UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-1004
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 24, 2010
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-9656
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
MICHIGAN | 38-0751137 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
1284 North Telegraph Road, Monroe, Michigan | 48162-3390 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (734) 242-1444
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller Reporting Company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class | | Outstanding at August 10, 2010 |
Common Shares, $1.00 par value | | 51,830,174 |
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
FORM 10-Q FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | Page Number(s) |
PART I Financial Information (Unaudited) | |
| Item 1. | Financial Statements | |
| | Consolidated Statement of Operations | 3 |
| | Consolidated Balance Sheet | 4 |
| | Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | 5 |
| | Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity | 6 |
| | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 7 |
| | Note 1. Basis of Presentation | 7 |
| | Note 2. Interim Results | 8 |
| | Note 3. Inventories | 8 |
| | Note 4. Pension Plans | 8 |
| | Note 5. Financial Guarantees and Product Warranties | 8 |
| | Note 6. Stock-Based Compensation | 9 |
| | Note 7. Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) | 9 |
| | Note 8. Segment Information | 10 |
| | Note 9. Restructuring | 10 |
| | Note 10. Income Taxes | 11 |
| | Note 11. Variable Interest Entities | 11 |
| | Note 12. Earnings per Share | 12 |
| | Note 13. Fair Value Measurements | 13 |
| | Note 14. Hedging Activities | 14 |
| | Note 15. Recent Accounting Pronouncements | 15 |
| | |
| Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 16 |
| | Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements | 16 |
| | Introduction | 16 |
| | Results of Operations | 18 |
| | Restructuring | 20 |
| | Liquidity and Capital Resources | 21 |
| | Critical Accounting Policies | 23 |
| | Regulatory Developments | 23 |
| | Recent Accounting Pronouncements | 24 |
| | Business Outlook | 24 |
| | |
| Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 24 |
| Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 24 |
| | | |
PART II Other Information | |
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 25 |
| Item 6. | Exhibits | 25 |
| | | |
| Signature Page | 26 |
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
| | First Quarter Ended | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data) | | 07/24/10 | | | 07/25/09 | |
Sales | | $ | 263,313 | | | $ | 262,671 | |
Cost of sales | | | | | | | | |
Cost of goods sold | | | 190,175 | | | | 181,559 | |
Restructuring | | | (21 | ) | | | 736 | |
Total cost of sales | | | 190,154 | | | | 182,295 | |
Gross profit | | | 73,159 | | | | 80,376 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 74,045 | | | | 77,612 | |
Restructuring | | | 165 | | | | 301 | |
Operating income (loss) | | | (1,051 | ) | | | 2,463 | |
Interest expense | | | 590 | | | | 980 | |
Interest income | | | 243 | | | | 276 | |
Other income, net | | | 351 | | | | 711 | |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes | | | (1,047 | ) | | | 2,470 | |
Income tax (benefit) expense | | | (468 | ) | | | 439 | |
Net income (loss) | | | (579 | ) | | | 2,031 | |
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | 384 | | | | (48 | ) |
Net income (loss) attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated | | $ | (195 | ) | | $ | 1,983 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic average shares | | | 51,785 | | | | 51,479 | |
Basic net income (loss) attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated per share | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.04 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Diluted average shares | | | 51,785 | | | | 51,479 | |
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated per share | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.04 | |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 07/24/10 | | | 04/24/10 | |
Current assets | | | | | | |
Cash and equivalents | | $ | 93,133 | | | $ | 108,421 | |
Receivables, net of allowance of $21,414 at 07/24/10 and $20,258 at 04/24/10 | | | 150,302 | | | | 165,038 | |
Inventories, net | | | 138,952 | | | | 134,187 | |
Deferred income taxes – current | | | 2,305 | | | | 2,305 | |
Other current assets | | | 17,403 | | | | 18,159 | |
Total current assets | | | 402,095 | | | | 428,110 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 133,482 | | | | 138,857 | |
Trade names | | | 3,100 | | | | 3,100 | |
Deferred income taxes – long-term | | | 442 | | | | 458 | |
Other long-term assets | | | 34,923 | | | | 38,293 | |
Total assets | | $ | 574,042 | | | $ | 608,818 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | $ | 5,223 | | | $ | 1,066 | |
Accounts payable | | | 43,299 | | | | 54,718 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | | 73,805 | | | | 91,496 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 122,327 | | | | 147,280 | |
Long-term debt | | | 40,540 | | | | 46,917 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 66,887 | | | | 68,381 | |
Contingencies and commitments | | | — | | | | — | |
Equity | | | | | | | | |
La-Z-Boy Incorporated shareholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Common shares, $1 par value | | | 51,823 | | | | 51,770 | |
Capital in excess of par value | | | 202,937 | | | | 201,873 | |
Retained earnings | | | 109,155 | | | | 108,707 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (20,606 | ) | | | (20,251 | ) |
Total La-Z-Boy Incorporated shareholders' equity | | | 343,309 | | | | 342,099 | |
Noncontrolling interests | | | 979 | | | | 4,141 | |
Total equity | | | 344,288 | | | | 346,240 | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 574,042 | | | $ | 608,818 | |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
| | First Quarter Ended | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 07/24/10 | | | 07/25/09 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (579 | ) | | $ | 2,031 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used for) operating activities | | | | | | | | |
(Gain) loss on sale of assets | | | 27 | | | | (13 | ) |
Restructuring | | | 144 | | | | 1,037 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | 914 | | | | 2,362 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 5,806 | | | | 6,275 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 1,027 | | | | 1,007 | |
Change in receivables | | | 16,985 | | | | 8,898 | |
Change in inventories | | | (9,332 | ) | | | (2,098 | ) |
Change in other assets | | | (19 | ) | | | (4,665 | ) |
Change in payables | | | (10,667 | ) | | | (2,326 | ) |
Change in other liabilities | | | (16,259 | ) | | | 1,269 | |
Change in deferred taxes | | | 37 | | | | 8 | |
Total adjustments | | | (11,337 | ) | | | 11,754 | |
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities | | | (11,916 | ) | | | 13,785 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from disposals of assets | | | 22 | | | | 1,686 | |
Capital expenditures | | | (2,436 | ) | | | (1,439 | ) |
Purchases of investments | | | (4,333 | ) | | | (1,199 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of investments | | | 4,353 | | | | 2,664 | |
Change in restricted cash | | | — | | | | 17,007 | |
Change in other long-term assets | | | (13 | ) | | | (15 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities | | | (2,407 | ) | | | 18,704 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from debt | | | 10,238 | | | | 10,460 | |
Payments on debt | | | (10,566 | ) | | | (22,159 | ) |
Stock issued from stock plans | | | 24 | | | | — | |
Net cash used for financing activities | | | (304 | ) | | | (11,699 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents | | | (29 | ) | | | 179 | |
Change in cash and equivalents | | | (14,656 | ) | | | 20,969 | |
Cash reduction upon deconsolidation of VIE | | | (632 | ) | | | — | |
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period | | | 108,421 | | | | 17,364 | |
Cash and equivalents at end of period | | $ | 93,133 | | | $ | 38,333 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash paid (net of refunds) during period – income taxes | | $ | 2,461 | | | $ | 266 | |
Cash paid during period – interest | | $ | 537 | | | $ | 725 | |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | Common Shares | | | Capital in Excess of Par Value | | | Retained Earnings | | | Accumulated Other Compre- hensive Loss | | | Non- Controlling Interests | | | Total | |
At April 25, 2009 | | $ | 51,478 | | | $ | 205,945 | | | $ | 67,431 | | | $ | (22,559 | ) | | $ | 4,137 | | | $ | 306,432 | |
Comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | 32,538 | | | | | | | | (487 | ) | | | | |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities arising during the period | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,685 | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification adjustment for gain on marketable securities included in net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (97 | ) | | | | | | | | |
Translation adjustment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (766 | ) | | | 401 | | | | | |
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 146 | | | | | | | | | |
Net pension amortization and net actuarial loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 340 | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 34,760 | |
Stock issued for stock and employee benefit plans, net of cancellations | | | 292 | | | | (9,294 | ) | | | 8,738 | | | | | | | | | | | | (264 | ) |
Stock option, restricted stock and performance based stock expense | | | | | | | 5,222 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,222 | |
Change in noncontrolling interest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 90 | | | | 90 | |
At April 24, 2010 | | | 51,770 | | | | 201,873 | | | | 108,707 | | | | (20,251 | ) | | | 4,141 | | | | 346,240 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | (195 | ) | | | | | | | (384 | ) | | | | |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities arising during the period | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (646 | ) | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification adjustment for gain on marketable securities included in net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (112 | ) | | | | | | | | |
Translation adjustment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (145 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | | |
Net pension amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 435 | | | | | | | | | |
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 113 | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (935 | ) |
Stock issued for stock and employee benefit plans, net of cancellations | | | 53 | | | | 37 | | | | (282 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (192 | ) |
Stock option and restricted stock expense | | | | | | | 1,027 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,027 | |
Changes in equity and noncontrolling interest upon deconsolidation of a VIE | | | | | | | | | | | 925 | | | | | | | | (2,777 | ) | | | (1,852 | ) |
At July 24, 2010 | | $ | 51,823 | | | $ | 202,937 | | | $ | 109,155 | | | $ | (20,606 | ) | | $ | 979 | | | $ | 344,288 | |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements include the consolidated accounts of La-Z-Boy Incorporated, our wholly-owned subsidiaries, and the Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”) in which we are the primary beneficiary. The April 24, 2010 balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements. The interim financial information is prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and such principles are applied on a basis consistent with those reflected in our fiscal 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, but does not include all the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, the interim financial information includes all adjustments and accruals, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments (except as otherwise disclosed), which are necessary for a fair presentation of results for the respective interim period.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board amended its guidance on accounting for VIEs. The new accounting guidance resulted in a change in our accounting policy effective April 25, 2010. Among other things, the new guidance requires more qualitative than quantitative analyses to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE and requires continuous assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Under the new guidance, a VIE must be consolidated if the enterprise has both (a) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and (b) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. We adopted this new accounting guidance and it was effective for us on April 25, 2010, the first day of our current fiscal year. This guidance is being applied prospectively.
On April 25, 2010, we deconsolidated our Toronto, Ontario VIE as a result of the above mentioned change in accounting policy. This entity is an independent La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® dealer operating eight stores and had previously been consolidated due to certain lease guarantees and other financial support we provided. Although these financial arrangements resulted in us holding a majority of the variable interests in this VIE, they do not empower us to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. Consequently, subsequent to this change in accounting policy, we deconsolidated this VIE.
The impact of the deconsolidation on our Consolidated Statements of Operations was minimal. Sales and operating income, net of eliminations, for our Toronto, Ontario, VIE for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 were $3.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively. The most significant impacts on our Consolidated Balance Sheet were a decrease to current assets of $6.9 million, a decrease to long-term assets of $5.0 million, and a decrease to noncontrolling interest by $2.8 million. We recognized a non-cash gain of $0.9 million at April 25, 2010. This gain is categorized as a cumulative effect to retained earnings during the first quarter of 2011.
We consolidate entities that are VIEs when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. We are deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE if we have a significant variable interest in the VIE that provides us with a controlling financial interest in the VIE. We will continuously evaluate our VIEs’ primary beneficiaries as facts and circumstances change to determine if such changes warrant a change in our status as primary beneficiary.
As reported in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 24, 2010, we corrected our historical financial statements related to one of our VIEs. This VIE previously amortized leasehold improvements over a period that exceeded the estimated useful life in accordance with our accounting policy. The correction resulted in a $0.2 million decrease in our net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. This correction did not impact our net income attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated for the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Note 2: Interim Results
The foregoing interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations which will occur for the full fiscal year ending April 30, 2011, which is a 53 week year. The additional week as compared to the prior year will be in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011.
Note 3: Inventories
A summary of inventories is as follows:
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 07/24/10 | | | 04/24/10 | |
Raw materials | | $ | 63,750 | | | $ | 60,913 | |
Work in process | | | 11,458 | | | | 11,018 | |
Finished goods | | | 88,451 | | | | 86,963 | |
FIFO inventories | | | 163,659 | | | | 158,894 | |
Excess of FIFO over LIFO | | | (24,707 | ) | | | (24,707 | ) |
Inventories, net | | $ | 138,952 | | | $ | 134,187 | |
Note 4: Pension Plans
Net periodic pension costs were as follows:
| | First Quarter Ended | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 07/24/10 | | | 07/25/09 | |
Service cost | | $ | 291 | | | $ | 261 | |
Interest cost | | | 1,356 | | | | 1,400 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (1,478 | ) | | | (1,206 | ) |
Net amortization | | | 435 | | | | 527 | |
Net periodic pension cost | | $ | 604 | | | $ | 982 | |
We did not make any contributions to the plans during the first quarter of fiscal 2011. We are not statutorily required to make any contributions to the defined benefit plan in fiscal year 2011; however, we expect to make a $2.5 million contribution during fiscal 2011. We also have the discretion to make additional contributions.
Note 5: Financial Guarantees and Product Warranties
We have provided financial guarantees relating to notes and leases in connection with certain La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores which are not operated by the company. The guarantees are generally for real estate leases and have remaining terms of one to two years. These guarantees enhance the credit of these dealers.
We would be required to perform under these agreements only if the dealer were to default on the lease or note. The maximum amount of potential future payments under these guarantees was $2.5 million as of July 24, 2010, compared to $2.1 million as of April 24, 2010.
We have, from time to time, entered into agreements which resulted in indemnifying third parties against certain liabilities, mainly environmental obligations. We believe that judgments, if any, against us related to such agreements would not have a material effect on our business or financial condition.
Our accounting policy for product warranties is to accrue an estimated liability at the time the revenue is recognized. We estimate future warranty claims based on claim experience and any additional anticipated future costs on previously sold products. Our liability incorporates the cost of repairs including materials consumed, labor and overhead amounts necessary to perform the repair and any costs associated with delivery of the repaired product to the customer. Over 90% of our warranty liability relates to our Upholstery Group where we generally warrant our products against defects from one to five years for fabric and padding and up to a lifetime on certain mechanisms and frames. Considerable judgment is used in the determination of our estimate. If actual costs were to differ significantly from our estimates, we would record the impact of these unforeseen costs in subsequent periods.
A reconciliation of the changes in our product warranty liability is as follows:
| | First Quarter Ended | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 07/24/10 | | | 07/25/09 | |
Balance as of the beginning of the period | | $ | 14,773 | | | $ | 14,394 | |
Accruals during the period | | | 3,211 | | | | 3,337 | |
Settlements during the period | | | (3,269 | ) | | | (3,434 | ) |
Balance as of the end of the period | | $ | 14,715 | | | $ | 14,297 | |
Note 6: Stock-Based Compensation
Total compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for all equity based compensation for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was $1.0 million.
Note 7: Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of total comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
| | First Quarter Ended | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 07/24/10 | | | 07/25/09 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (579 | ) | | $ | 2,031 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | |
Currency translation adjustment | | | (146 | ) | | | (606 | ) |
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge | | | 113 | | | | (14 | ) |
Net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities arising during the period | | | (758 | ) | | | 846 | |
Net pension amortization | | | 435 | | | | 527 | |
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (356 | ) | | | 753 | |
Total comprehensive income (loss) before allocation to noncontrolling interest | | | (935 | ) | | | 2,784 | |
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | | 385 | | | | (162 | ) |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated | | $ | (550 | ) | | $ | 2,622 | |
Note 8: Segment Information
Our reportable operating segments are the Upholstery Group, the Casegoods Group and the Retail Group.
Upholstery Group. The operating units in the Upholstery Group are La-Z-Boy, England, and Bauhaus. This group primarily manufactures and sells upholstered furniture to furniture retailers. Upholstered furniture includes recliners and motion furniture, sofas, loveseats, chairs, ottomans and sleeper sofas.
Casegoods Group. The operating units in the Casegoods Group consist of two groups, one including American Drew, Lea, and Hammary, the second being Kincaid. These groups primarily sell manufactured or imported wood furniture to furniture retailers. Casegoods product includes tables, chairs, entertainment centers, headboards, dressers, accent pieces and some coordinated upholstered furniture.
Retail Group. The Retail Group consists of 68 company-owned La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores in eight primary markets. The Retail Group sells upholstered furniture to end consumers, as well as casegoods and other accessories.
| | First Quarter Ended | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 07/24/10 | | | 07/25/09 | |
Sales | | | | | | |
Upholstery Group | | $ | 201,934 | | | $ | 196,692 | |
Casegoods Group | | | 36,850 | | | | 35,865 | |
Retail Group | | | 35,307 | | | | 35,961 | |
VIEs | | | 7,542 | | | | 11,739 | |
Corporate and Other | | | 376 | | | | 1,862 | |
Eliminations | | | (18,696 | ) | | | (19,448 | ) |
Consolidated Sales | | $ | 263,313 | | | $ | 262,671 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Operating Income (Loss) | | | | | | | | |
Upholstery Group | | $ | 10,088 | | | $ | 16,290 | |
Casegoods Group | | | 1,575 | | | | (121 | ) |
Retail Group | | | (4,924 | ) | | | (5,668 | ) |
VIEs | | | (1,040 | ) | | | 99 | |
Corporate and Other | | | (6,606 | ) | | | (7,100 | ) |
Restructuring | | | (144 | ) | | | (1,037 | ) |
Consolidated Operating Income (Loss) | | $ | (1,051 | ) | | $ | 2,463 | |
Note 9: Restructuring
During the past several years, we have committed to various restructuring plans to rationalize our manufacturing facilities, consolidate warehouse distribution centers and close underperforming retail facilities. With these restructuring plans, we have written-down various fixed assets, as well as, recorded charges for severance and benefits, contract terminations and other transition costs related to relocating and closing facilities.
During fiscal 2008, we committed to a restructuring plan to consolidate all of our North American cutting and sewing operations in Mexico. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we had a net reduction of estimated restructuring liabilities of less than $0.1 million under this plan. We expect to incur additional pre-tax restructuring charges of $0.3 million during the remainder of fiscal 2011. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we had pre-tax restructuring charges of $0.1 million covering severance and benefits under this plan.
During fiscal 2007 and 2008, several of our warehouse distribution centers were consolidated into larger facilities and several underperforming stores were closed. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we had pre-tax restructuring charges of $0.2 million related to contract terminations. We expect to incur approximately $0.4 million of additional charges in the remainder of fiscal 2011. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we had pre-tax restructuring charges of $0.3 million related to contract terminations.
During fiscal 2009, we committed to a restructuring plan to consolidate our casegoods manufacturing plants and convert another facility into a distribution center. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we had pre-tax restructuring charges of $0.6 million, covering severance and benefits and other restructuring costs.
For the current fiscal year through July 24, 2010, restructuring liabilities along with pre-tax charges to expense, cash payments or asset write-downs were as follows:
| | | | | Fiscal 2011 | | | | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 04/24/10 Balance | | | Charges to Expense * | | | Cash Payments or Asset Write-Downs | | | 07/24/10 Balance | |
Severance and benefit-related costs | | $ | 492 | | | $ | (21 | ) | | $ | (147 | ) | | $ | 324 | |
Contract termination costs | | | 292 | | | | 165 | | | | (253 | ) | | | 204 | |
Total restructuring | | $ | 784 | | | $ | 144 | | | $ | (400 | ) | | $ | 528 | |
* Charges to expense include $0.1 million of non-cash charges for contract termination costs. | |
Note 10: Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was 44.7% compared to 17.8% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was impacted by routine discrete items that had a significant impact on the effective tax rate due to our near break-even results. Absent these discrete items, our effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was 39.8% and 49.1%, respectively.
Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient future taxable income. Valuation allowances of $46.5 million associated with certain U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets could be reduced in the latter part of fiscal 2011 based on, among other factors, the level of taxable income generated in fiscal 2011.
Note 11: Variable Interest Entities
We had two consolidated VIEs during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 representing 22 stores and three consolidated VIEs during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 representing 30 stores. As of April 25, 2010, the first day of our current fiscal year, we deconsolidated our Toronto, Ontario VIE. This resulted in a decrease of eight stores for our VIEs when comparing the first quarter of fiscal 2011 to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. We deconsolidated our Toronto, Ontario VIE because we are no longer considered the primary beneficiary.
The table below shows the amount of assets and liabilities from VIEs included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 24, 2010, and April 24, 2010:
| | As of | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 07/24/10 | | | 04/24/10 | |
Cash and equivalents | | $ | 1,291 | | | $ | 2,069 | |
Receivables, net | | | 162 | | | | 152 | |
Inventories, net | | | 8,355 | | | | 13,591 | |
Other current assets | | | 407 | | | | 2,061 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 3,713 | | | | 8,940 | |
Other long-term assets, net | | | 160 | | | | 148 | |
Total assets | | $ | 14,088 | | | $ | 26,961 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | $ | — | | | $ | 128 | |
Accounts payable | | | 279 | | | | 1,048 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | | 4,020 | | | | 7,749 | |
Long-term debt | | | 4 | | | | 1,770 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 1,206 | | | | 1,270 | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 5,509 | | | $ | 11,965 | |
In addition to our consolidated VIEs, we had significant interests in three independent La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® dealers for which we were not the primary beneficiary. Our total exposure to losses related to these dealers was $2.4 million which consists of past due accounts receivable as well as notes receivable, net of reserves and collateral on inventory and real estate. We have not provided additional financial or other support to these dealers during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, and have no obligations or commitments to provide further support.
Note 12: Earnings per Share
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:
| | First Quarter Ended | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 07/24/10 | | | 07/25/09 | |
Numerator (basic and diluted): | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to La-Z-Boy Incorporated | | $ | (195 | ) | | $ | 1,983 | |
Income allocated to participating securities | | | — | | | | (30 | ) |
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | | $ | (195 | ) | | $ | 1,953 | |
| | First Quarter Ended | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 07/24/10 | | | 07/25/09 | |
Denominator: | | | | | | |
Basic common shares (based upon weighted average) | | | 51,785 | | | | 51,479 | |
Add: | | | | | | | | |
Stock option dilution | | | — | | | | — | |
Diluted common shares | | | 51,785 | | | | 51,479 | |
Share-based payment awards that entitle their holders to receive non-forfeitable dividends prior to vesting are considered participating securities. We granted restricted stock awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends on unvested shares; such stock awards are considered participating securities. As participating securities, the unvested shares are required to be included in the calculation of our basic earnings per common share, using the “two-class method.” The two-class method of computing earnings per common share is an allocation method that calculates earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. For the first quarter ended July 24, 2010, we did not allocate any loss to the unvested stock awards (participating securities), due to their anti-dilutive effect.
The effect of options to purchase 1.7 million and 2.3 million shares for the quarters ended July 24, 2010, and July 25, 2009, with a weighted average exercise price of $14.95 and $15.52, respectively, were excluded from the diluted share calculation as the exercise prices of these options were higher than the weighted average share price for the quarters and including them would have been anti-dilutive.
Note 13: Fair Value Measurements
Accounting standards require the categorization of financial assets and liabilities, based on the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The various levels of the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:
| · | Level 1 — Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities in an active market that we have the ability to access. |
| · | Level 2 — Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
| · | Level 3 — Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. |
Accounting standards require the use of observable market data, when available, in making fair value measurements. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
In addition to assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, we are required to record assets and liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Non-financial assets such as trade names and long-lived assets are measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an impairment is recognized. We did not measure any material assets or liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during fiscal 2011 or fiscal 2010.
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 24, 2010:
| | Fair Value Measurements | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-sale securities | | $ | 7,813 | | | $ | 2,323 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swap | | | — | | | | (464 | ) | | | — | |
Total | | $ | 7,813 | | | $ | 1,859 | | | $ | — | |
We hold available-for-sale marketable securities to fund future obligations of one of our non-qualified retirement plans. The fair value measurements for our available-for-sale securities are based upon quoted prices in active markets, as well as through broker quotes and independent valuation providers, multiplied by the number of shares owned exclusive of any transaction costs and without any adjustments to reflect discounts that may be applied to selling a large block of the securities at one time.
We entered into a three year interest rate swap agreement in order to fix a portion of our floating rate debt. The fair value of the swap agreement was measured as the present value of all expected future cash flows based on the LIBOR-based swap yield curve as of the date of the valuation and considered counterparty non-performance risk. These assumptions can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
Note 14: Hedging Activities
During fiscal 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement which we accounted for as a cash flow hedge. This swap hedges the interest on $20.0 million of floating rate debt. Under the swap, we are required to pay 3.33% through May 16, 2011, and we receive three-month LIBOR from the counterparty. This offsets the three-month LIBOR component of interest which we are required to pay on $20.0 million of floating rate debt. The interest rate on this debt as of July 24, 2010, was three-month LIBOR plus 1.75%.
We executed this interest rate cash flow hedge in order to mitigate our exposure to variability in cash flows for the future interest payments on a designated portion of borrowings. The gains and losses are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss (with an offset to the hedged item in other current liabilities) until the hedged transaction impacts our earnings. Our interest rate swap agreement was tested for ineffectiveness during fiscal 2009 and was determined to be effective. Our agreement also qualified for the “short cut” method of accounting. We believe that our agreement continues to be effective and therefore no gains or losses have been recorded in our earnings.
For the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we deferred gains of $0.1 million into accumulated other comprehensive loss, compared to losses of $0.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The fair value of our interest rate swap at July 24, 2010, was $0.5 million, which was included in other current liabilities. The fair value of our interest rate swap at April 24, 2010, was $0.6 million, which was included in other long-term liabilities. We expect to reclassify $0.5 million of losses into earnings in the next twelve months.
Note 15: Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009 and December 2009, the FASB issued amendments to the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities (“VIEs”). The guidance affects all entities currently within the scope of FASB ASC 810, Consolidation. We adopted these amendments as of April 25, 2010, the first day of our fiscal year. As a result of the adoption of these amendments, one of our VIEs, with assets of $11.9 million as of April 24, 2010, and sales and operating income of $3.8 million and $0.9 million, net of eliminations, respectively, in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was deconsolidated during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued amendments to the criteria for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. These amendments will establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The amendments will require that a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner that is consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis. These amendments will eliminate the residual method of allocation and require that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. These amendments will expand disclosures related to vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. These amendments will be effective for our fiscal 2012 year end. We are currently evaluating the impact these amendments will have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We have prepared this Management’s Discussion and Analysis to help you better understand our financial results. You should read it in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. After a cautionary note about forward-looking statements, we begin with an introduction to our key businesses and strategies. We then provide discussions of our results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, and critical accounting policies.
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
We are making forward-looking statements in this report, and our representatives may make oral forward-looking statements from time to time. Generally, forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future actions, events or results of operations. More specifically, forward-looking statements may include information regarding:
future income, margins and cash flows | future economic performance |
future growth | industry and importing trends |
adequacy and cost of financial resources | management plans |
Forward-looking statements also include those preceded or followed by the words "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "hopes," "plans," "intends" and "expects" or similar expressions. With respect to all forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Actual results could differ materially from those we anticipate or project due to a number of factors, including: (a) changes in consumer confidence and demographics; (b) continued economic recession; (c) changes in the real estate and credit markets and their effects on our customers and suppliers; (d) international political unrest, terrorism or war; (e) continued energy and other commodity price changes; (f) the impact of logistics on imports; (g) interest rate and currency exchange rate changes; (h) operating factors, such as supply, labor or distribution disruptions, product recalls or costs; (i) restructuring actions; (j) changes in the domestic or international regulatory environment; (k) adopting new accounting principles; (l) severe weather or other natural events such as hurricanes, earthquakes and tornadoes; (m) our ability to procure fabric rolls and leather hides or cut and sewn fabric and leather sets domestically or abroad; (n) fluctuations in our stock price; (o) information technology system failures; and (p) the matters discussed in Item 1A of our fiscal 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other factors identified from time-to-time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to, and expressly disclaim any such obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether to reflect new information or new developments or for any other reason.
Introduction
Our Business
La-Z-Boy Incorporated manufactures, markets, imports, distributes and retails upholstery products and casegoods (wood) furniture products. Our La-Z-Boy brand is the most recognized brand in the furniture industry, and we are the leading global producer of reclining chairs.
We sell our products, primarily in the United States and Canada, to furniture retailers and directly to consumers through company-owned stores. The centerpiece of our retail distribution strategy is our network of 304 La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores, each dedicated to marketing our La-Z-Boy branded products. We own 68 of those stores and the rest are independently owned and operated. La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores help consumers furnish their homes by combining the style, comfort and quality of La-Z-Boy furniture with our in-home design service. Taken together, the 304 stores in our La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® network make up the largest single-branded upholstered furniture retailer in North America.
We also distribute our products through Comfort Studios®, defined spaces within larger independent retailers that are dedicated to displaying La-Z-Boy branded products. On average, these independent retailers dedicate approximately 5,000 square feet of floor space to the Comfort Studios® located within their stores. As of July 24, 2010, there were 519 Comfort Studios®. In addition to the Comfort Studios® dedicated to La-Z-Boy branded products, our Kincaid, England and Lea operating units have their own dedicated in-store gallery programs.
Our reportable operating segments are the Upholstery Group, the Casegoods Group and the Retail Group.
| · | Upholstery Group. In terms of revenue, our largest segment is the Upholstery Group, which includes La-Z-Boy, our largest operating unit, as well as the Bauhaus and England operating units. The Upholstery Group primarily manufactures and sells upholstered furniture such as recliners and motion furniture, sofas, loveseats, chairs, ottomans and sleeper sofas to furniture retailers and proprietary stores. It sells mainly to La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores, operators of Comfort Studios®, general dealers and department stores. |
| · | Casegoods Group. Our Casegoods Group is primarily an importer, marketer and distributor of casegoods (wood) furniture such as tables, chairs, entertainment centers, headboards, dressers, and accent pieces, as well as some coordinated upholstered furniture. The operating units in the Casegoods Group consist of two subgroups: one consisting of American Drew, Lea, and Hammary, and the second being Kincaid. |
| · | Retail Group. Our Retail Group consists of the 68 company-owned La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores located in eight markets ranging from the Midwest to the east coast of the United States and also including southeastern Florida. The Retail Group sells upholstered furniture, as well as casegoods and other accessories, to end consumers through the retail network. |
Financial Highlights
Our sales volume during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was flat and we were not able to maintain our operating margin, primarily due to higher raw material costs. Supply chain disruptions and delays and Hurricane Alex also negatively affected our margins. The hurricane in Mexico washed out roads, delaying the transport of cut-and-sewn kits to our U.S.-based facilities and delaying production of approximately $10.0 million of orders to the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Partially offsetting the negative factors we faced during the first quarter, our Retail Group’s operating loss decreased despite a sales decline and our Casegoods Group’s sales and operating margin increased due to the completion of restructuring plans at the end of fiscal 2010.
Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”)
We have special operating agreements in place with two independent dealers that are VIEs which cause us to be considered their primary beneficiary. For the first quarter of fiscal 2011 we included these two VIEs, operating 22 La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores, in our consolidated statement of operations. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010 we consolidated three VIEs, operating 30 stores.
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2011 First Quarter Compared to Fiscal 2010 First Quarter
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except percentages) | | 07/24/2010 | | | 07/25/2009 | | | Percent change | |
Consolidated sales | | $ | 263,313 | | | $ | 262,671 | | | | 0.2 | % |
Consolidated operating income (loss) | | | (1,051 | ) | | | 2,463 | | | | (142.7 | )% |
Consolidated operating margin | | | (0.4 | )% | | | 0.9 | % | | | | |
Consolidated sales were flat in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The deconsolidation of our Toronto, Ontario, VIE resulted in a decrease of $3.8 million, net of eliminations, in our consolidated sales when comparing the first quarter of fiscal 2011 to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. This decrease was offset by a slight increase in sales volume.
Our first quarter fiscal 2011 gross margin decreased by 2.8 percentage points mainly due to raw material price increases during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Our operating margin in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 decreased by 1.3 percentage points in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 mainly due to the decrease in gross margin. The decrease in gross margin was partially offset by the following:
| · | A decrease in our bad debt expense resulted in a 0.6 percentage point improvement in our operating margin. The decrease in bad debt expense was a result of the stabilization of our dealers’ financial performance during fiscal 2010. |
| · | Our first quarter of fiscal 2011 included 0.1 percentage points of restructuring charges, whereas our first quarter fiscal 2010 operating margin included 0.4 percentage points of restructuring charges. |
Upholstery Group
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except percentages) | | 07/24/2010 | | | 07/25/2009 | | | Percent change | |
Sales | | $ | 201,934 | | | $ | 196,692 | | | | 2.7 | % |
Operating income | | | 10,088 | | | | 16,290 | | | | (38.1 | )% |
Operating margin | | | 5.0 | % | | | 8.3 | % | | | | |
Sales
Our Upholstery Group’s sale increased $5.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 primarily due to an increase in sales volume, offset by a 0.7 percentage point decrease resulting from sales price changes, net of changes in discounting. In addition, our Upholstery Group sales decreased as a result of consumers shifting their purchases to our lower price point products.
Operating Margin
Our Upholstery Group’s operating margin decreased 3.3 percentage points in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
| · | The segment’s gross margin decreased by 3.9 percentage points during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010, mainly due to increased raw material costs. Raw material price increases caused a 2.9 percentage point decrease in the segment’s operating margin. |
| · | A decrease in bad debt expense for this segment resulted in a 0.6 percentage point improvement in operating margin. The decrease in bad debt expense was a result of the stabilization of our dealers’ financial performance during fiscal 2010. |
Casegoods Group
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except percentages) | | 07/24/2010 | | | 07/25/2009 | | | Percent change | |
Sales | | $ | 36,850 | | | $ | 35,865 | | | | 2.7 | % |
Operating income (loss) | | | 1,575 | | | | (121 | ) | | | N/M | |
Operating margin | | | 4.3 | % | | | (0.3 | )% | | | | |
Sales
Our Casegoods Group’s sales increased $1.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. We offered higher than normal discounts on casegoods during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 in order to sell slow moving and obsolete inventory. This was not continued in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The changes in discounting for our Casegoods Group resulted in a 3.4 percentage point improvement in sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Operating Margin
Our Casegoods Group’s operating margin increased 4.6 percentage points in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The segment’s gross margin increased 3.8 percentage points in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 mainly due to less discounting and efficiencies realized in its manufacturing facility and warehousing operations as a result of the restructuring plan completed at the end of fiscal 2010.
Retail Group
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except percentages) | | 07/24/2010 | | | 07/25/2009 | | | Percent change | |
Sales | | $ | 35,307 | | | $ | 35,961 | | | | (1.8 | )% |
Operating loss | | | (4,924 | ) | | | (5,668 | ) | | | 13.1 | % |
Operating margin | | | (13.9 | )% | | | (15.8 | )% | | | | |
Sales
Our Retail Group’s sales decreased $0.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The slight decrease in sales volume was related to the weak retail environment that continued to depress the home furnishings market.
Operating Margin
Our Retail Group’s operating margin increased 1.9 percentage points in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
| · | The segment experienced a 3.8 percentage point improvement in gross margin during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 due to changes in the segment’s sales initiatives and merchandising. |
| · | Increased advertising expense caused a 1.0 percentage point decrease in the segment’s operating margin as key promotions performed below expectations. |
VIEs
Our VIEs’ sales decreased $4.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. This was mainly the result of deconsolidating our Toronto, Ontario, VIE, which reduced the number of stores for our VIEs to 22 for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to 30 for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Our VIEs had an operating loss of $1.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to operating income of $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The reduction in operating income was mainly due to our Toronto, Ontario, VIE, which was a profitable VIE, no longer being consolidated in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was less than the first quarter of fiscal 2010 due to a $10.1 million decrease in our average debt. Our weighted average interest rate increased 0.3 percentage points in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was 44.7% compared to 17.8% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was impacted by routine discrete items that had a significant impact on the effective tax rate due to our near break-even results. Absent these discrete items, our effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 was 39.8% and 49.1%, respectively.
Restructuring
During fiscal 2008, we committed to a restructuring plan to consolidate all of our North American cutting and sewing operations in Mexico and to transfer production from our Tremonton, Utah, plant, to our five remaining La-Z-Boy branded upholstery manufacturing facilities. Our Utah facility ceased operations during the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and production was shifted to our remaining manufacturing facilities. As of the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2011, almost 90% of our fabric cutting and sewing operations were coming from our Mexican facility, compared to 21% at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2010. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we had a net reduction of estimated restructuring liabilities of less than $0.1 million, classified in total cost of sales, covering severance and benefits. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010 we had restructuring charges of $0.1 million, classified in total cost of sales, covering severance and benefits.
During fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008, several of our retail warehouses were consolidated into larger facilities and several underperforming stores were closed. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and the first quarter of fiscal 2010 we had restructuring charges of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, classified as an operating expense line item below selling, general and administrative, due to contract terminations relating to these actions.
In fiscal 2009, we committed to a restructuring plan to consolidate our casegoods manufacturing plants in North Carolina related to our Kincaid and American Drew/Lea operations and to convert one of the facilities into a distribution center. The consolidation of these plants was completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and the conversion of the distribution center was completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. In connection with this plan, we recorded restructuring charges of $0.6 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, classified in total cost of sales, covering severance and benefits and other restructuring costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our sources of cash liquidity include cash and equivalents, cash from operations and amounts available under our credit facility. We believe these sources remain adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements, finance our long-term growth plans, meet debt service, and fulfill other cash requirements for day-to-day operations and capital expenditures. We had cash and equivalents of $93.1 million at July 24, 2010, compared to $108.4 million at April 24, 2010. The decrease in cash and equivalents in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was primarily a result of accrued benefit payments and a decrease in accounts payable, as well as an increase in our inventory levels. This was somewhat offset by cash generated from our decrease in accounts receivable during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Under our credit agreement we have certain covenants and restrictions, including a 1.05 to 1.00 fixed charge coverage ratio requirement which would become effective if our excess availability fell below $30.0 million. Excess availability is the difference between our eligible accounts receivable and inventory less the total of our outstanding letters of credit, other reserves as denoted in our credit agreement and our outstanding borrowings on our revolving credit agreement. We do not expect to fall below the required excess availability threshold in the next twelve months. As of July 24, 2010, we had $30.0 million outstanding on our credit facility and $79.1 million of excess availability, compared to $30.0 million outstanding on our credit facility and $90.6 million of excess availability as of April 24, 2010.
Our borrowing capacity is based on eligible trade accounts receivables and inventory. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, our accounts receivable decreased while the amount outstanding on our credit facility remained flat. As a result, our capacity to borrow under the credit facility decreased during the quarter.
Capital expenditures for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were $2.4 million compared with $1.4 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. We have no material commitments for capital expenditures, which are expected to be in the range of $14.0 million to $16.0 million in fiscal 2011. We expect that paying restructuring costs from transitioning our domestic cutting and sewing operations to Mexico and our ongoing costs for closed retail facilities will require approximately $0.8 million of cash during the remainder of fiscal 2011.
We expect to pay our contractual obligations due in the remainder of fiscal 2011 using our cash flow from operations, our $93.1 million of cash on hand as of July 24, 2010, and the $79.1 million of availability under our credit agreement.
The following table illustrates the main components of our cash flows:
Cash Flows Provided By (Used For) | | First Quarter Ended | |
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | | 07/24/10 | | | 07/25/09 | |
Operating activities | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (579 | ) | | $ | 2,031 | |
Non-cash add backs and changes in deferred taxes | | | 7,811 | | | | 9,639 | |
Restructuring | | | 144 | | | | 1,037 | |
Working capital | | | (19,292 | ) | | | 1,078 | |
Cash provided by (used for) operating activities | | | (11,916 | ) | | | 13,785 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investing activities | | | (2,407 | ) | | | 18,704 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Financing activities | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in debt | | | (328 | ) | | | (11,699 | ) |
Stock issued from stock plans | | | 24 | | | | — | |
Cash used for financing activities | | | (304 | ) | | | (11,699 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Exchange rate changes | | | (29 | ) | | | 179 | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents | | $ | (14,656 | ) | | $ | 20,969 | |
Operating Activities
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, net cash used for operating activities was $11.9 million, compared with $13.8 million provided by operating activities in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The main reason for our decrease in cash flows from operating activities was the decrease in cash flow from working capital. The majority of working capital cash used for operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 resulted from accrued benefit payments and a decrease in accounts payable, as well as an increase in inventory levels, somewhat offset by a decrease in accounts receivable. Our net income in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, as well as positive cash flow from working capital, were the main reasons for the positive cash flow from operating activities in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Investing Activities
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, net cash used for investing activities was $2.4 million, compared with $18.7 million of cash provided by investing activities during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The net cash provided by investing activities during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 resulted primarily from a $17.0 million change in restricted cash during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Financing Activities
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, net cash used for financing activities was $0.3 million, compared to $11.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The net cash used for financing activities primarily related to the repayment of debt.
Other
Our balance sheet at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2011 reflected a $2.2 million liability for uncertain income tax positions. We expect that a portion of this liability will be settled within the next 12 months. The remaining balance, to the extent it is ever paid, will be paid as tax audits are completed or settled. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011 there were no material changes to the information about our contractual obligations shown in the table contained in our fiscal 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient future taxable income. Valuation allowances of $46.5 million associated with certain U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets could be reduced in the latter part of fiscal 2011 based on, among other factors, the level of taxable income generated in fiscal 2011.
Our debt-to-capitalization ratio was 11.7% at July 24, 2010, and 12.2% at April 24, 2010. Capitalization is defined as total debt plus total equity.
Our board of directors has authorized the repurchase of company stock. As of July 24, 2010, 5.4 million additional shares could be purchased pursuant to this authorization. We did not purchase any shares during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
We have guaranteed various leases and notes of dealers with proprietary stores. The total amount of these guarantees was $2.5 million at July 24, 2010. Of this, $1.9 million will expire within one year and $0.6 million in one to two years. At the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we had $36.7 million in open purchase orders with foreign casegoods, leather and fabric sources. Our open purchase orders that have not begun production are cancelable.
During fiscal 2011, we are not statutorily required to make any contributions to our defined benefit plan. However, in order to receive tax benefits we expect to make a $2.5 million contribution to our defined benefit plan during fiscal 2011, although this contribution is not required until fiscal 2012.
Continuing compliance with existing federal, state and local statutes dealing with protection of the environment is not expected to have a material effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings, competitive position or liquidity.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended April 24, 2010. There were no material changes, except as disclosed in Note 1, to our critical accounting policies during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Regulatory Developments
Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000
The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) provides for distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection from anti-dumping cases to domestic producers that supported the anti-dumping petition. There have been numerous cases before the U.S. Court of International Trade and the Federal Circuit that have been stayed. The resolution of these cases will have a significant impact on the amount of additional CDSOA funds we receive.
In view of the uncertainties associated with this program, we are unable to predict the amounts, if any, we may receive in the future under CDSOA. However, assuming CDSOA distributions continue, these distributions could be material depending on the results of legal appeals and administrative reviews and our actual percentage allocation. We received $4.4 million during fiscal 2010, $8.1 million during fiscal 2009, $7.1 million during fiscal 2008 and $3.4 million during fiscal 2007 in CDSOA payments and funds related to the antidumping order on wooden bedroom furniture from China.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 15 for updates on recent accounting pronouncements since the filing of our Form 10-K for the year ended April 24, 2010.
Business Outlook
Although we remain concerned about the overall macroeconomic climate, with consumer confidence remaining at low levels and persistent high unemployment rates, we believe we can make progress this year as a result of the changes we have made to our operating structure. Our lean, efficient operations and, strong network of branded distribution position us well in the current business environment. Going forward, we will continue to manage costs relative to volume levels and are focused on improving the performance of all three business segments, particularly as cost-savings initiatives, including efficiencies from the Mexico cut-and-sew center, accelerate throughout the year. Our first quarter is historically our lowest level of sales and operating profit and is therefore not indicative of the potential for full-year results.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011 there were no material changes from the information contained in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2010.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended July 24, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes to our risk factors during the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Our risk factors are disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended April 24, 2010.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number | | Description |
(31.1) | | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
(31.2) | | Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
(32) | | Certifications of Executive Officers pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(b) |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED |
| | (Registrant) |
Date: August 17, 2010
| | BY: /s/ Margaret L. Mueller |
| | Margaret L. Mueller |
| | Corporate Controller |
| | On behalf of the Registrant and as |
| | Chief Accounting Officer |