474.0 | | | $ | 469.4 | |
North America Post-Acute Care | | | 48.9 | | | | 52.2 | | | | 99.6 | | | | 104.5 | |
International | | | 125.9 | | | | 98.6 | | | | 222.6 | | | | 202.4 | |
Total revenues | | $ | 415.1 | | | $ | 402.1 | | | $ | 796.2 | | | $ | 776.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Divisional income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America Acute Care | | $ | 60.1 | | | $ | 62.7 | | | $ | 114.2 | | | $ | 107.3 | |
North America Post-Acute Care | | | 8.0 | | | | 10.1 | | | | 17.6 | | | | 22.3 | |
International | | | 4.4 | | | | 4.2 | | | | 6.9 | | | | 14.7 | |
Corporate expenses | | | (19.1 | ) | | | (25.1 | ) | | | (35.7 | ) | | | (42.7 | ) |
Total divisional income/operating profit | | | 53.4 | | | | 51.9 | | | | 103.0 | | | | 101.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impairment of other intangibles | | | (8.0 | ) | | | - | | | | (8.0 | ) | | | - | |
Special charges | | | (8.0 | ) | | | (2.6 | ) | | | (8.0 | ) | | | (2.6 | ) |
Operating profit | | | 37.4 | | | | 49.3 | | | | 87.0 | | | | 99.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | (1.2 | ) | | | (2.1 | ) | | | (3.0 | ) | | | (4.2 | ) |
Investment income and other, net | | | 0.6 | | | | 0.7 | | | | 1.2 | | | | 0.7 | |
Income before income taxes | | $ | 36.8 | | | $ | 47.9 | | | $ | 85.2 | | | $ | 95.5 | |
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Batesville Casket Antitrust Litigation
In 2005 the Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. and a number of individual consumer casket purchasers filed a purported class action antitrust lawsuit on behalf of certain consumer purchasers of Batesville® caskets against us and our former Batesville Casket Company, Inc. subsidiary (now wholly-owned by Hillenbrand, Inc.), and three national funeral home businesses.
The district court has dismissed the claims and denied class certification, but in October 2010, the plaintiffs appealed these decisions to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. If the plaintiffs were to succeed in reversing the district court’s dismissal of the claims, but not the denial of class certification, then the plaintiffs would be able to pursue individual damages claims: the alleged overcharges on the plaintiffs’ individual casket purchases, which would be trebled as a matter of law, plus reasonable attorneys fees and costs.
If the plaintiffs were to (1) succeed in reversing the district court’s dismissal of the claims, (2) succeed in reversing the district court order denying class certification and certify a class, and (3) prevail at trial, then the damages awarded to the plaintiffs, which would be trebled as a matter of law, could have a significant material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity. The plaintiffs filed a report indicating that they are seeking damages ranging from approximately $947.0 million to approximately $1,460.0 million before trebling on behalf of the purported class of consumers they seek to represent.
We and Hillenbrand, Inc. have entered into a judgment sharing agreement that apportions the costs and any potential liabilities associated with this litigation between us and Hillenbrand, Inc. We believe that we have committed no wrongdoing as alleged by the plaintiffs and that we have meritorious defenses to class certification and to plaintiffs’ underlying allegations and damage theories.
Stryker Litigation
On April 4, 2011, we filed two separate actions against Stryker Corporation alleging infringement of certain Hill-Rom patents covering proprietary communications networks, status information systems and powered wheels used in our beds or stretchers. One suit was filed in the Southern District of Indiana and the other was filed in the Western District of Wisconsin. Both suits seek monetary damages and injunctions against Stryker for selling or distributing any beds, stretchers or ancillary products that infringe Hill-Rom’s patents. Stryker responded in the Wisconsin litigation with counterclaims seeking declaratory judgment for noninfringement and invalidity for several of the patents at issue and has filed counterclaims alleging infringement of three of their patents. In August 2011 the Wisconsin litigation was transferred to the Southern District of Indiana. No trial dates have been set. Because the litigation is in a preliminary stage, we cannot assess the likelihood of a positive or negative outcome or determine an estimate, or a range of estimates, of potential damages, nor can we give any assurances that this matter will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
General
We are subject to various other claims and contingencies arising out of the normal course of business, including those relating to governmental investigations and proceedings, commercial transactions, product liability, employee related matters, antitrust, safety, health, taxes, environmental and other matters. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of individual litigated matters is not predictable with assurance. It is possible that some litigation matters for which reserves have not been established could be decided unfavorably to us, and that any such unfavorable decisions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are generally self-insured up to certain limits for product/general liability, workers’ compensation, auto liability and professional liability insurance programs. These policies have deductibles and self-insured retentions ranging from $150 thousand to $1.5 million per occurrence, depending upon the type of coverage and policy period. We are also generally self-insured up to certain stop-limits for certain employee health benefits, including medical, drug and dental. Our policy is to estimate reserves based upon a number of factors including known claims, estimated incurred but not reported claims and outside actuarial analysis, which are based on historical information along with certain assumptions about future events. Such estimated reserves are classified as Other Current Liabilities and Other Long-Term Liabilities within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements within the meanings of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding our future plans, objectives, beliefs, expectations, representations and projections. We have tried, whenever possible, to identify these forward-looking statements by using words such as “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “encourage,” “expect,” “may,” “goal,” “become,” “pursue,” “estimate,” “strategy,” “will,” “projection,” “forecast,” “continue,” “accelerate,” “promise,” “increase,” “higher,” “lower,” “reduce,” “improve,” “expand,” “progress,” “potential” or the negative of those terms or other variations of them or by comparable terminology. The absence of such terms, however, does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 (“2011 Form 10-K”) and subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q as well as the discussions in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis”. We assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
Overview
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying interim financial statements and our 2011 Form 10-K.
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. (“we,” “us,” or “our”) is a leading worldwide manufacturer and provider of medical technologies and related services for the health care industry, including patient support systems, safe mobility and handling solutions, non-invasive therapeutic products for a variety of acute and chronic medical conditions, medical equipment rentals and information technology solutions. Our comprehensive product and service offerings are used by health care providers across the health care continuum and around the world in hospitals, extended care facilities and home care settings, to enhance the safety and quality of patient care.
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, including the related notes, are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). We provide adjusted income before taxes, income tax expense and diluted earnings per share results because we use these measures internally for planning, forecasting and evaluating the performance of the business.
In addition, we analyze net revenues on a constant currency basis to better measure the comparability of results between periods. We believe that evaluating growth in net revenues on a constant currency basis provides an additional and meaningful assessment to both management and investors.
We believe use of these non-GAAP measures contribute to an understanding of our financial performance and provide an additional analytical tool to understand our results from core operations and to reveal underlying trends. These measures should not, however, be considered in isolation, as a substitute for, or as superior to measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Consolidated Results of Operations
In this section, we provide a high-level overview of our consolidated results of operations. Immediately following this section is a discussion of our results of operations by reportable segment.
Net Revenues
| | Quarterly Period Ended March 31 | | | Percentage Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Constant | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | As Reported | | | Currency | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital sales | | $ | 300.6 | | | $ | 278.8 | | | | 7.8 | | | | 8.9 | |
Rental revenues | | | 114.5 | | | | 123.3 | | | | (7.1) | | | | (6.7) | |
Total Revenues | | $ | 415.1 | | | $ | 402.1 | | | | 3.2 | | | | 4.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year To Date Period Ended March 31 | | | Percentage Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Constant | |
| | | 2012 | | | | 2011 | | | As Reported | | | Currency | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital sales | | $ | 567.5 | | | $ | 535.5 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 6.6 | |
Rental revenues | | | 228.7 | | | | 240.8 | | | | (5.0) | | | | (4.8) | |
Total Revenues | | $ | 796.2 | | | $ | 776.3 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 3.1 | |
Capital sales increased for both the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012, primarily as a result of increased sales in our International segment. The Middle East and Eastern European regions showed strong growth and sales also benefited from the second quarter addition of the Völker business. This favorability was partially offset by a low single digit decline in our North America Acute Care segment for the second quarter on lower sales in Canada coming off a particularly strong quarter in the prior year. For the year to date period, North America Acute Care capital sales reflected low single digit growth.
Rental revenues declined for all segments in both the three- and six-month periods. In our North America Acute Care segment, revenues were down in both therapy and movable medical equipment products as volumes were impacted by lower indications of flu in the current year, along with the continuing impact of hospital initiatives to control operating costs and competitive pressures. In North America Post-Acute Care, revenues were lower in all businesses on lower volumes and pricing.
Gross Profit
| | Quarterly Period Ended March 31 | | | Percentage Change | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | | |
Gross Profit | | | | | | | | | |
Capital | | $ | 131.3 | | | $ | 127.8 | | | | 2.7 | |
Percent of Related Revenues | | | 43.7 | % | | | 45.8 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental | | $ | 64.5 | | | $ | 70.8 | | | | (8.9) | |
Percent of Related Revenues | | | 56.3 | % | | | 57.4 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Gross Profit | | $ | 195.8 | | | $ | 198.6 | | | | (1.4) | |
Percent of Related Revenues | | | 47.2 | % | | | 49.4 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year To Date Period Ended March 31 | | | Percentage Change | |
| | | 2012 | | | | 2011 | | | | | |
Gross Profit | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital | | $ | 250.5 | | | $ | 244.9 | | | | 2.3 | |
Percent of Related Revenues | | | 44.1 | % | | | 45.7 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental | | $ | 130.4 | | | $ | 138.2 | | | | (5.6) | |
Percent of Related Revenues | | | 57.0 | % | | | 57.4 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Gross Profit | | $ | 380.9 | | | $ | 383.1 | | | | (0.6) | |
Percent of Related Revenues | | | 47.8 | % | | | 49.3 | % | | | | |
Capital gross profit increased 2.7 and 2.3 percent, while gross margin decreased 210 and 160 basis points for the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012. The margin decline in both periods related to a number of factors including unfavorable geographic mix, higher commodity and fuel pricing, unfavorable product mix, inventory step-up associated with recent acquisitions, and generally lower margins associated with Völker products.
Rental gross profit decreased 8.9 and 5.6 percent and gross margin decreased 110 and 40 basis points for the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012. The margin decline in both periods is the result of lower revenues and the reduced leverage of our fleet and field service infrastructure. During the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012, we recognized gains of $1.0 million and $3.1 million related to a continuing vendor product recall matter.
Other
| | Quarterly Period Ended March 31 | | | Year To Date Period Ended March 31 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development expenses | | $ | 16.8 | | | $ | 16.2 | | | $ | 32.1 | | | $ | 31.0 | |
Percent of Total Revenues | | | 4.0 | % | | | 4.0 | % | | | 4.0 | % | | | 4.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | $ | 125.6 | | | $ | 130.5 | | | $ | 245.8 | | | $ | 250.5 | |
Percent of Total Revenues | | | 30.3 | % | | | 32.5 | % | | | 30.9 | % | | | 32.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impairment of other intangibles | | $ | 8.0 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 8.0 | | | $ | - | |
Special charges | | $ | 8.0 | | | $ | 2.6 | | | $ | 8.0 | | | $ | 2.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | $ | (1.2 | ) | | $ | (2.1 | ) | | $ | (3.0 | ) | | $ | (4.2 | ) |
Investment income | | $ | 0.3 | | | $ | 0.5 | | | $ | 0.7 | | | $ | 1.0 | |
Other | | $ | 0.3 | | | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | 0.5 | | | $ | (0.3 | ) |
Research and development expenses increased 3.7 and 3.5 percent for the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012. Selling and administrative expenses declined for both periods and improved as a percentage of revenues by 220 and 140 basis points as increased acquisition and integration costs were offset by lower legal costs, personnel costs, and community donations.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we incurred an impairment of a previously acquired trade name whose assessment was triggered by strategic changes in how the asset would be utilized on a go forward basis. This resulted in a non-cash impairment charge of $8.0 million. In addition, we announced a plan to improve our cost structure and streamline our organization by, among other things, eliminating approximately 200 positions across the Company. This resulted in a special charge of $4.8 million, net of reversals, primarily related to severance and other benefits to be provided to affected employees. We also incurred an impairment of certain tangible assets for which the carrying values could not be fully recovered as a result of various strategic decisions, which resulted in a non-cash charge of $3.2 million. Additional costs associated with these actions of $3.0 to $6.0 million are expected to be incurred over the balance of the fiscal year. These actions and the related cash expenditures will be substantially complete by the end of fiscal year 2012. The actions are anticipated to yield annualized cost savings of approximately $18 million after full implementation.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we recorded a special charge of $2.6 million related to our fiscal 2010 fourth quarter restructuring action for additional severance provided to affected employees of that action as well as a further write-down of assets held for sale.
Interest expense in both the three- and six-month periods was lower on continued low interest rates and lower outstanding borrowings.
Reported and Adjusted Earnings
| | Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2012 | | | Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2011 | |
| | Income Before Income Taxes | | | Income Tax Expense | | | Diluted EPS | | | Income Before Income Taxes | | | Income Tax Expense | | | Diluted EPS | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reported Earnings | | $ | 36.8 | | | $ | 11.5 | | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 47.9 | | | $ | 14.8 | | | $ | 0.52 | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vendor product recall | | | (1.0 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.8 | ) | | | (0.3 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) |
Acquisition and integration costs | | | 1.9 | | | | 0.3 | | | | 0.03 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Special charges | | | 8.0 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 0.08 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 0.03 | |
Impairment of other intangibles | | | 8.0 | | | | 2.1 | | | | 0.09 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Adjusted Earnings | | $ | 53.7 | | | $ | 16.5 | | | $ | 0.59 | | | $ | 49.7 | | | $ | 15.5 | | | $ | 0.54 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year To Date Period Ended March 31, 2012 | | | Year To Date Period Ended March 31, 2011 | |
| | Income Before Income Taxes | | | Income Tax Expense | | | Diluted EPS** | | | Income Before Income Taxes and NCI * | | | Income Tax Expense | | | Diluted EPS** | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reported Earnings | | $ | 85.2 | | | $ | 27.0 | | | $ | 0.93 | | | $ | 95.5 | | | $ | 27.0 | | | $ | 1.07 | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vendor product recall | | | (3.1 | ) | | | (1.2 | ) | | | (0.03 | ) | | | (0.8 | ) | | | (0.3 | ) | | | (0.01 | ) |
Acquisition and integration costs | | | 3.6 | | | | 0.8 | | | | 0.04 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Special charges | | | 8.0 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 0.08 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 0.03 | |
Impairment of other intangibles | | | 8.0 | | | | 2.1 | | | | 0.09 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Adjusted Earnings | | $ | 101.7 | | | $ | 31.7 | | | $ | 1.12 | | | $ | 97.3 | | | $ | 27.7 | | | $ | 1.08 | |
*NCI refers to our noncontrolling interest in our former Encompass joint venture.
**May not add due to rounding.
The effective tax rate for the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012 was 31.3 and 31.7 percent compared to 30.9 and 28.3 percent for the comparable periods in the prior year.
The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2012 was favorably impacted by the recognition of period tax benefits of $1.0 million primarily related to the release of foreign reserves. This compares to $2.2 million of period tax benefits recorded in the first six months of fiscal 2011 which related primarily to the retroactive reinstatement of the research and development tax credit. The lower favorable period items in first six months of fiscal 2012 increase the effective rate by 1.2 percentage points. Also favorably impacting the effective tax rate in the first six months of fiscal 2011 were international earnings which were not subject to tax as a result of the utilization of previously unrecognized operating loss carryforwards. The utilization of these loss carryforwards, most notably in France, benefited the prior year tax rate for the first six months by approximately 1.7 percentage points. Finally, the expiration of the research and development tax credit effective December 31, 2011 negatively impacted the current year rate by approximately 1 percentage point, the effect of which will continue until the credit is reinstated.
The adjusted effective tax rate for the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012 was 30.7 and 31.2 percent compared to 31.2 and 28.5 percent for the comparable periods in the prior year. The higher rate for the first six months of fiscal 2012 is due primarily to the same factors outlined above.
Net income attributable to common shareholders was $25.3 million for the second quarter ended March 31, 2012 compared to $33.1 million in the prior year period, a decline of 23.6 percent due to the other intangible impairment and special charges. On an adjusted basis, net income attributable to common shareholders increased $3.0 million, or 8.8 percent. Diluted earnings per share decreased 23.1 percent on a reported basis, however, increased on an adjusted basis by 9.3 percent. Net income attributable to common shareholders for the year to date period was $58.2 million compared to $68.3 million in the prior year, a decrease of 14.8 percent. On an adjusted basis, net income attributable to common shareholders increased $0.6 million or 0.9 percent. Diluted earnings per share decreased 13.1 percent on a reported basis, however increased 3.7 percent on an adjusted basis.
Business Segment Results of Operations
| | Quarterly Period Ended March 31 | | | Percentage Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Constant | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | As Reported | | | Currency | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America Acute Care | | $ | 240.3 | | | $ | 251.3 | | | | (4.4) | | | | (4.2) | |
North America Post-Acute Care | | | 48.9 | | | | 52.2 | | | | (6.3) | | | | (6.3) | |
International | | | 125.9 | | | | 98.6 | | | | 27.7 | | | | 30.9 | |
Total revenues | | $ | 415.1 | | | $ | 402.1 | | | | 3.2 | | | | 4.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Divisional income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America Acute Care | | $ | 60.1 | | | $ | 62.7 | | | | (4.1) | | | | | |
North America Post-Acute Care | | | 8.0 | | | | 10.1 | | | | (20.8) | | | | | |
International | | | 4.4 | | | | 4.2 | | | | 4.8 | | | | | |
Corporate Expenses | | | (19.1 | ) | | | (25.1 | ) | | | (23.9) | | | | | |
Total divisional income | | $ | 53.4 | | | $ | 51.9 | | | | 2.9 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year To Date Period Ended March 31 | | | Percentage Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Constant | |
| | | 2012 | | | | 2011 | | | As Reported | | | Currency | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America Acute Care | | $ | 474.0 | | | $ | 469.4 | | | | 1.0 | | | | 1.1 | |
North America Post-Acute Care | | | 99.6 | | | | 104.5 | | | | (4.7) | | | | (4.7) | |
International | | | 222.6 | | | | 202.4 | | | | 10.0 | | | | 11.6 | |
Total revenues | | $ | 796.2 | | | $ | 776.3 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 3.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Divisional income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America Acute Care | | $ | 114.2 | | | $ | 107.3 | | | | 6.4 | | | | | |
North America Post-Acute Care | | | 17.6 | | | | 22.3 | | | | (21.1) | | | | | |
International | | | 6.9 | | | | 14.7 | | | | (53.1) | | | | | |
Corporate Expenses | | | (35.7 | ) | | | (42.7 | ) | | | (16.4) | | | | | |
Total divisional income | | $ | 103.0 | | | $ | 101.6 | | | | 1.4 | | | | | |
North America Acute Care
North America Acute Care revenues decreased 4.4 percent for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, but increased by 1.0 percent for the six-month period. Capital sales were down for the quarter by 3.4 percent related primarily to volume declines in our patient support systems sales, which were down 8.1 percent on lower sales in Canada coming off a particularly strong quarter in the prior year. Capital sales for the first six months increased 3.2 percent, primarily the result of strong sales of patient support system and information technology products in the first quarter. Rental revenues declined in both periods by 7.0 and 4.6 percent, in both the therapy and movable medical equipment product lines. Volume declines are attributable to the lower indications of flu, continued initiatives by hospitals to control operating costs and competitive pressures.
North America Acute Care divisional income decreased for the three-month period due to lower revenues and the resulting lower gross profit, which was only partially offset by operating expense favorability. For the six-month period, divisional income increased benefiting from our stronger first quarter results. Capital margins remained flat for both the three- and six-month periods, despite higher commodity and fuel pricing, while rental margins were relatively flat for the quarter and improved for the first six months due to gains recognized in connection with a vendor product recall of $1.0 million and $3.1 million for the three- and six-month periods. Operating expenses were favorable for both periods due to lower personnel costs.
North America Post-Acute Care
North America Post-Acute Care capital sales declined 2.4 percent for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, while increasing 1.3 percent for the six-month period. Rental revenues decreased 7.5 and 6.4 percent for the three- and six-month periods as a result of lower rental volumes across all businesses for both periods, along with lower pricing in some areas.
North America Post-Acute Care divisional income decreased for both periods due to a decline in gross profit on lower revenues, partially offset by a decline in operating expenses year-over-year.
International
International capital sales increased 33.7 and 12.0 percent for the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2012, and increased 36.9 and 13.6 percent on a constant currency basis for the same periods, due to strong sales in the Middle East and Eastern European regions, as well as the sales included from our second quarter acquisition of Völker. Rental revenues declined during both periods by 6.9 and 2.9 percent on a reported basis and 3.4 and 1.1 percent on a constant currency basis. The rental decrease was the result of increasing price pressures, which were only partially offset by continued growth in bariatric product rentals.
While International divisional income increased for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, it declined over the six-month period. During the second quarter, our gross profit increased on the higher revenues while margins declined related primarily to the inventory step-up associated with recent acquisitions, generally lower margins associated with Völker products and higher commodity and fuel pricing. For the six-month period, gross profit was flat on higher revenues and gross margins declined due to the Völker acquisition, unfavorable product mix and higher commodity and fuel pricing. Operating expenses increased in both periods related primarily to costs introduced by our recent acquisitions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
| | Year To Date Period Ended March 31 | |
| | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Cash Flows Provided By (Used In): | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 123.6 | | | $ | 107.6 | |
Investing activities | | | (109.0 | ) | | | (26.4 | ) |
Financing activities | | | (66.2 | ) | | | (33.8 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | 1.7 | | | | 3.3 | |
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | | $ | (49.9 | ) | | $ | 50.7 | |
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2012 was driven primarily by net income and collections of high year-end receivables. These sources of cash were partially offset by the payout of our performance-based compensation related to our 2011 fiscal year. The increase over the first half of fiscal 2011 was due to higher cash collections, partially offset by a decline in net income and higher payouts of performance-based compensation.
Investing Activities
Cash used for investing activities was driven by our acquisition of the Völker group ($77.0 million) as well as capital expenditures, which increased year over year.
Financing Activities
Cash used for financing activities during fiscal 2012 consisted mainly of debt payments of $55.0 million as well as cash dividend payments. The increase in the use of cash compared to the first six months of fiscal 2011 was due to the debt payments in fiscal 2012 exceeding both the fiscal 2011 repurchased shares of common stock and the purchase of the remaining 40 percent noncontrolling interest in our former Encompass joint venture. In addition, we experienced higher proceeds on the exercise of our stock options in the prior year and increased our cumulative dividends paid for the six-month period by a total of $0.0325 per share compared to the same period in the prior year.
Other Liquidity Matters
Net cash flows from operating activities and selected borrowings have represented our primary sources of funds for growth of the business, including capital expenditures and acquisitions.
As of March 31, 2012, we held investment securities with a fair value of $10.5 million, which consisted primarily of AAA rated student loan auction rate securities. We have estimated the current fair value of our portfolio of auction rate securities based upon guidance provided by our investment advisors, which we have corroborated, including consideration of the credit quality of the underlying securities and the provisions of the respective security agreements. At March 31, 2012, we have recorded temporary unrealized losses totaling $1.0 million on these securities to reflect the estimated decline in fair value associated with the current illiquidity in the auction rate market. If current market conditions do not improve or worsen, the result could be further realized or unrealized losses or impairments and liquidity and earnings could be adversely affected.
We have a $500.0 million five-year senior revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2012, we had outstanding borrowings of $45.0 million and $5.8 million of outstanding, undrawn letters of credit under the facility, leaving $449.2 million of borrowing capacity available.
We also have trade finance credit lines and uncommitted letter of credit facilities. These lines are associated with the normal course of business and do not currently, nor have they historically, been of material size to the overall business.
We have $49.4 million of senior notes outstanding at various fixed interest rates as of March 31, 2012, classified as long-term in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Our pension plans invest in a variety of equity and debt securities. At September 30, 2011, our latest measurement date, our pension plans were underfunded by approximately $79 million. Given the significant funding contribution made during fiscal 2010, we currently do not anticipate any further contributions to our master pension plan in fiscal 2012.
As disclosed in our 2011 Form 10-K, we intend to continue to pay quarterly cash dividends comparable to those paid in the periods covered by these financial statements. However, the declaration and payment of dividends by us will be subject to the sole discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon many factors, including financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, covenants associated with debt obligations, legal requirements and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. We are not currently permitted to increase our dividend, absent a waiver from Hillenbrand, Inc. pursuant to the Distribution Agreement. During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, our Board of Directors approved a second quarter dividend of $0.1250 per share, $0.0125 higher than the first quarter, which is in accordance with the waiver received from Hillenbrand, Inc. under the requirements of the Distribution Agreement.
We intend to continue to pursue selective acquisition candidates in certain areas of our business, but the timing, size or success of any acquisition effort and the related potential capital commitments cannot be predicted. We expect to fund future acquisitions primarily with cash on hand, cash flow from operations and borrowings, within our set limits. The Distribution Agreement executed in conjunction with our spin-off of the funeral services business contains certain restrictions with respect to additional indebtedness we may take on to make acquisitions. We do not anticipate, however, such restrictions will limit our ability to execute our current growth strategy.
As of March 31, 2012, 2.0 million shares remain available for purchase under our existing board authorization, which does not have an expiration date. Repurchases may be made on the open market or via private transactions, and are used for general business purposes.
We believe that cash on hand and generated from operations, along with amounts available under our credit facility, will be sufficient to fund operations, working capital needs, capital expenditure requirements and financing obligations.
Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
There have not been any significant changes since September 30, 2011 impacting our contractual obligations and contingent liabilities and commitments except as discussed in Note 14 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our accounting policies require management to make significant estimates and assumptions using information available at the time the estimates are made. Such estimates and assumptions significantly affect various reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. If future experience differs materially from these estimates and assumptions, our results of operations and financial condition could be affected. A detailed description of our accounting policies is included in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the Critical Accounting Policies Section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our 2011 Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to such policies since September 30, 2011.
For a further summary of certain accounting policies and estimates and recently issued accounting pronouncements applicable to us, see Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.
We are exposed to various market risks, including fluctuations in interest rates, liquidity issues with respect to auction rate securities, collection risk associated with our accounts and notes receivable portfolio and variability in currency exchange rates. We have established policies, procedures and internal processes governing our management of market risks and the use of financial instruments to manage our exposure to such risks.
We are subject to variability in foreign currency exchange rates in our international operations. Exposure to this variability is periodically managed primarily through the use of natural hedges, whereby funding obligations and assets are both managed in the local currency. We, from time-to-time, enter into currency exchange agreements to manage our exposure arising from fluctuating exchange rates related to specific and forecasted transactions. We operate this program pursuant to documented corporate risk management policies and do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes. The sensitivity of earnings and cash flows to variability in exchange rates is assessed by applying an appropriate range of potential rate fluctuations to our assets, obligations and projected results of operations denominated in foreign currencies.
Our currency risk consists primarily of foreign currency denominated firm commitments and forecasted foreign currency denominated intercompany and third-party transactions. At March 31, 2012, the notional amount of open foreign exchange contracts was $10.8 million. The maximum length of time over which we hedge transaction exposures is 15 months. Derivative gains/(losses), initially reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, are reclassified to earnings in the period when the transaction affects earnings.
For additional information on market risks related to our auction rate securities and pension plan assets, see Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in our 2011 Form 10-K.
Our management, with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (the “Certifying Officers”), has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Certifying Officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report for the information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act to be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and such information is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Except as described in the following paragraphs, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
We utilize a company-wide information technology (“IT”) platform. This IT platform is integrated into substantially all of our company-wide operations and materially impacts our manufacturing, sales, accounting and other back-office functionality. We continue to implement the various phases of a multi-year upgrade to this platform. This upgrade includes changes to the design and operation of controls over financial reporting as well as monitoring controls surrounding the implementation of these changes. We are testing controls for design effectiveness prior to implementation of each phase, and operating effectiveness during and after implementation. The final phase of this upgrade is expected to be implemented in our third quarter of fiscal 2012.
On February 13, 2012, we completed the Völker acquisition. We are in the process of integrating Völker into our existing internal control environment. We expect to exclude Völker from the assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Refer to Note 14 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q for further information on our legal proceedings.
For information regarding the risks we face, see the discussion under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011. Except as described in the following paragraph, there have been no material changes to the risk factors described in that report.
In September and October of 2011, the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) conducted an inspection at our Batesville Indiana, production facilities. The inspection covered our production processes and certain promotional materials. At the close of the inspection, the FDA issued a Form 483 identifying certain observed instances of non-compliance with FDA regulations.
Since the date of the inspection, we have responded to the FDA’s Form 483, and we believe we have corrected a number of the observations made by the FDA. However, on March 6, 2012, we received the warning letter, which reiterated the issues raised in the Form 483. The FDA also identified certain instances of non-compliance with FDA requirements regarding the advertising and promotion of certain Hill-Rom products.
We have provided detailed responses to the FDA as to corrective actions on a regular basis. The warning letter does not restrict our ability to manufacture or seek 510(K) clearance of products, nor does it require the withdrawal of any product from the marketplace. We believe that these matters will not have a material impact on our financial results. However, we cannot give any assurances that the FDA will be satisfied with our response to the warning letter or as to the expected date of the resolution of the matters included in the warning letter.
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | | | Average Price Paid per Share | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs (2) | |
January 1, 2012 - January 31, 2012 | | | 3,337 | | | $ | 34.87 | | | | - | | | | 1,980,000 | |
February 1, 2012 - February 29, 2012 | | | 38 | | | | 34.47 | | | | - | | | | 1,980,000 | |
March 1, 2012 - March 31, 2012 | | | 0 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,980,000 | |
Total | | | 3,375 | | | $ | 34.86 | | | | - | | | | 1,980,000 | |
(1) | All shares purchased during the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 were in connection with employee payroll tax withholding for restricted and deferred stock distributions. |
(2) | As of March 31, 2012, a cumulative total of 26.7 million shares have been repurchased under this existing authorization, which does not have an expiration date. Currently there are no plans to terminate this program in the future. |
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 101.INS XBRL Instance Document |
| 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| 101.LAB XBRL Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
| 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
| 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC. |
| | | | (Registrant) |
| | | | |
| | | | |
DATE: April 26, 2012 | By: | | | /s/ Mark J. Guinan |
| Name: Title: | | | Mark J. Guinan Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (duly authorized officer and principal financial officer) |