FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | 10. F AIR V ALUE M EASUREMENTS GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined in the standards are as follows: Level 1 — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable; Level 3 — Unobservable pricing inputs in which little or no market activity exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. For items carried at (or adjusted to) fair value in the Consolidated Financial Statements, the following tables summarize the fair value of these instruments at August 15, 2015 and January 31, 2015: August 15, 2015 Fair Value Measurements Using Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total Trading Securities $ $ — $ — $ Available-for-Sale Securities — — Warrants — — Long-Lived Assets — — Interest Rate Hedges — ) — ) Total $ $ $ $ January 31, 2015 Fair Value Measurements Using Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total Trading Securities $ $ — $ — $ Available-for-Sale Securities — — Warrants — — Long-Lived Assets — — Interest Rate Hedges — ) — ) Total $ $ ) $ $ In the first two quarters of 2015, unrealized gains on the Level 1 available-for-sale securities totaled $11. The Company values warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is classified as a Level 2 input. The Company values interest rate hedges using observable forward yield curves. These forward yield curves are classified as Level 2 inputs. Fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities are primarily used in the impairment analysis of goodwill, other intangible assets, and long-lived assets, and in the valuation of store lease exit costs. The Company reviews goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment annually, during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, and as circumstances indicate the possibility of impairment. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015 for further discussion related to the Company’s carrying value of goodwill. Long-lived assets and store lease exit costs were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015 for further discussion of the Company’s policies regarding the valuation of long-lived assets and store lease exit costs. For the first two quarters of 2015, long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $30 were written down to their fair value of $4 resulting in an impairment charge of $26. For the first two quarters of 2014, long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $27 were written down to their fair value of $10 resulting in an impairment charge of $17. In fiscal year 2014, long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $59 were written down to their fair value of $22, resulting in an impairment charge of $37. Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments Current and Long-term Debt The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including current maturities, was estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues adjusted for illiquidity based on available market evidence. If quoted market prices were not available, the fair value was based upon the net present value of the future cash flow using the forward interest rate yield curve in effect at August 15, 2015 and January 31, 2015. At August 15, 2015, the fair value of total debt was $11,509 compared to a carrying value of $10,695. At January 31, 2015, the fair value of total debt was $12,319 compared to a carrying value of $11,026. The reduction in the fair value of total debt from January 31, 2015, compared to August 15, 2015, is primarily due to a decrease in the forward interest rate yield curve and a reduction in the amount of outstanding commercial paper. Cash and Temporary Cash Investments, Store Deposits In-Transit, Receivables, Prepaid and Other Current Assets, Trade Accounts Payable, Accrued Salaries and Wages and Other Current Liabilities The carrying amounts of these items approximated fair value. Other Assets The fair values of these investments were estimated based on quoted market prices for those or similar investments, or estimated cash flows, if appropriate. At August 15, 2015 and January 31, 2015, the carrying and fair value of long-term investments for which fair value is determinable was $137 and $133, respectively. At August 15, 2015 and January 31, 2015, the carrying value of notes receivable for which fair value is determinable was $112 and $98, respectively. |