Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-2958
HUBBELL INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
State of Connecticut | 06-0397030 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
584 Derby Milford Road, Orange, CT | 06477 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(203) 799-4100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filerþ Accelerated Filero Non-Accelerated Filero
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
The number of shares outstanding of the Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock as of July 31, 2006 were 8,413,128 and 52,368,305, respectively.
HUBBELL INCORPORATED
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
Signatures | 34 | |||||||
EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION | ||||||||
EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION | ||||||||
EX-32.1: CERTIFICATION | ||||||||
EX-32.2: CERTIFICATION |
2
Table of Contents
HUBBELL INCORPORATED
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income
(unaudited)
(in millions, except per share amounts)
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 603.2 | $ | 520.5 | $ | 1,176.2 | $ | 1,008.1 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 437.5 | 377.4 | 852.0 | 728.3 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 165.7 | 143.1 | 324.2 | 279.8 | ||||||||||||
Selling & administrative expenses | 102.9 | 88.0 | 202.0 | 180.4 | ||||||||||||
Special charges | 1.4 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 4.1 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 61.4 | 52.9 | 119.3 | 95.3 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | (2.2 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (4.1 | ) | (5.6 | ) | ||||||||
Other income, net | 0.5 | — | 0.8 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 59.7 | 50.1 | 116.0 | 89.8 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 18.1 | 14.4 | 34.7 | 25.3 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 41.6 | $ | 35.7 | $ | 81.3 | $ | 64.5 | ||||||||
Earnings per share | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 1.05 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.04 | ||||||||
Average number of common shares outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 60.7 | 61.0 | 60.6 | 61.2 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 61.6 | 61.9 | 61.4 | 62.3 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends per common share | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.66 |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
HUBBELL INCORPORATED
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
(unaudited)
(in millions)
(in millions)
June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current Assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 53.5 | $ | 110.6 | ||||
Short-term investments | 21.3 | 121.3 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 377.1 | 310.4 | ||||||
Inventories, net | 306.1 | 237.1 | ||||||
Deferred taxes and other | 45.0 | 40.7 | ||||||
Total current assets | 803.0 | 820.1 | ||||||
Property, Plant, and Equipment, net | 298.3 | 267.8 | ||||||
Other Assets | ||||||||
Investments | 58.6 | 78.8 | ||||||
Goodwill | 413.8 | 351.5 | ||||||
Intangible assets and other | 180.3 | 148.8 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,754.0 | $ | 1,667.0 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current Liabilities | ||||||||
Short-term debt | $ | 8.8 | $ | 29.6 | ||||
Accounts payable | 213.3 | 159.5 | ||||||
Accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits | 41.6 | 41.4 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes | 21.5 | 20.0 | ||||||
Dividends payable | 20.1 | 20.2 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 102.4 | 89.8 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 407.7 | 360.5 | ||||||
Long-Term Debt | 199.3 | 199.2 | ||||||
Other Non-Current Liabilities | 113.4 | 109.2 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | 720.4 | 668.9 | ||||||
Shareholders’ Equity | 1,033.6 | 998.1 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 1,754.0 | $ | 1,667.0 | ||||
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
HUBBELL INCORPORATED
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(in millions)
(in millions)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30 | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 81.3 | $ | 64.5 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 26.9 | 24.4 | ||||||
Changes in deferred income taxes | (2.0 | ) | 1.4 | |||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 5.4 | — | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Increase in accounts receivable | (54.6 | ) | (11.0 | ) | ||||
Increase in inventories | (58.3 | ) | (11.7 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities | 56.3 | (15.4 | ) | |||||
Changes in other assets and liabilities, net | 2.1 | 5.3 | ||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options | (3.6 | ) | — | |||||
Contribution to domestic pension plans | — | (10.0 | ) | |||||
Other, net | 0.1 | 3.2 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 53.6 | 50.7 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities | ||||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired | (118.0 | ) | (5.5 | ) | ||||
Capital expenditures | (38.1 | ) | (28.6 | ) | ||||
Purchases of available-for-sale investments | (102.4 | ) | (113.1 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale investments | 222.6 | 219.1 | ||||||
Purchases of held-to-maturity investments | (0.4 | ) | — | |||||
Other, net | 1.3 | 2.9 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (35.0 | ) | 74.8 | |||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | ||||||||
Payment of short-term debt | (20.9 | ) | — | |||||
Payment of dividends | (40.1 | ) | (40.5 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 23.5 | 14.7 | ||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options | 3.6 | — | ||||||
Acquisition of common shares | (42.5 | ) | (45.5 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (76.4 | ) | (71.3 | ) | ||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 0.7 | (0.8 | ) | |||||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (57.1 | ) | 53.4 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | ||||||||
Beginning of period | 110.6 | 139.9 | ||||||
End of period | $ | 53.5 | $ | 193.3 | ||||
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
HUBBELL INCORPORATED
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Hubbell Incorporated (“Hubbell”, the “Company”, or “registrant”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement of the results of the periods presented have been included. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2005 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. for complete financial statements.
Book overdraft cash balances have been reflected in Accounts payable beginning in the fourth quarter of 2005. Classification of prior year amounts in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows has been revised to conform to the current year presentation. Certain other prior year amounts in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Hubbell Incorporated Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of the tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and provides guidance related to classification and disclosure matters. FIN 48 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement may have on future financial statements and related notes to financial statements.
2. Business Acquisition
On June 1, 2006, the Company completed the purchase of 100 percent of the outstanding common stock of Strongwell Lenoir City, Inc. for $118.5 million in cash. Strongwell Lenoir City, Inc. (renamed Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc.) has been added to the Power segment and the results of operations after June 1, 2006 are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. The acquired business has manufacturing facilities in Lenoir City, TN and San Jose, CA. Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc. designs and manufactures precast polymer concrete products used to house underground equipment including handholes, enclosures, equipment pads and
6
Table of Contents
transformer pads under the brand names QUAZITE® and SPLITT-PAD® and also has a line of surface drain products sold under the brand names POLYCAST®, POLYVENT®, and DURAGUARD®. These products are sold to the electrical utility and telecommunications industries. Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc. complements the existing product lines of the Power segment and shares a similar customer base to the existing businesses within the Power segment.
The acquisition price of Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc. is subject to an audited balance sheet as of the closing date which has not been finalized. Therefore, the acquisition price is subject to adjustment. The Company is in the process of finalizing valuations of certain intangible assets and adjusting the historical cost basis of assets and liabilities to fair value and, as a result, the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary. The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on June 1, 2006, in millions.
Total purchase price including transaction expenses | $ | 118.5 | ||
Fair value allocated to assets acquired | 36.2 | |||
Fair value of liabilities assumed | (6.2 | ) | ||
Amounts allocated to intangible assets | 28.9 | |||
Amount allocated to goodwill | 59.6 |
The fair value allocated to net assets acquired primarily relates to inventory and fixed assets. Intangible assets identified consist of $21 million of tradenames and $7.9 million of customer lists. The tradenames are being amortized over a period of 30 years and customer lists are being amortized over a period of 10 years. The excess of purchase price over the fair values of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and identifiable intangible assets has been allocated to goodwill. All of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
In the first quarter of 2005, the Company completed the purchase of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities of a foundation anchoring business hereinafter referred to as “Atlas” for $5.5 million in cash, including fees and expenses and net of cash acquired. Atlas is a designer and manufacturer of helical and push pier anchors which are sold to dealers and installers throughout the U.S. and complements the product offering of the Company’s Power segment.
3. Stock-Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123 (R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123 (R)”). The standard requires expensing the value of all share-based payments, including stock options and similar awards, based upon the award’s fair value measurement on the grant date. SFAS 123 (R) revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”), and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). SFAS 123 (R) is supplemented by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, “Share-Based Payment”. SAB No. 107 expresses the SEC staff’s views regarding the interaction between SFAS 123(R) and certain rules and regulations including the valuation of share-based payment arrangements.
As of June 30, 2006, the Company had various stock-based awards outstanding which were issued to certain executives and other key employees. The Company will recognize the cost of these awards on a straight line attribution basis over their respective vesting periods, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company adopted the modified prospective transition method as outlined in SFAS 123 (R) and, therefore, prior year amounts have not been restated.
7
Table of Contents
In 2005, the Company issued restricted stock awards, performance based stock awards and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) on the Company’s Class B Common Stock pursuant to the Hubbell Incorporated 2005 Incentive Award Plan. In 2004 and 2003, the Company granted stock option awards on the Company’s Class B Common Stock under its stock option plan to certain employees. In the second quarter of 2006, the Company issued a total of 2,800 shares of restricted stock. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recognized total pretax stock-based compensation expense of $2.7 million, which was recorded in Selling & administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. For the first six months of 2006, total pretax stock-based compensation expense of $5.4 million was recorded, of which $5.1 million was recorded in Selling & administrative expense and $0.3��million was recorded in Cost of goods sold in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. In addition, $0.1 million has been capitalized in Inventory in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2006. Of the total $5.4 million of pretax stock-based compensation expense recorded in the first six months of 2006, $3.3 million relates to the expensing of stock options which would not have been expensed but for the adoption of SFAS 123 (R). Total stock-based compensation expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 reduced both basic and diluted earnings per share by $.03 and $.05, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year.
For the first six months of 2006, the Company recorded $2.1 million of income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense. The income tax benefit has been recorded as a deferred tax asset in Deferred taxes and other in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of June 30, 2006, there was $16.3 million, pretax, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements. This cost is expected to be recognized ratably through November 2008.
The Company may issue up to 5.9 million shares of Class B Common Stock in settlement of stock options, restricted stock, performance shares, or SARs in accordance with the Hubbell Incorporated 2005 Incentive Award Plan. The Company’s policy is to issue new shares for settlement of any stock-based awards.
Each of the compensation arrangements is discussed below.
Restricted Stock
The restricted stock granted to date is not transferable and is subject to forfeiture in the event of the recipient’s termination of employment prior to vesting. The restricted stock will generally vest in one-third increments on each anniversary of the date of grant or completely upon a change in control, termination of employment by reason of death or disability or in certain other instances. Recipients are entitled to receive dividends and voting rights on their restricted stock regardless of vesting. The weighted average fair value of the 2005 restricted stock grants was $49.07 per share. The fair values are measured using the average between the high and low trading prices of the Company’s Class B Common Stock on the measurement date. At December 31, 2005, the Company had 130,376 shares of restricted stock outstanding of which 4,408 shares have been forfeited and none have vested in the first six months of 2006. In the second quarter of 2006, the Company issued 350 shares to each of the eight non-management members of its Board of Directors for a total of 2,800 shares. These shares vest over a one year period on the date of the next Annual Meeting, which is scheduled for May 2007. A total of 128,768 non-vested shares remain outstanding as of June 30, 2006.
8
Table of Contents
Stock Appreciation Rights
The SARs granted to date entitle the recipient to the difference between the fair market value of the Company’s Class B Common Stock on the date of exercise and the grant price as determined using the average between the high and the low trading prices of the Company’s Class B Common Stock on the measurement date. This amount is payable in shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock. One-third of the SARs vest and become exercisable each year on the anniversary of the grant date and expire ten years after the grant date. At December 31, 2005 the Company had 504,239 SARs outstanding at a grant price of $49.76, of which none are vested as of June 30, 2006 and 17,424 have been forfeited. A total of 486,815 SARs remain outstanding as of June 30, 2006.
The fair value of the SARs was measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following table summarizes the assumptions used in applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the 2006 expense with respect to SARs. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company’s stock, and other factors. The Company uses historical data as well as other factors to estimate exercise behavior and employee termination. The expected term of SARs granted is based upon historical trends of stock option behavior as well as future projections. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the award.
Weighted Avg. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk Free | Grant Date | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend | Expected | Interest | Expected | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Yield | Volatility | Rate | Option Term | Per Option | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 SARs | 2.65 | % | 23.5 | % | 4.26 | % | 6 years | $11.10 |
Performance Shares
The performance shares granted to date vest and become deliverable based upon satisfaction of performance criteria established by the Company’s Compensation Committee. The criteria are based upon the Company’s cumulative growth in earnings per share compared to a peer group of the Standard & Poor’s Electrical Equipment Index over a three-year period. Performance at target will result in vesting and issuance of the performance shares. Performance below or above target can result in payment in the range of 0%-250% of the number of shares granted. Performance shares are issued on the third anniversary of the date of grant assuming the performance measures have been met. The fair value of the performance shares is $46.23, which was measured using the average between the high and low trading prices of the Company’s Class B Common Stock on the measurement date, discounted for the non-payment of dividends during the requisite period. At December 31, 2005, the Company had 35,178 performance based shares outstanding of which none have vested and none have been forfeited as of June 30, 2006. The Company estimates that the performance criteria is probable of being satisfied at 100% of the target number of shares granted.
Stock Option Awards
The Company granted options to officers and other key employees to purchase the Company’s Class B Common Stock in previous years. Options issued in 2004 and 2003 were partially vested on January 1, 2006, the effective date of SFAS 123(R). All options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on date of grant. These option awards generally vest annually over a three-year period and expire after ten years.
9
Table of Contents
Stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2006 is set forth below (shares in thousands):
Weighted | ||||||||
Number of | Average | |||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 | 5,942 | $ | 39.04 | |||||
Granted | — | — | ||||||
Exercised | (724 | ) | $ | 36.96 | ||||
Forfeited | (127 | ) | $ | 38.51 | ||||
Canceled or expired | (8 | ) | $ | 46.80 | ||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 | 5,083 | $ | 39.34 |
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock option exercises during the first six months of 2006 was $9.8 million. The aggregate intrinsic value of all outstanding stock option awards at June 30, 2006 was $42.2 million, of which $37.1 million relates to awards that are fully vested.
The following table sets forth information related to options outstanding at June 30, 2006:
Weighted | ||||||||
Number of Shares | Average Remaining | Weighted Average | ||||||
(in thousands) | Contractual Term | Exercise Price | ||||||
957 | 2 years | $ | 42.91 | |||||
1,051 | 5 years | $ | 27.47 | |||||
3,075* | 8 years | $ | 42.29 | |||||
5,083 | $ | 39.34 |
* | 949 of these shares are not vested as of June 30, 2006. |
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, for stock options in the prior year (in millions, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2005 | June 30, 2005 | |||||||
Net income, as reported | $ | 35.7 | $ | 64.5 | ||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of related tax effects | (1.6 | ) | (3.1 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income | $ | 34.1 | $ | 61.4 | ||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||
Basic — as reported | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.05 | ||||
Basic — pro forma | $ | 0.56 | $ | 1.00 | ||||
Diluted — as reported | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.04 | ||||
Diluted — pro forma | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.99 | ||||
Cash received from option exercises was $23.5 million and $14.7 million for the first six months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company recorded a realized tax benefit from the exercise of stock options of $3.6 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2006 which has been included in Cash Flows From Financing
10
Table of Contents
Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows as prescribed by SFAS 123(R). The Company recorded a realized tax benefit from the exercise of stock options of $4.1 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2005 which has been included in Other, net within Cash Flows From Operating Activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
4. Inventories
Inventories are comprised of the following (in millions):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Raw Material | $ | 100.7 | $ | 83.0 | ||||
Work-in-Process | 69.7 | 53.6 | ||||||
Finished Goods | 193.3 | 151.6 | ||||||
363.7 | 288.2 | |||||||
Excess of FIFO over LIFO cost basis | (57.6 | ) | (51.1 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 306.1 | $ | 237.1 | ||||
5. Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in millions, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 41.6 | $ | 35.7 | $ | 81.3 | $ | 64.5 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding—Basic | 60.7 | 61.0 | 60.6 | 61.2 | ||||||||||||
Potential dilutive shares | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
Average number of shares outstanding —Diluted | 61.6 | 61.9 | 61.4 | 62.3 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share of common stock: | ||||||||||||||||
—Basic | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 1.05 | ||||||||
—Diluted | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.04 | ||||||||
There were 0.9 million anti-dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. In addition, 0.5 million SARs were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the effect would be anti-dilutive. For the three months ended June 30, 2005 there were 1.4 million anti-dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding. There were no anti-dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
11
Table of Contents
6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2006, by segment, were as follows (in millions):
Segment | ||||||||||||||||
Industrial | ||||||||||||||||
Electrical | Power | Technology | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2005 | $ | 175.9 | $ | 122.1 | $ | 53.5 | $ | 351.5 | ||||||||
Acquisitions | — | 59.7 | — | 59.7 | ||||||||||||
Translation adjustments | 2.0 | 0.6 | — | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2006 | $ | 177.9 | $ | 182.4 | $ | 53.5 | $ | 413.8 | ||||||||
Included above in acquisitions is $59.6 million of goodwill from the acquisition of Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc.
The Company’s policy is to perform its annual impairment testing in the second quarter of each year, unless circumstances dictate the need for more frequent assessments. In 2006, this testing resulted in implied fair values for each reporting unit which exceeded the reporting unit’s carrying value, including goodwill. Consequently, there were no impairments of goodwill. Similarly, there were no impairments of indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Identifiable intangible assets are recorded in “Intangible assets and other” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and at June 30, 2006 include approximately $21.5 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets not subject to amortization and $52.7 million of intangibles with definite lives that are being amortized and are presented net of accumulated amortization of $5.4 million. Amortization expense is expected to be approximately $3.7 million per year over the next two years and $3.4 million for the three years thereafter. Indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily represent tradenames related to the Lighting Corporation of America (“LCA”) acquisition. Definite-lived intangible assets primarily represent trademarks, customer lists and patents of which $28.9 million relates to the acquisition of Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc (see Note 2).
12
Table of Contents
7. Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity is comprised of the following (in millions, except share and per share amounts):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value: | ||||||||
Class A — authorized 50,000,000 shares; outstanding 8,414,911 and 9,127,960 shares | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.1 | ||||
Class B — authorized 150,000,000 shares; outstanding 52,377,557 and 51,962,990 shares | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 249.4 | 267.2 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 790.2 | 749.1 | ||||||
Unearned compensation | — | (8.0 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax: | ||||||||
Pension liability adjustment | (4.1 | ) | (4.1 | ) | ||||
Cumulative translation adjustment | (1.2 | ) | (5.4 | ) | ||||
Cash flow hedge loss | (0.8 | ) | (1.0 | ) | ||||
Unrealized loss on investments | (0.5 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Total Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (6.6 | ) | (10.8 | ) | ||||
Total Shareholders’ equity | $ | 1,033.6 | $ | 998.1 | ||||
8. Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income and its components are as follows (in millions):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 41.6 | $ | 35.7 | $ | 81.3 | $ | 64.5 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 4.7 | (3.5 | ) | 4.2 | (6.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Unrealized loss on investments, net of tax | 0.1 | 0.1 | (0.2 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Cash flow hedge gain, net of tax | — | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 46.4 | $ | 32.6 | $ | 85.5 | $ | 58.7 | ||||||||
9. Special Charges
Special charges in the second quarter of 2006 and 2005 reflect pretax expenses of $1.4 million and $2.7 million, respectively. Included in the second quarter of 2005 is $0.5 million of inventory write-downs which were recorded in Cost of goods sold in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. Special charges for the first six months of 2006 and 2005 reflect pretax expense of $3.1 million and $4.6 million, respectively. Included in the first six months of 2006 and 2005 are $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of inventory write-downs which were recorded in Cost of goods sold in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. These charges were the result of actions taken in connection with the programs discussed below, all within the Electrical segment.
13
Table of Contents
Lighting Business Integration and Rationalization Program
The Company’s ongoing lighting business integration and rationalization program (“the Program” or “Lighting Program”) was initiated in 2002 following the Company’s acquisition of LCA and relates to both the integration and rationalization of the Company’s acquired and legacy lighting operations. The Program consists of a series of actions related to the consolidation of manufacturing, sales and administrative functions occurring throughout the commercial and industrial lighting fixture business and the relocation of the manufacturing and assembly of commercial lighting fixture products to low cost countries.
The 2006 second quarter charge consisted of $1.0 million of severance and related benefit costs and $0.4 million of transition and integration costs. The 2005 second quarter special charge consisted of $1.0 million of severance costs, $0.2 million of inventory write-downs and $0.6 million of facility exit costs. Special charges in the first six months of 2006 consisted of $2.0 million of severance and related benefits, $0.9 million of transition and integration costs, and $0.2 million of inventory write-downs related to product rationalizations. Special charges recorded in the first six months of 2005 consisted of $1.9 million of severance costs, $1.6 million of exit and integration costs and $0.2 million of inventory write-downs. The current year severance costs are being recorded as a result of actions initiated in 2005 and in the first quarter of 2006. The severance costs are being recorded ratably over the affected employees’ remaining service period following the announcement of the programs. A total reduction of approximately 580 employees is expected to occur as a result of actions related to these programs, of which approximately 290 employees have left the Company as of June 30, 2006.
Closure of a Wiring Device Factory
In the second quarter of 2004, the Company announced plans to close a wiring device factory in Puerto Rico. The factory closed during the second quarter of 2005 and production activities were transferred to existing facilities or outsourced. In the second quarter of 2005, the Company recorded $0.9 million of special charges, of which $0.6 million was related to facility closure and $0.3 million was for inventory write-downs. Approximately 220 employees were affected by this closure. All employees have left the Company and the remaining severance was paid in the first quarter of 2006.
The following table sets forth activity with respect to special charges for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and the status of amounts accrued at June 30, 2006 (in millions):
Accrued | Accrued | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at | 2006 | 2006 Cash | Non-cash | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||
12/31/05 | Provision | Expenditures | Write-downs | 6/30/06 | ||||||||||||||||
Lighting Business Integration and Rationalization Program: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Inventory write-downs | $ | — | $ | 0.2 | $ | — | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | — | |||||||||
Employee termination costs | 3.8 | 2.0 | (0.4 | ) | — | 5.4 | ||||||||||||||
Exit and integration costs | — | 0.9 | (0.9 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
3.8 | 3.1 | (1.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 5.4 | ||||||||||||||
Wiring Device Factory Closure: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Employee termination costs | 0.3 | — | (0.3 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 4.1 | $ | 3.1 | $ | (1.6 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | 5.4 | ||||||||
14
Table of Contents
10. Segment Information
The following table sets forth financial information by business segment (in millions):
Operating Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales | Operating Income | as a % of Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electrical | $ | 419.2 | $ | 376.4 | $ | 38.7 | $ | 35.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Special charges | — | — | (1.4 | ) | (2.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Electrical | 419.2 | 376.4 | 37.3 | 32.5 | 8.9 | % | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Power | 134.3 | 109.9 | 19.0 | 16.2 | 14.1 | % | 14.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Industrial Technology | 49.7 | 34.2 | 7.8 | 4.2 | 15.7 | % | 12.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 603.2 | 520.5 | 64.1 | 52.9 | 10.6 | % | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | (2.7 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 603.2 | $ | 520.5 | $ | 61.4 | $ | 52.9 | 10.2 | % | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electrical | $ | 810.3 | $ | 729.8 | $ | 71.8 | $ | 68.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Special charges | — | — | (3.1 | ) | (4.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Electrical | 810.3 | 729.8 | 68.7 | 63.9 | 8.5 | % | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Power | 266.6 | 208.6 | 39.5 | 26.9 | 14.8 | % | 12.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Industrial Technology | 99.3 | 69.7 | 16.5 | 9.1 | 16.6 | % | 13.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 1,176.2 | 1,008.1 | 124.7 | 99.9 | 10.6 | % | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Unusual item | — | — | — | (4.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | — | (5.4 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,176.2 | $ | 1,008.1 | $ | 119.3 | $ | 95.3 | 10.1 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||||
The unusual item in 2005 of $4.6 million, pretax, represents transactional expenses consisting of legal, accounting and consulting fees incurred in support of the Company’s strategic growth initiatives. These costs are included in Selling and administrative expenses and are not allocated to any one business segment for management reporting purposes.
Stock-based compensation expense reflects all costs recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. The Company does not allocate this amount to segments for management reporting purposes.
15
Table of Contents
11. Pension and Other Benefits
The following table sets forth the components of pension and other benefits cost for the three and six months ended June 30, (in millions):
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months | Three Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Six Months Ended | Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 4.8 | $ | 4.0 | $ | 9.6 | $ | 7.9 | $ | 0.1 | $ | — | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest cost | 8.0 | 7.1 | 16.0 | 14.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (9.8 | ) | (8.2 | ) | (19.6 | ) | (16.4 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | (0.3 | ) | 0.1 | (0.2 | ) | 0.2 | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial losses | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 3.7 | $ | 3.4 | $ | 7.7 | $ | 6.7 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 1.3 | $ | 1.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Employer Contributions
The Company expects to contribute between $15-$20 million to its domestic, defined benefit pension plans and $5-$7 million to its international plans in 2006. As of June 30, 2006 the Company has made no significant contributions to these plans.
12. Guarantees
The Company accrues for costs associated with guarantees when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The most likely cost to be incurred is accrued based on an evaluation of currently available facts and, where no amount within a range of estimates is more likely, the minimum is accrued.
As of June 30, 2006, the Company had six individual forward exchange contracts outstanding, each for the purchase of $1.0 million U.S. dollars which expire ratably each month through December 2006. These contracts were entered into in order to hedge the exposure to fluctuating rates of foreign currency exchange on inventory purchases. These contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended.
The Company offers a product warranty which covers defects on most of its products. These warranties primarily apply to products that are properly used for their intended purpose, installed correctly, and properly maintained. The Company generally accrues estimated warranty costs at the time of sale. Estimated warranty expenses are based upon historical information such as past experience, product failure rates, or the number of units to be repaired or replaced. Adjustments are made to the product warranty cost accrual as claims are incurred or as historical experience indicates. The product warranty cost accrual is reviewed for reasonableness on a quarterly basis and is adjusted as additional information regarding expected warranty costs becomes
16
Table of Contents
known. Changes in the accrual for product warranties in the first six months of 2006 are set forth below (in millions):
Balance at December 31, 2005 | $ | 3.8 | ||
Provision | 0.7 | |||
Expenditures | (0.7 | ) | ||
Balance at June 30, 2006 | $ | 3.8 | ||
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Summary of Business Strategy
A more detailed description of the objectives to our business strategy is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Our business strategy continues to incorporate the following objectives:
• | Transformation of business processes.The Company is committed to a long-term initiative of applying lean process improvement techniques throughout the enterprise to eliminate waste and improve efficiency and reliability. | |
• | Lighting integration and cost reduction.We continue to execute a multi-year program to rationalize our lighting business. Actions include facility consolidations, workforce reductions and product rationalizations. | |
• | Global sourcing.We continue to focus on expanding our global product and component sourcing and supplier cost reduction program through consolidation of suppliers, utilization of reverse auctions, and partnering with vendors to shorten lead times, improve quality and delivery and reduce costs. | |
• | Acquisitions in our core markets.We continue to seek potential acquisitions that would enhance our core electrical component businesses — wiring systems, lighting fixtures and controls, rough-in electrical products, and utility products. | |
• | Working capital efficiency.We continue to focus on improving our working capital efficiency which emphasizes improved inventory management, faster collection of accounts receivable and negotiation of more favorable supplier payment terms. | |
• | Common, enterprise-wide information system.A multi-year program is underway to provide a common information system to meet the needs of our business. SAP software has been installed at approximately 75% of the Company, excluding recent acquisitions, with another “go-live” scheduled for October 2006 which will substantially complete the domestic implementation. |
17
Table of Contents
OUTLOOK
Our outlook for 2006 in key areas is as follows:
Markets and Sales
We anticipate overall conditions to remain positive throughout 2006 in most of our major end use markets. Non-residential construction markets are expected to continue to outpace the levels of construction spending experienced in 2005. U.S. manufacturing utilization levels have resulted in higher spending on maintenance, repair and overhaul activities at many of the nation’s factories. Domestic utility markets are expected to move at or above the level of growth in the overall economy. Residential market activity is expected to soften throughout the remainder of 2006 due in part to higher mortgage interest rates, although we anticipate modest growth in this portion of our business as a result of new product introductions and increased market share. The outlook for our markets assumes no shocks to the economy occur which dampen consumer spending and business investments.
Commodity costs remain highly volatile, with global demand driving higher prices for core commodities including oil, steel, copper, aluminum and zinc. We will attempt to recover higher costs in these areas with increases in selling prices, as has been the case throughout 2004-2005. We currently expect overall sales growth in 2006 versus 2005 to be in a range of 12%-14%. Sales increases compared to 2005 are expected to be broad based, with each of our three segments contributing. The full year impact of acquisitions is expected to contribute 3-4 percentage points of the overall sales increase, with price increases accounting for approximately two percentage points.
Operating Results
Full year 2006 operating profit margin is expected to be at the level of margins reported in 2005 of 10.8%. The impact of expensing stock-based compensation in 2006 is expected to decrease operating profit margins by approximately one-half of a percentage point. In addition, supply chain and production inefficiencies in our Electrical segment, SAP implementation costs and spending on investments in new product development, are all expected to lower operating margins in 2006. Lastly, we expect that the pricing actions taken in 2005 and the first half of 2006 as well as additional planned increases will fall short of offsetting higher levels of raw material commodity costs and higher energy related costs. Overall, commodity and energy costs are expected to remain volatile and further increases in these costs in 2006 may also not be fully offset with price increases. In addition to higher volume levels, several key initiatives are expected to increase operating margins including savings from actions completed within the Lighting Program, expansion of global product sourcing initiatives and lean process improvement projects.
We expect to continue to integrate and streamline our operations, particularly within our Lighting business. These actions are expected to result in full year charges being recorded in 2006 related to severance, business integration costs and asset write-downs to consolidate operations at amounts near the $11 million of special charges recorded for the full year 2005. Amounts actually recorded in 2006 will depend on the nature and timing of when plans are finalized and approved.
Our business information system initiative is expected to facilitate consolidation of business support processes. We estimate total 2006 expenses directly related to the implementation of our SAP enterprise-wide
18
Table of Contents
information system will be in a range of $8-$10 million and capitalized costs will be in a range of $8-$10 million. In addition, non-cash amortization expenses associated with capitalization will approximate $8 million.
Taxation
We estimate the effective tax rate in 2006 will be approximately 30.0% compared with 23.5% reported in 2005. The increase is primarily due to the absence of a tax settlement recorded in 2005, which lowered the rate in that year by approximately five percentage points, and an anticipated higher level of U.S. taxable income at comparably higher tax rates. In addition, Congress has yet to renew the R&D tax credit that expired on December 31, 2005, and as such we have not recognized a benefit this year that had been reflected in the prior year effective tax rate.
Earnings Per Share
Overall, diluted earnings per share is currently expected to be in the range of $2.75-$2.90, including the impact of special charges and stock-based compensation expense.
Cash Flow
We expect an increase in working capital requirements to support higher sales levels.
Capital spending in 2006 is expected to be approximately $10-$15 million higher than the $73.4 million spent in 2005 primarily as a result of the construction of our new lighting headquarters facility and other strategic initiatives. We expect total share repurchases in 2006 to approximate $70 million, however, total repurchases may vary depending upon the level of financing and investing activities, and the market performance of the Company’s shares. Cash flow provided by operating activities is estimated to be $180-$210 million. Free cash flow (defined as cash flow from operations less capital spending) in 2006 is expected to range from $100-$125 million.
Growth
Our growth strategy contemplates acquisitions in our core businesses. This is evidenced by our 2005 acquisitions as well as the acquisition of Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc. in the second quarter of 2006. Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc. is expected to contribute $70-$80 million to Power segment sales on a full year basis with operating margins at or above the Power segment average. The rate and extent to which appropriate acquisition opportunities become available, acquired companies are integrated and anticipated cost savings are achieved can affect our future results.
19
Table of Contents
Summary of Consolidated Results
In millions, except per share data
Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | Net sales | 2005 | Net sales | 2006 | Net sales | 2005 | Net sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 603.2 | $ | 520.5 | $ | 1,176.2 | $ | 1,008.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 437.5 | 72.5 | % | 377.4 | 72.5 | % | 852.0 | 72.4 | % | 728.3 | 72.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 165.7 | 27.5 | % | 143.1 | 27.5 | % | 324.2 | 27.6 | % | 279.8 | 27.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selling & administrative expenses | 102.9 | 17.1 | % | 88.0 | 16.9 | % | 202.0 | 17.2 | % | 180.4 | 17.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Special charges | 1.4 | 0.2 | % | 2.2 | 0.4 | % | 2.9 | 0.2 | % | 4.1 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | 61.4 | 10.2 | % | 52.9 | 10.2 | % | 119.3 | 10.1 | % | 95.3 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share — diluted | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.04 |
Net Sales
Net sales for the second quarter of 2006 increased 16% versus the second quarter of 2005. The majority of the year-over-year increase is due to stronger end user demand as a result of improved economic conditions in most of our served markets. The impact of acquisitions accounted for 4 percentage points of the sales increase in the second quarter. We estimate that selling price increases accounted for approximately 1 percentage point of the year-over-year increase in quarterly sales. Net sales for the first six months of 2006 increased 17% compared to the same period of 2005. The majority of the increase is a result of favorable conditions in most of our major end use markets. Acquisitions and, to a lesser extent, selling price increases contributed approximately 5 percentage points of the six month increase. Currency translation had no material impact on sales in the second quarter or in the first six months of 2006 versus the comparable periods of 2005.
Sales to the retail and residential market increased approximately 13% in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 primarily resulting from increased market share and new product introductions. Residential sales represented approximately 14% of the Company’s consolidated net sales for the first six months of 2006.
Gross Profit
The consolidated gross profit margin in the second quarter of 2006 of 27.5% was unchanged from the second quarter of 2005. On a year-to-date basis, 2006 gross profit margin declined slightly to 27.6% compared to 27.8% for the first six months of 2005. Production and delivery inefficiencies and higher costs were experienced in certain of our Electrical and Power segment businesses in both the quarter and year-to-date results compared to the prior year. Further, higher year-over-year costs throughout each segment in the areas of commodity raw materials, transportation and utilities negatively impacted gross profit margins by 2-3 percentage points. These items were substantially offset by increased sales volume in 2006 compared to 2005, price increases, lower product costs from strategic sourcing initiatives and completed actions within our Lighting Program.
Selling & Administrative (“S&A”) Expenses
S&A expenses increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 versus the comparable periods in 2005 primarily due to higher selling and commission expenses associated with increased sales, expenses associated with new product launches and stock-based compensation cost. As a percentage of sales, S&A
20
Table of Contents
expenses were higher in the second quarter of 2006 versus the second quarter of 2005 primarily due to higher expense costs associated with the SAP implementation, stock-based compensation and costs associated with new product development. However, for the first six months of 2006, S&A expenses as a percent of sales declined year-over-year despite the impact of stock-based compensation due to higher sales and efforts to manage costs. In addition, the prior year included S&A costs associated with an unusual item consisting of $4.6 million, pretax, of transactional expenses in support of our strategic growth initiatives.
Special Charges
Special charges recorded in the second quarter of 2006 of $1.4 million consist of $1.0 million of severance costs and $0.4 million of exit and integration costs. The 2005 special charges recorded in the second quarter of 2005 of $2.7 million consist of $1.0 million of severance, $1.2 million of integration costs including facility closing costs and $0.5 million of inventory write-downs. Special charges recorded for the first six months of 2006 and 2005 were $3.1 million and $4.6 million, respectively, the components of which are summarized below. All charges recorded in 2006 pertain to actions associated with the Lighting Program. The second quarter charge in 2005 includes $0.9 million of costs related to the Wiring device factory closure. The remaining 2005 charges pertain to the Lighting Program. Both programs are discussed below.
The following table summarizes activity with respect to special charges for the six months ending June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in millions):
CATEGORY OF COSTS
Facility Exit and | Inventory | |||||||||||||||
Lighting Business Integration and Rationalization Program | Severance &Benefits | Integration | Write-Downs* | Total | ||||||||||||
2006 | $ | 2.0 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 3.1 | ||||||||
2005 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 3.7 | ||||||||||||
Wiring Device Factory Closure | ||||||||||||||||
2005 | $ | — | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.9 |
* | Included in Cost of goods sold |
Lighting Business Integration and Rationalization Program
The integration and streamlining of our lighting operations is a multi-year initiative. Individual projects within the Program consist of factory, office and warehouse closures, personnel realignments, and costs to streamline and combine product offerings. Total costs from the start of the Program in 2002 through the expected completion of the substantial components of the Program in late 2006 are expected to approximate $60 million. From inception of the Program through June 30, 2006 approximately $49 million has been spent. In addition, capital expenditures of $45-$55 million are forecast, of which $32 million has been spent. State and local tax incentives are expected to be available to offset certain of these costs. Program costs related to severance, asset impairments, and facility closures in conjunction with exit activities are generally reflected as
21
Table of Contents
Special charges within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. Inventory write-downs related to exit activities are recorded as a component of Cost of goods sold. Other costs associated with the Program are recorded as Cost of goods sold or Selling & administrative expenses depending on the nature of the cost.
The Program is comprised of three phases. Phase I began in 2002 soon after the LCA acquisition was completed. The Company is currently in its third and final phase of the Program which consists of the consolidation and relocation of administrative functions and manufacturing activities of commercial lighting facilities within the U.S. and Mexico. See further detail of these actions in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005.
Closure of a Wiring Device Factory
In the second quarter of 2004, the Company announced plans to close a Wiring device factory in Puerto Rico. The factory closed during the second quarter of 2005 and production activities have been transferred to existing facilities or outsourced. In the second quarter of 2005, the Company recorded $0.9 million of special charges, of which $0.6 million was related to facility closure costs and $0.3 million was for inventory write-downs.
Other Income/Expense
In the second quarter and first six months of 2006, interest expense, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income decreased versus the comparable periods in 2005. Interest expense was lower in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 versus the comparable periods of 2005 due to a lower level of fixed rate indebtedness in 2006 compared to 2005 as we repaid $100 million of senior notes upon maturity in October 2005. In the second quarter and first six months of 2006, investment income decreased compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2005 due to lower average investment balances partially offset by higher average interest rates received on cash and investments. The lower average investment balances are due to the funding of several acquisitions in 2005 and, to a lesser extent, the Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc. acquisition in June 2006, as well as higher share repurchases.
Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2006 was 30.3% compared to 28.7% in the second quarter of 2005. The increase in the effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2006 versus the comparable period of 2005 reflects a higher year-over-year annual effective tax rate estimate as a result of anticipated higher U.S.-based taxable income in 2006 which carries a higher tax rate than the majority of the Company’s non-U.S. income. The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2006 was 29.9% compared to 28.2% in the first six months of 2005. In addition, Congress has yet to renew the R&D tax credit that expired on December 31, 2005, and as such we have not recognized a benefit this year that had been reflected in the prior year effective tax rate.
Net Income and Earnings Per Share
Net income and diluted earnings per share increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2005 primarily due to higher sales and higher operating income, lower interest expense and lower special charges. Average shares outstanding-basic have decreased year-over-year by approximately 0.6 million shares due to shares repurchased under our stock repurchase program in excess of employee stock option exercises.
22
Table of Contents
Segment Results
Electrical
Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | (In millions) | |||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 419.2 | $ | 376.4 | $ | 810.3 | $ | 729.8 | ||||||||
Operating income | 37.3 | 32.5 | 68.7 | 63.9 | ||||||||||||
Operating margins | 8.9 | % | 8.6 | % | 8.5 | % | 8.8 | % |
Electrical segment sales increased 11% in both the second quarter and first six months of 2006 versus the comparable periods in 2005. The sales growth was broad based. Each of the businesses within the segment – wiring systems, electrical products and lighting fixtures experienced year-over-year increases in the second quarter and in the first six months of 2006. Selling price increases in both the second quarter and first six months of 2006 accounted for approximately one percentage point of the increase versus the comparable periods of 2005.
Lighting fixture sales represented in excess of 50% of total net sales reported in the Electrical segment in both the second quarter and first six months of both 2006 and 2005. Sales of lighting fixtures increased in both the commercial and industrial (“C&I”) and residential markets. Residential product shipments increased as a result of higher new product sales and market share gains. The C&I lighting business was favorably impacted by higher levels of commercial construction throughout the U.S. generating increases in lighting fixture project sales.
Sales of wiring systems in the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 were higher versus the comparable prior year periods, consistent with the segment’s overall percentage net sales increase, as demand in both industrial and commercial markets improved. Rough-in electrical products sales in the second quarter and first six months increased modestly from the previous year. Although commercial construction markets have strengthened, competition remains intense. Sales of harsh and hazardous products increased in both the second quarter and first six months year-over-year by amounts in excess of the segment average primarily due to higher oil and gas project shipments related to strong market conditions worldwide and the favorable impact of an acquisition completed in the third quarter of 2005.
Operating income improved both in the quarter and year-to-date versus the comparable periods of the prior year primarily due to higher sales. Special charges in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 were $1.4 million and $3.1 million compared to $2.7 million and $4.6 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, respectively. Operating margin in the segment was higher in the second quarter of 2006 versus the second quarter of 2005 primarily due to higher average margins on the incremental sales, offset by higher commodity costs in excess of selling price increases, higher project costs related to new product launches and increased freight and utility costs resulting from record high oil prices. Operating margin in the segment was lower in the first six months of 2006 versus the comparable period of 2005 despite higher sales and volumes primarily due to production and delivery inefficiencies, higher costs associated with new products and the SAP implementation as well as higher commodity raw material, freight and utility costs.
In our lighting business, operating margins improved in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 versus the comparable periods of 2005 as a result of higher volume and cost savings associated with actions
23
Table of Contents
completed under the streamlining Program, offset by inefficiencies associated with plant moves. Our wiring systems business reported lower operating profit margin in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 versus the comparable periods of 2005 due to commodity cost increases, higher transportation and production costs, due in part to supply chain and plant inefficiencies, and increased costs associated with the launch of new products. Margins in our harsh and hazardous products business were lower year-over-year, despite higher sales, due to commodity cost increases in excess of selling price increases. Overall, the segment incurred higher S&A expenses year-over-year due to new product initiatives and increased SAP implementation costs.
Power
Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | (In millions) | |||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 134.3 | $ | 109.9 | $ | 266.6 | $ | 208.6 | ||||||||
Operating income | 19.0 | 16.2 | 39.5 | 26.9 | ||||||||||||
Operating margins | 14.1 | % | 14.7 | % | 14.8 | % | 12.9 | % |
Net sales in the Power segment increased 22% and 28%, respectively, in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 versus the comparable periods in 2005. The increase in both the quarter and first six months was primarily due to higher levels of utility spending including line upgrades and transmission projects facilitated by higher levels of economic activity in the U.S. and favorable weather conditions. The acquisition of Delmar in the third quarter of last year as well as the Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc acquisition completed in the second quarter of 2006 accounted for just over half of the sales increase in the quarter and over one-third of the increase on a year to-date basis in 2006 versus 2005. Operating margins decreased in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the second quarter of 2005 as a result of commodity cost increases in excess of realized selling price increases and higher costs due to the SAP implementation. Operating margins increased in the first six months of 2006 compared to the comparable period of 2005 as a result of the increase in volume, an improved mix of higher margin products, productivity improvements from strategic sourcing and the favorable impact of acquisitions.
Industrial Technology
Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | (In millions) | |||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 49.7 | $ | 34.2 | $ | 99.3 | $ | 69.7 | ||||||||
Operating income | 7.8 | 4.2 | 16.5 | 9.1 | ||||||||||||
Operating margins | 15.7 | % | 12.3 | % | 16.6 | % | 13.1 | % |
Net sales in the Industrial Technology segment increased 45% and 42%, respectively, in the second quarter and first six months of 2006 versus the comparable periods in 2005. The increase in both the quarter and first six months was primarily due to the improvement in industrial activity as evidenced by higher manufacturing output and rising capacity utilization rates. All businesses within the segment reported double-digit increases in year-over-year sales. In addition, two acquisitions in the third quarter of 2005 in our industrial controls business accounted for over one third of the segment sales increase in the quarter and close to 50% of the six month increase versus the comparable period of 2005. Operating margins improved significantly in the second quarter
24
Table of Contents
and for the first six months of 2006 versus the comparable periods in 2005 as a result of increased volume, a more favorable industrial product mix and cost savings associated with outsourcing and other productivity improvements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flow
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30 | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(In Millions) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): | ||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 53.6 | $ | 50.7 | ||||
Investing activities | (35.0 | ) | 74.8 | |||||
Financing activities | (76.4 | ) | (71.3 | ) | ||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 0.7 | (0.8 | ) | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (57.1 | ) | $ | 53.4 | |||
Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased from the comparable period in 2005. Higher operating cash flow reflects higher net income and non-cash stock-based compensation cost, offset by higher working capital. Within working capital, inventory increased in the first six months of 2006 primarily as a result of a higher level of purchases to support the increased sales. Accounts receivable increased in the first six months of 2006 compared to the first six months of 2005 as a result of the increased sales volume in the first six months of 2006 versus the comparable period in 2005. Days sales outstanding in accounts receivable at June 30, 2006 were level with days sales outstanding at June 30, 2005. Current liabilities increased in the first six months of 2006 primarily due to higher inventory purchases which resulted in higher accounts payable balances, and lower annual incentive and employee bonus payouts.
Investing activities used cash of $35.0 million in the first six months of 2006 compared to cash provided by investing activities of $74.8 million in the first six months of 2005 primarily as a result of a business acquisition, as well as higher capital expenditures. Net cash used for financing activities increased $5.1 million in the first six months of 2006 when compared to the same period in 2005 primarily as a result of payments made on short-term debt in 2006, partially offset by higher proceeds from exercises of stock options.
Investments in the Business
We define investment in our business to include both normal expenditures required to maintain the operations of our equipment and facilities as well as expenditures in support of our strategic initiatives.
In the first six months of 2006, we recorded a total of $43.4 million of capital expenditures of which $35.0 million was additions to property, plant and equipment and $8.4 million was capitalized software primarily in connection with the enterprise-wide business system initiative. Included in the $43.4 million of capital expenditures were $5.3 million of accrued amounts not yet expended, resulting in total cash capital expenditures of $38.1 million.
We continue to invest in process improvement through our long-term lean initiatives. We have been actively
25
Table of Contents
engaged in the lean program for several years although we still consider ourselves in the early part of this initiative. We expect benefits from this investment will improve our operating results primarily in the form of increased productivity at our businesses.
In June 2005, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program which authorized the repurchase of up to $60 million of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock. Stock repurchases are being implemented through open market and privately negotiated transactions. The timing of such transactions depends on a variety of factors, including market conditions. As of June 30, 2006, approximately $3.3 million remains for the repurchase of shares under this program. In February 2006, the Board of Directors approved an additional stock repurchase program and authorized the purchase of up to $100 million of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock to be completed over a three year period. The repurchase program will be implemented upon completion of the $60 million repurchase program announced in June 2005. As of June 30, 2006, a total of $103.3 million remains authorized for future repurchases under the combined programs. We have spent $42.5 million on the repurchase of common shares in the first six months of 2006.
On August 3, 2006, in connection with our previously announced stock repurchase program, we established a prearranged repurchase plan (the “10b5-1 Plan”) intended to comply with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 and Rule 10b-18 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (“the Act”).
The 10b5-1 Plan will facilitate the ongoing repurchase of our Class A and Class B common stock under our repurchase programs by permitting us to repurchase shares during times when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods. Pursuant to the 10b5-1 Plan, a broker appointed by the Company will have the authority to repurchase, without further direction from the Company, up to 750,000 shares of our Class A common stock and up to 750,000 shares of our Class B common stock during the period commencing on August 4, 2006 and expiring on August 3, 2007, subject to conditions specified in the 10b5-1 Plan and unless earlier terminated. There is no guarantee as to the number of shares that will be repurchased under the plan, and we may terminate the plan at any time. Depending upon market conditions, we also expect to continue to conduct discretionary repurchases in privately negotiated transactions during our normal trading windows.
Debt to Capital
Net Debt, as disclosed below is a non-GAAP measure that may not be comparable to definitions used by other companies. We consider Net Debt to be more appropriate than Total Debt for measuring our financial leverage as it better measures our ability to meet our funding needs.
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(In Millions) | ||||||||
Total Debt | $ | 208.1 | $ | 228.8 | ||||
Total Shareholders’ Equity | 1,033.6 | 998.1 | ||||||
Total Capital | $ | 1,241.7 | $ | 1,226.9 | ||||
Debt to Total Capital | 17 | % | 19 | % | ||||
Cash and Investments | $ | 133.4 | $ | 310.7 | ||||
Net Debt (Total debt less cash and investments) | $ | 74.7 | $ | (81.9 | ) |
The ratio of debt to total capital at June 30, 2006 decreased to 17% compared with 19% at December 31,
26
Table of Contents
2005 primarily due to payments made on short-term debt. Net debt has increased in the first six months of 2006 due to the decrease in cash and investments as the Company used cash and investments to complete the Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc. acquisition.
At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Long-term debt in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet consisted of $200 million, excluding unamortized discount, of senior notes which mature in 2012. These notes are fixed rate indebtedness, are not callable and are only subject to accelerated payment prior to maturity if we fail to meet certain non-financial covenants, all of which were met at June 30, 2006. The most restrictive of these covenants limits our ability to enter into mortgages and sale-leasebacks of property having a net book value in excess of $5 million without the approval of the Note holders.
At June 30, 2006, Short-term debt in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet consisted of a $4.8 million money market loan issued by our U.K. subsidiary and $4 million of borrowings against our credit facility. The money market loan represents a line of credit to borrow up to 5 million pounds sterling entered into by our U.K. subsidiary (US $ equivalent at June 30, 2006 of $9.1 million). At June 30, 2006 we had $196 million of available borrowings under our $200 million committed bank credit facility. Borrowings under credit agreements generally are available with an interest rate equal to the prime rate or at a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate.
Although not the principal source of liquidity, we believe our credit facilities are capable of providing significant financing flexibility at reasonable rates of interest. However, a significant deterioration in the results of our operations or cash flows, leading to deterioration in financial condition, could either increase our borrowing costs or restrict our ability to borrow. We have not entered into any other guarantees, commitments or obligations that could give rise to material unexpected cash requirements.
Liquidity
We measure liquidity on the basis of our ability to meet short-term and long-term operational funding needs, fund additional investments, including acquisitions, and make dividend payments to shareholders. Significant factors affecting the management of liquidity are cash flows from operating activities, capital expenditures, cash dividend payments, stock repurchases, access to bank lines of credit and our ability to attract long-term capital with satisfactory terms.
Internal cash generation together with currently available cash and investments, available borrowing facilities and an ability to access credit lines if needed, are expected to be sufficient to fund operations, the current rate of cash dividends, capital expenditures, and any increase in working capital that would be required to accommodate a higher level of business activity. We actively seek to expand by acquisition as well as through the growth of our current businesses. While a significant acquisition may require additional debt and/or equity financing, we believe that we would be able to obtain acquisition financing based on our favorable historical earnings performance and strong financial position.
Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of our significant accounting policies is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We believe that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables us to provide
27
Table of Contents
the users of our financial statements with useful and reliable information about operating results and financial condition. There have been no changes to these policies since December 31, 2005.
We are required to make estimates and judgments in the preparation of our financial statements that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures. We continually review these estimates and their underlying assumptions to ensure they are appropriate for the circumstances. Changes in the estimates and assumptions we use could have a significant impact on our financial results.
Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the information included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, contain “forward-looking statements” as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These include statements about capital resources, performance and results of operations and are based on our reasonable current expectations. In addition, all statements regarding anticipated growth or improvement in operating results, or anticipated market and economic conditions, are forward looking. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words or phrases, such as “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “depend”, “should”, “plan”, “estimated”, “could”, “may”, “subject to”, “continues”, “growing”, “prospective”, “forecast”, “projected”, “purport”, “might”, “if”, “contemplate”, “potential”, “pending,” “target”, “goals”, “scheduled”, “will likely be”, and variations thereof and similar terms. Discussions of strategies, plans or intentions often contain forward-looking statements. Factors, among others, that could cause our actual results and future actions to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
• | Changes in demand for our products, changes in market conditions, or product availability adversely affecting sales levels. | ||
• | Changes in markets or competition adversely affecting realization of price increases. | ||
• | The amounts of net cash expenditures, benefits, including available state and local tax incentives, the timing of actions and impact of personnel reductions in connection with the ongoing lighting business integration and rationalization program and other special charges. | ||
• | Failure to achieve projected levels of efficiencies, cost savings and cost reduction measures, including those expected as a result of our lean initiative and strategic sourcing plans. | ||
• | The amounts of cash expenditures, benefits and the timing of actions in connection with our enterprise-wide business system implementation. | ||
• | Availability and costs of raw materials, purchased components, energy and freight. | ||
• | Changes in expected levels of operating cash flow and uses of cash. | ||
• | General economic and business conditions in particular industries or markets. |
28
Table of Contents
• | Failure to achieve expected benefits of process improvements and other lean initiatives as a result of changes in strategy or level of investments made. | ||
• | Regulatory issues, changes in tax laws or changes in geographic profit mix affecting tax rates and availability of tax incentives. | ||
• | A major disruption in one of our manufacturing or distribution facilities or headquarters, including the impact of plant consolidations, relocations and the construction of a new lighting headquarters. | ||
• | Impact of productivity improvements on lead times, quality and delivery of product. | ||
• | Future levels of indebtedness and capital spending. | ||
• | Anticipated future contributions and assumptions with respect to pensions. | ||
• | Adjustments to product warranty accruals in response to claims incurred, historical experiences and known costs. | ||
• | Unexpected costs or charges, certain of which might be outside of our control. | ||
• | Changes in strategy, economic conditions or other conditions outside of our control affecting anticipated future global product sourcing levels. | ||
• | Intense or new competition in the markets in which we compete. | ||
• | Ability to carry out future acquisitions and strategic investments in our core businesses and costs relating to acquisitions and acquisition integration costs. | ||
• | Future repurchases of common stock under our common stock repurchase program. | ||
• | Changes in customers’ credit worthiness adversely affecting the ability to continue business relationships with major customers. | ||
• | The outcome of environmental, legal and tax contingencies or costs compared to amounts provided for such contingencies. | ||
• | Adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates and the potential use of hedging instruments to hedge the exposure to fluctuating rates of foreign currency exchange on inventory purchases. | ||
• | And other factors described in our SEC filings, including the “Business” section and “Risk Factors” section in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. |
Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performances and actual results, developments and business decisions may differ from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements.
29
Table of Contents
The Company disclaims any duty to update any forward-looking statement, all of which are expressly qualified by the foregoing, other than as required by law.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
In the operation of its business, the Company has exposures to fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates, availability of purchased finished goods and raw materials, changes in raw material prices, foreign sourcing issues, and interest rates. As noted throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis, we have seen significant increases in the cost of certain metals used in our products, along with higher energy and freight costs. In addition, the Company’s procurement strategy continues to emphasize an increased level of purchases from international locations, primarily China and India, which subjects the Company to increased political and foreign currency exchange risk. Changes in the Chinese government’s policy regarding the value of the Chinese currency versus the U.S. dollar has not had any significant impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, strengthening of the Chinese currency could increase the cost of the Company’s products procured from this country. There has been no significant change in the Company’s strategies to manage these exposures during the first six months of 2006. For a complete discussion of the Company’s exposure to market risk, refer to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f), as of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, each of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2006, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
In April 2006, the Company implemented another phase of a multi-year program to implement a fully integrated suite of SAP application software. The implementation has involved changes to certain internal controls over financial reporting. The Company has reviewed each system as it is being implemented and the controls affected by the new system and made appropriate changes to affected internal controls as necessary. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recently completed quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
30
Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
In June 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program and authorized the repurchase of up to $60 million of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock. Stock repurchases under the June 2005 program are being implemented through open market and privately negotiated transactions. The timing of such transactions depends on a variety of factors, including market conditions. In addition, in February 2006 the Board of Directors approved an additional stock repurchase program and authorized the purchase of up to $100 million of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock to be completed over a three year period. The repurchase program will be implemented upon completion of the $60 million repurchase program announced in June 2005, the status of which is listed below.
Approximate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Dollar Value of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Shares | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Total | Shares | that May Yet Be | |||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Number of | Purchased as | Purchased | |||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Class B | Part of Publicly | Under | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Average | Shares | Average | Announced | the 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchased | Price Paid per | Purchased | Price Paid per | Program | Program | |||||||||||||||||||
Period | (000’s) | Class A Share | (000’s) | Class B Share | (000’s) | (000’s) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total for the quarter ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2006 | $ | 12,900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
April 2006 | 1 | $ | 48.53 | — | $ | — | 1 | 12,850 | ||||||||||||||||
May 2006 | 82 | 48.19 | — | — | 82 | 8,900 | ||||||||||||||||||
June 2006 | 25 | 45.36 | 95 | 47.24 | 120 | 3,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total for the quarter ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 | 108 | $ | 47.53 | 95 | $ | 47.24 | 203 | $ | 3,300 |
On August 3, 2006, in connection with its previously announced stock repurchase program, the Company established the 10b5-1 Plan intended to comply with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 and Rule 10b-18 under the Act.
The 10b5-1 Plan will facilitate the ongoing repurchase of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock under its repurchase programs during times when it otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods. Pursuant to the 10b5-1 Plan, a broker appointed by Hubbell will have the authority to repurchase, without further direction from the Company, up to 750,000 shares of Class A common stock and up to 750,000 shares of Class B common stock during the period commencing on August 4, 2006 and expiring on August 3, 2007, subject to conditions specified in the 10b5-1 Plan and unless earlier terminated. There is no guarantee as to the number of shares that
31
Table of Contents
will be repurchased under the plan, and the Company may terminate the plan at any time. Depending upon market conditions, the Company also expects to continue to conduct discretionary repurchases in privately negotiated transactions during its normal trading windows.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 1, 2006:
1. | The following nine (9) individuals were elected directors of the Company for the ensuing year to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company and until their respective successors may be elected and qualified, each Director being elected by plurality vote: |
Name of Individual | Votes For | Votes Withheld | ||||||
E. Richard Brooks | 199,219,205 | 2,640,376 | ||||||
George W. Edwards, Jr. | 199,231,089 | 2,628,492 | ||||||
Joel S. Hoffman | 199,440,955 | 2,418,626 | ||||||
Andrew McNally IV | 197,850,958 | 4,008,623 | ||||||
Daniel J. Meyer | 199,432,171 | 2,427,410 | ||||||
Timothy H. Powers | 199,511,032 | 2,348,549 | ||||||
G. Jackson Ratcliffe | 199,391,935 | 2,467,646 | ||||||
Richard J. Swift | 199,953,488 | 1,906,093 | ||||||
Daniel S. Van Riper | 199,919,594 | 1,939,987 |
2. | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was ratified as independent registered public accountants to examine the annual financial statements for the Company for the year 2006 receiving 200,572,331 affirmative votes, being a majority of the votes cast on the matter all voting as a single class, with 1,003,838 negative votes and 283,412 abstained. |
3. | The proposal relating to reapproval of the Company’s Senior Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, which appeared on pages 29 to 31 of the proxy statement, dated March 15, 2006, which proposal is incorporated herein by reference, has been approved with 193,954,891 affirmative votes, being a majority of the votes cast on the matter all voting as a single class (and representing a majority of the votes entitled to be cast), with 6,758,982 negative votes and 1,145,708 votes abstained. |
32
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
EXHIBITS
Number | Description | |
31.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Filed herewith |
33
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HUBBELL INCORPORATED | ||
Dated: August 4, 2006 | ||
/s/ David G. Nord | /s/ Gregory F. Covino | |
David G. Nord | Gregory F. Covino | |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | Vice President, Controller | |
(Chief Accounting Officer) |
34