As previously disclosed, on August 3, 2021, HollyFrontier Corporation (“HollyFrontier”) announced that it had entered into a Business Combination Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2021 (the “Business Combination Agreement”), by and among HollyFrontier, Hippo Parent Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of HollyFrontier (“New Parent”), Hippo Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of New Parent (“Parent Merger Sub”), The Sinclair Companies (“Sinclair HoldCo”) and Hippo Holding LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sinclair HoldCo (“Sinclair NewCo”), to acquire certain refining, marketing and other businesses of Sinclair Oil Corporation. Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, HollyFrontier will acquire Sinclair NewCo by effecting (a) a holding company merger in accordance with Section 251(g) of the Delaware General Corporation Law whereby HollyFrontier will merge with and into Parent Merger Sub, with HollyFrontier surviving such merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of New Parent (the “HFC Merger”) and (b) immediately following the HFC Merger, a contribution whereby Sinclair HoldCo will contribute all of the equity interests of Sinclair NewCo to New Parent in exchange for shares of common stock of New Parent, par value $0.01 per share (“New Parent Common Stock”), resulting in Sinclair NewCo becoming a direct wholly owned subsidiary of New Parent (together with the HFC Merger, the “HFC Transactions”). Immediately prior to the HFC Transactions, HEP will effect the transactions contemplated by that certain Contribution Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2021, by and among Sinclair HoldCo, Sinclair Transportation Company (“STC”) and Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (“HEP”), pursuant to which HEP will acquire all of the outstanding shares of STC in exchange for 21 million newly issued common limited partner units of HEP and cash consideration equal to $325 million (together with the HFC Transactions, the “Sinclair Transactions”).
HollyFrontier filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a preliminary proxy statement on September 17, 2021 (the “preliminary proxy statement”) and a definitive proxy statement on October 29, 2021 (the “definitive proxy statement”) in connection with the Sinclair Transactions. The definitive proxy statement was mailed to the stockholders of HollyFrontier on or about October 29, 2021.
Litigation Related to the Sinclair Transactions
As previously disclosed, two lawsuits were filed related to the Sinclair Transactions, one in state court and the other in federal court: Robert Garfield v. HollyFrontier Corporation, et al., No. 2021-66396, an individual action filed in Harris County District Court in Houston, Texas in which the plaintiff generally alleges Delaware state law claims that members of the HollyFrontier board of directors (the “Board”) breached fiduciary duties and failed to make complete disclosures in the preliminary proxy statement; and Gerald Lovoi v. HollyFrontier Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-08805, an individual action filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in which the plaintiff generally alleges that HollyFrontier and members of the Board violated federal securities laws, Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the related rules and regulations thereunder, by omitting material disclosures from the preliminary proxy statement.
Following the filing of the definitive proxy statement on October 29, 2021, six additional lawsuits were filed in federal court, in which the plaintiff asserted claims generally similar to those asserted in the prior federal case: Jared Abrams v. HollyFrontier Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-09309, an individual action filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Christopher Quayle v. HollyFrontier Corp., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03079, an individual action filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado; Shannon Jenkins v. HollyFrontier Corp., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-09497, an individual action filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; William Bancroft v. HollyFrontier Corp., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-09878, an individual action filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Stanley Jacobs v. HollyFrontier Corp., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01668, an individual action filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware; and Timothy Dolan v. HollyFrontier Corp., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01670, an individual action filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
In addition, the Board received two demands from stockholders for additional disclosures similar to those demanded in the federal lawsuits.
Additional lawsuits or demands may be received. There will be no further disclosures of additional complaints or demands received or filed unless they materially differ from those already disclosed.