Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2008
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-05083
FURMANITE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) | 74-1191271 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2435 North Central Expressway Suite 700 Richardson, Texas | 75080 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(972) 699-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former
Fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former
Fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.þ Yeso No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filero | Accelerated filerþ | Non-accelerated filero | Smaller reporting companyo | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
There were 36,523,852 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of November 3, 2008.
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
Number | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 | ||||||||
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 | ||||||||
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906(A) | ||||||||
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906(A) |
2
Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.Financial Statements
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 33,720 | $ | 31,570 | ||||
Accounts receivable, trade (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,692 and $4,011 as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) | 62,898 | 62,552 | ||||||
Receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders | 1,443 | 1,443 | ||||||
Inventories: | ||||||||
Raw materials and supplies | 16,884 | 13,770 | ||||||
Work-in-process | 9,766 | 8,100 | ||||||
Finished goods | 1,175 | 2,343 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 5,308 | 5,616 | ||||||
Total current assets | 131,194 | 125,394 | ||||||
Property and equipment | 57,827 | 57,505 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (27,665 | ) | (27,663 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment, net | 30,162 | 29,842 | ||||||
Goodwill | 13,148 | 13,148 | ||||||
Pension asset (excess of fair value over projected benefit) | 1,571 | 430 | ||||||
Other assets | 3,049 | 3,239 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 179,124 | $ | 172,053 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | $ | 411 | $ | 2,569 | ||||
Accounts payable | 12,619 | 16,025 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 30,124 | 26,341 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 3,636 | 3,542 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 46,790 | 48,477 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion | 35,390 | 43,185 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 1,963 | 2,055 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Series B preferred stock, unlimited shares authorized, none outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, no par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 40,571,815 and 39,959,792 shares issued as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively | 4,710 | 4,643 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 131,282 | 128,363 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (24,172 | ) | (40,943 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 1,355 | 4,467 | ||||||
Treasury stock | (18,194 | ) | (18,194 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 94,981 | 78,336 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 179,124 | $ | 172,053 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 75,883 | $ | 74,190 | $ | 239,455 | $ | 217,358 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) | 50,089 | 47,309 | 153,954 | 141,995 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,386 | 1,142 | 4,405 | 3,262 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 17,848 | 19,925 | 58,803 | 57,316 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 69,323 | 68,376 | 217,162 | 202,573 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 6,560 | 5,814 | 22,293 | 14,785 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 445 | 248 | 414 | 624 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (353 | ) | (872 | ) | (1,380 | ) | (2,659 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income taxes | 6,652 | 5,190 | 21,327 | 12,750 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | (1,250 | ) | (1,561 | ) | (4,556 | ) | (3,663 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 5,402 | $ | 3,629 | $ | 16,771 | $ | 9,087 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.25 | ||||||||
Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares used in computing net income per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 36,495 | 35,664 | 36,388 | 35,392 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 37,065 | 36,232 | 36,965 | 35,890 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 (Unaudited) and Year Ended December 31, 2007
(in thousands, except share data)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Shares | Common | Paid-In | Accumulated | Comprehensive | Treasury | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued | Treasury | Stock | Capital | Deficit | Income (Loss) | Stock | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at January 1, 2007 | 39,258,025 | 4,076,963 | $ | 4,558 | $ | 124,884 | $ | (53,438 | ) | $ | 2,921 | $ | (18,320 | ) | $ | 60,605 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | 12,495 | — | — | 12,495 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation and stock option exercises | 139,139 | (28,000 | ) | 15 | 589 | — | — | 126 | 730 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible debentures to common stock | 562,628 | — | 70 | 2,890 | — | — | — | 2,960 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment for subsidiary, net of tax | — | — | — | — | — | (1,247 | ) | — | (1,247 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — | — | — | — | — | 2,793 | — | 2,793 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2007 | 39,959,792 | 4,048,963 | 4,643 | 128,363 | (40,943 | ) | 4,467 | (18,194 | ) | 78,336 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | 16,771 | — | — | 16,771 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation and stock option exercises | 253,679 | — | 24 | 1,078 | — | — | — | 1,102 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible debentures to common stock | 358,344 | — | 43 | 1,841 | — | — | — | 1,884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment for subsidiary, net of tax | — | — | — | — | — | 158 | — | 158 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — | — | — | — | — | (3,270 | ) | — | (3,270 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at September 30, 2008 | 40,571,815 | 4,048,963 | $ | 4,710 | $ | 131,282 | $ | (24,172 | ) | $ | 1,355 | $ | (18,194 | ) | $ | 94,981 | ||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.
5
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
For the Nine Months | ||||||||
Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 16,771 | $ | 9,087 | ||||
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4,405 | 3,262 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | 83 | 716 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (47 | ) | (720 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 335 | 160 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | (1,282 | ) | (2,925 | ) | ||||
Inventories | (3,886 | ) | (2,888 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 749 | 967 | ||||||
Accounts payable | (3,784 | ) | 1,813 | |||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 3,710 | 4,663 | ||||||
Income tax payable | 94 | 320 | ||||||
Other, net | (1,262 | ) | 1,363 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 15,886 | 15,818 | ||||||
Investing activities: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (5,434 | ) | (5,740 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (5,434 | ) | (5,740 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: | ||||||||
Payments on debt | (7,913 | ) | (589 | ) | ||||
Payments on 8.75% convertible subordinated debentures | (155 | ) | — | |||||
Issuance of common stock | 278 | 514 | ||||||
Bank overdrafts | — | (1,553 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (7,790 | ) | (1,628 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | (512 | ) | 737 | |||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents | 2,150 | 9,187 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 31,570 | 23,937 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 33,720 | $ | 33,124 | ||||
Non-cash financing activities: | ||||||||
Conversion of 8.75% convertible debentures to common stock | $ | 1,884 | $ | 2,397 | ||||
Settlement of accrued bonuses in common stock | $ | 488 | $ | — |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 5,402 | $ | 3,629 | $ | 16,771 | $ | 9,087 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax | 208 | — | 158 | — | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (5,324 | ) | 1,836 | (3,270 | ) | 3,011 | ||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income | (5,116 | ) | 1,836 | (3,112 | ) | 3,011 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 286 | $ | 5,465 | $ | 13,659 | $ | 12,098 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
1. General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of Furmanite Corporation (the “Parent Company”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and do not include all disclosures required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements have been made. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.
On November 27, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the distribution of its pipeline, terminaling and product marketing business (the “Distribution”) to its stockholders in the form of a new limited liability company, Kaneb Services LLC (“KSL”). On June 29, 2001, the Distribution was completed, with each shareholder of the Company receiving one common share of KSL for each three shares of the Company’s common stock held on June 20, 2001, the record date for the Distribution, resulting in the distribution of 10.85 million KSL common shares. Pursuant to the Distribution, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with KSL, whereby KSL is obligated to pay the Company amounts equal to certain expenses and tax liabilities incurred by the Company in connection with the Distribution. The Distribution Agreement also requires KSL to pay the Company an amount calculated based on any income tax liability of the Company that, in the sole judgment of the Company, (i) is attributable to increases in income tax from past years arising out of adjustments required by federal and state tax authorities, to the extent that such increases are properly allocable to the businesses that became part of KSL, or (ii) is attributable to the distribution of KSL’s common shares and the operations of KSL’s businesses prior to the Distribution date. In the event of an examination of the Company by federal or state tax authorities, the Company will have unfettered control over the examination, administrative appeal, settlement or litigation that may be involved, notwithstanding that KSL has agreed to pay any additional tax. KSL was purchased by Valero L.P. in July 2005 and KSL’s obligations under the Distribution Agreement were assumed by Valero L.P. During 2006, accrued income taxes and the receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders were both reduced by $4.6 million related to the expiration of statutes for previously provided tax exposures. The receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders was further reduced in 2006 by $0.5 million by adjusting retained earnings for KSL previously provided tax exposures. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $1.4 million was recorded as receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders pursuant to the provisions of the Distribution Agreement.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior balances to conform to the classifications used for 2008. The 2006 balance sheet numbers, which impact the cash flow for 2007, were adjusted for the December 2007 Form 10-K to reflect the reclassification of $0.2 million of accounts receivable, trade that had previously been netted in accounts payable. Those numbers were also changed for a $0.1 million reclassification of the current portion of deferred tax assets from other assets to prepaid and other current assets.
Accordingly, reclassifications were made to the 2007 cash flow to conform to the 2008 presentation. The $0.2 million reclassification from accounts receivable, trade mentioned above caused a change in the accounts receivable and accounts payable lines in the operating activities section. The $0.1 million reclassification for the current portion of deferred tax asset caused a change in the other operating and prepaid expenses and other current assets line in the operating activities section. There was no net change in the operating activities section due to these reclassifications.
8
Table of Contents
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157,Fair Value Measurement, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value under other accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements and expands disclosures about such measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather it creates a consistent method for calculating fair value measurements to address non-comparability of financial statements containing fair value measurements utilizing different definitions of fair value. Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No 157. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which provides a one year deferral of the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. The Company elected to defer the effective date of its adoption to January 1, 2009 in accordance with FSP FAS No. 157-2. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. See Note 11 for additional disclosures.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132 (R). As required, the Company adopted the provision of SFAS No. 158 that required an employer to recognize the funded status of each pension and other post retirement benefit plan as an asset or liability on their balance sheet with all unrecognized amounts recorded in other comprehensive income. The standard also ultimately requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position. As required, the Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 158 relative to measurement date for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the full adoption of SFAS No. 158 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 expands the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards that require assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS No. 159, a company may elect to measure most financial assets and liabilities at fair value at specified election dates. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are to be reported in earnings. The fair value election is irrevocable and generally made on an instrument-by-instrument basis, even if a company has similar instruments that it elects not to measure based on fair value. The Company adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008 and did not elect to adopt the fair value option and re-measure any of its assets or liabilities.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007),Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 141 and provides revised guidance for recognizing and measuring assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. This statement also requires that transaction costs in a business combination be expensed as incurred. Changes in acquired tax contingencies, including those existing at the date of adoption, will be recognized in earnings if outside the maximum allocation period (generally one year). SFAS No. 141R will apply prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is after fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 141R will affect the Company’s accounting for future acquisitions.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”. This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. The objective of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141 (R), and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This FSP applies to all intangible assets, whether acquired in a business combination or otherwise and shall be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years and applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. The requirements of this FSP will be effective for the Company’s 2009 fiscal year and are not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
9
Table of Contents
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” which is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. This statement will be effective 60 days following the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendment to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 162 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
2. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated as net income divided by the average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share assumes issuance of the net incremental shares from stock options and restricted stock when dilutive. The weighted-average common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per share reflect the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents, including unvested restricted stock and options to purchase shares of common stock. Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding and earnings per share include the following (in thousands, except per share data):
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 5,402 | $ | 3,629 | $ | 16,771 | $ | 9,087 | ||||||||
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding | 36,495 | 35,664 | 36,388 | 35,392 | ||||||||||||
Diluted effect of common stock equivalents | 570 | 568 | 577 | 498 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding | 37,065 | 36,232 | 36,965 | 35,890 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||
Dilutive | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.25 | ||||||||
Stock options and restricted stock grants excluded from diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding because their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect: | 55,000 | 35,000 | 118,333 | 78,333 |
The Company’s outstanding 8.75% convertible subordinated debentures were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, because the effects of assumed conversion would be anti-dilutive. The 8.75% convertible debentures were settled in full in January 2008; therefore there is no effect on the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2008.
3. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | 11,848 | $ | 9,833 | ||||
Employee expenses, travel and training | 1,401 | 564 | ||||||
Asset and equipment costs | 1,911 | 2,009 | ||||||
Value added tax payable | 2,490 | 1,731 | ||||||
Taxes other than income | 1,114 | 1,619 | ||||||
Interest | 170 | 422 | ||||||
Professional, audit and legal fees | 2,961 | 3,320 | ||||||
Rent | 536 | 544 | ||||||
Other | 7,693 | 6,299 | ||||||
$ | 30,124 | $ | 26,341 | |||||
10
Table of Contents
4. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Borrowings under $50,000 revolving bank facility (the “$50.0 million facility”) | $ | 27,590 | $ | 27,590 | ||||
Borrowings under $15,000 revolving bank facility (the “$15.0 million facility”) | 7,500 | 15,000 | ||||||
8.75% convertible subordinated debentures | — | 2,040 | ||||||
Capital leases | 711 | 1,124 | ||||||
Total long-term debt | 35,801 | 45,754 | ||||||
Less current portion | (411 | ) | (2,569 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt, less current portion | $ | 35,390 | $ | 43,185 | ||||
Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and subsidiaries (“FWI”) is subject to various financial and operational covenants associated with the $50.0 million facility, including percentage of tangible assets related to certain geographical areas, ratios of debt and capital expenditures to cash flow, as defined in the $50.0 million facility, and cash flow to fixed charges. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $27.6 million was outstanding under the $50.0 million facility that provides for working capital. Borrowings under the $50.0 million facility bear interest at the option of the borrower at variable rates (based on either the LIBOR rate or prime rate) which were 3.6% and 6.2% at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. There is a commitment fee of 0.25% to 0.50% based on the debt to earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) ratio, currently 0.25%, on the unused portion of the $50.0 million facility. At September 30, 2008, FWI was in compliance with all covenants under the $50.0 million facility. The $50.0 million facility matures in January 2010 and is secured by substantially all of the tangible assets of FWI (which approximated $132 million, consisting primarily of current assets and property and equipment) and is without recourse to the Parent Company. Considering the outstanding borrowings and letters of credit at September 30, 2008, the unused borrowing capacity was $13.9 million under the $50.0 million facility.
At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there were $7.5 million and $15.0 million, respectively, outstanding under the $15.0 million facility. Borrowings under the $15.0 million facility bear interest at the option of the borrower at variable rates (based on either the LIBOR rate or prime rate) which were 3.1% and 5.7% at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The $15.0 million facility matures in January 2010 and is secured by a letter of credit under the $50.0 million facility. The $15.0 million facility has the same financial and operational covenants as the $50.0 million facility and is without recourse to the Parent Company. At September 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the $15.0 million facility, with no unused borrowing capacity due to the Company’s decision to reduce the facility to the amount outstanding.
The Company’s 8.75% subordinated debentures were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $5.26 per share. During 2008 and 2007, $1.9 million and $3.0 million, respectively, subordinated debentures were converted into 358,344 and 562,628 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock. The subordinated debentures matured in January 2008 and the final interest payment was made in January 2008.
5. Retirement Plan
One of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries has a defined benefit pension plan covering certain of its United Kingdom employees (the “U.K. Plan”). Net pension cost for the U.K. Plan included the following components (in thousands):
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 187 | $ | 195 | $ | 577 | $ | 513 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 1,019 | 1,170 | 3,149 | 3,084 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (1,308 | ) | (1,342 | ) | (4,040 | ) | (3,540 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | (29 | ) | (34 | ) | (90 | ) | (90 | ) | ||||||||
Recognized net loss | — | 249 | — | 657 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost (benefit) | $ | (131 | ) | $ | 238 | $ | (404 | ) | $ | 624 | ||||||
The expected long-term rate of return on invested assets is determined based on the weighted average of expected returns on asset investment categories as follows: 7.4% overall, 8.9% for equities and 5.4% for bonds. Estimated annual pension plan contributions are assumed to be consistent with the current expected contribution level of $1.3 million for 2008.
11
Table of Contents
6. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has one share-based compensation plan, which allows for the issuance of stock options, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized total stock-based compensation expense of $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, with no related tax benefit being realized due to the Company’s current domestic tax position related to net operating loss carryforwards. The Company uses authorized but unissued shares of common stock for stock option exercises and restricted stock issuances pursuant to the Company’s share based compensation plan and treasury stock for issuances outside of the plan.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company granted 60,000 shares of restricted stock to its directors at a grant date fair value of $10.17 per share or a total fair value of $0.6 million. All of the restricted stock grants cliff vest at the end of three years on March 11, 2011 unless the director ceases to be a director of the Company. None of the restricted stock grants can be sold as long as the individual is a director of the Company. The fair value of the restricted stock grants were determined based on the closing stock price on the date of grant. As of September 30, 2008, the total unamortized compensation related to these restricted stock grants was $0.5 million.
7. Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets includes the following (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Minimum pension liability: | ||||||||
Net actuarial loss | $ | (4,862 | ) | $ | (5,256 | ) | ||
Unamortized prior service cost | 918 | 1,090 | ||||||
Minimum pension liability | (3,944 | ) | (4,166 | ) | ||||
Deferred tax asset | 1,105 | 1,169 | ||||||
Net minimum pension liability | (2,839 | ) | (2,997 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 4,194 | 7,464 | ||||||
$ | 1,355 | $ | 4,467 | |||||
8. Income Taxes
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN 48 requires a two-step approach to determine how to recognize tax benefits in the financial statements where recognition and measurement of a tax benefit must be evaluated separately. A tax benefit will be recognized only if it meets a “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold. For tax positions that meet this threshold, the tax benefit recognized is based on the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority.
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 had no net impact on the Company’s tax reserves during 2007. Uncertain tax positions in certain foreign jurisdictions would not impact the effective foreign tax rate because non-current unrecognized tax benefits are offset by the foreign net operating loss carryforwards, which are fully reserved. The Company recognizes interest expense on underpayments of income taxes and accrued penalties related to unrecognized non-current tax benefits as part of the income tax provision. The Company did not recognize any interest or penalties for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 or 2007. Unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 of $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for uncertain tax positions related to transfer pricing would impact the effective foreign tax rate if recognized. A reconciliation of the change in the unrecognized tax benefits for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2007 | $ | 997 | ||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 239 | |||
Reductions for tax positions taken in prior years | (145 | ) | ||
Balance at September 30, 2008 | $ | 1,091 | ||
12
Table of Contents
9. Commitments and Contingencies
The operations of the Company are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations in the United States and various foreign locations relating to protection of the environment. Although the Company believes its operations are in compliance with applicable environmental regulations, there can be no assurance that costs and liabilities will not be incurred by the Company. Moreover, it is possible that other developments, such as increasingly stringent environmental laws, regulations and enforcement policies thereunder, and claims for damages to property or persons resulting from operations of the Company, could result in costs and liabilities to the Company. The Company has recorded an undiscounted reserve for environmental liabilities related to site contamination for properties in the United States in the amount of $1.9 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
A subsidiary of the Company is involved in disputes with three customers in connection with indemnification claims arising from enforcement actions between the customers and a governmental regulatory agency. In July 2007, a customer, The Premcor Refining Group Inc., initiated legal action against the subsidiary alleging that the subsidiary, Furmanite America, Inc., and one of its former employees, who performed data services at one of the customer’s facilities, breached its contract with the customer and failed to provide the customer with adequate and timely information supporting the subsidiary’s work at the customer’s facility during the fourth quarter of 2002 and the first quarter of 2003. On October 20, 2008, the parties jointly filed an agreed order of dismissal with the Court, as Premcor and the subsidiary reached an amicable settlement without admission of liability or wrongdoing on the part of either party. The settlement resolved all of the claims among the parties, avoiding the future expense, inconvenience, uncertainty and distraction of litigation and allowing the parties to resume their prior relationship as customer and service-provider. Two other customers, who are each negotiating with the governmental regulatory agency and have not initiated legal action against the subsidiary, claim that the subsidiary failed to provide the customer with satisfactory data services at one of the respective customer’s facilities. The subsidiary believes that it provided all of these customers with adequate and timely information supporting the subsidiary’s work at the customers’ facilities and will vigorously defend against the customers’ claims.
In the first quarter of 2008, a subsidiary of the Company filed an action seeking to vacate a $1.35 million arbitration award related to a sales brokerage agreement associated with a business that the subsidiary sold in 2005. The subsidiary believes that the sales broker is an affiliate of another company that in 2006 settled all of its claims, as well as all of the claims of its affiliates, against the subsidiary. The Company intends to vigorously pursue this matter.
The Company has contingent liabilities resulting from litigation, claims and commitments incident to the ordinary course of business. Management believes, after consulting with counsel, that the ultimate resolution of such contingencies will not have a materially adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
While the Company cannot make an assessment of the eventual outcome of all of these matters or determine the extent, if any, of any potential uninsured liability or damage, reserves of $2.53 million were recorded as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
13
Table of Contents
10. Business Segment Data
The following geographical area information includes revenues by major service line based on the physical location of the operations (in thousands):
United | Asia- | |||||||||||||||
States | Europe | Pacific | Total | |||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2008: | ||||||||||||||||
Under pressure services | $ | 12,172 | $ | 9,224 | $ | 2,953 | $ | 24,349 | ||||||||
Turnaround services | 12,582 | 20,794 | 4,263 | 37,639 | ||||||||||||
Other services | 5,924 | 7,070 | 901 | 13,895 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 30,678 | $ | 37,088 | $ | 8,117 | $ | 75,883 | ||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||
Under pressure services | $ | 12,110 | $ | 10,024 | $ | 2,865 | $ | 24,999 | ||||||||
Turnaround services | 11,959 | 18,633 | 4,931 | 35,523 | ||||||||||||
Other services | 7,260 | 5,827 | 581 | 13,668 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 31,329 | $ | 34,484 | $ | 8,377 | $ | 74,190 | ||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2008: | ||||||||||||||||
Under pressure services | $ | 35,592 | $ | 31,249 | $ | 8,681 | $ | 75,522 | ||||||||
Turnaround services | 54,712 | 58,121 | 14,333 | 127,166 | ||||||||||||
Other services | 17,252 | 16,991 | 2,524 | 36,767 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 107,556 | $ | 106,361 | $ | 25,538 | $ | 239,455 | ||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||
Under pressure services | $ | 36,596 | $ | 25,664 | $ | 6,837 | $ | 69,097 | ||||||||
Turnaround services | 40,571 | 56,820 | 14,494 | 111,885 | ||||||||||||
Other services | 19,417 | 15,325 | 1,634 | 36,376 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 96,584 | $ | 97,809 | $ | 22,965 | $ | 217,358 | ||||||||
14
Table of Contents
Historically the Company has not allocated headquarter costs to its operating locations. However, if the headquarter costs had been allocated to all the operating locations, the operating income by geographical area based on physical location would have been as follows (in thousands):
United | Asia- | |||||||||||||||
States | Europe | Pacific | Total | |||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2008: | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | $ | (445 | ) | $ | 5,499 | $ | 1,506 | $ | 6,560 | |||||||
Allocation of headquarter costs | 1,195 | (977 | ) | (218 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Adjusted operating income | $ | 750 | $ | 4,522 | $ | 1,288 | $ | 6,560 | ||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | $ | (1,451 | ) | $ | 5,245 | $ | 2,020 | $ | 5,814 | |||||||
Allocation of headquarter costs | 1,569 | (1,244 | ) | (325 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Adjusted operating income | $ | 118 | $ | 4,001 | $ | 1,695 | $ | 5,814 | ||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2008: | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 1,123 | $ | 16,255 | $ | 4,915 | $ | 22,293 | ||||||||
Allocation of headquarter costs | 5,630 | (4,534 | ) | (1,096 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Adjusted operating income | $ | 6,753 | $ | 11,721 | $ | 3,819 | $ | 22,293 | ||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | $ | (2,284 | ) | $ | 12,322 | $ | 4,747 | $ | 14,785 | |||||||
Allocation of headquarter costs | 4,021 | (3,234 | ) | (787 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Adjusted operating income | $ | 1,737 | $ | 9,088 | $ | 3,960 | $ | 14,785 | ||||||||
The following geographical area information includes total assets based on physical location (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
United States | $ | 94,047 | $ | 89,650 | ||||
Europe | 67,833 | 65,252 | ||||||
Asia-Pacific | 17,244 | 17,151 | ||||||
$ | 179,124 | $ | 172,053 | |||||
15
Table of Contents
11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Credit Risk
Fair value is defined under SFAS No. 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under SFAS No. 157 must maximize the use of the observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard established a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable.
• | Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. These are typically obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets. | ||
• | Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices included for identical or similar assets and liabilities that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. These are typically obtained from readily-available pricing sources for comparable instruments. | ||
• | Level 3 — Unobservable inputs, where there is little or no market activity for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, based on the best information available in the circumstances. |
The Company currently does not have any assets or liabilities that would require valuation under SFAS No. 157. The Company does not have any outside investments, derivatives or marketable securities.
The estimated fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the relatively short period to maturity of these instruments. The estimated fair value of all debt as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 approximated the carrying value. These fair values were estimated based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements, when quoted market prices were not available. The estimates presented above are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a current market exchange.
The Company provides services to an international client base that includes petroleum refineries, chemical plants, offshore energy production platforms, steel mills, nuclear power stations, conventional power stations, pulp and paper mills, food and beverage processing plants, other flow process facilities as well as the U.S. government. The Company does not believe that it has a significant concentration of credit risk at September 30, 2008, as the Company’s accounts receivable are generated from these distinct business industries with customers located throughout the United States, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
16
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Furmanite Corporation included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Business Overview
Furmanite Corporation (the “Parent Company”) through its subsidiaries (the “Company”) provides specialized technical services, including leak sealing and hot tapping under pressure, on-site machining, heat treatment, heat exchanger repair, concrete repair, bolting, valve testing and repair and other engineering products and services, primarily to electric power generating plants, petroleum refineries and other process industries in the United Kingdom, Continental Europe, Scandinavia, North America, Latin America and Asia-Pacific through Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and its domestic and international subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, “Furmanite”). The Company also provides information technology and other services primarily to the government contracting industry through Xtria LLC (“Xtria”). Xtria offers products and services that include web hosted data processing, consulting, research, program and policy analysis, program implementation and program evaluation to agencies of state and federal government. The combination of Furmanite and Xtria are representative of the operations of the Parent Company.
Financial Overview
The Company’s net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased $1.8 million and $7.7 million, respectively, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. Revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased 2.3% and 10.2%, respectively, to $75.9 million and $239.5 million in 2008, from $74.2 million and $217.4 million for the same periods in 2007. This increase in revenue is partially due to the introduction of heat treatment services in the United States in mid-2007 and other increases in underpressure and turnaround services. Revenues for the three month period ended September 30, 2008, were negatively impacted in the United States due to hurricanes. This resulted in a twenty-three day shutdown of many facilities in the Gulf Coast, thereby delaying or deferring approximately $7 to $8 million of business. The increases in revenue combined with smaller percentage increases in operating costs and in selling, general and administrative expenses combined to have a favorable outcome on net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. The Company’s diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 were $0.15 and $0.45, respectively, as compared to $0.10 and $0.25 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
17
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 75,883 | $ | 74,190 | $ | 239,455 | $ | 217,358 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) | 50,089 | 47,309 | 153,954 | 141,995 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,386 | 1,142 | 4,405 | 3,262 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 17,848 | 19,925 | 58,803 | 57,316 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 69,323 | 68,376 | 217,162 | 202,573 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 6,560 | 5,814 | 22,293 | 14,785 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 445 | 248 | 414 | 624 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (353 | ) | (872 | ) | (1,380 | ) | (2,659 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income taxes | 6,652 | 5,190 | 21,327 | 12,750 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | (1,250 | ) | (1,561 | ) | (4,556 | ) | (3,663 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 5,402 | $ | 3,629 | $ | 16,771 | $ | 9,087 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.25 |
Revenues
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, consolidated revenues increased by $22.1 million, or 10.2%, when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The changes in foreign currency exchange rates from Europe and Asia-Pacific accounted for $5.0 million and $2.4 million of the increase, respectively. Excluding foreign currency exchange rate differences, revenue increased $14.7 million, or 6.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This $14.7 million increase in revenues consisted of an $11.0 million increase from the United States, a $3.5 million increase from Europe and a $0.2 million increase in Asia-Pacific. The increase in revenue in the United States was primarily due to turnaround services. The increase in Europe was attributable to increases in under pressure and turnaround services while the Asia-Pacific revenues increased slightly across all service lines.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, consolidated revenues increased by $1.7 million, or 2.3%, when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The changes in foreign currency exchange rates from Europe and Asia-Pacific accounted for $0.5 million and $0.5 million of the increase, respectively. Excluding foreign currency exchange rate differences, revenue increased $0.7 million, or 1.0%, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This $0.7 million increase in revenues consisted of a $2.0 million increase from Europe partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease from the United States and a $0.7 million decrease in Asia-Pacific. The increase in revenue in Europe was attributable to an increase in turnaround and other services. The decrease in revenue in the United States was due to other services. The decrease in Asia-Pacific revenue was attributable to turnaround services.
Operating Costs
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, operating costs increased $12.0 million, or 8.4%, when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The changes in foreign currency exchange rates from Europe and Asia-Pacific accounted for $3.6 million and $1.5 million of the increase, respectively. Excluding foreign currency exchange rate differences, operating costs increased $6.9 million, or 4.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This $6.9 million increase in operating costs consisted of a $5.7 million increase in the United States, a $0.7 million increase in Europe and $0.5 million increase for Asia-Pacific. The increase in the United States was due to an increase in labor, benefit costs and rent which were partially offset by a decrease in material costs. The increase in Europe was due to increases in labor, benefit costs, rent, engineering charges and overhead which were partially offset by a decrease in material costs and subcontract services. The increase in Asia Pacific was due to an increase in labor, benefit and material costs.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, operating costs increased $2.8 million, or 5.9%, when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The changes in foreign currency exchange rates from Europe and Asia-Pacific accounted for $0.6 million and $0.3 million, of the increase, respectively. Excluding foreign currency exchange rate differences, operating costs increased $1.9 million, or 4.1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This $1.9 million increase in operating costs consists of a $0.4 million increase in the United States and a $1.6 million increase in Europe while Asia-Pacific
18
Table of Contents
decreased $0.1 million. The increase in the United States was due to increased labor and benefit costs offset by a decrease in material costs. The increase in Europe was due to increased labor, benefit costs and engineering charges offset by a decrease in material costs.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.2 million and $1.1 million for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2007 due to the depreciation and amortization related to $8.1 million of capital expenditures in 2007 and $5.4 million of capital expenditures placed in service during the first nine months of 2008.
Selling, General and Administrative
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.5 million, or 2.6%, when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The changes in foreign currency exchange rates from Europe and Asia-Pacific accounted for approximately $1.1 million and $0.4 million of the increase, respectively. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate differences, selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were consistent with the same period in 2007. Selling, general and administrative costs increased $1.2 million in the United States and were offset by a $1.1 million decrease in Europe and a $0.1 million decrease in Asia-Pacific. The United States increase in selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consisted of an increase in sales labor and benefit costs, vehicle costs and rent. The decrease in Europe represented decreases in legal fees and outside professional services partially offset by an increase in sales labor and benefit costs and rent.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $2.1 million, or 10.4%, when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The changes in foreign currency exchange rates from Europe and Asia-Pacific increased selling, general and administrative expenses by approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Excluding the foreign currency exchange rate differences, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $2.4 million, or 12.1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This $2.4 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs consists of a $2.2 million decrease in the United States, a $0.1 million decrease in Europe and a $0.1 million decrease in Asia-Pacific. The United States decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consisted of a decrease in labor and benefit costs, legal fees and outside professional services.
Interest Expense
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, consolidated interest expense decreased by $0.5 million, or 59.5%, and $1.3 million, or 48.1%, when compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The decrease in interest expense is due to the conversion and payoff of the Company’s 8.75% subordinated debentures which matured January 2008 as well as a decrease in outstanding debt and in interest rates from September 30, 2007 to September 30, 2008. During 2007, $3.0 million of the debentures were converted into 562,628 shares of the Company’s common stock with $1.9 million of the debentures converted into 358,344 shares of the Company’s common stock during the first half of January 2008. The remaining $0.2 million of subordinated debentures were paid in full in January 2008.
Income Taxes
The Company maintains a valuation allowance to adjust the basis of net deferred tax assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. As a result, primarily all domestic federal and state income taxes recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are fully offset by a corresponding change in valuation allowance. The income tax expense recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 consisted primarily of income taxes due in foreign and state jurisdictions of the Company.
Income tax expense differs from the expected tax at statutory rates due primarily to the change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and different tax rates in the various foreign jurisdictions. Additionally, the aggregate tax expenses are not consistent when comparing periods due to the changing income tax mix between domestic and foreign operations and within the foreign operations. In concluding that a full valuation allowance on domestic taxes was required, the Company primarily considered such factors as the history of operating losses and the nature of the deferred tax assets.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, income tax expense increased by $0.9 million when compared to the same period in 2007. The increase was primarily related to the increase in taxable income for foreign jurisdictions.
19
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s liquidity and capital resources requirements include the funding of working capital needs, the funding of capital investments and the financing of internal growth.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $15.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to $15.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Increases in net cash from operating activities were due primarily to an increase in net income of $7.7 million as well as an increase in non-cash items of $1.4 million. These increases were substantially offset by a $9.0 million decrease in net changes in operating assets and liabilities. The changes in operating assets and liabilities were driven by trade payables and accrued expenses that remained relatively flat for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to an increase of approximately $6.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Net cash used in investing activities, which consists of capital expenditures, totaled $5.4 million and $5.7 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 respectively.
Consolidated capital expenditures for the calendar year 2008 have been budgeted at $8.4 million to $10.4 million. Such expenditures, however, will depend on many factors beyond the Company’s control, including, without limitation, demand for services as well as domestic and foreign government regulations. No assurance can be given that required capital expenditures will not exceed anticipated amounts during 2008 or thereafter. Capital expenditures during the year are expected to be funded from existing cash and anticipated cash flows from operations.
Net cash used in financing activities was $7.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The Company made payments of $7.9 million in 2008 and $0.6 million in 2007 related to its capital leases and the pay down of long-term debt in 2008. The Company also paid $0.2 million for the final conversions of its 8.75% subordinated debentures in 2008. Additionally, the Company received $0.3 million and $0.5 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively, for common stock issued upon the exercise of options. These items were offset by $1.6 million in payments in 2007 for the bank overdraft which existed as of December 31, 2006.
Furmanite Worldwide, Inc. and subsidiaries (“FWI”) is subject to various financial and operational covenants associated with the $50.0 million facility, including percentage of tangible assets related to certain geographical areas, ratios of debt and capital expenditures to cash flow, as defined in the $50.0 million facility, and cash flow to fixed charges. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $27.6 million was outstanding under the $50.0 million facility that provides for working capital. Borrowings under the $50.0 million facility bear interest at the option of the borrower at variable rates (based on either the LIBOR rate or prime rate) which were 3.6% and 6.2% at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. There is a commitment fee of 0.25% to 0.50% based on the debt to earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) ratio, currently 0.25%, on the unused portion of the $50.0 million facility. At September 30, 2008, FWI was in compliance with all covenants under the $50.0 million facility. The $50.0 million facility matures in January 2010 and is secured by substantially all of the tangible assets of FWI (which approximated $132 million, consisting primarily of current assets and property and equipment) and is without recourse to the Parent Company. Considering the outstanding borrowings and letters of credit at September 30, 2008, the unused borrowing capacity was $13.9 million under the $50.0 million facility.
At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $7.5 million and $15.0 million, respectively, was outstanding under the $15.0 million facility. Borrowings under the $15.0 million facility bear interest at the option of the borrower at variable rates (based on either the LIBOR rate or prime rate) which were 3.1% and 5.7% at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The $15.0 million facility matures in January 2010 and is secured by a letter of credit under the $50.0 million facility. The $15.0 million facility has the same financial and operational covenants as the $50.0 million facility and is without recourse to the Parent Company. At September 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the $15.0 million facility, with no unused borrowing capacity due to the Company’s decision to reduce the facility to the amount outstanding.
The Company’s 8.75% subordinated debentures were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the option of the holder at the conversion price of $5.26 per share. These subordinated debentures matured in January 2008.
20
Table of Contents
On November 27, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the distribution of its pipeline, terminaling and product marketing business (the “Distribution”) to its stockholders in the form of a new limited liability company, Kaneb Services LLC (“KSL”). On June 29, 2001, the Distribution was completed, with each shareholder of the Company receiving one common share of KSL for each three shares of the Company’s common stock held on June 20, 2001, the record date for the Distribution, resulting in the distribution of 10.85 million KSL common shares. Pursuant to the Distribution, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with KSL, whereby KSL is obligated to pay the Company amounts equal to certain expenses and tax liabilities incurred by the Company in connection with the Distribution. The Distribution Agreement also requires KSL to pay the Company an amount calculated based on any income tax liability of the Company that, in the sole judgment of the Company, (i) is attributable to increases in income tax from past years arising out of adjustments required by federal and state tax authorities, to the extent that such increases are properly allocable to the businesses that became part of KSL, or (ii) is attributable to the distribution of KSL’s common shares and the operations of KSL’s businesses prior to the Distribution date. In the event of an examination of the Company by federal or state tax authorities, the Company will have unfettered control over the examination, administrative appeal, settlement or litigation that may be involved, notwithstanding that KSL has agreed to pay any additional tax. KSL was purchased by Valero L.P. in July 2005 and KSL’s obligations under the Distribution Agreement were assumed by Valero L.P. During 2006, accrued income taxes and the receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders were both reduced by $4.6 million related to the expiration of statutes for previously provided tax exposures. The receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders was further reduced in 2006 by $0.5 million by adjusting retained earnings for KSL previously provided tax exposures. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $1.4 million was recorded as receivable from businesses distributed to common stockholders pursuant to the provisions of the Distribution Agreement.
The Company does not anticipate paying any dividends as it believes investing those dollars back into the Company will provide a better long-term return to shareholders in increased per share value. The Company believes that funds generated from operations, together with existing cash and available credit under the $50.0 million facility will be sufficient to finance current operations, planned capital expenditure requirements and internal growth for the foreseeable future.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant policies are presented in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented under Item 1.
Critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial position and results of operations. These policies require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often employing the use of estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s most critical accounting policies pertain to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, the impairment of goodwill and income taxes. Critical accounting policies are discussed regularly, at least quarterly, with the Company’s Audit Committee.
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109(“FIN 48”), on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 had no net impact on the Company’s tax reserves during 2007. Uncertain tax positions in certain foreign jurisdictions would not impact the effective foreign tax rate because unrecognized non-current tax benefits are offset by the foreign net operating loss carryforwards, which are fully reserved. The Company recognizes interest expense on underpayments of income taxes and accrued penalties related to unrecognized non-current tax benefits as part of the income tax provision. The Company did not recognize any interest or penalties for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 or 2007. Unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 of $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for uncertain tax positions related to transfer pricing would impact the effective foreign tax rate if recognized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences between the US GAAP and tax treatment of certain income and expense items. The Company must assess and make estimates regarding the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be recovered. To the extent that it is determined the deferred tax assets will not be recovered, a valuation allowance must be established for such assets. In making such a determination, the Company must take into account positive and negative evidence, including projections of future taxable income and assessments of potential tax planning strategies. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company’s valuation allowance was $19.9 million and $22.7 million, respectively.
21
Table of Contents
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157,Fair Value Measurement, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value under other accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements and expands disclosures about such measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather it creates a consistent method for calculating fair value measurements to address non-comparability of financial statements containing fair value measurements utilizing different definitions of fair value. Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No 157. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which provides a one year deferral of the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. The Company elected to defer the effective date of its adoption to January 1, 2009 in accordance with FSP FAS No. 157-2. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. See Note 11 for additional disclosures.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132 (R). As required, the Company adopted the provision of SFAS No. 158 that required an employer to recognize the funded status of each pension and other post retirement benefit plan as an asset or liability on their balance sheet with all unrecognized amounts recorded in other comprehensive income. The standard also ultimately requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position. As required, the Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 158 relative to measurement date for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the full adoption of SFAS No. 158 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 expands the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards that require assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS No. 159, a company may elect to measure most financial assets and liabilities at fair value at specified election dates. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are to be reported in earnings. The fair value election is irrevocable and generally made on an instrument-by-instrument basis, even if a company has similar instruments that it elects not to measure based on fair value. The Company adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008 and did not elect to adopt the fair value option and re-measure any of its assets or liabilities.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007),Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 141 and provides revised guidance for recognizing and measuring assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. This statement also requires that transaction costs in a business combination be expensed as incurred. Changes in acquired tax contingencies, including those existing at the date of adoption, will be recognized in earnings if outside the maximum allocation period (generally one year). SFAS No. 141R will apply prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is after fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 141R will affect the Company’s accounting for future acquisitions.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”. This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. The objective of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141 (R), and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This FSP applies to all intangible assets, whether acquired in a business combination or otherwise and shall be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years and applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. The requirements of this FSP will be effective for the Company’s 2009 fiscal year and are not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
22
Table of Contents
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” which is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. This statement will be effective 60 days following the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendment to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 162 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
Other than operating leases, the Company was not a party to any off-balance sheet transactions at September 30, 2008, or for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
23
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company’s principal market risk exposures (i.e., the risk of loss arising from the adverse changes in market rates and prices) are to changes in interest rates on the Company’s debt and investment portfolios and fluctuations in foreign currency.
The Company centrally manages its debt, considering investment opportunities and risks, tax consequences and overall financing strategies. Based on the amount of variable rate debt, $35.1 million at September 30, 2008, a one percent increase in interest rates would increase annual interest expense by approximately $0.4 million.
A significant portion of the Company’s business is exposed to fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar as compared to foreign currencies as a result of the operations of the Company in Australia, Belgium, China, France, Germany, Malaysia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore and the United Kingdom. There have been no significant changes in foreign currency market risks since December 31, 2007.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated, as required by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the disclosure controls and procedures, as defined, as of September 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are adequate and effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78aet seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, those internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation. As a result, no corrective actions were required or undertaken.
24
Table of Contents
FURMANITE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II — Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The operations of the Company are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations in the United States and various foreign locations relating to protection of the environment. Although the Company believes its operations are in compliance with applicable environmental regulations, there can be no assurance that costs and liabilities will not be incurred by the Company. Moreover, it is possible that other developments, such as increasingly stringent environmental laws, regulations and enforcement policies thereunder, and claims for damages to property or persons resulting from operations of the Company, could result in costs and liabilities to the Company. The Company has recorded an undiscounted reserve for environmental liabilities related to site contamination for properties in the United States in the amount of $1.9 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
A subsidiary of the Company is involved in disputes with three customers in connection with indemnification claims arising from enforcement actions between the customers and a governmental regulatory agency. In July 2007, a customer, The Premcor Refining Group Inc., initiated legal action against the subsidiary alleging that the subsidiary, Furmanite America, Inc., and one of its former employees, who performed data services at one of the customer’s facilities, breached its contract with the customer and failed to provide the customer with adequate and timely information supporting the subsidiary’s work at the customer’s facility during the fourth quarter of 2002 and the first quarter of 2003. On October 20, 2008, the parties jointly filed an agreed order of dismissal with the Court, as Premcor and the subsidiary reached an amicable settlement without admission of liability or wrongdoing on the part of either party. The settlement resolved all of the claims among the parties, avoiding the future expense, inconvenience, uncertainty and distraction of litigation and allowing the parties to resume their prior relationship as customer and service-provider. Two other customers, who are each negotiating with the governmental regulatory agency and have not initiated legal action against the subsidiary, claim that the subsidiary failed to provide the customer with satisfactory data services at one of the respective customer’s facilities. The subsidiary believes that it provided all of these customers with adequate and timely information supporting the subsidiary’s work at the customers’ facilities and will vigorously defend against the customers’ claims.
In the first quarter of 2008, a subsidiary of the Company filed an action seeking to vacate a $1.35 million arbitration award related to a sales brokerage agreement associated with a business that the subsidiary sold in 2005. The subsidiary believes that the sales broker is an affiliate of another company that in 2006 settled all of its claims, as well as all of the claims of its affiliates, against the subsidiary. The Company intends to vigorously pursue this matter.
The Company has contingent liabilities resulting from litigation, claims and commitments incident to the ordinary course of business. Management believes, after consulting with counsel, that the ultimate resolution of such contingencies will not have a materially adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
While the Company cannot make an assessment of the eventual outcome of all of these matters or determine the extent, if any, of any potential uninsured liability or damage, reserves of $2.53 million were recorded as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Changes in the general economy, including the global financial crisis that accelerated in the quarter ended September 30, 2008, may negatively impact the Company’s business.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, a global financial crisis, particularly affecting the credit markets, accelerated and may produce a prolonged global recession. While the extent, timing of ramifications of the crisis cannot be predicted, the Company believes that the risks to its business in this environment have been heightened. In addition, continued issues involving liquidity and capital adequacy affecting lenders could affect the Company’s ability to fully access its credit facility.
Other than the addition of the risk factor set forth above, there have been no material changes to the risk factors presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None to report in Q3 2008.
25
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
3.1 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated September 26, 1979, filed as Exhibit 3.1 of the exhibits to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-16, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. |
3.2 | Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated April 30, 1981, filed as Exhibit 3.2 of the exhibits to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1981, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. |
3.3 | Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated May 28, 1985, filed as Exhibit 4.1 of the exhibits to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1985, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. |
3.4 | Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated September 17, 1985, filed as Exhibit 4.1 of the exhibits to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1985, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. |
3.5 | Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated July 10, 1990, filed as Exhibit 3.5 of the exhibits to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. |
3.6 | Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated September 21, 1990, filed as Exhibit 3.5 of the exhibits to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1990, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. |
3.7 | Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated August 8, 2001, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2001, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. |
3.8 | By-laws of the Registrant, as amended and restated June 14, 2007, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2007, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. |
4.1 | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights related to the Registrant’s Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock, filed as Exhibit 1 of the exhibits to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K and Registration Statement on Form 8-A, dated April 5, 1988, which exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference. |
4.2 | Rights Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2008, between the Registrant and The Bank of NewYork Trust Company, N.A., a national banking association, as Rights Agent, which includes as exhibits, the Form of Right Certificate and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Stock, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-A/A filed on April 18, 2008, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
31. | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 10, 2008. |
31. | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 10, 2008. |
32. | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 10, 2008. |
32. | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 10, 2008. |
26
Table of Contents
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FURMANITE CORPORATION (Registrant) | ||||
/s/ HOWARD C. WADSWORTH | ||||
Howard C. Wadsworth | ||||
Sr. Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary (Chief Financial Officer) | ||||
Date: November 10, 2008
27